summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/Documentation/git-rebase.txt
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* Documentation: explain optional arguments bettermm/keyid-docsMatthieu Moy2015-09-211-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Improve the documentation of commands taking optional arguments in two ways: * Documents the behavior of '-O' (for grep) and '-S' (for commands creating commits) when used without the optional argument. * Document the syntax of these options. For the second point, the behavior is documented in gitcli(7), but it is easy for users to miss, and hard for the same user to understand why e.g. "git status -u no" does not work. Document this explicitly in the documentation of each short option having an optional argument: they are the most error prone since there is no '=' sign between the option and its argument. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'jk/asciidoc-markup-fix'Junio C Hamano2015-05-221-1/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Various documentation mark-up fixes to make the output more consistent in general and also make AsciiDoctor (an alternative formatter) happier. * jk/asciidoc-markup-fix: doc: convert AsciiDoc {?foo} to ifdef::foo[] doc: put example URLs and emails inside literal backticks doc: drop backslash quoting of some curly braces doc: convert \--option to --option doc/add: reformat `--edit` option doc: fix length of underlined section-title doc: fix hanging "+"-continuation doc: fix unquoted use of "{type}" doc: fix misrendering due to `single quote'
| * doc: fix misrendering due to `single quote'Jeff King2015-05-121-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | AsciiDoc misparses some text that contains a `literal` word followed by a fancy `single quote' word, and treats everything from the start of the literal to the end of the quote as a single-quoted phrase. We can work around this by switching the latter to be a literal, as well. In the first case, this is perhaps what was intended anyway, as it makes us consistent with the the earlier literals in the same paragraph. In the second, the output is arguably better, as we will format our commit references as <code> blocks. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Sync with 2.3.5Junio C Hamano2015-03-311-1/+3
|\ \ | |/ | | | | | | | | * maint: Git 2.3.5 docs: clarify what git-rebase's "-p" / "--preserve-merges" does
| * Merge branch 'ss/pull-rebase-preserve' into maintJunio C Hamano2015-03-311-1/+3
| |\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * ss/pull-rebase-preserve: docs: clarify what git-rebase's "-p" / "--preserve-merges" does docs: clarify "preserve" option wording for git-pull
| | * docs: clarify what git-rebase's "-p" / "--preserve-merges" doesss/pull-rebase-preserveSebastian Schuberth2015-03-301-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ignoring a merge can be read as ignoring the changes a merge commit introduces altogether, as if the entire side branch the merge commit merged was removed from the history. But that is not what happens if "-p" is not specified. What happens is that the individual commits a merge commit introduces are replayed in order, and only any possible merge conflict resolutions or manual amendments to the merge commit are ignored. Get this straight in the docs. Also, do not say that merge commits are *tried* to be recreated. As that is true almost everywhere it is better left unsaid. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | *config.txt: stick to camelCase naming conventionnd/config-doc-camelCaseNguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy2015-03-131-3/+3
|/ / | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This should improve readability. Compare "thislongname" and "thisLongName". The following keys are left in unchanged. We can decide what to do with them later. - am.keepcr - core.autocrlf .safecrlf .trustctime - diff.dirstat .noprefix - gitcvs.usecrlfattr - gui.blamehistoryctx .trustmtime - pull.twohead - receive.autogc - sendemail.signedoffbycc .smtpsslcertpath .suppresscc Helped-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'so/rebase-doc-fork-point'Junio C Hamano2014-10-141-12/+19
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | * so/rebase-doc-fork-point: Documentation/git-rebase.txt: document when --fork-point is auto-enabled
| * | Documentation/git-rebase.txt: document when --fork-point is auto-enabledso/rebase-doc-fork-pointSergey Organov2014-09-291-12/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Running "git rebase" without giving a specific commit with respect to which the operation is done enables --fork-point mode, while telling the command to rebase with respect to a specific commit, i.e. "git rebase <upstream>" does not. This was not mentioned in the DESCRIPTION section of the manual page, even though the case of omitted <upstream> was otherwise discussed. That in turn made actual behavior of vanilla "git rebase" hardly discoverable. While we are at it, clarify the --fork-point description itself as well. Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Documentation/git-rebase.txt: <upstream> must be given to specify <branch>so/rebase-docSergey Organov2014-09-161-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current syntax description makes one wonder if there is any syntactic way to distinguish between <branch> and <upstream> so that one can specify <branch> but not <upstream>, but that is not the case. Make it explicit that these arguments are positional, i.e. the earlier ones cannot be omitted if you want to give later ones. Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Documentation/git-rebase.txt: -f forces a rebase that would otherwise be a no-opSergey Organov2014-08-121-5/+2
