From d9ec26b6578cfde9d7fb605787c9878ccd623893 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alan Modra Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 06:40:27 +0000 Subject: Correct spelling of "relocatable". --- bfd/coff-i860.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'bfd/coff-i860.c') diff --git a/bfd/coff-i860.c b/bfd/coff-i860.c index 767692dc61..b862ff7f0c 100644 --- a/bfd/coff-i860.c +++ b/bfd/coff-i860.c @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* BFD back-end for Intel 860 COFF files. - Copyright 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002 + Copyright 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. Created mostly by substituting "860" for "386" in coff-i386.c Harry Dolan , October 1995 @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static const bfd_target * i3coff_object_p PARAMS ((bfd *)); section for a reference to a common symbol is the value itself plus any desired offset. Ian Taylor, Cygnus Support. */ -/* If we are producing relocateable output, we need to do some +/* If we are producing relocatable output, we need to do some adjustments to the object file that are not done by the bfd_perform_relocation function. This function is called by every reloc type to make any required adjustments. */ @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ coff_i860_reloc (abfd, reloc_entry, symbol, data, input_section, output_bfd, { /* For some reason bfd_perform_relocation always effectively ignores the addend for a COFF target when producing - relocateable output. This seems to be always wrong for 860 + relocatable output. This seems to be always wrong for 860 COFF, so we handle the addend here instead. */ diff = reloc_entry->addend; } @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ coff_i860_rtype_to_howto (abfd, sec, rel, h, sym, addendp) } /* If the output symbol is common (in which case this must be a - relocateable link), we need to add in the final size of the + relocatable link), we need to add in the final size of the common symbol. */ if (h != NULL && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_common) *addendp += h->root.u.c.size; -- cgit v1.2.1