diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'PLANS/texi')
-rw-r--r-- | PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt b/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt index a0a5636e7..f13a32419 100644 --- a/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt +++ b/PLANS/texi/drop-split-info-files.txt @@ -2,12 +2,12 @@ For in Automake 2.0 (DONE) -------------------------- We will drop split info files in Automake 2.0. -See automake bug#13351: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/13351>. +See automake bug#13351: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/13351>. Basically, it has been confirmed that the original reason behind the existence of split info files was indeed "efficiency, especially memory size": -<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/texinfo-devel/2012-08/msg00024.html> +<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/texinfo-devel/2012-08/msg00024.html> So split info files have lost their reason d'etre on modern systems (where even Emacs has become a lightweight program ;-). And you are @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ not using an embedded system to read Info documentation, right? In addition, it appears that the use of split info files (at least the way Automake-generated rules have been handling them for a long time) can cause real problems in some (admittedly quite corner-case) -situations; see automake bug#12320: <http://debbugs.gnu.org/12320>. +situations; see automake bug#12320: <https://debbugs.gnu.org/12320>. This change should be completely transparent to the developer (no adjustments needed to be made to Makefile.am or other parts of the |