diff options
author | Hans Nilsson <hans@erlang.org> | 2016-12-19 18:26:01 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Hans Nilsson <hans@erlang.org> | 2017-01-25 16:43:05 +0100 |
commit | b0c245e8132bb13171e277b1af59c0cec00c9459 (patch) | |
tree | 4c7ec0b7078b1c2942aee24407c303c079bae1f7 /lib/public_key | |
parent | 941dc6198b0ca34eff7a9b30f986e964cbcccefb (diff) | |
download | erlang-b0c245e8132bb13171e277b1af59c0cec00c9459.tar.gz |
public_key: pkix_verify_hostname (RFC 6125)
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/public_key')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/doc/src/public_key.xml | 33 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/doc/src/using_public_key.xml | 253 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl | 164 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE.erl | 111 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem | 17 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName.pem | 14 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/verify_hostname.conf | 16 |
7 files changed, 608 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/public_key/doc/src/public_key.xml b/lib/public_key/doc/src/public_key.xml index c503230d70..37aa05e0fd 100644 --- a/lib/public_key/doc/src/public_key.xml +++ b/lib/public_key/doc/src/public_key.xml @@ -757,6 +757,39 @@ fun(#'DistributionPoint'{}, #'CertificateList'{}, </func> <func> + <name>pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, ReferenceIDs) -> boolean()</name> + <name>pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, ReferenceIDs, Opts) -> boolean()</name> + <fsummary>Verifies that a PKIX x.509 certificate <i>presented identifier</i> (e.g hostname) is + an expected one.</fsummary> + <type> + <v>Cert = der_encoded() | #'OTPCertificate'{} </v> + <v>ReferenceIDs = [ RefID ]</v> + <v>RefID = {IdType,string()}</v> + <v>IdType = dns_id | srv_id | uri_id</v> + <v>Opts = [ PvhOpt() ]</v> + <v>PvhOpt = [MatchOpt | FailCallBackOpt | FqdnExtractOpt]</v> + <v>MatchOpt = {fun(RefId | FQDN::string(), PresentedID) -> boolean() | default}</v> + <v>PresentedID = {dNSName,string()} | {uniformResourceIdentifier,string()}</v> + <v>FailCallBackOpt = {fail_callback, fun(#'OTPCertificate'{}) -> boolean()}</v> + <v>FqdnExtractOpt = {fqdn_fun, fun(RefID) -> FQDN::string() | default | undefined}</v> + </type> + <desc> + <p>This function checks that the <i>Presented Identifier</i> (e.g hostname) in a peer certificate + conforms with the Expected Identifier that the client wants to connect to. + This functions is intended to be added as an extra client check to the peer certificate when performing + <seealso marker="public_key:public_key#pkix_path_validation-3">public_key:pkix_path_validation/3</seealso> + </p> + <p>See <url href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125">RFC 6125</url> + for detailed information about hostname verification. + The <seealso marker="using_public_key#verify_hostname">User's Manual</seealso> + and + <seealso marker="using_public_key#verify_hostname_examples">code examples</seealso> + describes this function more detailed. + </p> + </desc> + </func> + + <func> <name>sign(Msg, DigestType, Key) -> binary()</name> <fsummary>Creates a digital signature.</fsummary> <type> diff --git a/lib/public_key/doc/src/using_public_key.xml b/lib/public_key/doc/src/using_public_key.xml index e3a1eed4be..417d479da3 100644 --- a/lib/public_key/doc/src/using_public_key.xml +++ b/lib/public_key/doc/src/using_public_key.xml @@ -417,6 +417,259 @@ true = public_key:verify(Digest, none, Signature, PublicKey),</code> </section> + <section> + <marker id="verify_hostname"></marker> + <title>Verifying a certificate hostname</title> + <section> + <title>Background</title> + <p>When a client checks a server certificate there are a number of checks available like + checks that