summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* merge: deprecate 'git merge <message> HEAD <commit>' syntaxjc/mergeJunio C Hamano2015-04-297-9/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We had this in "git merge" manual for eternity: 'git merge' <msg> HEAD <commit>... [This] syntax (<msg> `HEAD` <commit>...) is supported for historical reasons. Do not use it from the command line or in new scripts. It is the same as `git merge -m <msg> <commit>...`. With the update to "git merge" to make it understand what is recorded in FETCH_HEAD directly, including Octopus merge cases, we now can rewrite the use of this syntax in "git pull" with a simple "git merge FETCH_HEAD". Also there are quite a few fallouts in the test scripts, and it turns out that "git cvsimport" also uses this old syntax to record a merge. Judging from this result, I would not be surprised if dropping the support of the old syntax broke scripts people have written and been relying on for the past ten years. But at least we can start the deprecation process by throwing a warning message when the syntax is used. With luck, we might be able to drop the support in a few years. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: handle FETCH_HEAD internallyJunio C Hamano2015-04-293-39/+81
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The collect_parents() function now is responsible for 1. parsing the commits given on the command line into a list of commits to be merged; 2. filtering these parents into independent ones; and 3. optionally calling fmt_merge_msg() via prepare_merge_message() to prepare an auto-generated merge log message, using fake contents that FETCH_HEAD would have had if these commits were fetched from the current repository with "git pull . $args..." Make "git merge FETCH_HEAD" to be the same as the traditional git merge "$(git fmt-merge-msg <.git/FETCH_HEAD)" $commits invocation of the command in "git pull", where $commits are the ones that appear in FETCH_HEAD that are not marked as not-for-merge, by making it do a bit more, specifically: - noticing "FETCH_HEAD" is the only "commit" on the command line and picking the commits that are not marked as not-for-merge as the list of commits to be merged (substitute for step #1 above); - letting the resulting list fed to step #2 above; - doing the step #3 above, using the contents of the FETCH_HEAD instead of fake contents crafted from the list of commits parsed in the step #1 above. Note that this changes the semantics. "git merge FETCH_HEAD" has always behaved as if the first commit in the FETCH_HEAD file were directly specified on the command line, creating a two-way merge whose auto-generated merge log said "merge commit xyz". With this change, if the previous fetch was to grab multiple branches (e.g. "git fetch $there topic-a topic-b"), the new world order is to create an octopus, behaving as if "git pull $there topic-a topic-b" were run. This is a deliberate change to make that happen, and can be seen in the changes to t3033 tests. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: decide if we auto-generate the message early in collect_parents()Junio C Hamano2015-04-291-7/+9
| | | | Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: make collect_parents() auto-generate the merge messageJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-14/+22
| | | | Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: extract prepare_merge_message() logic outJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-11/+15
| | | | Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: narrow scope of merge_namesJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-4/+7
| | | | | | | | | | | | | In order to pass the list of parents to fmt_merge_msg(), cmd_merge() uses this strbuf to create something that look like FETCH_HEAD that describes commits that are being merged. This is necessary only when we are creating the merge commit message ourselves, but was done unconditionally. Move the variable and the logic to populate it to confine them in a block that needs them. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: split reduce_parents() out of collect_parents()Junio C Hamano2015-04-291-16/+25
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The latter does two separate things: - Parse the list of commits on the command line, and formulate the list of commits to be merged (including the current HEAD); - Compute the list of parents to be recorded in the resulting merge commit. Split the latter into a separate helper function, so that we can later supply the list commits to be merged from a different source (namely, FETCH_HEAD). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: clarify collect_parents() logicJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-2/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Clarify this small function in three ways. - The function initially collects all commits to be merged into a commit_list "remoteheads"; the "remotes" pointer always points at the tail of this list (either the remoteheads variable itself, or the ->next slot of the element at the end of the list) to help elongate the list by repeated calls to commit_list_insert(). Because the new element appended by commit_list_insert() will always have its ->next slot NULLed out, there is no need for us to assign NULL to *remotes to terminate the list at the end. - The variable "head_subsumed" always confused me every time I read this code. What is happening here is that we inspect what the caller told us to merge (including the current HEAD) and come up with the list of parents to be recorded for the resulting merge commit, omitting commits that are ancestor of other commits. This filtering may remove the current HEAD from the resulting parent list---and we signal that fact with this variable, so that we can later record it as the first parent when "--no-ff" is in effect. - The "parents" list is created for this function by reduce_heads() and was not deallocated after its use, even though the loop control was written in such a way to allow us to do so by taking the "next" element in a separate variable so that it can be used in the next-step part of the loop control. