Merge branch 'js/detach-doc'

* js/detach-doc:
  git-checkout.txt: improve detached HEAD documentation

1 files changed, 121 insertions, 23 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
index 87863fcadc..396f4cc15b 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-checkout.txt
@@ -215,40 +215,138 @@ leave out at most one of `A` and `B`, in which case it defaults to `HEAD`.
 
 DETACHED HEAD
 -------------
+HEAD normally refers to a named branch (e.g. 'master'). Meanwhile, each
+branch refers to a specific commit. Let's look at a repo with three
+commits, one of them tagged, and with branch 'master' checked out:
 
-It is sometimes useful to be able to 'checkout' a commit that is
-not at the tip of one of your branches.  The most obvious
-example is to check out the commit at a tagged official release
-point, like this:
+------------
+	   HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
+	    |
+	    v
+a---b---c  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'c')
+    ^
+    |
+  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
+------------
+
+When a commit is created in this state, the branch is updated to refer to
+the new commit. Specifically, 'git commit' creates a new commit 'd', whose
+parent is commit 'c', and then updates branch 'master' to refer to new
+commit 'd'. HEAD still refers to branch 'master' and so indirectly now refers
+to commit 'd':
 
 ------------
-$ git checkout v2.6.18
+$ edit; git add; git commit
+
+	       HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
+		|
+		v
+a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
+    ^
+    |
+  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 ------------
 
-Earlier versions of git did not allow this and asked you to
-create a temporary branch using the `-b` option, but starting from
-version 1.5.0, the above command 'detaches' your HEAD from the
-current branch and directly points at the commit named by the tag
-(`v2.6.18` in the example above).
+It is sometimes useful to be able to checkout a commit that is not at
+the tip of any named branch, or even to create a new commit that is not
+referenced by a named branch. Let's look at what happens when we
+checkout commit 'b' (here we show two ways this may be done):
 
-You can use all git commands while in this state.  You can use
-`git reset --hard $othercommit` to further move around, for
-example.  You can make changes and create a new commit on top of
-a detached HEAD.  You can even create a merge by using `git
-merge $othercommit`.
+------------
+$ git checkout v2.0  # or
+$ git checkout master^^
+
+   HEAD (refers to commit 'b')
+    |
+    v
+a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
+    ^
+    |
+  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
+------------
 
-The state you are in while your HEAD is detached is not recorded
-by any branch (which is natural --- you are not on any branch).
-What this means is that you can discard your temporary commits
-and merges by switching back to an existing branch (e.g. `git
-checkout master`), and a later `git prune` or `git gc` would
-garbage-collect them.  If you did this by mistake, you can ask
-the reflog for HEAD where you were, e.g.
+Notice that regardless of which checkout command we use, HEAD now refers
+directly to commit 'b'. This is known as being in detached HEAD state.
+It means simply that HEAD refers to a specific commit, as opposed to
+referring to a named branch. Let's see what happens when we create a commit:
 
 ------------
-$ git log -g -2 HEAD
+$ edit; git add; git commit
+
+     HEAD (refers to commit 'e')
+      |
+      v
+      e
+     /
+a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
+    ^
+    |
+  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
 ------------
 
+There is now a new commit 'e', but it is referenced only by HEAD. We can
+of course add yet another commit in this state:
+
+------------
+$ edit; git add; git commit
+
+	 HEAD (refers to commit 'f')
+	  |
+	  v
+      e---f
+     /
+a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
+    ^
+    |
+  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
+------------
+
+In fact, we can perform all the normal git operations. But, let's look
+at what happens when we then checkout master:
+
+------------
+$ git checkout master
+
+	       HEAD (refers to branch 'master')
+      e---f     |
+     /          v
+a---b---c---d  branch 'master' (refers to commit 'd')
+    ^
+    |
+  tag 'v2.0' (refers to commit 'b')
+------------
+
+It is important to realize that at this point nothing refers to commit
+'f'. Eventually commit 'f' (and by extension commit 'e') will be deleted
+by the routine git garbage collection process, unless we create a reference
+before that happens. If we have not yet moved away from commit 'f',
+any of these will create a reference to it:
+
+------------
+$ git checkout -b foo   <1>
+$ git branch foo        <2>
+$ git tag foo           <3>
+------------
+
+<1> creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f', and then
+updates HEAD to refer to branch 'foo'. In other words, we'll no longer
+be in detached HEAD state after this command.
+
+<2> similarly creates a new branch 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
+but leaves HEAD detached.
+
+<3> creates a new tag 'foo', which refers to commit 'f',
+leaving HEAD detached.
+
+If we have moved away from commit 'f', then we must first recover its object
+name (typically by using git reflog), and then we can create a reference to
+it. For example, to see the last two commits to which HEAD referred, we
+can use either of these commands:
+
+------------
+$ git reflog -2 HEAD # or
+$ git log -g -2 HEAD
+------------
 
 EXAMPLES
 --------