From b1cfbbc7ea0302bd2f53b69dc067c069d87bd78b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rich Bowen Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:02:55 +0000 Subject: Replace 'CVS' with 'svn', as per bug 50973 git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk@1085494 13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68 --- ABOUT_APACHE | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'ABOUT_APACHE') diff --git a/ABOUT_APACHE b/ABOUT_APACHE index f1a193cb3b..229661e6c3 100644 --- a/ABOUT_APACHE +++ b/ABOUT_APACHE @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ The Apache project is a meritocracy -- the more work you have done, the more you are allowed to do. The group founders set the original rules, but they can be changed by vote of the active members. There is a group of people who have logins on our server (apache.org) and access to the -CVS repository. Everyone has access to the CVS snapshots. Changes to +svn repository. Everyone has access to the svn snapshots. Changes to the code are proposed on the mailing list and usually voted on by active members -- three +1 (yes votes) and no -1 (no votes, or vetoes) are needed to commit a code change during a release cycle; docs are usually committed @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ in the web server community, release dates, etc. The actual code development takes place on the developers' local machines, with proposed changes communicated using a patch (output of a unified "diff -u oldfile newfile" command), and committed to the source repository by one of the core -developers using remote CVS. Anyone on the mailing list can vote on a +developers using remote svn. Anyone on the mailing list can vote on a particular issue, but we only count those made by active members or people who are known to be experts on that part of the server. Vetoes must be accompanied by a convincing explanation. -- cgit v1.2.1