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: small leakfix and code simplificationJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | When parsing a merged object name like "foo~20" to formulate a merge summary "Merge branch foo (early part)", a temporary strbuf is used, but we forgot to deallocate it when we failed to find the named branch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: do not check argc to determine number of remote headsJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | To reject merging multiple commits into an unborn branch, we check argc, thinking that collect_parents() that reads the remaining command line arguments from <argc, argv> will give us the same number of commits as its input, i.e. argc. Because what we really care about is the number of commits, let the function run and then make sure it returns only one commit instead. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: clarify "pulling into void" special caseJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-17/+18
| | | | | | | | Instead of having it as one of the three if/elseif/.. case arms, test the condition and handle this special case upfront. This makes it easier to follow the flow of logic. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5520: test pulling an octopus into an unborn branchJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-0/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | The code comment for "git merge" in builtin/merge.c, we say If the merged head is a valid one there is no reason to forbid "git merge" into a branch yet to be born. We do the same for "git pull". and t5520 does have an existing test for that behaviour. However, there was no test to make sure that 'git pull' to pull multiple branches into an unborn branch must fail. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* t5520: style fixesJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-16/+6
| | | | | | | | | | Fix style funnies in early part of this test script that checks "git pull" into an unborn branch. The primary change is that 'chdir' to a newly created empty test repository is now protected by being done in a subshell to make it more robust without having to chdir back to the original place. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: simplify code flowJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-8/+8
| | | | | | | | One of the first things cmd_merge() does is to see if the "--abort" option is given and run "reset --merge" and exit. When the control reaches this point, we know "--abort" was not given. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* merge: test the top-level merge driverJunio C Hamano2015-04-291-0/+136
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We seem to have tests for specific merge strategy backends (e.g. recursive), but not much test coverage for the "git merge" itself. As I am planning to update the semantics of merging "FETCH_HEAD" in such a way that these two git pull . topic_a topic_b... vs. git fetch . topic_a topic_b... git merge FETCH_HEAD are truly equivalent, let me add a few test cases to cover the tricky ones. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Git 2.2.2v2.2.2Junio C Hamano2015-01-123-2/+33
| | | | Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'jk/read-packed-refs-without-path-max' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-121-21/+25
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/read-packed-refs-without-path-max: read_packed_refs: use skip_prefix instead of static array read_packed_refs: pass strbuf to parse_ref_line read_packed_refs: use a strbuf for reading lines
| * read_packed_refs: use skip_prefix instead of static arrayjk/read-packed-refs-without-path-maxJeff King2014-12-101-3/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | We want to recognize the packed-refs header and skip to the "traits" part of the line. We currently do it by feeding sizeof() a static const array to strncmp. However, it's a bit simpler to just skip_prefix, which expresses the intention more directly, and without remembering to account for the NUL-terminator in each sizeof() call. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * read_packed_refs: pass strbuf to parse_ref_lineJeff King2014-12-101-12/+15
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Now that we have a strbuf in read_packed_refs, we can pass it straight to the line parser, which saves us an extra strlen. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * read_packed_refs: use a strbuf for reading linesJeff King2014-12-101-9/+11
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current code uses a fixed PATH_MAX-sized buffer for reading packed-refs lines. This is a reasonable guess, in the sense that git generally cannot work with refs larger than PATH_MAX. However, there are a few cases where it is not great: 1. Some systems may have a low value of PATH_MAX, but can actually handle larger paths in practice. Fixing this code path probably isn't enough to make them work completely with long refs, but it is a step in the right direction. 2. We use fgets, which will happily give us half a line on the first read, and then the rest of the line on the second. This is probably OK in practice, because our refline parser is careful enough to look for the trailing newline on the first line. The second line may look like a peeled line to us, but since "^" is illegal in refnames, it is not likely to come up. Still, it does not hurt to be more careful. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'mg/add-ignore-errors' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-122-2/+8
