path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/classes.exp

# Copyright 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002,
# 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
# 
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
# 
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.  

# Please email any bugs, comments, and/or additions to this file to:
# bug-gdb@prep.ai.mit.edu

# This file was written by Fred Fish. (fnf@cygnus.com)
# And rewritten by Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com>.

set ws "\[\r\n\t \]+"
set nl "\[\r\n\]+"

if $tracelevel then {
    strace $tracelevel
}

if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }

set testfile "misc"
set srcfile ${testfile}.cc
set binfile ${objdir}/${subdir}/${testfile}

if  { [gdb_compile "${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}" "${binfile}" executable {debug c++}] != "" } {
     gdb_suppress_entire_file "Testcase compile failed, so all tests in this file will automatically fail."
}

# Test ptype of class objects.
#
# This code accepts the output of gcc v2 and v3, dwarf-2 and stabs+.
# It could use some expansion with other compilers such as hp-ux ac++.
#
# There are lots of variations in the output:
#
# . gcc -stabs+ emits debug info for implicit member functions:
#   operator=, copy ctor, ctor.  gcc -gdwarf-2 does not.
#
# . gcc with abi version 1 puts the implicit member functions
#   at the beginning of the member function list; with abi version 2,
#   the implicit member functions are at the end of the member function
#   list.  This appears as an output difference with -gstabs+.
#   gcc 3.3.X defaults to abi version 1, and gcc 3.4 will default
#   to abi version 2.
#
# . gcc v2 shows data members for virtual base pointers.
#   gcc v3 does not.
#
# . gdb always prints "class" for both "class" and "struct".
#   In the future, I should accept "struct" in case gdb improves.

proc test_ptype_class_objects {} {
    global gdb_prompt
    global ws
    global nl

    # Simple type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct default_public_struct" "ptype struct default_public_struct" {
	-re "type = class default_public_struct \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype struct default_public_struct"
	}
	-re "type = class default_public_struct \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}default_public_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(default_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}default_public_struct\\(default_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}default_public_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype struct default_public_struct"
	}
    }

    # Same test, slightly different type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct explicit_public_struct" "ptype struct explicit_public_struct" {
	-re "type = class explicit_public_struct \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype struct explicit_public_struct"
	}
	-re "type = class explicit_public_struct \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}explicit_public_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(explicit_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_public_struct\\(explicit_public_struct const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_public_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype struct explicit_public_struct"
	}
    }

    # Same test, slightly different type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct protected_struct" "ptype struct protected_struct" {
	-re "type = class protected_struct \{${ws}protected:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype struct protected_struct"
	}
	-re "type = class protected_struct \{${ws}protected:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}protected_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(protected_struct const ?&\\);${ws}protected_struct\\(protected_struct const ?&\\);${ws}protected_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype struct protected_struct"
	}
    }

    # Same test, slightly different type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct private_struct" "ptype struct private_struct" {
	-re "type = class private_struct \{${ws}private:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype struct private_struct"
	}
	-re "type = class private_struct \{${ws}private:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}private_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(private_struct const ?&\\);${ws}private_struct\\(private_struct const ?&\\);${ws}private_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype struct private_struct"
	}
    }

    # Similar test, bigger type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct" "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct" {
	-re "type = class mixed_protection_struct \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct"
	}
	-re "type = class mixed_protection_struct \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;${ws}public:${ws}mixed_protection_struct ?& ?operator ?=\\(mixed_protection_struct const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_struct\\(mixed_protection_struct const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_struct\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype struct mixed_protection_struct"
	}
    }

    # All that again with "class" instead of "struct".
    # gdb does not care about the difference anyways.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class public_class" "ptype class public_class" {
	-re "type = class public_class \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class public_class"
	}
	-re "type = class public_class \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(public_class const ?&\\);${ws}public_class\\(public_class const ?&\\);${ws}public_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class public_class"
	}
    }

    # Same test, slightly different type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class protected_class" "ptype class protected_class" {
	-re "type = class protected_class \{${ws}protected:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class protected_class"
	}
	-re "type = class protected_class \{${ws}protected:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}protected_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(protected_class const ?&\\);${ws}protected_class\\(protected_class const ?&\\);${ws}protected_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class protected_class"
	}
    }

