diff options
author | Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me> | 2017-04-10 11:32:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me> | 2017-04-10 16:40:33 +0200 |
commit | 0aafb6abb89b4b0fc4c033b21ccbfd1082b56b30 (patch) | |
tree | 4570663f87192c99290b0a3cd79555395ec5c677 /doc/development/testing.md | |
parent | 91fb9f446fa8476f287657032003aa286c2606b6 (diff) | |
download | gitlab-ce-0aafb6abb89b4b0fc4c033b21ccbfd1082b56b30.tar.gz |
Document GitLab QA
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/testing.md')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/development/testing.md | 31 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/testing.md b/doc/development/testing.md index e096adcdf1c..0d29697df9e 100644 --- a/doc/development/testing.md +++ b/doc/development/testing.md @@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ Formal definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_testing These kind of tests ensure that a single unit of code (a method) works as expected (given an input, it has a predictable output). These tests should be -isolated as much as possible (for example, model methods that don't do anything -with the database shouldn't need a DB record). +isolated as much as possible. For example, model methods that don't do anything +with the database shouldn't need a DB record. Classes that don't need database +records should use stubs/doubles as much as possible. | Code path | Tests path | Testing engine | Notes | | --------- | ---------- | -------------- | ----- | @@ -94,6 +95,29 @@ possible). [Poltergeist]: https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara#poltergeist [RackTest]: https://github.com/teamcapybara/capybara#racktest +### Black-box tests or End-to-end tests + +GitLab consists of [multiple pieces] such as [GitLab Shell], [GitLab Workhorse], +[Gitaly], [GitLab Pages], [GitLab Runner], and GitLab Rails. All theses pieces +are configured and packaged by [GitLab Omnibus]. + +[GitLab QA] is a tool that allows to test that all these pieces integrate well +together by building a Docker image for a given version of GitLab Rails and +running feature tests (i.e. using Capybara) against it. + +The actual test scenarios and steps are [part of GitLab Rails] so that they're +always in-sync with the codebase. + +[multiple pieces]: ./architecture.md#components +[GitLab Shell]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell +[GitLab Workhorse]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse +[Gitaly]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly +[GitLab Pages]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-pages +[GitLab Runner]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner +[GitLab Omnibus]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/omnibus-gitlab +[GitLab QA]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-qa +[part of GitLab Rails]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/tree/master/qa + #### Best practices - Create only the necessary records in the database @@ -133,7 +157,7 @@ trade-off: - Unit tests are usually cheap, and you should consider them like the basement of your house: you need them to be confident that your code is behaving - correctly. However if you run only unit tests without integration / system tests, you might miss the [big] [picture]! + correctly. However if you run only unit tests without integration / system tests, you might [miss] the [big] [picture]! - Integration tests are a bit more expensive, but don't abuse them. A feature test is often better than an integration test that is stubbing a lot of internals. - System tests are expensive (compared to unit tests), even more if they require @@ -150,6 +174,7 @@ test includes: - The time it takes to fix the test if it breaks and the underlying code is OK - Maybe, the time it takes to change the code to make the code testable. +[miss]: https://twitter.com/ThePracticalDev/status/850748070698651649 [big]: https://twitter.com/timbray/status/822470746773409794 [picture]: https://twitter.com/withzombies/status/829716565834752000 [tests-cost]: https://medium.com/table-xi/high-cost-tests-and-high-value-tests-a86e27a54df#.2ulyh3a4e |