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | * mg/add-ignore-errors: add: ignore only ignored files
| * | add: ignore only ignored filesmg/add-ignore-errorsMichael J Gruber2014-11-212-2/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "git add foo bar" adds neither foo nor bar when bar is ignored, but dies to let the user recheck their command invocation. This becomes less helpful when "git add foo.*" is subject to shell expansion and some of the expanded files are ignored. "git add --ignore-errors" is supposed to ignore errors when indexing some files and adds the others. It does ignore errors from actual indexing attempts, but does not ignore the error "file is ignored" as outlined above. This is unexpected. Change "git add foo bar" to add foo when bar is ignored, but issue a warning and return a failure code as before the change. That is, in the case of trying to add ignored files we now act the same way (with or without "--ignore-errors") in which we act for more severe indexing errors when "--ignore-errors" is specified. Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Merge branch 'mh/find-uniq-abbrev' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-121-1/+1
|\ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * mh/find-uniq-abbrev: sha1_name: avoid unnecessary sha1 lookup in find_unique_abbrev
| * | | sha1_name: avoid unnecessary sha1 lookup in find_unique_abbrevmh/find-uniq-abbrevMike Hommey2014-11-261-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | An example where this happens is when doing an ls-tree on a tree that contains a commit link. In that case, find_unique_abbrev is called to get a non-abbreviated hex sha1, but still, a lookup is done as to whether the sha1 is in the repository (which ends up looking for a loose object in .git/objects), while the result of that lookup is not used when returning a non-abbreviated hex sha1. Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | Merge branch 'jk/approxidate-avoid-y-d-m-over-future-dates' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-122-9/+15
|\ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/approxidate-avoid-y-d-m-over-future-dates: approxidate: allow ISO-like dates far in the future pass TIME_DATE_NOW to approxidate future-check
| * | | | approxidate: allow ISO-like dates far in the futurejk/approxidate-avoid-y-d-m-over-future-datesJeff King2014-11-132-2/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we are parsing approxidate strings and we find three numbers separate by one of ":/-.", we guess that it may be a date. We feed the numbers to match_multi_number, which checks whether it makes sense as a date in various orderings (e.g., dd/mm/yy or mm/dd/yy, etc). One of the checks we do is to see whether it is a date more than 10 days in the future. This was added in 38035cf (date parsing: be friendlier to our European friends., 2006-04-05), and lets us guess that if it is currently April 2014, then "10/03/2014" is probably March 10th, not October 3rd. This has a downside, though; if you want to be overly generous with your "--until" date specification, we may wrongly parse "2014-12-01" as "2014-01-12" (because the latter is an in-the-past date). If the year is a future year (i.e., both are future dates), it gets even weirder. Due to the vagaries of approxidate, months _after_ the current date (no matter the year) get flipped, but ones before do not. This patch drops the "in the future" check for dates of this form, letting us treat them always as yyyy-mm-dd, even if they are in the future. This does not affect the normal dd/mm/yyyy versus mm/dd/yyyy lookup, because this code path only kicks in when the first number is greater than 70 (i.e., it must be a year, and cannot be either a date or a month). The one possible casualty is that "yyyy-dd-mm" is less likely to be chosen over "yyyy-mm-dd". That's probably OK, though because: 1. The difference happens only when the date is in the future. Already we prefer yyyy-mm-dd for dates in the past. 2. It's unclear whether anybody even uses yyyy-dd-mm regularly. It does not appear in lists of common date formats in Wikipedia[1,2]. 3. Even if (2) is wrong, it is better to prefer ISO-like dates, as that is consistent with what we use elsewhere in git. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_and_time_representation_by_country [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar_date Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | | pass TIME_DATE_NOW to approxidate future-checkJeff King2014-11-131-7/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The approxidate functions accept an extra "now" parameter to avoid calling time() themselves. We use this in our test suite to make sure we have a consistent time for computing relative dates. However, deep in the bowels of approxidate, we also call time() to check whether possible dates are far in the future. Let's make sure that the "now" override makes it to that spot, too, so we can consistently test that feature. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | Merge branch 'rw/apply-does-not-take-ignore-date' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-121-1/+0
|\ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * rw/apply-does-not-take-ignore-date: git-am.txt: --ignore-date flag is not passed to git-apply