| |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "Current branch is a descendant of the commit you are rebasing onto" does not necessarily mean "rebase" requires "--force". For a plain vanilla "history flattening" rebase, the rebase can be done without forcing if there is a merge between the tip of the branch being rebased and the commit you are rebasing onto, even if the tip is descendant of the other. [jc: reworded both the text and the log description] Signed-off-by: Sergey Organov <sorganov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | rebase: add the --gpg-sign optionNicolas Vigier2014-02-111-0/+4
|/ | | | | | Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase: use reflog to find common base with upstreamJohn Keeping2013-12-101-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Commit 15a147e (rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified, 2011-02-09) says: Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. but that isn't actually the case. Since commit d44e712 (pull: support rebased upstream + fetch + pull --rebase, 2009-07-19), pull has actually chosen the most recent reflog entry which is an ancestor of the current branch if it can find one. Add a '--fork-point' argument to git-rebase that can be used to trigger this behaviour. This option is turned on by default if no non-option arguments are specified on the command line, otherwise we treat an upstream specified on the command-line literally. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Documentation: make AsciiDoc links always point to HTML filesss/doclinksSebastian Schuberth2013-09-061-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | AsciiDoc's "link" is supposed to create hyperlinks for HTML output, so prefer a "link" to point to an HTML file instead of a text file if an HTML version of the file is being generated. For RelNotes, keep pointing to text files as no equivalent HTML files are generated. If appropriate, also update the link description to not contain the linked file's extension. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sschuberth@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i: handle fixup! fixup! in --autosquashAndrew Pimlott2013-06-271-1/+3
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In rebase -i --autosquash, ignore all "fixup! " or "squash! " after the first. This supports the case when a git commit --fixup/--squash referred to an earlier fixup/squash instead of the original commit (whether intentionally, as when the user expressly meant to note that the commit fixes an earlier fixup; or inadvertently, as when the user meant to refer to the original commit with :/msg; or out of laziness, as when the user could remember how to refer to the fixup but not the original). In the todo list, the full commit message is preserved, in case it provides useful cues to the user. A test helper set_cat_todo_editor is introduced to check this. Helped-by: Thomas Rast <trast@inf.ethz.ch> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase: implement --[no-]autostash and rebase.autostashRamkumar Ramachandra2013-05-291-0/+10
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | This new feature allows a rebase to be executed on a dirty worktree or index. It works by creating a temporary "dangling merge commit" out of the worktree and index changes (via 'git stash create'), and automatically applying it after a successful rebase or abort. rebase stores the SHA-1 hex of the temporary merge commit, along with the rest of the rebase state, in either .git/{rebase-merge,rebase-apply}/autostash depending on the kind of rebase. Since $state_dir is automatically removed at the end of a successful rebase or abort, so is the autostash. The advantage of this approach is that we do not affect the normal stash's reflogs, making the autostash invisible to the end-user. This means that you can use 'git stash' during a rebase as usual. When the autostash application results in a conflict, we push $state_dir/autostash onto the normal stash and remove $state_dir ending the rebase. The user can inspect the stash, and pop or drop at any time. Most significantly, this feature means that a caller like pull (with pull.rebase set to true) can easily be patched to remove the require_clean_work_tree restriction. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Documentation: the name of the system is 'Git', not 'git'Thomas Ackermann2013-02-011-1/+1
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Thomas Ackermann <th.acker@arcor.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i: Teach "--edit-todo" actionAndrew Wong2012-09-171-1/+4
| | | | | | | | | | This allows users to edit the todo file while they're stopped in the middle of an interactive rebase. When this action is executed, all comments from the original todo file are stripped, and new help messages are appended to the end. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'sn/doc-typofix'Junio C Hamano2012-07-231-1/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | * sn/doc-typofix: doc: A few minor copy edits.
