summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorlevine <levine@ae88bc3d-4319-0410-8dbf-d08b4c9d3795>1999-05-11 19:35:40 +0000
committerlevine <levine@ae88bc3d-4319-0410-8dbf-d08b4c9d3795>1999-05-11 19:35:40 +0000
commit694f0f04b20c8b4b45433e21848578551c3e7f2b (patch)
treef7bda81a61c4a11e085e25063a348e49f93020f0
parentb59a731d737b662dcea7235fd7756341335d30dd (diff)
downloadATCD-694f0f04b20c8b4b45433e21848578551c3e7f2b.tar.gz
*** empty log message ***
-rw-r--r--TAO/ChangeLog-99c81
1 files changed, 43 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/TAO/ChangeLog-99c b/TAO/ChangeLog-99c
index 728fd1a58db..0c12d751b15 100644
--- a/TAO/ChangeLog-99c
+++ b/TAO/ChangeLog-99c
@@ -1,49 +1,54 @@
+Tue May 11 14:34:56 1999 David L. Levine <levine@cs.wustl.edu>
+
+ * performance-tests/Cubit/TAO/IDL_Cubit/{client,server}.cpp:
+ removed unnecessary #includes of "tests/test_config.h".
+
Tue May 11 14:17:54 1999 Jeff Parsons <parsons@cs.wustl.edu>
- * tao/DomainS.cpp:
- Added some ACE_UNUSED_ARGs for generated code that has
- been commented out, and a marshaling exception because
- this method (ConstructionPolicy::make_domain_manager) is
- not yet implemented.
+ * tao/DomainS.cpp:
+ Added some ACE_UNUSED_ARGs for generated code that has
+ been commented out, and a marshaling exception because
+ this method (ConstructionPolicy::make_domain_manager) is
+ not yet implemented.
Tue May 11 13:51:55 1999 Carlos O'Ryan <coryan@cs.wustl.edu>
- * docs/releasenotes/TODO.html:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ConsumerAdmin.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ConsumerAdmin.h:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_Event_Channel.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxyConsumer.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxyConsumer.h:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxySupplier.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxySupplier.h:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_SupplierAdmin.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_SupplierAdmin.h:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Makefile:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Reconnect.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Shutdown.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Shutdown.h:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Consumer.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Driver.cpp:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Driver.h:
- * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Supplier.cpp:
- Completed the implementation of the destroy() method in the new
- Event Channel. It was not invoking the disconnect_push_XXX()
- operations on its list of suppliers and consumers.
+ * docs/releasenotes/TODO.html:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ConsumerAdmin.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ConsumerAdmin.h:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_Event_Channel.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxyConsumer.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxyConsumer.h:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxySupplier.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_ProxySupplier.h:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_SupplierAdmin.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/orbsvcs/Event/EC_SupplierAdmin.h:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Makefile:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Reconnect.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Shutdown.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/Basic/Shutdown.h:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Consumer.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Driver.cpp:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Driver.h:
+ * orbsvcs/tests/Event/lib/Supplier.cpp:
+ Completed the implementation of the destroy() method in the new
+ Event Channel. It was not invoking the disconnect_push_XXX()
+ operations on its list of suppliers and consumers.
Tue May 11 13:45:00 1999 Jeff Parsons <parsons@cs.wustl.edu>
- * tao/WrongTransactionC.{h,cpp}:
- * tao/corbafwd.h:
- * tao/Typecode_Constants.cpp:
- * tao/TAO.dsp:
- * tao/TAO_Staatic.dsp:
- * tao/Makefile:
- Added WrongTransaction exception. It applies to Requests
- so it is not part of minimum CORBA. Also, while the spec
- does not say so explicitly, it seems to be thrown only
- on the client side, so only that part of the generated
- code is here. If this turns out not to be the case,
- server side code will have to be added.
+ * tao/WrongTransactionC.{h,cpp}:
+ * tao/corbafwd.h:
+ * tao/Typecode_Constants.cpp:
+ * tao/TAO.dsp:
+ * tao/TAO_Staatic.dsp:
+ * tao/Makefile:
+ Added WrongTransaction exception. It applies to Requests
+ so it is not part of minimum CORBA. Also, while the spec
+ does not say so explicitly, it seems to be thrown only
+ on the client side, so only that part of the generated
+ code is here. If this turns out not to be the case,
+ server side code will have to be added.
Tue May 11 13:25:40 1999 David L. Levine <levine@cs.wustl.edu>