1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
|
// file : CCF/CIDL/SemanticAction/Impl/Factory.cpp
// author : Boris Kolpackov <boris@dre.vanderbilt.edu>
// cvs-id : $Id$
#include "CCF/IDL2/SemanticGraph/Elements.hpp"
#include "CCF/IDL2/SemanticGraph/Module.hpp"
#include "CCF/IDL2/SemanticGraph/Interface.hpp"
#include "CCF/CIDL/SemanticAction/Impl/Factory.hpp"
namespace CCF
{
namespace CIDL
{
namespace SemanticAction
{
namespace Impl
{
using namespace SemanticGraph;
Factory::
~Factory () throw ()
{
}
Factory::
Factory (CompilerElements::Context& context,
Diagnostic::Stream& dout,
SemanticGraph::TranslationUnit& tu)
: IDL2::SemanticAction::Impl::Factory (context, dout, tu),
IDL3::SemanticAction::Impl::Factory (context, dout, tu),
composition_ (ctx_),
home_executor_ (ctx_)
{
//@@ I am still not sure what is the right way to do this.
// Current approach suppresses Components.idl inclusion
// and implicitly defines necessary types.
//
//@@ this region is inserted after principal which is
// somewhat strange. It doesn't affect anything as
// long as no code is generated for this region.
//
// Implied translation region with CCM-related types.
//
TranslationRegion& ctr (tu.new_node<TranslationRegion> ());
tu.new_edge<ContainsImplied> (tu, ctr, ".components");
Root& cr (tu.new_node<Root> ());
tu.new_edge<ContainsRoot> (ctr, cr);
Module& cm (tu.new_node<Module> ());
tu.new_edge<Defines> (cr, cm, "Components");
tu.new_edge<Defines> (
cm, tu.new_node<LocalInterface> (), "EnterpriseComponent");
}
}
}
}
}
|
