summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--app/services/git/base_hooks_service.rb19
-rw-r--r--changelogs/unreleased/sh-fix-pipelines-not-being-created.yml5
-rw-r--r--doc/ci/runners/README.md8
-rw-r--r--doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md13
-rw-r--r--doc/development/testing_guide/testing_levels.md1
-rw-r--r--doc/user/analytics/cycle_analytics.md182
-rw-r--r--doc/user/analytics/index.md22
-rw-r--r--doc/user/discussions/img/make_suggestion.pngbin28447 -> 115084 bytes
-rw-r--r--doc/user/discussions/img/suggestion.pngbin39775 -> 149758 bytes
-rw-r--r--doc/user/group/saml_sso/scim_setup.md15
-rw-r--r--doc/user/permissions.md19
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/cycle_analytics.md182
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/img/cycle_analytics_landing_page.pngbin64872 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page.pngbin22464 -> 0 bytes
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page_v12_2.pngbin0 -> 57327 bytes
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/integrations/jira.md2
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/issues/design_management.md14
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/new_ci_build_permissions_model.md29
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/operations/feature_flags.md15
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/operations/img/target_users_v12_2.pngbin0 -> 42768 bytes
-rw-r--r--doc/user/project/quick_actions.md18
-rw-r--r--lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb2
-rw-r--r--spec/services/git/branch_push_service_spec.rb16
23 files changed, 329 insertions, 233 deletions
diff --git a/app/services/git/base_hooks_service.rb b/app/services/git/base_hooks_service.rb
index 3fd38444196..47c308c8280 100644
--- a/app/services/git/base_hooks_service.rb
+++ b/app/services/git/base_hooks_service.rb
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ module Git
return unless params.fetch(:create_pipelines, true)
Ci::CreatePipelineService
- .new(project, current_user, base_params)
+ .new(project, current_user, pipeline_params)
.execute(:push, pipeline_options)
end
@@ -75,24 +75,29 @@ module Git
ProjectCacheWorker.perform_async(project.id, file_types, [], false)
end
- def base_params
+ def pipeline_params
{
- oldrev: params[:oldrev],
- newrev: params[:newrev],
+ before: params[:oldrev],
+ after: params[:newrev],
ref: params[:ref],
- push_options: params[:push_options] || {}
+ push_options: params[:push_options] || {},
+ checkout_sha: Gitlab::DataBuilder::Push.checkout_sha(
+ project.repository, params[:newrev], params[:ref])
}
end
def push_data_params(commits:, with_changed_files: true)
- base_params.merge(
+ {
+ oldrev: params[:oldrev],
+ newrev: params[:newrev],
+ ref: params[:ref],
project: project,
user: current_user,
commits: commits,
message: event_message,
commits_count: commits_count,
with_changed_files: with_changed_files
- )
+ }
end
def event_push_data
diff --git a/changelogs/unreleased/sh-fix-pipelines-not-being-created.yml b/changelogs/unreleased/sh-fix-pipelines-not-being-created.yml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..a6937eae588
--- /dev/null
+++ b/changelogs/unreleased/sh-fix-pipelines-not-being-created.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+---
+title: Fix pipelines not always being created after a push
+merge_request: 31927
+author:
+type: fixed
diff --git a/doc/ci/runners/README.md b/doc/ci/runners/README.md
index 8474d4ef66e..269bd5c3428 100644
--- a/doc/ci/runners/README.md
+++ b/doc/ci/runners/README.md
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ visit the project you want to make the Runner work for in GitLab:
## Registering a group Runner
-Creating a group Runner requires Maintainer permissions for the group. To create a
+Creating a group Runner requires Owner permissions for the group. To create a
group Runner visit the group you want to make the Runner work for in GitLab:
1. Go to **Settings > CI/CD** to obtain the token
@@ -124,9 +124,9 @@ To lock/unlock a Runner:
## Assigning a Runner to another project
-If you are Maintainer on a project where a specific Runner is assigned to, and the
+If you are an Owner on a project where a specific Runner is assigned to, and the
Runner is not [locked only to that project](#locking-a-specific-runner-from-being-enabled-for-other-projects),
-you can enable the Runner also on any other project where you have Maintainer permissions.
+you can enable the Runner also on any other project where you have Owner permissions.
To enable/disable a Runner in your project:
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ When you [register a Runner][register], its default behavior is to **only pick**
[tagged jobs](../yaml/README.md#tags).
NOTE: **Note:**
-Maintainer [permissions](../../user/permissions.md) are required to change the
+Owner [permissions](../../user/permissions.md) are required to change the
Runner settings.