the certificate is not revoked, not forged or not out-of-date. + </p> + <p>There are however attacks that are not detected by those checks. Suppose a bad guy has + succeded with a DNS infection. Then the client could belive it is connecting to one host but + ends up at another but evil one. Though it is evil, it could have a perfectly legal + certificate! The certificate has a valid signature, it is not revoked, the certificate chain + is not faked and has a trusted root and so on. + </p> + <p>To detect that the server is not the intended one, the client must additionaly perform + a <i>hostname verification</i>. This procedure is described in + <url href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125">RFC 6125</url>. The idea is that the certificate + lists the hostnames it could be fetched from. This is checked by the certificate issuer when + the certificate is signed. So if the certificate is issued by a trusted root the client + could trust the host names signed in it. + </p> + <p>There is a default hostname matching procedure defined in + <url href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125#section-6">RFC 6125, section 6</url> + as well as protocol dependent variations defined in + <url href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125#appendix-B">RFC 6125 appendix B</url>. + The default procedure is implemented in + <seealso marker="public_key:public_key#pkix_verify_hostname-2">public_key:pkix_verify_hostname/2,3</seealso>. + It is possible for a client to hook in modified rules using the options list. + </p> + <p>Some terminology is needed: the certificate presents hostname(s) on which it is valid. + Those are called <i>Presented IDs</i>. The hostname(s) the client belives it connects to + are called <i>Reference IDs</i>. The matching rules aims to verify that there is at least + one of the Reference IDs that matches one of the Presented IDs. If not, the verification fails. + </p> + <p>The IDs contains normal fully qualified domain names like e.g <c>foo.example.com</c>, + but IP addresses are not recommended. The rfc describes why this is not recommended as well + as security considerations about how to aquire the Reference IDs. + </p> + <p>Internationalized domain names are not supported. + </p> + </section> + <section> + <title>The verification process</title> + <p>Traditionally the Presented IDs were found in the <c>Subject</c> certificate field as <c>CN</c> + names. This is still quite common. When printing a certificate they show up as: + </p> + <code> + $ openssl x509 -text < cert.pem + ... + Subject: C=SE, CN=example.com, CN=*.example.com, O=erlang.org + ... + </code> + <p>The example <c>Subject</c> field has one C, two CN and one O part. It is only the + CN (Common Name) that is used by hostname verification. The two other (C and O) is not used + here even when they contain a domain name like the O part. The C and O parts are defined + elsewhere and meaningful only for other functions. + </p> + <p>In the example the Presented IDs are <c>example.com</c> as well as hostnames matching + <c>*.example.com</c>. For example <c>foo.example.com</c> and <c>bar.example.com</c> both + matches but not <c>foo.bar.example.com</c>. The name <c>erlang.org</c> matches neither + since it is not a CN. + </p> + <p>In case where the Presented IDs are fetched from the <c>Subject</c> certificate field, the + names may contain wildcard characters. The function handles this as defined in + <url href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125#section-6.4.3">chapter 6.4.3 in RFC 6125</url>. + </p> + <p>There may only be one wildcard character and that is in the first label, for example: + <c>*.example.com</c>. This matches <c>foo.example.com</c> but neither <c>example.com</c> nor + <c>foo.bar.example.com</c>. + </p> + <p>There may be label characters before or/and after