summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/TAO/docs/releasenotes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'TAO/docs/releasenotes')
-rw-r--r--TAO/docs/releasenotes/TODO.html627
-rw-r--r--TAO/docs/releasenotes/ec.html234
-rw-r--r--TAO/docs/releasenotes/index.html786
-rw-r--r--TAO/docs/releasenotes/orbcore.html503
-rw-r--r--TAO/docs/releasenotes/trader.html1069
5 files changed, 0 insertions, 3219 deletions
diff --git a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/TODO.html b/TAO/docs/releasenotes/TODO.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 786f173a0df..00000000000
--- a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/TODO.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,627 +0,0 @@
-<HTML>
-<HEAD>
- <TITLE>TAO TODO List</TITLE>
-</HEAD>
- <BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
- <!-- $Id$ -->
- <CENTER><HR></CENTER>
-
- <CENTER>
- <H3>General TODO list for TAO</H3>
- </CENTER>
-
- <P>
- This document presents a general TODO list for TAO,
- the list is not very well organized or prioritized;
- it started as a personal TODO list for Carlos so it is biased
- towards the Event Service and related components.
- Hopefully as more people gets involved it will become more
- organized.
- </P>
- <P>
- Last Updated: $Date$ $Revision$
- </P>
-
- <CENTER><HR></CENTER>
-
- <CENTER>
- <H4>Pending Tasks</H4>
- </CENTER>
-
- <UL>
- <LI>Add suspend and resume operations to the PushConsumerProxy
- and PushSupplierProxy interfaces, following the Notification
- Service spec.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The current implementation of octet sequences based on
- message blocks has a few problems, it cannot marshall
- chains of message blocks properly.
- Notice that complete support for chains of message blocks will
- complicate the sequence of octets implementation (like
- operator[]) and will make others either hard or expensive
- (like get_buffer ()).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The IDL compiler gets confused with paths in NT, this may be
- due to my changes to report errors correctly.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The do_static_call() and do_dynamic_call() methods should
- use an array of void* (in the first case static and generated
- by the IDL compiler);
- this will remove the problems with g++ and probably work
- faster.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Object references inside structures or sequences are not
- decoded properly, the problem starts because the interpreter
- expects a CORBA::Object_ptr, but the real type is a T_var;
- virtual inheritance adds the last ingredient to the poison.
- <BR>[STATUS] A possible solution is to use a T_manager_var that
- has two fields a Object_ptr and a T_ptr....
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Optimize twoways by delaying memory allocation for the
- incoming data buffer, thus improving interleaving between the
- client and server (the client does something useful before
- starting to wait for the server).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Further optimize memory allocation by using a memory pool
- for the incoming CDR stream.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Further optimize the outgoing memory allocation by adding
- support for message blocks allocated from a pool (the
- Message_Block class itself not the Data_Block or the buffer it
- contains).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add compiled marshalling
- <BR>[STATUS] Andy is working on this.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Use active demuxing in the POA
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The data blocks and their buffers could be allocated in a
- single operation, using the beginning of a buffer to contain
- the data block and the rest of it to contain the actual buffer
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The size of pre-allocated buffer for the outgoing CDR
- streams is defined at compilation time; but if we use an
- efficient enough allocator we could make its size configurable
- via the svc.conf file. In any case the *second* (and
- subsequent) buffers come out of the allocator, so their sizes
- could be configured in the already mentioned file
- </LI>
-
- <LI>We need some TAO_TRY_* macro to encapsulate a common use of
- the CORBA::Environment argument: checking if it contains an
- exception and then returning.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The TypeCode internal (private) state needs locking, double
- checked locking is needed to avoid excessive overhead, there
- is potential for memory leaks if this locking is not used.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>IDL compiler front-end should be case insensitive (actually
- it should flag identifiers that only differ by case as a
- conflict).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support for 64bit longs in the IDL compiler
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The operation tables do not need to be statics, they could
- be created on creation of the first servant of that type.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Are nested upcalls in different concurrency models, like
- thread-per-connection working?
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add an option to the IDL-compiler (e.g. -rp) meaning
- "generate relative include paths".
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The IDL compiler should generate the files locally (maybe
- with an option).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add options to the IDL compiler to set the suffixes.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The IDL compiler should generate the code locally (not in
- the directory where the .idl resides) or at least give an
- option to do so
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support for unions with default cases (implicit or explicit)
- in the IDL compiler is incomplete.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>It seems that some memory is leaked from the ORB cached
- connector.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support for fixed in the IDL compiler
- </LI>
-
- <LI>CDR stream support for wchar is flaky.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add a corbafwd.h header file to eliminate the deep (and
- recursive) header dependencies in TAO.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Prepare the 1.0 release:
- <UL>
- <LI>Integrate the compiled marshalling approach.
- </LI>
- <LI>Verify the GPERF is working in all the relevant
- platforms.
- </LI>
- <LI>Integrate active demux of operations?
- </LI>
- </UL>
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support the Sun bootstrapping mechanism for the Naming
- Service
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add a -ORBlogfile flag so we can set the ACE_ERROR and
- ACE_DEBUG output destination in all TAO applications
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add the _raise() method to the exceptions...
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add support for multiple Profiles in the ORB (completing the
- IIOP 1.0 support)
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Purify, purify, purify the EC
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Quantify the EC.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support several calls to ORB_init() on the same thread.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support IIOP 1.1 in the ORB
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Use the IIOP 1.1 profile info to pass QoS info and use it to
- preserve end-to-end QoS.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Debug Memory Pools in the EC there seem to be a problem when
- sending multiple events in a row (a memory leak, limit or
- corruption).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Call ORB_init() in the EC threads?
- [The dispatching threads for Boeing]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Build an EC example that uses all the cool features
- (multiple ORBs on each process, collocated EC and Scheduling
- service, Naming, etc.)
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Extend the Concurrency Service (or create a new one) that
- allow us to have global "barriers" to synchronize EC
- startup/shutdown.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Correlation in the EC has a bug [?]
- Build regression tests for the EC features (filtering,
- correlation, timers, etc).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Build a COS Event Channel on top of the RTEC Event Service.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Check what is failing in $TAO_ROOT/tests/CDR/tc.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Debug interval computation in Linux (and NT?)
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Remove the uneeded methods from CORBA::Object
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Implement operation demuxing for clients.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Study the CORBAlite spec and see how we could implement it
- with TAO, considering dynamic and static configurations for
- the full CORBA support
- </LI>
-
- <LI><P>The CORBAlite RFP is very interesting IMHO we just need to
- remove features from TAO to make it a CORBAlite
- implementation. The problem is how to keep the full blown
- CORBA implementation also, this is an idea:
- Write the TAOlite version of a class (example TypeCode):</P>
-
- <PRE>
- class TAO_CORBAlite_TypeCode {
- // Just the CORBAlite methods are implemented.
- };
- </PRE>
-
- <P>Derive the full blown implementation:</P>
-
- <PRE>
- class TAO_CORBA_TypeCode : public TAO_CORBAlite_TypeCode {
- // Declare all the other methods.
- };
- </PRE>
-
- <P>create two namespaces:</P>
-
- <PRE>
- // in tao/CORBAlite.h
- class CORBA {
- tyedef TAO_CORBAlite_TypeCode TypeCode;
- };
-
- // in tao/CORBAfull.h
- class CORBA {
- typedef TAO_CORBAfull_TypeCode TypeCode;
- };
- </PRE>
-
- <P>then (at compile time) the users chooses between the CORBAlite
- or CORBAfull implementations:</P>
-
- <PRE>
- // In $TAO_ROOT/tao/corba.h
- #if USERS_WANTS_FAT_FREE_CORBA
- #include "tao/CORBAlite.h"
- #else
- #include "tao/CORBAfull.h"
- #endif
- </PRE>
-
- <P>We need to consider how to support even smaller profiles that
- the CORBAlite RFP, like removing <any> or <fixed> support.
- We also need to come out with a scheme to support
- interpretive marshalling in the CORBAlite framework (where
- TypeCodes don't have enough methods as to traverse them).
- </P>
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Consider decompositions of the ORB that would allow
- dynamically linked plug-ins, examples of things that would be
- easy to implement as plugins:
- <UL>
- <LI>SSL support
- </LI>
- <LI>UNIX socket support
- </LI>
- </UL>
- Things that would be really hard:
- <UL>
- <LI>Dynamically load the support for costly features, as the
- ImplRepo or Location Forwarding.
- </LI>
- <LI>Dynamically configure POA with or without support for
- holding state.
- </LI>
- </UL>
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Currently the IDL compiler creates an operation table that
- includes all the base classes operations; this permits the
- generation of efficient code that does not rely in
- dynamic_cast or the _downcast() method for Servanst (which
- compare strings, hence it is slow).
- It could be interesting to implement the alternative approach
- were the class only looks its own operations and then tries
- the parent. This will reduce code size, but will probably
- decrease performance.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Cleanup memory managment in some of the servers, for
- instance: Naming still believes that controlling the memory
- for a stub will control the servants, this is not true
- anymore.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The current scheme for the orbsvcs leaves the user without
- control collocation of servants, we need to move to a scheme
- similar to the one in $ACE_ROOT/netsvcs.
- <BR>[STATUS] The user can control collocation, but we need a
- dynamic way to do it (or an example) that exploits the Service
- Configurator. We also may need to split the library.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Cleanup the IDL structures for subscriptions, publications,
- etc. (in the EC).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Resolve the Typecode::equal dilemma: is it structural or
- type equivalence? Or a mixin?
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Automate EC multicast group usage. This probably requires
- some kind of server that mantains the realtion between event
- type/source and the mcast groups.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Improve configuration support in the EC, give an example of
- a single threaded EC, support different dispatching
- strategies, etc.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Use the Service_Configurator to dynamically load the EC
- Module_Factory thus making it really configurable.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The current scheme for Typecode (keeping a CDR buffer with
- their representation) is broken.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>We must support DynAny.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>We must support a IFR.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Server_Request objects in TAO are magical, the _duplicate()
- method returns 0 and release() does nothing.
- The problem starts because Server_Request is allocated from the
- stack (to speed up things), hence reference counting would be
- useless. Adding a clone() method will work better, but the
- Server_Request holds pointers to several positions in the CDR
- stream, we could clone the CDR stream, but a normal
- Server_Request does not own it.... In our opinion (Carlos and
- Irfan) we need not worry about this until we find a use case for
- it.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>
- The current implementation is optimal for hard-real-time
- applications, but in some cases it may be desirable to follow
- the normal execution path yet minize costs for collocated
- calls.
- An example would include an application that activates the
- objects on demand.
- It would be interesting to have a half-collocated stub
- implementation, that will marshall the request and then
- invokes the normal path on the "server" side, but without
- crossing the kernel boundary. Ideally even the serialization
- could be minimized or avoided.
- </LI>
- </UL>
-
- <CENTER>
- <H4>Completed Tasks</H4>
- </CENTER>
-
- <UL>
- <LI>Optimize connection lookup in the client side, using "hints"
- from the previous lookup, or keeping smaller sets on each IIOP
- profile or a combination of both.
- <BR>[STATUS] Irfan is working on
- this.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Optimize the outgoing CDR streams by using TSS memory pools
- for both the data blocks and the buffers.
- <BR>[DONE] But we may consider strategizing the kind of allocator
- we use (like using a free list instead of a generic
- ACE_Malloc).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Optimize Octet Sequences.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Obtain results for the EC_Multiple test.
- <UL>
- <LI>Latency seems OK.
- </LI>
- <LI> Overhead: need lower priority for scavenger thread.
- </LI>
- </UL>
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Debug EC_Multiple.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Your next assignment: Regenerate all methods in
- _tao_collocated to avoid "inherit via dominance" warnings.
- <BR>[STATUS] The IDL compiler was modified to generate a
- suitable
- <CODE>#pragma</CODE> that removes the warning, it reenables
- the warning when leaving the file
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Remove the SOLARIS2 macro from the TAO_IDL compilation.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Remove the preemption_prio message from Scheduling_Service.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The ORB core should be able to choose the right port for us
- (in other words -ORBport 0) should work.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Client side optimization for Octet Sequences.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Minimize memory allocation in TAO
- <BR>[STATUS] Down to 3 on the client side and 4 on the server
- side.
- <BR>[STATUS] For oneways it is down to 0 (for the common case)
- on the client side and 2 on the server side. For twoways it is
- 2 on both sides.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Automate subscription and publication list generation in the
- EC_Gateway.
- [VERY important for Boeing]
- <BR>[STATUS] Completed and debugged, but the EC is still
- buggy.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Debug EC shutdown and startup....
- [Specially startup for Boeign, but shutdown is important for
- Purify and Quantify]
- <BR>[STATUS] Shutdown is clean and startup of threads can be
- controlled by the user.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support a chain of Message Blocks in Output CDRs and use
- writev() to write them.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Memory managment in the demarshalling engine, it is not
- clear that the current scheme works in all cases (like
- sequences of unions of anys).
- We also need to fix sequences of object references: how does
- the demarshalling engine learn about the dynamic type of the
- objects?
- Closely related to this is the problem of memory alignment for
- different architectures, we need to develop strategies for each
- one (they should only be a few) and choose the right one.
