summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/modules/CIAO/docs/static_ciao_contents.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'modules/CIAO/docs/static_ciao_contents.html')
-rwxr-xr-xmodules/CIAO/docs/static_ciao_contents.html359
1 files changed, 359 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/modules/CIAO/docs/static_ciao_contents.html b/modules/CIAO/docs/static_ciao_contents.html
new file mode 100755
index 00000000000..d043e4c0aee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/modules/CIAO/docs/static_ciao_contents.html
@@ -0,0 +1,359 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
+<html>
+<head>
+ <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
+ content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
+ <meta name="Author" content="Venkita Subramonian">
+ <meta name="GENERATOR"
+ content="Mozilla/4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) [Netscape]">
+ <title>CIAO Static Configuration</title>
+ <base target="main"><!-- $Id$ -->
+</head>
+<body>
+<center>
+<h2>CIAO Static Configuration Support for Real-Time Platforms</h2>
+</center>
+<h3>
+<a name="intro"></a>1. Introduction</h3>
+The dynamic packaging, assembly, and deployment mechanisms currently
+available
+in CIAO are useful for application domains where component metadata is
+less likely to be known a priori, where implementation upgrades may
+need
+to be performed on-line, and where platform features like loading and
+unloading
+dynamic libraries are both available and useful.&nbsp; Furthermore, the
+new CCM Deployment and Configuration specification describes a wider
+range
+of configuration capabilities, opening up the question of alternative
+component
+configuration strategies more generally and requiring that any solution
+we devise can be migrated to that new configuration approach.
+<p>Therefore, we have incorporated support for component configuration
+in CIAO on platforms like VxWorks, as a set of optional strategies and
+optimizations to the existing CIAO configuration capabilities.&nbsp; By
+supporting both dynamic and static styles of configuration in CIAO, we
+will both (1) be able to realize our short term goals in making CIAO
+available
+on VxWorks for use in the Boeing PCES/MoBIES OEP, and (2) set a
+precedent
+for availability of static configuration capabilities more generally,
+so
+that DRE systems are well-supported within the new Deployment and
+Configuration
+specification implementation for CIAO as well.
+</p>
+<p>The fundamental intuition in understanding our approach is that in
+DRE
+systems the stages of the overall system lifecycle are similar to those
+in more dynamic conventional component-oriented client-server
+applications.&nbsp;
+However, in DRE systems several phases of the system lifecycle are
+compressed
+into the compile-time and system-initialization phases, so that (1) for
+testing and verification purposes the set of components in an
+application
+can be identified and analyzed before run-time, and (2) overheads for
+run-time
+operation following initialization are reduced and made more
+predictable.
+Furthermore, due to the nuances of the platforms traditionally used for
+deploying DRE systems, not all features of conventional platforms are
+available.
+Our approach therefore avoids certain mechanisms that are either
+unavailable
+or too costly in terms of performance.
+</p>
+<p>We follow these intuitions in our approach, taking the existing
+configuration
+phases in CIAO and pushing several of them earlier in the configuration
+lifecycle.&nbsp; We ensure that our approach can be realized in the
+context
+of the platforms on which the Boeing PCES/MoBIES OEP will be deployed,
+notably VxWorks, by re-factoring the configuration mechanisms and
+retargeting
+them to use only the services available on the target real-time
+platforms.
+<br>
+&nbsp;
+</p>
+<h3><a name="currentarch"></a>2. Current CIAO Configuration Architecture</h3>
+<center>
+<p><br>
+<img src="imgs/ciao-dynamic1.jpg" height="462" width="774"></p>
+<p><b>Figure 1. Current configuration process in CIAO</b></p>
+</center>
+<p>The first stage of the CIAO system lifecycle occurs off-line, when
+component
+package (.csd) and assembly (.cad) files are generated by a modeling
+tool
+or other prior stage of the tool chain.&nbsp; These files contain an
+abstract
+specification of the configuration that is to be achieved by CIAO in
+each
+particular deployment environment .
+</p>
+<p>CIAO interprets these .csd and .cad files, and creates and
+configures
+the components, their run-time server environments, and QoS properties
+within the supporting ORB and other related infrastructure.&nbsp;
+Currently,
+CIAO runs several daemon processes for each deployment environment: one
+or more Component Installation / Server Activation (CISA) daemons on
+each
+machine where components can be deployed, an additional Assembly
+Manager
+daemon and an Assembly Deployer process used by the system developer.
