summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjiez <jiez@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2010-10-26 16:13:04 +0000
committerjiez <jiez@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2010-10-26 16:13:04 +0000
commitc0fc75c3a05ed0c07fb0675c18813227c916a52a (patch)
tree1def84239e3f47c486cb01d95ea163c2e57e1573
parent4ba746627517cb5154a1762a6745c30a93291a50 (diff)
downloadgcc-c0fc75c3a05ed0c07fb0675c18813227c916a52a.tar.gz
* doc/invoke.texi: Improve documentation of
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@165971 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
-rw-r--r--gcc/ChangeLog5
-rw-r--r--gcc/doc/invoke.texi14
2 files changed, 13 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 1906f53720e..661e0c15fa8 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2010-10-26 Jie Zhang <jie@codesourcery.com>
+
+ * doc/invoke.texi: Improve documentation of
+ -fstrict-volatile-bitfields.
+
2010-10-26 Ira Rosen <irar@il.ibm.com>
PR tree-optimization/46167
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index ee68454fc16..7ea042f6775 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -18120,8 +18120,8 @@ is at @uref{http://gcc.gnu.org/@/wiki/@/Visibility}.
@opindex fstrict-volatile-bitfields
This option should be used if accesses to volatile bitfields (or other
structure fields, although the compiler usually honors those types
-anyway) should use a single access in a mode of the same size as the
-container's type, aligned to a natural alignment if possible. For
+anyway) should use a single access of the width of the
+field's type, aligned to a natural alignment if possible. For
example, targets with memory-mapped peripheral registers might require
all such accesses to be 16 bits wide; with this flag the user could
declare all peripheral bitfields as ``unsigned short'' (assuming short
@@ -18134,11 +18134,13 @@ instruction, even though that will access bytes that do not contain
any portion of the bitfield, or memory-mapped registers unrelated to
the one being updated.
-If the target requires strict alignment, and honoring the container
+If the target requires strict alignment, and honoring the field
type would require violating this alignment, a warning is issued.
-However, the access happens as the user requested, under the
-assumption that the user knows something about the target hardware
-that GCC is unaware of.
+If the field has @code{packed} attribute, the access is done without
+honoring the field type. If the field doesn't have @code{packed}
+attribute, the access is done honoring the field type. In both cases,
+GCC assumes that the user knows something about the target hardware
+that it is unaware of.
The default value of this option is determined by the application binary
interface for the target processor.