| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- Increase it in one go, not with lots of additions
- Deal with weird edge cases where max_global_id is not a sane value
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This avoids lingering ceph-create-keys tasks.
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit a90a2b42db8de134b8ea5d81cab7825fb9ec50b4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bug introduced in f3f92fe21061e21c8b259df5ef283a61782a44db.
Fixes: #5766
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit c562b72e703f671127d0ea2173f6a6907c825cd1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If the leader has and older lc than we do, and we are sharing states to
bring them up to date, we still want to also share our uncommitted value.
This particular case was broken by b26b7f6e, which was only contemplating
the case where the leader was ahead of us or at the same point as us, but
not the case where the leader was behind. Note that the call to
share_state() a few lines up will bring them fully up to date, so
after they receive and store_state() for this message they will be at the
same lc as we are.
Fixes: #5750
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 05b6c7e8645081f405c616735238ae89602d3cc6)
|
|\ |
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
A replay of an in progress merge or split might make
our counts unreliable.
Fixes: #5723
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0dc3efdd885377a07987d868af5bb7a38245c90b)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 37a4c4af54879512429bb114285bcb4c7c3488d5)
Conflicts:
src/os/LFNIndex.cc
src/test/filestore/store_test.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If the replay is being replayed, we might have already
performed the rename, skip it. Also, we must set the
collection replay guard only after we have done the
rename.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 870c474c5348831fcb13797d164f49682918fb30)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Fixes: #5714
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 6957dbc75cc2577652b542aa3eae69f03060cb63)
The original patch covered the same code in PGLog.cc.
Conflicts:
src/osd/PGLog.cc
src/osd/PG.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We shouldn't hold the pipe_lock while doing the ms_verify_authorizer
upcalls.
Fix by unlocking a bit earlier, and verifying our state is still correct
in the failure path.
This regression was introduced by ecab4bb9513385bd765cca23e4e2fadb7ac4bac2.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 723d691f7a1f53888618dfc311868d1988f61f56)
Conflicts:
src/msg/Pipe.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 16568d9e1fb8ac0c06ebaa1e1dc1d6a432a5e4d4)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Previously we did not bother with locking for accept() because we were
not visible to any other threads. However, we need to close accepting
Pipes from mark_down_all(), which means we need to handle interference.
Fix up the locking so that we hold pipe_lock when looking at Pipe state
and verify that we are still in the ACCEPTING state any time we retake
the lock.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit ecab4bb9513385bd765cca23e4e2fadb7ac4bac2)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We didn't build or review carefully enough!
Signed-off-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 1a84411209b13084b3edb87897d5d678937e3299)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We need to catch these pipes too, particularly when doing a rebind(),
to avoid them leaking through.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 687fe888b32ac9d41595348dfc82111c8dbf2fcb)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
New pipes exist in a sort of limbo before we know who the peer is and
add them to rank_pipe. Keep a list of them in accepting_pipes for that
period.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit dd4addef2d5b457cc9a58782fe42af6b13c68b81)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We can have a situation where:
- we have a pipe to a peer
- pipe goes to standby (on peer)
- we rebind to a new port
- ....
- we rebind again to the same old port
- we connect to peer
and get reattached to the ancient pipe from two instances back. Avoid that
by picking a new nonce each time we rebind.
Add 1,000,000 each time so that the port is still legible in the printed
output.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 994e2bf224ab7b7d5b832485ee14de05354d2ddf)
Conflicts:
src/msg/Accepter.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
If we are shutting down all old connections and binding to new ports,
we want to avoid a sequence like:
- close all prevoius connections
- new connection comes in on old port
- rebind to new ports
-> connection from old port leaks through
As a first step, close all connections after we shut down the old
accepter and before we start the new one.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 07a0860a1899c7353bb506e33de72fdd22b857dd)
Conflicts:
src/msg/SimpleMessenger.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Small cleanup. Nothing needs msgr->lock for the previously larger
window.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit ad548e72fd94b4a16717abd3b3f1d1be4a3476cf)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We need to maintain the invariant that all sub queues in out_q are never
empty. Fix discard_requeued_up_to() to avoid creating an entry unless we
know it is already present.
This bug leads to an incorrect reconnect attempt when
- we accept a pipe (lossless peer)
- they send some stuff, maybe
- fault
- we initiate reconnect, even tho we have nothing queued
In particular, we shouldn't reconnect because we aren't checking for
resets, and the fact that our out_seq is 0 while the peer's might be
something else entirely will trigger asserts later.
This fixes at least one source of #5626, and possibly #5517.
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9f1c27261811733f40acf759a72958c3689c8516)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
These all require that we hold pipe_lock.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 579d858aabbe5df88543d096ef4dbddcfc023cca)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 4282971d47b90484e681ff1a71ae29569dbd1d32)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Calling handle_ack() here has no effect because we have already
spliced sent messages back into our out queue. Instead, pull them out
of there and discard. Add a few assertions along the way.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 495ee108dbb39d63e44cd3d4938a6ec7d11b12e3)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
All paths to pipe shutdown should have cleared the con->pipe reference
already. Assert as much.
Also, do it under pipe_lock!
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9586305a2317c7d6bbf31c9cf5b67dc93ccab50d)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Instead of duplicating an incomplete cleanup sequence (that does not
clear_pipe()), goto fail_unlocked and do the cleanup in a generic way.
s/rc/r/ while we are here.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit ec612a5bda119cea52bbac9b2a49ecf1e83b08e5)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We need to do this under protection of the pipe_lock.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit afafb87e8402242d3897069f4b94ba46ffe0c413)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Observed a segfault in rebind -> mark_down_all -> clear_pipe -> put that
may have been due to a racing thread clearing the connection_state pointer.
