summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/misc/efaq.texi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/misc/efaq.texi')
-rw-r--r--doc/misc/efaq.texi8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/doc/misc/efaq.texi b/doc/misc/efaq.texi
index 7809cfe98ae..167aa45c281 100644
--- a/doc/misc/efaq.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/efaq.texi
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ posting bug reports to this newsgroup directly (@pxref{Reporting bugs}).
The FSF has maintained archives of all of the GNU mailing lists for many
years, although there may be some unintentional gaps in coverage. The
archive can be browsed over the web at
-@uref{http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/, the GNU mail archive}.
+@uref{https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/, the GNU mail archive}.
Web-based Usenet search services, such as
@uref{http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?q=gnu&, Google}, also
@@ -457,13 +457,13 @@ RMS says:
@quotation
Sending bug reports to
-@url{http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs,
+@url{https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs,
the help-gnu-emacs mailing list}
(which has the effect of posting on @uref{news:gnu.emacs.help}) is
undesirable because it takes the time of an unnecessarily large group
of people, most of whom are just users and have no idea how to fix
these problem.
-@url{http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs, The
+@url{https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs, The
bug-gnu-emacs list} reaches a much smaller group of people who are
more likely to know what to do and have expressed a wish to receive
more messages about Emacs than the others.
@@ -1432,7 +1432,7 @@ of files from Macintosh, Microsoft, and Unix platforms.
In general, new Emacs users should not be provided with @file{.emacs}
files, because this can cause confusing non-standard behavior. Then
they send questions to
-@url{http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs,
+@url{https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs,
the help-gnu-emacs mailing list} asking why Emacs
isn't behaving as documented.