    # Same test, slightly different type.
    # The 'private' is optional but gdb always prints it.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class default_private_class" "ptype class default_private_class" {
	-re "type = class default_private_class \{${ws}(private:${ws}|)int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class default_private_class"
	}
	-re "type = class default_private_class \{${ws}(private:${ws}|)int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}default_private_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(default_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}default_private_class\\(default_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}default_private_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class default_private_class"
	}
    }

    # Same test, slightly different type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class explicit_private_class" "ptype class explicit_private_class" {
	-re "type = class explicit_private_class \{${ws}(private:${ws}|)int a;${ws}int b;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class explicit_private_class"
	}
	-re "type = class explicit_private_class \{${ws}(private:${ws}|)int a;${ws}int b;${ws}public:${ws}explicit_private_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(explicit_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_private_class\\(explicit_private_class const ?&\\);${ws}explicit_private_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class explicit_private_class"
	}
    }

    # Similar test, bigger type.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class mixed_protection_class" "ptype struct mixed_protection_class" {
	-re "type = class mixed_protection_class \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class mixed_protection_class"
	}
	-re "type = class mixed_protection_class \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int b;${ws}private:${ws}int c;${ws}int d;${ws}protected:${ws}int e;${ws}int f;${ws}public:${ws}int g;${ws}private:${ws}int h;${ws}protected:${ws}int i;${ws}public:${ws}mixed_protection_class ?& ?operator ?=\\(mixed_protection_class const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_class\\(mixed_protection_class const ?&\\);${ws}mixed_protection_class\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class mixed_protection_class"
	}
    }

    # Here are some classes with inheritance.

    # Base class.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class A" "ptype class A" {
	-re "type = class A \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class A"
	}
	-re "type = class A \{${ws}public:${ws}int a;${ws}int x;${ws}A ?& ?operator ?=\\(A const ?&\\);${ws}A\\(A const ?&\\);${ws}A\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class A"
	}
    }

    # Derived class.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class B" "ptype class B" {
	-re "type = class B : public A \{${ws}public:${ws}int b;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class B"
	}
	-re "type = class B : public A \{${ws}public:${ws}int b;${ws}int x;${ws}B ?& ?operator ?=\\(B const ?&\\);${ws}B\\(B const ?&\\);${ws}B\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class B"
	}
    }

    # Derived class.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class C" "ptype class C" {
	-re "type = class C : public A \{${ws}public:${ws}int c;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class C"
	}
	-re "type = class C : public A \{${ws}public:${ws}int c;${ws}int x;${ws}C ?& ?operator ?=\\(C const ?&\\);${ws}C\\(C const ?&\\);${ws}C\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class C"
	}
    }

    # Derived class, multiple inheritance.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class D" "ptype class D" {
	-re "type = class D : public B, public C \{${ws}public:${ws}int d;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class D"
	}
	-re "type = class D : public B, public C \{${ws}public:${ws}int d;${ws}int x;${ws}D ?& ?operator ?=\\(D const ?&\\);${ws}D\\(D const ?&\\);${ws}D\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class D"
	}
    }

    # Derived class.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class E" "ptype class E" {
	-re "type = class E : public D \{${ws}public:${ws}int e;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class E"
	}
	-re "type = class E : public D \{${ws}public:${ws}int e;${ws}int x;${ws}E ?& ?operator ?=\\(E const ?&\\);${ws}E\\(E const ?&\\);${ws}E\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class E"
	}
    }

    # This is a break from inheritance tests.
    #
    # gcc 2.X with stabs (stabs or stabs+?) used to have a problem with
    # static methods whose name is the same as their argument mangling.
 
    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Static" "ptype class Static" {
	-re "type = class Static \{${ws}public:${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class Static"
	}
	-re "type = class Static \{${ws}public:${ws}Static ?& ?operator ?=\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\((void|)\\);${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Static"
	}
	-re "type = class Static \{${ws}public:${ws}static void ii\\(int, int\\);${ws}Static ?& ?operator ?=\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\(Static const ?&\\);${ws}Static\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Static"
	}
    }

    # Here are some virtual inheritance tests.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vA" "ptype class vA" {
	-re "type = class vA \{${ws}public:${ws}int va;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class vA"
	}
	-re "type = class vA \{${ws}public:${ws}int va;${ws}int vx;${ws}vA ?& ?operator ?=\\(vA const ?&\\);${ws}vA\\(vA const ?&\\);${ws}vA\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class vA"
	}
    }