- <BR>[STATUS] This seems to be working for most of the cases, the
- main idea is to delay demarshalling until enough information
- is available, for instance, when decoding an Any just a
- reference to the CDR stream is stored, decoding actually
- happens when the user invokes >>= on the any (at that point
- all the info is there).
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Add a new Profile type that includes the QoS info and using
- for end-to-end QoS preservation.
- [DEPRECATED] The IIOP 1.1 Profiles can handle that.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Show an example of the sequence<octet> and CDR streams.
- <BR>[DONE] But the example could also include the marshalling of
- plain C++ types.
- <BR>[DONE too]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Test anys in the EC.
- <BR>[DONE] Michael reported that they work OK on NT.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>UDP for event channel and Multicast support in the EC.
- <BR>[STATUS] Manual configuration using Suppliers and Consumers is
- possible, automation is under research.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Unbind the EC and scheduling service from the Naming
- Service.
- <BR>[DONE] For the Event_Service and the examples.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Optimize oneways by not allocating the memory for the return
- buffers.
- <BR>[DONE] Added different Invocation classes for each case.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Fix the _non_existent call.
- <BR>[DONE] The client side semantics match the new clarifications
- of the C++ RTF, the server side is implemented by the IDL
- compiler, though t could be a good idea to put that in the
- POA.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Simplify EC configuration, a Factory class must provide the
- Dispatching, Supplier, Correlation and any other Modules that
- are required.
- This is the right spot to add trivial Dispatching or
- Correlation Modules and to dynamically load and configure the
- EC.
- <BR>[DONE] A Factory class is used to create the modules, only the
- default factory is implemented so far.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Fix the ACE_Thread_Condition madness.
- <BR>[DONE] We changed ACE so ACE_SYNCH_CONDITION expands to
- ACE_Condition_Thread_Mutex
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Reference counting should have locks, but we should remove
- all the QueryInterface madness to make that work. The policy
- for references in multiple threads is: the reference count
- must be >2 if that happens.
- <BR>[STATUS] The QueryInterface method (all the COM stuff for that
- matter) was removed...
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Reference counting for Typecodes is completely broken.
- <BR>[DONE]
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Under g++(2.7.2) the use of multiple inheritance in IDL
- triggers some compiler bug, if the IDL explictly generated the
- copy constructor for the skeletons (the POA_ classes) the
- problem would go away.
- <BR>[DONE] Fixed, Seth is testing the fixes and will commit them
- soon (Tue Jul 21 14:24:56 CDT 1998)
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The octet sequence optimization causes problems when Anys
- get into the game.
- <BR>[DONE] Seth reported that the problem was not real.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The DEEP_FREE method is also broken, sometimes we need to
- release the top-level memory, sometimes not.
- <BR>[DONE] We always release the memory in the Any, it was failing
- due to weird interactions between the Environment containing
- an exception and the Any that also did.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Improve error messages in the IDL compiler.
- <BR>[DONE] At least the filename is correct now.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Support for arrays in the IDL compiler is incomplete,
- specially anonymous arrays.
- <BR>[DONE] According to Andy this is properly supported by the IDL
- compiler now.
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Prepare the 0.2 release:
- <UL>
- <LI>Execute all the tests in $TAO_ROOT/tests
- </LI>
- <LI>Run Param_Test (SII) and record what fails and what works.
- </LI>
- <LI>Run Param_test (DII) and record what fails and what works.
- </LI>
- <LI>Run Param_Test across Endian Borders.
- </LI>
- </UL>
- <BR>[DONE] At last!
- </LI>
-
- <LI>Move this list to the release notes.
- </LI>
- </UL>
-
-<HR>
-
-<P>Back to the TAO <A HREF="../index.html">documentation index</A>.&nbsp;<!--#include virtual="/~schmidt/cgi-sig.html" -->
-</BODY>
-</HTML>
diff --git a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/ec.html b/TAO/docs/releasenotes/ec.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 6f84f2ec177..00000000000
--- a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/ec.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,234 +0,0 @@
-<!-- $Id$ -->
-
-<HTML>
- <HEAD>
- <TITLE>Event Service Status</TITLE>
- </HEAD>
-
-<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
- <BODY>
- <H3>Event Service Status</H3>
- Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:coryan@cs.wustl.edu">Carlos O'Ryan</A>
-
- <H4>Last Updated: $Date$ </H4>
-
- <H3>New on this release</H3>
-
- <UL>
- <LI>
- Added a prototype Consumer and Supplier that can send events
- though multicast groups (or regular UDP sockets).
- </LI>
- <LI>
- The Event Channel can be configured using a Factory that
- constructs the right modules (like changing the dispatching
- module),
- in the current release only the default Factory is
- implemented.
- </LI>
- </UL>
-
- <H3>Known issues:</H3>
- <DL>
- <DT><EM>The schedule cannot be downloaded</EM></DT>
- <DD>
- The Scheduling Service seems to compute proper schedules,
- but it is not possible to download them,
- apparently there is a marshalling problem for sequences of
- complex structures.
-
- <P>Due to this problem we have been unable to test the
- run-time scheduler and performance it is impossible to
- complete performance measurements and optimizations:
- the (global) scheduling service latency and overhead is at
- least as large as the EC itself.</P>
- </DD>
-
- <DT><EM>Run-time scheduler requires re-link</EM></DT>
- <DD>
- During a normal execution of the system
- there is no
- need to use the a global Real-time Scheduling Service,
- a faster,
- collocated implementation for the service is available.
- Obviously the scheduling information is precomputed in some
- config run.
-
- <P>Unfortunately the current scheme requires a relink of all the
- involved applications against the generated tables for the
- run-time scheduling service.</P>
-
- <P>We should be able to download the schedule to the interested
- parties,
- without need for a separate link phase.
- This will simplify and speed up the developing cycle,
- but requires a (small and fixed) amount of dynamic memory
- allocation.
- It could be interesting to "save" the schedule computation in
- some persistent form,
- so startup cost are lower too.</P>
-
- <P>The current design contemplates a config run were a global
- consumer accumulates the QoS requirements of all the objects,
- next an external utility is used to force a computation and
- save of the schedule.
- In future executions
- the global scheduler pre-loads this schedule and
- the clients simply download the precomputed schedule,
- and all scheduling queries are to a local scheduling service,
- without any further contact to the global instance.</P>
- </DD>
-
- <DT><EM>Users have no control over service
- collocations</EM></DT>
- <DD>
- The user should have complete control of services collocation,
- using ACE Service Configurator;
- currently the services must be explicitly instantiated by the
- user.
- </DD>
-
- </DL>
-
- <H3>Examples</H3>
-
- <P>For general documentation on the Event Service please read
- <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/oopsla.ps.gz">
- The Design and Performance of a Real-time CORBA Event
- Service</A>.
-
- <P>The simplest test for the Event Channel is
- <CODE>Event_Latency</CODE>,
- below are the basic instructions to run it:</P>
-
- <OL>
- <LI> Compile everything under <CODE>$TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs</CODE>, this
- needs, obviously, <CODE>$TAO_ROOT/tao</CODE> and
- the IDL compiler in <CODE>$TAO_ROOT/TAO_IDL</CODE>.</LI>
-
- <LI><P>Run the naming service, the scheduling service, the event service
- and the test in
- <CODE>$TAO_ROOT/TAO/orbsvcs/tests/Event_Latency</CODE>;
- remember to give a different port to each one,
- using the <CODE>-ORBport</CODE> option. As in:</P>
-
- <CODE>
- <P>
- $ cd $TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs
- </P>
- <P>
-$ cd Naming_Service ; ./Naming_Service -ORBport 10000 &
- </P>
- <P>
-$ cd Event_Service ; ./Event_Service -ORBport 0 &
- </P>
- <P>
-$ cd tests/Event_Latency ; ./Event_Latency -ORBport 0 -m 20 -j &
- </P>
- </CODE>
-
- <P>
- You may want to run each program in a separate window.
- Try using a fixed port number for the <CODE>Naming
- Service</CODE> so you can use the <CODE>NameService</CODE>
- environment variable.
- </P>
-
- <P>
- The script <CODE>start_services</CODE>
- in <CODE>$TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs/tests</CODE> can help with
- this.
- </P>
-
- </LI>
-
- <LI> If you want real-time behavior on Solaris you may need to run
- these programs as root; on the other hand, this particular
- example really has no priority inversion, since only one
- thread runs at a time.</LI>
- </OL>
-
- <P>Another example is <CODE>EC_Multiple</CODE>,
- numerous examples on how to run this test can be found in the
- scripts located in
- <CODE>$TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs/tests/EC_Multiple</CODE>.</P>
-
- <H3>Features in previous releases</H3>
-
- <UL>
- <LI>
- <P>
- When several suppliers are consumers are distributed over the
- network it could be nice to exploit locality and have a
- separate Event Channel on each process (or host).
- Only when an event is required by some remote consumer we need
- to send it through the network. </P>
-
- <P>
- The basic architecture to achieve this seems very simple,
- each Event Channel has a proxy that connects to the EC peers,
- providing a "merge" of its (local) consumer subscriptions as
- its own subscription list. </P>
-
- <P>
- Locally the proxy connects as a supplier,
- publishing all the events it has register for. </P>
-
- <P>
- To avoid event looping the events carry a time-to-live field
- that is decremented each time the event goes through a proxy,
- when the TTL gets to zero the event is not propagated by the
- proxy. </P>
-
- <P>
- In the current release an experimental implementation is
- provided,
- it basically hardcodes all the subscriptions and publications,
- we are researching on how to automatically build the
- publication list.</P>
- </LI>
-
- <LI> <P>
- We use the COS Time Service types (not the services) to
- specify time for the Event Service and Scheduling Service.</P>
- </LI>
-
- <LI>The <CODE>Gateway</CODE> to connect two event channels was
- moved from a test to the library.
- The corresponding test (<CODE>EC_Multiple</CODE>) has been
- expanded and improved.</LI>
-
- <LI>
- The user can register a set of <CODE>EC_Gateways</CODE> with
- the <CODE>EventChannel</CODE> implementation, the event
- channel will automatically update the subscription list as
- consumers subscribe to the EC.
- </LI>
- <LI>
- The code for consumer and supplier disconnection was
- improved and seems to work without problems now
- </LI>
- <LI>
- The <CODE>Event_Service</CODE> program creates a collocated
- <CODE>Scheduling Service</CODE> this works around a problem
- in the ORB when running on multiprocessor.
- </LI>
- <LI>
- Startup and shutdown were revised, the event channel
- shutdown cleanly now.
- </LI>
- <LI>
- Added yet another example
- (<CODE>$TAO_ROOT/orbsvcs/tests/EC_Throughput</CODE>), this
- one ilustrate how to use the
- TAO extensions to create octet sequences based on CDR
- streams, without incurring in extra copies.
- This is useful to implement custom marshalling or late
- dermashalling of the event payload.
- Future versions of the test will help measuring the EC
- throughput, hence the name.
- </LI>
- </UL>
-
- </BODY>
-</HTML>
diff --git a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/index.html b/TAO/docs/releasenotes/index.html
deleted file mode 100644
index e103be67a88..00000000000
--- a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/index.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,786 +0,0 @@
-<HTML>
-<HEAD>
- <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
- <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="Mozilla/4.04 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4u) [Netscape]">
- <TITLE>TAO Release Information and TODO List</TITLE>
-</HEAD>
-<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
-<!-- $Id$ -->
-<CENTER>
-<HR></CENTER>
-
-<CENTER>
-<H3>
-Release Information for The ACE ORB (TAO)</H3></CENTER>
-Information is available on the following topics related to the <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/TAO/VERSION">current
-release</A> of <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/TAO.html">TAO</A>:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-<A HREF="orbcore.html">ORB Core</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#idl">IDL Compiler</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#poa">Portable Object Adapter</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#nservices">CORBA Naming Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="ec.html">CORBA Event Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#tservices">CORBA Trading Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#pservices">CORBA Property Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#cservices">CORBA Concurrency Control Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#logging">CORBA Logging Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#implrepo">Implementation Repository</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#av">CORBA Audio/Video Control Service</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#apps">Test &amp; Example Applications</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#ace">ORB-related ACE Changes</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#dove">The DOVE Demo</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#forwarding">Location forwarding</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#leader">Global resources and leader-follower model</A></LI>
-
-<LI>
-<A HREF="#locate">Locate requests</A></LI>
-<LI>
-
-<A HREF="TODO.html">Our TODO list</A></LI>
-</UL>
-
-A complete list of all modifications to TAO is available in the <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE_wrappers/TAO/ChangeLog">ChangeLog</A>.
-
-<P>&nbsp;
-<HR><!--#include virtual="orbcore.html" -->
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="idl"></A>IDL Compiler</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:gokhale@cs.wustl.edu">Aniruddha Gokhale</A>
-
-<P>Current status: (As of July 31st, 1998.)
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Anonymous arrays inside structs are supported. However, they are not yet
-supported inside unions.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Perfect Hashed Operation Lookup Strategy has been added to the IDL Compiler.
--P flag to the&nbsp;<tao_idl>enables the perfect hased lookup strategy.
