diff options
author | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> | 2019-06-04 12:26:52 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> | 2019-06-04 12:26:52 -0400 |
commit | ffb7bbdf6824054316a6f63df22eea6d8887bdbd (patch) | |
tree | 83077d3a4e85ba3d95b80810a11b312d4da72d21 /lisp/textmodes | |
parent | ea09b9fe34d2d715bf72a25e3f69ae2baff0b89c (diff) | |
download | emacs-ffb7bbdf6824054316a6f63df22eea6d8887bdbd.tar.gz |
* sgml-mode.el (sgml-syntax-propertize-rules): More verbose comments
Diffstat (limited to 'lisp/textmodes')
-rw-r--r-- | lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el | 17 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el b/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el index da25665e62e..0c5d5e56a69 100644 --- a/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el +++ b/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el @@ -368,11 +368,24 @@ Any terminating `>' or `/' is not matched.") ;; if it's outside of tags, but there are too many quotes and ;; the resulting number of calls to syntax-ppss made it too slow ;; (bug#33887), so we're now careful to leave alone any pair - ;; of quotes that doesn't hold a < or > char, which is the vast majority. + ;; of quotes that doesn't hold a < or > char, which is the vast majority: + ;; either they're both within a tag (or a comment), in which case it's + ;; indeed correct to leave them as is, or they're both outside of tags, in + ;; which case they arguably should have punctuation syntax, but it is + ;; harmless to let them have string syntax because they won't "hide" any + ;; tag or comment from us (and we use the + ;; font-lock-syntactic-face-function to make sure those spurious "strings + ;; within text" aren't highlighted as strings). ("\\([\"']\\)[^\"'<>]*" (1 (if (eq (char-after) (char-after (match-beginning 0))) + ;; Fast-track case. (forward-char 1) - ;; Avoid skipping comment ender. + ;; Point has moved to the end of the text we matched after the + ;; quote, but this risks overlooking a match to one of the other + ;; regexp in the rules. We could just (goto-char (match-end 1)) + ;; to solve this, but that would be too easy, so instead we + ;; only move back enough to avoid skipping comment ender, which + ;; happens to be the only one that we could have overlooked. (when (eq (char-after) ?>) (skip-chars-backward "-")) ;; Be careful to call `syntax-ppss' on a position before the one |