summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorpault <pault@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2008-01-20 08:22:56 +0000
committerpault <pault@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>2008-01-20 08:22:56 +0000
commitf1ce7f3e1e87543427f10979a133863c18fa51cf (patch)
tree9d64879d44fe6ed386e45de8c13efc7841555948 /gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
parent06398a9da96e23291ffa797b38555cdaa5be23e3 (diff)
downloadgcc-f1ce7f3e1e87543427f10979a133863c18fa51cf.tar.gz
2008-01-20 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/34784 * array.c (gfc_check_constructor_type): Clear the expression ts so that the checking starts from the deepest level of array constructor. * primary.c (match_varspec): If an unknown type is changed to default character and the attempt to match a substring fails, change it back to unknown. PR fortran/34785 * trans-array.c (gfc_add_loop_ss_code) : If ss->string_length is NULL for an array constructor, use the cl.length expression to build it. (gfc_conv_array_parameter): Change call to gfc_evaluate_now to a tree assignment. 2008-01-20 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/34784 * gfortran.dg/array_constructor_20.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/mapping_2.f90: Correct ubound expression for h4. PR fortran/34785 * gfortran.dg/array_constructor_21.f90: New test. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@131675 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/fortran/trans-array.c')
-rw-r--r--gcc/fortran/trans-array.c14
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
index 1718ba9cfae..08c2a80d85c 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
@@ -1906,6 +1906,18 @@ gfc_add_loop_ss_code (gfc_loopinfo * loop, gfc_ss * ss, bool subscript)
break;
case GFC_SS_CONSTRUCTOR:
+ if (ss->expr->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER
+ && ss->string_length== NULL
+ && ss->expr->ts.cl
+ && ss->expr->ts.cl->length)
+ {
+ gfc_init_se (&se, NULL);
+ gfc_conv_expr_type (&se, ss->expr->ts.cl->length,
+ gfc_charlen_type_node);
+ ss->string_length = se.expr;
+ gfc_add_block_to_block (&loop->pre, &se.pre);
+ gfc_add_block_to_block (&loop->post, &se.post);
+ }
gfc_trans_array_constructor (loop, ss);
break;
@@ -5042,7 +5054,7 @@ gfc_conv_array_parameter (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, gfc_ss * ss, int g77)
{
get_array_ctor_strlen (&se->pre, expr->value.constructor, &tmp);
expr->ts.cl->backend_decl = tmp;
- se->string_length = gfc_evaluate_now (tmp, &se->pre);
+ se->string_length = tmp;
}
/* Is this the result of the enclosing procedure? */