-This strategy uses <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/gperf.ps.gz">GPERF</A>,
-the GNU's Perfect Hash Function Generator written by Dr.Douglas C. Schmidt.
-Right now, GPERF works only on Solaris. Any work on porting GPERF to other
-platforms will be highly appreciated.&nbsp;</L1></LI>
-
-<LI>
-Support for Arrays is refined in terms of the code generated for parameters
-inside stubs and skeletons.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Significantly improved the support for unions. The default case is yet
-to be handled.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Added support for Arrays. Right now, support for typedefed arrays is in.
-Still needs testing.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Added support for TIE classes. If the interfaces are defined inside modules,
-then the TIE class and its code gets generated inside a conditional macro.
-For platforms that support namespaces, this macro will allow these TIE
-classes else they get commented out. The reason to do this is because nested
-templates have problems on most compilers.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-The &lt;&lt;= and >>= operators for user-defined types are now generated.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Completely redesigned the IDL compiler using the Visitor patterns. Many
-incomplete issues have been resolved. These include support for "sequence
-of typecodes", passing object references as in, inout, and out parameters.
-Code generation for sequences is also properly handled i.e., for a named
-sequence such as "typedef sequence&nbsp;<char>CharSeq;", we now generate
-a new class (and hence a type) called "class CharSeq". Arrays are still
-being worked out and will be done soon. An important difference in the
-generated code is that the skeletons now use a table driven approach very
-similar to the stubs.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Support for the "native" keyword added.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Introduced tests for object references to TAO. Still incomplete.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Param_Test example is able to test string sequences, fixed structs, variable
-sized structs and nested structs</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Param_Test test suite can now test fixed structs and string sequences.This
-needed bug fixes to TAO ORB core.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-A new test to test all the parameter passing modes for a number of data
-types has been added. At this point in time, it tests primitive types and
-strings. Other tests will be added. Bugs discovered thru these tests have
-been fixed.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Very preliminary support for arrays. Not working yet.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Many bugs associated with stub generation fixed. This included support
-for return values that are variable sized IDL types. Unions improved.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Support for sequences of strings and object references added. However,
-it is not tested yet so there may be some bugs. We should have these fixed
-in a day or so.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Support for handling exceptions added. TAO does not use direct C++ exceptions.
-Instead it uses the CORBA::Environment based approach.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Sequences as out parameters have been tested in the IDL_Cubit example.
-A test suite is currently being built to test all the parameter passing
-modes on a variety of IDL data types.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Support for attributes completed. Not tested yet.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-The problem of incorrect code generation for typedefs defined in an imported
-file is resolved.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Problems when interfaces use single or multiple inheritance solved. The
-problem was with the demultiplexing code, the generated operation tables,
-and the dispatching mechanism. We are currently testing this with the Event
-Channel code.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-The problems arising due to public virtual inheritance when casting from
-an interface class to CORBA::Object_ptr has been solved. We do this casting
-inside the stubs/skeletons rather than first converting an interface class
-pointer to a void*, storing it in an Any, and casting it to CORBA::Object_ptr
-in the encode/decode methods. The casting inside the stubs/skeletons work
-because the compiler has knowledge of both types.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-The compiler generates correct code for COSS Naming service and it runs
-properly. Correct code also gets generated for the Event Channel program</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Include files are handled properly. So are the definitions used inside
-the include files that are used in the currently parsed files.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-IN, INOUT, and OUT object reference parameters are now supported properly.
-We think the same approach should work for sequences, structs, and unions.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Many IDL constructs supported including primitive types, typedefs, sequences,
-structures, and unions.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Generates C++ stubs and skeletons that use TAO's <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/HICSS-97.ps.gz">interpretive
-IIOP protocol engine</A>.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Generated code closely follows the C++ Mapping specified in the POA Specification
-(ORBOS/97-05-15).</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Support dynamic libraries on NT, i.e., marking classes for DLL export was
-added. Two backend options control the name of the export macro, and the
-name of an extra include file were the macro is defined; the options are
-<TT>-Wp,export_macro=MACRO_NAME</TT> <TT>-Wp,export_include=INCLUDE_NAME</TT>.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-The IDL compiler generates now source code for sequences. The user has
-now the option to use these generated sequence classes or to use, as up
-to now, the template instatiation. If TAO_LACKS_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION
-is defined, then template instantiation will be used, else not. The reason
-for this was, that some C++ compilers did not support template instantiation
-properly and sequences were based on templates. The generated source code
-is mainly contained in the generated header file directly in the class
-declaration.</LI>
-</UL>
-Known bugs/unimplemented constructs:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Generation of Managed types must somehow be moved to the ORB Core</LI>
-
-<LI>
-We need support for ``TIEs'' (i.e., the object form of the Adapter pattern).</LI>
-
-<LI>
-TypeCode generation for multidimensional arrays and indirected typecodes
-is still a problem.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Unions with default cases yet to be handled</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Deal with names in the IDL definition that are C++ keywords.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-IDL is case-insensitive. However, it looks like our front-end is case-sensitive.
-Thanks to Anil Gopinath (anil@ittc.ukans.edu) for pointing this out.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-tao_idl generates code for a *.idl file only inside the directory where
-the *.idl resides. However, it may be required to generate code elsewhere
-i.e., in the directory where the compiler was invoked. Thanks to Tom Richards
-(tomr@MCMEnterprise.com) for this suggestion.</LI>
-</UL>
-Future work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Need to relocate the various libraries used by the IDL compiler out of
-the ACE directory. Having them here can cause problems when working with
-multiple versions of TAO and a single version of ACE.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Improve IDL compiler to generate compiled form of stubs/skeletons.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Fix bugs in the SunSoft IDL front-end we've uncovered. These primarily
-include support for Unions.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Add command line options to TAO IDL. These options will decide what strategy
-to use for operation name demultiplexing. Another option may decide whether
-to use the interpretive IIOP engine or generate compiled stubs/skeletons.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Use <A HREF="http://www.cs.utah.edu/projects/flux/flick/">Flick</A> (from
-the University of Utah) to generate compiled stubs.</LI>
-
-
-<P>Goal is to measure the code size of the interpretive stubs generated
-by TAO IDL compiler <I>vs</I> code size of compiled stubs. Then compare
-the performance of each. We want to prove the thesis that TAO IDL compiler
-generated interpretive stubs have a small code size, yet are comparable
-in performance (or slightly less) than compiled stubs. Hence, it will be
-useful for small distributed equipment such as handsets, PDAs, etc.
-
-<P>In doing the above, improvements to the IIOP protocol engine in terms
-of size/performance/determinism will be made.
-<LI>
-Tweak the IDL compiler to generate code that's more easily integrated back
-into the ORB Core, e.g., POA, etc. This will depend largely on our ability
-to generalize the changes necessary to generated code.</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<LI>
-The generated sequence classes should not be generated per sequence, but
-per type and parent scope. Which means, that the overhead of having the
-source code generated serveral times should be reduced. To do this, an
-extra pass over the internal representation of the IDL file has to be done.&nbsp;
-<HR></LI>
-
-<H3>
-<A NAME="poa"></A>Portable Object Adapter</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:irfan@cs.wustl.edu">Irfan Pyarali</A>
-
-<P>Current Status:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-TAO fully supports the POA spec. This section will carry updates as available.</LI>
-</UL>
-Known issues:
-<DL>
-<DT>
-<I>Support for collocation is not complete.</I></DT>
-
-<DD>
-If an object which should be collocated is created via <TT>string_to_object</TT>,
-it is created as a remote object rather than collocated.</DD>
-</DL>
-Critical work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-None.</LI>
-</UL>
-Future work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Determine the degree to which we will support the full semantics of remote
-objects on a collocated object. The spec mandates that collocated object
-should behave <I>exactly</I> like remote objects, but that means that request
-will have to be queued rather than calling a method directly, and this
-could be hazardous to our quest for real-time ORB status.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Provide extensions of the specification to ensure real-time delivery of
-messages.</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<HR><!--#include virtual="ec.html" -->
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="nservices"></A>CORBA Naming Service</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:sergio@cs.wustl.edu">Sergio Flores-Gaitan</A>
-and <A HREF="mailto:marina@cs.wustl.edu">Marina Spivak</A>
-
-<P>Current status (as of Feb 27th):
-<UL>
-<LI>
-The Naming Service implementation is complete.</LI>
-</UL>
-Future work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Currently the bindings are stored as a table in memory. Future work will
-include a persistent database to store the bindings.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Replication of the bindings to other Naming Service's currently running.
-It will probably be modeled after the LDAP Multi-Master Replication Protocol.
-For more information on this replication protocol please read <A HREF="ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-asid-ldap-mult-mast-rep-02.txt">LDAP
-Multi-Master Replication Protocol</A></LI>
-</UL>
-For general documentation on the Naming Service please read <A HREF="ftp://www.omg.org/pub/docs/formal/97-07-12.pdf">The
-Naming Service Specification</A>.
-
-<P>
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="tservices"></A>CORBA Trading Service</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:sbw1@cs.wustl.edu">Seth Widoff</A>
-
-<P>The TAO Trading Service is a transient implementation of the COS Trading
-Service speficiation that meets the Linked Trader conformance criteria
---- it implements the <TT>Lookup</TT>, <TT>Register</TT>, <TT>Admin</TT>,
-and <TT>Link</TT> interfaces, but not the <TT>Proxy</TT> interface. Notably,
-the TAO trader supports the following features:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Multithreaded operation;</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Trader federations and distributed queries;</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Dynamic properties;</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Modifiable properties;</LI>
-
-<LI>
-All policies described in the specification;</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Preference sorting;</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Service type inheritance hierarchies and subtype searching.</LI>
-</UL>
-<A HREF="trader.html">Trading Service documentation</A> is also available.
-
-<P>Future Work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-The Proxy Interface.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Persistent storage of service types and offers.</LI>
-</UL>
-For general documentation of the Trading Service, please read <A HREF="http://www.omg.org/corba/sectrans.htm#trader">The
-Trading Service Specification.</A>
-
-<P>
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="pservices"></A>CORBA Property Service</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:alex@cs.wustl.edu">Alexander Babu Arulanthu</A>
-
-<P>Current status (as of May&nbsp; 02, 1998)
-<BR>&nbsp;
-<BR>All the interfaces of this service have been implemented.&nbsp; Please
-go through the&nbsp; test examples at&nbsp; $TAO/orbsvcs/tests/CosPropertyService.&nbsp;
-Property Service is&nbsp; now used by the AVStreams that is currently being
-developed for TAO. More testing is being done.
-
-<P>For general documentation of the Property Service, please read <A HREF="http://www.omg.org/corba/sectrans.htm#prop">The
-Property Service Specification.</A>
-
-<P>
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="implrepo"></A>Implementation Repository</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:brunsch@cs.wustl.edu">Darrell Brunsch</A>
-
-<P>Current status (as of July 23, 1998)
-
-<P>Here is a brief list of my goals (and the dates completed). For more
-information, please see the <A HREF="../implrepo.html">Implementation Repository
-documentation</A>.
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Create the base test client and server programs [7/17]</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Add an IR that forwards server requests [7/23]</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Have the server register its IOR with the IR</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Have the server exit after every call, so it is restarted each time</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Add the ping object to the server</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Add in shutdown calls to test ping objects</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Change IOR format</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Add in support for server names</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Make the IR forward any request</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Add another server</LI>
-</UL>
-Other goals:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Implement the IDL Interface for the IR</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Move this stuff into the POA</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Multiple Profiles</LI>
-
-<LI>
-POA extension</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Persistence</LI>
-</UL>
-Future Goals:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-TAO client-side optimization with restarted servers</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Server security (checksums)</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Helper Application</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Federation of IRs</LI>
-
-<LI>
-DLLs</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="cservices"></A>CORBA Concurrency Control Service</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:tworm@cs.wustl.edu">Torben Worm</A>
-
-<P>Current status (as of May 3rd):
-<UL>
-<LI>
-A simple version of the concurrency service has been implemented, i.e.
-a version without transactions. It is currently being tested.</LI>
-</UL>
-Future Work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Implementation of the Concurrency Control Service with transactions</LI>
-</UL>
-For general documentation of the Concurrency Control Service, please read
-<A HREF="http://www.omg.org/corba/sectrans.htm#concur">The Concurrency
-Control Service Specification.</A>
-
-<P>
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="logging"></A>CORBA Logging Service</H3>
-Point of contact:&nbsp; <A HREF="mailto:mjb2@cs.wustl.edu">Matt Braun</A>
-
-<P>Current status (as of August 4'th):
-<UL>
-<LI>
-The basic logging service has been implemented. It can log basic messages
-from multiple clients. It is currently in the testing stage.</LI>
-</UL>
-Future work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-&nbsp;Add increased functionality. Requests and suggestions are welcome.</LI>
-</UL>
-&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
-<HR WIDTH="100%">
-<H3>
-<A NAME="av"></A>CORBA Audio/Video Control Service</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:sumedh@cs.wustl.edu">Sumedh Mungee</A>
-and <A HREF="mailto:naga@cs.wustl.edu">Nagarajan Surendran</A>
-
-<P>This is an implementation of the OMG spec addressing the <A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~sumedh/research/corbaav.pdf">Control
-and Management of Audio/Video Streams</A>.
