diff options
author | (no author) <(no author)@unknown> | 1997-07-22 08:51:02 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | (no author) <(no author)@unknown> | 1997-07-22 08:51:02 +0000 |
commit | ea4c2201559f7ba0c3d0c1770362f7226030e09a (patch) | |
tree | 2a5116e0b581544c13e6c9c2ab6850e5e68ac498 | |
parent | 57d2bef7296b2b25c6aaf252dccfdd028fb41e98 (diff) | |
download | httpd-ea4c2201559f7ba0c3d0c1770362f7226030e09a.tar.gz |
This commit was manufactured by cvs2svn to create branch 'APACHE_1_2_X'.
git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/1.3@78740 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
-rw-r--r-- | APACHE_1_2_X/htdocs/manual/misc/known_client_problems.html | 200 |
1 files changed, 200 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/APACHE_1_2_X/htdocs/manual/misc/known_client_problems.html b/APACHE_1_2_X/htdocs/manual/misc/known_client_problems.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..7da780013a --- /dev/null +++ b/APACHE_1_2_X/htdocs/manual/misc/known_client_problems.html @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN"> +<HTML> +<HEAD> +<TITLE>Apache HTTP Server Project</TITLE> +</HEAD> + +<!-- Background white, links blue (unvisited), navy (visited), red (active) --> +<BODY + BGCOLOR="#FFFFFF" + TEXT="#000000" + LINK="#0000FF" + VLINK="#000080" + ALINK="#FF0000" +> +<!--#include virtual="header.html" --> +<H1 ALIGN="CENTER">Known Problems in Clients</H1> + +<p>Over time the Apache Group has discovered or been notified of problems +with various clients which we have had to work around. This document +describes these problems and the workarounds available. It's not arranged +in any particular order. Some familiarity with the standards is assumed, +but not necessary. + +<p>For brevity, <i>Navigator</i> will refer to Netscape's Navigator +product, and <i>MSIE</i> will refer to Microsoft's Internet Explorer +product. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective +companies. We welcome input from the various client authors to correct +inconsistencies in this paper, or to provide us with exact version +numbers where things are broken/fixed. + +<p>For reference, +<a href="ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc1945.txt">RFC1945</a> +defines HTTP/1.0, and +<a href="ftp://ds.internic.net/rfc/rfc2068.txt">RFC2068</a> +defines HTTP/1.1. Apache as of version 1.2 is an HTTP/1.1 server (with an +optional HTTP/1.0 proxy). + +<p>Various of these workarounds are triggered by environment variables. +The admin typically controls which are set, and for which clients, by using +<a href="../mod/mod_browser.html">mod_browser</a>. Unless otherwise +noted all of these workarounds exist in versions 1.2 and later. + +<a name="trailing-crlf"><H3>Trailing CRLF on POSTs</H3></a> + +<p>This is a legacy issue. The CERN webserver required <code>POST</code> +data to have an extra <code>CRLF</code> following it. Thus many +clients send an extra <code>CRLF</code> that +is not included in the <code>Content-Length</code> of the request. +Apache works around this problem by eating any empty lines which +appear before a request. + +<a name="broken-keepalive"><h3>Broken keepalive</h3></a> + +<p>Various clients have had broken implementations of <i>keepalive</i> +(persistent connections). In particular the Windows versions of +Navigator 2.0 get very confused when the server times out an +idle connection. The workaround is present in the default config files: +<blockquote><code> +BrowserMatch Mozilla/2 nokeepalive +</code></blockquote> +Note that this matches some earlier versions of MSIE, which began the +practice of calling themselves <i>Mozilla</i> in their user-agent +strings just like Navigator. + +<p>MSIE 4.0b2, which claims to support HTTP/1.1, does not properly +support keepalive when it is used on 301 or 302 (redirect) +responses. Unfortunately Apache's <code>nokeepalive</code> code +prior to 1.2.2 would not work with HTTP/1.1 clients. You must apply +<a href="http://www.apache.org/dist/patches/apply_to_1.2.1/msie_4_0b2_fixes.patch">this +patch</a> to version 1.2.1. Then add this to your config: +<blockquote><code> +BrowserMatch "MSIE 4\.0b2;" nokeepalive +</code></blockquote> + +<a name="force-response-1.0"><h3>Incorrect interpretation of <code>HTTP/1.1</code> in response</h3></a> + +<p>To quote from section 3.1 of RFC1945: +<blockquote> +HTTP uses a "<major>.<minor>" numbering scheme to indicate versions +of the protocol. The protocol versioning policy is intended to allow +the sender to indicate the format of a message and its capacity for +understanding further HTTP communication, rather than the features +obtained via that communication. +</blockquote> +Since Apache is an HTTP/1.1 server, it indicates so as part of its +response. Many client authors mistakenly treat this part of the response +as an indication of the protocol that the response is in, and then refuse +to accept the response. + +<p>The first major indication of this problem was with AOL's proxy servers. +When Apache 1.2 went into beta it was the first wide-spread HTTP/1.1 +server. After some discussion, AOL fixed their proxies. In +anticipation of similar problems, the <code>force-response-1.0</code> +environment variable was added to Apache. When present Apache will +indicate "HTTP/1.0" in response to an HTTP/1.0 client, +but will not in any other way change the response. + +<p>The pre-1.1 Java Development Kit (JDK) that is used in many clients +(including Navigator 3.x and MSIE 3.x) exhibits this problem. As do some +of the early pre-releases of the 1.1 JDK. We think it is fixed in the +1.1 JDK release. In any event the workaround: +<blockquote><code> +BrowserMatch Java1.0 force-response-1.0 <br> +BrowserMatch JDK/1.0 force-response-1.0 +</code></blockquote> + +<p>RealPlayer 4.0 from Progressive Networks also exhibits this problem. +However they have fixed it in version 4.01 of the player, but version +4.01 uses the same <code>User-Agent</code> as version 4.0. The +workaround is still: +<blockquote><code> +BrowserMatch "RealPlayer 4.0" force-response-1.0 +</code></blockquote> + +<a name="msie4.0b2"><h3>Requests use HTTP/1.1 but responses must be in HTTP/1.0</h3></a> + +<p>MSIE 4.0b2 has this problem. Its Java VM makes requests in HTTP/1.1 +format but the responses must be in HTTP/1.0 format (in particular, it +does not understand <i>chunked</i> responses). The workaround +is to fool Apache into believing the request came in HTTP/1.0 format. +<blockquote><code> +BrowserMatch "MSIE 4\.0b2;" downgrade-1.0 force-response-1.0 +</code></blockquote> +This workaround is available in 1.2.2, and in a +<a href="http://www.apache.org/dist/patches/apply_to_1.2.1/msie_4_0b2_fixes.patch">patch +</a> against 1.2.1. + +<a name="257th-byte"><h3>Boundary problems with header parsing</h3></a> + +<p>All versions of Navigator from 2.0 through 4.0b2 (and possibly later) +have a problem if the trailing CRLF of the response header starts at +the 256th or 257th byte of the response. A BrowserMatch for this would +match on nearly every hit, so the workaround is enabled automatically +on all responses. The workaround is to detect when this condition would +occur in a response and add extra padding to the header to push the +trailing CRLF past the 257th byte of the response. + +<a name="boundary-string"><h3>Multipart responses and Quoted Boundary Strings</h3></a> + +<p>On multipart responses some clients will not accept quotes (") +around the boundary string. The MIME standard recommends that +such quotes be used. But the clients were probably written based +on one of the examples in RFC2068, which does not include quotes. +Apache does not include quotes on its boundary strings to workaround +this problem. + +<a name="byterange-requests"><h3>Byterange requests</h3></a> + +<p>A byterange request is used when the client wishes to retrieve a +portion of an object, not necessarily the entire object. There +was a very old draft which included these byteranges in the URL. +Old clients such as Navigator 2.0b1 and MSIE 3.0 for the MAC +exhibit this behaviour, and +it will appear in the servers' access logs as (failed) attempts to +retrieve a URL with a trailing ";xxx-yyy". Apache does not attempt +to implement this at all. + +<p>A subsequent draft of this standard defines a header +<code>Request-Range</code>, and a response type +<code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. The HTTP/1.1 standard includes +this draft with a few fixes, and it defines the header +<code>Range</code> and type <code>multipart/byteranges</code>. + +<p>Navigator (versions 2 and 3) sends both <code>Range</code> and +<code>Request-Range</code> headers (with the same value), but does not +accept a <code>multipart/byteranges</code> response. The response must +be <code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. As a workaround, if Apache +receives a <code>Request-Range</code> header it considers it "higher +priority" than a <code>Range</code> header and in response uses +<code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. + +<p>The Adobe Acrobat Reader plugin makes extensive use of byteranges and +prior to version 3.01 supports only the <code>multipart/x-byterange</code> +response. Unfortunately there is no clue that it is the plugin +making the request. If the plugin is used with Navigator, the above +workaround works fine. But if the plugin is used with MSIE 3 (on +Windows) the workaround won't work because MSIE 3 doesn't give the +<code>Range-Request</code> clue that Navigator does. To workaround this, +Apache special cases "MSIE 3" in the <code>User-Agent</code> and serves +<code>multipart/x-byteranges</code>. Note that the necessity for this +with MSIE 3 is actually due to the Acrobat plugin, not due to the browser. + +<p>Netscape Communicator appears to not issue the non-standard +<code>Request-Range</code> header. When an Acrobat plugin prior to +version 3.01 is used with it, it will not properly understand byteranges. +The user must upgrade their Acrobat reader to 3.01. + +<a name="cookie-merge"><h3><code>Set-Cookie</code> header is unmergeable</h3></a> + +<p>The HTTP specifications say that it is legal to merge headers with +duplicate names into one (separated by semicolon). Some browsers +that support Cookies don't like merged headers and prefer that each +<code>Set-Cookie</code> header is sent separately. When parsing the +headers returned by a CGI, Apache will explicitly avoid merging any +<code>Set-Cookie</code> headers. + +<!--#include virtual="footer.html" --> +</BODY> +</HTML> + |