summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorWilliam R. Otte <wotte@dre.vanderbilt.edu>2006-07-24 15:50:30 +0000
committerWilliam R. Otte <wotte@dre.vanderbilt.edu>2006-07-24 15:50:30 +0000
commitc44379cc7d9c7aa113989237ab0f56db12aa5219 (patch)
tree66a84b20d47f2269d8bdc6e0323f338763424d3a /ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp
parent3aff90f4a822fcf5d902bbfbcc9fa931d6191a8c (diff)
downloadATCD-c44379cc7d9c7aa113989237ab0f56db12aa5219.tar.gz
Repo restructuring
Diffstat (limited to 'ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp')
-rw-r--r--ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp534
1 files changed, 534 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp b/ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fa3c00993b0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ACE/ace/Singleton.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,534 @@
+// $Id$
+
+#ifndef ACE_SINGLETON_CPP
+#define ACE_SINGLETON_CPP
+
+#include "ace/Singleton.h"
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_PRAGMA_ONCE)
+# pragma once
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_PRAGMA_ONCE */
+
+#if !defined (__ACE_INLINE__)
+#include "ace/Singleton.inl"
+#endif /* __ACE_INLINE__ */
+
+#include "ace/Object_Manager.h"
+#include "ace/Log_Msg.h"
+#include "ace/Framework_Component.h"
+#include "ace/Guard_T.h"
+
+ACE_RCSID (ace,
+ Singleton,
+ "$Id$")
+
+
+ACE_BEGIN_VERSIONED_NAMESPACE_DECL
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_HAS_DUMP)
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump");
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_LIB_TEXT ("instance_ = %x"),
+ ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ()));
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_END_DUMP));
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+#endif /* ACE_HAS_DUMP */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&
+ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ // Pointer to the Singleton instance. This works around a bug with
+ // G++ and it's (mis-)handling of templates and statics...
+ static ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *singleton_ = 0;
+
+ return singleton_;
+#else
+ return ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_;
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> TYPE *
+ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance");
+
+ ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ // Perform the Double-Check pattern...
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::starting_up () ||
+ ACE_Object_Manager::shutting_down ())
+ {
+ // The program is still starting up, and therefore assumed
+ // to be single threaded. There's no need to double-check.
+ // Or, the ACE_Object_Manager instance has been destroyed,
+ // so the preallocated lock is not available. Either way,
+ // don't register for destruction with the
+ // ACE_Object_Manager: we'll have to leak this instance.
+
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton, (ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>), 0);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+ // Obtain a lock from the ACE_Object_Manager. The pointer
+ // is static, so we only obtain one per ACE_Singleton
+ // instantiation.
+ static ACE_LOCK *lock = 0;
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::get_singleton_lock (lock) != 0)
+ // Failed to acquire the lock!
+ return 0;
+
+ ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_LOCK, ace_mon, *lock, 0);
+
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton, (ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>), 0);
+
+ // Register for destruction with ACE_Object_Manager.
+ ACE_Object_Manager::at_exit (singleton);
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+ }
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+ }
+ }
+
+ return &singleton->instance_;
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::cleanup (void *)
+{
+ delete this;
+ ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i () = 0;
+}
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+// Pointer to the Singleton instance.
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *
+ACE_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_ = 0;
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *
+ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_ = 0;
+#endif /* !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES) */
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_HAS_DUMP)
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump");
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_LIB_TEXT ("instance_ = %x"),
+ ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ()));
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_END_DUMP));
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+#endif /* ACE_HAS_DUMP */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK>
+ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&
+ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ // Pointer to the Singleton instance. This works around a bug with
+ // G++ and it's (mis-)handling of templates and statics...
+ static ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *singleton_ = 0;
+
+ return singleton_;
+#else
+ return ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_;
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> TYPE *
+ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance");
+
+ ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ // Perform the Double-Check pattern...
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::starting_up () ||
+ ACE_Object_Manager::shutting_down ())
+ {
+ // The program is still starting up, and therefore assumed
+ // to be single threaded. There's no need to double-check.
+ // Or, the ACE_Object_Manager instance has been destroyed,
+ // so the preallocated lock is not available. Either way,
+ // don't register for destruction with the
+ // ACE_Object_Manager: we'll have to leak this instance.
+
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton, (ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+ // Obtain a lock from the ACE_Object_Manager. The pointer
+ // is static, so we only obtain one per
+ // ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton instantiation.
+ static ACE_LOCK *lock = 0;
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::get_singleton_lock (lock) != 0)
+ // Failed to acquire the lock!
+ return 0;
+
+ ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_LOCK, ace_mon, *lock, 0);
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton,
+ (ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return &singleton->instance_;
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close (void)
+{
+ ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ if (singleton)
+ {
+ singleton->cleanup ();
+ ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i () = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_HAS_DUMP)
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump");
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_LIB_TEXT ("instance_ = %x"),
+ ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ()));
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_END_DUMP));
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+#endif /* ACE_HAS_DUMP */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&
+ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ // Pointer to the Singleton instance. This works around a bug with
+ // G++ and it's (mis-)handling of templates and statics...
+ static ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *singleton_ = 0;
+
+ return singleton_;
+#else
+ return ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_;
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> TYPE *
+ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance");
+
+ ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ // Perform the Double-Check pattern...
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::starting_up () ||
+ ACE_Object_Manager::shutting_down ())
+ {
+ // The program is still starting up, and therefore assumed
+ // to be single threaded. There's no need to double-check.
+ // Or, the ACE_Object_Manager instance has been destroyed,
+ // so the preallocated lock is not available. Either way,
+ // don't register for destruction with the
+ // ACE_Object_Manager: we'll have to leak this instance.
