Change attribute((option(...))) to attribute((target(...))); Do not allocate tree nodes on x86 for builtins until we generate code for the ISA; Delete hot/cold functions changing optimization; Make C++ support target specific functions; Add #pragma GCC {push_options,pop_options,reset_options} instead of #pragma GCC {target,optimize} {push,reset,pop}

git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@139812 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/gcc/tree-inline.c b/gcc/tree-inline.c
index 0f59d164925..e38ef3a8d4e 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-inline.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-inline.c
@@ -4369,6 +4369,11 @@ build_duplicate_type (tree type)
 bool
 tree_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee)
 {
+#if 0
+  /* This causes a regression in SPEC in that it prevents a cold function from
+     inlining a hot function.  Perhaps this should only apply to functions
+     that the user declares hot/cold/optimize explicitly.  */
+
   /* Don't inline a function with a higher optimization level than the
      caller, or with different space constraints (hot/cold functions).  */
   tree caller_tree = DECL_FUNCTION_SPECIFIC_OPTIMIZATION (caller);
@@ -4390,6 +4395,7 @@ tree_can_inline_p (tree caller, tree callee)
 	  || (caller_opt->optimize_size != callee_opt->optimize_size))
 	return false;
     }
+#endif
 
   /* Allow the backend to decide if inlining is ok.  */
   return targetm.target_option.can_inline_p (caller, callee);