From df924cd9c5dd5ab079784faec344cdfd11f3147a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Arun Raghavan Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:30:14 +0530 Subject: control: Use strcpy() instead of stpcpy() This allows us to build in environments that don't provide stpcpy(). This makes it necessary to traverse the string twice, but should not be noticeable in clients since this function is very unlikely to be part of a performance-critical path. [coding style fixed by tiwai] Signed-off-by: Arun Raghavan Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai --- src/control/control.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/control/control.c b/src/control/control.c index a0965c6c..66277efe 100644 --- a/src/control/control.c +++ b/src/control/control.c @@ -417,8 +417,10 @@ int snd_ctl_elem_add_enumerated(snd_ctl_t *ctl, const snd_ctl_elem_id_t *id, info->value.enumerated.names_ptr = (uintptr_t)buf; info->value.enumerated.names_length = bytes; p = buf; - for (i = 0; i < items; ++i) - p = stpcpy(p, names[i]) + 1; + for (i = 0; i < items; ++i) { + strcpy(p, names[i]); + p += strlen(names[i]) + 1; + } err = ctl->ops->element_add(ctl, info); -- cgit v1.2.1