-
-<P>The audio/video streaming service has been implemented in the light
-profile. An MPEG-1 application which streams mpeg-1 video and mpeg-1 audio
-separately has been developed using the service. This application currently
-works only for Unix platforms.
-
-<P>Current Status:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Implemented the handshake mechanism between the consumer and supplier of
-the stream.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Implemented a simple version of the stream controller (StreamCtrl).</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Implemented the VDev and StreamEndPoint base class functionality.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Implemented the MMDevice interface, which is a factory for StreamEndPoint
-and VDev objects.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Implemented a mpeg-1 streaming audio/video application using the a/v service.</LI>
-</UL>
-Work in progress:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Implementing the SFP protocol</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Integrating the mpeg-1 streaming application with the trading service.</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="apps"></A>Test &amp; Example Applications</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:naga@cs.wustl.edu">Nagarajan Surendran</A>
-
-<P>Current Status:
-
-<P>The TAO IDL_Cubit test application makes use of the Naming Service and
-the server holds a TAO_Naming_Server component.Just running server and
-client is enough to test the application.
-
-<P>The various tests in the tests/POA test the different features of the
-Portable Object Adapter interface like Explicit Activation, On Demand Activation,etc..
-
-<P>Future work:
-
-<P>Developing a one-buttoned test for all the different TAO tests similar
-to the ACE-one buttoned test.
-
-<P>MT_Cubit:
-
-<P>Current status:
-
-<P>The TAO MT_Cubit test application is meant to serve as a starting point
-for real-time tests on the TAO system. It comprises the following parts:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-<I>Server.</I> The server creates multiple CORBA objects (servants), each
-with different real-time priorities. This priority is implemented by using
-real-time thread support provided by the operating system. Thus, requests
-sent to a high-priority servant are handled by a high-priority real-time
-thread, and those sent to a lower priority servant are handled by correspondingly
-lower priority threads.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-<I>Client.</I> The client component binds to the servants, and sends a
-stream of CORBA requests to the servants. It measures the response time,
-i.e. the time taken for the request to complete successfully. In particular,
-it measures the time taken for requests sent to the high priority servant
-to complete. The volume of lower priority requests is configurable. The
-client is thus able to measure the performance of the high-priority servant
-in the presence of competition from several lower-priority servants.</LI>
-</UL>
-Clearly, if the ORB endsystem handles the priorities of the various requests
-correctly, increasing the volume of lower priority requests should not
-affect the performance seen by the higher priority requests. The application
-thus serves as a tool to measure and confirm this behavior.
-
-<P>Future work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Study the impacts of scheduling &amp; concurrency strategies on performance.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Evolve into a testbed for discovering sources of performance non-determinism
-&amp; priority inversion.</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="ace"></A>ORB-related ACE Changes</H3>
-Points of contact: <A HREF="mailto:nanbor@cs.wustl.edu">Nanbor Wang</A>
-and <A HREF="mailto:irfan@cs.wustl.edu">Irfan Pyrarli</A>
-
-<P>Recently Completed Work:
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Added special declaration to OS.h for <TT>inet_ntoa</TT> and other functions
-because VxWorks doesn't provide full argument prototypes for these library
-functions.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-The current caching connector behaves properly in the face of a non-blocking
-connect request. The "fix" is simply to not support non-blocking connects
-through the cache. When the <TT>connect()</TT> fails with <TT>EWOULDBLOCK</TT>,
-morph the error to -1 and clean up the request.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Service handlers obtained from the caching connector are now cleaned up.
-The application needs to be able to signal that it's not using it any longer,
-and, when the application encounters an error, needs to effectively close
-down that connection for good so that a new connection can be initiated.</LI>
-
-<BR>Added the ability for a Svc_Handler to recycle itself. idle() can be
-called when the Svc_Handler is done serving a particular connection and
-can how be recycled. The Svc_Handler now also has a pointer to a recycler
-that is responsible for managing the connections. The recycler is usually
-a Cached_Connector.
-<BR>Added new class ACE_Recycling_Strategy. It defines the interface (and
-default implementation) for specifying a recycling strategy for a Svc_Handler.
-This strategy acts as a consular to the Svc_Handler, preparing it for the
-tough times ahead when the Svc_Handler will be recycled.
-<BR>Added new class ACE_NOOP_Concurrency_Strategy. It implements a no-op
-activation strategy in order to avoid calling open on a recycled svc_handler
-multiple times.
-<BR>ACE_Cached_Connect_Strategy now implements the ACE_Connection_Recycling_Strategy
-interface. This allows Svc_Handlers to cache themselves with ACE_Cached_Connect_Strategy
-when they become idle. It also allows them to purge themselves from the
-connection cache when the Svc_Handlers close down.
-<BR>Also added ~ACE_Cached_Connect_Strategy that will cleanup up the connection
-cache.</UL>
-Future work:
-<BLOCKQUOTE><I>None currently scheduled.</I></BLOCKQUOTE>
-
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="dove"></A>The DOVE Demo</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:mk1@cec.wustl.edu">Michael Kircher</A>.
-
-<P><A HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/dove.html">DOVE</A> is
-documented in detail <A
-HREF="http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/DOVE_and_LifeCycleService.ps.gz">online</A>.
-This discussion focuses on the following goals:<P>
-
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Have a DOVE Browser running using Java Beans as vizualization components.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Have the Event Channel as DOVE Agent running with an Event Consumer in
-the DOVE Browser.</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Having a DOVE Management Information Base (MIB), which dumps all events
-transfered on the Event Channel into a file on persistent storage for later
-reuse.</LI>
-</UL>
-The DOVE Browser uses independent visualization components (Java Beans)
-and the Event Channel as DOVE Agent. Connections can be established between
-monitored metrics and the visualization components.
-
-<P>We have three major components: Observables (monitored metrics),
-Observers (a Java Bean for displaying the metric) and a DataHandler
-(for demultiplexing the monitored metrics to the appropriate
-Observables). Each component inherits from a base class, so that a
-certain behavior of the components can be assured for each
-component. Relationships between components are based on these base
-classes.
-
-<P>The used Java Beans are required to conform to some standards, as
-they have to support a function called "getProperty" which allows the
-DOVE Browser to determine if the vizualization capabilities of a
-specific Java Bean are sufficient to display the metric. A JavaBean is
-for example a Java Panel which shows a Graph of the delivered
-doubles. So all metrics can be displayed by this visualization
-component which can be expressed by a single double.
-
-<P>The DataHandler is connected to the Event Push Consumer (PUSH,
-because we use the push concept of the Event Service). The Event Push
-Consumer does not know what kind of data is transported. The only
-component knowing all the details about the dependencies of the
-metrics is the DataHandler. This separation allows easy extension and
-change of the demo.
-
-<P><A HREF="http://students.cec.wustl.edu/~mk1/dove.html">Object Diagrams</A>
-are available about this new concept.
-
-<P>Event Service events are used as communication between DOVE
-Applications and the DOVE Browser. The DOVE MIB analyses the event
-data field of all events and stores this information into a file. The
-event data filed is of type CORBA::Any and the DOVE MIB has no notion
-of what is conveyed in this field. So the DOVE MIB has to discover the
-content via the embedded type code information. Future work includes:
-
-<UL>
-<LI>
-Enhancing MIB functionality</LI>
-
-<LI>
-Monitoring the AV Streaming Service</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="forwarding"></A>Location forwarding</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:irfan@cs.wustl.edu">Irfan Pyarali</A>,
-<A HREF="mailto:mk1@mk1.wustl.edu">Michael Kircher</A>.
-
-<P>For more information see <A HREF="../forwarding.html">Location forwarding</A>&nbsp;
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="leader"></A>Global resources and leader-follower model</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:irfan@cs.wustl.edu">Irfan Pyarali</A>,
-<A HREF="mailto:mk1@mk1.wustl.edu">Michael Kircher</A>.
-
-<P>For more information see <A HREF="../leader_follower.html">Leader-follower
-model</A>&nbsp;
-<HR>
-<H3>
-<A NAME="locate"></A>Implementation of locate request</H3>
-Point of contact: <A HREF="mailto:irfan@cs.wustl.edu">Irfan Pyarali</A>,
-<A HREF="mailto:mk1@mk1.wustl.edu">Michael Kircher</A>.
-
-<P>For more information see <A HREF="../locate_request.html">Locate request</A>&nbsp;
-<HR>
-
-<P>Back to the TAO <A HREF="../index.html">documentation index</A>.&nbsp;<!--#include virtual="/~schmidt/cgi-sig.html" -->
-</BODY>
-</HTML>
diff --git a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/orbcore.html b/TAO/docs/releasenotes/orbcore.html
deleted file mode 100644
index 61220111426..00000000000
--- a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/orbcore.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,503 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
-
-<!-- $Id$ -->
-
-<html>
- <head>
- <title>ORB Core Status</title>
- </head>
-
-<BODY TEXT="#000000" BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF">
- <H3><A NAME="orb"></A>ORB &amp; ORB Core</H3> Point of
- contact: <A HREF="mailto:nanbor@cs.wustl.edu">Nanbor Wang</A>
-
- <p>Last Update: $Date$ </P>
-
-<P>
-<b>Current status:</b>
-
-<UL>
- <LI>Provides dynamically linked wholesale assignment of ORB
- strategies for communication, concurrency, demultiplexing,
- scheduling, and dispatching using the ACE Service Configurator
- framework.</LI>
-
- <LI>Supports several concurrency models out of the box:
- Reactive, Thread-per-Connection, and ORB-per-thread. The
- ORB-per-thread design is optimized for real-time I/O
- subsystems. (See: <a href="../configurations.html">Configuration
- Guide</a>.)</LI>
-
- <LI>Supports <TT>resolve_initial_references("NameService")</TT>
- using ACE support for multicast.</LI>
-</UL><p>
-
-<b>Known issues:</b>
-<UL>
- <li>Some CORBA objects need to have access to the ORB. We tend to
- use TAO_ORB_Core_instance ()->orb () to fetch the right ORB the
- object is using. This is most often true when implementing the
- shutdown method which allow other process to shutdown a remote
- ORB. Althought this may be the "right" thing to do in TAO, it
- is not CORBA compliant and hurts the portability of object
- implementation.
-
- A common way of getting around this problem is to cache the ORB
- pointer in the object when it is created and simply use the
- cached ORB when needed. However, remember that there could be
- multiple ORBs in a process and a POA may be shared by several
- ORBs. That means, we may not handling the object with the same
- ORB it was created. Collocation optimization further complicated
- the problem.
-
- At the moment, using TAO_ORB_Core_instance ()->orb () is the
- only sane way to get arond the problem. Though there may be a
- better way.<p>
-
- <li>The acceptor on the server side doesn't get opened until calling
- CORBA_ORB::run (). And that's when we check whether the port
- the server wants to listen on is available or not. (Unless we
- specify ORBport to be 0, which implicitly ask the ORB to open
- the connection in ORB_init so we know how to export object
- IORs.) The problem of this approach is that the port the server
- is listen on may not be available. Since we export object IORs
- based on the port specified (or the default port,) without
- checking the availability of the port, we may announce a bad IOR
- end-point which the server will never be able to listen on.
-
- A possible solution might be opening the server acceptor
- whenever it is trying to export an IOR.<p>
-
- <li>The ORB doesn't handle the nested upcalls correctly. This seems
- to be stemmed from the incorrect suspension/resumption of file
- descriptor in connection management. It appears to work fine
- when two client and server calling each other from invoking an
- object method. This, however, is broken when a third ORB
- makes use of the object exported by the original client when the
- nested upcalls are in progress.<p>
-
- <LI>The current demarshalling scheme may not work in cases of
- complex types such as sequences of unions or anys or object
- references. The engine has difficulty determining the dynamic
- type of the objects.<p>
-
- <LI>Object references for objects dynamically created within
- a server may not have proper host.</em> (See also <a
- href="#hostfix">recent fix</a>.)
- When an object is dynamically created and its object
- reference returned, it simply has to "guess" at the host
- information that is returned in the IIOP Profile. Currently, it
- guesses using the host name, which is a reasonable guess in most
- cases.<br>
-
- However, if there are multiple interfaces on a machine
- <i>and</i> they have different host names, it is possible that
- the desired effect will not be realized, i.e., the connection to
- that new object may use a different interface from the original
- object. Currently the only way to change this is to use the <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBhost"><b>-ORBhost</b> option</a> to
- manually specify that dynamically-created objects bind to a
- specific interface so that their IIOP Profile has the desired
- hostname. A more desirable fix is being investigated.<p>
-</Ul>
-
-<b>Recently Completed Work:</b>
-
-<UL>
- <li>Making the collocation table configurable. We can either
- use a global collocation table to share objects among ORBs,
- or use the per-ORB collocation table.
-
- <li>Implement the inheritance mechanism in
- Default_Server_Connection_Handler to access the parent's
- POA. This is necessary when we are using
- thread-per-connection concurrency model.
