Merge branch 'master' into 42611-removed-branch-link

* master: (1252 commits)
  Render log artifact files in GitLab
  Check disabled_services when finding a service
  Fix invalid parent path on group settings page
  Backport CE changes for: [Frontend only] Batch comments on merge requests
  Add button to insert table in markdown editor
  Update GITALY_SERVER_VERSION
  Updates Laravel.gitlab-ci.yml template
  Update operations metrics empty state
  Fix LFS uploaded images not being rendered
  Prepare admin/projects/show view to allow EE specific feature
  Add timed incremental rollout to Auto DevOps
  Update spec comment to point to correct issue
  Fix documentation for variables
  Document Security and Licence Management features permissions
  Fix time dependent jobs spec
  Use a CTE to remove the query timeout
  Backport changes from gitlab-ee!7538
  Fix CE to EE merge (backport)
  Add changelog entry
  Refactor Feature.flipper method
  ...

685 files changed, 25178 insertions, 7197 deletions

diff --git a/spec/bin/changelog_spec.rb b/spec/bin/changelog_spec.rb
index 9dc4edf97d1..c59add88a82 100644
--- a/spec/bin/changelog_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/bin/changelog_spec.rb
@@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ describe 'bin/changelog' do
 
         it 'shows error message and exits the program' do
           allow($stdin).to receive(:getc).and_return(type)
+
           expect do
             expect { described_class.read_type }.to raise_error(
               ChangelogHelpers::Abort,
diff --git a/spec/config/settings_spec.rb b/spec/config/settings_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..83b2de47741
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/config/settings_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Settings do
+  describe 'omniauth' do
+    it 'defaults to enabled' do
+      expect(described_class.omniauth.enabled).to be true
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb
index 9d10d725ff3..2e0f79cd313 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/admin/application_settings_controller_spec.rb
@@ -78,5 +78,30 @@ describe Admin::ApplicationSettingsController do
       expect(response).to redirect_to(admin_application_settings_path)
       expect(ApplicationSetting.current.restricted_visibility_levels).to be_empty
     end
+
+    it 'updates the receive_max_input_size setting' do
+      put :update, application_setting: { receive_max_input_size: "1024" }
+
+      expect(response).to redirect_to(admin_application_settings_path)
+      expect(ApplicationSetting.current.receive_max_input_size).to eq(1024)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'PUT #reset_registration_token' do
+    before do
+      sign_in(admin)
+    end
+
+    subject { put :reset_registration_token }
+
+    it 'resets runner registration token' do
+      expect { subject }.to change { ApplicationSetting.current.runners_registration_token }
+    end
+
+    it 'redirects the user to admin runners page' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(response).to redirect_to(admin_runners_path)
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/admin/projects_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/admin/projects_controller_spec.rb
index cc200b9fed9..ee1aff09bdf 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/admin/projects_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/admin/projects_controller_spec.rb
@@ -42,4 +42,15 @@ describe Admin::ProjectsController do
       expect { get :index }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count)
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'GET /projects/:id' do
+    render_views
+
+    it 'renders show page' do
+      get :show, namespace_id: project.namespace.path, id: project.path
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response.body).to match(project.name)
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb
index fbf116e533b..2b28cfd16cc 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/application_controller_spec.rb
@@ -694,4 +694,114 @@ describe ApplicationController do
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(403)
     end
   end
+
+  context 'when invalid UTF-8 parameters are received' do
+    controller(described_class) do
+      def index
+        params[:text].split(' ')
+
+        render json: :ok
+      end
+    end
+
+    before do
+      sign_in user
+    end
+
+    context 'html' do
+      it 'renders 412' do
+        get :index, text: "hi \255"
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(412)
+        expect(response).to render_template :precondition_failed
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'js' do
+      it 'renders 412' do
+        get :index, text: "hi \255", format: :js
+
+        json_response = JSON.parse(response.body)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(412)
+        expect(json_response['error']).to eq('Invalid UTF-8')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'X-GitLab-Custom-Error header' do
+    before do
+      sign_in user
+    end
+
+    context 'given a 422 error page' do
+      controller do
+        def index
+          render 'errors/omniauth_error', layout: 'errors', status: 422
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'sets a custom header' do
+        get :index
+
+        expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to eq '1'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'given a 500 error page' do
+      controller do
+        def index
+          render 'errors/omniauth_error', layout: 'errors', status: 500
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'sets a custom header' do
+        get :index
+
+        expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to eq '1'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'given a 200 success page' do
+      controller do
+        def index
+          render 'errors/omniauth_error', layout: 'errors', status: 200
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'does not set a custom header' do
+        get :index
+
+        expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'given a json response' do
+      controller do
+        def index
+          render json: {}, status: :unprocessable_entity
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'does not set a custom header' do
+        get :index, format: :json
+
+        expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'given a json response for an html request' do
+      controller do
+        def index
+          render json: {}, status: :unprocessable_entity
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'does not set a custom header' do
+        get :index
+
+        expect(response.headers['X-GitLab-Custom-Error']).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections_spec.rb
index c1f42bbb9d7..d16a3464495 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections_spec.rb
@@ -21,6 +21,34 @@ describe IssuableCollections do
     controller
   end
 
+  describe '#set_set_order_from_cookie' do
+    describe 'when sort param given' do
+      let(:cookies) { {} }
+      let(:params) { { sort: 'downvotes_asc' } }
+
+      it 'sets the cookie with the right values and flags' do
+        allow(controller).to receive(:cookies).and_return(cookies)
+
+        controller.send(:set_sort_order_from_cookie)
+
+        expect(cookies['issue_sort']).to eq({ value: 'popularity', secure: false, httponly: false })
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'when cookie exists' do
+      let(:cookies) { { 'issue_sort' => 'id_asc' } }
+      let(:params) { {} }
+
+      it 'sets the cookie with the right values and flags' do
+        allow(controller).to receive(:cookies).and_return(cookies)
+
+        controller.send(:set_sort_order_from_cookie)
+
+        expect(cookies['issue_sort']).to eq({ value: 'created_asc', secure: false, httponly: false })
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#page_count_for_relation' do
     let(:params) { { state: 'opened' } }
 
diff --git a/spec/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload_spec.rb
index 58bb91a0c80..767fba7fd58 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload_spec.rb
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ describe SendFileUpload do
     end
 
     context 'with attachment' do
-      subject { controller.send_upload(uploader, attachment: 'test.js') }
+      let(:send_attachment) { controller.send_upload(uploader, attachment: 'test.js') }
 
       it 'sends a file with content-type of text/plain' do
         expected_params = {
@@ -62,7 +62,29 @@ describe SendFileUpload do
         }
         expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(uploader.path, expected_params)
 
-        subject
+        send_attachment
+      end
+
+      context 'with a proxied file in object storage' do
+        before do
+          stub_uploads_object_storage(uploader: uploader_class)
+          uploader.object_store = ObjectStorage::Store::REMOTE
+          uploader.store!(temp_file)
+          allow(Gitlab.config.uploads.object_store).to receive(:proxy_download) { true }
+        end
+
+        it 'sends a file with a custom type' do
+          headers = double
+          expected_headers = %r(response-content-disposition=attachment%3Bfilename%3D%22test.js%22&response-content-type=application/javascript)
+          expect(Gitlab::Workhorse).to receive(:send_url).with(expected_headers).and_call_original
+          expect(headers).to receive(:store).with(Gitlab::Workhorse::SEND_DATA_HEADER, /^send-url:/)
+
+          expect(controller).not_to receive(:send_file)
+          expect(controller).to receive(:headers) { headers }
+          expect(controller).to receive(:head).with(:ok)
+
+          send_attachment
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -80,7 +102,12 @@ describe SendFileUpload do
 
         it 'sends a file' do
           headers = double
+          expect(Gitlab::Workhorse).not_to receive(:send_url).with(/response-content-disposition/)
+          expect(Gitlab::Workhorse).not_to receive(:send_url).with(/response-content-type/)
+          expect(Gitlab::Workhorse).to receive(:send_url).and_call_original
+
           expect(headers).to receive(:store).with(Gitlab::Workhorse::SEND_DATA_HEADER, /^send-url:/)
+          expect(controller).not_to receive(:send_file)
           expect(controller).to receive(:headers) { headers }
           expect(controller).to receive(:head).with(:ok)
 
diff --git a/spec/controllers/dashboard/milestones_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/dashboard/milestones_controller_spec.rb
index 505c040b5d5..56047c0c8d2 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/dashboard/milestones_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/dashboard/milestones_controller_spec.rb
@@ -3,9 +3,11 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe Dashboard::MilestonesController do
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
   let(:group) { create(:group) }
+  let(:public_group) { create(:group, :public) }
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:project_milestone) { create(:milestone, project: project) }
   let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
+  let!(:public_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: public_group) }
   let(:milestone) do
     DashboardMilestone.build(
       [project],
@@ -43,13 +45,13 @@ describe Dashboard::MilestonesController do
   end
 
   describe "#index" do
-    it 'should contain group and project milestones' do
+    it 'returns group and project milestones to which the user belongs' do
       get :index, format: :json
 
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
       expect(json_response.size).to eq(2)
-      expect(json_response.map { |i| i["first_milestone"]["id"] }).to include(group_milestone.id, project_milestone.id)
-      expect(json_response.map { |i| i["group_name"] }).to include(group.name)
+      expect(json_response.map { |i| i["first_milestone"]["id"] }).to match_array([group_milestone.id, project_milestone.id])
+      expect(json_response.map { |i| i["group_name"] }.compact).to match_array(group.name)
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb
index ea18122e0c3..06ccace8242 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/groups/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb
@@ -17,4 +17,18 @@ describe Groups::Settings::CiCdController do
       expect(response).to render_template(:show)
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'PUT #reset_registration_token' do
+    subject { put :reset_registration_token, group_id: group }
+
+    it 'resets runner registration token' do
+      expect { subject }.to change { group.reload.runners_token }
+    end
+
+    it 'redirects the user to admin runners page' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(response).to redirect_to(group_settings_ci_cd_path)
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb
index 7a037828035..a099cdafa58 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/groups_controller_spec.rb
@@ -38,14 +38,6 @@ describe GroupsController do
       project
     end
 
-    context 'as html' do
-      it 'assigns whether or not a group has children' do
-        get :show, id: group.to_param
-
-        expect(assigns(:has_children)).to be_truthy
-      end
-    end
-
     context 'as atom' do
       it 'assigns events for all the projects in the group' do
         create(:event, project: project)
@@ -57,6 +49,16 @@ describe GroupsController do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'GET edit' do
+    it 'sets the badge API endpoint' do
+      sign_in(owner)
+
+      get :edit, id: group.to_param
+
+      expect(assigns(:badge_api_endpoint)).not_to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'GET #new' do
     context 'when creating subgroups', :nested_groups do
       [true, false].each do |can_create_group_status|
@@ -200,8 +202,8 @@ describe GroupsController do
   end
 
   describe 'GET #issues' do
-    let(:issue_1) { create(:issue, project: project) }
-    let(:issue_2) { create(:issue, project: project) }
+    let(:issue_1) { create(:issue, project: project, title: 'foo') }
+    let(:issue_2) { create(:issue, project: project, title: 'bar') }
 
     before do
       create_list(:award_emoji, 3, awardable: issue_2)
@@ -222,6 +224,31 @@ describe GroupsController do
         expect(assigns(:issues)).to eq [issue_2, issue_1]
       end
     end
+
+    context 'searching' do
+      # Remove as part of https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52271
+      before do
+        stub_feature_flags(use_cte_for_group_issues_search: false)
+      end
+
+      it 'works with popularity sort' do
+        get :issues, id: group.to_param, search: 'foo', sort: 'popularity'
+
+        expect(assigns(:issues)).to eq([issue_1])
+      end
+
+      it 'works with priority sort' do
+        get :issues, id: group.to_param, search: 'foo', sort: 'priority'
+
+        expect(assigns(:issues)).to eq([issue_1])
+      end
+
+      it 'works with label priority sort' do
+        get :issues, id: group.to_param, search: 'foo', sort: 'label_priority'
+
+        expect(assigns(:issues)).to eq([issue_1])
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe 'GET #merge_requests' do
diff --git a/spec/controllers/import/gitlab_projects_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/import/gitlab_projects_controller_spec.rb
index d624659bce9..cbd1a112602 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/import/gitlab_projects_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/import/gitlab_projects_controller_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe Import::GitlabProjectsController do
   set(:namespace) { create(:namespace) }
   set(:user) { namespace.owner }
-  let(:file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/doc_sample.txt', 'text/plain') }
+  let(:file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/project_export.tar.gz', 'text/plain') }
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
diff --git a/spec/controllers/instance_statistics/cohorts_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/instance_statistics/cohorts_controller_spec.rb
index e4eedede93a..596d3c7abe5 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/instance_statistics/cohorts_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/instance_statistics/cohorts_controller_spec.rb
@@ -3,5 +3,19 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe InstanceStatistics::CohortsController do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    sign_in(user)
+  end
+
   it_behaves_like 'instance statistics availability'
+
+  it 'renders a 404 when the usage ping is disabled' do
+    stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: false)
+
+    get :index
+
+    expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:not_found)
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/oauth/applications_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/oauth/applications_controller_spec.rb
index 1195f44f37d..ace8a954e92 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/oauth/applications_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/oauth/applications_controller_spec.rb
@@ -15,14 +15,44 @@ describe Oauth::ApplicationsController do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
       end
 
-      it 'redirects back to profile page if OAuth applications are disabled' do
-        allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.current_application_settings).to receive(:user_oauth_applications?).and_return(false)
+      it 'shows list of applications' do
+        disable_user_oauth
 
         get :index
 
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'POST #create' do
+      it 'creates an application' do
+        post :create, oauth_params
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(302)
+        expect(response).to redirect_to(oauth_application_path(Doorkeeper::Application.last))
+      end
+
+      it 'redirects back to profile page if OAuth applications are disabled' do
+        disable_user_oauth
+
+        post :create, oauth_params
+
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(302)
         expect(response).to redirect_to(profile_path)
       end
     end
   end
+
+  def disable_user_oauth
+    allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.current_application_settings).to receive(:user_oauth_applications?).and_return(false)
+  end
+
+  def oauth_params
+    {
+      doorkeeper_application: {
+        name: 'foo',
+        redirect_uri: 'http://example.org'
+      }
+    }
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb
index 4ea6f869aa3..6091185e252 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/artifacts_controller_spec.rb
@@ -19,10 +19,44 @@ describe Projects::ArtifactsController do
   end
 
   describe 'GET download' do
-    it 'sends the artifacts file' do
-      expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(job.artifacts_file.path, hash_including(disposition: 'attachment')).and_call_original
+    def download_artifact(extra_params = {})
+      params = { namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project, job_id: job }.merge(extra_params)
 
-      get :download, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project, job_id: job
+      get :download, params
+    end
+
+    context 'when no file type is supplied' do
+      it 'sends the artifacts file' do
+        expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(job.artifacts_file.path, hash_including(disposition: 'attachment')).and_call_original
+
+        download_artifact
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a file type is supplied' do
+      context 'when an invalid file type is supplied' do
+        let(:file_type) { 'invalid' }
+
+        it 'returns 404' do
+          download_artifact(file_type: file_type)
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when codequality file type is supplied' do
+        let(:file_type) { 'codequality' }
+
+        before do
+          create(:ci_job_artifact, :codequality, job: job)
+        end
+
+        it 'sends the codequality report' do
+          expect(controller).to receive(:send_file).with(job.job_artifacts_codequality.file.path, hash_including(disposition: 'attachment')).and_call_original
+
+          download_artifact(file_type: file_type)
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/clusters_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/clusters_controller_spec.rb
index 42917d0d505..97ac11fd171 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/clusters_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/clusters_controller_spec.rb
@@ -170,12 +170,14 @@ describe Projects::ClustersController do
   end
 
   describe 'POST create for new cluster' do
+    let(:legacy_abac_param) { 'true' }
     let(:params) do
       {
         cluster: {
           name: 'new-cluster',
           provider_gcp_attributes: {
-            gcp_project_id: 'gcp-project-12345'
+            gcp_project_id: 'gcp-project-12345',
+            legacy_abac: legacy_abac_param
           }
         }
       }
@@ -201,6 +203,18 @@ describe Projects::ClustersController do
           expect(response).to redirect_to(project_cluster_path(project, project.clusters.first))
           expect(project.clusters.first).to be_gcp
           expect(project.clusters.first).to be_kubernetes
+          expect(project.clusters.first.provider_gcp).to be_legacy_abac
+        end
+
+        context 'when legacy_abac param is false' do
+          let(:legacy_abac_param) { 'false' }
+
+          it 'creates a new cluster with legacy_abac_disabled' do
+            expect(ClusterProvisionWorker).to receive(:perform_async)
+            expect { go }.to change { Clusters::Cluster.count }
+              .and change { Clusters::Providers::Gcp.count }
+            expect(project.clusters.first.provider_gcp).not_to be_legacy_abac
+          end
         end
       end
 
@@ -274,11 +288,43 @@ describe Projects::ClustersController do
       context 'when creates a cluster' do
         it 'creates a new cluster' do
           expect(ClusterProvisionWorker).to receive(:perform_async)
+
           expect { go }.to change { Clusters::Cluster.count }
             .and change { Clusters::Platforms::Kubernetes.count }
+
           expect(response).to redirect_to(project_cluster_path(project, project.clusters.first))
+
+          expect(project.clusters.first).to be_user
+          expect(project.clusters.first).to be_kubernetes
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when creates a RBAC-enabled cluster' do
+        let(:params) do
+          {
+            cluster: {
+              name: 'new-cluster',
+              platform_kubernetes_attributes: {
+                api_url: 'http://my-url',
+                token: 'test',
+                namespace: 'aaa',
+                authorization_type: 'rbac'
+              }
+            }
+          }
+        end
+
+        it 'creates a new cluster' do
+          expect(ClusterProvisionWorker).to receive(:perform_async)
+
+          expect { go }.to change { Clusters::Cluster.count }
+            .and change { Clusters::Platforms::Kubernetes.count }
+
+          expect(response).to redirect_to(project_cluster_path(project, project.clusters.first))
+
           expect(project.clusters.first).to be_user
           expect(project.clusters.first).to be_kubernetes
+          expect(project.clusters.first).to be_platform_kubernetes_rbac
         end
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/hooks_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/hooks_controller_spec.rb
index 0f3033b0933..7d3a8c3d0d3 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/hooks_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/hooks_controller_spec.rb
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ describe Projects::HooksController do
         tag_push_events: true,
         merge_requests_events: true,
         issues_events: true,
+        confidential_note_events: true,
         confidential_issues_events: true,
         note_events: true,
         job_events: true,
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/issues_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/issues_controller_spec.rb
index 5b347b1109a..9df77560320 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/issues_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/issues_controller_spec.rb
@@ -637,6 +637,18 @@ describe Projects::IssuesController do
           project_id: project,
           id: id
       end
+
+      it 'avoids (most) N+1s loading labels', :request_store do
+        label = create(:label, project: project).to_reference
+        labels = create_list(:label, 10, project: project).map(&:to_reference)
+        issue = create(:issue, project: project, description: 'Test issue')
+
+        control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new { issue.update(description: [issue.description, label].join(' ')) }.count
+
+        # Follow-up to get rid of this `2 * label.count` requirement: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52230
+        expect { issue.update(description: [issue.description, labels].join(' ')) }
+          .not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count + 2 * labels.count)
+      end
     end
 
     describe 'GET #realtime_changes' do
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/jobs_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/jobs_controller_spec.rb
index 1aca44c6e74..383d6c1a2a9 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/jobs_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/jobs_controller_spec.rb
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ describe Projects::JobsController, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       def create_job(name, status)
         pipeline = create(:ci_pipeline, project: project)
         create(:ci_build, :tags, :triggered, :artifacts,
-          pipeline: pipeline, name: name, status: status)
+               pipeline: pipeline, name: name, status: status)
       end
     end
 
@@ -147,12 +147,255 @@ describe Projects::JobsController, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
         get_show(id: job.id, format: :json)
       end
 
-      it 'exposes needed information' do
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
-        expect(json_response['raw_path']).to match(%r{jobs/\d+/raw\z})
-        expect(json_response.dig('merge_request', 'path')).to match(%r{merge_requests/\d+\z})
-        expect(json_response['new_issue_path'])
-          .to include('/issues/new')
+      context 'when job failed' do
+        it 'exposes needed information' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['raw_path']).to match(%r{jobs/\d+/raw\z})
+          expect(json_response.dig('merge_request', 'path')).to match(%r{merge_requests/\d+\z})
+          expect(json_response['new_issue_path']).to include('/issues/new')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when job has artifacts' do
+        context 'with not expiry date' do
+          let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :artifacts, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+          it 'exposes needed information' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['artifact']['download_path']).to match(%r{artifacts/download})
+            expect(json_response['artifact']['browse_path']).to match(%r{artifacts/browse})
+            expect(json_response['artifact']).not_to have_key('expired')
+            expect(json_response['artifact']).not_to have_key('expired_at')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'with expiry date' do
+          let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :artifacts, :expired, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+          it 'exposes needed information' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['artifact']).not_to have_key('download_path')
+            expect(json_response['artifact']).not_to have_key('browse_path')
+            expect(json_response['artifact']['expired']).to eq(true)
+            expect(json_response['artifact']['expire_at']).not_to be_empty
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when job has terminal' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :running, :with_runner_session, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it 'exposes the terminal path' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['terminal_path']).to match(%r{/terminal})
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when job passed with no trace' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :artifacts, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it 'exposes empty state illustrations' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['status']['illustration']).to have_key('image')
+          expect(json_response['status']['illustration']).to have_key('size')
+          expect(json_response['status']['illustration']).to have_key('title')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with no deployment' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it 'does not exposes the deployment information' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(json_response['deployment_status']).to be_nil
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with deployment' do
+        let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) }
+        let(:environment) { create(:environment, project: project, name: 'staging', state: :available) }
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it 'exposes the deployment information' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(json_response).to match_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['deployment_status']["status"]).to eq 'creating'
+          expect(json_response['deployment_status']["environment"]).not_to be_nil
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when user can edit runner' do
+        context 'that belongs to the project' do
+          let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner, :project, projects: [project]) }
+          let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, pipeline: pipeline, runner: runner) }
+
+          before do
+            project.add_maintainer(user)
+            sign_in(user)
+
+            get_show(id: job.id, format: :json)
+          end
+
+          it 'user can edit runner' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['runner']).to have_key('edit_path')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'that belongs to group' do
+          let(:group) { create(:group) }
+          let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner, :group, groups: [group]) }
+          let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, pipeline: pipeline, runner: runner) }
+          let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
+
+          before do
+            project.add_maintainer(user)
+            sign_in(user)
+
+            get_show(id: job.id, format: :json)
+          end
+
+          it 'user can not edit runner' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['runner']).not_to have_key('edit_path')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'that belongs to instance' do
+          let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner, :instance) }
+          let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, pipeline: pipeline, runner: runner) }
+          let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
+
+          before do
+            project.add_maintainer(user)
+            sign_in(user)
+
+            get_show(id: job.id, format: :json)
+          end
+
+          it 'user can not edit runner' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['runner']).not_to have_key('edit_path')
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when no runners are available' do
+        let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner, :instance, active: false) }
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :pending, pipeline: pipeline, runner: runner) }
+
+        it 'exposes needed information' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['runners']['online']).to be false
+          expect(json_response['runners']['available']).to be false
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when no runner is online' do
+        let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner, :instance) }
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :pending, pipeline: pipeline, runner: runner) }
+
+        it 'exposes needed information' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['runners']['online']).to be false
+          expect(json_response['runners']['available']).to be true
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'settings_path' do
+        context 'when user is developer' do
+          it 'settings_path is not available' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['runners']).not_to have_key('settings_path')
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when user is maintainer' do
+          let(:user) { create(:user, :admin) }
+
+          before do
+            project.add_maintainer(user)
+            sign_in(user)
+          end
+
+          it 'settings_path is available' do
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+            expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+            expect(json_response['runners']['settings_path']).to match(/runners/)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when no trace is available' do
+        it 'has_trace is false' do
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['has_trace']).to be false
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when job has trace' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it "has_trace is true" do
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['has_trace']).to be true
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when requesting JSON job is triggered' do
+      let!(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) }
+      let(:trigger) { create(:ci_trigger, project: project) }
+      let(:trigger_request) { create(:ci_trigger_request, pipeline: pipeline, trigger: trigger) }
+      let(:job) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, trigger_request: trigger_request) }
+
+      before do
+        project.add_developer(user)
+        sign_in(user)
+
+        allow_any_instance_of(Ci::Build).to receive(:merge_request).and_return(merge_request)
+      end
+
+      context 'with no variables' do
+        before do
+          get_show(id: job.id, format: :json)
+        end
+
+        it 'exposes trigger information' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['short_token']).to eq 'toke'
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['variables'].length).to eq 0
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with variables' do
+        before do
+          create(:ci_pipeline_variable, pipeline: pipeline, key: :TRIGGER_KEY_1, value: 'TRIGGER_VALUE_1')
+
+          get_show(id: job.id, format: :json)
+        end
+
+        it 'exposes trigger information and variables' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('job/job_details')
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['short_token']).to eq 'toke'
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['variables'].length).to eq 1
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['variables'].first['key']).to eq "TRIGGER_KEY_1"
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['variables'].first['value']).to eq "TRIGGER_VALUE_1"
+          expect(json_response['trigger']['variables'].first['public']).to eq false
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -388,6 +631,46 @@ describe Projects::JobsController, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'POST unschedule' do
+    before do
+      project.add_developer(user)
+
+      create(:protected_branch, :developers_can_merge,
+             name: 'master', project: project)
+
+      sign_in(user)
+
+      post_unschedule
+    end
+
+    context 'when job is scheduled' do
+      let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'redirects to the unscheduled job page' do
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:found)
+        expect(response).to redirect_to(namespace_project_job_path(id: job.id))
+      end
+
+      it 'transits to manual' do
+        expect(job.reload).to be_manual
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when job is not scheduled' do
+      let(:job) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'renders unprocessable_entity' do
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:unprocessable_entity)
+      end
+    end
+
+    def post_unschedule
+      post :unschedule, namespace_id: project.namespace,
+                        project_id: project,
+                        id: job.id
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'POST cancel_all' do
     before do
       project.add_developer(user)
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller_spec.rb
index d9bb3981539..f2467bfd525 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller_spec.rb
@@ -763,25 +763,35 @@ describe Projects::MergeRequestsController do
 
   describe 'GET ci_environments_status' do
     context 'the environment is from a forked project' do
-      let!(:forked)       { fork_project(project, user, repository: true) }
-      let!(:environment)  { create(:environment, project: forked) }
-      let!(:deployment)   { create(:deployment, environment: environment, sha: forked.commit.id, ref: 'master') }
-      let(:admin)         { create(:admin) }
+      let!(:forked)      { fork_project(project, user, repository: true) }
+      let!(:environment) { create(:environment, project: forked) }
+      let!(:deployment)  { create(:deployment, environment: environment, sha: forked.commit.id, ref: 'master') }
+      let(:admin)        { create(:admin) }
 
       let(:merge_request) do
         create(:merge_request, source_project: forked, target_project: project)
       end
 
-      before do
+      it 'links to the environment on that project' do
+        get_ci_environments_status
+
+        expect(json_response.first['url']).to match /#{forked.full_path}/
+      end
+
+      # we're trying to reduce the overall number of queries for this method.
+      # set a hard limit for now. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/52287
+      it 'keeps queries in check' do
+        control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new { get_ci_environments_status }.count
+
+        expect(control_count).to be <= 137
+      end
+
+      def get_ci_environments_status
         get :ci_environments_status,
           namespace_id: merge_request.project.namespace.to_param,
           project_id: merge_request.project,
           id: merge_request.iid, format: 'json'
       end
-
-      it 'links to the environment on that project' do
-        expect(json_response.first['url']).to match /#{forked.full_path}/
-      end
     end
   end
 
@@ -885,4 +895,18 @@ describe Projects::MergeRequestsController do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'GET edit' do
+    it 'responds successfully' do
+      get :edit, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project, id: merge_request
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:success)
+    end
+
+    it 'assigns the noteable to make sure autocompletes work' do
+      get :edit, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project, id: merge_request
+
+      expect(assigns(:noteable)).not_to be_nil
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/notes_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/notes_controller_spec.rb
index 1458113b90c..e48c9dea976 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/notes_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/notes_controller_spec.rb
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ describe Projects::NotesController do
         get :index, request_params
 
         expect(parsed_response[:notes].count).to eq(1)
-        expect(note_json[:id]).to eq(note.id)
+        expect(note_json[:id]).to eq(note.id.to_s)
       end
 
       it 'does not result in N+1 queries' do
@@ -207,6 +207,14 @@ describe Projects::NotesController do
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
     end
 
+    it 'returns discussion JSON when the return_discussion param is set' do
+      post :create, request_params.merge(format: :json, return_discussion: 'true')
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(json_response).to have_key 'discussion'
+      expect(json_response['discussion']['notes'][0]['note']).to eq(request_params[:note][:note])
+    end
+
     context 'when merge_request_diff_head_sha present' do
       before do
         service_params = {
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller_spec.rb
index d89716b1b50..5c7415a318d 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller_spec.rb
@@ -90,6 +90,11 @@ describe Projects::PipelinesController do
 
     context 'when performing gitaly calls', :request_store do
       it 'limits the Gitaly requests' do
+        # Isolate from test preparation (Repository#exists? is also cached in RequestStore)
+        RequestStore.end!
+        RequestStore.clear!
+        RequestStore.begin!
+
         expect { get_pipelines_index_json }
           .to change { Gitlab::GitalyClient.get_request_count }.by(2)
       end
@@ -193,14 +198,34 @@ describe Projects::PipelinesController do
 
     context 'when accessing existing stage' do
       before do
+        create(:ci_build, :retried, :failed, pipeline: pipeline, stage: 'build')
         create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, stage: 'build')
+      end
+
+      context 'without retried' do
+        before do
+          get_stage('build')
+        end
 
-        get_stage('build')
+        it 'returns pipeline jobs without the retried builds' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('pipeline_stage')
+          expect(json_response['latest_statuses'].length).to eq 1
+          expect(json_response).not_to have_key('retried')
+        end
       end
 
-      it 'returns html source for stage dropdown' do
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
-        expect(response).to match_response_schema('pipeline_stage')
+      context 'with retried' do
+        before do
+          get_stage('build', retried: true)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns pipelines jobs with the retried builds' do
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:ok)
+          expect(response).to match_response_schema('pipeline_stage')
+          expect(json_response['latest_statuses'].length).to eq 1
+          expect(json_response['retried'].length).to eq 1
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -214,12 +239,13 @@ describe Projects::PipelinesController do
       end
     end
 
-    def get_stage(name)
-      get :stage, namespace_id: project.namespace,
-                  project_id: project,
-                  id: pipeline.id,
-                  stage: name,
-                  format: :json
+    def get_stage(name, params = {})
+      get :stage, **params.merge(
+        namespace_id: project.namespace,
+        project_id: project,
+        id: pipeline.id,
+        stage: name,
+        format: :json)
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller_spec.rb
index 17769a14def..d11e42b411b 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller_spec.rb
@@ -86,9 +86,10 @@ describe Projects::Registry::RepositoriesController do
           stub_container_registry_tags(repository: :any, tags: [])
         end
 
-        it 'deletes a repository' do
-          expect { delete_repository(repository) }.to change { ContainerRepository.all.count }.by(-1)
+        it 'schedules a job to delete a repository' do
+          expect(DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker).to receive(:perform_async).with(user.id, repository.id)
 
+          delete_repository(repository)
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(:no_content)
         end
       end
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb
index 1f14a0cc381..4629929f9af 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/settings/ci_cd_controller_spec.rb
@@ -74,6 +74,19 @@ describe Projects::Settings::CiCdController do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'PUT #reset_registration_token' do
+    subject { put :reset_registration_token, namespace_id: project.namespace, project_id: project }
+    it 'resets runner registration token' do
+      expect { subject }.to change { project.reload.runners_token }
+    end
+
+    it 'redirects the user to admin runners page' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(response).to redirect_to(namespace_project_settings_ci_cd_path)
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'PATCH update' do
     let(:params) { { ci_config_path: '' } }
 
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects/uploads_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects/uploads_controller_spec.rb
index 325ee53aafb..9802e4d5b1e 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects/uploads_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects/uploads_controller_spec.rb
@@ -18,6 +18,20 @@ describe Projects::UploadsController do
     end
   end
 
+  context "when exception occurs" do
+    before do
+      allow(FileUploader).to receive(:workhorse_authorize).and_raise(SocketError.new)
+      sign_in(create(:user))
+    end
+
+    it "responds with status internal_server_error" do
+      post_authorize
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(500)
+      expect(response.body).to eq('Error uploading file')
+    end
+  end
+
   def post_authorize(verified: true)
     request.headers.merge!(workhorse_internal_api_request_header) if verified
 
diff --git a/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb b/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb
index 94644b1f9fd..3bc9cbe64c5 100644
--- a/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/controllers/projects_controller_spec.rb
@@ -284,6 +284,19 @@ describe ProjectsController do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'GET edit' do
+    it 'sets the badge API endpoint' do
+      sign_in(user)
+      project.add_maintainer(user)
+
+      get :edit,
+          namespace_id: project.namespace.path,
+          id: project.path
+
+      expect(assigns(:badge_api_endpoint)).not_to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "#update" do
     render_views
 
@@ -790,37 +803,7 @@ describe ProjectsController do
       project.add_maintainer(user)
     end
 
-    context 'object storage disabled' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
-      end
-
-      context 'when project export is enabled' do
-        it 'returns 302' do
-          get :download_export, namespace_id: project.namespace, id: project
-
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(302)
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when project export is disabled' do
-        before do
-          stub_application_setting(project_export_enabled?: false)
-        end
-
-        it 'returns 404' do
-          get :download_export, namespace_id: project.namespace, id: project
-
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
     context 'object storage enabled' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-      end
-
       context 'when project export is enabled' do
         it 'returns 302' do
           get :download_export, namespace_id: project.namespace, id: project
diff --git a/spec/db/development/import_common_metrics_spec.rb b/spec/db/development/import_common_metrics_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..25061ef0887
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/db/development/import_common_metrics_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Import metrics on development seed' do
+  subject { load Rails.root.join('db', 'fixtures', 'development', '99_common_metrics.rb') }
+
+  it "imports all prometheus metrics" do
+    expect(PrometheusMetric.common).to be_empty
+
+    subject
+
+    expect(PrometheusMetric.common).not_to be_empty
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/db/importers/common_metrics_importer_spec.rb b/spec/db/importers/common_metrics_importer_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..68260820958
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/db/importers/common_metrics_importer_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+require Rails.root.join("db", "importers", "common_metrics_importer.rb")
+
+describe Importers::PrometheusMetric do
+  it 'group enum equals ::PrometheusMetric' do
+    expect(described_class.groups).to eq(::PrometheusMetric.groups)
+  end
+
+  it 'GROUP_TITLES equals ::PrometheusMetric' do
+    expect(described_class::GROUP_TITLES).to eq(::PrometheusMetric::GROUP_TITLES)
+  end
+end
+
+describe Importers::CommonMetricsImporter do
+  subject { described_class.new }
+
+  context "does import common_metrics.yml" do
+    let(:groups) { subject.content }
+    let(:metrics) { groups.map { |group| group['metrics'] }.flatten }
+    let(:queries) { metrics.map { |group| group['queries'] }.flatten }
+    let(:query_ids) { queries.map { |query| query['id'] } }
+
+    before do
+      subject.execute
+    end
+
+    it "has the same amount of groups" do
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common.group(:group).count.count).to eq(groups.count)
+    end
+
+    it "has the same amount of metrics" do
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common.group(:group, :title).count.count).to eq(metrics.count)
+    end
+
+    it "has the same amount of queries" do
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common.count).to eq(queries.count)
+    end
+
+    it "does not have duplicate IDs" do
+      expect(query_ids).to eq(query_ids.uniq)
+    end
+
+    it "imports all IDs" do
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common.pluck(:identifier)).to contain_exactly(*query_ids)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context "does import common_metrics.yml" do
+    it "when executed from outside of the Rails.root" do
+      Dir.chdir(Dir.tmpdir) do
+        expect { subject.execute }.not_to raise_error
+      end
+
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common).not_to be_empty
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'does import properly all fields' do
+    let(:query_identifier) { 'response-metric' }
+    let(:group) do
+      {
+        group: 'Response metrics (NGINX Ingress)',
+        metrics: [{
+          title: "Throughput",
+          y_label: "Requests / Sec",
+          queries: [{
+            id: query_identifier,
+            query_range: 'my-query',
+            unit: 'my-unit',
+            label: 'status code'
+          }]
+        }]
+      }
+    end
+
+    before do
+      expect(subject).to receive(:content) { [group.deep_stringify_keys] }
+    end
+
+    shared_examples 'stores metric' do
+      let(:metric) { PrometheusMetric.find_by(identifier: query_identifier) }
+
+      it 'with all data' do
+        expect(metric.group).to eq('nginx_ingress')
+        expect(metric.title).to eq('Throughput')
+        expect(metric.y_label).to eq('Requests / Sec')
+        expect(metric.unit).to eq('my-unit')
+        expect(metric.legend).to eq('status code')
+        expect(metric.query).to eq('my-query')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'if ID is missing' do
+      let(:query_identifier) { }
+
+      it 'raises exception' do
+        expect { subject.execute }.to raise_error(described_class::MissingQueryId)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'for existing common metric with different ID' do
+      let!(:existing_metric) { create(:prometheus_metric, :common, identifier: 'my-existing-metric') }
+
+      before do
+        subject.execute
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'stores metric' do
+        it 'and existing metric is not changed' do
+          expect(metric).not_to eq(existing_metric)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when metric with ID exists ' do
+      let!(:existing_metric) { create(:prometheus_metric, :common, identifier: 'response-metric') }
+
+      before do
+        subject.execute
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'stores metric' do
+        it 'and existing metric is changed' do
+          expect(metric).to eq(existing_metric)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/db/production/import_common_metrics_spec.rb b/spec/db/production/import_common_metrics_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1e4ff818a86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/db/production/import_common_metrics_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Import metrics on production seed' do
+  subject { load Rails.root.join('db', 'fixtures', 'production', '999_common_metrics.rb') }
+
+  it "imports all prometheus metrics" do
+    expect(PrometheusMetric.common).to be_empty
+
+    subject
+
+    expect(PrometheusMetric.common).not_to be_empty
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb b/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb
index 9a65e7f8a3f..1a2be5e9552 100644
--- a/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/broadcast_messages.rb
@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
 FactoryBot.define do
   factory :broadcast_message do
     message "MyText"
-    starts_at 1.day.ago
-    ends_at 1.day.from_now
+    starts_at { 1.day.ago }
+    ends_at { 1.day.from_now }
 
     trait :expired do
-      starts_at 5.days.ago
-      ends_at 3.days.ago
+      starts_at { 5.days.ago }
+      ends_at { 3.days.ago }
     end
 
     trait :future do
-      starts_at 5.days.from_now
-      ends_at 6.days.from_now
+      starts_at { 5.days.from_now }
+      ends_at { 6.days.from_now }
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb b/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb
index 9813190925b..85ba7d4097d 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/builds.rb
@@ -70,6 +70,18 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       status 'created'
     end
 
+    trait :scheduled do
+      schedulable
+      status 'scheduled'
+      scheduled_at  { 1.minute.since }
+    end
+
+    trait :expired_scheduled do
+      schedulable
+      status 'scheduled'
+      scheduled_at { 1.minute.ago }
+    end
+
     trait :manual do
       status 'manual'
       self.when 'manual'
@@ -98,6 +110,15 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       success
     end
 
+    trait :schedulable do
+      self.when 'delayed'
+      options start_in: '1 minute'
+    end
+
+    trait :actionable do
+      self.when 'manual'
+    end
+
     trait :retried do
       retried true
     end
@@ -159,12 +180,12 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     end
 
     trait :erased do
-      erased_at Time.now
+      erased_at { Time.now }
       erased_by factory: :user
     end
 
     trait :queued do
-      queued_at Time.now
+      queued_at { Time.now }
       runner factory: :ci_runner
     end
 
@@ -194,7 +215,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     end
 
     trait :expired do
-      artifacts_expire_at 1.minute.ago
+      artifacts_expire_at { 1.minute.ago }
     end
 
     trait :with_commit do
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb b/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb
index 46aaaf6aa5d..e0aeadeecd7 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/job_artifacts.rb
@@ -14,6 +14,33 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       artifact.project ||= artifact.job.project
     end
 
+    trait :raw do
+      file_format :raw
+
+      after(:build) do |artifact, _|
+        artifact.file = fixture_file_upload(
+          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/trace/sample_trace'), 'text/plain')
+      end
+    end
+
+    trait :zip do
+      file_format :zip
+
+      after(:build) do |artifact, _|
+        artifact.file = fixture_file_upload(
+          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/ci_build_artifacts.zip'), 'application/zip')
+      end
+    end
+
+    trait :gzip do
+      file_format :gzip
+
+      after(:build) do |artifact, _|
+        artifact.file = fixture_file_upload(
+          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/ci_build_artifacts_metadata.gz'), 'application/x-gzip')
+      end
+    end
+
     trait :archive do
       file_type :archive
       file_format :zip
@@ -24,6 +51,12 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       end
     end
 
+    trait :legacy_archive do
+      archive
+
+      file_location :legacy_path
+    end
+
     trait :metadata do
       file_type :metadata
       file_format :gzip
@@ -84,6 +117,16 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       end
     end
 
+    trait :codequality do
+      file_type :codequality
+      file_format :gzip
+
+      after(:build) do |artifact, evaluator|
+        artifact.file = fixture_file_upload(
+          Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz'), 'application/x-gzip')
+      end
+    end
+
     trait :correct_checksum do
       after(:build) do |artifact, evaluator|
         artifact.file_sha256 = Digest::SHA256.file(artifact.file.path).hexdigest
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb b/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb
index a6ff226fa75..8a44ce52849 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/pipelines.rb
@@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do
         status :manual
       end
 
+      trait :scheduled do
+        status :scheduled
+      end
+
       trait :success do
         status :success
       end
@@ -77,6 +81,14 @@ FactoryBot.define do
           pipeline.builds << build(:ci_build, :test_reports, pipeline: pipeline, project: pipeline.project)
         end
       end
+
+      trait :auto_devops_source do
+        config_source { Ci::Pipeline.config_sources[:auto_devops_source] }
+      end
+
+      trait :repository_source do
+        config_source { Ci::Pipeline.config_sources[:repository_source] }
+      end
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb b/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb
index 347e4f433e2..f564e7bee47 100644
--- a/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/ci/runners.rb
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     runner_type :instance_type
 
     trait :online do
-      contacted_at Time.now
+      contacted_at { Time.now }
     end
 
     trait :instance do
diff --git a/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb b/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb
index 7c4a440b9a9..3c9ca22a051 100644
--- a/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/clusters/applications/helm.rb
@@ -22,14 +22,27 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       status 3
     end
 
+    trait :updating do
+      status 4
+    end
+
+    trait :updated do
+      status 5
+    end
+
     trait :errored do
       status(-1)
       status_reason 'something went wrong'
     end
 
+    trait :update_errored do
+      status(6)
+      status_reason 'something went wrong'
+    end
+
     trait :timeouted do
       installing
-      updated_at ClusterWaitForAppInstallationWorker::TIMEOUT.ago
+      updated_at { ClusterWaitForAppInstallationWorker::TIMEOUT.ago }
     end
 
     factory :clusters_applications_ingress, class: Clusters::Applications::Ingress do
@@ -46,7 +59,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
 
     factory :clusters_applications_jupyter, class: Clusters::Applications::Jupyter do
       oauth_application factory: :oauth_application
-      cluster factory: %i(cluster with_installed_helm provided_by_gcp)
+      cluster factory: %i(cluster with_installed_helm provided_by_gcp project)
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb b/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb
index 89f6ddebf6a..4a0d1b181ea 100644
--- a/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb
@@ -3,11 +3,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     cluster
     namespace nil
     api_url 'https://kubernetes.example.com'
-    token 'a' * 40
+    token { 'a' * 40 }
 
     trait :configured do
       api_url 'https://kubernetes.example.com'
-      token 'a' * 40
       username 'xxxxxx'
       password 'xxxxxx'
 
@@ -16,5 +15,9 @@ FactoryBot.define do
         platform_kubernetes.ca_cert = File.read(pem_file)
       end
     end
+
+    trait :rbac_enabled do
+      authorization_type :rbac
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/commit_statuses.rb b/spec/factories/commit_statuses.rb
index 53368c64e10..381bf07f6a0 100644
--- a/spec/factories/commit_statuses.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/commit_statuses.rb
@@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       status 'manual'
     end
 
+    trait :scheduled do
+      status 'scheduled'
+    end
+
     after(:build) do |build, evaluator|
       build.project = build.pipeline.project
     end
diff --git a/spec/factories/emails.rb b/spec/factories/emails.rb
index 4dc7961060a..feacd5ccf15 100644
--- a/spec/factories/emails.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/emails.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     user
     email { generate(:email_alias) }
 
-    trait(:confirmed) { confirmed_at Time.now }
+    trait(:confirmed) { confirmed_at { Time.now } }
+    trait(:skip_validate) { to_create {|instance| instance.save(validate: false) } }
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/events.rb b/spec/factories/events.rb
index 5798b81ecad..bf8411b1894 100644
--- a/spec/factories/events.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/events.rb
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
 
   factory :push_event, class: PushEvent do
     project factory: :project_empty_repo
-    author factory: :user
+    author(factory: :user) { project.creator }
     action Event::PUSHED
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb b/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb
index 51b8ddc9934..3c0f43cc1b6 100644
--- a/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/gpg_keys.rb
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ require_relative '../support/helpers/gpg_helpers'
 
 FactoryBot.define do
   factory :gpg_key do
-    key GpgHelpers::User1.public_key
+    key { GpgHelpers::User1.public_key }
     user
 
     factory :gpg_key_with_subkeys do
-      key GpgHelpers::User1.public_key_with_extra_signing_key
+      key { GpgHelpers::User1.public_key_with_extra_signing_key }
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/group_members.rb b/spec/factories/group_members.rb
index 47036560b9d..12be63e5d92 100644
--- a/spec/factories/group_members.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/group_members.rb
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     trait(:developer) { access_level GroupMember::DEVELOPER }
     trait(:maintainer) { access_level GroupMember::MAINTAINER }
     trait(:owner)     { access_level GroupMember::OWNER }
-    trait(:access_request) { requested_at Time.now }
+    trait(:access_request) { requested_at { Time.now } }
 
     trait(:invited) do
       user_id nil
diff --git a/spec/factories/issues.rb b/spec/factories/issues.rb
index 4d4f74e101e..ab27fee33dc 100644
--- a/spec/factories/issues.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/issues.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       state :opened
     end
 
+    trait :locked do
+      discussion_locked true
+    end
+
     trait :closed do
       state :closed
       closed_at { Time.now }
diff --git a/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb b/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb
index b8b089b069b..8094c43b065 100644
--- a/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/merge_requests.rb
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
 
     trait :merge_when_pipeline_succeeds do
       merge_when_pipeline_succeeds true
-      merge_user author
+      merge_user { author }
     end
 
     trait :remove_source_branch do
diff --git a/spec/factories/notes.rb b/spec/factories/notes.rb
index 6844ed8aa4a..2d1f48bf249 100644
--- a/spec/factories/notes.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/notes.rb
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       noteable nil
       noteable_type 'Commit'
       noteable_id nil
-      commit_id RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id
+      commit_id { RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id }
     end
 
     trait :legacy_diff_note do
diff --git a/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb b/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb
index 9e6af24c4eb..02c51cd9899 100644
--- a/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/oauth_access_grants.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     resource_owner_id { create(:user).id }
     application
     token { Doorkeeper::OAuth::Helpers::UniqueToken.generate }
-    expires_in 2.hours
+    expires_in { 2.hours }
 
     redirect_uri { application.redirect_uri }
     scopes { application.scopes }
diff --git a/spec/factories/project_auto_devops.rb b/spec/factories/project_auto_devops.rb
index b77f702f9e1..75ac7cc7687 100644
--- a/spec/factories/project_auto_devops.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/project_auto_devops.rb
@@ -5,8 +5,16 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     domain "example.com"
     deploy_strategy :continuous
 
-    trait :manual do
-      deploy_strategy :manual
+    trait :continuous_deployment do
+      deploy_strategy ProjectAutoDevops.deploy_strategies[:continuous] # rubocop:disable FactoryBot/DynamicAttributeDefinedStatically
+    end
+
+    trait :manual_deployment do
+      deploy_strategy ProjectAutoDevops.deploy_strategies[:manual] # rubocop:disable FactoryBot/DynamicAttributeDefinedStatically
+    end
+
+    trait :timed_incremental_deployment do
+      deploy_strategy ProjectAutoDevops.deploy_strategies[:timed_incremental] # rubocop:disable FactoryBot/DynamicAttributeDefinedStatically
     end
 
     trait :disabled do
diff --git a/spec/factories/project_members.rb b/spec/factories/project_members.rb
index 22a8085ea45..c72e0487895 100644
--- a/spec/factories/project_members.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/project_members.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     trait(:reporter)  { access_level ProjectMember::REPORTER }
     trait(:developer) { access_level ProjectMember::DEVELOPER }
     trait(:maintainer) { access_level ProjectMember::MAINTAINER }
-    trait(:access_request) { requested_at Time.now }
+    trait(:access_request) { requested_at { Time.now } }
 
     trait(:invited) do
       user_id nil
diff --git a/spec/factories/projects.rb b/spec/factories/projects.rb
index 1215b04913e..e4823a5adf1 100644
--- a/spec/factories/projects.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/projects.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require_relative '../support/helpers/test_env'
 
 FactoryBot.define do
+  PAGES_ACCESS_LEVEL_SCHEMA_VERSION = 20180423204600
+
   # Project without repository
   #
   # Project does not have bare repository.
@@ -23,6 +25,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       issues_access_level ProjectFeature::ENABLED
       merge_requests_access_level ProjectFeature::ENABLED
       repository_access_level ProjectFeature::ENABLED
+      pages_access_level ProjectFeature::ENABLED
 
       # we can't assign the delegated `#ci_cd_settings` attributes directly, as the
       # `#ci_cd_settings` relation needs to be created first
@@ -34,13 +37,20 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       builds_access_level = [evaluator.builds_access_level, evaluator.repository_access_level].min
       merge_requests_access_level = [evaluator.merge_requests_access_level, evaluator.repository_access_level].min
 
-      project.project_feature.update(
+      hash = {
         wiki_access_level: evaluator.wiki_access_level,
         builds_access_level: builds_access_level,
         snippets_access_level: evaluator.snippets_access_level,
         issues_access_level: evaluator.issues_access_level,
         merge_requests_access_level: merge_requests_access_level,
-        repository_access_level: evaluator.repository_access_level)
+        repository_access_level: evaluator.repository_access_level
+      }
+
+      if ActiveRecord::Migrator.current_version >= PAGES_ACCESS_LEVEL_SCHEMA_VERSION
+        hash.store("pages_access_level", evaluator.pages_access_level)
+      end
+
+      project.project_feature.update(hash)
 
       # Normally the class Projects::CreateService is used for creating
       # projects, and this class takes care of making sure the owner and current
@@ -103,30 +113,41 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     end
 
     trait :with_export do
-      before(:create) do |_project, _evaluator|
-        allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with(:import_export_object_storage) { false }
-        allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with('import_export_object_storage') { false }
-      end
-
       after(:create) do |project, _evaluator|
         ProjectExportWorker.new.perform(project.creator.id, project.id)
       end
     end
 
-    trait :with_object_export do
-      before(:create) do |_project, _evaluator|
-        allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with(:import_export_object_storage) { true }
-        allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with('import_export_object_storage') { true }
+    trait :broken_storage do
+      after(:create) do |project|
+        project.update_column(:repository_storage, 'broken')
       end
+    end
 
-      after(:create) do |project, evaluator|
-        ProjectExportWorker.new.perform(project.creator.id, project.id)
+    # Build a custom repository by specifying a hash of `filename => content` in
+    # the transient `files` attribute. Each file will be created in its own
+    # commit, operating against the master branch. So, the following call:
+    #
+    #     create(:project, :custom_repo, files: { 'foo/a.txt' => 'foo', 'b.txt' => bar' })
+    #
+    # will create a repository containing two files, and two commits, in master
+    trait :custom_repo do
+      transient do
+        files {}
       end
-    end
 
-    trait :broken_storage do
-      after(:create) do |project|
-        project.update_column(:repository_storage, 'broken')
+      after :create do |project, evaluator|
+        raise "Failed to create repository!" unless project.create_repository
+
+        evaluator.files.each do |filename, content|
+          project.repository.create_file(
+            project.creator,
+            filename,
+            content,
+            message: "Automatically created file #{filename}",
+            branch_name: 'master'
+          )
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -233,6 +254,14 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     trait(:repository_enabled)      { repository_access_level ProjectFeature::ENABLED }
     trait(:repository_disabled)     { repository_access_level ProjectFeature::DISABLED }
     trait(:repository_private)      { repository_access_level ProjectFeature::PRIVATE }
+    trait(:pages_public)            { pages_access_level ProjectFeature::PUBLIC }
+    trait(:pages_enabled)           { pages_access_level ProjectFeature::ENABLED }
+    trait(:pages_disabled)          { pages_access_level ProjectFeature::DISABLED }
+    trait(:pages_private)           { pages_access_level ProjectFeature::PRIVATE }
+
+    trait :auto_devops do
+      association :auto_devops, factory: :project_auto_devops
+    end
   end
 
   # Project with empty repository
diff --git a/spec/factories/prometheus_metrics.rb b/spec/factories/prometheus_metrics.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c56644bfb96
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/factories/prometheus_metrics.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+FactoryBot.define do
+  factory :prometheus_metric, class: PrometheusMetric do
+    title 'title'
+    query 'avg(metric)'
+    y_label 'y_label'
+    unit 'm/s'
+    group :business
+    project
+    legend 'legend'
+
+    trait :common do
+      common true
+      project nil
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/factories/resource_label_events.rb b/spec/factories/resource_label_events.rb
index a67ad78c098..739ba901052 100644
--- a/spec/factories/resource_label_events.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/resource_label_events.rb
@@ -2,9 +2,12 @@
 
 FactoryBot.define do
   factory :resource_label_event do
-    user { issue.project.creator }
     action :add
     label
-    issue
+    user { issuable&.author || create(:user) }
+
+    after(:build) do |event, evaluator|
+      event.issue = create(:issue) unless event.issuable
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/site_statistics.rb b/spec/factories/site_statistics.rb
index dd8c795515a..2533d0eecc2 100644
--- a/spec/factories/site_statistics.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/site_statistics.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,5 @@ FactoryBot.define do
   factory :site_statistics, class: 'SiteStatistic' do
     id 1
     repositories_count 999
-    wikis_count 555
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/todos.rb b/spec/factories/todos.rb
index 14486c80341..ed3d87eb76b 100644
--- a/spec/factories/todos.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/todos.rb
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ FactoryBot.define do
     author
     user
     action { Todo::ASSIGNED }
-    commit_id RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id
+    commit_id { RepoHelpers.sample_commit.id }
     target_type "Commit"
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/factories/uploads.rb b/spec/factories/uploads.rb
index 81c485fba1a..7256f785e1f 100644
--- a/spec/factories/uploads.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/uploads.rb
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 FactoryBot.define do
   factory :upload do
     model { build(:project) }
-    size 100.kilobytes
+    size { 100.kilobytes }
     uploader "AvatarUploader"
     mount_point :avatar
     secret nil
@@ -19,13 +19,13 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       uploader "PersonalFileUploader"
       path { File.join(secret, filename) }
       model { build(:personal_snippet) }
-      secret SecureRandom.hex
+      secret { SecureRandom.hex }
     end
 
     trait :issuable_upload do
       uploader "FileUploader"
       path { File.join(secret, filename) }
-      secret SecureRandom.hex
+      secret { SecureRandom.hex }
     end
 
     trait :with_file do
@@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       model { build(:group) }
       path { File.join(secret, filename) }
       uploader "NamespaceFileUploader"
-      secret SecureRandom.hex
+      secret { SecureRandom.hex }
     end
 
     trait :favicon_upload do
       model { build(:appearance) }
       path { File.join(secret, filename) }
       uploader "FaviconUploader"
-      secret SecureRandom.hex
+      secret { SecureRandom.hex }
     end
 
     trait :attachment_upload do
diff --git a/spec/factories/users.rb b/spec/factories/users.rb
index 59db8cdc34b..a47bd7cafca 100644
--- a/spec/factories/users.rb
+++ b/spec/factories/users.rb
@@ -58,6 +58,14 @@ FactoryBot.define do
       project_view :readme
     end
 
+    trait :commit_email do
+      after(:create) do |user, evaluator|
+        additional = create(:email, :confirmed, user: user, email: "commit-#{user.email}")
+
+        user.update!(commit_email: additional.email)
+      end
+    end
+
     factory :omniauth_user do
       transient do
         extern_uid '123456'
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb
index f979d2f6090..a4904272706 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_manage_applications_spec.rb
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin manage applications' do
     check :doorkeeper_application_trusted
     click_on 'Submit'
     expect(page).to have_content('Application: test')
-    expect(page).to have_content('Application Id')
+    expect(page).to have_content('Application ID')
     expect(page).to have_content('Secret')
     expect(page).to have_content('Trusted Y')
 
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'admin manage applications' do
 
     click_on 'Submit'
     expect(page).to have_content('test_changed')
-    expect(page).to have_content('Application Id')
+    expect(page).to have_content('Application ID')
     expect(page).to have_content('Secret')
     expect(page).to have_content('Trusted N')
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb
index 5623e47eadf..ed9c0ea9ac0 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_runners_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe "Admin Runners" do
   include StubENV
+  include FilteredSearchHelpers
+  include SortingHelper
 
   before do
     stub_env('IN_MEMORY_APPLICATION_SETTINGS', 'false')
@@ -12,39 +14,156 @@ describe "Admin Runners" do
     let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline) }
 
     context "when there are runners" do
-      before do
-        runner = FactoryBot.create(:ci_runner, contacted_at: Time.now)
-        FactoryBot.create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, runner_id: runner.id)
+      it 'has all necessary texts' do
+        runner = create(:ci_runner, contacted_at: Time.now)
+        create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, runner_id: runner.id)
         visit admin_runners_path
-      end
 
-      it 'has all necessary texts' do
-        expect(page).to have_text "Setup a shared Runner manually"
+        expect(page).to have_text "Set up a shared Runner manually"
         expect(page).to have_text "Runners currently online: 1"
       end
 
-      describe 'search' do
+      describe 'search', :js do
         before do
-          FactoryBot.create :ci_runner, description: 'runner-foo'
-          FactoryBot.create :ci_runner, description: 'runner-bar'
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-foo')
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-bar')
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
         end
 
         it 'shows correct runner when description matches' do
-          search_form = find('#runners-search')
-          search_form.fill_in 'search', with: 'runner-foo'
-          search_form.click_button 'Search'
+          input_filtered_search_keys('runner-foo')
 
           expect(page).to have_content("runner-foo")
           expect(page).not_to have_content("runner-bar")
         end
 
         it 'shows no runner when description does not match' do
-          search_form = find('#runners-search')
-          search_form.fill_in 'search', with: 'runner-baz'
-          search_form.click_button 'Search'
+          input_filtered_search_keys('runner-baz')
+
+          expect(page).to have_text 'No runners found'
+        end
+      end
+
+      describe 'filter by status', :js do
+        it 'shows correct runner when status matches' do
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-active', active: true)
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-paused', active: false)
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
+
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-active'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-paused'
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('status:active')
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-active'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-paused'
+        end
+
+        it 'shows no runner when status does not match' do
+          create(:ci_runner, :online, description: 'runner-active', active: true)
+          create(:ci_runner, :online, description: 'runner-paused', active: false)
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('status:offline')
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-active'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-paused'
+
+          expect(page).to have_text 'No runners found'
+        end
+
+        it 'shows correct runner when status is selected and search term is entered' do
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-a-1', active: true)
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-a-2', active: false)
+          create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-b-1', active: true)
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('status:active')
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-a-1'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-b-1'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-a-2'
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('status:active runner-a')
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-a-1'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-b-1'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-a-2'
+        end
+      end
+
+      describe 'filter by type', :js do
+        it 'shows correct runner when type matches' do
+          create :ci_runner, :project, description: 'runner-project'
+          create :ci_runner, :group, description: 'runner-group'
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
+
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-project'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-group'
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('type:project_type')
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-project'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-group'
+        end
+
+        it 'shows no runner when type does not match' do
+          create :ci_runner, :project, description: 'runner-project'
+          create :ci_runner, :group, description: 'runner-group'
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('type:instance_type')
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-project'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-group'
 
           expect(page).to have_text 'No runners found'
         end
+
+        it 'shows correct runner when type is selected and search term is entered' do
+          create :ci_runner, :project, description: 'runner-a-1'
+          create :ci_runner, :instance, description: 'runner-a-2'
+          create :ci_runner, :project, description: 'runner-b-1'
+
+          visit admin_runners_path
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('type:project_type')
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-a-1'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-b-1'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-a-2'
+
+          input_filtered_search_keys('type:project_type runner-a')
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-a-1'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-b-1'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'runner-a-2'
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'sorts by last contact date', :js do
+        create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-1', created_at: '2018-07-12 15:37', contacted_at: '2018-07-12 15:37')
+        create(:ci_runner, description: 'runner-2', created_at: '2018-07-12 16:37', contacted_at: '2018-07-12 16:37')
+
+        visit admin_runners_path
+
+        within '.runners-content .gl-responsive-table-row:nth-child(2)' do
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-2'
+        end
+
+        within '.runners-content .gl-responsive-table-row:nth-child(3)' do
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-1'
+        end
+
+        sorting_by 'Last Contact'
+
+        within '.runners-content .gl-responsive-table-row:nth-child(2)' do
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-1'
+        end
+
+        within '.runners-content .gl-responsive-table-row:nth-child(3)' do
+          expect(page).to have_content 'runner-2'
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -54,7 +173,7 @@ describe "Admin Runners" do
       end
 
       it 'has all necessary texts including no runner message' do
-        expect(page).to have_text "Setup a shared Runner manually"
+        expect(page).to have_text "Set up a shared Runner manually"
         expect(page).to have_text "Runners currently online: 0"
         expect(page).to have_text 'No runners found'
       end
@@ -76,7 +195,7 @@ describe "Admin Runners" do
 
     context 'shared runner' do
       it 'shows the label and does not show the project count' do
-        runner = create :ci_runner, :instance
+        runner = create(:ci_runner, :instance)
 
         visit admin_runners_path
 
@@ -89,8 +208,8 @@ describe "Admin Runners" do
 
     context 'specific runner' do
       it 'shows the label and the project count' do
-        project = create :project
-        runner = create :ci_runner, :project, projects: [project]
+        project = create(:project)
+        runner = create(:ci_runner, :project, projects: [project])
 
         visit admin_runners_path
 
@@ -103,11 +222,11 @@ describe "Admin Runners" do
   end
 
   describe "Runner show page" do
-    let(:runner) { FactoryBot.create :ci_runner }
+    let(:runner) { create(:ci_runner) }
 
     before do
-      @project1 = FactoryBot.create(:project)
-      @project2 = FactoryBot.create(:project)
+      @project1 = create(:project)
+      @project2 = create(:project)
       visit admin_runner_path(runner)
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb
index a3229fe1741..0a69a26eb3e 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_settings_spec.rb
@@ -9,331 +9,365 @@ describe 'Admin updates settings' do
   before do
     stub_env('IN_MEMORY_APPLICATION_SETTINGS', 'false')
     sign_in(admin)
-    visit admin_application_settings_path
   end
 
-  it 'Change visibility settings' do
-    page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
-      choose "application_setting_default_project_visibility_20"
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+  context 'General page' do
+    before do
+      visit admin_application_settings_path
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Change visibility settings' do
+      page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
+        choose "application_setting_default_project_visibility_20"
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Uncheck all restricted visibility levels' do
-    page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
-      find('#application_setting_visibility_level_0').set(false)
-      find('#application_setting_visibility_level_10').set(false)
-      find('#application_setting_visibility_level_20').set(false)
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(find('#application_setting_visibility_level_0')).not_to be_checked
-    expect(find('#application_setting_visibility_level_10')).not_to be_checked
-    expect(find('#application_setting_visibility_level_20')).not_to be_checked
-  end
+    it 'Uncheck all restricted visibility levels' do
+      page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
+        find('#application_setting_visibility_level_0').set(false)
+        find('#application_setting_visibility_level_10').set(false)
+        find('#application_setting_visibility_level_20').set(false)
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Modify import sources' do
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.import_sources).not_to be_empty
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(find('#application_setting_visibility_level_0')).not_to be_checked
+      expect(find('#application_setting_visibility_level_10')).not_to be_checked
+      expect(find('#application_setting_visibility_level_20')).not_to be_checked
+    end
 
-    page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
-      Gitlab::ImportSources.options.map do |name, _|
-        uncheck name
+    it 'Modify import sources' do
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.import_sources).not_to be_empty
+
+      page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
+        Gitlab::ImportSources.options.map do |name, _|
+          uncheck name
+        end
+
+        click_button 'Save changes'
       end
 
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.import_sources).to be_empty
+
+      page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
+        check "Repo by URL"
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
+
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.import_sources).to eq(['git'])
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.import_sources).to be_empty
+    it 'Change Visibility and Access Controls' do
+      page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
+        uncheck 'Project export enabled'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
-      check "Repo by URL"
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.project_export_enabled).to be_falsey
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.import_sources).to eq(['git'])
-  end
+    it 'Change Keys settings' do
+      page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
+        select 'Are forbidden', from: 'RSA SSH keys'
+        select 'Are allowed', from: 'DSA SSH keys'
+        select 'Must be at least 384 bits', from: 'ECDSA SSH keys'
+        select 'Are forbidden', from: 'ED25519 SSH keys'
+        click_on 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Change Visibility and Access Controls' do
-    page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
-      uncheck 'Project export enabled'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      forbidden = ApplicationSetting::FORBIDDEN_KEY_VALUE.to_s
+
+      expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
+      expect(find_field('RSA SSH keys').value).to eq(forbidden)
+      expect(find_field('DSA SSH keys').value).to eq('0')
+      expect(find_field('ECDSA SSH keys').value).to eq('384')
+      expect(find_field('ED25519 SSH keys').value).to eq(forbidden)
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.project_export_enabled).to be_falsey
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Change Account and Limit Settings' do
+      page.within('.as-account-limit') do
+        uncheck 'Gravatar enabled'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Change Account and Limit Settings' do
-    page.within('.as-account-limit') do
-      uncheck 'Gravatar enabled'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.gravatar_enabled).to be_falsey
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.gravatar_enabled).to be_falsey
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Change New users set to external', :js do
+      user_internal_regex = find('#application_setting_user_default_internal_regex', visible: :all)
 
-  it 'Change New users set to external', :js do
-    user_internal_regex = find('#application_setting_user_default_internal_regex', visible: :all)
+      expect(user_internal_regex).to be_readonly
+      expect(user_internal_regex['placeholder']).to eq 'To define internal users, first enable new users set to external'
 
-    expect(user_internal_regex).to be_readonly
-    expect(user_internal_regex['placeholder']).to eq 'To define internal users, first enable new users set to external'
+      check 'application_setting_user_default_external'
 
-    check 'application_setting_user_default_external'
+      expect(user_internal_regex).not_to be_readonly
+      expect(user_internal_regex['placeholder']).to eq 'Regex pattern'
+    end
 
-    expect(user_internal_regex).not_to be_readonly
-    expect(user_internal_regex['placeholder']).to eq 'Regex pattern'
-  end
+    it 'Change Sign-in restrictions' do
+      page.within('.as-signin') do
+        fill_in 'Home page URL', with: 'https://about.gitlab.com/'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Change Sign-in restrictions' do
-    page.within('.as-signin') do
-      fill_in 'Home page URL', with: 'https://about.gitlab.com/'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.home_page_url).to eq "https://about.gitlab.com/"
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.home_page_url).to eq "https://about.gitlab.com/"
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Terms of Service' do
+      # Already have the admin accept terms, so they don't need to accept in this spec.
+      _existing_terms = create(:term)
+      accept_terms(admin)
 
-  it 'Terms of Service' do
-    # Already have the admin accept terms, so they don't need to accept in this spec.
-    _existing_terms = create(:term)
-    accept_terms(admin)
+      page.within('.as-terms') do
+        check 'Require all users to accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy when they access GitLab.'
+        fill_in 'Terms of Service Agreement', with: 'Be nice!'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.within('.as-terms') do
-      check 'Require all users to accept Terms of Service and Privacy Policy when they access GitLab.'
-      fill_in 'Terms of Service Agreement', with: 'Be nice!'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.enforce_terms).to be(true)
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.terms).to eq 'Be nice!'
+      expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.enforce_terms).to be(true)
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.terms).to eq 'Be nice!'
-    expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
-  end
+    it 'Modify oauth providers' do
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to be_empty
 
-  it 'Modify oauth providers' do
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to be_empty
+      page.within('.as-signin') do
+        uncheck 'Google'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.within('.as-signin') do
-      uncheck 'Google'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
-    end
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to include('google_oauth2')
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to include('google_oauth2')
+      page.within('.as-signin') do
+        check "Google"
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.within('.as-signin') do
-      check "Google"
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).not_to include('google_oauth2')
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).not_to include('google_oauth2')
-  end
+    it 'Oauth providers do not raise validation errors when saving unrelated changes' do
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to be_empty
 
-  it 'Oauth providers do not raise validation errors when saving unrelated changes' do
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to be_empty
+      page.within('.as-signin') do
+        uncheck 'Google'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.within('.as-signin') do
-      uncheck 'Google'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
-    end
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to include('google_oauth2')
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to include('google_oauth2')
+      # Remove google_oauth2 from the Omniauth strategies
+      allow(Devise).to receive(:omniauth_providers).and_return([])
 
-    # Remove google_oauth2 from the Omniauth strategies
-    allow(Devise).to receive(:omniauth_providers).and_return([])
+      # Save an unrelated setting
+      page.within('.as-terms') do
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    # Save an unrelated setting
-    page.within('.as-ci-cd') do
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to include('google_oauth2')
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources).to include('google_oauth2')
-  end
+    it 'Configure web terminal' do
+      page.within('.as-terminal') do
+        fill_in 'Max session time', with: 15
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Change Help page' do
-    page.within('.as-help-page') do
-      fill_in 'Help page text', with: 'Example text'
-      check 'Hide marketing-related entries from help'
-      fill_in 'Support page URL', with: 'http://example.com/help'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.terminal_max_session_time).to eq(15)
     end
-
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.help_page_text).to eq "Example text"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.help_page_hide_commercial_content).to be_truthy
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.help_page_support_url).to eq "http://example.com/help"
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
   end
 
-  it 'Change Pages settings' do
-    page.within('.as-pages') do
-      fill_in 'Maximum size of pages (MB)', with: 15
-      check 'Require users to prove ownership of custom domains'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+  context 'Integrations page' do
+    before do
+      visit integrations_admin_application_settings_path
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.max_pages_size).to eq 15
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.pages_domain_verification_enabled?).to be_truthy
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Enable hiding third party offers' do
+      page.within('.as-third-party-offers') do
+        check 'Do not display offers from third parties within GitLab'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Change CI/CD settings' do
-    page.within('.as-ci-cd') do
-      check 'Default to Auto DevOps pipeline for all projects'
-      fill_in 'Auto devops domain', with: 'domain.com'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.hide_third_party_offers).to be true
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.auto_devops_enabled?).to be true
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.auto_devops_domain).to eq('domain.com')
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Change Slack Notifications Service template settings' do
+      first(:link, 'Service Templates').click
+      click_link 'Slack notifications'
+      fill_in 'Webhook', with: 'http://localhost'
+      fill_in 'Username', with: 'test_user'
+      fill_in 'service_push_channel', with: '#test_channel'
+      page.check('Notify only broken pipelines')
+      page.check('Notify only default branch')
 
-  it 'Change Influx settings' do
-    page.within('.as-influx') do
-      check 'Enable InfluxDB Metrics'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
-    end
+      check_all_events
+      click_on 'Save'
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.metrics_enabled?).to be true
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+      expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
 
-  it 'Change Prometheus settings' do
-    page.within('.as-prometheus') do
-      check 'Enable Prometheus Metrics'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
-    end
+      click_link 'Slack notifications'
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.prometheus_metrics_enabled?).to be true
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      page.all('input[type=checkbox]').each do |checkbox|
+        expect(checkbox).to be_checked
+      end
+      expect(find_field('Webhook').value).to eq 'http://localhost'
+      expect(find_field('Username').value).to eq 'test_user'
+      expect(find('#service_push_channel').value).to eq '#test_channel'
+    end
   end
 
-  it 'Change Performance bar settings' do
-    group = create(:group)
+  context 'CI/CD page' do
+    it 'Change CI/CD settings' do
+      visit ci_cd_admin_application_settings_path
+
+      page.within('.as-ci-cd') do
+        check 'Default to Auto DevOps pipeline for all projects'
+        fill_in 'Auto devops domain', with: 'domain.com'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.within('.as-performance-bar') do
-      check 'Enable the Performance Bar'
-      fill_in 'Allowed group', with: group.path
-      click_on 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.auto_devops_enabled?).to be true
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.auto_devops_domain).to eq('domain.com')
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
+  end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(find_field('Enable the Performance Bar')).to be_checked
-    expect(find_field('Allowed group').value).to eq group.path
+  context 'Reporting page' do
+    it 'Change Spam settings' do
+      visit reporting_admin_application_settings_path
 
-    page.within('.as-performance-bar') do
-      uncheck 'Enable the Performance Bar'
-      click_on 'Save changes'
-    end
+      page.within('.as-spam') do
+        check 'Enable reCAPTCHA'
+        fill_in 'reCAPTCHA Site Key', with: 'key'
+        fill_in 'reCAPTCHA Private Key', with: 'key'
+        fill_in 'IPs per user', with: 15
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
-    expect(find_field('Enable the Performance Bar')).not_to be_checked
-    expect(find_field('Allowed group').value).to be_nil
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.recaptcha_enabled).to be true
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.unique_ips_limit_per_user).to eq(15)
+    end
   end
 
-  it 'Change Background jobs settings' do
-    page.within('.as-background') do
-      fill_in 'Throttling Factor', with: 1
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+  context 'Metrics and profiling page' do
+    before do
+      visit metrics_and_profiling_admin_application_settings_path
     end
 
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.sidekiq_throttling_factor).to eq(1)
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-  end
+    it 'Change Influx settings' do
+      page.within('.as-influx') do
+        check 'Enable InfluxDB Metrics'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Change Spam settings' do
-    page.within('.as-spam') do
-      check 'Enable reCAPTCHA'
-      fill_in 'reCAPTCHA Site Key', with: 'key'
-      fill_in 'reCAPTCHA Private Key', with: 'key'
-      fill_in 'IPs per user', with: 15
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.metrics_enabled?).to be true
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.recaptcha_enabled).to be true
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.unique_ips_limit_per_user).to eq(15)
-  end
+    it 'Change Prometheus settings' do
+      page.within('.as-prometheus') do
+        check 'Enable Prometheus Metrics'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-  it 'Configure web terminal' do
-    page.within('.as-terminal') do
-      fill_in 'Max session time', with: 15
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.prometheus_metrics_enabled?).to be true
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.terminal_max_session_time).to eq(15)
-  end
+    it 'Change Performance bar settings' do
+      group = create(:group)
 
-  it 'Enable outbound requests' do
-    page.within('.as-outbound') do
-      check 'Allow requests to the local network from hooks and services'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
-    end
+      page.within('.as-performance-bar') do
+        check 'Enable the Performance Bar'
+        fill_in 'Allowed group', with: group.path
+        click_on 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.allow_local_requests_from_hooks_and_services).to be true
-  end
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(find_field('Enable the Performance Bar')).to be_checked
+      expect(find_field('Allowed group').value).to eq group.path
 
-  it 'Enable hiding third party offers' do
-    page.within('.as-third-party-offers') do
-      check 'Do not display offers from third parties within GitLab'
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+      page.within('.as-performance-bar') do
+        uncheck 'Enable the Performance Bar'
+        click_on 'Save changes'
+      end
+
+      expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
+      expect(find_field('Enable the Performance Bar')).not_to be_checked
+      expect(find_field('Allowed group').value).to be_nil
     end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
-    expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.hide_third_party_offers).to be true
-  end
+    it 'loads usage ping payload on click', :js do
+      expect(page).to have_button 'Preview payload'
 
-  it 'Change Slack Notifications Service template settings' do
-    first(:link, 'Service Templates').click
-    click_link 'Slack notifications'
-    fill_in 'Webhook', with: 'http://localhost'
-    fill_in 'Username', with: 'test_user'
-    fill_in 'service_push_channel', with: '#test_channel'
-    page.check('Notify only broken pipelines')
-    page.check('Notify only default branch')
+      find('.js-usage-ping-payload-trigger').click
 
-    check_all_events
-    click_on 'Save'
+      expect(page).to have_selector '.js-usage-ping-payload'
+      expect(page).to have_button 'Hide payload'
+    end
+  end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
+  context 'Network page' do
+    it 'Enable outbound requests' do
+      visit network_admin_application_settings_path
 
-    click_link 'Slack notifications'
+      page.within('.as-outbound') do
+        check 'Allow requests to the local network from hooks and services'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    page.all('input[type=checkbox]').each do |checkbox|
-      expect(checkbox).to be_checked
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.allow_local_requests_from_hooks_and_services).to be true
     end
-    expect(find_field('Webhook').value).to eq 'http://localhost'
-    expect(find_field('Username').value).to eq 'test_user'
-    expect(find('#service_push_channel').value).to eq '#test_channel'
   end
 
-  it 'Change Keys settings' do
-    page.within('.as-visibility-access') do
-      select 'Are forbidden', from: 'RSA SSH keys'
-      select 'Are allowed', from: 'DSA SSH keys'
-      select 'Must be at least 384 bits', from: 'ECDSA SSH keys'
-      select 'Are forbidden', from: 'ED25519 SSH keys'
-      click_on 'Save changes'
+  context 'Preferences page' do
+    before do
+      visit preferences_admin_application_settings_path
+    end
+
+    it 'Change Help page' do
+      page.within('.as-help-page') do
+        fill_in 'Help page text', with: 'Example text'
+        check 'Hide marketing-related entries from help'
+        fill_in 'Support page URL', with: 'http://example.com/help'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
+
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.help_page_text).to eq "Example text"
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.help_page_hide_commercial_content).to be_truthy
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.help_page_support_url).to eq "http://example.com/help"
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
     end
 
-    forbidden = ApplicationSetting::FORBIDDEN_KEY_VALUE.to_s
+    it 'Change Pages settings' do
+      page.within('.as-pages') do
+        fill_in 'Maximum size of pages (MB)', with: 15
+        check 'Require users to prove ownership of custom domains'
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
 
-    expect(page).to have_content 'Application settings saved successfully'
-    expect(find_field('RSA SSH keys').value).to eq(forbidden)
-    expect(find_field('DSA SSH keys').value).to eq('0')
-    expect(find_field('ECDSA SSH keys').value).to eq('384')
-    expect(find_field('ED25519 SSH keys').value).to eq(forbidden)
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.max_pages_size).to eq 15
+      expect(Gitlab::CurrentSettings.pages_domain_verification_enabled?).to be_truthy
+      expect(page).to have_content "Application settings saved successfully"
+    end
   end
 
   def check_all_events
diff --git a/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb b/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb
index e658f1b6738..d04bb9acd9e 100644
--- a/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/admin/admin_uses_repository_checks_spec.rb
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ describe 'Admin uses repository checks' do
   end
 
   it 'to clear all repository checks', :js do
-    visit admin_application_settings_path
+    visit repository_admin_application_settings_path
 
     expect(RepositoryCheck::ClearWorker).to receive(:perform_async)
 
diff --git a/spec/features/boards/reload_boards_on_browser_back_spec.rb b/spec/features/boards/reload_boards_on_browser_back_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4b4bd705a77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/boards/reload_boards_on_browser_back_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe 'Ensure Boards do not show stale data on browser back', :js do
+  let(:project) {create(:project, :public)}
+  let(:board)   {create(:board, project: project)}
+  let(:user)    {create(:user)}
+
+  context 'authorized user' do
+    before do
+      project.add_maintainer(user)
+
+      sign_in(user)
+
+      visit project_board_path(project, board)
+      wait_for_requests
+
+      page.within(first('.board .issue-count-badge-count')) do
+        expect(page).to have_content('0')
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'created issue is listed on board' do
+      visit new_project_issue_path(project)
+      wait_for_requests
+
+      fill_in 'issue_title', with: 'issue should be shown'
+
+      click_button 'Submit issue'
+
+      page.go_back
+      wait_for_requests
+
+      page.go_back
+      wait_for_requests
+
+      page.within(first('.board .issue-count-badge-count')) do
+        expect(page).to have_content('1')
+      end
+
+      page.within(first('.board-card')) do
+        issue = project.issues.find_by_title('issue should be shown')
+
+        expect(page).to have_content(issue.to_reference)
+        expect(page).to have_link(issue.title, href: issue_path(issue))
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb b/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb
index f08946b0593..aa3ca8923ff 100644
--- a/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/calendar_spec.rb
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
   end
 
   def selected_day_activities(visible: true)
-    find('.user-calendar-activities', visible: visible).text
+    find('.tab-pane#activity .user-calendar-activities', visible: visible).text
   end
 
   before do
@@ -74,15 +74,16 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
   describe 'calendar day selection' do
     before do
       visit user.username
+      page.find('.js-activity-tab a').click
       wait_for_requests
     end
 
     it 'displays calendar' do
-      expect(page).to have_css('.js-contrib-calendar')
+      expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_css('.js-contrib-calendar')
     end
 
     describe 'select calendar day' do
-      let(:cells) { page.all('.user-contrib-cell') }
+      let(:cells) { page.all('.tab-pane#activity .user-contrib-cell') }
 
       before do
         cells[0].click
@@ -108,6 +109,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
       describe 'deselect calendar day' do
         before do
           cells[0].click
+          page.find('.js-activity-tab a').click
           wait_for_requests
         end
 
@@ -122,6 +124,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
     shared_context 'visit user page' do
       before do
         visit user.username
+        page.find('.js-activity-tab a').click
         wait_for_requests
       end
     end
@@ -130,12 +133,12 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
       include_context 'visit user page'
 
       it 'displays calendar activity square color for 1 contribution' do
-        expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(contribution_count), count: 1)
+        expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(contribution_count), count: 1)
       end
 
       it 'displays calendar activity square on the correct date' do
         today = Date.today.strftime(date_format)
-        expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(contribution_count, today), count: 1)
+        expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(contribution_count, today), count: 1)
       end
     end
 
@@ -150,7 +153,7 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
         include_context 'visit user page'
 
         it 'displays calendar activity log' do
-          expect(find('.content_list .event-note')).to have_content issue_title
+          expect(find('.tab-pane#activity .content_list .event-note')).to have_content issue_title
         end
       end
     end
@@ -182,17 +185,17 @@ describe 'Contributions Calendar', :js do
       include_context 'visit user page'
 
       it 'displays calendar activity squares for both days' do
-        expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(1), count: 2)
+        expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_color_selector(1), count: 2)
       end
 
       it 'displays calendar activity square for yesterday' do
         yesterday = Date.yesterday.strftime(date_format)
-        expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, yesterday), count: 1)
+        expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, yesterday), count: 1)
       end
 
       it 'displays calendar activity square for today' do
         today = Date.today.strftime(date_format)
-        expect(page).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, today), count: 1)
+        expect(find('.tab-pane#activity')).to have_selector(get_cell_date_selector(1, today), count: 1)
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/commits/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb b/spec/features/commits/user_uses_quick_actions_spec.rb
index 9a4b7bd2444..9a4b7bd2444 100644
--- a/spec/features/commits/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/commits/user_uses_quick_actions_spec.rb
diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb
index d7234158fa1..0db8093411b 100644
--- a/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/dashboard/datetime_on_tooltips_spec.rb
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ describe 'Tooltips on .timeago dates', :js do
                     updated_at: created_date, created_at: created_date)
 
       sign_in user
-      visit user_path(user)
+      visit user_activity_path(user)
       wait_for_requests()
 
       page.find('.js-timeago').hover
diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/group_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/group_spec.rb
index 1c7932e7964..e57fcde8b2c 100644
--- a/spec/features/dashboard/group_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/dashboard/group_spec.rb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ RSpec.describe 'Dashboard Group' do
 
   it 'creates new group', :js do
     visit dashboard_groups_path
-    find('.btn-new').click
+    find('.btn-success').click
     new_path = 'Samurai'
     new_description = 'Tokugawa Shogunate'
 
diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/groups_list_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/groups_list_spec.rb
index eceb12e91cd..e75c43d5338 100644
--- a/spec/features/dashboard/groups_list_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/dashboard/groups_list_spec.rb
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ describe 'Dashboard Groups page', :js do
     end
 
     it 'loads results for next page' do
-      expect(page).to have_selector('.gl-pagination .page', count: 2)
+      expect(page).to have_selector('.gl-pagination .page-item a[role=menuitemradio]', count: 2)
 
       # Check first page
       expect(page).to have_content(group2.full_name)
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ describe 'Dashboard Groups page', :js do
       expect(page).not_to have_selector("#group-#{group.id}")
 
       # Go to next page
-      find(".gl-pagination .page:not(.active) a").click
+      find('.gl-pagination .page-item:not(.active) a[role=menuitemradio]').click
 
       wait_for_requests
 
diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/milestones_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/milestones_spec.rb
index d9d67788b38..8fb2e37e269 100644
--- a/spec/features/dashboard/milestones_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/dashboard/milestones_spec.rb
@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@ describe 'Dashboard > Milestones' do
     let(:project) { create(:project, namespace: user.namespace) }
     let!(:milestone) { create(:milestone, project: project) }
     let!(:milestone2) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
+
     before do
-      project.add_maintainer(user)
+      group.add_developer(user)
       sign_in(user)
       visit dashboard_milestones_path
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/dashboard/projects_spec.rb b/spec/features/dashboard/projects_spec.rb
index 4daacc61d85..975b7944741 100644
--- a/spec/features/dashboard/projects_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/dashboard/projects_spec.rb
@@ -103,6 +103,14 @@ describe 'Dashboard Projects' do
       expect(page).not_to have_content(project.name)
       expect(page).to have_content(project3.name)
     end
+
+    it 'sorts projects by most stars when sorting by most stars' do
+      project_with_most_stars = create(:project, namespace: user.namespace, star_count: 10)
+
+      visit dashboard_projects_path(sort: :stars_desc)
+
+      expect(first('.project-row')).to have_content(project_with_most_stars.title)
+    end
   end
 
   context 'when on Starred projects tab' do
diff --git a/spec/features/explore/new_menu_spec.rb b/spec/features/explore/new_menu_spec.rb
index 0a88988ea09..11f05b6d220 100644
--- a/spec/features/explore/new_menu_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/explore/new_menu_spec.rb
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ describe 'Top Plus Menu', :js do
 
       click_topmenuitem("New project")
 
-      expect(page).to have_content('Project path')
+      expect(page).to have_content('Project URL')
       expect(page).to have_content('Project name')
     end
 
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ describe 'Top Plus Menu', :js do
         find('.header-new-group-project a').click
       end
 
-      expect(page).to have_content('Project path')
+      expect(page).to have_content('Project URL')
       expect(page).to have_content('Project name')
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/group_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/group_settings_spec.rb
index 59254ecc982..08fd9f8af2a 100644
--- a/spec/features/groups/group_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/groups/group_settings_spec.rb
@@ -98,6 +98,22 @@ describe 'Edit group settings' do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'edit group path' do
+    it 'has a root URL label for top-level group' do
+      visit edit_group_path(group)
+
+      expect(find(:css, '.group-root-path').text).to eq(root_url)
+    end
+
+    it 'has a parent group URL label for a subgroup group', :postgresql do
+      subgroup = create(:group, parent: group)
+
+      visit edit_group_path(subgroup)
+
+      expect(find(:css, '.group-root-path').text).to eq(group_url(subgroup.parent) + '/')
+    end
+  end
+
   def update_path(new_group_path)
     visit edit_group_path(group)
 
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/labels/search_labels_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/labels/search_labels_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..14b88a561b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/groups/labels/search_labels_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Search for labels', :js do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:group) { create(:group) }
+  let!(:label1) { create(:group_label, title: 'Foo', description: 'Lorem ipsum', group: group) }
+  let!(:label2) { create(:group_label, title: 'Bar', description: 'Fusce consequat', group: group) }
+
+  before do
+    group.add_maintainer(user)
+    sign_in(user)
+
+    visit group_labels_path(group)
+  end
+
+  it 'searches for label by title' do
+    fill_in 'label-search', with: 'Bar'
+    find('#label-search').native.send_keys(:enter)
+
+    expect(page).to have_content(label2.title)
+    expect(page).to have_content(label2.description)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label1.title)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label1.description)
+  end
+
+  it 'searches for label by description' do
+    fill_in 'label-search', with: 'Lorem'
+    find('#label-search').native.send_keys(:enter)
+
+    expect(page).to have_content(label1.title)
+    expect(page).to have_content(label1.description)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label2.title)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label2.description)
+  end
+
+  it 'shows nothing found message' do
+    fill_in 'label-search', with: 'nonexistent'
+    find('#label-search').native.send_keys(:enter)
+
+    expect(page).to have_content('No labels with such name or description')
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label1.title)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label1.description)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label2.title)
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(label2.description)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/labels/sort_labels_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/labels/sort_labels_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2aea4d77675
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/groups/labels/sort_labels_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Sort labels', :js do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:group) { create(:group) }
+  let!(:label1) { create(:group_label, title: 'Foo', description: 'Lorem ipsum', group: group) }
+  let!(:label2) { create(:group_label, title: 'Bar', description: 'Fusce consequat', group: group) }
+
+  before do
+    group.add_maintainer(user)
+    sign_in(user)
+
+    visit group_labels_path(group)
+  end
+
+  it 'sorts by title by default' do
+    expect(page).to have_button('Name')
+
+    # assert default sorting
+    within '.other-labels' do
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').first.text).to include('Bar')
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').last.text).to include('Foo')
+    end
+  end
+
+  it 'sorts by date' do
+    click_button 'Name'
+
+    sort_options = find('ul.dropdown-menu-sort li').all('a').collect(&:text)
+
+    expect(sort_options[0]).to eq('Name')
+    expect(sort_options[1]).to eq('Name, descending')
+    expect(sort_options[2]).to eq('Last created')
+    expect(sort_options[3]).to eq('Oldest created')
+    expect(sort_options[4]).to eq('Last updated')
+    expect(sort_options[5]).to eq('Oldest updated')
+
+    click_link 'Name, descending'
+
+    # assert default sorting
+    within '.other-labels' do
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').first.text).to include('Foo')
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').last.text).to include('Bar')
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb
index d9543bfa97f..22b51b297a6 100644
--- a/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/groups/labels/subscription_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe 'Labels subscription' do
   let(:user)     { create(:user) }
   let(:group)    { create(:group) }
-  let!(:feature) { create(:group_label, group: group, title: 'feature') }
+  let!(:label1)  { create(:group_label, group: group, title: 'foo') }
+  let!(:label2)  { create(:group_label, group: group, title: 'bar') }
 
   context 'when signed in' do
     before do
@@ -14,9 +15,9 @@ describe 'Labels subscription' do
     it 'users can subscribe/unsubscribe to group labels', :js do
       visit group_labels_path(group)
 
-      expect(page).to have_content('feature')
+      expect(page).to have_content(label1.title)
 
-      within "#group_label_#{feature.id}" do
+      within "#group_label_#{label1.id}" do
         expect(page).not_to have_button 'Unsubscribe'
 
         click_button 'Subscribe'
@@ -30,15 +31,48 @@ describe 'Labels subscription' do
         expect(page).not_to have_button 'Unsubscribe'
       end
     end
+
+    context 'subscription filter' do
+      before do
+        visit group_labels_path(group)
+      end
+
+      it 'shows only subscribed labels' do
+        label1.subscribe(user)
+
+        click_subscribed_tab
+
+        page.within('.labels-container') do
+          expect(page).to have_content label1.title
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'shows no subscribed labels message' do
+        click_subscribed_tab
+
+        page.within('.labels-container') do
+          expect(page).not_to have_content label1.title
+          expect(page).to have_content('You do not have any subscriptions yet')
+        end
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   context 'when not signed in' do
-    it 'users can not subscribe/unsubscribe to labels' do
+    before do
       visit group_labels_path(group)
+    end
 
-      expect(page).to have_content 'feature'
+    it 'users can not subscribe/unsubscribe to labels' do
+      expect(page).to have_content label1.title
       expect(page).not_to have_button('Subscribe')
     end
+
+    it 'does not show subscribed tab' do
+      page.within('.nav-tabs') do
+        expect(page).not_to have_link 'Subscribed'
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   def click_link_on_dropdown(text)
@@ -48,4 +82,10 @@ describe 'Labels subscription' do
       find('a.js-subscribe-button', text: text).click
     end
   end
+
+  def click_subscribed_tab
+    page.within('.nav-tabs') do
+      click_link 'Subscribed'
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/settings/ci_cd_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/settings/ci_cd_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d422fd18346
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/groups/settings/ci_cd_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Group CI/CD settings' do
+  include WaitForRequests
+
+  let(:user) {create(:user)}
+  let(:group) {create(:group)}
+
+  before do
+    group.add_owner(user)
+    sign_in(user)
+  end
+
+  describe 'runners registration token' do
+    let!(:token) { group.runners_token }
+
+    before do
+      visit group_settings_ci_cd_path(group)
+    end
+
+    it 'has a registration token' do
+      expect(page.find('#registration_token')).to have_content(token)
+    end
+
+    describe 'reload registration token' do
+      let(:page_token) { find('#registration_token').text }
+
+      before do
+        click_button 'Reset runners registration token'
+      end
+
+      it 'changes registration token' do
+        expect(page_token).not_to eq token
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/groups/settings/group_badges_spec.rb b/spec/features/groups/settings/group_badges_spec.rb
index 070a4a31ffa..a5c8dbf18d0 100644
--- a/spec/features/groups/settings/group_badges_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/groups/settings/group_badges_spec.rb
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ describe 'Group Badges' do
     group.add_owner(user)
     sign_in(user)
 
-    visit(group_settings_badges_path(group))
+    visit(edit_group_path(group))
   end
 
   it 'shows a list of badges', :js do
diff --git a/spec/features/instance_statistics/cohorts_spec.rb b/spec/features/instance_statistics/cohorts_spec.rb
index 573f8600be1..40e65515ceb 100644
--- a/spec/features/instance_statistics/cohorts_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/instance_statistics/cohorts_spec.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ require 'rails_helper'
 describe 'Cohorts page' do
   before do
     sign_in(create(:admin))
+
+    stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: true)
   end
 
   it 'See users count per month' do
@@ -12,12 +14,4 @@ describe 'Cohorts page' do
 
     expect(page).to have_content("#{Time.now.strftime('%b %Y')} 3 0")
   end
-
-  it 'shows usage data', :js do
-    visit instance_statistics_cohorts_path
-
-    wait_for_requests
-
-    expect(find('.js-syntax-highlight').text).not_to eq('')
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/instance_statistics/conversational_development_index_spec.rb b/spec/features/instance_statistics/conversational_development_index_spec.rb
index a6c16b6a2a3..d8be554d734 100644
--- a/spec/features/instance_statistics/conversational_development_index_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/instance_statistics/conversational_development_index_spec.rb
@@ -16,13 +16,21 @@ describe 'Conversational Development Index' do
   end
 
   context 'when usage ping is disabled' do
-    it 'shows empty state' do
+    before do
       stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: false)
+    end
 
+    it 'shows empty state' do
       visit instance_statistics_conversational_development_index_index_path
 
       expect(page).to have_content('Usage ping is not enabled')
     end
+
+    it 'hides the intro callout' do
+      visit instance_statistics_conversational_development_index_index_path
+
+      expect(page).not_to have_content 'Introducing Your Conversational Development Index'
+    end
   end
 
   context 'when there is no data to display' do
diff --git a/spec/features/instance_statistics/instance_statistics.rb b/spec/features/instance_statistics/instance_statistics.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d03e6e68075
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/instance_statistics/instance_statistics.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe 'Cohorts page', :js do
+  before do
+    sign_in(create(:admin))
+  end
+
+  it 'hides cohorts nav button when usage ping is disabled' do
+    stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: false)
+
+    visit instance_statistics_root_path
+
+    expect(find('.nav-sidebar')).not_to have_content('Cohorts')
+  end
+
+  it 'shows cohorts nav button when usage ping is enabled' do
+    stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: true)
+
+    visit instance_statistics_root_path
+
+    expect(find('.nav-sidebar')).to have_content('Cohorts')
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb b/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb
index de6f5fe1560..26c44baeb21 100644
--- a/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issuables/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.rb
@@ -56,6 +56,24 @@ describe 'Issuables Close/Reopen/Report toggle' do
       end
 
       it_behaves_like 'an issuable close/reopen/report toggle'
+
+      context 'when the issue is closed and locked' do
+        let(:issuable) { create(:issue, :closed, :locked, project: project) }
+
+        it 'hides the reopen button' do
+          expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen issue')
+        end
+
+        context 'when the issue author is the current user' do
+          before do
+            issuable.update(author: user)
+          end
+
+          it 'hides the reopen button' do
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen issue')
+          end
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when user doesnt have permission to update' do
@@ -93,6 +111,28 @@ describe 'Issuables Close/Reopen/Report toggle' do
       end
 
       it_behaves_like 'an issuable close/reopen/report toggle'
+
+      context 'when the merge request is merged' do
+        let(:issuable) { create(:merge_request, :merged, source_project: project) }
+
+        it 'shows only the `Report abuse` and `Edit` button' do
+          expect(page).to have_link('Report abuse')
+          expect(page).to have_link('Edit')
+          expect(page).not_to have_link('Close merge request')
+          expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen merge request')
+        end
+
+        context 'when the merge request author is the current user' do
+          let(:issuable) { create(:merge_request, :merged, source_project: project, author: user) }
+
+          it 'shows only the `Edit` button' do
+            expect(page).to have_link('Edit')
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Report abuse')
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Close merge request')
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Reopen merge request')
+          end
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when user doesnt have permission to update' do
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb
index b99c5a7f4e3..0e296ab2109 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/dropdown_hint_spec.rb
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ describe 'Dropdown hint', :js do
   before do
     project.add_maintainer(user)
     create(:issue, project: project)
+    create(:merge_request, source_project: project, target_project: project)
   end
 
   context 'when user not logged in' do
@@ -224,4 +225,21 @@ describe 'Dropdown hint', :js do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  context 'merge request page' do
+    before do
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit project_merge_requests_path(project)
+      filtered_search.click
+    end
+
+    it 'shows the WIP menu item and opens the WIP options dropdown' do
+      click_hint('wip')
+
+      expect(page).to have_css(js_dropdown_hint, visible: false)
+      expect(page).to have_css('#js-dropdown-wip', visible: true)
+      expect_tokens([{ name: 'wip' }])
+      expect_filtered_search_input_empty
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/filter_issues_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/filter_issues_spec.rb
index d4949de3f27..35d57b3896d 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/filter_issues_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/filtered_search/filter_issues_spec.rb
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ describe 'Filter issues', :js do
 
     context 'issue label clicked' do
       it 'filters and displays in search bar' do
-        find('.issues-list .issue .issue-main-info .issuable-info a .badge', text: multiple_words_label.title).click
+        find('.issues-list .issue .issuable-main-info .issuable-info a .badge', text: multiple_words_label.title).click
 
         expect_issues_list_count(1)
         expect_tokens([label_token("\"#{multiple_words_label.title}\"")])
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/gfm_autocomplete_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/gfm_autocomplete_spec.rb
index 98e37d8011a..08bf9bc7243 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/gfm_autocomplete_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/gfm_autocomplete_spec.rb
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ describe 'GFM autocomplete', :js do
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
   let(:label) { create(:label, project: project, title: 'special+') }
   let(:issue)   { create(:issue, project: project) }
+  let!(:project_snippet) { create(:project_snippet, project: project, title: 'code snippet') }
 
   before do
     project.add_maintainer(user)
@@ -301,6 +302,16 @@ describe 'GFM autocomplete', :js do
     end
   end
 
+  it 'shows project snippets' do
+    page.within '.timeline-content-form' do
+      find('#note-body').native.send_keys('$')
+    end
+
+    page.within '.atwho-container' do
+      expect(page).to have_content(project_snippet.title)
+    end
+  end
+
   private
 
   def expect_to_wrap(should_wrap, item, note, value)
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb
index 088ab114df3..76bc93e9766 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/issue_detail_spec.rb
@@ -18,6 +18,23 @@ describe 'Issue Detail', :js do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'when issue description has xss snippet' do
+    before do
+      issue.update!(description: '![xss" onload=alert(1);//](a)')
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit project_issue_path(project, issue)
+      wait_for_requests
+    end
+
+    it 'should encode the description to prevent xss issues' do
+      page.within('.issuable-details .detail-page-description') do
+        expect(page).to have_selector('img', count: 1)
+        expect(find('img')['onerror']).to be_nil
+        expect(find('img')['src']).to end_with('/a')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'when edited by a user who is later deleted' do
     before do
       sign_in(user)
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb
index f08c73f947c..fed77453cbb 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/notes_on_issues_spec.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,12 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe 'Create notes on issues', :js do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
 
+  def submit_comment(text)
+    fill_in 'note[note]', with: text
+    click_button 'Comment'
+    wait_for_requests
+  end
+
   shared_examples 'notes with reference' do
     let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project) }
     let(:note_text) { "Check #{mention.to_reference}" }
@@ -12,10 +18,7 @@ describe 'Create notes on issues', :js do
       sign_in(user)
       visit project_issue_path(project, issue)
 
-      fill_in 'note[note]', with: note_text
-      click_button 'Comment'
-
-      wait_for_requests
+      submit_comment(note_text)
     end
 
     it 'creates a note with reference and cross references the issue' do
@@ -74,4 +77,16 @@ describe 'Create notes on issues', :js do
       let(:mention) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) }
     end
   end
+
+  it 'highlights the current user in a comment' do
+    project = create(:project)
+    issue = create(:issue, project: project)
+    project.add_developer(user)
+    sign_in(user)
+
+    visit project_issue_path(project, issue)
+    submit_comment("@#{user.username} note to self")
+
+    expect(page).to have_selector '.gfm-project_member.current-user', text: user.username
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/resource_label_events_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/resource_label_events_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..40c452c991a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/issues/resource_label_events_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe 'List issue resource label events', :js do
+  let(:user)     { create(:user) }
+  let(:project)  { create(:project, :public) }
+  let(:issue)    { create(:issue, project: project, author: user) }
+  let!(:label)    { create(:label, project: project, title: 'foo') }
+
+  context 'when user displays the issue' do
+    let!(:note)     { create(:note_on_issue, author: user, project: project, noteable: issue, note: 'some note') }
+    let!(:event)    { create(:resource_label_event, user: user, issue: issue, label: label) }
+
+    before do
+      visit project_issue_path(project, issue)
+      wait_for_requests
+    end
+
+    it 'shows both notes and resource label events' do
+      page.within('#notes') do
+        expect(find("#note_#{note.id}")).to have_content 'some note'
+        expect(find("#note_#{event.discussion_id}")).to have_content 'added foo label'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when user adds label to the issue' do
+    def toggle_labels(labels)
+      page.within '.labels' do
+        click_link 'Edit'
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        labels.each { |label| click_link label }
+
+        click_link 'Edit'
+        wait_for_requests
+      end
+    end
+
+    before do
+      create(:label, project: project, title: 'bar')
+      project.add_developer(user)
+
+      sign_in(user)
+      visit project_issue_path(project, issue)
+      wait_for_requests
+    end
+
+    it 'shows add note for newly added labels' do
+      toggle_labels(%w(foo bar))
+      visit project_issue_path(project, issue)
+      wait_for_requests
+
+      page.within('#notes') do
+        expect(page).to have_content 'added bar foo labels'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/user_sees_breadcrumb_links_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/user_sees_breadcrumb_links_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ca234321235
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/issues/user_sees_breadcrumb_links_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe 'New issue breadcrumbs' do
+  let(:project) { create(:project) }
+  let(:user)    { project.creator }
+
+  before do
+    sign_in(user)
+    visit new_project_issue_path(project)
+  end
+
+  it 'display a link to project issues and new issue pages' do
+    page.within '.breadcrumbs' do
+      expect(find_link('Issues')[:href]).to end_with(project_issues_path(project))
+      expect(find_link('New')[:href]).to end_with(new_project_issue_path(project))
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb b/spec/features/issues/user_uses_quick_actions_spec.rb
index 5926e442f24..5926e442f24 100644
--- a/spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/issues/user_uses_quick_actions_spec.rb
diff --git a/spec/features/labels_hierarchy_spec.rb b/spec/features/labels_hierarchy_spec.rb
index 6f917f522bc..09904cb907f 100644
--- a/spec/features/labels_hierarchy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/labels_hierarchy_spec.rb
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ describe 'Labels Hierarchy', :js, :nested_groups do
       find('a.label-item', text: parent_group_label.title).click
       find('a.label-item', text: project_label_1.title).click
 
-      find('.btn-create').click
+      find('.btn-success').click
 
       expect(page.find('.issue-details h2.title')).to have_content('new created issue')
       expect(page).to have_selector('span.badge', text: grandparent_group_label.title)
diff --git a/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb b/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb
index cac8a5068ec..3b37ede8579 100644
--- a/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/markdown/markdown_spec.rb
@@ -264,9 +264,9 @@ describe 'GitLab Markdown', :aggregate_failures do
       @project_wiki = @feat.project_wiki
       @project_wiki_page = @feat.project_wiki_page
 
-      file = Gollum::File.new(@project_wiki.wiki)
-      expect(file).to receive(:path).and_return('images/example.jpg')
-      expect(@project_wiki).to receive(:find_file).with('images/example.jpg').and_return(file)
+      path = 'images/example.jpg'
+      gitaly_wiki_file = Gitlab::GitalyClient::WikiFile.new(path: path)
+      expect(@project_wiki).to receive(:find_file).with(path).and_return(Gitlab::Git::WikiFile.new(gitaly_wiki_file))
       allow(@project_wiki).to receive(:wiki_base_path) { '/namespace1/gitlabhq/wikis' }
 
       @html = markdown(@feat.raw_markdown, { pipeline: :wiki, project_wiki: @project_wiki, page_slug: @project_wiki_page.slug })
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb
index 441b080bee5..00cf368e8c9 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_comments_on_diff_spec.rb
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do
             click_button('Comment')
           end
 
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3)') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3)') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is wrong')
 
             find('.js-btn-vue-toggle-comments').click
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do
 
           wait_for_requests
 
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct')
           end
 
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do
           wait_for_requests
 
           # Hide the comment.
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3)') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3)') do
             find('.js-btn-vue-toggle-comments').click
 
             expect(page).not_to have_content('Line is wrong')
@@ -71,21 +71,21 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do
 
           # At this moment a user should see only one comment.
           # The other one should be hidden.
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct')
           end
 
           # Show the comment.
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3)') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3)') do
             find('.js-btn-vue-toggle-comments').click
           end
 
           # Now both the comments should be shown.
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3) .note-body > .note-text') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3) .note-body > .note-text') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is wrong')
           end
 
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .note-body > .note-text') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct')
           end
 
@@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ describe 'User comments on a diff', :js do
 
           wait_for_requests
 
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(3) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(3) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is wrong')
           end
 
-          page.within('.files > div:nth-child(2) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do
+          page.within('.diff-files-holder > div:nth-child(2) .parallel .note-body > .note-text') do
             expect(page).to have_content('Line is correct')
           end
         end
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_diff_notes_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_diff_notes_spec.rb
index 77261f9375c..fa148715855 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_diff_notes_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_diff_notes_spec.rb
@@ -186,11 +186,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User posts diff notes', :js do
 
     describe 'posting a note' do
       it 'adds as discussion' do
-        expect(page).to have_css('.js-temp-notes-holder', count: 2)
-
         should_allow_commenting(find('[id="6eb14e00385d2fb284765eb1cd8d420d33d63fc9_22_22"]'), asset_form_reset: false)
         expect(page).to have_css('.notes_holder .note.note-discussion', count: 1)
-        expect(page).to have_css('.js-temp-notes-holder', count: 1)
         expect(page).to have_button('Reply...')
       end
     end
@@ -203,23 +200,20 @@ describe 'Merge request > User posts diff notes', :js do
     end
 
     context 'with a new line' do
-      # TODO: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/48034
-      xit 'allows commenting' do
-        should_allow_commenting(find('[id="2f6fcd96b88b36ce98c38da085c795a27d92a3dd_10_9"]').find(:xpath, '..'))
+      it 'allows commenting' do
+        should_allow_commenting(find('[id="2f6fcd96b88b36ce98c38da085c795a27d92a3dd_10_9"]'))
       end
     end
 
     context 'with an old line' do
-      # TODO: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/48034
-      xit 'allows commenting' do
-        should_allow_commenting(find('[id="6eb14e00385d2fb284765eb1cd8d420d33d63fc9_22_22"]').find(:xpath, '..'))
+      it 'allows commenting' do
+        should_allow_commenting(find('[id="6eb14e00385d2fb284765eb1cd8d420d33d63fc9_22_22"]'))
       end
     end
 
     context 'with an unchanged line' do
-      # TODO: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/48034
-      xit 'allows commenting' do
-        should_allow_commenting(find('[id="2f6fcd96b88b36ce98c38da085c795a27d92a3dd_7_7"]').find(:xpath, '..'))
+      it 'allows commenting' do
+        should_allow_commenting(find('[id="2f6fcd96b88b36ce98c38da085c795a27d92a3dd_7_7"]'))
       end
     end
 
@@ -267,7 +261,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User posts diff notes', :js do
   def assert_comment_persistence(line_holder, asset_form_reset:)
     notes_holder_saved = line_holder.find(:xpath, notes_holder_input_xpath)
 
-    expect(notes_holder_saved[:class]).not_to include(notes_holder_input_class)
+    expect(notes_holder_saved[:class]).not_to include('note-edit-form')
     expect(notes_holder_saved).to have_content test_note_comment
 
     assert_form_is_reset if asset_form_reset
@@ -281,6 +275,6 @@ describe 'Merge request > User posts diff notes', :js do
   end
 
   def assert_form_is_reset
-    expect(page).to have_no_css('.js-temp-notes-holder')
+    expect(page).to have_no_css('.note-edit-form')
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_notes_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_notes_spec.rb
index 260c5f9c28b..ee5f5377ca6 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_notes_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_posts_notes_spec.rb
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User posts notes', :js do
       it 'allows using markdown buttons after saving a note and then trying to edit it again' do
         page.within('.current-note-edit-form') do
           fill_in 'note[note]', with: 'This is the new content'
-          find('.btn-save').click
+          find('.btn-success').click
         end
 
         find('.note').hover
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User posts notes', :js do
       it 'appends the edited at time to the note' do
         page.within('.current-note-edit-form') do
           fill_in 'note[note]', with: 'Some new content'
-          find('.btn-save').click
+          find('.btn-success').click
         end
 
         page.within("#note_#{note.id}") do
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb
index 629052442b4..50c723776a3 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_conflicts_spec.rb
@@ -44,9 +44,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User resolves conflicts', :js do
 
       within find('.diff-file', text: 'files/ruby/regex.rb') do
         expect(page).to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def username_regexp")
-        expect(page).not_to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def username_regex")
         expect(page).to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def project_name_regexp")
-        expect(page).not_to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def project_name_regex")
         expect(page).to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def path_regexp")
         expect(page).to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def archive_formats_regexp")
         expect(page).to have_selector('.line_content.new', text: "def git_reference_regexp")
@@ -110,12 +108,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User resolves conflicts', :js do
           click_link('conflicts', href: %r{/conflicts\Z})
         end
 
-        # TODO: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/48034
-        # include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Interactive mode"
-        # include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Edit inline mode"
-
-        it 'prevents RSpec/EmptyExampleGroup' do
-        end
+        include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Interactive mode"
+        include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Edit inline mode"
       end
 
       context 'in Parallel view mode' do
@@ -124,12 +118,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User resolves conflicts', :js do
           click_button 'Side-by-side'
         end
 
-        # TODO: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/48034
-        # include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Interactive mode"
-        # include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Edit inline mode"
-
-        it 'prevents RSpec/EmptyExampleGroup' do
-        end
+        include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Interactive mode"
+        include_examples "conflicts are resolved in Edit inline mode"
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_diff_notes_and_discussions_resolve_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_diff_notes_and_discussions_resolve_spec.rb
index 2d268ecab58..8a16c011067 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_diff_notes_and_discussions_resolve_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_resolves_diff_notes_and_discussions_resolve_spec.rb
@@ -139,44 +139,64 @@ describe 'Merge request > User resolves diff notes and discussions', :js do
             expect(find('.diffs .diff-file .notes_holder')).to be_visible
           end
         end
-      end
 
-      it 'allows user to resolve from reply form without a comment' do
-        page.within '.diff-content' do
-          click_button 'Reply...'
+        describe 'reply form' do
+          before do
+            click_button 'Toggle discussion'
 
-          click_button 'Resolve discussion'
-        end
+            page.within '.diff-content' do
+              click_button 'Reply...'
+            end
+          end
 
-        page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
-          expect(page).to have_content('1/1 discussion resolved')
-          expect(page).to have_selector('.line-resolve-btn.is-active')
-        end
-      end
+          it 'allows user to comment' do
+            page.within '.diff-content' do
+              find('.js-note-text').set 'testing'
 
-      it 'allows user to unresolve from reply form without a comment' do
-        page.within '.diff-content' do
-          click_button 'Resolve discussion'
-          sleep 1
+              click_button 'Comment'
 
-          click_button 'Reply...'
+              wait_for_requests
+            end
 
-          click_button 'Unresolve discussion'
-        end
+            page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
+              expect(page).to have_content('1/1 discussion resolved')
+            end
+          end
 
-        page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
-          expect(page).to have_content('0/1 discussion resolved')
-          expect(page).not_to have_selector('.line-resolve-btn.is-active')
+          it 'allows user to unresolve from reply form without a comment' do
+            page.within '.diff-content' do
+              click_button 'Unresolve discussion'
+
+              wait_for_requests
+            end
+
+            page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
+              expect(page).to have_content('0/1 discussion resolved')
+              expect(page).not_to have_selector('.line-resolve-btn.is-active')
+            end
+          end
+
+          it 'allows user to comment & unresolve discussion' do
+            page.within '.diff-content' do
+              find('.js-note-text').set 'testing'
+
+              click_button 'Comment & unresolve discussion'
+
+              wait_for_requests
+            end
+
+            page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
+              expect(page).to have_content('0/1 discussion resolved')
+            end
+          end
         end
       end
 
-      it 'allows user to comment & resolve discussion' do
+      it 'allows user to resolve from reply form without a comment' do
         page.within '.diff-content' do
           click_button 'Reply...'
 
-          find('.js-note-text').set 'testing'
-
-          click_button 'Comment & resolve discussion'
+          click_button 'Resolve discussion'
         end
 
         page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
@@ -185,19 +205,18 @@ describe 'Merge request > User resolves diff notes and discussions', :js do
         end
       end
 
-      it 'allows user to comment & unresolve discussion' do
+      it 'allows user to comment & resolve discussion' do
         page.within '.diff-content' do
-          click_button 'Resolve discussion'
-
           click_button 'Reply...'
 
           find('.js-note-text').set 'testing'
 
-          click_button 'Comment & unresolve discussion'
+          click_button 'Comment & resolve discussion'
         end
 
         page.within '.line-resolve-all-container' do
-          expect(page).to have_content('0/1 discussion resolved')
+          expect(page).to have_content('1/1 discussion resolved')
+          expect(page).to have_selector('.line-resolve-btn.is-active')
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb
index 428eb414274..d3da8cc6752 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_avatar_on_diff_notes_spec.rb
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees avatars on diff notes', :js do
         visit diffs_project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request, view: view)
 
         wait_for_requests
+
+        find('.js-toggle-tree-list').click
       end
 
       it 'shows note avatar' do
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_breadcrumb_links_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_breadcrumb_links_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f17acb35a5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_breadcrumb_links_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe 'New merge request breadcrumbs' do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:user)    { project.creator }
+
+  before do
+    sign_in(user)
+    visit project_new_merge_request_path(project)
+  end
+
+  it 'display a link to project merge requests and new merge request pages' do
+    page.within '.breadcrumbs' do
+      expect(find_link('Merge Requests')[:href]).to end_with(project_merge_requests_path(project))
+      expect(find_link('New')[:href]).to end_with(project_new_merge_request_path(project))
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_diff_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_diff_spec.rb
index 0c15febe8df..0df9e4bbc1a 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_diff_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_diff_spec.rb
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees diff', :js do
           }
         CONTENT
 
-        file_name = 'xss_file.txt'
+        file_name = 'xss_file.rs'
 
         create_file('master', file_name, file_content)
         merge_request = create(:merge_request, source_project: project)
@@ -133,6 +133,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees diff', :js do
         visit diffs_project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request)
 
         expect(page).to have_text("function foo<input> {")
+        expect(page).to have_css(".line[lang='rust'] .k")
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_widget_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_widget_spec.rb
index b285cd7a7ac..a5dc9017699 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_widget_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_merge_widget_spec.rb
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees merge widget', :js do
     end
   end
 
-  context 'view merge request where project has CI setup but no CI status' do
+  context 'view merge request where project has CI set up but no CI status' do
     before do
       pipeline = create(:ci_pipeline, project: project,
                                       sha: merge_request.diff_head_sha,
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees merge widget', :js do
     end
   end
 
-  context 'view merge request in project with only-mwps setting enabled but no CI is setup' do
+  context 'view merge request in project with only-mwps setting enabled but no CI is set up' do
     before do
       visit project_merge_request_path(project_only_mwps, merge_request_in_only_mwps_project)
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb
index f42b4dcbb47..92db4f44098 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_sees_versions_spec.rb
@@ -110,7 +110,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do
         diff_id: merge_request_diff3.id,
         start_sha: '6f6d7e7ed97bb5f0054f2b1df789b39ca89b6ff9'
       )
-      expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions'
+      expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files'
+      expect(page).to have_content '15 additions 6 deletions'
       expect(page).to have_content 'Not all comments are displayed'
 
       position = Gitlab::Diff::Position.new(
@@ -131,7 +132,8 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do
     end
 
     it 'show diff between new and old version' do
-      expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions'
+      expect(page).to have_content '4 changed files'
+      expect(page).to have_content '15 additions 6 deletions'
     end
 
     it 'returns to latest version when "Show latest version" button is clicked' do
@@ -158,7 +160,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do
 
     it 'has 0 chages between versions' do
       page.within '.mr-version-compare-dropdown' do
-        expect(find('.dropdown-toggle')).to have_content 'version 1'
+        expect(find('.dropdown-menu-toggle')).to have_content 'version 1'
       end
 
       page.within '.mr-version-dropdown' do
@@ -179,7 +181,7 @@ describe 'Merge request > User sees versions', :js do
 
     it 'sets the compared versions to be the same' do
       page.within '.mr-version-compare-dropdown' do
-        expect(find('.dropdown-toggle')).to have_content 'version 2'
+        expect(find('.dropdown-menu-toggle')).to have_content 'version 2'
       end
 
       page.within '.mr-version-dropdown' do
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_uses_quick_actions_spec.rb
index b81478a481f..b81478a481f 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_uses_quick_actions_spec.rb
diff --git a/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb b/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb
index b1bfe9e5de3..7f95a1282f9 100644
--- a/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/merge_request/user_views_diffs_spec.rb
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ describe 'User views diffs', :js do
     visit(diffs_project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request))
 
     wait_for_requests
+
+    find('.js-toggle-tree-list').click
   end
 
   shared_examples 'unfold diffs' do
diff --git a/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb b/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb
index 206a3a4fe9a..e168bb0fc89 100644
--- a/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/profiles/user_edit_profile_spec.rb
@@ -61,83 +61,229 @@ describe 'User edit profile' do
   end
 
   context 'user status', :js do
-    def select_emoji(emoji_name)
+    def select_emoji(emoji_name, is_modal = false)
+      emoji_menu_class = is_modal ? '.js-modal-status-emoji-menu' : '.js-status-emoji-menu'
       toggle_button = find('.js-toggle-emoji-menu')
       toggle_button.click
-      emoji_button = find(%Q{.js-status-emoji-menu .js-emoji-btn gl-emoji[data-name="#{emoji_name}"]})
+      emoji_button = find(%Q{#{emoji_menu_class} .js-emoji-btn gl-emoji[data-name="#{emoji_name}"]})
       emoji_button.click
     end
 
-    it 'shows the user status form' do
-      visit(profile_path)
+    context 'profile edit form' do
+      it 'shows the user status form' do
+        visit(profile_path)
 
-      expect(page).to have_content('Current status')
-    end
+        expect(page).to have_content('Current status')
+      end
 
-    it 'adds emoji to user status' do
-      emoji = 'biohazard'
-      visit(profile_path)
-      select_emoji(emoji)
-      submit_settings
+      it 'adds emoji to user status' do
+        emoji = 'biohazard'
+        visit(profile_path)
+        select_emoji(emoji)
+        submit_settings
 
-      visit user_path(user)
-      within('.cover-status') do
-        expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji)
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji)
+        end
       end
-    end
 
-    it 'adds message to user status' do
-      message = 'I have something to say'
-      visit(profile_path)
-      fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message
-      submit_settings
+      it 'adds message to user status' do
+        message = 'I have something to say'
+        visit(profile_path)
+        fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message
+        submit_settings
 
-      visit user_path(user)
-      within('.cover-status') do
-        expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon')
-        expect(page).to have_content message
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon')
+          expect(page).to have_content message
+        end
       end
-    end
 
-    it 'adds message and emoji to user status' do
-      emoji = 'tanabata_tree'
-      message = 'Playing outside'
-      visit(profile_path)
-      select_emoji(emoji)
-      fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message
-      submit_settings
+      it 'adds message and emoji to user status' do
+        emoji = 'tanabata_tree'
+        message = 'Playing outside'
+        visit(profile_path)
+        select_emoji(emoji)
+        fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message
+        submit_settings
 
-      visit user_path(user)
-      within('.cover-status') do
-        expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji)
-        expect(page).to have_content message
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji)
+          expect(page).to have_content message
+        end
       end
-    end
 
-    it 'clears the user status' do
-      user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread')
+      it 'clears the user status' do
+        user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread')
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji)
+          expect(page).to have_content user_status.message
+        end
+
+        visit(profile_path)
+        click_button 'js-clear-user-status-button'
+        submit_settings
 
-      visit user_path(user)
-      within('.cover-status') do
-        expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji)
-        expect(page).to have_content user_status.message
+        visit user_path(user)
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status'
       end
 
-      visit(profile_path)
-      click_button 'js-clear-user-status-button'
-      submit_settings
+      it 'displays a default emoji if only message is entered' do
+        message = 'a status without emoji'
+        visit(profile_path)
+        fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message
 
-      visit user_path(user)
-      expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status'
+        within('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon')
+        end
+      end
     end
 
-    it 'displays a default emoji if only message is entered' do
-      message = 'a status without emoji'
-      visit(profile_path)
-      fill_in 'js-status-message-field', with: message
+    context 'user menu' do
+      def open_user_status_modal
+        find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click
+
+        page.within ".header-user" do
+          click_button 'Set status'
+        end
+      end
+
+      def set_user_status_in_modal
+        page.within "#set-user-status-modal" do
+          click_button 'Set status'
+        end
+      end
+
+      before do
+        visit root_path(user)
+      end
+
+      it 'shows the "Set status" menu item in the user menu' do
+        find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click
+
+        page.within ".header-user" do
+          expect(page).to have_content('Set status')
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'shows the "Edit status" menu item in the user menu' do
+        user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread')
+        visit root_path(user)
+
+        find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click
+
+        page.within ".header-user" do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji)
+          expect(page).to have_content user_status.message
+          expect(page).to have_content('Edit status')
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'shows user status modal' do
+        open_user_status_modal
+
+        expect(page.find('#set-user-status-modal')).to be_visible
+        expect(page).to have_content('Set a status')
+      end
+
+      it 'adds emoji to user status' do
+        emoji = 'biohazard'
+        open_user_status_modal
+        select_emoji(emoji, true)
+        set_user_status_in_modal
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji)
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'adds message to user status' do
+        message = 'I have something to say'
+        open_user_status_modal
+        find('.js-status-message-field').native.send_keys(message)
+        set_user_status_in_modal
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon')
+          expect(page).to have_content message
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'adds message and emoji to user status' do
+        emoji = 'tanabata_tree'
+        message = 'Playing outside'
+        open_user_status_modal
+        select_emoji(emoji, true)
+        find('.js-status-message-field').native.send_keys(message)
+        set_user_status_in_modal
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(emoji)
+          expect(page).to have_content message
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'clears the user status with the "X" button' do
+        user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread')
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji)
+          expect(page).to have_content user_status.message
+        end
+
+        find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click
+
+        page.within ".header-user" do
+          click_button 'Edit status'
+        end
+
+        find('.js-clear-user-status-button').click
+        set_user_status_in_modal
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status'
+      end
+
+      it 'clears the user status with the "Remove status" button' do
+        user_status = create(:user_status, user: user, message: 'Eating bread', emoji: 'stuffed_flatbread')
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        within('.cover-status') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji(user_status.emoji)
+          expect(page).to have_content user_status.message
+        end
+
+        find('.header-user-dropdown-toggle').click
+
+        page.within ".header-user" do
+          click_button 'Edit status'
+        end
+
+        page.within "#set-user-status-modal" do
+          click_button 'Remove status'
+        end
+
+        visit user_path(user)
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector '.cover-status'
+      end
+
+      it 'displays a default emoji if only message is entered' do
+        message = 'a status without emoji'
+        open_user_status_modal
+        find('.js-status-message-field').native.send_keys(message)
 
-      within('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') do
-        expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon')
+        within('.js-toggle-emoji-menu') do
+          expect(page).to have_emoji('speech_balloon')
+        end
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb b/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb
index 387584fef62..34aaab240cc 100644
--- a/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/profiles/user_manages_applications_spec.rb
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ describe 'User manages applications' do
     click_on 'Save application'
 
     expect(page).to have_content 'Application: test'
-    expect(page).to have_content 'Application Id'
+    expect(page).to have_content 'Application ID'
     expect(page).to have_content 'Secret'
 
     click_on 'Edit'
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ describe 'User manages applications' do
     click_on 'Save application'
 
     expect(page).to have_content 'test_changed'
-    expect(page).to have_content 'Application Id'
+    expect(page).to have_content 'Application ID'
     expect(page).to have_content 'Secret'
 
     visit applications_profile_path
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_activity_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_activity_spec.rb
index e0248911b5f..ebaa137772d 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_activity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_activity_spec.rb
@@ -3,8 +3,10 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe 'Projects > Activity > User sees activity' do
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :public) }
   let(:user) { project.creator }
+  let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project) }
 
   before do
+    create(:event, :created, project: project, target: issue, author: user)
     event = create(:push_event, project: project, author: user)
     create(:push_event_payload,
            event: event,
@@ -12,10 +14,18 @@ describe 'Projects > Activity > User sees activity' do
            commit_to: '6d394385cf567f80a8fd85055db1ab4c5295806f',
            ref: 'fix',
            commit_count: 1)
-    visit activity_project_path(project)
   end
 
   it 'shows the last push in the activity page', :js do
+    visit activity_project_path(project)
+
     expect(page).to have_content "#{user.name} pushed new branch fix"
   end
+
+  it 'allows to filter event with the "event_filter=issue" URL param', :js do
+    visit activity_project_path(project, event_filter: 'issue')
+
+    expect(page).not_to have_content "#{user.name} pushed new branch fix"
+    expect(page).to have_content "#{user.name} opened issue #{issue.to_reference}"
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_private_activity_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_private_activity_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d7dc0a6712a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/projects/activity/user_sees_private_activity_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Project > Activity > User sees private activity', :js do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
+  let(:author) { create(:user) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project, author: author) }
+  let(:message) { "#{author.name} opened issue #{issue.to_reference}" }
+
+  before do
+    project.add_developer(author)
+
+    create(:event, :created, project: project, target: issue, author: author)
+  end
+
+  it 'shows the activity to a logged-in user with permissions' do
+    sign_in(author)
+    visit activity_project_path(project)
+
+    expect(page).to have_content(message)
+  end
+
+  it 'hides the activity from a logged-in user without permissions' do
+    sign_in(user)
+    visit activity_project_path(project)
+
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(message)
+  end
+
+  it 'hides the activity from an anonymous user' do
+    visit activity_project_path(project)
+
+    expect(page).not_to have_content(message)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/artifacts/user_downloads_artifacts_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/artifacts/user_downloads_artifacts_spec.rb
index 67ed2f18d76..554f0b49052 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/artifacts/user_downloads_artifacts_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/artifacts/user_downloads_artifacts_spec.rb
@@ -20,23 +20,13 @@ describe "User downloads artifacts" do
     end
 
     context "via job id" do
-      set(:url) { download_project_job_artifacts_path(project, job) }
+      let(:url) { download_project_job_artifacts_path(project, job) }
 
       it_behaves_like "downloading"
     end
 
     context "via branch name and job name" do
-      set(:url) { latest_succeeded_project_artifacts_path(project, "#{pipeline.ref}/download", job: job.name) }
-
-      it_behaves_like "downloading"
-    end
-
-    context "via clicking the `Download` button" do
-      set(:url) { project_job_path(project, job) }
-
-      before do
-        click_link("Download")
-      end
+      let(:url) { latest_succeeded_project_artifacts_path(project, "#{pipeline.ref}/download", job: job.name) }
 
       it_behaves_like "downloading"
     end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/blobs/blob_show_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/blobs/blob_show_spec.rb
index 1064f72c271..e2f9e7e9cc5 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/blobs/blob_show_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/blobs/blob_show_spec.rb
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ describe 'File blob', :js do
 
   let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
 
-  def visit_blob(path, anchor: nil, ref: 'master')
-    visit project_blob_path(project, File.join(ref, path), anchor: anchor)
+  def visit_blob(path, anchor: nil, ref: 'master', legacy_render: nil)
+    visit project_blob_path(project, File.join(ref, path), anchor: anchor, legacy_render: legacy_render)
 
     wait_for_requests
   end
@@ -142,6 +142,52 @@ describe 'File blob', :js do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'Markdown rendering' do
+    before do
+      project.add_maintainer(project.creator)
+
+      Files::CreateService.new(
+        project,
+        project.creator,
+        start_branch: 'master',
+        branch_name: 'master',
+        commit_message: "Add RedCarpet and CommonMark Markdown ",
+        file_path: 'files/commonmark/file.md',
+        file_content: "1. one\n  - sublist\n"
+      ).execute
+    end
+
+    context 'when rendering default markdown' do
+      before do
+        visit_blob('files/commonmark/file.md')
+
+        wait_for_requests
+      end
+
+      it 'renders using CommonMark' do
+        aggregate_failures do
+          expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+          expect(page).not_to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when rendering legacy markdown' do
+      before do
+        visit_blob('files/commonmark/file.md', legacy_render: 1)
+
+        wait_for_requests
+      end
+
+      it 'renders using RedCarpet' do
+        aggregate_failures do
+          expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+          expect(page).to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'Markdown file (stored in LFS)' do
     before do
       project.add_maintainer(project.creator)
@@ -487,7 +533,7 @@ describe 'File blob', :js do
         expect(page).to have_content('This project is licensed under the MIT License.')
 
         # shows a learn more link
-        expect(page).to have_link('Learn more', 'http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/')
+        expect(page).to have_link('Learn more', href: 'http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/')
       end
     end
   end
@@ -520,10 +566,10 @@ describe 'File blob', :js do
         expect(page).to have_content('This project manages its dependencies using RubyGems and defines a gem named activerecord.')
 
         # shows a link to the gem
-        expect(page).to have_link('activerecord', 'https://rubygems.org/gems/activerecord')
+        expect(page).to have_link('activerecord', href: 'https://rubygems.org/gems/activerecord')
 
         # shows a learn more link
-        expect(page).to have_link('Learn more', 'http://choosealicense.com/licenses/mit/')
+        expect(page).to have_link('Learn more', href: 'https://rubygems.org/')
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/blobs/edit_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/blobs/edit_spec.rb
index 0e036b4ea68..d5b20605860 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/blobs/edit_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/blobs/edit_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ describe 'Editing file blob', :js do
   let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project, source_branch: 'feature', target_branch: 'master') }
   let(:branch) { 'master' }
   let(:file_path) { project.repository.ls_files(project.repository.root_ref)[1] }
+  let(:readme_file_path) { 'README.md' }
 
   context 'as a developer' do
     let(:user) { create(:user) }
@@ -20,14 +21,19 @@ describe 'Editing file blob', :js do
     def edit_and_commit(commit_changes: true)
       wait_for_requests
       find('.js-edit-blob').click
-      find('#editor')
-      execute_script('ace.edit("editor").setValue("class NextFeature\nend\n")')
+      fill_editor(content: "class NextFeature\\nend\\n")
 
       if commit_changes
         click_button 'Commit changes'
       end
     end
 
+    def fill_editor(content: "class NextFeature\\nend\\n")
+      wait_for_requests
+      find('#editor')
+      execute_script("ace.edit('editor').setValue('#{content}')")
+    end
+
     context 'from MR diff' do
       before do
         visit diffs_project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request)
@@ -63,6 +69,30 @@ describe 'Editing file blob', :js do
         expect(new_line_count).to be > 0
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when rendering the preview' do
+      it 'renders content with CommonMark' do
+        visit project_edit_blob_path(project, tree_join(branch, readme_file_path))
+        fill_editor(content: "1. one\\n  - sublist\\n")
+        click_link 'Preview'
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        # the above generates two seperate lists (not embedded) in CommonMark
+        expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+        expect(page).not_to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+      end
+
+      it 'renders content with RedCarpet when legacy_render is set' do
+        visit project_edit_blob_path(project, tree_join(branch, readme_file_path), legacy_render: 1)
+        fill_editor(content: "1. one\\n  - sublist\\n")
+        click_link 'Preview'
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        # the above generates a sublist list in RedCarpet
+        expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+        expect(page).to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   context 'visit blob edit' do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb
index 31e3ebf675d..8b92b9fc869 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/clusters/gcp_spec.rb
@@ -33,6 +33,32 @@ describe 'Gcp Cluster', :js do
       context 'when user filled form with valid parameters' do
         subject { click_button 'Create Kubernetes cluster' }
 
+        shared_examples 'valid cluster gcp form' do
+          it 'users sees a form with the GCP token' do
+            expect(page).to have_selector(:css, 'form[data-token="token"]')
+          end
+
+          it 'user sees a cluster details page and creation status' do
+            subject
+
+            expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster is being created on Google Kubernetes Engine...')
+
+            Clusters::Cluster.last.provider.make_created!
+
+            expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster was successfully created on Google Kubernetes Engine')
+          end
+
+          it 'user sees a error if something wrong during creation' do
+            subject
+
+            expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster is being created on Google Kubernetes Engine...')
+
+            Clusters::Cluster.last.provider.make_errored!('Something wrong!')
+
+            expect(page).to have_content('Something wrong!')
+          end
+        end
+
         before do
           allow_any_instance_of(GoogleApi::CloudPlatform::Client)
             .to receive(:projects_zones_clusters_create) do
@@ -56,28 +82,14 @@ describe 'Gcp Cluster', :js do
           fill_in 'cluster[provider_gcp_attributes][machine_type]', with: 'n1-standard-2'
         end
 
-        it 'users sees a form with the GCP token' do
-          expect(page).to have_selector(:css, 'form[data-token="token"]')
-        end
-
-        it 'user sees a cluster details page and creation status' do
-          subject
-
-          expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster is being created on Google Kubernetes Engine...')
-
-          Clusters::Cluster.last.provider.make_created!
+        it_behaves_like 'valid cluster gcp form'
 
-          expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster was successfully created on Google Kubernetes Engine')
-        end
-
-        it 'user sees a error if something wrong during creation' do
-          subject
-
-          expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster is being created on Google Kubernetes Engine...')
-
-          Clusters::Cluster.last.provider.make_errored!('Something wrong!')
+        context 'RBAC is enabled for the cluster' do
+          before do
+            check 'cluster_provider_gcp_attributes_legacy_abac'
+          end
 
-          expect(page).to have_content('Something wrong!')
+          it_behaves_like 'valid cluster gcp form'
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb
index babf47cc341..9ae1dba60b5 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/clusters/user_spec.rb
@@ -21,20 +21,41 @@ describe 'User Cluster', :js do
     end
 
     context 'when user filled form with valid parameters' do
+      shared_examples 'valid cluster user form' do
+        it 'user sees a cluster details page' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster integration')
+          expect(page.find_field('cluster[name]').value).to eq('dev-cluster')
+          expect(page.find_field('cluster[platform_kubernetes_attributes][api_url]').value)
+            .to have_content('http://example.com')
+          expect(page.find_field('cluster[platform_kubernetes_attributes][token]').value)
+            .to have_content('my-token')
+        end
+      end
+
       before do
         fill_in 'cluster_name', with: 'dev-cluster'
         fill_in 'cluster_platform_kubernetes_attributes_api_url', with: 'http://example.com'
         fill_in 'cluster_platform_kubernetes_attributes_token', with: 'my-token'
-        click_button 'Add Kubernetes cluster'
       end
 
-      it 'user sees a cluster details page' do
-        expect(page).to have_content('Kubernetes cluster integration')
-        expect(page.find_field('cluster[name]').value).to eq('dev-cluster')
-        expect(page.find_field('cluster[platform_kubernetes_attributes][api_url]').value)
-          .to have_content('http://example.com')
-        expect(page.find_field('cluster[platform_kubernetes_attributes][token]').value)
-          .to have_content('my-token')
+      subject { click_button 'Add Kubernetes cluster' }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'valid cluster user form'
+
+      context 'RBAC is enabled for the cluster' do
+        before do
+          check 'cluster_platform_kubernetes_attributes_authorization_type'
+        end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'valid cluster user form'
+
+        it 'user sees a cluster details page with RBAC enabled' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(page.find_field('cluster[platform_kubernetes_attributes][authorization_type]', disabled: true)).to be_checked
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -63,7 +84,6 @@ describe 'User Cluster', :js do
     context 'when user disables the cluster' do
       before do
         page.find(:css, '.js-cluster-enable-toggle-area .js-project-feature-toggle').click
-        fill_in 'cluster_name', with: 'dev-cluster'
         page.within('#cluster-integration') { click_button 'Save changes' }
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb
index 4c5dda29fee..70e0879dd81 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/environments/environment_spec.rb
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ describe 'Environment' do
         context 'with manual action' do
           let(:action) do
             create(:ci_build, :manual, pipeline: pipeline,
-                                       name: 'deploy to production')
+                                       name: 'deploy to production', environment: environment.name)
           end
 
           context 'when user has ability to trigger deployment' do
@@ -73,12 +73,16 @@ describe 'Environment' do
               expect(page).to have_link(action.name.humanize)
             end
 
-            it 'does allow to play manual action' do
+            it 'does allow to play manual action', :js do
               expect(action).to be_manual
 
+              find('button.dropdown').click
+
               expect { click_link(action.name.humanize) }
                 .not_to change { Ci::Pipeline.count }
 
+              wait_for_all_requests
+
               expect(page).to have_content(action.name)
               expect(action.reload).to be_pending
             end
@@ -165,10 +169,10 @@ describe 'Environment' do
                          name: action.ref, project: project)
                 end
 
-                it 'allows to stop environment' do
+                it 'allows to stop environment', :js do
                   click_button('Stop')
                   click_button('Stop environment') # confirm modal
-
+                  wait_for_all_requests
                   expect(page).to have_content('close_app')
                 end
               end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_creates_license_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_creates_license_file_spec.rb
index ac6c8c337fa..6762460971f 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_creates_license_file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_creates_license_file_spec.rb
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ describe 'Projects > Files > Project owner creates a license file', :js do
   end
 
   it 'project maintainer creates a license file from the "Add license" link' do
-    click_link 'Add License'
+    click_link 'Add license'
 
     expect(page).to have_content('New file')
     expect(current_path).to eq(
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_sees_link_to_create_license_file_in_empty_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_sees_link_to_create_license_file_in_empty_project_spec.rb
index 801291c1f77..0b8474fb87a 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_sees_link_to_create_license_file_in_empty_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_sees_link_to_create_license_file_in_empty_project_spec.rb
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ describe 'Projects > Files > Project owner sees a link to create a license file
 
   it 'project maintainer creates a license file from a template' do
     visit project_path(project)
-    click_on 'Add License'
+    click_on 'Add license'
     expect(page).to have_content('New file')
 
     expect(current_path).to eq(
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb
index cd5fef8238e..7c71b4c52e0 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/fork_spec.rb
@@ -53,6 +53,18 @@ describe 'Project fork' do
     expect(current_path).to have_content(/#{user.namespace.name}/i)
   end
 
+  it 'shows avatars when Gravatar is disabled' do
+    stub_application_setting(gravatar_enabled: false)
+
+    visit project_path(project)
+
+    click_link 'Fork'
+
+    page.within('.fork-thumbnail-container') do
+      expect(page).to have_css('div.identicon')
+    end
+  end
+
   it 'shows the forked project on the list' do
     visit project_path(project)
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb
index eb281cd2122..f76f9ba7577 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/import_export/export_file_spec.rb
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project export integration test', :js do
   let(:export_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/import_file_spec" }
   let(:config_hash) { YAML.load_file(Gitlab::ImportExport.config_file).deep_stringify_keys }
 
-  let(:sensitive_words) { %w[pass secret token key] }
+  let(:sensitive_words) { %w[pass secret token key encrypted] }
   let(:safe_list) do
     {
       token: [ProjectHook, Ci::Trigger, CommitStatus],
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project export integration test', :js do
 
   before do
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
   end
 
   after do
@@ -50,6 +49,8 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project export integration test', :js do
 
       expect(file_permissions(project.export_path)).to eq(0700)
 
+      expect(project.export_file.path).to include('tar.gz')
+
       in_directory_with_expanded_export(project) do |exit_status, tmpdir|
         expect(exit_status).to eq(0)
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_object_storage_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_object_storage_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 0d364543916..00000000000
--- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_object_storage_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,103 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
-  include Select2Helper
-
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let(:file) { File.join(Rails.root, 'spec', 'features', 'projects', 'import_export', 'test_project_export.tar.gz') }
-  let(:export_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/import_file_spec" }
-
-  before do
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-    stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
-    gitlab_sign_in(user)
-  end
-
-  after do
-    FileUtils.rm_rf(export_path, secure: true)
-  end
-
-  context 'when selecting the namespace' do
-    let(:user) { create(:admin) }
-    let!(:namespace) { user.namespace }
-    let(:project_path) { 'test-project-path' + SecureRandom.hex }
-
-    context 'prefilled the path' do
-      it 'user imports an exported project successfully' do
-        visit new_project_path
-
-        select2(namespace.id, from: '#project_namespace_id')
-        fill_in :project_path, with: project_path, visible: true
-        click_import_project_tab
-        click_link 'GitLab export'
-
-        expect(page).to have_content('Import an exported GitLab project')
-        expect(URI.parse(current_url).query).to eq("namespace_id=#{namespace.id}&path=#{project_path}")
-
-        attach_file('file', file)
-        click_on 'Import project'
-
-        expect(Project.count).to eq(1)
-
-        project = Project.last
-        expect(project).not_to be_nil
-        expect(project.description).to eq("Foo Bar")
-        expect(project.issues).not_to be_empty
-        expect(project.merge_requests).not_to be_empty
-        expect(project_hook_exists?(project)).to be true
-        expect(wiki_exists?(project)).to be true
-        expect(project.import_state.status).to eq('finished')
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'path is not prefilled' do
-      it 'user imports an exported project successfully' do
-        visit new_project_path
-        click_import_project_tab
-        click_link 'GitLab export'
-
-        fill_in :path, with: 'test-project-path', visible: true
-        attach_file('file', file)
-
-        expect { click_on 'Import project' }.to change { Project.count }.by(1)
-
-        project = Project.last
-        expect(project).not_to be_nil
-        expect(page).to have_content("Project 'test-project-path' is being imported")
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  it 'invalid project' do
-    project = create(:project, namespace: user.namespace)
-
-    visit new_project_path
-
-    select2(user.namespace.id, from: '#project_namespace_id')
-    fill_in :project_path, with: project.name, visible: true
-    click_import_project_tab
-    click_link 'GitLab export'
-    attach_file('file', file)
-    click_on 'Import project'
-
-    page.within('.flash-container') do
-      expect(page).to have_content('Project could not be imported')
-    end
-  end
-
-  def wiki_exists?(project)
-    wiki = ProjectWiki.new(project)
-    wiki.repository.exists? && !wiki.repository.empty?
-  end
-
-  def project_hook_exists?(project)
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      Gitlab::Git::Hook.new('post-receive', project.repository.raw_repository).exists?
-    end
-  end
-
-  def click_import_project_tab
-    find('#import-project-tab').click
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb
index 2d86115de12..28ae90bc0de 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/import_export/import_file_spec.rb
@@ -2,13 +2,14 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
   include Select2Helper
+  include GitHelpers
 
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:file) { File.join(Rails.root, 'spec', 'features', 'projects', 'import_export', 'test_project_export.tar.gz') }
   let(:export_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/import_file_spec" }
 
   before do
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
+    stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
     gitlab_sign_in(user)
   end
@@ -20,20 +21,21 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
   context 'when selecting the namespace' do
     let(:user) { create(:admin) }
     let!(:namespace) { user.namespace }
-    let(:project_path) { 'test-project-path' + SecureRandom.hex }
+    let(:randomHex) { SecureRandom.hex }
+    let(:project_name) { 'Test Project Name' + randomHex }
+    let(:project_path) { 'test-project-name' + randomHex }
 
     context 'prefilled the path' do
       it 'user imports an exported project successfully' do
         visit new_project_path
 
         select2(namespace.id, from: '#project_namespace_id')
-        fill_in :project_path, with: project_path, visible: true
+        fill_in :project_name, with: project_name, visible: true
         click_import_project_tab
         click_link 'GitLab export'
 
         expect(page).to have_content('Import an exported GitLab project')
-        expect(URI.parse(current_url).query).to eq("namespace_id=#{namespace.id}&path=#{project_path}")
-        expect(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:import_upload_path).with(filename: /\A\h{32}\z/).and_call_original
+        expect(URI.parse(current_url).query).to eq("namespace_id=#{namespace.id}&name=#{ERB::Util.url_encode(project_name)}&path=#{project_path}")
 
         attach_file('file', file)
         click_on 'Import project'
@@ -57,6 +59,7 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
         click_import_project_tab
         click_link 'GitLab export'
 
+        fill_in :name, with: 'Test Project Name', visible: true
         fill_in :path, with: 'test-project-path', visible: true
         attach_file('file', file)
 
@@ -75,7 +78,7 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
     visit new_project_path
 
     select2(user.namespace.id, from: '#project_namespace_id')
-    fill_in :project_path, with: project.name, visible: true
+    fill_in :project_name, with: project.name, visible: true
     click_import_project_tab
     click_link 'GitLab export'
     attach_file('file', file)
@@ -91,12 +94,6 @@ describe 'Import/Export - project import integration test', :js do
     wiki.repository.exists? && !wiki.repository.empty?
   end
 
-  def project_hook_exists?(project)
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      Gitlab::Git::Hook.new('post-receive', project.repository.raw_repository).exists?
-    end
-  end
-
   def click_import_project_tab
     find('#import-project-tab').click
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/namespace_export_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/import_export/namespace_export_file_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 9bb8a2063b5..00000000000
--- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/namespace_export_file_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,68 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe 'Import/Export - Namespace export file cleanup', :js do
-  let(:export_path) { Dir.mktmpdir('namespace_export_file_spec') }
-
-  before do
-    allow(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
-  end
-
-  after do
-    FileUtils.rm_rf(export_path, secure: true)
-  end
-
-  shared_examples_for 'handling project exports on namespace change' do
-    let!(:old_export_path) { project.export_path }
-
-    before do
-      sign_in(create(:admin))
-
-      setup_export_project
-    end
-
-    context 'moving the namespace' do
-      it 'removes the export file' do
-        expect(File).to exist(old_export_path)
-
-        project.namespace.update!(path: build(:namespace).path)
-
-        expect(File).not_to exist(old_export_path)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'deleting the namespace' do
-      it 'removes the export file' do
-        expect(File).to exist(old_export_path)
-
-        project.namespace.destroy
-
-        expect(File).not_to exist(old_export_path)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe 'legacy storage' do
-    let(:project) { create(:project, :legacy_storage) }
-
-    it_behaves_like 'handling project exports on namespace change'
-  end
-
-  describe 'hashed storage' do
-    let(:project) { create(:project) }
-
-    it_behaves_like 'handling project exports on namespace change'
-  end
-
-  def setup_export_project
-    visit edit_project_path(project)
-
-    expect(page).to have_content('Export project')
-
-    find(:link, 'Export project').send_keys(:return)
-
-    visit edit_project_path(project)
-
-    expect(page).to have_content('Download export')
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz b/spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz
index 3b5df47e0b6..730e586b278 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz
+++ b/spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb
index 2d791947ee9..fc7b78ac21f 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/jobs/user_browses_job_spec.rb
@@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ describe 'User browses a job', :js do
     visit(project_job_path(project, build))
   end
 
-  it 'erases the job log' do
+  it 'erases the job log', :js do
+    wait_for_requests
+
     expect(page).to have_content("Job ##{build.id}")
     expect(page).to have_css('#build-trace')
 
@@ -29,18 +31,17 @@ describe 'User browses a job', :js do
     expect(build.artifacts_file.exists?).to be_falsy
     expect(build.artifacts_metadata.exists?).to be_falsy
 
-    page.within('.erased') do
-      expect(page).to have_content('Job has been erased')
-    end
+    expect(page).to have_content('Job has been erased')
   end
 
   context 'with a failed job' do
     let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
     it 'displays the failure reason' do
+      wait_for_all_requests
       within('.builds-container') do
         build_link = first('.build-job > a')
-        expect(build_link['data-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure)')
+        expect(build_link['data-original-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure)')
       end
     end
   end
@@ -49,9 +50,10 @@ describe 'User browses a job', :js do
     let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :retried, :trace_artifact, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
     it 'displays the failure reason and retried label' do
+      wait_for_all_requests
       within('.builds-container') do
         build_link = first('.build-job > a')
-        expect(build_link['data-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure) (retried)')
+        expect(build_link['data-original-title']).to eq('test - failed - (unknown failure) (retried)')
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb
index 83293c0ca7d..2076ce7b4f7 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/jobs_spec.rb
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:user_access_level) { :developer }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-  let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project) }
+  let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project, sha: project.commit('HEAD').sha) }
 
   let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :trace_live, pipeline: pipeline) }
   let(:job2) { create(:ci_build) }
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
   end
 
   describe "GET /:project/jobs" do
-    let!(:job) { create(:ci_build,  pipeline: pipeline) }
+    let!(:job) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
     context "Pending scope" do
       before do
@@ -115,36 +115,44 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
     context "Job from project" do
       let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_live, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
-      before do
+      it 'shows status name', :js do
         visit project_job_path(project, job)
-      end
 
-      it 'shows status name', :js do
+        wait_for_requests
+
         expect(page).to have_css('.ci-status.ci-success', text: 'passed')
       end
 
-      it 'shows commit`s data' do
-        expect(page.status_code).to eq(200)
+      it 'shows commit`s data', :js do
+        requests = inspect_requests() do
+          visit project_job_path(project, job)
+        end
+
+        wait_for_requests
+        expect(requests.first.status_code).to eq(200)
         expect(page).to have_content pipeline.sha[0..7]
-        expect(page).to have_content pipeline.git_commit_message
-        expect(page).to have_content pipeline.git_author_name
+        expect(page).to have_content pipeline.commit.title
       end
 
-      it 'shows active job' do
+      it 'shows active job', :js do
+        visit project_job_path(project, job)
+
+        wait_for_requests
         expect(page).to have_selector('.build-job.active')
       end
     end
 
-    context 'sidebar' do
+    context 'sidebar', :js do
       let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_live, pipeline: pipeline, name: '<img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)>') }
 
       before do
         visit project_job_path(project, job)
+        wait_for_requests
       end
 
       it 'renders escaped tooltip name' do
         page.within('aside.right-sidebar') do
-          expect(find('.active.build-job a')['data-title']).to eq('<img src="x"> - passed')
+          expect(find('.active.build-job a')['data-original-title']).to eq('&lt;img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)&gt; - passed')
         end
       end
     end
@@ -199,7 +207,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       it { expect(page.status_code).to eq(404) }
     end
 
-    context "Download artifacts" do
+    context "Download artifacts", :js do
       before do
         job.update(legacy_artifacts_file: artifacts_file)
         visit project_job_path(project, job)
@@ -208,9 +216,22 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       it 'has button to download artifacts' do
         expect(page).to have_content 'Download'
       end
+
+      it 'downloads the zip file when user clicks the download button' do
+        requests = inspect_requests() do
+          click_link 'Download'
+        end
+
+        artifact_request = requests.find { |req| req.url.match(%r{artifacts/download}) }
+
+        expect(artifact_request.response_headers["Content-Disposition"]).to eq(%Q{attachment; filename="#{job.artifacts_file.filename}"})
+        expect(artifact_request.response_headers['Content-Transfer-Encoding']).to eq("binary")
+        expect(artifact_request.response_headers['Content-Type']).to eq("image/gif")
+        expect(artifact_request.body).to eq(job.artifacts_file.file.read.b)
+      end
     end
 
-    context 'Artifacts expire date' do
+    context 'Artifacts expire date', :js do
       before do
         job.update(legacy_artifacts_file: artifacts_file,
                    artifacts_expire_at: expire_at)
@@ -231,12 +252,12 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
 
         context 'when user has ability to update job' do
           it 'keeps artifacts when keep button is clicked' do
-            expect(page).to have_content 'The artifacts will be removed'
+            expect(page).to have_content 'The artifacts will be removed in'
 
             click_link 'Keep'
 
             expect(page).to have_no_link 'Keep'
-            expect(page).to have_no_content 'The artifacts will be removed'
+            expect(page).to have_no_content 'The artifacts will be removed in'
           end
         end
 
@@ -314,6 +335,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
 
       shared_examples 'expected variables behavior' do
         it 'shows variable key and value after click', :js do
+          expect(page).to have_content('Token')
           expect(page).to have_css('.js-reveal-variables')
           expect(page).not_to have_css('.js-build-variable')
           expect(page).not_to have_css('.js-build-value')
@@ -347,39 +369,167 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when job starts environment' do
-      let(:environment) { create(:environment, project: project) }
-      let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project) }
+    context 'when job starts environment', :js do
+      let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: project) }
 
-      context 'job is successfull and has deployment' do
-        let(:deployment) { create(:deployment) }
-        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, deployments: [deployment], pipeline: pipeline) }
+      context 'job is successful and has deployment' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_live, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project, deployable: build) }
 
-        it 'shows a link for the job' do
-          visit project_job_path(project, job)
+        before do
+          visit project_job_path(project, build)
+          wait_for_requests
+          # scroll to the top of the page first
+          execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)"
+        end
 
+        it 'shows a link for the job' do
           expect(page).to have_link environment.name
         end
+
+        it 'shows deployment message' do
+          expect(page).to have_content 'This job is the most recent deployment'
+          expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
+        end
       end
 
       context 'job is complete and not successful' do
-        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
         it 'shows a link for the job' do
-          visit project_job_path(project, job)
+          visit project_job_path(project, build)
+          wait_for_requests
+          # scroll to the top of the page first
+          execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)"
 
           expect(page).to have_link environment.name
+          expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
         end
       end
 
-      context 'job creates a new deployment' do
-        let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, sha: project.commit.id) }
-        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) }
+      context 'deployment still not finished' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, environment: environment.name, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
         it 'shows a link to latest deployment' do
-          visit project_job_path(project, job)
+          visit project_job_path(project, build)
+          wait_for_all_requests
+          # scroll to the top of the page first
+          execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)"
+
+          expect(page).to have_link environment.name
+          expect(page).to have_content 'This job is creating a deployment'
+          expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'environment info in job view', :js do
+      before do
+        visit project_job_path(project, job)
+        wait_for_requests
+        # scroll to the top of the page first
+        execute_script "window.scrollTo(0,0)"
+      end
+
+      context 'job with outdated deployment' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let(:second_build) { create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) }
+        let!(:first_deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: job) }
+        let!(:second_deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: second_build) }
+
+        it 'shows deployment message' do
+          expected_text = 'This job is an out-of-date deployment ' \
+            "to staging. View the most recent deployment ##{second_deployment.iid}."
+
+          expect(page).to have_css('.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+        end
+
+        it 'renders a link to the most recent deployment' do
+          expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
+          expect(find('.js-job-deployment-link')['href']).to include(second_deployment.deployable.project.path, second_deployment.deployable_id.to_s)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'job failed to deploy' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) }
+
+        it 'shows deployment message' do
+          expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed.'
+
+          expect(page).to have_css(
+            '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'job will deploy' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        context 'when environment exists' do
+          let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) }
+
+          it 'shows deployment message' do
+            expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
+
+            expect(page).to have_css(
+              '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+            expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
+          end
+
+          context 'when it has deployment' do
+            let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment) }
+
+            it 'shows that deployment will be overwritten' do
+              expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
+
+              expect(page).to have_css(
+                '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+              expect(page).to have_css(
+                '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment')
+              expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when environment does not exist' do
+          let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) }
+
+          it 'shows deployment message' do
+            expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
+
+            expect(page).to have_css(
+              '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+            expect(page).not_to have_css(
+              '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment')
+            expect(find('.js-environment-link')['href']).to match("environments/#{environment.id}")
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'job that failed to deploy and environment has not been created' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) }
+
+        it 'shows deployment message' do
+          expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed'
+
+          expect(page).to have_css(
+            '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+        end
+      end
 
-          expect(page).to have_link('latest deployment')
+      context 'job that will deploy and environment has not been created' do
+        let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline) }
+        let!(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project) }
+
+        it 'shows deployment message' do
+          expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
+
+          expect(page).to have_css(
+            '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
+          expect(page).not_to have_css(
+            '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment')
         end
       end
     end
@@ -392,7 +542,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
         visit project_job_path(project, job)
       end
 
-      it 'shows manual action empty state' do
+      it 'shows manual action empty state', :js do
         expect(page).to have_content(job.detailed_status(user).illustration[:title])
         expect(page).to have_content('This job requires a manual action')
         expect(page).to have_content('This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments')
@@ -409,6 +559,30 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'Delayed job' do
+      let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      before do
+        project.add_developer(user)
+        visit project_job_path(project, job)
+      end
+
+      it 'shows delayed job', :js do
+        expect(page).to have_content('This is a scheduled to run in')
+        expect(page).to have_content("This job will automatically run after it's timer finishes.")
+        expect(page).to have_link('Unschedule job')
+      end
+
+      it 'unschedules delayed job and shows manual action', :js do
+        click_link 'Unschedule job'
+
+        wait_for_requests
+        expect(page).to have_content('This job requires a manual action')
+        expect(page).to have_content('This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments')
+        expect(page).to have_link('Trigger this manual action')
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'Non triggered job' do
       let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :created, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
@@ -416,14 +590,14 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
         visit project_job_path(project, job)
       end
 
-      it 'shows empty state' do
+      it 'shows empty state', :js do
         expect(page).to have_content(job.detailed_status(user).illustration[:title])
         expect(page).to have_content('This job has not been triggered yet')
         expect(page).to have_content('This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered')
       end
     end
 
-    context 'Pending job' do
+    context 'Pending job', :js do
       let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :pending, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
       before do
@@ -450,7 +624,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
         end
       end
 
-      context 'without log' do
+      context 'without log', :js do
         let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :canceled, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
         before do
@@ -465,7 +639,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'Skipped job' do
+    context 'Skipped job', :js do
       let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :skipped, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
       before do
@@ -479,7 +653,7 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when job is failed but has no trace' do
+    context 'when job is failed but has no trace', :js do
       let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :failed, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
       it 'renders empty state' do
@@ -542,20 +716,26 @@ describe 'Jobs', :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
     end
   end
 
-  describe "GET /:project/jobs/:id/download" do
+  describe "GET /:project/jobs/:id/download", :js do
     before do
       job.update(legacy_artifacts_file: artifacts_file)
       visit project_job_path(project, job)
+
       click_link 'Download'
     end
 
     context "Build from other project" do
       before do
         job2.update(legacy_artifacts_file: artifacts_file)
-        visit download_project_job_artifacts_path(project, job2)
       end
 
-      it { expect(page.status_code).to eq(404) }
+      it do
+        requests = inspect_requests() do
+          visit download_project_job_artifacts_path(project, job2)
+        end
+
+        expect(requests.first.status_code).to eq(404)
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/labels/sort_labels_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/labels/sort_labels_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..01c3f251173
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/projects/labels/sort_labels_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Sort labels', :js do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project) }
+  let!(:label1) { create(:label, title: 'Foo', description: 'Lorem ipsum', project: project) }
+  let!(:label2) { create(:label, title: 'Bar', description: 'Fusce consequat', project: project) }
+
+  before do
+    project.add_maintainer(user)
+    sign_in(user)
+
+    visit project_labels_path(project)
+  end
+
+  it 'sorts by title by default' do
+    expect(page).to have_button('Name')
+
+    # assert default sorting
+    within '.other-labels' do
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').first.text).to include('Bar')
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').last.text).to include('Foo')
+    end
+  end
+
+  it 'sorts by date' do
+    click_button 'Name'
+
+    sort_options = find('ul.dropdown-menu-sort li').all('a').collect(&:text)
+
+    expect(sort_options[0]).to eq('Name')
+    expect(sort_options[1]).to eq('Name, descending')
+    expect(sort_options[2]).to eq('Last created')
+    expect(sort_options[3]).to eq('Oldest created')
+    expect(sort_options[4]).to eq('Last updated')
+    expect(sort_options[5]).to eq('Oldest updated')
+
+    click_link 'Name, descending'
+
+    # assert default sorting
+    within '.other-labels' do
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').first.text).to include('Foo')
+      expect(page.all('.label-list-item').last.text).to include('Bar')
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/members/share_with_group_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/members/invite_group_spec.rb
index c6d85e5d22f..fceead0b45e 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/members/share_with_group_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/members/invite_group_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-describe 'Project > Members > Share with Group', :js do
+describe 'Project > Members > Invite group', :js do
   include Select2Helper
   include ActionView::Helpers::DateHelper
 
@@ -8,17 +8,16 @@ describe 'Project > Members > Share with Group', :js do
 
   describe 'Share with group lock' do
     shared_examples 'the project can be shared with groups' do
-      it 'the "Share with group" tab exists' do
+      it 'the "Invite group" tab exists' do
         visit project_settings_members_path(project)
-        expect(page).to have_selector('#share-with-group-tab')
+        expect(page).to have_selector('#invite-group-tab')
       end
     end
 
     shared_examples 'the project cannot be shared with groups' do
-      it 'the "Share with group" tab does not exist' do
+      it 'the "Invite group" tab does not exist' do
         visit project_settings_members_path(project)
-        expect(page).to have_selector('#add-member-tab')
-        expect(page).not_to have_selector('#share-with-group-tab')
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector('#invite-group-tab')
       end
     end
 
@@ -37,11 +36,11 @@ describe 'Project > Members > Share with Group', :js do
         it 'the project can be shared with another group' do
           visit project_settings_members_path(project)
 
-          click_on 'share-with-group-tab'
+          click_on 'invite-group-tab'
 
           select2 group_to_share_with.id, from: '#link_group_id'
           page.find('body').click
-          find('.btn-create').click
+          find('.btn-success').click
 
           page.within('.project-members-groups') do
             expect(page).to have_content(group_to_share_with.name)
@@ -117,13 +116,13 @@ describe 'Project > Members > Share with Group', :js do
 
       visit project_settings_members_path(project)
 
-      click_on 'share-with-group-tab'
+      click_on 'invite-group-tab'
 
       select2 group.id, from: '#link_group_id'
 
       fill_in 'expires_at_groups', with: (Time.now + 4.5.days).strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
-      click_on 'share-with-group-tab'
-      find('.btn-create').click
+      click_on 'invite-group-tab'
+      find('.btn-success').click
     end
 
     it 'the group link shows the expiration time with a warning class' do
@@ -150,7 +149,7 @@ describe 'Project > Members > Share with Group', :js do
 
         visit project_settings_members_path(project)
 
-        click_link 'Share with group'
+        click_link 'Invite group'
 
         find('.ajax-groups-select.select2-container')
 
@@ -183,7 +182,7 @@ describe 'Project > Members > Share with Group', :js do
       it 'the groups dropdown does not show ancestors', :nested_groups do
         visit project_settings_members_path(project)
 
-        click_on 'share-with-group-tab'
+        click_on 'invite-group-tab'
         click_link 'Search for a group'
 
         page.within '.select2-drop' do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb
index bbe08ff83ff..75c72a68069 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/new_project_spec.rb
@@ -12,8 +12,9 @@ describe 'New project' do
   it 'shows "New project" page', :js do
     visit new_project_path
 
-    expect(page).to have_content('Project path')
     expect(page).to have_content('Project name')
+    expect(page).to have_content('Project URL')
+    expect(page).to have_content('Project slug')
 
     find('#import-project-tab').click
 
@@ -65,12 +66,34 @@ describe 'New project' do
   end
 
   context 'Readme selector' do
-    it 'shows the initialize with Readme checkbox' do
+    it 'shows the initialize with Readme checkbox on "Blank project" tab' do
       visit new_project_path
 
       expect(page).to have_css('input#project_initialize_with_readme')
       expect(page).to have_content('Initialize repository with a README')
     end
+
+    it 'does not show the initialize with Readme checkbox on "Create from template" tab' do
+      visit new_project_path
+      find('#create-from-template-pane').click
+      first('.choose-template').click
+
+      page.within '.project-fields-form' do
+        expect(page).not_to have_css('input#project_initialize_with_readme')
+        expect(page).not_to have_content('Initialize repository with a README')
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'does not show the initialize with Readme checkbox on "Import project" tab' do
+      visit new_project_path
+      find('#import-project-tab').click
+      first('.js-import-git-toggle-button').click
+
+      page.within '.toggle-import-form' do
+        expect(page).not_to have_css('input#project_initialize_with_readme')
+        expect(page).not_to have_content('Initialize repository with a README')
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   context 'Namespace selector' do
@@ -187,7 +210,7 @@ describe 'New project' do
         collision_project = create(:project, name: 'test-name-collision', namespace: user.namespace)
 
         fill_in 'project_import_url', with: collision_project.http_url_to_repo
-        fill_in 'project_path', with: collision_project.path
+        fill_in 'project_name', with: collision_project.name
 
         click_on 'Create project'
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipeline_spec.rb
index 4d659cb988e..8cdefebd4ce 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -31,6 +31,11 @@ describe 'Pipeline', :js do
              pipeline: pipeline, stage: 'deploy', name: 'manual-build')
     end
 
+    let!(:build_scheduled) do
+      create(:ci_build, :scheduled,
+             pipeline: pipeline, stage: 'deploy', name: 'delayed-job')
+    end
+
     let!(:build_external) do
       create(:generic_commit_status, status: 'success',
                                      pipeline: pipeline,
@@ -84,10 +89,12 @@ describe 'Pipeline', :js do
           end
         end
 
-        it 'should be possible to cancel the running build' do
+        it 'cancels the running build and shows retry button' do
           find('#ci-badge-deploy .ci-action-icon-container').click
 
-          expect(page).not_to have_content('Cancel running')
+          page.within('#ci-badge-deploy') do
+            expect(page).to have_css('.js-icon-retry')
+          end
         end
       end
 
@@ -110,6 +117,27 @@ describe 'Pipeline', :js do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when pipeline has a delayed job' do
+        it 'shows the scheduled icon and an unschedule action for the delayed job' do
+          page.within('#ci-badge-delayed-job') do
+            expect(page).to have_selector('.js-ci-status-icon-scheduled')
+            expect(page).to have_content('delayed-job')
+          end
+
+          page.within('#ci-badge-delayed-job .ci-action-icon-container.js-icon-time-out') do
+            expect(page).to have_selector('svg')
+          end
+        end
+
+        it 'unschedules the delayed job and shows play button as a manual job' do
+          find('#ci-badge-delayed-job .ci-action-icon-container').click
+
+          page.within('#ci-badge-delayed-job') do
+            expect(page).to have_css('.js-icon-play')
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'when pipeline has failed builds' do
         it 'shows the failed icon and a retry action for the failed build' do
           page.within('#ci-badge-test') do
@@ -332,6 +360,18 @@ describe 'Pipeline', :js do
       it { expect(build_manual.reload).to be_pending }
     end
 
