blob: 6654dd0b84e47a49a7dae077671b58bd9957f083 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
|
From: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Noah Friedman)
To: roland@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Roland McGrath),
rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman),
jimb@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Jim Blandy),
mib@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Michael Bushnell)
Cc: cgw@sol.acs.unt.edu (chris williams),
clc@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Christian Longshore Claiborn)
Subject: Some gcc options we'd like to see.
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 93 00:45:09 EST
Reply-To: friedman@gnu.ai.mit.edu
-Waggravate-return
-Wcast-spell
-Wcaste-align
-Win
-Wmissing-protons
-Wredundant-repetitions
-antsy
-fbungee-jump
-fexpensive-operations
-fextra-strength
-fjesus-saves
-fkeep-programmers-inline
-fno-peeping-toms
-fruit-roll-ups
-fshort-enough
-mno-dialogue
-pedophile
-vomit-frame-pointer
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
Date: 06 Jan 2002 17:37:07 -0200
On Jan 2, 2002, in a long, heated thread concerning the interpretation
of certain passages of the C standard, jtv <jtv@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> (Yes, I'm a pedant. I'm pining for the day when gcc will support the
> options "-ffascist -Wanal")
How about introducing the options `-flame -War' :-)
|