To make a Runner pick untagged jobs:
diff --git a/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md b/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md
index a1f7d1d7253..f30a83a4c71 100644
--- a/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md
+++ b/doc/development/testing_guide/best_practices.md
@@ -445,6 +445,19 @@ complexity of RSpec expectations.They should be placed under
a certain type of specs only (e.g. features, requests etc.) but shouldn't be if
they apply to multiple type of specs.
+#### `be_like_time`
+
+Time returned from a database can differ in precision from time objects
+in Ruby, so we need flexible tolerances when comparing in specs. We can
+use `be_like_time` to compare that times are within one second of each
+other.
+
+Example:
+
+```ruby
+expect(metrics.merged_at).to be_like_time(time)
+```
+
#### `have_gitlab_http_status`
Prefer `have_gitlab_http_status` over `have_http_status` because the former
diff --git a/doc/development/testing_guide/testing_levels.md b/doc/development/testing_guide/testing_levels.md
index e1ce4d3b7d1..6c3a3171d39 100644
--- a/doc/development/testing_guide/testing_levels.md
+++ b/doc/development/testing_guide/testing_levels.md
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ They're useful to test permissions, redirections, what view is rendered etc.
| `app/controllers/` | `spec/controllers/` | RSpec | |
| `app/mailers/` | `spec/mailers/` | RSpec | |
| `lib/api/` | `spec/requests/api/` | RSpec | |
-| `lib/ci/api/` | `spec/requests/ci/api/` | RSpec | |
| `app/assets/javascripts/` | `spec/javascripts/`, `spec/frontend/` | Karma & Jest | More details in the [Frontend Testing guide](frontend_testing.md) section. |
### About controller tests
diff --git a/doc/user/analytics/cycle_analytics.md b/doc/user/analytics/cycle_analytics.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..b7389c8689d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/user/analytics/cycle_analytics.md
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+# Cycle Analytics
+
+> - Introduced prior to GitLab 12.2 at the project level.
+> - [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12077) in [GitLab Premium](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/) 12.2 at the group level (enabled by feature flag `analytics`).
+
+Cycle Analytics measures the time spent to go from an [idea to production] - also known
+as cycle time - for each of your projects. Cycle Analytics displays the median time for an idea to
+reach production, along with the time typically spent in each DevOps stage along the way.
+
+Cycle Analytics is useful in order to quickly determine the velocity of a given
+project. It points to bottlenecks in the development process, enabling management
+to uncover, triage, and identify the root cause of slowdowns in the software development life cycle.
+
+Cycle Analytics is tightly coupled with the [GitLab flow] and
+calculates a separate median for each stage.
+
+## Overview
+
+Cycle Analytics is available:
+
+- From GitLab 12.2, at the group level in the analytics workspace at
+ **Analytics > Cycle Analytics**. **(PREMIUM)**
+
+ In the future, multiple groups will be selectable which will effectively make this an
+ instance-level feature.
+
+ NOTE: **Note:**
+ Requires the [analytics workspace](index.md) to be enabled.
+
+- At the project level via **Project > Cycle Analytics**.
+
+There are seven stages that are tracked as part of the Cycle Analytics calculations.
+
+- **Issue** (Tracker)
+ - Time to schedule an issue (by milestone or by adding it to an issue board)
+- **Plan** (Board)
+ - Time to first commit
+- **Code** (IDE)
+ - Time to create a merge request
+- **Test** (CI)
+ - Time it takes GitLab CI/CD to test your code
+- **Review** (Merge Request/MR)
+ - Time spent on code review
+- **Staging** (Continuous Deployment)
+ - Time between merging and deploying to production
+- **Production** (Total)
+ - Total lifecycle time; i.e. the velocity of the project or team
+
+## How the data is measured
+
+Cycle Analytics records cycle time and data based on the project issues with the
+exception of the staging and production stages, where only data deployed to
+production are measured.
+
+Specifically, if your CI is not set up and you have not defined a `production`
+or `production/*` [environment], then you will not have any data for those stages.
+
+Each stage of Cycle Analytics is further described in the table below.
