delta/git.git/Documentation/technical/protocol-capabilities.txt, branch ss/userdiff-update-csharp-java

protocol-capabilities.txt: document no-done

2014-02-10T18:21:33+00:00

See 3e63b21 (upload-pack: Implement no-done capability - 2011-03-14)
and 761ecf0 (fetch-pack: Implement no-done capability - 2011-03-14)
for more information.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

protocol-capabilities.txt: refer multi_ack_detailed back to pack-protocol.txt

2014-02-10T18:21:33+00:00

pack-protocol.txt explains in detail how multi_ack_detailed works and
what's the difference between no multi_ack, multi_ack and
multi_ack_detailed. No need to repeat here.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

send-pack: don't send a thin pack to a server which doesn't support it

2013-11-25T21:16:19+00:00

Up to now git has assumed that all servers are able to fix thin
packs. This is however not always the case.

Document the 'no-thin' capability and prevent send-pack from generating
a thin pack if the server advertises it.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Martín Nieto 
Helped-by: Jeff King 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

document 'allow-tip-sha1-in-want' capability

2013-07-26T15:33:38+00:00

See 390eb36 (upload-pack: optionally allow fetching from the tips of
hidden refs - 2013-01-28) for more information.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

document 'quiet' receive-pack capability

2013-07-24T22:57:01+00:00

This was added in c207e34 (fix push --quiet: add 'quiet'
capability to receive-pack, 2012-01-08) but never
documented.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

document 'agent' protocol capability

2013-07-24T22:57:01+00:00

This was added in ff5effd (include agent identifier in
capability string, 2012-08-03), but neither the syntax nor
the semantics were ever documented outside of the commit
message.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

docs: note that receive-pack knows side-band-64k capability

2013-07-24T22:57:01+00:00

The protocol-capabilities documentation notes that any
capabilities not explicitly mentioned for receive-pack work
only for upload-pack.

Receive-pack has advertised and understood side-band-64k
since 38a81b4 (receive-pack: Wrap status reports inside
side-band-64k, 2010-02-05), but we do not mention it
explicitly. Let's do so.

Note that receive-pack does not understand side-band, which
was obsolete by that point.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

docs: fix 'report-status' protocol capability thinko

2013-07-24T22:57:01+00:00

The report-status capability is understood by receive-pack,
not upload-pack.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Documentation: Spelling fix in protocol-capabilities.txt

2010-07-10T00:36:28+00:00

Signed-off-by: Fredrik Skolmli 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano

Fix typos in technical documentation.

2010-01-31T18:24:53+00:00

Signed-off-by: Ralf Wildenhues 
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano