1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
|
// This may look like C, but it's really -*- C++ -*-
// $Id$
// ============================================================================
//
// = LIBRARY
//
// = FILENAME
//
// = DESCRIPTION
//
// = AUTHOR
//
// ============================================================================
#include "tao/IIOP_Acceptor.h"
#include "tao/IIOP_Profile.h"
#include "tao/ORB_Core.h"
#include "tao/Server_Strategy_Factory.h"
#include "tao/GIOP.h"
TAO_IIOP_Acceptor::TAO_IIOP_Acceptor (void)
: TAO_Acceptor (TAO_IOP_TAG_INTERNET_IOP),
base_acceptor_ ()
{
}
// @@ Fred&Ossama: Maybe not for the current round of changes, but
// shouldn't the acceptor know which version to create?
// And isn't this the right place to setup the tagged components of
// a v1.[12] profile?
// @@ Fred&Ossama: We need to check this interface: a single
// TAO_Acceptor may be bound to multiple addresses (think of a
// multihomed machine with an acceptor listening on the wildcard
// address), hence the "Right Thing" seems to be that we pass an
// MProfile that is filled up by the TAO_Acceptor class.
TAO_Profile *
TAO_IIOP_Acceptor::create_profile (TAO_ObjectKey &object_key)
{
ACE_INET_Addr new_address;
if (base_acceptor_.acceptor ().get_local_addr (new_address) == -1)
return 0;
return new TAO_IIOP_Profile (new_address, object_key);
}
int
TAO_IIOP_Acceptor::is_collocated (const TAO_Profile* pfile)
{
const TAO_IIOP_Profile *profile =
ACE_dynamic_cast(const TAO_IIOP_Profile*, pfile);
// @@ We should probably cache this value, but then again some
// acceptors have multiple addresses.
// @@ Fred: any ideas on how to optimize that?
ACE_INET_Addr address;
if (this->base_acceptor_.acceptor ().get_local_addr (address) == -1)
return 0;
// @@ Osssama: can you verify that this operator does the right thing?
return profile->object_addr () == address;
}
ACE_Event_Handler *
TAO_IIOP_Acceptor::acceptor (void)
{
return &base_acceptor_;
}
int
TAO_IIOP_Acceptor::open (TAO_ORB_Core *orb_core,
ACE_CString &address)
{
ACE_INET_Addr addr (address.c_str ());
if (this->base_acceptor_.open (
// orb_core->orb_params ()->addr (),
addr,
orb_core->reactor(),
orb_core->server_factory ()->creation_strategy (),
orb_core->server_factory ()->accept_strategy (),
orb_core->server_factory ()->concurrency_strategy (),
orb_core->server_factory ()->scheduling_strategy ()) == -1)
return -1;
else {
// The following step is necessary since the user may have specified
// a 0 for a port number. Once we open the acceptor, we can recheck
// the address and get the accurate port number.
ACE_INET_Addr new_address;
if (base_acceptor_.acceptor ().get_local_addr (new_address) == -1)
return -1;
// @@ Fred&Ossama: Does this call make any sense now? There is
// no such thing as the ORB address anymore, right? And if
// this is removed then this whole branch of the if()
// statement is a noop.
// Reset the address
orb_core->orb_params ()->addr (new_address);
// iiop_acceptor->acceptor ().enable (ACE_CLOEXEC);
// this is done in the connection handlers open method.
// @@ This is broken. The acceptor registry must be able to
// determine if a given profile refers to a collocated object.
// for now, this is done using a hash table and the INET_Addr
// as the key. This poa is the value I believe fredk.
// this->orb_core->add_to_collocation_table ();
}
return 0;
}
|