diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/lispintro/ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi | 4 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog b/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog index bc2ed8a8d82..b37426612f1 100644 --- a/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog +++ b/doc/lispintro/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +2012-10-13 Gregor Zattler <grfz@gmx.de> (tiny change) + + * emacs-lisp-intro.texi (Narrowing advantages): + Minor update for changed what-line implementation. (Bug#12629) + 2012-08-24 Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org> * Version 24.2 released. diff --git a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi index 9446333db2a..c0c7dec47bd 100644 --- a/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi +++ b/doc/lispintro/emacs-lisp-intro.texi @@ -6681,8 +6681,8 @@ buffer; or conversely, an Emacs Lisp function needs to work on all of a buffer that has been narrowed. The @code{what-line} function, for example, removes the narrowing from a buffer, if it has any narrowing and when it has finished its job, restores the narrowing to what it was. -On the other hand, the @code{count-lines} function, which is called by -@code{what-line}, uses narrowing to restrict itself to just that portion +On the other hand, the @code{count-lines} function +uses narrowing to restrict itself to just that portion of the buffer in which it is interested and then restores the previous situation. |