+</p>
+<p>The Assembly Manager stores an internal table with the target
+platform
+availability information .&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The Assembly Deployer
+tells
+the Assembly Manager which assemblies of components (each assembly is
+defined
+in a separate .cad file) should be deployed on which target
+machines.&nbsp;
+The Assembly Manager parses the XML structures in the .cad file, and
+generates
+its own internal data structure (<b>Figure 2</b>) as an intermediate
+representation
+of that assembly.
+</p>
+<p>The Assembly Manager then traverses (<b>Figure 2</b>) this
+intermediate
+representation, instructing each CISA daemon to install and configure
+specific
+component servers and containers, to create specific homes, and to
+instantiate
+specific component instances.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Each CISA daemon has
+additional
+information about the component implementations available on that
+endsystem
+&#8211; each component UUID is mapped to a disk path for the .dll or .so file
+within which a factory method for its home factory is defined.
+</p>
+<center>
+<p><img src="imgs/ciao-dynamic2.jpg" height="384" width="699"></p>
+<p><b>Figure 2. Intermediate representation of configuration information</b></p>
+</center>
+<p>The following steps are optional, and will only be performed if they
+are explicitly specified in the assembly definition itself.&nbsp; For
+the
+sake of discussion, we consider the case where all the steps are in
+fact
+specified.&nbsp; The Assembly Manager will tell the CISA daemon the
+UUIDs
+of the components to be installed in that component server, and the
+CISA
+daemon will look up and load the appropriate dynamic library, invoke
+the
+home factory method to create the home, and then invoke the home&#8217;s
+component
+creation method.&nbsp; After all the component instances and homes have
+been created and references to them have been obtained, the assembly
+manager
+will then make all the connections between ports and receptacles,
+facets,
+and event sources and sinks by invoking connect and subscribe methods
+on
+the receiving end component.
+</p>
+<p>QoS-specific metadata like priorities can be configured by a .cad
+file
+extension called a real-time descriptor (.rtcad) file.&nbsp; The
+Assembly
+Manager will read the .rtcad file and will parse and associate
+real-time
+policies with the appropriate component instances.&nbsp;&nbsp; One
+implication
+of this mechanism is that the Assembly Manager will maintain QoS
+meta-data
+within its intermediate representation, alongside the conventional CCM
+meta-data.
+</p>
+<p>Furthermore, when the Assembly Manager interacts with the CISA
+daemon(s)
+on each endsystem, commands to configure particular component and
+component
+server run-time infrastructure QoS properties are passed from the
+Assembly
+Manager to the CISA daemon.&nbsp; The ORB (and as a future extension
+the
+ORB Services) of the endsystem on which the components are installed is
+currently configured via the ACE Service Configurator.&nbsp; The CISA
+daemon
+maps different service configurations (as defined in particular
+svc.conf
+files) to logical names used in the component assembly descriptors.
+</p>
+<p>The logical configuration names are encoded within the .cad file as
+an extension of the conventional .cad file format using the &#8220;extension&#8221;
+element of the existing .cad file XML DTD.&nbsp; The Assembly Manager
+passes
+a component server creation command, containing a logical configuration
+name, which the CISA daemon maps to a particular svc.conf file when it
+creates a new component server.&nbsp; The CISA daemon adds a command
+line
+flag to the execution command line used to spawn the new component
+server,
+which causes that configuration file to be parsed and applied during
+startup
+of the component server itself.
+</p>
+<h3><a name="staticapproach"></a>3. Static Configuration Approach</h3>
+In the static configuration approach (<b>Figure 3</b>),
+configurations&nbsp;
+XML files are translated in a code generation step just before compile
+time (managed by the same project/Makefile processes that do the
+compilation)
+into C++ header and source files that are then compiled and linked with
+the main application.
+<center>
+<p><img src="imgs/ciao-static1.jpg" height="523" width="800"></p>
+<p><b>Figure 3. Static Configuration in CIAO</b></p>
+</center>
+<p>First, one of the generated files is a C++ header file, so that it
+can
+be included directly by C++ source files.&nbsp; There is no additional
+parsing required to import a number of static constants and identifiers
+it declares and defines, so that those constants end up being compiled
+directly into C++ code.&nbsp; Second, where enumeration of information
+is needed, the header file contains simple homogeneous C++ arrays so
+that
+C++ source code can iterate over those arrays with minimal
+overhead.&nbsp;
+Third, it declares information so that later information depends on
+earlier
+information (<b>Figure 4</b>), and the components are directly
+configured
+within that header file.
