From 0b3c2a5ea7b975d6e3c4d0541d549a0bc4027e07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 18:32:06 +0000 Subject: * frame.c (frame_func_unwind): Delete. (get_frame_func): Do not use it. * frame.h (frame_func_unwind): Delete prototype. * hppa-tdep.c (hppa_frame_cache): Update comment. * rs6000-tdep.c (rs6000_frame_cache): Update comment. --- gdb/hppa-tdep.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'gdb/hppa-tdep.c') diff --git a/gdb/hppa-tdep.c b/gdb/hppa-tdep.c index 4c097a014f5..8e9b507217f 100644 --- a/gdb/hppa-tdep.c +++ b/gdb/hppa-tdep.c @@ -1894,9 +1894,9 @@ hppa_frame_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache) in hppa_skip_prologue will return a prologue end that is too early for us to notice any potential frame adjustments. */ - /* We used to use frame_func_unwind () to locate the beginning of the - function to pass to skip_prologue (). However, when objects are - compiled without debug symbols, frame_func_unwind can return the wrong + /* We used to use get_frame_func to locate the beginning of the + function to pass to skip_prologue. However, when objects are + compiled without debug symbols, get_frame_func can return the wrong function (or 0). We can do better than that by using unwind records. This only works if the Region_description of the unwind record indicates that it includes the entry point of the function. -- cgit v1.2.1