+
+| **Stage** | **Description** |
+| --------- | --------------- |
+| Issue | Measures the median time between creating an issue and taking action to solve it, by either labeling it or adding it to a milestone, whatever comes first. The label will be tracked only if it already has an [Issue Board list](../project/issue_board.md#creating-a-new-list) created for it. |
+| Plan | Measures the median time between the action you took for the previous stage, and pushing the first commit to the branch. The very first commit of the branch is the one that triggers the separation between **Plan** and **Code**, and at least one of the commits in the branch needs to contain the related issue number (e.g., `#42`). If none of the commits in the branch mention the related issue number, it is not considered to the measurement time of the stage. |
+| Code | Measures the median time between pushing a first commit (previous stage) and creating a merge request (MR) related to that commit. The key to keep the process tracked is to include the [issue closing pattern](../project/issues/managing_issues.md#closing-issues-automatically) to the description of the merge request (for example, `Closes #xxx`, where `xxx` is the number of the issue related to this merge request). If the issue closing pattern is not present in the merge request description, the MR is not considered to the measurement time of the stage. |
+| Test | Measures the median time to run the entire pipeline for that project. It's related to the time GitLab CI takes to run every job for the commits pushed to that merge request defined in the previous stage. It is basically the start->finish time for all pipelines. |
+| Review | Measures the median time taken to review the merge request that has closing issue pattern, between its creation and until it's merged. |
+| Staging | Measures the median time between merging the merge request with closing issue pattern until the very first deployment to production. It's tracked by the [environment] set to `production` or matching `production/*` (case-sensitive, `Production` won't work) in your GitLab CI configuration. If there isn't a production environment, this is not tracked. |
+| Production| The sum of all time (medians) taken to run the entire process, from issue creation to deploying the code to production. |
+
+---
+
+How this works, behind the scenes:
+
+1. Issues and merge requests are grouped together in pairs, such that for each
+ `<issue, merge request>` pair, the merge request has the [issue closing pattern](../project/issues/managing_issues.md#closing-issues-automatically)
+ for the corresponding issue. All other issues and merge requests are **not**
+ considered.
+1. Then the `<issue, merge request>` pairs are filtered out by last XX days (specified
+ by the UI - default is 90 days). So it prohibits these pairs from being considered.
+1. For the remaining `<issue, merge request>` pairs, we check the information that
+ we need for the stages, like issue creation date, merge request merge time,
+ etc.
+
+To sum up, anything that doesn't follow [GitLab flow] will not be tracked and the
+Cycle Analytics dashboard will not present any data for:
+
+- merge requests that do not close an issue.
+- issues not labeled with a label present in the Issue Board or for issues not assigned a milestone.
+- staging and production stages, if the project has no `production` or `production/*`
+ environment.
+
+## Example workflow
+
+Below is a simple fictional workflow of a single cycle that happens in a
+single day passing through all seven stages. Note that if a stage does not have
+a start and a stop mark, it is not measured and hence not calculated in the median
+time. It is assumed that milestones are created and CI for testing and setting
+environments is configured.
+
+1. Issue is created at 09:00 (start of **Issue** stage).
+1. Issue is added to a milestone at 11:00 (stop of **Issue** stage / start of
+ **Plan** stage).
+1. Start working on the issue, create a branch locally and make one commit at
+ 12:00.
+1. Make a second commit to the branch which mentions the issue number at 12.30
+ (stop of **Plan** stage / start of **Code** stage).
+1. Push branch and create a merge request that contains the [issue closing pattern](../project/issues/managing_issues.md#closing-issues-automatically)
+ in its description at 14:00 (stop of **Code** stage / start of **Test** and
+ **Review** stages).
+1. The CI starts running your scripts defined in [`.gitlab-ci.yml`][yml] and
+ takes 5min (stop of **Test** stage).
+1. Review merge request, ensure that everything is OK and merge the merge
+ request at 19:00. (stop of **Review** stage / start of **Staging** stage).
+1. Now that the merge request is merged, a deployment to the `production`
+ environment starts and finishes at 19:30 (stop of **Staging** stage).
+1. The cycle completes and the sum of the median times of the previous stages
+ is recorded to the **Production** stage. That is the time between creating an
+ issue and deploying its relevant merge request to production.
+
+From the above example you can conclude the time it took each stage to complete
+as long as their total time:
+
+- **Issue**: 2h (11:00 - 09:00)
+- **Plan**: 1h (12:00 - 11:00)
+- **Code**: 2h (14:00 - 12:00)
+- **Test**: 5min
+- **Review**: 5h (19:00 - 14:00)
+- **Staging**: 30min (19:30 - 19:00)
+- **Production**: Since this stage measures the sum of median time off all
+ previous stages, we cannot calculate it if we don't know the status of the
+ stages before. In case this is the very first cycle that is run in the project,
+ then the **Production** time is 10h 30min (19:30 - 09:00)
+
+A few notes:
+
+- In the above example we demonstrated that it doesn't matter if your first
+ commit doesn't mention the issue number, you can do this later in any commit
+ of the branch you are working on.