    # With gcc 2, gdb prints the virtual base pointer.
    # With gcc 3, gdb does not print the virtual base pointer.
    # drow considers it a gdb bug if gdb prints the vbptr.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vB" "ptype class vB" {
	-re "type = class vB : public virtual vA \{${ws}private:${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.2vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # TODO: kfail this
	    fail "ptype class vB"
	}
	-re "type = class vB : public virtual vA \{${ws}public:${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class vB"
	}
	-re "type = class vB : public virtual vA \{${ws}private:${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;${ws}vB ?& ?operator ?=\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\(int, ?vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
	    # TODO: kfail this
	    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
	    fail "ptype class vB (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
	}
	-re "type = class vB : public virtual vA \{${ws}public:${ws}int vb;${ws}int vx;${ws}vB ?& ?operator ?=\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\(vB const ?&\\);${ws}vB\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class vB"
	}
    }

    # Another class with a virtual base.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vC" "ptype class vC" {
	-re "type = class vC : public virtual vA \{${ws}private:${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.2vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # TODO: kfail
	    fail "ptype class vC"
	}
	-re "type = class vC : public virtual vA \{${ws}public:${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class vC"
	}
	-re "type = class vC : public virtual vA \{${ws}private:${ws}vA ?\\* ?_vb.vA;${ws}public:${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;${ws}vC ?& ?operator ?=\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\(int, ?vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
	    # TODO: kfail
	    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
	    fail "ptype class vC (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
	}
	-re "type = class vC : public virtual vA \{${ws}public:${ws}int vc;${ws}int vx;${ws}vC ?& ?operator ?=\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\(vC const ?&\\);${ws}vC\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class vC"
	}
    }

    # The classic diamond inheritance.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vD" "ptype class vD" {
	-re "type = class vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{${ws}private:${ws}vC ?\\* ?_vb.2vC;${ws}vB ?\\* ?_vb.2vB;${ws}public:${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # TODO: kfail
	    fail "ptype class vD"
	}
	-re "type = class vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{${ws}public:${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class vD"
	}
	-re "type = class vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{${ws}private:${ws}vC ?\\* ?_vb.vC;${ws}vB ?\\* ?_vb.vB;${ws}public:${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;${ws}vD ?& ?operator ?=\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\(int, ?vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
	    # TODO: kfail
	    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
	    fail "ptype class vD (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
	}
	-re "type = class vD : public virtual vB, public virtual vC \{${ws}public:${ws}int vd;${ws}int vx;${ws}vD ?& ?operator ?=\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\(vD const ?&\\);${ws}vD\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class vD"
	}
    }

    # One more case of virtual derivation.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class vE" "ptype class vE" {
	-re "type = class vE : public virtual vD \{${ws}private:${ws}vD ?\\* ?_vb.2vD;${ws}public:${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # TODO: kfail
	    fail "ptype class vE"
	}
	-re "type = class vE : public virtual vD \{${ws}public:${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class vE"
	}
	-re "type = class vE : public virtual vD \{${ws}private:${ws}vD ?\\* ?_vb.vD;${ws}public:${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;${ws}vE ?& ?operator ?=\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\(int, ?vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # See the hidden "in-charge" ctor parameter!
	    # TODO: kfail
	    setup_xfail "*-*-*"
	    fail "ptype class vE (FIXME: non-portable virtual table constructs)"
	}
	-re "type = class vE : public virtual vD \{${ws}public:${ws}int ve;${ws}int vx;${ws}vE ?& ?operator ?=\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\(vE const ?&\\);${ws}vE\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class vE"
	}
    }

    # Another inheritance series.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Base1" "ptype class Base1" {
	-re "type = class Base1 \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}Base1\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class Base1"
	}
	-re "type = class Base1 \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}Base1 ?& ?operator ?=\\(Base1 const ?&\\);${ws}Base1\\(Base1 const ?&\\);${ws}Base1\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Base1"
	}
	-re "type = class Base1 \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}Base1\\(int\\);${ws}Base1 ?& ?operator ?=\\(Base1 const ?&\\);${ws}Base1\\(Base1 const ?&\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Base1"
	}
    }

