<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>delta/git.git/t/t5512-ls-remote.sh, branch ws/curl-http-proxy-over-https</title>
<subtitle>github.com: git/git.git
</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/'/>
<entry>
<title>wrapper.c: add and use fopen_or_warn()</title>
<updated>2017-05-26T03:33:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy</name>
<email>pclouds@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-05-03T10:16:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=e9d983f116c7de43f40a49aae60ebfe107f153ec'/>
<id>e9d983f116c7de43f40a49aae60ebfe107f153ec</id>
<content type='text'>
When fopen() returns NULL, it could be because the given path does not
exist, but it could also be some other errors and the caller has to
check. Add a wrapper so we don't have to repeat the same error check
everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy &lt;pclouds@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When fopen() returns NULL, it could be because the given path does not
exist, but it could also be some other errors and the caller has to
check. Add a wrapper so we don't have to repeat the same error check
everywhere.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy &lt;pclouds@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>remote: avoid reading $GIT_DIR config in non-repo</title>
<updated>2017-02-14T21:13:59+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jeff King</name>
<email>peff@peff.net</email>
</author>
<published>2017-02-14T20:33:28+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=4539c218c362f2c1a26c61b1aa57af10342fd5a4'/>
<id>4539c218c362f2c1a26c61b1aa57af10342fd5a4</id>
<content type='text'>
The "git ls-remote" command can be run outside of a
repository, but needs to look up configured remotes. The
config code is smart enough to handle this case itself, but
we also check the historical "branches" and "remotes" paths
in $GIT_DIR. The git_path() function causes us to blindly
look at ".git/remotes", even if we know we aren't in a git
repository.

For now, this is just an unlikely bug (you probably don't
have such a file if you're not in a repository), but it will
become more obvious once we merge b1ef400ee (setup_git_env:
avoid blind fall-back to ".git", 2016-10-20):

  [now]
  $ git ls-remote
  fatal: No remote configured to list refs from.

  [with b1ef400ee]
  $ git ls-remote
  fatal: BUG: setup_git_env called without repository

We can fix this by skipping these sources entirely when
we're outside of a repository.

The test is a little more complex than the demonstration
above. Rather than detect the correct behavior by parsing
the error message, we can actually set up a case where the
remote name we give is a valid repository, but b1ef400ee
would cause us to die in the configuration step.

This test doesn't fail now, but it future-proofs us for the
b1ef400ee change.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
The "git ls-remote" command can be run outside of a
repository, but needs to look up configured remotes. The
config code is smart enough to handle this case itself, but
we also check the historical "branches" and "remotes" paths
in $GIT_DIR. The git_path() function causes us to blindly
look at ".git/remotes", even if we know we aren't in a git
repository.

For now, this is just an unlikely bug (you probably don't
have such a file if you're not in a repository), but it will
become more obvious once we merge b1ef400ee (setup_git_env:
avoid blind fall-back to ".git", 2016-10-20):

  [now]
  $ git ls-remote
  fatal: No remote configured to list refs from.

  [with b1ef400ee]
  $ git ls-remote
  fatal: BUG: setup_git_env called without repository

We can fix this by skipping these sources entirely when
we're outside of a repository.

The test is a little more complex than the demonstration
above. Rather than detect the correct behavior by parsing
the error message, we can actually set up a case where the
remote name we give is a valid repository, but b1ef400ee
would cause us to die in the configuration step.

This test doesn't fail now, but it future-proofs us for the
b1ef400ee change.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'va/i18n-more'</title>
<updated>2016-09-26T23:09:18+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-09-26T23:09:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=8969feac7ee119dc3cdae0e2d8c65516aa8f4045'/>
<id>8969feac7ee119dc3cdae0e2d8c65516aa8f4045</id>
<content type='text'>
Even more i18n.

* va/i18n-more:
  i18n: stash: mark messages for translation
  i18n: notes-merge: mark die messages for translation
  i18n: ident: mark hint for translation
  i18n: i18n: diff: mark die messages for translation
  i18n: connect: mark die messages for translation
  i18n: commit: mark message for translation
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Even more i18n.

