Merge commit '981b5905a02ac89ca9f33ad7c91d8c1a576ed9af' into backstage/gb/build-stages-catch-up-migrationbackstage/gb/build-stages-catch-up-migration

* commit '981b5905a02ac89ca9f33ad7c91d8c1a576ed9af': (40 commits)

6 files changed, 331 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb
index f1655854486..49a179ba875 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb
@@ -118,6 +118,19 @@ describe Gitlab::ContributionsCalendar do
       expect(calendar.events_by_date(today)).to contain_exactly(e1)
       expect(calendar(contributor).events_by_date(today)).to contain_exactly(e1, e2, e3)
     end
+
+    context 'when the user cannot read read cross project' do
+      before do
+        allow(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).and_call_original
+        expect(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).with(user, :read_cross_project) { false }
+      end
+
+      it 'does not return any events' do
+        create_event(public_project, today)
+
+        expect(calendar(user).events_by_date(today)).to be_empty
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#starting_year' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/check_collection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/check_collection_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a9e7575240e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/check_collection_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess::CheckCollection do
+  subject(:collection) { described_class.new }
+
+  describe '#add_collection' do
+    it 'merges the checks of 2 collections' do
+      initial_check = double('check')
+      collection.add_check(initial_check)
+
+      other_collection = described_class.new
+      other_check = double('other_check')
+      other_collection.add_check(other_check)
+
+      shared_check = double('shared check')
+      other_collection.add_check(shared_check)
+      collection.add_check(shared_check)
+
+      collection.add_collection(other_collection)
+
+      expect(collection.checks).to contain_exactly(initial_check, shared_check, other_check)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#should_run?' do
+    def fake_check(run, skip)
+      check = double("Check: run=#{run} - skip={skip}")
+      allow(check).to receive(:should_run?).and_return(run)
+      allow(check).to receive(:should_skip?).and_return(skip)
+      allow(check).to receive(:skip).and_return(skip)
+
+      check
+    end
+
+    it 'returns true if one of the check says it should run' do
+      check = fake_check(true, false)
+      other_check = fake_check(false, false)
+
+      collection.add_check(check)
+      collection.add_check(other_check)
+
+      expect(collection.should_run?(double)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false if one of the check says it should be skipped' do
+      check = fake_check(true, false)
+      other_check = fake_check(false, true)
+
+      collection.add_check(check)
+      collection.add_check(other_check)
+
+      expect(collection.should_run?(double)).to be_falsey
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/check_info_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/check_info_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bc9dbf2bece
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/check_info_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess::CheckInfo do
+  let(:dummy_controller) { double }
+
+  before do
+    allow(dummy_controller).to receive(:action_name).and_return('index')
+  end
+
+  describe '#should_run?' do
+    it 'runs when an action is defined' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: true }, nil, nil, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'runs when the action is missing' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, nil, nil, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not run when the action is excluded' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: false }, nil, nil, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'runs when the `if` conditional is true' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, -> { true }, nil, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not run when the if condition is false' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, -> { false }, nil, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not run when the `unless` check is true' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, nil, -> { true }, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'runs when the `unless` check is false' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, nil, -> { false }, false)
+
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the the oposite of #should_skip? when the check is a skip' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, nil, nil, true)
+
+      expect(info).to receive(:should_skip?).with(dummy_controller).and_return(false)
+      expect(info.should_run?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#should_skip?' do
+    it 'skips when an action is defined' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: true }, nil, nil, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not skip when the action is not defined' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, nil, nil, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not skip when the action is excluded' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: false }, nil, nil, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'skips when the `if` conditional is true' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: true }, -> { true }, nil, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not skip the `if` conditional is false' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: true }, -> { false }, nil, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'does not skip when the `unless` check is true' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: true }, nil, -> { true }, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_falsy
+    end
+
+    it 'skips when `unless` check is false' do
+      info = described_class.new({ index: true }, nil, -> { false }, true)
+
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the the oposite of #should_run? when the check is not a skip' do
+      info = described_class.new({}, nil, nil, false)
+
+      expect(info).to receive(:should_run?).with(dummy_controller).and_return(false)
+      expect(info.should_skip?(dummy_controller)).to be_truthy
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/class_methods_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/class_methods_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5349685e633