-
- <li>It is often desireable for a server to start up and not have
- to specify the TCP port number on which the ORB will listen,
- i.e., let the OS decide. While this works properly (by
- providing an argument <code>-ORBport 0</code>), the actual
- port number used by the server won't be available after the
- server starts listening. TAO now tries to bind the address
- when <code>-ORBport 0</code> is issued so it can get the
- actual address to publish the IOR for clients' use.
-
- <li>Added optimization for collocated objects. This
- optimization enables TAO to bypass communication layers and
- talks to collocated objects directly.</li>
-
- <li>Broke the tight coupling between <code>CORBA_Object</code>
- and <code>IIOP_Object</code> so that multiple
- <code>CORBA_Object</code>s can share a single
- <code>IIOP_Object</code>. This has a big win in
- <code>_narrow</code> operations.</li>
-
- <li>Eliminated substantial memory leaks in servers.</li>
-
- <li>Added documentation for <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBpoa"><b>-ORBpoa</b></a>, which
- allows individual tweaking of the POA's locality (global
- vs. thread-specific) independent of the locality of other
- ORB resources. Also, <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBpoalock"><b>-ORBpoalock</b></a>
- and <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBpoamgrlock"><b>-ORBpoamgrlock</b></a>
- control locking in the POA and POA manager, respectively,
- according to application needs.</li>
-
- <li>Began the process of changing the internals of TAO to use
- the "underbar" namespace mapping. This should be completed
- soon.</li>
-
- <li>The ORBs manipulation of object keys and object ids is now
- consistent. Canonically, everything is managed as an opaque
- sequence of octets. Conversion to/from strings is permitted,
- with non-printables turning into a trigraph <b>\hl</b> where
- <b>h</b> is the high nibble digit in hex, and <b>l</b> is the
- low nibble in hex.</li>
-
- <li><code>CORBA_ORB::run()</code> should be able to be called
- multiply in the same execution path now.</li>
-
- <li>Fixed the <b>LOCATION_FORWARD</b> capabilities to work as
- described in the CORBA 2.1 and the POA specification.</li>
-
- <li>Fixed problem in the IDL Cubit example which caused the
- server to dump core when dealing with <code>_out</code> sequence
- types <em>ONLY</em> when compiled with G++. It seems that G++
- decided to interpret the expression <code>output == 0</code>
- (where <code>output</code> is of type <code>vector_out</code>)
- differently from Sun's C++ compiler.</li>
-
- <li>Fixed a slight problem in <a href="#hostfix">other recent
- work</a> where a servant listening on <code>INADDR_ANY</code>
- reported an IOR with address <tt>0.0.0.0</tt>. It now reports
- the default hostname instead.</li>
-
- <LI>Working version of TAO on VxWorks with VME transport.</li>
-
- <li>TAO now reacts gracefully in the face of a non-existent
- <code>svc.conf</code> file or simply missing entries in the
- file. It logs a warning message and uses default values
- versions of items which it would normally obtain from the
- Service Repository.</li>
-
- <li><a name="hostfix"></a>Fixed problem where object references
- for objects dynamically created within a server do not have
- proper host, at least if the desired host was specified using <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBhost"><b>-ORBhost</b></a> on the
- command line.</li>
-
- <li>Added support for <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBsndsock"><b>-ORBsndsock</b></a> and <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBrcvsock"><b>-ORBrcvsock</b></a> ORB
- options. See <a href="../Options.html">options
- documentation</a> for details.</li>
-
- <li>Added support for pre-established connections using the <a
- href="../Options.html#-ORBpreconnect"><b>-ORBpreconnect</b></a>
- option. This allows connections to be esablished before any
- CORBA requests are made. See <a href="../Options.html">options
- documentation</a> for details.</li>
-
- <li>Eliminated deprecated <b>-OAxxx</b> options parsed by the
- Object Adapter <code>init</code> method but no longer used by
- part of the ORB.</li>
-
- <li>Made argument parsing within the ORB and POA consume the
- arguments it parses.</li>
-
- <li>Placed an optimization in IIOP::Profile that should speed up
- invocations on the client side rather substantially. This was
- done by caching an instance of <code>ACE_INET_Addr</code> in
- the private portion of <code>Profile</code> because the cost
- of constructing one for every invocation (in
- <code>TAO_GIOP_Invocation::start</code>) was simply
- enormous--the construction was something like 100 cycles on
- Solaris. This is all because deep down this ends up calling
- <code>gethostbyname()</code>, which can be very costly. Of
- course, this is platform-dependent, so the improvements may
- not be as great on a different platform.</li>
-
- <li>Got rid of need to have compile in TSS ORB Core
- (<code>-DTAO_HAS_TSS_ORBCORE</code>). This is accomplished by
- having a Resource Factory (<code>TAO_Resource_Factory</code>)
- singleton which the ORB Core consults in order to get pointers
- to resources. The Resource Factory can be configured to
- return pointers from thread-specific storage, or
- process-global storage. By doing this, the ORB Core is
- shielded from ever having to know whether or not its resources
- are global or not.</li>
-
- <li>Made all command-line like options look like the
- standard-professed options, i.e., <b>-ORBxxx</b> or
- <b>-OAxxxx</b>.</li>
-
- <li>Moved ORB option parsing into
- <code>TAO_ORB_Core::init()</code> rather than in
- <code>ORB_init()</code>.</li>
-
- <li>Define <code>_FAR</code> for all cases as an interim fix
- for LynxOS.</li>
-
- <li>Fixed TAO so that the default port of 5001 is defined in
- <code>orb_core.h</code> config header somewhere rather than in
- <code>orbobj.cpp</code>, and use <b>MAXHOSTNAMELEN</b> ACE
- constant for the hostname buffer.</li>
-
- <li>Eliminated need for <code>CORBA::Object</code> to keep a
- pointer to its orb sitting around anywhere.</li>
-
- <LI>Tested <code>CORBA_ORB::shutdown()</code> as a manner in
- which a thread of control can request that
- <code>CORBA_ORB::run()</code> should return and no longer
- service requests. It only honors a
- <em>wait_for_completion</em> argument of <b>FALSE</b> right
- now because we haven't fully explored the issues which
- surround doing all the completion.</li>
-
- <li>Created a brief section in <a
- href="../../TAO-INSTALL.html"><code>$TAO_ROOT/TAO-INSTALL.html</code></a>
- that <em>briefly</em> documents installation on Unix
- platforms. There is also a brief section which documents
- issues that apply across ALL platforms, such as the fact that
- TAO and its application will likely not work well if your ACE
- is linked through Orbix, VisiBroker, or another ORB. <a
- href="../../ChangeLog">ChangeLog</a> discovery attribution for
- this should go to <em>Steve Wohlever
- &lt;wohlever@mitre.org&gt;</em>.</li>
-
- <LI>Implemented <code>CORBA_ORB::shutdown()</code> as a manner
- in which a thread of control can request that
- <code>CORBA_ORB::run()</code> should return and no longer
- service requests.</li>
-
- <LI>Validated movement of Strategy Connector into
- ORB&nbsp;Core.</LI>
-
- <li>Tested and commited <code>Connector::connect_n</code>
- changes to ACE</code>.</li>
-
- <li>ACE & TAO compiling cleanly using Sun's CC on Solaris and
- G++ on Linux. Also, the ACE tests run properly.</li>
-
- <li>Use <code>truss</code> to verify for <a
- href="mailto:PAUL.G.WEHLAGE@cdev.com">Paul Wehlage</a> that
- TAO really uses <code>select</code> vs. <code>recv</code> for
- <b>-R</b> vs. <b>-T</b>.</li>
-
- <li>Renamed <code>boa.*</code> to <code>poa.*</code>.</li>
-
- <LI>Renamed following files:&nbsp;Orb_Core.*&nbsp;->orb_core.*
- &amp;&nbsp;orbobj.* -> corba_orb.*.</LI>
-
- <LI>The lock used in <code>giop.cpp:626</code> originally
- appeared in the IIOP-1.4 code base. Its purpose was to
- protect access to the <code>fwd_profile</code> data member.
- The original features are available, but they are currently
- not used because none of our concurrency models present a
- thread-unsafe condition. The <a
- href="../../ChangeLog">ChangeLog</a> presents more details
- on the subject.</li>
-
- <li>Fixed problems seen by <a
- href="mailto:brian.r.mendel@boeing.com">Brian Mendel</a> of
- Boeing where the Cubit server application was crashing in
- <code>TAO_OA_Connection_Handler::handle_message</code> when it
- was trying to call <code>CORBA::POA::handle_request</code>
- through a NULL <code>root_poa</code> pointer. The NULL
- pointer resulted from the inadvertent use of the
- Thread-per-Connection concurrency model, which is currently
- incompatible with the ORB-per-thread model. It was not caught
- because the change is normally done in configuration files
- parsed by the Service Configurator, and VxWorks requires
- special code in that area which was not tested until Boeing
- got hold of the code.</li>
-
- <li>Clean up build under g++. All 'function used before
- declared inline' warnings have been eliminated. Also, all
- other warnings (except for one that is nearly unavoidable)
- have been eliminated.
- </li>
-
- <LI>Removed BOA and ROA names from the ORB.</LI>
-
- <LI>Changed <code>CORBA_ORB::open()</code> to return an error
- status (first cut at this already there--needs to be checked
- out).</LI>
-
- <LI>Added README file to multiCubit test.</li>
-</UL><p>
-
-<b>Ongoing Work:</b>
-
-<UL>
- <LI>Verify ACE & TAO on Linux using g++, Solaris using CC, and
- Solaris using g++.</LI>
-
- <LI>Use Purify to eliminate straggling problems.</LI>
-
- <LI>Clean up the internals and analyze for performance
- bottlenecks using Quantify.</LI>
-
- <li>Resolve <code>// @@</code> comment blocks. These are
- questions or comments placed in the code by a reviewer
- (typically Doug).</li>
-
- <li>Make more and better documentation on the internals of
- TAO.</li>
-</UL><p>
-
-<b>Current Work:</b>
-
-<UL>
- <LI>
- <p>Verify that, in the ORB-per-thread concurrency model,
- it's possible to have a factory in each thread that creates
- a client and returns an object reference to that client
- within that thread. This is different from the model that
- Sumedh originally had where the factory was trying to turn
- out a client in a separate thread/ORB combination.
-
- <p>There is no application which attempts this at the moment,
- so both a client and a server will need to be manufactured.
- Using existing Cubit-like examples (that poor app is so
- weary) should reduce development time to a couple of
- hours.
-
- <p>The real strategy/solution is to make
- <code>CORBA::Object</code> not keep a pointer to its orb
- sitting around anywhere. It should only get it when it needs
- it. This should not be difficult to change.
- </LI>
-</UL><p>
-
-<b>Critical Work:</b>
-
-<UL>
- <li>Identify/fix the problems in multithreaded client with TSS
- resources. This could be done using the leader-follower model
- (thread-pool.)