| * | | | | git-am.txt: --ignore-date flag is not passed to git-applyrw/apply-does-not-take-ignore-dateRonald Wampler2014-12-091-1/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Ronald Wampler <rdwampler@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | Merge branch 'jk/for-each-reflog-ent-reverse' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-122-12/+67
|\ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/for-each-reflog-ent-reverse: for_each_reflog_ent_reverse: turn leftover check into assertion for_each_reflog_ent_reverse: fix newlines on block boundaries
| * | | | | | for_each_reflog_ent_reverse: turn leftover check into assertionjk/for-each-reflog-ent-reverseJeff King2014-12-051-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our loop should always process all lines, even if we hit the beginning of the file. We have a conditional after the loop ends to double-check that there is nothing left and to process it. But this should never happen, and is a sign of a logic bug in the loop. Let's turn it into a BUG assertion. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | | | | for_each_reflog_ent_reverse: fix newlines on block boundariesJeff King2014-12-052-11/+66
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | When we read a reflog file in reverse, we read whole chunks of BUFSIZ bytes, then loop over the buffer, parsing any lines we find. We find the beginning of each line by looking for the newline from the previous line. If we don't find one, we know that we are either at the beginning of the file, or that we have to read another block. In the latter case, we stuff away what we have into a strbuf, read another block, and continue our parse. But we missed one case here. If we did find a newline, and it is at the beginning of the block, we must also stuff that newline into the strbuf, as it belongs to the block we are about to read. The minimal fix here would be to add this special case to the conditional that checks whether we found a newline. But we can make the flow a little clearer by rearranging a bit: we first handle lines that we are going to show, and then at the end of each loop, stuff away any leftovers if necessary. That lets us fold this special-case in with the more common "we ended in the middle of a line" case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | | Merge branch 'maint-2.1' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-01-072-12/+35
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * maint-2.1: is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}
| * \ \ \ \ \ \ Merge branch 'maint-2.0' into maint-2.1maint-2.1Junio C Hamano2015-01-072-12/+35
| |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * maint-2.0: is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}
| | * \ \ \ \ \ \ Merge branch 'maint-1.9' into maint-2.0maint-2.0Junio C Hamano2015-01-072-12/+35
| | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * maint-1.9: is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}
| | | * \ \ \ \ \ \ Merge branch 'maint-1.8.5' into maint-1.9maint-1.9Junio C Hamano2015-01-072-12/+35
| | | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * maint-1.8.5: is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}
| | | | * \ \ \ \ \ \ Merge branch 'jk/dotgit-case-maint-1.8.5' into maint-1.8.5maint-1.8.5Junio C Hamano2015-01-072-12/+35
| | | | |\ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jk/dotgit-case-maint-1.8.5: is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}
| | | | | * | | | | | | is_hfs_dotgit: loosen over-eager match of \u{..47}jk/dotgit-case-maint-1.8.5dotgit-case-maint-1.8.5Jeff King2014-12-292-12/+35
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our is_hfs_dotgit function relies on the hackily-implemented next_hfs_char to give us the next character that an HFS+ filename comparison would look at. It's hacky because it doesn't implement the full case-folding table of HFS+; it gives us just enough to see if the path matches ".git". At the end of next_hfs_char, we use tolower() to convert our 32-bit code point to lowercase. Our tolower() implementation only takes an 8-bit char, though; it throws away the upper 24 bits. This means we can't have any false negatives for is_hfs_dotgit. We only care about matching 7-bit ASCII characters in ".git", and we will correctly process 'G' or 'g'. However, we _can_ have false positives. Because we throw away the upper bits, code point \u{0147} (for example) will look like 'G' and get downcased to 'g'. It's not known whether a sequence of code points whose truncation ends up as ".git" is meaningful in any language, but it does not hurt to be more accurate here. We can just pass out the full 32-bit code point, and compare it manually to the upper and lowercase characters we care about. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | | | | | | | Prepare for 2.2.2Junio C Hamano2014-12-222-1/+34
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'jk/rebuild-perl-scripts-with-no-perl-seting-change' into maintJunio C Hamano2014-12-221-4/+10
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The build procedure did not bother fixing perl and python scripts when NO_PERL and NO_PYTHON build-time configuration changed. * jk/rebuild-perl-scripts-with-no-perl-seting-change: Makefile: have python scripts depend on NO_PYTHON setting Makefile: simplify by using SCRIPT_{PERL,SH}_GEN macros Makefile: have perl scripts depend on NO_PERL setting
