diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/ChangeLog | 5 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/reg-stack.c | 10 |
2 files changed, 14 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 24096b199af..f32d9cf2d11 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ +Tue Oct 19 02:03:00 1999 Jeffrey A Law (law@cygnus.com) + + * reg-stack.c (stack_result): Aggregates are not returned in + stack registers. + Tue Oct 19 01:26:48 1999 Alasdair Baird <alasdair@wildcat.demon.co.uk> * fold-const.c (fold): Fix thinko in x+(-0) -> x transformation. diff --git a/gcc/reg-stack.c b/gcc/reg-stack.c index 0cbc5da2124..d1bceefe6c6 100644 --- a/gcc/reg-stack.c +++ b/gcc/reg-stack.c @@ -1192,8 +1192,16 @@ static rtx stack_result (decl) tree decl; { - rtx result = DECL_RTL (DECL_RESULT (decl)); + rtx result; + /* If the value is supposed to be returned in memory, then clearly + it is not returned in a stack register. */ + if (aggregate_value_p (DECL_RESULT (decl))) + return 0; + + result = DECL_RTL (DECL_RESULT (decl)); + /* ?!? What is this code supposed to do? Can this code actually + trigger if we kick out aggregates above? */ if (result != 0 && ! (GET_CODE (result) == REG && REGNO (result) < FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)) |