- <LI>Support new concurrency models, e.g., Thread-per-Request,
- thread pool, etc..</LI>
-</UL>
-
-<b>Future work:</b>
-<UL>
- <li>Performance optimizations, such as:
- <ol>
- <li>Strategize the connection management scheme so that we
- don't always have to pay the price of a look up in the
- connection cache. Basically, we want to be able to "hold" a
- service handler for a string of requests. And, of course,
- do this in a portable manner.</LI>
-
- <li>Replace all uses of <code>new</code> and
- <code>delete</code> with allocators that can be put into
- TSS. The main motivation for this is to eliminate lock
- contention when multiple threads need to allocate/deallocate
- memory, however it might also be possible to substitute an
- allocator better-tuned to an application's specific
- usage.</li>
- </ol>
- </li>
-
- <li>Robustness improvements:
- <ol>
- <li>Improve connection cache so that it won't crash when there
- are no more slots or sockets.</li>
-
- <li>Add an option to the ORB core, e.g.,
- <b>-ORBnameservicetimeout</b>, to allow specification of an
- upper bound on the itime-to-wait for a response from the
- ORB's multicast "search" for a running name server.</li>
- </ol>
- </li>
-
- <li>New features:
- <ol>
- <li>Implement <code>ORB::perform_work</code> and
- <code>ORB::work_pending</code> so that <code>ORB::run</code>
- <em>could</em> be implemented in terms of them.</li>
-
- <li>Improve the <code>Service Configurator</code> service
- entry faking on VxWorks.</li>
-
- <li>Integrate with realtime upcalls (RTUs).</li>
-
- </ol>
- </li>
-
- <li>Internal restructuring:
- <ol>
- <li>Remove <code>_FAR</code> from all code.</li>
-
- <li>Rework underlayment to eliminate <code>IUnknown</code> class.</li>
-
- <li>Create some sort of internal "request" object which
- carries enough context to suport deferred method invocation
- such as one might find in the thread-pool approach or
- wherever queuing might occur.</li>
-
- <li>Rethink the entire memory allocation model used by the
- ORB. The current one from SSIIOP may no longer be suitable
- for our purposes.</li>
- </ol>
- </li>
-
- <li>Documentation:
- <ol>
- <li>Update ORB Patterns paper to reflect the latest TAO has to
- offer. Specifically
- <ul>
- <li>sections on the Abstract Factory and Concurrency
- strategies need to be updated, and the entire paper needs to
- be reviewed for accuracy w.r.t the current TAO.</li>
- <li>Metrics must be re-computed.</li>
- <li>Tighten existing discussions.</li>
- <li>Add information on new patterns (such as TSS) which
- have been used since initial work.</li>
- </ul>
-
- <li>Make the section in <a
- href="../../TAO-Install.html"><code>$TAO_ROOT/TAO-Install.html</code></a>
- that documents installation on Unix platforms more complete.</li>
-
- </ol> </li>
-
- <li>Miscellany:
- <ol>
- <LI>Assist in porting higher level services (e.g., <A
- HREF="#eventchannel">Event Channel</A>) to TAO.</LI>
-
- <li>Compile and verify ACE and TAO on Linux using the Kuck and
- Associates, Inc. (KAI) compiler tools.</li>
- <LI>CORBA::TypeCode is causing a memory leak. Since objects
- of this type are rather static in nature, this is
- currently not a big deal. However, it should be fixed
- soon. </LI>
- <LI>CORBA_Exception::Release is not working correctly as the
- memory is never really freed. </LI>
- </ol>
- </li>
-
-
- <li>Potential Optimizations:
- <ol>
- <LI>There is a certain amount of overhead introduced by the
- use of TSS Singletons. TSS singletons are very
- convenient as the variable does not have to be passed
- from function to function. Even though sort of access is
- generally acceptable, the overhead of this approach
- maybe too high when used in code which is executed
- frequently (e.g., during an upcall). This critical code
- may have to be restructured not to use TSS Singletons
- because of the high overhead associated with it. </LI>
- </ol>
- </li>
-
-
-</UL>
-
-</body>
-</html>
diff --git a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/trader.html b/TAO/docs/releasenotes/trader.html
deleted file mode 100644
index a0abc7017b5..00000000000
--- a/TAO/docs/releasenotes/trader.html
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,1069 +0,0 @@
-<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML//EN">
-<html>
-
-<head>
-<title>TAO Trading Service Documentation</title>
-</head>
-
-<body text="#000000" link="#0000FF" vlink="#CC0000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
-
-<hr>
-
-<h1 align="center">TAO Trading Service Documentation</h1>
-
-<hr>
-
-<p>The TAO transient Trading Service implements the COS TradingObject Service
-specification, and&nbsp; conforms to the Linked Trader conformance criteria. This document
-details how to use the TAO Trading Service from the following perspectives:
-
-<ul>
- <li>as an importer bootstrapping to the Trading Service;</li>
- <li>as a service offer exporter;</li>
- <li>as an administrator;</li>
- <li>as an out-of-the-box server process; </li>
- <li>as a collocated object. </li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>In addition, it covers running the Trading Service tests and discusses known bugs and
-workarounds.</p>
-
-<p>This document assumes you are familiar with Trading Service concepts, such as
-&quot;importer,&quot; &quot;exporter&quot;, &quot;service type&quot;, &quot;service
-offer,&quot; and &quot;dynamic property&quot;, as well as the roles of each of the Trading
-Service's interfaces --- <tt>Lookup</tt>, <tt>Register</tt>, <tt>Admin</tt>, and <tt>Link</tt>
-(the TAO implementation doesn't currently support <tt>Proxy</tt>). I recommend reading the
-first two sections of the <a href="ftp://www.omg.org/pub/docs/formal/97-12-23.pdf">Trading
-Service specification</a>. This document has the following layout:
-
-<ol>
- <li><a href="#TheClientRole">The Client Role</a> <ul>
- <li><a href="#BootstrappingtotheTradingService">Bootstrapping to the Trading Service</a> </li>
- <li><a href="#The ImporterRolePerformingaQuery">The Importer Role --- Performing a Query</a><ul>
- <li><a href="#Constraints">Constraints</a></li>
- <li><a href="#Preferences">Preferences</a></li>
- <li><a href="#Policies">Policies</a></li>
- <li><a href="#FilteringProperties">Filtering Properties</a> </li>
- <li><a href="#OfferIterators">Offer Iterators</a></li>
- <li><a href="#PropertyEvaluation">Property Evaluation</a></li>
- </ul>
- </li>
- <li><a href="#TheExporterRole">The Exporter Role --- Registering a Service Type and Offer</a>
- <ul>
- <li><a href="#TheServiceTypeRepository">The Service Type Repository</a> </li>
- <li><a href="#ExportingWithdrawingandModifying">Exporting, Withdrawing, and Modifying
- Service Offers</a> </li>
- <li><a href="#ImplementingDynamicProperties">Implementing Dynamic Properties</a></li>
- </ul>
- </li>
- <li><a href="#TheAdministratorRole">The Administrator Role --- Tweaking Policies and
- Adjusting Links</a></li>
- </ul>
- </li>
- <li><a href="#TheServerRole">The Server Role</a><ul>
- <li><a href="#TheTAOTradingServiceApplication">The TAO <tt>Trading_Service</tt> Application</a></li>
- <li><a href="#ColocatingtheTradingServiceinaTAOApplication">Colocating the Trading Service
- in a TAO Application</a></li>
- </ul>
- </li>
- <li><a href="#RunningtheTradingServiceTests">Running the Trading Service Tests</a></li>
- <li><a href="#KnownBugsandWorkarounds">Known Bugs and Workarounds</a></li>
- <li><a href="#FutureWork">Future Work</a></li>
-</ol>
-
-<hr>
-
-<h1><a name="TheClientRole">The Client Role</a></h1>
-
-<p align="left">There are three categories of operations that a client can perform on a
-Trading Service instance: exporting a service offer to the Trading Service, importing a
-list of Service Offers whose properties satisfy a constraint expression, and attending to
-administrative duties --- tweaking policies or adjusting links. The first order of
-business, of course, is obtaining a reference to a Trading Service instance, assuming that
-instance is not colocated with the client. </p>
-
-<h2 align="left"><a name="BootstrappingtotheTradingService">Bootstrapping to the Trading
-Service</a></h2>
-
-<p align="left">Like with the Naming Service, the ORB will obtain a reference to a Trading
-Service instance's <tt>Lookup</tt> interface when a client invokes the <tt>CORBA::ORB::resolve_initial_references</tt>
-method and passes to it the <tt>ObjectID</tt> &quot;<tt>TradingService</tt>&quot;. The
-following TAO code bootstraps to the Trading Service:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="6">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>TAO_TRY
-{
- TAO_ORB_Manager orb_manager;
- orb_manager.init (argc, argv, TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
- CORBA::ORB_var orb = orb_manager.orb ();
- CORBA::Object_var trading_obj =
- orb-&gt;resolve_initial_references ("TradingService");
- CosTrading::Lookup_var lookup_if =
- CosTrading::Lookup::_narrow (trading_obj.in (), TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-}
-TAO_CATCHANY
-{
- TAO_TRY_ENV.print_exception (&quot;Failed to bootstrap to a trader&quot;);
-}
-TAO_ENDTRY;</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>The first time <tt>resolve_initial_references</tt> is called, the ORB uses a multicast
-protocol to locate an existing trader. The ORB emits a multicast packet containing a field
-identifying the desired service --- Naming or Trading --- and the port number that the
-client is listening on for the response (the IP address can be inferred from the packet).
-When the trader receives the packet and finds that the id contained within matches its
-own, it opens a socket to the client on the designated port, and sends its IOR, which the
-ORB converts to an object reference that it caches. </p>
-
-<p>If the trader IOR is known ahead of time, the string can be passed to the client in the
-environment variable <tt>TradingService</tt>, or by the command line option <tt>-ORBtradingserviceior
-&lt;IOR&gt;</tt>. Likewise, if the multicast port is known ahead of time and differs from
-the default port, the port number can be passed to the client in the environment variable <tt>TradingServicePort</tt>,
-or by the command line option <tt>-ORBtradingserviceport &lt;PORTNUM&gt;</tt>. &nbsp; </p>
-
-<h2><a name="The ImporterRolePerformingaQuery">The Importer Role --- Performing a Query</a></h2>
-
-<p>Once the importer has obtained a reference to a trader's <tt>Lookup</tt> interface, it
-next needs to fire up a query. The query method takes nine parameters (aside from the <tt>CORBA::Environment</tt>):</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>const CosTrading::ServiceTypeName</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">The Trading Service will search Offers belonging to this subtype. If the <tt>exact_type_match</tt>
- policy wasn't explicitly set to false, then offers belonging to subtypes of this type will
- also be searched. </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>const CosTrading::Constraint</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">An expression in the OMG standard constraint language, where each property
- name is a property defined in the Service Type description of the type being searched.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>const CosTrading::Preference</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">An expression in the OMG standard constraint language dictating how offers
- in the <tt>returned_offers</tt> sequence should be ordered.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>const CosTrading::PolicySeq</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">Policies governing the breadth of search and the type of permissible
- offers. A policy is a name/value pair --- a string and an <tt>Any</tt> --- that affect the
- search algorithm. </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>const CosTrading::Lookup::SpecifiedProps</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">A union specifying which properties should be returned in each offer. If
- the descriminator is <tt>CosTrading::Lookup::some</tt>, the union&nbsp; contains the list
- of designated property names. Other options are <tt>all</tt>or <tt>none</tt>. </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>CORBA::ULong how_many</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">The number of offers that should be placed in the returned sequence.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>CosTrading::OfferSeq_out</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">A list of ordered offers whose properties meet the constraints.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>CosTrading::OfferIterator_out</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">Iterator over returned offers in excess of how_many --- unordered.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="39%"><tt>CosTrading::PolicyNameSeq_out</tt></td>
- <td width="61%">A sequence of policy names for policies that limited the search.</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="Constraints">Constraints</a></h3>
-
-<p>A constraint is a string in the OMG standard constraint language (the BNF can be found
-at the end of the specification). The trader iterates over applicable offers, and for each
-offer determines if its properties meet the constraints, replacing property names in the
-string with their values and computing the result. If the constraint evaluates to true,
-the offer is placed in the pool of matched offers. If the constraint string is
-syntactically invalid, contains property names not found in the service type description
-for the listed service type, or has operators with mismatched operand types, the query
-method will throw an <tt>InvalidConstraint</tt> exception. </p>
-
-<p>Operands can be of two types: property names or literals. A property name is an
-unquoted string of alphanumeric characters and underscores that begins with a letter. The
-service type describes the type of a property. A literal is an signed or unsigned integer,
-floating point number --- scientific notation acceptable ---, single-quoted string, or
-boolean --- written TRUE or FALSE. </p>
-
-<p>The constraint language supports the following operations:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="25%">Arithmetic (+, -, *, /)</td>
- <td width="34%"><tt>Disk_Space*1000 - Amount_Used/10</tt></td>
- <td width="41%">Accepts two numeric operands.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="25%">Inequality (&lt;,&gt;,&lt;=,&gt;=)</td>
- <td width="34%"><tt>Amount_Used &lt; Disk_Space</tt></td>
- <td width="41%">Accepts two numeric or two string operands.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="25%">Equality (==, !=)</td>
- <td width="34%"><tt>Amount_Used == Disk_Space</tt></td>
- <td width="41%">Accepts two numeric, two string, or two boolean operands.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="25%">Substring (~)</td>
- <td width="34%"><tt>'.wustl.edu' ~ Domain_Name</tt></td>
- <td width="41%">Accept two string operands. Returns true if the right string contains the
- left.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="25%">Sequence inclusion (in)</td>
- <td width="34%"><tt>'sbw1' in User_Queue</tt></td>
- <td width="41%">Accepts an operand of a primitive CORBA type on the left, and a sequence
- of the same type on the right. Returns true when the sequence contains the value in the
- left operand, false otherwise.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="25%">Property existence (exist)</td>
- <td width="34%"><tt>exist User_Queue</tt></td>
- <td width="41%">Accepts a property name. Returns true if the property is defined in the
- offer.</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="Preferences">Preferences</a></h3>
-
-<p>A preference is a constraint language string that determines the order of offers in the
-returned offer sequence. There are five types of preferences:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><tt>min</tt> &lt;expression&gt;</td>
- <td width="82%">Offers are ordered by ascending expression value. The expression must
- return a number.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><tt>max</tt> &lt;expression&gt; </td>
- <td width="82%">Offers are ordered by descending expression value. The expression must
- return a number. </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><tt>with</tt> &lt;expression&gt;</td>
- <td width="82%">Offers are partitioned into two parts: those offers for which the
- expression returns true are placed in the front, the rest in the back. The expression must
- return a boolean value.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><tt>random</tt></td>
- <td width="82%">Offers in the sequence are shuffled.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><tt>first</tt></td>
- <td width="82%">Offers are placed in the sequence in the order they're evaluated.</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="Policies">Policies</a></h3>
-
-<p>The following import policies are descibed in the specification and supported by the
-TAO Trading Service:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>exact_type_match</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::Boolean</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">True --- Search only considers offers belonging to&nbsp; the given type.<br>
- False --- Search considers offers belonging to the given type or any of its subtypes.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>search_card</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::ULong</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Search ceases after <tt>search_card</tt> number of offers have been
- evaluated.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>match_card</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::ULong</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Search ceases after <tt>search_card</tt> number of offers have been
- matched.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>return_card</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::ULong</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Query returns at most <tt>return_card</tt> number of offers.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>support_dynamic_properties</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::Boolean</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Search considers offers with dynamic properties.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>support_modifiable_properties</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::Boolean</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Search considers offers with not readonly properties.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>starting_trader</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CosTrading::TraderName</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Query is forwarded across all links in the policy, and search begins at
- the final trader.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>hop_count</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CORBA::ULong</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Maximum depth a query should be propagated in the trader federation.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="22%"><tt>link_follow_rule</tt></td>
- <td width="18%"><tt>CosTrading::FollowOption</tt></td>
- <td width="60%">Query propagates to other traders if the <tt>link_follow_rule</tt> permits
- it.</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>The TAO Trading Service comes with a handy utility --- <tt>TAO_Policy_Manager</tt> ---
-for creating a policy sequence to pass to the query method that won't incur any
-exceptions. &nbsp; Use the <tt>TAO_Policy_Manager</tt> in the following way:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>TAO_Policy_Manager policies;
-policies.exact_type_match (CORBA::B_FALSE);
-policies.search_card (16*NUM_OFFERS);
-policies.match_card (16*NUM_OFFERS);
-policies.return_card (16*NUM_OFFERS);
-policies.link_follow_rule (CosTrading::local_only);
-const CosTrading::PolicySeq&amp; policy_seq = policies.policy_seq ();</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="FilteringProperties">Filtering Properties</a></h3>
-
-<p>If the client wants only a subset of the properties defined for a service type returned
-in matching offers, it can specify those property names in the <tt>desired_properties</tt>
-parameter of the query method. Pass the <tt>prop_names</tt> method of <tt>CosTrading::Lookup::SpecifiedProperties</tt>
-a <tt>CosTrading::PropNameSeq</tt>:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>char* props[] = {&quot;Name&quot;, &quot;Description&quot;, &quot;Location&quot;, &quot;Host_Name&quot; };
-CosTrading::Lookup::SpecifiedProps desired_props;
-CosTrading::PropertyNameSeq prop_name_seq (4, 4, props, CORBA::B_FALSE);
-desired_props.prop_names (prop_name_seq);</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="OfferIterators">Offer Iterators</a></h3>
-
-<p>Those offers returned from the query in excess of <tt>how_many</tt> are placed in an
-offer iterator for deferred retrieval. The <tt>CosTrading::OfferIterator::next_n</tt>
-method will allocate a sequence and fill it with either n offers, or if it has fewer than <tt>n</tt>
-offers, the remaining offers. The <tt>next_n</tt> method returns true if the iterator
-contains more offers, and false if it's been depleted. After finishing with the iterator,
-invoke its <tt>destroy</tt> method to release any server-side resources.</p>
-
-<p>The following code is an example of obtaining offers from a <tt>CosTrading::OfferIterator</tt>:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>CORBA::Boolean any_left = CORBA::B_FALSE;
-CORBA::Environment _env;</pre>
- <pre>do
- {
- CosTrading::OfferSeq_ptr iter_offers_ptr;
- CosTrading::OfferSeq_out iter_offers_out (iter_offers_ptr);
-
- any_left = offer_iterator-&gt;next_n (length,
- iter_offers_out,
- _env);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, 0);
-
- CosTrading::OfferSeq_var iter_offers (iter_offers_ptr);
- // Process offers...
