diff options
author | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2013-01-23 13:55:30 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> | 2013-01-24 14:37:23 -0800 |
commit | 75e5c0dc5529aed42122b3a774e6b17383e51b66 (patch) | |
tree | 78600fde190fede594ec314d81bbc817220a8bf6 /transport.c | |
parent | 0f4d498dbecbc1b6da66f926df3bc12446bd44dd (diff) | |
download | git-75e5c0dc5529aed42122b3a774e6b17383e51b66.tar.gz |
push: introduce REJECT_FETCH_FIRST and REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE
When we push to update an existing ref, if:
* the object at the tip of the remote is not a commit; or
* the object we are pushing is not a commit,
it won't be correct to suggest to fetch, integrate and push again,
as the old and new objects will not "merge". We should explain that
the push must be forced when there is a non-committish object is
involved in such a case.
If we do not have the current object at the tip of the remote, we do
not even know that object, when fetched, is something that can be
merged. In such a case, suggesting to pull first just like
non-fast-forward case may not be technically correct, but in
practice, most such failures are seen when you try to push your work
to a branch without knowing that somebody else already pushed to
update the same branch since you forked, so "pull first" would work
as a suggestion most of the time. And if the object at the tip is
not a commit, "pull first" will fail, without making any permanent
damage. As a side effect, it also makes the error message the user
will get during the next "push" attempt easier to understand, now
the user is aware that a non-commit object is involved.
In these cases, the current code already rejects such a push on the
client end, but we used the same error and advice messages as the
ones used when rejecting a non-fast-forward push, i.e. pull from
there and integrate before pushing again.
Introduce new rejection reasons and reword the messages
appropriately.
[jc: with help by Peff on message details]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'transport.c')
-rw-r--r-- | transport.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/transport.c b/transport.c index 585ebcd2bf..5105562d6e 100644 --- a/transport.c +++ b/transport.c @@ -699,6 +699,14 @@ static int print_one_push_status(struct ref *ref, const char *dest, int count, i print_ref_status('!', "[rejected]", ref, ref->peer_ref, "already exists", porcelain); break; + case REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST: + print_ref_status('!', "[rejected]", ref, ref->peer_ref, + "fetch first", porcelain); + break; + case REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE: + print_ref_status('!', "[rejected]", ref, ref->peer_ref, + "needs force", porcelain); + break; case REF_STATUS_REMOTE_REJECT: print_ref_status('!', "[remote rejected]", ref, ref->deletion ? NULL : ref->peer_ref, @@ -750,6 +758,10 @@ void transport_print_push_status(const char *dest, struct ref *refs, *reject_reasons |= REJECT_NON_FF_OTHER; } else if (ref->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS) { *reject_reasons |= REJECT_ALREADY_EXISTS; + } else if (ref->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_FETCH_FIRST) { + *reject_reasons |= REJECT_FETCH_FIRST; + } else if (ref->status == REF_STATUS_REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE) { + *reject_reasons |= REJECT_NEEDS_FORCE; } } } |