+
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton, (ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>), 0);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+
+ // Obtain a lock from the ACE_Object_Manager. The pointer
+ // is static, so we only obtain one per ACE_Singleton instantiation.
+ static ACE_LOCK *lock = 0;
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::get_singleton_lock (lock) != 0)
+ // Failed to acquire the lock!
+ return 0;
+
+ ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_LOCK, ace_mon, *lock, 0);
+
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton, (ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+
+ // Register for destruction with ACE_Object_Manager.
+ ACE_Object_Manager::at_exit (singleton);
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+ }
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ACE_TSS_GET (&singleton->instance_, TYPE);
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::cleanup (void *)
+{
+ delete this;
+ ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i () = 0;
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_HAS_DUMP)
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump");
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_LIB_TEXT ("instance_ = %x"),
+ ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ()));
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_END_DUMP));
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+#endif /* ACE_HAS_DUMP */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK>
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ // Pointer to the Singleton instance. This works around a bug with
+ // G++ and it's (mis-)handling of templates and statics...
+ static ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *singleton_ = 0;
+
+ return singleton_;
+#else
+ return ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_;
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> TYPE *
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance");
+
+ ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ // Perform the Double-Check pattern...
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::starting_up () ||
+ ACE_Object_Manager::shutting_down ())
+ {
+ // The program is still starting up, and therefore assumed
+ // to be single threaded. There's no need to double-check.
+ // Or, the ACE_Object_Manager instance has been destroyed,
+ // so the preallocated lock is not available. Either way,
+ // don't register for destruction with the
+ // ACE_Object_Manager: we'll have to leak this instance.
+
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton,
+ (ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+ // Obtain a lock from the ACE_Object_Manager. The pointer
+ // is static, so we only obtain one per
+ // ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton instantiation.
+ static ACE_LOCK *lock = 0;
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::get_singleton_lock (lock) != 0)
+ // Failed to acquire the lock!
+ return 0;
+
+ ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_LOCK, ace_mon, *lock, 0);
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton,
+ (ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ACE_TSS_GET (&singleton->instance_, TYPE);
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close (void)
+{
+ ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ if (singleton)
+ singleton->cleanup ();
+}
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+// Pointer to the Singleton instance.
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> ACE_TSS_Singleton <TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *
+ACE_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_ = 0;
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK>
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *
+ACE_Unmanaged_TSS_Singleton<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_ = 0;
+#endif /* !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES) */
+
+/*************************************************************************/
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+// Pointer to the Singleton instance.
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_ = 0;
+#endif /* !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES) */
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump (void)
+{
+#if defined (ACE_HAS_DUMP)
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dump");
+
+#if !defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_LIB_TEXT ("instance_ = %x"),
+ ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ()));
+ ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, ACE_END_DUMP));
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+#endif /* ACE_HAS_DUMP */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK>
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i");
+
+#if defined (ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES)
+ // Pointer to the Singleton instance. This works around a bug with
+ // G++ and it's (mis-)handling of templates and statics...
+ static ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *singleton_ = 0;
+
+ return singleton_;
+#else
+ return ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::singleton_;
+#endif /* ACE_LACKS_STATIC_DATA_MEMBER_TEMPLATES */
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> TYPE *
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance");
+
+ ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ // Perform the Double-Check pattern...
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ {
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::starting_up () ||
+ ACE_Object_Manager::shutting_down ())
+ {
+ // The program is still starting up, and therefore assumed
+ // to be single threaded. There's no need to double-check.
+ // Or, the ACE_Object_Manager instance has been destroyed,
+ // so the preallocated lock is not available. Either way,
+ // don't register for destruction with the
+ // ACE_Object_Manager: we'll have to leak this instance.
+
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton, (ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+#if defined (ACE_MT_SAFE) && (ACE_MT_SAFE != 0)
+ // Obtain a lock from the ACE_Object_Manager. The pointer
+ // is static, so we only obtain one per
+ // ACE_Unmanaged_Singleton instantiation.
+ static ACE_LOCK *lock = 0;
+ if (ACE_Object_Manager::get_singleton_lock (lock) != 0)
+ // Failed to acquire the lock!
+ return 0;
+
+ ACE_GUARD_RETURN (ACE_LOCK, ace_mon, *lock, 0);
+#endif /* ACE_MT_SAFE */
+
+ if (singleton == 0)
+ ACE_NEW_RETURN (singleton,
+ (ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>),
+ 0);
+ }
+ //ACE_REGISTER_FRAMEWORK_COMPONENT(ACE_DLL_Singleton<TYPE,ACE_LOCK>, singleton);
+ ACE_Framework_Repository::instance ()->register_component
+ (new ACE_Framework_Component_T<ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> > (singleton));
+ }
+
+ return &singleton->instance_;
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close");
+
+ ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK> *&singleton =
+ ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::instance_i ();
+
+ delete singleton;
+ singleton = 0;
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> void
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close_singleton (void)
+{
+ ACE_TRACE ("ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close_singleton");
+ ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::close ();
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> const ACE_TCHAR *
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::dll_name (void)
+{
+ return this->instance ()->dll_name ();
+}
+
+template <class TYPE, class ACE_LOCK> const ACE_TCHAR *
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_T<TYPE, ACE_LOCK>::name (void)
+{
+ return this->instance ()->name ();
+}
+
+
+/**********************************************************************/
+
+template <class TYPE> const ACE_TCHAR*
+ACE_DLL_Singleton_Adapter_T<TYPE>::dll_name (void)
+{
+ // @todo make this a constant somewhere (or it there already is one
+ // then use it.
+ return ACE_TEXT("ACE");
+}
+
+ACE_END_VERSIONED_NAMESPACE_DECL
+
+#endif /* ACE_SINGLETON_CPP */