-
- } while (any_left);</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="PropertyEvaluation">Property Evaluation</a></h3>
-
-<p>After the client completes a query that used dynamic properties, to review the property
-values of the returned offers, it has to distinguish between <tt>Anys</tt> containing
-static properties and <tt>Anys</tt> containing dynamic property structures. The <tt>TAO_Property_Evaluator</tt>
-class is a handy utility to obtain property values that hides how it evalutes properties
-for the client --- by simple <tt>Any</tt> value extraction for static properties, or by
-calling back to a dynamic property interface. The <tt>TAO_Property_Evaluator</tt> caches
-the value of a dynamic property, and frees the allocated <tt>Anys</tt> during its
-destruction. </p>
-
-<p>The following code demonstrates how to use the <tt>TAO_Property_Evaluator</tt> to dump
-the properties of an offer to the screen. </p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>TAO_Property_Evaluator prop_eval (prop_seq);
-for (int length = prop_seq.length (), k = 0; k &lt; length; k++)
- {
- ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, &quot;%-15s: &quot;, prop_seq[k].name.in ()));
- TAO_TRY
- {
- CORBA::Boolean is_dynamic = prop_eval.is_dynamic_property (k);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
- value = prop_eval.property_value(k, env);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
- if (value != 0)
- CORBA::Any::dump (*value);
- }
- TAO_CATCHANY
- {
- ACE_DEBUG ((LM_DEBUG, &quot;Error retrieving property value.\n&quot;));
- }
- TAO_ENDTRY;
- }</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h2><a name="TheExporterRole">The Exporter Role --- Registering a Service Type and Offer</a></h2>
-
-<p>Before an exporting client can register a new service offer with the Trading Service,
-it needs to ensure first that its service type is present in the service type repository
-of the target trader. The most efficient way to do this is to first invoke the <tt>export</tt>
-method on the <tt>Register</tt> interface, and if it raises an <tt>UnknownServiceType</tt>
-exception, obtain a reference to the Repository, add the Service Type, and attempt the <tt>export</tt>
-a second time. Here's the boilerplate code:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>CORBA::Object_var trading_obj =
- orb_ptr-&gt;resolve_initial_references (&quot;TradingService&quot;);
-CosTrading::Lookup_var lookup_if =
- CosTrading::Lookup::_narrow (trading_obj.in (), _env);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, -1);
-CosTrading::Register_var register_if = lookup_if-&gt;register_if (_env);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, -1);
-CosTrading::TypeRepository_ptr obj = this-&gt;trader_-&gt;type_repos (_env);
-CosTradingRepos::ServiceTypeRepository_var str =
- CosTradingRepos::ServiceTypeRepository::_narrow (obj, _env);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, -1);
-
-TAO_TRY
- {
- // Attempt to export the offer.
- offer_id =
- register_id-&gt;export (object_ref, type, props, TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
- }
-TAO_CATCH (CosTrading::UnknownServiceType, excp)
- {
- // If the ServiceTypeName wasn't found, we'll have to add the
- // type to the Service Type repository ourselves.
- str-&gt;add_type (type,
- object_ref-&gt;_interface_repository_id (),
- prop_struct_seq,
- super_type_name_seq,
- _env);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, 0);
-
- // Now we'll try again to register the offer.
- offer_id = reg-&gt;export (object_ref, type, this-&gt;tprops_, _env);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, 0);
-
- TAO_TRY_ENV.clear ();
- }
-TAO_CATCHANY
- {
- // Sigh, all our efforts were for naught.
- TAO_RETHROW_RETURN (0);
- }
-TAO_ENDTRY;</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="TheServiceTypeRepository">The Service Type Repository</a></h3>
-
-<p>Creating a service type description is simply a matter of filling in two sequences: a <tt>CosTradingRepos::ServiceTypeRepository::PropStructSeq</tt>
-and a <tt>CosTradingRepos::ServiceTypeRepository::ServiceTypeNameSeq</tt>. When filling in
-the <tt>value_type</tt> field, remember to up the reference count of the <tt>TypeCode</tt>,
-since otherwise the <tt>TypeCode_var</tt> will sieze control of the memory and free it.
-Here's a code excerpt taken from <tt>export_test</tt> showing how to build the first
-couple elements of such sequences:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props.length (2);
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].super_types.length (1);
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].super_types[0] =
-TT_Info::INTERFACE_NAMES[TT_Info::REMOTE_IO];
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props[0].name =
-TT_Info::PLOTTER_PROPERTY_NAMES[TT_Info::PLOTTER_NUM_COLORS];
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props[0].value_type =
-CORBA::TypeCode::_duplicate (CORBA::_tc_long);
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props[0].mode =
-CosTradingRepos::ServiceTypeRepository::PROP_NORMAL;
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props[1].name =
-TT_Info::PLOTTER_PROPERTY_NAMES[TT_Info::PLOTTER_AUTO_LOADING];
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props[1].value_type =
-CORBA::TypeCode::_duplicate (CORBA::_tc_boolean);
-this-&gt;type_structs_[TT_Info::PLOTTER].props[1].mode =
-CosTradingRepos::ServiceTypeRepository::PROP_READONLY;</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h3><a name="ExportingWithdrawingandModifying">Exporting, Withdrawing, and Modifying
-Service Offers</a></h3>
-
-<p>Like with adding a Service Type, exporting an offer is just filling in the sequences.
-For offers, of course, property values are passed, so this involves employing the <tt>Any</tt>
-insertion operators. Here's a code exerpt from <tt>export_test</tt>:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>CosTrading::PropertySeq prop_seq (2);
-prop_seq[0].name =
- TT_Info::PLOTTER_PROPERTY_NAMES[TT_Info::PLOTTER_NUM_COLORS];
-prop_seq[0].value &lt;&lt;= ACE_static_cast (CORBA::Long, 256);
-prop_seq[1].name =
- TT_Info::PLOTTER_PROPERTY_NAMES[TT_Info::PLOTTER_AUTO_LOADING];
-prop_seq[1].value &lt;&lt;= CORBA::Any::from_boolean (CORBA::B_TRUE);</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>The <tt>export_test</tt> returns a <tt>CosTrading::OfferId</tt> string, which is
-required to perform the <tt>withdraw</tt> and <tt>modify</tt> operations on the exported
-offer. <tt>withdraw</tt> requires that you simply pass the <tt>OfferId</tt> of the offer
-to be withdrawn, while <tt>modify</tt> takes two additional sequences: a <tt>CosTrading::PropertyNameSeq</tt>
-of property names to be removed from the offer, and a <tt>CosTrading::PropertySeq</tt> of
-offers to be added or changed in the offer. </p>
-
-<h3><a name="ImplementingDynamicProperties">Implementing Dynamic Properties</a></h3>
-
-<p>To export an offer with a dynamic property:
-
-<ul>
- <li>inherit from the <tt>TAO_Dynamic_Property</tt> class and implement its <tt>DP_Eval</tt>
- method; </li>
- <li>create a <tt>CosTradingDynamic::DynamicProperty</tt> structure using the <tt>TAO_Dynamic_Property::construct_dynamic_prop</tt>
- method; </li>
- <li>insert the <tt>CosTradingDynamic::DynamicProperty</tt> in the value field of the
- property. </li>
-</ul>
-
-<p>The following code, taken from the <tt>export_test</tt> example, illustrates this:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>// Step 1: Write the Dynamic Property callback handler.
-class Simple_DP : public TAO_Dynamic_Property
-{
-public:
-
- virtual CORBA::Any* evalDP (const char* name,
- CORBA::TypeCode_ptr returned_type,
- const CORBA::Any&amp; extra_info,
- CORBA::Environment&amp; _env)
- TAO_THROW_SPEC ((CosTradingDynamic::DPEvalFailure));
-};
-
-CORBA::Any*
-Simple_DP::evalDP (const char* name,
- CORBA::TypeCode_ptr returned_type,
- const CORBA::Any&amp; extra_info,
- CORBA::Environment&amp; _env)
- TAO_THROW_SPEC ((CosTradingDynamic::DPEvalFailure))
-{
- CORBA::Any* return_value = 0;
- ACE_NEW_RETURN (return_value, CORBA::Any, 0);
-
- (*return_value) &lt;&lt;= ACE_static_cast (CORBA::ULong, ACE_OS::rand ());
- return return_value;
-}</pre>
- <pre>// Step 2: Create the Dynamic Property
-Simple_DP dp;
-CORBA::Any extra_info;
-CosTrading::PropertySeq prop_seq (1);
-CosTrading::DynamicProp* dp_struct =
- dp.construct_dynamic_prop (&quot;prop_name&quot;,
- CORBA::_tc_ulong,
- extra_info);</pre>
- <pre>// Step 3: Turn over the dynamic property to the propery value Any.
-CORBA::Environment env;
-prop_seq[0].name = &quot;prop_name&quot;;
-prop_seq[0].value.replace (CosTrading::_tc_DynamicProp,
- dp_struct,
- CORBA::B_TRUE,
- env);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (env, -1);</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<h2><a name="TheAdministratorRole">The Administrator Role --- Tweaking Policies and
-Adjusting Links</a></h2>
-
-<p>The trader can be configured remotely through two interfaces: the <tt>Admin</tt>
-interface, for tweaking global policies, enabling and disabling interfaces, and dumping
-the trader contents; and the <tt>Link</tt> interface, for attaching to and detaching from
-other traders. </p>
-
-<p>Adjusting policies is straightforward. Here's an example of setting the <tt>max_search_card</tt>
-policy:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>// lookup_if returned from resolve_initial_references.
-CosTrading::Admin_var admin_if =
- lookup_if-&gt;admin_if (TAO_TRY_ENV);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV;</pre>
- <pre>admin_if-&gt;set_max_match_card (200);</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>Here's an example of using the list_offers method on the Admin interface to remove all
-offers from the Trader:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>TAO_TRY
-{
-CosTrading::OfferIdIterator_ptr offer_id_iter;
-CosTrading::OfferIdSeq_ptr offer_id_seq;
-
-// lookup_if returned from resolve_initial_references.