the wildcard. For example: + <c>a*d.example.com</c> matches <c>abcd.example.com</c> and <c>ad.example.com</c>, + but not <c>ab.cd.example.com</c>. + </p> + <p>In the previous example there is no indication of which protocols are expected. So a client + has no indication of whether it is a web server, an ldap server or maybe a sip server it is + connected to. + There are fields in the certificate that can indicate this. To be more exact, the rfc + introduces the usage of the <c>X509v3 Subject Alternative Name</c> in the <c>X509v3 extensions</c> + field: + </p> + <code> + $ openssl x509 -text < cert.pem + ... + X509v3 extensions: + X509v3 Subject Alternative Name: + DNS:kb.example.org, URI:https://www.example.org + ... + </code> + <p>Here <c>kb.example.org</c> serves any protocol while <c>www.example.org</c> presents a secure + web server. + </p> + + <p>The next example has both <c>Subject</c> and <c>Subject Alternate Name</c> present:</p> + <code> + $ openssl x509 -text < cert.pem + ... + Subject: C=SE, CN=example.com, CN=*.example.com, O=erlang.org + ... + X509v3 extensions: + X509v3 Subject Alternative Name: + DNS:kb.example.org, URI:https://www.example.org + ... + </code> + <p>The RFC states that if a certificate defines Reference IDs in a <c>Subject Alternate Name</c> + field, the <c>Subject</c> field MUST NOT be used for host name checking, even if it contains + valid CN names. + Therefore only <c>kb.example.org</c> and <c>https://www.example.org</c> matches. The match fails + both for <c>example.com</c> and <c>foo.example.com</c> becuase they are in the <c>Subject</c> + field which is not checked because the <c>Subject Alternate Name</c> field is present. + </p> + </section> + + <section> + <marker id="verify_hostname_examples"></marker> + <title>Function call examples</title> + <note> + <p>Other applications like ssl/tls or https might have options that are passed + down to the <c>public_key:pkix_verify_hostname</c>. You will probably not + have to call it directly</p> + </note> + <p>Suppose our client expects to connect to the web server https://www.example.net. This + URI is therefore the Reference IDs of the client. + The call will be: + </p> + <code> + public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(CertFromHost, + [{uri_id, "https://www.example.net"} + ]). + </code> + <p>The call will return <c>true</c> or <c>false</c> depending on the check. The caller + do not need to handle the matching rules in the rfc. The matching will proceed as: + </p> + <list> + <item>If there is a <c>Subject Alternate Name</c> field, the <c>{uri_id,string()}</c> in the + function call will be compared to any + <c>{uniformResourceIdentifier,string()}</c> in the Certificate field. + If the two <c>strings()</c> are equal (case insensitive), there is a match. + The same applies for any <c>{dns_id,string()}</c> in the call which is compared + with all <c>{dNSName,string()}</c> in the Certificate field. + </item> + <item>If there is NO <c>Subject Alternate Name</c> field, the <c>Subject</c> field will be + checked. All <c>CN</c> names will be compared to all hostnames <i>extracted</i> from + <c>{uri_id,string()}</c> and from <c>{dns_id,string()}</c>. + </item> + </list> + </section> + <section> + <title>Extending the search mechanism</title> + <p>The caller can use own extraction and matching rules. This is done with the two options + <c>fqdn_fun</c> and <c>match_fun</c>. + </p> + <section> + <title>Hostname extraction</title> + <p>The <c>fqdn_fun</c> extracts hostnames (Fully Qualified Domain Names) from uri_id + or other ReferenceIDs that are not pre-defined in the public_key function. + Suppose you have some URI with a very special protocol-part: + <c>myspecial://example.com"</c>. Since this a non-standard URI there will be no hostname + extracted for matching CN-names in the <c>Subject</c>.