+    context 'when user unschedules a delayed job' do
+      before do
+        within '.pipeline-holder' do
+          click_link('Unschedule')
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'unschedules the delayed job and shows play button as a manual job' do
+        expect(page).to have_content('Trigger this manual action')
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'failed jobs' do
       it 'displays a tooltip with the failure reason' do
         page.within('.ci-table') do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipelines_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipelines_spec.rb
index 26a92f14787..17772a35779 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipelines_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/pipelines/pipelines_spec.rb
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ describe 'Pipelines', :js do
     before do
       sign_in(user)
       project.add_developer(user)
+      project.update!(auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false })
     end
 
     describe 'GET /:project/pipelines' do
@@ -231,6 +232,60 @@ describe 'Pipelines', :js do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when there is a delayed job' do
+        let!(:delayed_job) do
+          create(:ci_build, :scheduled,
+            pipeline: pipeline,
+            name: 'delayed job',
+            stage: 'test',
+            commands: 'test')
+        end
+
+        before do
+          visit_project_pipelines
+        end
+
+        it 'has a dropdown for actionable jobs' do
+          expect(page).to have_selector('.dropdown-new.btn.btn-default .icon-play')
+        end
+
+        it "has link to the delayed job's action" do
+          find('.js-pipeline-dropdown-manual-actions').click
+
+          time_diff = [0, delayed_job.scheduled_at - Time.now].max
+          expect(page).to have_button('delayed job')
+          expect(page).to have_content(Time.at(time_diff).utc.strftime("%H:%M:%S"))
+        end
+
+        context 'when delayed job is expired already' do
+          let!(:delayed_job) do
+            create(:ci_build, :expired_scheduled,
+              pipeline: pipeline,
+              name: 'delayed job',
+              stage: 'test',
+              commands: 'test')
+          end
+
+          it "shows 00:00:00 as the remaining time" do
+            find('.js-pipeline-dropdown-manual-actions').click
+
+            expect(page).to have_content("00:00:00")
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when user played a delayed job immediately' do
+          before do
+            find('.js-pipeline-dropdown-manual-actions').click
+            page.accept_confirm { click_button('delayed job') }
+            wait_for_requests
+          end
+
+          it 'enqueues the delayed job', :js do
+            expect(delayed_job.reload).to be_pending
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'for generic statuses' do
         context 'when running' do
           let!(:running) do
@@ -641,6 +696,7 @@ describe 'Pipelines', :js do
 
   context 'when user is not logged in' do
     before do
+      project.update!(auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false })
       visit project_pipelines_path(project)
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/services/user_activates_mattermost_slash_command_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/services/user_activates_mattermost_slash_command_spec.rb
index 25b74cc481d..70f3a812ee9 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/services/user_activates_mattermost_slash_command_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/services/user_activates_mattermost_slash_command_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-describe 'Setup Mattermost slash commands', :js do
+describe 'Set up Mattermost slash commands', :js do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
   let(:service) { project.create_mattermost_slash_commands_service }
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/integration_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/integration_settings_spec.rb
index 8745ff72df0..32959969f54 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/integration_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/integration_settings_spec.rb
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ describe 'Projects > Settings > Integration settings' do
 
         fill_in 'hook_url', with: url
         check 'Tag push events'
+        fill_in 'hook_push_events_branch_filter', with: 'master'
         check 'Enable SSL verification'
         check 'Job events'
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb
index 30b0a5578ea..6f8ec0015ad 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/pipelines_settings_spec.rb
@@ -137,5 +137,29 @@ describe "Projects > Settings > Pipelines settings" do
         end
       end
     end
+
+    describe 'runners registration token' do
+      let!(:token) { project.runners_token }
+
+      before do
+        visit project_settings_ci_cd_path(project)
+      end
+
+      it 'has a registration token' do
+        expect(page.find('#registration_token')).to have_content(token)
+      end
+
+      describe 'reload registration token' do
+        let(:page_token) { find('#registration_token').text }
+
+        before do
+          click_button 'Reset runners registration token'
+        end
+
+        it 'changes registration token' do
+          expect(page_token).not_to eq token
+        end
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/project_badges_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/project_badges_spec.rb
index 2ec94274f80..42b5547d43b 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/project_badges_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/project_badges_spec.rb
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ describe 'Project Badges' do
     group.add_maintainer(user)
     sign_in(user)
 
-    visit(project_settings_badges_path(project))
+    visit(edit_project_path(project))
   end
 
   it 'shows a list of badges', :js do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/user_changes_default_branch_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/user_changes_default_branch_spec.rb
index e925539351d..fcf05e04a5c 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/user_changes_default_branch_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/user_changes_default_branch_spec.rb
@@ -1,20 +1,35 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe 'Projects > Settings > User changes default branch' do
+  include Select2Helper
+
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, namespace: user.namespace) }
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
-    visit edit_project_path(project)
+
+    visit project_settings_repository_path(project)
   end
 
-  it 'allows to change the default branch' do
-    select 'fix', from: 'project_default_branch'
-    page.within '.general-settings' do
-      click_button 'Save changes'
+  context 'with normal project' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, namespace: user.namespace) }
+
+    it 'allows to change the default branch', :js do
+      select2('fix', from: '#project_default_branch')
+
+      page.within '#default-branch-settings' do
+        click_button 'Save changes'
+      end
+
+      expect(find('#project_default_branch', visible: false).value).to eq 'fix'
     end
+  end
 
-    expect(find(:css, 'select#project_default_branch').value).to eq 'fix'
+  context 'with empty project' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project_empty_repo, namespace: user.namespace) }
+
+    it 'does not show default branch selector' do
+      expect(page).not_to have_selector('#project_default_branch')
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/user_manages_group_links_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/user_manages_group_links_spec.rb
index 2f1824d7849..676659b90c3 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/user_manages_group_links_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/user_manages_group_links_spec.rb
@@ -26,13 +26,13 @@ describe 'Projects > Settings > User manages group links' do
     end
   end
 
-  it 'shares a project with a group', :js do
-    click_link('Share with group')
+  it 'invites a group to a project', :js do
+    click_link('Invite group')
 
     select2(group_market.id, from: '#link_group_id')
     select('Maintainer', from: 'link_group_access')
 
-    click_button('Share')
+    click_button('Invite')
 
     page.within('.project-members-groups') do
       expect(page).to have_content('Market')
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/settings/user_tags_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/settings/user_tags_project_spec.rb
index 57b4b1287fa..9357215ae6f 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/settings/user_tags_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/settings/user_tags_project_spec.rb
@@ -9,15 +9,13 @@ describe 'Projects > Settings > User tags a project' do
     visit edit_project_path(project)
   end
 
-  context 'when a project is archived' do
-    it 'unarchives a project' do
-      fill_in 'Tags', with: 'tag1, tag2'
+  it 'sets project tags' do
+    fill_in 'Tags', with: 'tag1, tag2'
 
-      page.within '.general-settings' do
-        click_button 'Save changes'
-      end
-
-      expect(find_field('Tags').value).to eq 'tag1, tag2'
+    page.within '.general-settings' do
+      click_button 'Save changes'
     end
+
+    expect(find_field('Tags').value).to eq 'tag1, tag2'
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/show/user_interacts_with_auto_devops_banner_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/show/user_interacts_with_auto_devops_banner_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..baf715000a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/projects/show/user_interacts_with_auto_devops_banner_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Project > Show > User interacts with auto devops implicitly enabled banner' do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    project.add_user(user, role)
+    sign_in(user)
+  end
+
+  context 'when user does not have maintainer access' do
+    let(:role) { :developer }
+
+    context 'when AutoDevOps is implicitly enabled' do
+      it 'does not display AutoDevOps implicitly enabled banner' do
+        expect(page).not_to have_css('.auto-devops-implicitly-enabled-banner')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when user has mantainer access' do
+    let(:role) { :maintainer }
+
+    context 'when AutoDevOps is implicitly enabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: true)
+
+        visit project_path(project)
+      end
+
+      it 'display AutoDevOps implicitly enabled banner' do
+        expect(page).to have_css('.auto-devops-implicitly-enabled-banner')
+      end
+
+      context 'when user dismisses the banner', :js do
+        it 'does not display AutoDevOps implicitly enabled banner' do
+          find('.hide-auto-devops-implicitly-enabled-banner').click
+          wait_for_requests
+          visit project_path(project)
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_css('.auto-devops-implicitly-enabled-banner')
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when AutoDevOps is not implicitly enabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: false)
+
+        visit project_path(project)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not display AutoDevOps implicitly enabled banner' do
+        expect(page).not_to have_css('.auto-devops-implicitly-enabled-banner')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/show/user_sees_setup_shortcut_buttons_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/show/user_sees_setup_shortcut_buttons_spec.rb
index 0405e21a0d7..6fe21579e8e 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/show/user_sees_setup_shortcut_buttons_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/show/user_sees_setup_shortcut_buttons_spec.rb
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe 'Projects > Show > User sees setup shortcut buttons' do
-  # For "New file", "Add License" functionality,
+  # For "New file", "Add license" functionality,
   # see spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_creates_license_file_spec.rb
   # see spec/features/projects/files/project_owner_sees_link_to_create_license_file_in_empty_project_spec.rb
 
@@ -28,8 +28,6 @@ describe 'Projects > Show > User sees setup shortcut buttons' do
       end
 
       it '"Auto DevOps enabled" button not linked' do
-        project.create_auto_devops!(enabled: true)
-
         visit project_path(project)
 
         page.within('.project-stats') do
@@ -58,26 +56,30 @@ describe 'Projects > Show > User sees setup shortcut buttons' do
         end
       end
 
-      it '"Add License" button linked to new file populated for a license' do
-        page.within('.project-stats') do
-          expect(page).to have_link('Add License', href: presenter.add_license_path)
+      it '"Add license" button linked to new file populated for a license' do
+        page.within('.project-metadata') do
+          expect(page).to have_link('Add license', href: presenter.add_license_path)
         end
       end
 
       describe 'Auto DevOps button' do
-        it '"Enable Auto DevOps" button linked to settings page' do
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+        context 'when Auto DevOps is enabled' do
+          it '"Auto DevOps enabled" anchor linked to settings page' do
+            visit project_path(project)
+
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+            end
           end
         end
 
-        it '"Auto DevOps enabled" anchor linked to settings page' do
-          project.create_auto_devops!(enabled: true)
+        context 'when Auto DevOps is not enabled' do
+          let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :empty_repo, auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false }) }
 
-          visit project_path(project)
-
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+          it '"Enable Auto DevOps" button linked to settings page' do
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+            end
           end
         end
       end
@@ -113,27 +115,31 @@ describe 'Projects > Show > User sees setup shortcut buttons' do
         visit project_path(project)
       end
 
-      it 'no Auto DevOps button if can not manage pipelines' do
-        page.within('.project-stats') do
-          expect(page).not_to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps')
-          expect(page).not_to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled')
+      context 'when Auto DevOps is enabled' do
+        it '"Auto DevOps enabled" button not linked' do
+          visit project_path(project)
+
+          page.within('.project-stats') do
+            expect(page).to have_text('Auto DevOps enabled')
+          end
         end
       end
 
-      it '"Auto DevOps enabled" button not linked' do
-        project.create_auto_devops!(enabled: true)
-
-        visit project_path(project)
+      context 'when Auto DevOps is not enabled' do
+        let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository, auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false }) }
 
-        page.within('.project-stats') do
-          expect(page).to have_text('Auto DevOps enabled')
+        it 'no Auto DevOps button if can not manage pipelines' do
+          page.within('.project-stats') do
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps')
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled')
+          end
         end
-      end
 
-      it 'no Kubernetes cluster button if can not manage clusters' do
-        page.within('.project-stats') do
-          expect(page).not_to have_link('Add Kubernetes cluster')
-          expect(page).not_to have_link('Kubernetes configured')
+        it 'no Kubernetes cluster button if can not manage clusters' do
+          page.within('.project-stats') do
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Add Kubernetes cluster')
+            expect(page).not_to have_link('Kubernetes configured')
+          end
         end
       end
     end
@@ -201,13 +207,13 @@ describe 'Projects > Show > User sees setup shortcut buttons' do
         end
       end
 
-      it 'no "Add License" button if the project already has a license' do
+      it 'no "Add license" button if the project already has a license' do
         visit project_path(project)
 
         expect(project.repository.license_blob).not_to be_nil
 
         page.within('.project-stats') do
-          expect(page).not_to have_link('Add License')
+          expect(page).not_to have_link('Add license')
         end
       end
 
@@ -222,97 +228,105 @@ describe 'Projects > Show > User sees setup shortcut buttons' do
       end
 
       describe 'GitLab CI configuration button' do
-        it '"Set up CI/CD" button linked to new file populated for a .gitlab-ci.yml' do
-          visit project_path(project)
-
-          expect(project.repository.gitlab_ci_yml).to be_nil
+        context 'when Auto DevOps is enabled' do
+          it 'no "Set up CI/CD" button if the project has Auto DevOps enabled' do
+            visit project_path(project)
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).to have_link('Set up CI/CD', href: presenter.add_ci_yml_path)
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).not_to have_link('Set up CI/CD')
+            end
           end
         end
 
-        it 'no "Set up CI/CD" button if the project already has a .gitlab-ci.yml' do
-          Files::CreateService.new(
-            project,
-            project.creator,
-            start_branch: 'master',
-            branch_name: 'master',
-            commit_message: "Add .gitlab-ci.yml",
-            file_path: '.gitlab-ci.yml',
-            file_content: File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/support/gitlab_stubs/gitlab_ci.yml'))
-          ).execute
+        context 'when Auto DevOps is not enabled' do
+          let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository, auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false }) }
 
-          expect(project.repository.gitlab_ci_yml).not_to be_nil
+          it '"Set up CI/CD" button linked to new file populated for a .gitlab-ci.yml' do
+            visit project_path(project)
 
-          visit project_path(project)
+            expect(project.repository.gitlab_ci_yml).to be_nil
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).not_to have_link('Set up CI/CD')
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).to have_link('Set up CI/CD', href: presenter.add_ci_yml_path)
+            end
           end
-        end
 
-        it 'no "Set up CI/CD" button if the project has Auto DevOps enabled' do
-          project.create_auto_devops!(enabled: true)
+          it 'no "Set up CI/CD" button if the project already has a .gitlab-ci.yml' do
+            Files::CreateService.new(
+              project,
+              project.creator,
+              start_branch: 'master',
+              branch_name: 'master',
+              commit_message: "Add .gitlab-ci.yml",
+              file_path: '.gitlab-ci.yml',
+              file_content: File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/support/gitlab_stubs/gitlab_ci.yml'))
+            ).execute
 
-          visit project_path(project)
+            expect(project.repository.gitlab_ci_yml).not_to be_nil
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).not_to have_link('Set up CI/CD')
+            visit project_path(project)
+
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).not_to have_link('Set up CI/CD')
+            end
           end
         end
       end
 
       describe 'Auto DevOps button' do
-        it '"Enable Auto DevOps" button linked to settings page' do
-          visit project_path(project)
+        context 'when Auto DevOps is enabled' do
+          it '"Auto DevOps enabled" anchor linked to settings page' do
+            visit project_path(project)
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+            end
           end
         end
 
-        it '"Enable Auto DevOps" button linked to settings page' do
-          project.create_auto_devops!(enabled: true)
+        context 'when Auto DevOps is not enabled' do
+          let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository, auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false }) }
 
-          visit project_path(project)
+          it '"Enable Auto DevOps" button linked to settings page' do
+            visit project_path(project)
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps', href: project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
+            end
           end
-        end
 
-        it 'no Auto DevOps button if Auto DevOps callout is shown' do
-          allow_any_instance_of(AutoDevopsHelper).to receive(:show_auto_devops_callout?).and_return(true)
+          it 'no Auto DevOps button if Auto DevOps callout is shown' do
+            allow_any_instance_of(AutoDevopsHelper).to receive(:show_auto_devops_callout?).and_return(true)
 
-          visit project_path(project)
+            visit project_path(project)
 
-          expect(page).to have_selector('.js-autodevops-banner')
+            expect(page).to have_selector('.js-autodevops-banner')
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).not_to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps')
-            expect(page).not_to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled')
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).not_to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps')
+              expect(page).not_to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled')
+            end
           end
-        end
 
-        it 'no "Enable Auto DevOps" button when .gitlab-ci.yml already exists' do
-          Files::CreateService.new(
-            project,
-            project.creator,
-            start_branch: 'master',
-            branch_name: 'master',
-            commit_message: "Add .gitlab-ci.yml",
-            file_path: '.gitlab-ci.yml',
-            file_content: File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/support/gitlab_stubs/gitlab_ci.yml'))
-          ).execute
+          it 'no "Enable Auto DevOps" button when .gitlab-ci.yml already exists' do
+            Files::CreateService.new(
+              project,
+              project.creator,
+              start_branch: 'master',
+              branch_name: 'master',
+              commit_message: "Add .gitlab-ci.yml",
+              file_path: '.gitlab-ci.yml',
+              file_content: File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/support/gitlab_stubs/gitlab_ci.yml'))
+            ).execute
 
-          expect(project.repository.gitlab_ci_yml).not_to be_nil
+            expect(project.repository.gitlab_ci_yml).not_to be_nil
 
-          visit project_path(project)
+            visit project_path(project)
 
-          page.within('.project-stats') do
-            expect(page).not_to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps')
-            expect(page).not_to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled')
+            page.within('.project-stats') do
+              expect(page).not_to have_link('Enable Auto DevOps')
+              expect(page).not_to have_link('Auto DevOps enabled')
+            end
           end
         end
       end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/tags/user_views_tags_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/tags/user_views_tags_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f344b682715
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/projects/tags/user_views_tags_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'User views tags', :feature do
+  context 'rss' do
+    shared_examples 'has access to the tags RSS feed' do
+      it do
+        visit project_tags_path(project, format: :atom)
+
+        expect(page).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      end
+    end
+
+    shared_examples 'does not have access to the tags RSS feed' do
+      it do
+        visit project_tags_path(project, format: :atom)
+
+        expect(page).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when project public' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PUBLIC) }
+
+      context 'when user signed in' do
+        let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+        before do
+          project.add_developer(user)
+          sign_in(user)
+          visit project_tags_path(project)
+        end
+
+        it_behaves_like "it has an RSS button with current_user's feed token"
+        it_behaves_like "an autodiscoverable RSS feed with current_user's feed token"
+        it_behaves_like 'has access to the tags RSS feed'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user signed out' do
+        before do
+          visit project_tags_path(project)
+        end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'it has an RSS button without a feed token'
+        it_behaves_like 'an autodiscoverable RSS feed without a feed token'
+        it_behaves_like 'has access to the tags RSS feed'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when project is not public' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE) }
+
+      context 'when user signed in' do
+        let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+        before do
+          project.add_developer(user)
+          sign_in(user)
+        end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'has access to the tags RSS feed'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user signed out' do
+        it_behaves_like 'does not have access to the tags RSS feed'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/tree/create_directory_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/tree/create_directory_spec.rb
index 9e58280b868..2cb2a23b7be 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/tree/create_directory_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/tree/create_directory_spec.rb
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ describe 'Multi-file editor new directory', :js do
     find('.js-ide-commit-mode').click
 
     find('.multi-file-commit-list-item').hover
-    first('.multi-file-discard-btn .btn').click
+    click_button 'Stage'
 
     fill_in('commit-message', with: 'commit message ide')
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/tree/create_file_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/tree/create_file_spec.rb
index a04d3566a7e..9f5524da8e9 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/tree/create_file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/tree/create_file_spec.rb
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ describe 'Multi-file editor new file', :js do
     find('.js-ide-commit-mode').click
 
     find('.multi-file-commit-list-item').hover
-    first('.multi-file-discard-btn .btn').click
+    click_button 'Stage'
 
     fill_in('commit-message', with: 'commit message ide')
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/tree/tree_show_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/tree/tree_show_spec.rb
index 8ae036cd29f..45e81e1c040 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/tree/tree_show_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/tree/tree_show_spec.rb
@@ -4,16 +4,30 @@ describe 'Projects tree', :js do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
 
+  # This commit has a known state on the master branch of gitlab-test
+  let(:test_sha) { '7975be0116940bf2ad4321f79d02a55c5f7779aa' }
+
   before do
     project.add_maintainer(user)
     sign_in(user)
   end
 
   it 'renders tree table without errors' do
-    visit project_tree_path(project, 'master')
+    visit project_tree_path(project, test_sha)
+    wait_for_requests
+
+    expect(page).to have_selector('.tree-item')
+    expect(page).to have_content('add tests for .gitattributes custom highlighting')
+    expect(page).not_to have_selector('.flash-alert')
+    expect(page).not_to have_selector('.label-lfs', text: 'LFS')
+  end
+
+  it 'renders tree table for a subtree without errors' do
+    visit project_tree_path(project, File.join(test_sha, 'files'))
     wait_for_requests
 
     expect(page).to have_selector('.tree-item')
+    expect(page).to have_content('add spaces in whitespace file')
     expect(page).not_to have_selector('.label-lfs', text: 'LFS')
     expect(page).not_to have_selector('.flash-alert')
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb
index 83d18996f4e..8d7e2883b2a 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/user_creates_project_spec.rb
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ describe 'User creates a project', :js do
   it 'creates a new project' do
     visit(new_project_path)
 
-    fill_in(:project_path, with: 'Empty')
+    fill_in(:project_name, with: 'Empty')
 
     page.within('#content-body') do
       click_button('Create project')
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ describe 'User creates a project', :js do
     it 'creates a new project' do
       visit(new_project_path)
 
+      fill_in :project_name, with: 'A Subgroup Project'
       fill_in :project_path, with: 'a-subgroup-project'
 
       page.find('.js-select-namespace').click
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ describe 'User creates a project', :js do
         click_button('Create project')
       end
 
-      expect(page).to have_content("Project 'a-subgroup-project' was successfully created")
+      expect(page).to have_content("Project 'A Subgroup Project' was successfully created")
 
       project = Project.last
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/markdown_preview_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/markdown_preview_spec.rb
index ed5f8105487..f505023d1d0 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/markdown_preview_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/wiki/markdown_preview_spec.rb
@@ -162,6 +162,34 @@ describe 'Projects > Wiki > User previews markdown changes', :js do
         expect(page.html).to include("<a href=\"/#{project.full_path}/wikis/title%20with%20spaces\">spaced link</a>")
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when rendering the preview' do
+      it 'renders content with CommonMark' do
+        create_wiki_page 'a-page/b-page/c-page/common-mark'
+        click_link 'Edit'
+
+        fill_in :wiki_content, with: "1. one\n  - sublist\n"
+        click_on "Preview"
+
+        # the above generates two seperate lists (not embedded) in CommonMark
+        expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+        expect(page).not_to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+      end
+
+      it 'renders content with RedCarpet when legacy_render is set' do
+        wiki_page = create(:wiki_page,
+                           wiki: project.wiki,
+                           attrs: { title: 'home', content: "Empty content" })
+        visit(project_wiki_edit_path(project, wiki_page, legacy_render: 1))
+
+        fill_in :wiki_content, with: "1. one\n  - sublist\n"
+        click_on "Preview"
+
+        # the above generates a sublist list in RedCarpet
+        expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+        expect(page).to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   it "does not linkify double brackets inside code blocks as expected" do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_creates_wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_creates_wiki_page_spec.rb
index 149eeb4f9ba..b30286e4446 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_creates_wiki_page_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_creates_wiki_page_spec.rb
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ describe "User creates wiki page" do
           expect(page).to have_selector(".katex", count: 3).and have_content("2+2 is 4")
         end
       end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'wiki file attachments'
     end
 
     context "in a group namespace", :js do
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_deletes_wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_deletes_wiki_page_spec.rb
index 5007794cd77..18ccd31f3d0 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_deletes_wiki_page_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_deletes_wiki_page_spec.rb
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ describe 'User deletes wiki page', :js do
   it 'deletes a page' do
     click_on('Edit')
     click_on('Delete')
-    find('.js-modal-primary-action').click
+    find('.modal-footer .btn-danger').click
 
     expect(page).to have_content('Page was successfully deleted')
   end
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_updates_wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_updates_wiki_page_spec.rb
index 2840d28cf30..2ce5ee0e87d 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_updates_wiki_page_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_updates_wiki_page_spec.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe 'User updates wiki page' do
   shared_examples 'wiki page user update' do
     let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
     before do
       project.add_maintainer(user)
       sign_in(user)
@@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
 
           expect(page).to have_content('Updated Wiki Content')
         end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'wiki file attachments'
       end
     end
 
@@ -64,14 +67,14 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
 
       before do
         visit(project_wikis_path(project))
+
+        click_link('Edit')
       end
 
       context 'in a user namespace' do
         let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo, namespace: user.namespace) }
 
         it 'updates a page' do
-          click_link('Edit')
-
           # Commit message field should have correct value.
           expect(page).to have_field('wiki[message]', with: 'Update home')
 
@@ -84,8 +87,6 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
         end
 
         it 'shows a validation error message' do
-          click_link('Edit')
-
           fill_in(:wiki_content, with: '')
           click_button('Save changes')
 
@@ -97,8 +98,6 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
         end
 
         it 'shows the emoji autocompletion dropdown', :js do
-          click_link('Edit')
-
           find('#wiki_content').native.send_keys('')
           fill_in(:wiki_content, with: ':')
 
@@ -106,8 +105,6 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
         end
 
         it 'shows the error message' do
-          click_link('Edit')
-
           wiki_page.update(content: 'Update')
 
           click_button('Save changes')
@@ -116,30 +113,27 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
         end
 
         it 'updates a page' do
-          click_on('Edit')
           fill_in('Content', with: 'Updated Wiki Content')
           click_on('Save changes')
 
           expect(page).to have_content('Updated Wiki Content')
         end
 
-        it 'cancels edititng of a page' do
-          click_on('Edit')
-
+        it 'cancels editing of a page' do
           page.within(:css, '.wiki-form .form-actions') do
             click_on('Cancel')
           end
 
           expect(current_path).to eq(project_wiki_path(project, wiki_page))
         end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'wiki file attachments'
       end
 
       context 'in a group namespace' do
         let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo, namespace: create(:group, :public)) }
 
         it 'updates a page' do
-          click_link('Edit')
-
           # Commit message field should have correct value.
           expect(page).to have_field('wiki[message]', with: 'Update home')
 
@@ -151,6 +145,8 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
           expect(page).to have_content("Last edited by #{user.name}")
           expect(page).to have_content('My awesome wiki!')
         end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'wiki file attachments'
       end
     end
 
@@ -222,6 +218,8 @@ describe 'User updates wiki page' do
 
         expect(current_path).to eq(project_wiki_path(project, "foo1/bar1/#{page_name}"))
       end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'wiki file attachments'
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb
index 760324adacc..9a4ce426e69 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects/wiki/user_views_wiki_page_spec.rb
@@ -83,17 +83,18 @@ describe 'User views a wiki page' do
       end
 
       it 'shows a file stored in a page' do
-        gollum_file_double = double('Gollum::File',
-                                    mime_type: 'image/jpeg',
-                                    name: 'images/image.jpg',
-                                    path: 'images/image.jpg',
-                                    raw_data: '')
-        wiki_file = Gitlab::Git::WikiFile.new(gollum_file_double)
+        raw_file = Gitlab::GitalyClient::WikiFile.new(
+          mime_type: 'image/jpeg',
+          name: 'images/image.jpg',
+          path: 'images/image.jpg',
+          raw_data: ''
+        )
+        wiki_file = Gitlab::Git::WikiFile.new(raw_file)
 
         allow(wiki_file).to receive(:mime_type).and_return('image/jpeg')
         allow_any_instance_of(ProjectWiki).to receive(:find_file).with('image.jpg', nil).and_return(wiki_file)
 
-        expect(page).to have_xpath('//img[@data-src="image.jpg"]')
+        expect(page).to have_xpath("//img[@data-src='#{project.wiki.wiki_base_path}/image.jpg']")
         expect(page).to have_link('image', href: "#{project.wiki.wiki_base_path}/image.jpg")
 
         click_on('image')
diff --git a/spec/features/projects_spec.rb b/spec/features/projects_spec.rb
index 56ed0c936a6..8e310f38a8c 100644
--- a/spec/features/projects_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/projects_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe 'Project' do
   include ProjectForksHelper
+  include MobileHelpers
 
   describe 'creating from template' do
     let(:user)    { create(:user) }
@@ -15,7 +16,7 @@ describe 'Project' do
     it "allows creation from templates", :js do
       find('#create-from-template-tab').click
       find("label[for=#{template.name}]").click
-      fill_in("project_path", with: template.name)
+      fill_in("project_name", with: template.name)
 
       page.within '#content-body' do
         click_button "Create project"
@@ -54,25 +55,72 @@ describe 'Project' do
     it 'parses Markdown' do
       project.update_attribute(:description, 'This is **my** project')
       visit path
-      expect(page).to have_css('.project-home-desc > p > strong')
+      expect(page).to have_css('.project-description > .project-description-markdown > p > strong')
     end
 
     it 'passes through html-pipeline' do
       project.update_attribute(:description, 'This project is the :poop:')
       visit path
-      expect(page).to have_css('.project-home-desc > p > gl-emoji')
+      expect(page).to have_css('.project-description > .project-description-markdown > p > gl-emoji')
     end
 
     it 'sanitizes unwanted tags' do
       project.update_attribute(:description, "```\ncode\n```")
       visit path
-      expect(page).not_to have_css('.project-home-desc code')
+      expect(page).not_to have_css('.project-description code')
     end
 
     it 'permits `rel` attribute on links' do
       project.update_attribute(:description, 'https://google.com/')
       visit path
-      expect(page).to have_css('.project-home-desc a[rel]')
+      expect(page).to have_css('.project-description a[rel]')
+    end
+
+    context 'read more', :js do
+      let(:read_more_selector)         { '.read-more-container' }
+      let(:read_more_trigger_selector) { '.project-home-desc .js-read-more-trigger' }
+
+      it 'does not display "read more" link on desktop breakpoint' do
+        project.update_attribute(:description, 'This is **my** project')
+        visit path
+
+        expect(find(read_more_trigger_selector, visible: false)).not_to be_visible
+      end
+
+      it 'displays "read more" link on mobile breakpoint' do
+        project.update_attribute(:description, 'This is **my** project')
+        visit path
+        resize_screen_xs
+
+        find(read_more_trigger_selector).click
+
+        expect(page).to have_css('.project-description .is-expanded')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'copy clone URL to clipboard', :js do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let(:path)    { project_path(project) }
+
+    before do
+      sign_in(create(:admin))
+      visit path
+    end
+
+    context 'desktop component' do
+      it 'shows on md and larger breakpoints' do
+        expect(find('.git-clone-holder')).to be_visible
+        expect(find('.mobile-git-clone', visible: false)).not_to be_visible
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'mobile component' do
+      it 'shows mobile component on sm and smaller breakpoints' do
+        resize_screen_xs
+        expect(find('.mobile-git-clone')).to be_visible
+        expect(find('.git-clone-holder', visible: false)).not_to be_visible
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/runners_spec.rb b/spec/features/runners_spec.rb
index 0c6cf3dc477..cb7a912946c 100644
--- a/spec/features/runners_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/runners_spec.rb
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ describe 'Runners' do
           expect(page).to have_content 'This group does not provide any group Runners yet'
 
           expect(page).to have_content 'Group maintainers can register group runners in the Group CI/CD settings'
-          expect(page).not_to have_content 'Ask your group maintainer to setup a group Runner'
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'Ask your group maintainer to set up a group Runner'
         end
       end
     end
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ describe 'Runners' do
           expect(page).to have_content 'This group does not provide any group Runners yet.'
 
           expect(page).not_to have_content 'Group maintainers can register group runners in the Group CI/CD settings'
-          expect(page).to have_content 'Ask your group maintainer to setup a group Runner.'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'Ask your group maintainer to set up a group Runner.'
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb b/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb
index 66afe163447..0725ff178ac 100644
--- a/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/search/user_uses_search_filters_spec.rb
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ describe 'User uses search filters', :js do
     visit(search_path)
   end
 
-  context' when filtering by group' do
+  context 'when filtering by group' do
     it 'shows group projects' do
       find('.js-search-group-dropdown').click
 
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ describe 'User uses search filters', :js do
     end
   end
 
-  context' when filtering by project' do
+  context 'when filtering by project' do
     it 'shows a project' do
       page.within('.project-filter') do
         find('.js-search-project-dropdown').click
diff --git a/spec/features/snippets/notes_on_personal_snippets_spec.rb b/spec/features/snippets/notes_on_personal_snippets_spec.rb
index 1442e011d52..eeacaf5f72a 100644
--- a/spec/features/snippets/notes_on_personal_snippets_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/snippets/notes_on_personal_snippets_spec.rb
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ describe 'Comments on personal snippets', :js do
 
       page.within('.current-note-edit-form') do
         fill_in 'note[note]', with: 'new content'
-        find('.btn-save').click
+        find('.btn-success').click
       end
 
       page.within("#notes-list li#note_#{snippet_notes[0].id}") do
diff --git a/spec/features/snippets/show_spec.rb b/spec/features/snippets/show_spec.rb
index 3fe0b60b18f..367a479f62a 100644
--- a/spec/features/snippets/show_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/snippets/show_spec.rb
@@ -68,23 +68,45 @@ describe 'Snippet', :js do
         end
       end
 
-      context 'with cached Redcarpet html' do
-        let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, file_name: file_name, content: content, cached_markdown_version: CacheMarkdownField::CACHE_REDCARPET_VERSION) }
+      context 'Markdown rendering' do
+        let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, file_name: file_name, content: content) }
         let(:file_name) { 'test.md' }
         let(:content) { "1. one\n  - sublist\n" }
 
-        it 'renders correctly' do
-          expect(page).to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+        context 'when rendering default markdown' do
+          it 'renders using CommonMark' do
+            expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+            expect(page).not_to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+          end
         end
-      end
 
-      context 'with cached CommonMark html' do
-        let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, file_name: file_name, content: content, cached_markdown_version: CacheMarkdownField::CACHE_COMMONMARK_VERSION) }
-        let(:file_name) { 'test.md' }
-        let(:content) { "1. one\n  - sublist\n" }
+        context 'when rendering legacy markdown' do
+          before do
+            visit snippet_path(snippet, legacy_render: 1)
 
-        it 'renders correctly' do
-          expect(page).not_to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+            wait_for_requests
+          end
+
+          it 'renders using RedCarpet' do
+            expect(page).to have_content("sublist")
+            expect(page).to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'with cached CommonMark html' do
+          let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, file_name: file_name, content: content, cached_markdown_version: CacheMarkdownField::CACHE_COMMONMARK_VERSION) }
+
+          it 'renders correctly' do
+            expect(page).not_to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'with cached Redcarpet html' do
+          let(:snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, file_name: file_name, content: content, cached_markdown_version: CacheMarkdownField::CACHE_REDCARPET_VERSION) }
+
+          it 'renders correctly' do
+            expect(page).to have_xpath("//ol//li//ul")
+          end
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/features/snippets/user_sees_breadcrumb_links.rb b/spec/features/snippets/user_sees_breadcrumb_links.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..696f2b93390
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/snippets/user_sees_breadcrumb_links.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe 'New user snippet breadcrumbs' do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    sign_in(user)
+    visit new_snippet_path
+  end
+
+  it 'display a link to user snippets and new user snippet pages' do
+    page.within '.breadcrumbs' do
+      expect(find_link('Snippets')[:href]).to end_with(dashboard_snippets_path)
+      expect(find_link('New')[:href]).to end_with(new_snippet_path)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/u2f_spec.rb b/spec/features/u2f_spec.rb
index f245c1ebbd9..ae9b65d1a39 100644
--- a/spec/features/u2f_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/u2f_spec.rb
@@ -3,14 +3,14 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe 'Using U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) Devices for Authentication', :js do
   def manage_two_factor_authentication
     click_on 'Manage two-factor authentication'
-    expect(page).to have_content("Setup new U2F device")
+    expect(page).to have_content("Set up new U2F device")
     wait_for_requests
   end
 
   def register_u2f_device(u2f_device = nil, name: 'My device')
     u2f_device ||= FakeU2fDevice.new(page, name)
     u2f_device.respond_to_u2f_registration
-    click_on 'Setup new U2F device'
+    click_on 'Set up new U2F device'
     expect(page).to have_content('Your device was successfully set up')
     fill_in "Pick a name", with: name
     click_on 'Register U2F device'
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ describe 'Using U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) Devices for Authentication', :js do
         visit profile_account_path
         click_on 'Enable two-factor authentication'
 
-        expect(page).to have_button('Setup new U2F device', disabled: true)
+        expect(page).to have_button('Set up new U2F device', disabled: true)
       end
     end
 
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ describe 'Using U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) Devices for Authentication', :js do
       it 'allows registering a new device with a name' do
         visit profile_account_path
         manage_two_factor_authentication
-        expect(page).to have_content("You've already enabled two-factor authentication using mobile")
+        expect(page).to have_content("You've already enabled two-factor authentication using one time password authenticators")
 
         u2f_device = register_u2f_device
 
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ describe 'Using U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) Devices for Authentication', :js do
       it 'allows deleting a device' do
         visit profile_account_path
         manage_two_factor_authentication
-        expect(page).to have_content("You've already enabled two-factor authentication using mobile")
+        expect(page).to have_content("You've already enabled two-factor authentication using one time password authenticators")
 
         first_u2f_device = register_u2f_device
         second_u2f_device = register_u2f_device(name: 'My other device')
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ describe 'Using U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) Devices for Authentication', :js do
 
         # Have the "u2f device" respond with bad data
         page.execute_script("u2f.register = function(_,_,_,callback) { callback('bad response'); };")
-        click_on 'Setup new U2F device'
+        click_on 'Set up new U2F device'
         expect(page).to have_content('Your device was successfully set up')
         click_on 'Register U2F device'
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ describe 'Using U2F (Universal 2nd Factor) Devices for Authentication', :js do
 
         # Failed registration
         page.execute_script("u2f.register = function(_,_,_,callback) { callback('bad response'); };")
-        click_on 'Setup new U2F device'
+        click_on 'Set up new U2F device'
         expect(page).to have_content('Your device was successfully set up')
         click_on 'Register U2F device'
         expect(page).to have_content("The form contains the following error")
diff --git a/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb b/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..dd8f3179895
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/usage_stats_consent_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Usage stats consent' do
+  context 'when signed in' do
+    let(:user) { create(:admin, created_at: 8.days.ago) }
+    let(:message) { 'To help improve GitLab, we would like to periodically collect usage information.' }
+
+    before do
+      allow(user).to receive(:has_current_license?).and_return false
+
+      gitlab_sign_in(user)
+    end
+
+    it 'hides the banner permanently when sets usage stats' do
+      visit root_dashboard_path
+
+      expect(page).to have_content(message)
+
+      click_link 'Send usage data'
+
+      expect(page).not_to have_content(message)
+      expect(page).to have_content('Application settings saved successfully')
+
+      gitlab_sign_out
+      gitlab_sign_in(user)
+      visit root_dashboard_path
+
+      expect(page).not_to have_content(message)
+    end
+
+    it 'shows banner on next session if user did not set usage stats' do
+      visit root_dashboard_path
+
+      expect(page).to have_content(message)
+
+      gitlab_sign_out
+      gitlab_sign_in(user)
+      visit root_dashboard_path
+
+      expect(page).to have_content(message)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/users/overview_spec.rb b/spec/features/users/overview_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..11f357cbaa5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/features/users/overview_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Overview tab on a user profile', :js do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:contributed_project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
+
+  def push_code_contribution
+    event = create(:push_event, project: contributed_project, author: user)
+
+    create(:push_event_payload,
+           event: event,
+           commit_from: '11f9ac0a48b62cef25eedede4c1819964f08d5ce',
+           commit_to: '1cf19a015df3523caf0a1f9d40c98a267d6a2fc2',
+           commit_count: 3,
+           ref: 'master')
+  end
+
+  before do
+    sign_in user
+  end
+
+  describe 'activities section' do
+    shared_context 'visit overview tab' do
+      before do
+        visit user.username
+        page.find('.js-overview-tab a').click
+        wait_for_requests
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'user has no activities' do
+      include_context 'visit overview tab'
+
+      it 'does not show any entries in the list of activities' do
+        page.within('.activities-block') do
+          expect(page).not_to have_selector('.event-item')
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'does not show a link to the activity list' do
+        expect(find('#js-overview .activities-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: false)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'user has 3 activities' do
+      before do
+        3.times { push_code_contribution }
+      end
+
+      include_context 'visit overview tab'
+
+      it 'display 3 entries in the list of activities' do
+        expect(find('#js-overview')).to have_selector('.event-item', count: 3)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'user has 10 activities' do
+      before do
+        10.times { push_code_contribution }
+      end
+
+      include_context 'visit overview tab'
+
+      it 'displays 5 entries in the list of activities' do
+        expect(find('#js-overview')).to have_selector('.event-item', count: 5)
+      end
+
+      it 'shows a link to the activity list' do
+        expect(find('#js-overview .activities-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: true)
+      end
+
+      it 'links to the activity tab' do
+        page.within('.activities-block') do
+          find('.js-view-all').click
+          wait_for_requests
+          expect(URI.parse(current_url).path).to eq("/users/#{user.username}/activity")
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'projects section' do
+    shared_context 'visit overview tab' do
+      before do
+        visit user.username
+        page.find('.js-overview-tab a').click
+        wait_for_requests
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'user has no personal projects' do
+      include_context 'visit overview tab'
+
+      it 'it shows an empty project list with an info message' do
+        page.within('.projects-block') do
+          expect(page).to have_content('No projects found')
+          expect(page).not_to have_selector('.project-row')
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'does not show a link to the project list' do
+        expect(find('#js-overview .projects-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: false)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'user has a personal project' do
+      let(:private_project) { create(:project, :private, namespace: user.namespace, creator: user) { |p| p.add_maintainer(user) } }
+      let!(:private_event)   { create(:event, project: private_project, author: user) }
+
+      include_context 'visit overview tab'
+
+      it 'it shows one entry in the list of projects' do
+        page.within('.projects-block') do
+          expect(page).to have_selector('.project-row', count: 1)
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'shows a link to the project list' do
+        expect(find('#js-overview .projects-block')).to have_selector('.js-view-all', visible: true)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb b/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb
index bc07ab48c39..86379164cf0 100644
--- a/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/features/users/show_spec.rb
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ describe 'User page' do
       visit(user_path(user))
 
       page.within '.nav-links' do
+        expect(page).to have_link('Overview')
         expect(page).to have_link('Activity')
         expect(page).to have_link('Groups')
         expect(page).to have_link('Contributed projects')
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ describe 'User page' do
       visit(user_path(user))
 
       page.within '.nav-links' do
+        expect(page).to have_link('Overview')
         expect(page).to have_link('Activity')
         expect(page).to have_link('Groups')
         expect(page).to have_link('Contributed projects')
diff --git a/spec/finders/admin/runners_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/admin/runners_finder_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0b2325cc7ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/finders/admin/runners_finder_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Admin::RunnersFinder do
+  describe '#execute' do
+    context 'with empty params' do
+      it 'returns all runners' do
+        runner1 = create :ci_runner, active: true
+        runner2 = create :ci_runner, active: false
+
+        expect(described_class.new(params: {}).execute).to match_array [runner1, runner2]
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'filter by search term' do
+      it 'calls Ci::Runner.search' do
+        expect(Ci::Runner).to receive(:search).with('term').and_call_original
+
+        described_class.new(params: { search: 'term' }).execute
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'filter by status' do
+      it 'calls the corresponding scope on Ci::Runner' do
+        expect(Ci::Runner).to receive(:paused).and_call_original
+
+        described_class.new(params: { status_status: 'paused' }).execute
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'filter by runner type' do
+      it 'calls the corresponding scope on Ci::Runner' do
+        expect(Ci::Runner).to receive(:project_type).and_call_original
+
+        described_class.new(params: { type_type: 'project_type' }).execute
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'sort' do
+      context 'without sort param' do
+        it 'sorts by created_at' do
+          runner1 = create :ci_runner, created_at: '2018-07-12 07:00'
+          runner2 = create :ci_runner, created_at: '2018-07-12 08:00'
+          runner3 = create :ci_runner, created_at: '2018-07-12 09:00'
+
+          expect(described_class.new(params: {}).execute).to eq [runner3, runner2, runner1]
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with sort param' do
+        it 'sorts by specified attribute' do
+          runner1 = create :ci_runner, contacted_at: 1.minute.ago
+          runner2 = create :ci_runner, contacted_at: 3.minutes.ago
+          runner3 = create :ci_runner, contacted_at: 2.minutes.ago
+
+          expect(described_class.new(params: { sort: 'contacted_asc' }).execute).to eq [runner2, runner3, runner1]
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'paginate' do
+      it 'returns the runners for the specified page' do
+        stub_const('Admin::RunnersFinder::NUMBER_OF_RUNNERS_PER_PAGE', 1)
+        runner1 = create :ci_runner, created_at: '2018-07-12 07:00'
+        runner2 = create :ci_runner, created_at: '2018-07-12 08:00'
+
+        expect(described_class.new(params: { page: 1 }).execute).to eq [runner2]
+        expect(described_class.new(params: { page: 2 }).execute).to eq [runner1]
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/finders/contributed_projects_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/contributed_projects_finder_spec.rb
index 9155a8d6fe9..81fb4e3561c 100644
--- a/spec/finders/contributed_projects_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/contributed_projects_finder_spec.rb
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ describe ContributedProjectsFinder do
 
   let!(:public_project) { create(:project, :public) }
   let!(:private_project) { create(:project, :private) }
+  let!(:internal_project) { create(:project, :internal) }
 
   before do
     private_project.add_maintainer(source_user)
@@ -16,17 +17,18 @@ describe ContributedProjectsFinder do
 
     create(:push_event, project: public_project, author: source_user)
     create(:push_event, project: private_project, author: source_user)
+    create(:push_event, project: internal_project, author: source_user)
   end
 
-  describe 'without a current user' do
+  describe 'activity without a current user' do
     subject { finder.execute }
 
-    it { is_expected.to eq([public_project]) }
+    it { is_expected.to match_array([public_project]) }
   end
 
-  describe 'with a current user' do
+  describe 'activity with a current user' do
     subject { finder.execute(current_user) }
 
-    it { is_expected.to eq([private_project, public_project]) }
+    it { is_expected.to match_array([private_project, internal_project, public_project]) }
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/finders/group_descendants_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/group_descendants_finder_spec.rb
index 796d40cb625..c64abdc3619 100644
--- a/spec/finders/group_descendants_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/group_descendants_finder_spec.rb
@@ -108,6 +108,15 @@ describe GroupDescendantsFinder do
         end
       end
     end
+
+    it 'does not include projects shared with the group' do
+      project = create(:project, namespace: group)
+      other_project = create(:project)
+      other_project.project_group_links.create(group: group,
+                                               group_access: ProjectGroupLink::MASTER)
+
+      expect(finder.execute).to contain_exactly(project)
+    end
   end
 
   context 'with nested groups', :nested_groups do
diff --git a/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7bdd312eff0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/finders/group_labels_finder_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe GroupLabelsFinder, '#execute' do
+  let!(:group) { create(:group) }
+  let!(:user)  { create(:user) }
+  let!(:label1) { create(:group_label, title: 'Foo', description: 'Lorem ipsum', group: group) }
+  let!(:label2) { create(:group_label, title: 'Bar', description: 'Fusce consequat', group: group) }
+
+  it 'returns all group labels sorted by name if no params' do
+    result = described_class.new(user, group).execute
+
+    expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label2, label1])
+  end
+
+  it 'returns all group labels sorted by name desc' do
+    result = described_class.new(user, group, sort: 'name_desc').execute
+
+    expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label2, label1])
+  end
+
+  it 'returns group labels that match search' do
+    result = described_class.new(user, group, search: 'Foo').execute
+
+    expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label1])
+  end
+
+  it 'returns group labels user subscribed to' do
+    label2.subscribe(user)
+
+    result = described_class.new(user, group, subscribed: 'true').execute
+
+    expect(result.to_a).to match_array([label2])
+  end
+
+  it 'returns second page of labels' do
+    result = described_class.new(user, group, page: '2').execute
+
+    expect(result.to_a).to match_array([])
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb
index 07a2fa86dd7..0689c843104 100644
--- a/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/issues_finder_spec.rb
@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ describe IssuesFinder do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'filtering by no assignee' do
+        let(:params) { { assignee_id: 0 } }
+
+        it 'returns issues not assign to any assignee' do
+          expect(issues).to contain_exactly(issue4)
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'filtering by group_id' do
         let(:params) { { group_id: group.id } }
 
@@ -117,6 +125,14 @@ describe IssuesFinder do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'filtering by any milestone' do
+        let(:params) { { milestone_title: Milestone::Any.title } }
+
+        it 'returns issues with any assigned milestone' do
+          expect(issues).to contain_exactly(issue1)
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'filtering by upcoming milestone' do
         let(:params) { { milestone_title: Milestone::Upcoming.name } }
 
diff --git a/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb
index f5cec8e349a..9abc52aa664 100644
--- a/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/labels_finder_spec.rb
@@ -210,5 +210,15 @@ describe LabelsFinder do
         expect(finder.execute).to eq [project_label_1]
       end
     end
+
+    context 'filter by subscription' do
+      it 'returns labels user subscribed to' do
+        project_label_1.subscribe(user)
+
+        finder = described_class.new(user, subscribed: 'true')
+
+        expect(finder.execute).to eq [project_label_1]
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/finders/license_template_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/license_template_finder_spec.rb
index a97903103c9..f6f40bf33cc 100644
--- a/spec/finders/license_template_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/license_template_finder_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe LicenseTemplateFinder do
   describe '#execute' do
-    subject(:result) { described_class.new(params).execute }
+    subject(:result) { described_class.new(nil, params).execute }
 
     let(:categories) { categorised_licenses.keys }
     let(:categorised_licenses) { result.group_by(&:category) }
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ describe LicenseTemplateFinder do
       it 'returns all licenses known by the Licensee gem' do
         from_licensee = Licensee::License.all.map { |l| l.key }
 
-        expect(result.map(&:id)).to match_array(from_licensee)
+        expect(result.map(&:key)).to match_array(from_licensee)
       end
 
       it 'correctly copies all attributes' do
diff --git a/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb
index 35d0eeda8f6..ff4c6b8dd42 100644
--- a/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/merge_requests_finder_spec.rb
@@ -3,25 +3,47 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe MergeRequestsFinder do
   include ProjectForksHelper
 
+  # We need to explicitly permit Gitaly N+1s because of the specs that use
+  # :request_store. Gitaly N+1 detection is only enabled when :request_store is,
+  # but we don't care about potential N+1s when we're just creating several
+  # projects in the setup phase.
+  def create_project_without_n_plus_1(*args)
+    Gitlab::GitalyClient.allow_n_plus_1_calls do
+      create(:project, :public, *args)
+    end
+  end
+
   let(:user)  { create :user }
   let(:user2) { create :user }
 
   let(:group) { create(:group) }
   let(:subgroup) { create(:group, parent: group) }
-  let(:project1) { create(:project, :public, group: group) }
-  let(:project2) { fork_project(project1, user) }
+  let(:project1) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: group) }
+  let(:project2) do
+    Gitlab::GitalyClient.allow_n_plus_1_calls do
+      fork_project(project1, user)
+    end
+  end
   let(:project3) do
-    p = fork_project(project1, user)
-    p.update!(archived: true)
-    p
+    Gitlab::GitalyClient.allow_n_plus_1_calls do
+      p = fork_project(project1, user)
+      p.update!(archived: true)
+      p
+    end
   end
-  let(:project4) { create(:project, :public, group: subgroup) }
+  let(:project4) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: subgroup) }
+  let(:project5) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: subgroup) }
+  let(:project6) { create_project_without_n_plus_1(group: subgroup) }
 
   let!(:merge_request1) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project1) }
   let!(:merge_request2) { create(:merge_request, :conflict, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project1, state: 'closed') }
-  let!(:merge_request3) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project2, state: 'locked') }
-  let!(:merge_request4) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project3, target_project: project3) }
-  let!(:merge_request5) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project4, target_project: project4) }
+  let!(:merge_request3) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project2, target_project: project2, state: 'locked', title: 'thing WIP thing') }
+  let!(:merge_request4) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project3, target_project: project3, title: 'WIP thing') }
+  let!(:merge_request5) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project4, target_project: project4, title: '[WIP]') }
+  let!(:merge_request6) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project5, target_project: project5, title: 'WIP: thing') }
+  let!(:merge_request7) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project6, target_project: project6, title: 'wip thing') }
+  let!(:merge_request8) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project1, target_project: project1, title: '[wip] thing') }
+  let!(:merge_request9) { create(:merge_request, :simple, author: user, source_project: project1, target_project: project2, title: 'wip: thing') }
 
   before do
     project1.add_maintainer(user)
@@ -29,19 +51,21 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do
     project3.add_developer(user)
     project2.add_developer(user2)
     project4.add_developer(user)
+    project5.add_developer(user)
+    project6.add_developer(user)
   end
 
   describe "#execute" do
     it 'filters by scope' do
       params = { scope: 'authored', state: 'opened' }
       merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
-      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(3)
+      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(7)
     end
 
     it 'filters by project' do
       params = { project_id: project1.id, scope: 'authored', state: 'opened' }
       merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
-      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(1)
+      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(2)
     end
 
     it 'filters by group' do
@@ -49,7 +73,7 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do
 
       merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
 
-      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(2)
+      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(3)
     end
 
     it 'filters by group including subgroups', :nested_groups do
@@ -57,13 +81,13 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do
 
       merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
 
-      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(3)
+      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(6)
     end
 
     it 'filters by non_archived' do
       params = { non_archived: true }
       merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
-      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(4)
+      expect(merge_requests.size).to eq(8)
     end
 
     it 'filters by iid' do
@@ -98,6 +122,36 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do
       expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request3)
     end
 
+    it 'filters by wip' do
+      params = { wip: 'yes' }
+
+      merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+
+      expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request4, merge_request5, merge_request6, merge_request7, merge_request8, merge_request9)
+    end
+
+    it 'filters by not wip' do
+      params = { wip: 'no' }
+
+      merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+
+      expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns all items if no valid wip param exists' do
+      params = { wip: '' }
+
+      merge_requests = described_class.new(user, params).execute
+
+      expect(merge_requests).to contain_exactly(merge_request1, merge_request2, merge_request3, merge_request4, merge_request5, merge_request6, merge_request7, merge_request8, merge_request9)
+    end
+
+    it 'adds wip to scalar params' do
+      scalar_params = described_class.scalar_params
+
+      expect(scalar_params).to include(:wip, :assignee_id)
+    end
+
     context 'filtering by group milestone' do
       let!(:group) { create(:group, :public) }
       let(:group_milestone) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
@@ -207,7 +261,7 @@ describe MergeRequestsFinder do
     it 'returns the number of rows for the default state' do
       finder = described_class.new(user)
 
-      expect(finder.row_count).to eq(3)
+      expect(finder.row_count).to eq(7)
     end
 
     it 'returns the number of rows for a given state' do
diff --git a/spec/finders/projects_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/projects_finder_spec.rb
index 7931ad9b9f0..590e838f13e 100644
--- a/spec/finders/projects_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/projects_finder_spec.rb
@@ -174,6 +174,13 @@ describe ProjectsFinder do
       end
     end
 
+    describe 'filter by without_deleted' do
+      let(:params) { { without_deleted: true } }
+      let!(:pending_delete_project) { create(:project, :public, pending_delete: true) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to match_array([public_project, internal_project]) }
+    end
+
     describe 'sorting' do
       let(:params) { { sort: 'name_asc' } }
 
diff --git a/spec/finders/template_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/template_finder_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..114af9461e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/finders/template_finder_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe TemplateFinder do
+  using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+  describe '#build' do
+    let(:project) { build_stubbed(:project) }
+
+    where(:type, :expected_class) do
+      :dockerfiles    | described_class
+      :gitignores     | described_class
+      :gitlab_ci_ymls | described_class
+      :licenses       | ::LicenseTemplateFinder
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      subject(:finder) { described_class.build(type, project) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_a(expected_class) }
+      it { expect(finder.project).to eq(project) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#execute' do
+    where(:type, :vendored_name) do
+      :dockerfiles    | 'Binary'
+      :gitignores     | 'Actionscript'
+      :gitlab_ci_ymls | 'Android'
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      it 'returns all vendored templates when no name is specified' do
+        result = described_class.new(type, nil).execute
+
+        expect(result).to include(have_attributes(name: vendored_name))
+      end
+
+      it 'returns only the specified vendored template when a name is specified' do
+        result = described_class.new(type, nil, name: vendored_name).execute
+
+        expect(result).to have_attributes(name: vendored_name)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns nil when an unknown name is specified' do
+        result = described_class.new(type, nil, name: 'unknown').execute
+
+        expect(result).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/finders/user_recent_events_finder_spec.rb b/spec/finders/user_recent_events_finder_spec.rb
index 58470f4c84d..c5fcd68eb4c 100644
--- a/spec/finders/user_recent_events_finder_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/finders/user_recent_events_finder_spec.rb
@@ -13,49 +13,25 @@ describe UserRecentEventsFinder do
   subject(:finder) { described_class.new(current_user, project_owner) }
 
   describe '#execute' do
-    context 'current user does not have access to projects' do
-      it 'returns public and internal events' do
-        records = finder.execute
-
-        expect(records).to include(public_event, internal_event)
-        expect(records).not_to include(private_event)
+    context 'when profile is public' do
+      it 'returns all the events' do
+        expect(finder.execute).to include(private_event, internal_event, public_event)
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when current user has access to the projects' do
-      before do
-        private_project.add_developer(current_user)
-        internal_project.add_developer(current_user)
-        public_project.add_developer(current_user)
-      end
-
-      context 'when profile is public' do
-        it 'returns all the events' do
-          expect(finder.execute).to include(private_event, internal_event, public_event)
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when profile is private' do
-        it 'returns no event' do
-          allow(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).and_call_original
-          allow(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).with(current_user, :read_user_profile, project_owner).and_return(false)
-          expect(finder.execute).to be_empty
-        end
-      end
+    context 'when profile is private' do
+      it 'returns no event' do
+        allow(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).and_call_original
+        allow(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).with(current_user, :read_user_profile, project_owner).and_return(false)
 
-      it 'does not include the events if the user cannot read cross project' do
-        expect(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).and_call_original
-        expect(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).with(current_user, :read_cross_project) { false }
         expect(finder.execute).to be_empty
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when current user is anonymous' do
-      let(:current_user) { nil }
-
-      it 'returns public events only' do
-        expect(finder.execute).to eq([public_event])
-      end
+    it 'does not include the events if the user cannot read cross project' do
+      expect(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).and_call_original
+      expect(Ability).to receive(:allowed?).with(current_user, :read_cross_project) { false }
+      expect(finder.execute).to be_empty
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/deployment.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/deployment.json
index 536e6475c23..8c8cdf8bcb2 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/deployment.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/deployment.json
@@ -1,45 +1,31 @@
 {
-    "additionalProperties": false,
-    "properties": {
-        "created_at": {
-            "type": "string"
-        },
-        "id": {
-            "type": "integer"
-        },
-        "iid": {
-            "type": "integer"
-        },
-        "last?": {
-            "type": "boolean"
-        },
-        "ref": {
-            "additionalProperties": false,
-            "properties": {
-                "name": {
-                    "type": "string"
-                }
-            },
-            "required": [
-                "name"
-            ],
-            "type": "object"
-        },
-        "sha": {
-            "type": "string"
-        },
-        "tag": {
-            "type": "boolean"
-        }
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "sha",
+    "created_at",
+    "iid",
+    "tag",
+    "last?",
+    "ref",
+    "id"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "created_at": { "type": "string" },
+    "id": { "type": "integer" },
+    "iid": { "type": "integer" },
+    "last?": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "ref": {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": [
+        "name"
+      ],
+      "properties": {
+        "name": { "type": "string" }
+      },
+      "additionalProperties": false
     },
-    "required": [
-        "sha",
-        "created_at",
-        "iid",
-        "tag",
-        "last?",
-        "ref",
-        "id"
-    ],
-    "type": "object"
+    "sha": { "type": "string" },
+    "tag": { "type": "boolean" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
 }
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/commit.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/commit.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..686d29c97d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/commit.json
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "allOf": [
+    { "$ref": "../public_api/v4/commit/basic.json" },
+    {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": [
+        "author_gravatar_url",
+        "commit_url",
+        "commit_path",
+        "author"
+      ],
+      "properties": {
+        "author_gravatar_url": { "type": "string" },
+        "commit_url": { "type": "string" },
+        "commit_path": { "type": "string" },
+        "author": {
+          "oneOf": [
+            { "type": "null" },
+            { "type": "user.json" }
+          ]
+        }
+      },
+      "additionalProperties": false
+    }
+  ]
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_line.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_line.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..66e8b443e1b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_line.json
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": ["type"],
+  "properties": {
+    "line_code": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
+    "type": { "type": ["string", "null"] },
+    "old_line": { "type": ["integer", "null"] },
+    "new_line": { "type": ["integer", "null"] },
+    "text": { "type": ["string"] },
+    "rich_text": { "type": ["string"] },
+    "meta_data": { "type": ["object", "null"] }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_line_parallel.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_line_parallel.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f924eb0c601
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_line_parallel.json
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "required" : [
+    "left",
+    "right"
+  ],
+  "properties" : {
+    "left": { "$ref": "diff_line.json" },
+    "right": { "$ref": "diff_line.json" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_viewer.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_viewer.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..19780f49a88
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/diff_viewer.json
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": ["name"],
+  "properties": {
+    "name": { "type": ["string"] }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/note_user_entity.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/note_user_entity.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9b838054563
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/note_user_entity.json
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "id",
+    "state",
+    "avatar_url",
+    "path",
+    "name",
+    "username"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "id": { "type": "integer" },
+    "state": { "type": "string" },
+    "avatar_url": { "type": "string" },
+    "path": { "type": "string" },
+    "name": { "type": "string" },
+    "username": { "type": "string" },
+    "status_tooltip_html": { "$ref": "../types/nullable_string.json" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/user.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/user.json
index 6482e0eedd2..82d80b75cef 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/user.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/entities/user.json
@@ -5,13 +5,19 @@
     "state",
     "avatar_url",
     "web_url",
-    "path"
+    "path",
+    "name",
+    "username"
   ],
   "properties": {
     "id": { "type": "integer" },
     "state": { "type": "string" },
     "avatar_url": { "type": "string" },
     "web_url": { "type": "string" },
-    "path": { "type": "string" }
-  }
+    "path": { "type": "string" },
+    "name": { "type": "string" },
+    "username": { "type": "string" },
+    "status_tooltip_html": { "$ref": "../types/nullable_string.json" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
 }
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/environment.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/environment.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f1d33e3ce7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/environment.json
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "id",
+    "name",
+    "state",
+    "external_url",
+    "environment_type",
+    "has_stop_action",
+    "environment_path",
+    "stop_path",
+    "folder_path",
+    "created_at",
+    "updated_at",
+    "can_stop"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "id": { "type": "integer" },
+    "name": { "type": "string" },
+    "state": { "type": "string" },
+    "external_url": { "$ref": "types/nullable_string.json" },
+    "environment_type": { "$ref": "types/nullable_string.json" },
+    "has_stop_action": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "environment_path": { "type": "string" },
+    "stop_path": { "type": "string" },
+    "folder_path": { "type": "string" },
+    "created_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
+    "updated_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
+    "can_stop": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "last_deployment": {
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "type": "null" },
+        { "$ref": "deployment.json" }
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/http_method.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/http_method.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c0f8acc5781
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/http_method.json
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+{
+  "type": "string",
+  "description": "HTTP methods that the API can specify to send.",
+  "enum": [ "post", "get", "put", "patch" ]
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/artifact.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/artifact.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1812e69fbd6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/artifact.json
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "properties": {
+    "download_path": { "type": "string"},
+    "browse_path": { "type": "string"},
+    "keep_path": { "type": "string"},
+    "expired": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "expire_at": { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/deployment_status.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/deployment_status.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..83b1899fdf3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/deployment_status.json
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "status",
+    "environment"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "status": {
+      "oneOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string",
+          "enum": [
+            "last",
+            "creating",
+            "failed",
+            "out_of_date"
+          ]
+        },
+        { "type": "null" }
+      ]
+    },
+    "environment": { "$ref": "../environment.json" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job.json
index 7b92ab25bc1..734c535ef70 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job.json
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 {
+  "description": "Basic job information",
   "type": "object",
   "required": [
     "id",
@@ -13,12 +14,20 @@
   "properties": {
     "id": { "type": "integer" },
     "name": { "type": "string" },
-    "started": { "type": "boolean" } ,
+    "started": {
+      "oneOf": [
+        { "type": "string", "format": "date-time" },
+        { "type": "boolean" }
+      ]
+    },
     "build_path": { "type": "string" },
+    "retry_path": { "type": "string" },
     "playable": { "type": "boolean" },
     "created_at": { "type": "string" },
     "updated_at": { "type": "string" },
-    "status": { "$ref": "ci_detailed_status.json" }
+    "status": { "$ref": "../status/ci_detailed_status.json" },
+    "callout_message": { "type": "string" },
+    "recoverable": { "type": "boolean" }
   },
-  "additionalProperties": false
+  "additionalProperties": true
 }
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..07e674216fa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/job_details.json
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+{
+  "allOf": [
+    { "$ref": "job.json" }
+  ],
+  "description": "An extension of job.json with more detailed information",
+  "required": [
+    "artifact",
+    "runner",
+    "runners",
+    "has_trace"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "artifact": { "$ref": "artifact.json" },
+    "terminal_path": { "type": "string" },
+    "trigger": { "$ref": "trigger.json" },
+    "deployment_status": { "$ref": "deployment_status.json" },
+    "runner": { "$ref": "runner.json" },
+    "runners": { "$ref": "runners.json" },
+    "has_trace": { "type": "boolean" }
+  }
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runner.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runner.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..acfeeeeb808
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runner.json
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "oneOf": [
+    { "type": "null" },
+    {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": [
+        "id",
+        "description"
+      ],
+      "properties": {
+        "id": { "type": "integer" },
+        "description": { "type": "string" },
+        "edit_path": { "type": "string" }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..646bfd3a82d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/runners.json
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "online",
+    "available"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "online": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "available": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "settings_path": { "type": "string" }
+  }
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/trigger.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/trigger.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1c7e9cc7693
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/job/trigger.json
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "short_token",
+    "variables"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "short_token": { "type": "string" },
+    "variables": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "items": {
+        "type": "object",
+        "required": [
+          "key",
+          "value",
+          "public"
+        ],
+        "properties": {
+          "key": { "type": "string" },
+          "value": { "type": "string" },
+          "public": { "type": "boolean" }
+        },
+        "additionalProperties": false
+      }
+    }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/pipeline_stage.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/pipeline_stage.json
index 55454200bb3..c01a1946185 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/pipeline_stage.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/pipeline_stage.json
@@ -13,10 +13,15 @@
     "groups": { "optional": true },
     "latest_statuses": {
       "type": "array",
-      "items": { "$ref": "job.json" },
+      "items": { "$ref": "job/job.json" },
       "optional": true
     },
-    "status": { "$ref": "ci_detailed_status.json" },
+    "retried": {
+      "type": "array",
+      "items": { "$ref": "job/job.json" },
+      "optional": true
+    },
+    "status": { "$ref": "status/ci_detailed_status.json" },
     "path": { "type": "string" },
     "dropdown_path": { "type": "string" }
   },
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/branch.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/branch.json
index a8891680d06..3b0f010bc4f 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/branch.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/branch.json
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
     "commit",
     "merged",
     "protected",
+    "default",
     "developers_can_push",
     "developers_can_merge"
   ],
@@ -13,6 +14,7 @@
     "commit": { "$ref": "commit/basic.json" },
     "merged": { "type": "boolean" },
     "protected": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "default": { "type": "boolean" },
     "developers_can_push": { "type": "boolean" },
     "developers_can_merge": { "type": "boolean" },
     "can_push": { "type": "boolean" }
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/license.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/license.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..38c8c3e9192
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/license.json
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "key",
+    "name",
+    "nickname",
+    "popular",
+    "html_url",
+    "source_url",
+    "description",
+    "conditions",
+    "permissions",
+    "limitations",
+    "content"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "key": { "type": "string" },
+    "name": { "type": "string" },
+    "nickname": { "type": ["null", "string"] },
+    "popular": { "type": "boolean" },
+    "html_url": { "type": ["null", "string"] },
+    "source_url": { "type": ["null", "string"] },
+    "description": { "type": ["null", "string"] },
+    "conditions": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
+    "permissions": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
+    "limitations": { "type": "array", "items": { "type": "string" } },
+    "content": { "type": "string" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/template.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/template.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..38601aa6b45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/template.json
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "name",
+    "content"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "name": { "type": "string" },
+    "content": { "type": "string" }
+  },
+  "additionalProperties": false
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/template_list.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/template_list.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2336dafb17b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/public_api/v4/template_list.json
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "type": "array",
+  "items": {
+    "type": "object",
+    "required": [
+      "key",
+      "name"
+    ],
+    "properties": {
+      "key": { "type": "string" },
+      "name": { "type": "string" }
+    },
+    "additionalProperties": false
+  }
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/action.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/action.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..99a576e6c5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/action.json
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+{
+  "type": "object",
+  "required": [
+    "icon",
+    "title",
+    "path",
+    "method"
+  ],
+  "properties": {
+    "icon": {
+      "type": "string",
+      "enum": [
+        "retry",
+        "play",
+        "cancel"
+      ]
+    },
+    "title": { "type": "string" },
+    "path": { "type": "string" },
+    "method": { "$ref": "../http_method.json" }
+  }
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/ci_detailed_status.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/ci_detailed_status.json
index 01e34249bf1..8d0f1e4a6af 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/ci_detailed_status.json
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/ci_detailed_status.json
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "type": "object",
-  "required" : [
+  "required": [
     "icon",
     "text",
     "label",
@@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
     "tooltip": { "type": "string" },
     "has_details": { "type": "boolean" },
     "details_path": { "type": "string" },
-    "favicon": { "type": "string" }
+    "favicon": { "type": "string" },
+    "illustration": { "$ref": "illustration.json" },
+    "action": { "$ref": "action.json" }
   },
   "additionalProperties": false
 }
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/illustration.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/illustration.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9a085f5f1ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/status/illustration.json
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+{
+  "oneOf": [
+    { "type": "null" },
+    {
+      "type": "object",
+      "required": [
+        "image",
+        "size",
+        "title"
+      ],
+      "properties": {
+        "image": { "type": "string" },
+        "size": { "type": "string" },
+        "title": { "type": "string" },
+        "content": { "type": "string" }
+      }
+    }
+  ]
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/types/nullable_string.json b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/types/nullable_string.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e3b0baef849
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/api/schemas/types/nullable_string.json
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+{
+  "oneOf": [
+    { "type": "null" },
+    { "type": "string" }
+  ]
+}
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..89cc4b46521
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+[{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `simulateDrag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a995a617b0ce0599b6d0a5649a308a8e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `simulateEvent` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e50b54fce33185efbb17d1c0d210b439","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `simulateDrag` has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75ffb8892dac22a9d50822bc69339ab2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1224000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"40f188d222bd1f110e8c11f08ec77c3f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/3d_viewer/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 60 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"95b71f07d08eb9e2368568c6d872f677","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_file_dropzone.js","lines":{"begin":21,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1440000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`FileTemplateMediator` has 29 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"02a64abfacf06440f6504888503fe571","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/file_template_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ede6d8c5878fbfdda2348d1c6a808f4b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initTargetBranchDropdown` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"748b8a39304544f015c0abcbee9b929c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_form.js","lines":{"begin":116,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `start` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0272210e1d618fe95522ee47f652308","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/smart_interval.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `render` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ceb92ce0f43dbe13431f1f07d5787aff","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/tabs/tabs.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `file_icon_map.js` has 587 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33d443c482c7a34a3a721ef8677a9b9b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon/file_icon_map.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":590}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6052800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `gl_dropdown.js` has 935 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"144655d5e2aa528a6e4d63861c3bc2f1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":11064000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdownInput` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4679297a043d89d437946bd083443d13","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdownFilter` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c2b6bfd5d744ae2f9724aae0a60a765","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `filter` has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3be214723bb15219db661db421dccba1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `GitLabDropdown` has 172 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"45e3d28c25ef43db19fcd1f8bf7a52dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":296,"end":481}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4128000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `parseData` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5a6929b08a7efc020e932267316a1ce4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":505,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `opened` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b32257d5ff71fd022c46be4ff3f196b6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":580,"end":627}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderItem` has 77 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"119c9b263aba3cc2173646b63b83d58d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":698,"end":793}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1848000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `rowClicked` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e37288d65d5701c4b7d06560d3eb6910","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":820,"end":904}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addArrowKeyEvent` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ccf81453af86fd4e7f521423adbf28e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":971,"end":1015}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `highlightRowAtIndex` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a0b5b8a75d9f5726f8a559a3068bbfd9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1026,"end":1073}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":174,"end":184}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"603368a717652923897a9efd4f494784"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onOptionClick` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1ead8da9cc948075715df57538a53fb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onOptionClick` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa9f5f9cb36f5307a7db44c29b5f3a4c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setSearchedGroups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4116f1bf48693b8dbc3a19233c167489","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `formatGroupItem` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97209b6e238a05d220f90d1e1fcf7c78","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":96}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getGroups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f9fc97d0941125a5eb91818b85ac955","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/service/groups_service.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1cc8f54fcedff8d025db690e89c4d3bc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1128000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d34e04056341d2986626e42b9927e829","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/stores/clusters_store.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initLayoutNav` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"858063cf6c5a28edd5390360940941f1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/layout_nav.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `sidebarToggleClicked` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e95063093263d654532b1bda2499ae09","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/right_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleSidebar` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4667aa48f617e84611c658bd9e6fd42","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/right_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":201,"end":218}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f561803cb2a47ffaeed70a1f967105da","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/error.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `issueTemplate` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36dc94ada0224320b48f9dcddf971dd3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`Api` has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62c9c1d73c6c2f6f294b2c13a5c92e49","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":282}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `validate` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b07c343f7afe957592fac79043c9586","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/new_branch_form.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `labels_select.js` has 444 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34830d2a928eacedb749d5c66c3637e9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":517}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3993600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setDropdownData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"99aee27c164d2c53ee3386f64239ebc9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":466,"end":507}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 369 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca542a5aefb3dbadb5e0a0100a94b863","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":429}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8856000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `data` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00d06b2fdc398a9031e900f76184076f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderRow` has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ef4d877e54496d7ad4da0e0a0b96d9aa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":177,"end":235}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleLabel` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35ba5b5dab8a50aa713a5ba60e1db7a1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":242,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `hidden` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2dc1a005647c9e7e9f81e0eabeb9563d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":294,"end":324}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f7fb23f1a88e5dc4c8430529946de3dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":327,"end":414}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setDropdownData` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"955ed39a38f4f36c3ae0d23199b6b90d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":466,"end":507}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":407,"end":412}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cefdca8d12fc08aff6e7a861750e99d9"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":377}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"1d311ac9ae722bf786749b2125e5cf47"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/labels_select.js","lines":{"begin":411,"end":411}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"7d42a3bbce082d2bbdc96d5eaa747454"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `storeEnvironments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70cce4c4dfcfa9c7fb820fc6dea68e9c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/stores/environments_store.js","lines":{"begin":36,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `storeEnvironments` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5b13b9d301832978862f37bcc22708f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/stores/environments_store.js","lines":{"begin":36,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `created` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"139fddb1aa522eb2c141871eab765fc3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4d0a598693b87337ee6b071a35c6da2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_context.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `dropzoneInput` has 210 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96984c8a7930ad755604f49c3edf6a2b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/dropzone_input.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":290}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5040000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ec26d8ddc2c55de770d1f8038f590f4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":67}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.ADD_NEW_NOTE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"026945d2d3de0e3f478ec55a7bb820f5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.REMOVE_PLACEHOLDER_NOTES` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26efdceb93879d8478e3c8a4f549bc22","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 22 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75cd5c2d207814d4a7c7fbf69c709fd6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `actions.js` has 271 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e2580af22da5d9875ac924fda6d0551","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":337}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1502400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `saveNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9dbdac686defafb20b3397ccb7105ba3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":151,"end":226}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getQuickActionText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3019b0611c6febc7b696f0615d561d1b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `collapseSystemNotes` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"757d82e7c89224872a7bd7b269ed55c5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/collapse_utils.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":105}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `unresolvedDiscussionsIdsByDiff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"250bf3d3615586b7cdaecad2c187e0a0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/getters.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `jumpToDiscussion` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebbd3b5d75f27f2372eb1a56ca4d9206","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/mixins/discussion_navigation.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `keydown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1977a74c9fba9606480c93a63cb0d5c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydown` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6356352d7ef34cfddc4738ed0c5ebdbf","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `trigger` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ad4384530fc0032f4fafe9d12e7dc70","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `_loadData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"357b7070736cef3f382a2c3439a40d89","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `trigger` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc97a87fa8ec1b132731256b23616434","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `Keyboard` has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6b1d8f0930c09b5318307d0788ffca30","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `Keyboard` has 96 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a812687f4ed1c53045b473f0d6aa5cb9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2304000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydown` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e7cbff360ff21f798bf424a899291302","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/keyboard.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlightHash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2bd33253a3ff30d380e94d478d49a6e7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/line_highlighter.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlightRange` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4258948c78c182b6db020222636c12bb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/line_highlighter.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":157}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `checkElementsInView` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"08e5457bd1bcf2aa36f67185fb5ab932","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lazy_loader.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `loadImage` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e063810e532be97a06efabd3c56e4db","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lazy_loader.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a3ef386977d1577238533b8b5352a499","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `handleClickUnfold` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f82a7cc93be5e64d548469363a77a2fb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initMergeConflicts` has 81 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd259a46f5e703e8f722acdac619ad79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflicts_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1944000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_conflict_store.js` has 357 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"131a2e61cbfe7efc49cced2ffab3568b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2740800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setParallelLine` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f005034ab86d552698a2211ae91ae99a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":101,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `isReadyToCommit` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"184e70a4c8de2226d5a4b197c147f2e8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":315,"end":351}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":331,"end":333}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"78a238497c0c8acd6ddefbb67176f033"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `init` has 216 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c8af9cd2b45c1c2e6e24c4678a9c6fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":253}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5184000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 91 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5e3838b8db3f11da2f72d9acaf52a17","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":250}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2184000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":187,"end":187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9265cc21e5d1eb1bebd044e85db1bf79"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/milestone_select.js","lines":{"begin":220,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"36ba0880a027f4448128be161cf33b26"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createFlash` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8f8d96fc8578fb3f7f7bf875e0668a0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/flash.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `textBuilder` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"877ac84192b385c963c08bb4ef960d3b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2f702de12038884b25d0ef63861bd2b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ref_select_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setConfig` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33b2d4c912bf8eb7a3c4b9c2d3302729","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notes.js` has 1338 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"515dff155804bebfe20a78b3935600eb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":16867200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `keydownNoteText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4a28bd8f572a9cb26ff49edf77e2d3a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc0dc1a78ad18f837b6cead5d11a5ac2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":403,"end":462}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderDiscussionNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dbb0fd84250020e115dbb0554f3dfc2a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":471,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleDiffNote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddb3cba4008791217e07933b09a14951","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1054,"end":1124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateTargetButtons` has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ea9fe607edc9cf98ef50a17584952c2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1196,"end":1241}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `postComment` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc8dd67d9f1598e83dc132f50b7f0726","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1604,"end":1796}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`Notes` has 74 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5363864915c583936ec6c63c5ed96689","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":1856}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 54 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"25812d53d4eb0f340c33a5a5ddca467a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":121}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1296000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addBinding` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b40ee2b94454885b3fd51a8bc139c1c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":127,"end":180}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `keydownNoteText` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85df701d158d32b25dca1c2039b6a3be","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderNote` has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8dfb4b9b4d144d82422186651b46b3e4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":403,"end":462}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderDiscussionNote` has 53 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"52b66ad02e73c9b1c8848bd1affad7fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":471,"end":538}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `removeNote` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c1e3976ef9bdf79365857e0b8bcb5d8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":848,"end":911}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setupDiscussionNoteForm` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1b7947a88bd1e4b3519e282320fbb38","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":956,"end":1009}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleDiffNote` has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60ae737d4dc10fe0af6e670d2d4bc7e2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1054,"end":1124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1464000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateTargetButtons` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ccd0067a20bb8afcaf3317b434b1ece","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1196,"end":1241}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createPlaceholderNote` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddcd3bc4735c7d763b0fe5da55217278","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `postComment` has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcdd1766ceaaa90c770bddfe75d120cd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1604,"end":1796}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3432000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateComment` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c508bf1571f9f4d795de4cb8ef1930a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1811,"end":1855}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":264}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cd548cc7c1ebbb2263b1d2ecdb94a5dd"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":272,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"cd548cc7c1ebbb2263b1d2ecdb94a5dd"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":275,"end":275}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"25fb735695be215146eaf2300412aae0"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `itemClicked` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86a06125a02d35c7e121952daf7f0f08","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `itemClicked` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e7751795d821a7afa57ab25dbd658ee4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `filterHint` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22102abbd93e4d53a0798ecf7e058512","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getSearchQuery` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26e123d9f4a95bfa34a59f42db0ae260","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `processTokens` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"28cb3a1b7fa1a51cd968e9016415efea","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `processTokens` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"287e8c4963cc8869358280d31e4d4005","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `loadDropdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31af8cc264fa78512d238c04106208fe","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":219}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setDropdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6dda613591636a58b06a298d0980498f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setupMapping` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f12b787fff78b0b8986506eb90b1997c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `load` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90c65f9cea258055f67defcb61f63abb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":165,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `filtered_search_manager.js` has 514 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"45105bf38088a343a5a9c0e1ca76840e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":645}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5001600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setup` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c08d2326cb1eb811c4329b3ee92fc04","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `checkForEnter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2056e10cb965de92a331a6181618ff7f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":265}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `handleInputVisualToken` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ef6573dc182d159eb13ddd70be42653","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":398,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`FilteredSearchManager` has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dee04c9127382346c9edead8ceb49788","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":644}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setup` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc525f4373639fe1e5e079259d587918","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `bindEvents` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0036874f7fdfa7b481bccec4adce2fd9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":145,"end":182}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `handleInputVisualToken` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"105fd464c05f365ea496107488c4d048","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":398,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadSearchParamsFromURL` has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc0a70cc2480e01d46d52df00f42980b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":463,"end":543}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1512000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `search` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d31d46c10a7c7b27cba3e79c2c7e684","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":558,"end":607}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":524,"end":529}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b4fcaa9a90b83251c167ce6bd363ead0"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"nested_control_flow","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":530,"end":533}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b9acc2eaf5ae1dd8b6f24ac70e97ace6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `users_select.js` has 594 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e6ca5bcc402f0dae9a9869dd46e4e77","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":701}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6153600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `UsersSelect` has 524 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4438d98e020e34865089e812790a72e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":628}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12576000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `processData` has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e7c9e224218cce1f434b0a0ff4616c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2112000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `clicked` has 64 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19cb3539002fa7a4aa2abf730fc550bc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":468}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1536000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderRow` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b67cb57917ef04a8b05e4be075bf6c0b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":493,"end":531}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `query` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"447defa81cda25e0ae3f708d8cb7f927","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":553,"end":604}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleCollapsed` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01ddc746dbdfa4103552d4d09bda67bd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/image_diff/helpers/dom_helper.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addBadge` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5cb8fbd4ee1e42eb778a29cd02efc8f5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/image_diff/image_diff.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1579b1a9e97ea98e6348df70287ccd85","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/job.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getBuildTrace` has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0990625843278c1e0d27866b6e51ec9b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/job.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":163}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1320000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setVisibilityOptions` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bd793c0b96469cb6904241d8beea60c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_visibility.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `restore` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebd9e5c02ce67b5fecb0e9a610fa01a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/autosave.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `populateActiveMetrics` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0808d7392776f800f01eb00247cb49fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadActiveMetrics` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2f56d70d330df4e004e4e730ec9bd7d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `adminInit` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb6b998e81923ba316eb986d14f16ef7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/admin.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d23e829e807e7cfa7fa60a5bd8bd2a4f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"59ee4d34d9113510c329a2b264aae308"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `showTab` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2db6bb70760f9a2493d374e830395ef3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/signin_tabs_memoizer.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"364739acddb57495be3b94860555f2ae","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initRefSwitcher` has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e62a2b92cc28ef2e2c5cc5e391c1b3c1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":155}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1512000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initLabelIndex` has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6cbf4de48d122212aa6790bce385c52","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1728000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `stat_graph_contributors_graph.js` has 260 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d70980224b971643c65164d7599d8306","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":315}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1344000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsGraph` has 68 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5ffd1e9b7f7eb20d76540029db76ea5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1632000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsMasterGraph` has 98 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c90cea5a64860bd8ebc11adfe43f966f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":109,"end":225}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2352000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `ContributorsAuthorGraph` has 75 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb2ba67ac3c7b0319408d414f7ab4a89","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":227,"end":314}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `parse_log` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"54a68f13ca92482f197897caa4dde8c6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `renderSidebar` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a8652d503fb546ee9566f5bf3f473ac","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/wikis/wikis.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `activity_calendar.js` has 257 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c8cf6370baf6d39528465c33a636bdaa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":300}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12e8c60549aefe50a5602474054d85e9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70826affaa552c98140c396bd20b2321","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderDays` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b25511a5a67d72f5494bf518b57f8945","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":182}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderKey` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f239dc6410f68cc561519c650b54fe79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":226,"end":257}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"910e3f36c66a265e42a8eaf26a167c4b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/show/search.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1560000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `showPreview` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1721f777313e23b7b202fa7491480968","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `copy_as_gfm.js` has 400 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac03b65c923edc62a2698fa8d47bed20","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":510}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3360000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `transformCodeSelection` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c2c7d04215c2bd2989380d4ec16d2fdd","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":392,"end":428}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `nodeToGFM` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"203624a0d90ac2910cd61598bd1ba9c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":430,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`gfmRules` has 23 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cef7679aa1f25cb0fb0333b4dfea466","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":169,"end":306}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `transformCodeSelection` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc79eaa8e95f40163769d11480f6ca8c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":392,"end":428}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `nodeToGFM` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"abacf74acfb9ae1429676cb952d5250f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":430,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":472,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4dc32f63393b2dba3bb2b4186a5a9d3c"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initPageShortcuts` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e91b97abbe33722ed743c916435f0ab","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3992dd4b39964f74489f5037465f0968","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateTopState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4115079d252dabe584b1839baffa5696","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `bindEvents` has 99 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d911289330106e823f8b66a27a6de9a8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2376000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `chooseTemplate` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38d61f9d4b3748a9e5ab863d54f4ccf8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":98,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `search_autocomplete.js` has 417 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"92cc9af55c3a4ab73da8e1f0d3edd029","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":506}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3604800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc8158cb371adf854571129bd363b7ef","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":149,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `getCategoryContents` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8c7fe125446a794240cdecc04543593","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":305}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onSearchInputKeyUp` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f647cc28b710d6de8a6b35f3f79f3ce","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":348,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onClick` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b118715fdcf7b3e7ac25f69bb1baa423","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":445,"end":458}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`SearchAutocomplete` has 28 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4afabdab2d1c2b911d6a1c563638e8e6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":501}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setSearchOptions` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba3145218ad79282dc1d42a52ae16802","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"27f6673ed668afd5ac9f3fd3c02a5e40","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":72,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getData` has 86 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a21aceb13c361e2e3e0299baa560bed5","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":149,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2064000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getCategoryContents` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"415e6e1a246f7b01199ed828bdebb278","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":305}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onSearchInputKeyUp` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"438f5589be7d3c9865113320e8a85fc4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":348,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `highlighter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"034f805c8a510c0c46e35c2e4fb8d329","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_find_file.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `selectRow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b2917d9725004429f0a4319beac0822e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_find_file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":143}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b590709d469cb1c8c28f467e53d2154","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af0c07eddd69b8e22c3e13c7474122a1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleDiff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"098b6e689349244e7adddfcad90974a3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/single_file_diff.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onSaveClicked` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18922f177ff6315e508e19e5d7a6cd4d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ci_variable_list/ajax_variable_list.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf8b6d0bf24fc15e2c0e87e1c6b6a636","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ci_variable_list/ci_variable_list.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `jumpToNextUnresolvedDiscussion` has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"792eaacd2770c50c0a42bce535c7bee9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/jump_to_discussion.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `jumpToNextUnresolvedDiscussion` has 102 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"784d361fd1ec4da2fc3be0e85d1e354e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/jump_to_discussion.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2448000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `buttonText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b0d7c1b1146fa7930c3c14fef72db27","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/comment_resolve_btn.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `diffNotesCompileComponents` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ec443ad0f520ec34248990713c0f0b5a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/diff_notes_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01a425e5bd2ad64d006f35854f477ad0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f1015e96e281a9a77bdaeeba619aa36b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `queryTimeSeries` has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c99f8cbe0230e2f1d48ff4478f2117c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2640000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `timeScaleFormat` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f52e997312984f599f152d3260bf8654","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/date_time_formatters.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":800000,"severity":"critical","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"531fa4647bfb14d1172613e86257dd28"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6d1e6ad89a6aec9b87ec051dfa0099d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":88,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.REMOVE_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"967d987657c3659898f377b3d07be15b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":137,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"08263cf95339fef038c9b82b56e70844","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":88,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `startRenderDiffsQueue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d28a6db58513b7ea1157b081952903c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `addLineReferences` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"782481c579d96128e5d0793c04d6113b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `prepareDiffData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69f60a55e02467d84573c99a4caa96e1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getNoteFormData` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2408381b663271af2ce36e4cfec0ef64","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addLineReferences` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e04f00e197ce4b77a3fa65c55e66cb1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `prepareDiffData` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fa4b2e2a939b7a261a1e47aea3b124e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `shouldRenderParallelCommentRow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf200732380b3f0a2a2993c8cb3d3a71","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initDiffsApp` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"37689c9906180d81c8f636a1285361fa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `create_merge_request_dropdown.js` has 391 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"efe0e6e60956f829c50aea15ff89a81c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3230400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `onChangeInput` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"51e3d7e3f8979e2acacf219907cfae33","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `updateInputState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"15a5141561c69faaf772cc24838b9882","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":433,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`CreateMergeRequestDropdown` has 32 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d33b610bd5704267ec05a9b7b5e44e0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":488}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9408c08016dc994d8ab6445d06b9e1ba","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onChangeInput` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5627e01c10e2d6e1299f91b38024a0a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `updateInputState` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5126386129e905b8737efa7b7aadb02e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":433,"end":472}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":321,"end":321}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"8643526d248036a3735dc9a6e2e57920"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addToImport` has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5c4a1a17a8903f8c6dd885142d0e5a7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/importer_status.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1152000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `autoUpdate` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86f5ee9b3a803d7476f4c94f06eeb20f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/importer_status.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":123}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `deviseState` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc96fa07083c1de787a6bff9f39300d8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `deviseState` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b9fdc968681b9a4d1a00bdaebcf5513e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":13}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"7e01335e6a48fbcffe9b977a5893e0c1"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":15}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"06b18956af744e4ba0818ef408ae519a"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"b6db36d200c40a47864a6c82d74ecdd9"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"94cbbf89dae775243077f30c7139777f"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":21,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"407c4389388a40459b3a50e566ec4695"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"c9317c489fdab4a76a50dbc5cebcfa17"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":25,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"d69b63a794f4784245d6a949c148e1c8"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"766dbcf000fa7d4e2636539267ea8cee"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9c3dd1c5c99c0b2e367eaf0f6c483688"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"9735ac3532df3e31eea793eb471bcd3e"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/get_state_key.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"6a3a4a85c8ee79ec2d8e4ea2cf165674"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `setData` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c334ad6c327b60fc52e19d4b1a441be0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setData` has 88 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"590c6f1bfea578d864bdc64a2fa9a1da","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/mr_widget_store.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2112000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `groupsSelect` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d30e631abef41c7858e8c2b472ab41b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `groupsSelect` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ced5ccd57fcd0e841cc27868cc850186","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setAjaxGroupsSelect2` has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb6c68e362058d81fc462714f431d13d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_select.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1704000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `setConfig` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93dedf1db90bd5e014f609731004784e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":25,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `memberExpirationDate` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93c026069e6f3fae025e1bf3bf480e0b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/member_expiration_date.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_request_tabs.js` has 311 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91dcee71900ea33c229c8f115d145f57","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":477}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2078400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `constructor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2c515fc51ceabbbd6bcacbadf7b409c8","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `tabShown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca9c966746914ecd639f907aed00306a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":159,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5e286159c60ca68824ec344d5dec0145","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `tabShown` has 56 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5752347dcb1fd9940bd4bc3d21abd442","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":159,"end":223}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1344000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `loadDiff` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3eedd69a3c93529e5939b19ecf1b3e32","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":331,"end":401}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleLabelPriority` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17bb8b4767aa6ee7a9db29cd4297dfd1","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/label_manager.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `toggleLabelPriority` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac24663bc55eac3c9635bccf3a68dc5a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/label_manager.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cd0496900d30272b32ee2e3adf188ae","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `addIssue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70f0f8ea0547b7001e920932e4980ddc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/list.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `addIssue` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f1eced6b6dca9d960756de9b56ac3c4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/list.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `moveIssueInList` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3726eea384e1d9e6d6d8eebb989b0a55","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":152,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `moveIssueToList` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc191b6dd17cde39e7dd162fd47e19c7","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `moveIssueToList` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0501fa18f105e7c808db7348aee50cb4","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/boards_store.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `newListDropdownInit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8f897d86e7796b5b3d49f700124b5adb","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `newListDropdownInit` has 51 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f73b08dfbb16f388d03764aefc71b663","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1224000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `projectSelect` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ccd46aac4a6745374730b2c4f0f1a7f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_select.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `query` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8facf3a4b06c65c72b401a6ae241812e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/project_select.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `swipe` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cd344682f57e11e94307c0ae71e31b21","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/image_file.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":153}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onion-skin` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d98db2ac5d0ba5352c5501d8e616908a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/image_file.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":193}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `mergeUrlParams` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9586f62e5526e65ea5dea846d2d34814","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/url_utility.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `common_utils.js` has 421 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b2e1f175792cddc3122cb26f6f2901b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":647}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3662400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `handleLocationHash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"73cd83cbd5164515c6be6e51ced09b94","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `urlParamsToObject` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"87d0167946e02e230645b1a8b4416926","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":152,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `createOverlayIcon` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1195653ae898b98df0d276acb1429b55","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":458,"end":505}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onload` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3e5a07a00d95bb2f853dee0c1c50e98","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":462,"end":502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `isSticky` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5704d88401ccd1910b07573165064f6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/sticky.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ff368be1929703177fe923eb38be8a2","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `moveCursor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"78da0046365fa4a2a913735a7884c4fe","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c17d7ff9d0dfd043e0ac8b46e612742","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `insertMarkdownText` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f38a0d7dccba49d8195065ab71f8ef39","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":54,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `toggleScroll` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1904c8e94b053af5f2371dece57951f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/logoutput_behaviours.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getMonthNames` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5630d70a3018ea651454e11d959c7e26","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getTimeago` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"915cddbb51190cedb7c5488e6d3f715a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `dateInWords` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35c8c58c18a9af9c0ee997ae5d4b8e48","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":201,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initKeyNav` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90bcaab65ebc8665cd94e8e6286ad7d3","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `generateUnicodeSupportMap` has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3235c3b88f6c553ff280eac9faec19fa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/support/unicode_support_map.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":141}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1128000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `getUnicodeSupportMap` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9342f9326c59d8e19277db8a2cb8500","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/support/unicode_support_map.js","lines":{"begin":143,"end":178}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `glEmojiTag` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"580f88e3583b6c310ded6fbad9390305","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/emoji/index.js","lines":{"begin":69,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initDropdown` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"301e9b71ddb9969243fc57daa227b33b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/lib/sidebar_move_issue.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `branch_graph.js` has 307 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8f961e52cddbca0cb2dd3290c7063853","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":352}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2020800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `buildGraph` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18ed687a5ecc08e272ec3f5a1e45ba85","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `renderPartialGraph` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"790548e7db64ebbadd07868d6c20245b","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":141,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `appendLabel` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"918265d9fa262a2ea6ddda4b96f04407","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":211,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `drawLines` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"df364db884043c3c81e753fb9a58ee90","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":286,"end":333}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `testWrap` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"65093271e08f9838db54de85e17d7c79","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `commitTooltip` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c2753572072946d03cae221981b2a147","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `testWrap` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ac8fefe6574f998844a591c4dff399c","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/raphael.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.TOGGLE_LOADING` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"41230e2a140c3c519f16d17067a948c0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.RENAME_ENTRY` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"65c7f9e9aa2de7fa4e24860dbded9820","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":263}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 26 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee3f6d8624f678d9741d386c4252f0fc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":269}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.RENAME_ENTRY` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"98f116d65b4aa0e565234027efee827f","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":263}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.SET_FILE_RAW_DATA` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6460bb9792e8eedb0b1e558f229e6ffa","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.DISCARD_FILE_CHANGES` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa62953384fc873bd8bddabed1341a3a","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `closeFile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca626095e258a497e9cf9c1fa4b7537e","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `createCommitPayload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ead12c6a7c7c105251c94c6af2fda7b0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `decorateData` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8abacda37ac495ce54d8ce69e488724","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this function.","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":158,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"75e7e39f5b8ea0aadff2470a9b44ca68"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `entries` has 67 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1a9caa4d3fce207f88b2afafe14a1df0","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/workers/files_decorator_worker.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1608000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Function `types.RECEIVE_LASTEST_PIPELINE_SUCCESS` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac7ea082c786419244a234de0970ebc9","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `types.RECEIVE_LASTEST_PIPELINE_SUCCESS` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0883c6639137c6b51cad4b57c0dd1c38","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d98be7e83cb9dbc1ca8775da0aa7d19","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/common/model.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initIde` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34f27cc8f1c849369b0095674a48c531","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/index.js","lines":{"begin":11,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `init` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c6f3babcfd2a42ae88ffe4cc05028dc","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pager.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":10}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `constructor` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f19d7f17b74ab07e9651e12680b14b9d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/profile/gl_crop.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `onModalShow` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c0421daee7918d81456c8580b8878457","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/profile/gl_crop.js","lines":{"begin":69,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Function `initMrNotes` has 74 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4dd3a8bed3022600ffaa03ba5cc77fe6","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"`` has 24 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"815b15d961f84ea742e6dce8eb3f8a4d","location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cbc52cfd6436c771188ac8f4e355cb9b","location":{"path":"app/validators/branch_filter_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8179f4c2dfe625c27616c834d37a930","location":{"path":"app/validators/js_regex_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":16}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d1ca6a4b7e3294fdc110a8e0ea47f92","location":{"path":"app/validators/cluster_name_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d62539a99ae9fabba3cd2cc96713cf09","location":{"path":"app/validators/abstract_path_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectTeam` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce2cc10520ba3b4b7205e61120d67315","location":{"path":"app/models/project_team.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_kube_client!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e929847f530fa79a8a58054b9aa3fb8e","location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":125,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `note.rb` has 325 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f0768574ccb05a5f08cf2e994799fa2","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":474}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2280000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `grouped_diff_discussions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e55577fec2bb70f0e880e0e8d0f42ec","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":168}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `in_reply_to?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a17100ec3750af84df807aff92514aa5","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":367,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Note` has 56 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d5c3b8714fe08a2c7df66bc4bfdc538","location":{"path":"app/models/note.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":474}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4800000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `track_greatest` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee586dc1932745869e3f752d180242c9","location":{"path":"app/models/internal_id.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rename_descendants` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"41d2108d52e96b7975591b300d3b2e60","location":{"path":"app/models/route.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":306,"end":313}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":400000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"1cd63fdd17237f7c081abfa37690a7fe"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `as_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"430a48264a7379f4d248d672bb16fe44","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `readable_by?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"05cd07a39aaac900028cc3b49079c531","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":301,"end":315}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Issue` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9619613b02f7bb8841b9e19c688f5251","location":{"path":"app/models/issue.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":326}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cached_attr_reader` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a0b7bc4cebaa36fff63efc3ada11817","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/redis_cacheable.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `move_dir` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75dea312f0b07cc41974f687ba6fc64","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/storage/legacy_namespace.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expand_hierarchy_for_child` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5222419d454a07f66c83180e4789d18","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/group_descendant.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `expand_hierarchy_for_child` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5cd85b2e5055a268df55df99d4d5a94e","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/group_descendant.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `avatar_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6177dbe195b50f7a5b10734fbc4a8d2","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/avatarable.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8e8f8a2e9ccd006ae8f61ca9db92d0c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/reactive_caching.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `exclusively_update_reactive_cache!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2811b2ef3d5196f0b89cec43f1f2b465","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/reactive_caching.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_binary_column_exists!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23444612f22a67bddc69d4fb3d9ab40a","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/sha_attribute.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `current` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"37517b27e64777d7506564ebffc2a9fa","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/cacheable_attributes.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `chronic_duration_attr_writer` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8acb577138f44873e03ae5712c65f31d","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/chronic_duration_attribute.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncated_diff_lines` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bade7fdd3ab51990a34487352c56728","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/discussion_on_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `calculate_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff34ec3cc17426f2d12b615f23171aad","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/prometheus_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `position_between` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f9f931c8a1748472719ac1b03432d6c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `status_sql` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46850ccc347015917b7f7d5813dfbb20","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/has_status.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_internal_id` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1753643cebf17fe9b88665c4895f0bc6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/atomic_internal_id.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_by_full_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9de369584b4bc5dcd50146b7967ef3b0","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/routable.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `where_full_path_in` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1d7711a695fff8bdfaa49dc578b0132c","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/routable.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `manual_inverse_association` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53ad262470fd01998ef23cb50fac0495","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/manual_inverse_association.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw_participants` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"014b735c6a47b089e8ef4112c427cdf6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/participable.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_batch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5ca9b6fe345855869ed62b41036772f6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/each_batch.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_batch` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e56746932db5150f690993cd09ec2c5a","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/each_batch.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_authentication_token_field` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ffe8c5e6736ff7519d2b0ad210f55dd","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/token_authenticatable.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_hook_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"651dd445a68aa882af831870aac09fe6","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/issuable.rb","lines":{"begin":264,"end":290}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notes_with_associations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"edf734b8128847bcceb4300c584ab8e9","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/issuable.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":334}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `max_member_access_for_resource_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a3525a1273d674a7a5dd1b4599a6b80","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/bulk_member_access_load.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enum_with_nil` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d195530dc1d564b6a5a2361310657dd7","location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/enum_with_nil.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_str` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf445c84a1f8ebfebacc811382517d81","location":{"path":"app/models/label_note.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notifiable?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"76278bc24d3f0c41a172b68e2f632daa","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_access?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4264d898878128898c4e12b32b905f8a","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_notification_setting` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf0f0817b180212c8e825cbbed40b752","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":144,"end":154}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `closest_non_global_group_notification_settting` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9f65343a59de0315d68462b18f90defe","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":157,"end":169}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/notification_recipient.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"d25d7135d797df677ee520a8a97ae9a6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `find_commits_by_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c28ee46d93aa21d37eeb5b2a26d394f","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository.rb` has 758 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"849ce5e0e3a20d8ed78311435ce5fce9","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1058}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8515200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `keep_around` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ffb83b66ddf0a719303059ae40ce506","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":249,"end":262}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38d273d7d1372c09c7a5c165e170a642","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":647,"end":659}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `next_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53a66b748f45002bcdd585986f4f828f","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":684,"end":697}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 128 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ffa67f7557cad6dc009a3331141e757","location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":1058}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enabled` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38454ee90e05a227558719509fe5ec29","location":{"path":"app/models/remote_mirror.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RemoteMirror` has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"24334db25a09b73ccd711bb06c29a822","location":{"path":"app/models/remote_mirror.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":229}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c206e4584e2321188004de82f54d910","location":{"path":"app/models/commit_range.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `user.rb` has 1050 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"11e77959335527c9cb28992c10d37866","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12720000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `increment_failed_attempts!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"51accad62fa466380528844722430a98","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1253,"end":1264}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_user_rights_and_limits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7a575c65331c7b917638baa8941d41c","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1405,"end":1414}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `signup_domain_valid?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a9b5f7bc9d9c55cfe5d888bed2fb420a","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1416,"end":1441}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `User` has 178 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f685bcbb6f822884dec234767db1861a","location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":1502}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":17000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project.rb` has 1664 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"531155f760c7355b54c66683855d1397","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":2277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":21561600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_or_update_import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"669b48913bc191fe053ef3cf863c7b51","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":691,"end":706}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_import_state` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c647270223f46682704c8933072ea030","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":732,"end":745}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_limit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"238a83e94e0d19d7e5bf774e737f1856","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":887,"end":899}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_or_initialize_services` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5c439340a2145fd43e3c155a46b8084","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1084,"end":1110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_repository_path_availability` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"84ad9cf46f3288017a0f4b6db6438a6c","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1302,"end":1316}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_create_default_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a2d29b10f840adb402e27183b8afb0e","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1685,"end":1704}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `container_registry_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22330faec24429812d37099efaf8566b","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":1811,"end":1821}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_update_attribute_error` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"103e8043443b236e57b2b71b4071ed2a","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":2240,"end":2250}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_branch_allows_collaboration?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a44b195efa5fdd8f8a133a9382fe540","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":2252,"end":2276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Project` has 258 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64039fbe3749f7d87b4ba7e85868d7fc","location":{"path":"app/models/project.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":2277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":25000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f45455ad20cdb5129a3bfb9eebb6498b","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Service` has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96ce9f4a9d59b553ec55116c8a3be7ae","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `available_services_names` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2ec9d5c5ae446fb75d746688a3a72fe","location":{"path":"app/models/service.rb","lines":{"begin":247,"end":284}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw_binary?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ae3aeb7a760efb26099272499cfbade","location":{"path":"app/models/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":175}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Blob` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a44f4d9e927f1b91399b8e17fb943f6d","location":{"path":"app/models/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":254}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `event.rb` has 309 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6850b538f65ad91cf5c5ef2e7148924e","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":410}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2049600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `visible_to_user?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"29269e08d03641e18bd2ba7cd22a0d3f","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":151,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `action_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f28caae33540f5326e5ce2d58a03d771","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":287}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Event` has 50 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"613c580b618dad28f34b389f766efe2e","location":{"path":"app/models/event.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":410}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `different_group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ac2c358921313bb5981e964133c5ecf","location":{"path":"app/models/project_group_link.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge_request_version_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d1a8357abf058d725c59df9cca495bf","location":{"path":"app/models/diff_discussion.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `active?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"772f6211e69bcffb4fbc411c5d7d31c3","location":{"path":"app/models/legacy_diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/legacy_diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4e0039e61f3fd67caeb1b978db868447"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `group.rb` has 290 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9e231fdbc15e514e21e1596b5e2d930","location":{"path":"app/models/group.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":403}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1776000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Group` has 53 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f82613684deaaf389431887bc5a62c74","location":{"path":"app/models/group.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":403}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4500000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Label` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9660fb59aa00ace0b608078c78c611a4","location":{"path":"app/models/label.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `has_intermediates?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc033b957f3fcb1bd690b7edb50aa441","location":{"path":"app/models/pages_domain.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":98}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `PagesDomain` has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"389a0c10cffbc7cd770d8d67a31e61ba","location":{"path":"app/models/pages_domain.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_slug` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d507615693230a051c9d4ae397fe5d2","location":{"path":"app/models/environment.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":203}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Environment` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4140683d4224f01a7fe2fad0da3d11c6","location":{"path":"app/models/environment.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectWiki` has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7ff4b093a326a93bf1e0887a36ba898","location":{"path":"app/models/project_wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":203}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `track` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d55ffd71690c0e606bcb1fa48074affd","location":{"path":"app/models/user_interacted_project.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8737f9bae4ea49696d911b5b162784ef","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":215,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"43c91a5205fef35946442db85ab54267","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":283,"end":295}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `WikiPage` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35e7d7ce82a5641563ba1029c54645bc","location":{"path":"app/models/wiki_page.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":326}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_position` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fa4f67c27ab14379e44af70d58264c1a","location":{"path":"app/models/diff_note.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":173}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `append` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d527adfd814d095e55079d7a898a3fc3","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build_trace_chunk.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `pipeline.rb` has 488 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cee8532683fbbb22a3b807c5714c49c7","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":671}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4627200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_yaml_from_repo` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f19177ae4080cc2c9d81a39383b45922","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":632,"end":639}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Pipeline` has 68 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af1e8c39d8b166628ae043bce72269a5","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":670}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `build.rb` has 604 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7967fd1fb861d27e33c208d88261cd76","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":809}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6297600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `scoped_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e310e4c57a2e9123f26a1cbcec9809eb","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":312,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `predefined_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"13282d4d569e2daa02632e5249568733","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":726,"end":745}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `legacy_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"81e2fd25bb2dd91faed640216e965698","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":747,"end":759}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `persisted_environment_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67327cbc303019830fbd1d6586dcde3e","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":761,"end":772}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Build` has 100 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"736c24725c78f957ee4538a1ef73cab0","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/build.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":808}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":9200000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c700cdde3d0b6292dd18227b3e90cf8d","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Runner` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a9c3d8a2409fd9c5506a846374c16d42","location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":320}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Discussion` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21189089f43b68ee94981dbac970d566","location":{"path":"app/models/discussion.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_format_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0e735e47b6b8a533b9ff579e13b277c9","location":{"path":"app/models/milestone.rb","lines":{"begin":261,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Milestone` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"283d777de6e0e7974ccbb1e316f5fd1a","location":{"path":"app/models/milestone.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":288}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d0fba50527ad864dc4649245f95f1bf","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/drone_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `calculate_reactive_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa74471515edc43c1ab5339ddf68e505","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/drone_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a0446e31eb4d865b34fe5938f53bbad","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07a9999f0d84368d5983e08e2891f237","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":111,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `notify_for_ref?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6a030ca161112b5f434986ab0ae88c0f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChatNotificationService` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d159cd60a69a3f1a1b5beb530264825","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/chat_notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69dbb9ff98b20cc8db3a809b7e239e5f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/mock_ci_service.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `KubernetesService` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2e6c7a0448e9bb4e799cb7efe0846fc7","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8fb7749a6cc98bccd8d5712c1d499494","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":132}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_properties` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a965dd277aee3504a57790eb7271cadb","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/issue_tracker_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `buildkite_endpoint` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"161d47385d79643f9414ed2ad67502a9","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/buildkite_service.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"42914696303830e3d209925e13650d83","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fields` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"773d8cd6842c7b74f60e9ab8003ad977","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b760b5c22532a27dbd776328b7db9a6","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pushover_service.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"802d66c5bd557b6f1bdd32240846e4c2","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/pipelines_email_service.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `jira_service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5f438f6b31722193eb4e10b389655b6","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":344}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `close_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f74475ea9bd04b9ed8ff7ddcc5c29633","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":117,"end":135}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_cross_reference_note` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6c27b1c9b77bd4f2d2f11a294e90cf36","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":137,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `JiraService` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2d0643b626f1ad53bf43aadedd954eae","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/jira_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":344}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_commit_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2f5469088e256c3b81eccc8ecaf967b","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":94,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcb9db20f4fe6adda5925e7da947a943","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_push_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f972562d25c4198e75c8dac6931a928","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `HipchatService` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb12852ed6419e4dea808d1d873302a1","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":311}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_note_message` has 39 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96500251c9498d9f1e9c7da0c8384528","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/hipchat_service.rb","lines":{"begin":200,"end":244}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":936000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_channel` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e064d1923f5ef24f603e3c03af81644f","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/irker_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6ee148a09cf8c383948472d577bfb74","location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/asana_service.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Namespace` has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"411d817f1a6db72f360bb2cb93e055ec","location":{"path":"app/models/namespace.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":302}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2600000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `application_setting.rb` has 387 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"50270695e6d7c5163050078e7cf65e18","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3172800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ApplicationSetting` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"02be76880912851331582ab14ef56dd4","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":489}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `defaults` has 76 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4a5e7733302a5f59e7878ab40f6b9f82","location":{"path":"app/models/application_setting.rb","lines":{"begin":232,"end":309}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1824000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `base_commit_sha` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"70d6880ba8e52f184e9eaf896119e352","location":{"path":"app/models/compare.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit.rb` has 355 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c361e4106ded93f757f69964f420b067","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":508}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2712000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `order_by` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4e54c836dbfddf9329a85f83378cb5","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `uri_type` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac39422eaa05c0e3880afe76c6341f18","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":425,"end":435}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Commit` has 68 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2175bec55ffd09f5d7b2352b5c5dcad","location":{"path":"app/models/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":508}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6000000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_request.rb` has 897 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59d143493fc6a1f49dd6ff46bba4459f","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":10516800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"95d0d3fa4206c77bab101daf5035ee18","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":524}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_fork` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68cf8c7f9bbbebf2133c22434d2bcae9","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":532,"end":539}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mergeable_state?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bdc249b8456dc07607ba4fe001ff1261","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":677,"end":685}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_merge_request_closes_issues!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcd9dc4beba740e5c019b9c760cacdd3","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":769,"end":782}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `compare_test_reports` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b662bb8a5b01a77feb8b7b0a9ffefdb2","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1041,"end":1054}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mergeable_with_quick_action?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74fd9deeffa5589190ba744e4af78384","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1177,"end":1187}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequest` has 137 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"417a10e5eb9495ae2d250b8c195971f7","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":1238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":12900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":682,"end":682}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"ac1600795e5aff84e3d4e9243b88bdbc"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request.rb","lines":{"begin":1184,"end":1184}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4cc86fde220f02f2e1c1443c9c96fe93"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `member.rb` has 297 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ead9a1c0eaecbe741f755dd85ef04b38","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1876800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `retrieve_member` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9cf98664280114d55fe07fc00a2931f4","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Member` has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c62b78b2bb4b49f04e64fa24a5e7525","location":{"path":"app/models/member.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `set` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8869fa571b5fb7a617adc0197c7ac362","location":{"path":"app/models/active_session.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `count_to_display_commit_in_center` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b411aa7c155fd11004316e7fd39fd0f0","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `place_chain` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"177c4e2e8eb1351747941148b8c5841f","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":180,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `take_left_leaves` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07eb1c8a024e1084d5249e442c56ead6","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":277}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `place_chain` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d89c4cb61eca0dac9322942ca4b87aff","location":{"path":"app/models/network/graph.rb","lines":{"begin":180,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save_diffs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c6b7ee6cba58c9eb3d9ad5eed75d6ec3","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":272,"end":296}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestDiff` has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7a32bf8ffc7cc2cb0b417114258fc44","location":{"path":"app/models/merge_request_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":322}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `object_storage.rb` has 315 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86494fa0d557a4aa389e5171896783dc","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":458}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2136000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `changed_mounts` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fd0a4f3d9448639f581ace634e78fb9f","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":113,"end":124}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `workhorse_remote_upload_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e022c746daf5a42b94b0696cad68db33","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":191,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unsafe_migrate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1684da513e48bc7fed9d7d05f006f4f3","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/object_storage.rb","lines":{"begin":415,"end":442}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `record_upload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7714f01e58a6f57d5612758293fdcd98","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/records_uploads.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `open` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3420c6ebb4c5709171dfe0ad626a693","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/gitlab_uploader.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `FileUploader` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"377d9736f93da216ab2620478b97b6a7","location":{"path":"app/uploaders/file_uploader.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":200}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ecf5e5baa621e39be46cda7a6b7e79a","location":{"path":"app/presenters/merge_request_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestPresenter` has 29 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8382c7b1054d55cea9b796fc549636ad","location":{"path":"app/presenters/merge_request_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":231}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2100000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `cards` has 79 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56c716082acebaebac8f5817c4770ff3","location":{"path":"app/presenters/conversational_development_index/metric_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1896000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `idea_to_production_steps` has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ec38351e7aae7c1eb1bbf782da34f4f","location":{"path":"app/presenters/conversational_development_index/metric_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1248000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project_presenter.rb` has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d892daae824d8e78fe2a0b68c288acda","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2092800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `default_view` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d66dbcb27efcacaf84388d8cfc5f690f","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":80}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `readme_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c40df23b551a8abe9f2d5830edfbf472","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":221,"end":231}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autodevops_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e4902e11edd6de01b81f9a61f5d9d7b","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":275,"end":285}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"119e536f7905363201fb67bbdcd65824","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":287,"end":299}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectPresenter` has 40 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"174173017516e33835d52eb7c5513209","location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notification_service.rb` has 356 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69e4d6c40c4449fefd31aa10ca6d0d74","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":550}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2726400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `NotificationService` has 57 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f69a1b203ea4d5900672119cebb81b66","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":550}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"40698d762fba8b2aa8a60c141d6d8790","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_create_group?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b75b73bf2d690e5a17c2abe284491440","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_allowed_transfer` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b1a41885cc0a6ac544248d54c07e1636","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4bb4279e0d059ae00152e8bdf1ea798d","location":{"path":"app/services/groups/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_operation_id` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e02445fcf7469e25e1790f6de102578e","location":{"path":"app/services/clusters/gcp/provision_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ee86b571c5fd71a16cf372ae35959a1d","location":{"path":"app/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7bf557578299a5ba915c32a04c77757","location":{"path":"app/services/gravatar_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `valid_visibility_level_change?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5663649284b422de3ee165079f02580a","location":{"path":"app/services/concerns/update_visibility_level.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":16}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e2214a2c7403de3b6b130ef6a8ae0e7","location":{"path":"app/services/labels/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"889d22762e16d3366a67e51333a2ca58","location":{"path":"app/services/labels/promote_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83f2800751c8e1fc38441feba44838e9","location":{"path":"app/services/notes/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64400ce10f6b24c336dc2c14dc7631e5","location":{"path":"app/services/notes/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"55c1155f35f19aeab86111aa747bcdef","location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9350f7f8937ed59a3c058c18876a72fc","location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `add_commits` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb5157bfd09a812f4b9e9e59faa9bd43","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_status` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b2b9c2adcef9eef8232ca3fabba5213","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":214,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_branch` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d01b8c3144cf8ecd33ca899268167ba5","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":370,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_branch_presence` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcdc7164fbd2b97a6ffca4f6dc2e0e44","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":390,"end":390}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `system_note_service.rb` has 269 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d114264549f2dceede46ea914a3550c","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":679}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1473600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `change_time_spent` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c81cb9f69e1de7b23d6f18ba82533d3","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":181,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cross_reference_disallowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf012be1a6a2e48dd333008fe9d0d152","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":455,"end":461}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `existing_commit_summary` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9e510f603309baf5e0cb54ad77970a75","location":{"path":"app/services/system_note_service.rb","lines":{"begin":637,"end":659}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_mention_todos` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8a610af9d7608ea64f58ba654367d763","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":273,"end":273}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `attributes_for_todo` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"22c5b886bc2bcef31fd1446dabf42446","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":310,"end":310}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `TodoService` has 43 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"888b933ca386de89d1c664deed0728bd","location":{"path":"app/services/todo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":357}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcfd0e3ea01c9694d57bfccaa03838e6","location":{"path":"app/services/verify_pages_domain_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d473aafcb22747b52b1f62e820f2074d","location":{"path":"app/services/create_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a39c0c805730f76077d4c41f5a49ab0","location":{"path":"app/services/todos/destroy/entity_leave_service.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd806bba9fb1ffe1bffc98d5b313f431","location":{"path":"app/services/todos/destroy/private_features_service.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"669e705b9b727535b65aa70c23908b8a","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable/bulk_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fa059d9d5e3d40934b6d454456a29e17","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_registry_access` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a9f93af474354f18c131c4a6f33ce74","location":{"path":"app/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_repository_access` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2612abf7127bdfa9f619c175cf5d2cc","location":{"path":"app/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7189b60fb2402fbb02818934986a95e8","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/overwrite_project_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"961ae326b78bf20ee97acef0cec52327","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_create_actions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e38e4c0872ce60d2ba85c11448b4522b","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save_project_and_import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49a616d751623502896fe1bf01ddc263","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"175fda5eebf084d959ea97dbc7ddba89","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"4406c9c51c68a677aea6fc1c46031379"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `propagate_projects_with_template` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"293ec445efe1987a7ed4d749d241b1c9","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/propagate_service_template.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a2218c0712e897508cb29f687ddbb15","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attempt_repositories_rollback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06f3aaf8a1f066c4e7933483e129d710","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_repository_to_project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0129f188de75c26a852812d70994f671","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_repository` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7dc266875c644d2161df4f52854509a","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `download_lfs_objects` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e22b343575e9881c97f2271bcd97f948","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7bc52f032ae36171f9038ca564b8725f","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3753f60f8dc5d9fdb996971cbdec0ee","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_zip_archive!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe7709a469edc64e95ec098c80aa4d9e","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `UpdatePagesService` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7d865dc59fc4a03d279c1c19c89a168","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_pages_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":191}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_as_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"78f7382b2da989274c44cca4dd67b726","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/autocomplete_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ecc06d47c5ab14de0497085a390276e9","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f166c36283c89cda2c2d1b400fc83d9c","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/transfer_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8619477bd476b8e6c20c420edaafa603","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eab5a0a1e19f69711efa955efe37831a","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `after_update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1014f2a5df19a7195983026335ef76c","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23b22fd0746b04d1cdb84c038d084b5b","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0543ffb09bae340f0c5077ae46b7cdcc","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_download_service.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"896cabbb6ed77bf3c709bb312f23a6fb","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfsconfig_endpoint_uri` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ab48443c563d169a420e80faa5c91bf8","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/lfs_pointers/lfs_import_service.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d7377f3f82a92babb9d1d653fb3a6c0","location":{"path":"app/services/projects/unlink_fork_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `notification_recipient_service.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"04116f97d81f75dc8b45ce0a5811fa81","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":384}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc4e88abd84c5b4832ac272b050f5372","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":257,"end":295}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Base` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"27695a9b55119263d5fc023bfb91d6e3","location":{"path":"app/services/notification_recipient_service.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":238}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6cc1d79d478940cb6d6b9ceed02cb6e6","location":{"path":"app/services/users/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute_without_lease` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67cb8ef6b0457ad00d8347bcbe3ff3f7","location":{"path":"app/services/users/refresh_authorized_projects_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_authorizations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6e70e1ba1ea2f084af1fff74047fe8d9","location":{"path":"app/services/users/refresh_authorized_projects_service.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9165689bde9f912aa84f6f518e598da","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_user_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"830b5807353157bd5e183aad25f2b282","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `admin_create_params` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe5ddceb25aafe04827303d1f6d564b4","location":{"path":"app/services/users/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5bc79f55d7e462657e85385bf64c461b","location":{"path":"app/services/submit_usage_ping_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eff6af7a39548e896b0c36625e41edfa","location":{"path":"app/services/validate_new_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f26b8395f9bebcbbe601568ab87f1dac","location":{"path":"app/services/tags/create_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009acc0cc8f2cad1eb48f996869cd8b3","location":{"path":"app/services/tags/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `close_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"268f126190d57eeaaded69cfb25897c3","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/close_service.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff12a5753d6bee667c95cfbc92416e03","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b14e45d1c64f39d6eedb20d84843741","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_assignee` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5691687cb00f6fd194e603429807185a","location":{"path":"app/services/issues/base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1a9702d3dc815e8d64756d8fb212f9b3","location":{"path":"app/services/web_hook_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d9ca5643eb0d67f71faf5371f5ae764","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/create_pipeline_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b8c02fe4ca7afa344ed38920cbc647e3","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/retry_pipeline_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc2e58626fb38ae2a635ad7504d1369f","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/stop_environments_service.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"617800a52fa424a1bcea1ed6a62b6793","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/register_job_service.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3c427dfa0dd24ca8d0170b6247260b87","location":{"path":"app/services/ci/register_job_service.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_label_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d322faf3023b3e313c8abe2020cf59af","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"139f887d96d46ca70a22e378422f8bc7","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuableBaseService` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"906133099e33d0679f4b8c65cc1eef9b","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":319}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009042d6d3df2763254c61f2b3d8536c","location":{"path":"app/services/issuable_base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":224}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_event_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"181f03475858936500cb1903a2981922","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_event_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"58fb30a590bb73d7a7c014c15cff2f61","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build_event_data` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb1f235466d69ba0f51ae5082e6ccd1b","location":{"path":"app/services/system_hooks_service.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `include_any_scope?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c3b269346955ff77f7af249761778c5f","location":{"path":"app/services/access_token_validation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b944cb228f06d17cfab396e042f46404","location":{"path":"app/services/create_deployment_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a911c4e00c978f2c3dee8a80d2b123c","location":{"path":"app/services/members/destroy_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e17107f5166483e06d9a3aa43ce4057","location":{"path":"app/services/delete_branch_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_be_resolved_in_ui?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"303b72ed1619302f77225ae41471638d","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/conflicts/list_service.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `reload_merge_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a105139484033c8e7ced10c6ce36e8db","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/refresh_service.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_new_commits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"851ed172a4510d8303c8caf10c7c09e1","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/refresh_service.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":141}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trigger` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8627834675a31ad536bf412edaafd7e7","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/merge_when_pipeline_succeeds_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4cd7f00168c6c916f0dc7075f0ca3349","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/merge_service.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35e1a81d921bd211a80412b3021d8f1f","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/create_from_issue_service.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"629d86725d56fa929caf501972ac7cf2","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":92,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BuildService` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0955c9bbce7bc1720631a8dc579bbf5f","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/build_service.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":208}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_branches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e605b474bb1fb7b66f5bfbaf51d3c6d","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/get_urls_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cefad5ecb48fbecc8f4fa6ba026659f8","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_changes` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db391ef0b97408393fd716be0c7356dd","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `commit_status_merge_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"784a58094574fa35608fca082c2548e7","location":{"path":"app/services/merge_requests/base_service.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `interpret_service.rb` has 596 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83735b0b7c1f8d22c40f49e709c57e70","location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":700}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6182400,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b08fd2ee935cfed15e0505bb9af417b4","location":{"path":"app/services/discussions/update_diff_position_service.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcb90a6db168562206b2356716e752b6","location":{"path":"app/services/git_push_service.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b2781e6841d5d63745094c685fcd1e8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/groups/children_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3169a6c4ee72f03a1318dedbed6b40ff","location":{"path":"app/controllers/groups/group_members_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `failure_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3605869f669f4cb85ba66bdd5b04c7a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `omniauth_flow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8cf6a8a0fd40eb5ff273cc6dba558403","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":95}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sign_in_user_flow` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e780968a46460e3b3fe11a34ddfc0c00","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `OmniauthCallbacksController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af6b190bf330da08acbe854817a6812f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/omniauth_callbacks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `impersonate` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f01a1ec9614ccf1b226a3e42206b203b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"af47e69f6ee053a6f226de336934f214","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `UsersController` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb3ecebd549737d88ffb4ea7b2d02d16","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":230}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d5e93c6a88076ccc249e69590f05f53","location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/system_info_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6c80ea5d1d0a024abdc38fba56cb8435","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/uploads_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `send_blob` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfa9da0619389a51f42df3b51bf5c65c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/sends_blob.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `leave` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f6860cf601d992df6f0af95d95748a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/membership_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `set_issuables_index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f415a6c750063cabd8f90d48e98e5eb0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/issuable_collections.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_with_two_factor` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36f3a297fab9a3ef0e526b7f851741b2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/authenticates_with_two_factor.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `safe_redirect_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36420be74fc50045ef291eb40a71bb77","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/internal_redirect.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `safe_redirect_path_for_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d5b751dbd9dd362815b574f1cb52225a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/internal_redirect.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"273ea02f6c72cced154034c12207d3f1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_discussion_html` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62bc37c3eb9f037889edcbe39ef53aa6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":148,"end":174}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"573f594e00ed6b29987ce9e763457833","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":239,"end":256}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `note_json` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2572ca1fa7eb27c9668322b7a098f02a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/notes_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `recaptcha_check_with_fallback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f5ab9c6deb983a187870f912e14afaea","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/spammable_actions.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"832aa36f617c6cce4927e6c8b561ce98","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_flash_notice` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"89030f5b74776bb2425f95279fdd5b7d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `final_success_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"afb1305c0c32730e0b027be235b174a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create_commit` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eaa2bdf0bf7bb61da1f37f4031392e35","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/creates_commit.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `send_upload` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfa021a786ee32f97584fecedce60cde","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/send_file_upload.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfs_check_access!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46d5167d71a5e6a69a9a236086347aed","location":{"path":"app/controllers/concerns/lfs_request.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"905d81937e68b3931dad7416dc6ef9a6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"20b781fcddc55e961f42441c445d70d8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/github_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `GithubController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ab20d51ced6ac78aa49e0f6de0af0ac0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/github_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":132}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_or_create_namespace` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f80525d40e648a6d7ea2229b2cb74ae","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/base_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d4ab07c39a5534d15b7443e37a7a235","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_server_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_import_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"da2d51f606c44590f847c4640444ac5b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/bitbucket_server_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `callback` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3c9e710a6531242212414756cccfe915","location":{"path":"app/controllers/import/google_code_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_captcha` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de5a9e305854d86a525c3be0d27eaf6d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `auto_sign_in_with_provider` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f619928e9105c1311e52540b45817001","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":167,"end":186}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `SessionsController` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca547cff8dfcb4f2bb32febd07c3a8b9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/sessions_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44af899cceadececa5fb2d6343c42fb8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/registrations_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `index` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07120d763a5a37d3563d108da7618fc2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/snippets_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19fe68118b5b1cf2a9c1bfef20064546","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/wikis_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4754ebccd6eb3ba307dee978dd12dde8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/wikis_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_requests_controller.rb` has 265 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed0fbac1699084d99f2798b9ff54b642","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1416000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6d989eecff0a311d8a4126b524b3d54","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"043aac3b7446fd75e17405d975137865","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":123,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ci_environments_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46e544b6af20509fb22aa245f36e853b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":242}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c7d0579b3b6ee7f277ab6932678009d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":285,"end":319}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `MergeRequestsController` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b062a438177acc72625495d3cbfaa77c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e3c966096d2b12e85a670db7911707b8","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ci_environments_status` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5b7f8ffd1531062cbb97dd163687759","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":242}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `set_commits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e6d95cec8ea5cbbfb499acf2d8c47bb9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `archive` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"24b42f263d62dd73163666f08a5dab84","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/repositories_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"48f2140ee4baa6d602990f3cd3a4e3bd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `create` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b53414d925313d554a03dbde87a17b1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/branches_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aeab90a0370c820e728a3abfbc25b413","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/git_http_client_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59245dcb34ab6bc8f9698502300494c2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/mirrors_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `resolve` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"43486b045d4b1186318cfc251852d98f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unresolve` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"687318ee4eb16a33452c1f37b2c881a0","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31c48fb29d257a60073d2b38d6e1cb4d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/forks_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `index` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a118caadbf010e6edb81311d4382716d","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/pipelines_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3abec97b27020fca915a84ac93bc67d6","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/imports_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4da2f2dd27d4fd213b9f9f2f1a5cd41f","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/group_links_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `service_test_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bca34a40fb26a815c60df6fd1e7dba51","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/services_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"519adc463f2dd3de5cb94580d7f50383","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/deployments_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `additional_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4f6fc892643a150dc844973ad4d976","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/deployments_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_match_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07c854b446b4087e5ee7892172f74ee7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":133,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `blob` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6f7a07f247048d784135038dce26244","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":151,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `editor_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cfcc7b49429c64315cf6da835ec8bede","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BlobController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c1e63be99f08c204815ffecf3dd4b66c","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/blob_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":284}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"979438a3332d8f5f08717dc86472299b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/tree_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"806fa8153a8d1eb022e92afcd4601d91","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/tree_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `raw` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4f02dd301b3eeb842d85c37f20bae2e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/jobs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":126,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `JobsController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6f969a368940183e4fce1acd28147f56","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/jobs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_merge_request_diff_compare` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91ff93d1ec72c5ce3a260ca7bb0355a1","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/merge_requests/diffs_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `download_objects!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b7b7331d3cec46b88359e5648ed2f9a2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/lfs_api_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ClustersController` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"964ab09026b9448f413a95a5f6094e09","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":222}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `move` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ae70ac550f5ace969dc34ad430e1a506","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/issues_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuesController` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"09358857b8d0a59b5b0f1efabe1eb312","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/issues_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_root_container_repository!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a31d8c82827ad31ea06cbe929b5bcb9e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/registry/repositories_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_keys` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e98b2fc794e033c8a48c3ee0becb6ada","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/keys_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7fac5d70e69bf9664ceb8d865c808fa2","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/two_factor_auths_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `show` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"053f896df50c58d1c5a7f874e0cf72c3","location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/two_factor_auths_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `new` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17c6af74d7968b2ff43b8ab9795a3e8a","location":{"path":"app/controllers/oauth/authorizations_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects_controller.rb` has 328 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed6bb55f0c75667bbb0ec51d3c2664cf","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2323200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `refs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4477c3a607082b3d28aae895558786dd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":274}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_landing_page` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"278be4b0b74df103253b6e3205fb8a62","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":281,"end":298}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ProjectsController` has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8090aa2673614a81e71589f7753eff30","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `project_params_attributes` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2fdc2a483f87578ca62a61a751d113d7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":331,"end":370}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_check_results` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba1563517e02434643d39267194f528e","location":{"path":"app/controllers/health_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f7c994d83ef228aa163c05179f06d2fd","location":{"path":"app/controllers/help_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `clean_path_info` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5db34152511808356524914b64cf554b","location":{"path":"app/controllers/help_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `application_controller.rb` has 341 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f029769395ddcac92c2b8d2ca3b05b28","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":465}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2510400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ldap_security_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"523cc3bb278c788d5848949c8c3dead7","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":262,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enforce_terms!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d14876e741b595110a644395f1230e14","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ApplicationController` has 53 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d63945970dce3ed1ef2b7634b214a4e9","location":{"path":"app/controllers/application_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":465}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4500000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `users_select_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a108342e6dd48ba76731363b84661eaf","location":{"path":"app/helpers/selects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `users_select_data_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a8bad651f6dba343e0468fd0003dd784","location":{"path":"app/helpers/selects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `show_last_push_widget?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f5475afeb1122f3cfa25ac5955cbb27","location":{"path":"app/helpers/application_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `visible_attributes` has 119 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17f189b8fca7fc3b1f8a420a4bcbda19","location":{"path":"app/helpers/application_settings_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":266}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2856000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `toggle_award_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d69f1bff0994f6e3441f85f3f11d5bbe","location":{"path":"app/helpers/award_emoji_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `page_gutter_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e65e525a4333beebdf83e031e767ef28","location":{"path":"app/helpers/nav_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_header_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f16a544d112fad89ba71d21c6d5db6a3","location":{"path":"app/helpers/nav_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_match_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b869dd8c4eaef5740ed1f255a8f1fbf1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/diff_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parallel_diff_discussions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ca093d3db0a23030593eb120a3b43fd","location":{"path":"app/helpers/diff_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `active_nav_link?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a16ad6a8f13c9288d42920124805df7f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/tab_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1c1f76f6143eff8d1d22a334a235fd12","location":{"path":"app/helpers/users_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `namespaces_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7abb679aa0b2ea21e01c24880d3bf77c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `options_for_group` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e8e66fbb82bdafdc25047aa1524869b","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `namespaces_options` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1da7571d4cd35e4edcc84ea6e21ec17","location":{"path":"app/helpers/namespaces_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submodule_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"592e98a3099ca8bf38ff5b45bcb0dffb","location":{"path":"app/helpers/submodule_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `submodule_links` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c06e0c3ec596b1cdfd2de6f634cd6b86","location":{"path":"app/helpers/submodule_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_member_message` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bba34164517c03c61579ce09b9d98bb9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/members_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `chunk_snippet` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de18ceb549965f7ea862a8c0dc960bea","location":{"path":"app/helpers/snippets_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":105}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `labels_filter_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d39f54cf4cda251c101014a6f4c7244","location":{"path":"app/helpers/labels_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `label_status_tooltip` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"64c9182b39df4fa2de87d8d55c2d2cbc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/labels_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":216,"end":222}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `event_feed_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ae609cca64a854e8b692dd72db01e13","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `event_feed_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f99a06ad5d757ef02870ca23d95676bc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":104,"end":122}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `push_event_feed_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0a4c5fb26657f91ff277b7ef0d13c32d","location":{"path":"app/helpers/events_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":138}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `discussion_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8fcc6a280f6df449c018435d3f92438","location":{"path":"app/helpers/notes_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":77,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `clipboard_button` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c29991b281e121dc435a356a600e4e1e","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_item_with_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d5076e20cc132338854d62653cd1df8","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `clipboard_button` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97e66a0f68fa32b384f734ea55e5e044","location":{"path":"app/helpers/button_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4267997c227f431d5c46888b32748d75","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dropdown_toggle` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a5dbb87125de6801bd8e3f421ea8d82","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `dropdown_tag` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5365287d8861b3ecac3eb84417018a2b","location":{"path":"app/helpers/dropdowns_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sprite_icon` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b288e014419e55f1aa86631629c79889","location":{"path":"app/helpers/icons_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `file_type_icon_class` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ddea2c28588a85667f5b5399507ff46","location":{"path":"app/helpers/icons_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":109,"end":151}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `commit_action_link` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8657821ad7a6c0ec4e6398a6aee36f9c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/commits_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":181}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `todo_target_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d03a4561eaff01e66db146018ad0c969","location":{"path":"app/helpers/todos_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `todo_due_date` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db4163fb6bc594c0c7f5188d10a94d61","location":{"path":"app/helpers/todos_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":141,"end":160}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `url_for_issue` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b77357907fc65f32d6adebdec5c99e74","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issues_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `path_breadcrumbs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"309df9fc4689b2f5fb71f6534a5efd03","location":{"path":"app/helpers/tree_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":121}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `edit_fork_button_tag` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2b6c57301b36358581b2491652866c44","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":302}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `edit_button_tag` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"723d5e25e5499349ff424fa5046927f1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":318}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `modify_file_button` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b6850840a5430937e584328e518311d","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `blob_raw_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b8466fa1a816b27c99638fe228016597","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":119,"end":131}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `edit_button_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"93c71a130633cfcebe91bcda32798413","location":{"path":"app/helpers/blob_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":318,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects_helper.rb` has 438 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a3d8d9970bc1e29fb6cf0845a8963a35","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":555}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3907200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `link_to_member` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"92e14b6f78cd2026911faaf78829ba53","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_title` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2ebe86c74e8aaea024bada46109f4e9a","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_project_nav_tabs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c4c2cc0402179e15ec7cff7acf71f67","location":{"path":"app/helpers/projects_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":266,"end":300}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disallowed_project_visibility_level_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cde9c43b6e33582ebc01be9dcc6b0cc6","location":{"path":"app/helpers/visibility_level_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disallowed_group_visibility_level_description` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c964b53a81590235d500b10d64921ffc","location":{"path":"app/helpers/visibility_level_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":106,"end":128}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_controller_bundle_tags` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1915400e4cdf8101f80cf09fcaa41a8","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_entrypoint_paths` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2059057b0a4c8c172104d3a69b6d33a1","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `webpack_public_host` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5187936b625c537cc83fe49f935245ac","location":{"path":"app/helpers/webpack_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_class_for_state` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9f98077e679dcc8bdc4adbc9fc03e111","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_time_for` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e9f0e967afa3a497b80340cf11b095e","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":122,"end":144}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestone_date_range` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4843496f3de8ac4a890951c97d469064","location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":181,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `share_with_group_lock_help_text` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ff00375205d66e384de0e3f33ec7d0d7","location":{"path":"app/helpers/groups_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `group_title_link` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"98657f045e5336754e6eae56e789418f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/groups_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":141,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ci_icon_for_status` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c3efeba2a30134025307449a05b2f77","location":{"path":"app/helpers/ci_status_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `sorting_helper.rb` has 302 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01923968066dde38b1a1f78557e3aa84","location":{"path":"app/helpers/sorting_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":382}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1948800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `link_to_html` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a4d4827db929df3ce6e16fb4d0b9522","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `first_line_in_markdown` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a45a636cd6cfd627a9b9cb575482d665","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_wiki_content` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f59f576a0875d3e1b3150c35d4244f1f","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `markup_unsafe` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f734634b0f84e17e369619da7591cc9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":166}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncate_visible` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7de1befc5006684b8aac21b36b5a2eee","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":229}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `truncate_if_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c65f7114f8bc0ff0c40ba17a721dc4e7","location":{"path":"app/helpers/markup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":234,"end":243}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issuables_helper.rb` has 354 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0534175d956cb265e089add14a703e9","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":436}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2697600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `multi_label_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6f2aa839b3380e86377b58408fcfa15","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_labels_tooltip` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ed7317a98ede04c4a1cde7f6af1871c","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":208,"end":219}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_todo_button_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"382bc77616cd06810f3d2112c8460240","location":{"path":"app/helpers/issuables_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":381,"end":395}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `project_policy.rb` has 333 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"61f7a144aa6cdf7e965d3130c52aacc3","location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":434}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2395200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remaining_days_in_words` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"db6e21e4091f24644db9efa04f03f5f2","location":{"path":"app/serializers/entity_date_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe3dd187f741789f765000b6e08c77bf","location":{"path":"app/serializers/merge_request_widget_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":260}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `reassigned_issue_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3e2a4c8e9b4b5584a258cdc21bf1779b","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `relabeled_issue_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eccd65b7da076099478491ce5ffd1bcd","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issue_status_changed_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d347450b4f4fa27b8d847a4e282b8f2","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issue_moved_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1fb6126b5a4051ae7af19c5fd1ea1ef","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `reassigned_merge_request_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bd5f4e62d9db3075aa99840c56f1dc3","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `relabeled_merge_request_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4fbe646413819b74d51d11132d24f75","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `merge_request_status_email` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c39ada600f20e34ac7bc271aaa17a489","location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `NotifyPreview` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ad28a90a453e7f0892e2fa27ca7dd74","location":{"path":"app/mailers/previews/notify_preview.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ae09aa8f81cc51243569392f706dea8b","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_branch_updates` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2efa6a64aab186fa6e22c887b82c2da8","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_commits` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bda830a07ed575bd9c98deb67e6efa84","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":84,"end":84}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `send_commits_count` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe8fcb808f2da3f31174330b3b8e8d2f","location":{"path":"app/workers/irker_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":113,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `process_commit_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0cbd58f4d824762ee08cbe8394a955be","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `close_issues` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0ddd5587d752e08728eca56e8b842057","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00fda5cf89ca2d06f32e73e5948d2d96","location":{"path":"app/workers/process_commit_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b2d21175bd49ce0560d00b41a5d4b105","location":{"path":"app/workers/emails_on_push_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21b177b9c8aab67c1dd18ac4736d07e0","location":{"path":"app/workers/emails_on_push_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1392000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc6bfd63748977ec6b13ad1bcd32f3e0","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_import_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":30}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac08a8c45d58e80f3f9f0e821af8c678","location":{"path":"app/workers/create_pipeline_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sanity_check!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e3c40adf8befa842892c33a2ef33ef6","location":{"path":"app/workers/object_storage/migrate_uploads_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5767377fdd633dc52d45bb5edaf792ad","location":{"path":"app/workers/object_storage/background_move_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"873b9f464ca14204612b7168bd6cd51a","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_update_remote_mirror_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform_repository_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c569f618db6dab9061d1c9a4fbd00161","location":{"path":"app/workers/repository_check/batch_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fb73a85eb279eea1e916d045d1752c0b","location":{"path":"app/workers/update_merge_requests_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":9}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c731770fbe34f3e5817178bf1c1c9c2","location":{"path":"app/workers/post_receive.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_project_changes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcfa21f106c7ddc7d59ef6a69ed225a5","location":{"path":"app/workers/post_receive.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90ee5638594e38ee879df3d7b6670837","location":{"path":"app/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c91f311ed659a5cf472f55294f93721e","location":{"path":"app/workers/project_migrate_hashed_storage_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_failure` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ea43d53b1207bf05223f6e3378b7622f","location":{"path":"app/workers/email_receiver_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fb063b327d5645323a0adeb4a475ab88","location":{"path":"app/workers/create_gpg_signature_worker.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90474c7bc130abea03bc8b0c1a6d72e3","location":{"path":"app/finders/concerns/finder_with_cross_project_access.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_due_date` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a7cd7e8d0b5f825ced9cce3fd0921f8b","location":{"path":"app/finders/issues_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":90}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `all_groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9450c1e48d60393e153d88597dff24f6","location":{"path":"app/finders/groups_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":54}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"be7b1d323697075c6c41a353ae096f3b","location":{"path":"app/finders/environments_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `execute` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"caa84d8a4abdc89470c9734cc20f668b","location":{"path":"app/finders/environments_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issuable_finder.rb` has 326 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a0da380c5a294186d2f8b47c7dbbefc2","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2294400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `milestones` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"10f2a889ce05a62411b22bd93f5cc5fb","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":195,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_milestone` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b5705f5f9e383902a98d61545a61a9f","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":432,"end":447}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `IssuableFinder` has 47 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"863953770234ecee39c26f4a376fd96f","location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `target` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"10931dd4f683d88c8163ae49517c9ab8","location":{"path":"app/finders/notes_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `by_archived` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8a0163155f7d44abda52664f1aeec277","location":{"path":"app/finders/projects_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `label_ids` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8efea533e852a1ae66e134916ddee3ed","location":{"path":"app/finders/labels_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dcae9d4bea82b824bf3281aee3585c28","location":{"path":"app/finders/labels_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b10747a7f6c51031eb2aec28a84ab64","location":{"path":"app/finders/autocomplete/users_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `distinct_on` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"684bb4005fc7ad31c75a6725f7cc9bb4","location":{"path":"app/finders/members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `TodosFinder` has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bda816f835a5b1d9557e5018542c8d40","location":{"path":"app/finders/todos_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":195}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2764263922dc65629ac261e7b22a4aaa","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_break_from_strong_memoize.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3d826dd296b41ed52a3d279711f08c1","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/reversible_add_column_with_default.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7c2b352ab3b2b95bfd273eed48b0abde","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/update_column_in_batches.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ca44c40f4350122f1d014c4832b0903","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/update_large_table.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"259f2282957271f68f06320d6e9c9304","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_reference.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_def` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1eade1345b7999362c94ffdd69c9abe5","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_index.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2957b0117eb58305df4d1c4f628f6e22","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_concurrent_index.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a265e4d95fda1c51004e6b280d4faa62","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/hash_index.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4642fe2fb8caa127e076b834679b38c7","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/add_column.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"53f08cb9ea1aded1c4867d5ec20513e1","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/datetime.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_def` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"33c826c076b3d604191dc285ae1c197f","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_column.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f6ab7199493398668d2f7fb4ae05a45","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/safer_boolean_column.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d3a133fdd5733e12d588c313215673c","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_concurrent_index.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_block` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60e29c1a431f0815adefc57a3daa815a","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_return_from_blocks.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parent_blocks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf710c1583fafaba0fb4a8d7507199ca","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/avoid_return_from_blocks.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac6a847fc937c343670c7deedadaa245","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_all_send_nodes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86036271965f234231993a45bdebb14d","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3468ff5bbfe02d60179b461cee64dcd2","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6cd42fcfb267a05384d5c43432583d9","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_if` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c31d398a0e65e6ad5bf772ffbe612d27","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autocorrect` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6790fd3dafb4732df58459faaaee4a86","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `on_send` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83f3ce0952418f2d18756e7f01d3f37e","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/project_path_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/project_path_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":18}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"16132947f8a9d308be379b39b9a5d3e6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00f629cf63f892026e01afc3ea1f7651","location":{"path":"qa/qa/scenario/test/sanity/selectors.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `configure!` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"024a3eec035772b027f91725d6217728","location":{"path":"qa/qa/runtime/browser.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b5bc236abe446161666817def77f8ddf","location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6f04a78d84c195424103bc166feb302","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/repository/push.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0619d32fe486fa8cd5d32a978dbba114","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/repository/push.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3806fbbd18c151ecd8c0b6a777c6eafd","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/kubernetes_cluster.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9a68225ad27f7d73dc48ba5138c97cc4","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/kubernetes_cluster.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"455a528019b993508c00252ac2356d13","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/branch.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `fabricate!` has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c20ae555f1495416940ef8126556a4b","location":{"path":"qa/qa/factory/resource/branch.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":73}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":960000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sign_in_using_credentials` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cf2fda789a392298297395e24cd69833","location":{"path":"qa/qa/page/main/login.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expand_section` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"403c8764d8456908ed9eeef4e0044633","location":{"path":"qa/qa/page/settings/common.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f47da27b9c8ebadc35daab5ecdfacbd","location":{"path":"qa/qa/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Base` has 36 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e990b96533b4c82f0e6c7290f79ea42e","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/base.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":330}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"return_statements","content":{"body":""},"description":"Avoid too many `return` statements within this method.","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/condition.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":300000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"453a21507c9d4e6b09338d4ea74a2cb6"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9109da1712e5180769d6dee88e01ab4b","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `steps_by_score` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c728761c8bd550bb676d5ac29cc54f2c","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `steps_by_score` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fda7518f9492e598aeaa14084a16fcad","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `flattened` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"938e199f4acb9d23e67b122acf7df125","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy/step.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e8ff80c1013b45a887d5b05aebda0a6d","location":{"path":"lib/mattermost/session.rb","lines":{"begin":100,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Session` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b6bc576e4f2b4e33eeb24fbd9a4756e0","location":{"path":"lib/mattermost/session.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":185}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `from_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8708d87b45e03dda5cf801ba3c8b4ae8","location":{"path":"lib/uploaded_file.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `object_link_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4d75625eef2a0bac64c81e6a99b470c7","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/merge_request_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e4a7914b17bf2c4568c886ae0510580a","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/issuable_state_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c21517ccaabda5807f34857c92c02c20","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/emoji_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b2ff3f6e59ccd27a3e8df6e92792289","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/gollum_tags_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_relative_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1fc007ca58af10483040ad6c3acafc7b","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":140}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0d11bc0fb07cb93de54e50ca187a470c","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/inline_diff_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"229de514760543ff1eae907b8931ae4a","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":60}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2adb2780e68c3edecbf3243959331bc","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":99,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `object_link_filter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"756d39528c96fdea1b53fc02cd2f1b54","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":204}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `AbstractReferenceFilter` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf8591fc0f7db3df80a7dd6204670584","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":359}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `call` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"158c3e7c7c151f7461c460b58c8eb7fb","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":99,"end":148}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `object_link_filter` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cce139d64bf42a05629c35156d98c24b","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/abstract_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":204}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f009def1da08a1c0910203aacb888646","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":55}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e19e0b6d7127e7778817e23a5c2202a6","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/external_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight_node` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9dc3f1809c63dc39b3c7b301b2c8b0a8","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/syntax_highlight_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0228be52a5d55a59f39144f901ba3de8","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_link_filter` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e1a29dd5f3f29173136fead3b7feacff","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c56c41f7c09938431d527c9d84ee464c","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"23c5be476e6cfabb3f50b8995a21481e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":67}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `autolink_match` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"63ef57bb6d5d4556a6d292a19e1eb7aa","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_unsafe_links` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"578c89c0c495a9f9912ae5425a9baf35","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/sanitization_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":91}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_unsafe_table_style` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"66ae1f700aade40e1b93928de1809522","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/sanitization_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":114}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_link_attr` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe0e7a59ae612e2391ff8956ece5a37e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/absolute_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"91ceeacf382258ddf799f7e8df323086","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/commit_trailers_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `link_to_user` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2cae91969679378626a39ee56d06c378","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/commit_trailers_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"complex_logic","content":{"body":""},"description":"Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/math_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":400000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure","fingerprint":"c132e79b1733f1ef2e4fba2f07f29935"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"88347949c1ff362bde8f0c3f4fe03dc2","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/table_of_contents_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_parent` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b3d0438ee7565d4ad0316ba6f05a9baf","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/table_of_contents_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `nodes_visible_to_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c851d1fc927d9308df218d02f42fde99","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/user_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `nodes_user_can_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bfa5e9970213f7ef43f0e22780710fb3","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/user_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `grouped_objects_for_nodes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56d2576cd012b6e37a94c3cac839a5fd","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":147}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `BaseParser` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3b65d4312cddf7542466b907246e6568","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":255}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_collection_render` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"86955f7d246e45efcedaab9abac1b39e","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/renderer.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":103}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_nodes_at_beginning` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"575e435b81c0cb589731931503f3f7ef","location":{"path":"lib/banzai/querying.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a1435f7fb2485ddc0076596fa851b5e1","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_validity!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4c0eea681bcd3ea73ab99bdeb9992c52","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4ad97d789c0a7bb2c49b85af370fa1cb","location":{"path":"lib/file_size_validator.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":65}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `projects.rb` has 419 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de2195ccf1e60f3a00e250b69809f314","location":{"path":"lib/api/projects.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":513}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3633600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `apply_filters` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d37733ec13b40a7294cb95cca30d7c0","location":{"path":"lib/api/projects.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `entities.rb` has 1174 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"14ca44a7292f309674c3e6bf5668d68a","location":{"path":"lib/api/entities.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1469}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":14505600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_note` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5bdd6d096b03346b779bae1a47c5df19","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers/notes_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_job!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9c2df515fd3e4e567e5c43ce34122ebc","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_runners` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8fe97bd7f7ff40f6f347505c5401de55","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":163,"end":176}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_show_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"678c4afecdf242daef2608fb52f16121","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":184,"end":188}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_delete_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"229dc324c7b4cd0754d3f429d0efa489","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":196,"end":201}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `authenticate_enable_runner!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fdde7223cb136c51a33619a48b7e10e9","location":{"path":"lib/api/runners.rb","lines":{"begin":203,"end":210}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `issues.rb` has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49d5eae8f5a9b7ef20af4a226580c9fb","location":{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":332}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1430400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `filter_builds` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b03e3d209e73511af90d54684b559d3a","location":{"path":"lib/api/jobs.rb","lines":{"begin":176,"end":185}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `list_milestones_for` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8e051bd18be2af43510bfc934382e630","location":{"path":"lib/api/milestone_responses.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_file_vars!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4be22423f2ecad963ae6b37b42f43510","location":{"path":"lib/api/files.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_blob_vars!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e73cbaada1130cabaf0dfa4c08f70656","location":{"path":"lib/api/repositories.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `services.rb` has 836 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68db3252fd8eaa9d286783dcd5099377","location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":864}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":9638400,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `runner.rb` has 266 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e11149dffed6dc2e322c584638327bf","location":{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":316}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1430400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `merge_requests.rb` has 322 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3de9fe3d6f81552276ac816a0f052fb7","location":{"path":"lib/api/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":398}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2236800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_merge_request_errors!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b0820e7ae582cfc463b18401dc7dfd6","location":{"path":"lib/api/merge_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":145,"end":159}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `helpers.rb` has 381 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5db68c679d275d3963e0f9660988e103","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":533}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3086400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attributes_for_keys` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"63712b203f7a63b38bcb9eea53c3001d","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":289,"end":299}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_finder_params` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"268f87eb93bd855d1807610fcddd6efe","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":408,"end":420}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `present_carrierwave_file!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"360f85bdb8a06a280a62224143731f15","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":440,"end":452}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sudo!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ddabeb34a3b3e3067c6b88323ce10dcc","location":{"path":"lib/api/helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":468,"end":487}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `users.rb` has 652 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"da0cb2b4e7ad1056fa1e4f7a0fc774d7","location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":837}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6988800,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eea17dfbc1a8fa0837c83d51e2708400","location":{"path":"lib/api/groups.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `inject_rblineprof` has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"16157b2c336822ada397c30b37d0e63b","location":{"path":"lib/peek/rblineprof/custom_controller_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `inject_rblineprof` has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9665938c091b2575d937990fbc609dac","location":{"path":"lib/peek/rblineprof/custom_controller_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1488000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `flatten_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3acab7e81bc6f21925b3944dc13c9d25","location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/representation/comment.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":111}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_errors!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5656af648a8148a4747d9750b93c8a0c","location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/connection.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_ref` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b8bde6183c235753993662c791c5f50","location":{"path":"lib/extracts_path.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `assign_ref_vars` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"994b000ce7697f00c9d2fdef6d5f219c","location":{"path":"lib/extracts_path.rb","lines":{"begin":108,"end":133}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `gitaly_configuration_toml` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7ce1b00e1e01659ed25ab9357f9d47d7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/setup_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":43}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_with_user_password` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0212b6bdb5ef9f95aaaad8df3d25a15a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rate_limit!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"18c084f7a7640dd9934777afe795d6e1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":104}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `service_request_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fcdcb167117e9fbdc60bcccfa8c52ce9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":128}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `deploy_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3349988ec83e4933b92c3a7e3824cc58","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":185,"end":199}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lfs_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f1a1535569de597558d429c01457d5e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":202,"end":228}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build_access_token_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1e8fcdca34d7247788de08e6051143d2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":245}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `setup_subscribers` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85ca5972d830d83ef927532dcf66122f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/performance_bar/peek_query_tracker.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fields` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dbfd2a1c630915fc2b4befaca081c456","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/issue_base.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"57bd6ed972d21a41e82e376f51d7a76e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/base.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `text` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0fea0819cd1d628d704dab5f9f56ae5c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/slash_commands/presenters/issue_show.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `file.rb` has 255 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcd7afc2511311acf93e48f89b257ee8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":356}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1272000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `simple_viewer_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"455a703cf96823be99c475db08de0c9f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":311,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `viewer_class_from` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cae1cebb92d35a5859ef229108d1e4c1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":345,"end":353}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `File` has 54 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4872155d7a8ab149e4dbfdd0a34d314f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":354}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `simple_viewer_class` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c663249a7eb69d79d53815c02da1287e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file.rb","lines":{"begin":311,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62d56326c2f46a050e8a9f1219488e25","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/line.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":10}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Position` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44aef8e9a5055d83b7605ef01a8ffcd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":150}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"922e6aee35a311a79f1043b07ee7064d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/highlight.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `highlight_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b41f2627f4109bdc5b74287cf3ba0d21","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/highlight.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":64}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parallelize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"631e96ad1ef01b07245ee2a542d76275","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parallel_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parallelize` has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c801b9d4ce1a0b15a92b13570e4b4a73","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parallel_diff.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":840000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff_stats_collection` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1edfc550eecbd5daa471adab0ab3385","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/base.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse` has a Cognitive Complexity of 29 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bfc88a6b4fdafecdb4881ebd0a709e90","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parse` has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6d81f9668924e2328ae1d3b978012b2e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1008000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"678e46609976cce578070c879cdeaa09","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_added_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d3253565d5f52fdc8e227a610a4ba02","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":127}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_removed_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a2345cd4720ceb59ce0efdf2c931d70","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":158}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `trace_unchanged_line` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68d033636c672cf93801ba4a440a9b10","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/position_tracer.rb","lines":{"begin":160,"end":199}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `map_line_number` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc329e8839fe1c0b24ddd3dbaa5b8485","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/diff/line_mapper.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":61}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `popen_with_detail` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1f3016518aa9a963248a02cac889fd75","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/popen.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `request_cache` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7f577fa9ce2f42e5f27aac8db514fe3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cache/request_cache.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `store_in_cache_if_needed` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"baa77c71d04626f49bd5c1e57a0e2ca9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cache/ci/project_pipeline_status.rb","lines":{"begin":92,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `aggregate_rblineprof` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c969b511dec60cc5ae82a493581e987","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sherlock/line_profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `subscribe_to_active_record` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cb47c9a23a0a444f0c02f2ce82101c23","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sherlock/transaction.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":96}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_keys_not_found_in_db` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"110e16cf8bc4b13203ae16707be71f9e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/shell.rb","lines":{"begin":229,"end":246}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Shell` has 37 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9bb914cee67608b26add7bcc4f81b00b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/shell.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":445}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `bulk_insert` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46738c8e24da7d644d4613d9605d7262","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":167,"end":197}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f71d3611436ba9323475933db3b224e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/conflict_files_stitcher.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":26}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a4899ef1be9285a53b4a3412a311ee1f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blobs_stitcher.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5e1fe756db8adf0384ead3d7ca4d40bb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_file` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f2ac95cd9282cf75ce51181ba7bcf087","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":128,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `wiki_page_from_iterator` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8d18749d8e89aa853f84d5b8ab2fa1e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service.rb","lines":{"begin":171,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit_service.rb` has 334 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"459baf31c3d4b57e8c9df845211d85c9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":431}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2409600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `diff` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6776fdb83e8edfae5378441fd52a4925","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":33,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree_entry` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00baf604adba61e863f7d154a8dee72b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"186f0eba8b7425edc8cc3c73c38cd40a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":242,"end":262}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `CommitService` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"49c846fd451fa9152c64a84b18cea747","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":429}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `ref_service.rb` has 252 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb1efcba78462f496979baf4cb6cd2ad","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1228800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RefService` has 31 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"00c5cfab9191c2db4747039325616652","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":325}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository_service.rb` has 323 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"493989beb71c8d830c2b79d5553c6147","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":396}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2251200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_remote` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f3aee0aba331f59ab18ffef3792b052a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RepositoryService` has 35 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ca9b3950e1ce99211058bd24b696cd9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":394}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_squash` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3244c060b29a67dfaca14f5fd90c0c69","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":207,"end":207}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files` has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e11b9bf00977dfd40d466849a02aad7e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":234,"end":235}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files_request_header` has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74f8cedbd2e30f093d96c68640b17e2f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":316,"end":317}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":600000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `operation_service.rb` has 284 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e9b10e91d8aa4aecb2dd40e2ff73151e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":343}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1689600,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `user_create_branch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f83bdf53147b9d2930979ca6a622f44f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_merge_branch` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96dce6cec3c6d464fe3b164bf05adf61","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `user_commit_files` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b324bd9e25781ee4f45ebe63530654b5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/operation_service.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":274}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `define_predicate_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1748406e1b1a3efed8bbdbc2f7310efb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fake_application_settings.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":19}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"306bfd1a5668c64b46f9a50ffcb84761","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":100}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_chunk` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"718a1c6197d9172beada51e8fb725aa8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":173}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `HttpIO` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f90f3bbe0002c0551d2c102e8d6cc2bb","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":192}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `system_usage_data` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e44de166e4765b13674da7e6f1adbb03","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/usage_data.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":85}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `print_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74e543934a1cb0119b1cb9bc2bef6f4a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler/total_time_flat_printer.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_issue_comment_body` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b9885935625732368d27f4d57c09a6b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":327,"end":327}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `importer.rb` has 283 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1456110a9f0cea86dbda2fdc6ff8b006","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":371}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1675200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fda606a33fed0d051037b3e7ec312764","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e40d64a7ad3fca74d9f0603fcdfde073","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_updates` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"627781504f289b64edb3cae5ded46686","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":237,"end":293}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `format_attachments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3eae70f0804e77646cf183b658337852","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":312,"end":325}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issues` has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"140622e56443443be6d89cf7f8134759","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":82,"end":126}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":792000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"81d77c1a0b5ebc4248e39438a9b784c1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":146,"end":179}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_updates` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b843b25138348d8d9e7cf6df7a2f0ed","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":237,"end":293}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `full_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"200d2aea21e0c3f34efb9b3a8051a82f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/rename_reserved_paths_migration/v1/migration_classes.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":15}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `rank_rows` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc13ef2bef6a33cc8bc4e67b71564878","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/median.rb","lines":{"begin":140,"end":174}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `migration_helpers.rb` has 543 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"01e21ae134d30a14bd512652b7a940ab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1078}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":5419200,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_timestamps_with_timezone` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c59bbcc4bf6935d5c169f128844c4c91","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_concurrent_foreign_key` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce151ede627cdfdf31c565ade50905ea","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":206}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `disable_statement_timeout` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"31b96e31df6242d18aba1d4abf07f1f9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":240,"end":272}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_column_in_batches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"21d13cfd466605197c31d8958201310c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":323,"end":380}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `add_column_with_default` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"009915036d7d7932903bc6f766511a5e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":406,"end":438}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `copy_indexes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60d019b8234aa4a0d7d445a95ee1e8ae","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":817,"end":859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `bulk_queue_background_migration_jobs_by_range` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"128bc9f2059885db7d254bdb6a31d4b3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":972,"end":993}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `add_concurrent_foreign_key` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f6243b1ac45a70775392f6137b36e35f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":206}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_column_in_batches` has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6dc99342ecbf79855eb8044b9e00cbdd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":323,"end":380}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":888000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `change_column_type_using_background_migration` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"39133c1e5a2502598dbf0ec8dc0af798","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":593,"end":640}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `rename_column_using_background_migration` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fc89feb63b650bd5547ac2ba44210012","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":670,"end":731}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `copy_indexes` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b98ee08501009b6bf421b8064689b30","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":817,"end":859}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fetch_config` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4b3b0f6bd727a62eae22091574b81015","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/mail_room.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `note_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"59ca4f1b16f978d96a1c7e36f7e69d62","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `rewrite` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f45f6ba5c50a0ab576b49cf1b282a615","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gfm/uploads_rewriter.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":29}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unfold_reference` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"be381321436537b6ec6941dcff14d0b9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gfm/reference_rewriter.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sections` has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f6b50ef494458ae4f54e52a28568869","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_match_line_header` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fef2b9774e94d0bd02f1158378f701c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":123,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `as_json` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ed7b03c5a2c2d110a9a9db9e00f3d8d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":150,"end":168}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `sections` has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"629b80d357b767eb9b1f37185affacd4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":110}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":864000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `which` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"565d3b45775f71100b9c7277076be0f6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/utils.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `render_go_doc` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e0fac0dd89237b115b26def1d32171a6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_open_files` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"83c9d42c4a44fe57eeee2a2b269ddb60","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/multipart.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `decorate_params_value` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32d0634549f8a039069852514c0c4e20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/middleware/multipart.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"100b77808e789566083b5722f853d491","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3bfd1976bd1c3f5b63ad73183773103c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":117,"end":136}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d3b76e6c4972600af102835c1739459a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":165}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8131d9fa54052fb8688da41fca5b29ff","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":245}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_wiki` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c9017489731af795ba61fdc442e91922","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":266,"end":278}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_releases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6cf70c97f808766cb57657e58420cb89","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":291}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"564493c4d63110500702ce8552822c02","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":339}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1900000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_object_to_import` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1c46822af079d421dee8173b07f3b80a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/parallel_scheduling.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_page` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8e73017cc50cf5ae0ff94ea436d3ced","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `with_rate_limit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8e67dd27500a710187cc201ddc1dded","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":133,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Client` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c409ff9cd79515f70c131a687a58c2d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/github_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":216}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_sub_relations` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"de78150728d4deb7bbd23ae848875928","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer.rb","lines":{"begin":134,"end":159}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_sub_relation` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"357889b554818506acea0dfc8f000afc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":171}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e960e3648215aee14c4e5443b5f897b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":49}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `build!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1dd9f4457d861e5b12020c99ef408fe4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategy_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"343742e2d2dc60bd360734eccf276cc8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/merge_request_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `copy_project_uploads` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d141822a7e49c9987620bcbcaf7749c0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b57d9528846dda6448ed9d3a49747c3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `imported_object` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7150a66352dfbd84b82e4bfa60942b90","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":209}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `RelationFactory` has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f17a460cbd29b77fbb38f05dd3866a4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":281}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2200000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `project_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"80346e71805b8ddd466c6b77a8f2e1e6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/import_export/group_project_object_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"34c8251c050af78b0e432e62b3bf6eaf","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e5d84ee4338c67ad951b6130bf67d21a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":98}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":696000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `build` has 49 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ac9809b4ea4dd090261cab4784070118","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/data_builder/build.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1176000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `absolute_image_urls` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b291bb28522abd9dde68b0387000c263","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hook_data/base_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `safe_hook_attributes` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"682e99b5b83244042ccc251929255272","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hook_data/merge_request_builder.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `gitaly_client.rb` has 321 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"aa680293a25a35a2aacd0db231b38fc3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":484}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2222400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `call` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96a0315d42972363e3be0faaf33fcff8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":124,"end":149}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `request_kwargs` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"62070bc24b2fd5133e0a7beab00d9b77","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":197,"end":221}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `feature_enabled?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"731633ec642f522eb73bf54d30cc752d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":239,"end":269}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `enforce_gitaly_request_limits` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75016ab6541606469d82939c599b4ad","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client.rb","lines":{"begin":317,"end":340}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"625fb557175f1173f5275a5c774ad3d6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/reference_extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"77acda463966e33d89aa2e8120528ca8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/simple_abstract_check.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `profile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fee59aefc8f7079890f207651b7981f0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":79}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `debug` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fdc82615456346012b61b614b718e980","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/profiler.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":109}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `protected_branch_push_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32eb78f0c97e724ad8a8d5553b542d3f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `protected_tag_checks` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06f719f8ef5751a719db79c5e8c24be7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":111,"end":120}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChangeAccess` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c155eb2e64ad1ed777bca59ce76dbaef","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":214}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8ee7f543cac7d3fb2d03c2cf82f45f09","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/commit_check.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `stop` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0578d528100ce788878962a15cbeec2a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/daemon.rb","lines":{"begin":39,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `verification_status` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"278e4598e8040e0a02ba62435277a8b2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gpg/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":100,"end":112}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"26ed72f706cbd880946abd65775661b1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":525000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `importer.rb` has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"144e11b64a9050685cd582324f4c5650","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":388}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1560000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Importer` has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"fe99b8de0e4e755d01efc8644f28aa32","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_server_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":386}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32c1c4d58157c12dafbd9c492c51a5aa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d95b586a43aa6e99b3f767263ce65d16","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/present/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b1d8edac9e190461296777cc29e22e5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/graphql/authorize/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d1438aadd557c25b108eea0106855664","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":81}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument_instance_methods` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"eb2114fa42977c795cf347169a0f542c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":99}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `instrument` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bca595f2e9128a833295cec69e8c1e4e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `instrument` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"46dbb1e9f69c06f7d078548fc6061570","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/instrumentation.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":167}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b4ef0ec3fde55c4188a9f170e0f50760","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/transaction.rb","lines":{"begin":114,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `submit_metrics` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9b54961b8f59db3e5122c4208ded0a04","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":62}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `pool` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"85d4413ec95715375e2c5ed3923bf252","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":165,"end":181}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `measure` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ce1cb49fa0e90749c14924f01742eab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/influx_db.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":133}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"04b6cf203bf783b43e1ac1b54b888441","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `format_issue_comment_body` has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1ec61e94902238cc9befa5a1daf367e9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":279,"end":279}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_cases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"deff1dce2bf92e8e8a73a7dad5c4c5c9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3399ad65a3497aa307eaeb32cb5e83e6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":158,"end":196}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_cases` has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cdbe17ce063af3997de1ea4bb7b62f8b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":146}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":816000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a350dd17c12b659d965d2849ad05d077","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":158,"end":196}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `git_access.rb` has 288 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"217b36994b7bc085e2426b68d5ae12da","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":372}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1747200,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_authentication_abilities!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12742436ece459400a3eaf9d0a1bb60c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":128,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ensure_project_on_push!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"96a9f1789e7e7f1f1ba2da1e54b194c6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":189,"end":213}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_push_access!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3ea1e3ce0a376bfea8bcf0212ff90809","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":251}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `GitAccess` has 41 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8b604fd91125836b6b7febd9f9706b53","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":371}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_service_account` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ede2112edc62f1c1aaab207b4d2d3bb8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":59}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `create_cluster_role_binding` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"35fbb979c3d0eb66f9ca187bb5295521","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `initialize` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a6788548613abbede0f945c93f499e01","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/project_creator.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":6}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issues` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dc7e6d5a30b4b296140a3b3ef8f0e44a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":106}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_issue_comments` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a48dbffa8fed1a096624520d3125343e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":109,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5a484ad1bd84dce7a3bef35405340b71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `import_pull_requests` has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb107ec4ecd65c38b8c57821b432e1bd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bitbucket_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":147,"end":183}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":744000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_info` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9ccb0c18a6f37f110aadd6045933f910","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/auth_hash.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tls_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"f8cf4abbbf7c74ebb10433a1b19d6e25","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/config.rb","lines":{"begin":210,"end":227}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Config` has 38 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8bf80e499225a5522c5bf02c2b5de50","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/config.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":248}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b6717c2575d1b9634403637d926a53e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b6717c2575d1b9634403637d926a53e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":63}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `ldap_search` has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5d595594b703b1d9783bd955a198807f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":83}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1150000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_pair` has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0b175175ba20f21bb15cdf8c88896cd1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_array` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d6d33eb81193471d4408113ca113deac","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":267,"end":281}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_pair` has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"648c4eb09b87d49a1d79f5d0a77de3ea","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":194}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3144000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `login` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c350e7d285ce68091161b324ed9ca293","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/authentication.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":20}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `save` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5b220e2f520a6fff2f90c05ba11999ba","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7a4874f3ff061cb0b1aeef04800ada15","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":60,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `update_profile` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"38ded984fa19d27580db26e0540ac53f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":229,"end":253}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `User` has 32 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e416592e77f689818995fceca5f571bc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/o_auth/user.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":268}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_user` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ba2b8382483d9be5260822909fe26d56","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/saml/user.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":28}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cache_method_output` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"173a260b95048ce7cfc5164ebeeaa45c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `expire_method_caches` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6938667a593219bc8d59f8046973c533","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `mark` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f23977dd6af02c109c5ecaf6ec88e79","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/string_range_marker.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":45}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `position_mapping` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"75e44855c1190acfa386bf060fe0c79c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/string_range_marker.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":88}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `log_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7bd641d0b563cc47dc64d5b378494dd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/storage_check/cli.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":68}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_permission!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"596d8f0ed603043a25830a78af0b7870","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/handler/reply_processing.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":47}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6fac16f8fc80d183ffc78d03d2d0245d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":23}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `select_body` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"74ea18f19435d9abee264cd1facce76a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/reply_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":58}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fix_charset` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bbfbab207f44913ec99bdb0f738ef744","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/reply_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":71}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `target_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"587a65f54b3a9d4006c9fb8e97881295","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/message/repository_push.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `subject` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"304068a60d47ba6b4d63d0770a3e66e0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/email/message/repository_push.rb","lines":{"begin":118,"end":137}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06bf786acefc4467f3887ce0b97790b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cleanup/remote_uploads.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":32}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `steal` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bcfc4aae2401e33076da306af1be4a91","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7f4a6a0b5a98750c352c1646b1b3f685","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_blocker.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `redis_store_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8e3b7658d5f2da0b6cfe80e375fba17a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/wrapper.rb","lines":{"begin":94,"end":116}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `calculate` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"027f65d9b15a5a20ac32b7746317815a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/project_authorizations/with_nested_groups.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":57}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `allowed?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5ffe0c3e3d42265eae2251a019292113","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/user_access.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `can_push_to_branch?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"303070bb63eb58bcb7a05b3b95932900","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/user_access.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `sanitize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ce964ef0b84100c7c6ad7cb863485dc1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ssh_public_key.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8bb3319e6987280746e3bc73708c56f0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/bare_repository_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `to_kubeconfig` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b447110ec4376566b0f143ec7955f597","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":85,"end":115}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_filters` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"52f2917ff84bcee853228888bc9d4f20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/search/query.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `encode!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5023e6a2cc1fe373219230a4ada29baa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/encoding_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `encode_utf8` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c7dee9a09179a88f06945225a2a221af","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/encoding_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":51,"end":69}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `handle_exception_response` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0c36580ef2976c77eabf04d27eda6e0b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/prometheus_client.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_full_url` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6347a85ed559890640d3146272847334","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/url_sanitizer.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `convert` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"427e98fa770dd0ce1ed98ef15ec75fd5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `open_new_tag` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3d7e5bd9e7a6c35c9d687fc490695bed","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":232,"end":256}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_xterm_color_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4936b554b5287229c74930b44325b20c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":329,"end":341}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Converter` has 69 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"61a0cb2a3f0303ed57f185452426b79a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":346}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":6100000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `convert` has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dd13e7297553d67e7801e8ccc8eed932","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/ansi2html.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1032000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `matches_pattern?` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ebde1954a4f6fc95ac088dde003d1f7c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/policy/refs.rb","lines":{"begin":27,"end":38}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `match_entries` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"12277d192b4e56c2980eae35423fc226","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read_version` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c8c5a0217b6a28198bd8cb92d0e82b00","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":92}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Entry` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a996c8f128cfc7543769dd21dd5de815","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/metadata/entry.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_s` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6710c7eee920701d15361f52dbe4bd3d","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/build/artifacts/path.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":36}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `read` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"481c8d08e5e47d4a4d4be68d0d06fe4b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `chunk_slice_from_offset` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60dbbad2af42b5e9d17acf1180b8e0d6","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `ChunkedIO` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3f6175d5d4d29675f68a7afb44b51fb3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":236}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extract_coverage` has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a126d9b81c791cb0bd1b8cd455422f3b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/stream.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":102}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `handle_line` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6e13932e33f438288cd2d7a23cca7b04","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/section_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_next_marker` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b78b80d610593251ebbeb9bb18f6246","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/section_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_string_or_regexp` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a99d0cd045678d388fd755c238f7757f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/legacy_validation_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc0685829f332ba16f511159006c4cf9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":155}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `variables_expressions_syntax` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"736e4fd1de9745ba1bb433fcb5443516","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":53}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"69c16e006586bdd7ac4cb17f7ede9848","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/attributable.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `helpers` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2d39bb63c3e71381a6cfd8d51654bee4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/configurable.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `extend!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fa7fe12ebb0fe9c7eed89e17ece5daf","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable/entry.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `write` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4254fbcc9b1008e1fd6a644e17f14b44","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":101}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unsafe_archive!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b90c223da9c451bd90087645954fe5ee","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":125,"end":145}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Trace` has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d9e217fe03ddebc9f270b441d4194d76","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":237}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1800000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"56ff592ebb6677c3a386b683db2b6821","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/chain/validate/config.rb","lines":{"begin":9,"end":21}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tokenize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"60a6e3ebf3ba798ac11eca1daba671b8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/expression/lexer.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"494fb3f15182110d4c2051f9a07b9ddc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/pipeline/expression/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `all_cases` has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f41f387d6f9c748719d97b454bbe92f","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/junit.rb","lines":{"begin":22,"end":37}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_job_dependencies!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"97a1046ed696c51fb2ce1bf34f0b7293","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":151}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_on_stop_job!` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"06fcc3fed9dc213e5669186830670f59","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor.rb","lines":{"begin":161,"end":180}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5f09e73f4a1aa8458ce984db4f5fce37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/downtime_check.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_entry` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4f46e2835f32393dfdf07c66c0f704d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/route_map.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `execute` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e2058f84cad6a346389ce944d7c1c76e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/upgrader.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fuzzy_arel_match` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44164fac144fbfeea45df1508dfe02db","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sql/pattern.rb","lines":{"begin":32,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `lazy_page_iterator` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"6ef599b3dc4f1b639d3197c028e40b71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitlab_import/client.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":76}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `merge_hash_tree` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e6ac0be8cece82ccc2e82ff8dd59e20e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/utils/merge_hash.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":97}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `listing` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7b99984bc28e1e4cbc4903a72d7ac663","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/hashed_storage/rake_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":87}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `ee_compat_check.rb` has 312 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2103307f841e293ce32cd4161da95965","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":440}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2092800,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `generate_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d35820a437b86e532f50e32d127b5ab0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":130}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `check_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2b66236ad0f63db5144a0820b94228b9","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":178,"end":211}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `EeCompatCheck` has 33 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"36de6fe216cdb6efd396cb08cb43cee5","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":439}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":2500000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `ce_branch_doesnt_apply_cleanly_and_no_ee_branch_msg` has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e819c9434d1b44e764eb37a75eb1f24c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ee_compat_check.rb","lines":{"begin":336,"end":412}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1080000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `scrub` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7d4324ffa269ec245847b9dd62388202","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":33}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `<=>` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"07c5403aa1fb1c5999cd6138fc8be4c8","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/version_info.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":40}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform_substitutions` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d72ee6aae32c9c1901f52bf269676a8b","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":134}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `commands_regex` has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1bf5c2a5cbd5a2d9489e4fefc15a284e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/extractor.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":113}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":720000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `to_h` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a75d7faca54c18a6777848a3850d38cc","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/quick_actions/command_definition.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `wait` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf93e6de620ccd0324ee0deae40e9661","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/job_waiter.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `validate_number_of_plurals` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"ca29b997f9707951ab1c16832eac75dd","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `fill_in_variables` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7baf89f0f9dd60c092411c5d3c85f5c4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":236}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `PoLinter` has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"befcb8a3c9cdc94613a938be76c2abf4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/i18n/po_linter.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1400000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `missing_members?` has 26 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a92dd0b78adf6408e1bb1362dfd52ac0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/create_fork_network_memberships_range.rb","lines":{"begin":48,"end":78}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":624000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `migrate_stage_index_sql` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"17594a98741c619d81f5982d56852229","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_stage_index.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":44}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_restricted_features_todos` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2f6311086002a50283e8edb15d2db097","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/remove_restricted_todos.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":94}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `perform` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"3b81cbbe6df91a033cc8895bc63aa0e7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/copy_column.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":17}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_pair` has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d8eeaa32395230adf97a240f222c4203","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3950000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize_array` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7098a1e02746bd3280879e695e913e37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":262,"end":276}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `perform` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb5327ee9231b73596539ad7b2c167fa","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":300,"end":314}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `each_pair` has 131 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d03740b18e02c4d6c12a846688367eb2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":53,"end":189}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":3144000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `single_diff_rows` has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c44e90db62947f73461b513d8b2bf71","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":750000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `single_diff_rows` has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bc4293178ed4b9812cc3752d52c4c2ae","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":129}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":768000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `median` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8131f9850b467befa49f83c8893e074e","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/base_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":46}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `first_time_reference_commit` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"57863573b761b600f6f37177c4bdcc2c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/plan_event_fetcher.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `groups` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bb94f91ea8ea9bfebe88077bde7c9c70","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/blame.rb","lines":{"begin":10,"end":34}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `issuable_meta_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"a722790729116e77942fe04c5ea5c2fe","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/issuable_metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `issuable_meta_data` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"654ad0544dd20bd2a0fa2b2222724814","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/issuable_metadata.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":42}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find_id_by_path` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"249edd9d3a49a4634c75d7f66eddf0d3","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tree.rb","lines":{"begin":36,"end":52}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `get_submodules_by_name` has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1779cdd505003a594a0ec1e401b49750","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/gitmodules_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":66}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `merge` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"14d8d23268624da10eee3aa315d71171","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":552,"end":552}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `find_commits_by_message` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"03db09f73721e8dc853a0e8d5c5b586a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":948,"end":948}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `repository.rb` has 724 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4fd0011d1b240dc0bd3776dada53d992","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":1,"end":1045}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":8025600,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `refs_hash` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"1b3b8f358aa6754b1127fcaf1fc63eab","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":461,"end":473}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_count_commits_options` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d7dfc3dabbbd3403a850821e31ef9869","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":987,"end":1005}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Repository` has 117 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e5d4a5ee3414c57e7d1ae875324fab4","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":7,"end":1043}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":10900000,"severity":"major","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `resolve_lines` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"2a9fd4db8c8cf162f378aa963d6765b0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/file.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":86}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"244c77bd66325eb47245517103368219","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `parse` has 44 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"bf9628db17f21b3c6afe90328a37f6d0","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/conflict/parser.rb","lines":{"begin":15,"end":70}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1056000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c678916b00a357376bbd89e7d450a28","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/blob.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":50}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_attributes` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4edbf1e31d321135c7006513a4035f15","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/attributes_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":77}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `parse_data` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"19a8edffd98f8988b199c80f6919a68a","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/attributes_parser.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":108}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"cc6e53b3d35661118499e22b31c33048","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `gitaly_update_page` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"29ae202c7d73dff34ed176c4c489e03c","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Wiki` has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"16108ddc899f6bed5535bed2d4dbd403","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/wiki.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":166}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1700000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `initialize` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"992ce430fa1cfa75fffb04b791835530","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/compare.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":22}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"file_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"File `commit.rb` has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"b0e8a3e8bec1d1e4d61a4ca6961eee37","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":421}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1358400,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `find` has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d2501d4f37da4c3f3bfc13d8ddefb8b1","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":650000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Commit` has 48 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"5c05f17b105a544fbb7b1e653e4e9622","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":419}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":4000000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `each_serialized_patch` has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"489c6b7588d70b32aa203aa6c41632df","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/diff_collection.rb","lines":{"begin":120,"end":152}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":850000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"argument_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `between` has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"4c22ec0e0d894fff0c7dd7383e7e90f2","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/diff.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":375000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `process_raw_blame` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c5cb9f5c58bb1d9925a29d6754967c20","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/blame.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":56}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `in_lock` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"68b34982cd05d58d79738b15c96f20f7","location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/exclusive_lease_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":27}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `run_check` has a Cognitive Complexity of 18 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"d86f72edc80623f2c31df045a73c54a3","location":{"path":"lib/system_check/simple_executor.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `run_check` has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"32ee25468fc9ba9255e373bf8565a409","location":{"path":"lib/system_check/simple_executor.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":82}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":648000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dump` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"90c4b195bc0f9e6e440c936a49f66db4","location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `dump` has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"e224fd061ebe87897322d771a18ed4f9","location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":48}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":672000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `dump` has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"7e1d28a077c128dd08f453c105fdd9df","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":11,"end":39}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":550000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `restore` has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"8c618e2d28195eb4c364400e1b377f3f","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1050000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `restore` has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"dce1e21850a52796bdc54dd0352fef39","location":{"path":"lib/backup/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":119}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":912000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `cleanup` has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"df1565e2084a026c19a57df20f8c1dab","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":72}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `remove_old` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"25cd2cf6fbb64afd366f3be6ab9d89fd","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":107}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `unpack` has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"67d7ec9e6873944629ee60ae0c82b98f","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":110,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1350000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_count","content":{"body":""},"description":"Class `Manager` has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"c011f3bde58a57c5c1b310f99fdde1e8","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":247}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":1300000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_lines","content":{"body":""},"description":"Method `unpack` has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"0f4697ee5870ab55f0f0482a90f0aafe","location":{"path":"lib/backup/manager.rb","lines":{"begin":110,"end":161}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":984000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `decoded` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"9d399e9cd55ad1c8999c18172266e16d","location":{"path":"lib/omni_auth/strategies/jwt.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":51}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `class_for_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"44146c776b1d2705ab1e91d14f931ca6","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":62,"end":74}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":250000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"categories":["Complexity"],"check_name":"method_complexity","content":{"body":"# Cognitive Complexity\nCognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.\n\n### A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:\n* Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one\n* Code is considered more complex for each \"break in the linear flow of the code\"\n* Code is considered more complex when \"flow breaking structures are nested\"\n\n### Further reading\n* [Cognitive Complexity docs](https://docs.codeclimate.com/v1.0/docs/cognitive-complexity)\n* [Cognitive Complexity: A new way of measuring understandability](https://www.sonarsource.com/docs/CognitiveComplexity.pdf)\n"},"description":"Method `compute_class_for_class` has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.","fingerprint":"504ef7ee6e8fa9917bb219a3ce5a6531","location":{"path":"lib/declarative_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":93}},"other_locations":[],"remediation_points":450000,"severity":"minor","type":"issue","engine_name":"structure"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":298}},"remediation_points":14090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":293}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 722**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1672855f6e5f2e5e61f5f47620f50c44","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/normalize_ldap_extern_uids_range.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":293}},"remediation_points":14090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/dn.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":298}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 722**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b04488cb6c1d433518d22f9fd7ac22","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 6 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":8,"end":20}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":38}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":45,"end":45}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":65}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":73,"end":73}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3612d232382cae9828e7733da5a69ff","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":81}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":61,"end":61}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":74,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9d3f720528b273e90fa0c600a4007367","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":88}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bfe7daee55e5a8099dd7a73db3a63a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":88}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bfe7daee55e5a8099dd7a73db3a63a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":59}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":41,"end":41}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":42,"end":42}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":58,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8e7cbf1a02ae8fa5ae5397530797b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":95}},"remediation_points":1610000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":30}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"22a2073b162b635650c424f759625ae1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":78}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":107,"end":120}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4b2ec9ed4e92599e6bbba9a4a97ebeb0","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":107,"end":120}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0c7ce0e1a2c6b9abe1956a85bf8e6e52","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":78}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f55aade2bccc69344fa093ec61a30db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":97,"end":97}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":75,"end":75}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":79,"end":79}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9473b40c2cb0f7afc9308169cf2dced6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":63}},"remediation_points":1090000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":35,"end":35}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":43,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6149a95705035fa65fb27a491aa16e7d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":83,"end":83}},"remediation_points":1070000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":49}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":56,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"123ff3d56c152101a1c911f1a95326be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":227}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":270,"end":299}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672d4e588f6155fa74bf7ca34fedabb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":270,"end":299}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":198,"end":227}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672d4e588f6155fa74bf7ca34fedabb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":101}},"remediation_points":1490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":103,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 92**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"633c7fa21c24339ba725403293231a75","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":103,"end":103}},"remediation_points":1490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":101,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 92**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"633c7fa21c24339ba725403293231a75","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":90}},"remediation_points":1390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 87**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"925e4b3663b9cd9937ee7db7f882dfbc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":102}},"remediation_points":1390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 87**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"925e4b3663b9cd9937ee7db7f882dfbc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}},"remediation_points":1250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b931145ce6d6777daae248a043f04d6d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":89,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":55,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b931145ce6d6777daae248a043f04d6d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":18}},"remediation_points":410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 38**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9daf3a24f43b64dd40b3841c26c29df5","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/bitbucket_server/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":20}},"remediation_points":410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/bitbucket/collection.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 38**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ebc02a5c26ee206388b48b53d93e24a1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":140}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6778d05c8ddc9f6653765ac7ae623751","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":91,"end":140}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":40,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6778d05c8ddc9f6653765ac7ae623751","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d27c41bdaed8bbbc1c91788baad098b2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e87685897f699d56f0c9bba98c92c792","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":179,"end":189}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/commit.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":169}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/tag.rb","lines":{"begin":14,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e87685897f699d56f0c9bba98c92c792","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":46}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"482f209ad35861d8a59e5e60275568d2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":80,"end":80}},"remediation_points":1150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"482f209ad35861d8a59e5e60275568d2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":24}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":50}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dd9851dda741bf04f8f991425e6b4fa8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":29,"end":50}},"remediation_points":1130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/git/location_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dd9851dda741bf04f8f991425e6b4fa8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":66}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"62cf424fda0f778b3dcc5914fc2096b6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":66}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/sanitizers/svg/whitelist.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"62cf424fda0f778b3dcc5914fc2096b6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"dc8d377ac78b1e411b24adff2bb25ac8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d6ed9adeccc2432c442bb7e3b2de77ca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/pipeline_schedules.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},"remediation_points":550000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/broadcast_messages.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":73}},{"path":"lib/api/system_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e53239021b533bc772fd7c38fd9fbf32","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":99}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":92}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06b83fddd1854f4cbb5ee692f2b3c479","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":69,"end":92}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fa155c048bfa229583a4b14cba8ef368","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25a210eb00ee75fb3a27aef364105444","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/compare_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":58}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/commits_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":38,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3331c85dad0745b1770318b847052656","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":91}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":133}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a485030c77dac9d4720e17783248f6f2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":129,"end":133}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":87,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70c3aa57163e28d9e2b8cf58b891e37a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":161}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":217}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c29d81ebf7e5c4008896a514ac05cd90","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":217}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":161}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"562f28dc8f9527c3acb9451bb9905421","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}},"remediation_points":770000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ee8707c802bad394fc157d1bd785ea38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}},"remediation_points":770000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"999d054331f9bf60e9fac34f362dfa33","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":363,"end":376}},"remediation_points":730000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":230}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6d5fdcb9f4e92bdc8de77ce0d327e38d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":230}},"remediation_points":730000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":363,"end":376}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b9094b2f402bdf758fbd32cced243c48","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":151}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":207}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9cdba14c6ea64993cb19a2d65e8cf92c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/kubernetes_service.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":207}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes.rb","lines":{"begin":143,"end":151}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a53ce766f9ff3869e29a216c2dd49425","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":85}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":59}},{"path":"app/controllers/users_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7de6970da5143bb219d1d73c65245a18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/serializers/note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":68}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/serializers/project_note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3177b0cd54cd809575f1d61e0a65ac25","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/serializers/project_note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":20,"end":21}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/serializers/note_entity.rb","lines":{"begin":67,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc28db1513fbf8f22f0e63c12ccb87bb","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cd274943b0a85d56266ca30e0dc9e6ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":91}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/project_hooks.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cd274943b0a85d56266ca30e0dc9e6ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":83}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":93}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad9527e40decd629ae978623c4e6dbb3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":86,"end":93}},"remediation_points":650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a97fc139bd16e6c2c1ebb387c258035","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/commits.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}},"remediation_points":590000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":182,"end":190}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4a0f4dd71fe015ff3e29d7ce0c5f5aa0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":182,"end":190}},"remediation_points":590000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/commits.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"656c922dc9f4dab2a9d07fc10e49f190","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a52f4db116344fb82ae762dfb265af18","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"31c92fe357e3684090c3440aef2d0b29","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/shared_state_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/cache_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},{"path":"lib/gitlab/health_checks/redis/queues_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fed5fac4efc814d8bd6d479976af387a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":219,"end":226}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":199,"end":206}},{"path":"app/helpers/milestones_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":216}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9bdbae2675861886dd810a67f252ae76","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":236}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":351}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 43**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6f53dee2e0dbe6e42301dfabd181bed2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":351}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":217,"end":236}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 43**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6f53dee2e0dbe6e42301dfabd181bed2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":322,"end":339}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":250,"end":267}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":511,"end":528}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":230,"end":247}},{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":302,"end":319}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14eeea8dcc69e4efb8f98042eb7ee62c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":119}},"remediation_points":490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":112}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 42**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9fcdc086aaa42b293828e5799976b36c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/ci/trace/chunked_io.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":112}},"remediation_points":490000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/http_io.rb","lines":{"begin":102,"end":119}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 42**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0aa489542536e966d0d4ee9d92b86de3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":170}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":177,"end":195}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3960d89aa99311987411af9a2ce4316a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":177,"end":195}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/policies/project_policy.rb","lines":{"begin":152,"end":170}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3960d89aa99311987411af9a2ce4316a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":104}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":124}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"04627bf7d430fe80b4f7d86af94fb085","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":115,"end":124}},"remediation_points":470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":95,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 41**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"04627bf7d430fe80b4f7d86af94fb085","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/commit_statuses.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 40**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"72cad3326805b4987fbe6343ebb3d0fd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/commit_statuses.rb","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/issues.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":171}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 40**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"69ab1e3ccd645591451e705830d55186","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":209,"end":213}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":159,"end":163}},{"path":"lib/api/discussions.rb","lines":{"begin":194,"end":198}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"94185a2a13c6fd98f5095f170db11d97","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/timestamps.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":22}},"remediation_points":430000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_index.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 39**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c7a34cb081b464faf300442c9a9c35d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/remove_index.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":21}},"remediation_points":430000,"other_locations":[{"path":"rubocop/cop/migration/timestamps.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 39**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c3d38d7fee5df958c3e432d1dd17b38","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":417,"end":423}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":265,"end":272}},{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":330,"end":337}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b090709c230c91d97c8733ac43a69eb2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":195}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":645,"end":668}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":645,"end":668}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":172,"end":195}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":469,"end":492}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":599,"end":622}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":599,"end":622}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/services.rb","lines":{"begin":469,"end":492}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef781c60f85295b7fcab51d2c5fa6dbf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b710502de22d6ac75887584b4089f55d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":70,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 37**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5ed54d7e9dec3ef5264c44b21ab42f3b","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6a6be26fc5b134ababae60c5b17185e7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":78,"end":90}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/relative_positioning.rb","lines":{"begin":63,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6a6be26fc5b134ababae60c5b17185e7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":252}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":305,"end":316}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b03582b4029701d34f64ca56f039ff3c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":305,"end":316}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/users.rb","lines":{"begin":241,"end":252}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b03582b4029701d34f64ca56f039ff3c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":615,"end":622}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":706,"end":713}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6613d45047514c566568cdc6b20a1433","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":706,"end":713}},"remediation_points":370000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database/migration_helpers.rb","lines":{"begin":615,"end":622}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 36**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6613d45047514c566568cdc6b20a1433","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e03c415d22f94144c8a11a51bf75449a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/project_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":30,"end":43}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":34,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a3a69b8619d932aa827e537f3525e47","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/code_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/review_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9c27f17bb5883c88a2dcf096a1e3eb10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/review_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/cycle_analytics/code_stage.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 34**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1a85a78111fd009c906af5e3e2e5c1b3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":61}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"043f75067c16ff3e5d772bc2d1ae6742","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/project_services/bamboo_service.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":58}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/project_services/teamcity_service.rb","lines":{"begin":52,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3bc437123bd781d63ac2e5f1e2ee6eb3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_webhooks.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3ed85e9f30996e6d2ccc2e0700c1902e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_services.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}},"remediation_points":310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/set_confidential_note_events_on_webhooks.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 33**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7ea2c375fc2078d33f6958933228ed7c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"eb17727d02a7c074c3154590d6ac3890","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":57,"end":61}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/backup/database.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"eb17727d02a7c074c3154590d6ac3890","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":135}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":143}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c728f05ae3efb5098c029de0b3280f52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":138,"end":143}},"remediation_points":290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/user_reference_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":130,"end":135}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 32**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c728f05ae3efb5098c029de0b3280f52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/updated_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/created_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cf343522a426e7b5b70965cafd123e2d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/concerns/created_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/concerns/updated_at_filterable.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"83ce9e73df4d8e3e8128ba7268e47c86","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1183,"end":1185}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1189,"end":1191}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c5665e3faea9b14f82119a1c414984d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1189,"end":1191}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1183,"end":1185}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c5665e3faea9b14f82119a1c414984d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":96}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb529d437944a41ecb389c07d4f4b95c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":105,"end":111}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/legacy_github_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":90,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb529d437944a41ecb389c07d4f4b95c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/app/tmp_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/app/log_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5873e0223d34261535ea9380a655f530","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/app/log_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}},"remediation_points":270000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/app/tmp_writable_check.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 31**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5f6516f48de36202ed1fb08b864850e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":20}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71865084b25bec6d7d5ead8d752fb091","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":34}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/search_service.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71865084b25bec6d7d5ead8d752fb091","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":201}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":205,"end":214}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"87efcabb3c142197252756a6564676fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":205,"end":214}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":192,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"87efcabb3c142197252756a6564676fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":12}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_into_gitlab_via_ldap_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0022a6eabe051cdbca1e39ad3d0616a0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_into_gitlab_via_ldap_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":14}},"remediation_points":250000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/qa/specs/features/browser_ui/1_manage/login/log_in_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":3,"end":12}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 30**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b769bd2ad86996248bc0cb9e9909ad48","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/admin/impersonation_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":30}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/personal_access_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d66178654f9f4136765d0ea5d8b3e694","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/profiles/personal_access_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":19,"end":28}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/admin/impersonation_tokens_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":21,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7450a990959a14aea730f2b6be2c03b2","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":85}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9983d989b521b3d7814b329e7276929a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":88,"end":101}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/controllers/projects/clusters_controller.rb","lines":{"begin":72,"end":85}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9983d989b521b3d7814b329e7276929a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/podspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/gemspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bff03fdced6cbae88ff2946f20dc10e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/gemspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/blob_viewer/podspec.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"51fdccc6768efcdd38f19730ffe72a7c","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/stage.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":442,"end":449}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25c1e443e5b07fc0b45f399a084137f7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":442,"end":449}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/stage.rb","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"577c618e98095b86078d36b2ac019b73","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":63}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":50}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"34d52e18accbf89e1d40ad4efe71140e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/tags.rb","lines":{"begin":46,"end":50}},"remediation_points":230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/settings.rb","lines":{"begin":59,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 29**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7249b946ecaa77a923de68a038829979","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b855af99fe41d98222cc7d488606c72e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/group_members_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b855af99fe41d98222cc7d488606c72e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/members.rb","lines":{"begin":132,"end":137}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/access_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"74eeab655880b068d73bfa1508e15e08","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/access_requests.rb","lines":{"begin":76,"end":81}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/members.rb","lines":{"begin":132,"end":137}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"89dd703acaf685f87aef279f54d3c31a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":109}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8f3ea2a51c54532c43041c348ab5c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":112,"end":123}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/database.rb","lines":{"begin":98,"end":109}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8f3ea2a51c54532c43041c348ab5c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e02e496b4b6107134a36720421ac55a9","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/ref_service.rb","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e02e496b4b6107134a36720421ac55a9","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":14}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4456b6f43cef6bfbf9b6d039f749cdc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":17,"end":25}},"remediation_points":210000,"other_locations":[{"path":"qa/spec/runtime/env_spec.rb","lines":{"begin":6,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 28**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4456b6f43cef6bfbf9b6d039f749cdc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":262}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":290}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":280,"end":290}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":252,"end":262}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":396,"end":405}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":410,"end":419}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":410,"end":419}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":396,"end":405}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d67c2bf9c225577fade90666e5dfc6e3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":61}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f75f6fbbc7064f4fdca08c087adf39c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":66,"end":104}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts.rb","lines":{"begin":24,"end":61}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f75f6fbbc7064f4fdca08c087adf39c3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef81133143dac9759b71c4ff2fbf45ed","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git_access.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":25}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/checks/change_access.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":17}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26fd0da9b8c1ef08c93581298c4ae63a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":564,"end":575}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":579,"end":590}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7853b1dd44bd6645b11dfd03b93082d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":579,"end":590}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/git/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":564,"end":575}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7853b1dd44bd6645b11dfd03b93082d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":211,"end":225}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":210}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85278ceed072f59d95f4d59bb38349cd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/fogbugz_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":204,"end":210}},"remediation_points":190000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/google_code_import/importer.rb","lines":{"begin":211,"end":225}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 27**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"84267e4195b1ef161585bb368ab56cb4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b3c569353eb654d48c0f3d5dfd5507","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/mailers/emails/profile.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"08b3c569353eb654d48c0f3d5dfd5507","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/prometheus_metric.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":43}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/helpers/preferences_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"84368938cf4e38b28be7f2494ab7dded","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/helpers/preferences_helper.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":22}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/prometheus_metric.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"60bfb34cb2ceca3dea92da73de2720d1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":826,"end":838}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":842,"end":854}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f850bbad5c6c0dbf53dcda181b0fe2ef","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":842,"end":854}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/repository.rb","lines":{"begin":826,"end":838}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f850bbad5c6c0dbf53dcda181b0fe2ef","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1195,"end":1197}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1201,"end":1203}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"79536c6f949eba9317227c4e88951f1f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1201,"end":1203}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/user.rb","lines":{"begin":1195,"end":1197}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"79536c6f949eba9317227c4e88951f1f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":242}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":272}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c2d74780d6448543b93af9ac07770eb6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":263,"end":272}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/presenters/project_presenter.rb","lines":{"begin":233,"end":242}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c2d74780d6448543b93af9ac07770eb6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a21c2dc3f646e0e31fff25ee48b9b44","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":29}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/protected_branches/legacy_api_update_service.rb","lines":{"begin":18,"end":22}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a21c2dc3f646e0e31fff25ee48b9b44","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":276,"end":283}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c5f1ca2a225a96cfa3b4fc88b12b03b0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":276,"end":283}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/services/quick_actions/interpret_service.rb","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c5f1ca2a225a96cfa3b4fc88b12b03b0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/branches.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":75}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/triggers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6da3752f53f9199ec80a8ad0d2b565c1","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/triggers.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":16}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/branches.rb","lines":{"begin":71,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a596f82671816ebb68812ebe7bf8287","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9c68d19fac636a233c57119e7465aae0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":31,"end":38}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fb90f649add7621cd688c8cf825bd6ac","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":56}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bde5f678a848776d31606c1f7b9474fa","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/autolink_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":54,"end":63}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":47,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37daabf17a192f4d7be1f8b27c2260a6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_job_artifact.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_lfs_object.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8744b4f4833ad7e9ac1e28093ac9f90e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_lfs_object.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fill_file_store_job_artifact.rb","lines":{"begin":5,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7504dbd080f799a40cd6f4e9f9588e2e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":419,"end":427}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blob_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":101}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"63af7969c300adefbe9421c884f45ddf","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/blob_service.rb","lines":{"begin":93,"end":101}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service.rb","lines":{"begin":419,"end":427}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"037891a3606e1c8a2fffd32f88e7cede","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":25}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a65a519016a876bba37ba5a3c7a819f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":28,"end":30}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/metrics/samplers/unicorn_sampler.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8a65a519016a876bba37ba5a3c7a819f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/repository_check.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/namespace_check.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6d29fff75b609f46ded82f4a44c12b3e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/namespace_check.rb","lines":{"begin":23,"end":30}},"remediation_points":170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/system_check/orphans/repository_check.rb","lines":{"begin":25,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 26**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5b93c21edd90205b8238e3ade31ae23","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/concerns/created_at_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":8}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":315,"end":319}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4781409b61d0fe8557e646dde62af4ee","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/finders/issuable_finder.rb","lines":{"begin":315,"end":319}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/finders/concerns/created_at_filter.rb","lines":{"begin":4,"end":8}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"99f151d4d58ba006fbb17af802305432","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":572,"end":575}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":220,"end":223}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3c0fb0db7a1fa6852c67bd50857aa448","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/models/ci/runner.rb","lines":{"begin":220,"end":223}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/models/ci/pipeline.rb","lines":{"begin":572,"end":575}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"44cfa492a10b5b72b394efe01cd9e29d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"320c3b54951e69257faaca3316f72058","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/api/group_variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/api/variables.rb","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fa689b5b4bab39de500b86b3d6814963","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":75}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26a19237576df2b97ff121c3b0cd2342","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":81,"end":91}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/background_migration/fix_cross_project_label_links.rb","lines":{"begin":65,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"26a19237576df2b97ff121c3b0cd2342","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":150}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fc526fdd6733948898ee897d1eef487e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":153,"end":167}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/repository_service.rb","lines":{"begin":136,"end":150}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fc526fdd6733948898ee897d1eef487e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/shared_state.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/queues.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"077a90f16d3842a49d8095f339e2187f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/queues.rb","lines":{"begin":12,"end":28}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/redis/shared_state.rb","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f48114ce0a7710485f176b1b75c08e79","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/issue_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/merge_request_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"685a5435dac10b7fc45977c34f30aba3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/merge_request_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":150000,"other_locations":[{"path":"lib/gitlab/template/issue_template.rb","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 25**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc65c6ec010926daa88fbdcb539ddeea","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d6588749bb4b05d1e583e13b9a75e39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e1b42460d85ed0074c2f1fbd38bf2631","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f4d765094c9218d5390de58501e17b93","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":41,"end":47}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/mixins/environments_mixin.js","lines":{"begin":164,"end":170}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"caa789e408f667bb83169e9a6e4f54bb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7b7e24c67302a04433b92238befc3cf1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"935ca74221c521771d96150adf2278fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"db86386cff8c19e24cbadfb75750f1d9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":148,"end":150}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":200}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":144}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/tree.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":44}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"db86386cff8c19e24cbadfb75750f1d9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":108}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":41}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37429fdf41dd049c7cec6890f8e50c82","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":96}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":114}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"860f8a405f1b26af1f14049631bd7aa9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":114}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"860f8a405f1b26af1f14049631bd7aa9","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/subscription_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":26}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue_status_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d440b0e1b0cca3d485fda9e0c4aaee09","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue_status_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":25}},"remediation_points":4710000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/subscription_select.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 192**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d85cea2030ab41431ddc90787eb11389","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/ci_yaml_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"remediation_points":4620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/dockerfile_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 189**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4a9d91d82457a2a845b5366d5f0ce5b4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/dockerfile_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}},"remediation_points":4620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/template_selectors/ci_yaml_selector.js","lines":{"begin":5,"end":32}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 189**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9a6d28971082883e9748dd3bac2a6695","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":316,"end":324}},"remediation_points":1470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/pipelines/pipelines_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 84**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5595f472c12029fb0da2e625d62d94d6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commit/pipelines/pipelines_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":42}},"remediation_points":1470000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":316,"end":324}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 84**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"30d9e8739fb74a1a2a7618b85b5e6f7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1204,"end":1222}},"remediation_points":3990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1222,"end":1240}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 168**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4725f16bae793b141b64c0921a6539b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1222,"end":1240}},"remediation_points":3990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1204,"end":1222}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 168**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4725f16bae793b141b64c0921a6539b7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":82,"end":104}},"remediation_points":2280000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":37}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":70}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 111**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"bc78d02c62558d8dc38d2567eaf302a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/group_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":14}},"remediation_points":3810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/shared/project_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 162**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"90682f4af3abe93c6405cd6eb215e9c6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/shared/project_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":15}},"remediation_points":3810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/group_avatar.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 162**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67e63301cd433971695d7cc16ff752b2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"272dee8d71a4ab9c8d815e23c04c7742","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/new_list_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"272dee8d71a4ab9c8d815e23c04c7742","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":217,"end":221}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":76,"end":80}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":95}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":127}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b1e5c7e2317fc81ce11cbdb1bfee15df","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":59}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f1257b0729020dbf8c1e761c6b423db","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"39bdab25a792c5662feb840979099a97","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commons/polyfills/element.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":283}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b95252006271b6a23d2d59296a0e5778","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils.js","lines":{"begin":278,"end":283}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/commons/polyfills/element.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67ee0da8e9d2d3b183449d9e8d462f44","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":99,"end":135}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6e9b85292de8771601751d3ed0d9dc18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":99,"end":135}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6e9b85292de8771601751d3ed0d9dc18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":115}},"remediation_points":2700000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":127}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 125**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0fee1b42ff17f6df3a6f14e35f13cf18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":127}},"remediation_points":2700000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":115}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 125**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0fee1b42ff17f6df3a6f14e35f13cf18","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":198,"end":201}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":183,"end":186}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":188,"end":191}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":193,"end":196}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8fc9b42e2195587e4e8d777e75ad89d8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"15c8237c5ef3dd70061ce1d44bd5d199","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/snippets/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8ae282c95da75609356442ee0da6e6fc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/new_group_child.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":262}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"611a498e9c5e5d8f256a05631ef5ac51","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":253,"end":262}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/new_group_child.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37087f35974839e5e79033d561c840a6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":117}},"remediation_points":2310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":126}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 112**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0e6b703c746c94d22e3a02f1993665ce","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":126}},"remediation_points":2310000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_actions.js","lines":{"begin":110,"end":117}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 112**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0e6b703c746c94d22e3a02f1993665ce","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":71}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef21ab3df8b01ca7e22d4d8804157d7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":71}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"scripts/frontend/prettier.js","lines":{"begin":64,"end":64}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ef21ab3df8b01ca7e22d4d8804157d7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":218,"end":221}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":208,"end":211}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":213,"end":216}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8774a69c35e7469e5831f013a372ab41","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6b694c569da1307b1f359dff7c2ba96a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3334e14e9af8a36a250b2eeea4a85929","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/index.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/components/board_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":95,"end":100}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/mixins/pipelines.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7f09eaadb7107879ce06fbd895c6dfd2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":142}},"remediation_points":2130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 106**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"316f57fc6559be3f06b67e902431d4f3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":153}},"remediation_points":2130000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issue.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":142}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 106**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"316f57fc6559be3f06b67e902431d4f3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":15}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7d9d7ed069d90637ae3219e74dfc3a6a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":24}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/settings/ci_cd/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":10,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"de8d186c2d499f4864bd5be7db1ddad4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":53}},"remediation_points":2010000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 102**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c1e5733385780c688efc3db1ad11f746","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":68}},"remediation_points":2010000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 102**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8de13799b826a6e485d4019569e6c278","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":124,"end":134}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"762a1afa922792a6981db079fca70fa7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":124,"end":134}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"762a1afa922792a6981db079fca70fa7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"23431c5334e56a528fc4eb179e3607ec","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1980000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 101**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c7090c499a2a96d464475ad7f818f11","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":615,"end":619}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":605,"end":609}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/users_select.js","lines":{"begin":610,"end":614}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"448aadd60c1a014f7e3ec3eed8404a65","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":90}},"remediation_points":1890000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38d9afeb8b320571be87977725fdcafe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/ajax_filter.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":108}},"remediation_points":1890000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/plugins/filter.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":90}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 98**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8f8bc2a8aade90176f81a992ae00dd6e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}},"remediation_points":1860000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutation_types.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 97**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7a9bae0109305e0b1d43de56513651bb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutation_types.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}},"remediation_points":1860000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/vue_merge_request_widget/stores/state_maps.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 97**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"500922ffefee136d140bb5e95d7a3653","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1830000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 96**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"746b71495fe41db39299682caa93445c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1830000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit_list.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 96**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5f6ce24443dd76a3e1d0f7521a36be5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":10}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e788e65abb5a4f6fb80e4e6628fb6d10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":20}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/settings_panels.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":10}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e788e65abb5a4f6fb80e4e6628fb6d10","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3f756c21d7aebceedb361afbef2d4a17","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":47,"end":47}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3f756c21d7aebceedb361afbef2d4a17","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":34}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":243,"end":245}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"50b54b3d38d73c256194eed3de425376","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"identical-code","description":"Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":243,"end":245}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/file.js","lines":{"begin":32,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"50b54b3d38d73c256194eed3de425376","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":112}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3d4aa6b1ed1ed8586dbb1479749be92","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":105,"end":112}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":103}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d3d4aa6b1ed1ed8586dbb1479749be92","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"961bf4d63d82bd0547b50951a7db6c69","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":94,"end":111}},"remediation_points":1680000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/mount_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":92}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 91**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"961bf4d63d82bd0547b50951a7db6c69","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":514,"end":533}},"remediation_points":1650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":522,"end":533}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 90**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e69530c757a3f18db186fc48d529606d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":522,"end":533}},"remediation_points":1650000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":514,"end":533}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 90**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e69530c757a3f18db186fc48d529606d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":99}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":114}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0407713555d3e0c75813d9f23089bcfd","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":114}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0407713555d3e0c75813d9f23089bcfd","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":41}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4a3e547360e709e6f65d844f47d2578","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":55}},"remediation_points":1620000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/services/monitoring_service.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":41}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 89**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d4a3e547360e709e6f65d844f47d2578","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":97}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":2,"end":14}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/cycle_analytics/default_event_objects.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac500b1ccac9075c6ed2fffbc9b3961c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":57}},"remediation_points":1530000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/stores/pipelines_store.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 86**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ac70092b1281d03613501e7bff10586e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/stores/pipelines_store.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":31}},"remediation_points":1530000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 86**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d99660a2eda83bcadef8b0ab894abe34","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}},"remediation_points":1500000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d5915d3ead3c5d344920b58d2d29398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":153}},"remediation_points":1500000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/badges/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 85**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d5915d3ead3c5d344920b58d2d29398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6bca973f7e7c682a30bc1ec4bf9bd764","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6bca973f7e7c682a30bc1ec4bf9bd764","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/sidebar/stores/sidebar_store.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":81}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":58,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":82}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0eb61104cf3e71a06f399141f9b4fa0d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":162,"end":165}},"remediation_points":600000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":53}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":142}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 55**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab644c43df256102910e1758c76cc0b5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}},"remediation_points":1410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25ff43fa592634a300a75d479e7131a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":83,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1410000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":35}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 82**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"25ff43fa592634a300a75d479e7131a7","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":91}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":99}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8761bbf2f2e7182d15c059e6eda61093","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":99}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":85,"end":91}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"8761bbf2f2e7182d15c059e6eda61093","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/blob/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/tree/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10512ee694664bf38a3b98f1983d771f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/tree/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/blob/show/index.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":29}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cacb4070042747bc39f22b6ed696d288","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":65}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14f5cdeb3ea2bd6b45456111559d4372","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":59,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1380000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 81**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"14f5cdeb3ea2bd6b45456111559d4372","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":154}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":156,"end":160}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c9b1f08a21d96ed70ae569a5f20147b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":156,"end":160}},"remediation_points":1350000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":154}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 80**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c9b1f08a21d96ed70ae569a5f20147b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":382}},"remediation_points":1320000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":382,"end":387}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f7da63bef0b10cc1b2852a187aa6da7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":382,"end":387}},"remediation_points":1320000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":377,"end":382}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 79**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f7da63bef0b10cc1b2852a187aa6da7a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 78**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c151b6404d32d859c90476abc53a459a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":19}},"remediation_points":1290000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":14,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 78**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2e1258cb46a94d486ff0c217b7ee506b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/tree.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":84}},"remediation_points":1260000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 77**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5801c2247d4ab393293432462fbf849b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1260000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/tree.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":84}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 77**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0b9486994211d1c4a0385b3c9ac7339f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ce9535c497280ac0f885dd216908adc4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":4,"end":14}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5ee1687cc7901d1085a41d0b7d5b3730","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":96}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":65}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0d9f79efa645b760bbea0b48922a8231","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":53,"end":65}},"remediation_points":1230000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":96}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 76**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9033fca3ba0465c4cc79203ac97a67c6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":197,"end":202}},"remediation_points":1200000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":204,"end":209}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"46e2ef5ccb0e3676b035d790303474f6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":204,"end":209}},"remediation_points":1200000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/preview_markdown.js","lines":{"begin":197,"end":202}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 75**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"46e2ef5ccb0e3676b035d790303474f6","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6738e3ca61bc9141c14aca35a4ece63","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b0ce2389e2ef7f95bdab6dd30392133a","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":79}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":62}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e577605dea8912ffd5b82ee2e188ec76","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":40}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":133}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1825ad84d47a08c46a9dd2a4386db970","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":123,"end":133}},"remediation_points":1170000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions.js","lines":{"begin":28,"end":40}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 74**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1825ad84d47a08c46a9dd2a4386db970","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40924a71c4587ae28cb080829b65871c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":74}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_util.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40924a71c4587ae28cb080829b65871c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":9}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ca3e7297c2c42380a6b34e26f5faa025","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":15}},"remediation_points":1140000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/test_utils/simulate_drag.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":9}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 73**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ca3e7297c2c42380a6b34e26f5faa025","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":26}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/branch.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5b01e7cc1ccdb5b45e44117d01906827","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/branch.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":30}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations/merge_request.js","lines":{"begin":22,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e8265ff476562ddb4bd141410d88ad2f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":18}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":15}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"33bcc15ccc0be1f4e4787d8882ad36e2","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":15}},"remediation_points":1110000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":12,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 72**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"931ead2443e997ee26d698667339fb06","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":244}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"36bae5f12de5a60023e0fd8fc19f1842","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":244}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":222,"end":229}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"36bae5f12de5a60023e0fd8fc19f1842","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"47474e924fc42a7e0f1319c7a8ae13d3","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":81,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1080000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":77}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 71**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"aade96d11a83331446e70683959d49ec","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":385}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":418,"end":422}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fdc3dab0afea85797bddfc16706a3869","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":418,"end":422}},"remediation_points":1050000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":381,"end":385}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 70**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"fdc3dab0afea85797bddfc16706a3869","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":80,"end":83}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":87}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85e1a20133858d47a7f4a64e49080aef","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":84,"end":87}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/getters.js","lines":{"begin":80,"end":83}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"85e1a20133858d47a7f4a64e49080aef","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":37}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c7c7576a99db4f904055a712b428b46","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":29,"end":37}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/frequent_items/constants.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c7c7576a99db4f904055a712b428b46","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/index.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":89}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/folder/environments_folder_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b80cd93182a7ed27e84c9e59840d8f01","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/environments/folder/environments_folder_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":34}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/index.js","lines":{"begin":79,"end":89}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2beaf3990d7c635f7339eb68a668c3a8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":20}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":213}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9441eb5a1202300a1a6bfdd0f0275a31","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":202,"end":213}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions.js","lines":{"begin":9,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f657ac30a9ca0e466c504f33ae3363a1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":259,"end":264}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":269}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40a4102731fea710642a925d4403b398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":264,"end":269}},"remediation_points":1020000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":259,"end":264}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 69**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"40a4102731fea710642a925d4403b398","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":68}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":82}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5c966c3b72bce8578a3e8c47c412d39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":70,"end":82}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/services/resolve.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":68}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f5c966c3b72bce8578a3e8c47c412d39","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":45}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":51}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5aa5f88f636432f3381edff9ce5eb33c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":51}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":45}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5aa5f88f636432f3381edff9ce5eb33c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":207,"end":220}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":234}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c3008559d14ec2056a4514ffdfd5d04b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":221,"end":234}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":207,"end":220}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c3008559d14ec2056a4514ffdfd5d04b","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1506,"end":1515}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"37585e488e2d24ae8b8b99880ff76099","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1506,"end":1515}},"remediation_points":990000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 68**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ea9f3aa39779bc4f5ead96ecdcd5e87c","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5306c1b3e6d8ac0ac9bed008b527b8a7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4dfd0fcaf710a6337c5924d7c4fa91ea","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/commit/actions.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":219}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1526,"end":1566}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"71749d080c69b950423ce3e73b3671d6","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"80bd962a66c5ba8f3bb261204e0e8404","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4dccfbb8118720c67894021eefaeb04f","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":43}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/delete_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}},{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":48}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"594be23bc97d64731abf2df62520ccd3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/services/clusters_service.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":12}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5b85961f2c362ae642ccf393b8352fcb","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":102}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/services/clusters_service.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":12}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cad81c7468728ba369f9f23c8a1271bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":93}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":172,"end":174}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"beda25571cf3ea070a68d9cdfae91c8d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":172,"end":174}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file.js","lines":{"begin":91,"end":93}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"beda25571cf3ea070a68d9cdfae91c8d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/target_branch_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":53}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/timezone_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"575f1444e3c2fec5a4f47d049cbd87c0","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/timezone_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":67}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/pipeline_schedules/shared/components/target_branch_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e4303b5381a6be7bcaade373d766f34","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":42}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1d8b266328571b1177e922384e474eb5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/authenticate.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":57}},"remediation_points":960000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/u2f/register.js","lines":{"begin":35,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 67**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"334a900ffecf98fb6a951456c58236a1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":181,"end":183}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":290,"end":292}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"32fbc7cab878611e7f156798ae3d2bca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":290,"end":292}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":181,"end":183}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"32fbc7cab878611e7f156798ae3d2bca","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":63}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c14eefb5c2db69bb969956efd4384de","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":57,"end":63}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/project.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2c14eefb5c2db69bb969956efd4384de","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":277,"end":286}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":287,"end":296}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"923d82c4da880c23e929c2402aedd37e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":287,"end":296}},"remediation_points":930000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/search_autocomplete.js","lines":{"begin":277,"end":286}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 66**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"923d82c4da880c23e929c2402aedd37e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":34}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"938856cdef6ef5aa2933db645ea96362","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/blob/blob_fork_suggestion.js","lines":{"begin":31,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"938856cdef6ef5aa2933db645ea96362","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":39}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b35237501aeed21f2d38aef31627b97e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/mr_notes/index.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":75}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/index.js","lines":{"begin":30,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"17da47f3678555baddd89ae6622e441f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":31}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a93d28498cd20f4d35a3f8dbbc0a7a35","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":46}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/lib/utils/datetime_utility.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a93d28498cd20f4d35a3f8dbbc0a7a35","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":241}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":340,"end":344}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"785078efeabfa8c98aa5bf0804b2619d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":340,"end":344}},"remediation_points":870000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":237,"end":241}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 64**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"785078efeabfa8c98aa5bf0804b2619d","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}},"remediation_points":840000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/diff/controller.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 63**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"09d7d5a8cacd9d95c32bc8b4e6b53930","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/lib/diff/controller.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":16}},"remediation_points":840000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/utils.js","lines":{"begin":112,"end":122}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 63**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f94a7934b1c80152deb5b61a0c5db3d4","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":124}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":126,"end":132}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"104c7ee7f9a45a32c42bacfaa5a5f1bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":126,"end":132}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/api.js","lines":{"begin":118,"end":124}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"104c7ee7f9a45a32c42bacfaa5a5f1bc","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f17e867f83499d67ff9ed50b8097db5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":57}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/comment_type_toggle.js","lines":{"begin":37,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f17e867f83499d67ff9ed50b8097db5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":84}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":34}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c4a434df3787893bc1f6d897464a8227","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":27,"end":34}},"remediation_points":810000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":77,"end":84}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 62**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5c1f719b9039c86ffdc704317d783449","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":24}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ab079e1e6bc28e1fc184b520beb34531","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/milestones/shared/promote_milestone_modal_init.js","lines":{"begin":17,"end":21}},"remediation_points":780000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/labels/index/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":24}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 61**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7369e08c5971c04639cff93271173af","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":64}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1ad13a005d315ccf15cfe0584579158f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":61,"end":64}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes/stores/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":56,"end":59}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1ad13a005d315ccf15cfe0584579158f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":107,"end":111}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":117}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9228663eecdf0fc1a8dbd811c863e38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":117}},"remediation_points":750000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/sessions/new/username_validator.js","lines":{"begin":107,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 60**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9228663eecdf0fc1a8dbd811c863e38","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":36}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/landing.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"0cdcc38394199ec6567937ce812cb5a5","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/landing.js","lines":{"begin":18,"end":21}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_button.js","lines":{"begin":33,"end":36}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6b06657bea1bfe588af0efba4a2bf57e","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":31}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":39}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1f5e585cdfd268a3748dbdd584f69df8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":34,"end":39}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":26,"end":31}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"67d77d7b888d52cac1d666c6a95ba502","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":46}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"16eb34236a934fb101dbe1e8b6ab4af1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":49,"end":57}},"remediation_points":720000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/tree.js","lines":{"begin":38,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 59**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"16eb34236a934fb101dbe1e8b6ab4af1","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":203}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"13f117af1725bb929e7aa63491a25429","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":236,"end":248}},"remediation_points":690000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/merge_conflict_store.js","lines":{"begin":191,"end":203}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 58**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"13f117af1725bb929e7aa63491a25429","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":16}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":238,"end":247}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2a553868b7fea8b08596f9a95a22d484","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":238,"end":247}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/groups_filterable_list.js","lines":{"begin":7,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"12bd1fc0fd53a6c025f6ed5d690be133","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":55}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7e7f0899a668845138c08c503e337fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":55}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/application_settings/usage_ping_payload.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e7e7f0899a668845138c08c503e337fe","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":11}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":16}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"21bb124a570e4088d0684442dade767f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":16}},"remediation_points":660000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/admin/broadcast_messages/broadcast_message.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 57**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"21bb124a570e4088d0684442dade767f","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":26}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":46}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d22f4f9ddac4d361d9f6721a25ded899","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":40,"end":46}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/namespace_select.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d22f4f9ddac4d361d9f6721a25ded899","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":116}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/constants.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":56}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"d9ad4d62a2c7b3a5ee02495f81a78cd8","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/constants.js","lines":{"begin":43,"end":56}},"remediation_points":630000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":116}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 56**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"b9bd1f7a0fafe178e70f6a652d6fd8be","severity":"major","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/components/diff_file_editor.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/resolve_discussion_btn.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":21}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"423d5a0cc874e941bd22657b325446b4","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diff_notes/components/resolve_discussion_btn.js","lines":{"begin":8,"end":21}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_conflicts/components/diff_file_editor.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":26}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"716df5a6c1cbc00338163aa638130bca","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":436,"end":441}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":452,"end":457}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a2cd4548ee8c0362f69cc88ee5982c0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":452,"end":457}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":436,"end":441}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a2cd4548ee8c0362f69cc88ee5982c0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":221}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e71451918dac542ee62e859e4a694a23","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/search/init_filtered_search.js","lines":{"begin":13,"end":20}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":214,"end":221}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6696916f5ca830f21733956d3dc83b22","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"723e924a871cea3a66a3ccd49f2f4407","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":50,"end":54}},"remediation_points":570000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/prometheus_metrics/prometheus_metrics.js","lines":{"begin":45,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 54**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"723e924a871cea3a66a3ccd49f2f4407","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":102}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":108}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38cb87a7a94d43c42903f71cfd248953","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":103,"end":108}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":97,"end":102}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"38cb87a7a94d43c42903f71cfd248953","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":129}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":153}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"77fe9230b5c1c681ca23dd48b5bde881","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":150,"end":153}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/project_new.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":129}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"77fe9230b5c1c681ca23dd48b5bde881","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":42}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6369d3d651e38cbbac285afad5297e9d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":44,"end":47}},"remediation_points":540000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/reports/store/utils.js","lines":{"begin":39,"end":42}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 53**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"6369d3d651e38cbbac285afad5297e9d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":108,"end":111}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":116}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8d07121aa08a0ef9af946ea4e5d60d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":113,"end":116}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/clusters/clusters_bundle.js","lines":{"begin":108,"end":111}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2b8d07121aa08a0ef9af946ea4e5d60d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":45}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":49}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c224ff513833f281d7bb58fb1280314","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":49}},"remediation_points":510000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/zen_mode.js","lines":{"begin":42,"end":45}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 52**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1c224ff513833f281d7bb58fb1280314","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":136}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":147}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e09ce34a63a712c502dfcaa775c5a8e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":144,"end":147}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/ide/stores/actions.js","lines":{"begin":133,"end":136}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5e09ce34a63a712c502dfcaa775c5a8e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":123}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":131}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5dcf5b9ed09acddcf34d9b99f4f7d4e0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":128,"end":131}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/network/branch_graph.js","lines":{"begin":120,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5dcf5b9ed09acddcf34d9b99f4f7d4e0","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/tree/services/commit_pipeline_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/services/job_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"020d87eef79dcc6d4979a4877f795e88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/services/job_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/projects/tree/services/commit_pipeline_service.js","lines":{"begin":3,"end":11}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"7f3c54ba927268843f9fe397b30c4541","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":23}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cc2a5b7fe6f4a900c4690f4960b1d2ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":23,"end":27}},"remediation_points":480000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/star.js","lines":{"begin":19,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 51**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cc2a5b7fe6f4a900c4690f4960b1d2ce","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":104}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/modal_store.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":74}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"e9ffa7b55a2d3d697297bb9c77d9e0c8","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/stores/modal_store.js","lines":{"begin":71,"end":74}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/groups/store/groups_store.js","lines":{"begin":102,"end":104}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"cae962d929e29ddbbe69117801f17860","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/issues/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/merge_requests/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"65a33b3fe4ae20436c9fb46d65d9db04","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/merge_requests/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/groups/issues/index.js","lines":{"begin":6,"end":13}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1b0f3dfb819efd869e74a58517390763","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":58}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":54}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ed657cc5e6969316c8bd1d2be6204668","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/job_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":51,"end":54}},"remediation_points":450000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pipelines/pipeline_details_mediator.js","lines":{"begin":55,"end":58}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 50**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3da1a06772dc32dbbb550900c97f6cbd","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":130}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":159}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6c22427e43838beefc533b33cde9955","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":154,"end":159}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":125,"end":130}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"f6c22427e43838beefc533b33cde9955","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":18}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":23}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5eaf7d9cd8339dca959f74f384e02906","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":20,"end":23}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/deploy_keys/service/index.js","lines":{"begin":15,"end":18}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5eaf7d9cd8339dca959f74f384e02906","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":148}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":250,"end":252}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70155684217b5724087f40626f7766bc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":250,"end":252}},"remediation_points":420000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/projects/graphs/show/stat_graph_contributors_graph.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":148}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 49**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"70155684217b5724087f40626f7766bc","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":134,"end":137}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":138,"end":141}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"180e35eb524273ddfc92de366020a611","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":138,"end":141}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm.js","lines":{"begin":134,"end":137}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"180e35eb524273ddfc92de366020a611","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":106}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":123}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672a79b04a463defdd46c0086474fd52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":117,"end":123}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/issuable_bulk_update_sidebar.js","lines":{"begin":100,"end":106}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"672a79b04a463defdd46c0086474fd52","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":149}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4ebfab6abe3fb873067f7b37190c9136","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":146,"end":149}},"remediation_points":390000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/jobs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":66,"end":69}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 48**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"4ebfab6abe3fb873067f7b37190c9136","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":53}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":60,"end":67}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10bdf4c525726570be1c10982443983e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":60,"end":67}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/droplab/hook_input.js","lines":{"begin":46,"end":53}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"10bdf4c525726570be1c10982443983e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":77}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":80}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"223d4160dbc2f173c7019bf4258bf71a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":80}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_hint.js","lines":{"begin":75,"end":77}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2f69c39865bb0c31ba27242592efb90a","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1451,"end":1457}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1459,"end":1465}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06432a7535afbcbc307fe2c2fad49f03","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1459,"end":1465}},"remediation_points":360000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/notes.js","lines":{"begin":1451,"end":1457}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 47**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"06432a7535afbcbc307fe2c2fad49f03","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":66}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":423,"end":426}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3cf8b42abcd81551bbf1d4b6a86a23ec","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":423,"end":426}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/create_merge_request_dropdown.js","lines":{"begin":63,"end":66}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"3cf8b42abcd81551bbf1d4b6a86a23ec","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":224}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":564,"end":565}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9b59a169ec24710bb17e53176d9f6484","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager.js","lines":{"begin":564,"end":565}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager.js","lines":{"begin":223,"end":224}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"629f61554a8bb6a8eb033206d609a01e","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":95}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":98}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a37da012d8b9134f9c2c07cbe6e5df45","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":96,"end":98}},"remediation_points":330000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/gl_form.js","lines":{"begin":93,"end":95}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 46**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a37da012d8b9134f9c2c07cbe6e5df45","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":52}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":72}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad4849cc4103d257a75a53f533f93f88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":68,"end":72}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/issue.js","lines":{"begin":48,"end":52}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"ad4849cc4103d257a75a53f533f93f88","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/project.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/milestone.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"63e808e699724c7876463b889a910d69","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/milestone.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/boards/models/project.js","lines":{"begin":1,"end":6}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d888235869b541141524699d46a10fe","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":143}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"a5d03fc520fddde3ecc4ff06b86c9a0d","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/actions.js","lines":{"begin":139,"end":139}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations.js","lines":{"begin":142,"end":143}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"5a0bd2adf62a695699f94e1cef624dd7","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":76}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":81}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1dc35d639071fed3c333a47b9c544d56","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":78,"end":81}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/merge_request_tabs.js","lines":{"begin":73,"end":76}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"1dc35d639071fed3c333a47b9c544d56","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":234,"end":240}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":260,"end":266}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9f4b3f70b4ef899508948c84a381a89","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":260,"end":266}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/pages/users/activity_calendar.js","lines":{"begin":234,"end":240}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"c9f4b3f70b4ef899508948c84a381a89","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":20}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":28}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"2d44f8e3653f3f06777c422f4151a7d3","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"type":"issue","check_name":"similar-code","description":"Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.","categories":["Duplication"],"location":{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_branches/protected_branch_edit.js","lines":{"begin":24,"end":28}},"remediation_points":300000,"other_locations":[{"path":"app/assets/javascripts/protected_tags/protected_tag_edit.js","lines":{"begin":16,"end":20}}],"content":{"body":"## Duplicated Code\n\nDuplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:\n\n> Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.\n\nWhen you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).\n\n## Tuning\n\n**This issue has a mass of 45**.\n\nWe set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.\n\nThe threshold configuration represents the minimum [mass](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication#mass) a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.\n\nIf the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.\n\nSee [`codeclimate-duplication`'s documentation](https://docs.codeclimate.com/docs/duplication) for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your `.codeclimate.yml`.\n\n## Refactorings\n\n*   [Extract Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-method)\n*   [Extract Class](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/extract-class)\n*   [Form Template Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/form-template-method)\n*   [Introduce Null Object](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/introduce-null-object)\n*   [Pull Up Method](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-method)\n*   [Pull Up Field](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/pull-up-field)\n*   [Substitute Algorithm](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/substitute-algorithm)\n\n## Further Reading\n\n*   [Don't Repeat Yourself](http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?DontRepeatYourself) on the C2 Wiki\n*   [Duplicated Code](http://sourcemaking.com/refactoring/duplicated-code) on SourceMaking\n*   [Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code](http://www.amazon.com/Refactoring-Improving-Design-Existing-Code/dp/0201485672) by Martin Fowler. _Duplicated Code_, p76\n"},"fingerprint":"9ff0344a1b63248724d8413b03573b43","severity":"minor","engine_name":"duplication"},{"categories":["Security"],"check_name":"Insecure Dependency","content":{"body":"**Advisory**: CVE-2018-1000211\n\n**URL**: https://blog.justinbull.ca/cve-2018-1000211-public-apps-cant-revoke-tokens-in-doorkeeper/\n\n**Solution**: upgrade to >= 4.4.0, >= 5.0.0.rc2"},"description":"Doorkeeper gem does not revoke token for public clients","location":{"path":"Gemfile.lock","lines":{"begin":173,"end":173}},"remediation_points":5000000,"severity":"minor","type":"Issue","fingerprint":"13e50c564110ecb5eba441004fe52261","engine_name":"bundler-audit"},{"categories":["Security"],"check_name":"Insecure Dependency","content":{"body":"**Advisory**: CVE-2018-3769\n\n**URL**: https://github.com/ruby-grape/grape/issues/1762\n\n**Solution**: upgrade to >= 1.1.0"},"description":"ruby-grape Gem has XSS via \"format\" parameter","location":{"path":"Gemfile.lock","lines":{"begin":346,"end":346}},"remediation_points":5000000,"severity":"minor","type":"Issue","fingerprint":"ac6d981abbf80f299374d5a1081c7d66","engine_name":"bundler-audit"}]
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f04ec0065b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/codequality/codequality.json.gz
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/gitlab/ci/external_files/.gitlab-ci-template-1.yml b/spec/fixtures/gitlab/ci/external_files/.gitlab-ci-template-1.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0bab94a7c2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/fixtures/gitlab/ci/external_files/.gitlab-ci-template-1.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+before_script:
+  - apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev nodejs
+  - ruby -v
+  - which ruby
+  - gem install bundler --no-ri --no-rdoc
+  - bundle install --jobs $(nproc)  "${FLAGS[@]}"
+
+rspec:
+  script:
+    - bundle exec rspec
diff --git a/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub b/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub
index 6bac42b3ad0..d43315ddae8 100644
--- a/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub
+++ b/spec/fixtures/ssh_host_example_key.pub
@@ -1 +1 @@
-random content
+ssh-rsa AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQCuRkAgwaap/pXThwCpjX8Wd5tR36Tqx3sW2sVVHs3UKB7kd+xNknw7e4qpuEATv56xHrhKm2+ye/JidTuQ/1EwFhjaz7I5wTslfVawQpeH1ZqAGmvdO/xTw+l7fgEFVlGVx9y0HV3m52y2C9yw82qmg+BohbTVgPtjjutpFc+CwLQxLTnTrRhZf5udQgz+YlwLv+Y0kDx6+DWWOl8N9+TWuGyFKBln79CyBgFcK5NFmF48kYn8W+r7rmawfw9XbuF1aa+6JF+6cNR1mCEonyrRLdXP+vWcxpLKYfejB0NmA1y+W9M/K53AcIHA5zlRQ49tFh0P22eh/Gl8JQ6yyuin foo@bar.mynet
diff --git a/spec/graphql/types/permission_types/project_spec.rb b/spec/graphql/types/permission_types/project_spec.rb
index 89eecef096e..927153adc5b 100644
--- a/spec/graphql/types/permission_types/project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/graphql/types/permission_types/project_spec.rb
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ describe Types::PermissionTypes::Project do
       :read_commit_status, :request_access, :create_pipeline, :create_pipeline_schedule,
       :create_merge_request_from, :create_wiki, :push_code, :create_deployment, :push_to_delete_protected_branch,
       :admin_wiki, :admin_project, :update_pages, :admin_remote_mirror, :create_label,
-      :update_wiki, :destroy_wiki, :create_pages, :destroy_pages
+      :update_wiki, :destroy_wiki, :create_pages, :destroy_pages, :read_pages_content
     ]
 
     expect(described_class).to have_graphql_fields(expected_permissions)
diff --git a/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
index 14297a1a544..4135f31e051 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/application_helper_spec.rb
@@ -3,48 +3,66 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe ApplicationHelper do
   describe 'current_controller?' do
-    it 'returns true when controller matches argument' do
+    before do
       stub_controller_name('foo')
+    end
 
-      expect(helper.current_controller?(:foo)).to eq true
+    it 'returns true when controller matches argument' do
+      expect(helper.current_controller?(:foo)).to be_truthy
     end
 
     it 'returns false when controller does not match argument' do
-      stub_controller_name('foo')
-
-      expect(helper.current_controller?(:bar)).to eq false
+      expect(helper.current_controller?(:bar)).to be_falsey
     end
 
     it 'takes any number of arguments' do
-      stub_controller_name('foo')
+      expect(helper.current_controller?(:baz, :bar)).to be_falsey
+      expect(helper.current_controller?(:baz, :bar, :foo)).to be_truthy
+    end
 
-      expect(helper.current_controller?(:baz, :bar)).to eq false
-      expect(helper.current_controller?(:baz, :bar, :foo)).to eq true
+    context 'when namespaced' do
+      before do
+        stub_controller_path('bar/foo')
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true when controller matches argument' do
+        expect(helper.current_controller?(:foo)).to be_truthy
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true when controller and namespace matches argument in path notation' do
+        expect(helper.current_controller?('bar/foo')).to be_truthy
+      end
+
+      it 'returns false when namespace doesnt match' do
+        expect(helper.current_controller?('foo/foo')).to be_falsey
+      end
     end
 
     def stub_controller_name(value)
       allow(helper.controller).to receive(:controller_name).and_return(value)
     end
+
+    def stub_controller_path(value)
+      allow(helper.controller).to receive(:controller_path).and_return(value)
+    end
   end
 
   describe 'current_action?' do
-    it 'returns true when action matches' do
+    before do
       stub_action_name('foo')
+    end
 
-      expect(helper.current_action?(:foo)).to eq true
+    it 'returns true when action matches' do
+      expect(helper.current_action?(:foo)).to be_truthy
     end
 
     it 'returns false when action does not match' do
-      stub_action_name('foo')
-
-      expect(helper.current_action?(:bar)).to eq false
+      expect(helper.current_action?(:bar)).to be_falsey
     end
 
     it 'takes any number of arguments' do
-      stub_action_name('foo')
-
-      expect(helper.current_action?(:baz, :bar)).to eq false
-      expect(helper.current_action?(:baz, :bar, :foo)).to eq true
+      expect(helper.current_action?(:baz, :bar)).to be_falsey
+      expect(helper.current_action?(:baz, :bar, :foo)).to be_truthy
     end
 
     def stub_action_name(value)
@@ -100,8 +118,7 @@ describe ApplicationHelper do
     end
 
     it 'accepts a custom html_class' do
-      expect(element(html_class: 'custom_class').attr('class'))
-        .to eq 'js-timeago custom_class'
+      expect(element(html_class: 'custom_class').attr('class')).to eq 'js-timeago custom_class'
     end
 
     it 'accepts a custom tooltip placement' do
@@ -114,6 +131,7 @@ describe ApplicationHelper do
 
     it 'add class for the short format' do
       timeago_element = element(short_format: 'short')
+
       expect(timeago_element.attr('class')).to eq 'js-short-timeago'
       expect(timeago_element.next_element).to eq nil
     end
@@ -128,11 +146,9 @@ describe ApplicationHelper do
     context 'when alternate support url is specified' do
       let(:alternate_url) { 'http://company.example.com/getting-help' }
 
-      before do
+      it 'returns the alternate support url' do
         stub_application_setting(help_page_support_url: alternate_url)
-      end
 
-      it 'returns the alternate support url' do
         expect(helper.support_url).to eq(alternate_url)
       end
     end
@@ -155,9 +171,10 @@ describe ApplicationHelper do
   describe '#autocomplete_data_sources' do
     let(:project) { create(:project) }
     let(:noteable_type) { Issue }
+
     it 'returns paths for autocomplete_sources_controller' do
       sources = helper.autocomplete_data_sources(project, noteable_type)
-      expect(sources.keys).to match_array([:members, :issues, :mergeRequests, :labels, :milestones, :commands])
+      expect(sources.keys).to match_array([:members, :issues, :mergeRequests, :labels, :milestones, :commands, :snippets])
       sources.keys.each do |key|
         expect(sources[key]).not_to be_nil
       end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/auto_devops_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/auto_devops_helper_spec.rb
index 1950c2b129b..75c30dbfe48 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/auto_devops_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/auto_devops_helper_spec.rb
@@ -16,7 +16,15 @@ describe AutoDevopsHelper do
 
     subject { helper.show_auto_devops_callout?(project) }
 
-    context 'when all conditions are met' do
+    context 'when auto devops is implicitly enabled' do
+      it { is_expected.to eq(false) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when auto devops is not implicitly enabled' do
+      before do
+        Gitlab::CurrentSettings.update!(auto_devops_enabled: false)
+      end
+
       it { is_expected.to eq(true) }
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb
index 55ee87163f9..aa0442ab847 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/avatars_helper_spec.rb
@@ -32,18 +32,6 @@ describe AvatarsHelper do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when providing a project path' do
-      it_behaves_like 'resource with a default avatar', 'project' do
-        let(:resource) { create(:project, name: 'foo') }
-        let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] }
-      end
-
-      it_behaves_like 'resource with a custom avatar', 'project' do
-        let(:resource) { create(:project, :public, avatar: File.open(uploaded_image_temp_path)) }
-        let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] }
-      end
-    end
-
     context 'when providing a group' do
       it_behaves_like 'resource with a default avatar', 'group' do
         let(:resource) { create(:group, name: 'foo') }
@@ -55,18 +43,6 @@ describe AvatarsHelper do
         let(:helper_args) { [resource] }
       end
     end
-
-    context 'when providing a group path' do
-      it_behaves_like 'resource with a default avatar', 'group' do
-        let(:resource) { create(:group, name: 'foo') }
-        let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] }
-      end
-
-      it_behaves_like 'resource with a custom avatar', 'group' do
-        let(:resource) { create(:group, avatar: File.open(uploaded_image_temp_path)) }
-        let(:helper_args) { [resource.full_path] }
-      end
-    end
   end
 
   describe '#avatar_icon_for' do
diff --git a/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb
index 0c0a0003231..eebae1d7290 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/button_helper_spec.rb
@@ -40,12 +40,24 @@ describe ButtonHelper do
       end
 
       context 'when user has no personal access tokens' do
-        it 'has a personal access token text on the dropdown description ' do
+        it 'has a personal access token text on the dropdown description' do
           description = element.search('.dropdown-menu-inner-content').first
 
           expect(description.inner_text).to eq 'Create a personal access token on your account to pull or push via HTTP.'
         end
       end
+
+      context 'when user has personal access tokens' do
+        before do
+          create(:personal_access_token, user: user)
+        end
+
+        it 'does not have a personal access token text on the dropdown description' do
+          description = element.search('.dropdown-menu-inner-content').first
+
+          expect(description).to be_nil
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when user is ldap user' do
diff --git a/spec/helpers/commits_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/commits_helper_spec.rb
index 4b6c7c33e5b..9c0e55739d6 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/commits_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/commits_helper_spec.rb
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ describe CommitsHelper do
         .not_to include('onmouseover="alert(1)"')
     end
 
-    it 'escapes the commiter name' do
+    it 'escapes the committer name' do
       user = build_stubbed(:user, name: 'Foo <script>alert("XSS")</script>')
 
       commit = double(committer: user, committer_name: '', committer_email: '')
diff --git a/spec/helpers/events_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/events_helper_spec.rb
index fccde8b7eba..466e018d68c 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/events_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/events_helper_spec.rb
@@ -25,4 +25,47 @@ describe EventsHelper do
       expect(helper.event_commit_title("foo & bar")).to eq("foo & bar")
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#event_feed_url' do
+    let(:event) { create(:event) }
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository) }
+
+    it "returns project issue url" do
+      event.target = create(:issue)
+
+      expect(helper.event_feed_url(event)).to eq(project_issue_url(event.project, event.issue))
+    end
+
+    it "returns project merge_request url" do
+      event.target = create(:merge_request)
+
+      expect(helper.event_feed_url(event)).to eq(project_merge_request_url(event.project, event.merge_request))
+    end
+
+    it "returns project commit url" do
+      event.target = create(:note_on_commit, project: project)
+
+      expect(helper.event_feed_url(event)).to eq(project_commit_url(event.project, event.note_target))
+    end
+
+    it "returns event note target url" do
+      event.target = create(:note)
+
+      expect(helper.event_feed_url(event)).to eq(event_note_target_url(event))
+    end
+
+    it "returns project url" do
+      event.project = project
+      event.action = 1
+
+      expect(helper.event_feed_url(event)).to eq(project_url(event.project))
+    end
+
+    it "returns push event feed url" do
+      event = create(:push_event)
+      create(:push_event_payload, event: event, action: :pushed)
+
+      expect(helper.event_feed_url(event)).to eq(push_event_feed_url(event))
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/issuables_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/issuables_helper_spec.rb
index f76ed4bfda4..4af98bc3678 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/issuables_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/issuables_helper_spec.rb
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ describe IssuablesHelper do
         issuableRef: "##{issue.iid}",
         markdownPreviewPath: "/#{@project.full_path}/preview_markdown",
         markdownDocsPath: '/help/user/markdown',
-        markdownVersion: 11,
+        markdownVersion: CacheMarkdownField::CACHE_COMMONMARK_VERSION,
         issuableTemplates: [],
         projectPath: @project.path,
         projectNamespace: @project.namespace.path,
diff --git a/spec/helpers/markup_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/markup_helper_spec.rb
index 597648b064d..a0c0af94fa5 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/markup_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/markup_helper_spec.rb
@@ -25,17 +25,17 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
       let(:actual) { "#{merge_request.to_reference} -> #{commit.to_reference} -> #{issue.to_reference}" }
 
       it "links to the merge request" do
-        expected = project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request)
+        expected = urls.project_merge_request_path(project, merge_request)
         expect(helper.markdown(actual)).to match(expected)
       end
 
       it "links to the commit" do
-        expected = project_commit_path(project, commit)
+        expected = urls.project_commit_path(project, commit)
         expect(helper.markdown(actual)).to match(expected)
       end
 
       it "links to the issue" do
-        expected = project_issue_path(project, issue)
+        expected = urls.project_issue_path(project, issue)
         expect(helper.markdown(actual)).to match(expected)
       end
     end
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
       let(:second_issue) { create(:issue, project: second_project) }
 
       it 'links to the issue' do
-        expected = project_issue_path(second_project, second_issue)
+        expected = urls.project_issue_path(second_project, second_issue)
         expect(markdown(actual, project: second_project)).to match(expected)
       end
     end
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
 
       # First issue link
       expect(doc.css('a')[1].attr('href'))
-        .to eq project_issue_path(project, issues[0])
+        .to eq urls.project_issue_path(project, issues[0])
       expect(doc.css('a')[1].text).to eq issues[0].to_reference
 
       # Internal commit link
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
 
       # Second issue link
       expect(doc.css('a')[3].attr('href'))
-        .to eq project_issue_path(project, issues[1])
+        .to eq urls.project_issue_path(project, issues[1])
       expect(doc.css('a')[3].text).to eq issues[1].to_reference
 
       # Trailing commit link
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
 
       # First issue link
       expect(doc.css('a')[1].attr('href'))
-        .to eq project_issue_path(project, issues[0])
+        .to eq urls.project_issue_path(project, issues[0])
       expect(doc.css('a')[1].text).to eq issues[0].to_reference
 
       # Internal commit link
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
 
       # Second issue link
       expect(doc.css('a')[3].attr('href'))
-        .to eq project_issue_path(project, issues[1])
+        .to eq urls.project_issue_path(project, issues[1])
       expect(doc.css('a')[3].text).to eq issues[1].to_reference
 
       # Trailing commit link
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
       doc = Nokogiri::HTML.parse(rendered)
 
       expect(doc.css('a')[0].attr('href'))
-        .to eq project_issue_path(project, issue)
+        .to eq urls.project_issue_path(project, issue)
       expect(doc.css('a')[0].text).to eq issue.to_reference
 
       wrapped = helper.link_to_html(rendered, link)
@@ -207,6 +207,17 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
 
       expect(helper).to receive(:markdown_unsafe).with('wiki content',
         pipeline: :wiki, project: project, project_wiki: @wiki, page_slug: "nested/page",
+        issuable_state_filter_enabled: true)
+
+      helper.render_wiki_content(@wiki)
+    end
+
+    it 'uses Wiki pipeline for markdown files with RedCarpet if feature disabled' do
+      stub_feature_flags(commonmark_for_repositories: false)
+      allow(@wiki).to receive(:format).and_return(:markdown)
+
+      expect(helper).to receive(:markdown_unsafe).with('wiki content',
+        pipeline: :wiki, project: project, project_wiki: @wiki, page_slug: "nested/page",
         issuable_state_filter_enabled: true, markdown_engine: :redcarpet)
 
       helper.render_wiki_content(@wiki)
@@ -259,10 +270,18 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
       expect(helper.markup('foo.md', content, rendered: '<p>NOEL</p>')).to eq('<p>NOEL</p>')
     end
 
-    it 'defaults to Redcarpet' do
-      expect(helper).to receive(:markdown_unsafe).with(content, hash_including(markdown_engine: :redcarpet)).and_return('NOEL')
+    it 'defaults to CommonMark' do
+      expect(helper.markup('foo.md', 'x^2')).to include('x^2')
+    end
 
-      expect(helper.markup('foo.md', content)).to eq('NOEL')
+    it 'honors markdown_engine for RedCarpet' do
+      expect(helper.markup('foo.md', 'x^2', { markdown_engine: :redcarpet })).to include('x<sup>2</sup>')
+    end
+
+    it 'uses RedCarpet if feature disabled' do
+      stub_feature_flags(commonmark_for_repositories: false)
+
+      expect(helper.markup('foo.md', 'x^2', { markdown_engine: :redcarpet })).to include('x<sup>2</sup>')
     end
   end
 
@@ -320,11 +339,25 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
         expect(first_line_in_markdown(object, attribute, 150, project: project)).to eq(expected)
       end
 
-      it 'preserves data-src for lazy images' do
-        object = create_object("![ImageTest](/uploads/test.png)")
-        image_url = "data-src=\".*/uploads/test.png\""
+      context 'when images are allowed' do
+        it 'preserves data-src for lazy images' do
+          object    = create_object("![ImageTest](/uploads/test.png)")
+          image_url = "data-src=\".*/uploads/test.png\""
+          text      = first_line_in_markdown(object, attribute, 150, project: project, allow_images: true)
+
+          expect(text).to match(image_url)
+          expect(text).to match('<a')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when images are not allowed' do
+        it 'removes any images' do
+          object = create_object("![ImageTest](/uploads/test.png)")
+          text   = first_line_in_markdown(object, attribute, 150, project: project)
 
-        expect(first_line_in_markdown(object, attribute, 150, project: project)).to match(image_url)
+          expect(text).not_to match('<img')
+          expect(text).not_to match('<a')
+        end
       end
 
       context 'labels formatting' do
@@ -414,4 +447,8 @@ describe MarkupHelper do
       expect(helper.cross_project_reference(project, issue)).to include(project.full_path)
     end
   end
+
+  def urls
+    Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/namespaces_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/namespaces_helper_spec.rb
index 234690e742b..7ccbdcd1332 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/namespaces_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/namespaces_helper_spec.rb
@@ -50,9 +50,12 @@ describe NamespacesHelper do
     end
 
     it 'selects the new group by default' do
+      # Ensure we don't select a group with the same name
+      create(:group, name: 'new-group', path: 'another-path')
+
       allow(helper).to receive(:current_user).and_return(user)
 
-      options = helper.namespaces_options(:extra_group, display_path: true, extra_group: build(:group, name: 'new-group'))
+      options = helper.namespaces_options(:extra_group, display_path: true, extra_group: build(:group, name: 'new-group', path: 'new-group'))
 
       expect(options).to include(user_group.name)
       expect(options).not_to include(admin_group.name)
diff --git a/spec/helpers/projects_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/projects_helper_spec.rb
index cbd4ff0fb4a..976b6c312b4 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/projects_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/projects_helper_spec.rb
@@ -470,4 +470,16 @@ describe ProjectsHelper do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#legacy_render_context' do
+    it 'returns the redcarpet engine' do
+      params = { legacy_render: '1' }
+
+      expect(helper.legacy_render_context(params)).to include(markdown_engine: :redcarpet)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns nothing' do
+      expect(helper.legacy_render_context({})).to be_empty
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/helpers/tab_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/tab_helper_spec.rb
index b473c0a7416..9abf63d4bd4 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/tab_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/tab_helper_spec.rb
@@ -9,31 +9,71 @@ describe TabHelper do
       allow(self).to receive(:action_name).and_return('foo')
     end
 
-    it "captures block output" do
-      expect(nav_link { "Testing Blocks" }).to match(/Testing Blocks/)
+    context 'with the content of the li' do
+      it "captures block output" do
+        expect(nav_link { "Testing Blocks" }).to match(/Testing Blocks/)
+      end
     end
 
-    it "performs checks on the current controller" do
-      expect(nav_link(controller: :foo)).to match(/<li class="active">/)
-      expect(nav_link(controller: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
-      expect(nav_link(controller: [:foo, :bar])).to match(/active/)
-    end
+    context 'with controller param' do
+      it "performs checks on the current controller" do
+        expect(nav_link(controller: :foo)).to match(/<li class="active">/)
+        expect(nav_link(controller: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
+        expect(nav_link(controller: [:foo, :bar])).to match(/active/)
+      end
+
+      context 'with action param' do
+        it "performs checks on both controller and action when both are present" do
+          expect(nav_link(controller: :bar, action: :foo)).not_to match(/active/)
+          expect(nav_link(controller: :foo, action: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
+          expect(nav_link(controller: :foo, action: :foo)).to match(/active/)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'with namespace in path notation' do
+        before do
+          allow(controller).to receive(:controller_path).and_return('bar/foo')
+        end
 
-    it "performs checks on the current action" do
-      expect(nav_link(action: :foo)).to match(/<li class="active">/)
-      expect(nav_link(action: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
-      expect(nav_link(action: [:foo, :bar])).to match(/active/)
+        it 'performs checks on both controller and namespace' do
+          expect(nav_link(controller: 'foo/foo')).not_to match(/active/)
+          expect(nav_link(controller: 'bar/foo')).to match(/active/)
+        end
+
+        context 'with action param' do
+          it "performs checks on both namespace, controller and action when they are all present" do
+            expect(nav_link(controller: 'foo/foo', action: :foo)).not_to match(/active/)
+            expect(nav_link(controller: 'bar/foo', action: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
+            expect(nav_link(controller: 'bar/foo', action: :foo)).to match(/active/)
+          end
+        end
+      end
     end
 
-    it "performs checks on both controller and action when both are present" do
-      expect(nav_link(controller: :bar, action: :foo)).not_to match(/active/)
-      expect(nav_link(controller: :foo, action: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
-      expect(nav_link(controller: :foo, action: :foo)).to match(/active/)
+    context 'with action param' do
+      it "performs checks on the current action" do
+        expect(nav_link(action: :foo)).to match(/<li class="active">/)
+        expect(nav_link(action: :bar)).not_to match(/active/)
+        expect(nav_link(action: [:foo, :bar])).to match(/active/)
+      end
     end
 
-    it "accepts a path shorthand" do
-      expect(nav_link(path: 'foo#bar')).not_to match(/active/)
-      expect(nav_link(path: 'foo#foo')).to match(/active/)
+    context 'with path param' do
+      it "accepts a path shorthand" do
+        expect(nav_link(path: 'foo#bar')).not_to match(/active/)
+        expect(nav_link(path: 'foo#foo')).to match(/active/)
+      end
+
+      context 'with namespace' do
+        before do
+          allow(controller).to receive(:controller_path).and_return('bar/foo')
+        end
+
+        it 'accepts a path shorthand with namespace' do
+          expect(nav_link(path: 'bar/foo#foo')).to match(/active/)
+          expect(nav_link(path: 'foo/foo#foo')).not_to match(/active/)
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     it "passes extra html options to the list element" do
diff --git a/spec/helpers/time_helper_spec.rb b/spec/helpers/time_helper_spec.rb
index 0b371d69ecf..cc310766433 100644
--- a/spec/helpers/time_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/helpers/time_helper_spec.rb
@@ -20,17 +20,35 @@ describe TimeHelper do
   end
 
   describe "#duration_in_numbers" do
-    it "returns minutes and seconds" do
-      durations_and_expectations = {
-        100 => "01:40",
-        121 => "02:01",
-        3721 => "01:02:01",
-        0 => "00:00",
-        42 => "00:42"
-      }
+    using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+    context "without passing allow_overflow" do
+      where(:duration, :formatted_string) do
+        0                              | "00:00"
+        1.second                       | "00:01"
+        42.seconds                     | "00:42"
+        2.minutes + 1.second           | "02:01"
+        3.hours + 2.minutes + 1.second | "03:02:01"
+        30.hours                       | "06:00:00"
+      end
+
+      with_them do
+        it { expect(duration_in_numbers(duration)).to eq formatted_string }
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "with allow_overflow = true" do
+      where(:duration, :formatted_string) do
+        0                              | "00:00:00"
+        1.second                       | "00:00:01"
+        42.seconds                     | "00:00:42"
+        2.minutes + 1.second           | "00:02:01"
+        3.hours + 2.minutes + 1.second | "03:02:01"
+        30.hours                       | "30:00:00"
+      end
 
-      durations_and_expectations.each do |duration, expectation|
-        expect(duration_in_numbers(duration)).to eq(expectation)
+      with_them do
+        it { expect(duration_in_numbers(duration, true)).to eq formatted_string }
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/.eslintrc.yml b/spec/javascripts/.eslintrc.yml
index 5525c9f5bd0..9b2c84ce9f5 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/.eslintrc.yml
+++ b/spec/javascripts/.eslintrc.yml
@@ -35,3 +35,9 @@ rules:
     - error
     - ignore:
       - 'fixtures/blob'
+  # Temporarily disabled to facilitate an upgrade to eslint-plugin-jasmine
+  jasmine/new-line-before-expect: off
+  jasmine/new-line-between-declarations: off
+  jasmine/no-promise-without-done-fail: off
+  jasmine/prefer-jasmine-matcher: off
+  jasmine/prefer-toHaveBeenCalledWith: off
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/api_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/api_spec.js
index 54cb6d84109..091edf13cfe 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/api_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/api_spec.js
@@ -250,71 +250,45 @@ describe('Api', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('licenseText', () => {
-    it('fetches a license text', done => {
-      const licenseKey = "driver's license";
-      const data = { unused: 'option' };
-      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/api/${dummyApiVersion}/templates/licenses/${licenseKey}`;
+  describe('issueTemplate', () => {
+    it('fetches an issue template', done => {
+      const namespace = 'some namespace';
+      const project = 'some project';
+      const templateKey = ' template #%?.key ';
+      const templateType = 'template type';
+      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/${namespace}/${project}/templates/${templateType}/${encodeURIComponent(
+        templateKey,
+      )}`;
       mock.onGet(expectedUrl).reply(200, 'test');
 
-      Api.licenseText(licenseKey, data, response => {
+      Api.issueTemplate(namespace, project, templateKey, templateType, (error, response) => {
         expect(response).toBe('test');
         done();
       });
     });
   });
 
-  describe('gitignoreText', () => {
-    it('fetches a gitignore text', done => {
-      const gitignoreKey = 'ignore git';
-      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/api/${dummyApiVersion}/templates/gitignores/${gitignoreKey}`;
-      mock.onGet(expectedUrl).reply(200, 'test');
-
-      Api.gitignoreText(gitignoreKey, response => {
-        expect(response).toBe('test');
-        done();
-      });
-    });
-  });
+  describe('projectTemplates', () => {
+    it('fetches a list of templates', done => {
+      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/api/${dummyApiVersion}/projects/gitlab-org%2Fgitlab-ce/templates/licenses`;
 
-  describe('gitlabCiYml', () => {
-    it('fetches a .gitlab-ci.yml', done => {
-      const gitlabCiYmlKey = 'Y CI ML';
-      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/api/${dummyApiVersion}/templates/gitlab_ci_ymls/${gitlabCiYmlKey}`;
       mock.onGet(expectedUrl).reply(200, 'test');
 
-      Api.gitlabCiYml(gitlabCiYmlKey, response => {
+      Api.projectTemplates('gitlab-org/gitlab-ce', 'licenses', {}, response => {
         expect(response).toBe('test');
         done();
       });
     });
   });
 
-  describe('dockerfileYml', () => {
-    it('fetches a Dockerfile', done => {
-      const dockerfileYmlKey = 'a giant whale';
-      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/api/${dummyApiVersion}/templates/dockerfiles/${dockerfileYmlKey}`;
-      mock.onGet(expectedUrl).reply(200, 'test');
-
-      Api.dockerfileYml(dockerfileYmlKey, response => {
-        expect(response).toBe('test');
-        done();
-      });
-    });
-  });
+  describe('projectTemplate', () => {
+    it('fetches a single template', done => {
+      const data = { unused: 'option' };
+      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/api/${dummyApiVersion}/projects/gitlab-org%2Fgitlab-ce/templates/licenses/test%20license`;
 
-  describe('issueTemplate', () => {
-    it('fetches an issue template', done => {
-      const namespace = 'some namespace';
-      const project = 'some project';
-      const templateKey = ' template #%?.key ';
-      const templateType = 'template type';
-      const expectedUrl = `${dummyUrlRoot}/${namespace}/${project}/templates/${templateType}/${encodeURIComponent(
-        templateKey,
-      )}`;
       mock.onGet(expectedUrl).reply(200, 'test');
 
-      Api.issueTemplate(namespace, project, templateKey, templateType, (error, response) => {
+      Api.projectTemplate('gitlab-org/gitlab-ce', 'licenses', 'test license', data, response => {
         expect(response).toBe('test');
         done();
       });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/badges/components/badge_form_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/badges/components/badge_form_spec.js
index dd21ec279cb..31195bd762b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/badges/components/badge_form_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/badges/components/badge_form_spec.js
@@ -1,21 +1,31 @@
 import Vue from 'vue';
+import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
+import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
 import store from '~/badges/store';
+import createEmptyBadge from '~/badges/empty_badge';
 import BadgeForm from '~/badges/components/badge_form.vue';
 import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
-import { createDummyBadge } from '../dummy_badge';
+import { DUMMY_IMAGE_URL, TEST_HOST } from '../../test_constants';
+
+// avoid preview background process
+BadgeForm.methods.debouncedPreview = () => {};
 
 describe('BadgeForm component', () => {
   const Component = Vue.extend(BadgeForm);
+  let axiosMock;
   let vm;
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     setFixtures(`
       <div id="dummy-element"></div>
     `);
+
+    axiosMock = new MockAdapter(axios);
   });
 
   afterEach(() => {
     vm.$destroy();
+    axiosMock.restore();
   });
 
   describe('methods', () => {
@@ -38,93 +48,86 @@ describe('BadgeForm component', () => {
         expect(vm.stopEditing).toHaveBeenCalled();
       });
     });
+  });
 
-    describe('onSubmit', () => {
-      describe('if isEditing is true', () => {
-        beforeEach(() => {
-          spyOn(vm, 'saveBadge').and.returnValue(Promise.resolve());
-          store.replaceState({
-            ...store.state,
-            isSaving: false,
-            badgeInEditForm: createDummyBadge(),
-          });
-          vm.isEditing = true;
-        });
-
-        it('returns immediately if imageUrl is empty', () => {
-          store.state.badgeInEditForm.imageUrl = '';
-
-          vm.onSubmit();
-
-          expect(vm.saveBadge).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
-
-        it('returns immediately if linkUrl is empty', () => {
-          store.state.badgeInEditForm.linkUrl = '';
-
-          vm.onSubmit();
-
-          expect(vm.saveBadge).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
-
-        it('returns immediately if isSaving is true', () => {
-          store.state.isSaving = true;
+  const sharedSubmitTests = submitAction => {
+    const imageUrlSelector = '#badge-image-url';
+    const findImageUrlElement = () => vm.$el.querySelector(imageUrlSelector);
+    const linkUrlSelector = '#badge-link-url';
+    const findLinkUrlElement = () => vm.$el.querySelector(linkUrlSelector);
+    const setValue = (inputElementSelector, url) => {
+      const inputElement = vm.$el.querySelector(inputElementSelector);
+      inputElement.value = url;
+      inputElement.dispatchEvent(new Event('input'));
+    };
+    const submitForm = () => {
+      const submitButton = vm.$el.querySelector('button[type="submit"]');
+      submitButton.click();
+    };
+    const expectInvalidInput = inputElementSelector => {
+      const inputElement = vm.$el.querySelector(inputElementSelector);
+      expect(inputElement).toBeMatchedBy(':invalid');
+      const feedbackElement = vm.$el.querySelector(`${inputElementSelector} + .invalid-feedback`);
+      expect(feedbackElement).toBeVisible();
+    };
 
-          vm.onSubmit();
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      spyOn(vm, submitAction).and.returnValue(Promise.resolve());
+      store.replaceState({
+        ...store.state,
+        badgeInAddForm: createEmptyBadge(),
+        badgeInEditForm: createEmptyBadge(),
+        isSaving: false,
+      });
 
-          expect(vm.saveBadge).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
+      setValue(linkUrlSelector, `${TEST_HOST}/link/url`);
+      setValue(imageUrlSelector, `${window.location.origin}${DUMMY_IMAGE_URL}`);
+    });
 
-        it('calls saveBadge', () => {
-          vm.onSubmit();
+    it('returns immediately if imageUrl is empty', () => {
+      setValue(imageUrlSelector, '');
 
-          expect(vm.saveBadge).toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
-      });
+      submitForm();
 
-      describe('if isEditing is false', () => {
-        beforeEach(() => {
-          spyOn(vm, 'addBadge').and.returnValue(Promise.resolve());
-          store.replaceState({
-            ...store.state,
-            isSaving: false,
-            badgeInAddForm: createDummyBadge(),
-          });
-          vm.isEditing = false;
-        });
+      expectInvalidInput(imageUrlSelector);
+      expect(vm[submitAction]).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
 
-        it('returns immediately if imageUrl is empty', () => {
-          store.state.badgeInAddForm.imageUrl = '';
+    it('returns immediately if imageUrl is malformed', () => {
+      setValue(imageUrlSelector, 'not-a-url');
 
-          vm.onSubmit();
+      submitForm();
 
-          expect(vm.addBadge).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
+      expectInvalidInput(imageUrlSelector);
+      expect(vm[submitAction]).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
 
-        it('returns immediately if linkUrl is empty', () => {
-          store.state.badgeInAddForm.linkUrl = '';
+    it('returns immediately if linkUrl is empty', () => {
+      setValue(linkUrlSelector, '');
 
-          vm.onSubmit();
+      submitForm();
 
-          expect(vm.addBadge).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
+      expectInvalidInput(linkUrlSelector);
+      expect(vm[submitAction]).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
 
-        it('returns immediately if isSaving is true', () => {
-          store.state.isSaving = true;
+    it('returns immediately if linkUrl is malformed', () => {
+      setValue(linkUrlSelector, 'not-a-url');
 
-          vm.onSubmit();
+      submitForm();
 
-          expect(vm.addBadge).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
+      expectInvalidInput(linkUrlSelector);
+      expect(vm[submitAction]).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
 
-        it('calls addBadge', () => {
-          vm.onSubmit();
+    it(`calls ${submitAction}`, () => {
+      submitForm();
 
-          expect(vm.addBadge).toHaveBeenCalled();
-        });
-      });
+      expect(findImageUrlElement()).toBeMatchedBy(':valid');
+      expect(findLinkUrlElement()).toBeMatchedBy(':valid');
+      expect(vm[submitAction]).toHaveBeenCalled();
     });
-  });
+  };
 
   describe('if isEditing is false', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
@@ -138,12 +141,15 @@ describe('BadgeForm component', () => {
     });
 
     it('renders one button', () => {
-      const buttons = vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.row-content-block button');
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.row-content-block')).toBeNull();
+      const buttons = vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.form-group:last-of-type button');
       expect(buttons.length).toBe(1);
       const buttonAddElement = buttons[0];
       expect(buttonAddElement).toBeVisible();
       expect(buttonAddElement).toHaveText('Add badge');
     });
+
+    sharedSubmitTests('addBadge');
   });
 
   describe('if isEditing is true', () => {
@@ -167,5 +173,7 @@ describe('BadgeForm component', () => {
       expect(buttonCancelElement).toBeVisible();
       expect(buttonCancelElement).toHaveText('Cancel');
     });
+
+    sharedSubmitTests('saveBadge');
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3305ddc412d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+import highlightCurrentUser from '~/behaviors/markdown/highlight_current_user';
+
+describe('highlightCurrentUser', () => {
+  let rootElement;
+  let elements;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    setFixtures(`
+      <div id="dummy-root-element">
+        <div data-user="1">@first</div>
+        <div data-user="2">@second</div>
+      </div>
+    `);
+    rootElement = document.getElementById('dummy-root-element');
+    elements = rootElement.querySelectorAll('[data-user]');
+  });
+
+  describe('without current user', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      window.gon = window.gon || {};
+      window.gon.current_user_id = null;
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      delete window.gon.current_user_id;
+    });
+
+    it('does not highlight the user', () => {
+      const initialHtml = rootElement.outerHTML;
+
+      highlightCurrentUser(elements);
+
+      expect(rootElement.outerHTML).toBe(initialHtml);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('with current user', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      window.gon = window.gon || {};
+      window.gon.current_user_id = 2;
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      delete window.gon.current_user_id;
+    });
+
+    it('highlights current user', () => {
+      highlightCurrentUser(elements);
+
+      expect(elements.length).toBe(2);
+      expect(elements[0]).not.toHaveClass('current-user');
+      expect(elements[1]).toHaveClass('current-user');
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_issuable_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts_issuable_spec.js
index a4753ab7cde..01b5bc112b2 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_issuable_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts_issuable_spec.js
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import $ from 'jquery';
 import initCopyAsGFM from '~/behaviors/markdown/copy_as_gfm';
-import ShortcutsIssuable from '~/shortcuts_issuable';
+import ShortcutsIssuable from '~/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts_issuable';
 
 initCopyAsGFM();
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/boards/board_blank_state_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/boards/board_blank_state_spec.js
index 89a4fae4b59..0e4e1697fd0 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/boards/board_blank_state_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/boards/board_blank_state_spec.js
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ describe('Boards blank state', () => {
   });
 
   it('creates pre-defined labels', (done) => {
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-create').click();
+    vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click();
 
     setTimeout(() => {
       expect(gl.issueBoards.BoardsStore.state.lists.length).toBe(2);
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ describe('Boards blank state', () => {
   it('resets the store if request fails', (done) => {
     fail = true;
 
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-create').click();
+    vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click();
 
     setTimeout(() => {
       expect(gl.issueBoards.BoardsStore.welcomeIsHidden()).toBeFalsy();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js
index ee37821ad08..1245e3e099a 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/boards/board_new_issue_spec.js
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ describe('Issue boards new issue form', () => {
         vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click();
 
         expect(vm.submit.calls.count()).toBe(1);
-        expect(vm.$refs['submit-button']).toBe(vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success'));
       })
       .then(done)
       .catch(done.fail);
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/boards/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/boards/mock_data.js
index 81f1a97112f..f380ef450db 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/boards/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/boards/mock_data.js
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ export const listObjDuplicate = {
 
 export const BoardsMockData = {
   GET: {
-    '/test/-/boards/1/lists/300/issues?id=300&page=1&=': {
+    '/test/-/boards/1/lists/300/issues?id=300&page=1': {
       issues: [
         {
           title: 'Testing',
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/boards/modal_store_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/boards/modal_store_spec.js
index a234c81fadf..3257a3fb8a3 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/boards/modal_store_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/boards/modal_store_spec.js
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ describe('Modal store', () => {
   let issue2;
 
   beforeEach(() => {
-    // Setup default state
+    // Set up default state
     Store.store.issues = [];
     Store.store.selectedIssues = [];
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/boards/utils/query_data_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/boards/utils/query_data_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 922215ffc1d..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/boards/utils/query_data_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,27 +0,0 @@
-import queryData from '~/boards/utils/query_data';
-
-describe('queryData', () => {
-  it('parses path for label with trailing +', () => {
-    expect(
-      queryData('label_name[]=label%2B', {}),
-    ).toEqual({
-      label_name: ['label+'],
-    });
-  });
-
-  it('parses path for milestone with trailing +', () => {
-    expect(
-      queryData('milestone_title=A%2B', {}),
-    ).toEqual({
-      milestone_title: 'A+',
-    });
-  });
-
-  it('parses path for search terms with spaces', () => {
-    expect(
-      queryData('search=two+words', {}),
-    ).toEqual({
-      search: 'two words',
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.js
index 925e959c85a..412abe2cbf8 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/close_reopen_report_toggle_spec.js
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+/* eslint-disable jasmine/no-unsafe-spy */
+
 import CloseReopenReportToggle from '~/close_reopen_report_toggle';
 import DropLab from '~/droplab/drop_lab';
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/datetime_utility_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/datetime_utility_spec.js
index 492171684dc..6c3e73f134e 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/datetime_utility_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/datetime_utility_spec.js
@@ -6,9 +6,7 @@ describe('Date time utils', () => {
       const date = new Date();
       date.setFullYear(date.getFullYear() - 1);
 
-      expect(
-        datetimeUtility.timeFor(date),
-      ).toBe('Past due');
+      expect(datetimeUtility.timeFor(date)).toBe('Past due');
     });
 
     it('returns remaining time when in the future', () => {
@@ -19,9 +17,7 @@ describe('Date time utils', () => {
       // short of a full year, timeFor will return '11 months remaining'
       date.setDate(date.getDate() + 1);
 
-      expect(
-        datetimeUtility.timeFor(date),
-      ).toBe('1 year remaining');
+      expect(datetimeUtility.timeFor(date)).toBe('1 year remaining');
     });
   });
 
@@ -168,3 +164,20 @@ describe('getTimeframeWindowFrom', () => {
     });
   });
 });
+
+describe('formatTime', () => {
+  const expectedTimestamps = [
+    [0, '00:00:00'],
+    [1000, '00:00:01'],
+    [42000, '00:00:42'],
+    [121000, '00:02:01'],
+    [10921000, '03:02:01'],
+    [108000000, '30:00:00'],
+  ];
+
+  expectedTimestamps.forEach(([milliseconds, expectedTimestamp]) => {
+    it(`formats ${milliseconds}ms as ${expectedTimestamp}`, () => {
+      expect(datetimeUtility.formatTime(milliseconds)).toBe(expectedTimestamp);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/deploy_keys/components/app_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/deploy_keys/components/app_spec.js
index 183d7cf2d41..cd147bb2935 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/deploy_keys/components/app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/deploy_keys/components/app_spec.js
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ describe('Deploy keys app component', () => {
   let mock;
 
   beforeEach((done) => {
-    // setup axios mock before component
+    // set up axios mock before component
     mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
     mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/dummy/`).replyOnce(200, data);
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js
index 7237274eb43..a3a714678af 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/app_spec.js
@@ -1 +1,85 @@
-// TODO: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/48034
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import { TEST_HOST } from 'spec/test_constants';
+import App from '~/diffs/components/app.vue';
+import createDiffsStore from '../create_diffs_store';
+import getDiffWithCommit from '../mock_data/diff_with_commit';
+
+describe('diffs/components/app', () => {
+  const oldMrTabs = window.mrTabs;
+  const Component = Vue.extend(App);
+
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    // setup globals (needed for component to mount :/)
+    window.mrTabs = jasmine.createSpyObj('mrTabs', ['resetViewContainer']);
+
+    // setup component
+    const store = createDiffsStore();
+    store.state.diffs.isLoading = false;
+
+    vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+      store,
+      props: {
+        endpoint: `${TEST_HOST}/diff/endpoint`,
+        projectPath: 'namespace/project',
+        currentUser: {},
+      },
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    // reset globals
+    window.mrTabs = oldMrTabs;
+
+    // reset component
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  it('does not show commit info', () => {
+    expect(vm.$el).not.toContainElement('.blob-commit-info');
+  });
+
+  it('shows comments message, with commit', done => {
+    vm.$store.state.diffs.commit = getDiffWithCommit().commit;
+
+    vm
+      .$nextTick()
+      .then(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el).toContainText('Only comments from the following commit are shown below');
+        expect(vm.$el).toContainElement('.blob-commit-info');
+      })
+      .then(done)
+      .catch(done.fail);
+  });
+
+  it('shows comments message, with old mergeRequestDiff', done => {
+    vm.$store.state.diffs.mergeRequestDiff = { latest: false };
+    vm.$store.state.diffs.targetBranch = 'master';
+
+    vm
+      .$nextTick()
+      .then(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el).toContainText(
+          "Not all comments are displayed because you're viewing an old version of the diff.",
+        );
+      })
+      .then(done)
+      .catch(done.fail);
+  });
+
+  it('shows comments message, with startVersion', done => {
+    vm.$store.state.diffs.startVersion = 'test';
+
+    vm
+      .$nextTick()
+      .then(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el).toContainText(
+          "Not all comments are displayed because you're comparing two versions of the diff.",
+        );
+      })
+      .then(done)
+      .catch(done.fail);
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/changed_files_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/changed_files_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index f737e8fa38e..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/changed_files_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,105 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import Vuex from 'vuex';
-import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers';
-import diffsModule from '~/diffs/store/modules';
-import changedFiles from '~/diffs/components/changed_files.vue';
-
-describe('ChangedFiles', () => {
-  const Component = Vue.extend(changedFiles);
-  const store = new Vuex.Store({
-    modules: {
-      diffs: diffsModule,
-    },
-  });
-
-  let vm;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    setFixtures(`
-      <div id="dummy-element"></div>
-      <div class="js-tabs-affix"></div>
-    `);
-
-    const props = {
-      diffFiles: [
-        {
-          addedLines: 10,
-          removedLines: 20,
-          blob: {
-            path: 'some/code.txt',
-          },
-          filePath: 'some/code.txt',
-        },
-      ],
-    };
-
-    vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { props, store });
-  });
-
-  describe('with single file added', () => {
-    it('shows files changes', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el).toContainText('1 changed file');
-    });
-
-    it('shows file additions and deletions', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el).toContainText('10 additions');
-      expect(vm.$el).toContainText('20 deletions');
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('diff view mode buttons', () => {
-    let inlineButton;
-    let parallelButton;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      inlineButton = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-inline-diff-button');
-      parallelButton = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-parallel-diff-button');
-    });
-
-    it('should have Inline and Side-by-side buttons', () => {
-      expect(inlineButton).toBeDefined();
-      expect(parallelButton).toBeDefined();
-    });
-
-    it('should add active class to Inline button', done => {
-      vm.$store.state.diffs.diffViewType = 'inline';
-
-      vm.$nextTick(() => {
-        expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true);
-        expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false);
-
-        done();
-      });
-    });
-
-    it('should toggle active state of buttons when diff view type changed', done => {
-      vm.$store.state.diffs.diffViewType = 'parallel';
-
-      vm.$nextTick(() => {
-        expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false);
-        expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true);
-
-        done();
-      });
-    });
-
-    describe('clicking them', () => {
-      it('should toggle the diff view type', done => {
-        parallelButton.click();
-
-        vm.$nextTick(() => {
-          expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false);
-          expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true);
-
-          inlineButton.click();
-
-          vm.$nextTick(() => {
-            expect(inlineButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(true);
-            expect(parallelButton.classList.contains('active')).toEqual(false);
-            done();
-          });
-        });
-      });
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8c3376c0eb3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_item_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import { TEST_HOST } from 'spec/test_constants';
+import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import { trimText } from 'spec/helpers/vue_component_helper';
+import { getTimeago } from '~/lib/utils/datetime_utility';
+import CommitItem from '~/diffs/components/commit_item.vue';
+import getDiffWithCommit from '../mock_data/diff_with_commit';
+
+const TEST_AUTHOR_NAME = 'test';
+const TEST_AUTHOR_EMAIL = 'test+test@gitlab.com';
+const TEST_AUTHOR_GRAVATAR = `${TEST_HOST}/avatar/test?s=36`;
+const TEST_SIGNATURE_HTML = '<a>Legit commit</a>';
+const TEST_PIPELINE_STATUS_PATH = `${TEST_HOST}/pipeline/status`;
+
+const getTitleElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-row-message.item-title');
+const getDescElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('pre.commit-row-description');
+const getDescExpandElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-content .text-expander.js-toggle-button');
+const getShaElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-sha-group');
+const getAvatarElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.user-avatar-link');
+const getCommitterElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commiter');
+const getCommitActionsElement = vm => vm.$el.querySelector('.commit-actions');
+
+describe('diffs/components/commit_widget', () => {
+  const Component = Vue.extend(CommitItem);
+  const timeago = getTimeago();
+  const { commit } = getDiffWithCommit();
+
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vm = mountComponent(Component, {
+      commit: getDiffWithCommit().commit,
+    });
+  });
+
+  it('renders commit title', () => {
+    const titleElement = getTitleElement(vm);
+
+    expect(titleElement).toHaveAttr('href', commit.commitUrl);
+    expect(titleElement).toHaveText(commit.titleHtml);
+  });
+
+  it('renders commit description', () => {
+    const descElement = getDescElement(vm);
+    const descExpandElement = getDescExpandElement(vm);
+
+    const expected = commit.descriptionHtml.replace(/&#x000A;/g, '');
+
+    expect(trimText(descElement.innerHTML)).toEqual(trimText(expected));
+    expect(descExpandElement).not.toBeNull();
+  });
+
+  it('renders commit sha', () => {
+    const shaElement = getShaElement(vm);
+    const labelElement = shaElement.querySelector('.label');
+    const buttonElement = shaElement.querySelector('button');
+
+    expect(labelElement.textContent).toEqual(commit.shortId);
+    expect(buttonElement).toHaveData('clipboard-text', commit.id);
+  });
+
+  it('renders author avatar', () => {
+    const avatarElement = getAvatarElement(vm);
+    const imgElement = avatarElement.querySelector('img');
+
+    expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttr('href', commit.author.webUrl);
+    expect(imgElement).toHaveClass('s36');
+    expect(imgElement).toHaveAttr('alt', commit.author.name);
+    expect(imgElement).toHaveAttr('src', commit.author.avatarUrl);
+  });
+
+  it('renders committer text', () => {
+    const committerElement = getCommitterElement(vm);
+    const nameElement = committerElement.querySelector('a');
+
+    const expectTimeText = timeago.format(commit.authoredDate);
+    const expectedText = `${commit.author.name} authored ${expectTimeText}`;
+
+    expect(trimText(committerElement.textContent)).toEqual(expectedText);
+    expect(nameElement).toHaveAttr('href', commit.author.webUrl);
+    expect(nameElement).toHaveText(commit.author.name);
+  });
+
+  describe('without commit description', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      vm.commit.descriptionHtml = '';
+
+      vm.$nextTick()
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+
+    it('hides description', () => {
+      const descElement = getDescElement(vm);
+      const descExpandElement = getDescExpandElement(vm);
+
+      expect(descElement).toBeNull();
+      expect(descExpandElement).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('with no matching user', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      vm.commit.author = null;
+      vm.commit.authorEmail = TEST_AUTHOR_EMAIL;
+      vm.commit.authorName = TEST_AUTHOR_NAME;
+      vm.commit.authorGravatarUrl = TEST_AUTHOR_GRAVATAR;
+
+      vm.$nextTick()
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+
+    it('renders author avatar', () => {
+      const avatarElement = getAvatarElement(vm);
+      const imgElement = avatarElement.querySelector('img');
+
+      expect(avatarElement).toHaveAttr('href', `mailto:${TEST_AUTHOR_EMAIL}`);
+      expect(imgElement).toHaveAttr('alt', TEST_AUTHOR_NAME);
+      expect(imgElement).toHaveAttr('src', TEST_AUTHOR_GRAVATAR);
+    });
+
+    it('renders committer text', () => {
+      const committerElement = getCommitterElement(vm);
+      const nameElement = committerElement.querySelector('a');
+
+      expect(nameElement).toHaveAttr('href', `mailto:${TEST_AUTHOR_EMAIL}`);
+      expect(nameElement).toHaveText(TEST_AUTHOR_NAME);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('with signature', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      vm.commit.signatureHtml = TEST_SIGNATURE_HTML;
+
+      vm.$nextTick()
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+
+    it('renders signature html', () => {
+      const actionsElement = getCommitActionsElement(vm);
+
+      expect(actionsElement).toContainHtml(TEST_SIGNATURE_HTML);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('with pipeline status', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      vm.commit.pipelineStatusPath = TEST_PIPELINE_STATUS_PATH;
+
+      vm.$nextTick()
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+
+    it('renders pipeline status', () => {
+      const actionsElement = getCommitActionsElement(vm);
+
+      expect(actionsElement).toContainElement('.ci-status-link');
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_widget_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_widget_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..951eb57255d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/commit_widget_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import CommitWidget from '~/diffs/components/commit_widget.vue';
+import getDiffWithCommit from '../mock_data/diff_with_commit';
+
+describe('diffs/components/commit_widget', () => {
+  const Component = Vue.extend(CommitWidget);
+  const { commit } = getDiffWithCommit();
+
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vm = mountComponent(Component, {
+      commit: getDiffWithCommit().commit,
+    });
+  });
+
+  it('renders commit item', () => {
+    const commitElement = vm.$el.querySelector('li.commit');
+
+    expect(commitElement).not.toBeNull();
+    expect(commitElement).toContainText(commit.shortId);
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js
index dea600a783a..67f7b569f47 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_content_spec.js
@@ -8,13 +8,12 @@ import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
 describe('DiffContent', () => {
   const Component = Vue.extend(DiffContentComponent);
   let vm;
-  const getDiffFileMock = () => Object.assign({}, diffFileMockData);
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
       store,
       props: {
-        diffFile: getDiffFileMock(),
+        diffFile: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(diffFileMockData)),
       },
     });
   });
@@ -43,7 +42,7 @@ describe('DiffContent', () => {
 
   describe('Non-Text diffs', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
-      vm.diffFile.text = false;
+      vm.diffFile.viewer.name = 'image';
     });
 
     describe('image diff', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_header_spec.js
index 92b2004c4d7..c986ea604b2 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_header_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_header_spec.js
@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ describe('diff_file_header', () => {
 
   const store = new Vuex.Store({
     modules: {
-      diffs: diffsModule,
-      notes: notesModule,
+      diffs: diffsModule(),
+      notes: notesModule(),
     },
   });
 
@@ -450,13 +450,14 @@ describe('diff_file_header', () => {
           propsCopy.diffFile.deletedFile = true;
 
           const discussionGetter = () => [diffDiscussionMock];
-          notesModule.getters.discussions = discussionGetter;
+          const notesModuleMock = notesModule();
+          notesModuleMock.getters.discussions = discussionGetter;
           vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
             props: propsCopy,
             store: new Vuex.Store({
               modules: {
-                diffs: diffsModule,
-                notes: notesModule,
+                diffs: diffsModule(),
+                notes: notesModuleMock,
               },
             }),
           });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_spec.js
index 44a38f7ca82..13859f43e98 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_file_spec.js
@@ -6,11 +6,10 @@ import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
 
 describe('DiffFile', () => {
   let vm;
-  const getDiffFileMock = () => Object.assign({}, diffFileMockData);
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     vm = createComponentWithStore(Vue.extend(DiffFileComponent), store, {
-      file: getDiffFileMock(),
+      file: JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(diffFileMockData)),
       canCurrentUserFork: false,
     }).$mount();
   });
@@ -18,7 +17,7 @@ describe('DiffFile', () => {
   describe('template', () => {
     it('should render component with file header, file content components', () => {
       const el = vm.$el;
-      const { fileHash, filePath } = diffFileMockData;
+      const { fileHash, filePath } = vm.file;
 
       expect(el.id).toEqual(fileHash);
       expect(el.classList.contains('diff-file')).toEqual(true);
@@ -51,6 +50,20 @@ describe('DiffFile', () => {
       });
 
       it('should have collapsed text and link', done => {
+        vm.file.renderIt = true;
+        vm.file.collapsed = false;
+        vm.file.highlightedDiffLines = null;
+
+        vm.$nextTick(() => {
+          expect(vm.$el.innerText).toContain('This diff is collapsed');
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-click-to-expand').length).toEqual(1);
+
+          done();
+        });
+      });
+
+      it('should have collapsed text and link even before rendered', done => {
+        vm.file.renderIt = false;
         vm.file.collapsed = true;
 
         vm.$nextTick(() => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_gutter_content_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_gutter_content_spec.js
index a1a37b342b7..663c0680845 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_gutter_content_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_gutter_content_spec.js
@@ -6,61 +6,61 @@ import discussionsMockData from '../mock_data/diff_discussions';
 import diffFileMockData from '../mock_data/diff_file';
 
 describe('DiffLineGutterContent', () => {
-  const getDiscussionsMockData = () => [Object.assign({}, discussionsMockData)];
   const getDiffFileMock = () => Object.assign({}, diffFileMockData);
   const createComponent = (options = {}) => {
     const cmp = Vue.extend(DiffLineGutterContent);
     const props = Object.assign({}, options);
+    props.line = {
+      lineCode: 'LC_42',
+      type: 'new',
+      oldLine: null,
+      newLine: 1,
+      discussions: [],
+      text: '+<span id="LC1" class="line" lang="plaintext">  - Bad dates</span>\n',
+      richText: '+<span id="LC1" class="line" lang="plaintext">  - Bad dates</span>\n',
+      metaData: null,
+    };
     props.fileHash = getDiffFileMock().fileHash;
     props.contextLinesPath = '/context/lines/path';
 
     return createComponentWithStore(cmp, store, props).$mount();
   };
-  const setDiscussions = component => {
-    component.$store.dispatch('setInitialNotes', getDiscussionsMockData());
-  };
-
-  const resetDiscussions = component => {
-    component.$store.dispatch('setInitialNotes', []);
-  };
 
   describe('computed', () => {
     describe('lineHref', () => {
       it('should prepend # to lineCode', () => {
         const lineCode = 'LC_42';
-        const component = createComponent({ lineCode });
+        const component = createComponent();
         expect(component.lineHref).toEqual(`#${lineCode}`);
       });
 
       it('should return # if there is no lineCode', () => {
-        const component = createComponent({ lineCode: null });
+        const component = createComponent();
+        component.line.lineCode = '';
         expect(component.lineHref).toEqual('#');
       });
     });
 
     describe('discussions, hasDiscussions, shouldShowAvatarsOnGutter', () => {
       it('should return empty array when there is no discussion', () => {
-        const component = createComponent({ lineCode: 'LC_42' });
-        expect(component.discussions).toEqual([]);
+        const component = createComponent();
         expect(component.hasDiscussions).toEqual(false);
         expect(component.shouldShowAvatarsOnGutter).toEqual(false);
       });
 
       it('should return discussions for the given lineCode', () => {
-        const { lineCode } = getDiffFileMock().highlightedDiffLines[1];
-        const component = createComponent({
-          lineCode,
+        const cmp = Vue.extend(DiffLineGutterContent);
+        const props = {
+          line: getDiffFileMock().highlightedDiffLines[1],
+          fileHash: getDiffFileMock().fileHash,
           showCommentButton: true,
-          discussions: getDiscussionsMockData(),
-        });
+          contextLinesPath: '/context/lines/path',
+        };
+        props.line.discussions = [Object.assign({}, discussionsMockData)];
+        const component = createComponentWithStore(cmp, store, props).$mount();
 
-        setDiscussions(component);
-
-        expect(component.discussions).toEqual(getDiscussionsMockData());
         expect(component.hasDiscussions).toEqual(true);
         expect(component.shouldShowAvatarsOnGutter).toEqual(true);
-
-        resetDiscussions(component);
       });
     });
   });
@@ -104,9 +104,7 @@ describe('DiffLineGutterContent', () => {
         lineCode: getDiffFileMock().highlightedDiffLines[1].lineCode,
       });
 
-      setDiscussions(component);
       expect(component.$el.querySelector('.diff-comment-avatar-holders')).toBeDefined();
-      resetDiscussions(component);
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_note_form_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_note_form_spec.js
index 6fe5fdaf7f9..f31fc1f0e2b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_note_form_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/diff_line_note_form_spec.js
@@ -69,22 +69,21 @@ describe('DiffLineNoteForm', () => {
 
     describe('saveNoteForm', () => {
       it('should call saveNote action with proper params', done => {
-        let isPromiseCalled = false;
-        const formDataSpy = spyOnDependency(DiffLineNoteForm, 'getNoteFormData').and.returnValue({
-          postData: 1,
-        });
-        const saveNoteSpy = spyOn(component, 'saveNote').and.returnValue(
-          new Promise(() => {
-            isPromiseCalled = true;
-            done();
-          }),
+        const saveDiffDiscussionSpy = spyOn(component, 'saveDiffDiscussion').and.returnValue(
+          Promise.resolve(),
         );
-
-        component.handleSaveNote('note body');
-
-        expect(formDataSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-        expect(saveNoteSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-        expect(isPromiseCalled).toEqual(true);
+        spyOnProperty(component, 'formData').and.returnValue('formData');
+
+        component
+          .handleSaveNote('note body')
+          .then(() => {
+            expect(saveDiffDiscussionSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+              note: 'note body',
+              formData: 'formData',
+            });
+          })
+          .then(done)
+          .catch(done.fail);
       });
     });
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/file_row_stats_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/file_row_stats_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a8a7f3f1d82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/file_row_stats_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import FileRowStats from '~/diffs/components/file_row_stats.vue';
+import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+
+describe('Diff file row stats', () => {
+  let Component;
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    Component = Vue.extend(FileRowStats);
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vm = mountComponent(Component, {
+      file: {
+        addedLines: 20,
+        removedLines: 10,
+      },
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  it('renders added lines count', () => {
+    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.cgreen').textContent).toContain('+20');
+  });
+
+  it('renders removed lines count', () => {
+    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.cred').textContent).toContain('-10');
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/parallel_diff_view_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/parallel_diff_view_spec.js
index 165e4b69b6c..091e01868d3 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/parallel_diff_view_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/parallel_diff_view_spec.js
@@ -18,11 +18,11 @@ describe('ParallelDiffView', () => {
     }).$mount();
   });
 
-  describe('computed', () => {
-    describe('parallelDiffLines', () => {
+  describe('assigned', () => {
+    describe('diffLines', () => {
       it('should normalize lines for empty cells', () => {
-        expect(component.parallelDiffLines[0].left.type).toEqual(constants.EMPTY_CELL_TYPE);
-        expect(component.parallelDiffLines[1].left.type).toEqual(constants.EMPTY_CELL_TYPE);
+        expect(component.diffLines[0].left.type).toEqual(constants.EMPTY_CELL_TYPE);
+        expect(component.diffLines[1].left.type).toEqual(constants.EMPTY_CELL_TYPE);
       });
     });
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/tree_list_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/tree_list_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..08e25d2004e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/components/tree_list_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import Vuex from 'vuex';
+import TreeList from '~/diffs/components/tree_list.vue';
+import createStore from '~/diffs/store/modules';
+import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+
+describe('Diffs tree list component', () => {
+  let Component;
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    Component = Vue.extend(TreeList);
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    Vue.use(Vuex);
+
+    const store = new Vuex.Store({
+      modules: {
+        diffs: createStore(),
+      },
+    });
+
+    // Setup initial state
+    store.state.diffs.addedLines = 10;
+    store.state.diffs.removedLines = 20;
+    store.state.diffs.diffFiles.push('test');
+
+    vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { store });
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  it('renders diff stats', () => {
+    expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('1 changed file');
+    expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('10 additions');
+    expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('20 deletions');
+  });
+
+  it('renders empty text', () => {
+    expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain('No files found');
+  });
+
+  describe('with files', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      Object.assign(vm.$store.state.diffs.treeEntries, {
+        'index.js': {
+          addedLines: 0,
+          changed: true,
+          deleted: false,
+          fileHash: 'test',
+          key: 'index.js',
+          name: 'index.js',
+          path: 'index.js',
+          removedLines: 0,
+          tempFile: true,
+          type: 'blob',
+        },
+        app: {
+          key: 'app',
+          path: 'app',
+          name: 'app',
+          type: 'tree',
+          tree: [],
+        },
+      });
+      vm.$store.state.diffs.tree = [
+        vm.$store.state.diffs.treeEntries['index.js'],
+        vm.$store.state.diffs.treeEntries.app,
+      ];
+
+      vm.$nextTick(done);
+    });
+
+    it('renders tree', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row').length).toBe(2);
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[0].textContent).toContain('index.js');
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[1].textContent).toContain('app');
+    });
+
+    it('filters tree list to blobs matching search', done => {
+      vm.search = 'index';
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row').length).toBe(1);
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[0].textContent).toContain('index.js');
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('calls toggleTreeOpen when clicking folder', () => {
+      spyOn(vm.$store, 'dispatch').and.stub();
+
+      vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.file-row')[1].click();
+
+      expect(vm.$store.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('diffs/toggleTreeOpen', 'app');
+    });
+
+    it('calls scrollToFile when clicking blob', () => {
+      spyOn(vm.$store, 'dispatch').and.stub();
+
+      vm.$el.querySelector('.file-row').click();
+
+      expect(vm.$store.dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('diffs/scrollToFile', 'index.js');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('clearSearch', () => {
+    it('resets search', () => {
+      vm.search = 'test';
+
+      vm.$el.querySelector('.tree-list-clear-icon').click();
+
+      expect(vm.search).toBe('');
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/create_diffs_store.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/create_diffs_store.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..aacde99964c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/create_diffs_store.js
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import Vuex from 'vuex';
+import diffsModule from '~/diffs/store/modules';
+import notesModule from '~/notes/stores/modules';
+
+Vue.use(Vuex);
+
+export default function createDiffsStore() {
+  return new Vuex.Store({
+    modules: {
+      diffs: diffsModule(),
+      notes: notesModule(),
+    },
+  });
+}
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js
index 41d0dfd8939..0ad214ea4a4 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_discussions.js
@@ -2,21 +2,19 @@ export default {
   id: '6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8',
   reply_id: '6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8',
   position: {
-    formatter: {
-      old_line: null,
-      new_line: 2,
-      old_path: 'CHANGELOG',
-      new_path: 'CHANGELOG',
-      base_sha: 'e63f41fe459e62e1228fcef60d7189127aeba95a',
-      start_sha: 'd9eaefe5a676b820c57ff18cf5b68316025f7962',
-      head_sha: 'c48ee0d1bf3b30453f5b32250ce03134beaa6d13',
-    },
+    old_line: null,
+    new_line: 2,
+    old_path: 'CHANGELOG',
+    new_path: 'CHANGELOG',
+    base_sha: 'e63f41fe459e62e1228fcef60d7189127aeba95a',
+    start_sha: 'd9eaefe5a676b820c57ff18cf5b68316025f7962',
+    head_sha: 'c48ee0d1bf3b30453f5b32250ce03134beaa6d13',
   },
   line_code: '1c497fbb3a46b78edf04cc2a2fa33f67e3ffbe2a_1_2',
   expanded: true,
   notes: [
     {
-      id: 1749,
+      id: '1749',
       type: 'DiffNote',
       attachment: null,
       author: {
@@ -68,7 +66,7 @@ export default {
         '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/issues/new?discussion_to_resolve=6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8&merge_request_to_resolve_discussions_of=20',
     },
     {
-      id: 1753,
+      id: '1753',
       type: 'DiffNote',
       attachment: null,
       author: {
@@ -120,7 +118,7 @@ export default {
         '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/issues/new?discussion_to_resolve=6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8&merge_request_to_resolve_discussions_of=20',
     },
     {
-      id: 1754,
+      id: '1754',
       type: 'DiffNote',
       attachment: null,
       author: {
@@ -162,7 +160,7 @@ export default {
         '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/issues/new?discussion_to_resolve=6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8&merge_request_to_resolve_discussions_of=20',
     },
     {
-      id: 1755,
+      id: '1755',
       type: 'DiffNote',
       attachment: null,
       author: {
@@ -204,7 +202,7 @@ export default {
         '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/issues/new?discussion_to_resolve=6b232e05bea388c6b043ccc243ba505faac04ea8&merge_request_to_resolve_discussions_of=20',
     },
     {
-      id: 1756,
+      id: '1756',
       type: 'DiffNote',
       attachment: null,
       author: {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js
index cce36ecc91f..d7bc0dbe431 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_file.js
@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ export default {
   aMode: '100644',
   bMode: '100644',
   text: true,
+  viewer: {
+    name: 'text',
+  },
   addedLines: 2,
   removedLines: 0,
   diffRefs: {
@@ -33,7 +36,7 @@ export default {
   contentSha: 'c48ee0d1bf3b30453f5b32250ce03134beaa6d13',
   storedExternally: null,
   externalStorage: null,
-  oldPathHtml: ['CHANGELOG', 'CHANGELOG'],
+  oldPathHtml: 'CHANGELOG',
   newPathHtml: 'CHANGELOG',
   editPath: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/edit/spooky-stuff/CHANGELOG',
   viewPath: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-test/blob/spooky-stuff/CHANGELOG',
@@ -49,6 +52,7 @@ export default {
       type: 'new',
       oldLine: null,
       newLine: 1,
+      discussions: [],
       text: '+<span id="LC1" class="line" lang="plaintext">  - Bad dates</span>\n',
       richText: '+<span id="LC1" class="line" lang="plaintext">  - Bad dates</span>\n',
       metaData: null,
@@ -58,6 +62,7 @@ export default {
       type: 'new',
       oldLine: null,
       newLine: 2,
+      discussions: [],
       text: '+<span id="LC2" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
       richText: '+<span id="LC2" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
       metaData: null,
@@ -67,6 +72,7 @@ export default {
       type: null,
       oldLine: 1,
       newLine: 3,
+      discussions: [],
       text: ' <span id="LC3" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.8.0</span>\n',
       richText: ' <span id="LC3" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.8.0</span>\n',
       metaData: null,
@@ -76,6 +82,7 @@ export default {
       type: null,
       oldLine: 2,
       newLine: 4,
+      discussions: [],
       text: ' <span id="LC4" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
       richText: ' <span id="LC4" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
       metaData: null,
@@ -85,6 +92,7 @@ export default {
       type: null,
       oldLine: 3,
       newLine: 5,
+      discussions: [],
       text: ' <span id="LC5" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.7.0</span>\n',
       richText: ' <span id="LC5" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.7.0</span>\n',
       metaData: null,
@@ -94,6 +102,7 @@ export default {
       type: 'match',
       oldLine: null,
       newLine: null,
+      discussions: [],
       text: '',
       richText: '',
       metaData: {
@@ -112,6 +121,7 @@ export default {
         type: 'new',
         oldLine: null,
         newLine: 1,
+        discussions: [],
         text: '+<span id="LC1" class="line" lang="plaintext">  - Bad dates</span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC1" class="line" lang="plaintext">  - Bad dates</span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -126,6 +136,7 @@ export default {
         type: 'new',
         oldLine: null,
         newLine: 2,
+        discussions: [],
         text: '+<span id="LC2" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC2" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -137,6 +148,7 @@ export default {
         type: null,
         oldLine: 1,
         newLine: 3,
+        discussions: [],
         text: ' <span id="LC3" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.8.0</span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC3" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.8.0</span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -146,6 +158,7 @@ export default {
         type: null,
         oldLine: 1,
         newLine: 3,
+        discussions: [],
         text: ' <span id="LC3" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.8.0</span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC3" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.8.0</span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -157,6 +170,7 @@ export default {
         type: null,
         oldLine: 2,
         newLine: 4,
+        discussions: [],
         text: ' <span id="LC4" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC4" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -166,6 +180,7 @@ export default {
         type: null,
         oldLine: 2,
         newLine: 4,
+        discussions: [],
         text: ' <span id="LC4" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC4" class="line" lang="plaintext"></span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -177,6 +192,7 @@ export default {
         type: null,
         oldLine: 3,
         newLine: 5,
+        discussions: [],
         text: ' <span id="LC5" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.7.0</span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC5" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.7.0</span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -186,6 +202,7 @@ export default {
         type: null,
         oldLine: 3,
         newLine: 5,
+        discussions: [],
         text: ' <span id="LC5" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.7.0</span>\n',
         richText: '<span id="LC5" class="line" lang="plaintext">v6.7.0</span>\n',
         metaData: null,
@@ -197,6 +214,7 @@ export default {
         type: 'match',
         oldLine: null,
         newLine: null,
+        discussions: [],
         text: '',
         richText: '',
         metaData: {
@@ -209,6 +227,7 @@ export default {
         type: 'match',
         oldLine: null,
         newLine: null,
+        discussions: [],
         text: '',
         richText: '',
         metaData: {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_with_commit.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_with_commit.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..98393a20583
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/mock_data/diff_with_commit.js
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+import { convertObjectPropsToCamelCase } from '~/lib/utils/common_utils';
+
+const FIXTURE = 'merge_request_diffs/with_commit.json';
+
+preloadFixtures(FIXTURE);
+
+export default function getDiffWithCommit() {
+  return convertObjectPropsToCamelCase(
+    getJSONFixture(FIXTURE),
+    { deep: true },
+  );
+}
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js
index c1560dac1a0..85c1926fcb1 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/actions_spec.js
@@ -5,19 +5,59 @@ import {
   INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
   PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
 } from '~/diffs/constants';
-import * as actions from '~/diffs/store/actions';
+import actions, {
+  setBaseConfig,
+  fetchDiffFiles,
+  assignDiscussionsToDiff,
+  removeDiscussionsFromDiff,
+  startRenderDiffsQueue,
+  setInlineDiffViewType,
+  setParallelDiffViewType,
+  showCommentForm,
+  cancelCommentForm,
+  loadMoreLines,
+  scrollToLineIfNeededInline,
+  scrollToLineIfNeededParallel,
+  loadCollapsedDiff,
+  expandAllFiles,
+  toggleFileDiscussions,
+  saveDiffDiscussion,
+  toggleTreeOpen,
+  scrollToFile,
+  toggleShowTreeList,
+} from '~/diffs/store/actions';
 import * as types from '~/diffs/store/mutation_types';
+import { reduceDiscussionsToLineCodes } from '~/notes/stores/utils';
 import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
 import testAction from '../../helpers/vuex_action_helper';
 
 describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
+  const originalMethods = {
+    requestAnimationFrame: global.requestAnimationFrame,
+    requestIdleCallback: global.requestIdleCallback,
+  };
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    ['requestAnimationFrame', 'requestIdleCallback'].forEach(method => {
+      global[method] = cb => {
+        cb();
+      };
+    });
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    ['requestAnimationFrame', 'requestIdleCallback'].forEach(method => {
+      global[method] = originalMethods[method];
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('setBaseConfig', () => {
     it('should set given endpoint and project path', done => {
       const endpoint = '/diffs/set/endpoint';
       const projectPath = '/root/project';
 
       testAction(
-        actions.setBaseConfig,
+        setBaseConfig,
         { endpoint, projectPath },
         { endpoint: '', projectPath: '' },
         [{ type: types.SET_BASE_CONFIG, payload: { endpoint, projectPath } }],
@@ -35,7 +75,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
       mock.onGet(endpoint).reply(200, res);
 
       testAction(
-        actions.fetchDiffFiles,
+        fetchDiffFiles,
         {},
         { endpoint },
         [
@@ -53,10 +93,193 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
     });
   });
 
+  describe('assignDiscussionsToDiff', () => {
+    it('should merge discussions into diffs', done => {
+      const state = {
+        diffFiles: [
+          {
+            fileHash: 'ABC',
+            parallelDiffLines: [
+              {
+                left: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+                right: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+              },
+            ],
+            highlightedDiffLines: [
+              {
+                lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                discussions: [],
+                oldLine: 5,
+                newLine: null,
+              },
+            ],
+            diffRefs: {
+              baseSha: 'abc',
+              headSha: 'def',
+              startSha: 'ghi',
+            },
+            newPath: 'file1',
+            oldPath: 'file2',
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+
+      const diffPosition = {
+        baseSha: 'abc',
+        headSha: 'def',
+        startSha: 'ghi',
+        newLine: null,
+        newPath: 'file1',
+        oldLine: 5,
+        oldPath: 'file2',
+      };
+
+      const singleDiscussion = {
+        line_code: 'ABC_1_1',
+        diff_discussion: {},
+        diff_file: {
+          file_hash: 'ABC',
+        },
+        fileHash: 'ABC',
+        resolvable: true,
+        position: diffPosition,
+        original_position: diffPosition,
+      };
+
+      const discussions = reduceDiscussionsToLineCodes([singleDiscussion]);
+
+      testAction(
+        assignDiscussionsToDiff,
+        discussions,
+        state,
+        [
+          {
+            type: types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE,
+            payload: {
+              fileHash: 'ABC',
+              discussions: [singleDiscussion],
+              diffPositionByLineCode: {
+                ABC_1_1: {
+                  baseSha: 'abc',
+                  headSha: 'def',
+                  startSha: 'ghi',
+                  newLine: null,
+                  newPath: 'file1',
+                  oldLine: 5,
+                  oldPath: 'file2',
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                  positionType: 'text',
+                },
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+        [],
+        () => {
+          done();
+        },
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('removeDiscussionsFromDiff', () => {
+    it('should remove discussions from diffs', done => {
+      const state = {
+        diffFiles: [
+          {
+            fileHash: 'ABC',
+            parallelDiffLines: [
+              {
+                left: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                  discussions: [
+                    {
+                      id: 1,
+                    },
+                  ],
+                },
+                right: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+              },
+            ],
+            highlightedDiffLines: [
+              {
+                lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+                discussions: [],
+              },
+            ],
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+      const singleDiscussion = {
+        fileHash: 'ABC',
+        line_code: 'ABC_1_1',
+      };
+
+      testAction(
+        removeDiscussionsFromDiff,
+        singleDiscussion,
+        state,
+        [
+          {
+            type: types.REMOVE_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE,
+            payload: {
+              fileHash: 'ABC',
+              lineCode: 'ABC_1_1',
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+        [],
+        () => {
+          done();
+        },
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('startRenderDiffsQueue', () => {
+    it('should set all files to RENDER_FILE', () => {
+      const state = {
+        diffFiles: [
+          {
+            id: 1,
+            renderIt: false,
+            collapsed: false,
+          },
+          {
+            id: 2,
+            renderIt: false,
+            collapsed: false,
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+
+      const pseudoCommit = (commitType, file) => {
+        expect(commitType).toBe(types.RENDER_FILE);
+        Object.assign(file, {
+          renderIt: true,
+        });
+      };
+
+      startRenderDiffsQueue({ state, commit: pseudoCommit });
+
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].renderIt).toBe(true);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[1].renderIt).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('setInlineDiffViewType', () => {
     it('should set diff view type to inline and also set the cookie properly', done => {
       testAction(
-        actions.setInlineDiffViewType,
+        setInlineDiffViewType,
         null,
         {},
         [{ type: types.SET_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, payload: INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE }],
@@ -74,7 +297,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
   describe('setParallelDiffViewType', () => {
     it('should set diff view type to parallel and also set the cookie properly', done => {
       testAction(
-        actions.setParallelDiffViewType,
+        setParallelDiffViewType,
         null,
         {},
         [{ type: types.SET_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE, payload: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE }],
@@ -94,7 +317,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
       const payload = { lineCode: 'lineCode' };
 
       testAction(
-        actions.showCommentForm,
+        showCommentForm,
         payload,
         {},
         [{ type: types.ADD_COMMENT_FORM_LINE, payload }],
@@ -109,7 +332,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
       const payload = { lineCode: 'lineCode' };
 
       testAction(
-        actions.cancelCommentForm,
+        cancelCommentForm,
         payload,
         {},
         [{ type: types.REMOVE_COMMENT_FORM_LINE, payload }],
@@ -131,7 +354,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
       mock.onGet(endpoint).reply(200, contextLines);
 
       testAction(
-        actions.loadMoreLines,
+        loadMoreLines,
         options,
         {},
         [
@@ -157,7 +380,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
       mock.onGet(file.loadCollapsedDiffUrl).reply(200, data);
 
       testAction(
-        actions.loadCollapsedDiff,
+        loadCollapsedDiff,
         file,
         {},
         [
@@ -178,7 +401,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
   describe('expandAllFiles', () => {
     it('should change the collapsed prop from the diffFiles', done => {
       testAction(
-        actions.expandAllFiles,
+        expandAllFiles,
         null,
         {},
         [
@@ -202,9 +425,13 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
 
       const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy('dispatch');
 
-      actions.toggleFileDiscussions({ getters, dispatch });
+      toggleFileDiscussions({ getters, dispatch });
 
-      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('collapseDiscussion', { discussionId: 1 }, { root: true });
+      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        'collapseDiscussion',
+        { discussionId: 1 },
+        { root: true },
+      );
     });
 
     it('should dispatch expandDiscussion when all discussions are collapsed', () => {
@@ -216,9 +443,13 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
 
       const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy();
 
-      actions.toggleFileDiscussions({ getters, dispatch });
+      toggleFileDiscussions({ getters, dispatch });
 
-      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('expandDiscussion', { discussionId: 1 }, { root: true });
+      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        'expandDiscussion',
+        { discussionId: 1 },
+        { root: true },
+      );
     });
 
     it('should dispatch expandDiscussion when some discussions are collapsed and others are expanded for the collapsed discussion', () => {
@@ -230,9 +461,235 @@ describe('DiffsStoreActions', () => {
 
       const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy();
 
-      actions.toggleFileDiscussions({ getters, dispatch });
+      toggleFileDiscussions({ getters, dispatch });
+
+      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        'expandDiscussion',
+        { discussionId: 1 },
+        { root: true },
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('scrollToLineIfNeededInline', () => {
+    const lineMock = {
+      lineCode: 'ABC_123',
+    };
+
+    it('should not call handleLocationHash when there is not hash', () => {
+      window.location.hash = '';
+
+      const handleLocationHashSpy = spyOnDependency(actions, 'handleLocationHash').and.stub();
+
+      scrollToLineIfNeededInline({}, lineMock);
+
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    it('should not call handleLocationHash when the hash does not match any line', () => {
+      window.location.hash = 'XYZ_456';
+
+      const handleLocationHashSpy = spyOnDependency(actions, 'handleLocationHash').and.stub();
+
+      scrollToLineIfNeededInline({}, lineMock);
+
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    it('should call handleLocationHash only when the hash matches a line', () => {
+      window.location.hash = 'ABC_123';
+
+      const handleLocationHashSpy = spyOnDependency(actions, 'handleLocationHash').and.stub();
+
+      scrollToLineIfNeededInline(
+        {},
+        {
+          lineCode: 'ABC_456',
+        },
+      );
+      scrollToLineIfNeededInline({}, lineMock);
+      scrollToLineIfNeededInline(
+        {},
+        {
+          lineCode: 'XYZ_456',
+        },
+      );
+
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('scrollToLineIfNeededParallel', () => {
+    const lineMock = {
+      left: null,
+      right: {
+        lineCode: 'ABC_123',
+      },
+    };
+
+    it('should not call handleLocationHash when there is not hash', () => {
+      window.location.hash = '';
+
+      const handleLocationHashSpy = spyOnDependency(actions, 'handleLocationHash').and.stub();
+
+      scrollToLineIfNeededParallel({}, lineMock);
+
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    it('should not call handleLocationHash when the hash does not match any line', () => {
+      window.location.hash = 'XYZ_456';
+
+      const handleLocationHashSpy = spyOnDependency(actions, 'handleLocationHash').and.stub();
+
+      scrollToLineIfNeededParallel({}, lineMock);
+
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    it('should call handleLocationHash only when the hash matches a line', () => {
+      window.location.hash = 'ABC_123';
+
+      const handleLocationHashSpy = spyOnDependency(actions, 'handleLocationHash').and.stub();
+
+      scrollToLineIfNeededParallel(
+        {},
+        {
+          left: null,
+          right: {
+            lineCode: 'ABC_456',
+          },
+        },
+      );
+      scrollToLineIfNeededParallel({}, lineMock);
+      scrollToLineIfNeededParallel(
+        {},
+        {
+          left: null,
+          right: {
+            lineCode: 'XYZ_456',
+          },
+        },
+      );
+
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(handleLocationHashSpy).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('saveDiffDiscussion', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      spyOnDependency(actions, 'getNoteFormData').and.returnValue('testData');
+      spyOnDependency(actions, 'reduceDiscussionsToLineCodes').and.returnValue('discussions');
+    });
+
+    it('dispatches actions', done => {
+      const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy('dispatch').and.callFake(name => {
+        switch (name) {
+          case 'saveNote':
+            return Promise.resolve({
+              discussion: 'test',
+            });
+          case 'updateDiscussion':
+            return Promise.resolve('discussion');
+          default:
+            return Promise.resolve({});
+        }
+      });
+
+      saveDiffDiscussion({ dispatch }, { note: {}, formData: {} })
+        .then(() => {
+          expect(dispatch.calls.argsFor(0)).toEqual(['saveNote', 'testData', { root: true }]);
+          expect(dispatch.calls.argsFor(1)).toEqual(['updateDiscussion', 'test', { root: true }]);
+          expect(dispatch.calls.argsFor(2)).toEqual(['assignDiscussionsToDiff', 'discussions']);
+        })
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('toggleTreeOpen', () => {
+    it('commits TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN', done => {
+      testAction(
+        toggleTreeOpen,
+        'path',
+        {},
+        [{ type: types.TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN, payload: 'path' }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('scrollToFile', () => {
+    let commit;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      commit = jasmine.createSpy();
+      jasmine.clock().install();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      jasmine.clock().uninstall();
+    });
+
+    it('updates location hash', () => {
+      const state = {
+        treeEntries: {
+          path: {
+            fileHash: 'test',
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      scrollToFile({ state, commit }, 'path');
+
+      expect(document.location.hash).toBe('#test');
+    });
+
+    it('commits UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID', () => {
+      const state = {
+        treeEntries: {
+          path: {
+            fileHash: 'test',
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      scrollToFile({ state, commit }, 'path');
+
+      expect(commit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(types.UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID, 'test');
+    });
+
+    it('resets currentDiffId after timeout', () => {
+      const state = {
+        treeEntries: {
+          path: {
+            fileHash: 'test',
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      scrollToFile({ state, commit }, 'path');
+
+      jasmine.clock().tick(1000);
+
+      expect(commit.calls.argsFor(1)).toEqual([types.UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID, '']);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('toggleShowTreeList', () => {
+    it('commits toggle', done => {
+      testAction(toggleShowTreeList, null, {}, [{ type: types.TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST }], [], done);
+    });
+
+    it('updates localStorage', () => {
+      spyOn(localStorage, 'setItem');
+
+      toggleShowTreeList({ commit() {}, state: { showTreeList: true } });
 
-      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('expandDiscussion', { discussionId: 1 }, { root: true });
+      expect(localStorage.setItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith('mr_tree_show', true);
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js
index a59b26b2634..cfeaaec6980 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/getters_spec.js
@@ -184,101 +184,73 @@ describe('Diffs Module Getters', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('singleDiscussionByLineCode', () => {
-    it('returns found discussion per line Code', () => {
-      const discussionsMock = {};
-      discussionsMock.ABC = discussionMock;
-
-      expect(
-        getters.singleDiscussionByLineCode(localState, {}, null, {
-          discussionsByLineCode: () => discussionsMock,
-        })('DEF'),
-      ).toEqual([]);
-    });
-
-    it('returns empty array when no discussions match', () => {
-      expect(
-        getters.singleDiscussionByLineCode(localState, {}, null, {
-          discussionsByLineCode: () => {},
-        })('DEF'),
-      ).toEqual([]);
-    });
-  });
-
   describe('shouldRenderParallelCommentRow', () => {
     let line;
 
     beforeEach(() => {
       line = {};
 
+      discussionMock.expanded = true;
+
       line.left = {
         lineCode: 'ABC',
+        discussions: [discussionMock],
       };
 
       line.right = {
         lineCode: 'DEF',
+        discussions: [discussionMock1],
       };
     });
 
     it('returns true when discussion is expanded', () => {
-      discussionMock.expanded = true;
-
-      expect(
-        getters.shouldRenderParallelCommentRow(localState, {
-          singleDiscussionByLineCode: () => [discussionMock],
-        })(line),
-      ).toEqual(true);
+      expect(getters.shouldRenderParallelCommentRow(localState)(line)).toEqual(true);
     });
 
     it('returns false when no discussion was found', () => {
+      line.left.discussions = [];
+      line.right.discussions = [];
+
       localState.diffLineCommentForms.ABC = false;
       localState.diffLineCommentForms.DEF = false;
 
-      expect(
-        getters.shouldRenderParallelCommentRow(localState, {
-          singleDiscussionByLineCode: () => [],
-        })(line),
-      ).toEqual(false);
+      expect(getters.shouldRenderParallelCommentRow(localState)(line)).toEqual(false);
     });
 
     it('returns true when discussionForm was found', () => {
       localState.diffLineCommentForms.ABC = {};
 
-      expect(
-        getters.shouldRenderParallelCommentRow(localState, {
-          singleDiscussionByLineCode: () => [discussionMock],
-        })(line),
-      ).toEqual(true);
+      expect(getters.shouldRenderParallelCommentRow(localState)(line)).toEqual(true);
     });
   });
 
   describe('shouldRenderInlineCommentRow', () => {
+    let line;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      discussionMock.expanded = true;
+
+      line = {
+        lineCode: 'ABC',
+        discussions: [discussionMock],
+      };
+    });
+
     it('returns true when diffLineCommentForms has form', () => {
       localState.diffLineCommentForms.ABC = {};
 
-      expect(
-        getters.shouldRenderInlineCommentRow(localState)({
-          lineCode: 'ABC',
-        }),
-      ).toEqual(true);
+      expect(getters.shouldRenderInlineCommentRow(localState)(line)).toEqual(true);
     });
 
     it('returns false when no line discussions were found', () => {
-      expect(
-        getters.shouldRenderInlineCommentRow(localState, {
-          singleDiscussionByLineCode: () => [],
-        })('DEF'),
-      ).toEqual(false);
+      line.discussions = [];
+      expect(getters.shouldRenderInlineCommentRow(localState)(line)).toEqual(false);
     });
 
     it('returns true if all found discussions are expanded', () => {
       discussionMock.expanded = true;
 
-      expect(
-        getters.shouldRenderInlineCommentRow(localState, {
-          singleDiscussionByLineCode: () => [discussionMock],
-        })('ABC'),
-      ).toEqual(true);
+      expect(getters.shouldRenderInlineCommentRow(localState)(line)).toEqual(true);
     });
   });
 
@@ -319,4 +291,31 @@ describe('Diffs Module Getters', () => {
       expect(getters.getDiffFileByHash(localState)('123')).toBeUndefined();
     });
   });
+
+  describe('allBlobs', () => {
+    it('returns an array of blobs', () => {
+      localState.treeEntries = {
+        file: {
+          type: 'blob',
+        },
+        tree: {
+          type: 'tree',
+        },
+      };
+
+      expect(getters.allBlobs(localState)).toEqual([
+        {
+          type: 'blob',
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('diffFilesLength', () => {
+    it('returns length of diff files', () => {
+      localState.diffFiles.push('test', 'test 2');
+
+      expect(getters.diffFilesLength(localState)).toBe(2);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js
index 8f89984c6e5..0b712055956 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/mutations_spec.js
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+import createState from '~/diffs/store/modules/diff_state';
 import mutations from '~/diffs/store/mutations';
 import * as types from '~/diffs/store/mutation_types';
 import { INLINE_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE } from '~/diffs/constants';
@@ -138,10 +139,9 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
 
       const fileHash = 123;
       const state = { diffFiles: [{}, { fileHash, existingField: 0 }] };
-      const file = { fileHash };
       const data = { diff_files: [{ file_hash: fileHash, extra_field: 1, existingField: 1 }] };
 
-      mutations[types.ADD_COLLAPSED_DIFFS](state, { file, data });
+      mutations[types.ADD_COLLAPSED_DIFFS](state, { file: state.diffFiles[1], data });
       expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(data, { deep: true });
 
       expect(state.diffFiles[1].fileHash).toEqual(fileHash);
@@ -149,4 +149,244 @@ describe('DiffsStoreMutations', () => {
       expect(state.diffFiles[1].extraField).toEqual(1);
     });
   });
+
+  describe('SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE', () => {
+    it('should add discussions to the given line', () => {
+      const diffPosition = {
+        baseSha: 'ed13df29948c41ba367caa757ab3ec4892509910',
+        headSha: 'b921914f9a834ac47e6fd9420f78db0f83559130',
+        newLine: null,
+        newPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+        oldLine: 5,
+        oldPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+        startSha: 'ed13df29948c41ba367caa757ab3ec4892509910',
+      };
+
+      const state = {
+        latestDiff: true,
+        diffFiles: [
+          {
+            fileHash: 'ABC',
+            parallelDiffLines: [
+              {
+                left: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+                right: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+              },
+            ],
+            highlightedDiffLines: [
+              {
+                lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                discussions: [],
+              },
+            ],
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+      const discussions = [
+        {
+          id: 1,
+          line_code: 'ABC_1',
+          diff_discussion: true,
+          resolvable: true,
+          original_position: diffPosition,
+          position: diffPosition,
+        },
+        {
+          id: 2,
+          line_code: 'ABC_1',
+          diff_discussion: true,
+          resolvable: true,
+          original_position: diffPosition,
+          position: diffPosition,
+        },
+      ];
+
+      const diffPositionByLineCode = {
+        ABC_1: diffPosition,
+      };
+
+      mutations[types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE](state, {
+        fileHash: 'ABC',
+        discussions,
+        diffPositionByLineCode,
+      });
+
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallelDiffLines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(2);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallelDiffLines[0].left.discussions[1].id).toEqual(2);
+
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(2);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0].discussions[1].id).toEqual(2);
+    });
+
+    it('should add legacy discussions to the given line', () => {
+      const diffPosition = {
+        baseSha: 'ed13df29948c41ba367caa757ab3ec4892509910',
+        headSha: 'b921914f9a834ac47e6fd9420f78db0f83559130',
+        newLine: null,
+        newPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+        oldLine: 5,
+        oldPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+        startSha: 'ed13df29948c41ba367caa757ab3ec4892509910',
+        lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+      };
+
+      const state = {
+        latestDiff: true,
+        diffFiles: [
+          {
+            fileHash: 'ABC',
+            parallelDiffLines: [
+              {
+                left: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+                right: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+              },
+            ],
+            highlightedDiffLines: [
+              {
+                lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                discussions: [],
+              },
+            ],
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+      const discussions = [
+        {
+          id: 1,
+          line_code: 'ABC_1',
+          diff_discussion: true,
+          active: true,
+        },
+        {
+          id: 2,
+          line_code: 'ABC_1',
+          diff_discussion: true,
+          active: true,
+        },
+      ];
+
+      const diffPositionByLineCode = {
+        ABC_1: diffPosition,
+      };
+
+      mutations[types.SET_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE](state, {
+        fileHash: 'ABC',
+        discussions,
+        diffPositionByLineCode,
+      });
+
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallelDiffLines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(2);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallelDiffLines[0].left.discussions[1].id).toEqual(2);
+
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(2);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0].discussions[1].id).toEqual(2);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('REMOVE_LINE_DISCUSSIONS', () => {
+    it('should remove the existing discussions on the given line', () => {
+      const state = {
+        diffFiles: [
+          {
+            fileHash: 'ABC',
+            parallelDiffLines: [
+              {
+                left: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                  discussions: [
+                    {
+                      id: 1,
+                      line_code: 'ABC_1',
+                    },
+                    {
+                      id: 2,
+                      line_code: 'ABC_1',
+                    },
+                  ],
+                },
+                right: {
+                  lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                  discussions: [],
+                },
+              },
+            ],
+            highlightedDiffLines: [
+              {
+                lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+                discussions: [
+                  {
+                    id: 1,
+                    line_code: 'ABC_1',
+                  },
+                  {
+                    id: 2,
+                    line_code: 'ABC_1',
+                  },
+                ],
+              },
+            ],
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+
+      mutations[types.REMOVE_LINE_DISCUSSIONS_FOR_FILE](state, {
+        fileHash: 'ABC',
+        lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+      });
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].parallelDiffLines[0].left.discussions.length).toEqual(0);
+      expect(state.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0].discussions.length).toEqual(0);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN', () => {
+    it('toggles entry opened prop', () => {
+      const state = {
+        treeEntries: {
+          path: {
+            opened: false,
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      mutations[types.TOGGLE_FOLDER_OPEN](state, 'path');
+
+      expect(state.treeEntries.path.opened).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST', () => {
+    it('toggles showTreeList', () => {
+      const state = createState();
+
+      mutations[types.TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST](state);
+
+      expect(state.showTreeList).toBe(false, 'Failed to toggle showTreeList to false');
+
+      mutations[types.TOGGLE_SHOW_TREE_LIST](state);
+
+      expect(state.showTreeList).toBe(true, 'Failed to toggle showTreeList to true');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID', () => {
+    it('updates currentDiffFileId', () => {
+      const state = createState();
+
+      mutations[types.UPDATE_CURRENT_DIFF_FILE_ID](state, 'somefileid');
+
+      expect(state.currentDiffFileId).toBe('somefileid');
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js
index 32136d9ebff..257270a91ec 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/diffs/store/utils_spec.js
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import {
   LINE_POSITION_LEFT,
   LINE_POSITION_RIGHT,
   TEXT_DIFF_POSITION_TYPE,
+  LEGACY_DIFF_NOTE_TYPE,
   DIFF_NOTE_TYPE,
   NEW_LINE_TYPE,
   OLD_LINE_TYPE,
@@ -135,6 +136,7 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
         note_project_id: '',
         target_type: options.noteableType,
         target_id: options.noteableData.id,
+        return_discussion: true,
         note: {
           noteable_type: options.noteableType,
           noteable_id: options.noteableData.id,
@@ -151,6 +153,65 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
         data: postData,
       });
     });
+
+    it('should create legacy note form data', () => {
+      const diffFile = getDiffFileMock();
+      delete diffFile.diffRefs.startSha;
+      delete diffFile.diffRefs.headSha;
+
+      noteableDataMock.targetType = MERGE_REQUEST_NOTEABLE_TYPE;
+
+      const options = {
+        note: 'Hello world!',
+        noteableData: noteableDataMock,
+        noteableType: MERGE_REQUEST_NOTEABLE_TYPE,
+        diffFile,
+        noteTargetLine: {
+          lineCode: '1c497fbb3a46b78edf04cc2a2fa33f67e3ffbe2a_1_3',
+          metaData: null,
+          newLine: 3,
+          oldLine: 1,
+        },
+        diffViewType: PARALLEL_DIFF_VIEW_TYPE,
+        linePosition: LINE_POSITION_LEFT,
+      };
+
+      const position = JSON.stringify({
+        base_sha: diffFile.diffRefs.baseSha,
+        start_sha: undefined,
+        head_sha: undefined,
+        old_path: diffFile.oldPath,
+        new_path: diffFile.newPath,
+        position_type: TEXT_DIFF_POSITION_TYPE,
+        old_line: options.noteTargetLine.oldLine,
+        new_line: options.noteTargetLine.newLine,
+      });
+
+      const postData = {
+        view: options.diffViewType,
+        line_type: options.linePosition === LINE_POSITION_RIGHT ? NEW_LINE_TYPE : OLD_LINE_TYPE,
+        merge_request_diff_head_sha: undefined,
+        in_reply_to_discussion_id: '',
+        note_project_id: '',
+        target_type: options.noteableType,
+        target_id: options.noteableData.id,
+        return_discussion: true,
+        note: {
+          noteable_type: options.noteableType,
+          noteable_id: options.noteableData.id,
+          commit_id: '',
+          type: LEGACY_DIFF_NOTE_TYPE,
+          line_code: options.noteTargetLine.lineCode,
+          note: options.note,
+          position,
+        },
+      };
+
+      expect(utils.getNoteFormData(options)).toEqual({
+        endpoint: options.noteableData.create_note_path,
+        data: postData,
+      });
+    });
   });
 
   describe('addLineReferences', () => {
@@ -179,32 +240,286 @@ describe('DiffsStoreUtils', () => {
 
   describe('trimFirstCharOfLineContent', () => {
     it('trims the line when it starts with a space', () => {
-      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: ' diff' })).toEqual({ richText: 'diff' });
+      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: ' diff' })).toEqual({
+        discussions: [],
+        richText: 'diff',
+      });
     });
 
     it('trims the line when it starts with a +', () => {
-      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: '+diff' })).toEqual({ richText: 'diff' });
+      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: '+diff' })).toEqual({
+        discussions: [],
+        richText: 'diff',
+      });
     });
 
     it('trims the line when it starts with a -', () => {
-      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: '-diff' })).toEqual({ richText: 'diff' });
+      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: '-diff' })).toEqual({
+        discussions: [],
+        richText: 'diff',
+      });
     });
 
     it('does not trims the line when it starts with a letter', () => {
-      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: 'diff' })).toEqual({ richText: 'diff' });
+      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent({ richText: 'diff' })).toEqual({
+        discussions: [],
+        richText: 'diff',
+      });
     });
 
     it('does not modify the provided object', () => {
       const lineObj = {
+        discussions: [],
         richText: ' diff',
       };
 
       utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent(lineObj);
-      expect(lineObj).toEqual({ richText: ' diff' });
+      expect(lineObj).toEqual({ discussions: [], richText: ' diff' });
     });
 
     it('handles a undefined or null parameter', () => {
-      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent()).toEqual({});
+      expect(utils.trimFirstCharOfLineContent()).toEqual({ discussions: [] });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('prepareDiffData', () => {
+    it('sets the renderIt and collapsed attribute on files', () => {
+      const preparedDiff = { diffFiles: [getDiffFileMock()] };
+      utils.prepareDiffData(preparedDiff);
+
+      const firstParallelDiffLine = preparedDiff.diffFiles[0].parallelDiffLines[2];
+      expect(firstParallelDiffLine.left.discussions.length).toBe(0);
+      expect(firstParallelDiffLine.left).not.toHaveAttr('text');
+      expect(firstParallelDiffLine.right.discussions.length).toBe(0);
+      expect(firstParallelDiffLine.right).not.toHaveAttr('text');
+      const firstParallelChar = firstParallelDiffLine.right.richText.charAt(0);
+      expect(firstParallelChar).not.toBe(' ');
+      expect(firstParallelChar).not.toBe('+');
+      expect(firstParallelChar).not.toBe('-');
+
+      const checkLine = preparedDiff.diffFiles[0].highlightedDiffLines[0];
+      expect(checkLine.discussions.length).toBe(0);
+      expect(checkLine).not.toHaveAttr('text');
+      const firstChar = checkLine.richText.charAt(0);
+      expect(firstChar).not.toBe(' ');
+      expect(firstChar).not.toBe('+');
+      expect(firstChar).not.toBe('-');
+
+      expect(preparedDiff.diffFiles[0].renderIt).toBeTruthy();
+      expect(preparedDiff.diffFiles[0].collapsed).toBeFalsy();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('isDiscussionApplicableToLine', () => {
+    const diffPosition = {
+      baseSha: 'ed13df29948c41ba367caa757ab3ec4892509910',
+      headSha: 'b921914f9a834ac47e6fd9420f78db0f83559130',
+      newLine: null,
+      newPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+      oldLine: 5,
+      oldPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+      startSha: 'ed13df29948c41ba367caa757ab3ec4892509910',
+    };
+
+    const wrongDiffPosition = {
+      baseSha: 'wrong',
+      headSha: 'wrong',
+      newLine: null,
+      newPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+      oldLine: 5,
+      oldPath: '500-lines-4.txt',
+      startSha: 'wrong',
+    };
+
+    const discussions = {
+      upToDateDiscussion1: {
+        original_position: diffPosition,
+        position: wrongDiffPosition,
+      },
+      outDatedDiscussion1: {
+        original_position: wrongDiffPosition,
+        position: wrongDiffPosition,
+      },
+    };
+
+    it('returns true when the discussion is up to date', () => {
+      expect(
+        utils.isDiscussionApplicableToLine({
+          discussion: discussions.upToDateDiscussion1,
+          diffPosition,
+          latestDiff: true,
+        }),
+      ).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when the discussion is not up to date', () => {
+      expect(
+        utils.isDiscussionApplicableToLine({
+          discussion: discussions.outDatedDiscussion1,
+          diffPosition,
+          latestDiff: true,
+        }),
+      ).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    it('returns true when line codes match and discussion does not contain position and is not active', () => {
+      const discussion = { ...discussions.outDatedDiscussion1, line_code: 'ABC_1', active: false };
+      delete discussion.original_position;
+      delete discussion.position;
+
+      expect(
+        utils.isDiscussionApplicableToLine({
+          discussion,
+          diffPosition: {
+            ...diffPosition,
+            lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+          },
+          latestDiff: true,
+        }),
+      ).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    it('returns true when line codes match and discussion does not contain position and is active', () => {
+      const discussion = { ...discussions.outDatedDiscussion1, line_code: 'ABC_1', active: true };
+      delete discussion.original_position;
+      delete discussion.position;
+
+      expect(
+        utils.isDiscussionApplicableToLine({
+          discussion,
+          diffPosition: {
+            ...diffPosition,
+            lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+          },
+          latestDiff: true,
+        }),
+      ).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false when not latest diff', () => {
+      const discussion = { ...discussions.outDatedDiscussion1, line_code: 'ABC_1', active: true };
+      delete discussion.original_position;
+      delete discussion.position;
+
+      expect(
+        utils.isDiscussionApplicableToLine({
+          discussion,
+          diffPosition: {
+            ...diffPosition,
+            lineCode: 'ABC_1',
+          },
+          latestDiff: false,
+        }),
+      ).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('generateTreeList', () => {
+    let files;
+
+    beforeAll(() => {
+      files = [
+        {
+          newPath: 'app/index.js',
+          deletedFile: false,
+          newFile: false,
+          removedLines: 10,
+          addedLines: 0,
+          fileHash: 'test',
+        },
+        {
+          newPath: 'app/test/index.js',
+          deletedFile: false,
+          newFile: true,
+          removedLines: 0,
+          addedLines: 0,
+          fileHash: 'test',
+        },
+        {
+          newPath: 'package.json',
+          deletedFile: true,
+          newFile: false,
+          removedLines: 0,
+          addedLines: 0,
+          fileHash: 'test',
+        },
+      ];
+    });
+
+    it('creates a tree of files', () => {
+      const { tree } = utils.generateTreeList(files);
+
+      expect(tree).toEqual([
+        {
+          key: 'app',
+          path: 'app',
+          name: 'app',
+          type: 'tree',
+          tree: [
+            {
+              addedLines: 0,
+              changed: true,
+              deleted: false,
+              fileHash: 'test',
+              key: 'app/index.js',
+              name: 'index.js',
+              path: 'app/index.js',
+              removedLines: 10,
+              tempFile: false,
+              type: 'blob',
+              tree: [],
+            },
+            {
+              key: 'app/test',
+              path: 'app/test',
+              name: 'test',
+              type: 'tree',
+              opened: true,
+              tree: [
+                {
+                  addedLines: 0,
+                  changed: true,
+                  deleted: false,
+                  fileHash: 'test',
+                  key: 'app/test/index.js',
+                  name: 'index.js',
+                  path: 'app/test/index.js',
+                  removedLines: 0,
+                  tempFile: true,
+                  type: 'blob',
+                  tree: [],
+                },
+              ],
+            },
+          ],
+          opened: true,
+        },
+        {
+          key: 'package.json',
+          path: 'package.json',
+          name: 'package.json',
+          type: 'blob',
+          changed: true,
+          tempFile: false,
+          deleted: true,
+          fileHash: 'test',
+          addedLines: 0,
+          removedLines: 0,
+          tree: [],
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    it('creates flat list of blobs & folders', () => {
+      const { treeEntries } = utils.generateTreeList(files);
+
+      expect(Object.keys(treeEntries)).toEqual([
+        'app',
+        'app/index.js',
+        'app/test',
+        'app/test/index.js',
+        'package.json',
+      ]);
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/dropzone_input_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/dropzone_input_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0c6b1a8946d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/dropzone_input_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+import $ from 'jquery';
+import dropzoneInput from '~/dropzone_input';
+import { TEST_HOST } from 'spec/test_constants';
+
+const TEST_FILE = {
+  upload: {},
+};
+const TEST_UPLOAD_PATH = `${TEST_HOST}/upload/file`;
+const TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE = 'A big error occurred!';
+const TEMPLATE = (
+`<form class="gfm-form" data-uploads-path="${TEST_UPLOAD_PATH}">
+  <textarea class="js-gfm-input"></textarea>
+  <div class="uploading-error-message"></div>
+</form>`
+);
+
+describe('dropzone_input', () => {
+  let form;
+  let dropzone;
+  let xhr;
+  let oldXMLHttpRequest;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    form = $(TEMPLATE);
+
+    dropzone = dropzoneInput(form);
+
+    xhr = jasmine.createSpyObj(Object.keys(XMLHttpRequest.prototype));
+    oldXMLHttpRequest = window.XMLHttpRequest;
+    window.XMLHttpRequest = () => xhr;
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    window.XMLHttpRequest = oldXMLHttpRequest;
+  });
+
+  it('shows error message, when AJAX fails with json', () => {
+    xhr = {
+      ...xhr,
+      statusCode: 400,
+      readyState: 4,
+      responseText: JSON.stringify({ message: TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE }),
+      getResponseHeader: () => 'application/json',
+    };
+
+    dropzone.processFile(TEST_FILE);
+
+    xhr.onload();
+
+    expect(form.find('.uploading-error-message').text()).toEqual(TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE);
+  });
+
+  it('shows error message, when AJAX fails with text', () => {
+    xhr = {
+      ...xhr,
+      statusCode: 400,
+      readyState: 4,
+      responseText: TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE,
+      getResponseHeader: () => 'text/plain',
+    };
+
+    dropzone.processFile(TEST_FILE);
+
+    xhr.onload();
+
+    expect(form.find('.uploading-error-message').text()).toEqual(TEST_ERROR_MESSAGE);
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/components/recent_searches_dropdown_content_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/components/recent_searches_dropdown_content_spec.js
index d926663fac0..9d670afe206 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/components/recent_searches_dropdown_content_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/components/recent_searches_dropdown_content_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import Vue from 'vue';
 import eventHub from '~/filtered_search/event_hub';
 import RecentSearchesDropdownContent from '~/filtered_search/components/recent_searches_dropdown_content.vue';
-import FilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys';
+import IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/issuable_filtered_search_token_keys';
 
 const createComponent = (propsData) => {
   const Component = Vue.extend(RecentSearchesDropdownContent);
@@ -18,14 +18,14 @@ const trimMarkupWhitespace = text => text.replace(/(\n|\s)+/gm, ' ').trim();
 describe('RecentSearchesDropdownContent', () => {
   const propsDataWithoutItems = {
     items: [],
-    allowedKeys: FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys(),
+    allowedKeys: IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys(),
   };
   const propsDataWithItems = {
     items: [
       'foo',
       'author:@root label:~foo bar',
     ],
-    allowedKeys: FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys(),
+    allowedKeys: IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys(),
   };
 
   let vm;
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user_spec.js
index c37a964975d..b48b1456eff 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_user_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import DropdownUtils from '~/filtered_search/dropdown_utils';
 import DropdownUser from '~/filtered_search/dropdown_user';
 import FilteredSearchTokenizer from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer';
-import FilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys';
+import IssuableFilteredTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/issuable_filtered_search_token_keys';
 
 describe('Dropdown User', () => {
   describe('getSearchInput', () => {
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ describe('Dropdown User', () => {
       spyOn(DropdownUtils, 'getSearchInput').and.callFake(() => {});
 
       dropdownUser = new DropdownUser({
-        tokenKeys: FilteredSearchTokenKeys,
+        tokenKeys: IssuableFilteredTokenKeys,
       });
     });
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js
index 3d6dec19eca..68bbbf838da 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/dropdown_utils_spec.js
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 import DropdownUtils from '~/filtered_search/dropdown_utils';
 import FilteredSearchDropdownManager from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_dropdown_manager';
-import FilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys';
+import IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/issuable_filtered_search_token_keys';
 import FilteredSearchSpecHelper from '../helpers/filtered_search_spec_helper';
 
 describe('Dropdown Utils', () => {
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ describe('Dropdown Utils', () => {
       `);
 
       input = document.getElementById('test');
-      allowedKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys();
+      allowedKeys = IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys();
     });
 
     function config() {
@@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ describe('Dropdown Utils', () => {
 
   describe('setDataValueIfSelected', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
-      spyOn(FilteredSearchDropdownManager, 'addWordToInput')
-        .and.callFake(() => {});
+      spyOn(FilteredSearchDropdownManager, 'addWordToInput').and.callFake(() => {});
     });
 
     it('calls addWordToInput when dataValue exists', () => {
       const selected = {
         getAttribute: () => 'value',
+        hasAttribute: () => false,
       };
 