    # The second base class.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Foo" "ptype class Foo" {
	-re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class Foo"
	}
	-re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo ?& ?operator ?=\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}int operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # TODO: "int operator int()" is a bug
	    # kfail "gdb/1497" "ptype class Foo"
	    pass "ptype class Foo"
	}
	-re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo ?& ?operator ?=\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Foo"
	}
	-re "type = class Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int x;${ws}int y;${ws}static int st;${ws}Foo\\(int, int\\);${ws}int operator ?!\\((void|)\\);${ws}operator int\\((void|)\\);${ws}int times\\(int\\);${ws}Foo ?& ?operator ?=\\(Foo const ?&\\);${ws}Foo\\(Foo const ?&\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Foo"
	}
    }

    # A multiple inheritance derived class.

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype class Bar" "ptype class Bar" {
	-re "type = class Bar : public Base1, public Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int z;${ws}Bar\\(int, int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype class Bar"
	}
	-re "type = class Bar : public Base1, public Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int z;${ws}Bar ?& ?operator ?=\\(Bar const ?&\\);${ws}Bar\\(Bar const ?&\\);${ws}Bar\\(int, int, int\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Bar"
	}
	-re "type = class Bar : public Base1, public Foo \{${ws}public:${ws}int z;${ws}Bar\\(int, int, int\\);${ws}Bar ?& ?operator ?=\\(Bar const ?&\\);${ws}Bar\\(Bar const ?&\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype class Bar"
	}
    }
}

# Test simple access to class members.
# TODO: these test names are gross!
# Just let the test name default.

proc test_non_inherited_member_access {} {
    global gdb_prompt
    
    # Print non-inherited members of g_A.
    gdb_test "print g_A.a" ".* = 1" "g_A.a incorrect"
    gdb_test "print g_A.x" ".* = 2" "g_A.x incorrect"

    # Print non-inherited members of g_B.
    gdb_test "print g_B.b" ".* = 5" "g_B.b incorrect"
    gdb_test "print g_B.x" ".* = 6" "g_B.x incorrect"

    # Print non-inherited members of g_C.
    gdb_test "print g_C.c" ".* = 9" "g_C.c incorrect"
    gdb_test "print g_C.x" ".* = 10" "g_C.x incorrect"

    # Print non-inherited members of g_D.
    gdb_test "print g_D.d" ".* = 19" "g_D.d incorrect"
    gdb_test "print g_D.x" ".* = 20" "g_D.x incorrect"

    # Print non-inherited members of g_E.
    gdb_test "print g_E.e" ".* = 31" "g_E.e incorrect"
    gdb_test "print g_E.x" ".* = 32" "g_E.x incorrect"
}

# Test access to members of other classes.
# gdb should refuse to print them.
# (I feel old -- I remember when this was legal in C -- chastain).
# TODO: Again, change the silly test names.

proc test_wrong_class_members {} {
    global gdb_prompt

    gdb_test "print g_A.b" "There is no member( or method|) named b." "print g_A.b should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_B.c" "There is no member( or method|) named c." "print g_B.c should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_B.d" "There is no member( or method|) named d." "print g_B.d should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_C.b" "There is no member( or method|) named b." "print g_C.b should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_C.d" "There is no member( or method|) named d." "print g_C.d should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_D.e" "There is no member( or method|) named e." "print g_D.e should be error"
}

# Test access to names that are not members of any class.
# TODO: test names again.

proc test_nonexistent_members {} {
    global gdb_prompt

    gdb_test "print g_A.y" "There is no member( or method|) named y." "print g_A.y should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_B.z" "There is no member( or method|) named z." "print g_B.z should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_C.q" "There is no member( or method|) named q." "print g_C.q should be error"
    gdb_test "print g_D.p" "There is no member( or method|) named p." "print g_D.p should be error"
}

# Call a method that expects a base class parameter with base, inherited,
# and unrelated class arguments.

proc test_method_param_class {} {
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&g_A)" ".* = 1" "base class param->a"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_x (&g_A)" ".* = 2" "base class param->x"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&g_B)" ".* = 3" "inherited class param->a"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_x (&g_B)" ".* = 4" "inherited class param->x"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (g_A)" ".* = 1" "base class (&param)->a"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_x (g_A)" ".* = 2" "base class (&param)->x"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (g_B)" ".* = 3" "inherited class (&param)->a"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_x (g_B)" ".* = 4" "inherited class (&param)->x"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (g_A)" ".* = 1" "base class param.a"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_x (g_A)" ".* = 2" "base class param.x"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (g_B)" ".* = 3" "inherited class param.a"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_x (g_B)" ".* = 4" "inherited class param.x"

    gdb_test "call class_param.Aptr_a (&foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class *param"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aref_a (foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class &param"
    gdb_test "call class_param.Aval_a (foo)" "Cannot resolve .*" "unrelated class param"
}

