summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/emacs/gnu.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/emacs/gnu.texi')
-rw-r--r--doc/emacs/gnu.texi8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/emacs/gnu.texi b/doc/emacs/gnu.texi
index 0f21dd635db..805b10c8193 100644
--- a/doc/emacs/gnu.texi
+++ b/doc/emacs/gnu.texi
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ our web site, @uref{http://www.gnu.org}. For software tasks and other
ways to contribute, see @uref{http://www.gnu.org/help}.
@end quotation
-@unnumberedsec What's GNU? Gnu's Not Unix!
+@unnumberedsec What's GNU@? Gnu's Not Unix!
GNU, which stands for Gnu's Not Unix, is the name for the complete
Unix-compatible software system which I am writing so that I can give it
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ systems, approved for use in a residential area, and not in need of
sophisticated cooling or power.
I have found very many programmers eager to contribute part-time work for
-GNU. For most projects, such part-time distributed work would be very hard
+GNU@. For most projects, such part-time distributed work would be very hard
to coordinate; the independently-written parts would not work together.
But for the particular task of replacing Unix, this problem is absent. A
complete Unix system contains hundreds of utility programs, each of which
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ and you must charge for the program to support that.''
@end quotation
There are various forms of free or very cheap publicity that can be used to
-inform numbers of computer users about something like GNU. But it may be
+inform numbers of computer users about something like GNU@. But it may be
true that one can reach more microcomputer users with advertising. If this
is really so, a business which advertises the service of copying and
mailing GNU for a fee ought to be successful enough to pay for its
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ advertising pay for it.
On the other hand, if many people get GNU from their friends, and such
companies don't succeed, this will show that advertising was not really
-necessary to spread GNU. Why is it that free market advocates don't
+necessary to spread GNU@. Why is it that free market advocates don't
want to let the free market decide this?@footnote{The Free Software
Foundation raises most of its funds from a distribution service,
although it is a charity rather than a company. If @emph{no one}