| * doc: A few minor copy edits.Štěpán Němec2012-07-141-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - (glossary) the quotes around the Wikipedia URL prevented its linkification in frontends that support it; remove them - (manual) newer version (SHA-1) == following, older == preceding, not the other way around - trivial typo and wording fixes Signed-off-by: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'cw/rebase-i-root'Junio C Hamano2012-07-151-4/+5
|\ \ | |/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | "git rebase [-i] --root $tip" can now be used to rewrite all the history down to the root. * cw/rebase-i-root: t3404: make test 57 work with dash and others Add tests for rebase -i --root without --onto rebase -i: support --root without --onto
| * rebase -i: support --root without --ontoChris Webb2012-06-261-4/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Allow --root to be specified to rebase -i without --onto, making it possible to edit and re-order all commits right back to the root(s). If there is a conflict to be resolved when applying the first change, the user will expect a sane index and working tree to get sensible behaviour from git-diff and friends, so create a sentinel commit with an empty tree to rebase onto. Automatically squash the sentinel with any commits rebased directly onto it, so they end up as root commits in their own right and retain their authorship and commit message. Implicitly use rebase -i for non-interactive rebase of --root without an --onto argument now that rebase -i can correctly do this. Signed-off-by: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | rebase -i: teach "--exec <cmd>"Lucien Kong2012-06-131-3/+42
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | During an interactive rebase session, it is sometimes desirable to run tests on each commit in the resulting history. This can be done by adding "exec <test command>" when editing the insn sheet, but the command used for testing is often the same for all resulting commits. By passing "--exec <cmd>" from the command line, automatically add these "exec" lines after each commit in the final history. To work well with the --autosquash option, these are added at the end of each run of "fixup" and "squash". Helped-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Lucien Kong <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Valentin Duperray <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Franck Jonas <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Thomas Nguy <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Huynh Khoi Nguyen Nguyen <Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'jk/doc-asciidoc-inline-literal'Junio C Hamano2012-05-021-5/+5
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Our documentation was written for an ancient version of AsciiDoc, making the source not very readable. By Jeff King * jk/doc-asciidoc-inline-literal: docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literal
| * docs: stop using asciidoc no-inline-literalJeff King2012-04-261-5/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | In asciidoc 7, backticks like `foo` produced a typographic effect, but did not otherwise affect the syntax. In asciidoc 8, backticks introduce an "inline literal" inside which markup is not interpreted. To keep compatibility with existing documents, asciidoc 8 has a "no-inline-literal" attribute to keep the old behavior. We enabled this so that the documentation could be built on either version. It has been several years now, and asciidoc 7 is no longer in wide use. We can now decide whether or not we want inline literals on their own merits, which are: 1. The source is much easier to read when the literal contains punctuation. You can use `master~1` instead of `master{tilde}1`. 2. They are less error-prone. Because of point (1), we tend to make mistakes and forget the extra layer of quoting. This patch removes the no-inline-literal attribute from the Makefile and converts every use of backticks in the documentation to an inline literal (they must be cleaned up, or the example above would literally show "{tilde}" in the output). Problematic sites were found by grepping for '`.*[{\\]' and examined and fixed manually. The results were then verified by comparing the output of "html2text" on the set of generated html pages. Doing so revealed that in addition to making the source more readable, this patch fixes several formatting bugs: - HTML rendering used the ellipsis character instead of literal "..." in code examples (like "git log A...B") - some code examples used the right-arrow character instead of '->' because they failed to quote - api-config.txt did not quote tilde, and the resulting HTML contained a bogus snippet like: <tt><sub></tt> foo <tt></sub>bar</tt> which caused some parsers to choke and omit whole sections of the page. - git-commit.txt confused ``foo`` (backticks inside a literal) with ``foo'' (matched double-quotes) - mentions of `A U Thor <author@example.com>` used to erroneously auto-generate a mailto footnote for author@example.com - the description of --word-diff=plain incorrectly showed the output as "[-removed-] and {added}", not "{+added+}". - using "prime" notation like: commit `C` and its replacement `C'` confused asciidoc into thinking that everything between the first backtick and the final apostrophe were meant to be inside matched quotes - asciidoc got confused by the escaping of some of our asterisks. In particular, `credential.\*` and `credential.<url>.\*` properly escaped the asterisk in the first case, but literally passed through the backslash in the second case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | git-rebase: add keep_empty flagNeil Horman2012-04-241-0/+4