# Examine a class with an enum field.

proc test_enums {} {
    global gdb_prompt
    global nl
    global ws

    # print the object

    gdb_test "print obj_with_enum" \
	"\\$\[0-9\]+ = \{priv_enum = red, x = 0\}" \
	"print obj_with_enum (1)"

    # advance one line

    gdb_test "next" ""

    # TODO: with gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2,
    # gdb says that obj_with_enum is out of scope here and the
    # tests after this FAIL.  This needs investigation.
    # -- chastain 2003-12-30

    # print the object again

    gdb_test "print obj_with_enum" \
	"\\$\[0-9\]+ = \{priv_enum = green, x = 0\}" \
	"print obj_with_enum (2)"

    # print the enum member

    gdb_test "print obj_with_enum.priv_enum" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = green"

    # ptype on the enum member

    gdb_test_multiple "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum" "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum" {
        -re "type = enum ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
        }
	-re "type = enum PrivEnum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
	}
	-re "type = enum \{ ?red, green, blue, yellow = 42 ?\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # This case case is a little dubious, but it's not clear what
	    # ought to be required of a ptype on a private enum...
	    # -sts 19990324
	    #
	    # It bugs me that this happens with gcc 3.
	    # -- chastain 2003-12-30
	    #
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "ptype obj_with_enum.priv_enum"
	}
    }

    # ptype on the object
    gdb_test_multiple "ptype obj_with_enum" "ptype obj_with_enum" {
	-re "type = class ClassWithEnum \{${ws}public:${ws}(enum |)ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    pass "ptype obj_with_enum"
	}
	-re "type = class ClassWithEnum \{${ws}public:${ws}(enum |)PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # NOTE: carlton/2003-02-28: One could certainly argue that
	    # this output is acceptable: PrivEnum is a member of
	    # ClassWithEnum, so there's no need to explicitly qualify
	    # its name with "ClassWithEnum::".  The truth, though, is
	    # that GDB is simply forgetting that PrivEnum is a member
	    # of ClassWithEnum, so we do that output for a bad reason
	    # instead of a good reason.  Under stabs, we probably
	    # can't get this right; under DWARF-2, we can.
	    #
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    kfail "gdb/57" "ptype obj_with_enum"
	}
	-re "type = class ClassWithEnum \{${ws}public:${ws}(enum |)PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;${ws}ClassWithEnum ?& ?operator ?=\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    kfail "gdb/57" "ptype obj_with_enum"
	}
	-re "type = class ClassWithEnum \{${ws}public:${ws}(enum |)ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum priv_enum;${ws}int x;${ws}ClassWithEnum ?& ?operator ?=\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\(ClassWithEnum const ?&\\);${ws}ClassWithEnum\\((void|)\\);$nl\}$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # I think this is a PASS, but only carlton knows for sure.
	    # -- chastain 2003-12-30
	    #
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    fail "ptype obj_with_enum"
	}
    }

    # I'll do this test two different ways, because of a parser bug.
    # See PR gdb/826.

    gdb_test_multiple "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42" {
	-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    pass "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
	}
	-re "A (parse|syntax) error in expression, near `42'.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # "parse error" is bison 1.35.
	    # "syntax error" is bison 1.875.
	    kfail "gdb/826" "print (ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum) 42"
	}
    }

    gdb_test_multiple "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42" "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42" {
	-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = yellow$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42"
	}
	-re "No symbol \"ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum\" in current context.$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    kfail "gdb/57" "print ('ClassWithEnum::PrivEnum') 42"
	}
    }
}

# Pointers to class members

proc test_pointers_to_class_members {} {
    global gdb_prompt

    gdb_test "print Bar::z" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\( ?Bar::& ?\\) ?\\) ?Bar::z"
    gdb_test "print &Foo::x" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\( ?Foo::\\* ?\\) ?\\) ?&Foo::x"
    gdb_test "print (int)&Foo::x" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 0"
    gdb_test "print (int)&Bar::y == 2*sizeof(int)" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = true"

