summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>2016-12-31 07:46:04 -0200
committerAlexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>2017-01-06 01:31:00 -0200
commit2dccc7c49bef10d058260151cef37bababc47d20 (patch)
treec0e094fa3c2cf189dabc681a1dcd1b7700f823e2
parente6b1bc99739015684f9114d89623329eec4eaf18 (diff)
downloadgcc-2dccc7c49bef10d058260151cef37bababc47d20.tar.gz
[bootstrap-O3,fortran] silence warning in simplify_transformation_to_array
simplify_transformation_to_array had the nested loop unrolled 7 times, which is reasonable given that it iterates over arrays of size GFC_MAX_DIMENSIONS == 7. The problem is that the last iteration increments the index, tests that it's less than result->rank, and then accesses the arrays with the incremented index. We did not optimize out that part in the 7th iteration, so VRP flagged the unreachable code as accessing arrays past the end. It couldn't possibly know that we'd never reach that part, since the test was on result->rank, and it's not obvious (for the compiler) that result->rank <= GFC_MAX_DIMENSIONS. Even an assert to that effect before the enclosing loop didn't avoid the warning turned to error, though; I suppose there might be some aliasing at play, because moving the assert into the loop does. An assert on the index itself would also work, even more efficiently, but we're just silencing the warning instead. for gcc/fortran/ChangeLog * simplify.c (simplify_transformation_to_array): Silence array bounds warning. Fix whitespace.
-rw-r--r--gcc/fortran/simplify.c11
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
index 549d900538b..db860f78099 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/simplify.c
@@ -610,9 +610,18 @@ simplify_transformation_to_array (gfc_expr *result, gfc_expr *array, gfc_expr *d
n++;
if (n < result->rank)
{
- count [n]++;
+#pragma GCC diagnostic push
+ /* If the nested loop is unrolled GFC_MAX_DIMENSIONS
+ times, we'd warn for the last iteration, because the
+ array index will have already been incremented to the
+ array sizes, and we can't tell that this must make
+ the test against result->rank false, because ranks
+ must not exceed GFC_MAX_DIMENSIONS. */
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Warray-bounds"
+ count[n]++;
base += sstride[n];
dest += dstride[n];
+#pragma GCC diagnostic pop
}
else
done = true;