-CosTrading::Admin_var admin_if =
- lookup_if-&gt;admin_if (TAO_TRY_ENV);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
-CosTrading::Register_var register_if =
- lookup_if-&gt;register_if (TAO_TRY_ENV);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
-admin_if-&gt;list_offers (10,
- CosTrading::OfferIdSeq_out (offer_id_seq),
- CosTrading::OfferIdIterator_out (offer_id_iter),
- TAO_TRY_ENV);
-TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
-if (offer_id_seq != 0)
- {
- CosTrading::OfferIdSeq_var offer_id_seq_var (offer_id_seq);
- for (CORBA::ULong i = 0; i &lt; offer_id_seq_var.length (); i++)
- {
- register_if-&gt;withdraw (offer_id_seq_var[i], TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
- }
- }
-
-if (offer_id_iter != CosTrading::OfferIdIterator::_nil ())
- {
- CORBA::Boolean any_left = CORBA::B_FALSE;
- CosTrading::OfferIdSeq_ptr id_seq = 0;
- CosTrading::OfferIdIterator_var offer_id_iter_var (offer_id_iter);
-
- do
- {
- any_left =
- offer_id_iter-&gt;next_n (length,
- CosTrading::OfferIdSeq_out (id_seq),
- TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
- CORBA::ULong offers = id_seq-&gt;length ();
- for (CORBA::ULong i = 0; i &lt; offers; i++)
- {
- register_if-&gt;withdraw (id_seq[i], TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
- }
-
- delete id_seq;
- }
- while (any_left);
-
- offer_id_iter-&gt;destroy (TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
- }
-}
-TAO_CATCHANY
-{
- // Handle Errors.
-}
-TAO_ENDTRY;</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>Here's an example a trader linking itself to another trader (<tt>this-&gt;trader_</tt>
-is a colocated trader --- see the next section for more information): </p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>TAO_TRY
- {
- CosTrading::Link_var link_if = lookup_if-&gt;link_if (TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
- TAO_Trading_Components_Impl&amp; trd_comp =
- this-&gt;trader_-&gt;trading_components ();
- CosTrading::Lookup_ptr our_lookup = trd_comp.lookup_if ();
- CosTrading::Link_ptr our_link = trd_comp.link_if ();
-
- link_if-&gt;add_link (this-&gt;name_.in (),
- our_lookup,
- CosTrading::always,
- CosTrading::always,
- TAO_TRY_ENV);
- TAO_CHECK_ENV;
-
- our_link-&gt;add_link (&quot;Bootstrap_Trader&quot;,
- lookup_if.in (),
- CosTrading::always,
- CosTrading::always,
- TAO_TRY_ENV);
- }
-TAO_CATCHANY
-{
- // Handle Errors.
-}
-TAO_ENDTRY;</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<hr>
-
-<h1><a name="TheServerRole">The Server Role</a></h1>
-
-<p>The TAO Trading Service comes with an out-of-the-box executable suitable for common
-use. However, it can also easily be colocated with any other TAO server to add Trading
-Service functionality to that server.</p>
-
-<h2><a name="TheTAOTradingServiceApplication">The TAO Trading Service Application</a></h2>
-
-<p>This out-of-the-box server takes a number of command line arguments:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSthreadsafe</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">The Trader will use reader/writer locks to protect the offer database and
- link collection, and normal thread mutexes for the rest of the shared state --- global
- policies, support attributes, and interface accessors. (default is not thread safe; Null
- Mutexes are used)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSconformance</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Determines which conformance category the Trading Service will meet:<br>
- <table border="0" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>query</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Instantiates the <tt>Lookup</tt> interface only</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>simple</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Instantiates the <tt>Lookup</tt> and <tt>Register</tt>
- interfaces</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>standalone</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Instantiates the <tt>Lookup</tt>, <tt>Register</tt>,
- and <tt>Admin</tt> interfaces</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>linked</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Instantiates the <tt>Lookup</tt>, <tt>Register</tt>,
- <tt>Admin</tt>, and <tt>Link</tt> interfaces (default)</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSsupports_dynamic_properties</tt></td>
- <td width="74%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>true</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Will consider offers with dynamic properties in
- queries unless explicitly disabled by a policy passed to the query method. (default)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>false</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Will not consider offers with dynamic properties
- in queries, unless explicitly enabled by a policy passed to the query method.</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSsupports_modifiable_properties</tt></td>
- <td width="74%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>true</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Will consider offers with not explicitly
- modifable properties in queries unless explicitly disabled by a policy passed to the query
- method. Enables the <tt>modify</tt> method on the <tt>Register</tt> interface. (default)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>false</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">Will not consider dynamic properties in queries,
- unless explicitly overridden by a query policy. Diables <tt>modify</tt> method on the <tt>Register</tt>
- interface.</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSdef_search_card</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Search cardinality if none is specified as a query policy. (default is
- 200)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSmax_search_card</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Upper limit on the search cardinality for a query. (default is 500)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSdef_match_card</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Match cardinality if none is specified as a query policy. (default is 200)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSmax_match_card</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Upper limit on the match cardinality for a query. (default is 500)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSdef_return_card</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Return cardinality if none is specified as a query policy. (default is
- 200)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSmax_return_card</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Upper limit on the return cardinality for a query. (default is 500)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSdef_hop_count</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">The depths a federated query may go if no query policy is specified.
- (default 5)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSmax_hop_count</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">The maximum number of links a federated query can travel after it passes
- through this trader. (default is 10) </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSdef_follow_policy</tt></td>
- <td width="74%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>always</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">The trader will always pass a query onto the
- next available linked trader.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>if_no_local</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">The trader will pass a query onto the next
- trader only if the local search produced no results. (default)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>local_only</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">The trader will never pass on a query.</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-TSmax_follow_policy</tt></td>
- <td width="74%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>always</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">The trader doesn't limit the importer to the
- local offer space. (default)</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>if_no_local</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">The trader refuses to pass on queries of the
- local search matched offers.</td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="18%"><ul>
- <li><em>local_only</em></li>
- </ul>
- </td>
- <td width="82%" valign="top" align="left">The trader will never allow federated queries.</td>
- </tr>
- </table>
- </td>
- </tr>
- <tr>
- <td width="26%"><tt>-ORBtradingserviceport</tt></td>
- <td width="74%">Port on which to listen for multicast bootstrap requests.</td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>By default the trader will listen for multicast <tt>resolve_initial_references</tt>
-requests, and respond with the IOR of its <tt>Lookup</tt> inteface. For the purposes of
-testing federated queries, when passed the <tt>-TSfederate</tt> method, instead of
-becoming a bootstrappable server, the <tt>Trading_Service</tt> application will bootstrap
-itself to a multicast trader, link itself to that trader and every other trader accessible
-through that trader. This protocol will have all traders on the multicast network form a
-complete graph. </p>
-
-<h2><a name="ColocatingtheTradingServiceinaTAOApplication">Colocating the Trading Service
-in a TAO Application</a></h2>
-
-<p>Colocating the Trading Service in a TAO application amounts to constructing a <tt>TAO_TRADER</tt>
-object using the <tt>TAO_Trader_Factory::construct_trader</tt> call. The <tt>argc</tt> and
-<tt>argv</tt> parameters to <tt>construct_trader</tt> contain the configuration parameters
-described in the previous section. The trader is also configurable programatically through
-its attribute classes. The follow code exerpt demonstrates this. </p>
-
-<p>In addition the application will need to create a service type repository
-implementation --- TAO's being the <tt>TAO_Service_Type_Repository</tt> --- and configure
-the trader with it. The service type repository is separate from the trader in this way to
-allow, for example, multiple traders to share the same service type repository. The
-following code exerpt also demontrates configuring the repository:</p>
-
-<table border="1" width="100%" cellpadding="3">
- <tr>
- <td width="100%"><pre>TAO_TRADER* trader = TAO_Trader_Factory::create_trader (argc, argv);
-TAO_Support_Attributes_Impl&amp; sup_attr = trader-&gt;support_attributes ();
-TAO_Import_Attributes_Impl&amp; imp_attr = trader-&gt;trading_components ();
-
-// Configure the trader with a service type repository.
-CORBA::Environment _env;
-TAO_Service_Type_Repository type_repos* type_repos = 0;
-ACE_NEW (type_repos, TAO_Service_Type_Repository);
-sup_attr.type_repos (type_repos-&gt;_this (_env));
-TAO_CHECK_ENV_RETURN (_env, -1);</pre>
- <pre>// Configure other policies, overriding the command line arguments.
-imp_attr.search_card (20);
-sup_attr.supports_dynamic_properties (CORBA::B_FALSE);</pre>
- </td>
- </tr>
-</table>
-
-<p>The trader interfaces register themselves with the default POA during the Trading
-Service's construction. All that remains is to activate the POA and enter the ORB event
-loop. </p>
-
-<hr>
-
-<h1><a name="RunningtheTradingServiceTests">Running the Trading Service Tests</a></h1>
-
-<p>There are two executables that test the Trading Service funtionality --- one to test
-the exporter role, and the other, the importer role. To run the tests simply launch the <tt>Trading_Service</tt>
-application, then run the <tt>export_test</tt> executable found in the <tt>orbsvcs/tests/Trading</tt>
-directory. When the <tt>export_test</tt> ceases to output data and enters the event loop,
-run the <tt>import_test</tt> found in the same directory. </p>
-
-<p><strong>Note: </strong>The export_test and the Trading_Service executables are servers
---- the export_test is a server of dynamic properties. Hence, if you run both executables
-on the same machine, you must supply them with different ports. For example, add -ORBport
-0 to the export_test command line.&nbsp; </p>
-
-<p>To test federated queries, run at least three copies of the <tt>Trading_Service</tt>
-application, each using the <tt>-TSfederate</tt> flag. The traders will form a complete
-graph, with each link follow policy set to <tt>CosTrading::always</tt>. When run with the <tt>-f</tt>
-flag, the <tt>export_test</tt> will add the service types and export offers to each of the
-traders in the federation. When run with the <tt>-f</tt> flag, the <tt>import_test </tt>will
-perform a directed query to a trader two links distant from the trader boostrapped to, in
-addition to performing federated queries.&nbsp;&nbsp; </p>
-
-<p>By default the tests dump the contents of service types and offers to the screen so the
-tester can validate the results. To run the tests in quiet mode, where the results of the
-describe and query methods are concealed, use the <tt>-q</tt> flag.</p>
-
-<hr>
-
-<h1><a name="KnownBugsandWorkarounds">Known Bugs and Workarounds</a></h1>
-
-<p>The following is a list of known problems with TAO that adversly affect the Trading
-Service, and the workarounds applied to those problems.</p>
-
-<p><strong>Problem: </strong>TAO has difficulty marshalling and demarshalling object
-references that extend <tt>CORBA::Object</tt> when they occur as a field in a <tt>struct</tt>.
-In the CosTrading IDL file there are two <tt>structs</tt> passed that contain such object
-references: <tt>CosTradingDynamic::DynamicProp</tt> and <tt>CosTrading::Link:LinkInfo</tt>.
-<br>
-<strong>Workaround</strong>: Instead of passing object references in the structs, we pass
-the IORs of those object references, strings. The IDL file and the Trading Service code is
-compiled with the preprocessor flag <tt>TAO_HAS_OBJECT_IN_STRUCT_MARSHAL_BUG</tt>. For
-dynamic properties, as long as the trader clients use the <tt>TAO_Property_Evaluator</tt>
-and <tt>TAO_Dynamic_Property</tt> classes, this workaround will be invisible --- these
-classes hide the use of the <tt>DynamicProp struct</tt>. However, for those applications
-that invoke the <tt>CosTrading::Link::describe_link</tt> method, checking for that flag
-definition will be necessary. Two additional lines of code will suffice--- a call to <tt>CORBA::ORB::string_to_object</tt>,
-and either <tt>CosTrading::Lookup::_narrow</tt> or <tt>CosTrading::Register::_narrow</tt>
-depending on the field of LinkInfo.</p>
-
-<hr>
-
-<h1><a name="FutureWork">Future Work</a></h1>
-
-<ul>
- <li><strong>Persistence</strong> --- Have the Trading Service offer database and service
- type repository survive the lifetime of a single Trading Service process. This would be
- accomplished by either taking advantage of the ability to serialize IDL types --- using
- CDR streams --- or through memory-mapped files, <em>a la </em>the ACE Naming Service.</li>
-</ul>
-
-<ul>
- <li><strong>The <tt>Proxy</tt> Interface </strong>--- Should we ever feel so motivated, we
- might implement the <tt>Proxy</tt> interface.&nbsp; </li>
-</ul>
-
-<hr>
-
-<address>
- <a href="mailto:sbw1@cs.wustl.edu">Seth Benjamin Widoff</a>
-</address>
-<!-- Created: Mon Jun 29 12:26:36 CDT 1998 -->
-<!-- hhmts start -->
-</body>
-</html>