    # TODO: this is a bogus test.  It's looking at a variable that
    # has not even been declared yet, so it's accessing random junk
    # on the stack and comparing that it's NOT equal to a specific
    # value.  It's been like this since gdb 4.10 in 1993!
    # -- chastain 2004-01-01
    gdb_test "print (int)pmi == sizeof(int)" ".* = false"
}

# Test static members.

proc test_static_members {} {
    global gdb_prompt
    global hex

    gdb_test "print Foo::st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 100"
    gdb_test "set foo.st = 200" "" ""
    gdb_test "print bar.st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 200"
    gdb_test "print &foo.st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\*\\) $hex"
    gdb_test "print &Bar::st" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = \\(int ?\\*\\) $hex"
    gdb_test "print *\$" "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 200"

    gdb_test "set print static-members off" ""
    gdb_test "print csi" \
	"{x = 10, y = 20}" \
	"print csi without static members"
    gdb_test "print cnsi" \
	"{x = 30, y = 40}" \
	"print cnsi without static members"

    gdb_test "set print static-members on" ""
    gdb_test "print csi" \
	"{x = 10, y = 20, static null = {x = 0, y = 0, static null = <same as static member of an already seen type>}}" \
	"print csi with static members"
    gdb_test "print cnsi" \
	"{x = 30, y = 40, static null = {x = 0, y = 0, static null = <same as static member of an already seen type>, static yy = {z = 5, static xx = {x = 1, y = 2, static null = <same as static member of an already seen type>, static yy = <same as static member of an already seen type>}}}, static yy = <same as static member of an already seen type>}" \
	"print cnsi with static members"
}

proc do_tests {} {
    global prms_id
    global bug_id
    global subdir
    global objdir
    global srcdir
    global binfile
    global gdb_prompt
    global nl

    set prms_id 0
    set bug_id 0

    # Start with a fresh gdb.

    gdb_exit
    gdb_start
    gdb_reinitialize_dir $srcdir/$subdir
    gdb_load $binfile

    gdb_test "set language c++" "" ""
    gdb_test "set width 0" "" ""

    if ![runto_main ] then {
	perror "couldn't run to breakpoint"
	return
    }

    gdb_breakpoint inheritance2
    gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* inheritance2.*" ""

    test_ptype_class_objects
    test_non_inherited_member_access
    test_wrong_class_members
    test_nonexistent_members
    test_method_param_class

    gdb_breakpoint enums2
    gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* enums2.*" "continue to enums2(\\(\\)|)"
    gdb_test "finish" "" ""
    test_enums

    gdb_test "finish" "" ""
    test_pointers_to_class_members
    test_static_members

    # Now some random tests that were just thrown in here.

    gdb_breakpoint marker_reg1
    gdb_test "continue" ".*Breakpoint .* marker_reg1.*" ""
    gdb_test "finish" "Run till exit from.*" "finish from marker_reg1"

    # This class is so small that an instance of it can fit in a register.
    # When gdb tries to call a method, it gets embarrassed about taking
    # the address of a register.
    #
    # TODO: I think that message should be a PASS, not an XFAIL.
    # gdb prints an informative message and declines to do something
    # impossible.
    #
    # The method call actually succeeds if the compiler allocates very
    # small classes in memory instead of registers.  So this test does
    # not tell us anything interesting if the call succeeds.
    #
    # -- chastain 2003-12-31
    gdb_test_multiple "print v.method ()" "calling method for small class" {
	-re "\\$\[0-9\]+ = 82$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+
	    # gcc HEAD 2003-12-28 21:08:30 UTC -gstabs+
	    pass "calling method for small class"
	}
	-re "Address requested for identifier \"v\" which is in register .*$nl$gdb_prompt $" {
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gdwarf-2
	    # gcc 2.95.3 -gstabs+
	    setup_xfail "*-*-*" 2972
	    fail "calling method for small class"
	}
    }

    # This is a random v2 demangling test.
    # This is redundant with existing tests in demangle.exp.
    # TODO: Just remove this.
    gdb_test "maint demangle inheritance1__Fv" "inheritance1\\(void\\)" "demangle"
}

do_tests