* va/i18n-more:
  i18n: stash: mark messages for translation
  i18n: notes-merge: mark die messages for translation
  i18n: ident: mark hint for translation
  i18n: i18n: diff: mark die messages for translation
  i18n: connect: mark die messages for translation
  i18n: commit: mark message for translation
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>i18n: connect: mark die messages for translation</title>
<updated>2016-09-19T17:55:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Vasco Almeida</name>
<email>vascomalmeida@sapo.pt</email>
</author>
<published>2016-09-19T13:08:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=f2b93b388ccbce342bc8b58d8581f6a077f42eff'/>
<id>f2b93b388ccbce342bc8b58d8581f6a077f42eff</id>
<content type='text'>
Mark messages passed to die() in die_initial_contact().

Update test to reflect changes.

Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida &lt;vascomalmeida@sapo.pt&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Mark messages passed to die() in die_initial_contact().

Update test to reflect changes.

Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida &lt;vascomalmeida@sapo.pt&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>connect: advertized capability is not a ref</title>
<updated>2016-09-09T20:40:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jonathan Tan</name>
<email>jonathantanmy@google.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-09-09T17:36:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=eb398797cdc97aae15419f5ac1316440936c31f1'/>
<id>eb398797cdc97aae15419f5ac1316440936c31f1</id>
<content type='text'>
When cloning an empty repository served by standard git, "git clone" produces
the following reassuring message:

	$ git clone git://localhost/tmp/empty
	Cloning into 'empty'...
	warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository.
	Checking connectivity... done.

Meanwhile when cloning an empty repository served by JGit, the output is more
haphazard:

	$ git clone git://localhost/tmp/empty
	Cloning into 'empty'...
	Checking connectivity... done.
	warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.

This is a common command to run immediately after creating a remote repository
as preparation for adding content to populate it and pushing. The warning is
confusing and needlessly worrying.

The cause is that, since v3.1.0.201309270735-rc1~22 (Advertise capabilities
with no refs in upload service., 2013-08-08), JGit's ref advertisement includes
a ref named capabilities^{} to advertise its capabilities on, while git's ref
advertisement is empty in this case. This allows the client to learn about the
server's capabilities and is needed, for example, for fetch-by-sha1 to work
when no refs are advertised.

This also affects "ls-remote". For example, against an empty repository served
by JGit:

	$ git ls-remote git://localhost/tmp/empty
	0000000000000000000000000000000000000000        capabilities^{}

Git advertises the same capabilities^{} ref in its ref advertisement for push
but since it never did so for fetch, the client didn't need to handle this
case.  Handle it.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan &lt;jonathantanmy@google.com&gt;
Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder &lt;jrnieder@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When cloning an empty repository served by standard git, "git clone" produces
the following reassuring message:

	$ git clone git://localhost/tmp/empty
	Cloning into 'empty'...
	warning: You appear to have cloned an empty repository.
	Checking connectivity... done.

Meanwhile when cloning an empty repository served by JGit, the output is more
haphazard:

	$ git clone git://localhost/tmp/empty
	Cloning into 'empty'...
	Checking connectivity... done.
	warning: remote HEAD refers to nonexistent ref, unable to checkout.

This is a common command to run immediately after creating a remote repository
as preparation for adding content to populate it and pushing. The warning is
confusing and needlessly worrying.

The cause is that, since v3.1.0.201309270735-rc1~22 (Advertise capabilities
with no refs in upload service., 2013-08-08), JGit's ref advertisement includes
a ref named capabilities^{} to advertise its capabilities on, while git's ref
advertisement is empty in this case. This allows the client to learn about the
server's capabilities and is needed, for example, for fetch-by-sha1 to work
when no refs are advertised.