</p> + <p>To "teach" the function how to extract, you can give a fun which replaces the default + extraction function. + The <c>fqdn_fun</c> takes one argument and returns + either a <c>string()</c> to be matched to each CN-name or the atom <c>default</c> which will invoke + the default fqdn extraction function. The return value <c>undefined</c> removes the current + URI from the fqdn extraction. + </p> + <code> + ... + Extract = fun({uri_id, "myspecial://"++HostName}) -> HostName; + (_Else) -> default + end, + ... + public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(CertFromHost, RefIDs, + [{fqdn_fun, Extract}]) + ... + </code> + </section> + <section> + <title>Re-defining the match operations</title> + <p>The default matching handles dns_id and uri_id. In an uri_id the value is tested for + equality with a value from the <c>Subject Alternate Name</c>. If som other kind of matching + is needed, use the <c>match_fun</c> option. + </p> + <p>The <c>match_fun</c> takes two arguments and returns either <c>true</c>, + <c>false</c> or <c>default</c>. The value <c>default</c> will invoke the default + match function. + </p> + <code> + ... + Match = fun({uri_id,"myspecial://"++A}, + {uniformResourceIdentifier,"myspecial://"++B}) -> + my_match(A,B); + (_RefID, _PresentedID) -> + default + end, + ... + public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(CertFromHost, RefIDs, + [{match_fun, Match}]), + ... + </code> + <p>In case of a match operation between a ReferenceID and a CN value from the <c>Subject</c> + field, the first argument to the fun is the extracted hostname from the ReferenceID, and the + second argument is the tuple <c>{cn, string()}</c> taken from the <c>Subject</c> field. That + makes it possible to have separate matching rules for Presented IDs from the <c>Subject</c> + field and from the <c>Subject Alternate Name</c> field. + </p> + <p>The default matching transformes the ascii values in strings to lowercase before comparing. + The <c>match_fun</c> is however called without any transfomation applied to the strings. The + reason is to enable the user to do unforseen handling of the strings where the original format + is needed. + </p> + </section> + </section> + <section> + <title>"Pinning" a Certificate</title> + <p>The <url href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6125">RFC 6125</url> defines <i>pinning</i> + as:</p> + <quote> + <p>"The act of establishing a cached name association between + the application service's certificate and one of the client's + reference identifiers, despite the fact that none of the presented + identifiers matches the given reference identifier. ..." + </p> + </quote> + <p>The purpose is to have a mechanism for a human to accept an otherwise faulty Certificate. + In for example a web browser, you could get a question like </p> + <quote> + <p>Warning: you wanted to visit the site www.example.com, + but the certificate is for shop.example.com. Accept anyway (yes/no)?" + </p> + </quote> + <p>This could be accomplished with the option <c>fail_callback</c> which will + be called if the hostname verification fails: + </p> + <code> + -include_lib("public_key/include/public_key.hrl"). % Record def + ... + Fail = fun(#'OTPCertificate'{}=C) -> + case in_my_cache(C) orelse my_accept(C) of + true -> + enter_my_cache(C), + true; + false -> + false + end, + ... + public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(CertFromHost, RefIDs, + [{fail_callback, Fail}]), + ... + </code> + </section> + </section> + <section> <title>SSH Files</title> diff --git a/lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl b/lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl index 05c09f8996..402f514803 100644 --- a/lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl +++ b/lib/public_key/src/public_key.erl @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ pkix_issuer_id/2, pkix_normalize_name/1, pkix_path_validation/3, + pkix_verify_hostname/2, pkix_verify_hostname/3, ssh_decode/2, ssh_encode/2, ssh_hostkey_fingerprint/1, ssh_hostkey_fingerprint/2, ssh_curvename2oid/1, oid2ssh_curvename/1, @@ -763,6 +764,76 @@ pkix_crls_validate(OtpCert, DPAndCRLs0, Options) -> pkix_crls_validate(OtpCert, DPAndCRLs, DPAndCRLs, Options, pubkey_crl:init_revokation_state()). +%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +-spec pkix_verify_hostname(Cert :: #'OTPCertificate'{} | binary(), + ReferenceIDs :: [{uri_id | dns_id | oid(), string()}]) -> boolean(). + +-spec pkix_verify_hostname(Cert :: #'OTPCertificate'{} | binary(), + ReferenceIDs :: [{uri_id | dns_id | oid(), string()}], + Options :: proplists:proplist()) -> boolean(). + +%% Description: Validates a hostname to RFC 6125 +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, ReferenceIDs) -> + pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, ReferenceIDs, []). + +pkix_verify_hostname(BinCert, ReferenceIDs, Options) when is_binary(BinCert) -> + pkix_verify_hostname(pkix_decode_cert(BinCert,otp), ReferenceIDs, Options); + +pkix_verify_hostname(Cert = #'OTPCertificate'{tbsCertificate = TbsCert}, ReferenceIDs0, Opts) -> + MatchFun = proplists:get_value(match_fun, Opts, undefined), + FailCB = proplists:get_value(fail_callback, Opts, fun(_Cert) -> false end), + FqdnFun = proplists:get_value(fqdn_fun, Opts, fun verify_hostname_extract_fqdn_default/1), + + ReferenceIDs = [{T,to_string(V)} || {T,V} <- ReferenceIDs0], + PresentedIDs = + try lists:keyfind(?'id-ce-subjectAltName', + #'Extension'.extnID, + TbsCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.extensions) + of + #'Extension'{extnValue = ExtVals} -> + [{T,to_string(V)} || {T,V} <- ExtVals]; + false -> + [] + catch + _:_ -> [] + end, + %% PresentedIDs example: [{dNSName,"ewstest.ericsson.com"}, {dNSName,"www.ericsson.com"}]} + case PresentedIDs of + [] -> + %% Fallback to CN-ids [rfc6125, ch6] + case TbsCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.subject of + {rdnSequence,RDNseq} -> + PresentedCNs = + [{cn, to_string(V)} + || ATVs <- RDNseq, % RDNseq is list-of-lists + #'AttributeTypeAndValue'{type = ?'id-at-commonName', + value = {_T,V}} <- ATVs + % _T = kind of string (teletexString etc) + ], + %% Example of PresentedCNs: [{cn,"www.ericsson.se"}] + %% match ReferenceIDs to PresentedCNs + verify_hostname_match_loop(verify_hostname_fqnds(ReferenceIDs, FqdnFun), + PresentedCNs, + MatchFun, FailCB, Cert); + + _ -> + false + end; + _ -> + %% match ReferenceIDs to PresentedIDs + case verify_hostname_match_loop(ReferenceIDs, PresentedIDs, + MatchFun, FailCB, Cert) of + false -> + %% Try to extract DNS-IDs from URIs etc + DNS_ReferenceIDs = + [{dns_is,X} || X <- verify_hostname_fqnds(ReferenceIDs, FqdnFun)], + verify_hostname_match_loop(DNS_ReferenceIDs, PresentedIDs, + MatchFun, FailCB, Cert); + true -> + true + end + end. %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- -spec ssh_decode(binary(), public_key | ssh_file()) -> [{public_key(), Attributes::list()}] @@ -1200,3 +1271,96 @@ ascii_to_lower(String) -> end)>> || <<C>> <= iolist_to_binary(String) >>. + +%%%---------------------------------------------------------------- +%%% pkix_verify_hostname help functions +verify_hostname_extract_fqdn_default({dns_id,S}) -> + S; +verify_hostname_extract_fqdn_default({uri_id,URI}) -> + {ok,{https,_,Host,_,_,_}} = http_uri:parse(URI), + Host. + + +verify_hostname_fqnds(L, FqdnFun) -> + [E || E0 <- L, + E <- [try case FqdnFun(E0) of + default -> verify_hostname_extract_fqdn_default(E0); + undefined -> undefined; % will make the "is_list(E)" test fail + Other -> Other + end + catch _:_-> undefined % will make the "is_list(E)" test fail + end], + is_list(E), + E =/= "", + {error,einval} == inet:parse_address(E) + ]. + + +-define(srvName_OID, {1,3,6,1,4,1,434,2,2,1,37,0}). + +verify_hostname_match_default(Ref, Pres) -> + verify_hostname_match_default0(to_lower_ascii(Ref), to_lower_ascii(Pres)). + +verify_hostname_match_default0(FQDN=[_|_], {cn,FQDN}) -> + not lists:member($*, FQDN); +verify_hostname_match_default0(FQDN=[_|_], {cn,Name=[_|_]}) -> + [F1|Fs] = string:tokens(FQDN, "."), + [N1|Ns] = string:tokens(Name, "."), + match_wild(F1,N1) andalso Fs==Ns; +verify_hostname_match_default0({dns_id,R}, {dNSName,P}) -> + R==P; +verify_hostname_match_default0({uri_id,R}, {uniformResourceIdentifier,P}) -> + R==P; +verify_hostname_match_default0({srv_id,R}, {T,P}) when T == srvName ; + T == ?srvName_OID -> + R==P; +verify_hostname_match_default0(_, _) -> + false. + + +match_wild(A, [$*|B]) -> match_wild_suffixes(A, B); +match_wild([C|A], [ C|B]) -> match_wild(A, B); +match_wild([], []) -> true; +match_wild(_, _) -> false. + +%% Match the parts after the only wildcard by comparing them from the end +match_wild_suffixes(A, B) -> match_wild_sfx(lists:reverse(A), lists:reverse(B)). + +match_wild_sfx([$*|_], _) -> false; % Bad name (no wildcards alowed) +match_wild_sfx(_, [$*|_]) -> false; % Bad pattern (no more wildcards alowed) +match_wild_sfx([A|Ar], [A|Br]) -> match_wild_sfx(Ar, Br); +match_wild_sfx(Ar, []) -> not lists:member($*, Ar); % Chk for bad name (= wildcards) +match_wild_sfx(_, _) -> false. + + +verify_hostname_match_loop(Refs0, Pres0, undefined, FailCB, Cert) -> + Pres = lists:map(fun to_lower_ascii/1, Pres0), + Refs = lists:map(fun to_lower_ascii/1, Refs0), + lists:any( + fun(R) -> + lists:any(fun(P) -> + verify_hostname_match_default(R,P) orelse FailCB(Cert) + end, Pres) + end, Refs); +verify_hostname_match_loop(Refs, Pres, MatchFun, FailCB, Cert) -> + lists:any( + fun(R) -> + lists:any(fun(P) -> + (case MatchFun(R,P) of + default -> verify_hostname_match_default(R,P); + Bool -> Bool + end) orelse FailCB(Cert) + end, + Pres) + end, + Refs). + + +to_lower_ascii(S) when is_list(S) -> lists:map(fun to_lower_ascii/1, S); +to_lower_ascii({T,S}) -> {T, to_lower_ascii(S)}; +to_lower_ascii(C) when $A =< C,C =< $Z -> C + ($a-$A); +to_lower_ascii(C) -> C. + +to_string(S) when is_list(S) -> S; +to_string(B) when is_binary(B) -> binary_to_list(B). + diff --git a/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE.erl b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE.erl index cd24819899..615ff32539 100644 --- a/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE.erl @@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ all() -> {group, sign_verify}, pkix, pkix_countryname, pkix_emailaddress, pkix_path_validation, pkix_iso_rsa_oid, pkix_iso_dsa_oid, pkix_crl, general_name, + pkix_verify_hostname_cn, + pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName, + pkix_verify_hostname_options, short_cert_issuer_hash, short_crl_issuer_hash, ssh_hostkey_fingerprint_md5_implicit, ssh_hostkey_fingerprint_md5, @@ -814,6 +817,114 @@ pkix_path_validation(Config) when is_list(Config) -> ok. %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +%% To generate the PEM file contents: +%% +%% openssl req -x509 -nodes -newkey rsa:1024 -keyout /dev/null -subj '/C=SE/CN=example.com/CN=*.foo.example.com/CN=a*b.bar.example.com/O=erlang.org' > public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem +%% +%% Note that the same pem-file is used in pkix_verify_hostname_options/1 +%% +%% Subject: C=SE, CN=example.com, CN=*.foo.example.com, CN=a*b.bar.example.com, O=erlang.org +%% extensions = no subjAltName + +pkix_verify_hostname_cn(Config) -> + DataDir = proplists:get_value(data_dir, Config), + {ok,Bin} = file:read_file(filename:join(DataDir,"pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem")), + Cert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(element(2,hd(public_key:pem_decode(Bin))), otp), + + %% Check that 1) only CNs are