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Add a command line switch to git-rebase to allow a user the ability to specify that they want to keep any commits in a series that are empty. When git-rebase's type is am, then this option will automatically keep any commit that has a tree object identical to its parent. This patch changes the default behavior of interactive rebases as well. With this patch, git-rebase -i will produce a revision set passed to git-revision-editor, in which empty commits are commented out. Empty commits may be kept manually by uncommenting them. If the new --keep-empty option is used in an interactive rebase the empty commits will automatically all be uncommented in the editor. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* documentation: fix alphabetic ordered list for git-rebase man pageNelson Benitez Leon2012-03-261-2/+5
| | | | | | | | | An alphabetic ordered list (a.) is converted to numerical in the man page (1.) so context comments naming 'a' were confusing, fix that by not using ordered list notation for 'a' anb 'b' items. Signed-off-by: Nelson Benitez Leon <nelsonjesus.benitez@seap.minhap.es> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'mz/doc-rebase-abort'Junio C Hamano2011-07-221-2/+6
|\ | | | | | | | | * mz/doc-rebase-abort: rebase: clarify "restore the original branch"
| * rebase: clarify "restore the original branch"Martin von Zweigbergk2011-07-131-2/+6
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The description for 'git rebase --abort' currently says: Restore the original branch and abort the rebase operation. The "restore" can be misinterpreted to imply that the original branch was somehow in a broken state during the rebase operation. It is also not completely clear what "the original branch" is --- is it the branch that was checked out before the rebase operation was called or is the the branch that is being rebased (it is the latter)? Although both issues are made clear in the DESCRIPTION section, let us also make the entry in the OPTIONS secion more clear. Also remove the term "rebasing process" from the usage text, since the user already knows that the text is about "git rebase". Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Documentation: use [verse] for SYNOPSIS sectionsMartin von Zweigbergk2011-07-061-1/+0
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The SYNOPSIS sections of most commands that span several lines already use [verse] to retain line breaks. Most commands that don't span several lines seem not to use [verse]. In the HTML output, [verse] does not only preserve line breaks, but also makes the section indented, which causes a slight inconsistency between commands that use [verse] and those that don't. Use [verse] in all SYNOPSIS sections for consistency. Also remove the blank lines from git-fetch.txt and git-rebase.txt to align with the other man pages. In the case of git-rebase.txt, which already uses [verse], the blank line makes the [verse] not apply to the last line, so removing the blank line also makes the formatting within the document more consistent. While at it, add single quotes to 'git cvsimport' for consistency with other commands. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'mz/rebase'Junio C Hamano2011-04-281-2/+9
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * mz/rebase: (34 commits) rebase: define options in OPTIONS_SPEC Makefile: do not install sourced rebase scripts rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specified rebase -i: remove unnecessary state rebase-root rebase -i: don't read unused variable preserve_merges git-rebase--am: remove unnecessary --3way option rebase -m: don't print exit code 2 when merge fails rebase -m: remember allow_rerere_autoupdate option rebase: remember strategy and strategy options rebase: remember verbose option rebase: extract code for writing basic state rebase: factor out sub command handling rebase: make -v a tiny bit more verbose rebase -i: align variable names rebase: show consistent conflict resolution hint rebase: extract am code to new source file rebase: extract merge code to new source file rebase: remove $branch as synonym for $orig_head rebase -i: support --stat rebase: factor out call to pre-rebase hook ...