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access/class_methods_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess::ClassMethods do
+  let(:dummy_class) do
+    Class.new do
+      extend Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess::ClassMethods
+    end
+  end
+  let(:dummy_proc) { lambda { false } }
+
+  describe '#requires_cross_project_access' do
+    it 'creates a correct check when a hash is passed' do
+      expect(Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess)
+        .to receive(:add_check).with(dummy_class,
+                                     actions: { hello: true, world: false },
+                                     positive_condition: dummy_proc,
+                                     negative_condition: dummy_proc)
+
+      dummy_class.requires_cross_project_access(
+        hello: true, world: false, if: dummy_proc, unless: dummy_proc
+      )
+    end
+
+    it 'creates a correct check when an array is passed' do
+      expect(Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess)
+        .to receive(:add_check).with(dummy_class,
+                                     actions: { hello: true, world: true },
+                                     positive_condition: nil,
+                                     negative_condition: nil)
+
+      dummy_class.requires_cross_project_access(:hello, :world)
+    end
+
+    it 'creates a correct check when an array and a hash is passed' do
+      expect(Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess)
+        .to receive(:add_check).with(dummy_class,
+                                     actions: { hello: true, world: true },
+                                     positive_condition: dummy_proc,
+                                     negative_condition: dummy_proc)
+
+      dummy_class.requires_cross_project_access(
+        :hello, :world, if: dummy_proc, unless: dummy_proc
+      )
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..614b0473c7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/cross_project_access_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::CrossProjectAccess do
+  let(:super_class) { Class.new }
+  let(:descendant_class) { Class.new(super_class) }
+  let(:current_instance) { described_class.new }
+
+  before do
+    allow(described_class).to receive(:instance).and_return(current_instance)
+  end
+
+  describe '#add_check' do
+    it 'keeps track of the properties to check' do
+      expect do
+        described_class.add_check(super_class,
+                                  actions: { index: true },
+                                  positive_condition: -> { true },
+                                  negative_condition: -> { false })
+      end.to change { described_class.checks.size }.by(1)
+    end
+
+    it 'builds the check correctly' do
+      check_collection = described_class.add_check(super_class,
+                                                   actions: { index: true },
+                                                   positive_condition: -> { 'positive' },
+                                                   negative_condition: -> { 'negative' })
+
+      check = check_collection.checks.first
+
+      expect(check.actions).to eq(index: true)
+      expect(check.positive_condition.call).to eq('positive')
+      expect(check.negative_condition.call).to eq('negative')
+    end
+
+    it 'merges the checks of a parent class into existing checks of a subclass' do
+      subclass_collection = described_class.add_check(descendant_class)
+
+      expect(subclass_collection).to receive(:add_collection).and_call_original
+
+      described_class.add_check(super_class)
+    end
+
+    it 'merges the existing checks of a superclass into the checks of a subclass' do
+      super_collection = described_class.add_check(super_class)
+      descendant_collection = described_class.add_check(descendant_class)
+
+      expect(descendant_collection.checks).to include(*super_collection.checks)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#find_check' do
+    it 'returns a check when it was defined for a superclass' do
+      expected_check = described_class.add_check(super_class,
+                                                 actions: { index: true },
+                                                 positive_condition: -> { 'positive' },
+                                                 negative_condition: -> { 'negative' })
+
+      expect(described_class.find_check(descendant_class.new))
+        .to eq(expected_check)
+    end
+
+    it 'caches the result for a subclass' do
+      described_class.add_check(super_class,
+                                actions: { index: true },
+                                positive_condition: -> { 'positive' },
+                                negative_condition: -> { 'negative' })
+
+      expect(described_class.instance).to receive(:closest_parent).once.and_call_original
+
+      2.times { described_class.find_check(descendant_class.new) }
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the checks for the closest class if there are more checks available' do
+      described_class.add_check(super_class,
+                                actions: { index: true })
+      expected_check = described_class.add_check(descendant_class,
+                                                 actions: { index: true, show: false })
+
+      check = described_class.find_check(descendant_class.new)
+
+      expect(check).to eq(expected_check)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb
index cd602ccab8e..73d60c021c8 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb
@@ -72,6 +72,28 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do
         expect(subject[5].text).to eq(code)
         expect(subject[5].text).to be_html_safe
       end
+
+      context 'when the inline diff marker has an invalid range' do
+        before do
+          allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Diff::InlineDiffMarker).to receive(:mark).and_raise(RangeError)
+        end
+
+        it 'keeps the original rich line' do
+          code = %q{+      raise RuntimeError, "System commands must be given as an array of strings"}
+
+          expect(subject[5].text).to eq(code)
+          expect(subject[5].text).not_to be_html_safe
+        end
+
+        it 'reports to Sentry if configured' do
+          allow(Gitlab::Sentry).to receive(:enabled?).and_return(true)
+
+          expect(Gitlab::Sentry).to receive(:context)
+          expect(Raven).to receive(:capture_exception)
+
+          subject
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 end