       DropdownUtils.setDataValueIfSelected(null, selected);
@@ -304,6 +304,7 @@ describe('Dropdown Utils', () => {
     it('returns true when dataValue exists', () => {
       const selected = {
         getAttribute: () => 'value',
+        hasAttribute: () => false,
       };
 
       const result = DropdownUtils.setDataValueIfSelected(null, selected);
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager_spec.js
index 8fcee36beb8..a03d5a31b41 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_manager_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 import RecentSearchesService from '~/filtered_search/services/recent_searches_service';
 import RecentSearchesServiceError from '~/filtered_search/services/recent_searches_service_error';
 import RecentSearchesRoot from '~/filtered_search/recent_searches_root';
-import FilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys';
+import IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/issuable_filtered_search_token_keys';
 import '~/lib/utils/common_utils';
 import DropdownUtils from '~/filtered_search/dropdown_utils';
 import FilteredSearchVisualTokens from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens';
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ describe('Filtered Search Manager', function () {
       expect(RecentSearchesService.isAvailable).toHaveBeenCalled();
       expect(RecentSearchesStoreSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
         isLocalStorageAvailable,
-        allowedKeys: FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys(),
+        allowedKeys: IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys(),
       });
     });
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys_spec.js
index 68158cf52e4..ab0ab72720e 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys_spec.js
@@ -1,26 +1,36 @@
 import FilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys';
 
 describe('Filtered Search Token Keys', () => {
-  describe('get', () => {
-    let tokenKeys;
+  const tokenKeys = [{
+    key: 'author',
+    type: 'string',
+    param: 'username',
+    symbol: '@',
+    icon: 'pencil',
+    tag: '@author',
+  }];
+
+  const conditions = [{
+    url: 'assignee_id=0',
+    tokenKey: 'assignee',
+    value: 'none',
+  }];
 
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      tokenKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.get();
-    });
+  describe('get', () => {
 
     it('should return tokenKeys', () => {
-      expect(tokenKeys !== null).toBe(true);
+      expect(new FilteredSearchTokenKeys().get() !== null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return tokenKeys as an array', () => {
-      expect(tokenKeys instanceof Array).toBe(true);
+      expect(new FilteredSearchTokenKeys().get() instanceof Array).toBe(true);
     });
   });
 
   describe('getKeys', () => {
     it('should return keys', () => {
-      const getKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys();
-      const keys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.get().map(i => i.key);
+      const getKeys = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).getKeys();
+      const keys = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).get().map(i => i.key);
 
       keys.forEach((key, i) => {
         expect(key).toEqual(getKeys[i]);
@@ -29,88 +39,78 @@ describe('Filtered Search Token Keys', () => {
   });
 
   describe('getConditions', () => {
-    let conditions;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      conditions = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getConditions();
-    });
-
     it('should return conditions', () => {
-      expect(conditions !== null).toBe(true);
+      expect(new FilteredSearchTokenKeys().getConditions() !== null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return conditions as an array', () => {
-      expect(conditions instanceof Array).toBe(true);
+      expect(new FilteredSearchTokenKeys().getConditions() instanceof Array).toBe(true);
     });
   });
 
   describe('searchByKey', () => {
     it('should return null when key not found', () => {
-      const tokenKey = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByKey('notakey');
+      const tokenKey = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchByKey('notakey');
       expect(tokenKey === null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return tokenKey when found by key', () => {
-      const tokenKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.get();
-      const result = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByKey(tokenKeys[0].key);
+      const result = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchByKey(tokenKeys[0].key);
       expect(result).toEqual(tokenKeys[0]);
     });
   });
 
   describe('searchBySymbol', () => {
     it('should return null when symbol not found', () => {
-      const tokenKey = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchBySymbol('notasymbol');
+      const tokenKey = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchBySymbol('notasymbol');
       expect(tokenKey === null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return tokenKey when found by symbol', () => {
-      const tokenKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.get();
-      const result = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchBySymbol(tokenKeys[0].symbol);
+      const result = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchBySymbol(tokenKeys[0].symbol);
       expect(result).toEqual(tokenKeys[0]);
     });
   });
 
   describe('searchByKeyParam', () => {
     it('should return null when key param not found', () => {
-      const tokenKey = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByKeyParam('notakeyparam');
+      const tokenKey = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchByKeyParam('notakeyparam');
       expect(tokenKey === null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return tokenKey when found by key param', () => {
-      const tokenKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.get();
-      const result = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByKeyParam(`${tokenKeys[0].key}_${tokenKeys[0].param}`);
+      const result = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchByKeyParam(`${tokenKeys[0].key}_${tokenKeys[0].param}`);
       expect(result).toEqual(tokenKeys[0]);
     });
 
     it('should return alternative tokenKey when found by key param', () => {
-      const tokenKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getAlternatives();
-      const result = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByKeyParam(`${tokenKeys[0].key}_${tokenKeys[0].param}`);
+      const result = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys(tokenKeys).searchByKeyParam(`${tokenKeys[0].key}_${tokenKeys[0].param}`);
       expect(result).toEqual(tokenKeys[0]);
     });
   });
 
   describe('searchByConditionUrl', () => {
     it('should return null when condition url not found', () => {
-      const condition = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByConditionUrl(null);
+      const condition = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys([], [], conditions).searchByConditionUrl(null);
       expect(condition === null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return condition when found by url', () => {
-      const conditions = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getConditions();
-      const result = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByConditionUrl(conditions[0].url);
+      const result = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys([], [], conditions)
+        .searchByConditionUrl(conditions[0].url);
       expect(result).toBe(conditions[0]);
     });
   });
 
   describe('searchByConditionKeyValue', () => {
     it('should return null when condition tokenKey and value not found', () => {
-      const condition = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.searchByConditionKeyValue(null, null);
+      const condition = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys([], [], conditions)
+        .searchByConditionKeyValue(null, null);
       expect(condition === null).toBe(true);
     });
 
     it('should return condition when found by tokenKey and value', () => {
-      const conditions = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getConditions();
-      const result = FilteredSearchTokenKeys
+      const result = new FilteredSearchTokenKeys([], [], conditions)
         .searchByConditionKeyValue(conditions[0].tokenKey, conditions[0].value);
       expect(result).toEqual(conditions[0]);
     });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer_spec.js
index 465f5f79931..4f9f546cbb5 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
-import FilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_token_keys';
+import IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys from '~/filtered_search/issuable_filtered_search_token_keys';
 import FilteredSearchTokenizer from '~/filtered_search/filtered_search_tokenizer';
 
 describe('Filtered Search Tokenizer', () => {
-  const allowedKeys = FilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys();
+  const allowedKeys = IssuableFilteredSearchTokenKeys.getKeys();
 
   describe('processTokens', () => {
     it('returns for input containing only search value', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js
index 756a654765b..53a6d1d62b0 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/filtered_search/filtered_search_visual_tokens_spec.js
@@ -240,13 +240,17 @@ describe('Filtered Search Visual Tokens', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       setFixtures(`
         <div class="test-area">
-        ${subject.createVisualTokenElementHTML()}
+        ${subject.createVisualTokenElementHTML('custom-token')}
         </div>
       `);
 
       tokenElement = document.querySelector('.test-area').firstElementChild;
     });
 
+    it('should add class name to token element', () => {
+      expect(document.querySelector('.test-area .custom-token')).toBeDefined();
+    });
+
     it('contains name div', () => {
       expect(tokenElement.querySelector('.name')).toEqual(jasmine.anything());
     });
@@ -280,7 +284,7 @@ describe('Filtered Search Visual Tokens', () => {
 
   describe('addVisualTokenElement', () => {
     it('renders search visual tokens', () => {
-      subject.addVisualTokenElement('search term', null, true);
+      subject.addVisualTokenElement('search term', null, { isSearchTerm: true });
       const token = tokensContainer.querySelector('.js-visual-token');
 
       expect(token.classList.contains('filtered-search-term')).toEqual(true);
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/fixtures/merge_requests_diffs.rb b/spec/javascripts/fixtures/merge_requests_diffs.rb
index ddce00bc0fe..afe34b834b0 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/fixtures/merge_requests_diffs.rb
+++ b/spec/javascripts/fixtures/merge_requests_diffs.rb
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ describe Projects::MergeRequests::DiffsController, '(JavaScript fixtures)', type
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, namespace: namespace, path: 'merge-requests-project') }
   let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, :with_diffs, source_project: project, target_project: project, description: '- [ ] Task List Item') }
   let(:path) { "files/ruby/popen.rb" }
+  let(:selected_commit) { merge_request.all_commits[0] }
   let(:position) do
     Gitlab::Diff::Position.new(
       old_path: path,
@@ -33,6 +34,14 @@ describe Projects::MergeRequests::DiffsController, '(JavaScript fixtures)', type
     remove_repository(project)
   end
 
+  it 'merge_request_diffs/with_commit.json' do |example|
+    # Create a user that matches the selected commit author
+    # This is so that the "author" information will be populated
+    create(:user, email: selected_commit.author_email, name: selected_commit.author_name)
+
+    render_merge_request(example.description, merge_request, commit_id: selected_commit.sha)
+  end
+
   it 'merge_request_diffs/inline_changes_tab_with_comments.json' do |example|
     create(:diff_note_on_merge_request, project: project, author: admin, position: position, noteable: merge_request)
     create(:note_on_merge_request, author: admin, project: project, noteable: merge_request)
@@ -47,13 +56,14 @@ describe Projects::MergeRequests::DiffsController, '(JavaScript fixtures)', type
 
   private
 
-  def render_merge_request(fixture_file_name, merge_request, view: 'inline')
+  def render_merge_request(fixture_file_name, merge_request, view: 'inline', **extra_params)
     get :show,
       namespace_id: project.namespace.to_param,
       project_id: project,
       id: merge_request.to_param,
       format: :json,
-      view: view
+      view: view,
+      **extra_params
 
     expect(response).to be_success
     store_frontend_fixture(response, fixture_file_name)
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/fixtures/projects.rb b/spec/javascripts/fixtures/projects.rb
index 57c78182abc..d98f7f55b20 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/fixtures/projects.rb
+++ b/spec/javascripts/fixtures/projects.rb
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ describe 'Projects (JavaScript fixtures)', type: :controller do
   let(:admin) { create(:admin) }
   let(:namespace) { create(:namespace, name: 'frontend-fixtures' )}
   let(:project) { create(:project, namespace: namespace, path: 'builds-project') }
+  let(:project_with_repo) { create(:project, :repository, description: 'Code and stuff') }
   let(:project_variable_populated) { create(:project, namespace: namespace, path: 'builds-project2') }
   let!(:variable1) { create(:ci_variable, project: project_variable_populated) }
   let!(:variable2) { create(:ci_variable, project: project_variable_populated) }
@@ -35,6 +36,15 @@ describe 'Projects (JavaScript fixtures)', type: :controller do
       store_frontend_fixture(response, example.description)
     end
 
+    it 'projects/overview.html.raw' do |example|
+      get :show,
+        namespace_id: project_with_repo.namespace.to_param,
+        id: project_with_repo
+
+      expect(response).to be_success
+      store_frontend_fixture(response, example.description)
+    end
+
     it 'projects/edit.html.raw' do |example|
       get :edit,
         namespace_id: project.namespace.to_param,
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/gfm_auto_complete_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/gfm_auto_complete_spec.js
index 1cb20a1e7ff..b57c4943c01 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/gfm_auto_complete_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/gfm_auto_complete_spec.js
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ describe('GfmAutoComplete', function () {
       gfmAutoCompleteCallbacks.matcher.call(context, flag, subtext)
     );
 
-    const flagsUseDefaultMatcher = ['@', '#', '!', '~', '%'];
+    const flagsUseDefaultMatcher = ['@', '#', '!', '~', '%', '$'];
     const otherFlags = ['/', ':'];
     const flags = flagsUseDefaultMatcher.concat(otherFlags);
 
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ describe('GfmAutoComplete', function () {
         shouldNotBeFollowedBy.forEach((followedSymbol) => {
           const seq = atSign + followedSymbol;
 
-          it(`should not match "${seq}"`, () => {
+          it(`should not match ${JSON.stringify(seq)}`, () => {
             expect(defaultMatcher(atwhoInstance, atSign, seq)).toBe(null);
           });
         });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/groups/components/app_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/groups/components/app_spec.js
index 03d4b472b87..89c07d1f06d 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/groups/components/app_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/groups/components/app_spec.js
@@ -9,9 +9,14 @@ import GroupsStore from '~/groups/store/groups_store';
 import GroupsService from '~/groups/service/groups_service';
 
 import {
-  mockEndpoint, mockGroups, mockSearchedGroups,
-  mockRawPageInfo, mockParentGroupItem, mockRawChildren,
-  mockChildren, mockPageInfo,
+  mockEndpoint,
+  mockGroups,
+  mockSearchedGroups,
+  mockRawPageInfo,
+  mockParentGroupItem,
+  mockRawChildren,
+  mockChildren,
+  mockPageInfo,
 } from '../mock_data';
 
 const createComponent = (hideProjects = false) => {
@@ -19,6 +24,8 @@ const createComponent = (hideProjects = false) => {
   const store = new GroupsStore(false);
   const service = new GroupsService(mockEndpoint);
 
+  store.state.pageInfo = mockPageInfo;
+
   return new Component({
     propsData: {
       store,
@@ -28,22 +35,23 @@ const createComponent = (hideProjects = false) => {
   });
 };
 
-const returnServicePromise = (data, failed) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
-  if (failed) {
-    reject(data);
-  } else {
-    resolve({
-      json() {
-        return data;
-      },
-    });
-  }
-});
+const returnServicePromise = (data, failed) =>
+  new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
+    if (failed) {
+      reject(data);
+    } else {
+      resolve({
+        json() {
+          return data;
+        },
+      });
+    }
+  });
 
 describe('AppComponent', () => {
   let vm;
 
-  beforeEach((done) => {
+  beforeEach(done => {
     Vue.component('group-folder', groupFolderComponent);
     Vue.component('group-item', groupItemComponent);
 
@@ -94,7 +102,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
     });
 
     describe('fetchGroups', () => {
-      it('should call `getGroups` with all the params provided', (done) => {
+      it('should call `getGroups` with all the params provided', done => {
         spyOn(vm.service, 'getGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise(mockGroups));
 
         vm.fetchGroups({
@@ -110,8 +118,10 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         }, 0);
       });
 
-      it('should set headers to store for building pagination info when called with `updatePagination`', (done) => {
-        spyOn(vm.service, 'getGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise({ headers: mockRawPageInfo }));
+      it('should set headers to store for building pagination info when called with `updatePagination`', done => {
+        spyOn(vm.service, 'getGroups').and.returnValue(
+          returnServicePromise({ headers: mockRawPageInfo }),
+        );
         spyOn(vm, 'updatePagination');
 
         vm.fetchGroups({ updatePagination: true });
@@ -122,7 +132,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         }, 0);
       });
 
-      it('should show flash error when request fails', (done) => {
+      it('should show flash error when request fails', done => {
         spyOn(vm.service, 'getGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise(null, true));
         spyOn($, 'scrollTo');
         spyOn(window, 'Flash');
@@ -138,7 +148,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
     });
 
     describe('fetchAllGroups', () => {
-      it('should fetch default set of groups', (done) => {
+      it('should fetch default set of groups', done => {
         spyOn(vm, 'fetchGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise(mockGroups));
         spyOn(vm, 'updatePagination').and.callThrough();
         spyOn(vm, 'updateGroups').and.callThrough();
@@ -153,7 +163,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         }, 0);
       });
 
-      it('should fetch matching set of groups when app is loaded with search query', (done) => {
+      it('should fetch matching set of groups when app is loaded with search query', done => {
         spyOn(vm, 'fetchGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise(mockSearchedGroups));
         spyOn(vm, 'updateGroups').and.callThrough();
 
@@ -173,7 +183,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
     });
 
     describe('fetchPage', () => {
-      it('should fetch groups for provided page details and update window state', (done) => {
+      it('should fetch groups for provided page details and update window state', done => {
         spyOn(vm, 'fetchGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise(mockGroups));
         spyOn(vm, 'updateGroups').and.callThrough();
         const mergeUrlParams = spyOnDependency(appComponent, 'mergeUrlParams').and.callThrough();
@@ -193,9 +203,13 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
           expect(vm.isLoading).toBe(false);
           expect($.scrollTo).toHaveBeenCalledWith(0);
           expect(mergeUrlParams).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ page: 2 }, jasmine.any(String));
-          expect(window.history.replaceState).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
-            page: jasmine.any(String),
-          }, jasmine.any(String), jasmine.any(String));
+          expect(window.history.replaceState).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+            {
+              page: jasmine.any(String),
+            },
+            jasmine.any(String),
+            jasmine.any(String),
+          );
           expect(vm.updateGroups).toHaveBeenCalled();
           done();
         }, 0);
@@ -211,7 +225,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         groupItem.isChildrenLoading = false;
       });
 
-      it('should fetch children of given group and expand it if group is collapsed and children are not loaded', (done) => {
+      it('should fetch children of given group and expand it if group is collapsed and children are not loaded', done => {
         spyOn(vm, 'fetchGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise(mockRawChildren));
         spyOn(vm.store, 'setGroupChildren');
 
@@ -244,7 +258,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         expect(groupItem.isOpen).toBe(false);
       });
 
-      it('should set `isChildrenLoading` back to `false` if load request fails', (done) => {
+      it('should set `isChildrenLoading` back to `false` if load request fails', done => {
         spyOn(vm, 'fetchGroups').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise({}, true));
 
         vm.toggleChildren(groupItem);
@@ -272,7 +286,9 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         expect(vm.groupLeaveConfirmationMessage).toBe('');
         vm.showLeaveGroupModal(group, mockParentGroupItem);
         expect(vm.showModal).toBe(true);
-        expect(vm.groupLeaveConfirmationMessage).toBe(`Are you sure you want to leave the "${group.fullName}" group?`);
+        expect(vm.groupLeaveConfirmationMessage).toBe(
+          `Are you sure you want to leave the "${group.fullName}" group?`,
+        );
       });
     });
 
@@ -299,7 +315,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         vm.targetParentGroup = groupItem;
       });
 
-      it('hides modal confirmation leave group and remove group item from tree', (done) => {
+      it('hides modal confirmation leave group and remove group item from tree', done => {
         const notice = `You left the "${childGroupItem.fullName}" group.`;
         spyOn(vm.service, 'leaveGroup').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise({ notice }));
         spyOn(vm.store, 'removeGroup').and.callThrough();
@@ -318,9 +334,11 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         }, 0);
       });
 
-      it('should show error flash message if request failed to leave group', (done) => {
+      it('should show error flash message if request failed to leave group', done => {
         const message = 'An error occurred. Please try again.';
-        spyOn(vm.service, 'leaveGroup').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise({ status: 500 }, true));
+        spyOn(vm.service, 'leaveGroup').and.returnValue(
+          returnServicePromise({ status: 500 }, true),
+        );
         spyOn(vm.store, 'removeGroup').and.callThrough();
         spyOn(window, 'Flash');
 
@@ -335,9 +353,11 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
         }, 0);
       });
 
-      it('should show appropriate error flash message if request forbids to leave group', (done) => {
+      it('should show appropriate error flash message if request forbids to leave group', done => {
         const message = 'Failed to leave the group. Please make sure you are not the only owner.';
-        spyOn(vm.service, 'leaveGroup').and.returnValue(returnServicePromise({ status: 403 }, true));
+        spyOn(vm.service, 'leaveGroup').and.returnValue(
+          returnServicePromise({ status: 403 }, true),
+        );
         spyOn(vm.store, 'removeGroup').and.callThrough();
         spyOn(window, 'Flash');
 
@@ -388,7 +408,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
   });
 
   describe('created', () => {
-    it('should bind event listeners on eventHub', (done) => {
+    it('should bind event listeners on eventHub', done => {
       spyOn(eventHub, '$on');
 
       const newVm = createComponent();
@@ -405,21 +425,21 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    it('should initialize `searchEmptyMessage` prop with correct string when `hideProjects` is `false`', (done) => {
+    it('should initialize `searchEmptyMessage` prop with correct string when `hideProjects` is `false`', done => {
       const newVm = createComponent();
       newVm.$mount();
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
-        expect(newVm.searchEmptyMessage).toBe('Sorry, no groups or projects matched your search');
+        expect(newVm.searchEmptyMessage).toBe('No groups or projects matched your search');
         newVm.$destroy();
         done();
       });
     });
 
-    it('should initialize `searchEmptyMessage` prop with correct string when `hideProjects` is `true`', (done) => {
+    it('should initialize `searchEmptyMessage` prop with correct string when `hideProjects` is `true`', done => {
       const newVm = createComponent(true);
       newVm.$mount();
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
-        expect(newVm.searchEmptyMessage).toBe('Sorry, no groups matched your search');
+        expect(newVm.searchEmptyMessage).toBe('No groups matched your search');
         newVm.$destroy();
         done();
       });
@@ -427,7 +447,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
   });
 
   describe('beforeDestroy', () => {
-    it('should unbind event listeners on eventHub', (done) => {
+    it('should unbind event listeners on eventHub', done => {
       spyOn(eventHub, '$off');
 
       const newVm = createComponent();
@@ -454,7 +474,7 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
       vm.$destroy();
     });
 
-    it('should render loading icon', (done) => {
+    it('should render loading icon', done => {
       vm.isLoading = true;
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.loading-animation')).toBeDefined();
@@ -463,17 +483,16 @@ describe('AppComponent', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    it('should render groups tree', (done) => {
+    it('should render groups tree', done => {
       vm.store.state.groups = [mockParentGroupItem];
       vm.isLoading = false;
-      vm.store.state.pageInfo = mockPageInfo;
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.groups-list-tree-container')).toBeDefined();
         done();
       });
     });
 
-    it('renders modal confirmation dialog', (done) => {
+    it('renders modal confirmation dialog', done => {
       vm.groupLeaveConfirmationMessage = 'Are you sure you want to leave the "foo" group?';
       vm.showModal = true;
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/helpers/vue_resource_helper.js b/spec/javascripts/helpers/vue_resource_helper.js
index 70b7ec4e574..0d1bf5e2e80 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/helpers/vue_resource_helper.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/helpers/vue_resource_helper.js
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ export const headersInterceptor = (request, next) => {
     response.headers.forEach((value, key) => {
       headers[key] = value;
     });
+    // eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
     response.headers = headers;
   });
 };
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/list_item_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/list_item_spec.js
index 41d8bfff7e7..bf48d7bfdad 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/list_item_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/list_item_spec.js
@@ -30,11 +30,7 @@ describe('Multi-file editor commit sidebar list item', () => {
   });
 
   it('renders file path', () => {
-    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-commit-list-path').textContent.trim()).toBe(f.path);
-  });
-
-  it('renders actionn button', () => {
-    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-discard-btn')).not.toBeNull();
+    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-commit-list-path').textContent).toContain(f.path);
   });
 
   it('opens a closed file in the editor when clicking the file path', done => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/stage_button_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/stage_button_spec.js
index a5b906da8a1..e09ccbe2a63 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/stage_button_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/commit_sidebar/stage_button_spec.js
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ describe('IDE stage file button', () => {
   });
 
   it('renders button to discard & stage', () => {
-    expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.btn').length).toBe(2);
+    expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.btn-blank').length).toBe(2);
   });
 
   it('calls store with stage button', () => {
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ describe('IDE stage file button', () => {
   });
 
   it('calls store with discard button', () => {
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-menu button').click();
+    vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-danger').click();
 
     expect(vm.discardFileChanges).toHaveBeenCalledWith(f.path);
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c93a939ad71
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_row_extra_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import { createStore } from '~/ide/stores';
+import { createComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import FileRowExtra from '~/ide/components/file_row_extra.vue';
+import { file, resetStore } from '../helpers';
+
+describe('IDE extra file row component', () => {
+  let Component;
+  let vm;
+  let unstagedFilesCount = 0;
+  let stagedFilesCount = 0;
+  let changesCount = 0;
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    Component = Vue.extend(FileRowExtra);
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    vm = createComponentWithStore(Component, createStore(), {
+      file: {
+        ...file('test'),
+      },
+      mouseOver: false,
+    });
+
+    spyOnProperty(vm, 'getUnstagedFilesCountForPath').and.returnValue(() => unstagedFilesCount);
+    spyOnProperty(vm, 'getStagedFilesCountForPath').and.returnValue(() => stagedFilesCount);
+    spyOnProperty(vm, 'getChangesInFolder').and.returnValue(() => changesCount);
+
+    vm.$mount();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+    resetStore(vm.$store);
+
+    stagedFilesCount = 0;
+    unstagedFilesCount = 0;
+    changesCount = 0;
+  });
+
+  describe('folderChangesTooltip', () => {
+    it('returns undefined when changes count is 0', () => {
+      expect(vm.folderChangesTooltip).toBe(undefined);
+    });
+
+    it('returns unstaged changes text', () => {
+      changesCount = 1;
+      unstagedFilesCount = 1;
+
+      expect(vm.folderChangesTooltip).toBe('1 unstaged change');
+    });
+
+    it('returns staged changes text', () => {
+      changesCount = 1;
+      stagedFilesCount = 1;
+
+      expect(vm.folderChangesTooltip).toBe('1 staged change');
+    });
+
+    it('returns staged and unstaged changes text', () => {
+      changesCount = 1;
+      stagedFilesCount = 1;
+      unstagedFilesCount = 1;
+
+      expect(vm.folderChangesTooltip).toBe('1 unstaged and 1 staged changes');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('show tree changes count', () => {
+    it('does not show for blobs', () => {
+      vm.file.type = 'blob';
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-tree-changes')).toBe(null);
+    });
+
+    it('does not show when changes count is 0', () => {
+      vm.file.type = 'tree';
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-tree-changes')).toBe(null);
+    });
+
+    it('does not show when tree is open', done => {
+      vm.file.type = 'tree';
+      vm.file.opened = true;
+      changesCount = 1;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-tree-changes')).toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('shows for trees with changes', done => {
+      vm.file.type = 'tree';
+      vm.file.opened = false;
+      changesCount = 1;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-tree-changes')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('changes file icon', () => {
+    it('hides when file is not changed', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).toBe(null);
+    });
+
+    it('shows when file is changed', done => {
+      vm.file.changed = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('shows when file is staged', done => {
+      vm.file.staged = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('shows when file is a tempFile', done => {
+      vm.file.tempFile = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-changed-icon')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('merge request icon', () => {
+    it('hides when not a merge request change', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ic-git-merge')).toBe(null);
+    });
+
+    it('shows when a merge request change', done => {
+      vm.file.mrChange = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ic-git-merge')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_templates/bar_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_templates/bar_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a688f7f69a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_templates/bar_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import { createStore } from '~/ide/stores';
+import Bar from '~/ide/components/file_templates/bar.vue';
+import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import { resetStore, file } from '../../helpers';
+
+describe('IDE file templates bar component', () => {
+  let Component;
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    Component = Vue.extend(Bar);
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    const store = createStore();
+
+    store.state.openFiles.push({
+      ...file('file'),
+      opened: true,
+      active: true,
+    });
+
+    vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, { store });
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+    resetStore(vm.$store);
+  });
+
+  describe('template type dropdown', () => {
+    it('renders dropdown component', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown').textContent).toContain('Choose a type');
+    });
+
+    it('calls setSelectedTemplateType when clicking item', () => {
+      spyOn(vm, 'setSelectedTemplateType').and.stub();
+
+      vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-content button').click();
+
+      expect(vm.setSelectedTemplateType).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+        name: '.gitlab-ci.yml',
+        key: 'gitlab_ci_ymls',
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('template dropdown', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.templates = [
+        {
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+      ];
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.selectedTemplateType = {
+        name: '.gitlab-ci.yml',
+        key: 'gitlab_ci_ymls',
+      };
+
+      vm.$nextTick(done);
+    });
+
+    it('renders dropdown component', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.dropdown')[1].textContent).toContain('Choose a template');
+    });
+
+    it('calls fetchTemplate on click', () => {
+      spyOn(vm, 'fetchTemplate').and.stub();
+
+      vm.$el
+        .querySelectorAll('.dropdown-content')[1]
+        .querySelector('button')
+        .click();
+
+      expect(vm.fetchTemplate).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+        name: 'test',
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  it('shows undo button if updateSuccess is true', done => {
+    vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.updateSuccess = true;
+
+    vm.$nextTick(() => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-default').style.display).not.toBe('none');
+
+      done();
+    });
+  });
+
+  it('calls undoFileTemplate when clicking undo button', () => {
+    spyOn(vm, 'undoFileTemplate').and.stub();
+
+    vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-default').click();
+
+    expect(vm.undoFileTemplate).toHaveBeenCalled();
+  });
+
+  it('calls setSelectedTemplateType if activeFile name matches a template', done => {
+    const fileName = '.gitlab-ci.yml';
+
+    spyOn(vm, 'setSelectedTemplateType');
+    vm.$store.state.openFiles[0].name = fileName;
+
+    vm.setInitialType();
+
+    vm.$nextTick(() => {
+      expect(vm.setSelectedTemplateType).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+        name: fileName,
+        key: 'gitlab_ci_ymls',
+      });
+
+      done();
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_templates/dropdown_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_templates/dropdown_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..898796f4fa0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/file_templates/dropdown_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+import $ from 'jquery';
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import { createStore } from '~/ide/stores';
+import Dropdown from '~/ide/components/file_templates/dropdown.vue';
+import { createComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import { resetStore } from '../../helpers';
+
+describe('IDE file templates dropdown component', () => {
+  let Component;
+  let vm;
+
+  beforeAll(() => {
+    Component = Vue.extend(Dropdown);
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    const store = createStore();
+
+    vm = createComponentWithStore(Component, store, {
+      label: 'Test',
+    }).$mount();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+    resetStore(vm.$store);
+  });
+
+  describe('async', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      vm.isAsyncData = true;
+    });
+
+    it('calls async store method on Bootstrap dropdown event', () => {
+      spyOn(vm, 'fetchTemplateTypes').and.stub();
+
+      $(vm.$el).trigger('show.bs.dropdown');
+
+      expect(vm.fetchTemplateTypes).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    it('renders templates when async', done => {
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.templates = [
+        {
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+      ];
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-content').textContent).toContain('test');
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('renders loading icon when isLoading is true', done => {
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.isLoading = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.loading-container')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('searches template data', () => {
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.templates = [
+        {
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+      ];
+      vm.searchable = true;
+      vm.search = 'hello';
+
+      expect(vm.outputData).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    it('does not filter data is searchable is false', () => {
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.templates = [
+        {
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+      ];
+      vm.search = 'hello';
+
+      expect(vm.outputData).toEqual([
+        {
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    it('calls clickItem on click', done => {
+      spyOn(vm, 'clickItem').and.stub();
+
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.templates = [
+        {
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+      ];
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-content button').click();
+
+        expect(vm.clickItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+          name: 'test',
+        });
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('renders input when searchable is true', done => {
+      vm.searchable = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-input')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('does not render input when searchable is true & showLoading is true', done => {
+      vm.searchable = true;
+      vm.$store.state.fileTemplates.isLoading = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-input')).toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('sync', () => {
+    beforeEach(done => {
+      vm.data = [
+        {
+          name: 'test sync',
+        },
+      ];
+
+      vm.$nextTick(done);
+    });
+
+    it('renders props data', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-content').textContent).toContain('test sync');
+    });
+
+    it('renders input when searchable is true', done => {
+      vm.searchable = true;
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-input')).not.toBe(null);
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('calls clickItem on click', done => {
+      spyOn(vm, 'clickItem').and.stub();
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-content button').click();
+
+        expect(vm.clickItem).toHaveBeenCalledWith({
+          name: 'test sync',
+        });
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('searches template data', () => {
+      vm.searchable = true;
+      vm.search = 'hello';
+
+      expect(vm.outputData).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    it('does not filter data is searchable is false', () => {
+      vm.search = 'hello';
+
+      expect(vm.outputData).toEqual([
+        {
+          name: 'test sync',
+        },
+      ]);
+    });
+
+    it('renders dropdown title', done => {
+      vm.title = 'Test title';
+
+      vm.$nextTick(() => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-title').textContent).toContain('Test title');
+
+        done();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js
index 0e93c5193a1..47d6492a7a6 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/ide_status_bar_spec.js
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 import Vue from 'vue';
 import store from '~/ide/stores';
 import ideStatusBar from '~/ide/components/ide_status_bar.vue';
+import { rightSidebarViews } from '~/ide/constants';
 import { createComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
 import { resetStore } from '../helpers';
 import { projectData } from '../mock_data';
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ describe('ideStatusBar', () => {
 
   describe('pipeline status', () => {
     it('opens right sidebar on clicking icon', done => {
-      spyOn(vm, 'setRightPane');
+      spyOn(vm, 'openRightPane');
       Vue.set(vm.$store.state.pipelines, 'latestPipeline', {
         details: {
           status: {
@@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ describe('ideStatusBar', () => {
         .then(() => {
           vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-status-pipeline button').click();
 
-          expect(vm.setRightPane).toHaveBeenCalledWith('pipelines-list');
+          expect(vm.openRightPane).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rightSidebarViews.pipelines);
         })
         .then(done)
         .catch(done.fail);
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js
index c75975d2af6..4899f850cf4 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/panes/right_spec.js
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ describe('IDE right pane', () => {
 
   describe('active', () => {
     it('renders merge request button as active', done => {
-      vm.$store.state.rightPane = rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo;
+      vm.$store.state.rightPane.isOpen = true;
+      vm.$store.state.rightPane.currentView = rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo.name;
       vm.$store.state.currentMergeRequestId = '123';
       vm.$store.state.currentProjectId = 'gitlab-ce';
       vm.$store.state.currentMergeRequestId = 1;
@@ -41,20 +42,21 @@ describe('IDE right pane', () => {
         },
       };
 
-      vm.$nextTick(() => {
-        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active')).not.toBe(null);
-        expect(
-          vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active').getAttribute('data-original-title'),
-        ).toBe('Merge Request');
-
-        done();
-      });
+      vm.$nextTick()
+        .then(() => {
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active')).not.toBe(null);
+          expect(
+            vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link.active').getAttribute('data-original-title'),
+          ).toBe('Merge Request');
+        })
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
     });
   });
 
   describe('click', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
-      spyOn(vm, 'setRightPane');
+      spyOn(vm, 'open');
     });
 
     it('sets view to merge request', done => {
@@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ describe('IDE right pane', () => {
       vm.$nextTick(() => {
         vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-sidebar-link').click();
 
-        expect(vm.setRightPane).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo);
+        expect(vm.open).toHaveBeenCalledWith(rightSidebarViews.mergeRequestInfo);
 
         done();
       });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_commit_section_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_commit_section_spec.js
index 30cd92b2ca4..6c726c1e154 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_commit_section_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_commit_section_spec.js
@@ -103,65 +103,6 @@ describe('RepoCommitSection', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  it('adds changed files into staged files', done => {
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-discard-btn .btn').click();
-    vm
-      .$nextTick()
-      .then(() => vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-discard-btn .btn').click())
-      .then(vm.$nextTick)
-      .then(() => {
-        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-commit-list-container').textContent).toContain(
-          'No changes',
-        );
-      })
-      .then(done)
-      .catch(done.fail);
-  });
-
-  it('stages a single file', done => {
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-discard-btn .btn').click();
-
-    Vue.nextTick(() => {
-      expect(
-        vm.$el
-          .querySelector('.ide-commit-list-container')
-          .querySelectorAll('.multi-file-commit-list > li').length,
-      ).toBe(1);
-
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-
-  it('discards a single file', done => {
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.multi-file-discard-btn .dropdown-menu button').click();
-
-    Vue.nextTick(() => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-commit-list-container').textContent).not.toContain('file1');
-      expect(
-        vm.$el
-          .querySelector('.ide-commit-list-container')
-          .querySelectorAll('.multi-file-commit-list > li').length,
-      ).toBe(1);
-
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-
-  it('unstages a single file', done => {
-    vm.$el
-      .querySelectorAll('.multi-file-discard-btn')[2]
-      .querySelector('.btn')
-      .click();
-
-    Vue.nextTick(() => {
-      expect(
-        vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.ide-commit-list-container')[1].querySelectorAll('li').length,
-      ).toBe(1);
-
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-
   describe('mounted', () => {
     it('opens last opened file', () => {
       expect(store.state.openFiles.length).toBe(1);
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js
index 0e2e246defd..991fb750876 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_editor_spec.js
@@ -319,8 +319,8 @@ describe('RepoEditor', () => {
       });
     });
 
-    it('calls updateDimensions when rightPane is updated', done => {
-      vm.$store.state.rightPane = 'testing';
+    it('calls updateDimensions when rightPane is opened', done => {
+      vm.$store.state.rightPane.isOpen = true;
 
       vm.$nextTick(() => {
         expect(vm.editor.updateDimensions).toHaveBeenCalled();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_file_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_file_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index fc639a672e2..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_file_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,145 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import store from '~/ide/stores';
-import repoFile from '~/ide/components/repo_file.vue';
-import router from '~/ide/ide_router';
-import { createComponentWithStore } from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
-import { file } from '../helpers';
-
-describe('RepoFile', () => {
-  let vm;
-
-  function createComponent(propsData) {
-    const RepoFile = Vue.extend(repoFile);
-
-    vm = createComponentWithStore(RepoFile, store, propsData);
-
-    vm.$mount();
-  }
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    vm.$destroy();
-  });
-
-  it('renders link, icon and name', () => {
-    createComponent({
-      file: file('t4'),
-      level: 0,
-    });
-
-    const name = vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-name');
-
-    expect(name.href).toMatch('');
-    expect(name.textContent.trim()).toEqual(vm.file.name);
-  });
-
-  it('fires clickFile when the link is clicked', done => {
-    spyOn(router, 'push');
-    createComponent({
-      file: file('t3'),
-      level: 0,
-    });
-
-    vm.$el.querySelector('.file-name').click();
-
-    setTimeout(() => {
-      expect(router.push).toHaveBeenCalledWith(`/project${vm.file.url}`);
-
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('folder', () => {
-    it('renders changes count inside folder', () => {
-      const f = {
-        ...file('folder'),
-        path: 'testing',
-        type: 'tree',
-        branchId: 'master',
-        projectId: 'project',
-      };
-
-      store.state.changedFiles.push({
-        ...file('fileName'),
-        path: 'testing/fileName',
-      });
-
-      createComponent({
-        file: f,
-        level: 0,
-      });
-
-      const treeChangesEl = vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-tree-changes');
-
-      expect(treeChangesEl).not.toBeNull();
-      expect(treeChangesEl.textContent).toContain('1');
-    });
-
-    it('renders action dropdown', done => {
-      createComponent({
-        file: {
-          ...file('t4'),
-          type: 'tree',
-          branchId: 'master',
-          projectId: 'project',
-        },
-        level: 0,
-      });
-
-      setTimeout(() => {
-        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-new-btn')).not.toBeNull();
-
-        done();
-      });
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('locked file', () => {
-    let f;
-
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      f = file('locked file');
-      f.file_lock = {
-        user: {
-          name: 'testuser',
-          updated_at: new Date(),
-        },
-      };
-
-      createComponent({
-        file: f,
-        level: 0,
-      });
-    });
-
-    it('renders lock icon', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-status-icon')).not.toBeNull();
-    });
-
-    it('renders a tooltip', () => {
-      expect(
-        vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-name span:nth-child(2)').dataset.originalTitle,
-      ).toContain('Locked by testuser');
-    });
-  });
-
-  it('calls scrollIntoView if made active', done => {
-    createComponent({
-      file: {
-        ...file(),
-        type: 'blob',
-        active: false,
-      },
-      level: 0,
-    });
-
-    spyOn(vm, 'scrollIntoView');
-
-    vm.file.active = true;
-
-    vm.$nextTick(() => {
-      expect(vm.scrollIntoView).toHaveBeenCalled();
-
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_loading_file_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_loading_file_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 7c20b8302f9..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_loading_file_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,63 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import store from '~/ide/stores';
-import repoLoadingFile from '~/ide/components/repo_loading_file.vue';
-import { resetStore } from '../helpers';
-
-describe('RepoLoadingFile', () => {
-  let vm;
-
-  function createComponent() {
-    const RepoLoadingFile = Vue.extend(repoLoadingFile);
-
-    return new RepoLoadingFile({
-      store,
-    }).$mount();
-  }
-
-  function assertLines(lines) {
-    lines.forEach((line, n) => {
-      const index = n + 1;
-      expect(line.classList.contains(`skeleton-line-${index}`)).toBeTruthy();
-    });
-  }
-
-  function assertColumns(columns) {
-    columns.forEach(column => {
-      const container = column.querySelector('.animation-container');
-      const lines = [...container.querySelectorAll(':scope > div')];
-
-      expect(container).toBeTruthy();
-      expect(lines.length).toEqual(3);
-      assertLines(lines);
-    });
-  }
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    vm.$destroy();
-
-    resetStore(vm.$store);
-  });
-
-  it('renders 3 columns of animated LoC', () => {
-    vm = createComponent();
-    const columns = [...vm.$el.querySelectorAll('td')];
-
-    expect(columns.length).toEqual(3);
-    assertColumns(columns);
-  });
-
-  it('renders 1 column of animated LoC if isMini', done => {
-    vm = createComponent();
-    vm.$store.state.leftPanelCollapsed = true;
-    vm.$store.state.openFiles.push('test');
-
-    vm.$nextTick(() => {
-      const columns = [...vm.$el.querySelectorAll('td')];
-
-      expect(columns.length).toEqual(1);
-      assertColumns(columns);
-
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js
index 278a0753322..3b52f279bf2 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/components/repo_tab_spec.js
@@ -93,13 +93,13 @@ describe('RepoTab', () => {
 
     Vue.nextTick()
       .then(() => {
-        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-modified')).toBeNull();
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-modified')).toBeNull();
 
         vm.$el.dispatchEvent(new Event('mouseout'));
       })
       .then(Vue.nextTick)
       .then(() => {
-        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.ide-file-modified')).not.toBeNull();
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-modified')).not.toBeNull();
 
         done();
       })
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js
index c11c482fef8..7e107747346 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/helpers.js
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ import commitState from '~/ide/stores/modules/commit/state';
 import mergeRequestsState from '~/ide/stores/modules/merge_requests/state';
 import pipelinesState from '~/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/state';
 import branchesState from '~/ide/stores/modules/branches/state';
+import fileTemplatesState from '~/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/state';
+import paneState from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/state';
 
 export const resetStore = store => {
   const newState = {
@@ -13,6 +15,8 @@ export const resetStore = store => {
     mergeRequests: mergeRequestsState(),
     pipelines: pipelinesState(),
     branches: branchesState(),
+    fileTemplates: fileTemplatesState(),
+    rightPane: paneState(),
   };
   store.replaceState(newState);
 };
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js
index bca2033ff97..1ca811e996b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions/file_spec.js
@@ -692,21 +692,6 @@ describe('IDE store file actions', () => {
         .then(done)
         .catch(done.fail);
     });
-
-    it('calls scrollToTab', done => {
-      const scrollToTabSpy = jasmine.createSpy('scrollToTab');
-      const oldScrollToTab = store._actions.scrollToTab; // eslint-disable-line
-      store._actions.scrollToTab = [scrollToTabSpy]; // eslint-disable-line
-
-      store
-        .dispatch('openPendingTab', { file: f, keyPrefix: 'pending' })
-        .then(() => {
-          expect(scrollToTabSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
-          store._actions.scrollToTab = oldScrollToTab; // eslint-disable-line
-        })
-        .then(done)
-        .catch(done.fail);
-    });
   });
 
   describe('removePendingTab', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions_spec.js
index d84f1717a61..c9a1158a14e 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/actions_spec.js
@@ -305,7 +305,11 @@ describe('Multi-file store actions', () => {
 
   describe('stageAllChanges', () => {
     it('adds all files from changedFiles to stagedFiles', done => {
-      store.state.changedFiles.push(file(), file('new'));
+      const openFile = { ...file(), path: 'test' };
+
+      store.state.openFiles.push(openFile);
+      store.state.stagedFiles.push(openFile);
+      store.state.changedFiles.push(openFile, file('new'));
 
       testAction(
         stageAllChanges,
@@ -316,7 +320,12 @@ describe('Multi-file store actions', () => {
           { type: types.STAGE_CHANGE, payload: store.state.changedFiles[0].path },
           { type: types.STAGE_CHANGE, payload: store.state.changedFiles[1].path },
         ],
-        [],
+        [
+          {
+            type: 'openPendingTab',
+            payload: { file: openFile, keyPrefix: 'staged' },
+          },
+        ],
         done,
       );
     });
@@ -324,7 +333,11 @@ describe('Multi-file store actions', () => {
 
   describe('unstageAllChanges', () => {
     it('removes all files from stagedFiles after unstaging', done => {
-      store.state.stagedFiles.push(file(), file('new'));
+      const openFile = { ...file(), path: 'test' };
+
+      store.state.openFiles.push(openFile);
+      store.state.changedFiles.push(openFile);
+      store.state.stagedFiles.push(openFile, file('new'));
 
       testAction(
         unstageAllChanges,
@@ -334,7 +347,12 @@ describe('Multi-file store actions', () => {
           { type: types.UNSTAGE_CHANGE, payload: store.state.stagedFiles[0].path },
           { type: types.UNSTAGE_CHANGE, payload: store.state.stagedFiles[1].path },
         ],
-        [],
+        [
+          {
+            type: 'openPendingTab',
+            payload: { file: openFile, keyPrefix: 'unstaged' },
+          },
+        ],
         done,
       );
     });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js
index f831a9f0a5d..734233100ab 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/actions_spec.js
@@ -69,11 +69,17 @@ describe('IDE file templates actions', () => {
 
   describe('fetchTemplateTypes', () => {
     describe('success', () => {
+      let nextPage;
+
       beforeEach(() => {
-        mock.onGet(/api\/(.*)\/templates\/licenses/).replyOnce(200, [
-          {
-            name: 'MIT',
-          },
+        mock.onGet(/api\/(.*)\/templates\/licenses/).replyOnce(() => [
+          200,
+          [
+            {
+              name: 'MIT',
+            },
+          ],
+          { 'X-NEXT-PAGE': nextPage },
         ]);
       });
 
@@ -116,6 +122,38 @@ describe('IDE file templates actions', () => {
           done,
         );
       });
+
+      it('dispatches actions for next page', done => {
+        nextPage = '2';
+        state.selectedTemplateType = {
+          key: 'licenses',
+        };
+
+        testAction(
+          actions.fetchTemplateTypes,
+          null,
+          state,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestTemplateTypes',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'receiveTemplateTypesSuccess',
+              payload: [
+                {
+                  name: 'MIT',
+                },
+              ],
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'fetchTemplateTypes',
+              payload: 2,
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
     });
 
     describe('error', () => {
@@ -148,14 +186,66 @@ describe('IDE file templates actions', () => {
   });
 
   describe('setSelectedTemplateType', () => {
-    it('commits SET_SELECTED_TEMPLATE_TYPE', done => {
-      testAction(
-        actions.setSelectedTemplateType,
-        'test',
-        state,
-        [{ type: types.SET_SELECTED_TEMPLATE_TYPE, payload: 'test' }],
-        [],
-        done,
+    it('commits SET_SELECTED_TEMPLATE_TYPE', () => {
+      const commit = jasmine.createSpy('commit');
+      const options = {
+        commit,
+        dispatch() {},
+        rootGetters: {
+          activeFile: {
+            name: 'test',
+            prevPath: '',
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      actions.setSelectedTemplateType(options, { name: 'test' });
+
+      expect(commit).toHaveBeenCalledWith(types.SET_SELECTED_TEMPLATE_TYPE, { name: 'test' });
+    });
+
+    it('dispatches discardFileChanges if prevPath matches templates name', () => {
+      const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy('dispatch');
+      const options = {
+        commit() {},
+        dispatch,
+        rootGetters: {
+          activeFile: {
+            name: 'test',
+            path: 'test',
+            prevPath: 'test',
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      actions.setSelectedTemplateType(options, { name: 'test' });
+
+      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith('discardFileChanges', 'test', { root: true });
+    });
+
+    it('dispatches renameEntry if file name doesnt match', () => {
+      const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy('dispatch');
+      const options = {
+        commit() {},
+        dispatch,
+        rootGetters: {
+          activeFile: {
+            name: 'oldtest',
+            path: 'oldtest',
+            prevPath: '',
+          },
+        },
+      };
+
+      actions.setSelectedTemplateType(options, { name: 'test' });
+
+      expect(dispatch).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
+        'renameEntry',
+        {
+          path: 'oldtest',
+          name: 'test',
+        },
+        { root: true },
       );
     });
   });
@@ -332,5 +422,20 @@ describe('IDE file templates actions', () => {
 
       expect(commit).toHaveBeenCalledWith('SET_UPDATE_SUCCESS', false);
     });
+
+    it('dispatches discardFileChanges if file has prevPath', () => {
+      const dispatch = jasmine.createSpy('dispatch');
+      const rootGetters = {
+        activeFile: { path: 'test', prevPath: 'newtest', raw: 'raw content' },
+      };
+
+      actions.undoFileTemplate({ dispatch, commit() {}, rootGetters });
+
+      expect(dispatch.calls.mostRecent().args).toEqual([
+        'discardFileChanges',
+        'test',
+        { root: true },
+      ]);
+    });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/getters_spec.js
index e337c3f331b..17cb457881f 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/getters_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/getters_spec.js
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+import createState from '~/ide/stores/state';
+import { activityBarViews } from '~/ide/constants';
 import * as getters from '~/ide/stores/modules/file_templates/getters';
 
 describe('IDE file templates getters', () => {
@@ -8,22 +10,49 @@ describe('IDE file templates getters', () => {
   });
 
   describe('showFileTemplatesBar', () => {
-    it('finds template type by name', () => {
+    let rootState;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      rootState = createState();
+    });
+
+    it('returns true if template is found and currentActivityView is edit', () => {
+      rootState.currentActivityView = activityBarViews.edit;
+
+      expect(
+        getters.showFileTemplatesBar(
+          null,
+          {
+            templateTypes: getters.templateTypes(),
+          },
+          rootState,
+        )('LICENSE'),
+      ).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false if template is found and currentActivityView is not edit', () => {
+      rootState.currentActivityView = activityBarViews.commit;
+
       expect(
-        getters.showFileTemplatesBar(null, {
-          templateTypes: getters.templateTypes(),
-        })('LICENSE'),
-      ).toEqual({
-        name: 'LICENSE',
-        key: 'licenses',
-      });
+        getters.showFileTemplatesBar(
+          null,
+          {
+            templateTypes: getters.templateTypes(),
+          },
+          rootState,
+        )('LICENSE'),
+      ).toBe(false);
     });
 
     it('returns undefined if not found', () => {
       expect(
-        getters.showFileTemplatesBar(null, {
-          templateTypes: getters.templateTypes(),
-        })('test'),
+        getters.showFileTemplatesBar(
+          null,
+          {
+            templateTypes: getters.templateTypes(),
+          },
+          rootState,
+        )('test'),
       ).toBe(undefined);
     });
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f150ded6df5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+import * as actions from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/actions';
+import * as types from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutation_types';
+import testAction from 'spec/helpers/vuex_action_helper';
+
+describe('IDE pane module actions', () => {
+  const TEST_VIEW = { name: 'test' };
+  const TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE = { name: 'test-keep-alive', keepAlive: true };
+
+  describe('toggleOpen', () => {
+    it('dispatches open if closed', done => {
+      testAction(
+        actions.toggleOpen,
+        TEST_VIEW,
+        { isOpen: false },
+        [],
+        [{ type: 'open', payload: TEST_VIEW }],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('dispatches close if opened', done => {
+      testAction(
+        actions.toggleOpen,
+        TEST_VIEW,
+        { isOpen: true },
+        [],
+        [{ type: 'close' }],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('open', () => {
+    it('commits SET_OPEN', done => {
+      testAction(
+        actions.open,
+        null,
+        {},
+        [{ type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: true }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('commits SET_CURRENT_VIEW if view is given', done => {
+      testAction(
+        actions.open,
+        TEST_VIEW,
+        {},
+        [
+          { type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: true },
+          { type: types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW, payload: TEST_VIEW.name },
+        ],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('commits KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW if keepAlive is true', done => {
+      testAction(
+        actions.open,
+        TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE,
+        {},
+        [
+          { type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: true },
+          { type: types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW, payload: TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE.name },
+          { type: types.KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW, payload: TEST_VIEW_KEEP_ALIVE.name },
+        ],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('close', () => {
+    it('commits SET_OPEN', done => {
+      testAction(
+        actions.close,
+        null,
+        {},
+        [{ type: types.SET_OPEN, payload: false }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2060863b5d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+import * as getters from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/getters';
+import state from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/state';
+
+describe('IDE pane module getters', () => {
+  const TEST_VIEW = 'test-view';
+  const TEST_KEEP_ALIVE_VIEWS = {
+    [TEST_VIEW]: true,
+  };
+
+  describe('isActiveView', () => {
+    it('returns true if given view matches currentView', () => {
+      const result = getters.isActiveView({ currentView: 'A' })('A');
+
+      expect(result).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false if given view does not match currentView', () => {
+      const result = getters.isActiveView({ currentView: 'A' })('B');
+
+      expect(result).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('isAliveView', () => {
+    it('returns true if given view is in keepAliveViews', () => {
+      const result = getters.isAliveView(
+        { keepAliveViews: TEST_KEEP_ALIVE_VIEWS },
+        {},
+      )(TEST_VIEW);
+
+      expect(result).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns true if given view is active view and open', () => {
+      const result = getters.isAliveView(
+        { ...state(), isOpen: true },
+        { isActiveView: () => true },
+      )(TEST_VIEW);
+
+      expect(result).toBe(true);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false if given view is active view and closed', () => {
+      const result = getters.isAliveView(
+        state(),
+        { isActiveView: () => true },
+      )(TEST_VIEW);
+
+      expect(result).toBe(false);
+    });
+
+    it('returns false if given view is not activeView', () => {
+      const result = getters.isAliveView(
+        { ...state(), isOpen: true },
+        { isActiveView: () => false },
+      )(TEST_VIEW);
+
+      expect(result).toBe(false);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b5fcd35912e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+import state from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/state';
+import mutations from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutations';
+import * as types from '~/ide/stores/modules/pane/mutation_types';
+
+describe('IDE pane module mutations', () => {
+  const TEST_VIEW = 'test-view';
+  let mockedState;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    mockedState = state();
+  });
+
+  describe('SET_OPEN', () => {
+    it('sets isOpen', () => {
+      mockedState.isOpen = false;
+
+      mutations[types.SET_OPEN](mockedState, true);
+
+      expect(mockedState.isOpen).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('SET_CURRENT_VIEW', () => {
+    it('sets currentView', () => {
+      mockedState.currentView = null;
+
+      mutations[types.SET_CURRENT_VIEW](mockedState, TEST_VIEW);
+
+      expect(mockedState.currentView).toEqual(TEST_VIEW);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW', () => {
+    it('adds entry to keepAliveViews', () => {
+      mutations[types.KEEP_ALIVE_VIEW](mockedState, TEST_VIEW);
+
+      expect(mockedState.keepAliveViews).toEqual({
+        [TEST_VIEW]: true,
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js
index 91edb388791..d85354c3681 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/modules/pipelines/actions_spec.js
@@ -315,29 +315,29 @@ describe('IDE pipelines actions', () => {
         'job',
         mockedState,
         [{ type: types.SET_DETAIL_JOB, payload: 'job' }],
-        [{ type: 'setRightPane', payload: 'jobs-detail' }],
+        [{ type: 'rightPane/open', payload: rightSidebarViews.jobsDetail }],
         done,
       );
     });
 
-    it('dispatches setRightPane as pipeline when job is null', done => {
+    it('dispatches rightPane/open as pipeline when job is null', done => {
       testAction(
         setDetailJob,
         null,
         mockedState,
         [{ type: types.SET_DETAIL_JOB, payload: null }],
-        [{ type: 'setRightPane', payload: rightSidebarViews.pipelines }],
+        [{ type: 'rightPane/open', payload: rightSidebarViews.pipelines }],
         done,
       );
     });
 
-    it('dispatches setRightPane as job', done => {
+    it('dispatches rightPane/open as job', done => {
       testAction(
         setDetailJob,
         'job',
         mockedState,
         [{ type: types.SET_DETAIL_JOB, payload: 'job' }],
-        [{ type: 'setRightPane', payload: rightSidebarViews.jobsDetail }],
+        [{ type: 'rightPane/open', payload: rightSidebarViews.jobsDetail }],
         done,
       );
     });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations_spec.js
index 6ce76aaa03b..41dd3d3c67f 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/ide/stores/mutations_spec.js
@@ -339,5 +339,13 @@ describe('Multi-file store mutations', () => {
 
       expect(localState.entries.parentPath.tree.length).toBe(1);
     });
+
+    it('adds to openFiles if previously opened', () => {
+      localState.entries.oldPath.opened = true;
+
+      mutations.RENAME_ENTRY(localState, { path: 'oldPath', name: 'newPath' });
+
+      expect(localState.openFiles).toEqual([localState.entries.newPath]);
+    });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/edit_actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/edit_actions_spec.js
index d779ab7bb31..004621f488a 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/edit_actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/edit_actions_spec.js
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ describe('Edit Actions components', () => {
       propsData: {
         canDestroy: true,
         formState: store.formState,
+        issuableType: 'issue',
       },
     }).$mount();
 
@@ -54,7 +55,7 @@ describe('Edit Actions components', () => {
 
     Vue.nextTick(() => {
       expect(
-        vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-save').getAttribute('disabled'),
+        vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').getAttribute('disabled'),
       ).toBe('disabled');
 
       done();
@@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ describe('Edit Actions components', () => {
 
   describe('updateIssuable', () => {
     it('sends update.issauble event when clicking save button', () => {
-      vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-save').click();
+      vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click();
 
       expect(
         eventHub.$emit,
@@ -80,11 +81,11 @@ describe('Edit Actions components', () => {
     });
 
     it('shows loading icon after clicking save button', (done) => {
-      vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-save').click();
+      vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click();
 
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
         expect(
-          vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-save .fa'),
+          vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success .fa'),
         ).not.toBeNull();
 
         done();
@@ -92,11 +93,11 @@ describe('Edit Actions components', () => {
     });
 
     it('disabled button after clicking save button', (done) => {
-      vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-save').click();
+      vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').click();
 
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
         expect(
-          vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-save').getAttribute('disabled'),
+          vm.$el.querySelector('.btn-success').getAttribute('disabled'),
         ).toBe('disabled');
 
         done();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/form_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/form_spec.js
index 50ce019c32a..eaac1e3536d 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/form_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/components/form_spec.js
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ describe('Inline edit form component', () => {
           description: 'a',
           lockedWarningVisible: false,
         },
+        issuableType: 'issue',
         markdownPreviewPath: '/',
         markdownDocsPath: '/',
         projectPath: '/',
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/issue_show/index_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/index_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fa0b426c06c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/issue_show/index_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+import initIssueableApp from '~/issue_show';
+
+describe('Issue show index', () => {
+  describe('initIssueableApp', () => {
+    it('should initialize app with no potential XSS attack', () => {
+      const d = document.createElement('div');
+      d.id = 'js-issuable-app-initial-data';
+      d.innerHTML = JSON.stringify({
+        initialDescriptionHtml: '&lt;img src=x onerror=alert(1)&gt;',
+      });
+      document.body.appendChild(d);
+
+      const alertSpy = spyOn(window, 'alert');
+      initIssueableApp();
+
+      expect(alertSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js
index 2fcb5566ebc..d6b5dec9e47 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/job_spec.js
@@ -57,25 +57,6 @@ describe('Job', () => {
         expect(job.buildStage).toBe('test');
         expect(job.state).toBe('');
       });
-
-      it('only shows the jobs matching the current stage', () => {
-        expect($('.build-job[data-stage="build"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false);
-        expect($('.build-job[data-stage="test"]').is(':visible')).toBe(true);
-        expect($('.build-job[data-stage="deploy"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false);
-      });
-
-      it('selects the current stage in the build dropdown menu', () => {
-        expect($('.stage-selection').text()).toBe('test');
-      });
-
-      it('updates the jobs when the build dropdown changes', () => {
-        $('.stage-item:contains("build")').click();
-
-        expect($('.stage-selection').text()).toBe('build');
-        expect($('.build-job[data-stage="build"]').is(':visible')).toBe(true);
-        expect($('.build-job[data-stage="test"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false);
-        expect($('.build-job[data-stage="deploy"]').is(':visible')).toBe(false);
-      });
     });
 
     describe('running build', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/artifacts_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/artifacts_block_spec.js
index a06d287b3fa..2fa7ff653fe 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/artifacts_block_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/artifacts_block_spec.js
@@ -11,6 +11,19 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   const timeago = getTimeago();
   const formatedDate = timeago.format(expireAt);
 
+  const expiredArtifact = {
+    expire_at: expireAt,
+    expired: true,
+  };
+
+  const nonExpiredArtifact = {
+    download_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/jobs/98314558/artifacts/download',
+    browse_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/jobs/98314558/artifacts/browse',
+    keep_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/-/jobs/98314558/artifacts/keep',
+    expire_at: expireAt,
+    expired: false,
+  };
+
   afterEach(() => {
     vm.$destroy();
   });
@@ -18,100 +31,87 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   describe('with expired artifacts', () => {
     it('renders expired artifact date and info', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
+        artifact: expiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-artifacts-removed')).not.toBeNull();
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-artifacts-will-be-removed')).toBeNull();
       expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain(formatedDate);
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-artifacts-removed').textContent.trim()).toEqual(
+        'The artifacts were removed',
+      );
     });
   });
 
   describe('with artifacts that will expire', () => {
     it('renders will expire artifact date and info', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: false,
-        willArtifactsExpire: true,
-        expireAt,
+        artifact: nonExpiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-artifacts-removed')).toBeNull();
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-artifacts-will-be-removed')).not.toBeNull();
       expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain(formatedDate);
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-artifacts-will-be-removed').textContent.trim()).toEqual(
+        'The artifacts will be removed in',
+      );
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when the user can keep the artifacts', () => {
+  describe('with keep path', () => {
     it('renders the keep button', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
-        keepArtifactsPath: '/keep',
+        artifact: nonExpiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-keep-artifacts')).not.toBeNull();
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when the user can not keep the artifacts', () => {
+  describe('without keep path', () => {
     it('does not render the keep button', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
+        artifact: expiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-keep-artifacts')).toBeNull();
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when the user can download the artifacts', () => {
+  describe('with download path', () => {
     it('renders the download button', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
-        downloadArtifactsPath: '/download',
+        artifact: nonExpiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-download-artifacts')).not.toBeNull();
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when the user can not download the artifacts', () => {
+  describe('without download path', () => {
     it('does not render the keep button', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
+        artifact: expiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-download-artifacts')).toBeNull();
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when the user can browse the artifacts', () => {
+  describe('with browse path', () => {
     it('does not render the browse button', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
-        browseArtifactsPath: '/browse',
+        artifact: nonExpiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-browse-artifacts')).not.toBeNull();
     });
   });
 
-  describe('when the user can not browse the artifacts', () => {
+  describe('without browse path', () => {
     it('does not render the browse button', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        haveArtifactsExpired: true,
-        willArtifactsExpire: false,
-        expireAt,
+        artifact: expiredArtifact,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-browse-artifacts')).toBeNull();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js
index e21fa9c2874..0bcc4ff940f 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/commit_block_spec.js
@@ -7,11 +7,16 @@ describe('Commit block', () => {
   let vm;
 
   const props = {
-    pipelineShortSha: '1f0fb84f',
-    pipelineShaPath: 'commit/1f0fb84fb6770d74d97eee58118fd3909cd4f48c',
-    mergeRequestReference: '!21244',
-    mergeRequestPath: 'merge_requests/21244',
-    gitCommitTitlte: 'Regenerate pot files',
+    commit: {
+      short_id: '1f0fb84f',
+      commit_path: 'commit/1f0fb84fb6770d74d97eee58118fd3909cd4f48c',
+      title: 'Update README.md',
+    },
+    mergeRequest: {
+      iid: '!21244',
+      path: 'merge_requests/21244',
+    },
+    isLastBlock: true,
   };
 
   afterEach(() => {
@@ -26,12 +31,18 @@ describe('Commit block', () => {
     });
 
     it('renders pipeline short sha link', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-commit-sha').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(props.pipelineShaPath);
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-commit-sha').textContent.trim()).toEqual(props.pipelineShortSha);
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-commit-sha').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
+        props.commit.commit_path,
+      );
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-commit-sha').textContent.trim()).toEqual(
+        props.commit.short_id,
+      );
     });
 
     it('renders clipboard button', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('button').getAttribute('data-clipboard-text')).toEqual(props.pipelineShortSha);
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('button').getAttribute('data-clipboard-text')).toEqual(
+        props.commit.short_id,
+      );
     });
   });
 
@@ -41,17 +52,19 @@ describe('Commit block', () => {
         ...props,
       });
 
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-link-commit').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(props.mergeRequestPath);
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-link-commit').textContent.trim()).toEqual(props.mergeRequestReference);
-
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-link-commit').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
+        props.mergeRequest.path,
+      );
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-link-commit').textContent.trim()).toEqual(
+        `!${props.mergeRequest.iid}`,
+      );
     });
   });
 
   describe('without merge request', () => {
     it('does not render merge request', () => {
       const copyProps = Object.assign({}, props);
-      delete copyProps.mergeRequestPath;
-      delete copyProps.mergeRequestReference;
+      delete copyProps.mergeRequest;
 
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
         ...copyProps,
@@ -67,7 +80,7 @@ describe('Commit block', () => {
         ...props,
       });
 
-      expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain(props.gitCommitTitlte);
+      expect(vm.$el.textContent).toContain(props.commit.title);
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js
index dcc2b3d8a20..73488eaab9b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/empty_state_spec.js
@@ -66,8 +66,8 @@ describe('Empty State', () => {
         ...props,
         content,
         action: {
-          link: 'runner',
-          title: 'Check runner',
+          path: 'runner',
+          button_title: 'Check runner',
           method: 'post',
         },
       });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js
index 015c26be9fc..7d836129b13 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/environments_block_spec.js
@@ -5,19 +5,16 @@ import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
 describe('Environments block', () => {
   const Component = Vue.extend(component);
   let vm;
-  const icon = {
+  const status = {
     group: 'success',
     icon: 'status_success',
     label: 'passed',
     text: 'passed',
     tooltip: 'passed',
   };
-  const deployment = {
-    path: 'deployment',
-    name: 'deployment name',
-  };
+
   const environment = {
-    path: '/environment',
+    environment_path: '/environment',
     name: 'environment',
   };
 
@@ -25,15 +22,14 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
     vm.$destroy();
   });
 
-  describe('with latest deployment', () => {
+  describe('with last deployment', () => {
     it('renders info for most recent deployment', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
         deploymentStatus: {
-          status: 'latest',
-          icon,
-          deployment,
+          status: 'last',
           environment,
         },
+        iconStatus: status,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual(
@@ -48,17 +44,17 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
           deploymentStatus: {
             status: 'out_of_date',
-            icon,
-            deployment,
             environment: Object.assign({}, environment, {
-              last_deployment: { name: 'deployment', path: 'last_deployment' },
+              last_deployment: { iid: 'deployment', deployable: { build_path: 'bar' } },
             }),
           },
+          iconStatus: status,
         });
 
         expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual(
-          'This job is an out-of-date deployment to environment. View the most recent deployment deployment.',
+          'This job is an out-of-date deployment to environment. View the most recent deployment #deployment.',
         );
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-deployment-link').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('bar');
       });
     });
 
@@ -67,10 +63,9 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
           deploymentStatus: {
             status: 'out_of_date',
-            icon,
-            deployment: null,
             environment,
           },
+          iconStatus: status,
         });
 
         expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual(
@@ -85,10 +80,9 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
         deploymentStatus: {
           status: 'failed',
-          icon,
-          deployment: null,
           environment,
         },
+        iconStatus: status,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual(
@@ -99,21 +93,24 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
 
   describe('creating deployment', () => {
     describe('with last deployment', () => {
-      it('renders info about creating deployment and overriding lastest deployment', () => {
+      it('renders info about creating deployment and overriding latest deployment', () => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
           deploymentStatus: {
             status: 'creating',
-            icon,
-            deployment,
             environment: Object.assign({}, environment, {
-              last_deployment: { name: 'deployment', path: 'last_deployment' },
+              last_deployment: {
+                iid: 'deployment',
+                deployable: { build_path: 'foo' },
+              },
             }),
           },
+          iconStatus: status,
         });
 
         expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual(
-          'This job is creating a deployment to environment and will overwrite the last deployment.',
+          'This job is creating a deployment to environment and will overwrite the latest deployment.',
         );
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-deployment-link').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('foo');
       });
     });
 
@@ -122,10 +119,9 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
           deploymentStatus: {
             status: 'creating',
-            icon,
-            deployment: null,
             environment,
           },
+          iconStatus: status,
         });
 
         expect(vm.$el.textContent.trim()).toEqual(
@@ -133,5 +129,18 @@ describe('Environments block', () => {
         );
       });
     });
+
+    describe('without environment', () => {
+      it('does not render environment link', () => {
+        vm = mountComponent(Component, {
+          deploymentStatus: {
+            status: 'creating',
+            environment: null,
+          },
+          iconStatus: status,
+        });
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-environment-link')).toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/erased_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/erased_block_spec.js
index a4ae0c7c81e..8e0433d3fb7 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/erased_block_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/erased_block_spec.js
@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ describe('Erased block', () => {
   describe('with job erased by user', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        erasedByUser: true,
-        username: 'root',
-        linkToUser: 'gitlab.com/root',
+        user: {
+          username: 'root',
+          web_url: 'gitlab.com/root',
+        },
         erasedAt,
       });
     });
@@ -40,7 +41,6 @@ describe('Erased block', () => {
   describe('with erased job', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        erasedByUser: false,
         erasedAt,
       });
     });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/header_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index e21e2c6d6e3..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/header_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import headerComponent from '~/jobs/components/header.vue';
-import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
-
-describe('Job details header', () => {
-  let HeaderComponent;
-  let vm;
-  let props;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    HeaderComponent = Vue.extend(headerComponent);
-
-    const threeWeeksAgo = new Date();
-    threeWeeksAgo.setDate(threeWeeksAgo.getDate() - 21);
-
-    const twoDaysAgo = new Date();
-    twoDaysAgo.setDate(twoDaysAgo.getDate() - 2);
-
-    props = {
-      job: {
-        status: {
-          group: 'failed',
-          icon: 'status_failed',
-          label: 'failed',
-          text: 'failed',
-          details_path: 'path',
-        },
-        id: 123,
-        created_at: threeWeeksAgo.toISOString(),
-        user: {
-          web_url: 'path',
-          name: 'Foo',
-          username: 'foobar',
-          email: 'foo@bar.com',
-          avatar_url: 'link',
-        },
-        started: twoDaysAgo.toISOString(),
-        new_issue_path: 'path',
-      },
-      isLoading: false,
-    };
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    vm.$destroy();
-  });
-
-  describe('job reason', () => {
-    it('should not render the reason when reason is absent', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props);
-
-      expect(vm.shouldRenderReason).toBe(false);
-    });
-
-    it('should render the reason when reason is present', () => {
-      props.job.callout_message = 'There is an unknown failure, please try again';
-
-      vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props);
-
-      expect(vm.shouldRenderReason).toBe(true);
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('triggered job', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props);
-    });
-
-    it('should render provided job information', () => {
-      expect(
-        vm.$el
-          .querySelector('.header-main-content')
-          .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ')
-          .trim(),
-      ).toEqual('failed Job #123 triggered 2 days ago by Foo');
-    });
-
-    it('should render new issue link', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
-        props.job.new_issue_path,
-      );
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('created job', () => {
-    it('should render created key', () => {
-      props.job.started = false;
-      vm = mountComponent(HeaderComponent, props);
-
-      expect(
-        vm.$el
-          .querySelector('.header-main-content')
-          .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ')
-          .trim(),
-      ).toEqual('failed Job #123 created 3 weeks ago by Foo');
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_app_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_app_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e02eb9723fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_app_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import jobApp from '~/jobs/components/job_app.vue';
+import createStore from '~/jobs/store';
+import { mountComponentWithStore } from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+
+describe('Job App ', () => {
+  const Component = Vue.extend(jobApp);
+  let store;
+  let vm;
+
+  const threeWeeksAgo = new Date();
+  threeWeeksAgo.setDate(threeWeeksAgo.getDate() - 21);
+
+  const twoDaysAgo = new Date();
+  twoDaysAgo.setDate(twoDaysAgo.getDate() - 2);
+
+  const job = {
+    status: {
+      group: 'failed',
+      icon: 'status_failed',
+      label: 'failed',
+      text: 'failed',
+      details_path: 'path',
+    },
+    id: 123,
+    created_at: threeWeeksAgo.toISOString(),
+    user: {
+      web_url: 'path',
+      name: 'Foo',
+      username: 'foobar',
+      email: 'foo@bar.com',
+      avatar_url: 'link',
+    },
+    started: twoDaysAgo.toISOString(),
+    new_issue_path: 'path',
+    runners: {
+      available: false,
+    },
+    tags: ['docker'],
+    has_trace: true,
+  };
+
+  const props = {
+    runnerHelpUrl: 'help/runners',
+  };
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    store = createStore();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  describe('Header section', () => {
+    describe('job callout message', () => {
+      it('should not render the reason when reason is absent', () => {
+        store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+          props,
+          store,
+        });
+
+        expect(vm.shouldRenderCalloutMessage).toBe(false);
+      });
+
+      it('should render the reason when reason is present', () => {
+        store.dispatch(
+          'receiveJobSuccess',
+          Object.assign({}, job, {
+            callout_message: 'There is an unknown failure, please try again',
+          }),
+        );
+
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+          props,
+          store,
+        });
+
+        expect(vm.shouldRenderCalloutMessage).toBe(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('triggered job', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+          props,
+          store,
+        });
+      });
+
+      it('should render provided job information', () => {
+        expect(
+          vm.$el
+            .querySelector('.header-main-content')
+            .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ')
+            .trim(),
+        ).toEqual('failed Job #123 triggered 2 days ago by Foo');
+      });
+
+      it('should render new issue link', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
+          job.new_issue_path,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('created job', () => {
+      it('should render created key', () => {
+        store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { started: false }));
+
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+          props,
+          store,
+        });
+
+        expect(
+          vm.$el
+            .querySelector('.header-main-content')
+            .textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ')
+            .trim(),
+        ).toEqual('failed Job #123 created 3 weeks ago by Foo');
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('stuck block', () => {
+    it('renders stuck block when there are no runners', () => {
+      store.dispatch(
+        'receiveJobSuccess',
+        Object.assign({}, job, {
+          status: {
+            group: 'pending',
+            icon: 'status_pending',
+            label: 'pending',
+            text: 'pending',
+            details_path: 'path',
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-stuck')).not.toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    it('renders tags in stuck block when there are no runners', () => {
+      store.dispatch(
+        'receiveJobSuccess',
+        Object.assign({}, job, {
+          status: {
+            group: 'pending',
+            icon: 'status_pending',
+            label: 'pending',
+            text: 'pending',
+            details_path: 'path',
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-stuck').textContent).toContain(job.tags[0]);
+    });
+
+    it(' does not renders stuck block when there are no runners', () => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { runners: { available: true } }));
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-stuck')).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('environments block', () => {
+    it('renders environment block when job has environment', () => {
+      store.dispatch(
+        'receiveJobSuccess',
+        Object.assign({}, job, {
+          deployment_status: {
+            environment: {
+              environment_path: '/path',
+              name: 'foo',
+            },
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-environment')).not.toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    it('does not render environment block when job has environment', () => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-environment')).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('erased block', () => {
+    it('renders erased block when `erased` is true', () => {
+      store.dispatch(
+        'receiveJobSuccess',
+        Object.assign({}, job, {
+          erased: true,
+          erased_by: {
+            username: 'root',
+            web_url: 'gitlab.com/root',
+          },
+          erased_at: '2016-11-07T11:11:16.525Z',
+        }),
+      );
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased')).not.toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    it('does not render erased block when `erased` is false', () => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { erased: false }));
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased')).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('empty states block', () => {
+    it('renders empty state when job does not have trace and is not running', () => {
+      store.dispatch(
+        'receiveJobSuccess',
+        Object.assign({}, job, {
+          has_trace: false,
+          status: {
+            group: 'pending',
+            icon: 'status_pending',
+            label: 'pending',
+            text: 'pending',
+            details_path: 'path',
+            illustration: {
+              image: 'path',
+              size: '340',
+              title: 'Empty State',
+              content: 'This is an empty state',
+            },
+            action: {
+              button_title: 'Retry job',
+              method: 'post',
+              path: '/path',
+            },
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-empty-state')).not.toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    it('does not render empty state when job does not have trace but it is running', () => {
+      store.dispatch(
+        'receiveJobSuccess',
+        Object.assign({}, job, {
+          has_trace: false,
+          status: {
+            group: 'running',
+            icon: 'status_running',
+            label: 'running',
+            text: 'running',
+            details_path: 'path',
+          },
+        }),
+      );
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-empty-state')).toBeNull();
+    });
+
+    it('does not render empty state when job has trace but it is not running', () => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', Object.assign({}, job, { has_trace: true }));
+
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(Component, {
+        props,
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-empty-state')).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_details_mediator_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_details_mediator_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 3e2fb7bfbbb..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_details_mediator_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
-import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
-import JobMediator from '~/jobs/job_details_mediator';
-import job from '../mock_data';
-
-describe('JobMediator', () => {
-  let mediator;
-  let mock;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    mediator = new JobMediator({ endpoint: 'jobs/40291672.json' });
-    mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    mock.restore();
-  });
-
-  it('should set defaults', () => {
-    expect(mediator.store).toBeDefined();
-    expect(mediator.service).toBeDefined();
-    expect(mediator.options).toEqual({ endpoint: 'jobs/40291672.json' });
-    expect(mediator.state.isLoading).toEqual(false);
-  });
-
-  describe('request and store data', () => {
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      mock.onGet().reply(200, job, {});
-    });
-
-    it('should store received data', (done) => {
-      mediator.fetchJob();
-      setTimeout(() => {
-        expect(mediator.store.state.job).toEqual(job);
-        done();
-      }, 0);
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_controllers_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_controllers_spec.js
index 416dfab8a48..099aca602c4 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_controllers_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_controllers_spec.js
@@ -10,50 +10,51 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
     vm.$destroy();
   });
 
-  describe('Truncate information', () => {
+  const props = {
+    rawPath: '/raw',
+    erasePath: '/erase',
+    size: 511952,
+    isScrollTopDisabled: false,
+    isScrollBottomDisabled: false,
+    isScrollingDown: true,
+    isTraceSizeVisible: true,
+  };
 
-    beforeEach(() => {
-      vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        rawTracePath: '/raw',
-        canEraseJob: true,
-        size: 511952,
-        canScrollToTop: true,
-        canScrollToBottom: true,
+  describe('Truncate information', () => {
+    describe('with isTraceSizeVisible', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        vm = mountComponent(Component, props);
+      });
+      it('renders size information', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-truncated-info').textContent).toContain('499.95 KiB');
       });
-    });
-
-    it('renders size information', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-truncated-info').textContent).toContain('499.95 KiB');
-    });
 
-    it('renders link to raw trace', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-raw-link').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('/raw');
+      it('renders link to raw trace', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-raw-link').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('/raw');
+      });
     });
-
   });
 
   describe('links section', () => {
     describe('with raw trace path', () => {
       it('renders raw trace link', () => {
-        vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-          rawTracePath: '/raw',
-          canEraseJob: true,
-          size: 511952,
-          canScrollToTop: true,
-          canScrollToBottom: true,
-        });
+        vm = mountComponent(Component, props);
 
-        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-raw-link-controller').getAttribute('href')).toEqual('/raw');
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-raw-link-controller').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
+          '/raw',
+        );
       });
     });
 
     describe('without raw trace path', () => {
       it('does not render raw trace link', () => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-          canEraseJob: true,
+          erasePath: '/erase',
           size: 511952,
-          canScrollToTop: true,
-          canScrollToBottom: true,
+          isScrollTopDisabled: true,
+          isScrollBottomDisabled: true,
+          isScrollingDown: false,
+          isTraceSizeVisible: true,
         });
 
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-raw-link-controller')).toBeNull();
@@ -62,52 +63,23 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
 
     describe('when is erasable', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
-        vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-          rawTracePath: '/raw',
-          canEraseJob: true,
-          size: 511952,
-          canScrollToTop: true,
-          canScrollToBottom: true,
-        });
+        vm = mountComponent(Component, props);
       });
 
-      it('renders erase job button', () => {
+      it('renders erase job link', () => {
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-erase-link')).not.toBeNull();
       });
-
-      describe('on click', () => {
-        describe('when user confirms action', () => {
-          it('emits eraseJob event', () => {
-            spyOn(window, 'confirm').and.returnValue(true);
-            spyOn(vm, '$emit');
-
-            vm.$el.querySelector('.js-erase-link').click();
-
-            expect(vm.$emit).toHaveBeenCalledWith('eraseJob');
-          });
-        });
-
-        describe('when user does not confirm action', () => {
-          it('does not emit eraseJob event', () => {
-            spyOn(window, 'confirm').and.returnValue(false);
-            spyOn(vm, '$emit');
-
-            vm.$el.querySelector('.js-erase-link').click();
-
-            expect(vm.$emit).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('eraseJob');
-          });
-        });
-      });
     });
 
     describe('when it is not erasable', () => {
       it('does not render erase button', () => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-          rawTracePath: '/raw',
-          canEraseJob: false,
+          rawPath: '/raw',
           size: 511952,
-          canScrollToTop: true,
-          canScrollToBottom: true,
+          isScrollTopDisabled: true,
+          isScrollBottomDisabled: true,
+          isScrollingDown: false,
+          isTraceSizeVisible: true,
         });
 
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-erase-link')).toBeNull();
@@ -119,13 +91,7 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
     describe('scroll top button', () => {
       describe('when user can scroll top', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
-          vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-            rawTracePath: '/raw',
-            canEraseJob: true,
-            size: 511952,
-            canScrollToTop: true,
-            canScrollToBottom: true,
-          });
+          vm = mountComponent(Component, props);
         });
 
         it('renders enabled scroll top button', () => {
@@ -143,16 +109,20 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
       describe('when user can not scroll top', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
           vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-            rawTracePath: '/raw',
-            canEraseJob: true,
+            rawPath: '/raw',
+            erasePath: '/erase',
             size: 511952,
-            canScrollToTop: false,
-            canScrollToBottom: true,
+            isScrollTopDisabled: true,
+            isScrollBottomDisabled: false,
+            isScrollingDown: false,
+            isTraceSizeVisible: true,
           });
         });
 
         it('renders disabled scroll top button', () => {
-          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-scroll-top').getAttribute('disabled')).toEqual('disabled');
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-scroll-top').getAttribute('disabled')).toEqual(
+            'disabled',
+          );
         });
 
         it('does not emit scrollJobLogTop event on click', () => {
@@ -167,13 +137,7 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
     describe('scroll bottom button', () => {
       describe('when user can scroll bottom', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
-          vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-            rawTracePath: '/raw',
-            canEraseJob: true,
-            size: 511952,
-            canScrollToTop: true,
-            canScrollToBottom: true,
-          });
+          vm = mountComponent(Component, props);
         });
 
         it('renders enabled scroll bottom button', () => {
@@ -191,17 +155,20 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
       describe('when user can not scroll bottom', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
           vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-            rawTracePath: '/raw',
-            canEraseJob: true,
+            rawPath: '/raw',
+            erasePath: '/erase',
             size: 511952,
-            canScrollToTop: true,
-            canScrollToBottom: false,
+            isScrollTopDisabled: false,
+            isScrollBottomDisabled: true,
+            isScrollingDown: false,
+            isTraceSizeVisible: true,
           });
         });
 
         it('renders disabled scroll bottom button', () => {
-          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-scroll-bottom').getAttribute('disabled')).toEqual('disabled');
-
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-scroll-bottom').getAttribute('disabled')).toEqual(
+            'disabled',
+          );
         });
 
         it('does not emit scrollJobLogBottom event on click', () => {
@@ -211,7 +178,29 @@ describe('Job log controllers', () => {
           expect(vm.$emit).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith('scrollJobLogBottom');
         });
       });
+
+      describe('while isScrollingDown is true', () => {
+        it('renders animate class for the scroll down button', () => {
+          vm = mountComponent(Component, props);
+
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-scroll-bottom').className).toContain('animate');
+        });
+      });
+
+      describe('while isScrollingDown is false', () => {
+        it('does not render animate class for the scroll down button', () => {
+          vm = mountComponent(Component, {
+            rawPath: '/raw',
+            erasePath: '/erase',
+            size: 511952,
+            isScrollTopDisabled: true,
+            isScrollBottomDisabled: false,
+            isScrollingDown: false,
+            isTraceSizeVisible: true,
+          });
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-scroll-bottom').className).not.toContain('animate');
+        });
+      });
     });
   });
 });
-
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_spec.js
index 6a5b375a26c..1011512360d 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_log_spec.js
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ describe('Job Log', () => {
   it('renders provided trace', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       trace,
-      isReceivingBuildTrace: true,
+      isComplete: true,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('code').textContent).toContain('Running with gitlab-runner 11.1.0 (081978aa)');
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ describe('Job Log', () => {
     it('renders animation', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
         trace,
-        isReceivingBuildTrace: true,
+        isComplete: true,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-log-animation')).not.toBeNull();
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ describe('Job Log', () => {
     it('does not render animation', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
         trace,
-        isReceivingBuildTrace: false,
+        isComplete: false,
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-log-animation')).toBeNull();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_store_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_store_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 0dad5111b32..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/job_store_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
-import JobStore from '~/jobs/stores/job_store';
-import job from '../mock_data';
-
-describe('Job Store', () => {
-  let store;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    store = new JobStore();
-  });
-
-  it('should set defaults', () => {
-    expect(store.state.job).toEqual({});
-  });
-
-  describe('storeJob', () => {
-    it('should store empty object if none is provided', () => {
-      store.storeJob();
-      expect(store.state.job).toEqual({});
-    });
-
-    it('should store provided argument', () => {
-      store.storeJob(job);
-      expect(store.state.job).toEqual(job);
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js
index f3f8ff0d031..fa3a2c4c266 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/jobs_container_spec.js
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import Vue from 'vue';
 import component from '~/jobs/components/jobs_container.vue';
 import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
 
-describe('Artifacts block', () => {
+describe('Jobs List block', () => {
   const Component = Vue.extend(component);
   let vm;
 
@@ -16,8 +16,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
       text: 'passed',
       tooltip: 'passed',
     },
-    path: 'job/233432756',
-    id: '233432756',
+    id: 233432756,
     tooltip: 'build - passed',
     retried: true,
   };
@@ -33,8 +32,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
       text: 'passed',
       tooltip: 'passed',
     },
-    path: 'job/2322756',
-    id: '2322756',
+    id: 2322756,
     tooltip: 'build - passed',
     active: true,
   };
@@ -50,8 +48,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
       text: 'passed',
       tooltip: 'passed',
     },
-    path: 'job/232153',
-    id: '232153',
+    id: 232153,
     tooltip: 'build - passed',
   };
 
@@ -62,14 +59,16 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   it('renders list of jobs', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [job, retried, active],
+      jobId: 12313,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('a').length).toEqual(3);
   });
 
-  it('renders arrow right when job is active', () => {
+  it('renders arrow right when job id matches `jobId`', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [active],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a .js-arrow-right')).not.toBeNull();
@@ -78,6 +77,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   it('does not render arrow right when job is not active', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [job],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a .js-arrow-right')).toBeNull();
@@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   it('renders job name when present', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [job],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').textContent.trim()).toContain(job.name);
@@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   it('renders job id when job name is not available', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [retried],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').textContent.trim()).toContain(retried.id);
@@ -103,14 +105,16 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   it('links to the job page', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [job],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
-    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.path);
+    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.status.details_path);
   });
 
   it('renders retry icon when job was retried', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [retried],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-icon')).not.toBeNull();
@@ -119,6 +123,7 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
   it('does not render retry icon when job was not retried', () => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
       jobs: [job],
+      jobId: active.id,
     });
 
     expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-icon')).toBeNull();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index ba19534dac2..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,139 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import sidebarDetailsBlock from '~/jobs/components/sidebar_details_block.vue';
-import job from '../mock_data';
-import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
-
-describe('Sidebar details block', () => {
-  let SidebarComponent;
-  let vm;
-
-  function trimWhitespace(element) {
-    return element.textContent.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim();
-  }
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    SidebarComponent = Vue.extend(sidebarDetailsBlock);
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    vm.$destroy();
-  });
-
-  describe('when it is loading', () => {
-    it('should render a loading spinner', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, {
-        job: {},
-        isLoading: true,
-      });
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.fa-spinner')).toBeDefined();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('when there is no retry path retry', () => {
-    it('should not render a retry button', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, {
-        job: {},
-        isLoading: false,
-      });
-
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job')).toBeNull();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('without terminal path', () => {
-    it('does not render terminal link', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, {
-        job,
-        isLoading: false,
-      });
-
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).toBeNull();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('with terminal path', () => {
-    it('renders terminal link', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, {
-        job,
-        isLoading: false,
-        terminalPath: 'job/43123/terminal',
-      });
-
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).not.toBeNull();
-    });
-  });
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    vm = mountComponent(SidebarComponent, {
-      job,
-      isLoading: false,
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('actions', () => {
-    it('should render link to new issue', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
-        job.new_issue_path,
-      );
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').textContent.trim()).toEqual('New issue');
-    });
-
-    it('should render link to retry job', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.retry_path);
-    });
-
-    it('should render link to cancel job', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-cancel-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.cancel_path);
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('information', () => {
-    it('should render merge request link', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr'))).toEqual('Merge Request: !2');
-
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
-        job.merge_request.path,
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('should render job duration', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-duration'))).toEqual(
-        'Duration: 6 seconds',
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('should render erased date', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased'))).toEqual('Erased: 3 weeks ago');
-    });
-
-    it('should render finished date', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-finished'))).toEqual(
-        'Finished: 3 weeks ago',
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('should render queued date', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-queued'))).toEqual('Queued: 9 seconds');
-    });
-
-    it('should render runner ID', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-runner'))).toEqual(
-        'Runner: local ci runner (#1)',
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('should render timeout information', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-timeout'))).toEqual(
-        'Timeout: 1m 40s (from runner)',
-      );
-    });
-
-    it('should render coverage', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-coverage'))).toEqual('Coverage: 20%');
-    });
-
-    it('should render tags', () => {
-      expect(trimWhitespace(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-tags'))).toEqual('Tags: tag');
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2f5c4245ced
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/sidebar_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import sidebarDetailsBlock from '~/jobs/components/sidebar.vue';
+import createStore from '~/jobs/store';
+import job, { stages, jobsInStage } from '../mock_data';
+import { mountComponentWithStore } from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import { trimText } from '../../helpers/vue_component_helper';
+
+describe('Sidebar details block', () => {
+  const SidebarComponent = Vue.extend(sidebarDetailsBlock);
+  let vm;
+  let store;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    store = createStore();
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  describe('when it is loading', () => {
+    it('should render a loading spinner', () => {
+      store.dispatch('requestJob');
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.fa-spinner')).toBeDefined();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('when there is no retry path retry', () => {
+    it('should not render a retry button', () => {
+      const copy = Object.assign({}, job);
+      delete copy.retry_path;
+
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', copy);
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, {
+        store,
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job')).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('without terminal path', () => {
+    it('does not render terminal link', () => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('with terminal path', () => {
+    it('renders terminal link', () => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+      vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, {
+        store,
+        props: {
+          terminalPath: 'job/43123/terminal',
+        },
+      });
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-terminal-link')).not.toBeNull();
+    });
+  });
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+    vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+  });
+
+  describe('actions', () => {
+    it('should render link to new issue', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
+        job.new_issue_path,
+      );
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-new-issue').textContent.trim()).toEqual('New issue');
+    });
+
+    it('should render link to retry job', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-retry-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.retry_path);
+    });
+
+    it('should render link to cancel job', () => {
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-cancel-job').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(job.cancel_path);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('information', () => {
+    it('should render merge request link', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr').textContent)).toEqual('Merge Request: !2');
+
+      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-mr a').getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
+        job.merge_request.path,
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render job duration', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-duration').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Duration: 6 seconds',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render erased date', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-erased').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Erased: 3 weeks ago',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render finished date', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-finished').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Finished: 3 weeks ago',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render queued date', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-queued').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Queued: 9 seconds',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render runner ID', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-runner').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Runner: local ci runner (#1)',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render timeout information', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-timeout').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Timeout: 1m 40s (from runner)',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render coverage', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-coverage').textContent)).toEqual(
+        'Coverage: 20%',
+      );
+    });
+
+    it('should render tags', () => {
+      expect(trimText(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-job-tags').textContent)).toEqual('Tags: tag');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('stages dropdown', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+    });
+
+    describe('while fetching stages', () => {
+      it('renders dropdown with More label', () => {
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-selected-stage').textContent.trim()).toEqual('More');
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('with stages', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        store.dispatch('receiveStagesSuccess', stages);
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+      });
+
+      it('renders first stage as selected', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-selected-stage').textContent.trim()).toEqual(
+          stages[0].name,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('without jobs for stages', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+        store.dispatch('receiveStagesSuccess', stages);
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+      });
+
+      it('does not render job container', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-jobs-container')).toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('with jobs for stages', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        store.dispatch('receiveJobSuccess', job);
+        store.dispatch('receiveStagesSuccess', stages);
+        store.dispatch('receiveJobsForStageSuccess', jobsInStage.latest_statuses);
+        vm = mountComponentWithStore(SidebarComponent, { store });
+      });
+
+      it('renders list of jobs', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-jobs-container')).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js
index 402289345aa..aa6cc0f1b1a 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/stages_dropdown_spec.js
@@ -8,10 +8,25 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-      pipelineId: 28029444,
-      pipelinePath: 'pipeline/28029444',
-      pipelineRef: '50101-truncated-job-information',
-      pipelineRefPath: 'commits/50101-truncated-job-information',
+      pipeline: {
+        id: 28029444,
+        details: {
+          status: {
+            details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines/28029444',
+            group: 'success',
+            has_details: true,
+            icon: 'status_success',
+            label: 'passed',
+            text: 'passed',
+            tooltip: 'passed',
+          },
+        },
+        path: 'pipeline/28029444',
+      },
+      ref: {
+        path: 'commits/50101-truncated-job-information',
+        name: '50101-truncated-job-information',
+      },
       stages: [
         {
           name: 'build',
@@ -20,15 +35,6 @@ describe('Artifacts block', () => {
           name: 'test',
         },
       ],
-      pipelineStatus: {
-        details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines/28029444',
-        group: 'success',
-        has_details: true,
-        icon: 'status_success',
-        label: 'passed',
-        text: 'passed',
-        tooltip: 'passed',
-      },
     });
   });
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/trigger_value_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/trigger_block_spec.js
index 3d41a3cfac1..e1b9898393e 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/trigger_value_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/components/trigger_block_spec.js
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@ describe('Trigger block', () => {
   describe('with short token', () => {
     it('renders short token', () => {
       vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-        shortToken: '0a666b2',
+        trigger: {
+          short_token: '0a666b2',
+        },
       });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-short-token').textContent).toContain('0a666b2');
@@ -22,7 +24,7 @@ describe('Trigger block', () => {
 
   describe('without short token', () => {
     it('does not render short token', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(Component, {});
+      vm = mountComponent(Component, { trigger: {} });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-short-token')).toBeNull();
     });
@@ -32,9 +34,12 @@ describe('Trigger block', () => {
     describe('reveal variables', () => {
       it('reveals variables on click', done => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-          variables: {
-            key: 'value',
-            variable: 'foo',
+          trigger: {
+            short_token: 'bd7e',
+            variables: [
+              { key: 'UPLOAD_TO_GCS', value: 'false', public: false },
+              { key: 'UPLOAD_TO_S3', value: 'true', public: false },
+            ],
           },
         });
 
@@ -44,10 +49,10 @@ describe('Trigger block', () => {
           .$nextTick()
           .then(() => {
             expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables')).not.toBeNull();
-            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('key');
-            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('value');
-            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('variable');
-            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('foo');
+            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('UPLOAD_TO_GCS');
+            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('false');
+            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('UPLOAD_TO_S3');
+            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables').textContent).toContain('true');
           })
           .then(done)
           .catch(done.fail);
@@ -57,7 +62,7 @@ describe('Trigger block', () => {
 
   describe('without variables', () => {
     it('does not render variables', () => {
-      vm = mountComponent(Component);
+      vm = mountComponent(Component, { trigger: {} });
 
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-reveal-variables')).toBeNull();
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-build-variables')).toBeNull();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js
index 8fdd9b309b7..4269b42e8b6 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/mock_data.js
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ export default {
     group: 'success',
     has_details: true,
     details_path: '/root/ci-mock/-/jobs/4757',
-    favicon: '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png',
+    favicon:
+      '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png',
     action: {
       icon: 'retry',
       title: 'Retry',
@@ -37,7 +38,8 @@ export default {
     username: 'root',
     id: 1,
     state: 'active',
-    avatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+    avatar_url:
+      'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
     web_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root',
   },
   erase_path: '/root/ci-mock/-/jobs/4757/erase',
@@ -54,7 +56,8 @@ export default {
       username: 'root',
       id: 1,
       state: 'active',
-      avatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+      avatar_url:
+        'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
       web_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root',
     },
     active: false,
@@ -78,7 +81,8 @@ export default {
         group: 'success',
         has_details: true,
         details_path: '/root/ci-mock/pipelines/140',
-        favicon: '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png',
+        favicon:
+          '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-308b4fc054cdd1b68d0865e6cfb7b02e92e3472f201507418f8eddb74ac11a59.png',
       },
       duration: 6,
       finished_at: '2017-06-01T17:32:00.042Z',
@@ -107,11 +111,14 @@ export default {
         username: 'root',
         id: 1,
         state: 'active',
-        avatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+        avatar_url:
+          'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
         web_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root',
       },
-      author_gravatar_url: 'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
-      commit_url: 'http://localhost:3000/root/ci-mock/commit/c58647773a6b5faf066d4ad6ff2c9fbba5f180f6',
+      author_gravatar_url:
+        'https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/e64c7d89f26bd1972efa854d13d7dd61?s=80\u0026d=identicon',
+      commit_url:
+        'http://localhost:3000/root/ci-mock/commit/c58647773a6b5faf066d4ad6ff2c9fbba5f180f6',
       commit_path: '/root/ci-mock/commit/c58647773a6b5faf066d4ad6ff2c9fbba5f180f6',
     },
   },
@@ -125,3 +132,1029 @@ export default {
   },
   raw_path: '/root/ci-mock/builds/4757/raw',
 };
+
+export const stages = [
+  {
+    name: 'build',
+    title: 'build: running',
+    groups: [
+      {
+        name: 'build:linux',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_pending',
+          text: 'pending',
+          label: 'pending',
+          group: 'pending',
+          tooltip: 'pending',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/pending_job_empty.svg',
+            size: 'svg-430',
+            title: 'This job has not started yet',
+            content: 'This job is in pending state and is waiting to be picked by a runner',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_pending-5bdf338420e5221ca24353b6bff1c9367189588750632e9a871b7af09ff6a2ae.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'cancel',
+            title: 'Cancel',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 1180,
+            name: 'build:linux',
+            started: false,
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180',
+            cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.229Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.503Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_pending',
+              text: 'pending',
+              label: 'pending',
+              group: 'pending',
+              tooltip: 'pending',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/pending_job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job has not started yet',
+                content: 'This job is in pending state and is waiting to be picked by a runner',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_pending-5bdf338420e5221ca24353b6bff1c9367189588750632e9a871b7af09ff6a2ae.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'cancel',
+                title: 'Cancel',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'build:osx',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: 'passed',
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: 'passed',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+            size: 'svg-430',
+            title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'retry',
+            title: 'Retry',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 444,
+            name: 'build:osx',
+            started: '2018-05-18T05:32:20.655Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+    ],
+    status: {
+      icon: 'status_running',
+      text: 'running',
+      label: 'running',
+      group: 'running',
+      tooltip: 'running',
+      has_details: true,
+      details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build',
+      illustration: null,
+      favicon:
+        '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_running-9c635b2419a8e1ec991c993061b89cc5aefc0743bb238ecd0c381e7741a70e8c.png',
+    },
+    path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build',
+    dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=build',
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'test',
+    title: 'test: passed with warnings',
+    groups: [
+      {
+        name: 'jenkins',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: null,
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: null,
+          has_details: false,
+          details_path: null,
+          illustration: null,
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 459,
+            name: 'jenkins',
+            started: '2018-05-18T09:32:20.658Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/459',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.330Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.330Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: null,
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: null,
+              has_details: false,
+              details_path: null,
+              illustration: null,
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'rspec:linux',
+        size: 3,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: 'passed',
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: 'passed',
+          has_details: false,
+          details_path: null,
+          illustration: null,
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 445,
+            name: 'rspec:linux 0 3',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.655Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.425Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.425Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/445/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+          {
+            id: 446,
+            name: 'rspec:linux 1 3',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.655Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.506Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.506Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/446/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+          {
+            id: 447,
+            name: 'rspec:linux 2 3',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.656Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.572Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.572Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/447/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'rspec:osx',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: 'passed',
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: 'passed',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+            size: 'svg-430',
+            title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'retry',
+            title: 'Retry',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452/retry',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 452,
+            name: 'rspec:osx',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.920Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.920Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/452/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'rspec:windows',
+        size: 3,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: 'passed',
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: 'passed',
+          has_details: false,
+          details_path: null,
+          illustration: null,
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 448,
+            name: 'rspec:windows 0 3',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.656Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.639Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.639Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/448/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+          {
+            id: 449,
+            name: 'rspec:windows 1 3',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.656Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.703Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.703Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/449/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+          {
+            id: 451,
+            name: 'rspec:windows 2 3',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.853Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.853Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/451/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'spinach:linux',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: 'passed',
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: 'passed',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+            size: 'svg-430',
+            title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'retry',
+            title: 'Retry',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453/retry',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 453,
+            name: 'spinach:linux',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.993Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.993Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/453/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'spinach:osx',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_warning',
+          text: 'failed',
+          label: 'failed (allowed to fail)',
+          group: 'failed_with_warnings',
+          tooltip: 'failed - (unknown failure) (allowed to fail)',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+            size: 'svg-430',
+            title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_failed-41304d7f7e3828808b0c26771f0309e55296819a9beea3ea9fbf6689d9857c12.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'retry',
+            title: 'Retry',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454/retry',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 454,
+            name: 'spinach:osx',
+            started: '2018-05-18T07:32:20.657Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.053Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.053Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_warning',
+              text: 'failed',
+              label: 'failed (allowed to fail)',
+              group: 'failed_with_warnings',
+              tooltip: 'failed - (unknown failure) (allowed to fail)',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_failed-41304d7f7e3828808b0c26771f0309e55296819a9beea3ea9fbf6689d9857c12.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/454/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+            callout_message: 'There is an unknown failure, please try again',
+            recoverable: true,
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+    ],
+    status: {
+      icon: 'status_warning',
+      text: 'passed',
+      label: 'passed with warnings',
+      group: 'success_with_warnings',
+      tooltip: 'passed',
+      has_details: true,
+      details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#test',
+      illustration: null,
+      favicon:
+        '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+    },
+    path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#test',
+    dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=test',
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'deploy',
+    title: 'deploy: running',
+    groups: [
+      {
+        name: 'production',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_created',
+          text: 'created',
+          label: 'created',
+          group: 'created',
+          tooltip: 'created',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg',
+            size: 'svg-306',
+            title: 'This job has not been triggered yet',
+            content:
+              'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'cancel',
+            title: 'Cancel',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457/cancel',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 457,
+            name: 'production',
+            started: false,
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457',
+            cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457/cancel',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.259Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.454Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_created',
+              text: 'created',
+              label: 'created',
+              group: 'created',
+              tooltip: 'created',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg',
+                size: 'svg-306',
+                title: 'This job has not been triggered yet',
+                content:
+                  'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'cancel',
+                title: 'Cancel',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/457/cancel',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'staging',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_success',
+          text: 'passed',
+          label: 'passed',
+          group: 'success',
+          tooltip: 'passed',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+            size: 'svg-430',
+            title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'retry',
+            title: 'Retry',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455/retry',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 455,
+            name: 'staging',
+            started: '2018-05-18T09:32:20.658Z',
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455',
+            retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455/retry',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.119Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.119Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_success',
+              text: 'passed',
+              label: 'passed',
+              group: 'success',
+              tooltip: 'passed',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+                size: 'svg-430',
+                title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'retry',
+                title: 'Retry',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/455/retry',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+      {
+        name: 'stop staging',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_created',
+          text: 'created',
+          label: 'created',
+          group: 'created',
+          tooltip: 'created',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg',
+            size: 'svg-306',
+            title: 'This job has not been triggered yet',
+            content:
+              'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'cancel',
+            title: 'Cancel',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456/cancel',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 456,
+            name: 'stop staging',
+            started: false,
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456',
+            cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456/cancel',
+            playable: false,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.205Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.396Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_created',
+              text: 'created',
+              label: 'created',
+              group: 'created',
+              tooltip: 'created',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/job_not_triggered.svg',
+                size: 'svg-306',
+                title: 'This job has not been triggered yet',
+                content:
+                  'This job depends on upstream jobs that need to succeed in order for this job to be triggered',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_created-4b975aa976d24e5a3ea7cd9a5713e6ce2cd9afd08b910415e96675de35f64955.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'cancel',
+                title: 'Cancel',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/456/cancel',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+    ],
+    status: {
+      icon: 'status_running',
+      text: 'running',
+      label: 'running',
+      group: 'running',
+      tooltip: 'running',
+      has_details: true,
+      details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#deploy',
+      illustration: null,
+      favicon:
+        '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_running-9c635b2419a8e1ec991c993061b89cc5aefc0743bb238ecd0c381e7741a70e8c.png',
+    },
+    path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#deploy',
+    dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=deploy',
+  },
+  {
+    name: 'notify',
+    title: 'notify: manual action',
+    groups: [
+      {
+        name: 'slack',
+        size: 1,
+        status: {
+          icon: 'status_manual',
+          text: 'manual',
+          label: 'manual play action',
+          group: 'manual',
+          tooltip: 'manual action',
+          has_details: true,
+          details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458',
+          illustration: {
+            image: 'illustrations/manual_action.svg',
+            size: 'svg-394',
+            title: 'This job requires a manual action',
+            content:
+              'This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments',
+          },
+          favicon:
+            '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_manual-829a0804612cef47d9efc1618dba38325483657c847dba0546c3b9f0295bb36c.png',
+          action: {
+            icon: 'play',
+            title: 'Play',
+            path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458/play',
+            method: 'post',
+          },
+        },
+        jobs: [
+          {
+            id: 458,
+            name: 'slack',
+            started: null,
+            build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458',
+            play_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458/play',
+            playable: true,
+            created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:55.303Z',
+            updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:34:08.535Z',
+            status: {
+              icon: 'status_manual',
+              text: 'manual',
+              label: 'manual play action',
+              group: 'manual',
+              tooltip: 'manual action',
+              has_details: true,
+              details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458',
+              illustration: {
+                image: 'illustrations/manual_action.svg',
+                size: 'svg-394',
+                title: 'This job requires a manual action',
+                content:
+                  'This job depends on a user to trigger its process. Often they are used to deploy code to production environments',
+              },
+              favicon:
+                '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_manual-829a0804612cef47d9efc1618dba38325483657c847dba0546c3b9f0295bb36c.png',
+              action: {
+                icon: 'play',
+                title: 'Play',
+                path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/458/play',
+                method: 'post',
+              },
+            },
+          },
+        ],
+      },
+    ],
+    status: {
+      icon: 'status_manual',
+      text: 'manual',
+      label: 'manual action',
+      group: 'manual',
+      tooltip: 'manual action',
+      has_details: true,
+      details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#notify',
+      illustration: null,
+      favicon:
+        '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_manual-829a0804612cef47d9efc1618dba38325483657c847dba0546c3b9f0295bb36c.png',
+    },
+    path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#notify',
+    dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=notify',
+  },
+];
+
+export const jobsInStage = {
+  name: 'build',
+  title: 'build: running',
+  latest_statuses: [
+    {
+      id: 1180,
+      name: 'build:linux',
+      started: false,
+      build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180',
+      cancel_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel',
+      playable: false,
+      created_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.229Z',
+      updated_at: '2018-09-28T11:09:57.503Z',
+      status: {
+        icon: 'status_pending',
+        text: 'pending',
+        label: 'pending',
+        group: 'pending',
+        tooltip: 'pending',
+        has_details: true,
+        details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180',
+        illustration: {
+          image: 'illustrations/pending_job_empty.svg',
+          size: 'svg-430',
+          title: 'This job has not started yet',
+          content: 'This job is in pending state and is waiting to be picked by a runner',
+        },
+        favicon:
+          '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_pending-5bdf338420e5221ca24353b6bff1c9367189588750632e9a871b7af09ff6a2ae.png',
+        action: {
+          icon: 'cancel',
+          title: 'Cancel',
+          path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/1180/cancel',
+          method: 'post',
+        },
+      },
+    },
+    {
+      id: 444,
+      name: 'build:osx',
+      started: '2018-05-18T05:32:20.655Z',
+      build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444',
+      retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry',
+      playable: false,
+      created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z',
+      updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.364Z',
+      status: {
+        icon: 'status_success',
+        text: 'passed',
+        label: 'passed',
+        group: 'success',
+        tooltip: 'passed',
+        has_details: true,
+        details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444',
+        illustration: {
+          image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+          size: 'svg-430',
+          title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+        },
+        favicon:
+          '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+        action: {
+          icon: 'retry',
+          title: 'Retry',
+          path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/444/retry',
+          method: 'post',
+        },
+      },
+    },
+  ],
+  retried: [
+    {
+      id: 443,
+      name: 'build:linux',
+      started: '2018-05-18T06:32:20.655Z',
+      build_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443',
+      retry_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443/retry',
+      playable: false,
+      created_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.296Z',
+      updated_at: '2018-05-18T15:32:54.296Z',
+      status: {
+        icon: 'status_success',
+        text: 'passed',
+        label: 'passed',
+        group: 'success',
+        tooltip: 'passed (retried)',
+        has_details: true,
+        details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443',
+        illustration: {
+          image: 'illustrations/skipped-job_empty.svg',
+          size: 'svg-430',
+          title: 'This job does not have a trace.',
+        },
+        favicon:
+          '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_success-8451333011eee8ce9f2ab25dc487fe24a8758c694827a582f17f42b0a90446a2.png',
+        action: {
+          icon: 'retry',
+          title: 'Retry',
+          path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/-/jobs/443/retry',
+          method: 'post',
+        },
+      },
+    },
+  ],
+  status: {
+    icon: 'status_running',
+    text: 'running',
+    label: 'running',
+    group: 'running',
+    tooltip: 'running',
+    has_details: true,
+    details_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build',
+    illustration: null,
+    favicon:
+      '/assets/ci_favicons/favicon_status_running-9c635b2419a8e1ec991c993061b89cc5aefc0743bb238ecd0c381e7741a70e8c.png',
+  },
+  path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27#build',
+  dropdown_path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-shell/pipelines/27/stage.json?stage=build',
+};
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5ab1f75d0d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/actions_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,613 @@
+import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
+import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
+import {
+  setJobEndpoint,
+  setTraceEndpoint,
+  setStagesEndpoint,
+  setJobsEndpoint,
+  clearEtagPoll,
+  stopPolling,
+  requestJob,
+  fetchJob,
+  receiveJobSuccess,
+  receiveJobError,
+  scrollTop,
+  scrollBottom,
+  requestTrace,
+  fetchTrace,
+  stopPollingTrace,
+  receiveTraceSuccess,
+  receiveTraceError,
+  fetchFavicon,
+  requestStatusFavicon,
+  receiveStatusFaviconSuccess,
+  requestStatusFaviconError,
+  requestStages,
+  fetchStages,
+  receiveStagesSuccess,
+  receiveStagesError,
+  requestJobsForStage,
+  fetchJobsForStage,
+  receiveJobsForStageSuccess,
+  receiveJobsForStageError,
+} from '~/jobs/store/actions';
+import state from '~/jobs/store/state';
+import * as types from '~/jobs/store/mutation_types';
+import testAction from 'spec/helpers/vuex_action_helper';
+import { TEST_HOST } from 'spec/test_constants';
+
+describe('Job State actions', () => {
+  let mockedState;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    mockedState = state();
+  });
+
+  describe('setJobEndpoint', () => {
+    it('should commit SET_JOB_ENDPOINT mutation', done => {
+      testAction(
+        setJobEndpoint,
+        'job/872324.json',
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.SET_JOB_ENDPOINT, payload: 'job/872324.json' }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('setTraceEndpoint', () => {
+    it('should commit SET_TRACE_ENDPOINT mutation', done => {
+      testAction(
+        setTraceEndpoint,
+        'job/872324/trace.json',
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.SET_TRACE_ENDPOINT, payload: 'job/872324/trace.json' }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('setStagesEndpoint', () => {
+    it('should commit SET_STAGES_ENDPOINT mutation', done => {
+      testAction(
+        setStagesEndpoint,
+        'job/872324/stages.json',
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.SET_STAGES_ENDPOINT, payload: 'job/872324/stages.json' }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('setJobsEndpoint', () => {
+    it('should commit SET_JOBS_ENDPOINT mutation', done => {
+      testAction(
+        setJobsEndpoint,
+        'job/872324/stages/build.json',
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.SET_JOBS_ENDPOINT, payload: 'job/872324/stages/build.json' }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('requestJob', () => {
+    it('should commit REQUEST_JOB mutation', done => {
+      testAction(requestJob, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.REQUEST_JOB }], [], done);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('fetchJob', () => {
+    let mock;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockedState.jobEndpoint = `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`;
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
+      stopPolling();
+      clearEtagPoll();
+    });
+
+    describe('success', () => {
+      it('dispatches requestJob and receiveJobSuccess ', done => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`).replyOnce(200, { id: 121212, name: 'karma' });
+
+        testAction(
+          fetchJob,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestJob',
+            },
+            {
+              payload: { id: 121212, name: 'karma' },
+              type: 'receiveJobSuccess',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('error', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`).reply(500);
+      });
+
+      it('dispatches requestJob and receiveJobError ', done => {
+        testAction(
+          fetchJob,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestJob',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'receiveJobError',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveJobSuccess', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_JOB_SUCCESS mutation', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveJobSuccess,
+        { id: 121232132 },
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_JOB_SUCCESS, payload: { id: 121232132 } }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveJobError', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_JOB_ERROR mutation', done => {
+      testAction(receiveJobError, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.RECEIVE_JOB_ERROR }], [], done);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('scrollTop', () => {
+    it('should commit SCROLL_TO_TOP mutation', done => {
+      testAction(scrollTop, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.SCROLL_TO_TOP }], [], done);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('scrollBottom', () => {
+    it('should commit SCROLL_TO_BOTTOM mutation', done => {
+      testAction(scrollBottom, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.SCROLL_TO_BOTTOM }], [], done);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('requestTrace', () => {
+    it('should commit REQUEST_TRACE mutation', done => {
+      testAction(requestTrace, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.REQUEST_TRACE }], [], done);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('fetchTrace', () => {
+    let mock;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockedState.traceEndpoint = `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint`;
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
+      stopPolling();
+      clearEtagPoll();
+    });
+
+    describe('success', () => {
+      it('dispatches requestTrace, fetchFavicon, receiveTraceSuccess and stopPollingTrace when job is complete', done => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint/trace.json`).replyOnce(200, {
+          html: 'I, [2018-08-17T22:57:45.707325 #1841]  INFO -- :',
+          complete: true,
+        });
+
+        testAction(
+          fetchTrace,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestTrace',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'fetchFavicon',
+            },
+            {
+              payload: {
+                html: 'I, [2018-08-17T22:57:45.707325 #1841]  INFO -- :',
+                complete: true,
+              },
+              type: 'receiveTraceSuccess',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'stopPollingTrace',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('error', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint/trace.json`).reply(500);
+      });
+
+      it('dispatches requestTrace and receiveTraceError ', done => {
+        testAction(
+          fetchTrace,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestTrace',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'receiveTraceError',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('stopPollingTrace', () => {
+    it('should commit STOP_POLLING_TRACE mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        stopPollingTrace,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.STOP_POLLING_TRACE }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveTraceSuccess', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveTraceSuccess,
+        'hello world',
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS, payload: 'hello world' }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveTraceError', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_TRACE_ERROR mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveTraceError,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_TRACE_ERROR }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('fetchFavicon', () => {
+    let mock;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockedState.pagePath = `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint`;
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
+    });
+
+    describe('success', () => {
+      it('dispatches requestStatusFavicon and receiveStatusFaviconSuccess ', done => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint/status.json`).replyOnce(200);
+
+        testAction(
+          fetchFavicon,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestStatusFavicon',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'receiveStatusFaviconSuccess',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('error', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint/status.json`).replyOnce(500);
+      });
+
+      it('dispatches requestStatusFavicon and requestStatusFaviconError ', done => {
+        testAction(
+          fetchFavicon,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestStatusFavicon',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'requestStatusFaviconError',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('requestStatusFavicon', () => {
+    it('should commit REQUEST_STATUS_FAVICON mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        requestStatusFavicon,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.REQUEST_STATUS_FAVICON }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveStatusFaviconSuccess', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_SUCCESS mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveStatusFaviconSuccess,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_SUCCESS }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('requestStatusFaviconError', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_ERROR mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        requestStatusFaviconError,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_ERROR }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('requestStages', () => {
+    it('should commit REQUEST_STAGES mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(requestStages, null, mockedState, [{ type: types.REQUEST_STAGES }], [], done);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('fetchStages', () => {
+    let mock;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mockedState.job.pipeline = {
+        path: `${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json/stages`,
+      };
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
+    });
+
+    describe('success', () => {
+      it('dispatches requestStages and receiveStagesSuccess, fetchJobsForStage ', done => {
+        mock
+          .onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json/stages`)
+          .replyOnce(200, { details: { stages: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }] } });
+
+        testAction(
+          fetchStages,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestStages',
+            },
+            {
+              payload: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }],
+              type: 'receiveStagesSuccess',
+            },
+            {
+              payload: { id: 121212, name: 'build' },
+              type: 'fetchJobsForStage',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('error', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/endpoint.json`).reply(500);
+      });
+
+      it('dispatches requestStages and receiveStagesError ', done => {
+        testAction(
+          fetchStages,
+          null,
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestStages',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'receiveStagesError',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveStagesSuccess', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_STAGES_SUCCESS mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveStagesSuccess,
+        {},
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_STAGES_SUCCESS, payload: {} }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveStagesError', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_STAGES_ERROR mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveStagesError,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_STAGES_ERROR }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('requestJobsForStage', () => {
+    it('should commit REQUEST_JOBS_FOR_STAGE mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        requestJobsForStage,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.REQUEST_JOBS_FOR_STAGE }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('fetchJobsForStage', () => {
+    let mock;
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
+    });
+
+    describe('success', () => {
+      it('dispatches requestJobsForStage and receiveJobsForStageSuccess ', done => {
+        mock
+          .onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json`)
+          .replyOnce(200, { latest_statuses: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }], retried: [] });
+
+        testAction(
+          fetchJobsForStage,
+          { dropdown_path: `${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json` },
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestJobsForStage',
+            },
+            {
+              payload: [{ id: 121212, name: 'build' }],
+              type: 'receiveJobsForStageSuccess',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('error', () => {
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        mock.onGet(`${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json`).reply(500);
+      });
+
+      it('dispatches requestJobsForStage and receiveJobsForStageError', done => {
+        testAction(
+          fetchJobsForStage,
+          { dropdown_path: `${TEST_HOST}/jobs.json` },
+          mockedState,
+          [],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'requestJobsForStage',
+            },
+            {
+              type: 'receiveJobsForStageError',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveJobsForStageSuccess', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_SUCCESS mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveJobsForStageSuccess,
+        [{ id: 121212, name: 'karma' }],
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_SUCCESS, payload: [{ id: 121212, name: 'karma' }] }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('receiveJobsForStageError', () => {
+    it('should commit RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_ERROR mutation ', done => {
+      testAction(
+        receiveJobsForStageError,
+        null,
+        mockedState,
+        [{ type: types.RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_ERROR }],
+        [],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/getters_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/getters_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..160b2f4b34a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/getters_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,213 @@
+import * as getters from '~/jobs/store/getters';
+import state from '~/jobs/store/state';
+
+describe('Job Store Getters', () => {
+  let localState;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    localState = state();
+  });
+
+  describe('headerActions', () => {
+    describe('with new issue path', () => {
+      it('returns an array with action to create a new issue', () => {
+        localState.job.new_issue_path = 'issues/new';
+
+        expect(getters.headerActions(localState)).toEqual([
+          {
+            label: 'New issue',
+            path: localState.job.new_issue_path,
+            cssClass:
+              'js-new-issue btn btn-success btn-inverted d-none d-md-block d-lg-block d-xl-block',
+            type: 'link',
+          },
+        ]);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('without new issue path', () => {
+      it('returns an empty array', () => {
+        expect(getters.headerActions(localState)).toEqual([]);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('headerTime', () => {
+    describe('when the job has started key', () => {
+      it('returns started key', () => {
+        const started = '2018-08-31T16:20:49.023Z';
+        localState.job.started = started;
+
+        expect(getters.headerTime(localState)).toEqual(started);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when the job does not have started key', () => {
+      it('returns created_at key', () => {
+        const created = '2018-08-31T16:20:49.023Z';
+        localState.job.created_at = created;
+        expect(getters.headerTime(localState)).toEqual(created);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('shouldRenderCalloutMessage', () => {
+    describe('with status and callout message', () => {
+      it('returns true', () => {
+        localState.job.callout_message = 'Callout message';
+        localState.job.status = { icon: 'passed' };
+
+        expect(getters.shouldRenderCalloutMessage(localState)).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('without status & with callout message', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.callout_message = 'Callout message';
+        expect(getters.shouldRenderCalloutMessage(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('with status & without callout message', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.status = { icon: 'passed' };
+
+        expect(getters.shouldRenderCalloutMessage(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('jobHasStarted', () => {
+    describe('when started equals false', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.started = false;
+        expect(getters.jobHasStarted(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when started equals string', () => {
+      it('returns true', () => {
+        localState.job.started = '2018-08-31T16:20:49.023Z';
+        expect(getters.jobHasStarted(localState)).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('hasEnvironment', () => {
+    describe('without `deployment_status`', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        expect(getters.hasEnvironment(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('with an empty object for `deployment_status`', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.deployment_status = {};
+        expect(getters.hasEnvironment(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when `deployment_status` is defined and not empty', () => {
+      it('returns true', () => {
+        localState.job.deployment_status = {
+          status: 'creating',
+          environment: {
+            last_deployment: {},
+          },
+        };
+
+        expect(getters.hasEnvironment(localState)).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('hasTrace', () => {
+    describe('when has_trace is true', () => {
+      it('returns true', () => {
+        localState.job.has_trace = true;
+        localState.job.status = {};
+
+        expect(getters.hasTrace(localState)).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when job is running', () => {
+      it('returns true', () => {
+        localState.job.has_trace = false;
+        localState.job.status = { group: 'running' };
+
+        expect(getters.hasTrace(localState)).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when has_trace is false and job is not running', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.has_trace = false;
+        localState.job.status = { group: 'pending' };
+
+        expect(getters.hasTrace(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('emptyStateIllustration', () => {
+    describe('with defined illustration', () => {
+      it('returns the state illustration object', () => {
+        localState.job.status = {
+          illustration: {
+            path: 'foo',
+          },
+        };
+
+        expect(getters.emptyStateIllustration(localState)).toEqual({ path: 'foo' });
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when illustration is not defined', () => {
+      it('returns an empty object', () => {
+        expect(getters.emptyStateIllustration(localState)).toEqual({});
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('isJobStuck', () => {
+    describe('when job is pending and runners are not available', () => {
+      it('returns true', () => {
+        localState.job.status = {
+          group: 'pending',
+        };
+        localState.job.runners = {
+          available: false,
+        };
+
+        expect(getters.isJobStuck(localState)).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when job is not pending', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.status = {
+          group: 'running',
+        };
+        localState.job.runners = {
+          available: false,
+        };
+
+        expect(getters.isJobStuck(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when runners are available', () => {
+      it('returns false', () => {
+        localState.job.status = {
+          group: 'pending',
+        };
+        localState.job.runners = {
+          available: true,
+        };
+
+        expect(getters.isJobStuck(localState)).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/mutations_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/mutations_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9ba543d32a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/jobs/store/mutations_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+import state from '~/jobs/store/state';
+import mutations from '~/jobs/store/mutations';
+import * as types from '~/jobs/store/mutation_types';
+
+describe('Jobs Store Mutations', () => {
+  let stateCopy;
+
+  const html =
+    'I, [2018-08-17T22:57:45.707325 #1841]  INFO -- : Writing /builds/ab89e95b0fa0b9272ea0c797b76908f24d36992630e9325273a4ce3.png<br>I';
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    stateCopy = state();
+  });
+
+  describe('SET_JOB_ENDPOINT', () => {
+    it('should set jobEndpoint', () => {
+      mutations[types.SET_JOB_ENDPOINT](stateCopy, 'job/21312321.json');
+      expect(stateCopy.jobEndpoint).toEqual('job/21312321.json');
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('REQUEST_STATUS_FAVICON', () => {
+    it('should set fetchingStatusFavicon to true', () => {
+      mutations[types.REQUEST_STATUS_FAVICON](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.fetchingStatusFavicon).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_SUCCESS', () => {
+    it('should set fetchingStatusFavicon to false', () => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_SUCCESS](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.fetchingStatusFavicon).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_ERROR', () => {
+    it('should set fetchingStatusFavicon to false', () => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_STATUS_FAVICON_ERROR](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.fetchingStatusFavicon).toEqual(false);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS', () => {
+    describe('when trace has state', () => {
+      it('sets traceState', () => {
+        const stateLog =
+          'eyJvZmZzZXQiOjczNDQ1MSwibl9vcGVuX3RhZ3MiOjAsImZnX2NvbG9yIjpudWxsLCJiZ19jb2xvciI6bnVsbCwic3R5bGVfbWFzayI6MH0=';
+        mutations[types.RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS](stateCopy, {
+          state: stateLog,
+        });
+        expect(stateCopy.traceState).toEqual(stateLog);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when traceSize is smaller than the total size', () => {
+      it('sets isTraceSizeVisible to true', () => {
+        mutations[types.RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS](stateCopy, { total: 51184600, size: 1231 });
+
+        expect(stateCopy.isTraceSizeVisible).toEqual(true);
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('when traceSize is bigger than the total size', () => {
+      it('sets isTraceSizeVisible to false', () => {
+        const copy = Object.assign({}, stateCopy, { traceSize: 5118460, size: 2321312 });
+
+        mutations[types.RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS](copy, { total: 511846 });
+
+        expect(copy.isTraceSizeVisible).toEqual(false);
+      });
+    });
+
+    it('sets trace, trace size and isTraceComplete', () => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_TRACE_SUCCESS](stateCopy, {
+        append: true,
+        html,
+        size: 511846,
+        complete: true,
+      });
+      expect(stateCopy.trace).toEqual(html);
+      expect(stateCopy.traceSize).toEqual(511846);
+      expect(stateCopy.isTraceComplete).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('STOP_POLLING_TRACE', () => {
+    it('sets isTraceComplete to true', () => {
+      mutations[types.STOP_POLLING_TRACE](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.isTraceComplete).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_TRACE_ERROR', () => {
+    it('resets trace state and sets error to true', () => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_TRACE_ERROR](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingTrace).toEqual(false);
+      expect(stateCopy.isTraceComplete).toEqual(true);
+      expect(stateCopy.hasTraceError).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('REQUEST_JOB', () => {
+    it('sets isLoading to true', () => {
+      mutations[types.REQUEST_JOB](stateCopy);
+
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoading).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_JOB_SUCCESS', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_JOB_SUCCESS](stateCopy, { id: 1312321 });
+    });
+
+    it('sets is loading to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoading).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('sets hasError to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.hasError).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('sets job data', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.job).toEqual({ id: 1312321 });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_JOB_ERROR', () => {
+    it('resets job data', () => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_JOB_ERROR](stateCopy);
+
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoading).toEqual(false);
+      expect(stateCopy.hasError).toEqual(true);
+      expect(stateCopy.job).toEqual({});
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('SCROLL_TO_TOP', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.SCROLL_TO_TOP](stateCopy);
+    });
+
+    it('sets isTraceScrolledToBottom to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isTraceScrolledToBottom).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('sets hasBeenScrolled to true', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.hasBeenScrolled).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('SCROLL_TO_BOTTOM', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.SCROLL_TO_BOTTOM](stateCopy);
+    });
+
+    it('sets isTraceScrolledToBottom to true', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isTraceScrolledToBottom).toEqual(true);
+    });
+
+    it('sets hasBeenScrolled to true', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.hasBeenScrolled).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('REQUEST_STAGES', () => {
+    it('sets isLoadingStages to true', () => {
+      mutations[types.REQUEST_STAGES](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingStages).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_STAGES_SUCCESS', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_STAGES_SUCCESS](stateCopy, [{ name: 'build' }]);
+    });
+
+    it('sets isLoadingStages to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingStages).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('sets stages', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.stages).toEqual([{ name: 'build' }]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_STAGES_ERROR', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_STAGES_ERROR](stateCopy);
+    });
+
+    it('sets isLoadingStages to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingStages).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('resets stages', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.stages).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('REQUEST_JOBS_FOR_STAGE', () => {
+    it('sets isLoadingStages to true', () => {
+      mutations[types.REQUEST_JOBS_FOR_STAGE](stateCopy);
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingJobs).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_SUCCESS', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_SUCCESS](stateCopy, [{ name: 'karma' }]);
+    });
+
+    it('sets isLoadingJobs to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingJobs).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('sets jobs', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.jobs).toEqual([{ name: 'karma' }]);
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_ERROR', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mutations[types.RECEIVE_JOBS_FOR_STAGE_ERROR](stateCopy);
+    });
+
+    it('sets isLoadingJobs to false', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.isLoadingJobs).toEqual(false);
+    });
+
+    it('resets jobs', () => {
+      expect(stateCopy.jobs).toEqual([]);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js
index 1d81e4e2d1a..eac4756e8a9 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lazy_loader_spec.js
@@ -1,57 +1,214 @@
 import LazyLoader from '~/lazy_loader';
+import { TEST_HOST } from './test_constants';
 
 let lazyLoader = null;
 
-describe('LazyLoader', function () {
+const execImmediately = callback => {
+  callback();
+};
+
+describe('LazyLoader', function() {
   preloadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw');
 
-  beforeEach(function () {
-    loadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw');
-    lazyLoader = new LazyLoader({
-      observerNode: 'body',
+  describe('with IntersectionObserver disabled', () => {
+    beforeEach(function() {
+      loadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw');
+
+      lazyLoader = new LazyLoader({
+        observerNode: 'foobar',
+      });
+
+      spyOn(LazyLoader, 'supportsIntersectionObserver').and.callFake(() => false);
+
+      spyOn(LazyLoader, 'loadImage').and.callThrough();
+
+      spyOn(window, 'requestAnimationFrame').and.callFake(execImmediately);
+      spyOn(window, 'requestIdleCallback').and.callFake(execImmediately);
+
+      // Doing everything that happens normally in onload
+      lazyLoader.register();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      lazyLoader.unregister();
+    });
+
+    it('should copy value from data-src to src for img 1', function(done) {
+      const img = document.querySelectorAll('img[data-src]')[0];
+      const originalDataSrc = img.getAttribute('data-src');
+      img.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(img.getAttribute('src')).toBe(originalDataSrc);
+        expect(img).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
+    });
+
+    it('should lazy load dynamically added data-src images', function(done) {
+      const newImg = document.createElement('img');
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
+      newImg.className = 'lazy';
+      newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath);
+      document.body.appendChild(newImg);
+      newImg.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(newImg.getAttribute('src')).toBe(testPath);
+        expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
+    });
+
+    it('should not alter normal images', function(done) {
+      const newImg = document.createElement('img');
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
+      newImg.setAttribute('src', testPath);
+      document.body.appendChild(newImg);
+      newImg.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
+    });
+
+    it('should not load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off', done => {
+      lazyLoader.stopContentObserver();
+
+      const newImg = document.createElement('img');
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
+      newImg.className = 'lazy';
+      newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath);
+      document.body.appendChild(newImg);
+      newImg.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
+    });
+
+    it('should load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off and on again', done => {
+      lazyLoader.stopContentObserver();
+      lazyLoader.startContentObserver();
+
+      const newImg = document.createElement('img');
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
+      newImg.className = 'lazy';
+      newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath);
+      document.body.appendChild(newImg);
+      newImg.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
     });
-    // Doing everything that happens normally in onload
-    lazyLoader.loadCheck();
   });
-  describe('behavior', function () {
-    it('should copy value from data-src to src for img 1', function (done) {
+
+  describe('with IntersectionObserver enabled', () => {
+    beforeEach(function() {
+      loadFixtures('issues/issue_with_comment.html.raw');
+
+      lazyLoader = new LazyLoader({
+        observerNode: 'foobar',
+      });
+
+      spyOn(LazyLoader, 'loadImage').and.callThrough();
+
+      spyOn(window, 'requestAnimationFrame').and.callFake(execImmediately);
+      spyOn(window, 'requestIdleCallback').and.callFake(execImmediately);
+
+      // Doing everything that happens normally in onload
+      lazyLoader.register();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      lazyLoader.unregister();
+    });
+
+    it('should copy value from data-src to src for img 1', function(done) {
       const img = document.querySelectorAll('img[data-src]')[0];
       const originalDataSrc = img.getAttribute('data-src');
       img.scrollIntoView();
 
       setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled();
         expect(img.getAttribute('src')).toBe(originalDataSrc);
-        expect(document.getElementsByClassName('js-lazy-loaded').length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        expect(img).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
         done();
-      }, 100);
+      }, 50);
     });
 
-    it('should lazy load dynamically added data-src images', function (done) {
+    it('should lazy load dynamically added data-src images', function(done) {
       const newImg = document.createElement('img');
-      const testPath = '/img/testimg.png';
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
       newImg.className = 'lazy';
       newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath);
       document.body.appendChild(newImg);
       newImg.scrollIntoView();
 
       setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled();
         expect(newImg.getAttribute('src')).toBe(testPath);
-        expect(document.getElementsByClassName('js-lazy-loaded').length).toBeGreaterThan(0);
+        expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
         done();
-      }, 100);
+      }, 50);
     });
 
-    it('should not alter normal images', function (done) {
+    it('should not alter normal images', function(done) {
       const newImg = document.createElement('img');
-      const testPath = '/img/testimg.png';
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
       newImg.setAttribute('src', testPath);
       document.body.appendChild(newImg);
       newImg.scrollIntoView();
 
       setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
         expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
         done();
-      }, 100);
+      }, 50);
+    });
+
+    it('should not load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off', done => {
+      lazyLoader.stopContentObserver();
+
+      const newImg = document.createElement('img');
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
+      newImg.className = 'lazy';
+      newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath);
+      document.body.appendChild(newImg);
+      newImg.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(newImg).not.toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
+    });
+
+    it('should load dynamically added pictures if content observer is turned off and on again', done => {
+      lazyLoader.stopContentObserver();
+      lazyLoader.startContentObserver();
+
+      const newImg = document.createElement('img');
+      const testPath = `${TEST_HOST}/img/testimg.png`;
+      newImg.className = 'lazy';
+      newImg.setAttribute('data-src', testPath);
+      document.body.appendChild(newImg);
+      newImg.scrollIntoView();
+
+      setTimeout(() => {
+        expect(LazyLoader.loadImage).toHaveBeenCalled();
+        expect(newImg).toHaveClass('js-lazy-loaded');
+        done();
+      }, 50);
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js
index 71b26a315af..28151c7e658 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/common_utils_spec.js
@@ -29,24 +29,46 @@ describe('common_utils', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('getUrlParamsArray', () => {
-    it('should return params array', () => {
-      expect(commonUtils.getUrlParamsArray() instanceof Array).toBe(true);
+  describe('urlParamsToArray', () => {
+    it('returns empty array for empty querystring', () => {
+      expect(commonUtils.urlParamsToArray('')).toEqual([]);
+    });
+
+    it('should decode params', () => {
+      expect(
+        commonUtils.urlParamsToArray('?label_name%5B%5D=test')[0],
+      ).toBe('label_name[]=test');
     });
 
     it('should remove the question mark from the search params', () => {
-      const paramsArray = commonUtils.getUrlParamsArray();
+      const paramsArray = commonUtils.urlParamsToArray('?test=thing');
       expect(paramsArray[0][0] !== '?').toBe(true);
     });
+  });
 
-    it('should decode params', () => {
-      window.history.pushState('', '', '?label_name%5B%5D=test');
+  describe('urlParamsToObject', () => {
+    it('parses path for label with trailing +', () => {
+      expect(
+        commonUtils.urlParamsToObject('label_name[]=label%2B', {}),
+      ).toEqual({
+        label_name: ['label+'],
+      });
+    });
 
+    it('parses path for milestone with trailing +', () => {
       expect(
-        commonUtils.getUrlParamsArray()[0],
-      ).toBe('label_name[]=test');
+        commonUtils.urlParamsToObject('milestone_title=A%2B', {}),
+      ).toEqual({
+        milestone_title: 'A+',
+      });
+    });
 
-      window.history.pushState('', '', '?');
+    it('parses path for search terms with spaces', () => {
+      expect(
+        commonUtils.urlParamsToObject('search=two+words', {}),
+      ).toEqual({
+        search: 'two words',
+      });
     });
   });
 
@@ -403,6 +425,7 @@ describe('common_utils', () => {
     afterEach(() => {
       document.body.removeChild(document.getElementById('favicon'));
     });
+
     it('should set page favicon to provided favicon', () => {
       const faviconPath = '//custom_favicon';
       commonUtils.setFavicon(faviconPath);
@@ -479,17 +502,14 @@ describe('common_utils', () => {
     });
 
     it('should reset favicon in case of error', (done) => {
-      mock.onGet(BUILD_URL).networkError();
+      mock.onGet(BUILD_URL).replyOnce(500);
 
       commonUtils.setCiStatusFavicon(BUILD_URL)
-        .then(() => {
+        .catch(() => {
           const favicon = document.getElementById('favicon');
           expect(favicon.getAttribute('href')).toEqual(faviconDataUrl);
           done();
-        })
-        // Error is already caught in catch() block of setCiStatusFavicon,
-        // It won't throw another error for us to catch
-        .catch(done.fail);
+        });
     });
 
     it('should set page favicon to CI status favicon based on provided status', (done) => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/mock_data.js
index fd0d62b751f..93d0d6259b9 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/mock_data.js
@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@ export const faviconDataUrl = '
 
 export const overlayDataUrl = '';
 
-export const faviconWithOverlayDataUrl = '';
+export const faviconWithOverlayDataUrl = '';
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_dashboard_navigation_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/navigation_utility_spec.js
index 7cb201e01d8..be620e4a27c 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_dashboard_navigation_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/navigation_utility_spec.js
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-import findAndFollowLink from '~/shortcuts_dashboard_navigation';
+import findAndFollowLink from '~/lib/utils/navigation_utility';
 
 describe('findAndFollowLink', () => {
   it('visits a link when the selector exists', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/poll_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/poll_spec.js
index 523f4997bc0..b28a052902e 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/poll_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/poll_spec.js
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+/* eslint-disable jasmine/no-unsafe-spy */
+
 import Poll from '~/lib/utils/poll';
 import { successCodes } from '~/lib/utils/http_status';
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js
index ca0e7c395a0..043dd018e0c 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_markdown_spec.js
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ describe('init markdown', () => {
       textArea.selectionStart = 0;
       textArea.selectionEnd = 0;
 
-      insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false);
+      insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false });
 
       expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}* `);
     });
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ describe('init markdown', () => {
       textArea.value = initialValue;
       textArea.setSelectionRange(initialValue.length, initialValue.length);
 
-      insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false);
+      insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false });
 
       expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}\n* `);
     });
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ describe('init markdown', () => {
       textArea.value = initialValue;
       textArea.setSelectionRange(initialValue.length, initialValue.length);
 
-      insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false);
+      insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false });
 
       expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}* `);
     });
@@ -54,9 +54,70 @@ describe('init markdown', () => {
       textArea.value = initialValue;
       textArea.setSelectionRange(initialValue.length, initialValue.length);
 
-      insertMarkdownText(textArea, textArea.value, '*', null, '', false);
+      insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected: '', wrap: false });
 
       expect(textArea.value).toEqual(`${initialValue}* `);
     });
   });
+
+  describe('with selection', () => {
+    const text = 'initial selected value';
+    const selected = 'selected';
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      textArea.value = text;
+      const selectedIndex = text.indexOf(selected);
+      textArea.setSelectionRange(selectedIndex, selectedIndex + selected.length);
+    });
+
+    it('applies the tag to the selected value', () => {
+      insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '*', blockTag: null, selected, wrap: true });
+
+      expect(textArea.value).toEqual(text.replace(selected, `*${selected}*`));
+    });
+
+    it('replaces the placeholder in the tag', () => {
+      insertMarkdownText({ textArea, text: textArea.value, tag: '[{text}](url)', blockTag: null, selected, wrap: false });
+
+      expect(textArea.value).toEqual(text.replace(selected, `[${selected}](url)`));
+    });
+
+    describe('and text to be selected', () => {
+      const tag = '[{text}](url)';
+      const select = 'url';
+
+      it('selects the text', () => {
+        insertMarkdownText({ textArea,
+          text: textArea.value,
+          tag,
+          blockTag: null,
+          selected,
+          wrap: false,
+          select });
+
+        const expectedText = text.replace(selected, `[${selected}](url)`);
+        expect(textArea.value).toEqual(expectedText);
+        expect(textArea.selectionStart).toEqual(expectedText.indexOf(select));
+        expect(textArea.selectionEnd).toEqual(expectedText.indexOf(select) + select.length);
+      });
+
+      it('selects the right text when multiple tags are present', () => {
+        const initialValue = `${tag} ${tag} ${selected}`;
+        textArea.value = initialValue;
+        const selectedIndex = initialValue.indexOf(selected);
+        textArea.setSelectionRange(selectedIndex, selectedIndex + selected.length);
+        insertMarkdownText({ textArea,
+          text: textArea.value,
+          tag,
+          blockTag: null,
+          selected,
+          wrap: false,
+          select });
+
+        const expectedText = initialValue.replace(selected, `[${selected}](url)`);
+        expect(textArea.value).toEqual(expectedText);
+        expect(textArea.selectionStart).toEqual(expectedText.lastIndexOf(select));
+        expect(textArea.selectionEnd).toEqual(expectedText.lastIndexOf(select) + select.length);
+      });
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_utility_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_utility_spec.js
index d60485b1308..ac3270baef5 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_utility_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/lib/utils/text_utility_spec.js
@@ -63,6 +63,12 @@ describe('text_utility', () => {
     });
   });
 
+  describe('slugifyWithHyphens', () => {
+    it('should replaces whitespaces with hyphens and convert to lower case', () => {
+      expect(textUtils.slugifyWithHyphens('My Input String')).toEqual('my-input-string');
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('stripHtml', () => {
     it('replaces html tag with the default replacement', () => {
       expect(textUtils.stripHtml('This is a text with <p>html</p>.')).toEqual(
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/dashboard_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/dashboard_spec.js
index 997163c7602..732c37a24bf 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/dashboard_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/dashboard_spec.js
@@ -4,28 +4,33 @@ import Dashboard from '~/monitoring/components/dashboard.vue';
 import axios from '~/lib/utils/axios_utils';
 import { metricsGroupsAPIResponse, mockApiEndpoint, environmentData } from './mock_data';
 
+const propsData = {
+  hasMetrics: false,
+  documentationPath: '/path/to/docs',
+  settingsPath: '/path/to/settings',
+  clustersPath: '/path/to/clusters',
+  tagsPath: '/path/to/tags',
+  projectPath: '/path/to/project',
+  metricsEndpoint: mockApiEndpoint,
+  deploymentEndpoint: null,
+  emptyGettingStartedSvgPath: '/path/to/getting-started.svg',
+  emptyLoadingSvgPath: '/path/to/loading.svg',
+  emptyNoDataSvgPath: '/path/to/no-data.svg',
+  emptyUnableToConnectSvgPath: '/path/to/unable-to-connect.svg',
+  environmentsEndpoint: '/root/hello-prometheus/environments/35',
+  currentEnvironmentName: 'production',
+};
+
+export default propsData;
+
 describe('Dashboard', () => {
   let DashboardComponent;
 
-  const propsData = {
-    hasMetrics: false,
-    documentationPath: '/path/to/docs',
-    settingsPath: '/path/to/settings',
-    clustersPath: '/path/to/clusters',
-    tagsPath: '/path/to/tags',
-    projectPath: '/path/to/project',
-    metricsEndpoint: mockApiEndpoint,
-    deploymentEndpoint: null,
-    emptyGettingStartedSvgPath: '/path/to/getting-started.svg',
-    emptyLoadingSvgPath: '/path/to/loading.svg',
-    emptyNoDataSvgPath: '/path/to/no-data.svg',
-    emptyUnableToConnectSvgPath: '/path/to/unable-to-connect.svg',
-    environmentsEndpoint: '/root/hello-prometheus/environments/35',
-    currentEnvironmentName: 'production',
-  };
-
   beforeEach(() => {
-    setFixtures('<div class="prometheus-graphs"></div>');
+    setFixtures(`
+      <div class="prometheus-graphs"></div>
+      <div class="nav-sidebar"></div>
+    `);
     DashboardComponent = Vue.extend(Dashboard);
   });
 
@@ -127,4 +132,41 @@ describe('Dashboard', () => {
       });
     });
   });
+
+  describe('when the window resizes', () => {
+    let mock;
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      mock = new MockAdapter(axios);
+      mock.onGet(mockApiEndpoint).reply(200, metricsGroupsAPIResponse);
+      jasmine.clock().install();
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      mock.restore();
+      jasmine.clock().uninstall();
+    });
+
+    it('rerenders the dashboard when the sidebar is resized', done => {
+      const component = new DashboardComponent({
+        el: document.querySelector('.prometheus-graphs'),
+        propsData: { ...propsData, hasMetrics: true, showPanels: false },
+      });
+
+      expect(component.forceRedraw).toEqual(0);
+
+      const navSidebarEl = document.querySelector('.nav-sidebar');
+      navSidebarEl.classList.add('nav-sidebar-collapsed');
+
+      Vue.nextTick()
+        .then(() => {
+          jasmine.clock().tick(1000);
+          return Vue.nextTick();
+        })
+        .then(() => {
+          expect(component.forceRedraw).toEqual(component.elWidth);
+          done();
+        })
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/flag_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/flag_spec.js
index 19278312b6d..a837b71db0b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/flag_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/flag_spec.js
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ const defaultValuesComponent = {
   unitOfDisplay: 'ms',
   currentDataIndex: 0,
   legendTitle: 'Average',
-  currentCoordinates: [],
+  currentCoordinates: {},
 };
 
 const deploymentFlagData = {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/legend_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/legend_spec.js
index abcc51aa077..9209e77dcf4 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/legend_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/legend_spec.js
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ const convertedMetrics = convertDatesMultipleSeries(singleRowMetricsMultipleSeri
 
 const defaultValuesComponent = {};
 
-const timeSeries = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 500, 300, 120);
+const { timeSeries } = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 500, 300, 120);
 
 defaultValuesComponent.timeSeries = timeSeries;
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_info_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_info_spec.js
index d3121d553f9..ce93ae28842 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_info_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_info_spec.js
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import createTimeSeries from '~/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series';
 import { singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries, convertDatesMultipleSeries } from '../mock_data';
 
 const convertedMetrics = convertDatesMultipleSeries(singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries);
-const timeSeries = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 500, 300, 120);
+const { timeSeries } = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 500, 300, 120);
 
 describe('TrackInfo component', () => {
   let vm;
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_line_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_line_spec.js
index 27602a861eb..2a4f89ddf6e 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_line_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph/track_line_spec.js
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import createTimeSeries from '~/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series';
 import { singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries, convertDatesMultipleSeries } from '../mock_data';
 
 const convertedMetrics = convertDatesMultipleSeries(singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries);
-const timeSeries = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 500, 300, 120);
+const { timeSeries } = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 500, 300, 120);
 
 describe('TrackLine component', () => {
   let vm;
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_path_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_path_spec.js
index 2515e2ad897..5f270c5cfe9 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_path_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_path_spec.js
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ const createComponent = (propsData) => {
 
 const convertedMetrics = convertDatesMultipleSeries(singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries);
 
-const timeSeries = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 428, 272, 120);
+const { timeSeries } = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 428, 272, 120);
 const firstTimeSeries = timeSeries[0];
 
 describe('Monitoring Paths', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_spec.js
index a46a387a534..99180e4d303 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/graph_spec.js
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 import Vue from 'vue';
 import Graph from '~/monitoring/components/graph.vue';
 import MonitoringMixins from '~/monitoring/mixins/monitoring_mixins';
-import eventHub from '~/monitoring/event_hub';
 import {
   deploymentData,
   convertDatesMultipleSeries,
@@ -69,23 +68,6 @@ describe('Graph', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  it('sends an event to the eventhub when it has finished resizing', done => {
-    const component = createComponent({
-      graphData: convertedMetrics[1],
-      updateAspectRatio: false,
-      deploymentData,
-      tagsPath,
-      projectPath,
-    });
-    spyOn(eventHub, '$emit');
-
-    component.updateAspectRatio = true;
-    Vue.nextTick(() => {
-      expect(eventHub.$emit).toHaveBeenCalled();
-      done();
-    });
-  });
-
   it('has a title for the y-axis and the chart legend that comes from the backend', () => {
     const component = createComponent({
       graphData: convertedMetrics[1],
@@ -113,6 +95,9 @@ describe('Graph', () => {
       projectPath,
     });
 
+    // simulate moving mouse over data series
+    component.seriesUnderMouse = component.timeSeries;
+
     component.positionFlag();
     expect(component.currentData).toBe(component.timeSeries[0].values[10]);
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/mock_data.js
index e4c98a3bcb5..6c833b17f98 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/mock_data.js
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ export const metricsGroupsAPIResponse = {
       priority: 1,
       metrics: [
         {
+          id: 5,
           title: 'Memory usage',
           weight: 1,
           queries: [
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series_spec.js
index 99584c75287..8937b7d9680 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series_spec.js
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import createTimeSeries from '~/monitoring/utils/multiple_time_series';
 import { convertDatesMultipleSeries, singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries } from '../mock_data';
 
 const convertedMetrics = convertDatesMultipleSeries(singleRowMetricsMultipleSeries);
-const timeSeries = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 428, 272, 120);
+const { timeSeries } = createTimeSeries(convertedMetrics[0].queries, 428, 272, 120);
 const firstTimeSeries = timeSeries[0];
 
 describe('Multiple time series', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_actions_spec.js
index 52cc42cb53d..d7298cb3483 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_actions_spec.js
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ describe('issue_note_actions component', () => {
         canEdit: true,
         canAwardEmoji: true,
         canReportAsAbuse: true,
-        noteId: 539,
+        noteId: '539',
         noteUrl: 'https://localhost:3000/group/project/merge_requests/1#note_1',
         reportAbusePath:
           '/abuse_reports/new?ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A3000%2Fgitlab-org%2Fgitlab-ce%2Fissues%2F7%23note_539&user_id=26',
@@ -59,6 +59,20 @@ describe('issue_note_actions component', () => {
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector(`a[href="${props.reportAbusePath}"]`)).toBeDefined();
       });
 
+      it('should be possible to copy link to a note', () => {
+        expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-btn-copy-note-link')).not.toBeNull();
+      });
+
+      it('should not show copy link action when `noteUrl` prop is empty', done => {
+        vm.noteUrl = '';
+        Vue.nextTick()
+          .then(() => {
+            expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-btn-copy-note-link')).toBeNull();
+          })
+          .then(done)
+          .catch(done.fail);
+      });
+
       it('should be possible to delete comment', () => {
         expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.js-note-delete')).toBeDefined();
       });
@@ -77,7 +91,7 @@ describe('issue_note_actions component', () => {
         canEdit: false,
         canAwardEmoji: false,
         canReportAsAbuse: false,
-        noteId: 539,
+        noteId: '539',
         noteUrl: 'https://localhost:3000/group/project/merge_requests/1#note_1',
         reportAbusePath:
           '/abuse_reports/new?ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A3000%2Fgitlab-org%2Fgitlab-ce%2Fissues%2F7%23note_539&user_id=26',
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_awards_list_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_awards_list_spec.js
index 9d98ba219da..6a6a810acff 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_awards_list_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_awards_list_spec.js
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ describe('note_awards_list component', () => {
       propsData: {
         awards: awardsMock,
         noteAuthorId: 2,
-        noteId: 545,
+        noteId: '545',
         canAwardEmoji: true,
         toggleAwardPath: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/notes/545/toggle_award_emoji',
       },
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ describe('note_awards_list component', () => {
         propsData: {
           awards: awardsMock,
           noteAuthorId: 2,
-          noteId: 545,
+          noteId: '545',
           canAwardEmoji: false,
           toggleAwardPath: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/notes/545/toggle_award_emoji',
         },
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_form_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_form_spec.js
index 95d400ab3df..147ffcf1b81 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_form_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_form_spec.js
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ describe('issue_note_form component', () => {
     props = {
       isEditing: false,
       noteBody: 'Magni suscipit eius consectetur enim et ex et commodi.',
-      noteId: 545,
+      noteId: '545',
     };
 
     vm = new Component({
@@ -32,6 +32,22 @@ describe('issue_note_form component', () => {
     vm.$destroy();
   });
 
+  describe('noteHash', () => {
+    it('returns note hash string based on `noteId`', () => {
+      expect(vm.noteHash).toBe(`#note_${props.noteId}`);
+    });
+
+    it('return note hash as `#` when `noteId` is empty', done => {
+      vm.noteId = '';
+      Vue.nextTick()
+        .then(() => {
+          expect(vm.noteHash).toBe('#');
+        })
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
+  });
+
   describe('conflicts editing', () => {
     it('should show conflict message if note changes outside the component', done => {
       vm.isEditing = true;
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_header_spec.js
index a3c6bf78988..379780f43a0 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_header_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/note_header_spec.js
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ describe('note_header component', () => {
           },
           createdAt: '2017-08-02T10:51:58.559Z',
           includeToggle: false,
-          noteId: 1394,
+          noteId: '1394',
           expanded: true,
         },
       }).$mount();
@@ -47,6 +47,16 @@ describe('note_header component', () => {
     it('should render timestamp link', () => {
       expect(vm.$el.querySelector('a[href="#note_1394"]')).toBeDefined();
     });
+
+    it('should not render user information when prop `author` is empty object', done => {
+      vm.author = {};
+      Vue.nextTick()
+        .then(() => {
+          expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.note-header-author-name')).toBeNull();
+        })
+        .then(done)
+        .catch(done.fail);
+    });
   });
 
   describe('discussion', () => {
@@ -66,7 +76,7 @@ describe('note_header component', () => {
           },
           createdAt: '2017-08-02T10:51:58.559Z',
           includeToggle: true,
-          noteId: 1395,
+          noteId: '1395',
           expanded: true,
         },
       }).$mount();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js
index 2a01bd85520..40b5f009ceb 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/components/noteable_discussion_spec.js
@@ -133,4 +133,29 @@ describe('noteable_discussion component', () => {
       });
     });
   });
+
+  describe('componentData', () => {
+    it('should return first note object for placeholder note', () => {
+      const data = {
+        isPlaceholderNote: true,
+        notes: [
+          { body: 'hello world!' },
+        ],
+      };
+
+      const note = vm.componentData(data);
+      expect(note).toEqual(data.notes[0]);
+    });
+
+    it('should return given note for nonplaceholder notes', () => {
+      const data = {
+        notes: [
+          { id: 12 },
+        ],
+      };
+
+      const note = vm.componentData(data);
+      expect(note).toEqual(data);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js
index 0423fcb6ec4..9a0e7f34a9c 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/mock_data.js
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ export const individualNote = {
   individual_note: true,
   notes: [
     {
-      id: 1390,
+      id: '1390',
       attachment: {
         url: null,
         filename: null,
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ export const individualNote = {
 };
 
 export const note = {
-  id: 546,
+  id: '546',
   attachment: {
     url: null,
     filename: null,
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ export const discussionMock = {
   expanded: true,
   notes: [
     {
-      id: 1395,
+      id: '1395',
       attachment: {
         url: null,
         filename: null,
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ export const discussionMock = {
       path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/notes/1395',
     },
     {
-      id: 1396,
+      id: '1396',
       attachment: {
         url: null,
         filename: null,
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ export const discussionMock = {
       path: '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/notes/1396',
     },
     {
-      id: 1437,
+      id: '1437',
       attachment: {
         url: null,
         filename: null,
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ export const discussionMock = {
 };
 
 export const loggedOutnoteableData = {
-  id: 98,
+  id: '98',
   iid: 26,
   author_id: 1,
   description: '',
@@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ export const collapseNotesMock = [
     individual_note: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 1390,
+        id: '1390',
         attachment: null,
         author: {
           id: 1,
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ export const collapseNotesMock = [
     individual_note: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 1391,
+        id: '1391',
         attachment: null,
         author: {
           id: 1,
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ export const INDIVIDUAL_NOTE_RESPONSE_MAP = {
         expanded: true,
         notes: [
           {
-            id: 1390,
+            id: '1390',
             attachment: {
               url: null,
               filename: null,
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@ export const INDIVIDUAL_NOTE_RESPONSE_MAP = {
         expanded: true,
         notes: [
           {
-            id: 1391,
+            id: '1391',
             attachment: {
               url: null,
               filename: null,
@@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ export const INDIVIDUAL_NOTE_RESPONSE_MAP = {
     '/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/notes/1471': {
       commands_changes: null,
       valid: true,
-      id: 1471,
+      id: '1471',
       attachment: null,
       author: {
         id: 1,
@@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ export const DISCUSSION_NOTE_RESPONSE_MAP = {
         expanded: true,
         notes: [
           {
-            id: 1471,
+            id: '1471',
             attachment: {
               url: null,
               filename: null,
@@ -671,7 +671,7 @@ export const notesWithDescriptionChanges = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 901,
+        id: '901',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ export const notesWithDescriptionChanges = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 902,
+        id: '902',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -765,7 +765,7 @@ export const notesWithDescriptionChanges = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 903,
+        id: '903',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ export const notesWithDescriptionChanges = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 904,
+        id: '904',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -854,7 +854,7 @@ export const notesWithDescriptionChanges = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 905,
+        id: '905',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -898,7 +898,7 @@ export const notesWithDescriptionChanges = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 906,
+        id: '906',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ export const collapsedSystemNotes = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 901,
+        id: '901',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -992,7 +992,7 @@ export const collapsedSystemNotes = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 902,
+        id: '902',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -1039,7 +1039,7 @@ export const collapsedSystemNotes = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 904,
+        id: '904',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ export const collapsedSystemNotes = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 905,
+        id: '905',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ export const collapsedSystemNotes = [
     expanded: true,
     notes: [
       {
-        id: 906,
+        id: '906',
         type: null,
         attachment: null,
         author: {
@@ -1177,10 +1177,8 @@ export const discussion1 = {
     file_path: 'about.md',
   },
   position: {
-    formatter: {
-      new_line: 50,
-      old_line: null,
-    },
+    new_line: 50,
+    old_line: null,
   },
   notes: [
     {
@@ -1197,10 +1195,8 @@ export const resolvedDiscussion1 = {
     file_path: 'about.md',
   },
   position: {
-    formatter: {
-      new_line: 50,
-      old_line: null,
-    },
+    new_line: 50,
+    old_line: null,
   },
   notes: [
     {
@@ -1217,10 +1213,8 @@ export const discussion2 = {
     file_path: 'README.md',
   },
   position: {
-    formatter: {
-      new_line: null,
-      old_line: 20,
-    },
+    new_line: null,
+    old_line: 20,
   },
   notes: [
     {
@@ -1237,10 +1231,8 @@ export const discussion3 = {
     file_path: 'README.md',
   },
   position: {
-    formatter: {
-      new_line: 21,
-      old_line: null,
-    },
+    new_line: 21,
+    old_line: null,
   },
   notes: [
     {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/actions_spec.js
index b66e8e1ceb3..f4643fd55ed 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/actions_spec.js
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ import _ from 'underscore';
 import { headersInterceptor } from 'spec/helpers/vue_resource_helper';
 import * as actions from '~/notes/stores/actions';
 import createStore from '~/notes/stores';
+import mrWidgetEventHub from '~/vue_merge_request_widget/event_hub';
 import testAction from '../../helpers/vuex_action_helper';
 import { resetStore } from '../helpers';
 import {
@@ -317,4 +318,195 @@ describe('Actions Notes Store', () => {
       );
     });
   });
+
+  describe('deleteNote', () => {
+    const interceptor = (request, next) => {
+      next(
+        request.respondWith(JSON.stringify({}), {
+          status: 200,
+        }),
+      );
+    };
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      Vue.http.interceptors.push(interceptor);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      Vue.http.interceptors = _.without(Vue.http.interceptors, interceptor);
+    });
+
+    it('commits DELETE_NOTE and dispatches updateMergeRequestWidget', done => {
+      const note = { path: `${gl.TEST_HOST}`, id: 1 };
+
+      testAction(
+        actions.deleteNote,
+        note,
+        store.state,
+        [
+          {
+            type: 'DELETE_NOTE',
+            payload: note,
+          },
+        ],
+        [
+          {
+            type: 'updateMergeRequestWidget',
+          },
+        ],
+        done,
+      );
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('createNewNote', () => {
+    describe('success', () => {
+      const res = {
+        id: 1,
+        valid: true,
+      };
+      const interceptor = (request, next) => {
+        next(
+          request.respondWith(JSON.stringify(res), {
+            status: 200,
+          }),
+        );
+      };
+
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        Vue.http.interceptors.push(interceptor);
+      });
+
+      afterEach(() => {
+        Vue.http.interceptors = _.without(Vue.http.interceptors, interceptor);
+      });
+
+      it('commits ADD_NEW_NOTE and dispatches updateMergeRequestWidget', done => {
+        testAction(
+          actions.createNewNote,
+          { endpoint: `${gl.TEST_HOST}`, data: {} },
+          store.state,
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'ADD_NEW_NOTE',
+              payload: res,
+            },
+          ],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'updateMergeRequestWidget',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('error', () => {
+      const res = {
+        errors: ['error'],
+      };
+      const interceptor = (request, next) => {
+        next(
+          request.respondWith(JSON.stringify(res), {
+            status: 200,
+          }),
+        );
+      };
+
+      beforeEach(() => {
+        Vue.http.interceptors.push(interceptor);
+      });
+
+      afterEach(() => {
+        Vue.http.interceptors = _.without(Vue.http.interceptors, interceptor);
+      });
+
+      it('does not commit ADD_NEW_NOTE or dispatch updateMergeRequestWidget', done => {
+        testAction(
+          actions.createNewNote,
+          { endpoint: `${gl.TEST_HOST}`, data: {} },
+          store.state,
+          [],
+          [],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('toggleResolveNote', () => {
+    const res = {
+      resolved: true,
+    };
+    const interceptor = (request, next) => {
+      next(
+        request.respondWith(JSON.stringify(res), {
+          status: 200,
+        }),
+      );
+    };
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      Vue.http.interceptors.push(interceptor);
+    });
+
+    afterEach(() => {
+      Vue.http.interceptors = _.without(Vue.http.interceptors, interceptor);
+    });
+
+    describe('as note', () => {
+      it('commits UPDATE_NOTE and dispatches updateMergeRequestWidget', done => {
+        testAction(
+          actions.toggleResolveNote,
+          { endpoint: `${gl.TEST_HOST}`, isResolved: true, discussion: false },
+          store.state,
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'UPDATE_NOTE',
+              payload: res,
+            },
+          ],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'updateMergeRequestWidget',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+
+    describe('as discussion', () => {
+      it('commits UPDATE_DISCUSSION and dispatches updateMergeRequestWidget', done => {
+        testAction(
+          actions.toggleResolveNote,
+          { endpoint: `${gl.TEST_HOST}`, isResolved: true, discussion: true },
+          store.state,
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'UPDATE_DISCUSSION',
+              payload: res,
+            },
+          ],
+          [
+            {
+              type: 'updateMergeRequestWidget',
+            },
+          ],
+          done,
+        );
+      });
+    });
+  });
+
+  describe('updateMergeRequestWidget', () => {
+    it('calls mrWidget checkStatus', () => {
+      spyOn(mrWidgetEventHub, '$emit');
+
+      actions.updateMergeRequestWidget();
+
+      expect(mrWidgetEventHub.$emit).toHaveBeenCalledWith('mr.discussion.updated');
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js
index a15ff1a5888..1ecfe914859 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/notes/stores/mutation_spec.js
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
 import mutations from '~/notes/stores/mutations';
 import {
   note,
@@ -155,6 +156,41 @@ describe('Notes Store mutations', () => {
       expect(state.discussions[2].notes[0].note).toBe(legacyNote.notes[1].note);
       expect(state.discussions.length).toEqual(3);
     });
+
+    it('adds truncated_diff_lines if discussion is a diffFile', () => {
+      const state = {
+        discussions: [],
+      };
+
+      mutations.SET_INITIAL_DISCUSSIONS(state, [
+        {
+          ...note,
+          diff_file: {
+            file_hash: 'a',
+          },
+          truncated_diff_lines: ['a'],
+        },
+      ]);
+
+      expect(state.discussions[0].truncated_diff_lines).toEqual(['a']);
+    });
+
+    it('adds empty truncated_diff_lines when not in discussion', () => {
+      const state = {
+        discussions: [],
+      };
+
+      mutations.SET_INITIAL_DISCUSSIONS(state, [
+        {
+          ...note,
+          diff_file: {
+            file_hash: 'a',
+          },
+        },
+      ]);
+
+      expect(state.discussions[0].truncated_diff_lines).toEqual([]);
+    });
   });
 
   describe('SET_LAST_FETCHED_AT', () => {
@@ -333,7 +369,7 @@ describe('Notes Store mutations', () => {
     });
   });
 
