1 files changed, 145 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ACE/tests/Compiler_Features_13_Test.cpp b/ACE/tests/Compiler_Features_13_Test.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f9f4317cbfc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/ACE/tests/Compiler_Features_13_Test.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+// $Id$
+
+/**
+ * @file
+ *
+ * This program checks if the compiler / platform supports the
+ * standard cast operators template parameters.  The motivation for
+ * this test was a discussion on the development mailing list, and the
+ * documentation was captured in:
+ *
+ *   http://bugzilla.dre.vanderbilt.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=3715
+ *
+ */
+
+#include "test_config.h"
+
+#include <stdexcept>
+
+ACE_RCSID(tests, Compiler_Features_13_Test, "$Id$")
+
+namespace
+{
+  /**
+   * Helper class for test
+   */
+  struct Base
+  {
+    virtual ~Base()
+    {}
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Helper class for test
+   */
+  struct Derived : public Base
+  {
+    int value;
+  };
+
+  /**
+   * Helper class for test
+   */
+  struct Another : public Base
+  {
+    int x;
+    int y;
+  };
+}
+
+
+int
+run_main (int, ACE_TCHAR *[])
+{
+  ACE_START_TEST (ACE_TEXT("Compiler_Features_13_Test"));
+
+  // As usual, the exit status from the test is 0 on success, 1 on
+  // failure
+  int status = 0;
+
+  {
+    // Make sure const cast works.  Compilation is interesting, the
+    // functionality test here is just to make sure the compiler does
+    // not optimize things away ...
+    int x = 5;
+    int const & y = x;
+    const_cast<int&>(y) = 3;
+
+    if (x != 3)
+      {
+	status = 1;
+	ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		   ACE_TEXT("Wrong value after const_cast,"
+			    " expected %d, got %d\n"),
+		   3, x));
+      }
+  }
+
+  // Make sure dynamic cast through pointers work ...
+  Derived d;
+  d.value = 24;
+  Base * b1 = &d;
+  Derived * d1 = dynamic_cast<Derived*>(b1);
+  if (d1 == 0)
+    {
+      status = 1;
+      ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		 ACE_TEXT("dynamic_cast returns null, expected value\n")));
+    }
+  d1->value = 42;
+  if (d.value != 42)
+    {
+      ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		 ACE_TEXT("Wrong value after dynamic_cast, expected %d, got %d\n"),
+		 42, d.value));
+    }
+  
+  // Make sure dynamic cast detects invalid casts
+  Another a;
+  Base * b2 = &a;
+  Derived * d2 = dynamic_cast<Derived*>(b2);
+  if (d2 != 0)
+    {
+      status = 1;
+      ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		 ACE_TEXT("dynamic_cast should return null\n")));
+    }
+
+  // Make sure dynamic cast raises an exception
+  Base & b3 = a;
+  try
+    {
+      (void) dynamic_cast<Derived&>(b3);
+
+      status = 1;
+      ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		 ACE_TEXT("dynamic_cast should have raised exception\n")));
+    }
+  catch(std::exception const &)
+    {
+    }
+  catch(...)
+    {
+      status = 1;
+      ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		 ACE_TEXT("dynamic_cast should have raised std::exception\n")));
+    }
+
+  {
+    // Just test these compile ...
+    double x = 42.0;
+    int y = static_cast<int>(x);
+    void * z = reinterpret_cast<void*>(y);
+
+    if (z == 0)
+      {
+	ACE_ERROR((LM_ERROR,
+		   ACE_TEXT("My hack to make sure the code is not "
+			    "optimized away backfired!\n")));
+      }
+  }
+
+  ACE_END_TEST;
+  return status;
+}
+