From bb9223595906e2dc3554b1eb71daf83e1a744bda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rakdver Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:58:11 +0000 Subject: * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c: Fix outcome. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@93116 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c') diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c index a1dabfd9bcb..8ba535b597a 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-4.c @@ -23,9 +23,18 @@ void xxx(void) arr_base[iter].y = foo (); } -/* Access to arr_base[iter].y should be strength reduced. */ +/* Access to arr_base[iter].y should be strength reduced. Depending on + whether we have an addressing mode of type [base + offset], one of the + following forms might get chosen: -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "arr_base\[^\\n\\r\]*=" 0 "vars" } } */ + -- induction variable with base &arr_base[0].y, the memory access of + form *iv = ... + -- induction variable with base 0, the memory access of form + *(iv + &arr_base[0].y) = ... + + In any case, we should not have 'arr_base.[^0].* =' */ + +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "arr_base.\[^0\]\[^\\n\\r\]*=" 0 "vars" } } */ /* And the original induction variable should be eliminated. */ -- cgit v1.2.1