summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/split-index.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2017-06-24 12:02:39 -0700
committerJunio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>2017-06-24 12:02:39 -0700
commit64719b115d61582fa501690ee6caff4c478b4b1a (patch)
tree56e1208d62bdb762b9282d5a109f26d312f12b1c /split-index.c
parentde950c577317f499df44c383ecbb7967f4905db9 (diff)
downloadgit-64719b115d61582fa501690ee6caff4c478b4b1a.tar.gz
Revert "split-index: add and use unshare_split_index()"nd/split-index-unshare
This reverts commit f9d7abec2ad2f9eb3d8873169cc28c34273df082; see public-inbox.org/git/CAP8UFD0bOfzY-_hBDKddOcJdPUpP2KEVaX_SrCgvAMYAHtseiQ@mail.gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'split-index.c')
-rw-r--r--split-index.c57
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 44 deletions
diff --git a/split-index.c b/split-index.c
index 49bd197f71..f519e60f87 100644
--- a/split-index.c
+++ b/split-index.c
@@ -73,17 +73,10 @@ void move_cache_to_base_index(struct index_state *istate)
int i;
/*
- * If "si" is shared with another index_state (e.g. by
- * unpack-trees code), we will need to duplicate split_index
- * struct. It's not happening now though, luckily.
+ * do not delete old si->base, its index entries may be shared
+ * with istate->cache[]. Accept a bit of leaking here because
+ * this code is only used by short-lived update-index.
*/
- assert(si->refcount <= 1);
-
- unshare_split_index(istate, 0);
- if (si->base) {
- discard_index(si->base);
- free(si->base);
- }
si->base = xcalloc(1, sizeof(*si->base));
si->base->version = istate->version;
/* zero timestamp disables racy test in ce_write_index() */
@@ -282,41 +275,11 @@ void finish_writing_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
istate->cache_nr = si->saved_cache_nr;
}
-void unshare_split_index(struct index_state *istate, int discard)
-{
- struct split_index *si = istate->split_index;
- int i;
-
- if (!si || !si->base)
- return;
-
- for (i = 0; i < istate->cache_nr; i++) {
- struct cache_entry *ce = istate->cache[i];
- struct cache_entry *new = NULL;
-
- if (!ce->index ||
- ce->index > si->base->cache_nr ||
- ce != si->base->cache[ce->index - 1])
- continue;
-
- if (!discard) {
- int len = ce_namelen(ce);
- new = xcalloc(1, cache_entry_size(len));
- copy_cache_entry(new, ce);
- memcpy(new->name, ce->name, len);
- new->index = 0;
- }
- istate->cache[i] = new;
- }
-}
-
-
void discard_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
{
struct split_index *si = istate->split_index;
if (!si)
return;
- unshare_split_index(istate, 0);
istate->split_index = NULL;
si->refcount--;
if (si->refcount)
@@ -365,8 +328,14 @@ void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate)
{
- if (!istate->split_index)
- return;
- discard_split_index(istate);
- istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED;
+ if (istate->split_index) {
+ /*
+ * can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that
+ * will destroy split_index->base->cache[], which may
+ * be shared with the_index.cache[]. So yeah we're
+ * leaking a bit here.
+ */
+ istate->split_index = NULL;
+ istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED;
+ }
}