This also affects "ls-remote". For example, against an empty repository served
by JGit:

	$ git ls-remote git://localhost/tmp/empty
	0000000000000000000000000000000000000000        capabilities^{}

Git advertises the same capabilities^{} ref in its ref advertisement for push
but since it never did so for fetch, the client didn't need to handle this
case.  Handle it.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan &lt;jonathantanmy@google.com&gt;
Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder &lt;jrnieder@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>ls-remote: add support for showing symrefs</title>
<updated>2016-01-19T18:07:56+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Thomas Gummerer</name>
<email>t.gummerer@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2016-01-18T23:20:50+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=99c08d4eb28f0525d71125e7903fd4462bfd6787'/>
<id>99c08d4eb28f0525d71125e7903fd4462bfd6787</id>
<content type='text'>
Sometimes it's useful to know the main branch of a git repository
without actually downloading the repository.  This can be done by
looking at the symrefs stored in the remote repository.  Currently git
doesn't provide a simple way to show the symrefs stored on the remote
repository, even though the information is available.  Add a --symref
command line argument to the ls-remote command, which shows the symrefs
in the remote repository.

While there, replace a literal tab in the format string with \t to make
it more obvious to the reader.

Suggested-by: pedro rijo &lt;pedrorijo91@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer &lt;t.gummerer@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
Sometimes it's useful to know the main branch of a git repository
without actually downloading the repository.  This can be done by
looking at the symrefs stored in the remote repository.  Currently git
doesn't provide a simple way to show the symrefs stored on the remote
repository, even though the information is available.  Add a --symref
command line argument to the ls-remote command, which shows the symrefs
in the remote repository.

While there, replace a literal tab in the format string with \t to make
it more obvious to the reader.

Suggested-by: pedro rijo &lt;pedrorijo91@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gummerer &lt;t.gummerer@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>refs: support negative transfer.hideRefs</title>
<updated>2015-08-07T18:47:36+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jeff King</name>
<email>peff@peff.net</email>
</author>
<published>2015-07-28T20:23:26+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=2bc31d1631229d863376d48ef84eb846fea1df02'/>
<id>2bc31d1631229d863376d48ef84eb846fea1df02</id>
<content type='text'>
If you hide a hierarchy of refs using the transfer.hideRefs
config, there is no way to later override that config to
"unhide" it. This patch implements a "negative" hide which
causes matches to immediately be marked as unhidden, even if
another match would hide it. We take care to apply the
matches in reverse-order from how they are fed to us by the
config machinery, as that lets our usual "last one wins"
config precedence work (and entries in .git/config, for
example, will override /etc/gitconfig).

So you can now do:

  $ git config --system transfer.hideRefs refs/secret
  $ git config transfer.hideRefs '!refs/secret/not-so-secret'

to hide refs/secret in all repos, except for one public bit
in one specific repo. Or you can even do:

  $ git clone \
      -u "git -c transfer.hiderefs="!refs/foo" upload-pack" \
      remote:repo.git

to clone remote:repo.git, overriding any hiding it has
configured.

There are two alternatives that were considered and
rejected:

  1. A generic config mechanism for removing an item from a
     list. E.g.: (e.g., "[transfer] hideRefs -= refs/foo").

     This is nice because it could apply to other
     multi-valued config, as well. But it is not nearly as
     flexible. There is no way to say:

       [transfer]
       hideRefs = refs/secret
       hideRefs = refs/secret/not-so-secret

     Having explicit negative specifications means we can
     override previous entries, even if they are not the
     same literal string.

  2. Adding another variable to override some parts of
     hideRefs (e.g., "exposeRefs").

     This solves the problem from alternative (1), but it
     cannot easily obey the normal config precedence,
     because it would use two separate lists. For example:

       [transfer]
       hideRefs = refs/secret
       exposeRefs = refs/secret/not-so-secret
       hideRefs = refs/secret/not-so-secret/no-really-its-secret

     With two lists, we have to apply the "expose" rules
     first, and only then apply the "hide" rules. But that
     does not match what the above config intends.

     Of course we could internally parse that to a single
     list, respecting the ordering, which saves us having to
     invent the new "!" syntax. But using a single name
     communicates to the user that the ordering _is_
     important. And "!" is well-known for negation, and
     should not appear at the beginning of a ref (it is
     actually valid in a ref-name, but all entries here
     should be fully-qualified, starting with "refs/").

