diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'admin/notes/copyright')
| -rw-r--r-- | admin/notes/copyright | 20 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/admin/notes/copyright b/admin/notes/copyright index f4c8b847a57..5d449763d3e 100644 --- a/admin/notes/copyright +++ b/admin/notes/copyright @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ in a README file in each directory with images. (Legal advice says that we need not add notices to each image file individually, if they allow for that.). It is recommended to use the word "convert" to describe the automatic process of changing an image from one format to -another (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00618.html). +another (https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00618.html). When installing a file with an "unusual" license (after checking first @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ etc/future-bug etc/letter.pbm,letter.xpm - trivial, no notice needed. -<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00324.html> +<https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00324.html> etc/FTP, ORDERS - trivial (at time of writing), no license needed @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ lib-src/etags.c from a legal point of view. lisp/cedet/semantic/imenu.el - - See https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg00410.html + - See https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg00410.html in which Eric Ludlam established that the remaining contributions from authors other than himself were negligible. @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ lisp/play/tetris.el (2007/1) there is no problem with our use of the name "tetris" or the concept. rms: "My understanding is that game rules as such are not copyrightable." - <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00960.html> + <https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00960.html> rms: Legal advice is that we are ok and need not worry about this. @@ -307,8 +307,8 @@ doc/*/*.texi - All manuals should be under GFDL (but see below), and should include a copy of it, so that they can be distributed separately. faq.texi has a different license, for some reason no-one can remember. -https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg00583.html -https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg00618.html +https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg00583.html +https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-04/msg00618.html doc/misc/mh-e.texi is dual-licensed (GPL and GFDL) per agreement with FSF (reconfirmed by rms Aug 25 2008). Discussion with @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ lisp/term/README Accordingly, FSF copyright was added. src/unexhp9k800.c - https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00138.html + https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-02/msg00138.html - briefly removed due to legal uncertainly Jan-Mar 2007. The relevant assignment is under "hp9k800" in copyright.list. File was written by John V. Morris at HP, and disclaimed by the author and @@ -406,10 +406,10 @@ src/unexhp9k800.c lisp/progmodes/python.el Dave Love alerted us to a potential legal problem: -https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-04/msg00459.html +https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-pretest-bug/2007-04/msg00459.html On consultation with a lawyer, we found there was no problem: -https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-05/msg00466.html +https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-05/msg00466.html ** Issues that are "fixed" for the release of Emacs 22, but we may @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ None known. The EMACS_22_BASE branch was changed to GPLv3 (or later) 2007/07/25. Some notes: -(see https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-07/msg01431.html) +(see https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-07/msg01431.html) 1. There are some files in the Emacs tree which are not part of Emacs (eg those included from Gnulib). These are all copyright FSF and (at time |