| * rebase: use @{upstream} if no upstream specifiedMartin von Zweigbergk2011-02-101-2/+9
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 'git rebase' without arguments is currently not supported. Make it default to 'git rebase @{upstream}'. That is also what 'git pull [--rebase]' defaults to, so it only makes sense that 'git rebase' defaults to the same thing. Defaulting to @{upstream} will make it possible to run e.g. 'git rebase -i' without arguments, which is probably a quite common use case. It also improves the scenario where you have multiple branches that rebase against a remote-tracking branch, where you currently have to choose between the extra network delay of 'git pull' or the slightly awkward keys to enter 'git rebase @{u}'. The error reporting when no upstream is configured for the current branch or when no branch is checked out is reused from git-pull.sh. A function is extracted into git-parse-remote.sh for this purpose. Helped-by: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'jk/doc-credits' of git://github.com/peff/gitJunio C Hamano2011-03-151-10/+0
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * 'jk/doc-credits' of git://github.com/peff/git: docs: point git.txt author credits to git-scm.com doc: add missing git footers doc: drop author/documentation sections from most pages
| * | doc: drop author/documentation sections from most pagesJeff King2011-03-111-10/+0
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The point of these sections is generally to: 1. Give credit where it is due. 2. Give the reader an idea of where to ask questions or file bug reports. But they don't do a good job of either case. For (1), they are out of date and incomplete. A much more accurate answer can be gotten through shortlog or blame. For (2), the correct contact point is generally git@vger, and even if you wanted to cc the contact point, the out-of-date and incomplete fields mean you're likely sending to somebody useless. So let's drop the fields entirely from all manpages except git(1) itself. We already point people to the mailing list for bug reports there, and we can update the Authors section to give credit to the major contributors and point to shortlog and blame for more information. Each page has a "This is part of git" footer, so people can follow that to the main git manpage.
* | Documentation: "rebase <onto> <that>" stays on <that> branch upon exitDrew Northup2011-03-141-2/+3
|/ | | | | | | | | | This change makes it clearer that the change to the history effected by executing 'git rebase master' while on 'topic' branch, and by executing 'git rebase master topic' on any branch, will be the same; the implicit checkout of the second form will remain after the rebase exits. Signed-off-by: Drew Northup <drew.northup@maine.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase: support --verifyMartin von Zweigbergk2010-11-231-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | Interactive rebase allows the '--verify' option to be passed, but it will be ignored. Implement proper support for the option for both interactive and non-interactive rebase by making it override any previous '--no-verify'. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge branch 'jn/doc-backslash'Junio C Hamano2010-09-031-1/+1
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * jn/doc-backslash: Documentation: remove stray backslash in show-branch discussion Documentation: remove stray backslashes from "Fighting regressions" article Documentation: do not convert ... operator to ellipses Documentation: avoid stray backslash in user manual Documentation: avoid stray backslashes in core tutorial Documentation: remove stray backslashes in rev-parse manual Documentation: remove backslash before ~ in fast-import manual Documentation: remove stray backslash from "git bundle" manual Documentation/technical: avoid stray backslash in parse-options API docs Documentation: remove backslashes in manpage synopses Documentation: clarify quoting in gitignore docs Documentation: clarify quoting in "git rm" example Documentation: add missing quotes to "git grep" examples Documentation: clarify quoting in "git add" example Documentation: unbreak regex in show-ref manual Documentation: quoting trouble in "git rm" discussion Documentation: tweak description of log.date
| * Documentation: do not convert ... operator to ellipsesJonathan Nieder2010-08-201-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The symmetric difference or merge-base operator ... as used by rev-list and diff is actually three period characters. If it gets replaced by an ellipsis glyph in the manual, that would stop readers from copying and pasting it. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | Merge branch 'hv/autosquash-config'Junio C Hamano2010-08-311-0/+8
|\ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | * hv/autosquash-config: add configuration variable for --autosquash option of interactive rebase
| * | add configuration variable for --autosquash option of interactive rebaseHeiko Voigt2010-07-141-0/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | If you use this feature regularly you can now enable it by default. In case the user wants to override this config on the commandline --no-autosquash can be used to force disabling. Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | | Merge branch 'mm/rebase-i-exec'Junio C Hamano2010-08-211-0/+24