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
If you hide a hierarchy of refs using the transfer.hideRefs
config, there is no way to later override that config to
"unhide" it. This patch implements a "negative" hide which
causes matches to immediately be marked as unhidden, even if
another match would hide it. We take care to apply the
matches in reverse-order from how they are fed to us by the
config machinery, as that lets our usual "last one wins"
config precedence work (and entries in .git/config, for
example, will override /etc/gitconfig).

So you can now do:

  $ git config --system transfer.hideRefs refs/secret
  $ git config transfer.hideRefs '!refs/secret/not-so-secret'

to hide refs/secret in all repos, except for one public bit
in one specific repo. Or you can even do:

  $ git clone \
      -u "git -c transfer.hiderefs="!refs/foo" upload-pack" \
      remote:repo.git

to clone remote:repo.git, overriding any hiding it has
configured.

There are two alternatives that were considered and
rejected:

  1. A generic config mechanism for removing an item from a
     list. E.g.: (e.g., "[transfer] hideRefs -= refs/foo").

     This is nice because it could apply to other
     multi-valued config, as well. But it is not nearly as
     flexible. There is no way to say:

       [transfer]
       hideRefs = refs/secret
       hideRefs = refs/secret/not-so-secret

     Having explicit negative specifications means we can
     override previous entries, even if they are not the
     same literal string.

  2. Adding another variable to override some parts of
     hideRefs (e.g., "exposeRefs").

     This solves the problem from alternative (1), but it
     cannot easily obey the normal config precedence,
     because it would use two separate lists. For example:

       [transfer]
       hideRefs = refs/secret
       exposeRefs = refs/secret/not-so-secret
       hideRefs = refs/secret/not-so-secret/no-really-its-secret

     With two lists, we have to apply the "expose" rules
     first, and only then apply the "hide" rules. But that
     does not match what the above config intends.

     Of course we could internally parse that to a single
     list, respecting the ordering, which saves us having to
     invent the new "!" syntax. But using a single name
     communicates to the user that the ordering _is_
     important. And "!" is well-known for negation, and
     should not appear at the beginning of a ref (it is
     actually valid in a ref-name, but all entries here
     should be fully-qualified, starting with "refs/").

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>t: wrap complicated expect_code users in a block</title>
<updated>2015-03-20T17:20:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Jeff King</name>
<email>peff@peff.net</email>
</author>
<published>2015-03-20T10:12:29+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=9ddc5ac97ecdd03ceda4b6e3ff20a7524a9f0f8d'/>
<id>9ddc5ac97ecdd03ceda4b6e3ff20a7524a9f0f8d</id>
<content type='text'>
If we are expecting a command to produce a particular exit
code, we can use test_expect_code. However, some cases are
more complicated, and want to accept one of a range of exit
codes. For these, we end up with something like:

  cmd;
  case "$?" in
  ...

That unfortunately breaks the &amp;&amp;-chain and fools
--chain-lint. Since these special cases are so few, we can
wrap them in a block, like this:

  { cmd; ret=$?; } &amp;&amp;
  case "$ret" in
  ...

This accomplishes the same thing, and retains the &amp;&amp;-chain
(the exit status fed to the &amp;&amp; is that of the assignment,
which should always be true). It's technically longer, but
it is probably a good thing for unusual code like this to
stand out.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
If we are expecting a command to produce a particular exit
code, we can use test_expect_code. However, some cases are
more complicated, and want to accept one of a range of exit
codes. For these, we end up with something like:

  cmd;
  case "$?" in
  ...

That unfortunately breaks the &amp;&amp;-chain and fools
--chain-lint. Since these special cases are so few, we can
wrap them in a block, like this:

  { cmd; ret=$?; } &amp;&amp;
  case "$ret" in
  ...

This accomplishes the same thing, and retains the &amp;&amp;-chain
(the exit status fed to the &amp;&amp; is that of the assignment,
which should always be true). It's technically longer, but
it is probably a good thing for unusual code like this to
stand out.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King &lt;peff@peff.net&gt;
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>upload/receive-pack: allow hiding ref hierarchies</title>
<updated>2013-02-07T21:48:47+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2013-01-19T00:08:30+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=daebaa78137d59693a808c1f0bdec0ecb40fc12e'/>
<id>daebaa78137d59693a808c1f0bdec0ecb40fc12e</id>
<content type='text'>
A repository may have refs that are only used for its internal
bookkeeping purposes that should not be exposed to the others that
come over the network.