+- You can see that the **Test** stage is not calculated to the overall time of
+ the cycle since it is included in the **Review** process (every MR should be
+ tested).
+- The example above was just **one cycle** of the seven stages. Add multiple
+ cycles, calculate their median time and the result is what the dashboard of
+ Cycle Analytics is showing.
+
+## Permissions
+
+The current permissions on the Project Cycle Analytics dashboard are:
+
+- Public projects - anyone can access
+- Internal projects - any authenticated user can access
+- Private projects - any member Guest and above can access
+
+You can [read more about permissions][permissions] in general.
+
+NOTE: **Note:**
+As of GitLab 12.2, the project-level page is deprecated. You should access
+project-level Cycle Analytics from **Analytics > Cycle Analytics** in the top
+navigation bar. We will ensure that the same project-level functionality is available
+to CE users in the new analytics space.
+
+For Cycle Analytics functionality introduced in GitLab 12.2 and later:
+
+- Users must have Reporter access or above.
+- Features are available only on
+ [Premium or Silver tiers](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/) and above.
+
+## More resources
+
+Learn more about Cycle Analytics in the following resources:
+
+- [Cycle Analytics feature page](https://about.gitlab.com/features/cycle-analytics/)
+- [Cycle Analytics feature preview](https://about.gitlab.com/2016/09/16/feature-preview-introducing-cycle-analytics/)
+- [Cycle Analytics feature highlight](https://about.gitlab.com/2016/09/21/cycle-analytics-feature-highlight/)
+
+[ce-5986]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5986
+[ce-20975]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20975
+[environment]: ../../ci/yaml/README.md#environment
+[GitLab flow]: ../../workflow/gitlab_flow.md
+[idea to production]: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/08/05/continuous-integration-delivery-and-deployment-with-gitlab/#from-idea-to-production-with-gitlab
+[permissions]: ../permissions.md
+[yml]: ../../ci/yaml/README.md
diff --git a/doc/user/analytics/index.md b/doc/user/analytics/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ec719c0b4a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/user/analytics/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+# Analytics workspace
+
+> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12077) in GitLab 12.2 (enabled using `analytics` feature flag).
+
+The Analytics workspace will make it possible to aggregate analytics across
+GitLab, so that users can view information across multiple projects and groups
+in one place.
+
+To access the centralized analytics workspace:
+
+1. Ensure it's enabled. Requires a GitLab administrator to enable it with the `analytics` feature
+ flag.
+1. Once enabled, click on **Analytics** from the top navigation bar.
+
+## Available analytics
+
+From the centralized analytics workspace, the following analytics are available:
+
+- [Cycle Analytics](cycle_analytics.md).
+
+NOTE: **Note:**
+Project-level Cycle Analytics are still available at a project's **Project > Cycle Analytics**.
diff --git a/doc/user/discussions/img/make_suggestion.png b/doc/user/discussions/img/make_suggestion.png
index 20acc1417da..a24e29770aa 100644
--- a/doc/user/discussions/img/make_suggestion.png
+++ b/doc/user/discussions/img/make_suggestion.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/doc/user/discussions/img/suggestion.png b/doc/user/discussions/img/suggestion.png
index 68a67e6ae5e..f7962305a15 100644
--- a/doc/user/discussions/img/suggestion.png
+++ b/doc/user/discussions/img/suggestion.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/doc/user/group/saml_sso/scim_setup.md b/doc/user/group/saml_sso/scim_setup.md
index f8bef8b8a6a..5d136ad62da 100644
--- a/doc/user/group/saml_sso/scim_setup.md
+++ b/doc/user/group/saml_sso/scim_setup.md
@@ -59,15 +59,14 @@ Once [Single sign-on](index.md) has been configured, we can:
### Azure
-First, double check the [Single sign-on](index.md) configuration for your group and ensure that **Name identifier value** (NameID) points to `user.objectid` or another unique identifier. This will match the `extern_uid` used on GitLab.
+The SAML application that was created during [Single sign-on](index.md) setup now needs to be set up for SCIM.
-![Name identifier value mapping](img/scim_name_identifier_mapping.png)
+1. Check the configuration for your GitLab SAML app and ensure that **Name identifier value** (NameID) points to `user.objectid` or another unique identifier. This will match the `extern_uid` used on GitLab.
