From 44a6b6ce1777f587c318008fe59b901a296f5326 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Junio C Hamano Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:50:34 -0800 Subject: ref-filter: resurrect "strip" as a synonym to "lstrip" We forgot that "strip" was introduced at 0571979bd6 ("tag: do not show ambiguous tag names as "tags/foo"", 2016-01-25) as part of Git 2.8 (and 2.7.1) when we started calling this "lstrip" to make it easier to explain the new "rstrip" operation. We shouldn't have renamed the existing one; "lstrip" should have been a new synonym that means the same thing as "strip". Scripts in the wild are surely using the original form already. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) (limited to 'Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt') diff --git a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt index 2008600e7e..111e1be6f5 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-for-each-ref.txt @@ -107,6 +107,8 @@ refname:: enough components, the result becomes an empty string if stripping with positive , or it becomes the full refname if stripping with negative . Neither is an error. ++ +`strip` can be used as a synomym to `lstrip`. objecttype:: The type of the object (`blob`, `tree`, `commit`, `tag`). -- cgit v1.2.1