+</p>
+<center>
+<p><img src="imgs/ciao-static2.jpg" height="476" width="816"></p>
+<p><b>Figure 4. All XML files are parsed offline and stored as
+cross-referenced
+tables in Static_Assembly_Config.h</b></p>
+</center>
+<p>The major issues that we addressed in developing a re-factored
+version
+of the CIAO configuration mechanisms are as follows:
+</p>
+<p>1. XML parsing is too expensive to be performed during system
+initialization,
+so that all such parsing has been moved off-line to before
+compile-time,
+and the resulting information is linked statically into the application
+itself.
+</p>
+<p>2. Each endsystem boots and initializes in a single process address
+space, so that any remaining inter-process communication between
+daemons
+is replaced by direct interactions between objects, or at most between
+threads.
+</p>
+<p>3. Dynamic link libraries are unavailable on VxWorks, so an
+alternative
+mechanism for obtaining the home factory method entry point is needed.
+We gather this information from the XML files and statically generate a
+map containing&nbsp; the entry point function names and the entry point
+function pointers. This information will be used by the CIAO container
+implementation instead of trying to load a dll and then finding the
+entry
+point in the dll.
+</p>
+<h4>Moving XML Parsing Earlier</h4>
+We first focused on taking the XML parsing stage off-line.&nbsp; Since
+the time required to do this by CIAO is currently reasonable as an
+off-line
+activity, we simply created (<b>Figure 4</b>) a stripped-down version
+of
+the Assembly Manager (reusing the existing class libraries the Assembly
+Manager uses) that after it performs the XML parsing and generation of
+its intermediate representation, emits a C++ header file containing
+that
+intermediate representation.
+<h4>Combining Configuration Daemons at Run-Time</h4>
+The intermediate representation is included in a configuration engine
+(CIAO::Static_Configurator)
+that consists of a simple reader for the intermediate representation,
+again
+derived from the code currently used in the Assembly Manager, which
+will
+dispatch to the configuration code used by the CISA daemons in the
+dynamic
+case.&nbsp; The configuration engine will be invoked from the
+application&#8217;s
+main entry point prior to starting execution of the application itself.
+<h4>Eliminating Dynamic Library Loading</h4>
+All code will need to be known a priori, and linked statically into the
+application.&nbsp; If alternative configurations must be supported
+statically,
+then those separate configurations can be alternative selections chosen
+during the build process.&nbsp; If alternative configurations must be
+selected
+adaptively at run-time then all the code for each possible
+configuration
+must be linked in statically, and appropriate mechanisms used to
+re-target
+a logical name dynamically to each particular configuration (e.g.,
+different
+configurations for different system modes).
+<br>
+&nbsp;
+<br>
+&nbsp;
+<br>
+<br>
+<center>
+<p><img src="imgs/ciao-static-vs-dynamic.jpg" height="384" width="735"><br>
+<b>Figure 5. CIAO Dynamic vs Static Configuration</b></p>
+</center>
+<h3>
+<a name="status"></a><b>4. Status of CIAO Static Configuration</b></h3>
+The initial version of the CIAO static configurator is available under
+$CIAO_ROOT/tools/static_configurator.
+<p>To run the static configurator,
+</p>
+<p><b><tt>Static_Assembly_Parser -a &lt;.cad file&gt;</tt></b>
+</p>
+<p>This will generate three files -
+</p>
+<p><b><tt>Static_CCM_App.cpp</tt></b> - this file contains the main
+program
+which instantiates the component server and invokes the static
+configuration
+engine to create containers, homes, etc.
+</p>
+<p><b><tt>Static_CCM_App.mpc</tt></b> - this file contains the
+necessary
+files for building the static application. You have to manually change
+this file so as to include files that are not known to the static
+configurator.
+</p>
+<p><b><tt>Static_Assembly_Config.h</tt></b> - this file contains the
+C++
+intermediate representation of all the information in the .cad, .csd
+and
+.ssd XML files.
+</p>
+<p><a name="Example"></a><b>Example</b> - An <a
+ href="static_config_example.html">example</a>
+run is shown using the <a href="../examples/OEP/BasicSP">BasicSP</a>
+scenario.
+</p>
+<h3><a name="futurework"></a><b>5. Future work</b></h3>
+<p>The current implementation does not have support for multiple
+component
+servers running on multiple processors. Multiprocessor scenario
+involves
+coordination and synchronization among the component servers running on
+different processors. There has to be some kind of a mediator which
+determines
+that all components are instantiated before connections can be made
+among
+them.<br>
+<br>
+&nbsp;
+</p>
+</body>
+</html>