-#### Set up admin credentials
+ ![Name identifier value mapping](img/scim_name_identifier_mapping.png)
-Next, configure your GitLab application in Azure by following the
-[Provisioning users and groups to applications that support SCIM](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/manage-apps/use-scim-to-provision-users-and-groups#provisioning-users-and-groups-to-applications-that-support-scim)
-section in Azure's SCIM setup documentation.
+1. Set up automatic provisioning and administrative credentials by following the
+ [Provisioning users and groups to applications that support SCIM](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/manage-apps/use-scim-to-provision-users-and-groups#provisioning-users-and-groups-to-applications-that-support-scim) section in Azure's SCIM setup documentation.
During this configuration, note the following:
@@ -97,6 +96,7 @@ You can then test the connection by clicking on **Test Connection**. If the conn
NOTE: **Note:** If you used a unique identifier **other than** `objectId`, be sure to map it instead to both `id` and `externalId`.
1. Below the mapping list click on **Show advanced options > Edit attribute list for AppName**.
+
1. Leave the `id` as the primary and only required field.
NOTE: **Note:**
@@ -129,8 +129,7 @@ When testing the connection, you may encounter an error: **You appear to have en
When checking the Audit Logs for the Provisioning, you can sometimes see the
error `Namespace can't be blank, Name can't be blank, and User can't be blank.`
-This is likely caused because not all required fields (such as first name and
-last name) are present for all users being mapped.
+This is likely caused because not all required fields (such as first name and last name) are present for all users being mapped.
As a workaround, try an alternate mapping:
diff --git a/doc/user/permissions.md b/doc/user/permissions.md
index 4fd7c5abf78..9ecc8a80b3a 100644
--- a/doc/user/permissions.md
+++ b/doc/user/permissions.md
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ to learn more.
### Cycle Analytics permissions
Find the current permissions on the Cycle Analytics dashboard on
-the [documentation on Cycle Analytics permissions](project/cycle_analytics.md#permissions).
+the [documentation on Cycle Analytics permissions](analytics/cycle_analytics.md#permissions).
### Issue Board permissions
@@ -237,13 +237,16 @@ To learn more, read through the documentation on
## Guest User
-Create a user and assign to a project with a role as `Guest` user, this user
-will be considered as guest user by GitLab and will not take up the license.
-There is no specific `Guest` role for newly created users. If this user will
-be assigned a higher role to any of the projects and groups then this user will
-take a license seat. If a user creates a project this user becomes a maintainer,
-therefore, takes up a license seat as well, in order to prevent this you have
-to go and edit user profile and mark the user as External.
+When a user is given `Guest` permissions on a project and/or group, and holds no
+higher permission level on any other project or group on the instance, the user
+is considered a guest user by GitLab and will not consume a license seat.
+There is no other specific "guest" designation for newly created users.
+
+If the user is assigned a higher role on any projects or groups, the user will
+take a license seat. If a user creates a project, the user becomes a `Maintainer`
+on the project, resulting in the use of a license seat. To prevent a guest user
+from creating projects, you can edit the user profile to mark the user as
+[External](#external-users-permissions).
## External users permissions
diff --git a/doc/user/project/cycle_analytics.md b/doc/user/project/cycle_analytics.md
index 424bee6e9f1..87577c9ec88 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/cycle_analytics.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/cycle_analytics.md
@@ -1,181 +1,5 @@
-# Cycle Analytics
-
-> - [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12077) at a group level in [GitLab Premium and Silver](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/) 12.2 (enabled by feature flag `analytics`).
-
-Cycle Analytics measures the time spent to go from an [idea to production] - also known
-as cycle time - for each of your projects. Cycle Analytics displays the median time for an idea to
-reach production, along with the time typically spent in each DevOps stage along the way.
-
-Cycle Analytics is useful in order to quickly determine the velocity of a given
-project. It points to bottlenecks in the development process, enabling management
-to uncover, triage, and root-cause slowdowns in the software development life cycle.
-
-Cycle Analytics is tightly coupled with the [GitLab flow] and
-calculates a separate median for each stage.
-
-## Overview
-
-Cycle Analytics are available at a:
-
-- Group level from the top navigation bar **Analytics > Cycle Analytics**. **(PREMIUM)**
-
- In the future, multiple groups will be selectable which will effectively make this an
- instance-level feature.
-
-- Project level from a project's **Project > Cycle Analytics**.
-
- ![Cycle Analytics landing page](img/cycle_analytics_landing_page.png)
-
-There are seven stages that are tracked as part of the Cycle Analytics calculations.