-  describe('SET_NOTES_FETCHING_STATE', () => {
+  describe('SET_NOTES_FETCHED_STATE', () => {
     it('should set the given state', () => {
       const state = {
         isNotesFetched: false,
@@ -343,4 +379,37 @@ describe('Notes Store mutations', () => {
       expect(state.isNotesFetched).toEqual(true);
     });
   });
+
+  describe('SET_DISCUSSION_DIFF_LINES', () => {
+    it('sets truncated_diff_lines', () => {
+      const state = {
+        discussions: [
+          {
+            id: 1,
+          },
+        ],
+      };
+
+      mutations.SET_DISCUSSION_DIFF_LINES(state, { discussionId: 1, diffLines: ['test'] });
+
+      expect(state.discussions[0].truncated_diff_lines).toEqual(['test']);
+    });
+
+    it('keeps reactivity of discussion', () => {
+      const state = {};
+      Vue.set(state, 'discussions', [
+        {
+          id: 1,
+          expanded: false,
+        },
+      ]);
+      const discussion = state.discussions[0];
+
+      mutations.SET_DISCUSSION_DIFF_LINES(state, { discussionId: 1, diffLines: ['test'] });
+
+      discussion.expanded = true;
+
+      expect(state.discussions[0].expanded).toBe(true);
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_actions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_actions_spec.js
index 72fb0a8f9ef..0566bc55693 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_actions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_actions_spec.js
@@ -1,46 +1,98 @@
 import Vue from 'vue';
-import pipelinesActionsComp from '~/pipelines/components/pipelines_actions.vue';
+import eventHub from '~/pipelines/event_hub';
+import PipelinesActions from '~/pipelines/components/pipelines_actions.vue';
+import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+import { TEST_HOST } from 'spec/test_constants';
 
 describe('Pipelines Actions dropdown', () => {
-  let component;
-  let actions;
-  let ActionsComponent;
+  const Component = Vue.extend(PipelinesActions);
+  let vm;
 
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    ActionsComponent = Vue.extend(pipelinesActionsComp);
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
 
-    actions = [
+  describe('manual actions', () => {
+    const actions = [
       {
         name: 'stop_review',
-        path: '/root/review-app/builds/1893/play',
+        path: `${TEST_HOST}/root/review-app/builds/1893/play`,
       },
       {
         name: 'foo',
-        path: '#',
+        path: `${TEST_HOST}/disabled/pipeline/action`,
         playable: false,
       },
     ];
 
-    component = new ActionsComponent({
-      propsData: {
-        actions,
-      },
-    }).$mount();
-  });
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      vm = mountComponent(Component, { actions });
+    });
 
-  it('should render a dropdown with the provided actions', () => {
-    expect(
-      component.$el.querySelectorAll('.dropdown-menu li').length,
-    ).toEqual(actions.length);
+    it('renders a dropdown with the provided actions', () => {
+      const dropdownItems = vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.dropdown-menu li');
+      expect(dropdownItems.length).toEqual(actions.length);
+    });
+
+    it("renders a disabled action when it's not playable", () => {
+      const dropdownItem = vm.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-menu li:last-child button');
+      expect(dropdownItem).toBeDisabled();
+    });
   });
 
-  it('should render a disabled action when it\'s not playable', () => {
-    expect(
-      component.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-menu li:last-child button').getAttribute('disabled'),
-    ).toEqual('disabled');
+  describe('scheduled jobs', () => {
+    const scheduledJobAction = {
+      name: 'scheduled action',
+      path: `${TEST_HOST}/scheduled/job/action`,
+      playable: true,
+      scheduled_at: '2063-04-05T00:42:00Z',
+    };
+    const expiredJobAction = {
+      name: 'expired action',
+      path: `${TEST_HOST}/expired/job/action`,
+      playable: true,
+      scheduled_at: '2018-10-05T08:23:00Z',
+    };
+    const findDropdownItem = action => {
+      const buttons = vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.dropdown-menu li button');
+      return Array.prototype.find.call(buttons, element =>
+        element.innerText.trim().startsWith(action.name),
+      );
+    };
+
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      spyOn(Date, 'now').and.callFake(() => new Date('2063-04-04T00:42:00Z').getTime());
+      vm = mountComponent(Component, { actions: [scheduledJobAction, expiredJobAction] });
+    });
+
+    it('emits postAction event after confirming', () => {
+      const emitSpy = jasmine.createSpy('emit');
+      eventHub.$on('postAction', emitSpy);
+      spyOn(window, 'confirm').and.callFake(() => true);
+
+      findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction).click();
+
+      expect(window.confirm).toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(emitSpy).toHaveBeenCalledWith(scheduledJobAction.path);
+    });
+
+    it('does not emit postAction event if confirmation is cancelled', () => {
+      const emitSpy = jasmine.createSpy('emit');
+      eventHub.$on('postAction', emitSpy);
+      spyOn(window, 'confirm').and.callFake(() => false);
+
+      findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction).click();
+
+      expect(window.confirm).toHaveBeenCalled();
+      expect(emitSpy).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+
+    it('displays the remaining time in the dropdown', () => {
+      expect(findDropdownItem(scheduledJobAction)).toContainText('24:00:00');
+    });
 
-    expect(
-      component.$el.querySelector('.dropdown-menu li:last-child button').classList.contains('disabled'),
-    ).toEqual(true);
+    it('displays 00:00:00 for expired jobs in the dropdown', () => {
+      expect(findDropdownItem(expiredJobAction)).toContainText('00:00:00');
+    });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_table_row_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_table_row_spec.js
index 03ffc122795..42795f5c134 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_table_row_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/pipelines/pipelines_table_row_spec.js
@@ -158,8 +158,13 @@ describe('Pipelines Table Row', () => {
   });
 
   describe('actions column', () => {
+    const scheduledJobAction = {
+      name: 'some scheduled job',
+    };
+
     beforeEach(() => {
       const withActions = Object.assign({}, pipeline);
+      withActions.details.scheduled_actions = [scheduledJobAction];
       withActions.flags.cancelable = true;
       withActions.flags.retryable = true;
       withActions.cancel_path = '/cancel';
@@ -171,6 +176,8 @@ describe('Pipelines Table Row', () => {
     it('should render the provided actions', () => {
       expect(component.$el.querySelector('.js-pipelines-retry-button')).not.toBeNull();
       expect(component.$el.querySelector('.js-pipelines-cancel-button')).not.toBeNull();
+      const dropdownMenu = component.$el.querySelectorAll('.dropdown-menu');
+      expect(dropdownMenu).toContainText(scheduledJobAction.name);
     });
 
     it('emits `retryPipeline` event when retry button is clicked and toggles loading', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/projects/project_new_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/projects/project_new_spec.js
index 84515d2bf97..dace834a3c8 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/projects/project_new_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/projects/project_new_spec.js
@@ -4,12 +4,14 @@ import projectNew from '~/projects/project_new';
 describe('New Project', () => {
   let $projectImportUrl;
   let $projectPath;
+  let $projectName;
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     setFixtures(`
       <div class='toggle-import-form'>
         <div class='import-url-data'>
           <input id="project_import_url" />
+          <input id="project_name" />
           <input id="project_path" />
         </div>
       </div>
@@ -17,6 +19,7 @@ describe('New Project', () => {
 
     $projectImportUrl = $('#project_import_url');
     $projectPath = $('#project_path');
+    $projectName = $('#project_name');
   });
 
   describe('deriveProjectPathFromUrl', () => {
@@ -129,4 +132,31 @@ describe('New Project', () => {
       });
     });
   });
+
+  describe('deriveSlugFromProjectName', () => {
+    beforeEach(() => {
+      projectNew.bindEvents();
+      $projectName.val('').keyup();
+    });
+
+    it('converts project name to lower case and dash-limited slug', () => {
+      const dummyProjectName = 'My Awesome Project';
+
+      $projectName.val(dummyProjectName);
+
+      projectNew.onProjectNameChange($projectName, $projectPath);
+
+      expect($projectPath.val()).toEqual('my-awesome-project');
+    });
+
+    it('does not add additional dashes in the slug if the project name already contains dashes', () => {
+      const dummyProjectName = 'My-Dash-Delimited Awesome Project';
+
+      $projectName.val(dummyProjectName);
+
+      projectNew.onProjectNameChange($projectName, $projectPath);
+
+      expect($projectPath.val()).toEqual('my-dash-delimited-awesome-project');
+    });
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/read_more_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/read_more_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b1af0f80a50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/read_more_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+import initReadMore from '~/read_more';
+
+describe('Read more click-to-expand functionality', () => {
+  const fixtureName = 'projects/overview.html.raw';
+
+  preloadFixtures(fixtureName);
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    loadFixtures(fixtureName);
+  });
+
+  describe('expands target element', () => {
+    it('adds "is-expanded" class to target element', () => {
+      const target = document.querySelector('.read-more-container');
+      const trigger = document.querySelector('.js-read-more-trigger');
+      initReadMore();
+
+      trigger.click();
+
+      expect(target.classList.contains('is-expanded')).toEqual(true);
+    });
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/right_sidebar_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/right_sidebar_spec.js
index 6d49536a712..c7190ea9960 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/right_sidebar_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/right_sidebar_spec.js
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* eslint-disable no-var, one-var, one-var-declaration-per-line, no-return-assign, vars-on-top, max-len */
+/* eslint-disable no-var, one-var, one-var-declaration-per-line, no-return-assign, vars-on-top, jasmine/no-unsafe-spy, max-len */
 
 import $ from 'jquery';
 import MockAdapter from 'axios-mock-adapter';
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/search_autocomplete_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/search_autocomplete_spec.js
index 86c001678c5..646d843162c 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/search_autocomplete_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/search_autocomplete_spec.js
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 import $ from 'jquery';
 import '~/gl_dropdown';
-import SearchAutocomplete from '~/search_autocomplete';
+import initSearchAutocomplete from '~/search_autocomplete';
 import '~/lib/utils/common_utils';
 
 describe('Search autocomplete dropdown', () => {
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ describe('Search autocomplete dropdown', () => {
     window.gon.current_user_id = userId;
     window.gon.current_username = userName;
 
-    return (widget = new SearchAutocomplete());
+    return (widget = initSearchAutocomplete());
   });
 
   afterEach(function() {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_spec.js
index 94cded7ee37..3ca6ecaa938 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/shortcuts_spec.js
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 import $ from 'jquery';
-import Shortcuts from '~/shortcuts';
+import Shortcuts from '~/behaviors/shortcuts/shortcuts';
 
 describe('Shortcuts', () => {
   const fixtureName = 'snippets/show.html.raw';
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js
index 9dff52a9d49..0e30759c41d 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/sidebar/components/time_tracking/time_tracker_spec.js
@@ -8,7 +8,10 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
   let initialData;
   let vm;
 
-  const initTimeTrackingComponent = opts => {
+  const initTimeTrackingComponent = ({ timeEstimate,
+                                         timeSpent,
+                                         timeEstimateHumanReadable,
+                                         timeSpentHumanReadable }) => {
     setFixtures(`
     <div>
       <div id="mock-container"></div>
@@ -16,10 +19,10 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
   `);
 
     initialData = {
-      time_estimate: opts.timeEstimate,
-      time_spent: opts.timeSpent,
-      human_time_estimate: opts.timeEstimateHumanReadable,
-      human_time_spent: opts.timeSpentHumanReadable,
+      timeEstimate,
+      timeSpent,
+      humanTimeEstimate: timeEstimateHumanReadable,
+      humanTimeSpent: timeSpentHumanReadable,
       rootPath: '/',
     };
 
@@ -43,8 +46,8 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
   describe('Initialization', () => {
     beforeEach(() => {
       initTimeTrackingComponent({
-        timeEstimate: 100000,
-        timeSpent: 5000,
+        timeEstimate: 10000, // 2h 46m
+        timeSpent: 5000, // 1h 23m
         timeEstimateHumanReadable: '2h 46m',
         timeSpentHumanReadable: '1h 23m',
       });
@@ -56,14 +59,14 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
 
     it('should correctly set timeEstimate', done => {
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
-        expect(vm.timeEstimate).toBe(initialData.time_estimate);
+        expect(vm.timeEstimate).toBe(initialData.timeEstimate);
         done();
       });
     });
 
     it('should correctly set time_spent', done => {
       Vue.nextTick(() => {
-        expect(vm.timeSpent).toBe(initialData.time_spent);
+        expect(vm.timeSpent).toBe(initialData.timeSpent);
         done();
       });
     });
@@ -74,8 +77,8 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
       describe('Comparison pane', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
           initTimeTrackingComponent({
-            timeEstimate: 100000,
-            timeSpent: 5000,
+            timeEstimate: 100000, // 1d 3h
+            timeSpent: 5000, // 1h 23m
             timeEstimateHumanReadable: '',
             timeSpentHumanReadable: '',
           });
@@ -106,8 +109,8 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
           });
 
           it('should display the remaining meter with the correct background color when over estimate', done => {
-            vm.time_estimate = 100000;
-            vm.time_spent = 20000000;
+            vm.timeEstimate = 10000; // 2h 46m
+            vm.timeSpent = 20000000; // 231 days
             Vue.nextTick(() => {
               expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.time-tracking-comparison-pane .progress[variant="danger"]')).not.toBeNull();
               done();
@@ -119,7 +122,7 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
       describe('Estimate only pane', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
           initTimeTrackingComponent({
-            timeEstimate: 100000,
+            timeEstimate: 10000, // 2h 46m
             timeSpent: 0,
             timeEstimateHumanReadable: '2h 46m',
             timeSpentHumanReadable: '',
@@ -142,7 +145,7 @@ describe('Issuable Time Tracker', () => {
         beforeEach(() => {
           initTimeTrackingComponent({
             timeEstimate: 0,
-            timeSpent: 5000,
+            timeSpent: 5000, // 1h 23m
             timeEstimateHumanReadable: '2h 46m',
             timeSpentHumanReadable: '1h 23m',
           });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/sidebar/sidebar_subscriptions_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/sidebar/sidebar_subscriptions_spec.js
index 9e437084224..af2fde0a5be 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/sidebar/sidebar_subscriptions_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/sidebar/sidebar_subscriptions_spec.js
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ describe('Sidebar Subscriptions', function () {
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     SidebarSubscriptions = Vue.extend(sidebarSubscriptions);
-    // Setup the stores, services, etc
+    // Set up the stores, services, etc
     // eslint-disable-next-line no-new
     new SidebarMediator(Mock.mediator);
   });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/test_bundle.js b/spec/javascripts/test_bundle.js
index 4452c470b82..96c0844f83c 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/test_bundle.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/test_bundle.js
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ jasmine.getJSONFixtures().fixturesPath = FIXTURES_PATH;
 beforeAll(() => {
   jasmine.addMatchers(
     jasmineDiff(jasmine, {
-      colors: true,
-      inline: true,
+      colors: window.__karma__.config.color,
+      inline: window.__karma__.config.color,
     }),
   );
   jasmine.addMatchers(customMatchers);
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/u2f/register_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/u2f/register_spec.js
index d9383314891..b774627651f 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/u2f/register_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/u2f/register_spec.js
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ describe('U2FRegister', function () {
 
   it('allows registering a U2F device', () => {
     const setupButton = this.container.find('#js-setup-u2f-device');
-    expect(setupButton.text()).toBe('Setup new U2F device');
+    expect(setupButton.text()).toBe('Set up new U2F device');
     setupButton.trigger('click');
     const inProgressMessage = this.container.children('p');
     expect(inProgressMessage.text()).toContain('Trying to communicate with your device');
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js
index 0e42537faed..237e2fa79f2 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/components/mr_widget_header_spec.js
@@ -114,28 +114,31 @@ describe('MRWidgetHeader', () => {
     });
 
     describe('with an open merge request', () => {
+      const mrDefaultOptions = {
+        iid: 1,
+        divergedCommitsCount: 12,
+        sourceBranch: 'mr-widget-refactor',
+        sourceBranchLink: '<a href="/foo/bar/mr-widget-refactor">mr-widget-refactor</a>',
+        sourceBranchRemoved: false,
+        targetBranchPath: 'foo/bar/commits-path',
+        targetBranchTreePath: 'foo/bar/tree/path',
+        targetBranch: 'master',
+        isOpen: true,
+        canPushToSourceBranch: true,
+        emailPatchesPath: '/mr/email-patches',
+        plainDiffPath: '/mr/plainDiffPath',
+        statusPath: 'abc',
+        sourceProjectFullPath: 'root/gitlab-ce',
+        targetProjectFullPath: 'gitlab-org/gitlab-ce',
+      };
+
       afterEach(() => {
         vm.$destroy();
       });
 
       beforeEach(() => {
         vm = mountComponent(Component, {
-          mr: {
-            iid: 1,
-            divergedCommitsCount: 12,
-            sourceBranch: 'mr-widget-refactor',
-            sourceBranchLink: '<a href="/foo/bar/mr-widget-refactor">mr-widget-refactor</a>',
-            sourceBranchRemoved: false,
-            targetBranchPath: 'foo/bar/commits-path',
-            targetBranchTreePath: 'foo/bar/tree/path',
-            targetBranch: 'master',
-            isOpen: true,
-            emailPatchesPath: '/mr/email-patches',
-            plainDiffPath: '/mr/plainDiffPath',
-            statusPath: 'abc',
-            sourceProjectFullPath: 'root/gitlab-ce',
-            targetProjectFullPath: 'gitlab-org/gitlab-ce',
-          },
+          mr: Object.assign({}, mrDefaultOptions),
         });
       });
 
@@ -151,11 +154,21 @@ describe('MRWidgetHeader', () => {
         const button = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-web-ide');
 
         expect(button.textContent.trim()).toEqual('Open in Web IDE');
+        expect(button.classList.contains('disabled')).toBe(false);
         expect(button.getAttribute('href')).toEqual(
           '/-/ide/project/root/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/1?target_project=gitlab-org%2Fgitlab-ce',
         );
       });
 
+      it('renders web ide button in disabled state with no href', () => {
+        const mr = Object.assign({}, mrDefaultOptions, { canPushToSourceBranch: false });
+        vm = mountComponent(Component, { mr });
+
+        const link = vm.$el.querySelector('.js-web-ide');
+        expect(link.classList.contains('disabled')).toBe(true);
+        expect(link.getAttribute('href')).toBeNull();
+      });
+
       it('renders web ide button with blank query string if target & source project branch', done => {
         vm.mr.targetProjectFullPath = 'root/gitlab-ce';
 
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js
index 6342ea00436..6ac7138743b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_mr_widget/mr_widget_options_spec.js
@@ -27,6 +27,10 @@ describe('mrWidgetOptions', () => {
     });
   });
 
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
   describe('data', () => {
     it('should instantiate Store and Service', () => {
       expect(vm.mr).toBeDefined();
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js
index 7308219f705..5b1038840c7 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/ide/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon_spec.js
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 import Vue from 'vue';
-import changedFileIcon from '~/ide/components/changed_file_icon.vue';
+import changedFileIcon from '~/vue_shared/components/changed_file_icon.vue';
 import createComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
 
-describe('IDE changed file icon', () => {
+describe('Changed file icon', () => {
   let vm;
 
   beforeEach(() => {
@@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ describe('IDE changed file icon', () => {
   });
 
   describe('changedIconClass', () => {
-    it('includes ide-file-modified when not a temp file', () => {
-      expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('ide-file-modified');
+    it('includes file-modified when not a temp file', () => {
+      expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('file-modified');
     });
 
-    it('includes ide-file-addition when a temp file', () => {
+    it('includes file-addition when a temp file', () => {
       vm.file.tempFile = true;
 
-      expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('ide-file-addition');
+      expect(vm.changedIconClass).toContain('file-addition');
     });
   });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon_spec.js
index 1c666fc6c55..f2a09d08829 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_icon_spec.js
@@ -62,9 +62,11 @@ describe('File Icon component', () => {
       loading: true,
     });
 
-    expect(
-      vm.$el.querySelector('i').getAttribute('class'),
-    ).toEqual('fa fa-spin fa-spinner fa-1x');
+    const { classList } = vm.$el.querySelector('i');
+    expect(classList.contains('fa')).toEqual(true);
+    expect(classList.contains('fa-spin')).toEqual(true);
+    expect(classList.contains('fa-spinner')).toEqual(true);
+    expect(classList.contains('fa-1x')).toEqual(true);
   });
 
   it('should add a special class and a size class', () => {
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_row_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_row_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9914c0b70f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/file_row_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import FileRow from '~/vue_shared/components/file_row.vue';
+import { file } from 'spec/ide/helpers';
+import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+
+describe('RepoFile', () => {
+  let vm;
+
+  function createComponent(propsData) {
+    const FileRowComponent = Vue.extend(FileRow);
+
+    vm = mountComponent(FileRowComponent, propsData);
+  }
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    vm.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  it('renders name', () => {
+    createComponent({
+      file: file('t4'),
+      level: 0,
+    });
+
+    const name = vm.$el.querySelector('.file-row-name');
+
+    expect(name.textContent.trim()).toEqual(vm.file.name);
+  });
+
+  it('emits toggleTreeOpen on click', () => {
+    createComponent({
+      file: {
+        ...file('t3'),
+        type: 'tree',
+      },
+      level: 0,
+    });
+    spyOn(vm, '$emit').and.stub();
+
+    vm.$el.querySelector('.file-row').click();
+
+    expect(vm.$emit).toHaveBeenCalledWith('toggleTreeOpen', vm.file.path);
+  });
+
+  it('calls scrollIntoView if made active', done => {
+    createComponent({
+      file: {
+        ...file(),
+        type: 'blob',
+        active: false,
+      },
+      level: 0,
+    });
+
+    spyOn(vm, 'scrollIntoView').and.stub();
+
+    vm.file.active = true;
+
+    vm.$nextTick(() => {
+      expect(vm.scrollIntoView).toHaveBeenCalled();
+
+      done();
+    });
+  });
+
+  it('indents row based on level', () => {
+    createComponent({
+      file: file('t4'),
+      level: 2,
+    });
+
+    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.file-row-name').style.marginLeft).toBe('32px');
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/loading_icon_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/loading_icon_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 5cd3466f501..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/loading_icon_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,54 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import loadingIcon from '~/vue_shared/components/loading_icon.vue';
-
-describe('Loading Icon Component', () => {
-  let LoadingIconComponent;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    LoadingIconComponent = Vue.extend(loadingIcon);
-  });
-
-  it('should render a spinner font awesome icon', () => {
-    const component = new LoadingIconComponent().$mount();
-
-    expect(
-      component.$el.querySelector('i').getAttribute('class'),
-    ).toEqual('fa fa-spin fa-spinner fa-1x');
-
-    expect(component.$el.tagName).toEqual('DIV');
-    expect(component.$el.classList).toContain('text-center');
-    expect(component.$el.classList).toContain('loading-container');
-  });
-
-  it('should render accessibility attributes', () => {
-    const component = new LoadingIconComponent().$mount();
-
-    const icon = component.$el.querySelector('i');
-    expect(icon.getAttribute('aria-hidden')).toEqual('true');
-    expect(icon.getAttribute('aria-label')).toEqual('Loading');
-  });
-
-  it('should render the provided label', () => {
-    const component = new LoadingIconComponent({
-      propsData: {
-        label: 'This is a loading icon',
-      },
-    }).$mount();
-
-    expect(
-      component.$el.querySelector('i').getAttribute('aria-label'),
-    ).toEqual('This is a loading icon');
-  });
-
-  it('should render the provided size', () => {
-    const component = new LoadingIconComponent({
-      propsData: {
-        size: '2',
-      },
-    }).$mount();
-
-    expect(
-      component.$el.querySelector('i').classList.contains('fa-2x'),
-    ).toEqual(true);
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js
index 69034975422..0dea9278cc2 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/field_spec.js
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ describe('Markdown field component', () => {
         const textarea = vm.$el.querySelector('textarea');
 
         textarea.setSelectionRange(0, 0);
-        vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[4].click();
+        vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[5].click();
 
         Vue.nextTick(() => {
           expect(
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ describe('Markdown field component', () => {
         const textarea = vm.$el.querySelector('textarea');
 
         textarea.setSelectionRange(0, 50);
-        vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[4].click();
+        vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md')[5].click();
 
         Vue.nextTick(() => {
           expect(
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js
index 488575df401..a4681617e66 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/markdown/header_spec.js
@@ -17,8 +17,13 @@ describe('Markdown field header component', () => {
     Vue.nextTick(done);
   });
 
-  it('renders markdown buttons', () => {
-    expect(vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.js-md').length).toBe(7);
+  it('renders markdown header buttons', () => {
+    const buttons = ['Add bold text', 'Add italic text', 'Insert a quote', 'Insert code', 'Add a link', 'Add a bullet list', 'Add a numbered list', 'Add a task list', 'Add a table', 'Go full screen'];
+    const elements = vm.$el.querySelectorAll('.toolbar-btn');
+
+    elements.forEach((buttonEl, index) => {
+      expect(buttonEl.getAttribute('data-original-title')).toBe(buttons[index]);
+    });
   });
 
   it('renders `write` link as active when previewMarkdown is false', () => {
@@ -69,4 +74,8 @@ describe('Markdown field header component', () => {
       done();
     });
   });
+
+  it('renders markdown table template', () => {
+    expect(vm.mdTable).toEqual('| header | header |\n| ------ | ------ |\n| cell | cell |\n| cell | cell |');
+  });
 });
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/notes/system_note_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/notes/system_note_spec.js
index 2a6015fe35f..adcb1c858aa 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/notes/system_note_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/notes/system_note_spec.js
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ describe('system note component', () => {
   beforeEach(() => {
     props = {
       note: {
-        id: 1424,
+        id: '1424',
         author: {
           id: 1,
           name: 'Root',
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/pagination_links_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/pagination_links_spec.js
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c9d183872b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/pagination_links_spec.js
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+import Vue from 'vue';
+import PaginationLinks from '~/vue_shared/components/pagination_links.vue';
+import { s__ } from '~/locale';
+import mountComponent from '../../helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
+
+describe('Pagination links component', () => {
+  const paginationLinksComponent = Vue.extend(PaginationLinks);
+  const change = page => page;
+  const pageInfo = {
+    page: 3,
+    perPage: 5,
+    total: 30,
+  };
+  const translations = {
+    firstText: s__('Pagination|« First'),
+    prevText: s__('Pagination|Prev'),
+    nextText: s__('Pagination|Next'),
+    lastText: s__('Pagination|Last »'),
+  };
+
+  let paginationLinks;
+  let glPagination;
+  let destinationComponent;
+
+  beforeEach(() => {
+    paginationLinks = mountComponent(
+      paginationLinksComponent,
+      {
+        change,
+        pageInfo,
+      },
+    );
+    [glPagination] = paginationLinks.$children;
+    [destinationComponent] = glPagination.$children;
+  });
+
+  afterEach(() => {
+    paginationLinks.$destroy();
+  });
+
+  it('should provide translated text to GitLab UI pagination', () => {
+    Object.entries(translations).forEach(entry =>
+      expect(
+        destinationComponent[entry[0]],
+      ).toBe(entry[1]),
+    );
+  });
+
+  it('should pass change to GitLab UI pagination', () => {
+    expect(
+      Object.is(glPagination.change, change),
+    ).toBe(true);
+  });
+
+  it('should pass page from pageInfo to GitLab UI pagination', () => {
+    expect(
+      destinationComponent.value,
+    ).toBe(pageInfo.page);
+  });
+
+  it('should pass per page from pageInfo to GitLab UI pagination', () => {
+    expect(
+      destinationComponent.perPage,
+    ).toBe(pageInfo.perPage);
+  });
+
+  it('should pass total items from pageInfo to GitLab UI pagination', () => {
+    expect(
+      destinationComponent.totalRows,
+    ).toBe(pageInfo.total);
+  });
+});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/skeleton_loading_container_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/skeleton_loading_container_spec.js
deleted file mode 100644
index 34487885cf0..00000000000
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/skeleton_loading_container_spec.js
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
-import Vue from 'vue';
-import skeletonLoadingContainer from '~/vue_shared/components/skeleton_loading_container.vue';
-import mountComponent from 'spec/helpers/vue_mount_component_helper';
-
-describe('Skeleton loading container', () => {
-  let vm;
-
-  beforeEach(() => {
-    const component = Vue.extend(skeletonLoadingContainer);
-    vm = mountComponent(component);
-  });
-
-  afterEach(() => {
-    vm.$destroy();
-  });
-
-  it('renders 3 skeleton lines by default', () => {
-    expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.skeleton-line-3')).not.toBeNull();
-  });
-
-  it('renders in full mode by default', () => {
-    expect(vm.$el.classList.contains('animation-container-small')).toBeFalsy();
-  });
-
-  describe('small', () => {
-    beforeEach((done) => {
-      vm.small = true;
-
-      Vue.nextTick(done);
-    });
-
-    it('renders in small mode', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.classList.contains('animation-container-small')).toBeTruthy();
-    });
-  });
-
-  describe('lines', () => {
-    beforeEach((done) => {
-      vm.lines = 5;
-
-      Vue.nextTick(done);
-    });
-
-    it('renders 5 lines', () => {
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.skeleton-line-5')).not.toBeNull();
-      expect(vm.$el.querySelector('.skeleton-line-6')).toBeNull();
-    });
-  });
-});
diff --git a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/table_pagination_spec.js b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/table_pagination_spec.js
index c36b607a34e..d193667210b 100644
--- a/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/table_pagination_spec.js
+++ b/spec/javascripts/vue_shared/components/table_pagination_spec.js
@@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
   let component;
   let PaginationComponent;
   let spy;
-  let mountComponet;
+  let mountComponent;
 
   beforeEach(() => {
     spy = jasmine.createSpy('spy');
     PaginationComponent = Vue.extend(paginationComp);
 
-    mountComponet = function (props) {
+    mountComponent = function (props) {
       return new PaginationComponent({
         propsData: props,
       }).$mount();
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
 
   describe('render', () => {
     it('should not render anything', () => {
-      component = mountComponet({
+      component = mountComponent({
         pageInfo: {
           nextPage: 1,
           page: 1,
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
 
     describe('prev button', () => {
       it('should be disabled and non clickable', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 2,
             page: 1,
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
       });
 
       it('should be enabled and clickable', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 3,
             page: 2,
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
 
     describe('first button', () => {
       it('should call the change callback with the first page', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 3,
             page: 2,
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
 
     describe('last button', () => {
       it('should call the change callback with the last page', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 3,
             page: 2,
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
 
     describe('next button', () => {
       it('should be disabled and non clickable', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 5,
             page: 5,
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
       });
 
       it('should be enabled and clickable', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 4,
             page: 3,
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
 
     describe('numbered buttons', () => {
       it('should render 5 pages', () => {
-        component = mountComponet({
+        component = mountComponent({
           pageInfo: {
             nextPage: 4,
             page: 3,
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ describe('Pagination component', () => {
     });
 
     it('should render the spread operator', () => {
-      component = mountComponet({
+      component = mountComponent({
         pageInfo: {
           nextPage: 4,
           page: 3,
diff --git a/spec/lib/api/helpers/pagination_spec.rb b/spec/lib/api/helpers/pagination_spec.rb
index c73c6023b60..0a7682d906b 100644
--- a/spec/lib/api/helpers/pagination_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/api/helpers/pagination_spec.rb
@@ -189,9 +189,9 @@ describe API::Helpers::Pagination do
           it 'it returns the right link to the next page' do
             allow(subject).to receive(:params)
               .and_return({ pagination: 'keyset', ks_prev_id: projects[3].id, ks_prev_name: projects[3].name, per_page: 2 })
+
             expect_header('X-Per-Page', '2')
             expect_header('X-Next-Page', "#{value}?ks_prev_id=#{projects[6].id}&ks_prev_name=#{projects[6].name}&pagination=keyset&per_page=2")
-
             expect_header('Link', anything) do |_key, val|
               expect(val).to include('rel="next"')
             end
diff --git a/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb b/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb
index ca319679e80..9633caac788 100644
--- a/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/backup/manager_spec.rb
@@ -11,10 +11,6 @@ describe Backup::Manager do
     allow(progress).to receive(:puts)
     allow(progress).to receive(:print)
 
-    allow_any_instance_of(String).to receive(:color) do |string, _color|
-      string
-    end
-
     @old_progress = $progress # rubocop:disable Style/GlobalVars
     $progress = progress # rubocop:disable Style/GlobalVars
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb b/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb
index c5a854b5660..fdeea814bb2 100644
--- a/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/backup/repository_spec.rb
@@ -11,10 +11,6 @@ describe Backup::Repository do
     allow(FileUtils).to receive(:mkdir_p).and_return(true)
     allow(FileUtils).to receive(:mv).and_return(true)
 
-    allow_any_instance_of(String).to receive(:color) do |string, _color|
-      string
-    end
-
     allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:progress).and_return(progress)
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/cross_project_reference_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/cross_project_reference_spec.rb
index aadfe7637dd..ba995e16be7 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/cross_project_reference_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/cross_project_reference_spec.rb
@@ -1,16 +1,21 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Banzai::CrossProjectReference do
-  include described_class
+  let(:including_class) { Class.new.include(described_class).new }
+
+  before do
+    allow(including_class).to receive(:context).and_return({})
+    allow(including_class).to receive(:parent_from_ref).and_call_original
+  end
 
   describe '#parent_from_ref' do
     context 'when no project was referenced' do
       it 'returns the project from context' do
         project = double
 
-        allow(self).to receive(:context).and_return({ project: project })
+        allow(including_class).to receive(:context).and_return({ project: project })
 
-        expect(parent_from_ref(nil)).to eq project
+        expect(including_class.parent_from_ref(nil)).to eq project
       end
     end
 
@@ -18,15 +23,15 @@ describe Banzai::CrossProjectReference do
       it 'returns the group from context' do
         group = double
 
-        allow(self).to receive(:context).and_return({ group: group })
+        allow(including_class).to receive(:context).and_return({ group: group })
 
-        expect(parent_from_ref(nil)).to eq group
+        expect(including_class.parent_from_ref(nil)).to eq group
       end
     end
 
     context 'when referenced project does not exist' do
       it 'returns nil' do
-        expect(parent_from_ref('invalid/reference')).to be_nil
+        expect(including_class.parent_from_ref('invalid/reference')).to be_nil
       end
     end
 
@@ -37,7 +42,7 @@ describe Banzai::CrossProjectReference do
         expect(Project).to receive(:find_by_full_path)
           .with('cross/reference').and_return(project2)
 
-        expect(parent_from_ref('cross/reference')).to eq project2
+        expect(including_class.parent_from_ref('cross/reference')).to eq project2
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/commit_range_reference_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/commit_range_reference_filter_spec.rb
index e1af5a15371..cbff2fdab14 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/commit_range_reference_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/commit_range_reference_filter_spec.rb
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::CommitRangeReferenceFilter do
       exp = act = "See #{commit1.id.reverse}...#{commit2.id}"
 
       allow(project.repository).to receive(:commit).with(commit1.id.reverse)
+      allow(project.repository).to receive(:commit).with(commit2.id)
       expect(reference_filter(act).to_html).to eq exp
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter_spec.rb
index d9018a7e4fe..0d0554a2259 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/external_issue_reference_filter_spec.rb
@@ -79,13 +79,9 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::ExternalIssueReferenceFilter do
       expect(link).to eq helper.url_for_issue(issue_id, project, only_path: true)
     end
 
-    context 'with RequestStore enabled' do
+    context 'with RequestStore enabled', :request_store do
       let(:reference_filter) { HTML::Pipeline.new([described_class]) }
 
-      before do
-        allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(true)
-      end
-
       it 'queries the collection on the first call' do
         expect_any_instance_of(Project).to receive(:default_issues_tracker?).once.and_call_original
         expect_any_instance_of(Project).to receive(:external_issue_reference_pattern).once.and_call_original
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb
index a515d07b072..cf49249756a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/markdown_filter_spec.rb
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::MarkdownFilter do
 
         expect(result).to start_with("<pre><code>")
       end
+
+      it 'works with utf8 chars in language' do
+        result = filter("```日\nsome code\n```")
+
+        expect(result).to start_with("<pre><code lang=\"日\">")
+      end
     end
 
     context 'using Redcarpet' do
@@ -60,4 +66,21 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::MarkdownFilter do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'footnotes in tables' do
+    it 'processes footnotes in table cells' do
+      text = <<-MD.strip_heredoc
+      | Column1   |
+      | --------- |
+      | foot [^1] |
+
+      [^1]: a footnote
+      MD
+
+      result = filter(text)
+
+      expect(result).to include('<td>foot <sup')
+      expect(result).to include('<section class="footnotes">')
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb
index ba8dc68ceda..ed1ebe9ebf6 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/relative_link_filter_spec.rb
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::RelativeLinkFilter do
     expect { filter(act) }.not_to raise_error
   end
 
+  it 'does not raise an exception with a space in the path' do
+    act = link("/uploads/d18213acd3732630991986120e167e3d/Landscape_8.jpg  \nBut here's some more unexpected text :smile:)")
+    expect { filter(act) }.not_to raise_error
+  end
+
   it 'ignores ref if commit is passed' do
     doc = filter(link('non/existent.file'), commit: project.commit('empty-branch') )
     expect(doc.at_css('a')['href'])
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter_spec.rb
index 4463c011522..1ad7f3ff567 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/spaced_link_filter_spec.rb
@@ -3,49 +3,73 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe Banzai::Filter::SpacedLinkFilter do
   include FilterSpecHelper
 
-  let(:link) { '[example](page slug)' }
+  let(:link)  { '[example](page slug)' }
+  let(:image) { '![example](img test.jpg)' }
 
-  it 'converts slug with spaces to a link' do
-    doc = filter("See #{link}")
+  context 'when a link is detected' do
+    it 'converts slug with spaces to a link' do
+      doc = filter("See #{link}")
 
-    expect(doc.at_css('a').text).to eq 'example'
-    expect(doc.at_css('a')['href']).to eq 'page%20slug'
-    expect(doc.at_css('p')).to eq nil
-  end
+      expect(doc.at_css('a').text).to eq 'example'
+      expect(doc.at_css('a')['href']).to eq 'page%20slug'
+      expect(doc.at_css('a')['title']).to be_nil
+      expect(doc.at_css('p')).to be_nil
+    end
 
-  it 'converts slug with spaces and a title to a link' do
-    link = '[example](page slug "title")'
-    doc  = filter("See #{link}")
+    it 'converts slug with spaces and a title to a link' do
+      link = '[example](page slug "title")'
+      doc  = filter("See #{link}")
 
-    expect(doc.at_css('a').text).to eq 'example'
-    expect(doc.at_css('a')['href']).to eq 'page%20slug'
-    expect(doc.at_css('a')['title']).to eq 'title'
-    expect(doc.at_css('p')).to eq nil
-  end
+      expect(doc.at_css('a').text).to eq 'example'
+      expect(doc.at_css('a')['href']).to eq 'page%20slug'
+      expect(doc.at_css('a')['title']).to eq 'title'
+      expect(doc.at_css('p')).to be_nil
+    end
 
-  it 'does nothing when markdown_engine is redcarpet' do
-    exp = act = link
-    expect(filter(act, markdown_engine: :redcarpet).to_html).to eq exp
-  end
+    it 'does nothing when markdown_engine is redcarpet' do
+      exp = act = link
+      expect(filter(act, markdown_engine: :redcarpet).to_html).to eq exp
+    end
+
+    it 'does nothing with empty text' do
+      link = '[](page slug)'
+      doc  = filter("See #{link}")
+
+      expect(doc.at_css('a')).to be_nil
+    end
 
-  it 'does nothing with empty text' do
-    link = '[](page slug)'
-    doc  = filter("See #{link}")
+    it 'does nothing with an empty slug' do
+      link = '[example]()'
+      doc  = filter("See #{link}")
 
-    expect(doc.at_css('a')).to eq nil
+      expect(doc.at_css('a')).to be_nil
+    end
   end
 
-  it 'does nothing with an empty slug' do
-    link = '[example]()'
-    doc  = filter("See #{link}")
+  context 'when an image is detected' do
+    it 'converts slug with spaces to an iamge' do
+      doc = filter("See #{image}")
+
+      expect(doc.at_css('img')['src']).to eq 'img%20test.jpg'
+      expect(doc.at_css('img')['alt']).to eq 'example'
+      expect(doc.at_css('p')).to be_nil
+    end
+
+    it 'converts slug with spaces and a title to an image' do
+      image = '![example](img test.jpg "title")'
+      doc   = filter("See #{image}")
 
-    expect(doc.at_css('a')).to eq nil
+      expect(doc.at_css('img')['src']).to eq 'img%20test.jpg'
+      expect(doc.at_css('img')['alt']).to eq 'example'
+      expect(doc.at_css('img')['title']).to eq 'title'
+      expect(doc.at_css('p')).to be_nil
+    end
   end
 
   it 'converts multiple URLs' do
     link1 = '[first](slug one)'
     link2 = '[second](http://example.com/slug two)'
-    doc   = filter("See #{link1} and #{link2}")
+    doc   = filter("See #{link1} and #{image} and #{link2}")
 
     found_links = doc.css('a')
 
@@ -54,6 +78,12 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::SpacedLinkFilter do
     expect(found_links[0]['href']).to eq 'slug%20one'
     expect(found_links[1].text).to eq 'second'
     expect(found_links[1]['href']).to eq 'http://example.com/slug%20two'
+
+    found_images = doc.css('img')
+
+    expect(found_images.size).to eq(1)
+    expect(found_images[0]['src']).to eq 'img%20test.jpg'
+    expect(found_images[0]['alt']).to eq 'example'
   end
 
   described_class::IGNORE_PARENTS.each do |elem|
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/wiki_link_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/wiki_link_filter_spec.rb
index 50d053011b3..b9059b85fdc 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/filter/wiki_link_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/filter/wiki_link_filter_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::WikiLinkFilter do
   let(:project)   { build_stubbed(:project, :public, name: "wiki_link_project", namespace: namespace) }
   let(:user) { double }
   let(:wiki) { ProjectWiki.new(project, user) }
+  let(:repository_upload_folder) { Wikis::CreateAttachmentService::ATTACHMENT_PATH }
 
   it "doesn't rewrite absolute links" do
     filtered_link = filter("<a href='http://example.com:8000/'>Link</a>", project_wiki: wiki).children[0]
@@ -20,6 +21,45 @@ describe Banzai::Filter::WikiLinkFilter do
     expect(filtered_link.attribute('href').value).to eq('/uploads/a.test')
   end
 
+  describe "when links point to the #{Wikis::CreateAttachmentService::ATTACHMENT_PATH} folder" do
+    context 'with an "a" html tag' do
+      it 'rewrites links' do
+        filtered_link = filter("<a href='#{repository_upload_folder}/a.test'>Link</a>", project_wiki: wiki).children[0]
+
+        expect(filtered_link.attribute('href').value).to eq("#{wiki.wiki_base_path}/#{repository_upload_folder}/a.test")
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with "img" html tag' do
+      let(:path) { "#{wiki.wiki_base_path}/#{repository_upload_folder}/a.jpg" }
+
+      context 'inside an "a" html tag' do
+        it 'rewrites links' do
+          filtered_elements = filter("<a href='#{repository_upload_folder}/a.jpg'><img src='#{repository_upload_folder}/a.jpg'>example</img></a>", project_wiki: wiki)
+
+          expect(filtered_elements.search('img').first.attribute('src').value).to eq(path)
+          expect(filtered_elements.search('a').first.attribute('href').value).to eq(path)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'outside an "a" html tag' do
+        it 'rewrites links' do
+          filtered_link = filter("<img src='#{repository_upload_folder}/a.jpg'>example</img>", project_wiki: wiki).children[0]
+
+          expect(filtered_link.attribute('src').value).to eq(path)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with "video" html tag' do
+      it 'rewrites links' do
+        filtered_link = filter("<video src='#{repository_upload_folder}/a.mp4'></video>", project_wiki: wiki).children[0]
+
+        expect(filtered_link.attribute('src').value).to eq("#{wiki.wiki_base_path}/#{repository_upload_folder}/a.mp4")
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "invalid links" do
     invalid_links = ["http://:8080", "http://", "http://:8080/path"]
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/gfm_pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/gfm_pipeline_spec.rb
index 75413596431..df24cef0b8b 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/gfm_pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/gfm_pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -87,4 +87,22 @@ describe Banzai::Pipeline::GfmPipeline do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'markdown link or image urls having spaces' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
+
+    it 'rewrites links with spaces in url' do
+      markdown = "[Link to Page](page slug)"
+      output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project)
+
+      expect(output).to include("href=\"page%20slug\"")
+    end
+
+    it 'rewrites images with spaces in url' do
+      markdown = "![My Image](test image.png)"
+      output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project)
+
+      expect(output).to include("src=\"test%20image.png\"")
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/wiki_pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/wiki_pipeline_spec.rb
index 88ae4c1e07a..64ca3ec345d 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/wiki_pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/pipeline/wiki_pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -121,6 +121,13 @@ describe Banzai::Pipeline::WikiPipeline do
               expect(output).to include("href=\"#{relative_url_root}/wiki_link_ns/wiki_link_project/wikis/page\"")
             end
 
+            it 'rewrites non-file links (with spaces) to be at the scope of the wiki root' do
+              markdown = "[Link to Page](page slug)"
+              output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project, project_wiki: project_wiki, page_slug: page.slug)
+
+              expect(output).to include("href=\"#{relative_url_root}/wiki_link_ns/wiki_link_project/wikis/page%20slug\"")
+            end
+
             it "rewrites file links to be at the scope of the current directory" do
               markdown = "[Link to Page](page.md)"
               output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project, project_wiki: project_wiki, page_slug: page.slug)
@@ -134,6 +141,13 @@ describe Banzai::Pipeline::WikiPipeline do
 
               expect(output).to include("href=\"#{relative_url_root}/wiki_link_ns/wiki_link_project/wikis/start-page#title\"")
             end
+
+            it 'rewrites links (with spaces) with anchor' do
+              markdown = '[Link to Header](start page#title)'
+              output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project, project_wiki: project_wiki, page_slug: page.slug)
+
+              expect(output).to include("href=\"#{relative_url_root}/wiki_link_ns/wiki_link_project/wikis/start%20page#title\"")
+            end
           end
 
           describe "when creating root links" do
@@ -164,4 +178,25 @@ describe Banzai::Pipeline::WikiPipeline do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'videos' do
+    let(:namespace) { create(:namespace, name: "wiki_link_ns") }
+    let(:project)   { create(:project, :public, name: "wiki_link_project", namespace: namespace) }
+    let(:project_wiki) { ProjectWiki.new(project, double(:user)) }
+    let(:page) { build(:wiki_page, wiki: project_wiki, page: OpenStruct.new(url_path: 'nested/twice/start-page')) }
+
+    it 'generates video html structure' do
+      markdown = "![video_file](video_file_name.mp4)"
+      output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project, project_wiki: project_wiki, page_slug: page.slug)
+
+      expect(output).to include('<video src="/wiki_link_ns/wiki_link_project/wikis/nested/twice/video_file_name.mp4"')
+    end
+
+    it 'rewrites and replaces video links names with white spaces to %20' do
+      markdown = "![video file](video file name.mp4)"
+      output = described_class.to_html(markdown, project: project, project_wiki: project_wiki, page_slug: page.slug)
+
+      expect(output).to include('<video src="/wiki_link_ns/wiki_link_project/wikis/nested/twice/video%20file%20name.mp4"')
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser_spec.rb
index 4e6e8eca38a..c6e9fc414a1 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/base_parser_spec.rb
@@ -263,11 +263,10 @@ describe Banzai::ReferenceParser::BaseParser do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'with RequestStore enabled' do
+    context 'with RequestStore enabled', :request_store do
       before do
         cache = Hash.new { |hash, key| hash[key] = {} }
 
-        allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(true)
         allow(subject).to receive(:collection_cache).and_return(cache)
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/commit_parser_spec.rb b/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/commit_parser_spec.rb
index cca53a8b9b9..f558dea209f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/commit_parser_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/banzai/reference_parser/commit_parser_spec.rb
@@ -120,4 +120,22 @@ describe Banzai::ReferenceParser::CommitParser do
       expect(subject.find_commits(project, %w{123})).to eq([])
     end
   end
+
+  context 'when checking commits on another projects' do
+    let(:control_links) do
+      [commit_link]
+    end
+
+    let(:actual_links) do
+      control_links + [commit_link, commit_link]
+    end
+
+    def commit_link
+      project = create(:project, :repository, :public)
+
+      Nokogiri::HTML.fragment(%Q{<a data-commit="#{project.commit.id}" data-project="#{project.id}"></a>}).children[0]
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'no project N+1 queries'
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/event_filter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/event_filter_spec.rb
index 87ae6b6cf01..30016da6828 100644
--- a/spec/lib/event_filter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/event_filter_spec.rb
@@ -1,58 +1,119 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe EventFilter do
+  describe 'FILTERS' do
+    it 'returns a definite list of filters' do
+      expect(described_class::FILTERS).to eq(%w[all push merged issue comments team])
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#filter' do
+    it 'returns "all" if given filter is nil' do
+      expect(described_class.new(nil).filter).to eq(described_class::ALL)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns "all" if given filter is ""' do
+      expect(described_class.new('').filter).to eq(described_class::ALL)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns "all" if given filter is "foo"' do
+      expect(described_class.new('foo').filter).to eq('all')
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#apply_filter' do
-    let(:source_user) { create(:user) }
-    let!(:public_project) { create(:project, :public) }
+    set(:public_project) { create(:project, :public) }
+
+    set(:push_event)     { create(:push_event,        project: public_project) }
+    set(:merged_event)   { create(:event, :merged,    project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:created_event)  { create(:event, :created,   project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:updated_event)  { create(:event, :updated,   project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:closed_event)   { create(:event, :closed,    project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:reopened_event) { create(:event, :reopened,  project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:comments_event) { create(:event, :commented, project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:joined_event)   { create(:event, :joined,    project: public_project, target: public_project) }
+    set(:left_event)     { create(:event, :left,      project: public_project, target: public_project) }
 
-    let!(:push_event)     { create(:push_event,        project: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:merged_event)   { create(:event, :merged,    project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:created_event)  { create(:event, :created,   project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:updated_event)  { create(:event, :updated,   project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:closed_event)   { create(:event, :closed,    project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:reopened_event) { create(:event, :reopened,  project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:comments_event) { create(:event, :commented, project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:joined_event)   { create(:event, :joined,    project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
-    let!(:left_event)     { create(:event, :left,      project: public_project, target: public_project, author: source_user) }
+    let(:filtered_events) { described_class.new(filter).apply_filter(Event.all) }
 
-    it 'applies push filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(described_class.push).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(push_event)
+    context 'with the "push" filter' do
+      let(:filter) { described_class::PUSH }
+
+      it 'filters push events only' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to contain_exactly(push_event)
+      end
     end
 
-    it 'applies merged filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(described_class.merged).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(merged_event)
+    context 'with the "merged" filter' do
+      let(:filter) { described_class::MERGED }
+
+      it 'filters merged events only' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to contain_exactly(merged_event)
+      end
     end
 
-    it 'applies issue filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(described_class.issue).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(created_event, updated_event, closed_event, reopened_event)
+    context 'with the "issue" filter' do
+      let(:filter) { described_class::ISSUE }
+
+      it 'filters issue events only' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to contain_exactly(created_event, updated_event, closed_event, reopened_event)
+      end
     end
 
-    it 'applies comments filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(described_class.comments).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(comments_event)
+    context 'with the "comments" filter' do
+      let(:filter) { described_class::COMMENTS }
+
+      it 'filters comment events only' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to contain_exactly(comments_event)
+      end
     end
 
-    it 'applies team filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(described_class.team).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(joined_event, left_event)
+    context 'with the "team" filter' do
+      let(:filter) { described_class::TEAM }
+
+      it 'filters team events only' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to contain_exactly(joined_event, left_event)
+      end
     end
 
-    it 'applies all filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(described_class.all).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(push_event, merged_event, created_event, updated_event, closed_event, reopened_event, comments_event, joined_event, left_event)
+    context 'with the "all" filter' do
+      let(:filter) { described_class::ALL }
+
+      it 'returns all events' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to eq(Event.all)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an unknown filter' do
+      let(:filter) { 'foo' }
+
+      it 'returns all events' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to eq(Event.all)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a nil filter' do
+      let(:filter) { nil }
+
+      it 'returns all events' do
+        expect(filtered_events).to eq(Event.all)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#active?' do
+    let(:event_filter) { described_class.new(described_class::TEAM) }
+
+    it 'returns false if filter does not include the given key' do
+      expect(event_filter.active?('foo')).to eq(false)
     end
 
-    it 'applies no filter' do
-      events = described_class.new(nil).apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(push_event, merged_event, created_event, updated_event, closed_event, reopened_event, comments_event, joined_event, left_event)
+    it 'returns false if the given key is nil' do
+      expect(event_filter.active?(nil)).to eq(false)
     end
 
-    it 'applies unknown filter' do
-      events = described_class.new('').apply_filter(Event.all)
-      expect(events).to contain_exactly(push_event, merged_event, created_event, updated_event, closed_event, reopened_event, comments_event, joined_event, left_event)
+    it 'returns true if filter does not include the given key' do
+      expect(event_filter.active?(described_class::TEAM)).to eq(true)
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/feature_spec.rb b/spec/lib/feature_spec.rb
index 8bb5a843484..9d56c62ae57 100644
--- a/spec/lib/feature_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/feature_spec.rb
@@ -91,7 +91,11 @@ describe Feature do
   end
 
   describe '.flipper' do
-    shared_examples 'a memoized Flipper instance' do
+    before do
+      described_class.instance_variable_set(:@flipper, nil)
+    end
+
+    context 'when request store is inactive' do
       it 'memoizes the Flipper instance' do
         expect(Flipper).to receive(:new).once.and_call_original
 
@@ -101,16 +105,14 @@ describe Feature do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when request store is inactive' do
-      before do
+    context 'when request store is active', :request_store do
+      it 'memoizes the Flipper instance' do
+        expect(Flipper).to receive(:new).once.and_call_original
+
+        described_class.flipper
         described_class.instance_variable_set(:@flipper, nil)
+        described_class.flipper
       end
-
-      it_behaves_like 'a memoized Flipper instance'
-    end
-
-    context 'when request store is inactive', :request_store do
-      it_behaves_like 'a memoized Flipper instance'
     end
   end
 
@@ -119,6 +121,10 @@ describe Feature do
       expect(described_class.enabled?(:some_random_feature_flag)).to be_falsey
     end
 
+    it 'returns true for undefined feature with default_enabled' do
+      expect(described_class.enabled?(:some_random_feature_flag, default_enabled: true)).to be_truthy
+    end
+
     it 'returns false for existing disabled feature in the database' do
       described_class.disable(:disabled_feature_flag)
 
@@ -160,6 +166,10 @@ describe Feature do
       expect(described_class.disabled?(:some_random_feature_flag)).to be_truthy
     end
 
+    it 'returns false for undefined feature with default_enabled' do
+      expect(described_class.disabled?(:some_random_feature_flag, default_enabled: true)).to be_falsey
+    end
+
     it 'returns true for existing disabled feature in the database' do
       described_class.disable(:disabled_feature_flag)
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/forever_spec.rb b/spec/lib/forever_spec.rb
index cf40c467c72..494c0561975 100644
--- a/spec/lib/forever_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/forever_spec.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ describe Forever do
     context 'when using PostgreSQL' do
       it 'should return Postgresql future date' do
         allow(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:postgresql?).and_return(true)
+
         expect(subject).to eq(described_class::POSTGRESQL_DATE)
       end
     end
@@ -14,6 +15,7 @@ describe Forever do
     context 'when using MySQL' do
       it 'should return MySQL future date' do
         allow(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:postgresql?).and_return(false)
+
         expect(subject).to eq(described_class::MYSQL_DATE)
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access_spec.rb
index 7800c543cdb..662f899180b 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/auth/ldap/access_spec.rb
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Auth::LDAP::Access do
       it 'logs the reason' do
         expect(Gitlab::AppLogger).to receive(:info).with(
           "LDAP account \"123456\" does not exist anymore, " \
-          "blocking Gitlab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
+          "blocking GitLab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
         )
 
         access.allowed?
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Auth::LDAP::Access do
         it 'logs the reason' do
           expect(Gitlab::AppLogger).to receive(:info).with(
             "LDAP account \"123456\" is disabled in Active Directory, " \
-            "blocking Gitlab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
+            "blocking GitLab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
           )
 
           access.allowed?
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Auth::LDAP::Access do
           it 'logs the reason' do
             expect(Gitlab::AppLogger).to receive(:info).with(
               "LDAP account \"123456\" is not disabled anymore, " \
-              "unblocking Gitlab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
+              "unblocking GitLab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
             )
 
             access.allowed?
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Auth::LDAP::Access do
           it 'logs the reason' do
             expect(Gitlab::AppLogger).to receive(:info).with(
               "LDAP account \"123456\" does not exist anymore, " \
-              "blocking Gitlab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
+              "blocking GitLab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
             )
 
             access.allowed?
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Auth::LDAP::Access do
           it 'logs the reason' do
             expect(Gitlab::AppLogger).to receive(:info).with(
               "LDAP account \"123456\" is available again, " \
-              "unblocking Gitlab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
+              "unblocking GitLab user \"#{user.name}\" (#{user.email})"
             )
 
             access.allowed?
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb
index 0735ebd6dcb..5dce3fcbcb6 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/deserialize_merge_request_diffs_and_commits_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::DeserializeMergeRequestDiffsAndCommits, :migration, schema: 20171114162227 do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:merge_request_diffs) { table(:merge_request_diffs) }
   let(:merge_requests) { table(:merge_requests) }
 
@@ -9,11 +11,7 @@ describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::DeserializeMergeRequestDiffsAndCommits, :m
     let(:merge_request) { merge_requests.create!(iid: 1, target_project_id: project.id, source_project_id: project.id, target_branch: 'feature', source_branch: 'master').becomes(MergeRequest) }
     let(:merge_request_diff) { MergeRequest.find(merge_request.id).create_merge_request_diff }
     let(:updated_merge_request_diff) { MergeRequestDiff.find(merge_request_diff.id) }
-    let(:rugged) do
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        project.repository.rugged
-      end
-    end
+    let(:rugged) { rugged_repo(project.repository) }
 
     before do
       allow_any_instance_of(MergeRequestDiff)
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/encrypt_columns_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/encrypt_columns_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2a869446753
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/encrypt_columns_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::EncryptColumns, :migration, schema: 20180910115836 do
+  let(:model) { Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::Models::EncryptColumns::WebHook }
+  let(:web_hooks) { table(:web_hooks) }
+
+  let(:plaintext_attrs) do
+    {
+      'encrypted_token' => nil,
+      'encrypted_url' => nil,
+      'token' =>  'secret',
+      'url' => 'http://example.com?access_token=secret'
+    }
+  end
+
+  let(:encrypted_attrs) do
+    {
+      'encrypted_token' => be_present,
+      'encrypted_url' => be_present,
+      'token' => nil,
+      'url' => nil
+    }
+  end
+
+  describe '#perform' do
+    it 'encrypts columns for the specified range' do
+      hooks = web_hooks.create([plaintext_attrs] * 5).sort_by(&:id)
+
+      # Encrypt all but the first and last rows
+      subject.perform(model, [:token, :url], hooks[1].id, hooks[3].id)
+
+      hooks = web_hooks.where(id: hooks.map(&:id)).order(:id)
+
+      aggregate_failures do
+        expect(hooks[0]).to have_attributes(plaintext_attrs)
+        expect(hooks[1]).to have_attributes(encrypted_attrs)
+        expect(hooks[2]).to have_attributes(encrypted_attrs)
+        expect(hooks[3]).to have_attributes(encrypted_attrs)
+        expect(hooks[4]).to have_attributes(plaintext_attrs)
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'acquires an exclusive lock for the update' do
+      relation = double('relation', each: nil)
+
+      expect(model).to receive(:where) { relation }
+      expect(relation).to receive(:lock) { relation }
+
+      subject.perform(model, [:token, :url], 1, 1)
+    end
+
+    it 'skips already-encrypted columns' do
+      values = {
+        'encrypted_token' => 'known encrypted token',
+        'encrypted_url' => 'known encrypted url',
+        'token' => 'token',
+        'url' => 'url'
+      }
+
+      hook = web_hooks.create(values)
+
+      subject.perform(model, [:token, :url], hook.id, hook.id)
+
+      hook.reload
+
+      expect(hook).to have_attributes(values)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2d1505dacfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/migrate_legacy_artifacts_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::MigrateLegacyArtifacts, :migration, schema: 20180816161409 do
+  let(:namespaces) { table(:namespaces) }
+  let(:projects) { table(:projects) }
+  let(:pipelines) { table(:ci_pipelines) }
+  let(:jobs) { table(:ci_builds) }
+  let(:job_artifacts) { table(:ci_job_artifacts) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new.perform(*range) }
+
+  context 'when a pipeline exists' do
+    let!(:namespace) { namespaces.create!(name: 'gitlab', path: 'gitlab-org') }
+    let!(:project) { projects.create!(name: 'gitlab', path: 'gitlab-ce', namespace_id: namespace.id) }
+    let!(:pipeline) { pipelines.create!(project_id: project.id, ref: 'master', sha: 'adf43c3a') }
+
+    context 'when a legacy artifacts exists' do
+      let(:artifacts_expire_at) { 1.day.since.to_s }
+      let(:file_store) { ::ObjectStorage::Store::REMOTE }
+
+      let!(:job) do
+        jobs.create!(
+          commit_id: pipeline.id,
+          project_id: project.id,
+          status: :success,
+          **artifacts_archive_attributes,
+          **artifacts_metadata_attributes)
+      end
+
+      let(:artifacts_archive_attributes) do
+        {
+          artifacts_file: 'archive.zip',
+          artifacts_file_store: file_store,
+          artifacts_size: 123,
+          artifacts_expire_at: artifacts_expire_at
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:artifacts_metadata_attributes) do
+        {
+          artifacts_metadata: 'metadata.gz',
+          artifacts_metadata_store: file_store
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'has legacy artifacts' do
+        expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_file, artifacts_file_store, artifacts_size, artifacts_expire_at')).to eq([artifacts_archive_attributes.values])
+        expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_metadata, artifacts_metadata_store')).to eq([artifacts_metadata_attributes.values])
+      end
+
+      it 'does not have new artifacts yet' do
+        expect(job_artifacts.count).to be_zero
+      end
+
+      context 'when the record exists inside of the range of a background migration' do
+        let(:range) { [job.id, job.id] }
+
+        it 'migrates a legacy artifact to ci_job_artifacts table' do
+          expect { subject }.to change { job_artifacts.count }.by(2)
+
+          expect(job_artifacts.order(:id).pluck('project_id, job_id, file_type, file_store, size, expire_at, file, file_sha256, file_location'))
+            .to eq([[project.id,
+                     job.id,
+                     described_class::ARCHIVE_FILE_TYPE,
+                     file_store,
+                     artifacts_archive_attributes[:artifacts_size],
+                     artifacts_expire_at,
+                     'archive.zip',
+                     nil,
+                     described_class::LEGACY_PATH_FILE_LOCATION],
+                    [project.id,
+                     job.id,
+                     described_class::METADATA_FILE_TYPE,
+                     file_store,
+                     nil,
+                     artifacts_expire_at,
+                     'metadata.gz',
+                     nil,
+                     described_class::LEGACY_PATH_FILE_LOCATION]])
+
+          expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_file, artifacts_file_store, artifacts_size, artifacts_expire_at')).to eq([[nil, nil, nil, artifacts_expire_at]])
+          expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_metadata, artifacts_metadata_store')).to eq([[nil, nil]])
+        end
+
+        context 'when file_store is nil' do
+          let(:file_store) { nil }
+
+          it 'has nullified file_store in all legacy artifacts' do
+            expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_file_store, artifacts_metadata_store')).to eq([[nil, nil]])
+          end
+
+          it 'fills file_store by the value of local file store' do
+            subject
+
+            expect(job_artifacts.pluck('file_store')).to all(eq(::ObjectStorage::Store::LOCAL))
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when new artifacts has already existed' do
+          context 'when only archive.zip existed' do
+            before do
+              job_artifacts.create!(project_id: project.id, job_id: job.id, file_type: described_class::ARCHIVE_FILE_TYPE, size: 999, file: 'archive.zip')
+            end
+
+            it 'had archive.zip already' do
+              expect(job_artifacts.exists?(job_id: job.id, file_type: described_class::ARCHIVE_FILE_TYPE)).to be_truthy
+            end
+
+            it 'migrates metadata' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { job_artifacts.count }.by(1)
+
+              expect(job_artifacts.exists?(job_id: job.id, file_type: described_class::METADATA_FILE_TYPE)).to be_truthy
+            end
+          end
+
+          context 'when both archive and metadata existed' do
+            before do
+              job_artifacts.create!(project_id: project.id, job_id: job.id, file_type: described_class::ARCHIVE_FILE_TYPE, size: 999, file: 'archive.zip')
+              job_artifacts.create!(project_id: project.id, job_id: job.id, file_type: described_class::METADATA_FILE_TYPE, size: 999, file: 'metadata.zip')
+            end
+
+            it 'does not migrate' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { job_artifacts.count }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when the record exists outside of the range of a background migration' do
+        let(:range) { [job.id + 1, job.id + 1] }
+
+        it 'does not migrate' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to change { job_artifacts.count }
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when the job does not have legacy artifacts' do
+      let!(:job) { jobs.create!(commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :success) }
+
+      it 'does not have the legacy artifacts in database' do
+        expect(jobs.count).to eq(1)
+        expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_file, artifacts_file_store, artifacts_size, artifacts_expire_at')).to eq([[nil, nil, nil, nil]])
+        expect(jobs.pluck('artifacts_metadata, artifacts_metadata_store')).to eq([[nil, nil]])
+      end
+
+      context 'when the record exists inside of the range of a background migration' do
+        let(:range) { [job.id, job.id] }
+
+        it 'does not migrate' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to change { job_artifacts.count }
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/populate_external_pipeline_source_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/populate_external_pipeline_source_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c7b272cd6ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/background_migration/populate_external_pipeline_source_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::PopulateExternalPipelineSource, :migration, schema: 20180916011959 do
+  let(:migration) { described_class.new }
+
+  let!(:internal_pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, source: :web) }
+  let(:pipelines) { [internal_pipeline, unknown_pipeline].map(&:id) }
+
+  let!(:unknown_pipeline) do
+    build(:ci_pipeline, source: :unknown)
+      .tap { |pipeline| pipeline.save(validate: false) }
+  end
+
+  subject { migration.perform(pipelines.min, pipelines.max) }
+
+  shared_examples 'no changes' do
+    it 'does not change the pipeline source' do
+      expect { subject }.not_to change { unknown_pipeline.reload.source }
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when unknown pipeline is external' do
+    before do
+      create(:generic_commit_status, pipeline: unknown_pipeline)
+    end
+
+    it 'populates the pipeline source' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(unknown_pipeline.reload.source).to eq('external')
+    end
+
+    it 'can be repeated without effect' do
+      subject
+
+      expect { subject }.not_to change { unknown_pipeline.reload.source }
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when unknown pipeline has just a build' do
+    before do
+      create(:ci_build, pipeline: unknown_pipeline)
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'no changes'
+  end
+
+  context 'when unknown pipeline has no statuses' do
+    it_behaves_like 'no changes'
+  end
+
+  context 'when unknown pipeline has a build and a status' do
+    before do
+      create(:generic_commit_status, pipeline: unknown_pipeline)
+      create(:ci_build, pipeline: unknown_pipeline)
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'no changes'
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/build/policy/changes_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/build/policy/changes_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ab401108c84
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/build/policy/changes_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Build::Policy::Changes do
+  set(:project) { create(:project) }
+
+  describe '#satisfied_by?' do
+    describe 'paths matching matching' do
+      let(:pipeline) do
+        build(:ci_empty_pipeline, project: project,
+                                  ref: 'master',
+                                  source: :push,
+                                  sha: '1234abcd',
+                                  before_sha: '0123aabb')
+      end
+
+      let(:ci_build) do
+        build(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, project: project, ref: 'master')
+      end
+
+      let(:seed) { double('build seed', to_resource: ci_build) }
+
+      before do
+        allow(pipeline).to receive(:modified_paths) do
+          %w[some/modified/ruby/file.rb some/other_file.txt some/.dir/file]
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'is satisfied by matching literal path' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[some/other_file.txt])
+
+        expect(policy).to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      it 'is satisfied by matching simple pattern' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[some/*.txt])
+
+        expect(policy).to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      it 'is satisfied by matching recusive pattern' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[some/**/*.rb])
+
+        expect(policy).to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      it 'is satisfied by matching a pattern with a dot' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[some/*/file])
+
+        expect(policy).to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      it 'is not satisfied when pattern does not match path' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[some/*.rb])
+
+        expect(policy).not_to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      it 'is not satisfied when pattern does not match' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[invalid/*.md])
+
+        expect(policy).not_to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      context 'when pipelines does not run for a branch update' do
+        before do
+          pipeline.before_sha = Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
+        end
+
+        it 'is always satisfied' do
+          policy = described_class.new(%w[invalid/*])
+
+          expect(policy).to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'gitaly integration' do
+      set(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+
+      let(:pipeline) do
+        create(:ci_empty_pipeline, project: project,
+                                   ref: 'master',
+                                   source: :push,
+                                   sha: '498214d',
+                                   before_sha: '281d3a7')
+      end
+
+      let(:build) do
+        create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, project: project, ref: 'master')
+      end
+
+      let(:seed) { double('build seed', to_resource: build) }
+
+      it 'is satisfied by changes introduced by a push' do
+        policy = described_class.new(['with space/*.md'])
+
+        expect(policy).to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+
+      it 'is not satisfied by changes that are not in the push' do
+        policy = described_class.new(%w[files/js/commit.js])
+
+        expect(policy).not_to be_satisfied_by(pipeline, seed)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job_spec.rb
index 6769f64f950..1169938b80c 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/job_spec.rb
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+require_dependency 'active_model'
 
 describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Job do
   let(:entry) { described_class.new(config, name: :rspec) }
@@ -38,6 +39,14 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Job do
           expect(entry.errors).to include "job name can't be blank"
         end
       end
+
+      context 'when delayed job' do
+        context 'when start_in is specified' do
+          let(:config) { { script: 'echo', when: 'delayed', start_in: '1 day' } }
+
+          it { expect(entry).to be_valid }
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when entry value is not correct' do
@@ -81,6 +90,15 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Job do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when extends key is not a string' do
+        let(:config) { { extends: 123 } }
+
+        it 'returns error about wrong value type' do
+          expect(entry).not_to be_valid
+          expect(entry.errors).to include "job extends should be a string"
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'when retry value is not correct' do
         context 'when it is not a numeric value' do
           let(:config) { { retry: true } }
@@ -119,11 +137,59 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Job do
           end
         end
       end
+
+      context 'when delayed job' do
+        context 'when start_in is specified' do
+          let(:config) { { script: 'echo', when: 'delayed', start_in: '1 day' } }
+
+          it 'returns error about invalid type' do
+            expect(entry).to be_valid
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when start_in is empty' do
+          let(:config) { { when: 'delayed', start_in: nil } }
+
+          it 'returns error about invalid type' do
+            expect(entry).not_to be_valid
+            expect(entry.errors).to include 'job start in should be a duration'
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when start_in is not formatted as a duration' do
+          let(:config) { { when: 'delayed', start_in: 'test' } }
+
+          it 'returns error about invalid type' do
+            expect(entry).not_to be_valid
+            expect(entry.errors).to include 'job start in should be a duration'
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when start_in is longer than one day' do
+          let(:config) { { when: 'delayed', start_in: '2 days' } }
+
+          it 'returns error about exceeding the limit' do
+            expect(entry).not_to be_valid
+            expect(entry.errors).to include 'job start in should not exceed the limit'
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when start_in specified without delayed specification' do
+        let(:config) { { start_in: '1 day' } }
+
+        it 'returns error about invalid type' do
+          expect(entry).not_to be_valid
+          expect(entry.errors).to include 'job start in must be blank'
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 
   describe '#relevant?' do
     it 'is a relevant entry' do
+      entry = described_class.new({ script: 'rspec' }, name: :rspec)
+
       expect(entry).to be_relevant
     end
   end
@@ -226,6 +292,24 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Job do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#delayed?' do
+    context 'when job is a delayed' do
+      let(:config) { { script: 'deploy', when: 'delayed' } }
+
+      it 'is a delayed' do
+        expect(entry).to be_delayed
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when job is not a delayed' do
+      let(:config) { { script: 'deploy' } }
+
+      it 'is not a delayed' do
+        expect(entry).not_to be_delayed
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#ignored?' do
     context 'when job is a manual action' do
       context 'when it is not specified if job is allowed to fail' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy_spec.rb
index 83d39b82068..bef93fe7af7 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/policy_spec.rb
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+require_dependency 'active_model'
 
 describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Policy do
   let(:entry) { described_class.new(config) }
@@ -124,6 +125,23 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Policy do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'when specifying a valid changes policy' do
+      let(:config) { { changes: %w[some/* paths/**/*.rb] } }
+
+      it 'is a correct configuraton' do
+        expect(entry).to be_valid
+        expect(entry.value).to eq(config)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when changes policy is invalid' do
+      let(:config) { { changes: [1, 2] } }
+
+      it 'returns errors' do
+        expect(entry.errors).to include /changes should be an array of strings/
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'when specifying unknown policy' do
       let(:config) { { refs: ['master'], invalid: :something } }
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb
index b3a3a6bee1d..7cf541447ce 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/entry/reports_spec.rb
@@ -3,27 +3,54 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Reports do
   let(:entry) { described_class.new(config) }
 
+  describe 'validates ALLOWED_KEYS' do
+    let(:artifact_file_types) { Ci::JobArtifact.file_types }
+
+    described_class::ALLOWED_KEYS.each do |keyword, _|
+      it "expects #{keyword} to be an artifact file_type" do
+        expect(artifact_file_types).to include(keyword)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'validation' do
     context 'when entry config value is correct' do
-      let(:config) { { junit: %w[junit.xml] } }
+      using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
 
-      describe '#value' do
-        it 'returns artifacs configuration' do
-          expect(entry.value).to eq config
+      shared_examples 'a valid entry' do |keyword, file|
+        describe '#value' do
+          it 'returns artifacs configuration' do
+            expect(entry.value).to eq({ "#{keyword}": [file] } )
+          end
         end
-      end
 
-      describe '#valid?' do
-        it 'is valid' do
-          expect(entry).to be_valid
+        describe '#valid?' do
+          it 'is valid' do
+            expect(entry).to be_valid
+          end
         end
       end
 
-      context 'when value is not array' do
-        let(:config) { { junit: 'junit.xml' } }
+      where(:keyword, :file) do
+        :junit | 'junit.xml'
+        :codequality | 'codequality.json'
+        :sast | 'gl-sast-report.json'
+        :dependency_scanning | 'gl-dependency-scanning-report.json'
+        :container_scanning | 'gl-container-scanning-report.json'
+        :dast | 'gl-dast-report.json'
+      end
+
+      with_them do
+        context 'when value is an array' do
+          let(:config) { { "#{keyword}": [file] } }
 
-        it 'converts to array' do
-          expect(entry.value).to eq({ junit: ['junit.xml'] } )
+          it_behaves_like 'a valid entry', params[:keyword], params[:file]
+        end
+
+        context 'when value is not array' do
+          let(:config) { { "#{keyword}": file } }
+
+          it_behaves_like 'a valid entry', params[:keyword], params[:file]
         end
       end
     end
@@ -31,11 +58,13 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Entry::Reports do
     context 'when entry value is not correct' do
       describe '#errors' do
         context 'when value of attribute is invalid' do
-          let(:config) { { junit: 10 } }
+          where(key: described_class::ALLOWED_KEYS) do
+            let(:config) { { "#{key}": 10 } }
 
-          it 'reports error' do
-            expect(entry.errors)
-              .to include 'reports junit should be an array of strings or a string'
+            it 'reports error' do
+              expect(entry.errors)
+                .to include "reports #{key} should be an array of strings or a string"
+            end
           end
         end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable/entry_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable/entry_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0a148375d11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable/entry_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Extendable::Entry do
+  describe '.new' do
+    context 'when entry key is not included in the context hash' do
+      it 'raises error' do
+        expect { described_class.new(:test, something: 'something') }
+          .to raise_error StandardError, 'Invalid entry key!'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#value' do
+    it 'reads a hash value from the context' do
+      entry = described_class.new(:test, test: 'something')
+
+      expect(entry.value).to eq 'something'
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#extensible?' do
+    context 'when entry has inheritance defined' do
+      it 'is extensible' do
+        entry = described_class.new(:test, test: { extends: 'something' })
+
+        expect(entry).to be_extensible
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when entry does not have inheritance specified' do
+      it 'is not extensible' do
+        entry = described_class.new(:test, test: { script: 'something' })
+
+        expect(entry).not_to be_extensible
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when entry value is not a hash' do
+      it 'is not extensible' do
+        entry = described_class.new(:test, test: 'something')
+
+        expect(entry).not_to be_extensible
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#extends_key' do
+    context 'when entry is extensible' do
+      it 'returns symbolized extends key value' do
+        entry = described_class.new(:test, test: { extends: 'something' })
+
+        expect(entry.extends_key).to eq :something
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when entry is not extensible' do
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        entry = described_class.new(:test, test: 'something')
+
+        expect(entry.extends_key).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#ancestors' do
+    let(:parent) do
+      described_class.new(:test, test: { extends: 'something' })
+    end
+
+    let(:child) do
+      described_class.new(:job, { job: { script: 'something' } }, parent)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns ancestors keys' do
+      expect(child.ancestors).to eq [:test]
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#base_hash!' do
+    subject { described_class.new(:test, hash) }
+
+    context 'when base hash is not extensible' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          template: { script: 'rspec' },
+          test: { extends: 'template' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'returns unchanged base hash' do
+        expect(subject.base_hash!).to eq(script: 'rspec')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when base hash is extensible too' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          first: { script: 'rspec' },
+          second: { extends: 'first' },
+          test: { extends: 'second' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'extends the base hash first' do
+        expect(subject.base_hash!).to eq(extends: 'first', script: 'rspec')
+      end
+
+      it 'mutates original context' do
+        subject.base_hash!
+
+        expect(hash.fetch(:second)).to eq(extends: 'first', script: 'rspec')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#extend!' do
+    subject { described_class.new(:test, hash) }
+
+    context 'when extending a non-hash value' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          first: 'my value',
+          test: { extends: 'first' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { subject.extend! }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::InvalidExtensionError,
+                          /invalid base hash/)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when extending unknown key' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        { test: { extends: 'something' } }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { subject.extend! }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::InvalidExtensionError,
+                          /unknown key/)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when extending a hash correctly' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          first: { script: 'my value' },
+          second: { extends: 'first' },
+          test: { extends: 'second' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:result) do
+        {
+          first: { script: 'my value' },
+          second: { extends: 'first', script: 'my value' },
+          test: { extends: 'second', script: 'my value' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'returns extended part of the hash' do
+        expect(subject.extend!).to eq result[:test]
+      end
+
+      it 'mutates original context' do
+        subject.extend!
+
+        expect(hash).to eq result
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when hash is not extensible' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          first: { script: 'my value' },
+          second: { extends: 'first' },
+          test: { value: 'something' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'returns original key value' do
+        expect(subject.extend!).to eq(value: 'something')
+      end
+
+      it 'does not mutate orignal context' do
+        original = hash.deep_dup
+
+        subject.extend!
+
+        expect(hash).to eq original
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when circular depenency gets detected' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        { test: { extends: 'test' } }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { subject.extend! }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::CircularDependencyError,
+                          /circular dependency detected/)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when nesting level is too deep' do
+      before do
+        stub_const("#{described_class}::MAX_NESTING_LEVELS", 0)
+      end
+
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          first: { script: 'my value' },
+          second: { extends: 'first' },
+          test: { extends: 'second' }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { subject.extend! }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::NestingTooDeepError)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..90213f6603d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config/extendable_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,228 @@
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Config::Extendable do
+  subject { described_class.new(hash) }
+
+  describe '#each' do
+    context 'when there is extendable entry in the hash' do
+      let(:test) do
+        { extends: 'something', only: %w[master] }
+      end
+
+      let(:hash) do
+        { something: { script: 'ls' }, test: test }
+      end
+
+      it 'yields control' do
+        expect { |b| subject.each(&b) }.to yield_control
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#to_hash' do
+    context 'when hash does not contain extensions' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          test: { script: 'test' },
+          production: {
+            script: 'deploy',
+            only: { variables: %w[$SOMETHING] }
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'does not modify the hash' do
+        expect(subject.to_hash).to eq hash
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when hash has a single simple extension' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          something: {
+            script: 'deploy',
+            only: { variables: %w[$SOMETHING] }
+          },
+
+          test: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: { refs: %w[master] }
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'extends a hash with a deep reverse merge' do
+        expect(subject.to_hash).to eq(
+          something: {
+            script: 'deploy',
+            only: { variables: %w[$SOMETHING] }
+          },
+
+          test: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: {
+              refs: %w[master],
+              variables: %w[$SOMETHING]
+            }
+          }
+        )
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a hash uses recursive extensions' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          test: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: { refs: %w[master] }
+          },
+
+          build: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            stage: 'build'
+          },
+
+          deploy: {
+            stage: 'deploy',
+            extends: '.first'
+          },
+
+          something: {
+            extends: '.first',
+            script: 'exec',
+            only: { variables: %w[$SOMETHING] }
+          },
+
+          '.first': {
+            script: 'run',
+            only: { kubernetes: 'active' }
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'extends a hash with a deep reverse merge' do
+        expect(subject.to_hash).to eq(
+          '.first': {
+            script: 'run',
+            only: { kubernetes: 'active' }
+          },
+
+          something: {
+            extends: '.first',
+            script: 'exec',
+            only: {
+              kubernetes: 'active',
+              variables: %w[$SOMETHING]
+            }
+          },
+
+          deploy: {
+            script: 'run',
+            stage: 'deploy',
+            only: { kubernetes: 'active' },
+            extends: '.first'
+          },
+
+          build: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'exec',
+            stage: 'build',
+            only: {
+              kubernetes: 'active',
+              variables: %w[$SOMETHING]
+            }
+          },
+
+          test: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: {
+              refs: %w[master],
+              variables: %w[$SOMETHING],
+              kubernetes: 'active'
+            }
+          }
+        )
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when nested circular dependecy has been detected' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          test: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: { refs: %w[master] }
+          },
+
+          something: {
+            extends: '.first',
+            script: 'deploy',
+            only: { variables: %w[$SOMETHING] }
+          },
+
+          '.first': {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'run',
+            only: { kubernetes: 'active' }
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error about circular dependency' do
+        expect { subject.to_hash }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::Entry::CircularDependencyError)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when circular dependecy to self has been detected' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          test: {
+            extends: 'test',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: { refs: %w[master] }
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error about circular dependency' do
+        expect { subject.to_hash }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::Entry::CircularDependencyError)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when invalid extends value is specified' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        { something: { extends: 1, script: 'ls' } }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error about invalid extension' do
+        expect { subject.to_hash }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::Entry::InvalidExtensionError)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when extensible entry has non-hash inheritance defined' do
+      let(:hash) do
+        {
+          test: {
+            extends: 'something',
+            script: 'ls',
+            only: { refs: %w[master] }
+          },
+
+          something: 'some text'
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error about invalid base' do
+        expect { subject.to_hash }
+          .to raise_error(described_class::Entry::InvalidExtensionError)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config_spec.rb
index 2e204da307d..b43aca8a354 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/config_spec.rb
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+
+require_dependency 'active_model'
 
 describe Gitlab::Ci::Config do
   let(:config) do
@@ -42,6 +44,36 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'when using extendable hash' do
+    let(:yml) do
+      <<-EOS
+        image: ruby:2.2
+
+        rspec:
+          script: rspec
+
+        test:
+          extends: rspec
+          image: ruby:alpine
+      EOS
+    end
+
+    it 'correctly extends the hash' do
+      hash = {
+        image: 'ruby:2.2',
+        rspec: { script: 'rspec' },
+        test: {
+          extends: 'rspec',
+          image: 'ruby:alpine',
+          script: 'rspec'
+        }
+      }
+
+      expect(config).to be_valid
+      expect(config.to_hash).to eq hash
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'when config is invalid' do
     context 'when yml is incorrect' do
       let(:yml) { '// invalid' }
@@ -49,7 +81,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config do
       describe '.new' do
         it 'raises error' do
           expect { config }.to raise_error(
-            ::Gitlab::Ci::Config::Loader::FormatError,
+            described_class::ConfigError,
             /Invalid configuration format/
           )
         end
@@ -75,5 +107,254 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Config do
         end
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when invalid extended hash has been provided' do
+      let(:yml) do
+        <<-EOS
+          test:
+            extends: test
+            script: rspec
+        EOS
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { config }.to raise_error(
+          described_class::ConfigError, /circular dependency detected/
+        )
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context "when using 'include' directive" do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let(:remote_location) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+    let(:local_location) { 'spec/fixtures/gitlab/ci/external_files/.gitlab-ci-template-1.yml' }
+
+    let(:remote_file_content) do
+      <<~HEREDOC
+      variables:
+        AUTO_DEVOPS_DOMAIN: domain.example.com
+        POSTGRES_USER: user
+        POSTGRES_PASSWORD: testing-password
+        POSTGRES_ENABLED: "true"
+        POSTGRES_DB: $CI_ENVIRONMENT_SLUG
+      HEREDOC
+    end
+
+    let(:local_file_content) do
+      File.read(Rails.root.join(local_location))
+    end
+
+    let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+      <<~HEREDOC
+      include:
+        - #{local_location}
+        - #{remote_location}
+
+      image: ruby:2.2
+      HEREDOC
+    end
+
+    let(:config) do
+      described_class.new(gitlab_ci_yml, project: project, sha: '12345')
+    end
+
+    before do
+      WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_location)
+        .to_return(body: remote_file_content)
+
+      allow(project.repository)
+        .to receive(:blob_data_at).and_return(local_file_content)
+    end
+
+    context "when gitlab_ci_yml has valid 'include' defined" do
+      it 'should return a composed hash' do
+        before_script_values = [
+          "apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev nodejs", "ruby -v",
+          "which ruby",
+          "gem install bundler --no-ri --no-rdoc",
+          "bundle install --jobs $(nproc)  \"${FLAGS[@]}\""
+        ]
+        variables = {
+          AUTO_DEVOPS_DOMAIN: "domain.example.com",
+          POSTGRES_USER: "user",
+          POSTGRES_PASSWORD: "testing-password",
+          POSTGRES_ENABLED: "true",
+          POSTGRES_DB: "$CI_ENVIRONMENT_SLUG"
+        }
+        composed_hash = {
+          before_script: before_script_values,
+          image: "ruby:2.2",
+          rspec: { script: ["bundle exec rspec"] },
+          variables: variables
+        }
+
+        expect(config.to_hash).to eq(composed_hash)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when gitlab_ci.yml has invalid 'include' defined"  do
+      let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+          include: invalid
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      it 'raises error YamlProcessor validationError' do
+        expect { config }.to raise_error(
+          ::Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError,
+          "Local file 'invalid' is not valid."
+        )
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe 'external file version' do
+      context 'when external local file SHA is defined' do
+        it 'is using a defined value' do
+          expect(project.repository).to receive(:blob_data_at)
+            .with('eeff1122', local_location)
+
+          described_class.new(gitlab_ci_yml, project: project, sha: 'eeff1122')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when external local file SHA is not defined' do
+        it 'is using latest SHA on the default branch' do
+          expect(project.repository).to receive(:root_ref_sha)
+
+          described_class.new(gitlab_ci_yml, project: project)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when both external files and gitlab_ci.yml defined the same key" do
+      let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        include:
+          - #{remote_location}
+
+        image: ruby:2.2
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      let(:remote_file_content) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        image: php:5-fpm-alpine
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      it 'should take precedence' do
+        expect(config.to_hash).to eq({ image: 'ruby:2.2' })
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when both external files and gitlab_ci.yml define a dictionary of distinct variables" do
+      let(:remote_file_content) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        variables:
+          A: 'alpha'
+          B: 'beta'
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        include:
+          - #{remote_location}
+
+        variables:
+          C: 'gamma'
+          D: 'delta'
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      it 'should merge the variables dictionaries' do
+        expect(config.to_hash).to eq({ variables: { A: 'alpha', B: 'beta', C: 'gamma', D: 'delta' } })
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when both external files and gitlab_ci.yml define a dictionary of overlapping variables" do
+      let(:remote_file_content) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        variables:
+          A: 'alpha'
+          B: 'beta'
+          C: 'omnicron'
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        include:
+          - #{remote_location}
+
+        variables:
+          C: 'gamma'
+          D: 'delta'
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      it 'later declarations should take precedence' do
+        expect(config.to_hash).to eq({ variables: { A: 'alpha', B: 'beta', C: 'gamma', D: 'delta' } })
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when both external files and gitlab_ci.yml define a job' do
+      let(:remote_file_content) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        job1:
+          script:
+          - echo 'hello from remote file'
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        include:
+          - #{remote_location}
+
+        job1:
+          variables:
+            VARIABLE_DEFINED_IN_MAIN_FILE: 'some value'
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      it 'merges the jobs' do
+        expect(config.to_hash).to eq({
+          job1: {
+            script: ["echo 'hello from remote file'"],
+            variables: {
+              VARIABLE_DEFINED_IN_MAIN_FILE: 'some value'
+            }
+          }
+        })
+      end
+
+      context 'when the script key is in both' do
+        let(:gitlab_ci_yml) do
+          <<~HEREDOC
+          include:
+            - #{remote_location}
+
+          job1:
+            script:
+            - echo 'hello from main file'
+            variables:
+              VARIABLE_DEFINED_IN_MAIN_FILE: 'some value'
+          HEREDOC
+        end
+
+        it 'uses the script from the gitlab_ci.yml' do
+          expect(config.to_hash).to eq({
+            job1: {
+              script: ["echo 'hello from main file'"],
+              variables: {
+                VARIABLE_DEFINED_IN_MAIN_FILE: 'some value'
+              }
+            }
+          })
+        end
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/file/local_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/file/local_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..73bb4ccf468
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/file/local_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Local do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:local_file) { described_class.new(location, { project: project, sha: '12345' }) }
+
+  describe '#valid?' do
+    context 'when is a valid local path' do
+      let(:location) { '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/existent-file.yml' }
+
+      before do
+        allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:fetch_local_content).and_return("image: 'ruby2:2'")
+      end
+
+      it 'should return true' do
+        expect(local_file.valid?).to be_truthy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when is not a valid local path' do
+      let(:location) { '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/non-existent-file.yml' }
+
+      it 'should return false' do
+        expect(local_file.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when is not a yaml file' do
+      let(:location) { '/config/application.rb' }
+
+      it 'should return false' do
+        expect(local_file.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#content' do
+    context 'with a a valid file' do
+      let(:local_file_content) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+          before_script:
+            - apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev nodejs
+            - ruby -v
+            - which ruby
+            - gem install bundler --no-ri --no-rdoc
+            - bundle install --jobs $(nproc)  "${FLAGS[@]}"
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+      let(:location) { '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/existent-file.yml' }
+
+      before do
+        allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:fetch_local_content).and_return(local_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should return the content of the file' do
+        expect(local_file.content).to eq(local_file_content)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an invalid file' do
+      let(:location) { '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/non-existent-file.yml' }
+
+      it 'should be nil' do
+        expect(local_file.content).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#error_message' do
+    let(:location) { '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/non-existent-file.yml' }
+
+    it 'should return an error message' do
+      expect(local_file.error_message).to eq("Local file '#{location}' is not valid.")
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/file/remote_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/file/remote_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b1819c8960b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/file/remote_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Remote do
+  let(:remote_file) { described_class.new(location) }
+  let(:location) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+  let(:remote_file_content) do
+    <<~HEREDOC
+      before_script:
+        - apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev nodejs
+        - ruby -v
+        - which ruby
+        - gem install bundler --no-ri --no-rdoc
+        - bundle install --jobs $(nproc)  "${FLAGS[@]}"
+    HEREDOC
+  end
+
+  describe "#valid?" do
+    context 'when is a valid remote url' do
+      before do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, location).to_return(body: remote_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should return true' do
+        expect(remote_file.valid?).to be_truthy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an irregular url' do
+      let(:location) { 'not-valid://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+
+      it 'should return false' do
+        expect(remote_file.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a timeout' do
+      before do
+        allow(Gitlab::HTTP).to receive(:get).and_raise(Timeout::Error)
+      end
+
+      it 'should be falsy' do
+        expect(remote_file.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when is not a yaml file' do
+      let(:location) { 'https://asdasdasdaj48ggerexample.com' }
+
+      it 'should be falsy' do
+        expect(remote_file.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an internal url' do
+      let(:location) { 'http://localhost:8080' }
+
+      it 'should be falsy' do
+        expect(remote_file.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "#content" do
+    context 'with a valid remote file' do
+      before do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, location).to_return(body: remote_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should return the content of the file' do
+        expect(remote_file.content).to eql(remote_file_content)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a timeout' do
+      before do
+        allow(Gitlab::HTTP).to receive(:get).and_raise(Timeout::Error)
+      end
+
+      it 'should be falsy' do
+        expect(remote_file.content).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an invalid remote url' do
+      let(:location) { 'https://asdasdasdaj48ggerexample.com' }
+
+      before do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, location).to_raise(SocketError.new('Some HTTP error'))
+      end
+
+      it 'should be nil' do
+        expect(remote_file.content).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an internal url' do
+      let(:location) { 'http://localhost:8080' }
+
+      it 'should be nil' do
+        expect(remote_file.content).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "#error_message" do
+    let(:location) { 'not-valid://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+
+    it 'should return an error message' do
+      expect(remote_file.error_message).to eq("Remote file '#{location}' is not valid.")
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/mapper_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/mapper_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d925d6af73d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/mapper_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::External::Mapper do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:file_content) do
+    <<~HEREDOC
+    image: 'ruby:2.2'
+    HEREDOC
+  end
+
+  describe '#process' do
+    subject { described_class.new(values, project, '123456').process }
+
+    context "when 'include' keyword is defined as string" do
+      context 'when the string is a local file' do
+        let(:values) do
+          {
+            include: '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/non-existent-file.yml',
+            image: 'ruby:2.2'
+          }
+        end
+
+        it 'returns an array' do
+          expect(subject).to be_an(Array)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns File instances' do
+          expect(subject.first).to be_an_instance_of(Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Local)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when the string is a remote file' do
+        let(:remote_url) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+        let(:values) do
+          {
+            include: remote_url,
+            image: 'ruby:2.2'
+          }
+        end
+
+        before do
+          WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_url).to_return(body: file_content)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns an array' do
+          expect(subject).to be_an(Array)
+        end
+
+        it 'returns File instances' do
+          expect(subject.first).to be_an_instance_of(Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Remote)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when 'include' is defined as an array" do
+      let(:remote_url) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+      let(:values) do
+        {
+          include:
+          [
+            remote_url,
+            '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/template.yml'
+          ],
+          image: 'ruby:2.2'
+        }
+      end
+
+      before do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_url).to_return(body: file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns an array' do
+        expect(subject).to be_an(Array)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns Files instances' do
+        expect(subject).to all(respond_to(:valid?))
+        expect(subject).to all(respond_to(:content))
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when 'include' is not defined" do
+      let(:values) do
+        {
+          image: 'ruby:2.2'
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'returns an empty array' do
+        expect(subject).to be_empty
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/processor_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/processor_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3c7394f53d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/external/processor_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::External::Processor do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:processor) { described_class.new(values, project, '12345') }
+
+  describe "#perform" do
+    context 'when no external files defined' do
+      let(:values) { { image: 'ruby:2.2' } }
+
+      it 'should return the same values' do
+        expect(processor.perform).to eq(values)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when an invalid local file is defined' do
+      let(:values) { { include: '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/non-existent-file.yml', image: 'ruby:2.2' } }
+
+      it 'should raise an error' do
+        expect { processor.perform }.to raise_error(
+          described_class::FileError,
+          "Local file '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/non-existent-file.yml' is not valid."
+        )
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when an invalid remote file is defined' do
+      let(:remote_file) { 'http://doesntexist.com/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+      let(:values) { { include: remote_file, image: 'ruby:2.2' } }
+
+      before do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_file).to_raise(SocketError.new('Some HTTP error'))
+      end
+
+      it 'should raise an error' do
+        expect { processor.perform }.to raise_error(
+          described_class::FileError,
+          "Remote file '#{remote_file}' is not valid."
+        )
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a valid remote external file is defined' do
+      let(:remote_file) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+      let(:values) { { include: remote_file, image: 'ruby:2.2' } }
+      let(:external_file_content) do
+        <<-HEREDOC
+        before_script:
+          - apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev nodejs
+          - ruby -v
+          - which ruby
+          - gem install bundler --no-ri --no-rdoc
+          - bundle install --jobs $(nproc)  "${FLAGS[@]}"
+
+        rspec:
+          script:
+            - bundle exec rspec
+
+        rubocop:
+          script:
+            - bundle exec rubocop
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      before do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_file).to_return(body: external_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should append the file to the values' do
+        output = processor.perform
+        expect(output.keys).to match_array([:image, :before_script, :rspec, :rubocop])
+      end
+
+      it "should remove the 'include' keyword" do
+        expect(processor.perform[:include]).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a valid local external file is defined' do
+      let(:values) { { include: '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/template.yml', image: 'ruby:2.2' } }
+      let(:local_file_content) do
+        <<-HEREDOC
+        before_script:
+          - apt-get update -qq && apt-get install -y -qq sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev nodejs
+          - ruby -v
+          - which ruby
+          - gem install bundler --no-ri --no-rdoc
+          - bundle install --jobs $(nproc)  "${FLAGS[@]}"
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      before do
+        allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Local).to receive(:fetch_local_content).and_return(local_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should append the file to the values' do
+        output = processor.perform
+        expect(output.keys).to match_array([:image, :before_script])
+      end
+
+      it "should remove the 'include' keyword" do
+        expect(processor.perform[:include]).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with multiple external files are defined' do
+      let(:remote_file) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+      let(:external_files) do
+        [
+          '/spec/fixtures/gitlab/ci/external_files/.gitlab-ci-template-1.yml',
+          remote_file
+        ]
+      end
+      let(:values) do
+        {
+          include: external_files,
+          image: 'ruby:2.2'
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:remote_file_content) do
+        <<-HEREDOC
+        stages:
+          - build
+          - review
+          - cleanup
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      before do
+        local_file_content = File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/gitlab/ci/external_files/.gitlab-ci-template-1.yml'))
+        allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Local).to receive(:fetch_local_content).and_return(local_file_content)
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_file).to_return(body: remote_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should append the files to the values' do
+        expect(processor.perform.keys).to match_array([:image, :stages, :before_script, :rspec])
+      end
+
+      it "should remove the 'include' keyword" do
+        expect(processor.perform[:include]).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when external files are defined but not valid' do
+      let(:values) { { include: '/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/template.yml', image: 'ruby:2.2' } }
+
+      let(:local_file_content) { 'invalid content file ////' }
+
+      before do
+        allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Ci::External::File::Local).to receive(:fetch_local_content).and_return(local_file_content)
+      end
+
+      it 'should raise an error' do
+        expect { processor.perform }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::Config::Loader::FormatError)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "when both external files and values defined the same key" do
+      let(:remote_file) { 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/1234/.gitlab-ci-1.yml' }
+      let(:values) do
+        {
+          include: remote_file,
+          image: 'ruby:2.2'
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:remote_file_content) do
+        <<~HEREDOC
+        image: php:5-fpm-alpine
+        HEREDOC
+      end
+
+      it 'should take precedence' do
+        WebMock.stub_request(:get, remote_file).to_return(body: remote_file_content)
+        expect(processor.perform[:image]).to eq('ruby:2.2')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/junit_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/test/junit_spec.rb
index f7ec86f5385..a49402c7398 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/junit_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/test/junit_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
 
-describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Junit do
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Test::Junit do
   describe '#parse!' do
     subject { described_class.new.parse!(junit, test_suite) }
 
@@ -8,21 +8,35 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Junit do
     let(:test_cases) { flattened_test_cases(test_suite) }
 
     context 'when data is JUnit style XML' do
-      context 'when there are no test cases' do
+      context 'when there are no <testcases> in <testsuite>' do
         let(:junit) do
           <<-EOF.strip_heredoc
             <testsuite></testsuite>
           EOF
         end
 
-        it 'raises an error and does not add any test cases' do
-          expect { subject }.to raise_error(described_class::JunitParserError)
+        it 'ignores the case' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(test_cases.count).to eq(0)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when there are no <testcases> in <testsuites>' do
+        let(:junit) do
+          <<-EOF.strip_heredoc
+            <testsuites><testsuite /></testsuites>
+          EOF
+        end
+
+        it 'ignores the case' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
 
           expect(test_cases.count).to eq(0)
         end
       end
 
-      context 'when there is a test case' do
+      context 'when there is only one <testcase> in <testsuite>' do
         let(:junit) do
           <<-EOF.strip_heredoc
             <testsuite>
@@ -40,6 +54,46 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Junit do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when there is only one <testsuite> in <testsuites>' do
+        let(:junit) do
+          <<-EOF.strip_heredoc
+            <testsuites>
+              <testsuite>
+                <testcase classname='Calculator' name='sumTest1' time='0.01'></testcase>
+              </testsuite>
+            </testsuites>
+          EOF
+        end
+
+        it 'parses XML and adds a test case to a suite' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(test_cases[0].classname).to eq('Calculator')
+          expect(test_cases[0].name).to eq('sumTest1')
+          expect(test_cases[0].execution_time).to eq(0.01)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'PHPUnit' do
+        let(:junit) do
+          <<-EOF.strip_heredoc
+          <testsuites>
+            <testsuite name="Project Test Suite" tests="1" assertions="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="1.376748">
+              <testsuite name="XXX\\FrontEnd\\WebBundle\\Tests\\Controller\\LogControllerTest" file="/Users/mcfedr/projects/xxx/server/tests/XXX/FrontEnd/WebBundle/Tests/Controller/LogControllerTest.php" tests="1" assertions="1" failures="0" errors="0" time="1.376748">
+                <testcase name="testIndexAction" class="XXX\\FrontEnd\\WebBundle\\Tests\\Controller\\LogControllerTest" file="/Users/mcfedr/projects/xxx/server/tests/XXX/FrontEnd/WebBundle/Tests/Controller/LogControllerTest.php" line="9" assertions="1" time="1.376748"/>
+              </testsuite>
+            </testsuite>
+          </testsuites>
+          EOF
+        end
+
+        it 'parses XML and adds a test case to a suite' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(test_cases.count).to eq(1)
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'when there are two test cases' do
         let(:junit) do
           <<-EOF.strip_heredoc
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/test_spec.rb
index 2fa83c4abae..0b85b432677 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/parsers/test_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers do
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Test do
   describe '.fabricate!' do
     subject { described_class.fabricate!(file_type) }
 
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Parsers do
       let(:file_type) { 'undefined' }
 
       it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { subject }.to raise_error(NameError)
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Test::ParserNotFoundError)
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/factory_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/factory_spec.rb
index 8b92088902b..aa53ecd5967 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/factory_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/factory_spec.rb
@@ -319,4 +319,53 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Factory do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  context 'when build is a delayed action' do
+    let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+    it 'matches correct core status' do
+      expect(factory.core_status).to be_a Gitlab::Ci::Status::Scheduled
+    end
+
+    it 'matches correct extended statuses' do
+      expect(factory.extended_statuses)
+        .to eq [Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Scheduled,
+                Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Unschedule,
+                Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Action]
+    end
+
+    it 'fabricates action detailed status' do
+      expect(status).to be_a Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Action
+    end
+
+    it 'fabricates status with correct details' do
+      expect(status.text).to eq 'scheduled'
+      expect(status.group).to eq 'scheduled'
+      expect(status.icon).to eq 'status_scheduled'
+      expect(status.favicon).to eq 'favicon_status_scheduled'
+      expect(status.illustration).to include(:image, :size, :title, :content)
+      expect(status.label).to include 'unschedule action'
+      expect(status).to have_details
+      expect(status.action_path).to include 'unschedule'
+    end
+
+    context 'when user has ability to play action' do
+      it 'fabricates status that has action' do
+        expect(status).to have_action
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when user does not have ability to play action' do
+      before do
+        allow(build.project).to receive(:empty_repo?).and_return(false)
+
+        create(:protected_branch, :no_one_can_push,
+                name: build.ref, project: build.project)
+      end
+
+      it 'fabricates status that has no action' do
+        expect(status).not_to have_action
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/scheduled_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/scheduled_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3098a17c50d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/scheduled_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Scheduled do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :stubbed_repository) }
+  let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, project: project) }
+  let(:status) { Gitlab::Ci::Status::Core.new(build, user) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(status) }
+
+  describe '#illustration' do
+    it { expect(subject.illustration).to include(:image, :size, :title) }
+  end
+
+  describe '#status_tooltip' do
+    context 'when scheduled_at is not expired' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, scheduled_at: 1.minute.since, project: project) }
+
+      it 'shows execute_in of the scheduled job' do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          expect(subject.status_tooltip).to include('00:01:00')
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when scheduled_at is expired' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :expired_scheduled, project: project) }
+
+      it 'shows 00:00:00' do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          expect(subject.status_tooltip).to include('00:00:00')
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.matches?' do
+    subject { described_class.matches?(build, user) }
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled and scheduled_at is present' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :expired_scheduled, project: project) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status: :scheduled, project: project) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
+    end
+
+    context 'when scheduled_at is present' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, scheduled_at: 1.minute.since, project: project) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/unschedule_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/unschedule_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ed046d66ca5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/build/unschedule_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Build::Unschedule do
+  let(:status) { double('core status') }
+  let(:user) { double('user') }
+
+  subject do
+    described_class.new(status)
+  end
+
+  describe '#label' do
+    it { expect(subject.label).to eq 'unschedule action' }
+  end
+
+  describe 'action details' do
+    let(:user) { create(:user) }
+    let(:build) { create(:ci_build) }
+    let(:status) { Gitlab::Ci::Status::Core.new(build, user) }
+
+    describe '#has_action?' do
+      context 'when user is allowed to update build' do
+        before do
+          stub_not_protect_default_branch
+
+          build.project.add_developer(user)
+        end
+
+        it { is_expected.to have_action }
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is not allowed to update build' do
+        it { is_expected.not_to have_action }
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '#action_path' do
+      it { expect(subject.action_path).to include "#{build.id}/unschedule" }
+    end
+
+    describe '#action_icon' do
+      it { expect(subject.action_icon).to eq 'time-out' }
+    end
+
+    describe '#action_title' do
+      it { expect(subject.action_title).to eq 'Unschedule' }
+    end
+
+    describe '#action_button_title' do
+      it { expect(subject.action_button_title).to eq 'Unschedule job' }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.matches?' do
+    subject { described_class.matches?(build, user) }
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      context 'when build unschedules an delayed job' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+        it 'is a correct match' do
+          expect(subject).to be true
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when build unschedules an normal job' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build) }
+
+        it 'does not match' do
+          expect(subject).to be false
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#status_tooltip' do
+    it 'does not override status status_tooltip' do
+      expect(status).to receive(:status_tooltip)
+
+      subject.status_tooltip
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#badge_tooltip' do
+    let(:user) { create(:user) }
+    let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :playable) }
+    let(:status) { Gitlab::Ci::Status::Core.new(build, user) }
+
+    it 'does not override status badge_tooltip' do
+      expect(status).to receive(:badge_tooltip)
+
+      subject.badge_tooltip
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/factory_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/factory_spec.rb
index defb3fdc0df..694d4ce160a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/factory_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/factory_spec.rb
@@ -11,8 +11,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Factory do
   end
 
   context 'when pipeline has a core status' do
-    (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - [HasStatus::BLOCKED_STATUS])
-      .each do |simple_status|
+    HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES.each do |simple_status|
       context "when core status is #{simple_status}" do
         let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, status: simple_status) }
 
@@ -24,12 +23,24 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Factory do
           expect(factory.core_status).to be_a expected_status
         end
 
-        it 'does not match extended statuses' do
-          expect(factory.extended_statuses).to be_empty
-        end
-
-        it "fabricates a core status #{simple_status}" do
-          expect(status).to be_a expected_status
+        if simple_status == 'manual'
+          it 'matches a correct extended statuses' do
+            expect(factory.extended_statuses)
+              .to eq [Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Blocked]
+          end
+        elsif simple_status == 'scheduled'
+          it 'matches a correct extended statuses' do
+            expect(factory.extended_statuses)
+              .to eq [Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Scheduled]
+          end
+        else
+          it 'does not match extended statuses' do
+            expect(factory.extended_statuses).to be_empty
+          end
+
+          it "fabricates a core status #{simple_status}" do
+            expect(status).to be_a expected_status
+          end
         end
 
         it 'extends core status with common pipeline methods' do
@@ -40,27 +51,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Factory do
         end
       end
     end
-
-    context "when core status is manual" do
-      let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, status: :manual) }
-
-      it "matches manual core status" do
-        expect(factory.core_status)
-          .to be_a Gitlab::Ci::Status::Manual
-      end
-
-      it 'matches a correct extended statuses' do
-        expect(factory.extended_statuses)
-          .to eq [Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Blocked]
-      end
-
-      it 'extends core status with common pipeline methods' do
-        expect(status).to have_details
-        expect(status).not_to have_action
-        expect(status.details_path)
-          .to include "pipelines/#{pipeline.id}"
-      end
-    end
   end
 
   context 'when pipeline has warnings' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/scheduled_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/scheduled_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..29afa08b56b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/pipeline/scheduled_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Pipeline::Scheduled do
+  let(:pipeline) { double('pipeline') }
+
+  subject do
+    described_class.new(pipeline)
+  end
+
+  describe '#text' do
+    it 'overrides status text' do
+      expect(subject.text).to eq 'scheduled'
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#label' do
+    it 'overrides status label' do
+      expect(subject.label).to eq 'waiting for delayed job'
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.matches?' do
+    let(:user) { double('user') }
+    subject { described_class.matches?(pipeline, user) }
+
+    context 'when pipeline is scheduled' do
+      let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :scheduled) }
+
+      it 'is a correct match' do
+        expect(subject).to be true
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when pipeline is not scheduled' do
+      let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :success) }
+
+      it 'does not match' do
+        expect(subject).to be false
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/scheduled_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/scheduled_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c35a6f43d5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/status/scheduled_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Ci::Status::Scheduled do
+  subject do
+    described_class.new(double('subject'), double('user'))
+  end
+
+  describe '#text' do
+    it { expect(subject.text).to eq 'scheduled' }
+  end
+
+  describe '#label' do
+    it { expect(subject.label).to eq 'scheduled' }
+  end
+
+  describe '#icon' do
+    it { expect(subject.icon).to eq 'status_scheduled' }
+  end
+
+  describe '#favicon' do
+    it { expect(subject.favicon).to eq 'favicon_status_scheduled' }
+  end
+
+  describe '#group' do
+    it { expect(subject.group).to eq 'scheduled' }
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/templates_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/templates_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0dd74399a47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/templates/templates_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe "CI YML Templates" do
+  Gitlab::Template::GitlabCiYmlTemplate.all.each do |template|
+    it "#{template.name} should be valid" do
+      expect { Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(template.content) }.not_to raise_error
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor_spec.rb
index e73cdc54a15..85b23edce9f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/ci/yaml_processor_spec.rb
@@ -121,6 +121,21 @@ module Gitlab
             end
           end
         end
+
+        describe 'delayed job entry' do
+          context 'when delayed is defined' do
+            let(:config) do
+              YAML.dump(rspec: { script: 'rollout 10%',
+                                 when: 'delayed',
+                                 start_in: '1 day' })
+            end
+
+            it 'has the attributes' do
+              expect(subject[:when]).to eq 'delayed'
+              expect(subject[:options][:start_in]).to eq '1 day'
+            end
+          end
+        end
       end
 
       describe '#stages_attributes' do
@@ -562,6 +577,58 @@ module Gitlab
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when using `extends`' do
+        let(:config_processor) { Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(config) }
+
+        subject { config_processor.builds.first }
+
+        context 'when using simple `extends`' do
+          let(:config) do
+            <<~YAML
+              .template:
+                script: test
+
+              rspec:
+                extends: .template
+                image: ruby:alpine
+            YAML
+          end
+
+          it 'correctly extends rspec job' do
+            expect(config_processor.builds).to be_one
+            expect(subject.dig(:commands)).to eq 'test'
+            expect(subject.dig(:options, :image, :name)).to eq 'ruby:alpine'
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when using recursive `extends`' do
+          let(:config) do
+            <<~YAML
+              rspec:
+                extends: .test
+                script: rspec
+                when: always
+
+              .template:
+                before_script:
+                  - bundle install
+
+              .test:
+                extends: .template
+                script: test
+                image: image:test
+            YAML
+          end
+
+          it 'correctly extends rspec job' do
+            expect(config_processor.builds).to be_one
+            expect(subject.dig(:commands)).to eq "bundle install\nrspec"
+            expect(subject.dig(:options, :image, :name)).to eq 'image:test'
+            expect(subject.dig(:when)).to eq 'always'
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
       describe "When" do
         %w(on_success on_failure always).each do |when_state|
           it "returns #{when_state} when defined" do
@@ -1208,7 +1275,7 @@ module Gitlab
           config = YAML.dump({ rspec: { script: "test", when: 1 } })
           expect do
             Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(config)
-          end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError, "jobs:rspec when should be on_success, on_failure, always or manual")
+          end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError, "jobs:rspec when should be on_success, on_failure, always, manual or delayed")
         end
 
         it "returns errors if job artifacts:name is not an a string" do
@@ -1302,24 +1369,28 @@ module Gitlab
           end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError, "jobs:rspec dependencies should be an array of strings")
         end
 
-        it 'returns errors if pipeline variables expression is invalid' do
+        it 'returns errors if pipeline variables expression policy is invalid' do
           config = YAML.dump({ rspec: { script: 'test', only: { variables: ['== null'] } } })
 
           expect { Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(config) }
             .to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError,
                             'jobs:rspec:only variables invalid expression syntax')
         end
-      end
 
-      describe "Validate configuration templates" do
-        templates = Dir.glob("#{Rails.root.join('vendor/gitlab-ci-yml')}/**/*.gitlab-ci.yml")
+        it 'returns errors if pipeline changes policy is invalid' do
+          config = YAML.dump({ rspec: { script: 'test', only: { changes: [1] } } })
 
-        templates.each do |file|
-          it "does not return errors for #{file}" do
-            file = File.read(file)
+          expect { Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(config) }
+            .to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError,
+                            'jobs:rspec:only changes should be an array of strings')
+        end
 
-            expect { Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(file) }.not_to raise_error
-          end
+        it 'returns errors if extended hash configuration is invalid' do
+          config = YAML.dump({ rspec: { extends: 'something', script: 'test' } })
+
+          expect { Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor.new(config) }
+            .to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::YamlProcessor::ValidationError,
+                            'rspec: unknown key in `extends`')
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb
index 11e605eece6..bf130b8fabd 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/cleanup/project_uploads_spec.rb
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Cleanup::ProjectUploads do
             let!(:path) { File.join(FileUploader.root, orphaned.model.full_path, orphaned.path) }
 
             before do
-              stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
               stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
 
               FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.dirname(path))
@@ -156,7 +155,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Cleanup::ProjectUploads do
             let!(:new_path) { File.join(FileUploader.root, '-', 'project-lost-found', 'wrong', orphaned.path) }
 
             before do
-              stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
               stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
 
               FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.dirname(path))
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/closing_issue_extractor_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/closing_issue_extractor_spec.rb
index 1f35d1e4880..44568f2a653 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/closing_issue_extractor_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/closing_issue_extractor_spec.rb
@@ -338,6 +338,13 @@ describe Gitlab::ClosingIssueExtractor do
       end
     end
 
+    context "with an invalid keyword such as suffix insted of fix" do
+      it do
+        message = "suffix #{reference}"
+        expect(subject.closed_by_message(message)).to eq([])
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'with multiple references' do
       let(:other_issue) { create(:issue, project: project) }
       let(:third_issue) { create(:issue, project: project) }
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb
index 9095ffbfd52..1bd077ddbdf 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/conflict/file_spec.rb
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Conflict::File do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:repository) { project.repository }
-  let(:rugged) { Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { repository.rugged } }
+  let(:rugged) { rugged_repo(repository) }
   let(:their_commit) { rugged.branches['conflict-start'].target }
   let(:our_commit) { rugged.branches['conflict-resolvable'].target }
   let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_branch: 'conflict-resolvable', target_branch: 'conflict-start', source_project: project) }
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb
index 2c63f3b0455..6d29044ffd5 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/contributions_calendar_spec.rb
@@ -62,13 +62,16 @@ describe Gitlab::ContributionsCalendar do
       expect(calendar.activity_dates).to eq(last_week => 2, today => 1)
     end
 
-    it "only shows private events to authorized users" do
-      create_event(private_project, today)
-      create_event(feature_project, today)
+    context "when the user has opted-in for private contributions" do
+      it "shows private and public events to all users" do
+        user.update_column(:include_private_contributions, true)
+        create_event(private_project, today)
+        create_event(public_project, today)
 
-      expect(calendar.activity_dates[today]).to eq(0)
-      expect(calendar(user).activity_dates[today]).to eq(0)
-      expect(calendar(contributor).activity_dates[today]).to eq(2)
+        expect(calendar.activity_dates[today]).to eq(1)
+        expect(calendar(user).activity_dates[today]).to eq(1)
+        expect(calendar(contributor).activity_dates[today]).to eq(2)
+      end
     end
 
     it "counts the diff notes on merge request" do
@@ -128,7 +131,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ContributionsCalendar do
       e3 = create_event(feature_project, today)
       create_event(public_project, last_week)
 
-      expect(calendar.events_by_date(today)).to contain_exactly(e1)
+      expect(calendar.events_by_date(today)).to contain_exactly(e1, e3)
       expect(calendar(contributor).events_by_date(today)).to contain_exactly(e1, e2, e3)
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb
index 9ca960502c8..98f1696badb 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/data_builder/pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -6,10 +6,10 @@ describe Gitlab::DataBuilder::Pipeline do
 
   let(:pipeline) do
     create(:ci_pipeline,
-           project: project,
-           status: 'success',
-           sha: project.commit.sha,
-           ref: project.default_branch)
+          project: project,
+          status: 'success',
+          sha: project.commit.sha,
+          ref: project.default_branch)
   end
 
   let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) }
@@ -20,18 +20,35 @@ describe Gitlab::DataBuilder::Pipeline do
     let(:build_data) { data[:builds].first }
     let(:project_data) { data[:project] }
 
-    it { expect(attributes).to be_a(Hash) }
-    it { expect(attributes[:ref]).to eq(pipeline.ref) }
-    it { expect(attributes[:sha]).to eq(pipeline.sha) }
-    it { expect(attributes[:tag]).to eq(pipeline.tag) }
-    it { expect(attributes[:id]).to eq(pipeline.id) }
-    it { expect(attributes[:status]).to eq(pipeline.status) }
-    it { expect(attributes[:detailed_status]).to eq('passed') }
+    it 'has correct attributes' do
+      expect(attributes).to be_a(Hash)
+      expect(attributes[:ref]).to eq(pipeline.ref)
+      expect(attributes[:sha]).to eq(pipeline.sha)
+      expect(attributes[:tag]).to eq(pipeline.tag)
+      expect(attributes[:id]).to eq(pipeline.id)
+      expect(attributes[:status]).to eq(pipeline.status)
+      expect(attributes[:detailed_status]).to eq('passed')
+      expect(build_data).to be_a(Hash)
+      expect(build_data[:id]).to eq(build.id)
+      expect(build_data[:status]).to eq(build.status)
+      expect(project_data).to eq(project.hook_attrs(backward: false))
+    end
 
-    it { expect(build_data).to be_a(Hash) }
-    it { expect(build_data[:id]).to eq(build.id) }
-    it { expect(build_data[:status]).to eq(build.status) }
+    context 'pipeline without variables' do
+      it 'has empty variables hash' do
+        expect(attributes[:variables]).to be_a(Array)
+        expect(attributes[:variables]).to be_empty()
+      end
+    end
 
-    it { expect(project_data).to eq(project.hook_attrs(backward: false)) }
+    context 'pipeline with variables' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) }
+      let(:data) { described_class.build(pipeline) }
+      let(:attributes) { data[:object_attributes] }
+      let!(:pipeline_variable) { create(:ci_pipeline_variable, pipeline: pipeline, key: 'TRIGGER_KEY_1', value: 'TRIGGER_VALUE_1') }
+
+      it { expect(attributes[:variables]).to be_a(Array) }
+      it { expect(attributes[:variables]).to contain_exactly({ key: 'TRIGGER_KEY_1', value: 'TRIGGER_VALUE_1' }) }
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/database/subquery_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/subquery_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..70380e02f16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/database/subquery_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Gitlab::Database::Subquery do
+  describe '.self_join' do
+    set(:project) { create(:project) }
+
+    it 'allows you to delete_all rows with WHERE and LIMIT' do
+      events = create_list(:event, 8, project: project)
+
+      expect do
+        described_class.self_join(Event.where('id < ?', events[5]).recent.limit(2)).delete_all
+      end.to change { Event.count }.by(-2)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/commit_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/commit_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6d1b66deb6a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/commit_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Diff::FileCollection::Commit do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+
+  it_behaves_like 'diff statistics' do
+    let(:collection_default_args) do
+      { diff_options: {} }
+    end
+    let(:diffable) { project.commit }
+    let(:stub_path) { 'bar/branch-test.txt' }
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/compare_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/compare_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f330f299ac1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/compare_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Diff::FileCollection::Compare do
+  include RepoHelpers
+
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:commit)  { project.commit }
+  let(:start_commit) { sample_image_commit }
+  let(:head_commit) { sample_commit }
+  let(:raw_compare) do
+    Gitlab::Git::Compare.new(project.repository.raw_repository,
+                             start_commit.id,
+                             head_commit.id)
+  end
+
+  it_behaves_like 'diff statistics' do
+    let(:collection_default_args) do
+      {
+        project: diffable.project,
+        diff_options: {},
+        diff_refs: diffable.diff_refs
+      }
+    end
+    let(:diffable) { Compare.new(raw_compare, project) }
+    let(:stub_path) { '.gitignore' }
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/merge_request_diff_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/merge_request_diff_spec.rb
index 79287021981..4578da70bfc 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/merge_request_diff_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_collection/merge_request_diff_spec.rb
@@ -29,6 +29,14 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::FileCollection::MergeRequestDiff do
     expect(mr_diff.cache_key).not_to eq(key)
   end
 
+  it_behaves_like 'diff statistics' do
+    let(:collection_default_args) do
+      { diff_options: {} }
+    end
+    let(:diffable) { merge_request.merge_request_diff }
+    let(:stub_path) { '.gitignore' }
+  end
+
   shared_examples 'initializes a DiffCollection' do
     it 'returns a valid instance of a DiffCollection' do
       expect(diff_files).to be_a(Gitlab::Git::DiffCollection)
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_spec.rb
index ebeb05d6e02..2f51642b58e 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/file_spec.rb
@@ -186,6 +186,70 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::File do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'diff file stats' do
+    let(:diff_file) do
+      described_class.new(diff,
+                          diff_refs: commit.diff_refs,
+                          repository: project.repository,
+                          stats: stats)
+    end
+
+    let(:raw_diff) do
+      <<~EOS
+        --- a/files/ruby/popen.rb
+        +++ b/files/ruby/popen.rb
+        @@ -6,12 +6,18 @@ module Popen
+
+           def popen(cmd, path=nil)
+             unless cmd.is_a?(Array)
+        -      raise "System commands must be given as an array of strings"
+        +      raise RuntimeError, "System commands must be given as an array of strings"
+        +      # foobar
+             end
+      EOS
+    end
+
+    describe '#added_lines' do
+      context 'when stats argument given' do
+        let(:stats) { double(Gitaly::DiffStats, additions: 10, deletions: 15) }
+
+        it 'returns added lines from stats' do
+          expect(diff_file.added_lines).to eq(stats.additions)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when stats argument not given' do
+        let(:stats) { nil }
+
+        it 'returns added lines by parsing raw diff' do
+          allow(diff_file).to receive(:raw_diff) { raw_diff }
+
+          expect(diff_file.added_lines).to eq(2)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '#removed_lines' do
+      context 'when stats argument given' do
+        let(:stats) { double(Gitaly::DiffStats, additions: 10, deletions: 15) }
+
+        it 'returns removed lines from stats' do
+          expect(diff_file.removed_lines).to eq(stats.deletions)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when stats argument not given' do
+        let(:stats) { nil }
+
+        it 'returns removed lines by parsing raw diff' do
+          allow(diff_file).to receive(:raw_diff) { raw_diff }
+
+          expect(diff_file.removed_lines).to eq(1)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#simple_viewer' do
     context 'when the file is not diffable' do
       before do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_cache_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_cache_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..bfcfed4231f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_cache_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Diff::HighlightCache do
+  let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request_with_diffs) }
+
+  subject(:cache) { described_class.new(merge_request.diffs, backend: backend) }
+
+  describe '#decorate' do
+    let(:backend) { double('backend').as_null_object }
+
+    # Manually creates a Diff::File object to avoid triggering the cache on
+    # the FileCollection::MergeRequestDiff
+    let(:diff_file) do
+      diffs = merge_request.diffs
+      raw_diff = diffs.diffable.raw_diffs(diffs.diff_options.merge(paths: ['CHANGELOG'])).first
+      Gitlab::Diff::File.new(raw_diff,
+                             repository: diffs.project.repository,
+                             diff_refs: diffs.diff_refs,
+                             fallback_diff_refs: diffs.fallback_diff_refs)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not calculate highlighting when reading from cache' do
+      cache.write_if_empty
+      cache.decorate(diff_file)
+
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Diff::Highlight).not_to receive(:highlight)
+
+      diff_file.highlighted_diff_lines
+    end
+
+    it 'assigns highlighted diff lines to the DiffFile' do
+      cache.write_if_empty
+      cache.decorate(diff_file)
+
+      expect(diff_file.highlighted_diff_lines.size).to be > 5
+    end
+
+    it 'submits a single reading from the cache' do
+      cache.decorate(diff_file)
+      cache.decorate(diff_file)
+
+      expect(backend).to have_received(:read).with(cache.key).once
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#write_if_empty' do
+    let(:backend) { double('backend', read: {}).as_null_object }
+
+    it 'submits a single writing to the cache' do
+      cache.write_if_empty
+      cache.write_if_empty
+
+      expect(backend).to have_received(:write).with(cache.key,
+                                                    hash_including('CHANGELOG-false-false-false'),
+                                                    expires_in: 1.week).once
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#clear' do
+    let(:backend) { double('backend').as_null_object }
+
+    it 'clears cache' do
+      cache.clear
+
+      expect(backend).to have_received(:delete).with(cache.key)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb
index 3c8cf9c56cc..5d0a603d11d 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/highlight_spec.rb
@@ -8,6 +8,20 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do
   let(:diff) { commit.raw_diffs.first }
   let(:diff_file) { Gitlab::Diff::File.new(diff, diff_refs: commit.diff_refs, repository: project.repository) }
 
+  shared_examples 'without inline diffs' do
+    let(:code) { '<h2 onmouseover="alert(2)">Test</h2>' }
+
+    before do
+      allow(Gitlab::Diff::InlineDiff).to receive(:for_lines).and_return([])
+      allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Diff::Line).to receive(:text).and_return(code)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns html escaped diff text' do
+      expect(subject[1].rich_text).to eq html_escape(code)
+      expect(subject[1].rich_text).to be_html_safe
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#highlight' do
     context "with a diff file" do
       let(:subject) { described_class.new(diff_file, repository: project.repository).highlight }
@@ -38,6 +52,16 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do
 
         expect(subject[5].rich_text).to eq(code)
       end
+
+      context 'when no diff_refs' do
+        before do
+          allow(diff_file).to receive(:diff_refs).and_return(nil)
+        end
+
+        context 'when no inline diffs' do
+          it_behaves_like 'without inline diffs'
+        end
+      end
     end
 
     context "with diff lines" do
@@ -93,6 +117,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Highlight do
           expect { subject }. to raise_exception(RangeError)
         end
       end
+
+      context 'when no inline diffs' do
+        it_behaves_like 'without inline diffs'
+      end
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb
index 677eb373d22..2d94356f386 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/diff/position_spec.rb
@@ -5,6 +5,34 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Position do
 
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
 
+  let(:args_for_img) do
+    {
+      old_path: "files/any.img",
+      new_path: "files/any.img",
+      base_sha: nil,
+      head_sha: nil,
+      start_sha: nil,
+      width: 100,
+      height: 100,
+      x: 1,
+      y: 100,
+      position_type: "image"
+    }
+  end
+
+  let(:args_for_text) do
+    {
+      old_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb",
+      new_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb",
+      old_line: nil,
+      new_line: 14,
+      base_sha: nil,
+      head_sha: nil,
+      start_sha: nil,
+      position_type: "text"
+    }
+  end
+
   describe "position for an added text file" do
     let(:commit) { project.commit("2ea1f3dec713d940208fb5ce4a38765ecb5d3f73") }
 
@@ -529,53 +557,49 @@ describe Gitlab::Diff::Position do
     end
   end
 
+  describe "#as_json" do
+    shared_examples "diff position json" do
+      let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(args) }
+
+      it "returns the position as JSON" do
+        expect(diff_position.as_json).to eq(args.stringify_keys)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "for text positon" do
+      let(:args) { args_for_text }
+
+      it_behaves_like "diff position json"
+    end
+
+    context "for image positon" do
+      let(:args) { args_for_img }
+
+      it_behaves_like "diff position json"
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "#to_json" do
     shared_examples "diff position json" do
+      let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(args) }
+
       it "returns the position as JSON" do
-        expect(JSON.parse(diff_position.to_json)).to eq(hash.stringify_keys)
+        expect(JSON.parse(diff_position.to_json)).to eq(args.stringify_keys)
       end
 
       it "works when nested under another hash" do
-        expect(JSON.parse(JSON.generate(pos: diff_position))).to eq('pos' => hash.stringify_keys)
+        expect(JSON.parse(JSON.generate(pos: diff_position))).to eq('pos' => args.stringify_keys)
       end
     end
 
     context "for text positon" do
-      let(:hash) do
-        {
-          old_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb",
-          new_path: "files/ruby/popen.rb",
-          old_line: nil,
-          new_line: 14,
-          base_sha: nil,
-          head_sha: nil,
-          start_sha: nil,
-          position_type: "text"
-        }
-      end
-
-      let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(hash) }
+      let(:args) { args_for_text }
 
       it_behaves_like "diff position json"
     end
 
     context "for image positon" do
-      let(:hash) do
-        {
-          old_path: "files/any.img",
-          new_path: "files/any.img",
-          base_sha: nil,
-          head_sha: nil,
-          start_sha: nil,
-          width: 100,
-          height: 100,
-          x: 1,
-          y: 100,
-          position_type: "image"
-        }
-      end
-
-      let(:diff_position) { described_class.new(hash) }
+      let(:args) { args_for_img }
 
       it_behaves_like "diff position json"
     end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_issue_handler_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_issue_handler_spec.rb
index 154ab4b3856..1d75e8cb5da 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_issue_handler_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_issue_handler_spec.rb
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Email::Handler::CreateIssueHandler do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_merge_request_handler_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_merge_request_handler_spec.rb
index 43c6280f251..ace3104f36f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_merge_request_handler_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_merge_request_handler_spec.rb
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Email::Handler::CreateMergeRequestHandler do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_note_handler_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_note_handler_spec.rb
index 950a7dd7d6c..b1f48c15c21 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_note_handler_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/create_note_handler_spec.rb
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Email::Handler::CreateNoteHandler do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler_spec.rb
index ce160e11de2..b8660b133ec 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler/unsubscribe_handler_spec.rb
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Email::Handler::UnsubscribeHandler do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler_spec.rb
index cedbfcc0d18..c651765dc0f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/email/handler_spec.rb
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Email::Handler do
@@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Email::Handler do
   end
 
   def ce_handlers
-    @ce_handlers ||= Gitlab::Email::Handler::HANDLERS.reject do |handler|
+    @ce_handlers ||= Gitlab::Email::Handler.handlers.reject do |handler|
       handler.name.start_with?('Gitlab::Email::Handler::EE::')
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/favicon_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/favicon_spec.rb
index 68abcb3520a..49a423191bb 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/favicon_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/favicon_spec.rb
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ RSpec.describe Gitlab::Favicon, :request_store do
         favicon_status_not_found
         favicon_status_pending
         favicon_status_running
+        favicon_status_scheduled
         favicon_status_skipped
         favicon_status_success
         favicon_status_warning
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/file_detector_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/file_detector_spec.rb
index 8e524f9b05a..9e351368b22 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/file_detector_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/file_detector_spec.rb
@@ -29,11 +29,15 @@ describe Gitlab::FileDetector do
     end
 
     it 'returns the type of a license file' do
-      %w(LICENSE LICENCE COPYING).each do |file|
+      %w(LICENSE LICENCE COPYING UNLICENSE UNLICENCE).each do |file|
         expect(described_class.type_of(file)).to eq(:license)
       end
     end
 
+    it 'returns nil for an UNCOPYING file' do
+      expect(described_class.type_of('UNCOPYING')).to be_nil
+    end
+
     it 'returns the type of a version file' do
       expect(described_class.type_of('VERSION')).to eq(:version)
     end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/file_markdown_link_builder_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/file_markdown_link_builder_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..feb2776c5d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/file_markdown_link_builder_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::FileMarkdownLinkBuilder do
+  let(:custom_class) do
+    Class.new do
+      include Gitlab::FileMarkdownLinkBuilder
+    end.new
+  end
+
+  before do
+    allow(custom_class).to receive(:filename).and_return(filename)
+  end
+
+  describe 'markdown_link' do
+    let(:url) { "/uploads/#{filename}"}
+
+    before do
+      allow(custom_class).to receive(:secure_url).and_return(url)
+    end
+
+    context 'when file name has the character ]' do
+      let(:filename) { 'd]k.png' }
+
+      it 'escapes the character' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_link).to eq '![d\\]k](/uploads/d]k.png)'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when file is an image or video' do
+      let(:filename) { 'dk.png' }
+
+      it 'returns preview markdown link' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_link).to eq '![dk](/uploads/dk.png)'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when file is not an image or video' do
+      let(:filename) { 'dk.zip' }
+
+      it 'returns markdown link' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_link).to eq '[dk.zip](/uploads/dk.zip)'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when file name is blank' do
+      let(:filename) { nil }
+
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_link).to eq nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'mardown_name' do
+    context 'when file is an image or video' do
+      let(:filename) { 'dk.png' }
+
+      it 'retrieves the name without the extension' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_name).to eq 'dk'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when file is not an image or video' do
+      let(:filename) { 'dk.zip' }
+
+      it 'retrieves the name with the extesion' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_name).to eq 'dk.zip'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when file name is blank' do
+      let(:filename) { nil }
+
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        expect(custom_class.markdown_name).to eq nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/file_type_detection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/file_type_detection_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5e9b8988cc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/file_type_detection_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::FileTypeDetection do
+  def upload_fixture(filename)
+    fixture_file_upload(File.join('spec', 'fixtures', filename))
+  end
+
+  describe '#image_or_video?' do
+    context 'when class is an uploader' do
+      let(:uploader) do
+        example_uploader = Class.new(CarrierWave::Uploader::Base) do
+          include Gitlab::FileTypeDetection
+
+          storage :file
+        end
+
+        example_uploader.new
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true for an image file' do
+        uploader.store!(upload_fixture('dk.png'))
+
+        expect(uploader).to be_image_or_video
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true for a video file' do
+        uploader.store!(upload_fixture('video_sample.mp4'))
+
+        expect(uploader).to be_image_or_video
+      end
+
+      it 'returns false for other extensions' do
+        uploader.store!(upload_fixture('doc_sample.txt'))
+
+        expect(uploader).not_to be_image_or_video
+      end
+
+      it 'returns false if filename is blank' do
+        uploader.store!(upload_fixture('dk.png'))
+
+        allow(uploader).to receive(:filename).and_return(nil)
+
+        expect(uploader).not_to be_image_or_video
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when class is a regular class' do
+      let(:custom_class) do
+        custom_class = Class.new do
+          include Gitlab::FileTypeDetection
+        end
+
+        custom_class.new
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true for an image file' do
+        allow(custom_class).to receive(:filename).and_return('dk.png')
+
+        expect(custom_class).to be_image_or_video
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true for a video file' do
+        allow(custom_class).to receive(:filename).and_return('video_sample.mp4')
+
+        expect(custom_class).to be_image_or_video
+      end
+
+      it 'returns false for other extensions' do
+        allow(custom_class).to receive(:filename).and_return('doc_sample.txt')
+
+        expect(custom_class).not_to be_image_or_video
+      end
+
+      it 'returns false if filename is blank' do
+        allow(custom_class).to receive(:filename).and_return(nil)
+
+        expect(custom_class).not_to be_image_or_video
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb
index ea49502ae2e..b243f0dacae 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/blob_spec.rb
@@ -4,6 +4,9 @@ require "spec_helper"
 
 describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do
   let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
+  let(:rugged) do
+    Rugged::Repository.new(File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, TEST_REPO_PATH))
+  end
 
   describe 'initialize' do
     let(:blob) { Gitlab::Git::Blob.new(name: 'test') }
@@ -139,9 +142,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do
       it 'limits the size of a large file' do
         blob_size = Gitlab::Git::Blob::MAX_DATA_DISPLAY_SIZE + 1
         buffer = Array.new(blob_size, 0)
-        rugged_blob = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          Rugged::Blob.from_buffer(repository.rugged, buffer.join(''))
-        end
+        rugged_blob = Rugged::Blob.from_buffer(rugged, buffer.join(''))
         blob = Gitlab::Git::Blob.raw(repository, rugged_blob)
 
         expect(blob.size).to eq(blob_size)
@@ -156,9 +157,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do
 
     context 'when sha references a tree' do
       it 'returns nil' do
-        tree = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          repository.rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}')
-        end
+        tree = rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}')
 
         blob = Gitlab::Git::Blob.raw(repository, tree.oid)
 
@@ -262,11 +261,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Blob, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '.batch_lfs_pointers' do
-    let(:tree_object) do
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        repository.rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}')
-      end
-    end
+    let(:tree_object) { rugged.rev_parse('master^{tree}') }
 
     let(:non_lfs_blob) do
       Gitlab::Git::Blob.find(
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb
index 79ccbb79966..0df282d0ae3 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/branch_spec.rb
@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@ require "spec_helper"
 describe Gitlab::Git::Branch, :seed_helper do
   let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
   let(:rugged) do
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      repository.rugged
-    end
+    Rugged::Repository.new(File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, repository.relative_path))
   end
 
   subject { repository.branches }
@@ -74,9 +72,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Branch, :seed_helper do
       Gitlab::Git.committer_hash(email: user.email, name: user.name)
     end
     let(:params) do
-      parents = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        [repository.rugged.head.target]
-      end
+      parents = [rugged.head.target]
       tree = parents.first.tree
 
       {
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb
index 2718a3c5e49..9ef27081f98 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/commit_spec.rb
@@ -1,19 +1,17 @@
 require "spec_helper"
 
 describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
-  let(:commit) { described_class.find(repository, SeedRepo::Commit::ID) }
-  let(:rugged_commit) do
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      repository.rugged.lookup(SeedRepo::Commit::ID)
-    end
+  let(:rugged_repo) do
+    Rugged::Repository.new(File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, TEST_REPO_PATH))
   end
+  let(:commit) { described_class.find(repository, SeedRepo::Commit::ID) }
+  let(:rugged_commit) { rugged_repo.lookup(SeedRepo::Commit::ID) }
+
   describe "Commit info" do
     before do
-      repo = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged
-      end
-
       @committer = {
         email: 'mike@smith.com',
         name: "Mike Smith",
@@ -26,12 +24,12 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do
         time: Time.now
       }
 
-      @parents = [repo.head.target]
+      @parents = [rugged_repo.head.target]
       @gitlab_parents = @parents.map { |c| described_class.find(repository, c.oid) }
       @tree = @parents.first.tree
 
       sha = Rugged::Commit.create(
-        repo,
+        rugged_repo,
         author: @author,
         committer: @committer,
         tree: @tree,
@@ -40,7 +38,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do
         update_ref: "HEAD"
       )
 
-      @raw_commit = repo.lookup(sha)
+      @raw_commit = rugged_repo.lookup(sha)
       @commit = described_class.find(repository, sha)
     end
 
@@ -61,10 +59,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do
 
     after do
       # Erase the new commit so other tests get the original repo
-      repo = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged
-      end
-      repo.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID)
+      rugged_repo.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID)
     end
   end
 
@@ -120,9 +115,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Commit, :seed_helper do
     describe '.find' do
       it "should return first head commit if without params" do
         expect(described_class.last(repository).id).to eq(
-          Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-            repository.rugged.head.target.oid
-          end
+          rugged_repo.head.target.oid
         )
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/committer_with_hooks_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/committer_with_hooks_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index c7626058acd..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/committer_with_hooks_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,156 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::Git::CommitterWithHooks, :seed_helper do
-  # TODO https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitaly/issues/1234
-  skip 'needs to be moved to gitaly-ruby test suite' do
-    shared_examples 'calling wiki hooks' do
-      let(:project) { create(:project) }
-      let(:user) { project.owner }
-      let(:project_wiki) { ProjectWiki.new(project, user) }
-      let(:wiki) { project_wiki.wiki }
-      let(:options) do
-        {
-          id: user.id,
-          username: user.username,
-          name: user.name,
-          email: user.email,
-          message: 'commit message'
-        }
-      end
-
-      subject { described_class.new(wiki, options) }
-
-      before do
-        project_wiki.create_page('home', 'test content')
-      end
-
-      shared_examples 'failing pre-receive hook' do
-        before do
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:run_hook).with('pre-receive').and_return([false, ''])
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).not_to receive(:run_hook).with('update')
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).not_to receive(:run_hook).with('post-receive')
-        end
-
-        it 'raises exception' do
-          expect { subject.commit }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Wiki::OperationError)
-        end
-
-        it 'does not create a new commit inside the repository' do
-          current_rev = find_current_rev
-
-          expect { subject.commit }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Wiki::OperationError)
-
-          expect(current_rev).to eq find_current_rev
-        end
-      end
-
-      shared_examples 'failing update hook' do
-        before do
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:run_hook).with('pre-receive').and_return([true, ''])
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:run_hook).with('update').and_return([false, ''])
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).not_to receive(:run_hook).with('post-receive')
-        end
-
-        it 'raises exception' do
-          expect { subject.commit }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Wiki::OperationError)
-        end
-
-        it 'does not create a new commit inside the repository' do
-          current_rev = find_current_rev
-
-          expect { subject.commit }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Wiki::OperationError)
-
-          expect(current_rev).to eq find_current_rev
-        end
-      end
-
-      shared_examples 'failing post-receive hook' do
-        before do
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:run_hook).with('pre-receive').and_return([true, ''])
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:run_hook).with('update').and_return([true, ''])
-          expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:run_hook).with('post-receive').and_return([false, ''])
-        end
-
-        it 'does not raise exception' do
-          expect { subject.commit }.not_to raise_error
-        end
-
-        it 'creates the commit' do
-          current_rev = find_current_rev
-
-          subject.commit
-
-          expect(current_rev).not_to eq find_current_rev
-        end
-      end
-
-      shared_examples 'when hooks call succceeds' do
-        let(:hook) { double(:hook) }
-
-        it 'calls the three hooks' do
-          expect(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:new).exactly(3).times.and_return(hook)
-          expect(hook).to receive(:trigger).exactly(3).times.and_return([true, nil])
-
-          subject.commit
-        end
-
-        it 'creates the commit' do
-          current_rev = find_current_rev
-
-          subject.commit
-
-          expect(current_rev).not_to eq find_current_rev
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when creating a page' do
-        before do
-          project_wiki.create_page('index', 'test content')
-        end
-
-        it_behaves_like 'failing pre-receive hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'failing update hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'failing post-receive hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'when hooks call succceeds'
-      end
-
-      context 'when updating a page' do
-        before do
-          project_wiki.update_page(find_page('home'), content: 'some other content', format: :markdown)
-        end
-
-        it_behaves_like 'failing pre-receive hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'failing update hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'failing post-receive hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'when hooks call succceeds'
-      end
-
-      context 'when deleting a page' do
-        before do
-          project_wiki.delete_page(find_page('home'))
-        end
-
-        it_behaves_like 'failing pre-receive hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'failing update hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'failing post-receive hook'
-        it_behaves_like 'when hooks call succceeds'
-      end
-
-      def find_current_rev
-        wiki.gollum_wiki.repo.commits.first&.sha
-      end
-
-      def find_page(name)
-        wiki.page(title: name)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when Gitaly is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'calling wiki hooks'
-    end
-
-    context 'when Gitaly is disabled', :disable_gitaly do
-      it_behaves_like 'calling wiki hooks'
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb
index 87d9fcee39e..8a4415506c4 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_spec.rb
@@ -2,12 +2,24 @@ require "spec_helper"
 
 describe Gitlab::Git::Diff, :seed_helper do
   let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
+  let(:gitaly_diff) do
+    Gitlab::GitalyClient::Diff.new(
+      from_path: '.gitmodules',
+      to_path: '.gitmodules',
+      old_mode: 0100644,
+      new_mode: 0100644,
+      from_id: '0792c58905eff3432b721f8c4a64363d8e28d9ae',
+      to_id: 'efd587ccb47caf5f31fc954edb21f0a713d9ecc3',
+      overflow_marker: false,
+      collapsed: false,
+      too_large: false,
+      patch: "@@ -4,3 +4,6 @@\n [submodule \"gitlab-shell\"]\n \tpath = gitlab-shell\n \turl = https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlab-shell.git\n+[submodule \"gitlab-grack\"]\n+\tpath = gitlab-grack\n+\turl = https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-grack.git\n"
+    )
+  end
 
   before do
     @raw_diff_hash = {
       diff: <<EOT.gsub(/^ {8}/, "").sub(/\n$/, ""),
-        --- a/.gitmodules
-        +++ b/.gitmodules
         @@ -4,3 +4,6 @@
          [submodule "gitlab-shell"]
          \tpath = gitlab-shell
@@ -26,12 +38,6 @@ EOT
       deleted_file: false,
       too_large: false
     }
-
-    # TODO use a Gitaly diff object instead
-    @rugged_diff = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      repository.rugged.diff("5937ac0a7beb003549fc5fd26fc247adbce4a52e^", "5937ac0a7beb003549fc5fd26fc247adbce4a52e", paths:
-                                              [".gitmodules"]).patches.first
-    end
   end
 
   describe '.new' do
@@ -58,9 +64,22 @@ EOT
       end
     end
 
-    context 'using a Rugged::Patch' do
+    context 'using a GitalyClient::Diff' do
+      let(:gitaly_diff) do
+        Gitlab::GitalyClient::Diff.new(
+          to_path: ".gitmodules",
+          from_path: ".gitmodules",
+          old_mode: 0100644,
+          new_mode: 0100644,
+          from_id: '357406f3075a57708d0163752905cc1576fceacc',
+          to_id: '8e5177d718c561d36efde08bad36b43687ee6bf0',
+          patch: raw_patch
+        )
+      end
+      let(:diff) { described_class.new(gitaly_diff) }
+
       context 'with a small diff' do
-        let(:diff) { described_class.new(@rugged_diff) }
+        let(:raw_patch) { @raw_diff_hash[:diff] }
 
         it 'initializes the diff' do
           expect(diff.to_hash).to eq(@raw_diff_hash)
@@ -72,28 +91,20 @@ EOT
       end
 
       context 'using a diff that is too large' do
-        it 'prunes the diff' do
-          expect_any_instance_of(String).to receive(:bytesize)
-            .and_return(1024 * 1024 * 1024)
-
-          diff = described_class.new(@rugged_diff)
+        let(:raw_patch) { 'a' * 204800 }
 
+        it 'prunes the diff' do
           expect(diff.diff).to be_empty
           expect(diff).to be_too_large
         end
       end
 
       context 'using a collapsable diff that is too large' do
-        before do
-          # The patch total size is 200, with lines between 21 and 54.
-          # This is a quick-and-dirty way to test this. Ideally, a new patch is
-          # added to the test repo with a size that falls between the real limits.
-          stub_const("#{described_class}::SIZE_LIMIT", 150)
-          stub_const("#{described_class}::COLLAPSE_LIMIT", 100)
-        end
+        let(:raw_patch) { 'a' * 204800 }
 
         it 'prunes the diff as a large diff instead of as a collapsed diff' do
-          diff = described_class.new(@rugged_diff, expanded: false)
+          gitaly_diff.too_large = true
+          diff = described_class.new(gitaly_diff, expanded: false)
 
           expect(diff.diff).to be_empty
           expect(diff).to be_too_large
@@ -101,54 +112,6 @@ EOT
         end
       end
 
-      context 'using a large binary diff' do
-        it 'does not prune the diff' do
-          expect_any_instance_of(Rugged::Diff::Delta).to receive(:binary?)
-            .and_return(true)
-
-          diff = described_class.new(@rugged_diff)
-
-          expect(diff.diff).not_to be_empty
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'using a GitalyClient::Diff' do
-      let(:diff) do
-        described_class.new(
-          Gitlab::GitalyClient::Diff.new(
-            to_path: ".gitmodules",
-            from_path: ".gitmodules",
-            old_mode: 0100644,
-            new_mode: 0100644,
-            from_id: '357406f3075a57708d0163752905cc1576fceacc',
-            to_id: '8e5177d718c561d36efde08bad36b43687ee6bf0',
-            patch: raw_patch
-          )
-        )
-      end
-
-      context 'with a small diff' do
-        let(:raw_patch) { @raw_diff_hash[:diff] }
-
-        it 'initializes the diff' do
-          expect(diff.to_hash).to eq(@raw_diff_hash)
-        end
-
-        it 'does not prune the diff' do
-          expect(diff).not_to be_too_large
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'using a diff that is too large' do
-        let(:raw_patch) { 'a' * 204800 }
-
-        it 'prunes the diff' do
-          expect(diff.diff).to be_empty
-          expect(diff).to be_too_large
-        end
-      end
-
       context 'when the patch passed is not UTF-8-encoded' do
         let(:raw_patch) { @raw_diff_hash[:diff].encode(Encoding::ASCII_8BIT) }
 
@@ -259,31 +222,37 @@ EOT
     end
 
     it 'leave non-binary diffs as-is' do
-      diff = described_class.new(@rugged_diff)
+      diff = described_class.new(gitaly_diff)
 
       expect(diff.json_safe_diff).to eq(diff.diff)
     end
   end
 
   describe '#submodule?' do
-    before do
-      # TODO use a Gitaly diff object instead
-      rugged_commit = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        repository.rugged.rev_parse('5937ac0a7beb003549fc5fd26fc247adbce4a52e')
-      end
-
-      @diffs = rugged_commit.parents[0].diff(rugged_commit).patches
+    let(:gitaly_submodule_diff) do
+      Gitlab::GitalyClient::Diff.new(
+        from_path: 'gitlab-grack',
+        to_path: 'gitlab-grack',
+        old_mode: 0,
+        new_mode: 57344,
+        from_id: '0000000000000000000000000000000000000000',
+        to_id: '645f6c4c82fd3f5e06f67134450a570b795e55a6',
+        overflow_marker: false,
+        collapsed: false,
+        too_large: false,
+        patch: "@@ -0,0 +1 @@\n+Subproject commit 645f6c4c82fd3f5e06f67134450a570b795e55a6\n"
+      )
     end
 
-    it { expect(described_class.new(@diffs[0]).submodule?).to eq(false) }
-    it { expect(described_class.new(@diffs[1]).submodule?).to eq(true) }
+    it { expect(described_class.new(gitaly_diff).submodule?).to eq(false) }
+    it { expect(described_class.new(gitaly_submodule_diff).submodule?).to eq(true) }
   end
 
   describe '#line_count' do
     it 'returns the correct number of lines' do
-      diff = described_class.new(@rugged_diff)
+      diff = described_class.new(gitaly_diff)
 
-      expect(diff.line_count).to eq(9)
+      expect(diff.line_count).to eq(7)
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_stats_collection_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_stats_collection_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b07690ef39c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/diff_stats_collection_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require "spec_helper"
+
+describe Gitlab::Git::DiffStatsCollection do
+  let(:stats_a) do
+    double(Gitaly::DiffStats, additions: 10, deletions: 15, path: 'foo')
+  end
+
+  let(:stats_b) do
+    double(Gitaly::DiffStats, additions: 5, deletions: 1, path: 'bar')
+  end
+
+  let(:diff_stats) { [stats_a, stats_b] }
+  let(:collection) { described_class.new(diff_stats) }
+
+  describe '#find_by_path' do
+    it 'returns stats by path when found' do
+      expect(collection.find_by_path('foo')).to eq(stats_a)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns nil when stats is not found by path' do
+      expect(collection.find_by_path('no-file')).to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#paths' do
+    it 'returns only modified paths' do
+      expect(collection.paths).to eq %w[foo bar]
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/gitlab_projects_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/gitlab_projects_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index f5d8503c30c..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/gitlab_projects_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,321 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::Git::GitlabProjects do
-  after do
-    TestEnv.clean_test_path
-  end
-
-  around do |example|
-    # TODO move this spec to gitaly-ruby. GitlabProjects is not used in gitlab-ce
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      example.run
-    end
-  end
-
-  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-
-  if $VERBOSE
-    let(:logger) { Logger.new(STDOUT) }
-  else
-    let(:logger) { double('logger').as_null_object }
-  end
-
-  let(:tmp_repos_path) { TestEnv.repos_path }
-  let(:repo_name) { project.disk_path + '.git' }
-  let(:tmp_repo_path) { File.join(tmp_repos_path, repo_name) }
-  let(:gl_projects) { build_gitlab_projects(TestEnv::REPOS_STORAGE, repo_name) }
-
-  describe '#initialize' do
-    it { expect(gl_projects.shard_path).to eq(tmp_repos_path) }
-    it { expect(gl_projects.repository_relative_path).to eq(repo_name) }
-    it { expect(gl_projects.repository_absolute_path).to eq(File.join(tmp_repos_path, repo_name)) }
-    it { expect(gl_projects.logger).to eq(logger) }
-  end
-
-  describe '#push_branches' do
-    let(:remote_name) { 'remote-name' }
-    let(:branch_name) { 'master' }
-    let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} push -- #{remote_name} #{branch_name}) }
-    let(:force) { false }
-
-    subject { gl_projects.push_branches(remote_name, 600, force, [branch_name]) }
-
-    it 'executes the command' do
-      stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, success: true)
-
-      is_expected.to be_truthy
-    end
-
-    it 'fails' do
-      stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, success: false)
-
-      is_expected.to be_falsy
-    end
-
-    context 'with --force' do
-      let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} push --force -- #{remote_name} #{branch_name}) }
-      let(:force) { true }
-
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#fetch_remote' do
-    let(:remote_name) { 'remote-name' }
-    let(:branch_name) { 'master' }
-    let(:force) { false }
-    let(:prune) { true }
-    let(:tags) { true }
-    let(:args) { { force: force, tags: tags, prune: prune }.merge(extra_args) }
-    let(:extra_args) { {} }
-    let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} fetch #{remote_name} --quiet --prune --tags) }
-
-    subject { gl_projects.fetch_remote(remote_name, 600, args) }
-
-    def stub_tempfile(name, filename, opts = {})
-      chmod = opts.delete(:chmod)
-      file = StringIO.new
-
-      allow(file).to receive(:close!)
-      allow(file).to receive(:path).and_return(name)
-
-      expect(Tempfile).to receive(:new).with(filename).and_return(file)
-      expect(file).to receive(:chmod).with(chmod) if chmod
-
-      file
-    end
-
-    context 'with default args' do
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, {}, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-
-      it 'fails' do
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, {}, success: false)
-
-        is_expected.to be_falsy
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with --force' do
-      let(:force) { true }
-      let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} fetch #{remote_name} --quiet --prune --force --tags) }
-
-      it 'executes the command with forced option' do
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, {}, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with --no-tags' do
-      let(:tags) { false }
-      let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} fetch #{remote_name} --quiet --prune --no-tags) }
-
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, {}, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with no prune' do
-      let(:prune) { false }
-      let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} fetch #{remote_name} --quiet --tags) }
-
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, {}, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'with an SSH key' do
-      let(:extra_args) { { ssh_key: 'SSH KEY' } }
-
-      it 'sets GIT_SSH to a custom script' do
-        script = stub_tempfile('scriptFile', 'gitlab-shell-ssh-wrapper', chmod: 0o755)
-        key = stub_tempfile('/tmp files/keyFile', 'gitlab-shell-key-file', chmod: 0o400)
-
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, { 'GIT_SSH' => 'scriptFile' }, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-
-        expect(script.string).to eq("#!/bin/sh\nexec ssh '-oIdentityFile=\"/tmp files/keyFile\"' '-oIdentitiesOnly=\"yes\"' \"$@\"")
-        expect(key.string).to eq('SSH KEY')
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'with known_hosts data' do
-      let(:extra_args) { { known_hosts: 'KNOWN HOSTS' } }
-
-      it 'sets GIT_SSH to a custom script' do
-        script = stub_tempfile('scriptFile', 'gitlab-shell-ssh-wrapper', chmod: 0o755)
-        key = stub_tempfile('/tmp files/knownHosts', 'gitlab-shell-known-hosts', chmod: 0o400)
-
-        stub_spawn(cmd, 600, tmp_repo_path, { 'GIT_SSH' => 'scriptFile' }, success: true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-
-        expect(script.string).to eq("#!/bin/sh\nexec ssh '-oStrictHostKeyChecking=\"yes\"' '-oUserKnownHostsFile=\"/tmp files/knownHosts\"' \"$@\"")
-        expect(key.string).to eq('KNOWN HOSTS')
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#import_project' do
-    let(:project) { create(:project) }
-    let(:import_url) { TestEnv.factory_repo_path_bare }
-    let(:cmd) { %W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} clone --bare -- #{import_url} #{tmp_repo_path}) }
-    let(:timeout) { 600 }
-
-    subject { gl_projects.import_project(import_url, timeout) }
-
-    shared_examples 'importing repository' do
-      context 'success import' do
-        it 'imports a repo' do
-          expect(File.exist?(File.join(tmp_repo_path, 'HEAD'))).to be_falsy
-
-          is_expected.to be_truthy
-
-          expect(File.exist?(File.join(tmp_repo_path, 'HEAD'))).to be_truthy
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'already exists' do
-        it "doesn't import" do
-          FileUtils.mkdir_p(tmp_repo_path)
-
-          is_expected.to be_falsy
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'logging' do
-      it 'imports a repo' do
-        message = "Importing project from <#{import_url}> to <#{tmp_repo_path}>."
-        expect(logger).to receive(:info).with(message)
-
-        subject
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'timeout' do
-      it 'does not import a repo' do
-        stub_spawn_timeout(cmd, timeout, nil)
-
-        message = "Importing project from <#{import_url}> to <#{tmp_repo_path}> failed."
-        expect(logger).to receive(:error).with(message)
-
-        is_expected.to be_falsy
-
-        expect(gl_projects.output).to eq("Timed out\n")
-        expect(File.exist?(File.join(tmp_repo_path, 'HEAD'))).to be_falsy
-      end
-    end
-
-    it_behaves_like 'importing repository'
-  end
-
-  describe '#fork_repository' do
-    let(:dest_repos) { TestEnv::REPOS_STORAGE }
-    let(:dest_repos_path) { tmp_repos_path }
-    let(:dest_repo_name) { File.join('@hashed', 'aa', 'bb', 'xyz.git') }
-    let(:dest_repo) { File.join(dest_repos_path, dest_repo_name) }
-
-    subject { gl_projects.fork_repository(dest_repos, dest_repo_name) }
-
-    before do
-      FileUtils.mkdir_p(dest_repos_path)
-    end
-
-    after do
-      FileUtils.rm_rf(dest_repos_path)
-    end
-
-    shared_examples 'forking a repository' do
-      it 'forks the repository' do
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-
-        expect(File.exist?(dest_repo)).to be_truthy
-        expect(File.exist?(File.join(dest_repo, 'hooks', 'pre-receive'))).to be_truthy
-        expect(File.exist?(File.join(dest_repo, 'hooks', 'post-receive'))).to be_truthy
-      end
-
-      it 'does not fork if a project of the same name already exists' do
-        # create a fake project at the intended destination
-        FileUtils.mkdir_p(dest_repo)
-
-        is_expected.to be_falsy
-      end
-    end
-
-    it_behaves_like 'forking a repository'
-
-    # We seem to be stuck to having only one working Gitaly storage in tests, changing
-    # that is not very straight-forward so I'm leaving this test here for now till
-    # https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/41393 is fixed.
-    context 'different storages' do
-      let(:dest_repos) { 'alternative' }
-      let(:dest_repos_path) { File.join(File.dirname(tmp_repos_path), dest_repos) }
-
-      before do
-        stub_storage_settings(dest_repos => { 'path' => dest_repos_path })
-      end
-
-      it 'forks the repo' do
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-
-        expect(File.exist?(dest_repo)).to be_truthy
-        expect(File.exist?(File.join(dest_repo, 'hooks', 'pre-receive'))).to be_truthy
-        expect(File.exist?(File.join(dest_repo, 'hooks', 'post-receive'))).to be_truthy
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'log messages' do
-      describe 'successful fork' do
-        it do
-          message = "Forking repository from <#{tmp_repo_path}> to <#{dest_repo}>."
-          expect(logger).to receive(:info).with(message)
-
-          subject
-        end
-      end
-
-      describe 'failed fork due existing destination' do
-        it do
-          FileUtils.mkdir_p(dest_repo)
-          message = "fork-repository failed: destination repository <#{dest_repo}> already exists."
-          expect(logger).to receive(:error).with(message)
-
-          subject
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  def build_gitlab_projects(*args)
-    described_class.new(
-      *args,
-      global_hooks_path: Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell.hooks_path,
-      logger: logger
-    )
-  end
-
-  def stub_spawn(*args, success: true)
-    exitstatus = success ? 0 : nil
-    expect(gl_projects).to receive(:popen_with_timeout).with(*args)
-      .and_return(["output", exitstatus])
-  end
-
-  def stub_spawn_timeout(*args)
-    expect(gl_projects).to receive(:popen_with_timeout).with(*args)
-      .and_raise(Timeout::Error)
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_env_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_env_spec.rb
index e6aa5ad8c90..5e49ea6da7a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_env_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_env_spec.rb
@@ -4,11 +4,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::HookEnv do
   let(:gl_repository) { 'project-123' }
 
   describe ".set" do
-    context 'with RequestStore.store disabled' do
-      before do
-        allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(false)
-      end
-
+    context 'with RequestStore disabled' do
       it 'does not store anything' do
         described_class.set(gl_repository, GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE: 'foo')
 
@@ -16,11 +12,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::HookEnv do
       end
     end
 
-    context 'with RequestStore.store enabled' do
-      before do
-        allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(true)
-      end
-
+    context 'with RequestStore enabled', :request_store do
       it 'whitelist some `GIT_*` variables and stores them using RequestStore' do
         described_class.set(
           gl_repository,
@@ -41,9 +33,8 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::HookEnv do
   end
 
   describe ".all" do
-    context 'with RequestStore.store enabled' do
+    context 'with RequestStore enabled', :request_store do
       before do
-        allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(true)
         described_class.set(
           gl_repository,
           GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE: 'foo',
@@ -60,7 +51,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::HookEnv do
   end
 
   describe ".to_env_hash" do
-    context 'with RequestStore.store enabled' do
+    context 'with RequestStore enabled', :request_store do
       using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
 
       let(:key) { 'GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE' }
@@ -76,7 +67,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::HookEnv do
 
       with_them do
         before do
-          allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(true)
           described_class.set(gl_repository, key.to_sym => input)
         end
 