| * | | | | | | | | | | | Makefile: have python scripts depend on NO_PYTHON settingjk/rebuild-perl-scripts-with-no-perl-seting-changeJonathan Nieder2014-11-181-0/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Like the perl scripts, python scripts need a dependency to ensure they are rebuilt when switching between the "dummy" versions that run without Python and the real thing. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | | | | | | | | | | Makefile: simplify by using SCRIPT_{PERL,SH}_GEN macrosJonathan Nieder2014-11-181-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | SCRIPT_PERL_GEN is defined as $(patsubst %.perl,%,$(SCRIPT_PERL)) for use in targets like build-perl-script used by makefiles in subdirectories that override SCRIPT_PERL (see v1.8.2-rc0~17^2, "git-remote-mediawiki: use toplevel's Makefile", 2013-02-08). The same expression is used in the rules that actually write the generated perl scripts, and since these rules were introduced before SCRIPT_PERL_GEN, they use the longhand instead of that macro. Use the macro to make reading easier. Likewise for SCRIPT_SH_GEN. The Python rules already got the same simplification in v1.8.4-rc0~162^2~8 (2013-05-24). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | | | | | | | | | | Makefile: have perl scripts depend on NO_PERL settingJeff King2014-11-181-0/+3
| | |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|/ | |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If NO_PERL is not set, our perl scripts are built as usual. If it is set, then we build "dummy" versions that tell you git was built without perl support and exit gracefully. However, if you switch to NO_PERL in a directory with existing build artifacts, we do not notice that the files need rebuilt. We see only that they are newer than the "unimplemented.sh" wrapper and assume they are done. So doing: make make NO_PERL=Nope would result in a git-add--interactive script that uses perl (and running the test suite would make use of it). Instead, we should trigger a rebuild of the perl scripts anytime NO_PERL changes. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'jk/no-perl-tests' into maintJunio C Hamano2014-12-223-4/+4
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Some tests that depend on perl lacked PERL prerequisite to protect them, breaking build with NO_PERL configuration. * jk/no-perl-tests: t960[34]: mark cvsimport tests as requiring perl t0090: mark add-interactive test with PERL prerequisite
| * | | | | | | | | | | | t960[34]: mark cvsimport tests as requiring perljk/no-perl-testsJeff King2014-11-182-3/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Git-cvsimport is written in perl, which understandably causes the tests to fail if you build with NO_PERL (which will avoid building cvsimport at all). The earlier cvsimport tests in t9600-t9602 are all marked with a PERL prerequisite, but these ones are not. The one in t9603 was likely not noticed because it is an expected failure anyway. The ones in t9604 have been around for a long time, but it is likely that the combination of NO_PERL and having cvsps installed is rare enough that nobody noticed. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
| * | | | | | | | | | | | t0090: mark add-interactive test with PERL prerequisiteJeff King2014-11-181-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The add-interactive system is built in perl. If you build with NO_PERL, running "git commit --interactive" will exit with an error and the test will fail. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'po/everyday-doc' into maintJunio C Hamano2014-12-221-1/+1
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "Everyday" document had a broken link. * po/everyday-doc: Documentation: change "gitlink" typo in git-push
| * | | | | | | | | | | | | Documentation: change "gitlink" typo in git-pushpo/everyday-docbrian m. carlson2014-11-171-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The git-push manual page used "gitlink" in one place instead of "linkgit". Fix this so the link renders correctly. Noticed-by: Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | | | | | | | | | | | | Merge branch 'jk/push-simple' into maintJunio C Hamano2014-12-222-6/+34
|\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Git 2.0 was supposed to make the "simple" mode for the default of "git push", but it didn't. * jk/push-simple: push: truly use "simple" as default, not "upstream"
| * | | | | | | | | | | | | | push: truly use "simple" as default, not "upstream"jk/push-simpleJeff King2014-11-302-6/+34
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The plan for the push.default transition had all along been to use the "simple" method rather than "upstream" as a default if the user did not specify their own push.default value. Commit 11037ee (push: switch default from "matching" to "simple", 2013-01-04) tried to implement that by moving PUSH_DEFAULT_UNSPECIFIED in our switch statement to fall-through to the PUSH_DEFAULT_SIMPLE case. When the commit that became 11037ee was originally written, that would have been enough. We would fall through to calling setup_push_upstream() with the "simple" parameter set to 1. However, it was delayed for a while until we were ready to make the transition in Git 2.0. And in the meantime, commit ed2b182 (push: change `simple` to accommodate triangular workflows, 2013-06-19) threw a monkey wrench into the works. That commit drops the "simple" parameter to setup_push_upstream, and instead checks whether the global "push_default" is PUSH_DEFAULT_SIMPLE. This is right when the user has explicitly configured push.default to simple, but wrong when we are a fall-through for the "unspecified" case. We never noticed because our push.default tests do not cover the case of the variable being totally unset; they only check the "simple" behavior itself. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>