-
-- **Issue** (Tracker)
- - Time to schedule an issue (by milestone or by adding it to an issue board)
-- **Plan** (Board)
- - Time to first commit
-- **Code** (IDE)
- - Time to create a merge request
-- **Test** (CI)
- - Time it takes GitLab CI/CD to test your code
-- **Review** (Merge Request/MR)
- - Time spent on code review
-- **Staging** (Continuous Deployment)
- - Time between merging and deploying to production
-- **Production** (Total)
- - Total lifecycle time; i.e. the velocity of the project or team
-
-## How the data is measured
-
-Cycle Analytics records cycle time and data based on the project issues with the
-exception of the staging and production stages, where only data deployed to
-production are measured.
-
-Specifically, if your CI is not set up and you have not defined a `production`
-or `production/*` [environment], then you will not have any data for those stages.
-
-Below you can see in more detail what the various stages of Cycle Analytics mean.
-
-| **Stage** | **Description** |
-| --------- | --------------- |
-| Issue | Measures the median time between creating an issue and taking action to solve it, by either labeling it or adding it to a milestone, whatever comes first. The label will be tracked only if it already has an [Issue Board list][board] created for it. |
-| Plan | Measures the median time between the action you took for the previous stage, and pushing the first commit to the branch. The very first commit of the branch is the one that triggers the separation between **Plan** and **Code**, and at least one of the commits in the branch needs to contain the related issue number (e.g., `#42`). If none of the commits in the branch mention the related issue number, it is not considered to the measurement time of the stage. |
-| Code | Measures the median time between pushing a first commit (previous stage) and creating a merge request (MR) related to that commit. The key to keep the process tracked is to include the [issue closing pattern] to the description of the merge request (for example, `Closes #xxx`, where `xxx` is the number of the issue related to this merge request). If the issue closing pattern is not present in the merge request description, the MR is not considered to the measurement time of the stage. |
-| Test | Measures the median time to run the entire pipeline for that project. It's related to the time GitLab CI takes to run every job for the commits pushed to that merge request defined in the previous stage. It is basically the start->finish time for all pipelines. |
-| Review | Measures the median time taken to review the merge request that has closing issue pattern, between its creation and until it's merged. |
-| Staging | Measures the median time between merging the merge request with closing issue pattern until the very first deployment to production. It's tracked by the [environment] set to `production` or matching `production/*` (case-sensitive, `Production` won't work) in your GitLab CI configuration. If there isn't a production environment, this is not tracked. |
-| Production| The sum of all time (medians) taken to run the entire process, from issue creation to deploying the code to production. |
-
+---
+redirect_to: '../analytics/cycle_analytics.md'
---
-Here's a little explanation of how this works behind the scenes:
-
-1. Issues and merge requests are grouped together in pairs, such that for each
- `<issue, merge request>` pair, the merge request has the [issue closing pattern]
- for the corresponding issue. All other issues and merge requests are **not**
- considered.
-1. Then the `<issue, merge request>` pairs are filtered out by last XX days (specified
- by the UI - default is 90 days). So it prohibits these pairs from being considered.
-1. For the remaining `<issue, merge request>` pairs, we check the information that
- we need for the stages, like issue creation date, merge request merge time,
- etc.
-
-To sum up, anything that doesn't follow the [GitLab flow] won't be tracked at all.
-So, the Cycle Analytics dashboard won't present any data:
-
-- For merge requests that do not close an issue.
-- For issues not labeled with a label present in the Issue Board or for issues not assigned a milestone.
-- For staging and production stages, if the project has no `production` or `production/*`
- environment.
-
-## Example workflow
-
-Below is a simple fictional workflow of a single cycle that happens in a
-single day passing through all seven stages. Note that if a stage does not have
-a start and a stop mark, it is not measured and hence not calculated in the median
-time. It is assumed that milestones are created and CI for testing and setting
-environments is configured.
-
-1. Issue is created at 09:00 (start of **Issue** stage).
-1. Issue is added to a milestone at 11:00 (stop of **Issue** stage / start of
- **Plan** stage).
-1. Start working on the issue, create a branch locally and make one commit at
- 12:00.
-1. Make a second commit to the branch which mentions the issue number at 12.30
- (stop of **Plan** stage / start of **Code** stage).
-1. Push branch and create a merge request that contains the [issue closing pattern]
- in its description at 14:00 (stop of **Code** stage / start of **Test** and
- **Review** stages).
-1. The CI starts running your scripts defined in [`.gitlab-ci.yml`][yml] and
- takes 5min (stop of **Test** stage).