@@ -92,7 +82,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::HookEnv do
   end
 
   describe 'thread-safety' do
-    context 'with RequestStore.store enabled' do
+    context 'with RequestStore enabled', :request_store do
       before do
         allow(RequestStore).to receive(:active?).and_return(true)
         described_class.set(gl_repository, GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE: 'foo')
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index a45c8510b15..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hook_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,111 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-require 'fileutils'
-
-describe Gitlab::Git::Hook do
-  before do
-    # We need this because in the spec/spec_helper.rb we define it like this:
-    # allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:trigger).and_return([true, nil])
-    allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:trigger).and_call_original
-  end
-
-  around do |example|
-    # TODO move hook tests to gitaly-ruby. Hook will disappear from gitlab-ce
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      example.run
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe "#trigger" do
-    set(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-    let(:repository) { project.repository.raw_repository }
-    let(:repo_path) { repository.path }
-    let(:hooks_dir) { File.join(repo_path, 'hooks') }
-    let(:user) { create(:user) }
-    let(:gl_id) { Gitlab::GlId.gl_id(user) }
-    let(:gl_username) { user.username }
-
-    def create_hook(name)
-      FileUtils.mkdir_p(hooks_dir)
-      hook_path = File.join(hooks_dir, name)
-      File.open(hook_path, 'w', 0755) do |f|
-        f.write(<<~HOOK)
-          #!/bin/sh
-          exit 0
-        HOOK
-      end
-    end
-
-    def create_failing_hook(name)
-      FileUtils.mkdir_p(hooks_dir)
-      hook_path = File.join(hooks_dir, name)
-      File.open(hook_path, 'w', 0755) do |f|
-        f.write(<<~HOOK)
-          #!/bin/sh
-          echo 'regular message from the hook'
-          echo 'error message from the hook' 1>&2
-          echo 'error message from the hook line 2' 1>&2
-          exit 1
-        HOOK
-      end
-    end
-
-    ['pre-receive', 'post-receive', 'update'].each do |hook_name|
-      context "when triggering a #{hook_name} hook" do
-        context "when the hook is successful" do
-          let(:hook_path) { File.join(hooks_dir, hook_name) }
-          let(:gl_repository) { Gitlab::GlRepository.gl_repository(project, false) }
-          let(:env) do
-            {
-              'GL_ID' => gl_id,
-              'GL_USERNAME' => gl_username,
-              'PWD' => repo_path,
-              'GL_PROTOCOL' => 'web',
-              'GL_REPOSITORY' => gl_repository
-            }
-          end
-
-          it "returns success with no errors" do
-            create_hook(hook_name)
-            hook = described_class.new(hook_name, repository)
-            blank = Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
-            ref = Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX + 'new_branch'
-
-            if hook_name != 'update'
-              expect(Open3).to receive(:popen3)
-                .with(env, hook_path, chdir: repo_path).and_call_original
-            end
-
-            status, errors = hook.trigger(gl_id, gl_username, blank, blank, ref)
-            expect(status).to be true
-            expect(errors).to be_blank
-          end
-        end
-
-        context "when the hook is unsuccessful" do
-          it "returns failure with errors" do
-            create_failing_hook(hook_name)
-            hook = described_class.new(hook_name, repository)
-            blank = Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
-            ref = Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX + 'new_branch'
-
-            status, errors = hook.trigger(gl_id, gl_username, blank, blank, ref)
-            expect(status).to be false
-            expect(errors).to eq("error message from the hook\nerror message from the hook line 2\n")
-          end
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context "when the hook doesn't exist" do
-      it "returns success with no errors" do
-        hook = described_class.new('unknown_hook', repository)
-        blank = Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
-        ref = Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX + 'new_branch'
-
-        status, errors = hook.trigger(gl_id, gl_username, blank, blank, ref)
-        expect(status).to be true
-        expect(errors).to be_nil
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hooks_service_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hooks_service_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 55ffced36ac..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/hooks_service_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,50 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::Git::HooksService, :seed_helper do
-  let(:gl_id) { 'user-456' }
-  let(:gl_username) { 'janedoe' }
-  let(:user) { Gitlab::Git::User.new(gl_username, 'Jane Doe', 'janedoe@example.com', gl_id) }
-  let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, 'project-123') }
-  let(:service) { described_class.new }
-  let(:blankrev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
-  let(:oldrev) { SeedRepo::Commit::PARENT_ID }
-  let(:newrev) { SeedRepo::Commit::ID }
-  let(:ref) { 'refs/heads/feature' }
-
-  describe '#execute' do
-    context 'when receive hooks were successful' do
-      let(:hook) { double(:hook) }
-
-      it 'calls all three hooks' do
-        expect(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:new).exactly(3).times.and_return(hook)
-        expect(hook).to receive(:trigger).with(gl_id, gl_username, blankrev, newrev, ref)
-          .exactly(3).times.and_return([true, nil])
-
-        service.execute(user, repository, blankrev, newrev, ref) { }
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when pre-receive hook failed' do
-      it 'does not call post-receive hook' do
-        expect(service).to receive(:run_hook).with('pre-receive').and_return([false, 'hello world'])
-        expect(service).not_to receive(:run_hook).with('post-receive')
-
-        expect do
-          service.execute(user, repository, blankrev, newrev, ref)
-        end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::PreReceiveError, 'hello world')
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when update hook failed' do
-      it 'does not call post-receive hook' do
-        expect(service).to receive(:run_hook).with('pre-receive').and_return([true, nil])
-        expect(service).to receive(:run_hook).with('update').and_return([false, 'hello world'])
-        expect(service).not_to receive(:run_hook).with('post-receive')
-
-        expect do
-          service.execute(user, repository, blankrev, newrev, ref)
-        end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::PreReceiveError, 'hello world')
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/index_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/index_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index c4edd6961e1..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/index_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,239 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::Git::Index, :seed_helper do
-  let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
-  let(:index) { described_class.new(repository) }
-
-  before do
-    index.read_tree(lookup('master').tree)
-  end
-
-  around do |example|
-    # TODO move these specs to gitaly-ruby. The Index class will disappear from gitlab-ce
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      example.run
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#create' do
-    let(:options) do
-      {
-        content: 'Lorem ipsum...',
-        file_path: 'documents/story.txt'
-      }
-    end
-
-    context 'when no file at that path exists' do
-      it 'creates the file in the index' do
-        index.create(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-
-        expect(entry).not_to be_nil
-        expect(lookup(entry[:oid]).content).to eq(options[:content])
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a file at that path exists' do
-      before do
-        options[:file_path] = 'files/executables/ls'
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { index.create(options) }.to raise_error('A file with this name already exists')
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when content is in base64' do
-      before do
-        options[:content] = Base64.encode64(options[:content])
-        options[:encoding] = 'base64'
-      end
-
-      it 'decodes base64' do
-        index.create(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-        expect(lookup(entry[:oid]).content).to eq(Base64.decode64(options[:content]))
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when content contains CRLF' do
-      before do
-        repository.autocrlf = :input
-        options[:content] = "Hello,\r\nWorld"
-      end
-
-      it 'converts to LF' do
-        index.create(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-        expect(lookup(entry[:oid]).content).to eq("Hello,\nWorld")
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#create_dir' do
-    let(:options) do
-      {
-        file_path: 'newdir'
-      }
-    end
-
-    context 'when no file or dir at that path exists' do
-      it 'creates the dir in the index' do
-        index.create_dir(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path] + '/.gitkeep')
-
-        expect(entry).not_to be_nil
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a file at that path exists' do
-      before do
-        options[:file_path] = 'files/executables/ls'
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { index.create_dir(options) }.to raise_error('A file with this name already exists')
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a directory at that path exists' do
-      before do
-        options[:file_path] = 'files/executables'
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { index.create_dir(options) }.to raise_error('A directory with this name already exists')
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#update' do
-    let(:options) do
-      {
-        content: 'Lorem ipsum...',
-        file_path: 'README.md'
-      }
-    end
-
-    context 'when no file at that path exists' do
-      before do
-        options[:file_path] = 'documents/story.txt'
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { index.update(options) }.to raise_error("A file with this name doesn't exist")
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a file at that path exists' do
-      it 'updates the file in the index' do
-        index.update(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-
-        expect(lookup(entry[:oid]).content).to eq(options[:content])
-      end
-
-      it 'preserves file mode' do
-        options[:file_path] = 'files/executables/ls'
-
-        index.update(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-
-        expect(entry[:mode]).to eq(0100755)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#move' do
-    let(:options) do
-      {
-        content: 'Lorem ipsum...',
-        previous_path: 'README.md',
-        file_path: 'NEWREADME.md'
-      }
-    end
-
-    context 'when no file at that path exists' do
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        options[:previous_path] = 'documents/story.txt'
-
-        expect { index.move(options) }.to raise_error("A file with this name doesn't exist")
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a file at the new path already exists' do
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        options[:file_path] = 'CHANGELOG'
-
-        expect { index.move(options) }.to raise_error("A file with this name already exists")
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a file at that path exists' do
-      it 'removes the old file in the index' do
-        index.move(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:previous_path])
-
-        expect(entry).to be_nil
-      end
-
-      it 'creates the new file in the index' do
-        index.move(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-
-        expect(entry).not_to be_nil
-        expect(lookup(entry[:oid]).content).to eq(options[:content])
-      end
-
-      it 'preserves file mode' do
-        options[:previous_path] = 'files/executables/ls'
-
-        index.move(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-
-        expect(entry[:mode]).to eq(0100755)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#delete' do
-    let(:options) do
-      {
-        file_path: 'README.md'
-      }
-    end
-
-    context 'when no file at that path exists' do
-      before do
-        options[:file_path] = 'documents/story.txt'
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { index.delete(options) }.to raise_error("A file with this name doesn't exist")
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when a file at that path exists' do
-      it 'removes the file in the index' do
-        index.delete(options)
-
-        entry = index.get(options[:file_path])
-
-        expect(entry).to be_nil
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  def lookup(revision)
-    repository.rugged.rev_parse(revision)
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/popen_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/popen_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 074e66d2a5d..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/popen_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,179 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe 'Gitlab::Git::Popen' do
-  let(:path) { Rails.root.join('tmp').to_s }
-  let(:test_string) { 'The quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog' }
-  # The pipe buffer is typically 64K. This string is about 440K.
-  let(:spew_command) { ['bash', '-c', "for i in {1..10000}; do echo '#{test_string}' 1>&2; done"] }
-
-  let(:klass) do
-    Class.new(Object) do
-      include Gitlab::Git::Popen
-    end
-  end
-
-  context 'popen' do
-    context 'zero status' do
-      let(:result) { klass.new.popen(%w(ls), path) }
-      let(:output) { result.first }
-      let(:status) { result.last }
-
-      it { expect(status).to be_zero }
-      it { expect(output).to include('tests') }
-    end
-
-    context 'non-zero status' do
-      let(:result) { klass.new.popen(%w(cat NOTHING), path) }
-      let(:output) { result.first }
-      let(:status) { result.last }
-
-      it { expect(status).to eq(1) }
-      it { expect(output).to include('No such file or directory') }
-    end
-
-    context 'unsafe string command' do
-      it 'raises an error when it gets called with a string argument' do
-        expect { klass.new.popen('ls', path) }.to raise_error(RuntimeError)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with custom options' do
-      let(:vars) { { 'foobar' => 123, 'PWD' => path } }
-      let(:options) { { chdir: path } }
-
-      it 'calls popen3 with the provided environment variables' do
-        expect(Open3).to receive(:popen3).with(vars, 'ls', options)
-
-        klass.new.popen(%w(ls), path, { 'foobar' => 123 })
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'use stdin' do
-      let(:result) { klass.new.popen(%w[cat], path) { |stdin| stdin.write 'hello' } }
-      let(:output) { result.first }
-      let(:status) { result.last }
-
-      it { expect(status).to be_zero }
-      it { expect(output).to eq('hello') }
-    end
-
-    context 'with lazy block' do
-      it 'yields a lazy io' do
-        expect_lazy_io = lambda do |io|
-          expect(io).to be_a Enumerator::Lazy
-          expect(io.inspect).to include('#<IO:fd')
-        end
-
-        klass.new.popen(%w[ls], path, lazy_block: expect_lazy_io)
-      end
-
-      it "doesn't wait for process exit" do
-        Timeout.timeout(2) do
-          klass.new.popen(%w[yes], path, lazy_block: ->(io) {})
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with a process that writes a lot of data to stderr' do
-      it 'returns zero' do
-        output, status = klass.new.popen(spew_command, path)
-
-        expect(output).to include(test_string)
-        expect(status).to eq(0)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  context 'popen_with_timeout' do
-    let(:timeout) { 1.second }
-
-    context 'no timeout' do
-      context 'zero status' do
-        let(:result) { klass.new.popen_with_timeout(%w(ls), timeout, path) }
-        let(:output) { result.first }
-        let(:status) { result.last }
-
-        it { expect(status).to be_zero }
-        it { expect(output).to include('tests') }
-      end
-
-      context 'multi-line string' do
-        let(:test_string) { "this is 1 line\n2nd line\n3rd line\n" }
-        let(:result) { klass.new.popen_with_timeout(['echo', test_string], timeout, path) }
-        let(:output) { result.first }
-        let(:status) { result.last }
-
-        it { expect(status).to be_zero }
-        # echo adds its own line
-        it { expect(output).to eq(test_string + "\n") }
-      end
-
-      context 'non-zero status' do
-        let(:result) { klass.new.popen_with_timeout(%w(cat NOTHING), timeout, path) }
-        let(:output) { result.first }
-        let(:status) { result.last }
-
-        it { expect(status).to eq(1) }
-        it { expect(output).to include('No such file or directory') }
-      end
-
-      context 'unsafe string command' do
-        it 'raises an error when it gets called with a string argument' do
-          expect { klass.new.popen_with_timeout('ls', timeout, path) }.to raise_error(RuntimeError)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'timeout' do
-      context 'timeout' do
-        it "raises a Timeout::Error" do
-          expect { klass.new.popen_with_timeout(%w(sleep 1000), timeout, path) }.to raise_error(Timeout::Error)
-        end
-
-        it "handles processes that do not shutdown correctly" do
-          expect { klass.new.popen_with_timeout(['bash', '-c', "trap -- '' SIGTERM; sleep 1000"], timeout, path) }.to raise_error(Timeout::Error)
-        end
-
-        it 'handles process that writes a lot of data to stderr' do
-          output, status = klass.new.popen_with_timeout(spew_command, timeout, path)
-
-          expect(output).to include(test_string)
-          expect(status).to eq(0)
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'timeout period' do
-        let(:time_taken) do
-          begin
-            start = Time.now
-            klass.new.popen_with_timeout(%w(sleep 1000), timeout, path)
-          rescue
-            Time.now - start
-          end
-        end
-
-        it { expect(time_taken).to be >= timeout }
-      end
-
-      context 'clean up' do
-        let(:instance) { klass.new }
-
-        it 'kills the child process' do
-          expect(instance).to receive(:kill_process_group_for_pid).and_wrap_original do |m, *args|
-            # is the PID, and it should not be running at this point
-            m.call(*args)
-
-            pid = args.first
-            begin
-              Process.getpgid(pid)
-              raise "The child process should have been killed"
-            rescue Errno::ESRCH
-            end
-          end
-
-          expect { instance.popen_with_timeout(['bash', '-c', "trap -- '' SIGTERM; sleep 1000"], timeout, path) }.to raise_error(Timeout::Error)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/push_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/push_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..566c8209504
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/push_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Git::Push do
+  set(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+
+  let(:oldrev) { project.commit('HEAD~2').id }
+  let(:newrev) { project.commit.id }
+  let(:ref) { 'refs/heads/some-branch' }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(project, oldrev, newrev, ref) }
+
+  describe '#branch_name' do
+    context 'when it is a branch push' do
+      let(:ref) { 'refs/heads/my-branch' }
+
+      it 'returns branch name' do
+        expect(subject.branch_name).to eq 'my-branch'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when it is a tag push' do
+      let(:ref) { 'refs/tags/my-branch' }
+
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        expect(subject.branch_name).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#branch_push?' do
+    context 'when pushing a branch ref' do
+      let(:ref) { 'refs/heads/my-branch' }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_branch_push }
+    end
+
+    context 'when it is a tag push' do
+      let(:ref) { 'refs/tags/my-tag' }
+
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_push }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#branch_updated?' do
+    context 'when it is a branch push with correct old and new revisions' do
+      it { is_expected.to be_branch_updated }
+    end
+
+    context 'when it is not a branch push' do
+      let(:ref) { 'refs/tags/my-tag' }
+
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_updated }
+    end
+
+    context 'when old revision is blank' do
+      let(:oldrev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
+
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_updated }
+    end
+
+    context 'when it is not a branch push' do
+      let(:newrev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
+
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_updated }
+    end
+
+    context 'when oldrev is nil' do
+      let(:oldrev) { nil }
+
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_updated }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#force_push?' do
+    context 'when old revision is an ancestor of the new revision' do
+      let(:oldrev) { 'HEAD~3' }
+      let(:newrev) { 'HEAD~1' }
+
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_force_push }
+    end
+
+    context 'when old revision is not an ancestor of the new revision' do
+      let(:oldrev) { 'HEAD~3' }
+      let(:newrev) { '123456' }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_force_push }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#branch_added?' do
+    context 'when old revision is defined' do
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_added }
+    end
+
+    context 'when old revision is not defined' do
+      let(:oldrev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_branch_added }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#branch_removed?' do
+    context 'when new revision is defined' do
+      it { is_expected.not_to be_branch_removed }
+    end
+
+    context 'when new revision is not defined' do
+      let(:newrev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_branch_removed }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#modified_paths' do
+    context 'when a push is a branch update' do
+      let(:newrev) { '498214d' }
+      let(:oldrev) { '281d3a7' }
+
+      it 'returns modified paths' do
+        expect(subject.modified_paths).to eq ['bar/branch-test.txt',
+                                              'files/js/commit.coffee',
+                                              'with space/README.md']
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a push is not a branch update' do
+      let(:oldrev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { subject.modified_paths }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#oldrev' do
+    context 'when a valid oldrev is provided' do
+      it 'returns oldrev' do
+        expect(subject.oldrev).to eq oldrev
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a nil valud is provided' do
+      let(:oldrev) { nil }
+
+      it 'returns blank SHA' do
+        expect(subject.oldrev).to eq Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#newrev' do
+    context 'when valid newrev is provided' do
+      it 'returns newrev' do
+        expect(subject.newrev).to eq newrev
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a nil valud is provided' do
+      let(:newrev) { nil }
+
+      it 'returns blank SHA' do
+        expect(subject.newrev).to eq Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb
index 17348b01006..51eb997a325 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/repository_spec.rb
@@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
   end
 
+  let(:mutable_repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
   let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
+  let(:repository_path) { File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, repository.relative_path) }
+  let(:repository_rugged) { Rugged::Repository.new(repository_path) }
   let(:storage_path) { TestEnv.repos_path }
   let(:user) { build(:user) }
 
@@ -71,7 +74,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   describe "Respond to" do
     subject { repository }
 
-    it { is_expected.to respond_to(:rugged) }
     it { is_expected.to respond_to(:root_ref) }
     it { is_expected.to respond_to(:tags) }
   end
@@ -91,57 +93,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
   end
 
-  describe "#rugged" do
-    describe 'when storage is broken', :broken_storage  do
-      it 'raises a storage exception when storage is not available' do
-        broken_repo = described_class.new('broken', 'a/path.git', '')
-
-        expect { broken_repo.rugged }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Storage::Inaccessible)
-      end
-    end
-
-    it 'raises a no repository exception when there is no repo' do
-      broken_repo = described_class.new('default', 'a/path.git', '')
-
-      expect do
-        Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { broken_repo.rugged }
-      end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::NoRepository)
-    end
-
-    describe 'alternates keyword argument' do
-      context 'with no Git env stored' do
-        before do
-          allow(Gitlab::Git::HookEnv).to receive(:all).and_return({})
-        end
-
-        it "is passed an empty array" do
-          expect(Rugged::Repository).to receive(:new).with(repository_path, alternates: [])
-
-          repository_rugged
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'with absolute and relative Git object dir envvars stored' do
-        before do
-          allow(Gitlab::Git::HookEnv).to receive(:all).and_return({
-            'GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY_RELATIVE' => './objects/foo',
-            'GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES_RELATIVE' => ['./objects/bar', './objects/baz'],
-            'GIT_OBJECT_DIRECTORY' => 'ignored',
-            'GIT_ALTERNATE_OBJECT_DIRECTORIES' => %w[ignored ignored],
-            'GIT_OTHER' => 'another_env'
-          })
-        end
-
-        it "is passed the relative object dir envvars after being converted to absolute ones" do
-          alternates = %w[foo bar baz].map { |d| File.join(repository_path, './objects', d) }
-          expect(Rugged::Repository).to receive(:new).with(repository_path, alternates: alternates)
-
-          repository_rugged
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#branch_names' do
     subject { repository.branch_names }
 
@@ -284,7 +235,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#submodule_url_for' do
-    let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
     let(:ref) { 'master' }
 
     def submodule_url(path)
@@ -322,21 +272,12 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#commit_count' do
-    shared_examples 'simple commit counting' do
-      it { expect(repository.commit_count("master")).to eq(25) }
-      it { expect(repository.commit_count("feature")).to eq(9) }
-      it { expect(repository.commit_count("does-not-exist")).to eq(0) }
-    end
+    it { expect(repository.commit_count("master")).to eq(25) }
+    it { expect(repository.commit_count("feature")).to eq(9) }
+    it { expect(repository.commit_count("does-not-exist")).to eq(0) }
 
-    context 'when Gitaly commit_count feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'simple commit counting'
-      it_behaves_like 'wrapping gRPC errors', Gitlab::GitalyClient::CommitService, :commit_count do
-        subject { repository.commit_count('master') }
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when Gitaly commit_count feature is disabled', :skip_gitaly_mock  do
-      it_behaves_like 'simple commit counting'
+    it_behaves_like 'wrapping gRPC errors', Gitlab::GitalyClient::CommitService, :commit_count do
+      subject { repository.commit_count('master') }
     end
   end
 
@@ -345,7 +286,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
       it { expect(repository.has_local_branches?).to eq(true) }
 
       context 'mutable' do
-        let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
+        let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
         after do
           ensure_seeds
@@ -378,118 +319,82 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe "#delete_branch" do
-    shared_examples "deleting a branch" do
-      let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
-
-      after do
-        ensure_seeds
-      end
-
-      it "removes the branch from the repo" do
-        branch_name = "to-be-deleted-soon"
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
-        repository.create_branch(branch_name)
-        expect(repository_rugged.branches[branch_name]).not_to be_nil
+    after do
+      ensure_seeds
+    end
 
-        repository.delete_branch(branch_name)
-        expect(repository_rugged.branches[branch_name]).to be_nil
-      end
+    it "removes the branch from the repo" do
+      branch_name = "to-be-deleted-soon"
 
-      context "when branch does not exist" do
-        it "raises a DeleteBranchError exception" do
-          expect { repository.delete_branch("this-branch-does-not-exist") }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::DeleteBranchError)
-        end
-      end
-    end
+      repository.create_branch(branch_name)
+      expect(repository_rugged.branches[branch_name]).not_to be_nil
 
-    context "when Gitaly delete_branch is enabled" do
-      it_behaves_like "deleting a branch"
+      repository.delete_branch(branch_name)
+      expect(repository_rugged.branches[branch_name]).to be_nil
     end
 
-    context "when Gitaly delete_branch is disabled", :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like "deleting a branch"
+    context "when branch does not exist" do
+      it "raises a DeleteBranchError exception" do
+        expect { repository.delete_branch("this-branch-does-not-exist") }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::DeleteBranchError)
+      end
     end
   end
 
   describe "#create_branch" do
-    shared_examples 'creating a branch' do
-      let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
-
-      after do
-        ensure_seeds
-      end
-
-      it "should create a new branch" do
-        expect(repository.create_branch('new_branch', 'master')).not_to be_nil
-      end
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
-      it "should create a new branch with the right name" do
-        expect(repository.create_branch('another_branch', 'master').name).to eq('another_branch')
-      end
+    after do
+      ensure_seeds
+    end
 
-      it "should fail if we create an existing branch" do
-        repository.create_branch('duplicated_branch', 'master')
-        expect {repository.create_branch('duplicated_branch', 'master')}.to raise_error("Branch duplicated_branch already exists")
-      end
+    it "should create a new branch" do
+      expect(repository.create_branch('new_branch', 'master')).not_to be_nil
+    end
 
-      it "should fail if we create a branch from a non existing ref" do
-        expect {repository.create_branch('branch_based_in_wrong_ref', 'master_2_the_revenge')}.to raise_error("Invalid reference master_2_the_revenge")
-      end
+    it "should create a new branch with the right name" do
+      expect(repository.create_branch('another_branch', 'master').name).to eq('another_branch')
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly create_branch feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'creating a branch'
+    it "should fail if we create an existing branch" do
+      repository.create_branch('duplicated_branch', 'master')
+      expect {repository.create_branch('duplicated_branch', 'master')}.to raise_error("Branch duplicated_branch already exists")
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly create_branch feature is disabled', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like 'creating a branch'
+    it "should fail if we create a branch from a non existing ref" do
+      expect {repository.create_branch('branch_based_in_wrong_ref', 'master_2_the_revenge')}.to raise_error("Invalid reference master_2_the_revenge")
     end
   end
 
   describe '#delete_refs' do
-    shared_examples 'deleting refs' do
-      let(:repo) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
-
-      def repo_rugged
-        Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          repo.rugged
-        end
-      end
-
-      after do
-        ensure_seeds
-      end
-
-      it 'deletes the ref' do
-        repo.delete_refs('refs/heads/feature')
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
-        expect(repo_rugged.references['refs/heads/feature']).to be_nil
-      end
+    after do
+      ensure_seeds
+    end
 
-      it 'deletes all refs' do
-        refs = %w[refs/heads/wip refs/tags/v1.1.0]
-        repo.delete_refs(*refs)
+    it 'deletes the ref' do
+      repository.delete_refs('refs/heads/feature')
 
-        refs.each do |ref|
-          expect(repo_rugged.references[ref]).to be_nil
-        end
-      end
+      expect(repository_rugged.references['refs/heads/feature']).to be_nil
+    end
 
-      it 'does not fail when deleting an empty list of refs' do
-        expect { repo.delete_refs(*[]) }.not_to raise_error
-      end
+    it 'deletes all refs' do
+      refs = %w[refs/heads/wip refs/tags/v1.1.0]
+      repository.delete_refs(*refs)
 
-      it 'raises an error if it failed' do
-        expect { repo.delete_refs('refs\heads\fix') }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::GitError)
+      refs.each do |ref|
+        expect(repository_rugged.references[ref]).to be_nil
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly delete_refs feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'deleting refs'
+    it 'does not fail when deleting an empty list of refs' do
+      expect { repository.delete_refs(*[]) }.not_to raise_error
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly delete_refs feature is disabled', :disable_gitaly do
-      it_behaves_like 'deleting refs'
+    it 'raises an error if it failed' do
+      expect { repository.delete_refs('refs\heads\fix') }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::Repository::GitError)
     end
   end
 
@@ -542,44 +447,63 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
       Gitlab::Shell.new.remove_repository('default', 'my_project')
     end
 
-    shared_examples 'repository mirror fetching' do
-      it 'fetches a repository as a mirror remote' do
+    it 'fetches a repository as a mirror remote' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(refs(new_repository_path)).to eq(refs(repository_path))
+    end
+
+    context 'with keep-around refs' do
+      let(:sha) { SeedRepo::Commit::ID }
+      let(:keep_around_ref) { "refs/keep-around/#{sha}" }
+      let(:tmp_ref) { "refs/tmp/#{SecureRandom.hex}" }
+
+      before do
+        repository_rugged.references.create(keep_around_ref, sha, force: true)
+        repository_rugged.references.create(tmp_ref, sha, force: true)
+      end
+
+      it 'includes the temporary and keep-around refs' do
         subject
 
-        expect(refs(new_repository_path)).to eq(refs(repository_path))
+        expect(refs(new_repository_path)).to include(keep_around_ref)
+        expect(refs(new_repository_path)).to include(tmp_ref)
       end
+    end
 
-      context 'with keep-around refs' do
-        let(:sha) { SeedRepo::Commit::ID }
-        let(:keep_around_ref) { "refs/keep-around/#{sha}" }
-        let(:tmp_ref) { "refs/tmp/#{SecureRandom.hex}" }
+    def new_repository_path
+      File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, new_repository.relative_path)
+    end
+  end
 
-        before do
-          repository_rugged.references.create(keep_around_ref, sha, force: true)
-          repository_rugged.references.create(tmp_ref, sha, force: true)
-        end
+  describe '#find_remote_root_ref' do
+    it 'gets the remote root ref from GitalyClient' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::GitalyClient::RemoteService)
+        .to receive(:find_remote_root_ref).and_call_original
 
-        it 'includes the temporary and keep-around refs' do
-          subject
+      expect(repository.find_remote_root_ref('origin')).to eq 'master'
+    end
 
-          expect(refs(new_repository_path)).to include(keep_around_ref)
-          expect(refs(new_repository_path)).to include(tmp_ref)
-        end
-      end
+    it 'returns UTF-8' do
+      expect(repository.find_remote_root_ref('origin')).to be_utf8
     end
 
-    context 'with gitaly enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'repository mirror fetching'
+    it 'returns nil when remote name is nil' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::GitalyClient::RemoteService)
+        .not_to receive(:find_remote_root_ref)
+
+      expect(repository.find_remote_root_ref(nil)).to be_nil
     end
 
-    context 'with gitaly enabled', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like 'repository mirror fetching'
+    it 'returns nil when remote name is empty' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::GitalyClient::RemoteService)
+        .not_to receive(:find_remote_root_ref)
+
+      expect(repository.find_remote_root_ref('')).to be_nil
     end
 
-    def new_repository_path
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        new_repository.path
-      end
+    it_behaves_like 'wrapping gRPC errors', Gitlab::GitalyClient::RemoteService, :find_remote_root_ref do
+      subject { repository.find_remote_root_ref('origin') }
     end
   end
 
@@ -595,18 +519,16 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
         Gitlab::Git::Commit.find(repository, @rename_commit_id)
       end
 
-      before(:context) do
+      before do
         # Add new commits so that there's a renamed file in the commit history
-        repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged
-        @commit_with_old_name_id = new_commit_edit_old_file(repo).oid
-        @rename_commit_id = new_commit_move_file(repo).oid
-        @commit_with_new_name_id = new_commit_edit_new_file(repo).oid
+        @commit_with_old_name_id = new_commit_edit_old_file(repository_rugged).oid
+        @rename_commit_id = new_commit_move_file(repository_rugged).oid
+        @commit_with_new_name_id = new_commit_edit_new_file(repository_rugged).oid
       end
 
-      after(:context) do
+      after do
         # Erase our commits so other tests get the original repo
-        repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged
-        repo.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID)
+        repository_rugged.references.update("refs/heads/master", SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID)
       end
 
       context "where 'follow' == true" do
@@ -887,25 +809,15 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#merge_base' do
-    shared_examples '#merge_base' do
-      where(:from, :to, :result) do
-        '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d' | '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d'
-        '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d' | '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d'
-        '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | 'foobar' | nil
-        'foobar' | '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | nil
-      end
-
-      with_them do
-        it { expect(repository.merge_base(from, to)).to eq(result) }
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with gitaly' do
-      it_behaves_like '#merge_base'
+    where(:from, :to, :result) do
+      '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d' | '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d'
+      '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d' | '570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d'
+      '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | 'foobar' | nil
+      'foobar' | '40f4a7a617393735a95a0bb67b08385bc1e7c66d' | nil
     end
 
-    context 'without gitaly', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like '#merge_base'
+    with_them do
+      it { expect(repository.merge_base(from, to)).to eq(result) }
     end
   end
 
@@ -997,54 +909,6 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#autocrlf' do
-    before(:all) do
-      @repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-      @repo.rugged.config['core.autocrlf'] = true
-    end
-
-    around do |example|
-      # OK because autocrlf is only used in gitaly-ruby
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        example.run
-      end
-    end
-
-    it 'return the value of the autocrlf option' do
-      expect(@repo.autocrlf).to be(true)
-    end
-
-    after(:all) do
-      @repo.rugged.config.delete('core.autocrlf')
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#autocrlf=' do
-    before(:all) do
-      @repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-      @repo.rugged.config['core.autocrlf'] = false
-    end
-
-    around do |example|
-      # OK because autocrlf= is only used in gitaly-ruby
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        example.run
-      end
-    end
-
-    it 'should set the autocrlf option to the provided option' do
-      @repo.autocrlf = :input
-
-      File.open(File.join(SEED_STORAGE_PATH, TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, 'config')) do |config_file|
-        expect(config_file.read).to match('autocrlf = input')
-      end
-    end
-
-    after(:all) do
-      @repo.rugged.config.delete('core.autocrlf')
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#find_branch' do
     it 'should return a Branch for master' do
       branch = repository.find_branch('master')
@@ -1086,12 +950,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     subject { repository.branches }
 
     context 'with local and remote branches' do
-      let(:repository) do
-        Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-      end
+      let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
       before do
-        create_remote_branch(repository, 'joe', 'remote_branch', 'master')
+        create_remote_branch('joe', 'remote_branch', 'master')
         repository.create_branch('local_branch', 'master')
       end
 
@@ -1114,12 +976,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
 
     context 'with local and remote branches' do
-      let(:repository) do
-        Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-      end
+      let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
       before do
-        create_remote_branch(repository, 'joe', 'remote_branch', 'master')
+        create_remote_branch('joe', 'remote_branch', 'master')
         repository.create_branch('local_branch', 'master')
       end
 
@@ -1144,57 +1004,81 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#merged_branch_names' do
-    shared_examples 'finding merged branch names' do
-      context 'when branch names are passed' do
-        it 'only returns the names we are asking' do
-          names = repository.merged_branch_names(%w[merge-test])
+    context 'when branch names are passed' do
+      it 'only returns the names we are asking' do
+        names = repository.merged_branch_names(%w[merge-test])
 
-          expect(names).to contain_exactly('merge-test')
-        end
+        expect(names).to contain_exactly('merge-test')
+      end
 
-        it 'does not return unmerged branch names' do
-          names = repository.merged_branch_names(%w[feature])
+      it 'does not return unmerged branch names' do
+        names = repository.merged_branch_names(%w[feature])
 
-          expect(names).to be_empty
-        end
+        expect(names).to be_empty
       end
+    end
 
-      context 'when no root ref is available' do
-        it 'returns empty list' do
-          project = create(:project, :empty_repo)
+    context 'when no root ref is available' do
+      it 'returns empty list' do
+        project = create(:project, :empty_repo)
 
-          names = project.repository.merged_branch_names(%w[feature])
+        names = project.repository.merged_branch_names(%w[feature])
 
-          expect(names).to be_empty
-        end
+        expect(names).to be_empty
       end
+    end
 
-      context 'when no branch names are specified' do
-        before do
-          repository.create_branch('identical', 'master')
-        end
+    context 'when no branch names are specified' do
+      before do
+        repository.create_branch('identical', 'master')
+      end
 
-        after do
-          ensure_seeds
-        end
+      after do
+        ensure_seeds
+      end
 
-        it 'returns all merged branch names except for identical one' do
-          names = repository.merged_branch_names
+      it 'returns all merged branch names except for identical one' do
+        names = repository.merged_branch_names
 
-          expect(names).to include('merge-test')
-          expect(names).to include('fix-mode')
-          expect(names).not_to include('feature')
-          expect(names).not_to include('identical')
-        end
+        expect(names).to include('merge-test')
+        expect(names).to include('fix-mode')
+        expect(names).not_to include('feature')
+        expect(names).not_to include('identical')
       end
     end
+  end
+
+  describe '#diff_stats' do
+    let(:left_commit_id) { 'feature' }
+    let(:right_commit_id) { 'master' }
+
+    it 'returns a DiffStatsCollection' do
+      collection = repository.diff_stats(left_commit_id, right_commit_id)
+
+      expect(collection).to be_a(Gitlab::Git::DiffStatsCollection)
+      expect(collection).to be_a(Enumerable)
+    end
+
+    it 'yields Gitaly::DiffStats objects' do
+      collection = repository.diff_stats(left_commit_id, right_commit_id)
+
+      expect(collection.to_a).to all(be_a(Gitaly::DiffStats))
+    end
+
+    it 'returns no Gitaly::DiffStats when SHAs are invalid' do
+      collection = repository.diff_stats('foo', 'bar')
 
-    context 'when Gitaly merged_branch_names feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'finding merged branch names'
+      expect(collection).to be_a(Gitlab::Git::DiffStatsCollection)
+      expect(collection).to be_a(Enumerable)
+      expect(collection.to_a).to be_empty
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly merged_branch_names feature is disabled', :disable_gitaly do
-      it_behaves_like 'finding merged branch names'
+    it 'returns no Gitaly::DiffStats when there is a nil SHA' do
+      collection = repository.diff_stats(nil, 'master')
+
+      expect(collection).to be_a(Gitlab::Git::DiffStatsCollection)
+      expect(collection).to be_a(Enumerable)
+      expect(collection.to_a).to be_empty
     end
   end
 
@@ -1311,98 +1195,68 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#ref_exists?' do
-    shared_examples 'checks the existence of refs' do
-      it 'returns true for an existing tag' do
-        expect(repository.ref_exists?('refs/heads/master')).to eq(true)
-      end
-
-      it 'returns false for a non-existing tag' do
-        expect(repository.ref_exists?('refs/tags/THIS_TAG_DOES_NOT_EXIST')).to eq(false)
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an ArgumentError for an empty string' do
-        expect { repository.ref_exists?('') }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
-      end
+    it 'returns true for an existing tag' do
+      expect(repository.ref_exists?('refs/heads/master')).to eq(true)
+    end
 
-      it 'raises an ArgumentError for an invalid ref' do
-        expect { repository.ref_exists?('INVALID') }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
-      end
+    it 'returns false for a non-existing tag' do
+      expect(repository.ref_exists?('refs/tags/THIS_TAG_DOES_NOT_EXIST')).to eq(false)
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly ref_exists feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'checks the existence of refs'
+    it 'raises an ArgumentError for an empty string' do
+      expect { repository.ref_exists?('') }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly ref_exists feature is disabled', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like 'checks the existence of refs'
+    it 'raises an ArgumentError for an invalid ref' do
+      expect { repository.ref_exists?('INVALID') }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
     end
   end
 
   describe '#tag_exists?' do
-    shared_examples 'checks the existence of tags' do
-      it 'returns true for an existing tag' do
-        tag = repository.tag_names.first
-
-        expect(repository.tag_exists?(tag)).to eq(true)
-      end
+    it 'returns true for an existing tag' do
+      tag = repository.tag_names.first
 
-      it 'returns false for a non-existing tag' do
-        expect(repository.tag_exists?('v9000')).to eq(false)
-      end
+      expect(repository.tag_exists?(tag)).to eq(true)
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly ref_exists_tags feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'checks the existence of tags'
-    end
-
-    context 'when Gitaly ref_exists_tags feature is disabled', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like 'checks the existence of tags'
+    it 'returns false for a non-existing tag' do
+      expect(repository.tag_exists?('v9000')).to eq(false)
     end
   end
 
   describe '#branch_exists?' do
-    shared_examples 'checks the existence of branches' do
-      it 'returns true for an existing branch' do
-        expect(repository.branch_exists?('master')).to eq(true)
-      end
-
-      it 'returns false for a non-existing branch' do
-        expect(repository.branch_exists?('kittens')).to eq(false)
-      end
-
-      it 'returns false when using an invalid branch name' do
-        expect(repository.branch_exists?('.bla')).to eq(false)
-      end
+    it 'returns true for an existing branch' do
+      expect(repository.branch_exists?('master')).to eq(true)
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly ref_exists_branches feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'checks the existence of branches'
+    it 'returns false for a non-existing branch' do
+      expect(repository.branch_exists?('kittens')).to eq(false)
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly ref_exists_branches feature is disabled', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like 'checks the existence of branches'
+    it 'returns false when using an invalid branch name' do
+      expect(repository.branch_exists?('.bla')).to eq(false)
     end
   end
 
   describe '#local_branches' do
-    before(:all) do
-      @repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
+
+    before do
+      create_remote_branch('joe', 'remote_branch', 'master')
+      repository.create_branch('local_branch', 'master')
     end
 
-    after(:all) do
+    after do
       ensure_seeds
     end
 
     it 'returns the local branches' do
-      create_remote_branch(@repo, 'joe', 'remote_branch', 'master')
-      @repo.create_branch('local_branch', 'master')
-
-      expect(@repo.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'remote_branch' }).to eq(false)
-      expect(@repo.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'local_branch' }).to eq(true)
+      expect(repository.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'remote_branch' }).to eq(false)
+      expect(repository.local_branches.any? { |branch| branch.name == 'local_branch' }).to eq(true)
     end
 
     it 'returns a Branch with UTF-8 fields' do
-      branches = @repo.local_branches.to_a
+      branches = repository.local_branches.to_a
       expect(branches.size).to be > 0
       branches.each do |branch|
         expect(branch.name).to be_utf8
@@ -1413,11 +1267,11 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     it 'gets the branches from GitalyClient' do
       expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::GitalyClient::RefService).to receive(:local_branches)
         .and_return([])
-      @repo.local_branches
+      repository.local_branches
     end
 
     it_behaves_like 'wrapping gRPC errors', Gitlab::GitalyClient::RefService, :local_branches do
-      subject { @repo.local_branches }
+      subject { repository.local_branches }
     end
   end
 
@@ -1471,56 +1325,9 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#with_repo_branch_commit' do
-    context 'when comparing with the same repository' do
-      let(:start_repository) { repository }
-
-      context 'when the branch exists' do
-        let(:start_branch_name) { 'master' }
-
-        it 'yields the commit' do
-          expect { |b| repository.with_repo_branch_commit(start_repository, start_branch_name, &b) }
-            .to yield_with_args(an_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Commit))
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when the branch does not exist' do
-        let(:start_branch_name) { 'definitely-not-master' }
-
-        it 'yields nil' do
-          expect { |b| repository.with_repo_branch_commit(start_repository, start_branch_name, &b) }
-            .to yield_with_args(nil)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when comparing with another repository' do
-      let(:start_repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
-
-      context 'when the branch exists' do
-        let(:start_branch_name) { 'master' }
-
-        it 'yields the commit' do
-          expect { |b| repository.with_repo_branch_commit(start_repository, start_branch_name, &b) }
-            .to yield_with_args(an_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Commit))
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when the branch does not exist' do
-        let(:start_branch_name) { 'definitely-not-master' }
-
-        it 'yields nil' do
-          expect { |b| repository.with_repo_branch_commit(start_repository, start_branch_name, &b) }
-            .to yield_with_args(nil)
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#fetch_source_branch!' do
     let(:local_ref) { 'refs/merge-requests/1/head' }
-    let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '') }
-    let(:source_repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
+    let(:source_repository) { mutable_repository }
 
     after do
       ensure_seeds
@@ -1529,7 +1336,8 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     context 'when the branch exists' do
       context 'when the commit does not exist locally' do
         let(:source_branch) { 'new-branch-for-fetch-source-branch' }
-        let(:source_rugged) { Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { source_repository.rugged } }
+        let(:source_path) { File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, source_repository.relative_path) }
+        let(:source_rugged) { Rugged::Repository.new(source_path) }
         let(:new_oid) { new_commit_edit_old_file(source_rugged).oid }
 
         before do
@@ -1567,29 +1375,19 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#rm_branch' do
-    shared_examples "user deleting a branch" do
-      let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-      let(:repository) { project.repository.raw }
-      let(:branch_name) { "to-be-deleted-soon" }
-
-      before do
-        project.add_developer(user)
-        repository.create_branch(branch_name)
-      end
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let(:repository) { project.repository.raw }
+    let(:branch_name) { "to-be-deleted-soon" }
 
-      it "removes the branch from the repo" do
-        repository.rm_branch(branch_name, user: user)
-
-        expect(repository_rugged.branches[branch_name]).to be_nil
-      end
+    before do
+      project.add_developer(user)
+      repository.create_branch(branch_name)
     end
 
-    context "when Gitaly user_delete_branch is enabled" do
-      it_behaves_like "user deleting a branch"
-    end
+    it "removes the branch from the repo" do
+      repository.rm_branch(branch_name, user: user)
 
-    context "when Gitaly user_delete_branch is disabled", :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like "user deleting a branch"
+      expect(repository_rugged.branches[branch_name]).to be_nil
     end
   end
 
@@ -1651,8 +1449,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#set_config' do
-    let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
-    let(:rugged) { repository_rugged }
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
     let(:entries) do
       {
         'test.foo1' => 'bla bla',
@@ -1664,19 +1461,18 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     it 'can set config settings' do
       expect(repository.set_config(entries)).to be_nil
 
-      expect(rugged.config['test.foo1']).to eq('bla bla')
-      expect(rugged.config['test.foo2']).to eq('1234')
-      expect(rugged.config['test.foo3']).to eq('true')
+      expect(repository_rugged.config['test.foo1']).to eq('bla bla')
+      expect(repository_rugged.config['test.foo2']).to eq('1234')
+      expect(repository_rugged.config['test.foo3']).to eq('true')
     end
 
     after do
-      entries.keys.each { |k| rugged.config.delete(k) }
+      entries.keys.each { |k| repository_rugged.config.delete(k) }
     end
   end
 
   describe '#delete_config' do
-    let(:repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '') }
-    let(:rugged) { repository_rugged }
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
     let(:entries) do
       {
         'test.foo1' => 'bla bla',
@@ -1687,21 +1483,19 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
 
     it 'can delete config settings' do
       entries.each do |key, value|
-        rugged.config[key] = value
+        repository_rugged.config[key] = value
       end
 
       expect(repository.delete_config(*%w[does.not.exist test.foo1 test.foo2])).to be_nil
 
-      config_keys = rugged.config.each_key.to_a
+      config_keys = repository_rugged.config.each_key.to_a
       expect(config_keys).not_to include('test.foo1')
       expect(config_keys).not_to include('test.foo2')
     end
   end
 
   describe '#merge' do
-    let(:repository) do
-      Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-    end
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
     let(:source_sha) { '913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e' }
     let(:target_branch) { 'test-merge-target-branch' }
 
@@ -1713,46 +1507,34 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
       ensure_seeds
     end
 
-    shared_examples '#merge' do
-      it 'can perform a merge' do
-        merge_commit_id = nil
-        result = repository.merge(user, source_sha, target_branch, 'Test merge') do |commit_id|
-          merge_commit_id = commit_id
-        end
-
-        expect(result.newrev).to eq(merge_commit_id)
-        expect(result.repo_created).to eq(false)
-        expect(result.branch_created).to eq(false)
+    it 'can perform a merge' do
+      merge_commit_id = nil
+      result = repository.merge(user, source_sha, target_branch, 'Test merge') do |commit_id|
+        merge_commit_id = commit_id
       end
 
-      it 'returns nil if there was a concurrent branch update' do
-        concurrent_update_id = '33f3729a45c02fc67d00adb1b8bca394b0e761d9'
-        result = repository.merge(user, source_sha, target_branch, 'Test merge') do
-          # This ref update should make the merge fail
-          repository.write_ref(Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX + target_branch, concurrent_update_id)
-        end
-
-        # This 'nil' signals that the merge was not applied
-        expect(result).to be_nil
+      expect(result.newrev).to eq(merge_commit_id)
+      expect(result.repo_created).to eq(false)
+      expect(result.branch_created).to eq(false)
+    end
 
-        # Our concurrent ref update should not have been undone
-        expect(repository.find_branch(target_branch).target).to eq(concurrent_update_id)
+    it 'returns nil if there was a concurrent branch update' do
+      concurrent_update_id = '33f3729a45c02fc67d00adb1b8bca394b0e761d9'
+      result = repository.merge(user, source_sha, target_branch, 'Test merge') do
+        # This ref update should make the merge fail
+        repository.write_ref(Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX + target_branch, concurrent_update_id)
       end
-    end
 
-    context 'with gitaly' do
-      it_behaves_like '#merge'
-    end
+      # This 'nil' signals that the merge was not applied
+      expect(result).to be_nil
 
-    context 'without gitaly', :skip_gitaly_mock do
-      it_behaves_like '#merge'
+      # Our concurrent ref update should not have been undone
+      expect(repository.find_branch(target_branch).target).to eq(concurrent_update_id)
     end
   end
 
   describe '#ff_merge' do
-    let(:repository) do
-      Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-    end
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
     let(:branch_head) { '6d394385cf567f80a8fd85055db1ab4c5295806f' }
     let(:source_sha) { 'cfe32cf61b73a0d5e9f13e774abde7ff789b1660' }
     let(:target_branch) { 'test-ff-target-branch' }
@@ -1815,9 +1597,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe '#delete_all_refs_except' do
-    let(:repository) do
-      Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-    end
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
 
     before do
       repository.write_ref("refs/delete/a", "0b4bc9a49b562e85de7cc9e834518ea6828729b9")
@@ -1841,12 +1621,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
   end
 
   describe 'remotes' do
-    let(:repository) do
-      Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_MUTABLE_REPO_PATH, '')
-    end
-    let(:rugged) do
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { repository.rugged }
-    end
+    let(:repository) { mutable_repository }
     let(:remote_name) { 'my-remote' }
     let(:url) { 'http://my-repo.git' }
 
@@ -1857,88 +1632,47 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     describe '#add_remote' do
       let(:mirror_refmap) { '+refs/*:refs/*' }
 
-      shared_examples 'add_remote' do
-        it 'added the remote' do
-          begin
-            rugged.remotes.delete(remote_name)
-          rescue Rugged::ConfigError
-          end
-
-          repository.add_remote(remote_name, url, mirror_refmap: mirror_refmap)
-
-          expect(rugged.remotes[remote_name]).not_to be_nil
-          expect(rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.mirror"]).to eq('true')
-          expect(rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.prune"]).to eq('true')
-          expect(rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.fetch"]).to eq(mirror_refmap)
+      it 'added the remote' do
+        begin
+          repository_rugged.remotes.delete(remote_name)
+        rescue Rugged::ConfigError
         end
-      end
 
-      context 'using Gitaly' do
-        it_behaves_like 'add_remote'
-      end
+        repository.add_remote(remote_name, url, mirror_refmap: mirror_refmap)
 
-      context 'with Gitaly disabled', :disable_gitaly do
-        it_behaves_like 'add_remote'
+        expect(repository_rugged.remotes[remote_name]).not_to be_nil
+        expect(repository_rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.mirror"]).to eq('true')
+        expect(repository_rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.prune"]).to eq('true')
+        expect(repository_rugged.config["remote.#{remote_name}.fetch"]).to eq(mirror_refmap)
       end
     end
 
     describe '#remove_remote' do
-      shared_examples 'remove_remote' do
-        it 'removes the remote' do
-          rugged.remotes.create(remote_name, url)
+      it 'removes the remote' do
+        repository_rugged.remotes.create(remote_name, url)
 
-          repository.remove_remote(remote_name)
+        repository.remove_remote(remote_name)
 
-          expect(rugged.remotes[remote_name]).to be_nil
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'using Gitaly' do
-        it_behaves_like 'remove_remote'
-      end
-
-      context 'with Gitaly disabled', :disable_gitaly do
-        it_behaves_like 'remove_remote'
+        expect(repository_rugged.remotes[remote_name]).to be_nil
       end
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#gitlab_projects' do
-    subject { repository.gitlab_projects }
-
-    it do
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        expect(subject.shard_path).to eq(storage_path)
-      end
-    end
-    it { expect(subject.repository_relative_path).to eq(repository.relative_path) }
-  end
-
   describe '#bundle_to_disk' do
-    shared_examples 'bundling to disk' do
-      let(:save_path) { File.join(Dir.tmpdir, "repo-#{SecureRandom.hex}.bundle") }
-
-      after do
-        FileUtils.rm_rf(save_path)
-      end
-
-      it 'saves a bundle to disk' do
-        repository.bundle_to_disk(save_path)
+    let(:save_path) { File.join(Dir.tmpdir, "repo-#{SecureRandom.hex}.bundle") }
 
-        success = system(
-          *%W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} -C #{repository_path} bundle verify #{save_path}),
-          [:out, :err] => '/dev/null'
-        )
-        expect(success).to be true
-      end
+    after do
+      FileUtils.rm_rf(save_path)
     end
 
-    context 'when Gitaly bundle_to_disk feature is enabled' do
-      it_behaves_like 'bundling to disk'
-    end
+    it 'saves a bundle to disk' do
+      repository.bundle_to_disk(save_path)
 
-    context 'when Gitaly bundle_to_disk feature is disabled', :disable_gitaly do
-      it_behaves_like 'bundling to disk'
+      success = system(
+        *%W(#{Gitlab.config.git.bin_path} -C #{repository_path} bundle verify #{save_path}),
+        [:out, :err] => '/dev/null'
+      )
+      expect(success).to be true
     end
   end
 
@@ -1975,7 +1709,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
 
   describe '#checksum' do
     it 'calculates the checksum for non-empty repo' do
-      expect(repository.checksum).to eq '4be7d24ce7e8d845502d599b72d567d23e6a40c0'
+      expect(repository.checksum).to eq '51d0a9662681f93e1fee547a6b7ba2bcaf716059'
     end
 
     it 'returns 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 for an empty repo' do
@@ -2013,138 +1747,41 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
   end
 
-  context 'gitlab_projects commands' do
-    let(:gitlab_projects) { repository.gitlab_projects }
-    let(:timeout) { Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell.git_timeout }
-
-    describe '#push_remote_branches' do
-      subject do
-        repository.push_remote_branches('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-      end
-
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:push_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', timeout, true, ['master'])
-          .and_return(true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error if the command fails' do
-        allow(gitlab_projects).to receive(:output) { 'error' }
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:push_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', timeout, true, ['master'])
-          .and_return(false)
-
-        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommandError, 'error')
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe '#delete_remote_branches' do
-      subject do
-        repository.delete_remote_branches('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-      end
-
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:delete_remote_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-          .and_return(true)
-
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
-
-      it 'raises an error if the command fails' do
-        allow(gitlab_projects).to receive(:output) { 'error' }
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:delete_remote_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-          .and_return(false)
-
-        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommandError, 'error')
-      end
-    end
+  describe '#clean_stale_repository_files' do
+    let(:worktree_path) { File.join(repository_path, 'worktrees', 'delete-me') }
 
-    describe '#delete_remote_branches' do
-      subject do
-        repository.delete_remote_branches('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-      end
+    it 'cleans up the files' do
+      create_worktree = %W[git -C #{repository_path} worktree add --detach #{worktree_path} master]
+      raise 'preparation failed' unless system(*create_worktree, err: '/dev/null')
 
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:delete_remote_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-          .and_return(true)
+      FileUtils.touch(worktree_path, mtime: Time.now - 8.hours)
+      # git rev-list --all will fail in git 2.16 if HEAD is pointing to a non-existent object,
+      # but the HEAD must be 40 characters long or git will ignore it.
+      File.write(File.join(worktree_path, 'HEAD'), Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA)
 
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
+      # git 2.16 fails with "fatal: bad object HEAD"
+      expect(rev_list_all).to be false
 
-      it 'raises an error if the command fails' do
-        allow(gitlab_projects).to receive(:output) { 'error' }
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:delete_remote_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-          .and_return(false)
+      repository.clean_stale_repository_files
 
-        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommandError, 'error')
-      end
+      expect(rev_list_all).to be true
+      expect(File.exist?(worktree_path)).to be_falsey
     end
 
-    describe '#clean_stale_repository_files' do
-      let(:worktree_path) { File.join(repository_path, 'worktrees', 'delete-me') }
-
-      it 'cleans up the files' do
-        create_worktree = %W[git -C #{repository_path} worktree add --detach #{worktree_path} master]
-        raise 'preparation failed' unless system(*create_worktree, err: '/dev/null')
-
-        FileUtils.touch(worktree_path, mtime: Time.now - 8.hours)
-        # git rev-list --all will fail in git 2.16 if HEAD is pointing to a non-existent object,
-        # but the HEAD must be 40 characters long or git will ignore it.
-        File.write(File.join(worktree_path, 'HEAD'), Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA)
-
-        # git 2.16 fails with "fatal: bad object HEAD"
-        expect(rev_list_all).to be false
-
-        repository.clean_stale_repository_files
-
-        expect(rev_list_all).to be true
-        expect(File.exist?(worktree_path)).to be_falsey
-      end
-
-      def rev_list_all
-        system(*%W[git -C #{repository_path} rev-list --all], out: '/dev/null', err: '/dev/null')
-      end
-
-      it 'increments a counter upon an error' do
-        expect(repository.gitaly_repository_client).to receive(:cleanup).and_raise(Gitlab::Git::CommandError)
-
-        counter = double(:counter)
-
-        expect(counter).to receive(:increment)
-        expect(Gitlab::Metrics).to receive(:counter).with(:failed_repository_cleanup_total,
-                                                          'Number of failed repository cleanup events').and_return(counter)
-
-        repository.clean_stale_repository_files
-      end
+    def rev_list_all
+      system(*%W[git -C #{repository_path} rev-list --all], out: '/dev/null', err: '/dev/null')
     end
 
-    describe '#delete_remote_branches' do
-      subject do
-        repository.delete_remote_branches('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-      end
+    it 'increments a counter upon an error' do
+      expect(repository.gitaly_repository_client).to receive(:cleanup).and_raise(Gitlab::Git::CommandError)
 
-      it 'executes the command' do
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:delete_remote_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-          .and_return(true)
+      counter = double(:counter)
 
-        is_expected.to be_truthy
-      end
+      expect(counter).to receive(:increment)
+      expect(Gitlab::Metrics).to receive(:counter).with(:failed_repository_cleanup_total,
+                                                        'Number of failed repository cleanup events').and_return(counter)
 
-      it 'raises an error if the command fails' do
-        allow(gitlab_projects).to receive(:output) { 'error' }
-        expect(gitlab_projects).to receive(:delete_remote_branches)
-          .with('downstream-remote', ['master'])
-          .and_return(false)
-
-        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommandError, 'error')
-      end
+      repository.clean_stale_repository_files
     end
   end
 
@@ -2187,13 +1824,11 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
       end
 
       context 'when the diff contains a rename' do
-        let(:repo) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged }
-        let(:end_sha) { new_commit_move_file(repo).oid }
+        let(:end_sha) { new_commit_move_file(repository_rugged).oid }
 
         after do
           # Erase our commits so other tests get the original repo
-          repo = Gitlab::Git::Repository.new('default', TEST_REPO_PATH, '').rugged
-          repo.references.update('refs/heads/master', SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID)
+          repository_rugged.references.update('refs/heads/master', SeedRepo::LastCommit::ID)
         end
 
         it 'does not include the renamed file in the sparse checkout' do
@@ -2240,10 +1875,9 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
     end
   end
 
-  def create_remote_branch(repository, remote_name, branch_name, source_branch_name)
+  def create_remote_branch(remote_name, branch_name, source_branch_name)
     source_branch = repository.branches.find { |branch| branch.name == source_branch_name }
-    rugged = repository_rugged
-    rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", source_branch.dereferenced_target.sha)
+    repository_rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", source_branch.dereferenced_target.sha)
   end
 
   # Build the options hash that's passed to Rugged::Commit#create
@@ -2321,16 +1955,4 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::Repository, :seed_helper do
       line.split("\t").last
     end
   end
-
-  def repository_rugged
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      repository.rugged
-    end
-  end
-
-  def repository_path
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      repository.path
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/user_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/user_spec.rb
index 99d850e1df9..d9d338206f8 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git/user_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git/user_spec.rb
@@ -22,10 +22,19 @@ describe Gitlab::Git::User do
   end
 
   describe '.from_gitlab' do
-    let(:user) { build(:user) }
-    subject { described_class.from_gitlab(user) }
+    context 'when no commit_email has been set' do
+      let(:user) { build(:user, email: 'alice@example.com', commit_email: nil) }
+      subject { described_class.from_gitlab(user) }
 
-    it { expect(subject).to eq(described_class.new(user.username, user.name, user.email, 'user-')) }
+      it { expect(subject).to eq(described_class.new(user.username, user.name, user.email, 'user-')) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when commit_email has been set' do
+      let(:user) { build(:user, email: 'alice@example.com', commit_email: 'bob@example.com') }
+      subject { described_class.from_gitlab(user) }
+
+      it { expect(subject).to eq(described_class.new(user.username, user.name, user.commit_email, 'user-')) }
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#==' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb
index dbd64c4bec0..e7da5565c26 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/git_access_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::GitAccess do
   include TermsHelper
+  include GitHelpers
 
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
 
@@ -736,21 +737,19 @@ describe Gitlab::GitAccess do
 
     def merge_into_protected_branch
       @protected_branch_merge_commit ||= begin
-        Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          project.repository.add_branch(user, unprotected_branch, 'feature')
-          rugged = project.repository.rugged
-          target_branch = rugged.rev_parse('feature')
-          source_branch = project.repository.create_file(
-            user,
-            'filename',
-            'This is the file content',
-            message: 'This is a good commit message',
-            branch_name: unprotected_branch)
-          author = { email: "email@example.com", time: Time.now, name: "Example Git User" }
-
-          merge_index = rugged.merge_commits(target_branch, source_branch)
-          Rugged::Commit.create(rugged, author: author, committer: author, message: "commit message", parents: [target_branch, source_branch], tree: merge_index.write_tree(rugged))
-        end
+        project.repository.add_branch(user, unprotected_branch, 'feature')
+        rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository)
+        target_branch = rugged.rev_parse('feature')
+        source_branch = project.repository.create_file(
+          user,
+          'filename',
+          'This is the file content',
+          message: 'This is a good commit message',
+          branch_name: unprotected_branch)
+        author = { email: "email@example.com", time: Time.now, name: "Example Git User" }
+
+        merge_index = rugged.merge_commits(target_branch, source_branch)
+        Rugged::Commit.create(rugged, author: author, committer: author, message: "commit message", parents: [target_branch, source_branch], tree: merge_index.write_tree(rugged))
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb
index 54f2ea33f90..d7bd757149d 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/commit_service_spec.rb
@@ -19,7 +19,14 @@ describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::CommitService do
           right_commit_id: commit.id,
           collapse_diffs: false,
           enforce_limits: true,
-          **Gitlab::Git::DiffCollection.collection_limits.to_h
+          # Tests limitation parameters explicitly
+          max_files: 100,
+          max_lines: 5000,
+          max_bytes: 512000,
+          safe_max_files: 100,
+          safe_max_lines: 5000,
+          safe_max_bytes: 512000,
+          max_patch_bytes: 102400
         )
 
         expect_any_instance_of(Gitaly::DiffService::Stub).to receive(:commit_diff).with(request, kind_of(Hash))
@@ -37,7 +44,14 @@ describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::CommitService do
           right_commit_id: initial_commit.id,
           collapse_diffs: false,
           enforce_limits: true,
-          **Gitlab::Git::DiffCollection.collection_limits.to_h
+          # Tests limitation parameters explicitly
+          max_files: 100,
+          max_lines: 5000,
+          max_bytes: 512000,
+          safe_max_files: 100,
+          safe_max_lines: 5000,
+          safe_max_bytes: 512000,
+          max_patch_bytes: 102400
         )
 
         expect_any_instance_of(Gitaly::DiffService::Stub).to receive(:commit_diff).with(request, kind_of(Hash))
@@ -104,6 +118,22 @@ describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::CommitService do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#diff_stats' do
+    let(:left_commit_id) { 'master' }
+    let(:right_commit_id) { 'cfe32cf61b73a0d5e9f13e774abde7ff789b1660' }
+
+    it 'sends an RPC request' do
+      request = Gitaly::DiffStatsRequest.new(repository: repository_message,
+                                             left_commit_id: left_commit_id,
+                                             right_commit_id: right_commit_id)
+
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitaly::DiffService::Stub).to receive(:diff_stats)
+        .with(request, kind_of(Hash)).and_return([])
+
+      described_class.new(repository).diff_stats(left_commit_id, right_commit_id)
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#tree_entries' do
     let(:path) { '/' }
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/remote_service_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/remote_service_spec.rb
index f03c7e3f04b..9030a49983d 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/remote_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/remote_service_spec.rb
@@ -45,6 +45,26 @@ describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::RemoteService do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#find_remote_root_ref' do
+    it 'sends an find_remote_root_ref message and returns the root ref' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitaly::RemoteService::Stub)
+        .to receive(:find_remote_root_ref)
+        .with(gitaly_request_with_path(storage_name, relative_path), kind_of(Hash))
+        .and_return(double(ref: 'master'))
+
+      expect(client.find_remote_root_ref('origin')).to eq 'master'
+    end
+
+    it 'ensure ref is a valid UTF-8 string' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitaly::RemoteService::Stub)
+        .to receive(:find_remote_root_ref)
+        .with(gitaly_request_with_path(storage_name, relative_path), kind_of(Hash))
+        .and_return(double(ref: "an_invalid_ref_\xE5"))
+
+      expect(client.find_remote_root_ref('origin')).to eq "an_invalid_ref_å"
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#update_remote_mirror' do
     let(:ref_name) { 'remote_mirror_1' }
     let(:only_branches_matching) { ['my-branch', 'master'] }
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb
index 5f67fe6b952..d82c9c28da0 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/gitaly_client/wiki_service_spec.rb
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@ describe Gitlab::GitalyClient::WikiService do
       expect(wiki_page.title).to eq('My Page')
       expect(wiki_page.raw_data).to eq('ab')
       expect(wiki_page_version.format).to eq('markdown')
+
+      expect(wiki_page.title).to be_utf8
+      expect(wiki_page.path).to be_utf8
+      expect(wiki_page.name).to be_utf8
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb
index 29e61d15726..88f7099ff3c 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/highlight_spec.rb
@@ -56,5 +56,22 @@ describe Gitlab::Highlight do
 
       described_class.highlight('file.name', 'Contents')
     end
+
+    context 'timeout' do
+      subject { described_class.new('file.name', 'Contents') }
+
+      it 'utilizes timeout for web' do
+        expect(Timeout).to receive(:timeout).with(described_class::TIMEOUT_FOREGROUND).and_call_original
+
+        subject.highlight("Content")
+      end
+
+      it 'utilizes longer timeout for sidekiq' do
+        allow(Sidekiq).to receive(:server?).and_return(true)
+        expect(Timeout).to receive(:timeout).with(described_class::TIMEOUT_BACKGROUND).and_call_original
+
+        subject.highlight("Content")
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_object_storage_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_object_storage_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 5059d68e54b..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_object_storage_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,105 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::ImportExport::AfterExportStrategies::BaseAfterExportStrategy do
-  let!(:service) { described_class.new }
-  let!(:project) { create(:project, :with_object_export) }
-  let(:shared) { project.import_export_shared }
-  let!(:user) { create(:user) }
-
-  describe '#execute' do
-    before do
-      allow(service).to receive(:strategy_execute)
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-    end
-
-    it 'returns if project exported file is not found' do
-      allow(project).to receive(:export_project_object_exists?).and_return(false)
-
-      expect(service).not_to receive(:strategy_execute)
-
-      service.execute(user, project)
-    end
-
-    it 'creates a lock file in the export dir' do
-      allow(service).to receive(:delete_after_export_lock)
-
-      service.execute(user, project)
-
-      expect(lock_path_exist?).to be_truthy
-    end
-
-    context 'when the method succeeds' do
-      it 'removes the lock file' do
-        service.execute(user, project)
-
-        expect(lock_path_exist?).to be_falsey
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when the method fails' do
-      before do
-        allow(service).to receive(:strategy_execute).and_call_original
-      end
-
-      context 'when validation fails' do
-        before do
-          allow(service).to receive(:invalid?).and_return(true)
-        end
-
-        it 'does not create the lock file' do
-          expect(service).not_to receive(:create_or_update_after_export_lock)
-
-          service.execute(user, project)
-        end
-
-        it 'does not execute main logic' do
-          expect(service).not_to receive(:strategy_execute)
-
-          service.execute(user, project)
-        end
-
-        it 'logs validation errors in shared context' do
-          expect(service).to receive(:log_validation_errors)
-
-          service.execute(user, project)
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when an exception is raised' do
-        it 'removes the lock' do
-          expect { service.execute(user, project) }.to raise_error(NotImplementedError)
-
-          expect(lock_path_exist?).to be_falsey
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#log_validation_errors' do
-    it 'add the message to the shared context' do
-      errors = %w(test_message test_message2)
-
-      allow(service).to receive(:invalid?).and_return(true)
-      allow(service.errors).to receive(:full_messages).and_return(errors)
-
-      expect(shared).to receive(:add_error_message).twice.and_call_original
-
-      service.execute(user, project)
-
-      expect(shared.errors).to eq errors
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#to_json' do
-    it 'adds the current strategy class to the serialized attributes' do
-      params = { param1: 1 }
-      result = params.merge(klass: described_class.to_s).to_json
-
-      expect(described_class.new(params).to_json).to eq result
-    end
-  end
-
-  def lock_path_exist?
-    File.exist?(described_class.lock_file_path(project))
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_spec.rb
index 566b7f46c87..9a442de2900 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/base_after_export_strategy_spec.rb
@@ -9,11 +9,10 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::AfterExportStrategies::BaseAfterExportStrategy do
   describe '#execute' do
     before do
       allow(service).to receive(:strategy_execute)
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
     end
 
     it 'returns if project exported file is not found' do
-      allow(project).to receive(:export_project_path).and_return(nil)
+      allow(project).to receive(:export_file_exists?).and_return(false)
 
       expect(service).not_to receive(:strategy_execute)
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/web_upload_strategy_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/web_upload_strategy_spec.rb
index 7f2e0a4ee2c..ec17ad8541f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/web_upload_strategy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/after_export_strategies/web_upload_strategy_spec.rb
@@ -24,34 +24,13 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::AfterExportStrategies::WebUploadStrategy do
   end
 
   describe '#execute' do
-    context 'without object storage' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
-      end
-
-      it 'removes the exported project file after the upload' do
-        allow(strategy).to receive(:send_file)
-        allow(strategy).to receive(:handle_response_error)
-
-        expect(project).to receive(:remove_exported_project_file)
-
-        strategy.execute(user, project)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with object storage' do
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-      end
+    it 'removes the exported project file after the upload' do
+      allow(strategy).to receive(:send_file)
+      allow(strategy).to receive(:handle_response_error)
 
-      it 'removes the exported project file after the upload' do
-        allow(strategy).to receive(:send_file)
-        allow(strategy).to receive(:handle_response_error)
+      expect(project).to receive(:remove_exports)
 
-        expect(project).to receive(:remove_exported_project_file)
-
-        strategy.execute(user, project)
-      end
+      strategy.execute(user, project)
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml
index b4269bd5786..fe167033941 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml
@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ pipelines:
 - retryable_builds
 - cancelable_statuses
 - manual_actions
+- scheduled_actions
 - artifacts
 - pipeline_schedule
 - merge_requests
@@ -288,6 +289,7 @@ project:
 - fork_network_member
 - fork_network
 - custom_attributes
+- prometheus_metrics
 - lfs_file_locks
 - project_badges
 - source_of_merge_requests
@@ -303,6 +305,8 @@ award_emoji:
 - user
 priorities:
 - label
+prometheus_metrics:
+- project
 timelogs:
 - issue
 - merge_request
@@ -321,3 +325,9 @@ metrics:
 - latest_closed_by
 - merged_by
 - pipeline
+resource_label_events:
+- user
+- issue
+- merge_request
+- epic
+- label
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_restorer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_restorer_spec.rb
index 4897d604bc1..e44ff6bbcbd 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_restorer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_restorer_spec.rb
@@ -6,22 +6,35 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::AvatarRestorer do
   let(:shared) { project.import_export_shared }
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
 
-  before do
-    allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:avatar_export_file)
-                                                .and_return(uploaded_image_temp_path)
-  end
-
   after do
     project.remove_avatar!
   end
 
-  it 'restores a project avatar' do
-    expect(described_class.new(project: project, shared: shared).restore).to be true
+  context 'with avatar' do
+    before do
+      allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:avatar_export_file)
+                                                  .and_return(uploaded_image_temp_path)
+    end
+
+    it 'restores a project avatar' do
+      expect(described_class.new(project: project, shared: shared).restore).to be true
+    end
+
+    it 'saves the avatar into the project' do
+      described_class.new(project: project, shared: shared).restore
+
+      expect(project.reload.avatar.file.exists?).to be true
+    end
   end
 
-  it 'saves the avatar into the project' do
-    described_class.new(project: project, shared: shared).restore
+  it 'does not break if there is just a directory' do
+    Dir.mktmpdir do |tmpdir|
+      FileUtils.mkdir_p("#{tmpdir}/a/b")
+
+      allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:avatar_export_path)
+                                                  .and_return("#{tmpdir}/a")
 
-    expect(project.reload.avatar.file.exists?).to be true
+      expect(described_class.new(project: project, shared: shared).restore).to be true
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_saver_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_saver_spec.rb
index 90e6d653d34..2bd1b9924c6 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_saver_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/avatar_saver_spec.rb
@@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::AvatarSaver do
 
   before do
     FileUtils.mkdir_p("#{shared.export_path}/avatar/")
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
+    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::Shared).to receive(:export_path).and_return(export_path)
   end
 
   after do
@@ -19,7 +18,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::AvatarSaver do
   it 'saves a project avatar' do
     described_class.new(project: project_with_avatar, shared: shared).save
 
-    expect(File).to exist("#{shared.export_path}/avatar/dk.png")
+    expect(File).to exist(Dir["#{shared.export_path}/avatar/**/dk.png"].first)
   end
 
   it 'is fine not to have an avatar' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_object_storage_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_object_storage_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 287745eb40e..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_object_storage_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter do
-  let(:shared) { Gitlab::ImportExport::Shared.new(nil) }
-  let(:storage_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/file_importer_spec" }
-  let(:valid_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/valid.json" }
-  let(:symlink_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/invalid.json" }
-  let(:hidden_symlink_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/.hidden" }
-  let(:subfolder_symlink_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/subfolder/invalid.json" }
-  let(:evil_symlink_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/.\nevil" }
-
-  before do
-    stub_const('Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter::MAX_RETRIES', 0)
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-    stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
-
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(storage_path)
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::CommandLineUtil).to receive(:untar_zxf).and_return(true)
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::Shared).to receive(:relative_archive_path).and_return('test')
-    allow(SecureRandom).to receive(:hex).and_return('abcd')
-    setup_files
-  end
-
-  after do
-    FileUtils.rm_rf(storage_path)
-  end
-
-  context 'normal run' do
-    before do
-      described_class.import(project: build(:project), archive_file: '', shared: shared)
-    end
-
-    it 'removes symlinks in root folder' do
-      expect(File.exist?(symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'removes hidden symlinks in root folder' do
-      expect(File.exist?(hidden_symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'removes evil symlinks in root folder' do
-      expect(File.exist?(evil_symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'removes symlinks in subfolders' do
-      expect(File.exist?(subfolder_symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'does not remove a valid file' do
-      expect(File.exist?(valid_file)).to be true
-    end
-
-    it 'creates the file in the right subfolder' do
-      expect(shared.export_path).to include('test/abcd')
-    end
-  end
-
-  context 'error' do
-    before do
-      allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:wait_for_archived_file).and_raise(StandardError)
-      described_class.import(project: build(:project), archive_file: '', shared: shared)
-    end
-
-    it 'removes symlinks in root folder' do
-      expect(File.exist?(symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'removes hidden symlinks in root folder' do
-      expect(File.exist?(hidden_symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'removes symlinks in subfolders' do
-      expect(File.exist?(subfolder_symlink_file)).to be false
-    end
-
-    it 'does not remove a valid file' do
-      expect(File.exist?(valid_file)).to be true
-    end
-  end
-
-  def setup_files
-    FileUtils.mkdir_p("#{shared.export_path}/subfolder/")
-    FileUtils.touch(valid_file)
-    FileUtils.ln_s(valid_file, symlink_file)
-    FileUtils.ln_s(valid_file, subfolder_symlink_file)
-    FileUtils.ln_s(valid_file, hidden_symlink_file)
-    FileUtils.ln_s(valid_file, evil_symlink_file)
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_spec.rb
index 78fccdf1dfc..bf34cefe18f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/file_importer_spec.rb
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter do
   let(:shared) { Gitlab::ImportExport::Shared.new(nil) }
-  let(:export_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/file_importer_spec" }
+  let(:storage_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/file_importer_spec" }
   let(:valid_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/valid.json" }
   let(:symlink_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/invalid.json" }
   let(:hidden_symlink_file) { "#{shared.export_path}/.hidden" }
@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter do
 
   before do
     stub_const('Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter::MAX_RETRIES', 0)
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
+    stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
+
+    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(storage_path)
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::CommandLineUtil).to receive(:untar_zxf).and_return(true)
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::Shared).to receive(:relative_archive_path).and_return('test')
     allow(SecureRandom).to receive(:hex).and_return('abcd')
@@ -19,12 +21,12 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter do
   end
 
   after do
-    FileUtils.rm_rf(export_path)
+    FileUtils.rm_rf(storage_path)
   end
 
   context 'normal run' do
     before do
-      described_class.import(project: nil, archive_file: '', shared: shared)
+      described_class.import(project: build(:project), archive_file: '', shared: shared)
     end
 
     it 'removes symlinks in root folder' do
@@ -55,7 +57,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter do
   context 'error' do
     before do
       allow_any_instance_of(described_class).to receive(:wait_for_archived_file).and_raise(StandardError)
-      described_class.import(project: nil, archive_file: '', shared: shared)
+      described_class.import(project: build(:project), archive_file: '', shared: shared)
     end
 
     it 'removes symlinks in root folder' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_object_storage_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_object_storage_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 24a994b3611..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_object_storage_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,115 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::ImportExport::Importer do
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let(:test_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/importer_spec" }
-  let(:shared) { project.import_export_shared }
-  let(:project) { create(:project) }
-  let(:import_file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz') }
-
-  subject(:importer) { described_class.new(project) }
-
-  before do
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(test_path)
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter).to receive(:remove_import_file)
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-    stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
-
-    FileUtils.mkdir_p(shared.export_path)
-    ImportExportUpload.create(project: project, import_file: import_file)
-  end
-
-  after do
-    FileUtils.rm_rf(test_path)
-  end
-
-  describe '#execute' do
-    it 'succeeds' do
-      importer.execute
-
-      expect(shared.errors).to be_empty
-    end
-
-    it 'extracts the archive'  do
-      expect(Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter).to receive(:import).and_call_original
-
-      importer.execute
-    end
-
-    it 'checks the version' do
-      expect(Gitlab::ImportExport::VersionChecker).to receive(:check!).and_call_original
-
-      importer.execute
-    end
-
-    context 'all restores are executed' do
-      [
-        Gitlab::ImportExport::AvatarRestorer,
-        Gitlab::ImportExport::RepoRestorer,
-        Gitlab::ImportExport::WikiRestorer,
-        Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsRestorer,
-        Gitlab::ImportExport::LfsRestorer,
-        Gitlab::ImportExport::StatisticsRestorer
-      ].each do |restorer|
-        it "calls the #{restorer}" do
-          fake_restorer = double(restorer.to_s)
-
-          expect(fake_restorer).to receive(:restore).and_return(true).at_least(1)
-          expect(restorer).to receive(:new).and_return(fake_restorer).at_least(1)
-
-          importer.execute
-        end
-      end
-
-      it 'restores the ProjectTree' do
-        expect(Gitlab::ImportExport::ProjectTreeRestorer).to receive(:new).and_call_original
-
-        importer.execute
-      end
-
-      it 'removes the import file' do
-        expect(importer).to receive(:remove_import_file).and_call_original
-
-        importer.execute
-
-        expect(project.import_export_upload.import_file&.file).to be_nil
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when project successfully restored' do
-      let!(:existing_project) { create(:project, namespace: user.namespace) }
-      let(:project) { create(:project, namespace: user.namespace, name: 'whatever', path: 'whatever') }
-
-      before do
-        restorers = double(:restorers, all?: true)
-
-        allow(subject).to receive(:import_file).and_return(true)
-        allow(subject).to receive(:check_version!).and_return(true)
-        allow(subject).to receive(:restorers).and_return(restorers)
-        allow(project).to receive(:import_data).and_return(double(data: { 'original_path' => existing_project.path }))
-      end
-
-      context 'when import_data' do
-        context 'has original_path' do
-          it 'overwrites existing project' do
-            expect_any_instance_of(::Projects::OverwriteProjectService).to receive(:execute).with(existing_project)
-
-            subject.execute
-          end
-        end
-
-        context 'has not original_path' do
-          before do
-            allow(project).to receive(:import_data).and_return(double(data: {}))
-          end
-
-          it 'does not call the overwrite service' do
-            expect_any_instance_of(::Projects::OverwriteProjectService).not_to receive(:execute).with(existing_project)
-
-            subject.execute
-          end
-        end
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_spec.rb
index 8053c48ad6c..11f98d782b1 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/importer_spec.rb
@@ -4,16 +4,18 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::Importer do
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:test_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/importer_spec" }
   let(:shared) { project.import_export_shared }
-  let(:project) { create(:project, import_source: File.join(test_path, 'test_project_export.tar.gz')) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project) }
+  let(:import_file) { fixture_file_upload('spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz') }
 
   subject(:importer) { described_class.new(project) }
 
   before do
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(test_path)
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport::FileImporter).to receive(:remove_import_file)
+    stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
 
     FileUtils.mkdir_p(shared.export_path)
-    FileUtils.cp(Rails.root.join('spec/features/projects/import_export/test_project_export.tar.gz'), test_path)
+    ImportExportUpload.create(project: project, import_file: import_file)
   end
 
   after do
@@ -64,6 +66,14 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::Importer do
         importer.execute
       end
 
+      it 'removes the import file' do
+        expect(importer).to receive(:remove_import_file).and_call_original
+
+        importer.execute
+
+        expect(project.import_export_upload.import_file&.file).to be_nil
+      end
+
       it 'sets the correct visibility_level when visibility level is a string' do
         project.create_or_update_import_data(
           data: { override_params: { visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE.to_s } }
@@ -85,7 +95,6 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::Importer do
         allow(subject).to receive(:import_file).and_return(true)
         allow(subject).to receive(:check_version!).and_return(true)
         allow(subject).to receive(:restorers).and_return(restorers)
-        allow(restorers).to receive(:all?).and_return(true)
         allow(project).to receive(:import_data).and_return(double(data: { 'original_path' => existing_project.path }))
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/model_configuration_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/model_configuration_spec.rb
index 5cb8f2589c8..2e28f978c3a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/model_configuration_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/model_configuration_spec.rb
@@ -16,14 +16,30 @@ describe 'Import/Export model configuration' do
     # - User, Author... Models we do not care about for checking models
     names.flatten.uniq - %w(milestones labels user author) + ['project']
   end
+  let(:ce_models_yml) { 'spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml' }
+  let(:ce_models_hash) { YAML.load_file(ce_models_yml) }
+
+  let(:ee_models_yml) { 'ee/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml' }
+  let(:ee_models_hash) { File.exist?(ee_models_yml) ? YAML.load_file(ee_models_yml) : {} }
 
-  let(:all_models_yml) { 'spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/all_models.yml' }
-  let(:all_models) { YAML.load_file(all_models_yml) }
   let(:current_models) { setup_models }
+  let(:all_models_hash) do
+    all_models_hash = ce_models_hash.dup
+
+    all_models_hash.each do |model, associations|
+      associations.concat(ee_models_hash[model] || [])
+    end
+
+    ee_models_hash.each do |model, associations|
+      all_models_hash[model] ||= associations
+    end
+
+    all_models_hash
+  end
 
   it 'has no new models' do
     model_names.each do |model_name|
-      new_models = Array(current_models[model_name]) - Array(all_models[model_name])
+      new_models = Array(current_models[model_name]) - Array(all_models_hash[model_name])
       expect(new_models).to be_empty, failure_message(model_name.classify, new_models)
     end
   end
@@ -31,27 +47,21 @@ describe 'Import/Export model configuration' do
   # List of current models between models, in the format of
   # {model: [model_2, model3], ...}
   def setup_models
-    all_models_hash = {}
-
-    model_names.each do |model_name|
-      model_class = relation_class_for_name(model_name)
-
-      all_models_hash[model_name] = associations_for(model_class) - ['project']
+    model_names.each_with_object({}) do |model_name, hash|
+      hash[model_name] = associations_for(relation_class_for_name(model_name)) - ['project']
     end
-
-    all_models_hash
   end
 
   def failure_message(parent_model_name, new_models)
-    <<-MSG
+    <<~MSG
       New model(s) <#{new_models.join(',')}> have been added, related to #{parent_model_name}, which is exported by
       the Import/Export feature.
 
-      If you think this model should be included in the export, please add it to IMPORT_EXPORT_CONFIG.
-      Definitely add it to MODELS_JSON to signal that you've handled this error and to prevent it from showing up in the future.
+      If you think this model should be included in the export, please add it to `#{Gitlab::ImportExport.config_file}`.
 
-      MODELS_JSON: #{File.expand_path(all_models_yml)}
-      IMPORT_EXPORT_CONFIG: #{Gitlab::ImportExport.config_file}
+      Definitely add it to `#{File.expand_path(ce_models_yml)}`
+      #{"or `#{File.expand_path(ee_models_yml)}` if the model/associations are EE-specific\n" if ee_models_hash.any?}
+      to signal that you've handled this error and to prevent it from showing up in the future.
     MSG
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project.json b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project.json
index 1b7fa11cb3c..3f2281f213f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project.json
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project.json
@@ -331,6 +331,28 @@
           },
           "events": []
         }
+      ],
+      "resource_label_events": [
+        {
+          "id":244,
+          "action":"remove",
+          "issue_id":40,
+          "merge_request_id":null,
+          "label_id":2,
+          "user_id":1,
+          "created_at":"2018-08-28T08:24:00.494Z",
+          "label": {
+            "id": 2,
+            "title": "test2",
+            "color": "#428bca",
+            "project_id": 8,
+            "created_at": "2016-07-22T08:55:44.161Z",
+            "updated_at": "2016-07-22T08:55:44.161Z",
+            "template": false,
+            "description": "",
+            "type": "ProjectLabel"
+          }
+        }
       ]
     },
     {
@@ -2515,6 +2537,17 @@
           "events": []
         }
       ],
+      "resource_label_events": [
+        {
+          "id":243,
+          "action":"add",
+          "issue_id":null,
+          "merge_request_id":27,
+          "label_id":null,
+          "user_id":1,
+          "created_at":"2018-08-28T08:24:00.494Z"
+        }
+      ],
       "merge_request_diff": {
         "id": 27,
         "state": "collected",
@@ -6110,7 +6143,7 @@
       "id": 36,
       "project_id": 5,
       "ref": "master",
-      "sha": "be93687618e4b132087f430a4d8fc3a609c9b77c",
+      "sha": "sha-notes",
       "before_sha": null,
       "push_data": null,
       "created_at": "2016-03-22T15:20:35.755Z",
@@ -6121,6 +6154,7 @@
       "status": "failed",
       "started_at": null,
       "finished_at": null,
+      "user_id": 9999,
       "duration": null,
       "notes": [
         {
@@ -6320,6 +6354,7 @@
     },
     {
       "id": 38,
+      "iid": 1,
       "project_id": 5,
       "ref": "master",
       "sha": "5f923865dde3436854e9ceb9cdb7815618d4e849",
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer_spec.rb
index a88ac0a091e..7ebfc61f5e7 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_restorer_spec.rb
@@ -59,7 +59,11 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::ProjectTreeRestorer do
       end
 
       it 'creates a valid pipeline note' do
-        expect(Ci::Pipeline.first.notes).not_to be_empty
+        expect(Ci::Pipeline.find_by_sha('sha-notes').notes).not_to be_empty
+      end
+
+      it 'pipeline has the correct user ID' do
+        expect(Ci::Pipeline.find_by_sha('sha-notes').user_id).to eq(@user.id)
       end
 
       it 'restores pipelines with missing ref' do
@@ -89,6 +93,14 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::ProjectTreeRestorer do
         expect(ProtectedTag.first.create_access_levels).not_to be_empty
       end
 
+      it 'restores issue resource label events' do
+        expect(Issue.find_by(title: 'Voluptatem').resource_label_events).not_to be_empty
+      end
+
+      it 'restores merge requests resource label events' do
+        expect(MergeRequest.find_by(title: 'MR1').resource_label_events).not_to be_empty
+      end
+
       context 'event at forth level of the tree' do
         let(:event) { Event.where(action: 6).first }
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_saver_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_saver_spec.rb
index fec8a2af9ab..5dc372263ad 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_saver_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/project_tree_saver_spec.rb
@@ -169,6 +169,14 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::ProjectTreeSaver do
         expect(priorities.flatten).not_to be_empty
       end
 
+      it 'has issue resource label events' do
+        expect(saved_project_json['issues'].first['resource_label_events']).not_to be_empty
+      end
+
+      it 'has merge request resource label events' do
+        expect(saved_project_json['merge_requests'].first['resource_label_events']).not_to be_empty
+      end
+
       it 'saves the correct service type' do
         expect(saved_project_json['services'].first['type']).to eq('CustomIssueTrackerService')
       end
@@ -291,6 +299,9 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::ProjectTreeSaver do
            project: project,
            commit_id: ci_build.pipeline.sha)
 
+    create(:resource_label_event, label: project_label, issue: issue)
+    create(:resource_label_event, label: group_label, merge_request: merge_request)
+
     create(:event, :created, target: milestone, project: project, author: user)
     create(:service, project: project, type: 'CustomIssueTrackerService', category: 'issue_tracker', properties: { one: 'value' })
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb
index cf9e0f71910..a31f77484d8 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/relation_factory_spec.rb
@@ -191,9 +191,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::RelationFactory do
         "author" => {
           "name" => "Administrator"
         },
-        "events" => [
-
-        ]
+        "events" => []
       }
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/repo_restorer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/repo_restorer_spec.rb
index 7ffa84f906d..8a699eb1461 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/repo_restorer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/repo_restorer_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::ImportExport::RepoRestorer do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   describe 'bundle a project Git repo' do
     let(:user) { create(:user) }
     let!(:project_with_repo) { create(:project, :repository, name: 'test-repo-restorer', path: 'test-repo-restorer') }
@@ -36,9 +38,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::RepoRestorer do
     it 'has the webhooks' do
       restorer.restore
 
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        expect(Gitlab::Git::Hook.new('post-receive', project.repository.raw_repository)).to exist
-      end
+      expect(project_hook_exists?(project)).to be true
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/safe_model_attributes.yml b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/safe_model_attributes.yml
index 0a1e3eb83d3..f7935149b23 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/safe_model_attributes.yml
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/safe_model_attributes.yml
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ CommitStatus:
 - retried
 - protected
 - failure_reason
+- scheduled_at
 Ci::Variable:
 - id
 - project_id
@@ -416,6 +417,7 @@ ProjectHook:
 - type
 - service_id
 - push_events
+- push_events_branch_filter
 - issues_events
 - merge_requests_events
 - tag_push_events
@@ -491,6 +493,7 @@ ProjectFeature:
 - snippets_access_level
 - builds_access_level
 - repository_access_level
+- pages_access_level
 - created_at
 - updated_at
 ProtectedBranch::MergeAccessLevel:
@@ -554,6 +557,19 @@ ProjectCustomAttribute:
 - project_id
 - key
 - value
+PrometheusMetric:
+- id
+- created_at
+- updated_at
+- project_id
+- y_label
+- unit
+- legend
+- title
+- query
+- group
+- common
+- identifier
 Badge:
 - id
 - link_url
@@ -565,3 +581,11 @@ Badge:
 - type
 ProjectCiCdSetting:
 - group_runners_enabled
+ResourceLabelEvent:
+- id
+- action
+- issue_id
+- merge_request_id
+- label_id
+- user_id
+- created_at
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/saver_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/saver_spec.rb
index 02f1a4b81aa..d185ff2dfcc 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/saver_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/saver_spec.rb
@@ -18,26 +18,12 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::Saver do
     FileUtils.rm_rf(export_path)
   end
 
-  context 'local archive' do
-    it 'saves the repo to disk' do
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
+  it 'saves the repo using object storage' do
+    stub_uploads_object_storage(ImportExportUploader)
 
-      subject.save
+    subject.save
 
-      expect(shared.errors).to be_empty
-      expect(Dir.empty?(shared.archive_path)).to be false
-    end
-  end
-
-  context 'object storage' do
-    it 'saves the repo using object storage' do
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-      stub_uploads_object_storage(ImportExportUploader)
-
-      subject.save
-
-      expect(ImportExportUpload.find_by(project: project).export_file.url)
-        .to match(%r[\/uploads\/-\/system\/import_export_upload\/export_file.*])
-    end
+    expect(ImportExportUpload.find_by(project: project).export_file.url)
+      .to match(%r[\/uploads\/-\/system\/import_export_upload\/export_file.*])
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager_spec.rb
index f799de18cd0..792117e1df1 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_manager_spec.rb
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsManager do
   let(:shared) { project.import_export_shared }
   let(:export_path) { "#{Dir.tmpdir}/project_tree_saver_spec" }
   let(:project) { create(:project) }
+  let(:upload) { create(:upload, :issuable_upload, :object_storage, model: project) }
   let(:exported_file_path) { "#{shared.export_path}/uploads/#{upload.secret}/#{File.basename(upload.path)}" }
 
   subject(:manager) { described_class.new(project: project, shared: shared) }
@@ -69,44 +70,20 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsManager do
         end
       end
     end
+  end
 
-    context 'using object storage' do
-      let!(:upload) { create(:upload, :issuable_upload, :object_storage, model: project) }
-
-      before do
-        stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-        stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
-      end
-
-      it 'saves the file' do
-        fake_uri = double
-
-        expect(fake_uri).to receive(:open).and_return(StringIO.new('File content'))
-        expect(URI).to receive(:parse).and_return(fake_uri)
-
-        manager.save
+  describe '#restore' do
+    before do
+      stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
 
-        expect(File.read(exported_file_path)).to eq('File content')
-      end
+      FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/72a497a02fe3ee09edae2ed06d390038'))
+      FileUtils.touch(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/72a497a02fe3ee09edae2ed06d390038', "dummy.txt"))
     end
 
-    describe '#restore' do
-      context 'using object storage' do
-        before do
-          stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
-          stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
-
-          FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/72a497a02fe3ee09edae2ed06d390038'))
-          FileUtils.touch(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/72a497a02fe3ee09edae2ed06d390038', "dummy.txt"))
-        end
+    it 'restores the file' do
+      manager.restore
 
-        it 'restores the file' do
-          manager.restore
-
-          expect(project.uploads.size).to eq(1)
-          expect(project.uploads.first.build_uploader.filename).to eq('dummy.txt')
-        end
-      end
+      expect(project.uploads.map { |u| u.build_uploader.filename }).to include('dummy.txt')
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_restorer_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_restorer_spec.rb
index acef97459b8..6072f18b8c7 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_restorer_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_restorer_spec.rb
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsRestorer do
     before do
       allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
       FileUtils.mkdir_p(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/random'))
-      FileUtils.touch(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/random', "dummy.txt"))
+      FileUtils.touch(File.join(shared.export_path, 'uploads/random', 'dummy.txt'))
     end
 
     after do
@@ -27,9 +27,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsRestorer do
       it 'copies the uploads to the project path' do
         subject.restore
 
-        uploads = Dir.glob(File.join(subject.uploads_path, '**/*')).map { |file| File.basename(file) }
-
-        expect(uploads).to include('dummy.txt')
+        expect(project.uploads.map { |u| u.build_uploader.filename }).to include('dummy.txt')
       end
     end
 
@@ -45,9 +43,7 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsRestorer do
       it 'copies the uploads to the project path' do
         subject.restore
 
-        uploads = Dir.glob(File.join(subject.uploads_path, '**/*')).map { |file| File.basename(file) }
-
-        expect(uploads).to include('dummy.txt')
+        expect(project.uploads.map { |u| u.build_uploader.filename }).to include('dummy.txt')
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_saver_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_saver_spec.rb
index c716edd9397..24993460e51 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_saver_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/import_export/uploads_saver_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ describe Gitlab::ImportExport::UploadsSaver do
     let(:shared) { project.import_export_shared }
 
     before do
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
       allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/cluster_role_binding_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/cluster_role_binding_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4a669408025
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/cluster_role_binding_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::ClusterRoleBinding do
+  let(:cluster_role_binding) { described_class.new(name, cluster_role_name, subjects) }
+  let(:name) { 'cluster-role-binding-name' }
+  let(:cluster_role_name) { 'cluster-admin' }
+
+  let(:subjects) { [{ kind: 'ServiceAccount', name: 'sa', namespace: 'ns' }] }
+
+  describe '#generate' do
+    let(:role_ref) do
+      {
+        apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io',
+        kind: 'ClusterRole',
+        name: cluster_role_name
+      }
+    end
+
+    let(:resource) do
+      ::Kubeclient::Resource.new(
+        metadata: { name: name },
+        roleRef: role_ref,
+        subjects: subjects
+      )
+    end
+
+    subject { cluster_role_binding.generate }
+
+    it 'should build a Kubeclient Resource' do
+      is_expected.to eq(resource)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb
index 341f71a3e49..9200724ed23 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/api_spec.rb
@@ -5,9 +5,18 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do
   let(:helm) { described_class.new(client) }
   let(:gitlab_namespace) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::NAMESPACE }
   let(:namespace) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::Namespace.new(gitlab_namespace, client) }
-  let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_prometheus) }
-
-  let(:command) { application.install_command }
+  let(:application_name) { 'app-name' }
+  let(:rbac) { false }
+  let(:files) { {} }
+
+  let(:command) do
+    Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InstallCommand.new(
+      name: application_name,
+      chart: 'chart-name',
+      rbac: rbac,
+      files: files
+    )
+  end
 
   subject { helm }
 
@@ -28,6 +37,8 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do
     before do
       allow(client).to receive(:create_pod).and_return(nil)
       allow(client).to receive(:create_config_map).and_return(nil)
+      allow(client).to receive(:create_service_account).and_return(nil)
+      allow(client).to receive(:create_cluster_role_binding).and_return(nil)
       allow(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once
     end
 
@@ -39,7 +50,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do
     end
 
     context 'with a ConfigMap' do
-      let(:resource) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::ConfigMap.new(application.name, application.files).generate }
+      let(:resource) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::ConfigMap.new(application_name, files).generate }
 
       it 'creates a ConfigMap on kubeclient' do
         expect(client).to receive(:create_config_map).with(resource).once
@@ -47,6 +58,133 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do
         subject.install(command)
       end
     end
+
+    context 'without a service account' do
+      it 'does not create a service account on kubeclient' do
+        expect(client).not_to receive(:create_service_account)
+        expect(client).not_to receive(:create_cluster_role_binding)
+
+        subject.install(command)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a service account' do
+      let(:command) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InitCommand.new(name: application_name, files: files, rbac: rbac) }
+
+      context 'rbac-enabled cluster' do
+        let(:rbac) { true }
+
+        let(:service_account_resource) do
+          Kubeclient::Resource.new(metadata: { name: 'tiller', namespace: 'gitlab-managed-apps' })
+        end
+
+        let(:cluster_role_binding_resource) do
+          Kubeclient::Resource.new(
+            metadata: { name: 'tiller-admin' },
+            roleRef: { apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io', kind: 'ClusterRole', name: 'cluster-admin' },
+            subjects: [{ kind: 'ServiceAccount', name: 'tiller', namespace: 'gitlab-managed-apps' }]
+          )
+        end
+
+        context 'service account and cluster role binding does not exist' do
+          before do
+            expect(client).to receive('get_service_account').with('tiller', 'gitlab-managed-apps').and_raise(Kubeclient::HttpError.new(404, 'Not found', nil))
+            expect(client).to receive('get_cluster_role_binding').with('tiller-admin').and_raise(Kubeclient::HttpError.new(404, 'Not found', nil))
+          end
+
+          it 'creates a service account, followed the cluster role binding on kubeclient' do
+            expect(client).to receive(:create_service_account).with(service_account_resource).once.ordered
+            expect(client).to receive(:create_cluster_role_binding).with(cluster_role_binding_resource).once.ordered
+
+            subject.install(command)
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'service account already exists' do
+          before do
+            expect(client).to receive('get_service_account').with('tiller', 'gitlab-managed-apps').and_return(service_account_resource)
+            expect(client).to receive('get_cluster_role_binding').with('tiller-admin').and_raise(Kubeclient::HttpError.new(404, 'Not found', nil))
+          end
+
+          it 'updates the service account, followed by creating the cluster role binding' do
+            expect(client).to receive(:update_service_account).with(service_account_resource).once.ordered
+            expect(client).to receive(:create_cluster_role_binding).with(cluster_role_binding_resource).once.ordered
+
+            subject.install(command)
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'service account and cluster role binding already exists' do
+          before do
+            expect(client).to receive('get_service_account').with('tiller', 'gitlab-managed-apps').and_return(service_account_resource)
+            expect(client).to receive('get_cluster_role_binding').with('tiller-admin').and_return(cluster_role_binding_resource)
+          end
+
+          it 'updates the service account, followed by creating the cluster role binding' do
+            expect(client).to receive(:update_service_account).with(service_account_resource).once.ordered
+            expect(client).to receive(:update_cluster_role_binding).with(cluster_role_binding_resource).once.ordered
+
+            subject.install(command)
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'a non-404 error is thrown' do
+          before do
+            expect(client).to receive('get_service_account').with('tiller', 'gitlab-managed-apps').and_raise(Kubeclient::HttpError.new(401, 'Unauthorized', nil))
+          end
+
+          it 'raises an error' do
+            expect { subject.install(command) }.to raise_error(Kubeclient::HttpError)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'legacy abac cluster' do
+        it 'does not create a service account on kubeclient' do
+          expect(client).not_to receive(:create_service_account)
+          expect(client).not_to receive(:create_cluster_role_binding)
+
+          subject.install(command)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#update' do
+    let(:rbac) { false }
+
+    let(:command) do
+      Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::UpgradeCommand.new(
+        application_name,
+        chart: 'chart-name',
+        files: files,
+        rbac: rbac
+      )
+    end
+
+    before do
+      allow(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once
+
+      allow(client).to receive(:update_config_map).and_return(nil)
+      allow(client).to receive(:create_pod).and_return(nil)
+    end
+
+    it 'ensures the namespace exists before creating the pod' do
+      expect(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once.ordered
+      expect(client).to receive(:create_pod).once.ordered
+
+      subject.update(command)
+    end
+
+    it 'updates the config map on kubeclient when one exists' do
+      resource = Gitlab::Kubernetes::ConfigMap.new(
+        application_name, files
+      ).generate
+
+      expect(client).to receive(:update_config_map).with(resource).once
+
+      subject.update(command)
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#status' do
@@ -78,4 +216,25 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Api do
       subject.delete_pod!(command.pod_name)
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#get_config_map' do
+    before do
+      allow(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once
+      allow(client).to receive(:get_config_map).and_return(nil)
+    end
+
+    it 'ensures the namespace exists before retrieving the config map' do
+      expect(namespace).to receive(:ensure_exists!).once
+
+      subject.get_config_map('example-config-map-name')
+    end
+
+    it 'gets the config map on kubeclient' do
+      expect(client).to receive(:get_config_map)
+        .with('example-config-map-name', namespace.name)
+        .once
+
+      subject.get_config_map('example-config-map-name')
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/base_command_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/base_command_spec.rb
index d50616e95e8..aacae78be43 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/base_command_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/base_command_spec.rb
@@ -2,14 +2,24 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::BaseCommand do
   let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_helm) }
+  let(:rbac) { false }
+
   let(:test_class) do
     Class.new do
       include Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::BaseCommand
 
+      def initialize(rbac)
+        @rbac = rbac
+      end
+
       def name
         "test-class-name"
       end
 
+      def rbac?
+        @rbac
+      end
+
       def files
         {
           some: 'value'
@@ -19,7 +29,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::BaseCommand do
   end
 
   let(:base_command) do
-    test_class.new
+    test_class.new(rbac)
   end
 
   subject { base_command }
@@ -34,6 +44,14 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::BaseCommand do
     it 'should returns a kubeclient resoure with pod content for application' do
       is_expected.to be_an_instance_of ::Kubeclient::Resource
     end
+
+    context 'when rbac is true' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it 'also returns a kubeclient resource' do
+        is_expected.to be_an_instance_of ::Kubeclient::Resource
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#pod_name' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/init_command_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/init_command_spec.rb
index dcbc046cf00..72dc1817936 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/init_command_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/init_command_spec.rb
@@ -2,9 +2,135 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InitCommand do
   let(:application) { create(:clusters_applications_helm) }
-  let(:commands) { 'helm init --tiller-tls --tiller-tls-verify --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/helm/config/ca.pem --tiller-tls-cert /data/helm/helm/config/cert.pem --tiller-tls-key /data/helm/helm/config/key.pem >/dev/null' }
+  let(:rbac) { false }
+  let(:files) { {} }
+  let(:init_command) { described_class.new(name: application.name, files: files, rbac: rbac) }
 
-  subject { described_class.new(name: application.name, files: {}) }
+  let(:commands) do
+    <<~EOS
+    helm init --tiller-tls --tiller-tls-verify --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/helm/config/ca.pem --tiller-tls-cert /data/helm/helm/config/cert.pem --tiller-tls-key /data/helm/helm/config/key.pem >/dev/null
+    EOS
+  end
+
+  subject { init_command }
 
   it_behaves_like 'helm commands'
+
+  context 'on a rbac-enabled cluster' do
+    let(:rbac) { true }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
+      let(:commands) do
+        <<~EOS
+        helm init --tiller-tls --tiller-tls-verify --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/helm/config/ca.pem --tiller-tls-cert /data/helm/helm/config/cert.pem --tiller-tls-key /data/helm/helm/config/key.pem --service-account tiller >/dev/null
+        EOS
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#rbac?' do
+    subject { init_command.rbac? }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#config_map_resource' do
+    let(:metadata) do
+      {
+        name: 'values-content-configuration-helm',
+        namespace: 'gitlab-managed-apps',
+        labels: { name: 'values-content-configuration-helm' }
+      }
+    end
+
+    let(:resource) { ::Kubeclient::Resource.new(metadata: metadata, data: files) }
+
+    subject { init_command.config_map_resource }
+
+    it 'returns a KubeClient resource with config map content for the application' do
+      is_expected.to eq(resource)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#pod_resource' do
+    subject { init_command.pod_resource }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it 'generates a pod that uses the tiller serviceAccountName' do
+        expect(subject.spec.serviceAccountName).to eq('tiller')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it 'generates a pod that uses the default serviceAccountName' do
+        expect(subject.spec.serviceAcccountName).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#service_account_resource' do
+    let(:resource) do
+      Kubeclient::Resource.new(metadata: { name: 'tiller', namespace: 'gitlab-managed-apps' })
+    end
+
+    subject { init_command.service_account_resource }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it 'generates a Kubeclient resource for the tiller ServiceAccount' do
+        is_expected.to eq(resource)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it 'generates nothing' do
+        is_expected.to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#cluster_role_binding_resource' do
+    let(:resource) do
+      Kubeclient::Resource.new(
+        metadata: { name: 'tiller-admin' },
+        roleRef: { apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io', kind: 'ClusterRole', name: 'cluster-admin' },
+        subjects: [{ kind: 'ServiceAccount', name: 'tiller', namespace: 'gitlab-managed-apps' }]
+      )
+    end
+
+    subject { init_command.cluster_role_binding_resource }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it 'generates a Kubeclient resource for the ClusterRoleBinding for tiller' do
+        is_expected.to eq(resource)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it 'generates nothing' do
+        is_expected.to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/install_command_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/install_command_spec.rb
index 982e2f41043..f28941ce58f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/install_command_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/install_command_spec.rb
@@ -3,14 +3,17 @@ require 'rails_helper'
 describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InstallCommand do
   let(:files) { { 'ca.pem': 'some file content' } }
   let(:repository) { 'https://repository.example.com' }
+  let(:rbac) { false }
   let(:version) { '1.2.3' }
 
   let(:install_command) do
     described_class.new(
       name: 'app-name',
       chart: 'chart-name',
+      rbac: rbac,
       files: files,
-      version: version, repository: repository
+      version: version,
+      repository: repository
     )
   end
 
@@ -21,19 +24,76 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InstallCommand do
       <<~EOS
       helm init --client-only >/dev/null
       helm repo add app-name https://repository.example.com
-      helm install chart-name --name app-name --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem --version 1.2.3 --namespace gitlab-managed-apps -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+      #{helm_install_comand}
+      EOS
+    end
+
+    let(:helm_install_comand) do
+      <<~EOS.squish
+      helm install chart-name
+        --name app-name
+        --tls
+        --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem
+        --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem
+        --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem
+        --version 1.2.3
+        --namespace gitlab-managed-apps
+        -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
       EOS
     end
   end
 
+  context 'when rbac is true' do
+    let(:rbac) { true }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
+      let(:commands) do
+        <<~EOS
+        helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+        helm repo add app-name https://repository.example.com
+        #{helm_install_command}
+        EOS
+      end
+
+      let(:helm_install_command) do
+        <<~EOS.squish
+        helm install chart-name
+          --name app-name
+          --tls
+          --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem
+          --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem
+          --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem
+          --version 1.2.3
+          --set rbac.create\\=true,rbac.enabled\\=true
+          --namespace gitlab-managed-apps
+          -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        EOS
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'when there is no repository' do
     let(:repository) { nil }
 
     it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
       let(:commands) do
         <<~EOS
-         helm init --client-only >/dev/null
-         helm install chart-name --name app-name --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem --version 1.2.3 --namespace gitlab-managed-apps -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+        #{helm_install_command}
+        EOS
+      end
+
+      let(:helm_install_command) do
+        <<~EOS.squish
+        helm install chart-name
+          --name app-name
+          --tls
+          --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem
+          --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem
+          --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem
+          --version 1.2.3
+          --namespace gitlab-managed-apps
+          -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
         EOS
       end
     end
@@ -45,9 +105,19 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InstallCommand do
     it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
       let(:commands) do
         <<~EOS
-         helm init --client-only >/dev/null
-         helm repo add app-name https://repository.example.com
-         helm install chart-name --name app-name --version 1.2.3 --namespace gitlab-managed-apps -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+        helm repo add app-name https://repository.example.com
+        #{helm_install_command}
+        EOS
+      end
+
+      let(:helm_install_command) do
+        <<~EOS.squish
+        helm install chart-name
+           --name app-name
+           --version 1.2.3
+           --namespace gitlab-managed-apps
+           -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
         EOS
       end
     end
@@ -59,14 +129,63 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InstallCommand do
     it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
       let(:commands) do
         <<~EOS
-         helm init --client-only >/dev/null
-         helm repo add app-name https://repository.example.com
-         helm install chart-name --name app-name --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem --namespace gitlab-managed-apps -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+        helm repo add app-name https://repository.example.com
+        #{helm_install_command}
+        EOS
+      end
+
+      let(:helm_install_command) do
+        <<~EOS.squish
+        helm install chart-name
+          --name app-name
+          --tls
+          --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/ca.pem
+          --tls-cert /data/helm/app-name/config/cert.pem
+          --tls-key /data/helm/app-name/config/key.pem
+          --namespace gitlab-managed-apps
+          -f /data/helm/app-name/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
         EOS
       end
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#rbac?' do
+    subject { install_command.rbac? }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#pod_resource' do
+    subject { install_command.pod_resource }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it 'generates a pod that uses the tiller serviceAccountName' do
+        expect(subject.spec.serviceAccountName).to eq('tiller')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it 'generates a pod that uses the default serviceAccountName' do
+        expect(subject.spec.serviceAcccountName).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#config_map_resource' do
     let(:metadata) do
       {
@@ -84,4 +203,20 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::InstallCommand do
       is_expected.to eq(resource)
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#service_account_resource' do
+    subject { install_command.service_account_resource }
+
+    it 'returns nothing' do
+      is_expected.to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#cluster_role_binding_resource' do
+    subject { install_command.cluster_role_binding_resource }
+
+    it 'returns nothing' do
+      is_expected.to be_nil
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/pod_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/pod_spec.rb
index ec64193c0b2..b333b334f36 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/pod_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/pod_spec.rb
@@ -5,8 +5,9 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Pod do
     let(:app) {  create(:clusters_applications_prometheus) }
     let(:command) {  app.install_command }
     let(:namespace) { Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::NAMESPACE }
+    let(:service_account_name) { nil }
 
-    subject { described_class.new(command, namespace) }
+    subject { described_class.new(command, namespace, service_account_name: service_account_name) }
 
     context 'with a command' do
       it 'should generate a Kubeclient::Resource' do
@@ -58,6 +59,20 @@ describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::Pod do
         expect(volume.configMap['items'].first['key']).to eq(:'values.yaml')
         expect(volume.configMap['items'].first['path']).to eq(:'values.yaml')
       end
+
+      it 'should have no serviceAccountName' do
+        spec = subject.generate.spec
+        expect(spec.serviceAccountName).to be_nil
+      end
+
+      context 'with a service_account_name' do
+        let(:service_account_name) { 'sa' }
+
+        it 'should use the serviceAccountName provided' do
+          spec = subject.generate.spec
+          expect(spec.serviceAccountName).to eq(service_account_name)
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/upgrade_command_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/upgrade_command_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3dabf04413e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/helm/upgrade_command_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::UpgradeCommand do
+  let(:application) { build(:clusters_applications_prometheus) }
+  let(:files) { { 'ca.pem': 'some file content' } }
+  let(:namespace) { ::Gitlab::Kubernetes::Helm::NAMESPACE }
+  let(:rbac) { false }
+  let(:upgrade_command) do
+    described_class.new(
+      application.name,
+      chart: application.chart,
+      files: files,
+      rbac: rbac
+    )
+  end
+
+  subject { upgrade_command }
+
+  it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
+    let(:commands) do
+      <<~EOS
+         helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+         helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/key.pem --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+      EOS
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'rbac is true' do
+    let(:rbac) { true }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
+      let(:commands) do
+        <<~EOS
+         helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+         helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/key.pem --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        EOS
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'with an application with a repository' do
+    let(:ci_runner) { create(:ci_runner) }
+    let(:application) { build(:clusters_applications_runner, runner: ci_runner) }
+    let(:upgrade_command) do
+      described_class.new(
+        application.name,
+        chart: application.chart,
+        files: files,
+        rbac: rbac,
+        repository: application.repository
+      )
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
+      let(:commands) do
+        <<~EOS
+           helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+           helm repo add #{application.name} #{application.repository}
+           helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --tls --tls-ca-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/ca.pem --tls-cert /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/cert.pem --tls-key /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/key.pem --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        EOS
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when there is no ca.pem file' do
+    let(:files) { { 'file.txt': 'some content' } }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'helm commands' do
+      let(:commands) do
+        <<~EOS
+         helm init --client-only >/dev/null
+         helm upgrade #{application.name} #{application.chart} --reset-values --install --namespace #{namespace} -f /data/helm/#{application.name}/config/values.yaml >/dev/null
+        EOS
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#pod_resource' do
+    subject { upgrade_command.pod_resource }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it 'generates a pod that uses the tiller serviceAccountName' do
+        expect(subject.spec.serviceAccountName).to eq('tiller')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it 'generates a pod that uses the default serviceAccountName' do
+        expect(subject.spec.serviceAcccountName).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#config_map_resource' do
+    let(:metadata) do
+      {
+        name: "values-content-configuration-#{application.name}",
+        namespace: namespace,
+        labels: { name: "values-content-configuration-#{application.name}" }
+      }
+    end
+    let(:resource) { ::Kubeclient::Resource.new(metadata: metadata, data: files) }
+
+    it 'returns a KubeClient resource with config map content for the application' do
+      expect(subject.config_map_resource).to eq(resource)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#rbac?' do
+    subject { upgrade_command.rbac? }
+
+    context 'rbac is enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { true }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+
+    context 'rbac is not enabled' do
+      let(:rbac) { false }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#pod_name' do
+    it 'returns the pod name' do
+      expect(subject.pod_name).to eq("upgrade-#{application.name}")
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/kube_client_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/kube_client_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..53c5a4e7c94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/kube_client_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::KubeClient do
+  include KubernetesHelpers
+
+  let(:api_url) { 'https://kubernetes.example.com/prefix' }
+  let(:api_groups) { ['api', 'apis/rbac.authorization.k8s.io'] }
+  let(:api_version) { 'v1' }
+  let(:kubeclient_options) { { auth_options: { bearer_token: 'xyz' } } }
+
+  let(:client) { described_class.new(api_url, api_groups, api_version, kubeclient_options) }
+
+  before do
+    stub_kubeclient_discover(api_url)
+  end
+
+  describe '#hashed_clients' do
+    subject { client.hashed_clients }
+
+    it 'has keys from api groups' do
+      expect(subject.keys).to match_array api_groups
+    end
+
+    it 'has values of Kubeclient::Client' do
+      expect(subject.values).to all(be_an_instance_of Kubeclient::Client)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#clients' do
+    subject { client.clients }
+
+    it 'is not empty' do
+      is_expected.to be_present
+    end
+
+    it 'is an array of Kubeclient::Client objects' do
+      is_expected.to all(be_an_instance_of Kubeclient::Client)
+    end
+
+    it 'has each API group url' do
+      expected_urls = api_groups.map { |group| "#{api_url}/#{group}" }
+
+      expect(subject.map(&:api_endpoint).map(&:to_s)).to match_array(expected_urls)
+    end
+
+    it 'has the kubeclient options' do
+      subject.each do |client|
+        expect(client.auth_options).to eq({ bearer_token: 'xyz' })
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'has the api_version' do
+      subject.each do |client|
+        expect(client.instance_variable_get(:@api_version)).to eq('v1')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#core_client' do
+    subject { client.core_client }
+
+    it 'is a Kubeclient::Client' do
+      is_expected.to be_an_instance_of Kubeclient::Client
+    end
+
+    it 'has the core API endpoint' do
+      expect(subject.api_endpoint.to_s).to match(%r{\/api\Z})
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#rbac_client' do
+    subject { client.rbac_client }
+
+    it 'is a Kubeclient::Client' do
+      is_expected.to be_an_instance_of Kubeclient::Client
+    end
+
+    it 'has the RBAC API group endpoint' do
+      expect(subject.api_endpoint.to_s).to match(%r{\/apis\/rbac.authorization.k8s.io\Z})
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#extensions_client' do
+    subject { client.extensions_client }
+
+    let(:api_groups) { ['apis/extensions'] }
+
+    it 'is a Kubeclient::Client' do
+      is_expected.to be_an_instance_of Kubeclient::Client
+    end
+
+    it 'has the extensions API group endpoint' do
+      expect(subject.api_endpoint.to_s).to match(%r{\/apis\/extensions\Z})
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#discover!' do
+    it 'makes a discovery request for each API group' do
+      client.discover!
+
+      api_groups.each do |api_group|
+        discovery_url = api_url + '/' + api_group + '/v1'
+        expect(WebMock).to have_requested(:get, discovery_url).once
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'core API' do
+    let(:core_client) { client.core_client }
+
+    [
+      :get_pods,
+      :get_secrets,
+      :get_config_map,
+      :get_pod,
+      :get_namespace,
+      :get_secret,
+      :get_service,
+      :get_service_account,
+      :delete_pod,
+      :create_config_map,
+      :create_namespace,
+      :create_pod,
+      :create_secret,
+      :create_service_account,
+      :update_config_map,
+      :update_service_account
+    ].each do |method|
+      describe "##{method}" do
+        it 'delegates to the core client' do
+          expect(client).to delegate_method(method).to(:core_client)
+        end
+
+        it 'responds to the method' do
+          expect(client).to respond_to method
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'rbac API group' do
+    let(:rbac_client) { client.rbac_client }
+
+    [
+      :create_cluster_role_binding,
+      :get_cluster_role_binding,
+      :update_cluster_role_binding
+    ].each do |method|
+      describe "##{method}" do
+        it 'delegates to the rbac client' do
+          expect(client).to delegate_method(method).to(:rbac_client)
+        end
+
+        it 'responds to the method' do
+          expect(client).to respond_to method
+        end
+
+        context 'no rbac client' do
+          let(:api_groups) { ['api'] }
+
+          it 'throws an error' do
+            expect { client.public_send(method) }.to raise_error(Module::DelegationError)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'extensions API group' do
+    let(:api_groups) { ['apis/extensions'] }
+    let(:api_version) { 'v1beta1' }
+    let(:extensions_client) { client.extensions_client }
+
+    describe '#get_deployments' do
+      it 'delegates to the extensions client' do
+        expect(client).to delegate_method(:get_deployments).to(:extensions_client)
+      end
+
+      it 'responds to the method' do
+        expect(client).to respond_to :get_deployments
+      end
+
+      context 'no extensions client' do
+        let(:api_groups) { ['api'] }
+        let(:api_version) { 'v1' }
+
+        it 'throws an error' do
+          expect { client.get_deployments }.to raise_error(Module::DelegationError)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'non-entity methods' do
+    it 'does not proxy for non-entity methods' do
+      expect(client.clients.first).to respond_to :proxy_url
+
+      expect(client).not_to respond_to :proxy_url
+    end
+
+    it 'throws an error' do
+      expect { client.proxy_url }.to raise_error(NoMethodError)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#get_pod_log' do
+    let(:core_client) { client.core_client }
+
+    it 'is delegated to the core client' do
+      expect(client).to delegate_method(:get_pod_log).to(:core_client)
+    end
+
+    context 'when no core client' do
+      let(:api_groups) { ['apis/extensions'] }
+
+      it 'throws an error' do
+        expect { client.get_pod_log('pod-name') }.to raise_error(Module::DelegationError)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#watch_pod_log' do
+    let(:core_client) { client.core_client }
+
+    it 'is delegated to the core client' do
+      expect(client).to delegate_method(:watch_pod_log).to(:core_client)
+    end
+
+    context 'when no core client' do
+      let(:api_groups) { ['apis/extensions'] }
+
+      it 'throws an error' do
+        expect { client.watch_pod_log('pod-name') }.to raise_error(Module::DelegationError)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'methods that do not exist on any client' do
+    it 'throws an error' do
+      expect { client.non_existent_method }.to raise_error(NoMethodError)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for respond_to' do
+      expect(client.respond_to?(:non_existent_method)).to be_falsey
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/service_account_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/service_account_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8da9e932dc3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/service_account_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::ServiceAccount do
+  let(:name) { 'a_service_account' }
+  let(:namespace_name) { 'a_namespace' }
+  let(:service_account) { described_class.new(name, namespace_name) }
+
+  it { expect(service_account.name).to eq(name) }
+  it { expect(service_account.namespace_name).to eq(namespace_name) }
+
+  describe '#generate' do
+    let(:resource) do
+      ::Kubeclient::Resource.new(metadata: { name: name, namespace: namespace_name })
+    end
+
+    subject { service_account.generate }
+
+    it 'should build a Kubeclient Resource' do
+      is_expected.to eq(resource)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/service_account_token_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/service_account_token_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0773d3d9aec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/kubernetes/service_account_token_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Kubernetes::ServiceAccountToken do
+  let(:name) { 'token-name' }
+  let(:service_account_name) { 'a_service_account' }
+  let(:namespace_name) { 'a_namespace' }
+  let(:service_account_token) { described_class.new(name, service_account_name, namespace_name) }
+
+  it { expect(service_account_token.name).to eq(name) }
+  it { expect(service_account_token.service_account_name).to eq(service_account_name) }
+  it { expect(service_account_token.namespace_name).to eq(namespace_name) }
+
+  describe '#generate' do
+    let(:resource) do
+      ::Kubeclient::Resource.new(
+        metadata: {
+          name: name,
+          namespace: namespace_name,
+          annotations: {
+            'kubernetes.io/service-account.name': service_account_name
+          }
+        },
+        type: 'kubernetes.io/service-account-token'
+      )
+    end
+
+    subject { service_account_token.generate }
+
+    it 'should build a Kubeclient Resource' do
+      is_expected.to eq(resource)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/metrics/subscribers/active_record_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/metrics/subscribers/active_record_spec.rb
index 4e7bd433a9c..ee6d6fc961f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/metrics/subscribers/active_record_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/metrics/subscribers/active_record_spec.rb
@@ -42,6 +42,65 @@ describe Gitlab::Metrics::Subscribers::ActiveRecord do
 
         subscriber.sql(event)
       end
+
+      context 'events are internal to Rails or irrelevant' do
+        let(:schema_event) do
+          double(
+            :event,
+            name: 'sql.active_record',
+            payload: {
+              sql: "SELECT attr.attname FROM pg_attribute attr INNER JOIN pg_constraint cons ON attr.attrelid = cons.conrelid AND attr.attnum = any(cons.conkey) WHERE cons.contype = 'p' AND cons.conrelid = '\"projects\"'::regclass",
+              name: 'SCHEMA',
+              connection_id: 135,
+              statement_name: nil,
+              binds: []
+            },
+            duration: 0.7
+          )
+        end
+
+        let(:begin_event) do
+          double(
+            :event,
+            name: 'sql.active_record',
+            payload: {
+              sql: "BEGIN",
+              name: nil,
+              connection_id: 231,
+              statement_name: nil,
+              binds: []
+            },
+            duration: 1.1
+          )
+        end
+
+        let(:commit_event) do
+          double(
+            :event,
+            name: 'sql.active_record',
+            payload: {
+              sql: "COMMIT",
+              name: nil,
+              connection_id: 212,
+              statement_name: nil,
+              binds: []
+            },
+            duration: 1.6
+          )
+        end
+
+        it 'skips schema/begin/commit sql commands' do
+          expect(subscriber).to receive(:current_transaction)
+                                  .at_least(:once)
+                                  .and_return(transaction)
+
+          expect(transaction).not_to receive(:increment)
+
+          subscriber.sql(schema_event)
+          subscriber.sql(begin_event)
+          subscriber.sql(commit_event)
+        end
+      end
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/middleware/read_only_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/middleware/read_only_spec.rb
index 8fbeaa065fa..ac3bc6b2dfe 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/middleware/read_only_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/middleware/read_only_spec.rb
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Middleware::ReadOnly do
     end
   end
 
-  context 'normal requests to a read-only Gitlab instance' do
+  context 'normal requests to a read-only GitLab instance' do
     let(:fake_app) { lambda { |env| [200, { 'Content-Type' => 'text/plain' }, ['OK']] } }
 
     before do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/null_request_store_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/null_request_store_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c023dac53ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/null_request_store_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::NullRequestStore do
+  let(:null_store) { described_class.new }
+
+  describe '#store' do
+    it 'returns an empty hash' do
+      expect(null_store.store).to eq({})
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#active?' do
+    it 'returns falsey' do
+      expect(null_store.active?).to be_falsey
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#read' do
+    it 'returns nil' do
+      expect(null_store.read('foo')).to be nil
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#[]' do
+    it 'returns nil' do
+      expect(null_store['foo']).to be nil
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#write' do
+    it 'returns the same value' do
+      expect(null_store.write('key', 'value')).to eq('value')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#[]=' do
+    it 'returns the same value' do
+      expect(null_store['key'] = 'value').to eq('value')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#exist?' do
+    it 'returns falsey' do
+      expect(null_store.exist?('foo')).to be_falsey
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#fetch' do
+    it 'returns the block result' do
+      expect(null_store.fetch('key') { 'block result' }).to eq('block result')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#delete' do
+    context 'when a block is given' do
+      it 'yields the key to the block' do
+        expect do |b|
+          null_store.delete('foo', &b)
+        end.to yield_with_args('foo')
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the block result' do
+        expect(null_store.delete('foo') { |key| 'block result' }).to eq('block result')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a block is not given' do
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        expect(null_store.delete('foo')).to be nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/patch/prependable_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/patch/prependable_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..725d733d176
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/patch/prependable_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+
+# Patching ActiveSupport::Concern
+require_relative '../../../../config/initializers/0_as_concern'
+
+describe Gitlab::Patch::Prependable do
+  before do
+    @prepended_modules = []
+  end
+
+  let(:ee) do
+    # So that block in Module.new could see them
+    prepended_modules = @prepended_modules
+
+    Module.new do
+      extend ActiveSupport::Concern
+
+      class_methods do
+        def class_name
+          super.tr('C', 'E')
+        end
+      end
+
+      this = self
+      prepended do
+        prepended_modules << [self, this]
+      end
+
+      def name
+        super.tr('c', 'e')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  let(:ce) do
+    # So that block in Module.new could see them
+    prepended_modules = @prepended_modules
+    ee_ = ee
+
+    Module.new do
+      extend ActiveSupport::Concern
+      prepend ee_
+
+      class_methods do
+        def class_name
+          'CE'
+        end
+      end
+
+      this = self
+      prepended do
+        prepended_modules << [self, this]
+      end
+
+      def name
+        'ce'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'a class including a concern prepending a concern' do
+    subject { Class.new.include(ce) }
+
+    it 'returns values from prepended module ee' do
+      expect(subject.new.name).to eq('ee')
+      expect(subject.class_name).to eq('EE')
+    end
+
+    it 'has the expected ancestors' do
+      expect(subject.ancestors.take(3)).to eq([subject, ee, ce])
+      expect(subject.singleton_class.ancestors.take(3))
+        .to eq([subject.singleton_class,
+                ee.const_get(:ClassMethods),
+                ce.const_get(:ClassMethods)])
+    end
+
+    it 'prepends only once even if called twice' do
+      2.times { ce.prepend(ee) }
+
+      subject
+
+      expect(@prepended_modules).to eq([[ce, ee]])
+    end
+
+    context 'overriding methods' do
+      before do
+        subject.module_eval do
+          def self.class_name
+            'Custom'
+          end
+
+          def name
+            'custom'
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'returns values from the class' do
+        expect(subject.new.name).to eq('custom')
+        expect(subject.class_name).to eq('Custom')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'a class prepending a concern prepending a concern' do
+    subject { Class.new.prepend(ce) }
+
+    it 'returns values from prepended module ee' do
+      expect(subject.new.name).to eq('ee')
+      expect(subject.class_name).to eq('EE')
+    end
+
+    it 'has the expected ancestors' do
+      expect(subject.ancestors.take(3)).to eq([ee, ce, subject])
+      expect(subject.singleton_class.ancestors.take(3))
+        .to eq([ee.const_get(:ClassMethods),
+                ce.const_get(:ClassMethods),
+                subject.singleton_class])
+    end
+
+    it 'prepends only once' do
+      subject.prepend(ce)
+
+      expect(@prepended_modules).to eq([[ce, ee], [subject, ce]])
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'a class prepending a concern' do
+    subject do
+      ee_ = ee
+
+      Class.new do
+        prepend ee_
+
+        def self.class_name
+          'CE'
+        end
+
+        def name
+          'ce'
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'returns values from prepended module ee' do
+      expect(subject.new.name).to eq('ee')
+      expect(subject.class_name).to eq('EE')
+    end
+
+    it 'has the expected ancestors' do
+      expect(subject.ancestors.take(2)).to eq([ee, subject])
+      expect(subject.singleton_class.ancestors.take(2))
+        .to eq([ee.const_get(:ClassMethods),
+                subject.singleton_class])
+    end
+
+    it 'prepends only once' do
+      subject.prepend(ee)
+
+      expect(@prepended_modules).to eq([[subject, ee]])
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'simple case' do
+    subject do
+      foo_ = foo
+
+      Class.new do
+        prepend foo_
+
+        def value
+          10
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    let(:foo) do
+      Module.new do
+        extend ActiveSupport::Concern
+
+        prepended do
+          def self.class_value
+            20
+          end
+        end
+
+        def value
+          super * 10
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'class methods' do
+      it "has a method" do
+        expect(subject).to respond_to(:class_value)
+      end
+
+      it 'can execute a method' do
+        expect(subject.class_value).to eq(20)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'instance methods' do
+      it "has a method" do
+        expect(subject.new).to respond_to(:value)
+      end
+
+      it 'chains a method execution' do
+        expect(subject.new.value).to eq(100)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'having two prepended blocks' do
+    subject do
+      Module.new do
+        extend ActiveSupport::Concern
+
+        prepended do
+        end
+
+        prepended do
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    it "raises an error" do
+      expect { subject }
+        .to raise_error(described_class::MultiplePrependedBlocks)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/additional_metrics_parser_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/additional_metrics_parser_spec.rb
index 5589db92b1d..1a108003bc2 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/additional_metrics_parser_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/additional_metrics_parser_spec.rb
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Prometheus::AdditionalMetricsParser do
   let(:parser_error_class) { Gitlab::Prometheus::ParsingError }
 
   describe '#load_groups_from_yaml' do
-    subject { described_class.load_groups_from_yaml }
+    subject { described_class.load_groups_from_yaml('dummy.yaml') }
 
     describe 'parsing sample yaml' do
       let(:sample_yaml) do
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/metric_group_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/metric_group_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e7d16e73663
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/prometheus/metric_group_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'rails_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::Prometheus::MetricGroup do
+  describe '.common_metrics' do
+    let!(:project_metric) { create(:prometheus_metric) }
+    let!(:common_metric_group_a) { create(:prometheus_metric, :common, group: :aws_elb) }
+    let!(:common_metric_group_b_q1) { create(:prometheus_metric, :common, group: :kubernetes) }
+    let!(:common_metric_group_b_q2) { create(:prometheus_metric, :common, group: :kubernetes) }
+
+    subject { described_class.common_metrics }
+
+    it 'returns exactly two groups' do
+      expect(subject.map(&:name)).to contain_exactly(
+        'Response metrics (AWS ELB)', 'System metrics (Kubernetes)')
+    end
+
+    it 'returns exactly three metric queries' do
+      expect(subject.map(&:metrics).flatten.map(&:id)).to contain_exactly(
+        common_metric_group_a.id, common_metric_group_b_q1.id,
+        common_metric_group_b_q2.id)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.for_project' do
+    let!(:other_project) { create(:project) }
+    let!(:project_metric) { create(:prometheus_metric) }
+    let!(:common_metric) { create(:prometheus_metric, :common, group: :aws_elb) }
+
+    subject do
+      described_class.for_project(other_project)
+        .map(&:metrics).flatten
+        .map(&:id)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns exactly one common metric' do
+      is_expected.to contain_exactly(common_metric.id)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter_spec.rb
index 5bd4d6c6a48..0295138fc3a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_adapter_spec.rb
@@ -65,6 +65,144 @@ describe Gitlab::RepositoryCacheAdapter do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#cache_method_output_asymmetrically', :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching, :request_store do
+    let(:request_store_cache) { repository.send(:request_store_cache) }
+
+    context 'with a non-existing repository' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project) } # No repository
+      let(:object) { double }
+
+      subject do
+        repository.cache_method_output_asymmetrically(:cats) do
+          object.cats_call_stub
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the output of the original method' do
+        expect(object).to receive(:cats_call_stub).and_return('output')
+
+        expect(subject).to eq('output')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a method throwing a non-existing-repository error' do
+      subject do
+        repository.cache_method_output_asymmetrically(:cats) do
+          raise Gitlab::Git::Repository::NoRepository
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'returns nil' do
+        expect(subject).to eq(nil)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not cache the data' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(repository.instance_variable_defined?(:@cats)).to eq(false)
+        expect(cache.exist?(:cats)).to eq(false)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an existing repository' do
+      let(:object) { double }
+
+      context 'when it returns truthy' do
+        before do
+          expect(object).to receive(:cats).once.and_return('truthy output')
+        end
+
+        it 'caches the output in RequestStore' do
+          expect do
+            repository.cache_method_output_asymmetrically(:cats) { object.cats }
+          end.to change { request_store_cache.read(:cats) }.from(nil).to('truthy output')
+        end
+
+        it 'caches the output in RepositoryCache' do
+          expect do
+            repository.cache_method_output_asymmetrically(:cats) { object.cats }
+          end.to change { cache.read(:cats) }.from(nil).to('truthy output')
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when it returns false' do
+        before do
+          expect(object).to receive(:cats).once.and_return(false)
+        end
+
+        it 'caches the output in RequestStore' do
+          expect do
+            repository.cache_method_output_asymmetrically(:cats) { object.cats }
+          end.to change { request_store_cache.read(:cats) }.from(nil).to(false)
+        end
+
+        it 'does NOT cache the output in RepositoryCache' do
+          expect do
+            repository.cache_method_output_asymmetrically(:cats) { object.cats }
+          end.not_to change { cache.read(:cats) }.from(nil)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#memoize_method_output' do
+    let(:fallback) { 10 }
+
+    context 'with a non-existing repository' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project) } # No repository
+
+      subject do
+        repository.memoize_method_output(:cats, fallback: fallback) do
+          repository.cats_call_stub
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the fallback value' do
+        expect(subject).to eq(fallback)
+      end
+
+      it 'avoids calling the original method' do
+        expect(repository).not_to receive(:cats_call_stub)
+
+        subject
+      end
+
+      it 'does not set the instance variable' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(repository.instance_variable_defined?(:@cats)).to eq(false)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with a method throwing a non-existing-repository error' do
+      subject do
+        repository.memoize_method_output(:cats, fallback: fallback) do
+          raise Gitlab::Git::Repository::NoRepository
+        end
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the fallback value' do
+        expect(subject).to eq(fallback)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not set the instance variable' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(repository.instance_variable_defined?(:@cats)).to eq(false)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an existing repository' do
+      it 'sets the instance variable' do
+        repository.memoize_method_output(:cats, fallback: fallback) do
+          'block output'
+        end
+
+        expect(repository.instance_variable_get(:@cats)).to eq('block output')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#expire_method_caches' do
     it 'expires the caches of the given methods' do
       expect(cache).to receive(:expire).with(:rendered_readme)
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_spec.rb
index fc259cf1208..741ee12633f 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/repository_cache_spec.rb
@@ -47,4 +47,89 @@ describe Gitlab::RepositoryCache do
       expect(backend).to have_received(:fetch).with("baz:#{namespace}", &p)
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#fetch_without_caching_false', :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching do
+    let(:key) { :foo }
+    let(:backend) { Rails.cache }
+
+    it 'requires a block' do
+      expect do
+        cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key)
+      end.to raise_error(LocalJumpError)
+    end
+
+    context 'when the key does not exist in the cache' do
+      context 'when the result of the block is truthy' do
+        it 'returns the result of the block' do
+          result = cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key) { true }
+
+          expect(result).to be true
+        end
+
+        it 'caches the value' do
+          expect(backend).to receive(:write).with("#{key}:#{namespace}", true)
+
+          cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key) { true }
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when the result of the block is falsey' do
+        let(:p) { -> { false } }
+
+        it 'returns the result of the block' do
+          result = cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key, &p)
+
+          expect(result).to be false
+        end
+
+        it 'does not cache the value' do
+          expect(backend).not_to receive(:write).with("#{key}:#{namespace}", true)
+
+          cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key, &p)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when the cached value is truthy' do
+      before do
+        backend.write("#{key}:#{namespace}", true)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the cached value' do
+        result = cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key) { 'block result' }
+
+        expect(result).to be true
+      end
+
+      it 'does not execute the block' do
+        expect do |b|
+          cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key, &b)
+        end.not_to yield_control
+      end
+
+      it 'does not write to the cache' do
+        expect(backend).not_to receive(:write)
+
+        cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key) { 'block result' }
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when the cached value is falsey' do
+      before do
+        backend.write("#{key}:#{namespace}", false)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the result of the block' do
+        result = cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key) { 'block result' }
+
+        expect(result).to eq 'block result'
+      end
+
+      it 'writes the truthy value to the cache' do
+        expect(backend).to receive(:write).with("#{key}:#{namespace}", 'block result')
+
+        cache.fetch_without_caching_false(key) { 'block result' }
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/safe_request_store_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/safe_request_store_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c797171dbe2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/safe_request_store_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::SafeRequestStore do
+  describe '.store' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(described_class.store).to eq(RequestStore)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect(described_class.store).to be_a(Gitlab::NullRequestStore)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.begin!' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(RequestStore).to receive(:begin!)
+
+        described_class.begin!
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(RequestStore).to receive(:begin!)
+
+        described_class.begin!
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.clear!' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(RequestStore).to receive(:clear!).twice.and_call_original
+
+        described_class.clear!
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(RequestStore).to receive(:clear!).and_call_original
+
+        described_class.clear!
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.end!' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(RequestStore).to receive(:end!).twice.and_call_original
+
+        described_class.end!
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect(RequestStore).to receive(:end!).and_call_original
+
+        described_class.end!
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.write' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          described_class.write('foo', true)
+        end.to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil).to(true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          described_class.write('foo', true)
+        end.not_to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.[]=' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          described_class['foo'] = true
+        end.to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil).to(true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          described_class['foo'] = true
+        end.not_to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.read' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          RequestStore.write('foo', true)
+        end.to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil).to(true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          RequestStore.write('foo', true)
+        end.not_to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil)
+
+        RequestStore.clear! # Clean up
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.[]' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          RequestStore.write('foo', true)
+        end.to change { described_class['foo'] }.from(nil).to(true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          RequestStore.write('foo', true)
+        end.not_to change { described_class['foo'] }.from(nil)
+
+        RequestStore.clear! # Clean up
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.exist?' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          RequestStore.write('foo', 'not nil')
+        end.to change { described_class.exist?('foo') }.from(false).to(true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          RequestStore.write('foo', 'not nil')
+        end.not_to change { described_class.exist?('foo') }.from(false)
+
+        RequestStore.clear! # Clean up
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.fetch' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          described_class.fetch('foo') { 'block result' }
+        end.to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil).to('block result')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        RequestStore.clear! # Ensure clean
+
+        expect do
+          described_class.fetch('foo') { 'block result' }
+        end.not_to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(nil)
+
+        RequestStore.clear! # Clean up
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.delete' do
+    context 'when RequestStore is active', :request_store do
+      it 'uses RequestStore' do
+        described_class.write('foo', true)
+
+        expect do
+          described_class.delete('foo')
+        end.to change { described_class.read('foo') }.from(true).to(nil)
+      end
+
+      context 'when given a block and the key exists' do
+        it 'does not execute the block' do
+          described_class.write('foo', true)
+
+          expect do |b|
+            described_class.delete('foo', &b)
+          end.not_to yield_control
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when given a block and the key does not exist' do
+        it 'yields the key and returns the block result' do
+          result = described_class.delete('foo') { |key| "#{key} block result" }
+
+          expect(result).to eq('foo block result')
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when RequestStore is NOT active' do
+      before do
+        RequestStore.write('foo', true)
+      end
+
+      after do
+        RequestStore.clear! # Clean up
+      end
+
+      it 'does not use RequestStore' do
+        expect do
+          described_class.delete('foo')
+        end.not_to change { RequestStore.read('foo') }.from(true)
+      end
+
+      context 'when given a block' do
+        it 'yields the key and returns the block result' do
+          result = described_class.delete('foo') { |key| "#{key} block result" }
+
+          expect(result).to eq('foo block result')
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/shell_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/shell_spec.rb
index f8bf896950e..b1b7c427313 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/shell_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/shell_spec.rb
@@ -7,15 +7,10 @@ describe Gitlab::Shell do
   let(:repository) { project.repository }
   let(:gitlab_shell) { described_class.new }
   let(:popen_vars) { { 'GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT' => ENV['GIT_TERMINAL_PROMPT'] } }
-  let(:gitlab_projects) { double('gitlab_projects') }
   let(:timeout) { Gitlab.config.gitlab_shell.git_timeout }
 
   before do
     allow(Project).to receive(:find).and_return(project)
-
-    allow(gitlab_shell).to receive(:gitlab_projects)
-      .with(project.repository_storage, project.disk_path + '.git')
-      .and_return(gitlab_projects)
   end
 
   it { is_expected.to respond_to :add_key }
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/sidekiq_throttler_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/sidekiq_throttler_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 2dbb7bb7c34..00000000000
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/sidekiq_throttler_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Gitlab::SidekiqThrottler do
-  describe '#execute!' do
-    context 'when job throttling is enabled' do
-      before do
-        Sidekiq.options[:concurrency] = 35
-
-        stub_application_setting(
-          sidekiq_throttling_enabled: true,
-          sidekiq_throttling_factor: 0.1,
-          sidekiq_throttling_queues: %w[build project_cache]
-        )
-      end
-
-      it 'requires sidekiq-limit_fetch' do
-        expect(described_class).to receive(:require).with('sidekiq-limit_fetch').and_call_original
-
-        described_class.execute!
-      end
-
-      it 'sets limits on the selected queues' do
-        described_class.execute!
-
-        expect(Sidekiq::Queue['build'].limit).to eq 4
-        expect(Sidekiq::Queue['project_cache'].limit).to eq 4
-      end
-
-      it 'does not set limits on other queues' do
-        described_class.execute!
-
-        expect(Sidekiq::Queue['merge'].limit).to be_nil
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when job throttling is disabled' do
-      it 'does not require sidekiq-limit_fetch' do
-        expect(described_class).not_to receive(:require).with('sidekiq-limit_fetch')
-
-        described_class.execute!
-      end
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/template/gitlab_ci_yml_template_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/template/gitlab_ci_yml_template_spec.rb
index e2fa76522bc..fe46c67a920 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/template/gitlab_ci_yml_template_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/template/gitlab_ci_yml_template_spec.rb
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ describe Gitlab::Template::GitlabCiYmlTemplate do
 
   describe '#content' do
     it 'loads the full file' do
-      gitignore = subject.new(Rails.root.join('vendor/gitlab-ci-yml/Ruby.gitlab-ci.yml'))
+      gitignore = subject.new(Rails.root.join('lib/gitlab/ci/templates/Ruby.gitlab-ci.yml'))
 
       expect(gitignore.name).to eq 'Ruby'
       expect(gitignore.content).to start_with('#')
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/tree_summary_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/tree_summary_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7ffcef2baef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/tree_summary_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::TreeSummary do
+  using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :empty_repo) }
+  let(:repo) { project.repository }
+  let(:commit) { repo.head_commit }
+
+  let(:path) { nil }
+  let(:offset) { nil }
+  let(:limit) { nil }
+
+  subject(:summary) { described_class.new(commit, project, path: path, offset: offset, limit: limit) }
+
+  describe '#initialize' do
+    it 'defaults offset to 0' do
+      expect(summary.offset).to eq(0)
+    end
+
+    it 'defaults limit to 25' do
+      expect(summary.limit).to eq(25)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#summarize' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :custom_repo, files: { 'a.txt' => '' }) }
+
+    subject(:summarized) { summary.summarize }
+
+    it 'returns an array of entries, and an array of commits' do
+      expect(summarized).to be_a(Array)
+      expect(summarized.size).to eq(2)
+
+      entries, commits = *summarized
+      aggregate_failures do
+        expect(entries).to contain_exactly(
+          a_hash_including(file_name: 'a.txt', commit: have_attributes(id: commit.id))
+        )
+
+        expect(commits).to match_array(entries.map { |entry| entry[:commit] })
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#summarize (entries)' do
+    let(:limit) { 2 }
+
+    custom_files = {
+      'a.txt' => '',
+      'b.txt' => '',
+      'directory/c.txt' => ''
+    }
+
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :custom_repo, files: custom_files) }
+    let(:commit) { repo.head_commit }
+
+    subject(:entries) { summary.summarize.first }
+
+    it 'summarizes the entries within the window' do
+      is_expected.to contain_exactly(
+        a_hash_including(type: :tree, file_name: 'directory'),
+        a_hash_including(type: :blob, file_name: 'a.txt')
+        # b.txt is excluded by the limit
+      )
+    end
+
+    it 'references the commit and commit path in entries' do
+      entry = entries.first
+      expected_commit_path = Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers.project_commit_path(project, commit)
+
+      expect(entry[:commit]).to be_a(::Commit)
+      expect(entry[:commit_path]).to eq expected_commit_path
+    end
+
+    context 'in a good subdirectory' do
+      let(:path) { 'directory' }
+
+      it 'summarizes the entries in the subdirectory' do
+        is_expected.to contain_exactly(a_hash_including(type: :blob, file_name: 'c.txt'))
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'in a non-existent subdirectory' do
+      let(:path) { 'tmp' }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_empty }
+    end
+
+    context 'custom offset and limit' do
+      let(:offset) { 2 }
+
+      it 'returns entries from the offset' do
+        is_expected.to contain_exactly(a_hash_including(type: :blob, file_name: 'b.txt'))
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#summarize (commits)' do
+    # This is a commit in the master branch of the gitlab-test repository that
+    # satisfies certain assumptions these tests depend on
+    let(:test_commit_sha) { '7975be0116940bf2ad4321f79d02a55c5f7779aa' }
+    let(:whitespace_commit_sha) { '66eceea0db202bb39c4e445e8ca28689645366c5' }
+
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let(:commit) { repo.commit(test_commit_sha) }
+    let(:limit) { nil }
+    let(:entries) { summary.summarize.first }
+
+    subject(:commits) do
+      summary.summarize.last
+    end
+
+    it 'returns an Array of ::Commit objects' do
+      is_expected.not_to be_empty
+      is_expected.to all(be_kind_of(::Commit))
+    end
+
+    it 'deduplicates commits when multiple entries reference the same commit' do
+      expect(commits.size).to be < entries.size
+    end
+
+    context 'in a subdirectory' do
+      let(:path) { 'files' }
+
+      it 'returns commits for entries in the subdirectory' do
+        expect(commits).to satisfy_one { |c| c.id == whitespace_commit_sha }
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#more?' do
+    let(:path) { 'tmp/more' }
+
+    where(:num_entries, :offset, :limit, :expected_result) do
+      0 | 0 | 0 | false
+      0 | 0 | 1 | false
+
+      1 | 0 | 0 | true
+      1 | 0 | 1 | false
+      1 | 1 | 0 | false
+      1 | 1 | 1 | false
+
+      2 | 0 | 0 | true
+      2 | 0 | 1 | true
+      2 | 0 | 2 | false
+      2 | 0 | 3 | false
+      2 | 1 | 0 | true
+      2 | 1 | 1 | false
+      2 | 2 | 0 | false
+      2 | 2 | 1 | false
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      before do
+        create_file('dummy', path: 'other') if num_entries.zero?
+        1.upto(num_entries) { |n| create_file(n, path: path) }
+      end
+
+      subject { summary.more? }
+
+      it { is_expected.to eq(expected_result) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#next_offset' do
+    let(:path) { 'tmp/next_offset' }
+
+    where(:num_entries, :offset, :limit, :expected_result) do
+      0 | 0 | 0 | 0
+      0 | 0 | 1 | 1
+      0 | 1 | 0 | 1
+      0 | 1 | 1 | 1
+
+      1 | 0 | 0 | 0
+      1 | 0 | 1 | 1
+      1 | 1 | 0 | 1
+      1 | 1 | 1 | 2
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      before do
+        create_file('dummy', path: 'other')  if num_entries.zero?
+        1.upto(num_entries) { |n| create_file(n, path: path) }
+      end
+
+      subject { summary.next_offset }
+
+      it { is_expected.to eq(expected_result) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  def create_file(unique, path:)
+    repo.create_file(
+      project.creator,
+      "#{path}/file-#{unique}.txt",
+      'content',
+      message: "Commit message #{unique}",
+      branch_name: 'master'
+    )
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb
index de6dd2a9fea..d669c42ab4a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/usage_data_spec.rb
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ describe Gitlab::UsageData do
         git
         database
         avg_cycle_analytics
+        web_ide_commits
       ))
     end
 
@@ -166,4 +167,20 @@ describe Gitlab::UsageData do
       expect(subject[:recorded_at]).to be_a(Time)
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#count' do
+    let(:relation) { double(:relation) }
+
+    it 'returns the count when counting succeeds' do
+      allow(relation).to receive(:count).and_return(1)
+
+      expect(described_class.count(relation)).to eq(1)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the fallback value when counting fails' do
+      allow(relation).to receive(:count).and_raise(ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid.new(''))
+
+      expect(described_class.count(relation, fallback: 15)).to eq(15)
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/user_extractor_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/user_extractor_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..fcc05ab3a0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/user_extractor_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::UserExtractor do
+  let(:text) do
+    <<~TXT
+    This is a long texth that mentions some users.
+    @user-1, @user-2 and user@gitlab.org take a walk in the park.
+    There they meet @user-4 that was out with other-user@gitlab.org.
+    @user-1 thought it was late, so went home straight away
+    TXT
+  end
+  subject(:extractor) { described_class.new(text) }
+
+  describe '#users' do
+    it 'returns an empty relation when nil was passed' do
+      extractor = described_class.new(nil)
+
+      expect(extractor.users).to be_empty
+      expect(extractor.users).to be_a(ActiveRecord::Relation)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the user case insensitive for usernames' do
+      user = create(:user, username: "USER-4")
+
+      expect(extractor.users).to include(user)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users by primary email' do
+      user = create(:user, email: 'user@gitlab.org')
+
+      expect(extractor.users).to include(user)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns users by secondary email' do
+      user = create(:email, email: 'other-user@gitlab.org').user
+
+      expect(extractor.users).to include(user)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#matches' do
+    it 'includes all mentioned email adresses' do
+      expect(extractor.matches[:emails]).to contain_exactly('user@gitlab.org', 'other-user@gitlab.org')
+    end
+
+    it 'includes all mentioned usernames' do
+      expect(extractor.matches[:usernames]).to contain_exactly('user-1', 'user-2', 'user-4')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#references' do
+    it 'includes all user-references once' do
+      expect(extractor.references).to contain_exactly('user-1', 'user-2', 'user@gitlab.org', 'user-4', 'other-user@gitlab.org')
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/version_info_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/version_info_spec.rb
index c8a1e433d59..30035c79e58 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/version_info_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/version_info_spec.rb
@@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ describe 'Gitlab::VersionInfo' do
   context 'parse' do
     it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("1.0.0")).to eq(@v1_0_0) }
     it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("1.0.0.1")).to eq(@v1_0_0) }
+    it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("1.0.0-ee")).to eq(@v1_0_0) }
+    it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("1.0.0-rc1")).to eq(@v1_0_0) }
+    it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("1.0.0-rc1-ee")).to eq(@v1_0_0) }
     it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("git 1.0.0b1")).to eq(@v1_0_0) }
     it { expect(Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse("git 1.0b1")).not_to be_valid }
   end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/web_ide_commits_counter_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/web_ide_commits_counter_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c51889a1c63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/web_ide_commits_counter_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Gitlab::WebIdeCommitsCounter, :clean_gitlab_redis_shared_state do
+  describe '.increment' do
+    it 'increments the web ide commits counter by 1' do
+      expect do
+        described_class.increment
+      end.to change { described_class.total_count }.from(0).to(1)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.total_count' do
+    it 'returns the total amount of web ide commits' do
+      expect(described_class.total_count).to eq(0)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/gitlab/workhorse_spec.rb b/spec/lib/gitlab/workhorse_spec.rb
index 23869f3d2da..b3f55a2e1bd 100644
--- a/spec/lib/gitlab/workhorse_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/gitlab/workhorse_spec.rb
@@ -336,6 +336,22 @@ describe Gitlab::Workhorse do
         it { expect { subject }.to raise_exception('Unsupported action: download') }
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when receive_max_input_size has been updated' do
+      it 'returns custom git config' do
+        allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:receive_max_input_size) { 1 }
+
+        expect(subject[:GitConfigOptions]).to be_present
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when receive_max_input_size is empty' do
+      it 'returns an empty git config' do
+        allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:receive_max_input_size) { nil }
+
+        expect(subject[:GitConfigOptions]).to be_empty
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '.set_key_and_notify' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/google_api/cloud_platform/client_spec.rb b/spec/lib/google_api/cloud_platform/client_spec.rb
index 27cb3198e5b..e2134dc279c 100644
--- a/spec/lib/google_api/cloud_platform/client_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/google_api/cloud_platform/client_spec.rb
@@ -66,25 +66,30 @@ describe GoogleApi::CloudPlatform::Client do
   describe '#projects_zones_clusters_create' do
     subject do
       client.projects_zones_clusters_create(
-        spy, spy, cluster_name, cluster_size, machine_type: machine_type)
+        project_id, zone, cluster_name, cluster_size, machine_type: machine_type, legacy_abac: legacy_abac)
     end
 
+    let(:project_id) { 'project-123' }
+    let(:zone) { 'us-central1-a' }
     let(:cluster_name) { 'test-cluster' }
     let(:cluster_size) { 1 }
     let(:machine_type) { 'n1-standard-2' }
+    let(:legacy_abac) { true }
+    let(:create_cluster_request_body) { double('Google::Apis::ContainerV1::CreateClusterRequest') }
     let(:operation) { double }
 
     before do
       allow_any_instance_of(Google::Apis::ContainerV1::ContainerService)
-        .to receive(:create_cluster).with(any_args, options: user_agent_options)
+        .to receive(:create_cluster).with(any_args)
         .and_return(operation)
     end
 
-    it { is_expected.to eq(operation) }
-
     it 'sets corresponded parameters' do
-      expect_any_instance_of(Google::Apis::ContainerV1::CreateClusterRequest)
-        .to receive(:initialize).with(
+      expect_any_instance_of(Google::Apis::ContainerV1::ContainerService)
+        .to receive(:create_cluster).with(project_id, zone, create_cluster_request_body, options: user_agent_options)
+
+      expect(Google::Apis::ContainerV1::CreateClusterRequest)
+        .to receive(:new).with(
           {
             "cluster": {
               "name": cluster_name,
@@ -96,9 +101,35 @@ describe GoogleApi::CloudPlatform::Client do
                 "enabled": true
               }
             }
-          } )
+          } ).and_return(create_cluster_request_body)
+
+      expect(subject).to eq operation
+    end
+
+    context 'create without legacy_abac' do
+      let(:legacy_abac) { false }
+
+      it 'sets corresponded parameters' do
+        expect_any_instance_of(Google::Apis::ContainerV1::ContainerService)
+          .to receive(:create_cluster).with(project_id, zone, create_cluster_request_body, options: user_agent_options)
+
+        expect(Google::Apis::ContainerV1::CreateClusterRequest)
+          .to receive(:new).with(
+            {
+              "cluster": {
+                "name": cluster_name,
+                "initial_node_count": cluster_size,
+                "node_config": {
+                  "machine_type": machine_type
+                },
+                "legacy_abac": {
+                  "enabled": false
+                }
+              }
+            } ).and_return(create_cluster_request_body)
 
-      subject
+        expect(subject).to eq operation
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/mattermost/session_spec.rb b/spec/lib/mattermost/session_spec.rb
index b7687d48c68..f18f97a9c6a 100644
--- a/spec/lib/mattermost/session_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/mattermost/session_spec.rb
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ describe Mattermost::Session, type: :request do
             .to_return(headers: { Authorization: 'token thisworksnow' }, status: 200)
         end
 
-        it 'can setup a session' do
+        it 'can set up a session' do
           subject.with_session do |session|
           end
 
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ describe Mattermost::Session, type: :request do
         expect_to_obtain_exclusive_lease(lease_key, 'uuid')
         expect_to_cancel_exclusive_lease(lease_key, 'uuid')
 
-        # Cannot setup a session, but we should still cancel the lease
+        # Cannot set up a session, but we should still cancel the lease
         expect { subject.with_session }.to raise_error(Mattermost::NoSessionError)
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/lib/object_storage/direct_upload_spec.rb b/spec/lib/object_storage/direct_upload_spec.rb
index e0569218d78..1024e1a25ea 100644
--- a/spec/lib/object_storage/direct_upload_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/lib/object_storage/direct_upload_spec.rb
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ describe ObjectStorage::DirectUpload do
         expect(subject[:GetURL]).to start_with(storage_url)
         expect(subject[:StoreURL]).to start_with(storage_url)
         expect(subject[:DeleteURL]).to start_with(storage_url)
+        expect(subject[:CustomPutHeaders]).to be_truthy
+        expect(subject[:PutHeaders]).to eq({})
       end
     end
 
@@ -81,6 +83,16 @@ describe ObjectStorage::DirectUpload do
         expect(subject[:MultipartUpload][:AbortURL]).to start_with(storage_url)
         expect(subject[:MultipartUpload][:AbortURL]).to include('uploadId=myUpload')
       end
+
+      it 'uses only strings in query parameters' do
+        expect(direct_upload.send(:connection)).to receive(:signed_url).at_least(:once) do |params|
+          if params[:query]
+            expect(params[:query].keys.all? { |key| key.is_a?(String) }).to be_truthy
+          end
+        end
+
+        subject
+      end
     end
 
     shared_examples 'a valid upload without multipart data' do
diff --git a/spec/lib/quality/helm_client_spec.rb b/spec/lib/quality/helm_client_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..553cd8719de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/quality/helm_client_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Quality::HelmClient do
+  let(:namespace) { 'review-apps-ee' }
+  let(:release_name) { 'my-release' }
+  let(:raw_helm_list_result) do
+    <<~OUTPUT
+    NAME                    	REVISION	UPDATED                 	STATUS	CHART       	NAMESPACE
+    review-improve-re-2dsd9d	1       	Tue Jul 31 15:53:17 2018	FAILED	gitlab-0.3.4	#{namespace}
+    review-11-1-stabl-3r2fso	1       	Mon Jul 30 22:44:14 2018	FAILED	gitlab-0.3.3	#{namespace}
+    review-49375-css-fk664j 	1       	Thu Jul 19 11:01:30 2018	FAILED	gitlab-0.2.4	#{namespace}
+    OUTPUT
+  end
+
+  subject { described_class.new(namespace: namespace) }
+
+  describe '#releases' do
+    it 'calls helm list with default arguments' do
+      expect(Gitlab::Popen).to receive(:popen_with_detail)
+        .with([%(helm list --namespace "#{namespace}")])
+        .and_return(Gitlab::Popen::Result.new([], ''))
+
+      subject.releases
+    end
+
+    it 'calls helm list with given arguments' do
+      expect(Gitlab::Popen).to receive(:popen_with_detail)
+        .with([%(helm list --namespace "#{namespace}" --deployed)])
+        .and_return(Gitlab::Popen::Result.new([], ''))
+
+      subject.releases(args: ['--deployed'])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns a list of Release objects' do
+      expect(Gitlab::Popen).to receive(:popen_with_detail)
+        .with([%(helm list --namespace "#{namespace}" --deployed)])
+        .and_return(Gitlab::Popen::Result.new([], raw_helm_list_result))
+
+      releases = subject.releases(args: ['--deployed'])
+
+      expect(releases.size).to eq(3)
+      expect(releases[0].name).to eq('review-improve-re-2dsd9d')
+      expect(releases[0].revision).to eq(1)
+      expect(releases[0].last_update).to eq(Time.parse('Tue Jul 31 15:53:17 2018'))
+      expect(releases[0].status).to eq('FAILED')
+      expect(releases[0].chart).to eq('gitlab-0.3.4')
+      expect(releases[0].namespace).to eq(namespace)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#delete' do
+    it 'calls helm delete with default arguments' do
+      expect(Gitlab::Popen).to receive(:popen_with_detail)
+        .with(["helm delete --purge #{release_name}"])
+        .and_return(Gitlab::Popen::Result.new([], '', '', 0))
+
+      expect(subject.delete(release_name: release_name).status).to eq(0)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/lib/quality/kubernetes_client_spec.rb b/spec/lib/quality/kubernetes_client_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3c0c0d0977a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/lib/quality/kubernetes_client_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+RSpec.describe Quality::KubernetesClient do
+  subject { described_class.new(namespace: 'review-apps-ee') }
+
+  describe '#cleanup' do
+    it 'calls kubectl with the correct arguments' do
+      # popen_with_detail will receive an array with a bunch of arguments; we're
+      # only concerned with it having the correct namespace and release name
+      expect(Gitlab::Popen).to receive(:popen_with_detail) do |args|
+        expect(args)
+          .to satisfy_one { |arg| arg.start_with?('-n "review-apps-ee" get') }
+        expect(args)
+          .to satisfy_one { |arg| arg == 'grep "my-release"' }
+        expect(args)
+          .to satisfy_one { |arg| arg.end_with?('-n "review-apps-ee" delete') }
+      end
+
+      # We're not verifying the output here, just silencing it
+      expect { subject.cleanup(release_name: 'my-release') }.to output.to_stdout
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/mailers/emails/auto_devops_spec.rb b/spec/mailers/emails/auto_devops_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..839caf3f50e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/mailers/emails/auto_devops_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Emails::AutoDevops do
+  include EmailSpec::Matchers
+
+  describe '#auto_devops_disabled_email' do
+    let(:owner) { create(:user) }
+    let(:namespace) { create(:namespace, owner: owner) }
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops) }
+    let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :failed, project: project) }
+
+    subject { Notify.autodevops_disabled_email(pipeline, owner.email) }
+
+    it 'sents email with correct subject' do
+      is_expected.to have_subject("#{project.name} | Auto DevOps pipeline was disabled for #{project.name}")
+    end
+
+    it 'sents an email to the user' do
+      recipient = subject.header[:to].addrs.map(&:address).first
+
+      expect(recipient).to eq(owner.email)
+    end
+
+    it 'is sent as GitLab email' do
+      sender = subject.header[:from].addrs[0].address
+
+      expect(sender).to match(/gitlab/)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/add_pages_access_level_to_project_feature_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/add_pages_access_level_to_project_feature_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3946602c5be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/add_pages_access_level_to_project_feature_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+require Rails.root.join('db', 'migrate', '20180423204600_add_pages_access_level_to_project_feature.rb')
+
+describe AddPagesAccessLevelToProjectFeature, :migration do
+  let(:namespaces) { table(:namespaces) }
+  let(:projects) { table(:projects) }
+  let(:features) { table(:project_features) }
+  let!(:namespace) { namespaces.create(name: 'gitlab', path: 'gitlab') }
+  let!(:first_project) { projects.create(name: 'gitlab1', path: 'gitlab1', namespace_id: namespace.id) }
+  let!(:first_project_features) { features.create(project_id: first_project.id) }
+  let!(:second_project) { projects.create(name: 'gitlab2', path: 'gitlab2', namespace_id: namespace.id) }
+  let!(:second_project_features) { features.create(project_id: second_project.id) }
+
+  it 'correctly migrate pages for old projects to be public' do
+    migrate!
+
+    # For old projects pages should be public
+    expect(first_project_features.reload.pages_access_level).to eq ProjectFeature::PUBLIC
+    expect(second_project_features.reload.pages_access_level).to eq ProjectFeature::PUBLIC
+  end
+
+  it 'after migration pages are enabled as default' do
+    migrate!
+
+    # For new project default is enabled
+    third_project = projects.create(name: 'gitlab3', path: 'gitlab3', namespace_id: namespace.id)
+    third_project_features = features.create(project_id: third_project.id)
+    expect(third_project_features.reload.pages_access_level).to eq ProjectFeature::ENABLED
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/import_common_metrics_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/import_common_metrics_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..1001629007c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/import_common_metrics_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require Rails.root.join('db', 'migrate', '20180831164910_import_common_metrics.rb')
+
+describe ImportCommonMetrics, :migration do
+  describe '#up' do
+    it "imports all prometheus metrics" do
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common).to be_empty
+
+      migrate!
+
+      expect(PrometheusMetric.common).not_to be_empty
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/migrate_legacy_artifacts_to_job_artifacts_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/migrate_legacy_artifacts_to_job_artifacts_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..df82672f254
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/migrate_legacy_artifacts_to_job_artifacts_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+require Rails.root.join('db', 'post_migrate', '20180816161409_migrate_legacy_artifacts_to_job_artifacts.rb')
+
+describe MigrateLegacyArtifactsToJobArtifacts, :migration, :sidekiq do
+  let(:migration_class) { Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::MigrateLegacyArtifacts }
+  let(:migration_name)  { migration_class.to_s.demodulize }
+
+  let(:namespaces) { table(:namespaces) }
+  let(:projects) { table(:projects) }
+  let(:pipelines) { table(:ci_pipelines) }
+  let(:jobs) { table(:ci_builds) }
+  let(:job_artifacts) { table(:ci_job_artifacts) }
+  let(:namespace) { namespaces.create!(name: 'gitlab', path: 'gitlab-org') }
+  let(:project) { projects.create!(name: 'gitlab', path: 'gitlab-ce', namespace_id: namespace.id) }
+  let(:pipeline) { pipelines.create!(project_id: project.id, ref: 'master', sha: 'adf43c3a') }
+  let(:archive_file_type) { Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::MigrateLegacyArtifacts::ARCHIVE_FILE_TYPE }
+  let(:metadata_file_type) { Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::MigrateLegacyArtifacts::METADATA_FILE_TYPE }
+  let(:local_store) { ::ObjectStorage::Store::LOCAL }
+  let(:remote_store) { ::ObjectStorage::Store::REMOTE }
+  let(:legacy_location) { Gitlab::BackgroundMigration::MigrateLegacyArtifacts::LEGACY_PATH_FILE_LOCATION }
+
+  context 'when legacy artifacts exist' do
+    before do
+      jobs.create!(id: 1, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :success, artifacts_file: 'archive.zip')
+      jobs.create!(id: 2, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :failed, artifacts_metadata: 'metadata.gz')
+      jobs.create!(id: 3, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :failed, artifacts_file: 'archive.zip', artifacts_metadata: 'metadata.gz')
+      jobs.create!(id: 4, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :running)
+      jobs.create!(id: 5, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :success, artifacts_file: 'archive.zip', artifacts_file_store: remote_store, artifacts_metadata: 'metadata.gz')
+      jobs.create!(id: 6, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :failed, artifacts_file: 'archive.zip', artifacts_metadata: 'metadata.gz')
+    end
+
+    it 'schedules a background migration' do
+      Sidekiq::Testing.fake! do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          migrate!
+
+          expect(migration_name).to be_scheduled_delayed_migration(5.minutes, 1, 6)
+          expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs.size).to eq 1
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'migrates legacy artifacts to ci_job_artifacts table' do
+      migrate!
+
+      expect(job_artifacts.order(:job_id, :file_type).pluck('project_id, job_id, file_type, file_store, size, expire_at, file, file_sha256, file_location'))
+        .to eq([[project.id, 1, archive_file_type, local_store, nil, nil, 'archive.zip', nil, legacy_location],
+                [project.id, 3, archive_file_type, local_store, nil, nil, 'archive.zip', nil, legacy_location],
+                [project.id, 3, metadata_file_type, local_store, nil, nil, 'metadata.gz', nil, legacy_location],
+                [project.id, 5, archive_file_type, remote_store, nil, nil, 'archive.zip', nil, legacy_location],
+                [project.id, 5, metadata_file_type, local_store, nil, nil, 'metadata.gz', nil, legacy_location],
+                [project.id, 6, archive_file_type, local_store, nil, nil, 'archive.zip', nil, legacy_location],
+                [project.id, 6, metadata_file_type, local_store, nil, nil, 'metadata.gz', nil, legacy_location]])
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when legacy artifacts do not exist' do
+    before do
+      jobs.create!(id: 1, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :success)
+      jobs.create!(id: 2, commit_id: pipeline.id, project_id: project.id, status: :failed, artifacts_metadata: 'metadata.gz')
+    end
+
+    it 'does not schedule background migrations' do
+      Sidekiq::Testing.fake! do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          migrate!
+
+          expect(BackgroundMigrationWorker.jobs.size).to eq 0
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/migrations/remove_orphaned_label_links_spec.rb b/spec/migrations/remove_orphaned_label_links_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..13b8919343e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/migrations/remove_orphaned_label_links_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require Rails.root.join('db', 'post_migrate', '20180906051323_remove_orphaned_label_links.rb')
+
+describe RemoveOrphanedLabelLinks, :migration do
+  let(:label_links) { table(:label_links) }
+  let(:labels) { table(:labels) }
+
+  let(:project) { create(:project) } # rubocop:disable RSpec/FactoriesInMigrationSpecs
+  let(:label) { create_label }
+
+  context 'add foreign key on label_id' do
+    let!(:label_link_with_label) { create_label_link(label_id: label.id) }
+    let!(:label_link_without_label) { create_label_link(label_id: nil) }
+
+    it 'removes orphaned labels without corresponding label' do
+      expect { migrate! }.to change { LabelLink.count }.from(2).to(1)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not remove entries with valid label_id' do
+      expect { migrate! }.not_to change { label_link_with_label.reload }
+    end
+  end
+
+  def create_label(**opts)
+    labels.create!(
+      project_id: project.id,
+      **opts
+    )
+  end
+
+  def create_label_link(**opts)
+    label_links.create!(
+      target_id: 1,
+      target_type: 'Issue',
+      **opts
+    )
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb b/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb
index 483cc546423..dcfc80daa57 100644
--- a/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/application_setting_spec.rb
@@ -305,6 +305,36 @@ describe ApplicationSetting do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'setting Sentry DSNs' do
+    context 'server DSN' do
+      it 'strips leading and trailing whitespace' do
+        subject.update(sentry_dsn: ' http://test ')
+
+        expect(subject.sentry_dsn).to eq('http://test')
+      end
+
+      it 'handles nil values' do
+        subject.update(sentry_dsn: nil)
+
+        expect(subject.sentry_dsn).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'client-side DSN' do
+      it 'strips leading and trailing whitespace' do
+        subject.update(clientside_sentry_dsn: ' http://test ')
+
+        expect(subject.clientside_sentry_dsn).to eq('http://test')
+      end
+
+      it 'handles nil values' do
+        subject.update(clientside_sentry_dsn: nil)
+
+        expect(subject.clientside_sentry_dsn).to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#disabled_oauth_sign_in_sources=' do
     before do
       allow(Devise).to receive(:omniauth_providers).and_return([:github])
@@ -562,4 +592,19 @@ describe ApplicationSetting do
       it { is_expected.to eq(result) }
     end
   end
+
+  context 'diff limit settings' do
+    describe '#diff_max_patch_bytes' do
+      context 'validations' do
+        it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:diff_max_patch_bytes) }
+
+        it do
+          is_expected.to validate_numericality_of(:diff_max_patch_bytes)
+          .only_integer
+          .is_greater_than_or_equal_to(Gitlab::Git::Diff::DEFAULT_MAX_PATCH_BYTES)
+          .is_less_than_or_equal_to(Gitlab::Git::Diff::MAX_PATCH_BYTES_UPPER_BOUND)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/blob_viewer/gitlab_ci_yml_spec.rb b/spec/models/blob_viewer/gitlab_ci_yml_spec.rb
index bed364a8c14..01c555a7a90 100644
--- a/spec/models/blob_viewer/gitlab_ci_yml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/blob_viewer/gitlab_ci_yml_spec.rb
@@ -2,22 +2,24 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe BlobViewer::GitlabCiYml do
   include FakeBlobHelpers
+  include RepoHelpers
 
-  let(:project) { build_stubbed(:project) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:data) { File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/support/gitlab_stubs/gitlab_ci.yml')) }
   let(:blob) { fake_blob(path: '.gitlab-ci.yml', data: data) }
+  let(:sha) { sample_commit.id }
   subject { described_class.new(blob) }
 
   describe '#validation_message' do
     it 'calls prepare! on the viewer' do
       expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!)
 