Teach upload-pack to omit some refs from its initial advertisement
by paying attention to the uploadpack.hiderefs multi-valued
configuration variable.  Do the same to receive-pack via the
receive.hiderefs variable.  As a convenient short-hand, allow using
transfer.hiderefs to set the value to both of these variables.

Any ref that is under the hierarchies listed on the value of these
variable is excluded from responses to requests made by "ls-remote",
"fetch", etc. (for upload-pack) and "push" (for receive-pack).

Because these hidden refs do not count as OUR_REF, an attempt to
fetch objects at the tip of them will be rejected, and because these
refs do not get advertised, "git push :" will not see local branches
that have the same name as them as "matching" ones to be sent.

An attempt to update/delete these hidden refs with an explicit
refspec, e.g. "git push origin :refs/hidden/22", is rejected.  This
is not a new restriction.  To the pusher, it would appear that there
is no such ref, so its push request will conclude with "Now that I
sent you all the data, it is time for you to update the refs.  I saw
that the ref did not exist when I started pushing, and I want the
result to point at this commit".  The receiving end will apply the
compare-and-swap rule to this request and rejects the push with
"Well, your update request conflicts with somebody else; I see there
is such a ref.", which is the right thing to do. Otherwise a push to
a hidden ref will always be "the last one wins", which is not a good
default.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
A repository may have refs that are only used for its internal
bookkeeping purposes that should not be exposed to the others that
come over the network.

Teach upload-pack to omit some refs from its initial advertisement
by paying attention to the uploadpack.hiderefs multi-valued
configuration variable.  Do the same to receive-pack via the
receive.hiderefs variable.  As a convenient short-hand, allow using
transfer.hiderefs to set the value to both of these variables.

Any ref that is under the hierarchies listed on the value of these
variable is excluded from responses to requests made by "ls-remote",
"fetch", etc. (for upload-pack) and "push" (for receive-pack).

Because these hidden refs do not count as OUR_REF, an attempt to
fetch objects at the tip of them will be rejected, and because these
refs do not get advertised, "git push :" will not see local branches
that have the same name as them as "matching" ones to be sent.

An attempt to update/delete these hidden refs with an explicit
refspec, e.g. "git push origin :refs/hidden/22", is rejected.  This
is not a new restriction.  To the pusher, it would appear that there
is no such ref, so its push request will conclude with "Now that I
sent you all the data, it is time for you to update the refs.  I saw
that the ref did not exist when I started pushing, and I want the
result to point at this commit".  The receiving end will apply the
compare-and-swap rule to this request and rejects the push with
"Well, your update request conflicts with somebody else; I see there
is such a ref.", which is the right thing to do. Otherwise a push to
a hidden ref will always be "the last one wins", which is not a good
default.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano &lt;gitster@pobox.com&gt;
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Merge branch 'hv/remote-end-hung-up'</title>
<updated>2012-07-05T06:40:12+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Junio C Hamano</name>
<email>gitster@pobox.com</email>
</author>
<published>2012-07-05T06:40:11+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://trove.baserock.org/cgit/delta/git.git/commit/?id=348c44e78eb079fa97a575f8fb8c1fcac747efe5'/>
<id>348c44e78eb079fa97a575f8fb8c1fcac747efe5</id>
<content type='text'>
When we get disconnected while expecting a response from the remote
side because authentication failed, we issued an error message "The
remote side hung up unexpectedly."

Give hint that it may be a permission problem in the message when we
can reasonably suspect it.

* hv/remote-end-hung-up:
  remove the impression of unexpectedness when access is denied
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
When we get disconnected while expecting a response from the remote
side because authentication failed, we issued an error message "The
remote side hung up unexpectedly."

Give hint that it may be a permission problem in the message when we
can reasonably suspect it.

* hv/remote-end-hung-up:
  remove the impression of unexpectedness when access is denied
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