-1. Review merge request, ensure that everything is OK and merge the merge
- request at 19:00. (stop of **Review** stage / start of **Staging** stage).
-1. Now that the merge request is merged, a deployment to the `production`
- environment starts and finishes at 19:30 (stop of **Staging** stage).
-1. The cycle completes and the sum of the median times of the previous stages
- is recorded to the **Production** stage. That is the time between creating an
- issue and deploying its relevant merge request to production.
-
-From the above example you can conclude the time it took each stage to complete
-as long as their total time:
-
-- **Issue**: 2h (11:00 - 09:00)
-- **Plan**: 1h (12:00 - 11:00)
-- **Code**: 2h (14:00 - 12:00)
-- **Test**: 5min
-- **Review**: 5h (19:00 - 14:00)
-- **Staging**: 30min (19:30 - 19:00)
-- **Production**: Since this stage measures the sum of median time off all
- previous stages, we cannot calculate it if we don't know the status of the
- stages before. In case this is the very first cycle that is run in the project,
- then the **Production** time is 10h 30min (19:30 - 09:00)
-
-A few notes:
-
-- In the above example we demonstrated that it doesn't matter if your first
- commit doesn't mention the issue number, you can do this later in any commit
- of the branch you are working on.
-- You can see that the **Test** stage is not calculated to the overall time of
- the cycle since it is included in the **Review** process (every MR should be
- tested).
-- The example above was just **one cycle** of the seven stages. Add multiple
- cycles, calculate their median time and the result is what the dashboard of
- Cycle Analytics is showing.
-
-## Permissions
-
-The current permissions on the Project Cycle Analytics dashboard are:
-
-- Public projects - anyone can access
-- Internal projects - any authenticated user can access
-- Private projects - any member Guest and above can access
-
-You can [read more about permissions][permissions] in general.
-
-NOTE: **Note:**
-As of GitLab 12.2, the project-level page is deprecated. You should access
-project-level Cycle Analytics from **Analytics > Cycle Analytics** in the top
-navigation bar. We will ensure that the same project-level functionality is available
-to CE users in the new analytics space.
-
-For Cycle Analytics functionality introduced in GitLab 12.2 and later:
-
-- Users must have Reporter access or above.
-- Features are available only on
- [Premium or Silver tiers](https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/) and above.
-
-## More resources
-
-Learn more about Cycle Analytics in the following resources:
-
-- [Cycle Analytics feature page](https://about.gitlab.com/features/cycle-analytics/)
-- [Cycle Analytics feature preview](https://about.gitlab.com/2016/09/16/feature-preview-introducing-cycle-analytics/)
-- [Cycle Analytics feature highlight](https://about.gitlab.com/2016/09/21/cycle-analytics-feature-highlight/)
-
-[board]: issue_board.md#creating-a-new-list
-[ce-5986]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5986
-[ce-20975]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20975
-[environment]: ../../ci/yaml/README.md#environment
-[GitLab flow]: ../../workflow/gitlab_flow.md
-[idea to production]: https://about.gitlab.com/2016/08/05/continuous-integration-delivery-and-deployment-with-gitlab/#from-idea-to-production-with-gitlab
-[issue closing pattern]: issues/managing_issues.md#closing-issues-automatically
-[permissions]: ../permissions.md
-[yml]: ../../ci/yaml/README.md
+This document was moved to [another location](../analytics/cycle_analytics.md)
diff --git a/doc/user/project/img/cycle_analytics_landing_page.png b/doc/user/project/img/cycle_analytics_landing_page.png
deleted file mode 100644
index c0c07e84a82..00000000000
--- a/doc/user/project/img/cycle_analytics_landing_page.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page.png b/doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page.png
deleted file mode 100644
index 76fd5f4641c..00000000000
--- a/doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page.png
+++ /dev/null
Binary files differ
diff --git a/doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page_v12_2.png b/doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page_v12_2.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..ba7dad9b438
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/user/project/integrations/img/jira_service_page_v12_2.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/doc/user/project/integrations/jira.md b/doc/user/project/integrations/jira.md
index ca990ee6c32..61f6f6c9412 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/integrations/jira.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/integrations/jira.md
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ even if the status you are changing to is the same.
After saving the configuration, your GitLab project will be able to interact
with all Jira projects in your Jira instance and you'll see the Jira link on the GitLab project pages that takes you to the appropriate Jira project.