checked, + %% 2) an empty label does not match a wildcard and + %% 3) a wildcard does not match more than one label + false = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"erlang.org"}, + {dns_id,"foo.EXAMPLE.com"}, + {dns_id,"b.a.foo.EXAMPLE.com"}]), + + %% Check that a hostname is extracted from a https-uri and used for checking: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"HTTPS://EXAMPLE.com"}]), + + %% Check wildcard matching one label: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"a.foo.EXAMPLE.com"}]), + + %% Check wildcard with surrounding chars matches one label: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"accb.bar.EXAMPLE.com"}]), + + %% Check that a wildcard with surrounding chars matches an empty string: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"https://ab.bar.EXAMPLE.com"}]). + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +%% To generate the PEM file contents: +%% +%% openssl req -x509 -nodes -newkey rsa:1024 -keyout /dev/null -extensions SAN -config public_key_SUITE_data/verify_hostname.conf 2>/dev/null > public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName.pem +%% +%% Subject: C=SE, CN=example.com +%% Subject Alternative Name: DNS:kb.example.org, URI:http://www.example.org, URI:https://wws.example.org + +pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName(Config) -> + DataDir = proplists:get_value(data_dir, Config), + {ok,Bin} = file:read_file(filename:join(DataDir,"pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName.pem")), + Cert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(element(2,hd(public_key:pem_decode(Bin))), otp), + + %% Check that neither a uri nor dns hostname matches a CN if subjAltName is present: + false = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"https://example.com"}, + {dns_id,"example.com"}]), + + %% Check that a uri_id matches a URI subjAltName: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"https://wws.example.org"}]), + + %% Check that a dns_id does not match a URI subjAltName: + false = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"www.example.org"}, + {dns_id,"wws.example.org"}]), + + %% Check that a dns_id matches a DNS subjAltName: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"kb.example.org"}]). + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +%% Uses the pem-file for pkix_verify_hostname_cn +%% Subject: C=SE, CN=example.com, CN=*.foo.example.com, CN=a*b.bar.example.com, O=erlang.org +pkix_verify_hostname_options(Config) -> + DataDir = proplists:get_value(data_dir, Config), + {ok,Bin} = file:read_file(filename:join(DataDir,"pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem")), + Cert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(element(2,hd(public_key:pem_decode(Bin))), otp), + + %% Check that the fail_callback is called and is presented the correct certificate: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"erlang.org"}], + [{fail_callback, + fun(#'OTPCertificate'{}=C) when C==Cert -> + true; % To test the return value matters + (#'OTPCertificate'{}=C) -> + ct:log("~p:~p: Wrong cert:~n~p~nExpect~n~p", + [?MODULE, ?LINE, C, Cert]), + ct:fail("Wrong cert, see log"); + (C) -> + ct:log("~p:~p: Bad cert: ~p",[?MODULE,?LINE,C]), + ct:fail("Bad cert, see log") + end}]), + + %% Check the callback for user-provided match functions: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"very.wrong.domain"}], + [{match_fun, + fun("very.wrong.domain", {cn,"example.com"}) -> + true; + (_, _) -> + false + end}]), + false = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"not.example.com"}], + [{match_fun, fun(_, _) -> default end}]), + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{dns_id,"example.com"}], + [{match_fun, fun(_, _) -> default end}]), + + %% Check the callback for user-provided fqdn extraction: + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"some://very.wrong.domain"}], + [{fqdn_fun, + fun({uri_id, "some://very.wrong.domain"}) -> + "example.com"; + (_) -> + "" + end}]), + true = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"https://example.com"}], + [{fqdn_fun, fun(_) -> default end}]), + false = public_key:pkix_verify_hostname(Cert, [{uri_id,"some://very.wrong.domain"}]). + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- pkix_iso_rsa_oid() -> [{doc, "Test workaround for supporting certs that use ISO oids" " 1.3.14.3.2.29 instead of PKIX/PKCS oid"}]. diff --git a/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9f7b428f9a --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_cn.pem @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- +MIICsjCCAhugAwIBAgIJAMCGx1ezaJFRMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMHIxCzAJBgNV +BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQDDAtleGFtcGxlLmNvbTEaMBgGA1UEAwwRKi5mb28uZXhh +bXBsZS5jb20xHDAaBgNVBAMME2EqYi5iYXIuZXhhbXBsZS5jb20xEzARBgNVBAoM +CmVybGFuZy5vcmcwHhcNMTYxMjIwMTUwNDUyWhcNMTcwMTE5MTUwNDUyWjByMQsw +CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEAwwLZXhhbXBsZS5jb20xGjAYBgNVBAMMESouZm9v +LmV4YW1wbGUuY29tMRwwGgYDVQQDDBNhKmIuYmFyLmV4YW1wbGUuY29tMRMwEQYD +VQQKDAplcmxhbmcub3JnMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDVGJgZ +defGucvMXf0RrEm6Hb18IfVUo9IV6swSP/kwAu/608ZIZdzlfp2pxC0e72a4E3WN +4vrGxAr2wMMQOiyoy4qlAeLX27THJ6Q4Vl82fc6QuOJbScKIydSZ4KoB+luGlBu5 +b6xYh2pBbneKFpsecmK5rsWtTactjD4n1tKjUwIDAQABo1AwTjAdBgNVHQ4EFgQU +OCtzidUeaDva7qp12T0CQrgfLW4wHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUOCtzidUeaDva7qp12T0C +QrgfLW4wDAYDVR0TBAUwAwEB/zANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOBgQCAz+ComCMo9Qbu +PHxG7pv3mQvoxrMFva/Asg4o9mW2mDyrk0DwI4zU8vMHbSRKSBYGm4TATXsQkDQT +gJw/bxhISnhZZtPC7Yup8kJCkJ6S6EDLYrlzgsRqfeU6jWim3nbfaLyMi9dHFDMk +HULnyNNW3qxTEKi8Wo2sCMej4l7KFg== +-----END CERTIFICATE----- diff --git a/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName.pem b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName.pem new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..83e1ad37b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/pkix_verify_hostname_subjAltName.pem @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- +MIICEjCCAXugAwIBAgIJANwliLph5EiAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAMCMxCzAJBgNV +BAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtleGFtcGxlLmNvbTAeFw0xNjEyMjAxNTEyMjRaFw0x +NzAxMTkxNTEyMjRaMCMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlNFMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtleGFtcGxlLmNv +bTCBnzANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEAydstIN157w8QxkVaOl3wm81j +fgZ8gqO3BXkECPF6bw5ewLlmePL6Qs4RypsaRe7cKJ9rHFlwhpdcYkxWSWEt2N7Z +Ry3N4SjuU04ohWbYgy3ijTt7bJg7jOV1Dh56BnI4hwhQj0oNFizNZOeRRfEzdMnS ++uk03t/Qre2NS7KbwnUCAwEAAaNOMEwwSgYDVR0RBEMwQYIOa2IuZXhhbXBsZS5v +cmeGFmh0dHA6Ly93d3cuZXhhbXBsZS5vcmeGF2h0dHBzOi8vd3dzLmV4YW1wbGUu +b3JnMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4GBAKqFqW5gCso422bXriCBJoygokOTTOw1Rzpq +K8Mm0B8W9rrW9OTkoLEcjekllZcUCZFin2HovHC5HlHZz+mQvBI1M6sN2HVQbSzS +EgL66U9gwJVnn9/U1hXhJ0LO28aGbyE29DxnewNR741dWN3oFxCdlNaO6eMWaEsO +gduJ5sDl +-----END CERTIFICATE----- diff --git a/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/verify_hostname.conf b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/verify_hostname.conf new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..a28864dc78 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/public_key/test/public_key_SUITE_data/verify_hostname.conf @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +[req] +prompt = no +distinguished_name = DN + +[DN] +C=SE +CN=example.com + +[SAN] +subjectAltName = @alt_names + +[alt_names] +DNS = kb.example.org +URI.1 = http://www.example.org +URI.2 = https://wws.example.org + |