|\ \ \ | |_|/ |/| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * mm/rebase-i-exec: git-rebase--interactive.sh: use printf instead of echo to print commit message git-rebase--interactive.sh: rework skip_unnecessary_picks test-lib: user-friendly alternatives to test [-d|-f|-e] rebase -i: add exec command to launch a shell command Conflicts: git-rebase--interactive.sh t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh
| * | rebase -i: add exec command to launch a shell commandMatthieu Moy2010-08-111-0/+24
| |/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The typical usage pattern would be to run a test (or simply a compilation command) at given points in history. The shell command is ran (from the worktree root), and the rebase is stopped when the command fails, to give the user an opportunity to fix the problem before continuing with "git rebase --continue". This needs a little rework of skip_unnecessary_picks, which wasn't robust enough to deal with lines like exec >"file name with many spaces" in the todolist. The new version extracts command, sha1 and rest from each line, but outputs the line itself verbatim to avoid changing the whitespace layout. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* | rebase: support -X to pass through strategy optionsMike Lundy2010-08-031-0/+7
|/ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | git-rebase calls out to merge strategies, but did not support merge strategy options so far. Add this, in the same style used in git-merge. Sadly we have to do the full quoting/eval dance here, since merge-recursive supports the --subtree=<path> option which potentially contains whitespace. This patch does not cover git rebase -i, which does not call any merge strategy directly except in --preserve-merges, and even then only for merges. [jc: with a trivial fix-up for 'expr'] Signed-off-by: Mike Lundy <mike@fluffypenguin.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* rebase -i -p: document shortcomingsJonathan Nieder2010-06-111-0/+27
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The rebase --preserve-merges facility presents a list of commits in its instruction sheet and uses a separate table to keep track of their parents. Unfortunately, in practice this means that with -p after most attempts to rearrange patches, some commits have the "wrong" parent and the resulting history is rarely what the caller expected. Yes, it would be nice to fix that. But first, add a warning to the manual to help the uninitiated understand what is going on. Reported-by: Jiří Paleček <jpalecek@web.de> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Documentation: A...B shortcut for checkout and rebaseMichael J Gruber2010-06-021-0/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | Describe the A...B shortcuts for checkout and rebase [-i] which were introduced in these commits: 619a64e ("checkout A...B" switches to the merge base between A and B, 2009-10-18) 61dfa1b ("rebase --onto A...B" replays history on the merge base between A and B, 2009-11-20) 230a456 (rebase -i: teach --onto A...B syntax, 2010-01-07) Signed-off-by: Michael J Gruber <git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Documentation: rebase -i ignores options passed to "git am"Markus Heidelberg2010-05-181-0/+1
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Teach rebase the --no-ff option.Marc Branchaud2010-03-241-2/+21
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | For git-rebase.sh, --no-ff is a synonym for --force-rebase. For git-rebase--interactive.sh, --no-ff cherry-picks all the commits in the rebased branch, instead of fast-forwarding over any unchanged commits. --no-ff offers an alternative way to deal with reverted merges. Instead of "reverting the revert" you can use "rebase --no-ff" to recreate the branch with entirely new commits (they're new because at the very least the committer time is different). This obviates the need to revert the reversion, as you can re-merge the new topic branch directly. Added an addendum to revert-a-faulty-merge.txt describing the situation and how to use --no-ff to handle it. Signed-off-by: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xiplink.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* git-rebase.txt: Fix spellingHorst H. von Brand2010-01-211-1/+1
| | | | | Signed-off-by: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* Merge remote branch 'remotes/trast-doc/for-next'Junio C Hamano2010-01-201-19/+19
|\ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | * remotes/trast-doc/for-next: Documentation: spell 'git cmd' without dash throughout Documentation: format full commands in typewriter font Documentation: warn prominently against merging with dirty trees Documentation/git-merge: reword references to "remote" and "pull" Conflicts: Documentation/config.txt Documentation/git-config.txt Documentation/git-merge.txt
| * Documentation: spell 'git cmd' without dash throughoutThomas Rast2010-01-101-19/+19
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The documentation was quite inconsistent when spelling 'git cmd' if it only refers to the program, not to some specific invocation syntax: both 'git-cmd' and 'git cmd' spellings exist. The current trend goes towards dashless forms, and there is precedent in 647ac70 (git-svn.txt: stop using dash-form of commands., 2009-07-07) to actively eliminate the dashed variants. Replace 'git-cmd' with 'git cmd' throughout, except where git-shell, git-cvsserver, git-upload-pack, git-receive-pack, and git-upload-archive are concerned, because those really live in the $PATH.
View Lorry Controller Status