Do the clear_pipe() call under the protection of pipe_lock, as we do in
all other contexts.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5fc1dabfb3b2cbffdee3214d24d7769d6e440e45)
Conflicts:
src/msg/SimpleMessenger.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
We also assert in on_flushed() that the temp collection is actually
empty.
Fixes: #5670
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 47516d9c4b7f023f3a16e166749fa7b1c7b3b24c)
Conflicts:
src/osd/ReplicatedPG.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9f56a7b8bfcb63cb4fbbc0c9b8ff01de9e518c57)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Once we start serving reads, stray objects must have already
been removed. Therefore, we have to flush all operations
up to the transaction writing out the authoritative log.
On replicas, we flush in Stray() if we will not eventually
be activated and in ReplicaActive if we are in the acting
set. This way a replica won't serve a replica read until
the store is consistent.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit b41f1ba48563d1d3fd17c2f62d10103b5d63f305)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Stray objects should have been cleaned up in the merge_log
transactions. Only on the primary have those operations
necessarily been flushed at activate().
Fixes: 5084
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 278c7b59228f614addf830cb0afff4988c9bc8cb)
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
In the event of a split or collection rename, we need to ensure that
we don't replay any operations on objects within those collections
prior to that point. Thus, we mark a global replay guard on the
collection after doing a syncfs and make sure to check that in
_check_replay_guard() for all object operations.
Fixes: #5154
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit f3f92fe21061e21c8b259df5ef283a61782a44db)
Conflicts:
src/os/FileStore.cc
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
Large peering_wq batch sizes may excessively delay
peering messages resulting in unreasonably long
peering. This may speed up peering.
Backport: cuttlefish
Related: #5084
Signed-off-by: Samuel Just <sam.just@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 39e5a2a406b77fa82e9a78c267b679d49927e3c3)
|
|/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Mick <dan.mick@inktank.com>
Tested-by: Olivier Bonvalet <ob.ceph@daevel.fr>
(cherry picked from commit fd1fd664d6102a2a96b27e8ca9933b54ac626ecb)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Not all devices are basename + number; some have intervening character(s),
like /dev/cciss/c0d1p2.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 2ea8fac441141d64ee0d26c5dd2b441f9782d840)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 5b031e100b40f597752b4917cdbeebb366eb98d7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is more robust than the broken split trick.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3359aaedde838c98d1155611e157fd2da9e8b9f5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Make these methods work in terms of device *names*, not paths, and fix up
the only direct list_partitions() caller to do the same.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 35d3f2d84808efda3d2ac868afe03e6959d51c03)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit e0401591e352ea9653e3276d66aebeb41801eeb3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Assume the last component is the unique device name, even if it appears
under a subdir of /dev.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit cb97338b1186939deecb78e9d949c38c3ef59026)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Handle the case where the device is a full disk. Make the partition
check a bit more robust (don't make assumptions about naming aside from
the device being a prefix of the partition).
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit e082f1247fb6ddfb36c4223cbfdf500d6b45c978)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
In 97462a3213e5e15812c79afc0f54d697b6c498b1 we tried to search for a
recent full osdmap but were looking at the wrong key. If full_0 was
present we could record that the latest full map was last_committed even
though it wasn't present. This is fixed in 76cd7ac1c, but we need to
compensate for when get_version_latest_full() gives us a back version
number by repeating the search.
Fixes: #5737
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit c2131d4047156aa2964581c9dbd93846382a07e7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a segfault
Signed-off-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit a7a7d3fc8a2ba4a30ef136a32f2903d157b3e19a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes: #5737
Backport: cuttlefish
Signed-off-by: Joao Eduardo Luis <joao.luis@inktank.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 76cd7ac1c2094b34ad36bea89b2246fa90eb2f6d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
During the collect/last exchange, peers share any uncommitted values
with the leader. They are supposed to also share the pn under which
that value was accepted, but were instead using the just-accepted pn
value. This effectively meant that we *always* took the uncommitted
value; if there were multiples, which one we accepted depended on what
order the LAST messages arrived, not which pn the values were generated
under.
The specific failure sequence I observed:
- collect
- learned uncommitted value for 262 from myself
- send collect with pn 901
- got last with pn 901 (incorrect) for 200 (old) from peer
- discard our own value, remember the other
- finish collect phase
- ignore old uncommitted value
Fix this by storing a pending_v and pending_pn value whenever we accept
a value. Use this to send an appropriate pn value in the LAST reply
so that the leader can make it's decision about which uncommitted value
to accept based on accurate information. Also use it when we learn
the uncommitted value from ourselves.
We could probably be more clever about storing less information here,
for example by omitting pending_v and clearing pending_pn at the
appropriate point, but that would be more fragile. Similarly, we could
store a pn for *every* commit if we wanted to lay some groundwork for
having multiple uncommitted proposals in flight, but I don't want to
speculate about what is necessary or sufficient for a correct solution
there.
Fixes: #5698
Backport: cuttlefish, bobtail
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 20baf662112dd5f560bc3a2d2114b469444c3de8)
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit 19b29788966eb80ed847630090a16a3d1b810969)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
If an older peer sends an uncommitted value, make sure we only take it
if it is in the future, and at least as new as any current uncommitted
value.
(Prior to the previous patch, peers could send values from long-past
rounds. The pn values are also bogus.)
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit b3253a453c057914753846c77499f98d3845c58e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
We may have an uncommitted value from our perspective (it is our lc + 1)
when the collector has a much larger lc (because we have been out for
the last few rounds). Only share an uncommitted value if it is in fact
the next value.
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
(cherry picked from commit b26b7f6e5e02ac6beb66e3e34e177e6448cf91cf)
|
| |
|