diff options
author | Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> | 2014-07-26 06:17:25 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> | 2014-07-26 06:17:25 -0700 |
commit | 9e9f8582a893f1e97b1f8955f69b96f969ee1f85 (patch) | |
tree | ef8b4c36f8b88d1273572b8140a8651854b65e6b /src/dispnew.c | |
parent | 54e3f15626296c1ece932852df2b3d4938b0b44a (diff) | |
download | emacs-9e9f8582a893f1e97b1f8955f69b96f969ee1f85.tar.gz |
Revert previous change.
There is certainly nothing wrong with writing code like 'lo <= i
&& i <= hi', even if LO happens to a constant. There isn't even
anything wrong in general with writing 'a <= b' if A happens to
be a constant. At any rate stylistic changes shouldn't
be done like this without discussion.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/dispnew.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/dispnew.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/dispnew.c b/src/dispnew.c index 045ad2ed70b..2d137b4abbd 100644 --- a/src/dispnew.c +++ b/src/dispnew.c @@ -5829,7 +5829,7 @@ sit_for (Lisp_Object timeout, bool reading, int display_option) else if (FLOATP (timeout)) { double seconds = XFLOAT_DATA (timeout); - if (! (seconds > 0)) + if (! (0 < seconds)) return Qt; else { |