-      subject.validation_message
+      subject.validation_message(project, sha)
     end
 
     context 'when the configuration is valid' do
       it 'returns nil' do
-        expect(subject.validation_message).to be_nil
+        expect(subject.validation_message(project, sha)).to be_nil
       end
     end
 
@@ -25,7 +27,7 @@ describe BlobViewer::GitlabCiYml do
       let(:data) { 'oof' }
 
       it 'returns the error message' do
-        expect(subject.validation_message).to eq('Invalid configuration format')
+        expect(subject.validation_message(project, sha)).to eq('Invalid configuration format')
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb b/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb
index 5ed2f4400bc..fbaa8d47a71 100644
--- a/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/blob_viewer/package_json_spec.rb
@@ -40,13 +40,14 @@ describe BlobViewer::PackageJson do
   end
 
   context 'when package.json has "private": true' do
+    let(:homepage) { 'http://example.com' }
     let(:data) do
       <<-SPEC.strip_heredoc
       {
         "name": "module-name",
         "version": "10.3.1",
         "private": true,
-        "homepage": "myawesomepackage.com"
+        "homepage": #{homepage.to_json}
       }
       SPEC
     end
@@ -54,10 +55,22 @@ describe BlobViewer::PackageJson do
     subject { described_class.new(blob) }
 
     describe '#package_url' do
-      it 'returns homepage if any' do
-        expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!)
+      context 'when the homepage has a valid URL' do
+        it 'returns homepage URL' do
+          expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!)
+
+          expect(subject.package_url).to eq(homepage)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when the homepage has an invalid URL' do
+        let(:homepage) { 'javascript:alert()' }
+
+        it 'returns nil' do
+          expect(subject).to receive(:prepare!)
 
-        expect(subject.package_url).to eq('myawesomepackage.com')
+          expect(subject.package_url).to be_nil
+        end
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb
index 42b627b6823..cebc822d525 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/build_spec.rb
@@ -176,9 +176,7 @@ describe Ci::Build do
       it 'does not execute a query for selecting job artifact one by one' do
         recorded = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new do
           subject.each do |build|
-            Ci::JobArtifact::TEST_REPORT_FILE_TYPES.each do |file_type|
-              build.public_send("job_artifacts_#{file_type}").file.exists?
-            end
+            build.job_artifacts.map { |a| a.file.exists? }
           end
         end
 
@@ -211,6 +209,155 @@ describe Ci::Build do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#schedulable?' do
+    subject { build.schedulable? }
+
+    context 'when build is schedulable' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :created, :schedulable, project: project) }
+
+      it { expect(subject).to be_truthy }
+
+      context 'when feature flag is diabled' do
+        before do
+          stub_feature_flags(ci_enable_scheduled_build: false)
+        end
+
+        it { expect(subject).to be_falsy }
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is not schedulable' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :created, project: project) }
+
+      it { expect(subject).to be_falsy }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#schedule' do
+    subject { build.schedule }
+
+    before do
+      project.add_developer(user)
+    end
+
+    let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :created, :schedulable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+    it 'transits to scheduled' do
+      allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at)
+
+      subject
+
+      expect(build).to be_scheduled
+    end
+
+    it 'updates scheduled_at column' do
+      allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at)
+
+      subject
+
+      expect(build.scheduled_at).not_to be_nil
+    end
+
+    it 'schedules BuildScheduleWorker at the right time' do
+      Timecop.freeze do
+        expect(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker)
+          .to receive(:perform_at).with(1.minute.since, build.id)
+
+        subject
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#unschedule' do
+    subject { build.unschedule }
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'cleans scheduled_at column' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(build.scheduled_at).to be_nil
+      end
+
+      it 'transits to manual' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(build).to be_manual
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is not scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :created, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'does not transit status' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(build).to be_created
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#options_scheduled_at' do
+    subject { build.options_scheduled_at }
+
+    let(:build) { build_stubbed(:ci_build, options: option) }
+
+    context 'when start_in is 1 day' do
+      let(:option) { { start_in: '1 day' } }
+
+      it 'returns date after 1 day' do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          is_expected.to eq(1.day.since)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when start_in is 1 week' do
+      let(:option) { { start_in: '1 week' } }
+
+      it 'returns date after 1 week' do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          is_expected.to eq(1.week.since)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#enqueue_scheduled' do
+    subject { build.enqueue_scheduled }
+
+    before do
+      stub_feature_flags(ci_enable_scheduled_build: true)
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled and the right time has not come yet' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'does not transits the status' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(build).to be_scheduled
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled and the right time has already come' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :expired_scheduled, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'cleans scheduled_at column' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(build.scheduled_at).to be_nil
+      end
+
+      it 'transits to pending' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(build).to be_pending
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#any_runners_online?' do
     subject { build.any_runners_online? }
 
@@ -550,44 +697,22 @@ describe Ci::Build do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#has_test_reports?' do
-    subject { build.has_test_reports? }
+  describe '#has_job_artifacts?' do
+    subject { build.has_job_artifacts? }
 
-    context 'when build has a test report' do
-      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :test_reports) }
+    context 'when build has a job artifact' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :artifacts) }
 
       it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
     end
 
-    context 'when build does not have test reports' do
-      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :artifacts) }
+    context 'when build does not have job artifacts' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :legacy_artifacts) }
 
       it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#erase_test_reports!' do
-    subject { build.erase_test_reports! }
-
-    context 'when build has a test report' do
-      let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :test_reports) }
-
-      it 'removes a test report' do
-        subject
-
-        expect(build.has_test_reports?).to be_falsy
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when build does not have test reports' do
-      let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :artifacts) }
-
-      it 'does not erase anything' do
-        expect { subject }.not_to change { Ci::JobArtifact.count }
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#has_old_trace?' do
     subject { build.has_old_trace? }
 
@@ -850,8 +975,8 @@ describe Ci::Build do
         expect(build.artifacts_metadata.exists?).to be_falsy
       end
 
-      it 'removes test reports' do
-        expect(build.job_artifacts.test_reports.count).to eq(0)
+      it 'removes all job_artifacts' do
+        expect(build.job_artifacts.count).to eq(0)
       end
 
       it 'erases build trace in trace file' do
@@ -1022,6 +1147,32 @@ describe Ci::Build do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#erase_erasable_artifacts!' do
+    let!(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success) }
+
+    subject { build.erase_erasable_artifacts! }
+
+    before do
+      Ci::JobArtifact.file_types.keys.each do |file_type|
+        create(:ci_job_artifact, job: build, file_type: file_type, file_format: Ci::JobArtifact::TYPE_AND_FORMAT_PAIRS[file_type.to_sym])
+      end
+    end
+
+    it "erases erasable artifacts" do
+      subject
+
+      expect(build.job_artifacts.erasable).to be_empty
+    end
+
+    it "keeps non erasable artifacts" do
+      subject
+
+      Ci::JobArtifact::NON_ERASABLE_FILE_TYPES.each do |file_type|
+        expect(build.send("job_artifacts_#{file_type}")).not_to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#first_pending' do
     let!(:first) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, status: 'pending', created_at: Date.yesterday) }
     let!(:second) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline, status: 'pending') }
@@ -1191,6 +1342,12 @@ describe Ci::Build do
         it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
       end
 
+      context 'when is set to delayed' do
+        let(:value) { 'delayed' }
+
+        it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+      end
+
       context 'when set to something else' do
         let(:value) { 'something else' }
 
@@ -1276,6 +1433,19 @@ describe Ci::Build do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#artifacts_file_for_type' do
+    let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :artifacts) }
+    let(:file_type) { :archive }
+
+    subject { build.artifacts_file_for_type(file_type) }
+
+    it 'queries artifacts for type' do
+      expect(build).to receive_message_chain(:job_artifacts, :find_by).with(file_type: Ci::JobArtifact.file_types[file_type])
+
+      subject
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#merge_request' do
     def create_mr(build, pipeline, factory: :merge_request, created_at: Time.now)
       create(factory, source_project: pipeline.project,
@@ -1461,6 +1631,12 @@ describe Ci::Build do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      subject { build_stubbed(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_playable }
+    end
+
     context 'when build is not a manual action' do
       subject { build_stubbed(:ci_build, :success) }
 
@@ -1676,6 +1852,7 @@ describe Ci::Build do
 
   describe '#variables' do
     let(:container_registry_enabled) { false }
+    let(:gitlab_version_info) { Gitlab::VersionInfo.parse(Gitlab::VERSION) }
     let(:predefined_variables) do
       [
         { key: 'CI_PIPELINE_ID', value: pipeline.id.to_s, public: true },
@@ -1693,6 +1870,9 @@ describe Ci::Build do
         { key: 'GITLAB_FEATURES', value: project.licensed_features.join(','), public: true },
         { key: 'CI_SERVER_NAME', value: 'GitLab', public: true },
         { key: 'CI_SERVER_VERSION', value: Gitlab::VERSION, public: true },
+        { key: 'CI_SERVER_VERSION_MAJOR', value: gitlab_version_info.major.to_s, public: true },
+        { key: 'CI_SERVER_VERSION_MINOR', value: gitlab_version_info.minor.to_s, public: true },
+        { key: 'CI_SERVER_VERSION_PATCH', value: gitlab_version_info.patch.to_s, public: true },
         { key: 'CI_SERVER_REVISION', value: Gitlab.revision, public: true },
         { key: 'CI_JOB_NAME', value: 'test', public: true },
         { key: 'CI_JOB_STAGE', value: 'test', public: true },
@@ -2844,16 +3024,10 @@ describe Ci::Build do
         end
 
         it 'raises an error' do
-          expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Junit::JunitParserError)
+          expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Ci::Parsers::Test::Junit::JunitParserError)
         end
       end
     end
-
-    context 'when build does not have test reports' do
-      it 'raises an error' do
-        expect { subject }.to raise_error(NoMethodError)
-      end
-    end
   end
 
   describe '#artifacts_metadata_entry' do
@@ -2981,4 +3155,46 @@ describe Ci::Build do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#deployment_status' do
+    context 'when build is a last deployment' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, environment: 'production') }
+      let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: build.project) }
+      let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project, deployable: build) }
+
+      it { expect(build.deployment_status).to eq(:last) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when there is a newer build with deployment' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, environment: 'production') }
+      let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: build.project) }
+      let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project, deployable: build) }
+      let!(:last_deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project) }
+
+      it { expect(build.deployment_status).to eq(:out_of_date) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when build with deployment has failed' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, environment: 'production') }
+      let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: build.project) }
+      let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project, deployable: build) }
+
+      it { expect(build.deployment_status).to eq(:failed) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when build with deployment is running' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, environment: 'production') }
+      let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: build.project) }
+      let!(:deployment) { create(:deployment, environment: environment, project: environment.project, deployable: build) }
+
+      it { expect(build.deployment_status).to eq(:creating) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is successful but deployment is not ready yet' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :success, environment: 'production') }
+      let(:environment) { create(:environment, name: 'production', project: build.project) }
+
+      it { expect(build.deployment_status).to eq(:creating) }
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb
index 1bf338f4c70..85fad77a242 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/job_artifact_spec.rb
@@ -31,6 +31,22 @@ describe Ci::JobArtifact do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '.erasable' do
+    subject { described_class.erasable }
+
+    context 'when there is an erasable artifact' do
+      let!(:artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :junit) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to eq([artifact]) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when there are no erasable artifacts' do
+      let!(:artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :trace) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_empty }
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'callbacks' do
     subject { create(:ci_job_artifact, :archive) }
 
@@ -106,34 +122,46 @@ describe Ci::JobArtifact do
   describe 'validates file format' do
     subject { artifact }
 
-    context 'when archive type with zip format' do
-      let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, :archive, file_format: :zip) }
+    described_class::TYPE_AND_FORMAT_PAIRS.except(:trace).each do |file_type, file_format|
+      context "when #{file_type} type with #{file_format} format" do
+        let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, file_type: file_type, file_format: file_format) }
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_valid }
-    end
+        it { is_expected.to be_valid }
+      end
 
-    context 'when archive type with gzip format' do
-      let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, :archive, file_format: :gzip) }
+      context "when #{file_type} type without format specification" do
+        let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, file_type: file_type, file_format: nil) }
 
-      it { is_expected.not_to be_valid }
-    end
+        it { is_expected.not_to be_valid }
+      end
 
-    context 'when archive type without format specification' do
-      let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, :archive, file_format: nil) }
+      context "when #{file_type} type with other formats" do
+        described_class.file_formats.except(file_format).values.each do |other_format|
+          let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, file_type: file_type, file_format: other_format) }
 
-      it { is_expected.not_to be_valid }
+          it { is_expected.not_to be_valid }
+        end
+      end
     end
+  end
 
-    context 'when junit type with zip format' do
-      let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, :junit, file_format: :zip) }
+  describe 'validates DEFAULT_FILE_NAMES' do
+    subject { described_class::DEFAULT_FILE_NAMES }
 
-      it { is_expected.not_to be_valid }
+    described_class.file_types.each do |file_type, _|
+      it "expects #{file_type} to be included" do
+        is_expected.to include(file_type.to_sym)
+      end
     end
+  end
 
-    context 'when junit type with gzip format' do
-      let(:artifact) { build(:ci_job_artifact, :junit, file_format: :gzip) }
+  describe 'validates TYPE_AND_FORMAT_PAIRS' do
+    subject { described_class::TYPE_AND_FORMAT_PAIRS }
 
-      it { is_expected.to be_valid }
+    described_class.file_types.each do |file_type, _|
+      it "expects #{file_type} to be included" do
+        expect(described_class.file_formats).to include(subject[file_type.to_sym])
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
index 77b7332a761..3b01b39ecab 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_spec.rb
@@ -75,6 +75,18 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#delay' do
+    subject { pipeline.delay }
+
+    let(:pipeline) { build(:ci_pipeline, status: :created) }
+
+    it 'changes pipeline status to schedule' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(pipeline).to be_scheduled
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#valid_commit_sha' do
     context 'commit.sha can not start with 00000000' do
       before do
@@ -825,6 +837,57 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#branch_updated?' do
+    context 'when pipeline has before SHA' do
+      before do
+        pipeline.update_column(:before_sha, 'a1b2c3d4')
+      end
+
+      it 'runs on a branch update push' do
+        expect(pipeline.before_sha).not_to be Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
+        expect(pipeline.branch_updated?).to be true
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when pipeline does not have before SHA' do
+      before do
+        pipeline.update_column(:before_sha, Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not run on a branch updating push' do
+        expect(pipeline.branch_updated?).to be false
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#modified_paths' do
+    context 'when old and new revisions are set' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+
+      before do
+        pipeline.update(before_sha: '1234abcd', sha: '2345bcde')
+      end
+
+      it 'fetches stats for changes between commits' do
+        expect(project.repository)
+          .to receive(:diff_stats).with('1234abcd', '2345bcde')
+          .and_call_original
+
+        pipeline.modified_paths
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when either old or new revision is missing' do
+      before do
+        pipeline.update_column(:before_sha, Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA)
+      end
+
+      it 'raises an error' do
+        expect { pipeline.modified_paths }.to raise_error(ArgumentError)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#has_kubernetes_active?' do
     context 'when kubernetes is active' do
       shared_examples 'same behavior between KubernetesService and Platform::Kubernetes' do
@@ -1151,7 +1214,11 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
   end
 
   describe '#set_config_source' do
-    context 'when pipelines does not contain needed data' do
+    context 'when pipelines does not contain needed data and auto devops is disabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: false)
+      end
+
       it 'defines source to be unknown' do
         pipeline.set_config_source
 
@@ -1196,7 +1263,6 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
 
         context 'auto devops enabled' do
           before do
-            stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: true)
             allow(project).to receive(:ci_config_path) { 'custom' }
           end
 
@@ -1285,6 +1351,19 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'when updating status to scheduled' do
+      before do
+        allow(pipeline)
+          .to receive_message_chain(:statuses, :latest, :status)
+          .and_return(:scheduled)
+      end
+
+      it 'updates pipeline status to scheduled' do
+        expect { pipeline.update_status }
+          .to change { pipeline.reload.status }.to 'scheduled'
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'when statuses status was not recognized' do
       before do
         allow(pipeline)
@@ -1743,7 +1822,7 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
         create(:ci_pipeline, config: { rspec: { script: 'rake test' } })
       end
 
-      it 'does not containyaml errors' do
+      it 'does not contain yaml errors' do
         expect(pipeline).not_to have_yaml_errors
       end
     end
@@ -1941,4 +2020,58 @@ describe Ci::Pipeline, :mailer do
       expect(pipeline.total_size).to eq(5)
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#status' do
+    context 'when transitioning to failed' do
+      context 'when pipeline has autodevops as source' do
+        let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :running, :auto_devops_source) }
+
+        it 'calls autodevops disable service' do
+          expect(AutoDevops::DisableWorker).to receive(:perform_async).with(pipeline.id)
+
+          pipeline.drop
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when pipeline has other source' do
+        let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :running, :repository_source) }
+
+        it 'does not call auto devops disable service' do
+          expect(AutoDevops::DisableWorker).not_to receive(:perform_async)
+
+          pipeline.drop
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#default_branch?' do
+    let(:default_branch) { 'master'}
+
+    subject { pipeline.default_branch? }
+
+    before do
+      allow(project).to receive(:default_branch).and_return(default_branch)
+    end
+
+    context 'when pipeline ref is the default branch of the project' do
+      let(:pipeline) do
+        build(:ci_empty_pipeline, status: :created, project: project, ref: default_branch)
+      end
+
+      it "returns true" do
+        expect(subject).to be_truthy
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when pipeline ref is not the default branch of the project' do
+      let(:pipeline) do
+        build(:ci_empty_pipeline, status: :created, project: project, ref: 'another_branch')
+      end
+
+      it "returns false" do
+        expect(subject).to be_falsey
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb
index 889c243c8d8..03d09cb31d6 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/pipeline_variable_spec.rb
@@ -5,4 +5,13 @@ describe Ci::PipelineVariable do
 
   it { is_expected.to include_module(HasVariable) }
   it { is_expected.to validate_uniqueness_of(:key).scoped_to(:pipeline_id) }
+
+  describe '#hook_attrs' do
+    let(:variable) { create(:ci_pipeline_variable, key: 'foo', value: 'bar') }
+
+    subject { variable.hook_attrs }
+
+    it { is_expected.to be_a(Hash) }
+    it { is_expected.to eq({ key: 'foo', value: 'bar' }) }
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/runner_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/runner_spec.rb
index 953af2c4710..b545e036aa1 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/runner_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/runner_spec.rb
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ describe Ci::Runner do
     subject { described_class.online }
 
     before do
-      @runner1 = create(:ci_runner, :instance, contacted_at: 1.year.ago)
+      @runner1 = create(:ci_runner, :instance, contacted_at: 1.hour.ago)
       @runner2 = create(:ci_runner, :instance, contacted_at: 1.second.ago)
     end
 
@@ -300,6 +300,17 @@ describe Ci::Runner do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '.offline' do
+    subject { described_class.offline }
+
+    before do
+      @runner1 = create(:ci_runner, :instance, contacted_at: 1.hour.ago)
+      @runner2 = create(:ci_runner, :instance, contacted_at: 1.second.ago)
+    end
+
+    it { is_expected.to eq([@runner1])}
+  end
+
   describe '#can_pick?' do
     set(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline) }
     let(:build) { create(:ci_build, pipeline: pipeline) }
@@ -786,4 +797,22 @@ describe Ci::Runner do
       expect { subject.destroy }.to change { described_class.count }.by(-1)
     end
   end
+
+  describe '.order_by' do
+    it 'supports ordering by the contact date' do
+      runner1 = create(:ci_runner, contacted_at: 1.year.ago)
+      runner2 = create(:ci_runner, contacted_at: 1.month.ago)
+      runners = described_class.order_by('contacted_asc')
+
+      expect(runners).to eq([runner1, runner2])
+    end
+
+    it 'supports ordering by the creation date' do
+      runner1 = create(:ci_runner, created_at: 1.year.ago)
+      runner2 = create(:ci_runner, created_at: 1.month.ago)
+      runners = described_class.order_by('created_asc')
+
+      expect(runners).to eq([runner2, runner1])
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/ci/stage_spec.rb b/spec/models/ci/stage_spec.rb
index 22a4556c10c..5076f7faeac 100644
--- a/spec/models/ci/stage_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/ci/stage_spec.rb
@@ -89,6 +89,18 @@ describe Ci::Stage, :models do
       end
     end
 
+    context 'when stage is scheduled because of scheduled builds' do
+      before do
+        create(:ci_build, :scheduled, stage_id: stage.id)
+      end
+
+      it 'updates status to scheduled' do
+        expect { stage.update_status }
+          .to change { stage.reload.status }
+          .to 'scheduled'
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'when stage is skipped because is empty' do
       it 'updates status to skipped' do
         expect { stage.update_status }
@@ -188,6 +200,18 @@ describe Ci::Stage, :models do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#delay' do
+    subject { stage.delay }
+
+    let(:stage) { create(:ci_stage_entity, status: :created) }
+
+    it 'updates stage status' do
+      subject
+
+      expect(stage).to be_scheduled
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#position' do
     context 'when stage has been imported and does not have position index set' do
       before do
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb
index e5b2bdc8a4e..2c37cd20ecc 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/applications/helm_spec.rb
@@ -47,5 +47,19 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Helm do
       cert = OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new(subject.files[:'cert.pem'])
       expect(cert.not_after).to be > 999.years.from_now
     end
+
+    describe 'rbac' do
+      context 'non rbac cluster' do
+        it { expect(subject).not_to be_rbac }
+      end
+
+      context 'rbac cluster' do
+        before do
+          helm.cluster.platform_kubernetes.rbac!
+        end
+
+        it { expect(subject).to be_rbac }
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/applications/ingress_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/applications/ingress_spec.rb
index 21f75ced8c3..c55953c8d22 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/applications/ingress_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/applications/ingress_spec.rb
@@ -88,9 +88,18 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Ingress do
       expect(subject.name).to eq('ingress')
       expect(subject.chart).to eq('stable/nginx-ingress')
       expect(subject.version).to eq('0.23.0')
+      expect(subject).not_to be_rbac
       expect(subject.files).to eq(ingress.files)
     end
 
+    context 'on a rbac enabled cluster' do
+      before do
+        ingress.cluster.platform_kubernetes.rbac!
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_rbac }
+    end
+
     context 'application failed to install previously' do
       let(:ingress) { create(:clusters_applications_ingress, :errored, version: 'nginx') }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/applications/jupyter_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/applications/jupyter_spec.rb
index 027b732681b..9c4396731eb 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/applications/jupyter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/applications/jupyter_spec.rb
@@ -51,10 +51,19 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Jupyter do
       expect(subject.name).to eq('jupyter')
       expect(subject.chart).to eq('jupyter/jupyterhub')
       expect(subject.version).to eq('v0.6')
+      expect(subject).not_to be_rbac
       expect(subject.repository).to eq('https://jupyterhub.github.io/helm-chart/')
       expect(subject.files).to eq(jupyter.files)
     end
 
+    context 'on a rbac enabled cluster' do
+      before do
+        jupyter.cluster.platform_kubernetes.rbac!
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_rbac }
+    end
+
     context 'application failed to install previously' do
       let(:jupyter) { create(:clusters_applications_jupyter, :errored, version: '0.0.1') }
 
@@ -99,8 +108,15 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Jupyter do
       expect(values).to include('rbac')
       expect(values).to include('proxy')
       expect(values).to include('auth')
+      expect(values).to include('singleuser')
       expect(values).to match(/clientId: '?#{application.oauth_application.uid}/)
       expect(values).to match(/callbackUrl: '?#{application.callback_url}/)
     end
+
+    context 'when cluster belongs to a project' do
+      it 'sets GitLab project id' do
+        expect(values).to match(/GITLAB_CLUSTER_ID: '?#{application.cluster.id}/)
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/applications/prometheus_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/applications/prometheus_spec.rb
index 26b75c75e1d..f34b4ece8db 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/applications/prometheus_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/applications/prometheus_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'rails_helper'
 
 describe Clusters::Applications::Prometheus do
+  include KubernetesHelpers
+
   include_examples 'cluster application core specs', :clusters_applications_prometheus
   include_examples 'cluster application status specs', :cluster_application_prometheus
 
@@ -107,26 +109,14 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Prometheus do
     end
 
     context 'cluster has kubeclient' do
-      let(:kubernetes_url) { 'http://example.com' }
-      let(:k8s_discover_response) do
-        {
-          resources: [
-            {
-              name: 'service',
-              kind: 'Service'
-            }
-          ]
-        }
-      end
-
-      let(:kube_client) { Kubeclient::Client.new(kubernetes_url) }
+      let(:kubernetes_url) { subject.cluster.platform_kubernetes.api_url }
+      let(:kube_client) { subject.cluster.kubeclient.core_client }
 
-      let(:cluster) { create(:cluster) }
-      subject { create(:clusters_applications_prometheus, cluster: cluster) }
+      subject { create(:clusters_applications_prometheus) }
 
       before do
-        allow(kube_client.rest_client).to receive(:get).and_return(k8s_discover_response.to_json)
-        allow(subject.cluster).to receive(:kubeclient).and_return(kube_client)
+        subject.cluster.platform_kubernetes.namespace = 'a-namespace'
+        stub_kubeclient_discover(subject.cluster.platform_kubernetes.api_url)
       end
 
       it 'creates proxy prometheus rest client' do
@@ -134,7 +124,7 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Prometheus do
       end
 
       it 'creates proper url' do
-        expect(subject.prometheus_client.url).to eq('http://example.com/api/v1/namespaces/gitlab-managed-apps/service/prometheus-prometheus-server:80/proxy')
+        expect(subject.prometheus_client.url).to eq("#{kubernetes_url}/api/v1/namespaces/gitlab-managed-apps/services/prometheus-prometheus-server:80/proxy")
       end
 
       it 'copies options and headers from kube client to proxy client' do
@@ -164,9 +154,18 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Prometheus do
       expect(subject.name).to eq('prometheus')
       expect(subject.chart).to eq('stable/prometheus')
       expect(subject.version).to eq('6.7.3')
+      expect(subject).not_to be_rbac
       expect(subject.files).to eq(prometheus.files)
     end
 
+    context 'on a rbac enabled cluster' do
+      before do
+        prometheus.cluster.platform_kubernetes.rbac!
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_rbac }
+    end
+
     context 'application failed to install previously' do
       let(:prometheus) { create(:clusters_applications_prometheus, :errored, version: '2.0.0') }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/applications/runner_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/applications/runner_spec.rb
index d84f125e246..eda8d519f60 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/applications/runner_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/applications/runner_spec.rb
@@ -46,10 +46,19 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::Runner do
       expect(subject.name).to eq('runner')
       expect(subject.chart).to eq('runner/gitlab-runner')
       expect(subject.version).to eq('0.1.31')
+      expect(subject).not_to be_rbac
       expect(subject.repository).to eq('https://charts.gitlab.io')
       expect(subject.files).to eq(gitlab_runner.files)
     end
 
+    context 'on a rbac enabled cluster' do
+      before do
+        gitlab_runner.cluster.platform_kubernetes.rbac!
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_rbac }
+    end
+
     context 'application failed to install previously' do
       let(:gitlab_runner) { create(:clusters_applications_runner, :errored, runner: ci_runner, version: '0.1.13') }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/cluster_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/cluster_spec.rb
index 6f66515b45f..2727191eb9b 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/cluster_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/cluster_spec.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ describe Clusters::Cluster do
   it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:status_reason).to(:provider) }
   it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:status_name).to(:provider) }
   it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:on_creation?).to(:provider) }
+  it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:active?).to(:platform_kubernetes).with_prefix }
+  it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:rbac?).to(:platform_kubernetes).with_prefix }
+  it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:installed?).to(:application_helm).with_prefix }
+  it { is_expected.to delegate_method(:installed?).to(:application_ingress).with_prefix }
   it { is_expected.to respond_to :project }
 
   describe '.enabled' do
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes_spec.rb
index ab7f89f9bf4..66198d5ee2b 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/platforms/kubernetes_spec.rb
@@ -92,6 +92,30 @@ describe Clusters::Platforms::Kubernetes, :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#kubeclient' do
+    subject { kubernetes.kubeclient }
+
+    let(:kubernetes) { build(:cluster_platform_kubernetes, :configured, namespace: 'a-namespace') }
+
+    it { is_expected.to be_an_instance_of(Gitlab::Kubernetes::KubeClient) }
+  end
+
+  describe '#rbac?' do
+    subject { kubernetes.rbac? }
+
+    let(:kubernetes) { build(:cluster_platform_kubernetes, :configured) }
+
+    context 'when authorization type is rbac' do
+      let(:kubernetes) { build(:cluster_platform_kubernetes, :rbac_enabled, :configured) }
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+
+    context 'when authorization type is nil' do
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsey }
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#actual_namespace' do
     subject { kubernetes.actual_namespace }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/clusters/providers/gcp_spec.rb b/spec/models/clusters/providers/gcp_spec.rb
index b38b5e6bcad..d134608b538 100644
--- a/spec/models/clusters/providers/gcp_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/clusters/providers/gcp_spec.rb
@@ -74,6 +74,24 @@ describe Clusters::Providers::Gcp do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#legacy_abac?' do
+    let(:gcp) { build(:cluster_provider_gcp) }
+
+    subject { gcp }
+
+    it 'should default to true' do
+      is_expected.to be_legacy_abac
+    end
+
+    context 'legacy_abac is set to false' do
+      let(:gcp) { build(:cluster_provider_gcp, legacy_abac: false) }
+
+      it 'is false' do
+        is_expected.not_to be_legacy_abac
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#state_machine' do
     context 'when any => [:created]' do
       let(:gcp) { build(:cluster_provider_gcp, :creating) }
diff --git a/spec/models/commit_spec.rb b/spec/models/commit_spec.rb
index d5f88e930d4..ed41ff7a0fa 100644
--- a/spec/models/commit_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/commit_spec.rb
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ describe Commit do
 
       key = "Commit:author:#{commit.author_email.downcase}"
 
-      expect(RequestStore.store[key]).to eq(user)
+      expect(Gitlab::SafeRequestStore[key]).to eq(user)
       expect(commit.author).to eq(user)
     end
 
@@ -270,11 +270,11 @@ eos
     let(:issue) { create :issue, project: project }
     let(:other_project) { create(:project, :public) }
     let(:other_issue) { create :issue, project: other_project }
-    let(:commiter) { create :user }
+    let(:committer) { create :user }
 
     before do
-      project.add_developer(commiter)
-      other_project.add_developer(commiter)
+      project.add_developer(committer)
+      other_project.add_developer(committer)
     end
 
     it 'detects issues that this commit is marked as closing' do
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ eos
 
       allow(commit).to receive_messages(
         safe_message: "Fixes ##{issue.iid} and #{ext_ref}",
-        committer_email: commiter.email
+        committer_email: committer.email
       )
 
       expect(commit.closes_issues).to include(issue)
diff --git a/spec/models/commit_status_spec.rb b/spec/models/commit_status_spec.rb
index f3f2bc28d2c..917685399d4 100644
--- a/spec/models/commit_status_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/commit_status_spec.rb
@@ -129,6 +129,20 @@ describe CommitStatus do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#cancel' do
+    subject { job.cancel }
+
+    context 'when status is scheduled' do
+      let(:job) { build(:commit_status, :scheduled) }
+
+      it 'updates the status' do
+        subject
+
+        expect(job).to be_canceled
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#auto_canceled?' do
     subject { commit_status.auto_canceled? }
 
@@ -564,6 +578,12 @@ describe CommitStatus do
 
       it_behaves_like 'commit status enqueued'
     end
+
+    context 'when initial state is :scheduled' do
+      let(:commit_status) { create(:commit_status, :scheduled) }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'commit status enqueued'
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#present' do
diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/avatarable_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/avatarable_spec.rb
index 76f734079b7..7d617cb7b19 100644
--- a/spec/models/concerns/avatarable_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/concerns/avatarable_spec.rb
@@ -12,6 +12,26 @@ describe Avatarable do
     stub_config_setting(relative_url_root: relative_url_root)
   end
 
+  describe '#update' do
+    let(:validator) { project._validators[:avatar].detect { |v| v.is_a?(FileSizeValidator) } }
+
+    context 'when avatar changed' do
+      it 'validates the file size' do
+        expect(validator).to receive(:validate_each).and_call_original
+
+        project.update(avatar: 'uploads/avatar.png')
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when avatar was not changed' do
+      it 'skips validation of file size' do
+        expect(validator).not_to receive(:validate_each)
+
+        project.update(name: 'Hello world')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#avatar_path' do
     using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
 
diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb
index da26d802688..f8d50e89d40 100644
--- a/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/concerns/cache_markdown_field_spec.rb
@@ -331,11 +331,12 @@ describe CacheMarkdownField do
     end
 
     context 'with a project' do
-      let(:thing) { thing_subclass(:project).new(foo: markdown, foo_html: html, project: :project_value) }
+      let(:project) { create(:project, group: create(:group)) }
+      let(:thing) { thing_subclass(:project).new(foo: markdown, foo_html: html, project: project) }
 
       it 'sets the project in the context' do
         is_expected.to have_key(:project)
-        expect(context[:project]).to eq(:project_value)
+        expect(context[:project]).to eq(project)
       end
 
       it 'invalidates the cache when project changes' do
diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/case_sensitivity_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/case_sensitivity_spec.rb
index 5c0dfaeb4d3..1bf6c9b3404 100644
--- a/spec/models/concerns/case_sensitivity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/concerns/case_sensitivity_spec.rb
@@ -3,186 +3,50 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe CaseSensitivity do
   describe '.iwhere' do
     let(:connection) { ActiveRecord::Base.connection }
-    let(:model)      { Class.new { include CaseSensitivity } }
-
-    describe 'using PostgreSQL' do
-      before do
-        allow(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:postgresql?).and_return(true)
-        allow(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:mysql?).and_return(false)
-      end
-
-      describe 'with a single column/value pair' do
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column and a value' do
-          criteria = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:foo)
-            .and_return('"foo"')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{LOWER("foo") = LOWER(:value)}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(criteria)
-
-          expect(model.iwhere(foo: 'bar')).to eq(criteria)
-        end
-
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column with a table, and a value' do
-          criteria = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:'foo.bar')
-            .and_return('"foo"."bar"')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{LOWER("foo"."bar") = LOWER(:value)}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(criteria)
-
-          expect(model.iwhere('foo.bar'.to_sym => 'bar')).to eq(criteria)
-        end
-      end
-
-      describe 'with multiple column/value pairs' do
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column and a value' do
-          initial = double(:criteria)
-          final   = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:foo)
-            .and_return('"foo"')
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:bar)
-            .and_return('"bar"')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{LOWER("foo") = LOWER(:value)}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(initial)
-
-          expect(initial).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{LOWER("bar") = LOWER(:value)}, value: 'baz')
-            .and_return(final)
-
-          got = model.iwhere(foo: 'bar', bar: 'baz')
-
-          expect(got).to eq(final)
-        end
-
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column with a table, and a value' do
-          initial = double(:criteria)
-          final   = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:'foo.bar')
-            .and_return('"foo"."bar"')
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:'foo.baz')
-            .and_return('"foo"."baz"')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{LOWER("foo"."bar") = LOWER(:value)}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(initial)
-
-          expect(initial).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{LOWER("foo"."baz") = LOWER(:value)}, value: 'baz')
-            .and_return(final)
-
-          got = model.iwhere('foo.bar'.to_sym => 'bar',
-                             'foo.baz'.to_sym => 'baz')
-
-          expect(got).to eq(final)
-        end
+    let(:model) do
+      Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do
+        include CaseSensitivity
+        self.table_name = 'namespaces'
       end
     end
 
-    describe 'using MySQL' do
-      before do
-        allow(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:postgresql?).and_return(false)
-        allow(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:mysql?).and_return(true)
-      end
-
-      describe 'with a single column/value pair' do
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column and a value' do
-          criteria = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:foo)
-            .and_return('`foo`')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{`foo` = :value}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(criteria)
+    let!(:model_1) { model.create(path: 'mOdEl-1', name: 'mOdEl 1') }
+    let!(:model_2) { model.create(path: 'mOdEl-2', name: 'mOdEl 2') }
 
-          expect(model.iwhere(foo: 'bar')).to eq(criteria)
-        end
+    it 'finds a single instance by a single attribute regardless of case' do
+      expect(model.iwhere(path: 'MODEL-1')).to contain_exactly(model_1)
+    end
 
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column with a table, and a value' do
-          criteria = double(:criteria)
+    it 'finds multiple instances by a single attribute regardless of case' do
+      expect(model.iwhere(path: %w(MODEL-1 model-2))).to contain_exactly(model_1, model_2)
+    end
 
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:'foo.bar')
-            .and_return('`foo`.`bar`')
+    it 'finds instances by multiple attributes' do
+      expect(model.iwhere(path: %w(MODEL-1 model-2), name: 'model 1'))
+        .to contain_exactly(model_1)
+    end
 
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{`foo`.`bar` = :value}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(criteria)
+    # Using `mysql` & `postgresql` metadata-tags here because both adapters build
+    # the query slightly differently
+    context 'for MySQL', :mysql do
+      it 'builds a simple query' do
+        query = model.iwhere(path: %w(MODEL-1 model-2), name: 'model 1').to_sql
+        expected_query = <<~QRY.strip
+        SELECT `namespaces`.* FROM `namespaces` WHERE (`namespaces`.`path` IN ('MODEL-1', 'model-2')) AND (`namespaces`.`name` = 'model 1')
+        QRY
 
-          expect(model.iwhere('foo.bar'.to_sym => 'bar'))
-            .to eq(criteria)
-        end
+        expect(query).to eq(expected_query)
       end
+    end
 
-      describe 'with multiple column/value pairs' do
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column and a value' do
-          initial = double(:criteria)
-          final   = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:foo)
-            .and_return('`foo`')
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:bar)
-            .and_return('`bar`')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{`foo` = :value}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(initial)
-
-          expect(initial).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{`bar` = :value}, value: 'baz')
-            .and_return(final)
-
-          got = model.iwhere(foo: 'bar', bar: 'baz')
-
-          expect(got).to eq(final)
-        end
-
-        it 'returns the criteria for a column with a table, and a value' do
-          initial = double(:criteria)
-          final   = double(:criteria)
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:'foo.bar')
-            .and_return('`foo`.`bar`')
-
-          expect(connection).to receive(:quote_table_name)
-            .with(:'foo.baz')
-            .and_return('`foo`.`baz`')
-
-          expect(model).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{`foo`.`bar` = :value}, value: 'bar')
-            .and_return(initial)
-
-          expect(initial).to receive(:where)
-            .with(%q{`foo`.`baz` = :value}, value: 'baz')
-            .and_return(final)
-
-          got = model.iwhere('foo.bar'.to_sym => 'bar',
-                             'foo.baz'.to_sym => 'baz')
+    context 'for PostgreSQL', :postgresql do
+      it 'builds a query using LOWER' do
+        query = model.iwhere(path: %w(MODEL-1 model-2), name: 'model 1').to_sql
+        expected_query = <<~QRY.strip
+        SELECT \"namespaces\".* FROM \"namespaces\" WHERE (LOWER(\"namespaces\".\"path\") IN (LOWER('MODEL-1'), LOWER('model-2'))) AND (LOWER(\"namespaces\".\"name\") = LOWER('model 1'))
+        QRY
 
-          expect(got).to eq(final)
-        end
+        expect(query).to eq(expected_query)
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/from_union_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/from_union_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ee427a667c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/models/concerns/from_union_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe FromUnion do
+  describe '.from_union' do
+    let(:model) do
+      Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do
+        self.table_name = 'users'
+
+        include FromUnion
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'selects from the results of the UNION' do
+      query = model.from_union([model.where(id: 1), model.where(id: 2)])
+
+      expect(query.to_sql).to match(/FROM \(SELECT.+UNION.+SELECT.+\) users/m)
+    end
+
+    it 'supports the use of a custom alias for the sub query' do
+      query = model.from_union(
+        [model.where(id: 1), model.where(id: 2)],
+        alias_as: 'kittens'
+      )
+
+      expect(query.to_sql).to match(/FROM \(SELECT.+UNION.+SELECT.+\) kittens/m)
+    end
+
+    it 'supports keeping duplicate rows' do
+      query = model.from_union(
+        [model.where(id: 1), model.where(id: 2)],
+        remove_duplicates: false
+      )
+
+      expect(query.to_sql)
+        .to match(/FROM \(SELECT.+UNION ALL.+SELECT.+\) users/m)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/has_status_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/has_status_spec.rb
index 6866b43432c..6b1038cb8fd 100644
--- a/spec/models/concerns/has_status_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/concerns/has_status_spec.rb
@@ -270,11 +270,11 @@ describe HasStatus do
     describe '.cancelable' do
       subject { CommitStatus.cancelable }
 
-      %i[running pending created].each do |status|
+      %i[running pending created scheduled].each do |status|
         it_behaves_like 'containing the job', status
       end
 
-      %i[failed success skipped canceled].each do |status|
+      %i[failed success skipped canceled manual].each do |status|
         it_behaves_like 'not containing the job', status
       end
     end
@@ -290,6 +290,18 @@ describe HasStatus do
         it_behaves_like 'not containing the job', status
       end
     end
+
+    describe '.scheduled' do
+      subject { CommitStatus.scheduled }
+
+      %i[scheduled].each do |status|
+        it_behaves_like 'containing the job', status
+      end
+
+      %i[failed success skipped canceled].each do |status|
+        it_behaves_like 'not containing the job', status
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '::DEFAULT_STATUS' do
@@ -300,7 +312,41 @@ describe HasStatus do
 
   describe '::BLOCKED_STATUS' do
     it 'is a status manual' do
-      expect(described_class::BLOCKED_STATUS).to eq 'manual'
+      expect(described_class::BLOCKED_STATUS).to eq %w[manual scheduled]
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'blocked?' do
+    subject { object.blocked? }
+
+    %w[ci_pipeline ci_stage ci_build generic_commit_status].each do |type|
+      let(:object) { build(type, status: status) }
+
+      context 'when status is scheduled' do
+        let(:status) { :scheduled }
+
+        it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+      end
+
+      context 'when status is manual' do
+        let(:status) { :manual }
+
+        it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+      end
+
+      context 'when status is created' do
+        let(:status) { :created }
+
+        it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.status_sql' do
+    subject { Ci::Build.status_sql }
+
+    it 'returns SQL' do
+      puts subject
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/concerns/triggerable_hooks_spec.rb b/spec/models/concerns/triggerable_hooks_spec.rb
index 621d2d38eae..265abd6bd72 100644
--- a/spec/models/concerns/triggerable_hooks_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/concerns/triggerable_hooks_spec.rb
@@ -40,4 +40,28 @@ RSpec.describe TriggerableHooks do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe '.select_active' do
+    it 'returns hooks that match the active filter' do
+      TestableHook.create!(url: 'http://example1.com', push_events: true)
+      TestableHook.create!(url: 'http://example2.com', push_events: true)
+      filter1 = double(:filter1)
+      filter2 = double(:filter2)
+      allow(ActiveHookFilter).to receive(:new).exactly(2).times.and_return(filter1, filter2)
+      expect(filter1).to receive(:matches?).and_return(true)
+      expect(filter2).to receive(:matches?).and_return(false)
+
+      hooks = TestableHook.push_hooks.order_id_asc
+      expect(hooks.select_active(:push_hooks, {})).to eq [hooks.first]
+    end
+
+    it 'returns empty list if no hooks match the active filter' do
+      TestableHook.create!(url: 'http://example1.com', push_events: true)
+      filter = double(:filter)
+      allow(ActiveHookFilter).to receive(:new).and_return(filter)
+      expect(filter).to receive(:matches?).and_return(false)
+
+      expect(TestableHook.push_hooks.select_active(:push_hooks, {})).to eq []
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/event_collection_spec.rb b/spec/models/event_collection_spec.rb
index e0a87c18cc7..6078f429bdc 100644
--- a/spec/models/event_collection_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/event_collection_spec.rb
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ describe EventCollection do
     end
 
     it 'allows filtering of events using an EventFilter' do
-      filter = EventFilter.new(EventFilter.issue)
+      filter = EventFilter.new(EventFilter::ISSUE)
       events = described_class.new(projects, filter: filter).to_a
 
       expect(events.length).to eq(1)
diff --git a/spec/models/event_spec.rb b/spec/models/event_spec.rb
index c1eac4fa489..81748681528 100644
--- a/spec/models/event_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/event_spec.rb
@@ -148,9 +148,14 @@ describe Event do
     let(:admin) { create(:admin) }
     let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) }
     let(:confidential_issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) }
+    let(:project_snippet) { create(:project_snippet, :public, project: project, author: author) }
+    let(:personal_snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :public, author: author) }
     let(:note_on_commit) { create(:note_on_commit, project: project) }
     let(:note_on_issue) { create(:note_on_issue, noteable: issue, project: project) }
     let(:note_on_confidential_issue) { create(:note_on_issue, noteable: confidential_issue, project: project) }
+    let(:note_on_project_snippet) { create(:note_on_project_snippet, author: author, noteable: project_snippet, project: project) }
+    let(:note_on_personal_snippet) { create(:note_on_personal_snippet, author: author, noteable: personal_snippet, project: nil) }
+    let(:milestone_on_project) { create(:milestone, project: project) }
     let(:event) { described_class.new(project: project, target: target, author_id: author.id) }
 
     before do
@@ -268,6 +273,125 @@ describe Event do
         end
       end
     end
+
+    context 'milestone event' do
+      let(:target) { milestone_on_project }
+
+      it do
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+      end
+
+      context 'on public project with private issue tracker and merge requests' do
+        let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :issues_private, :merge_requests_private) }
+
+        it do
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'on private project' do
+        let(:project) { create(:project, :private) }
+
+        it do
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'project snippet note event' do
+      let(:target) { note_on_project_snippet }
+
+      it do
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+      end
+
+      context 'on public project with private snippets' do
+        let(:project) { create(:project, :public, :snippets_private) }
+
+        it do
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy
+
+          # Normally, we'd expect the author of a comment to be able to view it.
+          # However, this doesn't seem to be the case for comments on snippets.
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_falsy
+
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'on private project' do
+        let(:project) { create(:project, :private) }
+
+        it do
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy
+
+          # Normally, we'd expect the author of a comment to be able to view it.
+          # However, this doesn't seem to be the case for comments on snippets.
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_falsy
+
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(member)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(guest)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'personal snippet note event' do
+      let(:target) { note_on_personal_snippet }
+
+      it do
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy
+        expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+      end
+
+      context 'on internal snippet' do
+        let(:personal_snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :internal, author: author) }
+
+        it do
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_truthy
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'on private snippet' do
+        let(:personal_snippet) { create(:personal_snippet, :private, author: author) }
+
+        it do
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(nil)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(non_member)).to be_falsy
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(author)).to be_truthy
+
+          # It is very unexpected that a private personal snippet is not visible
+          # to an instance administrator. This should be fixed in the future.
+          expect(event.visible_to_user?(admin)).to be_falsy
+        end
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '.limit_recent' do
diff --git a/spec/models/group_spec.rb b/spec/models/group_spec.rb
index 0729eb99e78..1bf8f89e126 100644
--- a/spec/models/group_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/group_spec.rb
@@ -169,22 +169,42 @@ describe Group do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '.visible_to_user' do
-    let!(:group) { create(:group) }
-    let!(:user)  { create(:user) }
+  describe '.public_or_visible_to_user' do
+    let!(:private_group)  { create(:group, :private)  }
+    let!(:internal_group) { create(:group, :internal) }
 
-    subject { described_class.visible_to_user(user) }
+    subject { described_class.public_or_visible_to_user(user) }
 
-    describe 'when the user has access to a group' do
-      before do
-        group.add_user(user, Gitlab::Access::MAINTAINER)
-      end
+    context 'when user is nil' do
+      let!(:user) { nil }
 
-      it { is_expected.to eq([group]) }
+      it { is_expected.to match_array([group]) }
     end
 
-    describe 'when the user does not have access to any groups' do
-      it { is_expected.to eq([]) }
+    context 'when user' do
+      let!(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+      context 'when user does not have access to any private group' do
+        it { is_expected.to match_array([internal_group, group]) }
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is a member of private group' do
+        before do
+          private_group.add_user(user, Gitlab::Access::DEVELOPER)
+        end
+
+        it { is_expected.to match_array([private_group, internal_group, group]) }
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is a member of private subgroup', :postgresql do
+        let!(:private_subgroup) { create(:group, :private, parent: private_group) }
+
+        before do
+          private_subgroup.add_user(user, Gitlab::Access::DEVELOPER)
+        end
+
+        it { is_expected.to match_array([private_subgroup, internal_group, group]) }
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/hooks/active_hook_filter_spec.rb b/spec/models/hooks/active_hook_filter_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..df7edda2213
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/models/hooks/active_hook_filter_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe ActiveHookFilter do
+  subject(:filter) { described_class.new(hook) }
+
+  describe '#matches?' do
+    context 'for push event hooks' do
+      let(:hook) do
+        create(:project_hook, push_events: true, push_events_branch_filter: branch_filter)
+      end
+
+      context 'branch filter is specified' do
+        let(:branch_filter) { 'master' }
+
+        it 'returns true if branch matches' do
+          expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/master' })).to be true
+        end
+
+        it 'returns false if branch does not match' do
+          expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/my_branch' })).to be false
+        end
+
+        it 'returns false if ref is nil' do
+          expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, {})).to be false
+        end
+
+        context 'branch filter contains wildcard' do
+          let(:branch_filter) { 'features/*' }
+
+          it 'returns true if branch matches' do
+            expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/features/my-branch' })).to be true
+            expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/features/my-branch/something' })).to be true
+          end
+
+          it 'returns false if branch does not match' do
+            expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/master' })).to be false
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'branch filter is not specified' do
+        let(:branch_filter) { nil }
+
+        it 'returns true' do
+          expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/master' })).to be true
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'branch filter is empty string' do
+        let(:branch_filter) { '' }
+
+        it 'acts like branch is not specified' do
+          expect(filter.matches?(:push_hooks, { ref: 'refs/heads/master' })).to be true
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'for non-push-events hooks' do
+      let(:hook) do
+        create(:project_hook, issues_events: true, push_events: false, push_events_branch_filter: '')
+      end
+
+      it 'returns true as branch filters are not yet supported for these' do
+        expect(filter.matches?(:issues_events, { ref: 'refs/heads/master' })).to be true
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb b/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb
index ea6d6e53ef5..a308ac6e33a 100644
--- a/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/hooks/web_hook_spec.rb
@@ -35,6 +35,32 @@ describe WebHook do
 
       it { is_expected.not_to allow_values("foo\nbar", "foo\r\nbar").for(:token) }
     end
+
+    describe 'push_events_branch_filter' do
+      it { is_expected.to allow_values("good_branch_name", "another/good-branch_name").for(:push_events_branch_filter) }
+      it { is_expected.to allow_values("").for(:push_events_branch_filter) }
+      it { is_expected.not_to allow_values("bad branch name", "bad~branchname").for(:push_events_branch_filter) }
+
+      it 'gets rid of whitespace' do
+        hook.push_events_branch_filter = ' branch '
+        hook.save
+
+        expect(hook.push_events_branch_filter).to eq('branch')
+      end
+
+      it 'stores whitespace only as empty' do
+        hook.push_events_branch_filter = ' '
+        hook.save
+
+        expect(hook.push_events_branch_filter).to eq('')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'encrypted attributes' do
+    subject { described_class.encrypted_attributes.keys }
+
+    it { is_expected.to contain_exactly(:token, :url) }
   end
 
   describe 'execute' do
diff --git a/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb b/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb
index 8548fff5c76..cb3d6c7cda2 100644
--- a/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/instance_configuration_spec.rb
@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-RSpec.describe InstanceConfiguration do
+describe InstanceConfiguration do
   context 'without cache' do
     describe '#settings' do
       describe '#ssh_algorithms_hashes' do
-        let(:md5) { '54:e0:f8:70:d6:4f:4c:b1:b3:02:44:77:cf:cd:0d:fc' }
-        let(:sha256) { '9327f0d15a48c4d9f6a3aee65a1825baf9a3412001c98169c5fd022ac27762fc' }
+        let(:md5) { '5a:65:6c:4d:d4:4c:6d:e6:59:25:b8:cf:ba:34:e7:64' }
+        let(:sha256) { 'SHA256:2KJDT7xf2i68mBgJ3TVsjISntg4droLbXYLfQj0VvSY' }
 
         it 'does not return anything if file does not exist' do
           stub_pub_file(exist: false)
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ RSpec.describe InstanceConfiguration do
           expect(gitlab_pages).to eq(Settings.pages.symbolize_keys)
         end
 
-        it 'returns the Gitlab\'s pages host ip address' do
+        it 'returns the GitLab\'s pages host ip address' do
           expect(gitlab_pages.keys).to include(:ip_address)
         end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/internal_id_spec.rb b/spec/models/internal_id_spec.rb
index f2aad455d5f..52c00a74b4b 100644
--- a/spec/models/internal_id_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/internal_id_spec.rb
@@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ describe InternalId do
     context 'with an insufficient schema version' do
       before do
         described_class.reset_column_information
-        expect(ActiveRecord::Migrator).to receive(:current_version).and_return(InternalId::REQUIRED_SCHEMA_VERSION - 1)
+        # Project factory will also call the current_version
+        expect(ActiveRecord::Migrator).to receive(:current_version).twice.and_return(InternalId::REQUIRED_SCHEMA_VERSION - 1)
       end
 
       let(:init) { double('block') }
diff --git a/spec/models/issue_spec.rb b/spec/models/issue_spec.rb
index c21d85fb2a4..6f900a60213 100644
--- a/spec/models/issue_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/issue_spec.rb
@@ -84,15 +84,32 @@ describe Issue do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#closed_at' do
-    it 'sets closed_at to Time.now when issue is closed' do
-      issue = create(:issue, state: 'opened')
+  describe '#close' do
+    subject(:issue) { create(:issue, state: 'opened') }
 
-      expect(issue.closed_at).to be_nil
+    it 'sets closed_at to Time.now when an issue is closed' do
+      expect { issue.close }.to change { issue.closed_at }.from(nil)
+    end
+
+    it 'changes the state to closed' do
+      expect { issue.close }.to change { issue.state }.from('opened').to('closed')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#reopen' do
+    let(:user) { create(:user) }
+    let(:issue) { create(:issue, state: 'closed', closed_at: Time.now, closed_by: user) }
 
-      issue.close
+    it 'sets closed_at to nil when an issue is reopend' do
+      expect { issue.reopen }.to change { issue.closed_at }.to(nil)
+    end
+
+    it 'sets closed_by to nil when an issue is reopend' do
+      expect { issue.reopen }.to change { issue.closed_by }.from(user).to(nil)
+    end
 
-      expect(issue.closed_at).to be_present
+    it 'changes the state to opened' do
+      expect { issue.reopen }.to change { issue.state }.from('closed').to('opened')
     end
   end
 
@@ -251,45 +268,6 @@ describe Issue do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#related_branches' do
-    let(:user) { create(:admin) }
-
-    before do
-      allow(subject.project.repository).to receive(:branch_names)
-                                            .and_return(["mpempe", "#{subject.iid}mepmep", subject.to_branch_name, "#{subject.iid}-branch"])
-
-      # Without this stub, the `create(:merge_request)` above fails because it can't find
-      # the source branch. This seems like a reasonable compromise, in comparison with
-      # setting up a full repo here.
-      allow_any_instance_of(MergeRequest).to receive(:create_merge_request_diff)
-    end
-
-    it "selects the right branches when there are no referenced merge requests" do
-      expect(subject.related_branches(user)).to eq([subject.to_branch_name, "#{subject.iid}-branch"])
-    end
-
-    it "selects the right branches when there is a referenced merge request" do
-      merge_request = create(:merge_request, { description: "Closes ##{subject.iid}",
-                                               source_project: subject.project,
-                                               source_branch: "#{subject.iid}-branch" })
-      merge_request.create_cross_references!(user)
-
-      referenced_merge_requests = Issues::ReferencedMergeRequestsService
-                                    .new(subject.project, user)
-                                    .referenced_merge_requests(subject)
-
-      expect(referenced_merge_requests).not_to be_empty
-      expect(subject.related_branches(user)).to eq([subject.to_branch_name])
-    end
-
-    it 'excludes stable branches from the related branches' do
-      allow(subject.project.repository).to receive(:branch_names)
-        .and_return(["#{subject.iid}-0-stable"])
-
-      expect(subject.related_branches(user)).to eq []
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#suggested_branch_name' do
     let(:repository) { double }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/label_note_spec.rb b/spec/models/label_note_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f69874d94aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/models/label_note_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe LabelNote do
+  set(:project)  { create(:project, :repository) }
+  set(:user)   { create(:user) }
+  set(:label) { create(:label, project: project) }
+  set(:label2) { create(:label, project: project) }
+  let(:resource_parent) { project }
+
+  context 'when resource is issue' do
+    set(:resource) { create(:issue, project: project) }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'label note created from events'
+  end
+
+  context 'when resource is merge request' do
+    set(:resource) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project, target_project: project) }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'label note created from events'
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/label_spec.rb b/spec/models/label_spec.rb
index 99670af786a..3fc6c06b7fa 100644
--- a/spec/models/label_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/label_spec.rb
@@ -155,4 +155,40 @@ describe Label do
       expect(described_class.search('feature')).to be_empty
     end
   end
+
+  describe '.subscribed_by' do
+    let!(:user)   { create(:user) }
+    let!(:label)  { create(:label) }
+    let!(:label2) { create(:label) }
+
+    before do
+      label.subscribe(user)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns subscribed labels' do
+      expect(described_class.subscribed_by(user.id)).to eq([label])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns nothing' do
+      expect(described_class.subscribed_by(0)).to be_empty
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.optionally_subscribed_by' do
+    let!(:user)   { create(:user) }
+    let!(:label)  { create(:label) }
+    let!(:label2) { create(:label) }
+
+    before do
+      label.subscribe(user)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns subscribed labels' do
+      expect(described_class.optionally_subscribed_by(user.id)).to eq([label])
+    end
+
+    it 'returns all labels if user_id is nil' do
+      expect(described_class.optionally_subscribed_by(nil)).to match_array([label, label2])
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/license_template_spec.rb b/spec/models/license_template_spec.rb
index c633e1908d4..dd912eefac1 100644
--- a/spec/models/license_template_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/license_template_spec.rb
@@ -54,6 +54,6 @@ describe LicenseTemplate do
   end
 
   def build_template(content)
-    described_class.new(id: 'foo', name: 'foo', category: :Other, content: content)
+    described_class.new(key: 'foo', name: 'foo', category: :Other, content: content)
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb b/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb
index 48f4e53b93e..666d7e69f89 100644
--- a/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/merge_request_spec.rb
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ describe MergeRequest do
   end
 
   describe "#wipless_title" do
-    ['WIP ', 'WIP:', 'WIP: ', '[WIP]', '[WIP] ', ' [WIP] WIP [WIP] WIP: WIP '].each do |wip_prefix|
+    ['WIP ', 'WIP:', 'WIP: ', '[WIP]', '[WIP] ', '[WIP] WIP [WIP] WIP: WIP '].each do |wip_prefix|
       it "removes the '#{wip_prefix}' prefix" do
         wipless_title = subject.title
         subject.title = "#{wip_prefix}#{subject.title}"
diff --git a/spec/models/milestone_spec.rb b/spec/models/milestone_spec.rb
index 55b984faecf..27d4e622710 100644
--- a/spec/models/milestone_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/milestone_spec.rb
@@ -95,6 +95,24 @@ describe Milestone do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '.order_by_name_asc' do
+    it 'sorts by name ascending' do
+      milestone1 = create(:milestone, title: 'Foo')
+      milestone2 = create(:milestone, title: 'Bar')
+
+      expect(described_class.order_by_name_asc).to eq([milestone2, milestone1])
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '.reorder_by_due_date_asc' do
+    it 'reorders the input relation' do
+      milestone1 = create(:milestone, due_date: Date.new(2018, 9, 30))
+      milestone2 = create(:milestone, due_date: Date.new(2018, 10, 20))
+
+      expect(described_class.reorder_by_due_date_asc).to eq([milestone1, milestone2])
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "#percent_complete" do
     it "does not count open issues" do
       milestone.issues << issue
diff --git a/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb b/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb
index 9b7f932ec3a..8913644a3ce 100644
--- a/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/namespace_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Namespace do
   include ProjectForksHelper
+  include GitHelpers
 
   let!(:namespace) { create(:namespace) }
   let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
@@ -82,6 +83,27 @@ describe Namespace do
     it { expect(namespace.human_name).to eq(namespace.owner_name) }
   end
 
+  describe '#first_project_with_container_registry_tags' do
+    let(:container_repository) { create(:container_repository) }
+    let!(:project) { create(:project, namespace: namespace, container_repositories: [container_repository]) }
+
+    before do
+      stub_container_registry_config(enabled: true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the project' do
+      stub_container_registry_tags(repository: :any, tags: ['tag'])
+
+      expect(namespace.first_project_with_container_registry_tags).to eq(project)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns no project' do
+      stub_container_registry_tags(repository: :any, tags: nil)
+
+      expect(namespace.first_project_with_container_registry_tags).to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '.search' do
     let(:namespace) { create(:namespace) }
 
@@ -184,7 +206,8 @@ describe Namespace do
         end
 
         it 'raises an error about not movable project' do
-          expect { namespace.move_dir }.to raise_error(/Namespace cannot be moved/)
+          expect { namespace.move_dir }.to raise_error(Gitlab::UpdatePathError,
+                                                       /Namespace .* cannot be moved/)
         end
       end
     end
@@ -339,9 +362,7 @@ describe Namespace do
     end
 
     def project_rugged(project)
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        project.repository.rugged
-      end
+      rugged_repo(project.repository)
     end
   end
 
@@ -394,12 +415,6 @@ describe Namespace do
           child.destroy
         end
       end
-
-      it 'removes the exports folder' do
-        expect(namespace).to receive(:remove_exports!)
-
-        namespace.destroy
-      end
     end
 
     context 'hashed storage' do
@@ -414,12 +429,6 @@ describe Namespace do
 
         expect(File.exist?(deleted_path_in_dir)).to be(false)
       end
-
-      it 'removes the exports folder' do
-        expect(namespace).to receive(:remove_exports!)
-
-        namespace.destroy
-      end
     end
   end
 
@@ -706,26 +715,6 @@ describe Namespace do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#remove_exports' do
-    let(:legacy_project) { create(:project, :with_export, :legacy_storage, namespace: namespace) }
-    let(:hashed_project) { create(:project, :with_export, namespace: namespace) }
-    let(:export_path) { Dir.mktmpdir('namespace_remove_exports_spec') }
-    let(:legacy_export) { legacy_project.export_project_path }
-    let(:hashed_export) { hashed_project.export_project_path }
-
-    it 'removes exports for legacy and hashed projects' do
-      allow(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path) { export_path }
-
-      expect(File.exist?(legacy_export)).to be_truthy
-      expect(File.exist?(hashed_export)).to be_truthy
-
-      namespace.remove_exports!
-
-      expect(File.exist?(legacy_export)).to be_falsy
-      expect(File.exist?(hashed_export)).to be_falsy
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#full_path_was' do
     context 'when the group has no parent' do
       it 'should return the path was' do
diff --git a/spec/models/note_spec.rb b/spec/models/note_spec.rb
index 947be44c903..1783dd3206b 100644
--- a/spec/models/note_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/note_spec.rb
@@ -231,33 +231,60 @@ describe Note do
     let(:ext_proj)  { create(:project, :public) }
     let(:ext_issue) { create(:issue, project: ext_proj) }
 
-    let(:note) do
-      create :note,
-        noteable: ext_issue, project: ext_proj,
-        note: "mentioned in issue #{private_issue.to_reference(ext_proj)}",
-        system: true
-    end
+    shared_examples "checks references" do
+      it "returns true" do
+        expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_truthy
+      end
 
-    it "returns true" do
-      expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_truthy
-    end
+      it "returns false" do
+        expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(private_user)).to be_falsy
+      end
 
-    it "returns false" do
-      expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(private_user)).to be_falsy
+      it "returns false if user visible reference count set" do
+        note.user_visible_reference_count = 1
+        note.total_reference_count = 1
+
+        expect(note).not_to receive(:reference_mentionables)
+        expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_falsy
+      end
+
+      it "returns true if ref count is 0" do
+        note.user_visible_reference_count = 0
+
+        expect(note).not_to receive(:reference_mentionables)
+        expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_truthy
+      end
     end
 
-    it "returns false if user visible reference count set" do
-      note.user_visible_reference_count = 1
+    context "when there is one reference in note" do
+      let(:note) do
+        create :note,
+          noteable: ext_issue, project: ext_proj,
+          note: "mentioned in issue #{private_issue.to_reference(ext_proj)}",
+          system: true
+      end
 
-      expect(note).not_to receive(:reference_mentionables)
-      expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_falsy
+      it_behaves_like "checks references"
     end
 
-    it "returns true if ref count is 0" do
-      note.user_visible_reference_count = 0
+    context "when there are two references in note" do
+      let(:note) do
+        create :note,
+          noteable: ext_issue, project: ext_proj,
+          note: "mentioned in issue #{private_issue.to_reference(ext_proj)} and " \
+                "public issue #{ext_issue.to_reference(ext_proj)}",
+          system: true
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like "checks references"
 
-      expect(note).not_to receive(:reference_mentionables)
-      expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_truthy
+      it "returns true if user visible reference count set and there is a private reference" do
+        note.user_visible_reference_count = 1
+        note.total_reference_count = 2
+
+        expect(note).not_to receive(:reference_mentionables)
+        expect(note.cross_reference_not_visible_for?(ext_issue.author)).to be_truthy
+      end
     end
   end
 
@@ -269,7 +296,7 @@ describe Note do
     end
 
     context 'when the note might contain cross references' do
-      SystemNoteMetadata::TYPES_WITH_CROSS_REFERENCES.each do |type|
+      SystemNoteMetadata.new.cross_reference_types.each do |type|
         let(:note) { create(:note, :system) }
         let!(:metadata) { create(:system_note_metadata, note: note, action: type) }
 
diff --git a/spec/models/project_auto_devops_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_auto_devops_spec.rb
index 797d767465a..342798f730b 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_auto_devops_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_auto_devops_spec.rb
@@ -70,24 +70,31 @@ describe ProjectAutoDevops do
     end
 
     context 'when deploy_strategy is manual' do
-      let(:domain) { 'example.com' }
-
-      before do
-        auto_devops.deploy_strategy = 'manual'
+      let(:auto_devops) { build_stubbed(:project_auto_devops, :manual_deployment, project: project) }
+      let(:expected_variables) do
+        [
+          { key: 'INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_MODE', value: 'manual' },
+          { key: 'STAGING_ENABLED', value: '1' },
+          { key: 'INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_ENABLED', value: '1' }
+        ]
       end
 
+      it { expect(auto_devops.predefined_variables).to include(*expected_variables) }
+    end
+
+    context 'when deploy_strategy is continuous' do
+      let(:auto_devops) { build_stubbed(:project_auto_devops, :continuous_deployment, project: project) }
+
       it do
         expect(auto_devops.predefined_variables.map { |var| var[:key] })
-          .to include("STAGING_ENABLED", "INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_ENABLED")
+          .not_to include("STAGING_ENABLED", "INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_ENABLED")
       end
     end
 
-    context 'when deploy_strategy is continuous' do
-      let(:domain) { 'example.com' }
+    context 'when deploy_strategy is timed_incremental' do
+      let(:auto_devops) { build_stubbed(:project_auto_devops, :timed_incremental_deployment, project: project) }
 
-      before do
-        auto_devops.deploy_strategy = 'continuous'
-      end
+      it { expect(auto_devops.predefined_variables).to include(key: 'INCREMENTAL_ROLLOUT_MODE', value: 'timed') }
 
       it do
         expect(auto_devops.predefined_variables.map { |var| var[:key] })
diff --git a/spec/models/project_feature_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_feature_spec.rb
index 10617edec0f..fee7d65c217 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_feature_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_feature_spec.rb
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ describe ProjectFeature do
   end
 
   describe '#feature_available?' do
-    let(:features) { %w(issues wiki builds merge_requests snippets repository) }
+    let(:features) { %w(issues wiki builds merge_requests snippets repository pages) }
 
     context 'when features are disabled' do
       it "returns false" do
@@ -73,6 +73,22 @@ describe ProjectFeature do
         end
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when feature is disabled by a feature flag' do
+      it 'returns false' do
+        stub_feature_flags(issues: false)
+
+        expect(project.feature_available?(:issues, user)).to eq(false)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when feature is enabled by a feature flag' do
+      it 'returns true' do
+        stub_feature_flags(issues: true)
+
+        expect(project.feature_available?(:issues, user)).to eq(true)
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   context 'repository related features' do
@@ -96,6 +112,19 @@ describe ProjectFeature do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'public features' do
+    it "does not allow public for other than pages" do
+      features = %w(issues wiki builds merge_requests snippets repository)
+      project_feature = project.project_feature
+
+      features.each do |feature|
+        field = "#{feature}_access_level".to_sym
+        project_feature.update_attribute(field, ProjectFeature::PUBLIC)
+        expect(project_feature.valid?).to be_falsy
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#*_enabled?' do
     let(:features) { %w(wiki builds merge_requests) }
 
@@ -119,46 +148,4 @@ describe ProjectFeature do
       end
     end
   end
-
-  context 'Site Statistics' do
-    set(:project_with_wiki) { create(:project, :wiki_enabled) }
-    set(:project_without_wiki) { create(:project, :wiki_disabled) }
-
-    context 'when creating a project' do
-      it 'tracks wiki availability when wikis are enabled by default' do
-        expect { create(:project) }.to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }.by(1)
-      end
-
-      it 'does not track wiki availability when wikis are disabled by default' do
-        expect { create(:project, :wiki_disabled) }.not_to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when updating a project_feature' do
-      it 'untracks wiki availability when disabling wiki access' do
-        expect { project_with_wiki.project_feature.update_attribute(:wiki_access_level, ProjectFeature::DISABLED) }
-          .to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }.by(-1)
-      end
-
-      it 'tracks again wiki availability when re-enabling wiki access as public' do
-        expect { project_without_wiki.project_feature.update_attribute(:wiki_access_level, ProjectFeature::ENABLED) }
-          .to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }.by(1)
-      end
-
-      it 'tracks again wiki availability when re-enabling wiki access as private' do
-        expect { project_without_wiki.project_feature.update_attribute(:wiki_access_level, ProjectFeature::PRIVATE) }
-          .to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }.by(1)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when removing a project' do
-      it 'untracks wiki availability when removing a project with previous wiki access' do
-        expect { project_with_wiki.destroy }.to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }.by(-1)
-      end
-
-      it 'does not untrack wiki availability when removing a project without wiki access' do
-        expect { project_without_wiki.destroy }.not_to change { SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count }
-      end
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/project_services/chat_message/merge_message_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_services/chat_message/merge_message_spec.rb
index 184a07ae0f9..7997b5bb6b9 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_services/chat_message/merge_message_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_services/chat_message/merge_message_spec.rb
@@ -27,13 +27,30 @@ describe ChatMessage::MergeMessage do
     }
   end
 
+  # Integration point in EE
+  context 'when state is overridden' do
+    it 'respects the overridden state' do
+      allow(subject).to receive(:state_or_action_text) { 'devoured' }
+
+      aggregate_failures do
+        expect(subject.summary).not_to include('opened')
+        expect(subject.summary).to include('devoured')
+
+        activity_title = subject.activity[:title]
+
+        expect(activity_title).not_to include('opened')
+        expect(activity_title).to include('devoured')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'without markdown' do
     let(:color) { '#345' }
 
     context 'open' do
       it 'returns a message regarding opening of merge requests' do
         expect(subject.pretext).to eq(
-          'Test User (test.user) opened <http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100|!100 *Merge Request title*> in <http://somewhere.com|project_name>: *Merge Request title*')
+          'Test User (test.user) opened <http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100|!100 *Merge Request title*> in <http://somewhere.com|project_name>')
         expect(subject.attachments).to be_empty
       end
     end
@@ -44,7 +61,7 @@ describe ChatMessage::MergeMessage do
       end
       it 'returns a message regarding closing of merge requests' do
         expect(subject.pretext).to eq(
-          'Test User (test.user) closed <http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100|!100 *Merge Request title*> in <http://somewhere.com|project_name>: *Merge Request title*')
+          'Test User (test.user) closed <http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100|!100 *Merge Request title*> in <http://somewhere.com|project_name>')
         expect(subject.attachments).to be_empty
       end
     end
@@ -58,7 +75,7 @@ describe ChatMessage::MergeMessage do
     context 'open' do
       it 'returns a message regarding opening of merge requests' do
         expect(subject.pretext).to eq(
-          'Test User (test.user) opened [!100 *Merge Request title*](http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100) in [project_name](http://somewhere.com): *Merge Request title*')
+          'Test User (test.user) opened [!100 *Merge Request title*](http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100) in [project_name](http://somewhere.com)')
         expect(subject.attachments).to be_empty
         expect(subject.activity).to eq({
           title: 'Merge Request opened by Test User (test.user)',
@@ -76,7 +93,7 @@ describe ChatMessage::MergeMessage do
 
       it 'returns a message regarding closing of merge requests' do
         expect(subject.pretext).to eq(
-          'Test User (test.user) closed [!100 *Merge Request title*](http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100) in [project_name](http://somewhere.com): *Merge Request title*')
+          'Test User (test.user) closed [!100 *Merge Request title*](http://somewhere.com/merge_requests/100) in [project_name](http://somewhere.com)')
         expect(subject.attachments).to be_empty
         expect(subject.activity).to eq({
           title: 'Merge Request closed by Test User (test.user)',
diff --git a/spec/models/project_services/chat_notification_service_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_services/chat_notification_service_spec.rb
index 3aa1039d8bf..46713df77da 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_services/chat_notification_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_services/chat_notification_service_spec.rb
@@ -26,4 +26,54 @@ describe ChatNotificationService do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#execute' do
+    let(:chat_service) { described_class.new }
+    let(:user) { create(:user) }
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+    let(:webhook_url) { 'https://example.gitlab.com/' }
+
+    before do
+      allow(chat_service).to receive_messages(
+        project: project,
+        project_id: project.id,
+        service_hook: true,
+        webhook: webhook_url
+      )
+
+      WebMock.stub_request(:post, webhook_url)
+
+      subject.active = true
+    end
+
+    context 'with a repository' do
+      it 'returns true' do
+        subject.project = project
+        data = Gitlab::DataBuilder::Push.build_sample(project, user)
+
+        expect(Slack::Notifier).to receive(:new)
+         .with(webhook_url, {})
+         .and_return(
+           double(:slack_service).as_null_object
+         )
+
+        expect(chat_service.execute(data)).to be true
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'with an empty repository' do
+      it 'returns true' do
+        subject.project = create(:project, :empty_repo)
+        data = Gitlab::DataBuilder::Push.build_sample(subject.project, user)
+
+        expect(Slack::Notifier).to receive(:new)
+         .with(webhook_url, {})
+         .and_return(
+           double(:slack_service).as_null_object
+         )
+
+        expect(chat_service.execute(data)).to be true
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/project_services/jira_service_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_services/jira_service_spec.rb
index 54f1a0e38a5..788b3179b01 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_services/jira_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_services/jira_service_spec.rb
@@ -231,12 +231,12 @@ describe JiraService do
       end
 
       it 'logs exception when transition id is not valid' do
-        allow(Rails.logger).to receive(:info)
-        WebMock.stub_request(:post, @transitions_url).with(basic_auth: %w(gitlab_jira_username gitlab_jira_password)).and_raise('Bad Request')
+        allow(@jira_service).to receive(:log_error)
+        WebMock.stub_request(:post, @transitions_url).with(basic_auth: %w(gitlab_jira_username gitlab_jira_password)).and_raise("Bad Request")
 
         @jira_service.close_issue(resource, ExternalIssue.new('JIRA-123', project))
 
-        expect(Rails.logger).to have_received(:info).with('JiraService Issue Transition failed message ERROR: http://jira.example.com - Bad Request')
+        expect(@jira_service).to have_received(:log_error).with("Issue transition failed", error: "Bad Request", client_url: "http://jira.example.com")
       end
 
       it 'calls the api with jira_issue_transition_id' do
diff --git a/spec/models/project_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_spec.rb
index 7cfffbde42f..31c69e5bd2c 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Project do
   include ProjectForksHelper
+  include GitHelpers
 
   describe 'associations' do
     it { is_expected.to belong_to(:group) }
@@ -1072,6 +1073,18 @@ describe Project do
     it { expect(project.builds_enabled?).to be_truthy }
   end
 
+  describe '.sort_by_attribute' do
+    it 'reorders the input relation by start count desc' do
+      project1 = create(:project, star_count: 2)
+      project2 = create(:project, star_count: 1)
+      project3 = create(:project)
+
+      projects = described_class.sort_by_attribute(:stars_desc)
+
+      expect(projects).to eq([project1, project2, project3])
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '.with_shared_runners' do
     subject { described_class.with_shared_runners }
 
@@ -2854,73 +2867,12 @@ describe Project do
   end
 
   describe '#remove_export' do
-    let(:legacy_project) { create(:project, :legacy_storage, :with_export) }
     let(:project) { create(:project, :with_export) }
 
-    before do
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
-    end
-
-    it 'removes the exports directory for the project' do
-      expect(File.exist?(project.export_path)).to be_truthy
-
-      allow(FileUtils).to receive(:rm_rf).and_call_original
-      expect(FileUtils).to receive(:rm_rf).with(project.export_path).and_call_original
-      project.remove_exports
-
-      expect(File.exist?(project.export_path)).to be_falsy
-    end
-
-    it 'is a no-op on legacy projects when there is no namespace' do
-      export_path = legacy_project.export_path
-
-      legacy_project.namespace.delete
-      legacy_project.reload
-
-      expect(FileUtils).not_to receive(:rm_rf).with(export_path)
-
-      legacy_project.remove_exports
-
-      expect(File.exist?(export_path)).to be_truthy
-    end
-
-    it 'runs on hashed storage projects when there is no namespace' do
-      export_path = project.export_path
-
-      project.namespace.delete
-      legacy_project.reload
-
-      allow(FileUtils).to receive(:rm_rf).and_call_original
-      expect(FileUtils).to receive(:rm_rf).with(export_path).and_call_original
-
+    it 'removes the export' do
       project.remove_exports
 
-      expect(File.exist?(export_path)).to be_falsy
-    end
-
-    it 'is run when the project is destroyed' do
-      expect(project).to receive(:remove_exports).and_call_original
-
-      project.destroy
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#remove_exported_project_file' do
-    let(:project) { create(:project, :with_export) }
-
-    it 'removes the exported project file' do
-      stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: false)
-
-      exported_file = project.export_project_path
-
-      expect(File.exist?(exported_file)).to be_truthy
-
-      allow(FileUtils).to receive(:rm_rf).and_call_original
-      expect(FileUtils).to receive(:rm_rf).with(exported_file).and_call_original
-
-      project.remove_exported_project_file
-
-      expect(File.exist?(exported_file)).to be_falsy
+      expect(project.export_file_exists?).to be_falsey
     end
   end
 
@@ -3290,17 +3242,17 @@ describe Project do
         expect(repository).to receive(:gitlab_ci_yml) { nil }
       end
 
-      it "CI is not available" do
-        expect(project).not_to have_ci
+      it "CI is available" do
+        expect(project).to have_ci
       end
 
-      context 'when auto devops is enabled' do
+      context 'when auto devops is disabled' do
         before do
-          stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: true)
+          stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: false)
         end
 
-        it "CI is available" do
-          expect(project).to have_ci
+        it "CI is not available" do
+          expect(project).not_to have_ci
         end
       end
     end
@@ -3734,21 +3686,45 @@ describe Project do
   end
 
   describe '#execute_hooks' do
-    it 'executes the projects hooks with the specified scope' do
-      hook1 = create(:project_hook, merge_requests_events: true, tag_push_events: false)
-      hook2 = create(:project_hook, merge_requests_events: false, tag_push_events: true)
-      project = create(:project, hooks: [hook1, hook2])
+    let(:data) { { ref: 'refs/heads/master', data: 'data' } }
+    it 'executes active projects hooks with the specified scope' do
+      hook = create(:project_hook, merge_requests_events: false, push_events: true)
+      expect(ProjectHook).to receive(:select_active)
+        .with(:push_hooks, data)
+        .and_return([hook])
+      project = create(:project, hooks: [hook])
 
       expect_any_instance_of(ProjectHook).to receive(:async_execute).once
 
-      project.execute_hooks({}, :tag_push_hooks)
+      project.execute_hooks(data, :push_hooks)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not execute project hooks that dont match the specified scope' do
+      hook = create(:project_hook, merge_requests_events: true, push_events: false)
+      project = create(:project, hooks: [hook])
+
+      expect_any_instance_of(ProjectHook).not_to receive(:async_execute).once
+
+      project.execute_hooks(data, :push_hooks)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not execute project hooks which are not active' do
+      hook = create(:project_hook, push_events: true)
+      expect(ProjectHook).to receive(:select_active)
+        .with(:push_hooks, data)
+        .and_return([])
+      project = create(:project, hooks: [hook])
+
+      expect_any_instance_of(ProjectHook).not_to receive(:async_execute).once
+
+      project.execute_hooks(data, :push_hooks)
     end
 
     it 'executes the system hooks with the specified scope' do
-      expect_any_instance_of(SystemHooksService).to receive(:execute_hooks).with({ data: 'data' }, :merge_request_hooks)
+      expect_any_instance_of(SystemHooksService).to receive(:execute_hooks).with(data, :merge_request_hooks)
 
       project = build(:project)
-      project.execute_hooks({ data: 'data' }, :merge_request_hooks)
+      project.execute_hooks(data, :merge_request_hooks)
     end
 
     it 'executes the system hooks when inside a transaction' do
@@ -3763,7 +3739,7 @@ describe Project do
       # actually get to the `after_commit` hook that queues these jobs.
       expect do
         project.transaction do
-          project.execute_hooks({ data: 'data' }, :merge_request_hooks)
+          project.execute_hooks(data, :merge_request_hooks)
         end
       end.not_to raise_error # Sidekiq::Worker::EnqueueFromTransactionError
     end
@@ -4020,9 +3996,84 @@ describe Project do
     end
   end
 
-  def rugged_config
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      project.repository.rugged.config
+  context '#members_among' do
+    let(:users) { create_list(:user, 3) }
+    set(:group) { create(:group) }
+    set(:project) { create(:project, namespace: group) }
+
+    before do
+      project.add_guest(users.first)
+      project.group.add_maintainer(users.last)
+    end
+
+    context 'when users is an Array' do
+      it 'returns project members among the users' do
+        expect(project.members_among(users)).to eq([users.first, users.last])
+      end
+
+      it 'maintains input order' do
+        expect(project.members_among(users.reverse)).to eq([users.last, users.first])
+      end
+
+      it 'returns empty array if users is empty' do
+        result = project.members_among([])
+
+        expect(result).to be_empty
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when users is a relation' do
+      it 'returns project members among the users' do
+        result = project.members_among(User.where(id: users.map(&:id)))
+
+        expect(result).to be_a(ActiveRecord::Relation)
+        expect(result).to eq([users.first, users.last])
+      end
+
+      it 'returns empty relation if users is empty' do
+        result = project.members_among(User.none)
+
+        expect(result).to be_a(ActiveRecord::Relation)
+        expect(result).to be_empty
+      end
     end
   end
+
+  describe "#find_or_initialize_services" do
+    subject { build(:project) }
+
+    it 'returns only enabled services' do
+      allow(Service).to receive(:available_services_names).and_return(%w(prometheus pushover))
+      allow(subject).to receive(:disabled_services).and_return(%w(prometheus))
+
+      services = subject.find_or_initialize_services
+
+      expect(services.count).to eq 1
+      expect(services).to include(PushoverService)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "#find_or_initialize_service" do
+    subject { build(:project) }
+
+    it 'avoids N+1 database queries' do
+      allow(Service).to receive(:available_services_names).and_return(%w(prometheus pushover))
+
+      control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new { subject.find_or_initialize_service('prometheus') }.count
+
+      allow(Service).to receive(:available_services_names).and_call_original
+
+      expect { subject.find_or_initialize_service('prometheus') }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns nil if service is disabled' do
+      allow(subject).to receive(:disabled_services).and_return(%w(prometheus))
+
+      expect(subject.find_or_initialize_service('prometheus')).to be_nil
+    end
+  end
+
+  def rugged_config
+    rugged_repo(project.repository).config
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/project_wiki_spec.rb b/spec/models/project_wiki_spec.rb
index 528f5b610d7..f38fc191943 100644
--- a/spec/models/project_wiki_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/project_wiki_spec.rb
@@ -2,12 +2,13 @@
 require "spec_helper"
 
 describe ProjectWiki do
-  let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user, :commit_email) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo, namespace: user.namespace) }
   let(:repository) { project.repository }
-  let(:user) { project.owner }
   let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
   let(:project_wiki) { described_class.new(project, user) }
   let(:raw_repository) { Gitlab::Git::Repository.new(project.repository_storage, subject.disk_path + '.git', 'foo') }
+  let(:commit) { project_wiki.repository.head_commit }
 
   subject { project_wiki }
 
@@ -276,6 +277,14 @@ describe ProjectWiki do
         expect(subject.pages.first.page.version.message).to eq("commit message")
       end
 
+      it 'sets the correct commit email' do
+        subject.create_page('test page', 'content')
+
+        expect(user.commit_email).not_to eq(user.email)
+        expect(commit.author_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+        expect(commit.committer_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+      end
+
       it 'updates project activity' do
         subject.create_page('Test Page', 'This is content')
 
@@ -320,6 +329,12 @@ describe ProjectWiki do
       expect(@page.version.message).to eq("updated page")
     end
 
+    it 'sets the correct commit email' do
+      expect(user.commit_email).not_to eq(user.email)
+      expect(commit.author_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+      expect(commit.committer_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+    end
+
     it 'updates project activity' do
       subject.update_page(
         @gitlab_git_wiki_page,
@@ -347,6 +362,14 @@ describe ProjectWiki do
         expect(subject.pages.count).to eq(0)
       end
 
+      it 'sets the correct commit email' do
+        subject.delete_page(@page)
+
+        expect(user.commit_email).not_to eq(user.email)
+        expect(commit.author_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+        expect(commit.committer_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+      end
+
       it 'updates project activity' do
         subject.delete_page(@page)
 
@@ -420,7 +443,7 @@ describe ProjectWiki do
   end
 
   def commit_details
-    Gitlab::Git::Wiki::CommitDetails.new(user.id, user.username, user.name, user.email, "test commit")
+    Gitlab::Git::Wiki::CommitDetails.new(user.id, user.username, user.name, user.commit_email, "test commit")
   end
 
   def create_page(name, content)
diff --git a/spec/models/prometheus_metric_spec.rb b/spec/models/prometheus_metric_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a83a31ae88c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/models/prometheus_metric_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe PrometheusMetric do
+  subject { build(:prometheus_metric) }
+  let(:other_project) { build(:project) }
+
+  it { is_expected.to belong_to(:project) }
+  it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:title) }
+  it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:query) }
+  it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:group) }
+
+  describe 'common metrics' do
+    using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+    where(:common, :project, :result) do
+      false | other_project | true
+      false | nil           | false
+      true  | other_project | false
+      true  | nil           | true
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      before do
+        subject.common = common
+        subject.project = project
+      end
+
+      it { expect(subject.valid?).to eq(result) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#query_series' do
+    using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+
+    where(:legend, :type) do
+      'Some other legend' | NilClass
+      'Status Code'       | Array
+    end
+
+    with_them do
+      before do
+        subject.legend = legend
+      end
+
+      it { expect(subject.query_series).to be_a(type) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#group_title' do
+    shared_examples 'group_title' do |group, title|
+      subject { build(:prometheus_metric, group: group).group_title }
+
+      it "returns text #{title} for group #{group}" do
+        expect(subject).to eq(title)
+      end
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'group_title', :business, 'Business metrics (Custom)'
+    it_behaves_like 'group_title', :response, 'Response metrics (Custom)'
+    it_behaves_like 'group_title', :system, 'System metrics (Custom)'
+  end
+
+  describe '#to_query_metric' do
+    it 'converts to queryable metric object' do
+      expect(subject.to_query_metric).to be_instance_of(Gitlab::Prometheus::Metric)
+    end
+
+    it 'queryable metric object has title' do
+      expect(subject.to_query_metric.title).to eq(subject.title)
+    end
+
+    it 'queryable metric object has y_label' do
+      expect(subject.to_query_metric.y_label).to eq(subject.y_label)
+    end
+
+    it 'queryable metric has no required_metric' do
+      expect(subject.to_query_metric.required_metrics).to eq([])
+    end
+
+    it 'queryable metric has weight 0' do
+      expect(subject.to_query_metric.weight).to eq(0)
+    end
+
+    it 'queryable metrics has query description' do
+      queries = [
+        {
+          query_range: subject.query,
+          unit: subject.unit,
+          label: subject.legend
+        }
+      ]
+
+      expect(subject.to_query_metric.queries).to eq(queries)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb b/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb
index 269d5deca20..3d316fb3c5b 100644
--- a/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/remote_mirror_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'rails_helper'
 
 describe RemoteMirror do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   describe 'URL validation' do
     context 'with a valid URL' do
       it 'should be valid' do
@@ -74,9 +76,7 @@ describe RemoteMirror do
 
         mirror.update_attribute(:url, 'http://foo:baz@test.com')
 
-        config = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          repo.raw_repository.rugged.config
-        end
+        config = rugged_repo(repo).config
         expect(config["remote.#{mirror.remote_name}.url"]).to eq('http://foo:baz@test.com')
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/repository_spec.rb b/spec/models/repository_spec.rb
index 93898012d34..77e549d9528 100644
--- a/spec/models/repository_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/repository_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Repository do
   include RepoHelpers
+  include GitHelpers
+
   TestBlob = Struct.new(:path)
 
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
@@ -137,9 +139,7 @@ describe Repository do
           options = { message: 'test tag message\n',
                       tagger: { name: 'John Smith', email: 'john@gmail.com' } }
 
-          Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-            repository.rugged.tags.create(annotated_tag_name, 'a48e4fc218069f68ef2e769dd8dfea3991362175', options)
-          end
+          rugged_repo(repository).tags.create(annotated_tag_name, 'a48e4fc218069f68ef2e769dd8dfea3991362175', options)
 
           double_first = double(committed_date: Time.now - 1.second)
           double_last = double(committed_date: Time.now)
@@ -151,9 +151,7 @@ describe Repository do
         it { is_expected.to eq(['v1.1.0', 'v1.0.0', annotated_tag_name]) }
 
         after do
-          Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-            repository.rugged.tags.delete(annotated_tag_name)
-          end
+          rugged_repo(repository).tags.delete(annotated_tag_name)
         end
       end
     end
@@ -188,6 +186,57 @@ describe Repository do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#list_last_commits_for_tree' do
+    let(:path_to_commit) do
+      {
+        "encoding" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e",
+        "files" => "570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d",
+        ".gitignore" => "c1acaa58bbcbc3eafe538cb8274ba387047b69f8",
+        ".gitmodules" => "6f6d7e7ed97bb5f0054f2b1df789b39ca89b6ff9",
+        "CHANGELOG" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e",
+        "CONTRIBUTING.md" => "6d394385cf567f80a8fd85055db1ab4c5295806f",
+        "Gemfile.zip" => "ae73cb07c9eeaf35924a10f713b364d32b2dd34f",
+        "LICENSE" => "1a0b36b3cdad1d2ee32457c102a8c0b7056fa863",
+        "MAINTENANCE.md" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e",
+        "PROCESS.md" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e",
+        "README.md" => "1a0b36b3cdad1d2ee32457c102a8c0b7056fa863",
+        "VERSION" => "913c66a37b4a45b9769037c55c2d238bd0942d2e",
+        "gitlab-shell" => "6f6d7e7ed97bb5f0054f2b1df789b39ca89b6ff9",
+        "six" => "cfe32cf61b73a0d5e9f13e774abde7ff789b1660"
+      }
+    end
+
+    subject { repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.').id }
+
+    it 'returns the last commits for every entry in the current path' do
+      result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.')
+
+      result.each do |key, value|
+        result[key] = value.id
+      end
+
+      expect(result).to include(path_to_commit)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns the last commits for every entry in the current path starting from the offset' do
+      result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.', offset: path_to_commit.size - 1)
+
+      expect(result.size).to eq(1)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns a limited number of last commits for every entry in the current path starting from the offset' do
+      result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.', limit: 1)
+
+      expect(result.size).to eq(1)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns an empty hash when offset is out of bounds' do
+      result = repository.list_last_commits_for_tree(sample_commit.id, '.', offset: path_to_commit.size)
+
+      expect(result.size).to eq(0)
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#last_commit_for_path' do
     shared_examples 'getting last commit for path' do
       subject { repository.last_commit_for_path(sample_commit.id, '.gitignore').id }
@@ -1028,208 +1077,61 @@ describe Repository do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#update_branch_with_hooks' do
-    let(:old_rev) { '0b4bc9a49b562e85de7cc9e834518ea6828729b9' } # git rev-parse feature
-    let(:new_rev) { 'a74ae73c1ccde9b974a70e82b901588071dc142a' } # commit whose parent is old_rev
-    let(:updating_ref) { 'refs/heads/feature' }
-    let(:target_project) { project }
-    let(:target_repository) { target_project.repository }
-
-    around do |example|
-      # TODO Gitlab::Git::OperationService will be moved to gitaly-ruby and disappear from this repo
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        example.run
-      end
+  describe '#exists?' do
+    it 'returns true when a repository exists' do
+      expect(repository.exists?).to be(true)
     end
 
-    context 'when pre hooks were successful' do
-      before do
-        service = Gitlab::Git::HooksService.new
-        expect(Gitlab::Git::HooksService).to receive(:new).and_return(service)
-        expect(service).to receive(:execute)
-          .with(git_user, target_repository.raw_repository, old_rev, new_rev, updating_ref)
-          .and_yield(service).and_return(true)
-      end
-
-      it 'runs without errors' do
-        expect do
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository).with_branch('feature') do
-            new_rev
-          end
-        end.not_to raise_error
-      end
-
-      it 'ensures the autocrlf Git option is set to :input' do
-        service = Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository)
+    it 'returns false if no full path can be constructed' do
+      allow(repository).to receive(:full_path).and_return(nil)
 
-        expect(service).to receive(:update_autocrlf_option)
+      expect(repository.exists?).to be(false)
+    end
 
-        service.with_branch('feature') { new_rev }
+    context 'with broken storage', :broken_storage do
+      it 'should raise a storage error' do
+        expect_to_raise_storage_error { broken_repository.exists? }
       end
+    end
 
-      context "when the branch wasn't empty" do
-        it 'updates the head' do
-          expect(repository.find_branch('feature').dereferenced_target.id).to eq(old_rev)
-
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository).with_branch('feature') do
-            new_rev
-          end
+    context 'asymmetric caching', :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching, :request_store do
+      let(:cache) { repository.send(:cache) }
+      let(:request_store_cache) { repository.send(:request_store_cache) }
 
-          expect(repository.find_branch('feature').dereferenced_target.id).to eq(new_rev)
+      context 'when it returns true' do
+        before do
+          expect(repository.raw_repository).to receive(:exists?).once.and_return(true)
         end
-      end
-
-      context 'when target project does not have the commit' do
-        let(:target_project) { create(:project, :empty_repo) }
-        let(:old_rev) { Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA }
-        let(:new_rev) { project.commit('feature').sha }
-        let(:updating_ref) { 'refs/heads/master' }
-
-        it 'fetch_ref and create the branch' do
-          expect(target_project.repository.raw_repository).to receive(:fetch_ref)
-            .and_call_original
-
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, target_repository.raw_repository)
-            .with_branch(
-              'master',
-              start_repository: project.repository.raw_repository,
-              start_branch_name: 'feature') { new_rev }
 
-          expect(target_repository.branch_names).to contain_exactly('master')
+        it 'caches the output in RequestStore' do
+          expect do
+            repository.exists?
+          end.to change { request_store_cache.read(:exists?) }.from(nil).to(true)
         end
-      end
-
-      context 'when target project already has the commit' do
-        let(:target_project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-
-        it 'does not fetch_ref and just pass the commit' do
-          expect(target_repository).not_to receive(:fetch_ref)
 
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, target_repository.raw_repository)
-            .with_branch('feature', start_repository: project.repository.raw_repository) { new_rev }
+        it 'caches the output in RepositoryCache' do
+          expect do
+            repository.exists?
+          end.to change { cache.read(:exists?) }.from(nil).to(true)
         end
       end
-    end
-
-    context 'when temporary ref failed to be created from other project' do
-      let(:target_project) { create(:project, :empty_repo) }
-
-      before do
-        expect(target_project.repository.raw_repository).to receive(:run_git)
-      end
-
-      it 'raises Rugged::ReferenceError' do
-        expect do
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, target_project.repository.raw_repository)
-            .with_branch('feature',
-                         start_repository: project.repository.raw_repository,
-                         &:itself)
-        end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommandError)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when the update adds more than one commit' do
-      let(:old_rev) { '33f3729a45c02fc67d00adb1b8bca394b0e761d9' }
-
-      it 'runs without errors' do
-        # old_rev is an ancestor of new_rev
-        expect(repository.merge_base(old_rev, new_rev)).to eq(old_rev)
-
-        # old_rev is not a direct ancestor (parent) of new_rev
-        expect(repository.rugged.lookup(new_rev).parent_ids).not_to include(old_rev)
-
-        branch = 'feature-ff-target'
-        repository.add_branch(user, branch, old_rev)
-
-        expect do
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository).with_branch(branch) do
-            new_rev
-          end
-        end.not_to raise_error
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when the update would remove commits from the target branch' do
-      let(:branch) { 'master' }
-      let(:old_rev) { repository.find_branch(branch).dereferenced_target.sha }
-
-      it 'raises an exception' do
-        # The 'master' branch is NOT an ancestor of new_rev.
-        expect(repository.merge_base(old_rev, new_rev)).not_to eq(old_rev)
-
-        # Updating 'master' to new_rev would lose the commits on 'master' that
-        # are not contained in new_rev. This should not be allowed.
-        expect do
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository).with_branch(branch) do
-            new_rev
-          end
-        end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommitError)
-      end
-    end
 
-    context 'when pre hooks failed' do
-      it 'gets an error' do
-        allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:trigger).and_return([false, ''])
-
-        expect do
-          Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository).with_branch('feature') do
-            new_rev
-          end
-        end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::PreReceiveError)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when target branch is different from source branch' do
-      before do
-        allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:trigger).and_return([true, ''])
-      end
-
-      subject do
-        Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(git_user, repository.raw_repository).with_branch('new-feature') do
-          new_rev
+      context 'when it returns false' do
+        before do
+          expect(repository.raw_repository).to receive(:exists?).once.and_return(false)
         end
-      end
-
-      it 'returns branch_created as true' do
-        expect(subject).not_to be_repo_created
-        expect(subject).to     be_branch_created
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when repository is empty' do
-      before do
-        allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:trigger).and_return([true, ''])
-      end
 
-      it 'expires creation and branch cache' do
-        empty_repository = create(:project, :empty_repo).repository
-
-        expect(empty_repository).to receive(:expire_exists_cache)
-        expect(empty_repository).to receive(:expire_root_ref_cache)
-        expect(empty_repository).to receive(:expire_emptiness_caches)
-        expect(empty_repository).to receive(:expire_branches_cache)
-
-        empty_repository.create_file(user, 'CHANGELOG', 'Changelog!',
-                                     message: 'Updates file content',
-                                     branch_name: 'master')
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe '#exists?' do
-    it 'returns true when a repository exists' do
-      expect(repository.exists?).to be(true)
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false if no full path can be constructed' do
-      allow(repository).to receive(:full_path).and_return(nil)
-
-      expect(repository.exists?).to be(false)
-    end
+        it 'caches the output in RequestStore' do
+          expect do
+            repository.exists?
+          end.to change { request_store_cache.read(:exists?) }.from(nil).to(false)
+        end
 
-    context 'with broken storage', :broken_storage do
-      it 'should raise a storage error' do
-        expect_to_raise_storage_error { broken_repository.exists? }
+        it 'does NOT cache the output in RepositoryCache' do
+          expect do
+            repository.exists?
+          end.not_to change { cache.read(:exists?) }.from(nil)
+        end
       end
     end
   end
@@ -1298,40 +1200,6 @@ describe Repository do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#update_autocrlf_option' do
-    around do |example|
-      # TODO Gitlab::Git::OperationService will be moved to gitaly-ruby and disappear from this repo
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        example.run
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'when autocrlf is not already set to :input' do
-      before do
-        repository.raw_repository.autocrlf = true
-      end
-
-      it 'sets autocrlf to :input' do
-        Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(nil, repository.raw_repository).send(:update_autocrlf_option)
-
-        expect(repository.raw_repository.autocrlf).to eq(:input)
-      end
-    end
-
-    describe 'when autocrlf is already set to :input' do
-      before do
-        repository.raw_repository.autocrlf = :input
-      end
-
-      it 'does nothing' do
-        expect(repository.raw_repository).not_to receive(:autocrlf=)
-          .with(:input)
-
-        Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(nil, repository.raw_repository).send(:update_autocrlf_option)
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#empty?' do
     let(:empty_repository) { create(:project_empty_repo).repository }
 
@@ -1808,10 +1676,7 @@ describe Repository do
     it 'returns the number of branches' do
       expect(repository.branch_count).to be_an(Integer)
 
-      # NOTE: Until rugged goes away, make sure rugged and gitaly are in sync
-      rugged_count = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        repository.raw_repository.rugged.branches.count
-      end
+      rugged_count = rugged_repo(repository).branches.count
 
       expect(repository.branch_count).to eq(rugged_count)
     end
@@ -1821,10 +1686,7 @@ describe Repository do
     it 'returns the number of tags' do
       expect(repository.tag_count).to be_an(Integer)
 
-      # NOTE: Until rugged goes away, make sure rugged and gitaly are in sync
-      rugged_count = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        repository.raw_repository.rugged.tags.count
-      end
+      rugged_count = rugged_repo(repository).tags.count
 
       expect(repository.tag_count).to eq(rugged_count)
     end
@@ -1938,12 +1800,19 @@ describe Repository do
 
   describe '#expire_exists_cache' do
     let(:cache) { repository.send(:cache) }
+    let(:request_store_cache) { repository.send(:request_store_cache) }
 
     it 'expires the cache' do
       expect(cache).to receive(:expire).with(:exists?)
 
       repository.expire_exists_cache
     end
+
+    it 'expires the request store cache', :request_store do
+      expect(request_store_cache).to receive(:expire).with(:exists?)
+
+      repository.expire_exists_cache
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#xcode_project?' do
@@ -2025,27 +1894,6 @@ describe Repository do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '#update_ref' do
-    around do |example|
-      # TODO Gitlab::Git::OperationService will be moved to gitaly-ruby and disappear from this repo
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-        example.run
-      end
-    end
-
-    it 'can create a ref' do
-      Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(nil, repository.raw_repository).send(:update_ref, 'refs/heads/foobar', 'refs/heads/master', Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA)
-
-      expect(repository.find_branch('foobar')).not_to be_nil
-    end
-
-    it 'raises CommitError when the ref update fails' do
-      expect do
-        Gitlab::Git::OperationService.new(nil, repository.raw_repository).send(:update_ref, 'refs/heads/master', 'refs/heads/master', Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA)
-      end.to raise_error(Gitlab::Git::CommitError)
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '#contribution_guide', :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching do
     it 'returns and caches the output' do
       expect(repository).to receive(:file_on_head)
@@ -2135,7 +1983,7 @@ describe Repository do
         match[1].to_sym if match
       end.compact
 
-      expect(methods).to match_array(Repository::CACHED_METHODS + Repository::MEMOIZED_CACHED_METHODS)
+      expect(Repository::CACHED_METHODS + Repository::MEMOIZED_CACHED_METHODS).to include(*methods)
     end
   end
 
@@ -2328,9 +2176,7 @@ describe Repository do
   end
 
   def create_remote_branch(remote_name, branch_name, target)
-    rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      repository.rugged
-    end
+    rugged = rugged_repo(repository)
     rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", target.id)
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/models/resource_label_event_spec.rb b/spec/models/resource_label_event_spec.rb
index 4756caa1b97..da6e1b5610d 100644
--- a/spec/models/resource_label_event_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/resource_label_event_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 require 'rails_helper'
 
 RSpec.describe ResourceLabelEvent, type: :model do
-  subject { build(:resource_label_event) }
+  subject { build(:resource_label_event, issue: issue) }
   let(:issue) { create(:issue) }
   let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request) }
 
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceLabelEvent, type: :model do
 
   describe 'validations' do
     it { is_expected.to be_valid }
-    it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:label) }
-    it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:user) }
 
     describe 'Issuable validation' do
       it 'is invalid if issue_id and merge_request_id are missing' do
@@ -45,4 +43,52 @@ RSpec.describe ResourceLabelEvent, type: :model do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  describe '#expire_etag_cache' do
+    def expect_expiration(issue)
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::EtagCaching::Store)
+        .to receive(:touch)
+        .with("/#{issue.project.namespace.to_param}/#{issue.project.to_param}/noteable/issue/#{issue.id}/notes")
+    end
+
+    it 'expires resource note etag cache on event save' do
+      expect_expiration(subject.issuable)
+
+      subject.save!
+    end
+
+    it 'expires resource note etag cache on event destroy' do
+      subject.save!
+
+      expect_expiration(subject.issuable)
+
+      subject.destroy!
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#outdated_markdown?' do
+    it 'returns true if label is missing and reference is not empty' do
+      subject.attributes = { reference: 'ref', label_id: nil }
+
+      expect(subject.outdated_markdown?).to be true
+    end
+
+    it 'returns true if reference is not set yet' do
+      subject.attributes = { reference: nil }
+
+      expect(subject.outdated_markdown?).to be true
+    end
+
+    it 'returns true markdown is outdated' do
+      subject.attributes = { cached_markdown_version: 0 }
+
+      expect(subject.outdated_markdown?).to be true
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false if label and reference are set' do
+      subject.attributes = { reference: 'whatever', cached_markdown_version: CacheMarkdownField::CACHE_COMMONMARK_VERSION  }
+
+      expect(subject.outdated_markdown?).to be false
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/service_spec.rb b/spec/models/service_spec.rb
index 029ad7f3e9f..25eecb3f909 100644
--- a/spec/models/service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/service_spec.rb
@@ -345,4 +345,31 @@ describe Service do
       expect(service.api_field_names).to eq(['safe_field'])
     end
   end
+
+  context 'logging' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project) }
+    let(:service) { create(:service, project: project) }
+    let(:test_message) { "test message" }
+    let(:arguments) do
+      {
+        service_class: service.class.name,
+        project_path: project.full_path,
+        project_id: project.id,
+        message: test_message,
+        additional_argument: 'some argument'
+      }
+    end
+
+    it 'logs info messages using json logger' do
+      expect(Gitlab::JsonLogger).to receive(:info).with(arguments)
+
+      service.log_info(test_message, additional_argument: 'some argument')
+    end
+
+    it 'logs error messages using json logger' do
+      expect(Gitlab::JsonLogger).to receive(:error).with(arguments)
+
+      service.log_error(test_message, additional_argument: 'some argument')
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/models/site_statistic_spec.rb b/spec/models/site_statistic_spec.rb
index 9b056fbf332..0e739900065 100644
--- a/spec/models/site_statistic_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/site_statistic_spec.rb
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ describe SiteStatistic do
 
       it 'increases the attribute counter' do
         expect { described_class.track('repositories_count') }.to change { statistics.reload.repositories_count }.by(1)
-        expect { described_class.track('wikis_count') }.to change { statistics.reload.wikis_count }.by(1)
       end
 
       it 'doesnt increase the attribute counter when an exception happens during transaction' do
@@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ describe SiteStatistic do
 
       it 'decreases the attribute counter' do
         expect { described_class.untrack('repositories_count') }.to change { statistics.reload.repositories_count }.by(-1)
-        expect { described_class.untrack('wikis_count') }.to change { statistics.reload.wikis_count }.by(-1)
       end
 
       it 'doesnt decrease the attribute counter when an exception happens during transaction' do
diff --git a/spec/models/user_spec.rb b/spec/models/user_spec.rb
index fd99acb3bb2..99d17f563d9 100644
--- a/spec/models/user_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/user_spec.rb
@@ -167,6 +167,55 @@ describe User do
       subject { build(:user).tap { |user| user.emails << build(:email, email: email_value) } }
     end
 
+    describe '#commit_email' do
+      subject(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+      it 'defaults to the primary email' do
+        expect(user.email).to be_present
+        expect(user.commit_email).to eq(user.email)
+      end
+
+      it 'defaults to the primary email when the column in the database is null' do
+        user.update_column(:commit_email, nil)
+
+        found_user = described_class.find_by(id: user.id)
+
+        expect(found_user.commit_email).to eq(user.email)
+      end
+
+      it 'can be set to a confirmed email' do
+        confirmed = create(:email, :confirmed, user: user)
+        user.commit_email = confirmed.email
+
+        expect(user).to be_valid
+        expect(user.commit_email).to eq(confirmed.email)
+      end
+
+      it 'can not be set to an unconfirmed email' do
+        unconfirmed = create(:email, user: user)
+        user.commit_email = unconfirmed.email
+
+        # This should set the commit_email attribute to the primary email
+        expect(user).to be_valid
+        expect(user.commit_email).to eq(user.email)
+      end
+
+      it 'can not be set to a non-existent email' do
+        user.commit_email = 'non-existent-email@nonexistent.nonexistent'
+
+        # This should set the commit_email attribute to the primary email
+        expect(user).to be_valid
+        expect(user.commit_email).to eq(user.email)
+      end
+
+      it 'can not be set to an invalid email, even if confirmed' do
+        confirmed = create(:email, :confirmed, :skip_validate, user: user, email: 'invalid')
+        user.commit_email = confirmed.email
+
+        expect(user).not_to be_valid
+      end
+    end
+
     describe 'email' do
       context 'when no signup domains whitelisted' do
         before do
@@ -405,6 +454,23 @@ describe User do
         end
       end
     end
+
+    describe '.by_username' do
+      it 'finds users regardless of the case passed' do
+        user = create(:user, username: 'CaMeLcAsEd')
+        user2 = create(:user, username: 'UPPERCASE')
+
+        expect(described_class.by_username(%w(CAMELCASED uppercase)))
+          .to contain_exactly(user, user2)
+      end
+
+      it 'finds a single user regardless of the case passed' do
+        user = create(:user, username: 'CaMeLcAsEd')
+
+        expect(described_class.by_username('CAMELCASED'))
+          .to contain_exactly(user)
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe "Respond to" do
@@ -1373,7 +1439,6 @@ describe User do
     it 'returns only confirmed emails' do
       email_confirmed = create :email, user: user, confirmed_at: Time.now
       create :email, user: user
-      user.reload
 
       expect(user.verified_emails).to match_array([user.email, email_confirmed.email])
     end
@@ -2478,6 +2543,34 @@ describe User do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#assigned_open_merge_requests_count' do
+    it 'returns number of open merge requests from non-archived projects' do
+      user    = create(:user)
+      project = create(:project, :public)
+      archived_project = create(:project, :public, :archived)
+
+      create(:merge_request, source_project: project, author: user, assignee: user)
+      create(:merge_request, :closed, source_project: project, author: user, assignee: user)
+      create(:merge_request, source_project: archived_project, author: user, assignee: user)
+
+      expect(user.assigned_open_merge_requests_count(force: true)).to eq 1
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#assigned_open_issues_count' do
+    it 'returns number of open issues from non-archived projects' do
+      user    = create(:user)
+      project = create(:project, :public)
+      archived_project = create(:project, :public, :archived)
+
+      create(:issue, project: project, author: user, assignees: [user])
+      create(:issue, :closed, project: project, author: user, assignees: [user])
+      create(:issue, project: archived_project, author: user, assignees: [user])
+
+      expect(user.assigned_open_issues_count(force: true)).to eq 1
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#personal_projects_count' do
     it 'returns the number of personal projects using a single query' do
       user = build(:user)
@@ -2940,6 +3033,48 @@ describe User do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#requires_usage_stats_consent?' do
+    let(:user) { create(:user, created_at: 8.days.ago) }
+
+    before do
+      allow(user).to receive(:has_current_license?).and_return false
+    end
+
+    context 'in single-user environment' do
+      it 'requires user consent after one week' do
+        create(:user, ghost: true)
+
+        expect(user.requires_usage_stats_consent?).to be true
+      end
+
+      it 'requires user consent after one week if there is another ghost user' do
+        expect(user.requires_usage_stats_consent?).to be true
+      end
+
+      it 'does not require consent in the first week' do
+        user.created_at = 6.days.ago
+
+        expect(user.requires_usage_stats_consent?).to be false
+      end
+
+      it 'does not require consent if usage stats were set by this user' do
+        allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:usage_stats_set_by_user_id).and_return(user.id)
+
+        expect(user.requires_usage_stats_consent?).to be false
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'in multi-user environment' do
+      before do
+        create(:user)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not require consent' do
+        expect(user.requires_usage_stats_consent?).to be false
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'with uploads' do
     it_behaves_like 'model with mounted uploader', false do
       let(:model_object) { create(:user, :with_avatar) }
diff --git a/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb b/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb
index 63850939be1..b4732ec0cd5 100644
--- a/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/models/wiki_page_spec.rb
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ describe WikiPage do
   end
 
   describe "#initialize" do
-    context "when initialized with an existing gollum page" do
+    context "when initialized with an existing page" do
       before do
         create_page("test page", "test content")
         @page = wiki.wiki.page(title: "test page")
diff --git a/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb b/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb
index 793b724bfca..008d118b557 100644
--- a/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/policies/issue_policy_spec.rb
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ describe IssuePolicy do
     let(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
     let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, assignees: [assignee], author: author) }
     let(:issue_no_assignee) { create(:issue, project: project) }
+    let(:issue_locked) { create(:issue, :locked, project: project, author: author, assignees: [assignee]) }
 
     before do
       project.add_guest(guest)
@@ -124,36 +125,49 @@ describe IssuePolicy do
 
     it 'allows guests to read issues' do
       expect(permissions(guest, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid)
-      expect(permissions(guest, issue)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue)
+      expect(permissions(guest, issue)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
 
       expect(permissions(guest, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid)
-      expect(permissions(guest, issue_no_assignee)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue)
+      expect(permissions(guest, issue_no_assignee)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+
+      expect(permissions(guest, issue_locked)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid)
+      expect(permissions(guest, issue_locked)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
     end
 
-    it 'allows reporters to read, update, and admin issues' do
-      expect(permissions(reporter, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue)
-      expect(permissions(reporter, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue)
+    it 'allows reporters to read, update, reopen, and admin issues' do
+      expect(permissions(reporter, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+      expect(permissions(reporter, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+      expect(permissions(reporter, issue_locked)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue)
+      expect(permissions(reporter, issue_locked)).to be_disallowed(:reopen_issue)
     end
 
-    it 'allows reporters from group links to read, update, and admin issues' do
-      expect(permissions(reporter_from_group_link, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue)
-      expect(permissions(reporter_from_group_link, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue)
+    it 'allows reporters from group links to read, update, reopen and admin issues' do
+      expect(permissions(reporter_from_group_link, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+      expect(permissions(reporter_from_group_link, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+      expect(permissions(reporter_from_group_link, issue_locked)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :admin_issue)
+      expect(permissions(reporter_from_group_link, issue_locked)).to be_disallowed(:reopen_issue)
     end
 
-    it 'allows issue authors to read and update their issues' do
-      expect(permissions(author, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue)
+    it 'allows issue authors to read, reopen and update their issues' do
+      expect(permissions(author, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :reopen_issue)
       expect(permissions(author, issue)).to be_disallowed(:admin_issue)
 
       expect(permissions(author, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid)
-      expect(permissions(author, issue_no_assignee)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue)
+      expect(permissions(author, issue_no_assignee)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+
+      expect(permissions(author, issue_locked)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue)
+      expect(permissions(author, issue_locked)).to be_disallowed(:admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
     end
 
-    it 'allows issue assignees to read and update their issues' do
-      expect(permissions(assignee, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue)
+    it 'allows issue assignees to read, reopen and update their issues' do
+      expect(permissions(assignee, issue)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue, :reopen_issue)
       expect(permissions(assignee, issue)).to be_disallowed(:admin_issue)
 
       expect(permissions(assignee, issue_no_assignee)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid)
-      expect(permissions(assignee, issue_no_assignee)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue)
+      expect(permissions(assignee, issue_no_assignee)).to be_disallowed(:update_issue, :admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
+
+      expect(permissions(assignee, issue_locked)).to be_allowed(:read_issue, :read_issue_iid, :update_issue)
+      expect(permissions(assignee, issue_locked)).to be_disallowed(:admin_issue, :reopen_issue)
     end
 
     context 'with confidential issues' do
diff --git a/spec/presenters/ci/build_presenter_spec.rb b/spec/presenters/ci/build_presenter_spec.rb
index 547d95e0908..b2fe10bb0b0 100644
--- a/spec/presenters/ci/build_presenter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/presenters/ci/build_presenter_spec.rb
@@ -218,6 +218,42 @@ describe Ci::BuildPresenter do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '#execute_in' do
+    subject { presenter.execute_in }
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      context 'when schedule is not expired' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+        it 'returns execution time' do
+          Timecop.freeze do
+            is_expected.to eq(60.0)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when schedule is expired' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :expired_scheduled) }
+
+        it 'returns execution time' do
+          Timecop.freeze do
+            is_expected.to eq(0)
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is not delayed' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build) }
+
+      it 'does not return execution time' do
+        Timecop.freeze do
+          is_expected.to be_falsy
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '#callout_failure_message' do
     let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :failed, :api_failure) }
 
diff --git a/spec/presenters/ci/build_runner_presenter_spec.rb b/spec/presenters/ci/build_runner_presenter_spec.rb
index e7019b990dd..a42d1f3d399 100644
--- a/spec/presenters/ci/build_runner_presenter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/presenters/ci/build_runner_presenter_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 describe Ci::BuildRunnerPresenter do
   let(:presenter) { described_class.new(build) }
   let(:archive) { { paths: ['sample.txt'] } }
-  let(:junit) { { junit: ['junit.xml'] } }
 
   let(:archive_expectation) do
     {
@@ -14,16 +13,6 @@ describe Ci::BuildRunnerPresenter do
     }
   end
 
-  let(:junit_expectation) do
-    {
-      name: 'junit.xml',
-      artifact_type: :junit,
-      artifact_format: :gzip,
-      paths: ['junit.xml'],
-      when: 'always'
-    }
-  end
-
   describe '#artifacts' do
     context "when option contains archive-type artifacts" do
       let(:build) { create(:ci_build, options: { artifacts: archive } ) }
@@ -49,20 +38,44 @@ describe Ci::BuildRunnerPresenter do
       end
     end
 
-    context "when option has 'junit' keyword" do
-      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, options: { artifacts: { reports: junit } } ) }
+    context "with reports" do
+      Ci::JobArtifact::DEFAULT_FILE_NAMES.each do |file_type, filename|
+        let(:report) { { "#{file_type}": [filename] } }
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, options: { artifacts: { reports: report } } ) }
+
+        let(:report_expectation) do
+          {
+             name: filename,
+             artifact_type: :"#{file_type}",
+             artifact_format: :gzip,
+             paths: [filename],
+             when: 'always'
+          }
+        end
 
-      it 'presents correct hash' do
-        expect(presenter.artifacts.first).to include(junit_expectation)
+        it 'presents correct hash' do
+          expect(presenter.artifacts.first).to include(report_expectation)
+        end
       end
     end
 
     context "when option has both archive and reports specification" do
-      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, options: { script: 'echo', artifacts: { **archive, reports: junit } } ) }
+      let(:report) { { junit: ['junit.xml'] } }
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, options: { script: 'echo', artifacts: { **archive, reports: report } } ) }
+
+      let(:report_expectation) do
+        {
+          name: 'junit.xml',
+          artifact_type: :junit,
+          artifact_format: :gzip,
+          paths: ['junit.xml'],
+          when: 'always'
+        }
+      end
 
       it 'presents correct hash' do
         expect(presenter.artifacts.first).to include(archive_expectation)
-        expect(presenter.artifacts.second).to include(junit_expectation)
+        expect(presenter.artifacts.second).to include(report_expectation)
       end
 
       context "when archive specifies 'expire_in' keyword" do
@@ -70,7 +83,7 @@ describe Ci::BuildRunnerPresenter do
 
         it 'inherits expire_in from archive' do
           expect(presenter.artifacts.first).to include({ **archive_expectation, expire_in: '3 mins 4 sec' })
-          expect(presenter.artifacts.second).to include({ **junit_expectation, expire_in: '3 mins 4 sec' })
+          expect(presenter.artifacts.second).to include({ **report_expectation, expire_in: '3 mins 4 sec' })
         end
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/presenters/project_presenter_spec.rb b/spec/presenters/project_presenter_spec.rb
index 01085dbcb49..96193784072 100644
--- a/spec/presenters/project_presenter_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/presenters/project_presenter_spec.rb
@@ -159,39 +159,76 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'statistics anchors (empty repo)' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :empty_repo) }
+    let(:presenter) { described_class.new(project, current_user: user) }
+
+    describe '#files_anchor_data' do
+      it 'returns files data' do
+        expect(presenter.files_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                               label: 'Files (0 Bytes)',
+                                                               link: nil)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '#commits_anchor_data' do
+      it 'returns commits data' do
+        expect(presenter.commits_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                 label: 'Commits (0)',
+                                                                 link: nil)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '#branches_anchor_data' do
+      it 'returns branches data' do
+        expect(presenter.branches_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                  label: "Branches (0)",
+                                                                  link: nil)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe '#tags_anchor_data' do
+      it 'returns tags data' do
+        expect(presenter.tags_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                              label: "Tags (0)",
+                                                              link: nil)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'statistics anchors' do
     let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
     let(:presenter) { described_class.new(project, current_user: user) }
 
     describe '#files_anchor_data' do
       it 'returns files data' do
-        expect(presenter.files_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                 label: 'Files (0 Bytes)',
-                                                                 link: presenter.project_tree_path(project)))
+        expect(presenter.files_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                               label: 'Files (0 Bytes)',
+                                                               link: presenter.project_tree_path(project))
       end
     end
 
     describe '#commits_anchor_data' do
       it 'returns commits data' do
-        expect(presenter.commits_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                   label: 'Commits (0)',
-                                                                   link: presenter.project_commits_path(project, project.repository.root_ref)))
+        expect(presenter.commits_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                 label: 'Commits (0)',
+                                                                 link: presenter.project_commits_path(project, project.repository.root_ref))
       end
     end
 
     describe '#branches_anchor_data' do
       it 'returns branches data' do
-        expect(presenter.branches_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                    label: "Branches (#{project.repository.branches.size})",
-                                                                    link: presenter.project_branches_path(project)))
+        expect(presenter.branches_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                  label: "Branches (#{project.repository.branches.size})",
+                                                                  link: presenter.project_branches_path(project))
       end
     end
 
     describe '#tags_anchor_data' do
       it 'returns tags data' do
-        expect(presenter.tags_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                label: "Tags (#{project.repository.tags.size})",
-                                                                link: presenter.project_tags_path(project)))
+        expect(presenter.tags_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                              label: "Tags (#{project.repository.tags.size})",
+                                                              link: presenter.project_tags_path(project))
       end
     end
 
@@ -199,10 +236,10 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
       it 'returns new file data if user can push' do
         project.add_developer(user)
 
-        expect(presenter.new_file_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                    label: "New file",
-                                                                    link: presenter.project_new_blob_path(project, 'master'),
-                                                                    class_modifier: 'new'))
+        expect(presenter.new_file_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                  label: "New file",
+                                                                  link: presenter.project_new_blob_path(project, 'master'),
+                                                                  class_modifier: 'new')
       end
 
       it 'returns nil if user cannot push' do
@@ -227,9 +264,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           project.add_developer(user)
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:readme).and_return(nil)
 
-          expect(presenter.readme_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                    label: 'Add Readme',
-                                                                    link: presenter.add_readme_path))
+          expect(presenter.readme_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                  label: 'Add Readme',
+                                                                  link: presenter.add_readme_path)
         end
       end
 
@@ -237,9 +274,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
         it 'returns anchor data' do
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:readme).and_return(double(name: 'readme'))
 
-          expect(presenter.readme_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                    label: 'Readme',
-                                                                    link: presenter.readme_path))
+          expect(presenter.readme_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                  label: 'Readme',
+                                                                  link: presenter.readme_path)
         end
       end
     end
@@ -250,9 +287,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           project.add_developer(user)
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:changelog).and_return(nil)
 
-          expect(presenter.changelog_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                       label: 'Add Changelog',
-                                                                       link: presenter.add_changelog_path))
+          expect(presenter.changelog_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                     label: 'Add Changelog',
+                                                                     link: presenter.add_changelog_path)
         end
       end
 
@@ -260,9 +297,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
         it 'returns anchor data' do
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:changelog).and_return(double(name: 'foo'))
 
-          expect(presenter.changelog_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                       label: 'Changelog',
-                                                                       link: presenter.changelog_path))
+          expect(presenter.changelog_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                     label: 'Changelog',
+                                                                     link: presenter.changelog_path)
         end
       end
     end
@@ -273,9 +310,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           project.add_developer(user)
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:license_blob).and_return(nil)
 
-          expect(presenter.license_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                     label: 'Add License',
-                                                                     link: presenter.add_license_path))
+          expect(presenter.license_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                   label: 'Add license',
+                                                                   link: presenter.add_license_path)
         end
       end
 
@@ -283,9 +320,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
         it 'returns anchor data' do
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:license_blob).and_return(double(name: 'foo'))
 
-          expect(presenter.license_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                     label: presenter.license_short_name,
-                                                                     link: presenter.license_path))
+          expect(presenter.license_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                   label: presenter.license_short_name,
+                                                                   link: presenter.license_path)
         end
       end
     end
@@ -296,9 +333,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           project.add_developer(user)
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:contribution_guide).and_return(nil)
 
-          expect(presenter.contribution_guide_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                                label: 'Add Contribution guide',
-                                                                                link: presenter.add_contribution_guide_path))
+          expect(presenter.contribution_guide_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                              label: 'Add Contribution guide',
+                                                                              link: presenter.add_contribution_guide_path)
         end
       end
 
@@ -306,9 +343,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
         it 'returns anchor data' do
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:contribution_guide).and_return(double(name: 'foo'))
 
-          expect(presenter.contribution_guide_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                                label: 'Contribution guide',
-                                                                                link: presenter.contribution_guide_path))
+          expect(presenter.contribution_guide_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                              label: 'Contribution guide',
+                                                                              link: presenter.contribution_guide_path)
         end
       end
     end
@@ -318,9 +355,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
         it 'returns anchor data' do
           allow(project).to receive(:auto_devops_enabled?).and_return(true)
 
-          expect(presenter.autodevops_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                        label: 'Auto DevOps enabled',
-                                                                        link: nil))
+          expect(presenter.autodevops_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                      label: 'Auto DevOps enabled',
+                                                                      link: nil)
         end
       end
 
@@ -330,9 +367,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           allow(project).to receive(:auto_devops_enabled?).and_return(false)
           allow(project.repository).to receive(:gitlab_ci_yml).and_return(nil)
 
-          expect(presenter.autodevops_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                        label: 'Enable Auto DevOps',
-                                                                        link: presenter.project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings')))
+          expect(presenter.autodevops_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                      label: 'Enable Auto DevOps',
+                                                                      link: presenter.project_settings_ci_cd_path(project, anchor: 'autodevops-settings'))
         end
       end
     end
@@ -343,9 +380,9 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           project.add_maintainer(user)
           cluster = create(:cluster, projects: [project])
 
-          expect(presenter.kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                                label: 'Kubernetes configured',
-                                                                                link: presenter.project_cluster_path(project, cluster)))
+          expect(presenter.kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                              label: 'Kubernetes configured',
+                                                                              link: presenter.project_cluster_path(project, cluster))
         end
 
         it 'returns link to clusters page if more than one exists' do
@@ -353,17 +390,17 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
           create(:cluster, :production_environment, projects: [project])
           create(:cluster, projects: [project])
 
-          expect(presenter.kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: true,
-                                                                                label: 'Kubernetes configured',
-                                                                                link: presenter.project_clusters_path(project)))
+          expect(presenter.kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: true,
+                                                                              label: 'Kubernetes configured',
+                                                                              link: presenter.project_clusters_path(project))
         end
 
         it 'returns link to create a cluster if no cluster exists' do
           project.add_maintainer(user)
 
-          expect(presenter.kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                                label: 'Add Kubernetes cluster',
-                                                                                link: presenter.new_project_cluster_path(project)))
+          expect(presenter.kubernetes_cluster_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                              label: 'Add Kubernetes cluster',
+                                                                              link: presenter.new_project_cluster_path(project))
         end
       end
 
@@ -375,14 +412,14 @@ describe ProjectPresenter do
     end
 
     describe '#koding_anchor_data' do
-      it 'returns link to setup Koding if user can push and no koding YML exists' do
+      it 'returns link to set up Koding if user can push and no koding YML exists' do
         project.add_developer(user)
         allow(project.repository).to receive(:koding_yml).and_return(nil)
         allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:koding_enabled?).and_return(true)
 
-        expect(presenter.koding_anchor_data).to eq(OpenStruct.new(enabled: false,
-                                                                  label: 'Set up Koding',
-                                                                  link: presenter.add_koding_stack_path))
+        expect(presenter.koding_anchor_data).to have_attributes(enabled: false,
+                                                                label: 'Set up Koding',
+                                                                link: presenter.add_koding_stack_path)
       end
 
       it 'returns nil if user cannot push' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb
index 246947e58a8..98399471f9a 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/commits_spec.rb
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
 
     describe 'create' do
       let(:message) { 'Created file' }
-      let!(:invalid_c_params) do
+      let(:invalid_c_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
           ]
         }
       end
-      let!(:valid_c_params) do
+      let(:valid_c_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
           ]
         }
       end
-      let!(:valid_utf8_c_params) do
+      let(:valid_utf8_c_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -278,6 +278,12 @@ describe API::Commits do
         }
       end
 
+      it 'does not increment the usage counters using access token authentication' do
+        expect(::Gitlab::WebIdeCommitsCounter).not_to receive(:increment)
+
+        post api(url, user), valid_c_params
+      end
+
       it 'a new file in project repo' do
         post api(url, user), valid_c_params
 
@@ -315,7 +321,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
 
     describe 'delete' do
       let(:message) { 'Deleted file' }
-      let!(:invalid_d_params) do
+      let(:invalid_d_params) do
         {
           branch: 'markdown',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -327,7 +333,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
           ]
         }
       end
-      let!(:valid_d_params) do
+      let(:valid_d_params) do
         {
           branch: 'markdown',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -356,7 +362,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
 
     describe 'move' do
       let(:message) { 'Moved file' }
-      let!(:invalid_m_params) do
+      let(:invalid_m_params) do
         {
           branch: 'feature',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -370,7 +376,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
           ]
         }
       end
-      let!(:valid_m_params) do
+      let(:valid_m_params) do
         {
           branch: 'feature',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -401,7 +407,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
 
     describe 'update' do
       let(:message) { 'Updated file' }
-      let!(:invalid_u_params) do
+      let(:invalid_u_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -414,7 +420,7 @@ describe API::Commits do
           ]
         }
       end
-      let!(:valid_u_params) do
+      let(:valid_u_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -442,9 +448,57 @@ describe API::Commits do
       end
     end
 
+    describe 'chmod' do
+      let(:message) { 'Chmod +x file' }
+      let(:file_path) { 'files/ruby/popen.rb' }
+      let(:execute_filemode) { true }
+      let(:params) do
+        {
+          branch: 'master',
+          commit_message: message,
+          actions: [
+            {
+              action: 'chmod',
+              file_path: file_path,
+              execute_filemode: execute_filemode
+            }
+          ]
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'responds with success' do
+        post api(url, user), params
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
+        expect(json_response['title']).to eq(message)
+      end
+
+      context 'when execute_filemode is false' do
+        let(:execute_filemode) { false }
+
+        it 'responds with success' do
+          post api(url, user), params
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
+          expect(json_response['title']).to eq(message)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "when the file doesn't exists" do
+        let(:file_path) { 'foo/bar.baz' }
+
+        it "responds with 400" do
+          post api(url, user), params
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+          expect(json_response['message']).to eq("A file with this name doesn't exist")
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
     describe 'multiple operations' do
       let(:message) { 'Multiple actions' }
-      let!(:invalid_mo_params) do
+      let(:invalid_mo_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -468,11 +522,16 @@ describe API::Commits do
               action: 'update',
               file_path: 'foo/bar.baz',
               content: 'puts 8'
+            },
+            {
+              action: 'chmod',
+              file_path: 'files/ruby/popen.rb',
+              execute_filemode: true
             }
           ]
         }
       end
-      let!(:valid_mo_params) do
+      let(:valid_mo_params) do
         {
           branch: 'master',
           commit_message: message,
@@ -496,6 +555,11 @@ describe API::Commits do
               action: 'update',
               file_path: 'files/ruby/popen.rb',
               content: 'puts 8'
+            },
+            {
+              action: 'chmod',
+              file_path: 'files/ruby/popen.rb',
+              execute_filemode: true
             }
           ]
         }
@@ -508,6 +572,20 @@ describe API::Commits do
         expect(json_response['title']).to eq(message)
       end
 
+      it 'includes the commit stats' do
+        post api(url, user), valid_mo_params
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
+        expect(json_response).to include 'stats'
+      end
+
+      it "doesn't include the commit stats when stats is false" do
+        post api(url, user), valid_mo_params.merge(stats: false)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
+        expect(json_response).not_to include 'stats'
+      end
+
       it 'return a 400 bad request if there are any issues' do
         post api(url, user), invalid_mo_params
 
@@ -1040,6 +1118,14 @@ describe API::Commits do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'when branch is empty' do
+        ['', ' '].each do |branch|
+          it_behaves_like '400 response' do
+            let(:request) { post api(route, current_user), branch: branch }
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'when branch does not exist' do
         it_behaves_like '404 response' do
           let(:request) { post api(route, current_user), branch: 'foo' }
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb
index 3a8948f8477..3802b5c6848 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/groups_spec.rb
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ describe API::Groups do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
         expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(:name).pluck(:name))
+        expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(:name).pluck(:name))
       end
 
       it "sorts in descending order when passed" do
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ describe API::Groups do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
         expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(name: :desc).pluck(:name))
+        expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(name: :desc).pluck(:name))
       end
 
       it "sorts by path in order_by param" do
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ describe API::Groups do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
         expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(:path).pluck(:name))
+        expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(:path).pluck(:name))
       end
 
       it "sorts by id in the order_by param" do
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ describe API::Groups do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
         expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(:id).pluck(:name))
+        expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(:id).pluck(:name))
       end
 
       it "sorts also by descending id with pagination fix" do
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ describe API::Groups do
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
         expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(response_groups).to eq(Group.visible_to_user(user1).order(id: :desc).pluck(:name))
+        expect(response_groups).to eq(groups_visible_to_user(user1).order(id: :desc).pluck(:name))
       end
 
       it "sorts identical keys by id for good pagination" do
@@ -211,6 +211,10 @@ describe API::Groups do
         expect(json_response).to be_an Array
         expect(response_groups_ids).to eq(Group.select { |group| group['name'] == 'same-name' }.map { |group| group['id'] }.sort)
       end
+
+      def groups_visible_to_user(user)
+        Group.where(id: user.authorized_groups.select(:id).reorder(nil))
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when using owned in the request' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/internal_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/internal_spec.rb
index 85c93f35c20..e0b5b34f9c4 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/internal_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/internal_spec.rb
@@ -369,6 +369,26 @@ describe API::Internal do
             expect(user.reload.last_activity_on).to be_nil
           end
         end
+
+        context 'when receive_max_input_size has been updated' do
+          it 'returns custom git config' do
+            allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:receive_max_input_size) { 1 }
+
+            push(key, project)
+
+            expect(json_response["git_config_options"]).to be_present
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'when receive_max_input_size is empty' do
+          it 'returns an empty git config' do
+            allow(Gitlab::CurrentSettings).to receive(:receive_max_input_size) { nil }
+
+            push(key, project)
+
+            expect(json_response["git_config_options"]).to be_empty
+          end
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -381,7 +401,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
         it do
           pull(key, project)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
           expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
           expect(user.reload.last_activity_on).to be_nil
         end
@@ -391,13 +411,61 @@ describe API::Internal do
         it do
           push(key, project)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
           expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
           expect(user.reload.last_activity_on).to be_nil
         end
       end
     end
 
+    context "custom action" do
+      let(:access_checker) { double(Gitlab::GitAccess) }
+      let(:message) { 'CustomActionError message' }
+      let(:payload) do
+        {
+          'action' => 'geo_proxy_to_primary',
+          'data' => {
+            'api_endpoints' => %w{geo/proxy_git_push_ssh/info_refs geo/proxy_git_push_ssh/push},
+            'gl_username' => 'testuser',
+            'primary_repo' => 'http://localhost:3000/testuser/repo.git'
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      let(:custom_action_result) { Gitlab::GitAccessResult::CustomAction.new(payload, message) }
+
+      before do
+        project.add_guest(user)
+        expect(Gitlab::GitAccess).to receive(:new).with(
+          key,
+          project,
+          'ssh',
+          {
+            authentication_abilities: [:read_project, :download_code, :push_code],
+            namespace_path: project.namespace.name,
+            project_path: project.path,
+            redirected_path: nil
+          }
+        ).and_return(access_checker)
+        expect(access_checker).to receive(:check).with(
+          'git-receive-pack',
+          'd14d6c0abdd253381df51a723d58691b2ee1ab08 570e7b2abdd848b95f2f578043fc23bd6f6fd24d refs/heads/master'
+        ).and_return(custom_action_result)
+      end
+
+      context "git push" do
+        it do
+          push(key, project)
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(300)
+          expect(json_response['status']).to be_truthy
+          expect(json_response['message']).to eql(message)
+          expect(json_response['payload']).to eql(payload)
+          expect(user.reload.last_activity_on).to be_nil
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
     context "blocked user" do
       let(:personal_project) { create(:project, namespace: user.namespace) }
 
@@ -409,7 +477,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
         it do
           pull(key, personal_project)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
           expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
           expect(user.reload.last_activity_on).to be_nil
         end
@@ -419,7 +487,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
         it do
           push(key, personal_project)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
           expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
           expect(user.reload.last_activity_on).to be_nil
         end
@@ -445,7 +513,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
         it do
           push(key, project)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
           expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
         end
       end
@@ -477,7 +545,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
         it do
           archive(key, project)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
           expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
         end
       end
@@ -489,7 +557,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
 
         pull(key, project)
 
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
         expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
       end
     end
@@ -498,7 +566,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
       it do
         pull(OpenStruct.new(id: 0), project)
 
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
         expect(json_response["status"]).to be_falsey
       end
     end
@@ -511,7 +579,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
       it 'rejects the SSH push' do
         push(key, project)
 
-        expect(response.status).to eq(200)
+        expect(response.status).to eq(401)
         expect(json_response['status']).to be_falsey
         expect(json_response['message']).to eq 'Git access over SSH is not allowed'
       end
@@ -519,7 +587,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
       it 'rejects the SSH pull' do
         pull(key, project)
 
-        expect(response.status).to eq(200)
+        expect(response.status).to eq(401)
         expect(json_response['status']).to be_falsey
         expect(json_response['message']).to eq 'Git access over SSH is not allowed'
       end
@@ -533,7 +601,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
       it 'rejects the HTTP push' do
         push(key, project, 'http')
 
-        expect(response.status).to eq(200)
+        expect(response.status).to eq(401)
         expect(json_response['status']).to be_falsey
         expect(json_response['message']).to eq 'Git access over HTTP is not allowed'
       end
@@ -541,7 +609,7 @@ describe API::Internal do
       it 'rejects the HTTP pull' do
         pull(key, project, 'http')
 
-        expect(response.status).to eq(200)
+        expect(response.status).to eq(401)
         expect(json_response['status']).to be_falsey
         expect(json_response['message']).to eq 'Git access over HTTP is not allowed'
       end
@@ -571,14 +639,14 @@ describe API::Internal do
       it 'rejects the push' do
         push(key, project)
 
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
         expect(json_response['status']).to be_falsy
       end
 
       it 'rejects the SSH pull' do
         pull(key, project)
 
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
         expect(json_response['status']).to be_falsy
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb
index f64815feffa..9f6cf12f9a7 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/issues_spec.rb
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ describe API::Issues do
   let!(:note) { create(:note_on_issue, author: user, project: project, noteable: issue) }
 
   let(:no_milestone_title) { URI.escape(Milestone::None.title) }
+  let(:any_milestone_title) { URI.escape(Milestone::Any.title) }
 
   before(:all) do
     project.add_reporter(user)
@@ -168,6 +169,15 @@ describe API::Issues do
         expect(first_issue['id']).to eq(issue2.id)
       end
 
+      it 'returns issues with no assignee' do
+        issue2 = create(:issue, author: user2, project: project)
+
+        get api('/issues', user), assignee_id: 0, scope: 'all'
+
+        expect_paginated_array_response(size: 1)
+        expect(first_issue['id']).to eq(issue2.id)
+      end
+
       it 'returns issues reacted by the authenticated user by the given emoji' do
         issue2 = create(:issue, project: project, author: user, assignees: [user])
         award_emoji = create(:award_emoji, awardable: issue2, user: user2, name: 'star')
@@ -802,6 +812,15 @@ describe API::Issues do
       expect(json_response.first['id']).to eq(confidential_issue.id)
     end
 
+    it 'returns an array of issues with any milestone' do
+      get api("#{base_url}/issues?milestone=#{any_milestone_title}", user)
+
+      response_ids = json_response.map { |issue| issue['id'] }
+
+      expect_paginated_array_response(size: 2)
+      expect(response_ids).to contain_exactly(closed_issue.id, issue.id)
+    end
+
     it 'sorts by created_at descending by default' do
       get api("#{base_url}/issues", user)
 
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/jobs_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/jobs_spec.rb
index 6adbbb40489..8770365c893 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/jobs_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/jobs_spec.rb
@@ -721,7 +721,7 @@ describe API::Jobs do
         expect(job.trace.exist?).to be_falsy
         expect(job.artifacts_file.exists?).to be_falsy
         expect(job.artifacts_metadata.exists?).to be_falsy
-        expect(job.has_test_reports?).to be_falsy
+        expect(job.has_job_artifacts?).to be_falsy
       end
 
       it 'updates job' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/markdown_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/markdown_spec.rb
index a55796cf343..e369c1435f0 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/markdown_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/markdown_spec.rb
@@ -106,6 +106,52 @@ describe API::Markdown do
                                         .and include("#1</a>")
           end
         end
+
+        context 'with a public project and confidential issue' do
+          let(:public_project)     { create(:project, :public) }
+          let(:confidential_issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: public_project, title: 'Confidential title') }
+
+          let(:text)   { ":tada: Hello world! :100: #{confidential_issue.to_reference}" }
+          let(:params) { { text: text, gfm: true, project: public_project.full_path } }
+
+          shared_examples 'user without proper access' do
+            it 'does not render the title or link' do
+              expect(response).to have_http_status(201)
+              expect(json_response["html"]).not_to include('Confidential title')
+              expect(json_response["html"]).not_to include('<a href=')
+              expect(json_response["html"]).to include('Hello world!')
+                                          .and include('data-name="tada"')
+                                          .and include('data-name="100"')
+                                          .and include('#1</p>')
+            end
+          end
+
+          context 'when not logged in' do
+            let(:user) { }
+
+            it_behaves_like 'user without proper access'
+          end
+
+          context 'when logged in as user without access' do
+            let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+            it_behaves_like 'user without proper access'
+          end
+
+          context 'when logged in as author' do
+            let(:user) { confidential_issue.author }
+
+            it 'renders the title or link' do
+              expect(response).to have_http_status(201)
+              expect(json_response["html"]).to include('Confidential title')
+              expect(json_response["html"]).to include('Hello world!')
+                                          .and include('data-name="tada"')
+                                          .and include('data-name="100"')
+                                          .and include("<a href=\"#{IssuesHelper.url_for_issue(confidential_issue.iid, public_project)}\"")
+                                          .and include("#1</a>")
+            end
+          end
+        end
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb
index 4de834bf93a..07d19e3ad29 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/merge_requests_spec.rb
@@ -81,6 +81,35 @@ describe API::MergeRequests do
       let(:user2) { create(:user) }
 
       it 'returns an array of all merge requests except unauthorized ones' do
+        get api('/merge_requests', user), scope: :all
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+        expect(json_response.map { |mr| mr['id'] })
+          .to contain_exactly(merge_request.id, merge_request_closed.id, merge_request_merged.id, merge_request_locked.id, merge_request2.id)
+      end
+
+      it "returns an array of no merge_requests when wip=yes" do
+        get api("/merge_requests", user), wip: 'yes'
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+        expect(json_response.length).to eq(0)
+      end
+
+      it "returns an array of no merge_requests when wip=no" do
+        get api("/merge_requests", user), wip: 'no'
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+        expect(json_response.map { |mr| mr['id'] })
+            .to contain_exactly(merge_request.id, merge_request_closed.id, merge_request_merged.id, merge_request_locked.id, merge_request2.id)
+      end
+
+      it 'does not return unauthorized merge requests' do
         private_project = create(:project, :private)
         merge_request3 = create(:merge_request, :simple, source_project: private_project, target_project: private_project, source_branch: 'other-branch')
 
@@ -244,6 +273,15 @@ describe API::MergeRequests do
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
     end
 
+    it "returns an array of no merge_requests when wip=yes" do
+      get api("/projects/#{project.id}/merge_requests", user), wip: 'yes'
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+      expect(json_response.length).to eq(0)
+    end
+
     it 'returns merge_request by "iids" array' do
       get api(endpoint_path, user), iids: [merge_request.iid, merge_request_closed.iid]
 
@@ -353,6 +391,15 @@ describe API::MergeRequests do
       end
     end
 
+    it 'returns the commits behind the target branch when include_diverged_commits_count is present' do
+      allow_any_instance_of(merge_request.class).to receive(:diverged_commits_count).and_return(1)
+
+      get api("/projects/#{project.id}/merge_requests/#{merge_request.iid}", user), include_diverged_commits_count: true
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(json_response['diverged_commits_count']).to eq(1)
+    end
+
     it "returns a 404 error if merge_request_iid not found" do
       get api("/projects/#{project.id}/merge_requests/999", user)
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/pages/internal_access_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/pages/internal_access_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c41eabe0a48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/pages/internal_access_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe "Internal Project Pages Access" do
+  using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+  include AccessMatchers
+
+  set(:group) { create(:group) }
+  set(:project) { create(:project, :internal, pages_access_level: ProjectFeature::ENABLED, namespace: group) }
+
+  set(:admin) { create(:admin) }
+  set(:owner) { create(:user) }
+  set(:master) { create(:user) }
+  set(:developer) { create(:user) }
+  set(:reporter) { create(:user) }
+  set(:guest) { create(:user) }
+  set(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    allow(Gitlab.config.pages).to receive(:access_control).and_return(true)
+    group.add_owner(owner)
+    project.add_master(master)
+    project.add_developer(developer)
+    project.add_reporter(reporter)
+    project.add_guest(guest)
+  end
+
+  describe "Project should be internal" do
+    describe '#internal?' do
+      subject { project.internal? }
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "GET /projects/:id/pages_access" do
+    context 'access depends on the level' do
+      where(:pages_access_level, :with_user, :expected_result) do
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "admin"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "owner"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "master"    |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "developer" |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "reporter"  |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "guest"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "user"      |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   nil         |  404
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "user"      |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   nil         |  404
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "user"      |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   nil         |  404
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "user"      |  403
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   nil         |  404
+      end
+
+      with_them do
+        before do
+          project.project_feature.update(pages_access_level: pages_access_level)
+        end
+        it "correct return value" do
+          if !with_user.nil?
+            user = public_send(with_user)
+            get api("/projects/#{project.id}/pages_access", user)
+          else
+            get api("/projects/#{project.id}/pages_access")
+          end
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(expected_result)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/pages/private_access_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/pages/private_access_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..d69c15b0477
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/pages/private_access_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe "Private Project Pages Access"  do
+  using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+  include AccessMatchers
+
+  set(:group) { create(:group) }
+  set(:project) { create(:project, :private, pages_access_level: ProjectFeature::ENABLED, namespace: group) }
+
+  set(:admin) { create(:admin) }
+  set(:owner) { create(:user) }
+  set(:master) { create(:user) }
+  set(:developer) { create(:user) }
+  set(:reporter) { create(:user) }
+  set(:guest) { create(:user) }
+  set(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    allow(Gitlab.config.pages).to receive(:access_control).and_return(true)
+    group.add_owner(owner)
+    project.add_master(master)
+    project.add_developer(developer)
+    project.add_reporter(reporter)
+    project.add_guest(guest)
+  end
+
+  describe "Project should be private" do
+    describe '#private?' do
+      subject { project.private? }
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "GET /projects/:id/pages_access" do
+    context 'access depends on the level' do
+      where(:pages_access_level, :with_user, :expected_result) do
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "admin"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "owner"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "master"    |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "developer" |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "reporter"  |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "guest"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "user"      |  404
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   nil         |  404
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "user"      |  404
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   nil         |  404
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "user"      |  404
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   nil         |  404
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "user"      |  404
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   nil         |  404
+      end
+
+      with_them do
+        before do
+          project.project_feature.update(pages_access_level: pages_access_level)
+        end
+        it "correct return value" do
+          if !with_user.nil?
+            user = public_send(with_user)
+            get api("/projects/#{project.id}/pages_access", user)
+          else
+            get api("/projects/#{project.id}/pages_access")
+          end
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(expected_result)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/pages/public_access_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/pages/public_access_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..882ca26ac51
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/pages/public_access_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe "Public Project Pages Access"  do
+  using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
+  include AccessMatchers
+
+  set(:group) { create(:group) }
+  set(:project) { create(:project, :public, pages_access_level: ProjectFeature::ENABLED, namespace: group) }
+
+  set(:admin) { create(:admin) }
+  set(:owner) { create(:user) }
+  set(:master) { create(:user) }
+  set(:developer) { create(:user) }
+  set(:reporter) { create(:user) }
+  set(:guest) { create(:user) }
+  set(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    allow(Gitlab.config.pages).to receive(:access_control).and_return(true)
+    group.add_owner(owner)
+    project.add_master(master)
+    project.add_developer(developer)
+    project.add_reporter(reporter)
+    project.add_guest(guest)
+  end
+
+  describe "Project should be public" do
+    describe '#public?' do
+      subject { project.public? }
+      it { is_expected.to be_truthy }
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe "GET /projects/:id/pages_access" do
+    context 'access depends on the level' do
+      where(:pages_access_level, :with_user, :expected_result) do
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "admin"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "owner"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "master"    |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "developer" |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "reporter"  |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "guest"     |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   "user"      |  403
+        ProjectFeature::DISABLED   |   nil         |  403
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   "user"      |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PUBLIC     |   nil         |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   "user"      |  200
+        ProjectFeature::ENABLED    |   nil         |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "admin"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "owner"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "master"    |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "developer" |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "reporter"  |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "guest"     |  200
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   "user"      |  403
+        ProjectFeature::PRIVATE    |   nil         |  403
+      end
+
+      with_them do
+        before do
+          project.project_feature.update(pages_access_level: pages_access_level)
+        end
+        it "correct return value" do
+          if !with_user.nil?
+            user = public_send(with_user)
+            get api("/projects/#{project.id}/pages_access", user)
+          else
+            get api("/projects/#{project.id}/pages_access")
+          end
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(expected_result)
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/pipelines_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/pipelines_spec.rb
index 342a97b6a69..f0e1992bccd 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/pipelines_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/pipelines_spec.rb
@@ -370,12 +370,18 @@ describe API::Pipelines do
       end
 
       context 'without gitlab-ci.yml' do
-        it 'fails to create pipeline' do
-          post api("/projects/#{project.id}/pipeline", user), ref: project.default_branch
+        context 'without auto devops enabled' do
+          before do
+            project.update!(auto_devops_attributes: { enabled: false })
+          end
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
-          expect(json_response['message']['base'].first).to eq 'Missing .gitlab-ci.yml file'
-          expect(json_response).not_to be_an Array
+          it 'fails to create pipeline' do
+            post api("/projects/#{project.id}/pipeline", user), ref: project.default_branch
+
+            expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+            expect(json_response['message']['base'].first).to eq 'Missing .gitlab-ci.yml file'
+            expect(json_response).not_to be_an Array
+          end
         end
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/project_export_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/project_export_spec.rb
index 45e4e35d773..0586025956f 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/project_export_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/project_export_spec.rb
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ describe API::ProjectExport do
   set(:project) { create(:project) }
   set(:project_none) { create(:project) }
   set(:project_started) { create(:project) }
-  set(:project_finished) { create(:project) }
-  set(:project_after_export) { create(:project) }
+  let(:project_finished) { create(:project, :with_export) }
+  let(:project_after_export) { create(:project, :with_export) }
   set(:user) { create(:user) }
   set(:admin) { create(:admin) }
 
@@ -29,13 +29,7 @@ describe API::ProjectExport do
     # simulate exporting work directory
     FileUtils.mkdir_p File.join(project_started.export_path, 'securerandom-hex')
 
-    # simulate exported
-    FileUtils.mkdir_p project_finished.export_path
-    FileUtils.touch File.join(project_finished.export_path, '_export.tar.gz')
-
     # simulate in after export action
-    FileUtils.mkdir_p project_after_export.export_path
-    FileUtils.touch File.join(project_after_export.export_path, '_export.tar.gz')
     FileUtils.touch Gitlab::ImportExport::AfterExportStrategies::BaseAfterExportStrategy.lock_file_path(project_after_export)
   end
 
@@ -191,14 +185,11 @@ describe API::ProjectExport do
 
       context 'when upload complete' do
         before do
-          FileUtils.rm_rf(project_after_export.export_path)
-
-          if project_after_export.export_project_object_exists?
-            upload = project_after_export.import_export_upload
+          project_after_export.remove_exports
+        end
 
-            upload.remove_export_file!
-            upload.save
-          end
+        it 'has removed the export' do
+          expect(project_after_export.export_file_exists?).to be_falsey
         end
 
         it_behaves_like '404 response' do
@@ -273,13 +264,13 @@ describe API::ProjectExport do
       before do
         stub_uploads_object_storage(ImportExportUploader)
 
-        [project, project_finished, project_after_export].each do |p|
-          p.add_maintainer(user)
+        project.add_maintainer(user)
+        project_finished.add_maintainer(user)
+        project_after_export.add_maintainer(user)
 
-          upload = ImportExportUpload.new(project: p)
-          upload.export_file = fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/project_export.tar.gz', "`/tar.gz")
-          upload.save!
-        end
+        upload = ImportExportUpload.new(project: project)
+        upload.export_file = fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/project_export.tar.gz', "`/tar.gz")
+        upload.save!
       end
 
       it_behaves_like 'get project download by strategy'
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/project_hooks_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/project_hooks_spec.rb
index d3f81cc038d..87997a48dc9 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/project_hooks_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/project_hooks_spec.rb
@@ -9,7 +9,8 @@ describe API::ProjectHooks, 'ProjectHooks' do
            :all_events_enabled,
            project: project,
            url: 'http://example.com',
-           enable_ssl_verification: true)
+           enable_ssl_verification: true,
+           push_events_branch_filter: 'master')
   end
 
   before do
@@ -38,6 +39,7 @@ describe API::ProjectHooks, 'ProjectHooks' do
         expect(json_response.first['pipeline_events']).to eq(true)
         expect(json_response.first['wiki_page_events']).to eq(true)
         expect(json_response.first['enable_ssl_verification']).to eq(true)
+        expect(json_response.first['push_events_branch_filter']).to eq('master')
       end
     end
 
@@ -90,7 +92,7 @@ describe API::ProjectHooks, 'ProjectHooks' do
       expect do
         post api("/projects/#{project.id}/hooks", user),
           url: "http://example.com", issues_events: true, confidential_issues_events: true, wiki_page_events: true,
-          job_events: true
+          job_events: true, push_events_branch_filter: 'some-feature-branch'
       end.to change {project.hooks.count}.by(1)
 
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
@@ -106,6 +108,7 @@ describe API::ProjectHooks, 'ProjectHooks' do
       expect(json_response['pipeline_events']).to eq(false)
       expect(json_response['wiki_page_events']).to eq(true)
       expect(json_response['enable_ssl_verification']).to eq(true)
+      expect(json_response['push_events_branch_filter']).to eq('some-feature-branch')
       expect(json_response).not_to include('token')
     end
 
@@ -132,7 +135,12 @@ describe API::ProjectHooks, 'ProjectHooks' do
     end
 
     it "returns a 422 error if url not valid" do
-      post api("/projects/#{project.id}/hooks", user), "url" => "ftp://example.com"
+      post api("/projects/#{project.id}/hooks", user), url: "ftp://example.com"
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(422)
+    end
+
+    it "returns a 422 error if branch filter is not valid" do
+      post api("/projects/#{project.id}/hooks", user), url: "http://example.com", push_events_branch_filter: '~badbranchname/'
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(422)
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/project_import_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/project_import_spec.rb
index bc06f3c3732..c8fa4754810 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/project_import_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/project_import_spec.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ describe API::ProjectImport do
   let(:namespace) { create(:group) }
   before do
     allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::ImportExport).to receive(:storage_path).and_return(export_path)
-    stub_feature_flags(import_export_object_storage: true)
     stub_uploads_object_storage(FileUploader)
 
     namespace.add_owner(user)
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/project_templates_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/project_templates_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..86e33f23951
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/project_templates_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe API::ProjectTemplates do
+  let(:public_project) { create(:project, :public) }
+  let(:private_project) { create(:project, :private) }
+  let(:developer) { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    private_project.add_developer(developer)
+  end
+
+  describe 'GET /projects/:id/templates/:type' do
+    it 'returns dockerfiles' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/dockerfiles")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template_list')
+      expect(json_response).to satisfy_one { |template| template['key'] == 'Binary' }
+    end
+
+    it 'returns gitignores' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/gitignores")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template_list')
+      expect(json_response).to satisfy_one { |template| template['key'] == 'Actionscript' }
+    end
+
+    it 'returns gitlab_ci_ymls' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/gitlab_ci_ymls")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template_list')
+      expect(json_response).to satisfy_one { |template| template['key'] == 'Android' }
+    end
+
+    it 'returns licenses' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/licenses")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template_list')
+      expect(json_response).to satisfy_one { |template| template['key'] == 'mit' }
+    end
+
+    it 'returns 400 for an unknown template type' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/unknown")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+    end
+
+    it 'denies access to an anonymous user on a private project' do
+      get api("/projects/#{private_project.id}/templates/licenses")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+    end
+
+    it 'permits access to a developer on a private project' do
+      get api("/projects/#{private_project.id}/templates/licenses", developer)
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template_list')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'GET /projects/:id/templates/licenses' do
+    it 'returns key and name for the listed licenses' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/licenses")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template_list')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'GET /projects/:id/templates/:type/:key' do
+    it 'returns a specific dockerfile' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/dockerfiles/Binary")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template')
+      expect(json_response['name']).to eq('Binary')
+    end
+
+    it 'returns a specific gitignore' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/gitignores/Actionscript")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template')
+      expect(json_response['name']).to eq('Actionscript')
+    end
+
+    it 'returns a specific gitlab_ci_yml' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/gitlab_ci_ymls/Android")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/template')
+      expect(json_response['name']).to eq('Android')
+    end
+
+    it 'returns a specific license' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/licenses/mit")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/license')
+    end
+
+    it 'returns 404 for an unknown specific template' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/licenses/unknown")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+    end
+
+    it 'denies access to an anonymous user on a private project' do
+      get api("/projects/#{private_project.id}/templates/licenses/mit")
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+    end
+
+    it 'permits access to a developer on a private project' do
+      get api("/projects/#{private_project.id}/templates/licenses/mit", developer)
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/license')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe 'GET /projects/:id/templates/licenses/:key' do
+    it 'fills placeholders in the license' do
+      get api("/projects/#{public_project.id}/templates/licenses/agpl-3.0"),
+          project: 'Project Placeholder',
+          fullname: 'Fullname Placeholder'
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to match_response_schema('public_api/v4/license')
+
+      content = json_response['content']
+
+      expect(content).to include('Project Placeholder')
+      expect(content).to include("Copyright (C) #{Time.now.year}  Fullname Placeholder")
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/projects_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/projects_spec.rb
index b6f92042ecc..c8e98e6024c 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/projects_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/projects_spec.rb
@@ -148,6 +148,16 @@ describe API::Projects do
         expect(json_response.first.keys).to include('open_issues_count')
       end
 
+      it 'does not include projects marked for deletion' do
+        project.update(pending_delete: true)
+
+        get api('/projects', user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+        expect(json_response.map { |p| p['id'] }).not_to include(project.id)
+      end
+
       it 'does not include open_issues_count if issues are disabled' do
         project.project_feature.update_attribute(:issues_access_level, ProjectFeature::DISABLED)
 
@@ -557,6 +567,14 @@ describe API::Projects do
       expect(json_response['visibility']).to eq('private')
     end
 
+    it 'creates a new project initialized with a README.md' do
+      project = attributes_for(:project, initialize_with_readme: 1, name: 'somewhere')
+
+      post api('/projects', user), project
+
+      expect(json_response['readme_url']).to eql("#{Gitlab.config.gitlab.url}/#{json_response['namespace']['full_path']}/somewhere/blob/master/README.md")
+    end
+
     it 'sets tag list to a project' do
       project = attributes_for(:project, tag_list: %w[tagFirst tagSecond])
 
@@ -1004,6 +1022,15 @@ describe API::Projects do
         expect(json_response).not_to include("import_error")
       end
 
+      it 'returns 404 when project is marked for deletion' do
+        project.update(pending_delete: true)
+
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+        expect(json_response['message']).to eq('404 Project Not Found')
+      end
+
       context 'links exposure' do
         it 'exposes related resources full URIs' do
           get api("/projects/#{project.id}", user)
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/redacted_events_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/redacted_events_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..086dd3df9ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/redacted_events_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe 'Redacted events in API::Events' do
+  shared_examples 'private events are redacted' do
+    it 'redacts events the user does not have access to' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Event).to receive(:visible_to_user?).and_call_original
+
+      get api(path), user
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(json_response).to contain_exactly(
+        'project_id' => nil,
+        'action_name' => nil,
+        'target_id' => nil,
+        'target_iid' => nil,
+        'target_type' => nil,
+        'author_id' => nil,
+        'target_title' => 'Confidential event',
+        'created_at' => nil,
+        'author_username' => nil
+      )
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '/users/:id/events' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
+    let(:path) { "/users/#{project.owner.id}/events" }
+    let(:issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project) }
+
+    before do
+      EventCreateService.new.open_issue(issue, issue.author)
+    end
+
+    context 'unauthenticated user views another user with private events' do
+      let(:user) { nil }
+
+      include_examples 'private events are redacted'
+    end
+
+    context 'authenticated user without access views another user with private events' do
+      let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+      include_examples 'private events are redacted'
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '/projects/:id/events' do
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :public) }
+    let(:path) { "/projects/#{project.id}/events" }
+    let(:issue) { create(:issue, :confidential, project: project) }
+
+    before do
+      EventCreateService.new.open_issue(issue, issue.author)
+    end
+
+    context 'unauthenticated user views public project' do
+      let(:user) { nil }
+
+      include_examples 'private events are redacted'
+    end
+
+    context 'authenticated user without access views public project' do
+      let(:user) { create(:user) }
+
+      include_examples 'private events are redacted'
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/resource_label_events_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/resource_label_events_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b7d4a5152cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/requests/api/resource_label_events_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe API::ResourceLabelEvents do
+  set(:user) { create(:user) }
+  set(:project) { create(:project, :public, :repository, namespace: user.namespace) }
+  set(:private_user)    { create(:user) }
+
+  before do
+    project.add_developer(user)
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'resource_label_events API' do |parent_type, eventable_type, id_name|
+    describe "GET /#{parent_type}/:id/#{eventable_type}/:noteable_id/resource_label_events" do
+      it "returns an array of resource label events" do
+        get api("/#{parent_type}/#{parent.id}/#{eventable_type}/#{eventable[id_name]}/resource_label_events", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+        expect(json_response.first['id']).to eq(event.id)
+      end
+
+      it "returns a 404 error when eventable id not found" do
+        get api("/#{parent_type}/#{parent.id}/#{eventable_type}/12345/resource_label_events", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+      end
+
+      it "returns 404 when not authorized" do
+        parent.update!(visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE)
+
+        get api("/#{parent_type}/#{parent.id}/#{eventable_type}/#{eventable[id_name]}/resource_label_events", private_user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+      end
+    end
+
+    describe "GET /#{parent_type}/:id/#{eventable_type}/:noteable_id/resource_label_events/:event_id" do
+      it "returns a resource label event by id" do
+        get api("/#{parent_type}/#{parent.id}/#{eventable_type}/#{eventable[id_name]}/resource_label_events/#{event.id}", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(json_response['id']).to eq(event.id)
+      end
+
+      it "returns a 404 error if resource label event not found" do
+        get api("/#{parent_type}/#{parent.id}/#{eventable_type}/#{eventable[id_name]}/resource_label_events/12345", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when eventable is an Issue' do
+    let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, author: user) }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'resource_label_events API', 'projects', 'issues', 'iid' do
+      let(:parent) { project }
+      let(:eventable) { issue }
+      let!(:event) { create(:resource_label_event, issue: issue) }
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when eventable is a Merge Request' do
+    let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project, target_project: project, author: user) }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'resource_label_events API', 'projects', 'merge_requests', 'iid' do
+      let(:parent) { project }
+      let(:eventable) { merge_request }
+      let!(:event) { create(:resource_label_event, merge_request: merge_request) }
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/runners_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/runners_spec.rb
index 3ebdb54f71f..49a79d2ccf9 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/runners_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/runners_spec.rb
@@ -25,36 +25,71 @@ describe API::Runners do
 
   describe 'GET /runners' do
     context 'authorized user' do
-      it 'returns user available runners' do
+      it 'returns response status and headers' do
         get api('/runners', user)
 
-        shared = json_response.any? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
-        descriptions = json_response.map { |runner| runner['description'] }
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
-        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(json_response[0]).to have_key('ip_address')
-        expect(descriptions).to contain_exactly(
-          'Project runner', 'Two projects runner', 'Group runner'
-        )
-        expect(shared).to be_falsey
+      end
+
+      it 'returns user available runners' do
+        get api('/runners', user)
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Group runner')
+        ]
       end
 
       it 'filters runners by scope' do
-        get api('/runners?scope=active', user)
+        create(:ci_runner, :project, :inactive, description: 'Inactive project runner', projects: [project])
+
+        get api('/runners?scope=paused', user)
 
-        shared = json_response.any? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
-        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(json_response[0]).to have_key('ip_address')
-        expect(shared).to be_falsey
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Inactive project runner')
+        ]
       end
 
       it 'avoids filtering if scope is invalid' do
         get api('/runners?scope=unknown', user)
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
       end
+
+      it 'filters runners by type' do
+        get api('/runners?type=project_type', user)
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner')
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it 'does not filter by invalid type' do
+        get api('/runners?type=bogus', user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+      end
+
+      it 'filters runners by status' do
+        create(:ci_runner, :project, :inactive, description: 'Inactive project runner', projects: [project])
+
+        get api('/runners?status=paused', user)
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Inactive project runner')
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it 'does not filter by invalid status' do
+        get api('/runners?status=bogus', user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+      end
     end
 
     context 'unauthorized user' do
@@ -69,51 +104,91 @@ describe API::Runners do
   describe 'GET /runners/all' do
     context 'authorized user' do
       context 'with admin privileges' do
+        it 'returns response status and headers' do
+          get api('/runners/all', admin)
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+        end
+
         it 'returns all runners' do
           get api('/runners/all', admin)
 
-          shared = json_response.any? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
+          expect(json_response).to match_array [
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner'),
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Group runner'),
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Shared runner')
+          ]
+        end
+
+        it 'filters runners by scope' do
+          get api('/runners/all?scope=shared', admin)
+
+          shared = json_response.all? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
           expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
           expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
           expect(json_response).to be_an Array
           expect(json_response[0]).to have_key('ip_address')
           expect(shared).to be_truthy
         end
-      end
 
-      context 'without admin privileges' do
-        it 'does not return runners list' do
-          get api('/runners/all', user)
+        it 'filters runners by scope' do
+          get api('/runners/all?scope=specific', admin)
 
-          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(403)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+          expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+
+          expect(json_response).to match_array [
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner'),
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Group runner')
+          ]
         end
-      end
 
-      it 'filters runners by scope' do
-        get api('/runners/all?scope=shared', admin)
+        it 'avoids filtering if scope is invalid' do
+          get api('/runners/all?scope=unknown', admin)
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+        end
 
-        shared = json_response.all? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
-        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
-        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(json_response[0]).to have_key('ip_address')
-        expect(shared).to be_truthy
-      end
+        it 'filters runners by type' do
+          get api('/runners/all?type=project_type', admin)
 
-      it 'filters runners by scope' do
-        get api('/runners/all?scope=specific', admin)
+          expect(json_response).to match_array [
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner')
+          ]
+        end
 
-        shared = json_response.any? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
-        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
-        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(json_response[0]).to have_key('ip_address')
-        expect(shared).to be_falsey
+        it 'does not filter by invalid type' do
+          get api('/runners/all?type=bogus', admin)
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+        end
+
+        it 'filters runners by status' do
+          create(:ci_runner, :project, :inactive, description: 'Inactive project runner', projects: [project])
+
+          get api('/runners/all?status=paused', admin)
+
+          expect(json_response).to match_array [
+            a_hash_including('description' => 'Inactive project runner')
+          ]
+        end
+
+        it 'does not filter by invalid status' do
+          get api('/runners/all?status=bogus', admin)
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+        end
       end
 
-      it 'avoids filtering if scope is invalid' do
-        get api('/runners?scope=unknown', admin)
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+      context 'without admin privileges' do
+        it 'does not return runners list' do
+          get api('/runners/all', user)
+
+          expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(403)
+        end
       end
     end
 
@@ -577,15 +652,69 @@ describe API::Runners do
 
   describe 'GET /projects/:id/runners' do
     context 'authorized user with maintainer privileges' do
-      it "returns project's runners" do
+      it 'returns response status and headers' do
+        get api('/runners/all', admin)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      end
+
+      it 'returns all runners' do
         get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners", user)
 
