summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/accel_cal.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuval Peress <peress@chromium.org>2019-10-24 14:29:06 -0600
committerCommit Bot <commit-bot@chromium.org>2020-02-08 01:42:46 +0000
commitdc77f10578a33ef0d3450623bf5a648d42606d8b (patch)
tree739da5b3a151bafecb9e9f11f919d059428e873c /test/accel_cal.c
parent0fffe36e799cd7d0d0ecc7f28d01c332cdcebd57 (diff)
downloadchrome-ec-dc77f10578a33ef0d3450623bf5a648d42606d8b.tar.gz
common: Implement accelerometer calibration
This change implements the hybrid accelerometer calibration algorithm described in https://drive.google.com/corp/drive/u/0/folders/13k8AWvVkCg8KUr1HhD2qv6_ob1ixgCbE 1. Waits until the device is still 2. Adds a still sample to an orientation accumulator - If the new sample is close to an existing one, they're merged. - If the new sample is unique, it is added to the list of orientations in a FIFO manner (may be evicting an older sample). - Once enough orientations have been gathered, run the kasa algorithm. - The kasa algorithm should yield a radius that's near 1g, since all the samples were added when still. If this isn't the case, we fall back on newton's method (which takes longer). BUG=b:138303429,chromium:1023858 BRANCH=None TEST=buildall with new unit tests Change-Id: I98bb0d365017d8a916b008c7c0c263345a9cddac Signed-off-by: Yuval Peress <peress@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/1879716 Reviewed-by: Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/accel_cal.c')
-rw-r--r--test/accel_cal.c137
1 files changed, 137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/accel_cal.c b/test/accel_cal.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e7dd876995
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/accel_cal.c
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+/* Copyright 2020 The Chromium OS Authors. All rights reserved.
+ * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
+ * found in the LICENSE file.
+ */
+
+#include "common.h"
+#include "accel_cal.h"
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "motion_sense.h"
+#include <math.h>
+
+struct motion_sensor_t motion_sensors[] = {};
+const unsigned int motion_sensor_count = ARRAY_SIZE(motion_sensors);
+
+struct accel_cal_algo algos[2] = {
+ {
+ .newton_fit = NEWTON_FIT(8, 1, 0.01f, 0.25f, 1.0e-8f, 100),
+ },
+ {
+ .newton_fit = NEWTON_FIT(8, 1, 0.01f, 0.25f, 1.0e-8f, 100),
+ }
+};
+
+struct accel_cal cal = {
+ .still_det = STILL_DET(0.00025f, 800 * MSEC, 1200 * MSEC, 5),
+ .algos = algos,
+ .num_temp_windows = ARRAY_SIZE(algos),
+};
+
+static bool accumulate(float x, float y, float z, float temperature)
+{
+ return accel_cal_accumulate(&cal, 0, x, y, z, temperature)
+ | accel_cal_accumulate(&cal, 200 * MSEC, x, y, z, temperature)
+ | accel_cal_accumulate(&cal, 400 * MSEC, x, y, z, temperature)
+ | accel_cal_accumulate(&cal, 600 * MSEC, x, y, z, temperature)
+ | accel_cal_accumulate(&cal, 800 * MSEC, x, y, z, temperature)
+ | accel_cal_accumulate(&cal, 1000 * MSEC, x, y, z, temperature);
+}
+
+static int test_calibrated_correctly_with_kasa(void)
+{
+ bool has_bias;
+
+ accumulate(1.01f, 0.01f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(-0.99f, 0.01f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, 1.01f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, -0.99f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, 0.01f, 1.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, 0.01f, -0.99f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.7171f, 0.7171f, 0.7171f, 21.0f);
+ has_bias = accumulate(-0.6971f, -0.6971f, -0.6971f, 21.0f);
+
+ TEST_EQ(has_bias, true, "%d");
+ TEST_NEAR(cal.bias[X], 0.01f, 0.0001f, "%f");
+ TEST_NEAR(cal.bias[Y], 0.01f, 0.0001f, "%f");
+ TEST_NEAR(cal.bias[Z], 0.01f, 0.0001f, "%f");
+
+ return EC_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int test_calibrated_correctly_with_newton(void)
+{
+ bool has_bias = false;
+ struct kasa_fit kasa;
+ fpv3_t kasa_bias;
+ float kasa_radius;
+ int i;
+ float data[] = {
+ 1.00290f, 0.09170f, 0.09649f,
+ 0.95183f, 0.23626f, 0.25853f,
+ 0.95023f, 0.15387f, 0.31865f,
+ 0.97374f, 0.01639f, 0.27675f,
+ 0.88521f, 0.30212f, 0.39558f,
+ 0.92787f, 0.35157f, 0.21209f,
+ 0.95162f, 0.33173f, 0.10924f,
+ 0.98397f, 0.22644f, 0.07737f,
+ };
+
+ kasa_reset(&kasa);
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(data); i += 3) {
+ TEST_EQ(has_bias, false, "%d");
+ kasa_accumulate(&kasa, data[i], data[i + 1], data[i + 2]);
+ has_bias = accumulate(data[i], data[i + 1], data[i + 2], 21.0f);
+ }
+
+ kasa_compute(&kasa, kasa_bias, &kasa_radius);
+ TEST_EQ(has_bias, true, "%d");
+ /* Check that the bias is right */
+ TEST_NEAR(cal.bias[X], 0.01f, 0.001f, "%f");
+ TEST_NEAR(cal.bias[Y], 0.01f, 0.001f, "%f");
+ TEST_NEAR(cal.bias[Z], 0.01f, 0.001f, "%f");
+ /* Demonstrate that we got a better bias compared to kasa */
+ TEST_LT(sqrtf(powf(cal.bias[X] - 0.01f, 2.0f) +
+ powf(cal.bias[Y] - 0.01f, 2.0f) +
+ powf(cal.bias[Z] - 0.01f, 2.0f)),
+ sqrtf(powf(kasa_bias[X] - 0.01f, 2.0f) +
+ powf(kasa_bias[Y] - 0.01f, 2.0f) +
+ powf(kasa_bias[Z] - 0.01f, 2.0f)),
+ "%f");
+
+ return EC_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+static int test_temperature_gates(void)
+{
+ bool has_bias;
+
+ accumulate(1.01f, 0.01f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(-0.99f, 0.01f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, 1.01f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, -0.99f, 0.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, 0.01f, 1.01f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.01f, 0.01f, -0.99f, 21.0f);
+ accumulate(0.7171f, 0.7171f, 0.7171f, 21.0f);
+ has_bias = accumulate(-0.6971f, -0.6971f, -0.6971f, 31.0f);
+
+ TEST_EQ(has_bias, false, "%d");
+
+ return EC_SUCCESS;
+}
+
+void before_test(void)
+{
+ cal.still_det = STILL_DET(0.00025f, 800 * MSEC, 1200 * MSEC, 5);
+ accel_cal_reset(&cal);
+}
+
+void run_test(void)
+{
+ test_reset();
+
+ RUN_TEST(test_calibrated_correctly_with_kasa);
+ RUN_TEST(test_calibrated_correctly_with_newton);
+ RUN_TEST(test_temperature_gates);
+
+ test_print_result();
+}