From 71adda65f010e3d13681b972a127fce991dfae20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: levine Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 19:33:30 +0000 Subject: cleaned up comments --- ace/Malloc.cpp | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'ace/Malloc.cpp') diff --git a/ace/Malloc.cpp b/ace/Malloc.cpp index cd85f0a9061..9f630abac94 100644 --- a/ace/Malloc.cpp +++ b/ace/Malloc.cpp @@ -77,17 +77,17 @@ ACE_Allocator::instance (void) // Have a seat. We want to avoid ever having to delete the // ACE_Allocator instance, to avoid shutdown order // dependencies. ACE_New_Allocator never needs to be - // destroyed: it's destructor is empty and its instance + // destroyed: its destructor is empty and its instance // doesn't have any state. Therefore, sizeof // ACE_New_Allocator is equal to sizeof void *. It's // instance just contains a pointer to its virtual function // table. // - // So, we allocation space for the ACE_New_Allocator - // instance in the data segment. Because its size is the - // same as that of a pointer, we allocate it as a pointer so - // that it doesn't get constructed statically. We never - // bother to destroy it. + // So, we allocate space for the ACE_New_Allocator instance + // in the data segment. Because its size is the same as + // that of a pointer, we allocate it as a pointer so that it + // doesn't get constructed statically. We never bother to + // destroy it. static void *allocator_instance = 0; // Check this critical assumption . . . -- cgit v1.2.1