-        shared = json_response.any? { |r| r['is_shared'] }
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Shared runner')
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it 'filters runners by scope' do
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners?scope=specific", user)
+
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
-        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(json_response[0]).to have_key('ip_address')
-        expect(shared).to be_truthy
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner')
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it 'avoids filtering if scope is invalid' do
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners?scope=unknown", user)
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+      end
+
+      it 'filters runners by type' do
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners?type=project_type", user)
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Project runner'),
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Two projects runner')
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it 'does not filter by invalid type' do
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners?type=bogus", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+      end
+
+      it 'filters runners by status' do
+        create(:ci_runner, :project, :inactive, description: 'Inactive project runner', projects: [project])
+
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners?status=paused", user)
+
+        expect(json_response).to match_array [
+          a_hash_including('description' => 'Inactive project runner')
+        ]
+      end
+
+      it 'does not filter by invalid status' do
+        get api("/projects/#{project.id}/runners?status=bogus", user)
+
+        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb
index 3e0f47b84a1..e379bd9785a 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/settings_spec.rb
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ describe API::Settings, 'Settings' do
           enforce_terms: true,
           terms: 'Hello world!',
           performance_bar_allowed_group_path: group.full_path,
-          instance_statistics_visibility_private: true
+          instance_statistics_visibility_private: true,
+          diff_max_patch_bytes: 150_000
 
         expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
         expect(json_response['default_projects_limit']).to eq(3)
@@ -92,6 +93,7 @@ describe API::Settings, 'Settings' do
         expect(json_response['terms']).to eq('Hello world!')
         expect(json_response['performance_bar_allowed_group_id']).to eq(group.id)
         expect(json_response['instance_statistics_visibility_private']).to be(true)
+        expect(json_response['diff_max_patch_bytes']).to eq(150_000)
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb
index d48d577afa1..09c1d016081 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/users_spec.rb
@@ -785,35 +785,25 @@ describe API::Users do
   end
 
   describe 'GET /user/:id/keys' do
-    before do
-      admin
-    end
+    it 'returns 404 for non-existing user' do
+      user_id = not_existing_user_id
 
-    context 'when unauthenticated' do
-      it 'returns authentication error' do
-        get api("/users/#{user.id}/keys")
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(401)
-      end
-    end
+      get api("/users/#{user_id}/keys")
 
-    context 'when authenticated' do
-      it 'returns 404 for non-existing user' do
-        get api('/users/999999/keys', admin)
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
-        expect(json_response['message']).to eq('404 User Not Found')
-      end
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(404)
+      expect(json_response['message']).to eq('404 User Not Found')
+    end
 
-      it 'returns array of ssh keys' do
-        user.keys << key
-        user.save
+    it 'returns array of ssh keys' do
+      user.keys << key
+      user.save
 
-        get api("/users/#{user.id}/keys", admin)
+      get api("/users/#{user.id}/keys")
 
-        expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
-        expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
-        expect(json_response).to be_an Array
-        expect(json_response.first['title']).to eq(key.title)
-      end
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(200)
+      expect(response).to include_pagination_headers
+      expect(json_response).to be_an Array
+      expect(json_response.first['title']).to eq(key.title)
     end
   end
 
@@ -1031,11 +1021,14 @@ describe API::Users do
       expect(json_response['error']).to eq('email is missing')
     end
 
-    it "creates email" do
+    it "creates unverified email" do
       email_attrs = attributes_for :email
       expect do
         post api("/users/#{user.id}/emails", admin), email_attrs
       end.to change { user.emails.count }.by(1)
+
+      email = Email.find_by(user_id: user.id, email: email_attrs[:email])
+      expect(email).not_to be_confirmed
     end
 
     it "returns a 400 for invalid ID" do
@@ -1043,6 +1036,18 @@ describe API::Users do
 
       expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
     end
+
+    it "creates verified email" do
+      email_attrs = attributes_for :email
+      email_attrs[:skip_confirmation] = true
+
+      post api("/users/#{user.id}/emails", admin), email_attrs
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
+
+      email = Email.find_by(user_id: user.id, email: email_attrs[:email])
+      expect(email).to be_confirmed
+    end
   end
 
   describe 'GET /user/:id/emails' do
diff --git a/spec/requests/api/wikis_spec.rb b/spec/requests/api/wikis_spec.rb
index 489cb001b82..c40d01e1a14 100644
--- a/spec/requests/api/wikis_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/api/wikis_spec.rb
@@ -139,6 +139,27 @@ describe API::Wikis do
     end
   end
 
+  shared_examples_for 'uploads wiki attachment' do
+    it 'pushes attachment to the wiki repository' do
+      allow(SecureRandom).to receive(:hex).and_return('fixed_hex')
+
+      post(api(url, user), payload)
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(201)
+      expect(json_response).to eq result_hash.deep_stringify_keys
+    end
+
+    it 'responds with validation error on empty file' do
+      payload.delete(:file)
+
+      post(api(url, user), payload)
+
+      expect(response).to have_gitlab_http_status(400)
+      expect(json_response.size).to eq(1)
+      expect(json_response['error']).to eq('file is missing')
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'GET /projects/:id/wikis' do
     let(:url) { "/projects/#{project.id}/wikis" }
 
@@ -698,4 +719,107 @@ describe API::Wikis do
       include_examples '204 No Content'
     end
   end
+
+  describe 'POST /projects/:id/wikis/attachments' do
+    let(:payload) { { file: fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/dk.png') } }
+    let(:url) { "/projects/#{project.id}/wikis/attachments" }
+    let(:file_path) { "#{Wikis::CreateAttachmentService::ATTACHMENT_PATH}/fixed_hex/dk.png" }
+    let(:result_hash) do
+      {
+        file_name: 'dk.png',
+        file_path: file_path,
+        branch: 'master',
+        link: {
+          url: file_path,
+          markdown: "![dk](#{file_path})"
+        }
+      }
+    end
+
+    context 'when wiki is disabled' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_disabled, :wiki_repo) }
+
+      context 'when user is guest' do
+        before do
+          post(api(url), payload)
+        end
+
+        include_examples '404 Project Not Found'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is developer' do
+        before do
+          project.add_developer(user)
+          post(api(url, user), payload)
+        end
+
+        include_examples '403 Forbidden'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is maintainer' do
+        before do
+          project.add_maintainer(user)
+          post(api(url, user), payload)
+        end
+
+        include_examples '403 Forbidden'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when wiki is available only for team members' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_private, :wiki_repo) }
+
+      context 'when user is guest' do
+        before do
+          post(api(url), payload)
+        end
+
+        include_examples '404 Project Not Found'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is developer' do
+        before do
+          project.add_developer(user)
+        end
+
+        include_examples 'uploads wiki attachment'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is maintainer' do
+        before do
+          project.add_maintainer(user)
+        end
+
+        include_examples 'uploads wiki attachment'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when wiki is available for everyone with access' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo) }
+
+      context 'when user is guest' do
+        before do
+          post(api(url), payload)
+        end
+
+        include_examples '404 Project Not Found'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is developer' do
+        before do
+          project.add_developer(user)
+        end
+
+        include_examples 'uploads wiki attachment'
+      end
+
+      context 'when user is maintainer' do
+        before do
+          project.add_maintainer(user)
+        end
+
+        include_examples 'uploads wiki attachment'
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/requests/openid_connect_spec.rb b/spec/requests/openid_connect_spec.rb
index b14d4b8fb6e..b1cf7a531f4 100644
--- a/spec/requests/openid_connect_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/requests/openid_connect_spec.rb
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ describe 'OpenID Connect requests' do
         expect(@payload).to match(a_hash_including(id_token_claims))
       end
 
-      it 'includes the Gitlab root URL' do
+      it 'includes the GitLab root URL' do
         expect(@payload['iss']).to eq Gitlab.config.gitlab.url
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb b/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb
index 5abc6d81958..bdfb12dc5df 100644
--- a/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/routing/project_routing_spec.rb
@@ -133,8 +133,9 @@ describe 'project routing' do
   # labels_namespace_project_autocomplete_sources_path         GET /:project_id/autocomplete_sources/labels(.:format)         projects/autocomplete_sources#labels
   # milestones_namespace_project_autocomplete_sources_path     GET /:project_id/autocomplete_sources/milestones(.:format)     projects/autocomplete_sources#milestones
   # commands_namespace_project_autocomplete_sources_path       GET /:project_id/autocomplete_sources/commands(.:format)       projects/autocomplete_sources#commands
+  # snippets_namespace_project_autocomplete_sources_path       GET /:project_id/autocomplete_sources/snippets(.:format)       projects/autocomplete_sources#snippets
   describe Projects::AutocompleteSourcesController, 'routing' do
-    [:members, :issues, :merge_requests, :labels, :milestones, :commands].each do |action|
+    [:members, :issues, :merge_requests, :labels, :milestones, :commands, :snippets].each do |action|
       it "to ##{action}" do
         expect(get("/gitlab/gitlabhq/autocomplete_sources/#{action}")).to route_to("projects/autocomplete_sources##{action}", namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq')
       end
@@ -258,10 +259,10 @@ describe 'project routing' do
     end
 
     it 'to #logs_tree' do
-      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/stable/logs_tree')).to             route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'stable')
-      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2345/logs_tree')).to             route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature#45')
-      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2B45/logs_tree')).to             route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature+45')
-      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature@45/logs_tree')).to             route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature@45')
+      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/stable/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'stable')
+      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2345/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature#45')
+      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2B45/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature+45')
+      expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature@45/logs_tree')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature@45')
       expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/stable/logs_tree/foo/bar/baz')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'stable', path: 'foo/bar/baz')
       expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2345/logs_tree/foo/bar/baz')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature#45', path: 'foo/bar/baz')
       expect(get('/gitlab/gitlabhq/refs/feature%2B45/logs_tree/foo/bar/baz')).to route_to('projects/refs#logs_tree', namespace_id: 'gitlab', project_id: 'gitlabhq', id: 'feature+45', path: 'foo/bar/baz')
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/code_reuse_helpers_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/code_reuse_helpers_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2720141aad2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/code_reuse_helpers_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'parser/current'
+require_relative '../../rubocop/code_reuse_helpers'
+
+describe RuboCop::CodeReuseHelpers do
+  def parse_source(source, path = 'foo.rb')
+    buffer = Parser::Source::Buffer.new(path)
+    buffer.source = source
+
+    builder = RuboCop::AST::Builder.new
+    parser = Parser::CurrentRuby.new(builder)
+
+    parser.parse(buffer)
+  end
+
+  let(:cop) do
+    Class.new do
+      include RuboCop::CodeReuseHelpers
+    end.new
+  end
+
+  describe '#send_to_constant?' do
+    it 'returns true when sending to a constant' do
+      node = parse_source('Foo.bar')
+
+      expect(cop.send_to_constant?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false when sending to something other than a constant' do
+      node = parse_source('10')
+
+      expect(cop.send_to_constant?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#send_receiver_name_ends_with?' do
+    it 'returns true when the receiver ends with a suffix' do
+      node = parse_source('FooFinder.new')
+
+      expect(cop.send_receiver_name_ends_with?(node, 'Finder')).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false when the receiver is the same as a suffix' do
+      node = parse_source('Finder.new')
+
+      expect(cop.send_receiver_name_ends_with?(node, 'Finder')).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#file_path_for_node' do
+    it 'returns the file path of a node' do
+      node = parse_source('10')
+      path = cop.file_path_for_node(node)
+
+      expect(path).to eq('foo.rb')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#name_of_constant' do
+    it 'returns the name of a constant' do
+      node = parse_source('Foo')
+
+      expect(cop.name_of_constant(node)).to eq(:Foo)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_finder?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the finders directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'finders', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_finder?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the finders directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_finder?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_model?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the models directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'models', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_model?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the models directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_model?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_service_class?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the services directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'services', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_service_class?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the services directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_service_class?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_presenter?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the presenters directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'presenters', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_presenter?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the presenters directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_presenter?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_serializer?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the serializers directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'serializers', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_serializer?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the serializers directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_serializer?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_worker?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the workers directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'workers', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_worker?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the workers directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_worker?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_api?' do
+    it 'returns true for a node in the API directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('lib', 'api', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_api?(node)).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a node outside the API directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('lib', 'foo', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_api?(node)).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#in_directory?' do
+    it 'returns true for a directory in the CE app/ directory' do
+      node = parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('app', 'models', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_directory?(node, 'models')).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns true for a directory in the EE app/ directory' do
+      node =
+        parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('ee', 'app', 'models', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_directory?(node, 'models')).to eq(true)
+    end
+
+    it 'returns false for a directory in the lib/ directory' do
+      node =
+        parse_source('10', Rails.root.join('lib', 'models', 'foo.rb'))
+
+      expect(cop.in_directory?(node, 'models')).to eq(false)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#name_of_receiver' do
+    it 'returns the name of a send receiver' do
+      node = parse_source('Foo.bar')
+
+      expect(cop.name_of_receiver(node)).to eq('Foo')
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#each_class_method' do
+    it 'yields every class method to the supplied block' do
+      node = parse_source(<<~RUBY)
+        class Foo
+          class << self
+            def first
+            end
+          end
+
+          def self.second
+          end
+        end
+      RUBY
+
+      nodes = cop.each_class_method(node).to_a
+
+      expect(nodes.length).to eq(2)
+
+      expect(nodes[0].children[0]).to eq(:first)
+      expect(nodes[1].children[1]).to eq(:second)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#each_send_node' do
+    it 'yields every send node to the supplied block' do
+      node = parse_source("foo\nbar")
+      nodes = cop.each_send_node(node).to_a
+
+      expect(nodes.length).to eq(2)
+      expect(nodes[0].children[1]).to eq(:foo)
+      expect(nodes[1].children[1]).to eq(:bar)
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#disallow_send_to' do
+    it 'disallows sending a message to a constant' do
+      def_node = parse_source(<<~RUBY)
+        def foo
+          FooFinder.new
+        end
+      RUBY
+
+      send_node = def_node.each_child_node(:send).first
+
+      expect(cop)
+        .to receive(:add_offense)
+        .with(send_node, location: :expression, message: 'oops')
+
+      cop.disallow_send_to(def_node, 'Finder', 'oops')
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/avoid_route_redirect_leading_slash_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/avoid_route_redirect_leading_slash_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c9eb61ccc72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/avoid_route_redirect_leading_slash_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require_relative '../../../rubocop/cop/avoid_route_redirect_leading_slash'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::AvoidRouteRedirectLeadingSlash do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  before do
+    allow(cop).to receive(:in_routes?).and_return(true)
+  end
+
+  it 'registers an offense when redirect has a leading slash' do
+    expect_offense(<<~PATTERN.strip_indent)
+      root to: redirect("/-/route")
+               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Do not use a leading "/" in route redirects
+    PATTERN
+  end
+
+  it 'does not register an offense when redirect does not have a leading slash' do
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~PATTERN.strip_indent)
+      root to: redirect("-/route")
+    PATTERN
+  end
+
+  it 'autocorrect `/-/route` to `-/route`' do
+    expect(autocorrect_source('redirect("/-/route")')).to eq('redirect("-/route")')
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a30fc52d26f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/code_reuse/active_record'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::CodeReuse::ActiveRecord do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of "where" without any arguments' do
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+    def foo
+      User.where
+           ^^^^^ This method can only be used inside an ActiveRecord model
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of "where" with arguments' do
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+    def foo
+      User.where(id: 10)
+           ^^^^^ This method can only be used inside an ActiveRecord model
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of "group" without any arguments' do
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE)
+    def foo
+      project.group
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of "group" with arguments' do
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+    def foo
+      project.group(:name)
+              ^^^^^ This method can only be used inside an ActiveRecord model
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of ActiveRecord models in a model' do
+    path = Rails.root.join('app', 'models', 'foo.rb').to_s
+
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, path)
+    def foo
+      project.group(:name)
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of ActiveRecord models in a spec' do
+    path = Rails.root.join('spec', 'foo_spec.rb').to_s
+
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, path)
+    def foo
+      project.group(:name)
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of ActiveRecord models in a background migration' do
+    path = Rails
+      .root
+      .join('lib', 'gitlab', 'background_migration', 'foo.rb')
+      .to_s
+
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, path)
+    def foo
+      project.group(:name)
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of ActiveRecord models in lib/gitlab/database' do
+    path = Rails.root.join('lib', 'gitlab', 'database', 'foo.rb').to_s
+
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE, path)
+    def foo
+      project.group(:name)
+    end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'autocorrects offenses in instance methods by whitelisting them' do
+    corrected = autocorrect_source(<<~SOURCE)
+    def foo
+      User.where
+    end
+    SOURCE
+
+    expect(corrected).to eq(<<~SOURCE)
+    # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
+    def foo
+      User.where
+    end
+    # rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'autocorrects offenses in class methods by whitelisting them' do
+    corrected = autocorrect_source(<<~SOURCE)
+    def self.foo
+      User.where
+    end
+    SOURCE
+
+    expect(corrected).to eq(<<~SOURCE)
+    # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
+    def self.foo
+      User.where
+    end
+    # rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'autocorrects offenses in blocks by whitelisting them' do
+    corrected = autocorrect_source(<<~SOURCE)
+    get '/' do
+      User.where
+    end
+    SOURCE
+
+    expect(corrected).to eq(<<~SOURCE)
+    # rubocop: disable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
+    get '/' do
+      User.where
+    end
+    # rubocop: enable CodeReuse/ActiveRecord
+    SOURCE
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/finder_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/finder_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b04e053a4c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/finder_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/code_reuse/finder'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::CodeReuse::Finder do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Finder inside another Finder' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_finder?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooFinder
+        def execute
+          BarFinder.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Finders can not be used inside a Finder.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+
+    expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(1)
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Finder inside a model class method' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User
+        class << self
+          def second_method
+            BarFinder.new
+            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Finders can not be used inside model class methods.
+          end
+        end
+
+        def self.second_method
+          FooFinder.new
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Finders can not be used inside model class methods.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of a Finder in a non Finder file' do
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooFinder
+        def execute
+          BarFinder.new.execute
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of a Finder in a regular class method' do
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User
+        class << self
+          def second_method
+            BarFinder.new
+          end
+        end
+
+        def self.second_method
+          FooFinder.new
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4fe72619273
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/code_reuse/presenter'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::CodeReuse::Presenter do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Presenter in a Service class' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_service_class?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooService
+        def execute
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a Service class.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Presenter in a Finder' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_finder?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooFinder
+        def execute
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a Finder.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Service class in a Presenter' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_presenter?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooPresenter
+        def execute
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a Presenter.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Presenter in a Serializer' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_serializer?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooSerializer
+        def execute
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a Serializer.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Presenter in a model instance method' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User < ActiveRecord::Base
+        def execute
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a model.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Presenter in a model class method' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User < ActiveRecord::Base
+        def self.execute
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a model.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Presenter in a worker' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_worker?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooWorker
+        def perform
+          FooPresenter.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Presenters can not be used in a worker.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4530b15eed7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/code_reuse/serializer'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::CodeReuse::Serializer do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a Service class' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_service_class?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooService
+        def execute
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a Service class.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a Finder' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_finder?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooFinder
+        def execute
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a Finder.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a Presenter' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_presenter?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooPresenter
+        def execute
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a Presenter.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a Serializer' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_serializer?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooSerializer
+        def execute
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a Serializer.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a model instance method' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User < ActiveRecord::Base
+        def execute
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a model.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a model class method' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User < ActiveRecord::Base
+        def self.execute
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a model.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Serializer in a worker' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_worker?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooWorker
+        def perform
+          FooSerializer.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Serializers can not be used in a worker.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/service_class_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/service_class_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b8d82f332e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/service_class_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/code_reuse/service_class'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::CodeReuse::ServiceClass do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Service class in a Finder' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_finder?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooFinder
+        def execute
+          FooService.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Service classes can not be used in a Finder.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Service class in a Presenter' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_presenter?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooPresenter
+        def execute
+          FooService.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Service classes can not be used in a Presenter.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Service class in a Serializer' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_serializer?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooSerializer
+        def execute
+          FooService.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Service classes can not be used in a Serializer.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a Service class in a model' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User < ActiveRecord::Model
+        class << self
+          def first
+            FooService.new.execute
+            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Service classes can not be used in a model.
+          end
+        end
+
+        def second
+          FooService.new.execute
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Service classes can not be used in a model.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of a Service class in a regular class' do
+    expect_no_offenses(<<~SOURCE)
+      class Foo
+        def execute
+          FooService.new.execute
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..97acaeb7643
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/code_reuse/worker'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::CodeReuse::Worker do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of a worker in a controller' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_controller?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooController
+        def index
+          FooWorker.perform_async
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Workers can not be used in a controller.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a worker in an API' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_api?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class Foo < Grape::API
+        resource :projects do
+          get '/' do
+            FooWorker.perform_async
+            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Workers can not be used in a Grape API.
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a worker in a Finder' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_finder?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooFinder
+        def execute
+          FooWorker.perform_async
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Workers can not be used in a Finder.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a worker in a Presenter' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_presenter?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooPresenter
+        def execute
+          FooWorker.perform_async
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Workers can not be used in a Presenter.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a worker in a Serializer' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_serializer?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class FooSerializer
+        def execute
+          FooWorker.perform_async
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Workers can not be used in a Serializer.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'flags the use of a worker in a model class method' do
+    allow(cop)
+      .to receive(:in_model?)
+      .and_return(true)
+
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+      class User < ActiveRecord::Base
+        def self.execute
+          FooWorker.perform_async
+          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Workers can not be used in model class methods.
+        end
+      end
+    SOURCE
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/gitlab/union_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/gitlab/union_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..5b06f30b25f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/gitlab/union_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../../rubocop/cop/gitlab/union'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::Gitlab::Union do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of Gitlab::SQL::Union.new' do
+    expect_offense(<<~SOURCE)
+    Gitlab::SQL::Union.new([foo])
+    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Use the `FromUnion` concern, instead of using `Gitlab::SQL::Union` directly
+    SOURCE
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of Gitlab::SQL::Union in a spec' do
+    allow(cop).to receive(:in_spec?).and_return(true)
+
+    expect_no_offenses('Gitlab::SQL::Union.new([foo])')
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..7b5235a3da7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+require 'rubocop'
+require 'rubocop/rspec/support'
+require_relative '../../../rubocop/cop/group_public_or_visible_to_user'
+
+describe RuboCop::Cop::GroupPublicOrVisibleToUser do
+  include CopHelper
+
+  subject(:cop) { described_class.new }
+
+  it 'flags the use of Group.public_or_visible_to_user with a constant receiver' do
+    inspect_source('Group.public_or_visible_to_user')
+
+    expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(1)
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flat the use of public_or_visible_to_user with a constant that is not Group' do
+    inspect_source('Project.public_or_visible_to_user')
+
+    expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(0)
+  end
+
+  it 'does not flag the use of Group.public_or_visible_to_user with a send receiver' do
+    inspect_source('foo.public_or_visible_to_user')
+
+    expect(cop.offenses.size).to eq(0)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block_spec.rb b/spec/rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block_spec.rb
index 03eeffe6483..892b393c307 100644
--- a/spec/rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/rubocop/cop/line_break_around_conditional_block_spec.rb
@@ -328,6 +328,22 @@ describe RuboCop::Cop::LineBreakAroundConditionalBlock do
       expect(cop.offenses).to be_empty
     end
 
+    it "doesn't flag violation for #{conditional} preceded by a rescue" do
+      source = <<~RUBY
+        def a_method
+          do_something
+        rescue
+          #{conditional} condition
+            do_something
+          end
+        end
+      RUBY
+
+      inspect_source(source)
+
+      expect(cop.offenses).to be_empty
+    end
+
     it "doesn't flag violation for #{conditional} followed by a rescue" do
       source = <<~RUBY
             def a_method
diff --git a/spec/serializers/build_action_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/build_action_entity_spec.rb
index 15720d86583..9e2bee2ee60 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/build_action_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/build_action_entity_spec.rb
@@ -22,5 +22,17 @@ describe BuildActionEntity do
     it 'contains whether it is playable' do
       expect(subject[:playable]).to eq job.playable?
     end
+
+    context 'when job is scheduled' do
+      let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+      it 'returns scheduled_at' do
+        expect(subject[:scheduled_at]).to eq(job.scheduled_at)
+      end
+
+      it 'returns unschedule path' do
+        expect(subject[:unschedule_path]).to include "jobs/#{job.id}/unschedule"
+      end
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb
index 04247c78549..b9995818e98 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/commit_entity_spec.rb
@@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe CommitEntity do
+  SIGNATURE_HTML = 'TEST'.freeze
+
   let(:entity) do
     described_class.new(commit, request: request)
   end
-
   let(:request) { double('request') }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:commit) { project.commit }
@@ -12,7 +13,11 @@ describe CommitEntity do
   subject { entity.as_json }
 
   before do
+    render = double('render')
+    allow(render).to receive(:call).and_return(SIGNATURE_HTML)
+
     allow(request).to receive(:project).and_return(project)
+    allow(request).to receive(:render).and_return(render)
   end
 
   context 'when commit author is a user' do
@@ -51,4 +56,56 @@ describe CommitEntity do
   it 'exposes gravatar url that belongs to author' do
     expect(subject.fetch(:author_gravatar_url)).to match /gravatar/
   end
+
+  context 'when type is not set' do
+    it 'does not expose extra properties' do
+      expect(subject).not_to include(:description_html)
+      expect(subject).not_to include(:title_html)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when type is "full"' do
+    let(:entity) do
+      described_class.new(commit, request: request, type: :full, pipeline_ref: project.default_branch, pipeline_project: project)
+    end
+
+    it 'exposes extra properties' do
+      expect(subject).to include(:description_html)
+      expect(subject).to include(:title_html)
+      expect(subject.fetch(:description_html)).not_to be_nil
+      expect(subject.fetch(:title_html)).not_to be_nil
+    end
+
+    context 'when commit has signature' do
+      let(:commit) { project.commit(TestEnv::BRANCH_SHA['signed-commits']) }
+
+      it 'exposes "signature_html"' do
+        expect(request.render).to receive(:call)
+        expect(subject.fetch(:signature_html)).to be SIGNATURE_HTML
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when commit has pipeline' do
+      before do
+        create(:ci_pipeline, project: project, sha: commit.id)
+      end
+
+      it 'exposes "pipeline_status_path"' do
+        expect(subject.fetch(:pipeline_status_path)).not_to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when commit_url_params is set' do
+    let(:entity) do
+      params = { merge_request_iid: 3 }
+
+      described_class.new(commit, request: request, commit_url_params: params)
+    end
+
+    it 'adds commit_url_params to url and path' do
+      expect(subject[:commit_path]).to include "?merge_request_iid=3"
+      expect(subject[:commit_url]).to include "?merge_request_iid=3"
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/status_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/detailed_status_entity_spec.rb
index 0b010ebd507..62f57ca8689 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/status_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/detailed_status_entity_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
-describe StatusEntity do
+describe DetailedStatusEntity do
   let(:entity) { described_class.new(status) }
 
   let(:status) do
diff --git a/spec/serializers/diff_file_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/diff_file_entity_spec.rb
index 00b2146dc86..7497b8f27bd 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/diff_file_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/diff_file_entity_spec.rb
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ describe DiffFileEntity do
       )
     end
 
+    it 'includes viewer' do
+      expect(subject[:viewer].with_indifferent_access)
+          .to match_schema('entities/diff_viewer')
+    end
+
     # Converted diff files from GitHub import does not contain blob file
     # and content sha.
     context 'when diff file does not have a blob and content sha' do
@@ -67,4 +72,21 @@ describe DiffFileEntity do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  context '#parallel_diff_lines' do
+    it 'exposes parallel diff lines correctly' do
+      response = subject
+
+      lines = response[:parallel_diff_lines]
+
+      # make sure at least one line is present for each side
+      expect(lines.map { |line| line[:right] }.compact).to be_present
+      expect(lines.map { |line| line[:left] }.compact).to be_present
+      # make sure all lines are in correct format
+      lines.each do |parallel_line|
+        expect(parallel_line[:left].as_json).to match_schema('entities/diff_line') if parallel_line[:left]
+        expect(parallel_line[:right].as_json).to match_schema('entities/diff_line') if parallel_line[:right]
+      end
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/diff_line_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/diff_line_entity_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2549f64bcd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/serializers/diff_line_entity_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe DiffLineEntity do
+  include RepoHelpers
+
+  let(:code) { 'hello world' }
+  let(:line) { Gitlab::Diff::Line.new(code, 'new', 1, nil, 1) }
+  let(:entity) { described_class.new(line, request: {}) }
+
+  subject { entity.as_json }
+
+  it 'exposes correct attributes' do
+    expect(subject).to include(
+      :line_code, :type, :old_line, :new_line, :text, :meta_data, :rich_text
+    )
+  end
+
+  describe '#rich_text' do
+    let(:code) { '<h2 onmouseover="alert(2)">Test</h2>' }
+    let(:rich_text_value) { nil }
+
+    before do
+      line.instance_variable_set(:@rich_text, rich_text_value)
+    end
+
+    shared_examples 'escapes html tags' do
+      it do
+        expect(subject[:rich_text]).to eq html_escape(code)
+        expect(subject[:rich_text]).to be_html_safe
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when rich_line is present' do
+      let(:rich_text_value) { code }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'escapes html tags'
+    end
+
+    context 'when rich_line is not present' do
+      it_behaves_like 'escapes html tags'
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/diff_line_serializer_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/diff_line_serializer_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..6dd8abd0579
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/serializers/diff_line_serializer_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe DiffLineSerializer do
+  let(:line) { Gitlab::Diff::Line.new('hello world', 'new', 1, nil, 1) }
+  let(:serializer) { described_class.new.represent(line) }
+
+  describe '#to_json' do
+    subject { serializer.to_json }
+
+    it 'matches the schema' do
+      expect(subject).to match_schema('entities/diff_line')
+    end
+
+    context 'when lines are parallel' do
+      let(:right_line) { Gitlab::Diff::Line.new('right line', 'new', 1, nil, 1) }
+      let(:left_line) { Gitlab::Diff::Line.new('left line', 'match', 1, nil, 1) }
+      let(:parallel_line) { [{ right: right_line, left: left_line }] }
+      let(:serializer) { described_class.new.represent(parallel_line, {}, DiffLineParallelEntity) }
+
+      it 'matches the schema' do
+        expect(subject).to match_schema('entities/diff_line_parallel')
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/diff_viewer_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/diff_viewer_entity_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..66ac6ef2adc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/serializers/diff_viewer_entity_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe DiffViewerEntity do
+  include RepoHelpers
+
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+  let(:repository) { project.repository }
+  let(:commit) { project.commit(sample_commit.id) }
+  let(:diff_refs) { commit.diff_refs }
+  let(:diff) { commit.raw_diffs.first }
+  let(:diff_file) { Gitlab::Diff::File.new(diff, diff_refs: diff_refs, repository: repository) }
+  let(:viewer) { diff_file.simple_viewer }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(viewer).as_json }
+
+  it 'serializes diff file viewer' do
+    expect(subject.with_indifferent_access).to match_schema('entities/diff_viewer')
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/serializers/discussion_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/discussion_entity_spec.rb
index 378540a35b6..0590304e832 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/discussion_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/discussion_entity_spec.rb
@@ -36,6 +36,13 @@ describe DiscussionEntity do
     )
   end
 
+  it 'resolved_by matches note_user_entity schema' do
+    Notes::ResolveService.new(note.project, user).execute(note)
+
+    expect(subject[:resolved_by].with_indifferent_access)
+      .to match_schema('entities/note_user_entity')
+  end
+
   context 'when is LegacyDiffDiscussion' do
     let(:project) { create(:project) }
     let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) }
diff --git a/spec/serializers/job_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/job_entity_spec.rb
index 8e1ca3f308d..5fc27da4906 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/job_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/job_entity_spec.rb
@@ -109,6 +109,18 @@ describe JobEntity do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'when job is scheduled' do
+    let(:job) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+    it 'contains path to unschedule action' do
+      expect(subject).to include(:unschedule_path)
+    end
+
+    it 'contains scheduled_at' do
+      expect(subject[:scheduled_at]).to eq(job.scheduled_at)
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'when job is generic commit status' do
     let(:job) { create(:generic_commit_status, target_url: 'http://google.com') }
 
diff --git a/spec/serializers/pipeline_details_entity_spec.rb b/spec/serializers/pipeline_details_entity_spec.rb
index 45e18086894..8e73a3e67c6 100644
--- a/spec/serializers/pipeline_details_entity_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/serializers/pipeline_details_entity_spec.rb
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ describe PipelineDetailsEntity do
         expect(subject[:details])
           .to include :duration, :finished_at
         expect(subject[:details])
-          .to include :stages, :artifacts, :manual_actions
+          .to include :stages, :artifacts, :manual_actions, :scheduled_actions
         expect(subject[:details][:status]).to include :icon, :favicon, :text, :label
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service_spec.rb
index c7f88e45c84..f2e9799452a 100644
--- a/spec/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/auth/container_registry_authentication_service_spec.rb
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ describe Auth::ContainerRegistryAuthenticationService do
         { scopes: ["registry:catalog:*"] }
       end
 
-      context 'disallow browsing for users without Gitlab admin rights' do
+      context 'disallow browsing for users without GitLab admin rights' do
         it_behaves_like 'an inaccessible'
         it_behaves_like 'not a container repository factory'
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/boards/issues/list_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/boards/issues/list_service_spec.rb
index 27a7bf0e605..010679b5360 100644
--- a/spec/services/boards/issues/list_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/boards/issues/list_service_spec.rb
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ describe Boards::Issues::ListService do
 
       let!(:opened_issue1) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m1, title: 'Issue 1', labels: [bug]) }
       let!(:opened_issue2) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m2, title: 'Issue 2', labels: [p2]) }
-      let!(:reopened_issue1) { create(:issue, :opened, project: project, title: 'Issue 3' ) }
+      let!(:reopened_issue1) { create(:issue, :opened, project: project, title: 'Reopened Issue 1' ) }
 
       let!(:list1_issue1) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m1, labels: [p2, development]) }
       let!(:list1_issue2) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m2, labels: [development]) }
@@ -44,12 +44,19 @@ describe Boards::Issues::ListService do
       end
 
       it_behaves_like 'issues list service'
+
+      context 'when project is archived' do
+        let(:project) { create(:project, :archived) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'issues list service'
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when parent is a group' do
       let(:user)    { create(:user) }
       let(:project) { create(:project, :empty_repo, namespace: group) }
       let(:project1) { create(:project, :empty_repo, namespace: group) }
+      let(:project_archived) { create(:project, :empty_repo, :archived, namespace: group) }
 
       let(:m1) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
       let(:m2) { create(:milestone, group: group) }
@@ -77,7 +84,8 @@ describe Boards::Issues::ListService do
 
       let!(:opened_issue1) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m1, title: 'Issue 1', labels: [bug]) }
       let!(:opened_issue2) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m2, title: 'Issue 2', labels: [p2, p2_project]) }
-      let!(:reopened_issue1) { create(:issue, state: 'opened', project: project, title: 'Issue 3', closed_at: Time.now ) }
+      let!(:opened_issue3) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project_archived, milestone: m1, title: 'Issue 3', labels: [bug]) }
+      let!(:reopened_issue1) { create(:issue, state: 'opened', project: project, title: 'Reopened Issue 1', closed_at: Time.now ) }
 
       let!(:list1_issue1) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m1, labels: [p2, p2_project, development]) }
       let!(:list1_issue2) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, milestone: m2, labels: [development]) }
diff --git a/spec/services/ci/enqueue_build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/enqueue_build_service_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index e41b8e4800b..00000000000
--- a/spec/services/ci/enqueue_build_service_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,16 +0,0 @@
-# frozen_string_literal: true
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Ci::EnqueueBuildService, '#execute' do
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
-  let(:project) { create(:project) }
-  let(:ci_build) { create(:ci_build, :created) }
-
-  subject { described_class.new(project, user).execute(ci_build) }
-
-  it 'enqueues the build' do
-    subject
-
-    expect(ci_build.pending?).to be_truthy
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/services/ci/fetch_kubernetes_token_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/fetch_kubernetes_token_service_spec.rb
deleted file mode 100644
index 1d05c9671a9..00000000000
--- a/spec/services/ci/fetch_kubernetes_token_service_spec.rb
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,64 +0,0 @@
-require 'spec_helper'
-
-describe Ci::FetchKubernetesTokenService do
-  describe '#execute' do
-    subject { described_class.new(api_url, ca_pem, username, password).execute }
-
-    let(:api_url) { 'http://111.111.111.111' }
-    let(:ca_pem) { '' }
-    let(:username) { 'admin' }
-    let(:password) { 'xxx' }
-
-    context 'when params correct' do
-      let(:token) { 'xxx.token.xxx' }
-
-      let(:secrets_json) do
-        [
-          {
-            'metadata': {
-              name: metadata_name
-            },
-            'data': {
-              'token': Base64.encode64(token)
-            }
-          }
-        ]
-      end
-
-      before do
-        allow_any_instance_of(Kubeclient::Client)
-          .to receive(:get_secrets).and_return(secrets_json)
-      end
-
-      context 'when default-token exists' do
-        let(:metadata_name) { 'default-token-123' }
-
-        it { is_expected.to eq(token) }
-      end
-
-      context 'when default-token does not exist' do
-        let(:metadata_name) { 'another-token-123' }
-
-        it { is_expected.to be_nil }
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'when api_url is nil' do
-      let(:api_url) { nil }
-
-      it { expect { subject }.to raise_error("Incomplete settings") }
-    end
-
-    context 'when username is nil' do
-      let(:username) { nil }
-
-      it { expect { subject }.to raise_error("Incomplete settings") }
-    end
-
-    context 'when password is nil' do
-      let(:password) { nil }
-
-      it { expect { subject }.to raise_error("Incomplete settings") }
-    end
-  end
-end
diff --git a/spec/services/ci/process_build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/process_build_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..9f47439dc4a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/ci/process_build_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Ci::ProcessBuildService, '#execute' do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(project, user).execute(build, current_status) }
+
+  before do
+    project.add_maintainer(user)
+  end
+
+  shared_examples_for 'Enqueuing properly' do |valid_statuses_for_when|
+    valid_statuses_for_when.each do |status_for_prior_stages|
+      context "when status for prior stages is #{status_for_prior_stages}" do
+        let(:current_status) { status_for_prior_stages }
+
+        %w[created skipped manual scheduled].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, when: when_option, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'enqueues the build' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { build.status }.to('pending')
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        %w[pending running success failed canceled].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, when: when_option, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'does not change the build status' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { build.status }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - valid_statuses_for_when).each do |status_for_prior_stages|
+      let(:current_status) { status_for_prior_stages }
+
+      context "when status for prior stages is #{status_for_prior_stages}" do
+        %w[created pending].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, when: when_option, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'skips the build' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { build.status }.to('skipped')
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - %w[created pending]).each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, when: when_option, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'does not change build status' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { build.status }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples_for 'Actionizing properly' do |valid_statuses_for_when|
+    valid_statuses_for_when.each do |status_for_prior_stages|
+      context "when status for prior stages is #{status_for_prior_stages}" do
+        let(:current_status) { status_for_prior_stages }
+
+        %w[created].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :actionable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'enqueues the build' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { build.status }.to('manual')
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        %w[manual skipped pending running success failed canceled scheduled].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :actionable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'does not change the build status' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { build.status }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - valid_statuses_for_when).each do |status_for_prior_stages|
+      let(:current_status) { status_for_prior_stages }
+
+      context "when status for prior stages is #{status_for_prior_stages}" do
+        %w[created pending].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :actionable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'skips the build' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { build.status }.to('skipped')
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - %w[created pending]).each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :actionable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'does not change build status' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { build.status }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples_for 'Scheduling properly' do |valid_statuses_for_when|
+    valid_statuses_for_when.each do |status_for_prior_stages|
+      context "when status for prior stages is #{status_for_prior_stages}" do
+        let(:current_status) { status_for_prior_stages }
+
+        %w[created].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :schedulable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'enqueues the build' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { build.status }.to('scheduled')
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        %w[manual skipped pending running success failed canceled scheduled].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :schedulable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'does not change the build status' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { build.status }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - valid_statuses_for_when).each do |status_for_prior_stages|
+      let(:current_status) { status_for_prior_stages }
+
+      context "when status for prior stages is #{status_for_prior_stages}" do
+        %w[created pending].each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :schedulable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'skips the build' do
+              expect { subject }.to change { build.status }.to('skipped')
+            end
+          end
+        end
+
+        (HasStatus::AVAILABLE_STATUSES - %w[created pending]).each do |status|
+          context "when build status is #{status}" do
+            let(:build) { create(:ci_build, status.to_sym, :schedulable, user: user, project: project) }
+
+            it 'does not change build status' do
+              expect { subject }.not_to change { build.status }
+            end
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when build has on_success option' do
+    let(:when_option) { :on_success }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'Enqueuing properly', %w[success skipped]
+  end
+
+  context 'when build has on_failure option' do
+    let(:when_option) { :on_failure }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'Enqueuing properly', %w[failed]
+  end
+
+  context 'when build has always option' do
+    let(:when_option) { :always }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'Enqueuing properly', %w[success failed skipped]
+  end
+
+  context 'when build has manual option' do
+    let(:when_option) { :manual }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'Actionizing properly', %w[success skipped]
+  end
+
+  context 'when build has delayed option' do
+    let(:when_option) { :delayed }
+
+    before do
+      allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at) { }
+    end
+
+    context 'when ci_enable_scheduled_build is enabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_feature_flags(ci_enable_scheduled_build: true)
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'Scheduling properly', %w[success skipped]
+    end
+
+    context 'when ci_enable_scheduled_build is enabled' do
+      before do
+        stub_feature_flags(ci_enable_scheduled_build: false)
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'Actionizing properly', %w[success skipped]
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/ci/process_pipeline_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/process_pipeline_service_spec.rb
index feb5120bc68..8c7258c42ad 100644
--- a/spec/services/ci/process_pipeline_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/ci/process_pipeline_service_spec.rb
@@ -31,17 +31,14 @@ describe Ci::ProcessPipelineService, '#execute' do
       succeed_pending
 
       expect(builds.success.count).to eq(2)
-      expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
 
       succeed_pending
 
       expect(builds.success.count).to eq(4)
-      expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
 
       succeed_pending
 
       expect(builds.success.count).to eq(5)
-      expect(process_pipeline).to be_falsey
     end
 
     it 'does not process pipeline if existing stage is running' do
@@ -242,6 +239,187 @@ describe Ci::ProcessPipelineService, '#execute' do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'when delayed jobs are defined' do
+    context 'when the scene is timed incremental rollout' do
+      before do
+        create_build('build', stage_idx: 0)
+        create_build('rollout10%', **delayed_options, stage_idx: 1)
+        create_build('rollout100%', **delayed_options, stage_idx: 2)
+        create_build('cleanup', stage_idx: 3)
+
+        allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at)
+      end
+
+      context 'when builds are successful' do
+        it 'properly processes the pipeline' do
+          expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'pending' })
+
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'scheduled' })
+
+          enqueue_scheduled('rollout10%')
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'success', 'rollout100%': 'scheduled' })
+
+          enqueue_scheduled('rollout100%')
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'success', 'rollout100%': 'success', 'cleanup': 'pending' })
+
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'success', 'rollout100%': 'success', 'cleanup': 'success' })
+          expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'success'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when build job fails' do
+        it 'properly processes the pipeline' do
+          expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'pending' })
+
+          fail_running_or_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'failed' })
+          expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'failed'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when rollout 10% is unscheduled' do
+        it 'properly processes the pipeline' do
+          expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'pending' })
+
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'scheduled' })
+
+          unschedule
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'manual' })
+          expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'manual'
+        end
+
+        context 'when user plays rollout 10%' do
+          it 'schedules rollout100%' do
+            process_pipeline
+            succeed_pending
+            unschedule
+            play_manual_action('rollout10%')
+            succeed_pending
+
+            expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'success', 'rollout100%': 'scheduled' })
+            expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'scheduled'
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when rollout 10% fails' do
+        it 'properly processes the pipeline' do
+          expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'pending' })
+
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'scheduled' })
+
+          enqueue_scheduled('rollout10%')
+          fail_running_or_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'failed' })
+          expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'failed'
+        end
+
+        context 'when user retries rollout 10%' do
+          it 'does not schedule rollout10% again' do
+            process_pipeline
+            succeed_pending
+            enqueue_scheduled('rollout10%')
+            fail_running_or_pending
+            retry_build('rollout10%')
+
+            expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'pending' })
+            expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'running'
+          end
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when rollout 10% is played immidiately' do
+        it 'properly processes the pipeline' do
+          expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'pending' })
+
+          succeed_pending
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'scheduled' })
+
+          play_manual_action('rollout10%')
+
+          expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'build': 'success', 'rollout10%': 'pending' })
+          expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'running'
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when only one scheduled job exists in a pipeline' do
+      before do
+        create_build('delayed', **delayed_options, stage_idx: 0)
+
+        allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at)
+      end
+
+      it 'properly processes the pipeline' do
+        expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+        expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'delayed': 'scheduled' })
+
+        expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'scheduled'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when there are two delayed jobs in a stage' do
+      before do
+        create_build('delayed1', **delayed_options, stage_idx: 0)
+        create_build('delayed2', **delayed_options, stage_idx: 0)
+        create_build('job', stage_idx: 1)
+
+        allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at)
+      end
+
+      it 'blocks the stage until all scheduled jobs finished' do
+        expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+        expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'delayed1': 'scheduled', 'delayed2': 'scheduled' })
+
+        enqueue_scheduled('delayed1')
+
+        expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'delayed1': 'pending', 'delayed2': 'scheduled' })
+        expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'running'
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a delayed job is allowed to fail' do
+      before do
+        create_build('delayed', **delayed_options, allow_failure: true, stage_idx: 0)
+        create_build('job', stage_idx: 1)
+
+        allow(Ci::BuildScheduleWorker).to receive(:perform_at)
+      end
+
+      it 'blocks the stage and continues after it failed' do
+        expect(process_pipeline).to be_truthy
+        expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'delayed': 'scheduled' })
+
+        enqueue_scheduled('delayed')
+        fail_running_or_pending
+
+        expect(builds_names_and_statuses).to eq({ 'delayed': 'failed', 'job': 'pending' })
+        expect(pipeline.reload.status).to eq 'pending'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   context 'when there are manual action in earlier stages' do
     context 'when first stage has only optional manual actions' do
       before do
@@ -536,6 +714,13 @@ describe Ci::ProcessPipelineService, '#execute' do
     builds.pluck(:name)
   end
 
+  def builds_names_and_statuses
+    builds.each_with_object({}) do |b, h|
+      h[b.name.to_sym] = b.status
+      h
+    end
+  end
+
   def all_builds_names
     all_builds.pluck(:name)
   end
@@ -549,7 +734,7 @@ describe Ci::ProcessPipelineService, '#execute' do
   end
 
   def succeed_pending
-    builds.pending.update_all(status: 'success')
+    builds.pending.map(&:success)
   end
 
   def succeed_running_or_pending
@@ -568,6 +753,14 @@ describe Ci::ProcessPipelineService, '#execute' do
     builds.find_by(name: name).play(user)
   end
 
+  def enqueue_scheduled(name)
+    builds.scheduled.find_by(name: name).enqueue
+  end
+
+  def retry_build(name)
+    Ci::Build.retry(builds.find_by(name: name), user)
+  end
+
   def manual_actions
     pipeline.manual_actions(true)
   end
@@ -575,4 +768,12 @@ describe Ci::ProcessPipelineService, '#execute' do
   def create_build(name, **opts)
     create(:ci_build, :created, pipeline: pipeline, name: name, **opts)
   end
+
+  def delayed_options
+    { when: 'delayed', options: { start_in: '1 minute' } }
+  end
+
+  def unschedule
+    pipeline.builds.scheduled.map(&:unschedule)
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb
index 18d52082399..642de81ed52 100644
--- a/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/ci/retry_build_service_spec.rb
@@ -24,7 +24,10 @@ describe Ci::RetryBuildService do
        artifacts_file artifacts_metadata artifacts_size created_at
        updated_at started_at finished_at queued_at erased_by
        erased_at auto_canceled_by job_artifacts job_artifacts_archive
-       job_artifacts_metadata job_artifacts_trace job_artifacts_junit].freeze
+       job_artifacts_metadata job_artifacts_trace job_artifacts_junit
+       job_artifacts_sast job_artifacts_dependency_scanning
+       job_artifacts_container_scanning job_artifacts_dast
+       job_artifacts_codequality scheduled_at].freeze
 
   IGNORE_ACCESSORS =
     %i[type lock_version target_url base_tags trace_sections
@@ -38,11 +41,11 @@ describe Ci::RetryBuildService do
     let(:another_pipeline) { create(:ci_empty_pipeline, project: project) }
 
     let(:build) do
-      create(:ci_build, :failed, :artifacts, :test_reports, :expired, :erased,
-             :queued, :coverage, :tags, :allowed_to_fail, :on_tag,
-             :triggered, :trace_artifact, :teardown_environment,
+      create(:ci_build, :failed, :expired, :erased, :queued, :coverage, :tags,
+             :allowed_to_fail, :on_tag, :triggered, :teardown_environment,
              description: 'my-job', stage: 'test', stage_id: stage.id,
-             pipeline: pipeline, auto_canceled_by: another_pipeline)
+             pipeline: pipeline, auto_canceled_by: another_pipeline,
+             scheduled_at: 10.seconds.since)
     end
 
     before do
@@ -50,6 +53,15 @@ describe Ci::RetryBuildService do
       # can reset one of the fields when assigning another. We plan to deprecate
       # and remove legacy `stage` column in the future.
       build.update(stage: 'test', stage_id: stage.id)
+
+      # Make sure we have one instance for every possible job_artifact_X
+      # associations to check they are correctly rejected on build duplication.
+      Ci::JobArtifact::TYPE_AND_FORMAT_PAIRS.each do |file_type, file_format|
+        create(:ci_job_artifact, file_format,
+               file_type: file_type, job: build, expire_at: build.artifacts_expire_at)
+      end
+
+      build.reload
     end
 
     describe 'clone accessors' do
diff --git a/spec/services/ci/run_scheduled_build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/ci/run_scheduled_build_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..2c921dac238
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/ci/run_scheduled_build_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Ci::RunScheduledBuildService do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project) }
+  let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, project: project) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(project, user).execute(build) }
+
+  before do
+    stub_feature_flags(ci_enable_scheduled_build: true)
+  end
+
+  context 'when user can update build' do
+    before do
+      project.add_developer(user)
+
+      create(:protected_branch, :developers_can_merge,
+             name: pipeline.ref, project: project)
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      context 'when scheduled_at is expired' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :expired_scheduled, user: user, project: project, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it 'can run the build' do
+          expect { subject }.not_to raise_error
+
+          expect(build).to be_pending
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when scheduled_at is not expired' do
+        let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, user: user, project: project, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+        it 'can not run the build' do
+          expect { subject }.to raise_error(StateMachines::InvalidTransition)
+
+          expect(build).to be_scheduled
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is not scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :created, user: user, project: project, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'can not run the build' do
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(StateMachines::InvalidTransition)
+
+        expect(build).to be_created
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when user can not update build' do
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, user: user, project: project, pipeline: pipeline) }
+
+      it 'can not run the build' do
+        expect { subject }.to raise_error(Gitlab::Access::AccessDeniedError)
+
+        expect(build).to be_scheduled
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb
index 986f11410fd..1a565bb734d 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/applications/check_installation_progress_service_spec.rb
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::CheckInstallationProgressService do
         service.execute
 
         expect(application).to be_errored
-        expect(application.status_reason).to eq(errors)
+        expect(application.status_reason).to eq("Installation failed")
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb
index a744ec30b65..4bd19f5bd79 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/applications/install_service_spec.rb
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ describe Clusters::Applications::InstallService do
         service.execute
 
         expect(application).to be_errored
-        expect(application.status_reason).to match(/kubernetes error:/i)
+        expect(application.status_reason).to match('Kubernetes error.')
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/gcp/finalize_creation_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/gcp/finalize_creation_service_spec.rb
index 0cf91307589..0f484222228 100644
--- a/spec/services/clusters/gcp/finalize_creation_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/gcp/finalize_creation_service_spec.rb
@@ -12,9 +12,11 @@ describe Clusters::Gcp::FinalizeCreationService do
     let(:zone) { provider.zone }
     let(:cluster_name) { cluster.name }
 
+    subject { described_class.new.execute(provider) }
+
     shared_examples 'success' do
       it 'configures provider and kubernetes' do
-        described_class.new.execute(provider)
+        subject
 
         expect(provider).to be_created
       end
@@ -22,7 +24,7 @@ describe Clusters::Gcp::FinalizeCreationService do
 
     shared_examples 'error' do
       it 'sets an error to provider object' do
-        described_class.new.execute(provider)
+        subject
 
         expect(provider.reload).to be_errored
       end
@@ -33,6 +35,7 @@ describe Clusters::Gcp::FinalizeCreationService do
       let(:api_url) { 'https://' + endpoint }
       let(:username) { 'sample-username' }
       let(:password) { 'sample-password' }
+      let(:secret_name) { 'gitlab-token' }
 
       before do
         stub_cloud_platform_get_zone_cluster(
@@ -43,60 +46,102 @@ describe Clusters::Gcp::FinalizeCreationService do
             password: password
           }
         )
-
-        stub_kubeclient_discover(api_url)
       end
 
-      context 'when suceeded to fetch kuberenetes token' do
-        let(:token) { 'sample-token' }
-
+      context 'service account and token created' do
         before do
-          stub_kubeclient_get_secrets(
-            api_url,
-            {
-              token: Base64.encode64(token)
-            } )
+          stub_kubeclient_discover(api_url)
+          stub_kubeclient_create_service_account(api_url)
+          stub_kubeclient_create_secret(api_url)
         end
 
-        it_behaves_like 'success'
+        shared_context 'kubernetes token successfully fetched' do
+          let(:token) { 'sample-token' }
+
+          before do
+            stub_kubeclient_get_secret(
+              api_url,
+              {
+                metadata_name: secret_name,
+                token: Base64.encode64(token)
+              } )
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'provider legacy_abac is enabled' do
+          include_context 'kubernetes token successfully fetched'
+
+          it_behaves_like 'success'
 
-        it 'has corresponded data' do
-          described_class.new.execute(provider)
-          cluster.reload
-          provider.reload
-          platform.reload
+          it 'properly configures database models' do
+            subject
 
-          expect(provider.endpoint).to eq(endpoint)
-          expect(platform.api_url).to eq(api_url)
-          expect(platform.ca_cert).to eq(Base64.decode64(load_sample_cert))
-          expect(platform.username).to eq(username)
-          expect(platform.password).to eq(password)
-          expect(platform.token).to eq(token)
+            cluster.reload
+
+            expect(provider.endpoint).to eq(endpoint)
+            expect(platform.api_url).to eq(api_url)
+            expect(platform.ca_cert).to eq(Base64.decode64(load_sample_cert))
+            expect(platform.username).to eq(username)
+            expect(platform.password).to eq(password)
+            expect(platform).to be_abac
+            expect(platform.authorization_type).to eq('abac')
+            expect(platform.token).to eq(token)
+          end
         end
-      end
 
-      context 'when default-token is not found' do
-        before do
-          stub_kubeclient_get_secrets(api_url, metadata_name: 'aaaa')
+        context 'provider legacy_abac is disabled' do
+          before do
+            provider.legacy_abac = false
+          end
+
+          include_context 'kubernetes token successfully fetched'
+
+          context 'cluster role binding created' do
+            before do
+              stub_kubeclient_create_cluster_role_binding(api_url)
+            end
+
+            it_behaves_like 'success'
+
+            it 'properly configures database models' do
+              subject
+
+              cluster.reload
+
+              expect(provider.endpoint).to eq(endpoint)
+              expect(platform.api_url).to eq(api_url)
+              expect(platform.ca_cert).to eq(Base64.decode64(load_sample_cert))
+              expect(platform.username).to eq(username)
+              expect(platform.password).to eq(password)
+              expect(platform).to be_rbac
+              expect(platform.token).to eq(token)
+            end
+          end
         end
 
-        it_behaves_like 'error'
-      end
+        context 'when token is empty' do
+          before do
+            stub_kubeclient_get_secret(api_url, token: '', metadata_name: secret_name)
+          end
 
-      context 'when token is empty' do
-        before do
-          stub_kubeclient_get_secrets(api_url, token: '')
+          it_behaves_like 'error'
         end
 
-        it_behaves_like 'error'
-      end
+        context 'when failed to fetch kubernetes token' do
+          before do
+            stub_kubeclient_get_secret_error(api_url, secret_name)
+          end
 
-      context 'when failed to fetch kuberenetes token' do
-        before do
-          stub_kubeclient_get_secrets_error(api_url)
+          it_behaves_like 'error'
         end
 
-        it_behaves_like 'error'
+        context 'when service account fails to create' do
+          before do
+            stub_kubeclient_create_service_account_error(api_url)
+          end
+
+          it_behaves_like 'error'
+        end
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/gcp/kubernetes/create_service_account_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/gcp/kubernetes/create_service_account_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..065d021db5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/gcp/kubernetes/create_service_account_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Clusters::Gcp::Kubernetes::CreateServiceAccountService do
+  include KubernetesHelpers
+
+  let(:service) { described_class.new(kubeclient, rbac: rbac) }
+
+  describe '#execute' do
+    let(:rbac) { false }
+    let(:api_url) { 'http://111.111.111.111' }
+    let(:username) { 'admin' }
+    let(:password) { 'xxx' }
+
+    let(:kubeclient) do
+      Gitlab::Kubernetes::KubeClient.new(
+        api_url,
+        ['api', 'apis/rbac.authorization.k8s.io'],
+        auth_options: { username: username, password: password }
+      )
+    end
+
+    subject { service.execute }
+
+    context 'when params are correct' do
+      before do
+        stub_kubeclient_discover(api_url)
+        stub_kubeclient_create_service_account(api_url)
+        stub_kubeclient_create_secret(api_url)
+      end
+
+      shared_examples 'creates service account and token' do
+        it 'creates a kubernetes service account' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(WebMock).to have_requested(:post, api_url + '/api/v1/namespaces/default/serviceaccounts').with(
+            body: hash_including(
+              kind: 'ServiceAccount',
+              metadata: { name: 'gitlab', namespace: 'default' }
+            )
+          )
+        end
+
+        it 'creates a kubernetes secret of type ServiceAccountToken' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(WebMock).to have_requested(:post, api_url + '/api/v1/namespaces/default/secrets').with(
+            body: hash_including(
+              kind: 'Secret',
+              metadata: {
+                name: 'gitlab-token',
+                namespace: 'default',
+                annotations: {
+                  'kubernetes.io/service-account.name': 'gitlab'
+                }
+              },
+              type: 'kubernetes.io/service-account-token'
+            )
+          )
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'abac enabled cluster' do
+        it_behaves_like 'creates service account and token'
+      end
+
+      context 'rbac enabled cluster' do
+        let(:rbac) { true }
+
+        before do
+          stub_kubeclient_create_cluster_role_binding(api_url)
+        end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'creates service account and token'
+
+        it 'creates a kubernetes cluster role binding' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(WebMock).to have_requested(:post, api_url + '/apis/rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/clusterrolebindings').with(
+            body: hash_including(
+              kind: 'ClusterRoleBinding',
+              metadata: { name: 'gitlab-admin' },
+              roleRef: {
+                apiGroup: 'rbac.authorization.k8s.io',
+                kind: 'ClusterRole',
+                name: 'cluster-admin'
+              },
+              subjects: [{ kind: 'ServiceAccount', namespace: 'default', name: 'gitlab' }]
+            )
+          )
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/clusters/gcp/kubernetes/fetch_kubernetes_token_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/clusters/gcp/kubernetes/fetch_kubernetes_token_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c543de21d5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/clusters/gcp/kubernetes/fetch_kubernetes_token_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'fast_spec_helper'
+
+describe Clusters::Gcp::Kubernetes::FetchKubernetesTokenService do
+  describe '#execute' do
+    let(:api_url) { 'http://111.111.111.111' }
+    let(:username) { 'admin' }
+    let(:password) { 'xxx' }
+
+    let(:kubeclient) do
+      Gitlab::Kubernetes::KubeClient.new(
+        api_url,
+        ['api', 'apis/rbac.authorization.k8s.io'],
+        auth_options: { username: username, password: password }
+      )
+    end
+
+    subject { described_class.new(kubeclient).execute }
+
+    context 'when params correct' do
+      let(:decoded_token) { 'xxx.token.xxx' }
+      let(:token) { Base64.encode64(decoded_token) }
+
+      let(:secret_json) do
+        {
+          'metadata': {
+            name: 'gitlab-token'
+          },
+          'data': {
+            'token': token
+          }
+        }
+      end
+
+      before do
+        allow_any_instance_of(Kubeclient::Client)
+          .to receive(:get_secret).and_return(secret_json)
+      end
+
+      context 'when gitlab-token exists' do
+        let(:metadata_name) { 'gitlab-token' }
+
+        it { is_expected.to eq(decoded_token) }
+      end
+
+      context 'when gitlab-token does not exist' do
+        let(:secret_json) { {} }
+
+        it { is_expected.to be_nil }
+      end
+
+      context 'when token is nil' do
+        let(:token) { nil }
+
+        it { is_expected.to be_nil }
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/files/create_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/files/create_service_spec.rb
index 30d94e4318d..751b7160276 100644
--- a/spec/services/files/create_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/files/create_service_spec.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ require "spec_helper"
 describe Files::CreateService do
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:repository) { project.repository }
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user, :commit_email) }
   let(:file_content) { 'Test file content' }
   let(:branch_name) { project.default_branch }
   let(:start_branch) { branch_name }
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ describe Files::CreateService do
     }
   end
 
+  let(:commit) { repository.head_commit }
+
   subject { described_class.new(project, user, commit_params) }
 
   before do
@@ -75,4 +77,16 @@ describe Files::CreateService do
       end
     end
   end
+
+  context 'commit attribute' do
+    let(:file_path) { 'test-commit-attributes.txt' }
+
+    it 'uses the commit email' do
+      subject.execute
+
+      expect(user.commit_email).not_to eq(user.email)
+      expect(commit.author_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+      expect(commit.committer_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+    end
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/files/delete_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/files/delete_service_spec.rb
index 73566afe8c8..309802ce733 100644
--- a/spec/services/files/delete_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/files/delete_service_spec.rb
@@ -4,10 +4,11 @@ describe Files::DeleteService do
   subject { described_class.new(project, user, commit_params) }
 
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user, :commit_email) }
   let(:file_path) { 'files/ruby/popen.rb' }
   let(:branch_name) { project.default_branch }
   let(:last_commit_sha) { nil }
+  let(:commit) { project.repository.head_commit }
 
   let(:commit_params) do
     {
@@ -34,6 +35,14 @@ describe Files::DeleteService do
 
       expect(blob).to be_nil
     end
+
+    it 'uses the commit email' do
+      subject.execute
+
+      expect(user.commit_email).not_to eq(user.email)
+      expect(commit.author_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+      expect(commit.committer_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+    end
   end
 
   before do
diff --git a/spec/services/files/multi_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/files/multi_service_spec.rb
index 3bdedaf3770..5f3c8e82715 100644
--- a/spec/services/files/multi_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/files/multi_service_spec.rb
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ describe Files::MultiService do
   let(:new_file_path) { 'files/ruby/popen.rb' }
   let(:file_content) { 'New content' }
   let(:action) { 'update' }
+  let(:commit_message) { 'Update File' }
 
   let!(:original_commit_id) do
     Gitlab::Git::Commit.last_for_path(project.repository, branch_name, original_file_path).sha
@@ -30,7 +31,7 @@ describe Files::MultiService do
 
   let(:commit_params) do
     {
-      commit_message: "Update File",
+      commit_message: commit_message,
       branch_name: branch_name,
       start_branch: branch_name,
       actions: actions
@@ -84,6 +85,39 @@ describe Files::MultiService do
       end
     end
 
+    describe 'changing execute_filemode of a file' do
+      let(:commit_message) { 'Chmod +x file' }
+      let(:file_path) { original_file_path }
+      let(:default_action) do
+        {
+          action: 'chmod',
+          file_path: file_path,
+          execute_filemode: true
+        }
+      end
+
+      it 'accepts the commit' do
+        results = subject.execute
+
+        expect(results[:status]).to eq(:success)
+      end
+
+      it 'updates the execute_filemode of the file' do
+        expect { subject.execute }.to change { repository.blob_at_branch(branch_name, file_path).mode }.from('100644').to('100755')
+      end
+
+      context "when the file doesn't exists" do
+        let(:file_path) { 'files/wrong_path.rb' }
+
+        it 'rejects the commit' do
+          results = subject.execute
+
+          expect(results[:status]).to eq(:error)
+          expect(results[:message]).to eq("A file with this name doesn't exist")
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
     context 'when moving a file' do
       let(:action) { 'move' }
       let(:new_file_path) { 'files/ruby/new_popen.rb' }
diff --git a/spec/services/files/update_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/files/update_service_spec.rb
index e01fe487ffa..23db35c2418 100644
--- a/spec/services/files/update_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/files/update_service_spec.rb
@@ -4,11 +4,12 @@ describe Files::UpdateService do
   subject { described_class.new(project, user, commit_params) }
 
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user, :commit_email) }
   let(:file_path) { 'files/ruby/popen.rb' }
   let(:new_contents) { 'New Content' }
   let(:branch_name) { project.default_branch }
   let(:last_commit_sha) { nil }
+  let(:commit) { project.repository.commit }
 
   let(:commit_params) do
     {
@@ -54,6 +55,14 @@ describe Files::UpdateService do
 
         expect(results.data).to eq(new_contents)
       end
+
+      it 'uses the commit email' do
+        subject.execute
+
+        expect(user.commit_email).not_to eq(user.email)
+        expect(commit.author_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+        expect(commit.committer_email).to eq(user.commit_email)
+      end
     end
 
     context "when the last_commit_sha is not supplied" do
diff --git a/spec/services/git_push_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/git_push_service_spec.rb
index d4528256640..45ef26aebbd 100644
--- a/spec/services/git_push_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/git_push_service_spec.rb
@@ -246,13 +246,15 @@ describe GitPushService, services: true do
 
     describe 'system hooks' do
       let!(:push_data) { push_data_from_service(project, user, oldrev, newrev, ref) }
-      let(:system_hooks_service) { SystemHooksService.new }
+      let!(:system_hooks_service) { SystemHooksService.new }
 
       it "sends a system hook after pushing a branch" do
-        expect(SystemHooksService).to receive(:new).and_return(system_hooks_service)
-        expect(system_hooks_service).to receive(:execute_hooks).with(push_data, :push_hooks)
+        allow(SystemHooksService).to receive(:new).and_return(system_hooks_service)
+        allow(system_hooks_service).to receive(:execute_hooks)
 
         execute_service(project, user, oldrev, newrev, ref)
+
+        expect(system_hooks_service).to have_received(:execute_hooks).with(push_data, :push_hooks)
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb
index 92159e1e372..2699f6e7bcd 100644
--- a/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/git_tag_push_service_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe GitTagPushService do
   include RepoHelpers
+  include GitHelpers
 
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
@@ -118,9 +119,7 @@ describe GitTagPushService do
 
       before do
         # Create the lightweight tag
-        Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          project.repository.raw_repository.rugged.tags.create(tag_name, newrev)
-        end
+        rugged_repo(project.repository).tags.create(tag_name, newrev)
 
         # Clear tag list cache
         project.repository.expire_tags_cache
diff --git a/spec/services/groups/destroy_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/groups/destroy_service_spec.rb
index 97a88b5d697..d80d0f5a8a8 100644
--- a/spec/services/groups/destroy_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/groups/destroy_service_spec.rb
@@ -35,14 +35,6 @@ describe Groups::DestroyService do
       it { expect(NotificationSetting.unscoped.all).not_to include(notification_setting) }
     end
 
-    context 'site statistics' do
-      it 'doesnt trigger project deletion hooks twice' do
-        expect_any_instance_of(Project).to receive(:untrack_site_statistics).once
-
-        destroy_group(group, user, async)
-      end
-    end
-
     context 'mattermost team' do
       let!(:chat_team) { create(:chat_team, namespace: group) }
 
diff --git a/spec/services/groups/transfer_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/groups/transfer_service_spec.rb
index 999677cfaaa..d71ccfb4334 100644
--- a/spec/services/groups/transfer_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/groups/transfer_service_spec.rb
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ describe Groups::TransferService, :postgresql do
       end
     end
 
-    context "when there's an exception on Gitlab shell directories" do
+    context "when there's an exception on GitLab shell directories" do
       let(:new_parent_group) { create(:group, :public) }
 
       before do
diff --git a/spec/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service_spec.rb
index dcf4503ef9c..fa1a421d528 100644
--- a/spec/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/issuable/common_system_notes_service_spec.rb
@@ -12,12 +12,21 @@ describe Issuable::CommonSystemNotesService do
     it_behaves_like 'system note creation', { time_estimate: 5 }, 'changed time estimate'
 
     context 'when new label is added' do
+      let(:label) { create(:label, project: project) }
+
       before do
-        label = create(:label, project: project)
         issuable.labels << label
+        issuable.save
       end
 
-      it_behaves_like 'system note creation', {}, /added ~\w+ label/
+      it 'creates a resource label event' do
+        described_class.new(project, user).execute(issuable, [])
+        event = issuable.reload.resource_label_events.last
+
+        expect(event).not_to be_nil
+        expect(event.label_id).to eq label.id
+        expect(event.user_id).to eq user.id
+      end
     end
 
     context 'when new milestone is assigned' do
diff --git a/spec/services/issues/move_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/issues/move_service_spec.rb
index 609eef76d2c..b5767583952 100644
--- a/spec/services/issues/move_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/issues/move_service_spec.rb
@@ -122,6 +122,17 @@ describe Issues::MoveService do
         end
       end
 
+      context 'issue with resource label events' do
+        it 'assigns resource label events to new issue' do
+          old_issue.resource_label_events = create_list(:resource_label_event, 2, issue: old_issue)
+
+          new_issue = move_service.execute(old_issue, new_project)
+
+          expected = old_issue.resource_label_events.map(&:label_id)
+          expect(new_issue.resource_label_events.map(&:label_id)).to match_array(expected)
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'generic issue' do
         include_context 'issue move executed'
 
diff --git a/spec/services/issues/related_branches_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/issues/related_branches_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c2e1eba6a63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/issues/related_branches_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Issues::RelatedBranchesService do
+  let(:user) { create(:admin) }
+  let(:issue) { create(:issue) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(issue.project, user) }
+
+  describe '#execute' do
+    before do
+      allow(issue.project.repository).to receive(:branch_names).and_return(["mpempe", "#{issue.iid}mepmep", issue.to_branch_name, "#{issue.iid}-branch"])
+    end
+
+    it "selects the right branches when there are no referenced merge requests" do
+      expect(subject.execute(issue)).to eq([issue.to_branch_name, "#{issue.iid}-branch"])
+    end
+
+    it "selects the right branches when there is a referenced merge request" do
+      merge_request = create(:merge_request, { description: "Closes ##{issue.iid}",
+                                               source_project: issue.project,
+                                               source_branch: "#{issue.iid}-branch" })
+      merge_request.create_cross_references!(user)
+
+      referenced_merge_requests = Issues::ReferencedMergeRequestsService
+                                    .new(issue.project, user)
+                                    .referenced_merge_requests(issue)
+
+      expect(referenced_merge_requests).not_to be_empty
+      expect(subject.execute(issue)).to eq([issue.to_branch_name])
+    end
+
+    it 'excludes stable branches from the related branches' do
+      allow(issue.project.repository).to receive(:branch_names)
+        .and_return(["#{issue.iid}-0-stable"])
+
+      expect(subject.execute(issue)).to eq []
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/issues/update_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/issues/update_service_spec.rb
index 5bcfef46b75..07aa8449a66 100644
--- a/spec/services/issues/update_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/issues/update_service_spec.rb
@@ -189,11 +189,12 @@ describe Issues::UpdateService, :mailer do
           expect(note.note).to include "assigned to #{user2.to_reference}"
         end
 
-        it 'creates system note about issue label edit' do
-          note = find_note('added ~')
+        it 'creates a resource label event' do
+          event = issue.resource_label_events.last
 
-          expect(note).not_to be_nil
-          expect(note.note).to include "added #{label.to_reference} label"
+          expect(event).not_to be_nil
+          expect(event.label_id).to eq label.id
+          expect(event.user_id).to eq user.id
         end
 
         it 'creates system note about title change' do
diff --git a/spec/services/merge_requests/build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/merge_requests/build_service_spec.rb
index 0ced5d1b6d6..9f1da7d9419 100644
--- a/spec/services/merge_requests/build_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/merge_requests/build_service_spec.rb
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ describe MergeRequests::BuildService do
   let(:description) { nil }
   let(:source_branch) { 'feature-branch' }
   let(:target_branch) { 'master' }
+  let(:milestone_id) { nil }
+  let(:label_ids) { [] }
   let(:merge_request) { service.execute }
   let(:compare) { double(:compare, commits: commits) }
   let(:commit_1) { double(:commit_1, sha: 'f00ba7', safe_message: "Initial commit\n\nCreate the app") }
@@ -25,7 +27,9 @@ describe MergeRequests::BuildService do
                                     source_branch: source_branch,
                                     target_branch: target_branch,
                                     source_project: source_project,
-                                    target_project: target_project)
+                                    target_project: target_project,
+                                    milestone_id: milestone_id,
+                                    label_ids: label_ids)
   end
 
   before do
@@ -179,6 +183,33 @@ describe MergeRequests::BuildService do
             expect(merge_request.description).to eq(expected_description)
           end
         end
+
+        context 'when the source branch matches an internal issue' do
+          let(:label) { create(:label, project: project) }
+          let(:milestone) { create(:milestone, project: project) }
+          let(:source_branch) { '123-fix-issue' }
+
+          before do
+            issue.update!(iid: 123, labels: [label], milestone: milestone)
+          end
+
+          it 'assigns the issue label and milestone' do
+            expect(merge_request.milestone).to eq(milestone)
+            expect(merge_request.labels).to match_array([label])
+          end
+
+          context 'when milestone_id and label_ids are shared in the params' do
+            let(:label2) { create(:label, project: project) }
+            let(:milestone2) { create(:milestone, project: project) }
+            let(:label_ids) { [label2.id] }
+            let(:milestone_id) { milestone2.id }
+
+            it 'assigns milestone_id and label_ids instead of issue labels and milestone' do
+              expect(merge_request.milestone).to eq(milestone2)
+              expect(merge_request.labels).to match_array([label2])
+            end
+          end
+        end
       end
     end
 
diff --git a/spec/services/merge_requests/rebase_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/merge_requests/rebase_service_spec.rb
index 2703da7ae44..427a2d63a88 100644
--- a/spec/services/merge_requests/rebase_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/merge_requests/rebase_service_spec.rb
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ describe MergeRequests::RebaseService do
           expect(merge_request.reload.rebase_commit_sha).to eq(head_sha)
         end
 
-        it 'logs correct author and commiter' do
+        it 'logs correct author and committer' do
           head_commit = merge_request.source_project.repository.commit(merge_request.source_branch)
 
           expect(head_commit.author_email).to eq('dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com')
diff --git a/spec/services/merge_requests/reload_diffs_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/merge_requests/reload_diffs_service_spec.rb
index a0a27d247fc..21f369a3818 100644
--- a/spec/services/merge_requests/reload_diffs_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/merge_requests/reload_diffs_service_spec.rb
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ describe MergeRequests::ReloadDiffsService, :use_clean_rails_memory_store_cachin
         expect(Rails.cache).to receive(:delete).with(old_cache_key).and_call_original
         expect(Rails.cache).to receive(:read).with(new_cache_key).and_call_original
         expect(Rails.cache).to receive(:write).with(new_cache_key, anything, anything).and_call_original
+
         subject.execute
       end
     end
diff --git a/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb
index 8ab09412f55..53bce15735c 100644
--- a/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/merge_requests/squash_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe MergeRequests::SquashService do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:service) { described_class.new(project, user, {}) }
   let(:user) { project.owner }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
@@ -63,9 +65,7 @@ describe MergeRequests::SquashService do
       end
 
       it 'has the same diff as the merge request, but a different SHA' do
-        rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          project.repository.rugged
-        end
+        rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository)
         mr_diff = rugged.diff(merge_request.diff_base_sha, merge_request.diff_head_sha)
         squash_diff = rugged.diff(merge_request.diff_start_sha, squash_sha)
 
diff --git a/spec/services/merge_requests/update_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/merge_requests/update_service_spec.rb
index f0029af83cc..55dfab81c26 100644
--- a/spec/services/merge_requests/update_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/merge_requests/update_service_spec.rb
@@ -109,11 +109,12 @@ describe MergeRequests::UpdateService, :mailer do
         expect(note.note).to include "assigned to #{user2.to_reference}"
       end
 
-      it 'creates system note about merge_request label edit' do
-        note = find_note('added ~')
+      it 'creates a resource label event' do
+        event = merge_request.resource_label_events.last
 
-        expect(note).not_to be_nil
-        expect(note.note).to include "added #{label.to_reference} label"
+        expect(event).not_to be_nil
+        expect(event.label_id).to eq label.id
+        expect(event.user_id).to eq user.id
       end
 
       it 'creates system note about title change' do
diff --git a/spec/services/notes/build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/notes/build_service_spec.rb
index 6e1c1fe6c02..ff85c261cd4 100644
--- a/spec/services/notes/build_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/notes/build_service_spec.rb
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ describe Notes::BuildService do
   let(:note) { create(:discussion_note_on_issue) }
   let(:project) { note.project }
   let(:author) { note.author }
+  let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project) }
+  let(:mr_note) { create(:discussion_note_on_merge_request, noteable: merge_request, project: project, author: author) }
 
   describe '#execute' do
     context 'when in_reply_to_discussion_id is specified' do
@@ -12,6 +14,19 @@ describe Notes::BuildService do
           new_note = described_class.new(project, author, note: 'Test', in_reply_to_discussion_id: note.discussion_id).execute
           expect(new_note).to be_valid
           expect(new_note.in_reply_to?(note)).to be_truthy
+          expect(new_note.resolved?).to be_falsey
+        end
+
+        context 'when discussion is resolved' do
+          before do
+            mr_note.resolve!(author)
+          end
+
+          it 'resolves the note' do
+            new_note = described_class.new(project, author, note: 'Test', in_reply_to_discussion_id: mr_note.discussion_id).execute
+            expect(new_note).to be_valid
+            expect(new_note.resolved?).to be_truthy
+          end
         end
       end
 
diff --git a/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb
index 14ba6b7bed2..cea5ea125b9 100644
--- a/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/notification_recipient_service_spec.rb
@@ -10,27 +10,50 @@ describe NotificationRecipientService do
     let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, assignees: [assignee]) }
     let(:note) { create(:note_on_issue, noteable: issue, project_id: issue.project_id) }
 
-    def create_watcher
-      watcher = create(:user)
-      create(:notification_setting, source: project, user: watcher, level: :watch)
+    shared_examples 'no N+1 queries' do
+      it 'avoids N+1 queries', :request_store do
+        create_user
 
-      other_projects.each do |other_project|
-        create(:notification_setting, source: other_project, user: watcher, level: :watch)
+        service.build_new_note_recipients(note)
+
+        control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new do
+          service.build_new_note_recipients(note)
+        end
+
+        create_user
+
+        expect { service.build_new_note_recipients(note) }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count)
       end
     end
 
-    it 'avoids N+1 queries', :request_store do
-      create_watcher
+    context 'when there are multiple watchers' do
+      def create_user
+        watcher = create(:user)
+        create(:notification_setting, source: project, user: watcher, level: :watch)
+
+        other_projects.each do |other_project|
+          create(:notification_setting, source: other_project, user: watcher, level: :watch)
+        end
+      end
 
-      service.build_new_note_recipients(note)
+      include_examples 'no N+1 queries'
+    end
 
-      control_count = ActiveRecord::QueryRecorder.new do
-        service.build_new_note_recipients(note)
+    context 'when there are multiple subscribers' do
+      def create_user
+        subscriber = create(:user)
+        issue.subscriptions.create(user: subscriber, project: project, subscribed: true)
       end
 
-      create_watcher
+      include_examples 'no N+1 queries'
 
-      expect { service.build_new_note_recipients(note) }.not_to exceed_query_limit(control_count)
+      context 'when the project is private' do
+        before do
+          project.update!(visibility_level: Gitlab::VisibilityLevel::PRIVATE)
+        end
+
+        include_examples 'no N+1 queries'
+      end
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/notification_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/notification_service_spec.rb
index c442f6fe32f..68a361fa882 100644
--- a/spec/services/notification_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/notification_service_spec.rb
@@ -1969,6 +1969,23 @@ describe NotificationService, :mailer do
     end
   end
 
+  context 'Auto DevOps notifications' do
+    describe '#autodevops_disabled' do
+      let(:owner) { create(:user) }
+      let(:namespace) { create(:namespace, owner: owner) }
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops, namespace: namespace) }
+      let(:pipeline_user) { create(:user) }
+      let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :failed, project: project, user: pipeline_user) }
+
+      it 'emails project owner and user that triggered the pipeline' do
+        notification.autodevops_disabled(pipeline, [owner.email, pipeline_user.email])
+
+        should_email(owner)
+        should_email(pipeline_user)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   def build_team(project)
     @u_watcher               = create_global_setting_for(create(:user), :watch)
     @u_participating         = create_global_setting_for(create(:user), :participating)
diff --git a/spec/services/preview_markdown_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/preview_markdown_service_spec.rb
index 507909d9231..b69977c812a 100644
--- a/spec/services/preview_markdown_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/preview_markdown_service_spec.rb
@@ -101,4 +101,11 @@ describe PreviewMarkdownService do
 
     expect(result[:markdown_engine]).to eq :common_mark
   end
+
+  it 'honors the legacy_render parameter' do
+    service = described_class.new(project, user, { legacy_render: '1' })
+    result  = service.execute
+
+    expect(result[:markdown_engine]).to eq :redcarpet
+  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb
index cd52bc88f4c..4dd6c6dab86 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/after_import_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Projects::AfterImportService do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   subject { described_class.new(project) }
 
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
@@ -53,7 +55,7 @@ describe Projects::AfterImportService do
     end
 
     def rugged
-      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access { repository.rugged }
+      rugged_repo(repository)
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/auto_devops/disable_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/auto_devops/disable_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..76977d7a1a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/projects/auto_devops/disable_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Projects::AutoDevops::DisableService, '#execute' do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops) }
+  let(:auto_devops) { project.auto_devops }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(project).execute }
+
+  context 'when Auto DevOps disabled at instance level' do
+    before do
+      stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: false)
+    end
+
+    it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
+  end
+
+  context 'when Auto DevOps enabled at instance level' do
+    before do
+      stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: true)
+    end
+
+    context 'when Auto DevOps explicitly enabled on project' do
+      before do
+        auto_devops.update!(enabled: true)
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
+    end
+
+    context 'when Auto DevOps explicitly disabled on project' do
+      before do
+        auto_devops.update!(enabled: false)
+      end
+
+      it { is_expected.to be_falsy }
+    end
+
+    context 'when Auto DevOps is implicitly enabled' do
+      before do
+        auto_devops.update!(enabled: nil)
+      end
+
+      context 'when is the first pipeline failure' do
+        before do
+          create(:ci_pipeline, :failed, :auto_devops_source, project: project)
+        end
+
+        it 'should disable Auto DevOps for project' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(auto_devops.enabled).to eq(false)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when it is not the first pipeline failure' do
+        before do
+          create_list(:ci_pipeline, 2, :failed, :auto_devops_source, project: project)
+        end
+
+        it 'should explicitly disable Auto DevOps for project' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(auto_devops.reload.enabled).to eq(false)
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when an Auto DevOps pipeline has succeeded before' do
+        before do
+          create(:ci_pipeline, :success, :auto_devops_source, project: project)
+        end
+
+        it 'should not disable Auto DevOps for project' do
+          subject
+
+          expect(auto_devops.reload.enabled).to be_nil
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when project does not have an Auto DevOps record related' do
+      let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
+
+      before do
+        create(:ci_pipeline, :failed, :auto_devops_source, project: project)
+      end
+
+      it 'should disable Auto DevOps for project' do
+        subject
+        auto_devops = project.reload.auto_devops
+
+        expect(auto_devops.enabled).to eq(false)
+      end
+
+      it 'should create a ProjectAutoDevops record' do
+        expect { subject }.to change { ProjectAutoDevops.count }.from(0).to(1)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb
index e98df375d48..373fe7cb7dd 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/autocomplete_service_spec.rb
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ describe Projects::AutocompleteService do
     let!(:label1) { create(:label, project: project) }
     let!(:label2) { create(:label, project: project) }
     let!(:sub_group_label) { create(:group_label, group: sub_group) }
-    let!(:parent_group_label) { create(:group_label, group: group.parent) }
+    let!(:parent_group_label) { create(:group_label, group: group.parent, group_id: group.id) }
 
     before do
       create(:group_member, group: group, user: user)
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ describe Projects::AutocompleteService do
 
     it 'returns labels from project and ancestor groups' do
       service = described_class.new(project, user)
-      results = service.labels_as_hash
+      results = service.labels_as_hash(nil)
       expected_labels = [label1, label2, parent_group_label]
 
       expect_labels_to_equal(results, expected_labels)
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/container_repository/destroy_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/container_repository/destroy_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..affcc66d2bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/projects/container_repository/destroy_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Projects::ContainerRepository::DestroyService do
+  set(:user) { create(:user) }
+  set(:project) { create(:project, :private) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new(project, user) }
+
+  before do
+    stub_container_registry_config(enabled: true)
+  end
+
+  context 'when user does not have access to registry' do
+    let!(:repository) { create(:container_repository, :root, project: project) }
+
+    it 'does not delete a repository' do
+      expect { subject.execute(repository) }.not_to change { ContainerRepository.all.count }
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when user has access to registry' do
+    before do
+      project.add_developer(user)
+    end
+
+    context 'when root container repository exists' do
+      let!(:repository) { create(:container_repository, :root, project: project) }
+
+      before do
+        stub_container_registry_tags(repository: :any, tags: [])
+      end
+
+      it 'deletes the repository' do
+        expect(repository).to receive(:delete_tags!).and_call_original
+        expect { described_class.new(project, user).execute(repository) }.to change { ContainerRepository.all.count }.by(-1)
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb
index bb3f1501f0e..a80c8a7fe51 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/create_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Projects::CreateService, '#execute' do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
   let(:user) { create :user }
   let(:opts) do
@@ -295,9 +297,7 @@ describe Projects::CreateService, '#execute' do
 
   it 'writes project full path to .git/config' do
     project = create_project(user, opts)
-    rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      project.repository.rugged
-    end
+    rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository)
 
     expect(rugged.config['gitlab.fullpath']).to eq project.full_path
   end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/destroy_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/destroy_service_spec.rb
index e428808ab68..beff499f2be 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/destroy_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/destroy_service_spec.rb
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ describe Projects::DestroyService do
       context 'when image repository deletion fails' do
         it 'raises an exception' do
           expect_any_instance_of(ContainerRepository)
-            .to receive(:delete_tags!).and_return(false)
+            .to receive(:delete_tags!).and_raise(RuntimeError)
 
           expect(destroy_project(project, user)).to be false
         end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb
index 5f67c325223..0e82194e9ee 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/hashed_storage/migrate_repository_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Projects::HashedStorage::MigrateRepositoryService do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
   let(:project) { create(:project, :legacy_storage, :repository, :wiki_repo) }
   let(:legacy_storage) { Storage::LegacyProject.new(project) }
@@ -38,9 +40,7 @@ describe Projects::HashedStorage::MigrateRepositoryService do
       it 'writes project full path to .git/config' do
         service.execute
 
-        rugged_config = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          project.repository.rugged.config['gitlab.fullpath']
-        end
+        rugged_config = rugged_repo(project.repository).config['gitlab.fullpath']
 
         expect(rugged_config).to eq project.full_path
       end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb
index 92c5ac7354a..1411723fb9e 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/transfer_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Projects::TransferService do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
   let(:user) { create(:user) }
   let(:group) { create(:group) }
@@ -291,8 +293,6 @@ describe Projects::TransferService do
   end
 
   def rugged_config
-    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      project.repository.rugged.config
-    end
+    rugged_repo(project.repository).config
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service_spec.rb
index 96e8a80b334..cd903bfe8a5 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/update_remote_mirror_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,107 +1,88 @@
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe Projects::UpdateRemoteMirrorService do
-  set(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
-  let(:owner) { project.owner }
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:remote_project) { create(:forked_project_with_submodules) }
-  let(:repository) { project.repository }
-  let(:raw_repository) { repository.raw }
   let(:remote_mirror) { project.remote_mirrors.create!(url: remote_project.http_url_to_repo, enabled: true, only_protected_branches: false) }
+  let(:remote_name) { remote_mirror.remote_name }
 
-  subject { described_class.new(project, project.creator) }
+  subject(:service) { described_class.new(project, project.creator) }
 
   describe "#execute" do
     before do
-      repository.add_branch(owner, 'existing-branch', 'master')
+      project.repository.add_branch(project.owner, 'existing-branch', 'master')
 
       allow(remote_mirror).to receive(:update_repository).and_return(true)
     end
 
+    it "ensures the remote exists" do
+      stub_fetch_remote(project, remote_name: remote_name)
+
+      expect(remote_mirror).to receive(:ensure_remote!)
+
+      service.execute(remote_mirror)
+    end
+
     it "fetches the remote repository" do
-      expect(remote_mirror).to receive(:ensure_remote!).and_call_original
-      expect(repository).to receive(:fetch_remote).with(remote_mirror.remote_name, no_tags: true) do
-        sync_remote(repository, remote_mirror.remote_name, local_branch_names)
-      end
+      expect(project.repository)
+        .to receive(:fetch_remote)
+        .with(remote_mirror.remote_name, no_tags: true)
 
-      subject.execute(remote_mirror)
+      service.execute(remote_mirror)
     end
 
-    it "succeeds" do
-      allow(repository).to receive(:fetch_remote) { sync_remote(repository, remote_mirror.remote_name, local_branch_names) }
+    it "returns success when updated succeeds" do
+      stub_fetch_remote(project, remote_name: remote_name)
 
-      result = subject.execute(remote_mirror)
+      result = service.execute(remote_mirror)
 
       expect(result[:status]).to eq(:success)
     end
 
     context 'when syncing all branches' do
       it "push all the branches the first time" do
-        allow(repository).to receive(:fetch_remote)
+        stub_fetch_remote(project, remote_name: remote_name)
 
         expect(remote_mirror).to receive(:update_repository).with({})
 
-        subject.execute(remote_mirror)
+        service.execute(remote_mirror)
       end
     end
 
     context 'when only syncing protected branches' do
-      let(:unprotected_branch_name) { 'existing-branch' }
-      let(:protected_branch_name) do
-        project.repository.branch_names.find { |n| n != unprotected_branch_name }
-      end
-      let!(:protected_branch) do
-        create(:protected_branch, project: project, name: protected_branch_name)
-      end
-
-      before do
-        project.reload
+      it "sync updated protected branches" do
+        stub_fetch_remote(project, remote_name: remote_name)
+        protected_branch = create_protected_branch(project)
         remote_mirror.only_protected_branches = true
-      end
 
-      it "sync updated protected branches" do
-        allow(repository).to receive(:fetch_remote)
-        expect(remote_mirror).to receive(:update_repository).with(only_branches_matching: [protected_branch_name])
+        expect(remote_mirror)
+          .to receive(:update_repository)
+          .with(only_branches_matching: [protected_branch.name])
 
-        subject.execute(remote_mirror)
+        service.execute(remote_mirror)
       end
-    end
-  end
 
-  def sync_remote(repository, remote_name, local_branch_names)
-    local_branch_names.each do |branch|
-      commit = repository.commit(branch)
-      repository.write_ref("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch}", commit.id) if commit
+      def create_protected_branch(project)
+        branch_name = project.repository.branch_names.find { |n| n != 'existing-branch' }
+        create(:protected_branch, project: project, name: branch_name)
+      end
     end
   end
 
-  def update_remote_branch(repository, remote_name, branch)
-    masterrev = repository.commit('master').id
-
-    repository.write_ref("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch}", masterrev, force: true)
-    repository.expire_branches_cache
+  def stub_fetch_remote(project, remote_name:)
+    allow(project.repository)
+      .to receive(:fetch_remote)
+      .with(remote_name, no_tags: true) { fetch_remote(project.repository, remote_name) }
   end
 
-  def update_branch(repository, branch)
-    masterrev = repository.commit('master').id
-
-    repository.write_ref("refs/heads/#{branch}", masterrev, force: true)
-    repository.expire_branches_cache
-  end
-
-  def generate_tags(repository, *tag_names)
-    tag_names.each_with_object([]) do |name, tags|
-      tag = repository.find_tag(name)
-      target = tag.try(:target)
-      target_commit = tag.try(:dereferenced_target)
-      tags << Gitlab::Git::Tag.new(repository.raw_repository, {
-        name: name,
-        target: target,
-        target_commit: target_commit
-      })
+  def fetch_remote(repository, remote_name)
+    local_branch_names(repository).each do |branch|
+      commit = repository.commit(branch)
+      repository.write_ref("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch}", commit.id) if commit
     end
   end
 
-  def local_branch_names
+  def local_branch_names(repository)
     branch_names = repository.branches.map(&:name)
     # we want the protected branch to be pushed first
     branch_names.unshift(branch_names.delete('master'))
diff --git a/spec/services/projects/update_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/projects/update_service_spec.rb
index 695b9980548..d58ff2cedc0 100644
--- a/spec/services/projects/update_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/projects/update_service_spec.rb
@@ -340,6 +340,27 @@ describe Projects::UpdateService do
         call_service
       end
     end
+
+    context 'when updating #pages_access_level' do
+      subject(:call_service) do
+        update_project(project, admin, project_feature_attributes: { pages_access_level: ProjectFeature::PRIVATE })
+      end
+
+      it 'updates the attribute' do
+        expect { call_service }
+          .to change { project.project_feature.pages_access_level }
+          .to(ProjectFeature::PRIVATE)
+      end
+
+      it 'calls Projects::UpdatePagesConfigurationService' do
+        expect(Projects::UpdatePagesConfigurationService)
+          .to receive(:new)
+          .with(project)
+          .and_call_original
+
+        call_service
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe '#run_auto_devops_pipeline?' do
diff --git a/spec/services/quick_actions/interpret_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/quick_actions/interpret_service_spec.rb
index bf1c157c4a2..ac0ca1f33a5 100644
--- a/spec/services/quick_actions/interpret_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/quick_actions/interpret_service_spec.rb
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe QuickActions::InterpretService do
@@ -272,6 +274,28 @@ describe QuickActions::InterpretService do
       end
     end
 
+    shared_examples 'lock command' do
+      let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, discussion_locked: false) }
+      let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project, discussion_locked: false) }
+
+      it 'returns discussion_locked: true if content contains /lock' do
+        _, updates = service.execute(content, issuable)
+
+        expect(updates).to eq(discussion_locked: true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    shared_examples 'unlock command' do
+      let(:issue) { create(:issue, project: project, discussion_locked: true) }
+      let(:merge_request) { create(:merge_request, source_project: project, discussion_locked: true) }
+
+      it 'returns discussion_locked: true if content contains /unlock' do
+        _, updates = service.execute(content, issuable)
+
+        expect(updates).to eq(discussion_locked: false)
+      end
+    end
+
     shared_examples 'empty command' do
       it 'populates {} if content contains an unsupported command' do
         _, updates = service.execute(content, issuable)
@@ -786,6 +810,26 @@ describe QuickActions::InterpretService do
       let(:issuable) { issue }
     end
 
+    it_behaves_like 'lock command' do
+      let(:content) { '/lock' }
+      let(:issuable) { issue }
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'lock command' do
+      let(:content) { '/lock' }
+      let(:issuable) { merge_request }
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'unlock command' do
+      let(:content) { '/unlock' }
+      let(:issuable) { issue }
+    end
+
+    it_behaves_like 'unlock command' do
+      let(:content) { '/unlock' }
+      let(:issuable) { merge_request }
+    end
+
     context '/todo' do
       let(:content) { '/todo' }
 
@@ -821,6 +865,13 @@ describe QuickActions::InterpretService do
         let(:source_issuable) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, labels: [inreview_label, todo_label]) }
 
         let(:content) { "/copy_metadata #{source_issuable.to_reference}" }
+        let(:issuable) { build(:issue, project: project) }
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'copy_metadata command' do
+        let(:source_issuable) { create(:labeled_issue, project: project, labels: [inreview_label, todo_label]) }
+
+        let(:content) { "/copy_metadata #{source_issuable.to_reference}" }
         let(:issuable) { issue }
       end
 
@@ -961,6 +1012,16 @@ describe QuickActions::InterpretService do
         let(:content) { '/duplicate #{issue.to_reference}' }
         let(:issuable) { issue }
       end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'empty command' do
+        let(:content) { '/lock' }
+        let(:issuable) { issue }
+      end
+
+      it_behaves_like 'empty command' do
+        let(:content) { '/unlock' }
+        let(:issuable) { issue }
+      end
     end
 
     context '/award command' do
diff --git a/spec/services/resource_events/change_labels_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/resource_events/change_labels_service_spec.rb
index 41b0fb3eea3..4c9138fb1ef 100644
--- a/spec/services/resource_events/change_labels_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/resource_events/change_labels_service_spec.rb
@@ -18,6 +18,14 @@ describe ResourceEvents::ChangeLabelsService do
       expect(event.action).to eq(action)
     end
 
+    it 'expires resource note etag cache' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Gitlab::EtagCaching::Store)
+        .to receive(:touch)
+        .with("/#{resource.project.namespace.to_param}/#{resource.project.to_param}/noteable/issue/#{resource.id}/notes")
+
+      described_class.new(resource, author).execute(added_labels: [labels[0]])
+    end
+
     context 'when adding a label' do
       let(:added)   { [labels[0]] }
       let(:removed) { [] }
diff --git a/spec/services/resource_events/merge_into_notes_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/resource_events/merge_into_notes_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0d333d541c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/resource_events/merge_into_notes_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe ResourceEvents::MergeIntoNotesService do
+  def create_event(params)
+    event_params = { action: :add, label: label, issue: resource,
+                     user: user }
+
+    create(:resource_label_event, event_params.merge(params))
+  end
+
+  def create_note(params)
+    opts = { noteable: resource, project: project }
+
+    create(:note_on_issue, opts.merge(params))
+  end
+
+  set(:project)  { create(:project) }
+  set(:user)   { create(:user) }
+  set(:resource) { create(:issue, project: project) }
+  set(:label) { create(:label, project: project) }
+  set(:label2) { create(:label, project: project) }
+  let(:time) { Time.now }
+
+  describe '#execute' do
+    it 'merges label events into notes in order of created_at' do
+      note1 = create_note(created_at: 4.days.ago)
+      note2 = create_note(created_at: 2.days.ago)
+      event1 = create_event(created_at: 3.days.ago)
+      event2 = create_event(created_at: 1.day.ago)
+
+      notes = described_class.new(resource, user).execute([note1, note2])
+
+      expected = [note1, event1, note2, event2].map(&:discussion_id)
+      expect(notes.map(&:discussion_id)).to eq expected
+    end
+
+    it 'squashes events with same time and author into single note' do
+      user2 = create(:user)
+
+      create_event(created_at: time)
+      create_event(created_at: time, label: label2, action: :remove)
+      create_event(created_at: time, user: user2)
+      create_event(created_at: 1.day.ago, label: label2)
+
+      notes = described_class.new(resource, user).execute()
+
+      expected = [
+        "added #{label.to_reference} label and removed #{label2.to_reference} label",
+        "added #{label.to_reference} label",
+        "added #{label2.to_reference} label"
+      ]
+
+      expect(notes.count).to eq 3
+      expect(notes.map(&:note)).to match_array expected
+    end
+
+    it 'fetches only notes created after last_fetched_at' do
+      create_event(created_at: 4.days.ago)
+      event = create_event(created_at: 1.day.ago)
+
+      notes = described_class.new(resource, user,
+                                  last_fetched_at: 2.days.ago.to_i).execute()
+
+      expect(notes.count).to eq 1
+      expect(notes.first.discussion_id).to eq event.discussion_id
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb
index 442de61f69b..a18126ee339 100644
--- a/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/system_note_service_spec.rb
@@ -197,45 +197,6 @@ describe SystemNoteService do
     end
   end
 
-  describe '.change_label' do
-    subject { described_class.change_label(noteable, project, author, added, removed) }
-
-    let(:labels)  { create_list(:label, 2, project: project) }
-    let(:added)   { [] }
-    let(:removed) { [] }
-
-    it_behaves_like 'a system note' do
-      let(:action) { 'label' }
-    end
-
-    context 'with added labels' do
-      let(:added)   { labels }
-      let(:removed) { [] }
-
-      it 'sets the note text' do
-        expect(subject.note).to eq "added ~#{labels[0].id} ~#{labels[1].id} labels"
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with removed labels' do
-      let(:added)   { [] }
-      let(:removed) { labels }
-
-      it 'sets the note text' do
-        expect(subject.note).to eq "removed ~#{labels[0].id} ~#{labels[1].id} labels"
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'with added and removed labels' do
-      let(:added)   { [labels[0]] }
-      let(:removed) { [labels[1]] }
-
-      it 'sets the note text' do
-        expect(subject.note).to eq "added ~#{labels[0].id} and removed ~#{labels[1].id} labels"
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   describe '.change_milestone' do
     context 'for a project milestone' do
       subject { described_class.change_milestone(noteable, project, author, milestone) }
@@ -288,6 +249,30 @@ describe SystemNoteService do
     end
   end
 
+  describe '.change_due_date' do
+    subject { described_class.change_due_date(noteable, project, author, due_date) }
+
+    let(:due_date) { Date.today }
+
+    it_behaves_like 'a system note' do
+      let(:action) { 'due_date' }
+    end
+
+    context 'when due date added' do
+      it 'sets the note text' do
+        expect(subject.note).to eq "changed due date to #{Date.today.to_s(:long)}"
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when due date removed' do
+      let(:due_date) { nil }
+
+      it 'sets the note text' do
+        expect(subject.note).to eq 'removed due date'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe '.change_status' do
     subject { described_class.change_status(noteable, project, author, status, source) }
 
@@ -339,7 +324,7 @@ describe SystemNoteService do
     end
 
     it "posts the 'merge when pipeline succeeds' system note" do
-      expect(subject.note).to eq  "canceled the automatic merge"
+      expect(subject.note).to eq "canceled the automatic merge"
     end
   end
 
@@ -725,7 +710,7 @@ describe SystemNoteService do
     let(:jira_tracker)    { project.jira_service }
     let(:commit)          { project.commit }
     let(:comment_url)     { jira_api_comment_url(jira_issue.id) }
-    let(:success_message) { "JiraService SUCCESS: Successfully posted to http://jira.example.net." }
+    let(:success_message) { "SUCCESS: Successfully posted to http://jira.example.net." }
 
     before do
       stub_jira_urls(jira_issue.id)
diff --git a/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb
index b987fe45138..051e8c87f39 100644
--- a/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/users/build_service_spec.rb
@@ -14,6 +14,49 @@ describe Users::BuildService do
         expect(service.execute).to be_valid
       end
 
+      context 'allowed params' do
+        let(:params) do
+          {
+            access_level: 1,
+            admin: 1,
+            avatar: anything,
+            bio: 1,
+            can_create_group: 1,
+            color_scheme_id: 1,
+            email: 1,
+            external: 1,
+            force_random_password: 1,
+            hide_no_password: 1,
+            hide_no_ssh_key: 1,
+            linkedin: 1,
+            name: 1,
+            password: 1,
+            password_automatically_set: 1,
+            password_expires_at: 1,
+            projects_limit: 1,
+            remember_me: 1,
+            skip_confirmation: 1,
+            skype: 1,
+            theme_id: 1,
+            twitter: 1,
+            username: 1,
+            website_url: 1,
+            private_profile: 1,
+            organization: 1,
+            location: 1,
+            public_email: 1
+          }
+        end
+
+        it 'sets all allowed attributes' do
+          admin_user # call first so the admin gets created before setting `expect`
+
+          expect(User).to receive(:new).with(hash_including(params)).and_call_original
+
+          service.execute
+        end
+      end
+
       context 'with "user_default_external" application setting' do
         using RSpec::Parameterized::TableSyntax
 
diff --git a/spec/services/wikis/create_attachment_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/wikis/create_attachment_service_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..f5899f292c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/services/wikis/create_attachment_service_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,224 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Wikis::CreateAttachmentService do
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :wiki_repo) }
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:file_name) { 'filename.txt' }
+  let(:file_path_regex) { %r{#{described_class::ATTACHMENT_PATH}/\h{32}/#{file_name}} }
+
+  let(:file_opts) do
+    {
+      file_name: file_name,
+      file_content: 'Content of attachment'
+    }
+  end
+  let(:opts) { file_opts }
+
+  subject(:service) { described_class.new(project, user, opts) }
+
+  before do
+    project.add_developer(user)
+  end
+
+  describe 'initialization' do
+    context 'author commit info' do
+      it 'does not raise error if user is nil' do
+        service = described_class.new(project, nil, opts)
+
+        expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@author_email)).to be_nil
+        expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@author_name)).to be_nil
+      end
+
+      it 'fills file_path from the repository uploads folder' do
+        expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@file_path)).to match(file_path_regex)
+      end
+
+      context 'when no author info provided' do
+        it 'fills author_email and author_name from current_user info' do
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@author_email)).to eq user.email
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@author_name)).to eq user.name
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when author info provided' do
+        let(:author_email) { 'author_email' }
+        let(:author_name) { 'author_name' }
+        let(:opts) { file_opts.merge(author_email: author_email, author_name: author_name) }
+
+        it 'fills author_email and author_name from params' do
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@author_email)).to eq author_email
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@author_name)).to eq author_name
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'commit message' do
+      context 'when no commit message provided' do
+        it 'sets a default commit message' do
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@commit_message)).to eq "Upload attachment #{opts[:file_name]}"
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when commit message provided' do
+        let(:commit_message) { 'whatever' }
+        let(:opts) { file_opts.merge(commit_message: commit_message) }
+
+        it 'use the commit message from params' do
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@commit_message)).to eq commit_message
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'branch name' do
+      context 'when no branch provided' do
+        it 'sets the branch from the wiki default_branch' do
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@branch_name)).to eq project.wiki.default_branch
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'when branch provided' do
+        let(:branch_name) { 'whatever' }
+        let(:opts) { file_opts.merge(branch_name: branch_name) }
+
+        it 'use the commit message from params' do
+          expect(service.instance_variable_get(:@branch_name)).to eq branch_name
+        end
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#parse_file_name' do
+    context 'when file_name' do
+      context 'has white spaces' do
+        let(:file_name) { 'file with spaces' }
+
+        it "replaces all of them with '_'" do
+          result = service.execute
+
+          expect(result[:status]).to eq :success
+          expect(result[:result][:file_name]).to eq 'file_with_spaces'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'has other invalid characters' do
+        let(:file_name) { "file\twith\tinvalid chars" }
+
+        it "replaces all of them with '_'" do
+          result = service.execute
+
+          expect(result[:status]).to eq :success
+          expect(result[:result][:file_name]).to eq 'file_with_invalid_chars'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'is not present' do
+        let(:file_name) { nil }
+
+        it 'returns error' do
+          result = service.execute
+
+          expect(result[:status]).to eq :error
+          expect(result[:message]).to eq 'The file name cannot be empty'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'length' do
+        context 'is bigger than 255' do
+          let(:file_name) { "#{'0' * 256}.jpg" }
+
+          it 'truncates file name' do
+            result = service.execute
+
+            expect(result[:status]).to eq :success
+            expect(result[:result][:file_name].length).to eq 255
+            expect(result[:result][:file_name]).to match(/0{251}\.jpg/)
+          end
+        end
+
+        context 'is less or equal to 255 does not return error' do
+          let(:file_name) { '0' * 255 }
+
+          it 'does not return error' do
+            result = service.execute
+
+            expect(result[:status]).to eq :success
+          end
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when user' do
+      shared_examples 'wiki attachment user validations' do
+        it 'returns error' do
+          result = described_class.new(project, user2, opts).execute
+
+          expect(result[:status]).to eq :error
+          expect(result[:message]).to eq 'You are not allowed to push to the wiki'
+        end
+      end
+
+      context 'does not have permission' do
+        let(:user2) { create(:user) }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'wiki attachment user validations'
+      end
+
+      context 'is nil' do
+        let(:user2) { nil }
+
+        it_behaves_like 'wiki attachment user validations'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#execute' do
+    let(:wiki) { project.wiki }
+    subject(:service_execute) { service.execute[:result] }
+
+    context 'creates branch if it does not exists' do
+      let(:branch_name) { 'new_branch' }
+      let(:opts) { file_opts.merge(branch_name: branch_name) }
+
+      it do
+        expect(wiki.repository.branches).to be_empty
+        expect { service.execute }.to change { wiki.repository.branches.count }.by(1)
+        expect(wiki.repository.branches.first.name).to eq branch_name
+      end
+    end
+
+    it 'adds file to the repository' do
+      expect(wiki.repository.ls_files('HEAD')).to be_empty
+
+      service.execute
+
+      files = wiki.repository.ls_files('HEAD')
+      expect(files.count).to eq 1
+      expect(files.first).to match(file_path_regex)
+    end
+
+    context 'returns' do
+      before do
+        allow(SecureRandom).to receive(:hex).and_return('fixed_hex')
+
+        service_execute
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the file name' do
+        expect(service_execute[:file_name]).to eq file_name
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the path where file was stored' do
+        expect(service_execute[:file_path]).to eq 'uploads/fixed_hex/filename.txt'
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the branch where the file was pushed' do
+        expect(service_execute[:branch]).to eq wiki.default_branch
+      end
+
+      it 'returns the commit id' do
+        expect(service_execute[:commit]).not_to be_empty
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/spec_helper.rb b/spec/spec_helper.rb
index a15a46a9534..cd69160be10 100644
--- a/spec/spec_helper.rb
+++ b/spec/spec_helper.rb
@@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ Rainbow.enabled = false
 # Requires supporting ruby files with custom matchers and macros, etc,
 # in spec/support/ and its subdirectories.
 # Requires helpers, and shared contexts/examples first since they're used in other support files
+
+# Load these first since they may be required by other helpers
+require Rails.root.join("spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb")
+
+# Then the rest
 Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/helpers/*.rb")].each { |f| require f }
 Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/shared_contexts/*.rb")].each { |f| require f }
 Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/shared_examples/*.rb")].each { |f| require f }
@@ -42,6 +47,7 @@ Dir[Rails.root.join("spec/support/**/*.rb")].each { |f| require f }
 RSpec.configure do |config|
   config.use_transactional_fixtures = false
   config.use_instantiated_fixtures  = false
+  config.fixture_path = Rails.root
 
   config.verbose_retry = true
   config.display_try_failure_messages = true
@@ -134,6 +140,10 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
     Fog.unmock! if Fog.mock?
   end
 
+  config.after(:example) do
+    Gitlab::CurrentSettings.clear_in_memory_application_settings!
+  end
+
   config.before(:example, :mailer) do
     reset_delivered_emails!
   end
diff --git a/spec/support/features/issuable_slash_commands_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/features/issuable_quick_actions_shared_examples.rb
index 9b44c532ff6..846e697eb96 100644
--- a/spec/support/features/issuable_slash_commands_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/features/issuable_quick_actions_shared_examples.rb
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ shared_examples 'issuable record that supports quick actions in its description
 
   describe "note on #{issuable_type}", :js do
     before do
-      visit public_send("namespace_project_#{issuable_type}_path", project.namespace, project, issuable)
+      visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
     end
 
     context 'with a note containing commands' do
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ shared_examples 'issuable record that supports quick actions in its description
 
           gitlab_sign_out
           gitlab_sign_in(guest)
-          visit public_send("namespace_project_#{issuable_type}_path", project.namespace, project, issuable)
+          visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
         end
 
         it "does not close the #{issuable_type}" do
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ shared_examples 'issuable record that supports quick actions in its description
 
           gitlab_sign_out
           gitlab_sign_in(guest)
-          visit public_send("namespace_project_#{issuable_type}_path", project.namespace, project, issuable)
+          visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
         end
 
         it "does not reopen the #{issuable_type}" do
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ shared_examples 'issuable record that supports quick actions in its description
 
           gitlab_sign_out
           gitlab_sign_in(guest)
-          visit public_send("namespace_project_#{issuable_type}_path", project.namespace, project, issuable)
+          visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
         end
 
         it "does not change the #{issuable_type} title" do
@@ -285,13 +285,87 @@ shared_examples 'issuable record that supports quick actions in its description
         expect(issuable.reload.assignees).to eq [maintainer]
       end
     end
+
+    context "with a note locking the #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+      before do
+        issuable.update(discussion_locked: false)
+        expect(issuable).not_to be_discussion_locked
+      end
+
+      context "when current user can lock #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+        it "locks the #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+          add_note("/lock")
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_content '/lock'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'Commands applied'
+
+          expect(issuable.reload).to be_discussion_locked
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "when current user cannot lock #{issuable_type}" do
+        before do
+          guest = create(:user)
+          project.add_guest(guest)
+
+          gitlab_sign_out
+          sign_in(guest)
+          visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
+        end
+
+        it "does not lock the #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+          add_note("/lock")
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'Commands applied'
+
+          expect(issuable).not_to be_discussion_locked
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context "with a note unlocking the #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+      before do
+        issuable.update(discussion_locked: true)
+        expect(issuable).to be_discussion_locked
+      end
+
+      context "when current user can unlock #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+        it "unlocks the #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+          add_note("/unlock")
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_content '/unlock'
+          expect(page).to have_content 'Commands applied'
+
+          expect(issuable.reload).not_to be_discussion_locked
+        end
+      end
+
+      context "when current user cannot unlock #{issuable_type}" do
+        before do
+          guest = create(:user)
+          project.add_guest(guest)
+
+          gitlab_sign_out
+          sign_in(guest)
+          visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
+        end
+
+        it "does not unlock the #{issuable_type} discussion" do
+          add_note("/unlock")
+
+          expect(page).not_to have_content 'Commands applied'
+
+          expect(issuable).to be_discussion_locked
+        end
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   describe "preview of note on #{issuable_type}", :js do
     it 'removes quick actions from note and explains them' do
       create(:user, username: 'bob')
 
-      visit public_send("namespace_project_#{issuable_type}_path", project.namespace, project, issuable)
+      visit public_send("project_#{issuable_type}_path", project, issuable)
 
       page.within('.js-main-target-form') do
         fill_in 'note[note]', with: "Awesome!\n/assign @bob "
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb
index e0fceae88de..83035788a56 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/cycle_analytics_helpers.rb
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
 module CycleAnalyticsHelpers
+  include GitHelpers
+
   def create_commit_referencing_issue(issue, branch_name: generate(:branch))
     project.repository.add_branch(user, branch_name, 'master')
     create_commit("Commit for ##{issue.iid}", issue.project, user, branch_name)
@@ -9,7 +11,7 @@ module CycleAnalyticsHelpers
     oldrev = repository.commit(branch_name)&.sha || Gitlab::Git::BLANK_SHA
 
     if Timecop.frozen? && Gitlab::GitalyClient.feature_enabled?(:operation_user_commit_files)
-      mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(repository.raw, commit_time)
+      mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(repository, commit_time)
     end
 
     commit_shas = Array.new(count) do |index|
@@ -118,18 +120,15 @@ module CycleAnalyticsHelpers
       protected: false)
   end
 
-  def mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(raw_repository, commit_time)
-    allow(raw_repository).to receive(:multi_action).and_wrap_original do |m, *args|
+  def mock_gitaly_multi_action_dates(repository, commit_time)
+    allow(repository.raw).to receive(:multi_action).and_wrap_original do |m, *args|
       new_date = commit_time || Time.now
       branch_update = m.call(*args)
 
       if branch_update.newrev
         _, opts = args
 
-        commit = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-          rugged = raw_repository.rugged
-          rugged.rev_parse(branch_update.newrev)
-        end
+        commit = rugged_repo(repository).rev_parse(branch_update.newrev)
 
         branch_update.newrev = commit.amend(
           update_ref: "#{Gitlab::Git::BRANCH_REF_PREFIX}#{opts[:branch_name]}",
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..99a7c39852e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/git_helpers.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+module GitHelpers
+  def rugged_repo(repository)
+    path = File.join(TestEnv.repos_path, repository.disk_path + '.git')
+
+    Rugged::Repository.new(path)
+  end
+
+  def project_hook_exists?(project)
+    Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
+      project_path = project.repository.raw_repository.path
+
+      File.exist?(File.join(project_path, 'hooks', 'post-receive'))
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/kubernetes_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/kubernetes_helpers.rb
index 683a64504a1..c077ca9f15b 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/kubernetes_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/kubernetes_helpers.rb
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ module KubernetesHelpers
   def stub_kubeclient_discover(api_url)
     WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + '/api/v1').to_return(kube_response(kube_v1_discovery_body))
     WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + '/apis/extensions/v1beta1').to_return(kube_response(kube_v1beta1_discovery_body))
+    WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + '/apis/rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1').to_return(kube_response(kube_v1_rbac_authorization_discovery_body))
   end
 
   def stub_kubeclient_pods(response = nil)
@@ -32,31 +33,49 @@ module KubernetesHelpers
     WebMock.stub_request(:get, deployments_url).to_return(response || kube_deployments_response)
   end
 
-  def stub_kubeclient_get_secrets(api_url, **options)
-    WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + '/api/v1/secrets')
-      .to_return(kube_response(kube_v1_secrets_body(options)))
+  def stub_kubeclient_get_secret(api_url, namespace: 'default', **options)
+    options[:metadata_name] ||= "default-token-1"
+
+    WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + "/api/v1/namespaces/#{namespace}/secrets/#{options[:metadata_name]}")
+      .to_return(kube_response(kube_v1_secret_body(options)))
   end
 
-  def stub_kubeclient_get_secrets_error(api_url)
-    WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + '/api/v1/secrets')
+  def stub_kubeclient_get_secret_error(api_url, name, namespace: 'default')
+    WebMock.stub_request(:get, api_url + "/api/v1/namespaces/#{namespace}/secrets/#{name}")
       .to_return(status: [404, "Internal Server Error"])
   end
 
-  def kube_v1_secrets_body(**options)
+  def stub_kubeclient_create_service_account(api_url, namespace: 'default')
+    WebMock.stub_request(:post, api_url + "/api/v1/namespaces/#{namespace}/serviceaccounts")
+      .to_return(kube_response({}))
+  end
+
+  def stub_kubeclient_create_service_account_error(api_url, namespace: 'default')
+    WebMock.stub_request(:post, api_url + "/api/v1/namespaces/#{namespace}/serviceaccounts")
+      .to_return(status: [500, "Internal Server Error"])
+  end
+
+  def stub_kubeclient_create_secret(api_url, namespace: 'default')
+    WebMock.stub_request(:post, api_url + "/api/v1/namespaces/#{namespace}/secrets")
+      .to_return(kube_response({}))
+  end
+
+  def stub_kubeclient_create_cluster_role_binding(api_url)
+    WebMock.stub_request(:post, api_url + '/apis/rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1/clusterrolebindings')
+      .to_return(kube_response({}))
+  end
+
+  def kube_v1_secret_body(**options)
     {
       "kind" => "SecretList",
       "apiVersion": "v1",
-      "items" => [
-        {
-          "metadata": {
-            "name": options[:metadata_name] || "default-token-1",
-            "namespace": "kube-system"
-          },
-          "data": {
-            "token": options[:token] || Base64.encode64('token-sample-123')
-          }
-        }
-      ]
+      "metadata": {
+        "name": options[:metadata_name] || "default-token-1",
+        "namespace": "kube-system"
+      },
+      "data": {
+        "token": options[:token] || Base64.encode64('token-sample-123')
+      }
     }
   end
 
@@ -66,7 +85,9 @@ module KubernetesHelpers
       "resources" => [
         { "name" => "pods", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Pod" },
         { "name" => "deployments", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Deployment" },
-        { "name" => "secrets", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Secret" }
+        { "name" => "secrets", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Secret" },
+        { "name" => "serviceaccounts", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "ServiceAccount" },
+        { "name" => "services", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Service" }
       ]
     }
   end
@@ -77,7 +98,21 @@ module KubernetesHelpers
       "resources" => [
         { "name" => "pods", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Pod" },
         { "name" => "deployments", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Deployment" },
-        { "name" => "secrets", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Secret" }
+        { "name" => "secrets", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Secret" },
+        { "name" => "serviceaccounts", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "ServiceAccount" },
+        { "name" => "services", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Service" }
+      ]
+    }
+  end
+
+  def kube_v1_rbac_authorization_discovery_body
+    {
+      "kind" => "APIResourceList",
+      "resources" => [
+        { "name" => "clusterrolebindings", "namespaced" => false, "kind" => "ClusterRoleBinding" },
+        { "name" => "clusterroles", "namespaced" => false, "kind" => "ClusterRole" },
+        { "name" => "rolebindings", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "RoleBinding" },
+        { "name" => "roles", "namespaced" => true, "kind" => "Role" }
       ]
     }
   end
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/markdown_feature.rb b/spec/support/helpers/markdown_feature.rb
index 346f5b1cc4d..96401379cf0 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/markdown_feature.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/markdown_feature.rb
@@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
 class MarkdownFeature
   include FactoryBot::Syntax::Methods
 
+  attr_reader :fixture_path
+
+  def initialize(fixture_path = Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/markdown.md.erb'))
+    @fixture_path = fixture_path
+  end
+
   def user
     @user ||= create(:user)
   end
@@ -122,7 +128,7 @@ class MarkdownFeature
   end
 
   def raw_markdown
-    markdown = File.read(Rails.root.join('spec/fixtures/markdown.md.erb'))
+    markdown = File.read(fixture_path)
     ERB.new(markdown).result(binding)
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/migrations_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/migrations_helpers.rb
index 0bc235701eb..0c35764ed9a 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/migrations_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/migrations_helpers.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,10 @@ module MigrationsHelpers
     Class.new(ActiveRecord::Base) do
       self.table_name = name
       self.inheritance_column = :_type_disabled
+
+      def self.name
+        table_name.singularize.camelcase
+      end
     end
   end
 
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/reference_parser_helpers.rb b/spec/support/helpers/reference_parser_helpers.rb
index c01897ed1a1..9f27502aa52 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/reference_parser_helpers.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/reference_parser_helpers.rb
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ module ReferenceParserHelpers
     Nokogiri::HTML.fragment('<a></a>').children[0]
   end
 
-  shared_examples 'no N+1 queries' do
+  shared_examples 'no project N+1 queries' do
     it 'avoids N+1 queries in #nodes_visible_to_user', :request_store do
       context = Banzai::RenderContext.new(project, user)
 
@@ -19,6 +19,10 @@ module ReferenceParserHelpers
       expect(actual.count).to be <= control.count
       expect(actual.cached_count).to be <= control.cached_count
     end
+  end
+
+  shared_examples 'no N+1 queries' do
+    it_behaves_like 'no project N+1 queries'
 
     it 'avoids N+1 queries in #records_for_nodes', :request_store do
       context = Banzai::RenderContext.new(project, user)
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/stub_configuration.rb b/spec/support/helpers/stub_configuration.rb
index 8475f91799b..776119564ec 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/stub_configuration.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/stub_configuration.rb
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 require 'active_support/core_ext/hash/transform_values'
 require 'active_support/hash_with_indifferent_access'
+require 'active_support/dependencies'
+
+require_dependency 'gitlab'
 
 module StubConfiguration
   def stub_application_setting(messages)
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/stub_feature_flags.rb b/spec/support/helpers/stub_feature_flags.rb
index c54a871b157..4061a8d1bc9 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/stub_feature_flags.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/stub_feature_flags.rb
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ module StubFeatureFlags
   # @param [Hash] features where key is feature name and value is boolean whether enabled or not
   def stub_feature_flags(features)
     features.each do |feature_name, enabled|
-      allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with(feature_name) { enabled }
-      allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with(feature_name.to_s) { enabled }
+      allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with(feature_name, any_args) { enabled }
+      allow(Feature).to receive(:enabled?).with(feature_name.to_s, any_args) { enabled }
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/support/helpers/test_env.rb b/spec/support/helpers/test_env.rb
index 21103771d1f..97875669d0e 100644
--- a/spec/support/helpers/test_env.rb
+++ b/spec/support/helpers/test_env.rb
@@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ module TestEnv
     'add_images_and_changes'             => '010d106',
     'update-gitlab-shell-v-6-0-1'        => '2f61d70',
     'update-gitlab-shell-v-6-0-3'        => 'de78448',
-    '2-mb-file'                          => 'bf12d25'
+    '2-mb-file'                          => 'bf12d25',
+    'with-codeowners'                    => '219560e'
   }.freeze
 
   # gitlab-test-fork is a fork of gitlab-fork, but we don't necessarily
@@ -84,7 +85,7 @@ module TestEnv
 
     clean_test_path
 
-    # Setup GitLab shell for test instance
+    # Set up GitLab shell for test instance
     setup_gitlab_shell
 
     setup_gitaly
@@ -106,10 +107,6 @@ module TestEnv
       .and_call_original
   end
 
-  def disable_pre_receive
-    allow_any_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::Hook).to receive(:trigger).and_return([true, nil])
-  end
-
   # Clean /tmp/tests
   #
   # Keeps gitlab-shell and gitlab-test
@@ -370,7 +367,7 @@ module TestEnv
     FileUtils.rm_rf(install_dir)
     exit 1
   ensure
-    puts "    #{component} setup in #{Time.now - start} seconds...\n"
+    puts "    #{component} set up in #{Time.now - start} seconds...\n"
   end
 
   def ensure_component_dir_name_is_correct!(component, path)
diff --git a/spec/support/import_export/export_file_helper.rb b/spec/support/import_export/export_file_helper.rb
index 4d925ac77f4..d9ed405baf4 100644
--- a/spec/support/import_export/export_file_helper.rb
+++ b/spec/support/import_export/export_file_helper.rb
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ module ExportFileHelper
   # Expands the compressed file for an exported project into +tmpdir+
   def in_directory_with_expanded_export(project)
     Dir.mktmpdir do |tmpdir|
-      export_file = project.export_project_path
+      export_file = project.export_file.path
       _output, exit_status = Gitlab::Popen.popen(%W{tar -zxf #{export_file} -C #{tmpdir}})
 
       yield(exit_status, tmpdir)
diff --git a/spec/support/rspec.rb b/spec/support/rspec.rb
index 9b8bcebcb3a..b38c5dfe60b 100644
--- a/spec/support/rspec.rb
+++ b/spec/support/rspec.rb
@@ -11,6 +11,4 @@ RSpec.configure do |config|
   config.include StubMetrics
   config.include StubObjectStorage
   config.include StubENV
-
-  config.fixture_path = Rails.root if defined?(Rails)
 end
diff --git a/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb b/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb
index 43a2fd05498..b0bf942aa09 100644
--- a/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb
+++ b/spec/support/services/clusters/create_service_shared.rb
@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@ shared_context 'valid cluster create params' do
         gcp_project_id: 'gcp-project',
         zone: 'us-central1-a',
         num_nodes: 1,
-        machine_type: 'machine_type-a'
+        machine_type: 'machine_type-a',
+        legacy_abac: 'true'
       }
     }
   end
@@ -44,6 +45,7 @@ shared_examples 'create cluster service success' do
     expect(subject.provider.num_nodes).to eq(1)
     expect(subject.provider.machine_type).to eq('machine_type-a')
     expect(subject.provider.access_token).to eq(access_token)
+    expect(subject.provider).to be_legacy_abac
     expect(subject.platform).to be_nil
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/diff_file_collections.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/diff_file_collections.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..55ce160add0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/diff_file_collections.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+shared_examples 'diff statistics' do |test_include_stats_flag: true|
+  def stub_stats_find_by_path(path, stats_mock)
+    expect_next_instance_of(Gitlab::Git::DiffStatsCollection) do |collection|
+      allow(collection).to receive(:find_by_path).and_call_original
+      expect(collection).to receive(:find_by_path).with(path).and_return(stats_mock)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when should request diff stats' do
+    it 'Repository#diff_stats is called' do
+      subject = described_class.new(diffable, collection_default_args)
+
+      expect(diffable.project.repository)
+        .to receive(:diff_stats)
+        .with(diffable.diff_refs.base_sha, diffable.diff_refs.head_sha)
+        .and_call_original
+
+      subject.diff_files
+    end
+
+    it 'Gitlab::Diff::File is initialized with diff stats' do
+      subject = described_class.new(diffable, collection_default_args)
+
+      stats_mock = double(Gitaly::DiffStats, path: '.gitignore', additions: 758, deletions: 120)
+      stub_stats_find_by_path(stub_path, stats_mock)
+
+      diff_file = subject.diff_files.find { |file| file.new_path == stub_path }
+
+      expect(diff_file.added_lines).to eq(stats_mock.additions)
+      expect(diff_file.removed_lines).to eq(stats_mock.deletions)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when should not request diff stats' do
+    it 'Repository#diff_stats is not called' do
+      collection_default_args[:diff_options][:include_stats] = false
+
+      subject = described_class.new(diffable, collection_default_args)
+
+      expect(diffable.project.repository).not_to receive(:diff_stats)
+
+      subject.diff_files
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/features/editable_merge_request_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/features/editable_merge_request_shared_examples.rb
index 3057845061b..a096627ee62 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/features/editable_merge_request_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/features/editable_merge_request_shared_examples.rb
@@ -73,9 +73,13 @@ RSpec.shared_examples 'an editable merge request' do
 
   it 'description has autocomplete', :js do
     find('#merge_request_description').native.send_keys('')
-    fill_in 'merge_request_description', with: '@'
+    fill_in 'merge_request_description', with: user.to_reference[0..4]
 
-    expect(page).to have_selector('.atwho-view')
+    wait_for_requests
+
+    page.within('.atwho-view') do
+      expect(page).to have_content(user2.name)
+    end
   end
 
   it 'has class js-quick-submit in form' do
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/instance_statistics_controllers_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/instance_statistics_controllers_shared_examples.rb
index 5334af841e1..8ea307c7c61 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/instance_statistics_controllers_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/instance_statistics_controllers_shared_examples.rb
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ shared_examples 'instance statistics availability' do
 
   before do
     sign_in(user)
+
+    stub_application_setting(usage_ping_enabled: true)
   end
 
   describe 'GET #index' do
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/models/label_note_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/models/label_note_shared_examples.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..406385c13bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/models/label_note_shared_examples.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+shared_examples 'label note created from events' do
+  def create_event(params = {})
+    event_params = { action: :add, label: label, user: user }
+    resource_key = resource.class.name.underscore.to_s
+    event_params[resource_key] = resource
+
+    build(:resource_label_event, event_params.merge(params))
+  end
+
+  def label_refs(events)
+    labels = events.map(&:label).compact
+
+    labels.map { |l| l.to_reference}.sort.join(' ')
+  end
+
+  let(:time) { Time.now }
+  let(:local_label_ids) { [label.id, label2.id] }
+
+  describe '.from_events' do
+    it 'returns system note with expected attributes' do
+      event = create_event
+
+      note = described_class.from_events([event, create_event])
+
+      expect(note.system).to be true
+      expect(note.author_id).to eq event.user_id
+      expect(note.discussion_id).to eq event.discussion_id
+      expect(note.noteable).to eq event.issuable
+      expect(note.note).to be_present
+      expect(note.note_html).to be_present
+    end
+
+    it 'updates markdown cache if reference is not set yet' do
+      event = create_event(reference: nil)
+
+      described_class.from_events([event])
+
+      expect(event.reference).not_to be_nil
+    end
+
+    it 'updates markdown cache if label was deleted' do
+      event = create_event(reference: 'some_ref', label: nil)
+
+      described_class.from_events([event])
+
+      expect(event.reference).to eq ''
+    end
+
+    it 'returns html note' do
+      events = [create_event(created_at: time)]
+
+      note = described_class.from_events(events)
+
+      expect(note.note_html).to include label.title
+    end
+
+    it 'returns text note for added labels' do
+      events = [create_event(created_at: time),
+                create_event(created_at: time, label: label2),
+                create_event(created_at: time, label: nil)]
+
+      note = described_class.from_events(events)
+
+      expect(note.note).to eq "added #{label_refs(events)} + 1 deleted label"
+    end
+
+    it 'returns text note for removed labels' do
+      events = [create_event(action: :remove, created_at: time),
+                create_event(action: :remove, created_at: time, label: label2),
+                create_event(action: :remove, created_at: time, label: nil)]
+
+      note = described_class.from_events(events)
+
+      expect(note.note).to eq "removed #{label_refs(events)} + 1 deleted label"
+    end
+
+    it 'returns text note for added and removed labels' do
+      add_events = [create_event(created_at: time),
+                    create_event(created_at: time, label: nil)]
+
+      remove_events = [create_event(action: :remove, created_at: time),
+                       create_event(action: :remove, created_at: time, label: nil)]
+
+      note = described_class.from_events(add_events + remove_events)
+
+      expect(note.note).to eq "added #{label_refs(add_events)} + 1 deleted label and removed #{label_refs(remove_events)} + 1 deleted label"
+    end
+
+    it 'returns text note for cross-project label' do
+      other_label = create(:label)
+      event = create_event(label: other_label)
+
+      note = described_class.from_events([event])
+
+      expect(note.note).to eq "added #{other_label.to_reference(resource_parent)} label"
+    end
+
+    it 'returns text note for cross-group label' do
+      other_label = create(:group_label)
+      event = create_event(label: other_label)
+
+      note = described_class.from_events([event])
+
+      expect(note.note).to eq "added #{other_label.to_reference(other_label.group, target_project: project, full: true)} label"
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb
index 93c21a99e59..1190863d88e 100644
--- a/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/uploaders/gitlab_uploader_shared_examples.rb
@@ -33,6 +33,14 @@ shared_examples "builds correct paths" do |**patterns|
     it_behaves_like "matches the method pattern", :upload_path
   end
 
+  describe "#relative_path" do
+    it 'is relative' do
+      skip 'Path not set, skipping.' unless subject.path
+
+      expect(Pathname.new(subject.relative_path)).to be_relative
+    end
+  end
+
   describe ".absolute_path" do
     it_behaves_like "matches the method pattern", :absolute_path do
       let(:target) { subject.class }
diff --git a/spec/support/shared_examples/wiki_file_attachments_examples.rb b/spec/support/shared_examples/wiki_file_attachments_examples.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b6fb2a66b0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/shared_examples/wiki_file_attachments_examples.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+# Requires a context containing:
+#   project
+
+shared_examples 'wiki file attachments' do
+  include DropzoneHelper
+
+  context 'uploading attachments', :js do
+    let(:wiki) { project.wiki }
+
+    def attach_with_dropzone(wait = false)
+      dropzone_file([Rails.root.join('spec', 'fixtures', 'dk.png')], 0, wait)
+    end
+
+    context 'before uploading' do
+      it 'shows "Attach a file" button' do
+        expect(page).to have_button('Attach a file')
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector('.uploading-progress-container', visible: true)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'uploading is in progress' do
+      it 'cancels uploading on clicking to "Cancel" button' do
+        slow_requests do
+          attach_with_dropzone
+
+          click_button 'Cancel'
+        end
+
+        expect(page).to have_button('Attach a file')
+        expect(page).not_to have_button('Cancel')
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector('.uploading-progress-container', visible: true)
+      end
+
+      it 'shows "Attaching a file" message on uploading 1 file' do
+        slow_requests do
+          attach_with_dropzone
+
+          expect(page).to have_selector('.attaching-file-message', visible: true, text: 'Attaching a file -')
+        end
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'uploading is complete' do
+      it 'shows "Attach a file" button on uploading complete' do
+        attach_with_dropzone
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page).to have_button('Attach a file')
+        expect(page).not_to have_selector('.uploading-progress-container', visible: true)
+      end
+
+      it 'the markdown link is added to the page' do
+        fill_in(:wiki_content, with: '')
+        attach_with_dropzone(true)
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        expect(page.find('#wiki_content').value)
+          .to match(%r{\!\[dk\]\(uploads/\h{32}/dk\.png\)$})
+      end
+
+      it 'the links point to the wiki root url' do
+        attach_with_dropzone(true)
+        wait_for_requests
+
+        find('.js-md-preview-button').click
+        file_path = page.find('input[name="files[]"]', visible: :hidden).value
+        link = page.find('a.no-attachment-icon')['href']
+        img_link = page.find('a.no-attachment-icon img')['src']
+
+        expect(link).to eq img_link
+        expect(URI.parse(link).path).to eq File.join(wiki.wiki_base_path, file_path)
+      end
+
+      it 'the file has been added to the wiki repository' do
+        expect do
+          attach_with_dropzone(true)
+          wait_for_requests
+        end.to change { wiki.repository.ls_files('HEAD').count }.by(1)
+
+        file_path = page.find('input[name="files[]"]', visible: :hidden).value
+
+        expect(wiki.find_file(file_path, 'HEAD').path).not_to be_nil
+      end
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/support/sidekiq.rb b/spec/support/sidekiq.rb
index d143014692d..6c4e11910d3 100644
--- a/spec/support/sidekiq.rb
+++ b/spec/support/sidekiq.rb
@@ -1,7 +1,27 @@
 require 'sidekiq/testing/inline'
 
+# If Sidekiq::Testing.inline! is used, SQL transactions done inside
+# Sidekiq worker are included in the SQL query limit (in a real
+# deployment sidekiq worker is executed separately). To avoid
+# increasing SQL limit counter, the request is marked as whitelisted
+# during Sidekiq block
+class DisableQueryLimit
+  def call(worker_instance, msg, queue)
+    transaction = Gitlab::QueryLimiting::Transaction.current
+
+    if !transaction.respond_to?(:whitelisted) || transaction.whitelisted
+      yield
+    else
+      transaction.whitelisted = true
+      yield
+      transaction.whitelisted = false
+    end
+  end
+end
+
 Sidekiq::Testing.server_middleware do |chain|
   chain.add Gitlab::SidekiqStatus::ServerMiddleware
+  chain.add DisableQueryLimit
 end
 
 RSpec.configure do |config|
diff --git a/spec/support/stub_version.rb b/spec/support/stub_version.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..594ab64e7c6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/support/stub_version.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+module StubVersion
+  def stub_version(version, revision)
+    stub_const('Gitlab::VERSION', version)
+    allow(Gitlab).to receive(:revision).and_return(revision)
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/tasks/gitlab/cleanup_rake_spec.rb b/spec/tasks/gitlab/cleanup_rake_spec.rb
index cc2cca10f58..19794227d9f 100644
--- a/spec/tasks/gitlab/cleanup_rake_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/tasks/gitlab/cleanup_rake_spec.rb
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ describe 'gitlab:cleanup rake tasks' do
   end
 
   describe 'cleanup namespaces and repos' do
+    let(:gitlab_shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
+    let(:storage) { storages.keys.first }
     let(:storages) do
       {
         'default' => Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.new(@default_storage_hash.merge('path' => 'tmp/tests/default_storage'))
@@ -17,53 +19,56 @@ describe 'gitlab:cleanup rake tasks' do
     end
 
     before do
-      FileUtils.mkdir(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage'))
       allow(Gitlab.config.repositories).to receive(:storages).and_return(storages)
     end
 
     after do
-      FileUtils.rm_rf(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage'))
+      Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageService.new(storage).delete_all_repositories
     end
 
     describe 'cleanup:repos' do
       before do
-        FileUtils.mkdir_p(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/broken/project.git'))
-        FileUtils.mkdir_p(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/@hashed/12/34/5678.git'))
+        gitlab_shell.add_namespace(storage, 'broken/project.git')
+        gitlab_shell.add_namespace(storage, '@hashed/12/34/5678.git')
       end
 
       it 'moves it to an orphaned path' do
-        run_rake_task('gitlab:cleanup:repos')
-        repo_list = Dir['tmp/tests/default_storage/broken/*']
+        now = Time.now
+
+        Timecop.freeze(now) do
+          run_rake_task('gitlab:cleanup:repos')
+          repo_list = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageService.new(storage).list_directories(depth: 0)
 
-        expect(repo_list.first).to include('+orphaned+')
+          expect(repo_list.last).to include("broken+orphaned+#{now.to_i}")
+        end
       end
 
       it 'ignores @hashed repos' do
         run_rake_task('gitlab:cleanup:repos')
 
-        expect(Dir.exist?(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/@hashed/12/34/5678.git'))).to be_truthy
+        expect(gitlab_shell.exists?(storage, '@hashed/12/34/5678.git')).to be(true)
       end
     end
 
     describe 'cleanup:dirs' do
       it 'removes missing namespaces' do
-        FileUtils.mkdir_p(Settings.absolute("tmp/tests/default_storage/namespace_1/project.git"))
-        FileUtils.mkdir_p(Settings.absolute("tmp/tests/default_storage/namespace_2/project.git"))
-        allow(Namespace).to receive(:pluck).and_return('namespace_1')
+        gitlab_shell.add_namespace(storage, "namespace_1/project.git")
+        gitlab_shell.add_namespace(storage, "namespace_2/project.git")
+        allow(Namespace).to receive(:pluck).and_return(['namespace_1'])
 
         stub_env('REMOVE', 'true')
         run_rake_task('gitlab:cleanup:dirs')
 
-        expect(Dir.exist?(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/namespace_1'))).to be_truthy
-        expect(Dir.exist?(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/namespace_2'))).to be_falsey
+        expect(gitlab_shell.exists?(storage, 'namespace_1')).to be(true)
+        expect(gitlab_shell.exists?(storage, 'namespace_2')).to be(false)
       end
 
       it 'ignores @hashed directory' do
-        FileUtils.mkdir_p(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/@hashed/12/34/5678.git'))
+        gitlab_shell.add_namespace(storage, '@hashed/12/34/5678.git')
 
         run_rake_task('gitlab:cleanup:dirs')
 
-        expect(Dir.exist?(Settings.absolute('tmp/tests/default_storage/@hashed/12/34/5678.git'))).to be_truthy
+        expect(gitlab_shell.exists?(storage, '@hashed/12/34/5678.git')).to be(true)
       end
     end
   end
diff --git a/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb b/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb
index b81aea23306..5818892d56a 100644
--- a/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/tasks/gitlab/db_rake_spec.rb
@@ -61,6 +61,39 @@ describe 'gitlab:db namespace rake task' do
       expect(Rake::Task['db:migrate']).not_to receive(:invoke)
       expect { run_rake_task('gitlab:db:configure') }.to raise_error(RuntimeError, 'error')
     end
+
+    context 'SKIP_POST_DEPLOYMENT_MIGRATIONS environment variable set' do
+      let(:rails_paths) { { 'db' => ['db'], 'db/migrate' => ['db/migrate'] } }
+
+      before do
+        allow(ENV).to receive(:[]).and_call_original
+        allow(ENV).to receive(:[]).with('SKIP_POST_DEPLOYMENT_MIGRATIONS').and_return true
+
+        # Our environment has already been loaded, so we need to pretend like post_migrations were not
+        allow(Rails.application.config).to receive(:paths).and_return(rails_paths)
+        allow(ActiveRecord::Migrator).to receive(:migrations_paths).and_return(rails_paths['db/migrate'].dup)
+      end
+
+      it 'adds post deployment migrations before schema load if the schema is not already loaded' do
+        allow(ActiveRecord::Base.connection).to receive(:tables).and_return([])
+        expect(Gitlab::Database).to receive(:add_post_migrate_path_to_rails).and_call_original
+        expect(Rake::Task['db:schema:load']).to receive(:invoke)
+        expect(Rake::Task['db:seed_fu']).to receive(:invoke)
+        expect(Rake::Task['db:migrate']).not_to receive(:invoke)
+        expect { run_rake_task('gitlab:db:configure') }.not_to raise_error
+        expect(rails_paths['db/migrate'].include?(File.join(Rails.root, 'db', 'post_migrate'))).to be(true)
+      end
+
+      it 'ignores post deployment migrations  when schema has already been loaded' do
+        allow(ActiveRecord::Base.connection).to receive(:tables).and_return(%w[table1 table2])
+        expect(Rake::Task['db:migrate']).to receive(:invoke)
+        expect(Gitlab::Database).not_to receive(:add_post_migrate_path_to_rails)
+        expect(Rake::Task['db:schema:load']).not_to receive(:invoke)
+        expect(Rake::Task['db:seed_fu']).not_to receive(:invoke)
+        expect { run_rake_task('gitlab:db:configure') }.not_to raise_error
+        expect(rails_paths['db/migrate'].include?(File.join(Rails.root, 'db', 'post_migrate'))).to be(false)
+      end
+    end
   end
 
   def run_rake_task(task_name)
diff --git a/spec/tasks/gitlab/site_statistics_rake_spec.rb b/spec/tasks/gitlab/site_statistics_rake_spec.rb
index 20f0df65e63..c43ce25a540 100644
--- a/spec/tasks/gitlab/site_statistics_rake_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/tasks/gitlab/site_statistics_rake_spec.rb
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ describe 'rake gitlab:refresh_site_statistics' do
     Rake.application.rake_require 'tasks/gitlab/site_statistics'
 
     create(:project)
-    SiteStatistic.fetch.update(repositories_count: 0, wikis_count: 0)
+    SiteStatistic.fetch.update(repositories_count: 0)
   end
 
   let(:task) { 'gitlab:refresh_site_statistics' }
@@ -15,10 +15,9 @@ describe 'rake gitlab:refresh_site_statistics' do
     run_rake_task(task)
 
     expect(SiteStatistic.fetch.repositories_count).to eq(1)
-    expect(SiteStatistic.fetch.wikis_count).to eq(1)
   end
 
   it 'displays message listing counters' do
-    expect { run_rake_task(task) }.to output(/Updating Site Statistics counters:.* Repositories\.\.\. OK!.* Wikis\.\.\. OK!/m).to_stdout
+    expect { run_rake_task(task) }.to output(/Updating Site Statistics counters:.* Repositories\.\.\. OK!/m).to_stdout
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/uploaders/avatar_uploader_spec.rb b/spec/uploaders/avatar_uploader_spec.rb
index b0468bc35ff..6aaec7a4fef 100644
--- a/spec/uploaders/avatar_uploader_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/uploaders/avatar_uploader_spec.rb
@@ -35,5 +35,13 @@ describe AvatarUploader do
 
     it_behaves_like "migrates", to_store: described_class::Store::REMOTE
     it_behaves_like "migrates", from_store: described_class::Store::REMOTE, to_store: described_class::Store::LOCAL
+
+    it 'sets the right absolute path' do
+      storage_path = Gitlab.config.uploads.storage_path
+      absolute_path = File.join(storage_path, upload.path)
+
+      expect(uploader.absolute_path.scan(storage_path).size).to eq(1)
+      expect(uploader.absolute_path).to eq(absolute_path)
+    end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/uploaders/job_artifact_uploader_spec.rb b/spec/uploaders/job_artifact_uploader_spec.rb
index 3ad5fe7e3b3..061432f082a 100644
--- a/spec/uploaders/job_artifact_uploader_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/uploaders/job_artifact_uploader_spec.rb
@@ -40,6 +40,53 @@ describe JobArtifactUploader do
     it { is_expected.to end_with("ci_build_artifacts.zip") }
   end
 
+  describe '#dynamic_segment' do
+    let(:uploaded_content) { File.binread(Rails.root + 'spec/fixtures/ci_build_artifacts.zip') }
+    let(:model) { uploader.model }
+
+    shared_examples_for 'Read file from legacy path' do
+      it 'store_path returns the legacy path' do
+        expect(model.file.store_path).to eq(File.join(model.created_at.utc.strftime('%Y_%m'), model.project_id.to_s, model.job_id.to_s, 'ci_build_artifacts.zip'))
+      end
+
+      it 'has exactly the same content' do
+        expect(::File.binread(model.file.path)).to eq(uploaded_content)
+      end
+    end
+
+    shared_examples_for 'Read file from hashed path' do
+      it 'store_path returns hashed path' do
+        expect(model.file.store_path).to eq(File.join(disk_hash[0..1], disk_hash[2..3], disk_hash, creation_date, model.job_id.to_s, model.id.to_s, 'ci_build_artifacts.zip'))
+      end
+
+      it 'has exactly the same content' do
+        expect(::File.binread(model.file.path)).to eq(uploaded_content)
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when a job artifact is stored in legacy_path' do
+      let(:job_artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :legacy_archive) }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'Read file from legacy path'
+    end
+
+    context 'when the artifact file is stored in hashed_path' do
+      let(:job_artifact) { create(:ci_job_artifact, :archive) }
+      let(:disk_hash) { Digest::SHA2.hexdigest(model.project_id.to_s) }
+      let(:creation_date) { model.created_at.utc.strftime('%Y_%m_%d') }
+
+      it_behaves_like 'Read file from hashed path'
+
+      context 'when file_location column is empty' do
+        before do
+          job_artifact.update_column(:file_location, nil)
+        end
+
+        it_behaves_like 'Read file from hashed path'
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "#migrate!" do
     before do
       uploader.store!(fixture_file_upload('spec/fixtures/trace/sample_trace'))
diff --git a/spec/uploaders/namespace_file_uploader_spec.rb b/spec/uploaders/namespace_file_uploader_spec.rb
index 71fe2c353c0..799c6db57fa 100644
--- a/spec/uploaders/namespace_file_uploader_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/uploaders/namespace_file_uploader_spec.rb
@@ -26,6 +26,26 @@ describe NamespaceFileUploader do
                     upload_path: IDENTIFIER
   end
 
+  context '.base_dir' do
+    it 'returns local storage base_dir without store param' do
+      expect(described_class.base_dir(group)).to eq("uploads/-/system/namespace/#{group.id}")
+    end
+
+    it 'returns local storage base_dir when store param is Store::LOCAL' do
+      expect(described_class.base_dir(group, ObjectStorage::Store::LOCAL)).to eq("uploads/-/system/namespace/#{group.id}")
+    end
+
+    it 'returns remote base_dir when store param is Store::REMOTE' do
+      expect(described_class.base_dir(group, ObjectStorage::Store::REMOTE)).to eq("namespace/#{group.id}")
+    end
+  end
+
+  describe '#workhorse_local_upload_path' do
+    it 'returns the correct path in uploads directory' do
+      expect(described_class.workhorse_local_upload_path).to end_with('/uploads/tmp/uploads')
+    end
+  end
+
   describe "#migrate!" do
     before do
       uploader.store!(fixture_file_upload(File.join('spec/fixtures/doc_sample.txt')))
diff --git a/spec/uploaders/uploader_helper_spec.rb b/spec/uploaders/uploader_helper_spec.rb
index 33da93cc9d0..fd6712d4645 100644
--- a/spec/uploaders/uploader_helper_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/uploaders/uploader_helper_spec.rb
@@ -11,27 +11,10 @@ describe UploaderHelper do
     example_uploader.new
   end
 
-  def upload_fixture(filename)
-    fixture_file_upload(File.join('spec', 'fixtures', filename))
-  end
-
-  describe '#image_or_video?' do
-    it 'returns true for an image file' do
-      uploader.store!(upload_fixture('dk.png'))
-
-      expect(uploader).to be_image_or_video
-    end
-
-    it 'it returns true for a video file' do
-      uploader.store!(upload_fixture('video_sample.mp4'))
-
-      expect(uploader).to be_image_or_video
-    end
-
-    it 'returns false for other extensions' do
-      uploader.store!(upload_fixture('doc_sample.txt'))
-
-      expect(uploader).not_to be_image_or_video
+  describe '#extension_match?' do
+    it 'returns false if file does not exists' do
+      expect(uploader.file).to be_nil
+      expect(uploader.send(:extension_match?, 'jpg')).to eq false
     end
   end
 end
diff --git a/spec/validators/branch_filter_validator_spec.rb b/spec/validators/branch_filter_validator_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3be54827431
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/validators/branch_filter_validator_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe BranchFilterValidator do
+  let(:validator) { described_class.new(attributes: [:push_events_branch_filter]) }
+  let(:hook) { build(:project_hook) }
+
+  describe '#validates_each' do
+    it 'allows valid branch names' do
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, "good_branch_name")
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, "another/good_branch_name")
+      expect(hook.errors.empty?).to be true
+    end
+
+    it 'disallows bad branch names' do
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, "bad branch~name")
+      expect(hook.errors[:push_events_branch_filter].empty?).to be false
+    end
+
+    it 'allows wildcards' do
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, "features/*")
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, "features/*/bla")
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, "*-stable")
+      expect(hook.errors.empty?).to be true
+    end
+
+    it 'gets rid of whitespace' do
+      filter = ' master '
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, filter)
+
+      expect(filter).to eq 'master'
+    end
+
+    # Branch names can be quite long but in practice aren't over 255 so 4000 should
+    # be enough space for a list of branch names but we can increase if needed.
+    it 'limits length to 4000 chars' do
+      filter = 'a' * 4001
+      validator.validate_each(hook, :push_events_branch_filter, filter)
+
+      expect(hook.errors[:push_events_branch_filter].empty?).to be false
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/validators/url_validator_spec.rb b/spec/validators/url_validator_spec.rb
index 93fe013d11c..ab6100509a6 100644
--- a/spec/validators/url_validator_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/validators/url_validator_spec.rb
@@ -24,6 +24,21 @@ describe UrlValidator do
 
       expect(badge.errors.empty?).to be true
     end
+
+    it 'strips urls' do
+      badge.link_url = "\n\r\n\nhttps://127.0.0.1\r\n\r\n\n\n\n"
+
+      # It's unusual for a validator to modify its arguments. Some extensions,
+      # such as attr_encrypted, freeze the string to signal that modifications
+      # will not be persisted, so freeze this string to ensure the scheme is
+      # compatible with them.
+      badge.link_url.freeze
+
+      subject
+
+      expect(badge.errors).to be_empty
+      expect(badge.link_url).to eq('https://127.0.0.1')
+    end
   end
 
   context 'when allow_localhost is set to false' do
diff --git a/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb
index 836d452304c..34e93d929a7 100644
--- a/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/views/help/index.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -1,11 +1,18 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
 require 'rails_helper'
 
 describe 'help/index' do
+  include StubVersion
+
   describe 'version information' do
+    before do
+      stub_helpers
+    end
+
     it 'is hidden from guests' do
       stub_user(nil)
       stub_version('8.0.2', 'abcdefg')
-      stub_helpers
 
       render
 
@@ -13,15 +20,28 @@ describe 'help/index' do
       expect(rendered).not_to match 'abcdefg'
     end
 
-    it 'is shown to users' do
-      stub_user
-      stub_version('8.0.2', 'abcdefg')
-      stub_helpers
+    context 'when logged in' do
+      before do
+        stub_user
+      end
 
-      render
+      it 'shows a link to the tag to users' do
+        stub_version('8.0.2', 'abcdefg')
+
+        render
+
+        expect(rendered).to match '8.0.2'
+        expect(rendered).to have_link('8.0.2', href: %r{https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-(ce|ee)/tags/v8.0.2})
+      end
+
+      it 'shows a link to the commit for pre-releases' do
+        stub_version('8.0.2-pre', 'abcdefg')
 
-      expect(rendered).to match '8.0.2'
-      expect(rendered).to have_link('abcdefg', 'https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commits/abcdefg')
+        render
+
+        expect(rendered).to match '8.0.2'
+        expect(rendered).to have_link('abcdefg', href: %r{https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-(ce|ee)/commits/abcdefg})
+      end
     end
   end
 
@@ -29,7 +49,7 @@ describe 'help/index' do
     it 'is visible to guests' do
       render
 
-      expect(rendered).to have_link(nil, help_instance_configuration_url)
+      expect(rendered).to have_link(nil, href: help_instance_configuration_url)
     end
   end
 
@@ -37,11 +57,6 @@ describe 'help/index' do
     allow(view).to receive(:user_signed_in?).and_return(user)
   end
 
-  def stub_version(version, revision)
-    stub_const('Gitlab::VERSION', version)
-    allow(Gitlab).to receive(:revision).and_return(revision)
-  end
-
   def stub_helpers
     allow(view).to receive(:markdown).and_return('')
     allow(view).to receive(:version_status_badge).and_return('')
diff --git a/spec/views/projects/_home_panel.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/_home_panel.html.haml_spec.rb
index b56940a9613..fc1fe5739c3 100644
--- a/spec/views/projects/_home_panel.html.haml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/views/projects/_home_panel.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ describe 'projects/_home_panel' do
 
       allow(view).to receive(:current_user).and_return(user)
       allow(view).to receive(:can?).with(user, :read_project, project).and_return(false)
+      allow(project).to receive(:license_anchor_data).and_return(false)
     end
 
     context 'when user is signed in' do
@@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ describe 'projects/_home_panel' do
 
       allow(view).to receive(:current_user).and_return(user)
       allow(view).to receive(:can?).with(user, :read_project, project).and_return(false)
+      allow(project).to receive(:license_anchor_data).and_return(false)
     end
 
     context 'has no badges' do
@@ -71,8 +73,7 @@ describe 'projects/_home_panel' do
       it 'should not render any badge' do
         render
 
-        expect(rendered).to have_selector('.project-badges')
-        expect(rendered).not_to have_selector('.project-badges > a')
+        expect(rendered).not_to have_selector('.project-badges')
       end
     end
 
@@ -118,6 +119,7 @@ describe 'projects/_home_panel' do
       assign(:project, project)
 
       allow(view).to receive(:current_user).and_return(user)
+      allow(project).to receive(:license_anchor_data).and_return(false)
     end
 
     context 'user can read project' do
diff --git a/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb
index c93152b88e3..e06a9ecb98b 100644
--- a/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/views/projects/jobs/show.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -18,161 +18,6 @@ describe 'projects/jobs/show' do
     allow(view).to receive(:can?).and_return(true)
   end
 
-  describe 'environment info in job view' do
-    context 'job with latest deployment' do
-      let(:build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging')
-      end
-
-      before do
-        create(:environment, name: 'staging')
-        create(:deployment, deployable: build)
-      end
-
-      it 'shows deployment message' do
-        expected_text = 'This job is the most recent deployment'
-        render
-
-        expect(rendered).to have_css(
-          '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'job with outdated deployment' do
-      let(:build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline)
-      end
-
-      let(:second_build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :success, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline)
-      end
-
-      let(:environment) do
-        create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project)
-      end
-
-      let!(:first_deployment) do
-        create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: build)
-      end
-
-      let!(:second_deployment) do
-        create(:deployment, environment: environment, deployable: second_build)
-      end
-
-      it 'shows deployment message' do
-        expected_text = 'This job is an out-of-date deployment ' \
-          "to staging.\nView the most recent deployment ##{second_deployment.iid}."
-        render
-
-        expect(rendered).to have_css('.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'job failed to deploy' do
-      let(:build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline)
-      end
-
-      let!(:environment) do
-        create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project)
-      end
-
-      it 'shows deployment message' do
-        expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed.'
-        render
-
-        expect(rendered).to have_css(
-          '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'job will deploy' do
-      let(:build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline)
-      end
-
-      context 'when environment exists' do
-        let!(:environment) do
-          create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project)
-        end
-
-        it 'shows deployment message' do
-          expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
-          render
-
-          expect(rendered).to have_css(
-            '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-        end
-
-        context 'when it has deployment' do
-          let!(:deployment) do
-            create(:deployment, environment: environment)
-          end
-
-          it 'shows that deployment will be overwritten' do
-            expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
-            render
-
-            expect(rendered).to have_css(
-              '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-            expect(rendered).to have_css(
-              '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment')
-          end
-        end
-      end
-
-      context 'when environment does not exist' do
-        it 'shows deployment message' do
-          expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
-          render
-
-          expect(rendered).to have_css(
-            '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-          expect(rendered).not_to have_css(
-            '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment')
-        end
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'job that failed to deploy and environment has not been created' do
-      let(:build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :failed, :trace_artifact, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline)
-      end
-
-      let!(:environment) do
-        create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project)
-      end
-
-      it 'shows deployment message' do
-        expected_text = 'The deployment of this job to staging did not succeed'
-        render
-
-        expect(rendered).to have_css(
-          '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-      end
-    end
-
-    context 'job that will deploy and environment has not been created' do
-      let(:build) do
-        create(:ci_build, :running, :trace_live, environment: 'staging', pipeline: pipeline)
-      end
-
-      let!(:environment) do
-        create(:environment, name: 'staging', project: project)
-      end
-
-      it 'shows deployment message' do
-        expected_text = 'This job is creating a deployment to staging'
-        render
-
-        expect(rendered).to have_css(
-          '.environment-information', text: expected_text)
-        expect(rendered).not_to have_css(
-          '.environment-information', text: 'latest deployment')
-      end
-    end
-  end
-
   context 'when job is running' do
     let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :trace_live, :running, pipeline: pipeline) }
 
@@ -188,40 +33,4 @@ describe 'projects/jobs/show' do
       expect(rendered).not_to have_link('New issue')
     end
   end
-
-  context 'when incomplete trigger_request is used' do
-    before do
-      build.trigger_request = FactoryBot.build(:ci_trigger_request, trigger: nil)
-    end
-
-    it 'test should not render token block' do
-      render
-
-      expect(rendered).not_to have_content('Token')
-    end
-  end
-
-  context 'when complete trigger_request is used' do
-    before do
-      build.trigger_request = FactoryBot.build(:ci_trigger_request)
-    end
-
-    it 'should render token' do
-      render
-
-      expect(rendered).to have_content('Token')
-      expect(rendered).to have_content(build.trigger_request.trigger.short_token)
-    end
-  end
-
-  describe 'commit title in sidebar' do
-    let(:commit_title) { project.commit.title }
-
-    it 'shows commit title and not show commit message' do
-      render
-
-      expect(rendered).to have_css('p.build-light-text.append-bottom-0',
-        text: /\A\n#{Regexp.escape(commit_title)}\n\Z/)
-    end
-  end
 end
diff --git a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb
index 8befae39d3a..0206928a211 100644
--- a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ describe 'projects/merge_requests/creations/_new_submit.html.haml' do
     assign(:hidden_commit_count, 0)
     assign(:total_commit_count, merge_request.commits.count)
     assign(:project, merge_request.target_project)
+    assign(:mr_presenter, merge_request.present(current_user: merge_request.author))
 
     allow(view).to receive(:can?).and_return(true)
     allow(view).to receive(:url_for).and_return('#')
diff --git a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb
index 9b74a7e1946..c13eab30054 100644
--- a/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/views/projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml_spec.rb
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ describe 'projects/merge_requests/edit.html.haml' do
   before do
     assign(:project, project)
     assign(:merge_request, closed_merge_request)
+    assign(:mr_presenter, closed_merge_request.present(current_user: user))
 
     allow(view).to receive(:can?).and_return(true)
     allow(view).to receive(:current_user)
diff --git a/spec/workers/auto_devops/disable_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/auto_devops/disable_worker_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..800a07e41a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/workers/auto_devops/disable_worker_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe AutoDevops::DisableWorker, '#perform' do
+  let(:user) { create(:user) }
+  let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops) }
+  let(:auto_devops) { project.auto_devops }
+  let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :failed, :auto_devops_source, project: project, user: user) }
+
+  subject { described_class.new }
+
+  before do
+    stub_application_setting(auto_devops_enabled: true)
+    auto_devops.update_attribute(:enabled, nil)
+  end
+
+  it 'disables auto devops for project' do
+    subject.perform(pipeline.id)
+
+    expect(auto_devops.reload.enabled).to eq(false)
+  end
+
+  context 'when project owner is a user' do
+    let(:owner) { create(:user) }
+    let(:namespace) { create(:namespace, owner: owner) }
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops, namespace: namespace) }
+
+    it 'sends an email to pipeline user and project owner' do
+      expect(NotificationService).to receive_message_chain(:new, :autodevops_disabled).with(pipeline, [user.email, owner.email])
+
+      subject.perform(pipeline.id)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when project does not have owner' do
+    let(:group) { create(:group) }
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops, namespace: group) }
+
+    it 'sends an email to pipeline user' do
+      expect(NotificationService).to receive_message_chain(:new, :autodevops_disabled).with(pipeline, [user.email])
+
+      subject.perform(pipeline.id)
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when pipeline is not related to a user and project does not have owner' do
+    let(:group) { create(:group) }
+    let(:project) { create(:project, :repository, :auto_devops, namespace: group) }
+    let(:pipeline) { create(:ci_pipeline, :failed, project: project) }
+
+    it 'does not send an email' do
+      expect(NotificationService).not_to receive(:new)
+
+      subject.perform(pipeline.id)
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/workers/ci/build_schedule_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/ci/build_schedule_worker_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..4a3fe84d7f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/workers/ci/build_schedule_worker_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe Ci::BuildScheduleWorker do
+  subject { described_class.new.perform(build.id) }
+
+  context 'when build is found' do
+    context 'when build is scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+      it 'executes RunScheduledBuildService' do
+        expect_any_instance_of(Ci::RunScheduledBuildService)
+          .to receive(:execute).once
+
+        subject
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when build is not scheduled' do
+      let(:build) { create(:ci_build, :created) }
+
+      it 'executes RunScheduledBuildService' do
+        expect_any_instance_of(Ci::RunScheduledBuildService)
+          .not_to receive(:execute)
+
+        subject
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
+  context 'when build is not found' do
+    let(:build) { build_stubbed(:ci_build, :scheduled) }
+
+    it 'does nothing' do
+      expect_any_instance_of(Ci::RunScheduledBuildService)
+        .not_to receive(:execute)
+
+      subject
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/workers/delete_container_repository_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/delete_container_repository_worker_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..8c40611a959
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/workers/delete_container_repository_worker_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe DeleteContainerRepositoryWorker do
+  let(:registry) { create(:container_repository) }
+  let(:project) { registry.project }
+  let(:user) { project.owner }
+
+  subject { described_class.new }
+
+  describe '#perform' do
+    it 'executes the destroy service' do
+      service = instance_double(Projects::ContainerRepository::DestroyService)
+      expect(service).to receive(:execute)
+      expect(Projects::ContainerRepository::DestroyService).to receive(:new).with(project, user).and_return(service)
+
+      subject.perform(user.id, registry.id)
+    end
+
+    it 'does not raise error when user could not be found' do
+      expect do
+        subject.perform(-1, registry.id)
+      end.not_to raise_error
+    end
+
+    it 'does not raise error when registry could not be found' do
+      expect do
+        subject.perform(user.id, -1)
+      end.not_to raise_error
+    end
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb
index 30e67e67e0e..a159f24f876 100644
--- a/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/workers/git_garbage_collect_worker_spec.rb
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ require 'fileutils'
 require 'spec_helper'
 
 describe GitGarbageCollectWorker do
+  include GitHelpers
+
   let(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
   let(:shell) { Gitlab::Shell.new }
   let!(:lease_uuid) { SecureRandom.uuid }
@@ -197,9 +199,7 @@ describe GitGarbageCollectWorker do
 
   # Create a new commit on a random new branch
   def create_objects(project)
-    rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      project.repository.rugged
-    end
+    rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository)
     old_commit = rugged.branches.first.target
     new_commit_sha = Rugged::Commit.create(
       rugged,
diff --git a/spec/workers/project_service_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/project_service_worker_spec.rb
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..56934f122e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/spec/workers/project_service_worker_spec.rb
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# frozen_string_literal: true
+require 'spec_helper'
+
+describe ProjectServiceWorker, '#perform' do
+  let(:worker) { described_class.new }
+  let(:service) { JiraService.new }
+
+  before do
+    allow(Service).to receive(:find).and_return(service)
+  end
+
+  it 'executes service with given data' do
+    data = { test: 'test' }
+    expect(service).to receive(:execute).with(data)
+
+    worker.perform(1, data)
+  end
+
+  it 'logs error messages' do
+    allow(service).to receive(:execute).and_raise(StandardError, 'invalid URL')
+    expect(Sidekiq.logger).to receive(:error).with({ class: described_class.name, service_class: service.class.name, message: "invalid URL" })
+
+    worker.perform(1, {})
+  end
+end
diff --git a/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb
index a653f6f926c..6ddb653d142 100644
--- a/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/workers/repository_remove_remote_worker_spec.rb
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ require 'rails_helper'
 
 describe RepositoryRemoveRemoteWorker do
   include ExclusiveLeaseHelpers
+  include GitHelpers
 
   describe '#perform' do
     let!(:project) { create(:project, :repository) }
@@ -50,9 +51,7 @@ describe RepositoryRemoveRemoteWorker do
   end
 
   def create_remote_branch(remote_name, branch_name, target)
-    rugged = Gitlab::GitalyClient::StorageSettings.allow_disk_access do
-      project.repository.rugged
-    end
+    rugged = rugged_repo(project.repository)
 
     rugged.references.create("refs/remotes/#{remote_name}/#{branch_name}", target.id)
   end
diff --git a/spec/workers/stuck_ci_jobs_worker_spec.rb b/spec/workers/stuck_ci_jobs_worker_spec.rb
index 856886e3df5..557934346c9 100644
--- a/spec/workers/stuck_ci_jobs_worker_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/workers/stuck_ci_jobs_worker_spec.rb
@@ -127,6 +127,47 @@ describe StuckCiJobsWorker do
     end
   end
 
+  describe 'drop stale scheduled builds' do
+    let(:status) { 'scheduled' }
+    let(:updated_at) { }
+
+    context 'when scheduled at 2 hours ago but it is not executed yet' do
+      let!(:job) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, scheduled_at: 2.hours.ago) }
+
+      it 'drops the stale scheduled build' do
+        expect(Ci::Build.scheduled.count).to eq(1)
+        expect(job).to be_scheduled
+
+        worker.perform
+        job.reload
+
+        expect(Ci::Build.scheduled.count).to eq(0)
+        expect(job).to be_failed
+        expect(job).to be_stale_schedule
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when scheduled at 30 minutes ago but it is not executed yet' do
+      let!(:job) { create(:ci_build, :scheduled, scheduled_at: 30.minutes.ago) }
+
+      it 'does not drop the stale scheduled build yet' do
+        expect(Ci::Build.scheduled.count).to eq(1)
+        expect(job).to be_scheduled
+
+        worker.perform
+
+        expect(Ci::Build.scheduled.count).to eq(1)
+        expect(job).to be_scheduled
+      end
+    end
+
+    context 'when there are no stale scheduled builds' do
+      it 'does not drop the stale scheduled build yet' do
+        expect { worker.perform }.not_to raise_error
+      end
+    end
+  end
+
   describe 'exclusive lease' do
     let(:status) { 'running' }
     let(:updated_at) { 2.days.ago }