diff options
| author | Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> | 2012-01-03 09:06:09 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> | 2012-01-03 22:21:33 +0100 |
| commit | 4e4dae500390d2ace681e4e4bc4c590ecdca38c6 (patch) | |
| tree | 967a1158ab19697bf5b72ea1d8e394300fa6deda /automake.in | |
| parent | 971000c121b9b79b787435f1eaaa76caa37986ee (diff) | |
| download | automake-4e4dae500390d2ace681e4e4bc4c590ecdca38c6.tar.gz | |
install: pkglibexec_SCRIPTS is a valid prefix/primary combination
It makes little sense for `libexec_SCRIPTS' to be accepted as valid
while `pkglibexec_SCRIPTS' is not. So fix this inconsistency by
explicitly allowing `pkglibexec_SCRIPTS' as well. It is worth
noting that the inconsistency has been there for a long time,
but only the quite recent commit `v1.11-373-g9ca6326' "Warnings
about primary/prefix mismatch fixed and extended" has made it
noisy enough to be noticed.
* automake.in (handle_scripts): Also list `pkglibexec' among the
prefixes valid for the `SCRIPTS' primary.
* doc/automake.texi (Scripts): Likewise.
* tests/primary-prefix-valid-couples.test: Update.
* THANKS: Likewise.
* NEWS: Likewise.
Reported by Dennis Schridde on the automake list:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2012-01/msg00002.html>
Diffstat (limited to 'automake.in')
| -rw-r--r-- | automake.in | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/automake.in b/automake.in index a852195d0..a689b639d 100644 --- a/automake.in +++ b/automake.in @@ -3091,7 +3091,7 @@ sub handle_scripts # useful to sometimes distribute scripts verbatim. This happens # e.g. in Automake itself. &am_install_var ('-candist', 'scripts', 'SCRIPTS', - 'bin', 'sbin', 'libexec', 'pkgdata', + 'bin', 'sbin', 'libexec', 'pkglibexec', 'pkgdata', 'noinst', 'check'); } |