diff options
author | Nick Thomas <nick@gitlab.com> | 2016-11-04 11:43:02 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Nick Thomas <nick@gitlab.com> | 2016-11-29 14:14:34 +0000 |
commit | 5e05f9c5c2cfaf14cc0337c23ff54f86c5d5f5a8 (patch) | |
tree | 5e7bd4ddeb096317fe8423bda2cda138939eb961 /doc/development | |
parent | e6d31ce31ff9d408503ea7b0ba1e6faad7cd5290 (diff) | |
download | gitlab-ce-5e05f9c5c2cfaf14cc0337c23ff54f86c5d5f5a8.tar.gz |
Add StackProf to the Gemfile, along with a utility to get a profile for a spec
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/development/performance.md | 110 |
1 files changed, 110 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/performance.md b/doc/development/performance.md index 8337c2d9cb3..5c43ae7b79a 100644 --- a/doc/development/performance.md +++ b/doc/development/performance.md @@ -101,6 +101,116 @@ In short: 5. If you must write a benchmark use the benchmark-ips Gem instead of Ruby's `Benchmark` module. +## Profiling + +By collecting snapshots of process state at regular intervals, profiling allows +you to see where time is spent in a process. The [StackProf](https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof) +gem is included in GitLab's development environment, allowing you to investigate +the behaviour of suspect code in detail. + +It's important to note that profiling an application *alters its performance*, +and will generally be done *in an unrepresentative environment*. In particular, +a method is not necessarily troublesome just because it is executed many times, +or takes a long time to execute. Profiles are tools you can use to better +understand what is happening in an application - using that information wisely +is up to you! + +Keeping that in mind, to create a profile, identify (or create) a spec that +exercises the troublesome code path, then run it using the `bin/rspec-stackprof` +helper, e.g.: + +``` +$ LIMIT=10 bin/rspec-stackprof spec/policies/project_policy_spec.rb +8/8 |====== 100 ======>| Time: 00:00:18 + +Finished in 18.19 seconds (files took 4.8 seconds to load) +8 examples, 0 failures + +================================== + Mode: wall(1000) + Samples: 17033 (5.59% miss rate) + GC: 1901 (11.16%) +================================== + TOTAL (pct) SAMPLES (pct) FRAME + 6000 (35.2%) 2566 (15.1%) Sprockets::Cache::FileStore#get + 2018 (11.8%) 888 (5.2%) ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::PostgreSQLAdapter#exec_no_cache + 1338 (7.9%) 640 (3.8%) ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::PostgreSQL::DatabaseStatements#execute + 3125 (18.3%) 394 (2.3%) Sprockets::Cache::FileStore#safe_open + 913 (5.4%) 301 (1.8%) ActiveRecord::ConnectionAdapters::PostgreSQLAdapter#exec_cache + 288 (1.7%) 288 (1.7%) ActiveRecord::Attribute#initialize + 246 (1.4%) 246 (1.4%) Sprockets::Cache::FileStore#safe_stat + 295 (1.7%) 193 (1.1%) block (2 levels) in class_attribute + 187 (1.1%) 187 (1.1%) block (4 levels) in class_attribute +``` + +You can limit the specs that are run by passing any arguments `rspec` would +normally take. + +The output is sorted by the `Samples` column by default. This is the number of +samples taken where the method is the one currently being executed. The `Total` +column shows the number of samples taken where the method, or any of the methods +it calls, were being executed. + +To create a graphical view of the call stack: + +```shell +$ stackprof tmp/project_policy_spec.rb.dump --graphviz > project_policy_spec.dot +$ dot -Tsvg project_policy_spec.dot > project_policy_spec.svg +``` + +To load the profile in [kcachegrind](https://kcachegrind.github.io/): + +``` +$ stackprof tmp/project_policy_spec.dump --callgrind > project_policy_spec.callgrind +$ kcachegrind project_policy_spec.callgrind # Linux +$ qcachegrind project_policy_spec.callgrind # Mac +``` + +It may be useful to zoom in on a specific method, e.g.: + +``` +$ stackprof tmp/project_policy_spec.rb.dump --method warm_asset_cache +TestEnv#warm_asset_cache (/Users/lupine/dev/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit/gitlab/spec/support/test_env.rb:164) + samples: 0 self (0.0%) / 6288 total (36.9%) + callers: + 6288 ( 100.0%) block (2 levels) in <top (required)> + callees (6288 total): + 6288 ( 100.0%) Capybara::RackTest::Driver#visit + code: + | 164 | def warm_asset_cache + | 165 | return if warm_asset_cache? + | 166 | return unless defined?(Capybara) + | 167 | + 6288 (36.9%) | 168 | Capybara.current_session.driver.visit '/' + | 169 | end +$ stackprof tmp/project_policy_spec.rb.dump --method BasePolicy#abilities +BasePolicy#abilities (/Users/lupine/dev/gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-development-kit/gitlab/app/policies/base_policy.rb:79) + samples: 0 self (0.0%) / 50 total (0.3%) + callers: + 25 ( 50.0%) BasePolicy.abilities + 25 ( 50.0%) BasePolicy#collect_rules + callees (50 total): + 25 ( 50.0%) ProjectPolicy#rules + 25 ( 50.0%) BasePolicy#collect_rules + code: + | 79 | def abilities + | 80 | return RuleSet.empty if @user && @user.blocked? + | 81 | return anonymous_abilities if @user.nil? + 50 (0.3%) | 82 | collect_rules { rules } + | 83 | end +``` + +Since the profile includes the work done by the test suite as well as the +application code, these profiles can be used to investigate slow tests as well. +However, for smaller runs (like this example), this means that the cost of +setting up the test suite will tend to dominate. + +It's also possible to modify the application code in-place to output profiles +whenever a particular code path is triggered without going through the test +suite first. See the +[StackProf documentation](https://github.com/tmm1/stackprof/blob/master/README.md) +for details. + ## Importance of Changes When working on performance improvements, it's important to always ask yourself |