From a330503cb6001cb5a48111bf732d30d9bacecc1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Automated Commit Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 18:25:47 +0000 Subject: Update explicit-failures-markup.xml [skip ci] --- status/explicit-failures-markup.xml | 22 +++++----------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml b/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml index 4998d6ce7b..f8298b8698 100644 --- a/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml +++ b/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ Even tests that do not use C++11 lambda functions fail on this compiler because it incorrectly attempts an extra copy when - objects are constructed via `boost::check c = ...`. + objects are constructed using `boost::check c = ...`. This is fixed in MinGW GCC 4.3. @@ -894,11 +894,10 @@ Even tests that do not use C++11 lambda functions fail on this - compiler because of a number of different issues - (Boost.Exception, which used by this library, also is not - supported on this compiler, incorrect implementation of some - aspects of friendship, incorrect dispatching of some `volatile` - calls, etc.). + compiler because of a number of issues (Boost.Exception is not + supported on this compiler but it is used by this library + implementation, some aspects of `friend` and `volatile` are not + properly implemented on this compiler, etc.). These specific issues are fixed in MSVC 9.0 (but only MSVC 11.0 has adequate lambda function support that makes this library actually usable). @@ -1125,17 +1124,6 @@ lambda function support). - - - - - - - This test fails because of this compiler/platform cause an - error in Boost.TypeTraits (this could be fixed in the master - branch... not sure). - - -- cgit v1.2.1