summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lisp/textmodes
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>2019-06-04 12:26:52 -0400
committerStefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>2019-06-04 12:26:52 -0400
commitffb7bbdf6824054316a6f63df22eea6d8887bdbd (patch)
tree83077d3a4e85ba3d95b80810a11b312d4da72d21 /lisp/textmodes
parentea09b9fe34d2d715bf72a25e3f69ae2baff0b89c (diff)
downloademacs-ffb7bbdf6824054316a6f63df22eea6d8887bdbd.tar.gz
* sgml-mode.el (sgml-syntax-propertize-rules): More verbose comments
Diffstat (limited to 'lisp/textmodes')
-rw-r--r--lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el17
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el b/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el
index da25665e62e..0c5d5e56a69 100644
--- a/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el
+++ b/lisp/textmodes/sgml-mode.el
@@ -368,11 +368,24 @@ Any terminating `>' or `/' is not matched.")
;; if it's outside of tags, but there are too many quotes and
;; the resulting number of calls to syntax-ppss made it too slow
;; (bug#33887), so we're now careful to leave alone any pair
- ;; of quotes that doesn't hold a < or > char, which is the vast majority.
+ ;; of quotes that doesn't hold a < or > char, which is the vast majority:
+ ;; either they're both within a tag (or a comment), in which case it's
+ ;; indeed correct to leave them as is, or they're both outside of tags, in
+ ;; which case they arguably should have punctuation syntax, but it is
+ ;; harmless to let them have string syntax because they won't "hide" any
+ ;; tag or comment from us (and we use the
+ ;; font-lock-syntactic-face-function to make sure those spurious "strings
+ ;; within text" aren't highlighted as strings).
("\\([\"']\\)[^\"'<>]*"
(1 (if (eq (char-after) (char-after (match-beginning 0)))
+ ;; Fast-track case.
(forward-char 1)
- ;; Avoid skipping comment ender.
+ ;; Point has moved to the end of the text we matched after the
+ ;; quote, but this risks overlooking a match to one of the other
+ ;; regexp in the rules. We could just (goto-char (match-end 1))
+ ;; to solve this, but that would be too easy, so instead we
+ ;; only move back enough to avoid skipping comment ender, which
+ ;; happens to be the only one that we could have overlooked.
(when (eq (char-after) ?>)
(skip-chars-backward "-"))
;; Be careful to call `syntax-ppss' on a position before the one