summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/a25.c
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Add struct flashctx * parameter to all functions accessing flash chips.hailfinger2011-12-181-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All programmer access function prototypes except init have been made static and moved to the respective file. A few internal functions in flash chip drivers had chipaddr parameters which are no longer needed. The lines touched by flashctx changes have been adjusted to 80 columns except in header files. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1474 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
* Use struct flashctx instead of struct flashchip for flash chip accesshailfinger2011-12-141-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | struct flashchip is used only for the flashchips array and for operations which do not access hardware, e.g. printing a list of supported flash chips. struct flashctx (flash context) contains all data available in struct flashchip, but it also contains runtime information like mapping addresses. struct flashctx is expected to grow additional members over time, a prime candidate being programmer info. struct flashctx contains all of struct flashchip with identical member layout, but struct flashctx has additional members at the end. The separation between struct flashchip/flashctx shrinks the memory requirement of the big flashchips array and allows future extension of flashctx without having to worry about bloat. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: Michael Karcher <flashrom@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1473 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
* extract spi_prettyprint_status_register_amic_a25_srwdstefanct2011-07-291-8/+10
| | | | | | | | | | extract spi_prettyprint_status_register_amic_a25_srwd from spi_prettyprint_status_register_amic_a25l* functions Signed-off-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1399 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
* Random whitespace and coding-style fixes.uwe2011-07-281-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Also, indentation fixes, e.g. due to conversion to msg_*, use ARRAY_SIZE where possible, wrap overly long line, etc. Compile-tested. There should be no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de> Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe@hermann-uwe.de> git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1397 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
* Add lock printing for AMIC A25L05PT, A25L05PU, A25L10PT, A25L10PU,hailfinger2011-05-191-0/+104
A25L20PT, A25L20PU, A25L40PT, A25L40PU, A25L80P, A25L16PT, A25L16PU, A25L512, A25L010, A25L020, A25L040, A25L080, A25L016, A25L032, A25LQ032 to a25.c. Add lock printing for Atmel AT26DF081A, AT26DF161, AT26DF161A, AT26DF321. Move Atmel AT25*/AT26* lock related functions originally added in r1115 from spi25.c to at25.c. For SPI chips the lock printing was handled by one common function, but sharing a common function which only is a big switch() statement doesn't make sense, especially if we can define lock printing functions per flash chip anyway. The printlock function pointer in struct flashchip is used to print status register and locking information, and serves as replacement for implicit status register and lock printing during probe. That code will later be changed to store locking info in a machine- accessible data structure so flashrom can handle locked regions correctly. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger<c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: Stefan Tauner <stefan.tauner@student.tuwien.ac.at> git-svn-id: https://code.coreboot.org/svn/flashrom/trunk@1316 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1