diff options
author | jsm28 <jsm28@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2000-08-15 18:08:04 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | jsm28 <jsm28@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4> | 2000-08-15 18:08:04 +0000 |
commit | 0090b1e540804e3bc2cb5e7993c814e8bb1ac734 (patch) | |
tree | b9b1e29df44d6b796427579573476a26f94ff045 /gcc/testsuite | |
parent | 087e845912daf17c3c6b29892100fc109b2867cb (diff) | |
download | gcc-0090b1e540804e3bc2cb5e7993c814e8bb1ac734.tar.gz |
* gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-2.c, gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-2.c,
gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-2.c, gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-2.c,
gcc.dg/c99-func-3.c, gcc.dg/c99-func-4.c: New tests.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@35728 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Diffstat (limited to 'gcc/testsuite')
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog | 6 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-2.c | 20 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-2.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-2.c | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-2.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-3.c | 16 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-4.c | 10 |
7 files changed, 142 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog index 96b5fd78c02..1c8be14f47f 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +2000-08-15 Joseph S. Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> + + * gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-2.c, gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-2.c, + gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-2.c, gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-2.c, + gcc.dg/c99-func-3.c, gcc.dg/c99-func-4.c: New tests. + 2000-08-14 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> * g++.old-deja/g++.other/refinit2.C: New test. diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-2.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b5461e8c785 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-array-lval-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/* Test for non-lvalue arrays decaying to pointers: in C99 only. */ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1990 -pedantic-errors" } */ + +struct s { char c[17]; }; + +struct s x; + +extern struct s foo (void); + +#define ASSERT(v, a) char v[((a) ? 1 : -1)] + +ASSERT (p, sizeof (x.c) == 17); +ASSERT (q, sizeof (0, x.c) == sizeof (char *)); +ASSERT (r, sizeof ((foo ()).c) == 17); +/* The non-lvalue array does not decay to a pointer, so the comma expression + has (non-lvalue) array type. +*/ +ASSERT (s, sizeof (0, (foo ()).c) == 17); /* { dg-bogus "array" "bad non-lvalue array handling" { xfail *-*-* } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-2.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..940a7189795 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +/* Test for constant expressions: details of what is a null pointer + constant. +*/ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1990" } */ +/* Note: not using -pedantic since the -std option alone should be enough + to give the correct behavior to conforming programs. If -pedantic is + needed to make (say) (0, 0) not be a constant expression, this is a + bug. +*/ + +int *a; +int b; +long *c; + +/* Assertion that n is a null pointer constant: so the conditional expression + has type 'int *' instead of 'void *'. +*/ +#define ASSERT_NPC(n) (b = *(1 ? a : (n))) +/* Assertion that n is not a null pointer constant: so the conditional + expresions has type 'void *' instead of 'int *'. +*/ +#define ASSERT_NOT_NPC(n) (c = (1 ? a : (n))) + +void +foo (void) +{ + ASSERT_NPC (0); + ASSERT_NPC ((void *)0); + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(void *)0); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(char *)0); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(0, 0)); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + /* This last one is a null pointer constant in C99 only. */ + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(1 ? 0 : (0, 0))); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-2.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..68d8599ee39 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-array-lval-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/* Test for non-lvalue arrays decaying to pointers: in C99 only. */ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */ + +struct s { char c[17]; }; + +struct s x; + +extern struct s foo (void); + +#define ASSERT(v, a) char v[((a) ? 1 : -1)] + +ASSERT (p, sizeof (x.c) == 17); +ASSERT (q, sizeof (0, x.c) == sizeof (char *)); +ASSERT (r, sizeof ((foo ()).c) == 17); +/* The non-lvalue array decays to a pointer in C99. */ +ASSERT (s, sizeof (0, (foo ()).c) == sizeof (char *)); /* { dg-bogus "array" "bad non-lvalue array handling" { xfail *-*-* } } */ diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-2.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03422b61522 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-2.c @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +/* Test for constant expressions: details of what is a null pointer + constant. +*/ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999" } */ +/* Note: not using -pedantic since the -std option alone should be enough + to give the correct behavior to conforming programs. If -pedantic is + needed to make (say) (0, 0) not be a constant expression, this is a + bug. +*/ + +int *a; +int b; +long *c; + +/* Assertion that n is a null pointer constant: so the conditional expression + has type 'int *' instead of 'void *'. +*/ +#define ASSERT_NPC(n) (b = *(1 ? a : (n))) +/* Assertion that n is not a null pointer constant: so the conditional + expresions has type 'void *' instead of 'int *'. +*/ +#define ASSERT_NOT_NPC(n) (c = (1 ? a : (n))) + +void +foo (void) +{ + ASSERT_NPC (0); + ASSERT_NPC ((void *)0); + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(void *)0); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(char *)0); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + ASSERT_NOT_NPC ((void *)(0, 0)); /* { dg-bogus "incompatible" "bogus null pointer constant" { xfail *-*-* } } */ + /* This last one is a null pointer constant in C99 only. */ + ASSERT_NPC ((void *)(1 ? 0 : (0, 0))); +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-3.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5fa920a9f65 --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-3.c @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* Test for C99 __func__: not merging with string literals. */ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */ + +extern void abort (void); +extern void exit (int); + +int +main (void) +{ + if ("main" == __func__) + abort (); + else + exit (0); +} diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-4.c new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d1388033dab --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/c99-func-4.c @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +/* Test for C99 __func__: of type const char []. */ +/* Origin: Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> */ +/* { dg-do compile } */ +/* { dg-options "-std=iso9899:1999 -pedantic-errors" } */ + +void +foo (void) +{ + char *p = __func__; /* { dg-error "discards" "__func__ pointer to const" { xfail *-*-* } } */ +} |