-![Jira service page](img/jira_service_page.png)
+![Jira service page](img/jira_service_page_v12_2.png)
## Jira issues
diff --git a/doc/user/project/issues/design_management.md b/doc/user/project/issues/design_management.md
index bffbcb544e3..1324a90e00b 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/issues/design_management.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/issues/design_management.md
@@ -35,9 +35,19 @@ to be enabled:
## Limitations
-- Files uploaded must have a file extension of either `png`, `jpg`, `jpeg`, `gif`, `bmp`, `tiff` or `ico`. The [`svg` extension is not yet supported](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12771).
+- Files uploaded must have a file extension of either `png`, `jpg`, `jpeg`, `gif`, `bmp`, `tiff` or `ico`.
+ The [`svg` extension is not yet supported](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/12771).
+- Design uploads are limited to 10 files at a time.
- [Designs cannot yet be deleted](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/11089).
-- Design Management is [not yet supported in the project export](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/11090).
+- Design Management is
+ [not yet supported in the project export](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/11090).
+- Design Management data
+ [isn't deleted when a project is destroyed](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13429) yet.
+- Design Management data [won't be moved](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13426)
+ when an issue is moved, nor [deleted](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/13427)
+ when an issue is deleted.
+- Design Management
+ [isn't supported by Geo](https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/1633) yet.
## The Design Management page
diff --git a/doc/user/project/new_ci_build_permissions_model.md b/doc/user/project/new_ci_build_permissions_model.md
index 03ae24242e3..8606d92f20c 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/new_ci_build_permissions_model.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/new_ci_build_permissions_model.md
@@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ The reasons to do it like that are:
With the new behavior, any job that is triggered by the user, is also marked
with their read permissions. When a user does a `git push` or changes files through
the web UI, a new pipeline will be usually created. This pipeline will be marked
-as created be the pusher (local push or via the UI) and any job created in this
+as created by the pusher (local push or via the UI) and any job created in this
pipeline will have the read permissions of the pusher but not write permissions.
This allows us to make it really easy to evaluate the access for all projects
that have [Git submodules][gitsub] or are using container images that the pusher
-would have access too. **The permission is granted only for time that job is
-running. The access is revoked after the job is finished.**
+would have access too. **The permission is granted only for the time that the job
+is running. The access is revoked after the job is finished.**
## Types of users
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ We try to make sure that this token doesn't leak by:
1. Securing all API endpoints to not expose the job token.
1. Masking the job token from job logs.
-1. Allowing to use the job token **only** when job is running.
+1. Granting permissions to the job token **only** when the job is running.
However, this brings a question about the Runners security. To make sure that
this token doesn't leak, you should also make sure that you configure
@@ -86,12 +86,6 @@ your Runners in the most possible secure way, by avoiding the following:
By using an insecure GitLab Runner configuration, you allow the rogue developers
to steal the tokens of other jobs.
-## Pipeline triggers
-
-Since 9.0 [pipeline triggers][triggers] do support the new permission model.
-The new triggers do impersonate their associated user including their access
-to projects and their project permissions.
-
## Before GitLab 8.12
In versions before GitLab 8.12, all CI jobs would use the CI Runner's token
@@ -203,7 +197,7 @@ Container Registries for private projects.
> **Notes:**
>
> - GitLab Runner versions prior to 1.8 don't incorporate the introduced changes
-> for permissions. This makes the `image:` directive to not work with private
+> for permissions. This makes the `image:` directive not work with private
> projects automatically and it needs to be configured manually on Runner's host
> with a predefined account (for example administrator's personal account with
> access token created explicitly for this purpose). This issue is resolved with
@@ -227,11 +221,22 @@ test:
- docker run $CI_REGISTRY/group/other-project:latest
```
+### Pipeline triggers
+
+Since 9.0 [pipeline triggers][triggers] do support the new permission model.
+The new triggers do impersonate their associated user including their access
+to projects and their project permissions.
+
+### API
+
+GitLab API cannot be used via `CI_JOB_TOKEN` but there is a [proposal](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/29566)
+to support it.
+
[job permissions]: ../permissions.md#job-permissions
[comment]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22484#note_16648302
[gitsub]: ../../ci/git_submodules.md
[https]: ../admin_area/settings/visibility_and_access_controls.md#enabled-git-access-protocols
-[triggers]: ../../ci/triggers/README.md
+[triggers]: ../../ci/triggers/README.md#ci-job-token
[update-docs]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/tree/master/doc/update
[workhorse]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse
[jobenv]: ../../ci/variables/README.md#predefined-environment-variables
diff --git a/doc/user/project/operations/feature_flags.md b/doc/user/project/operations/feature_flags.md
index 19ccde6e16a..75b0623e6b0 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/operations/feature_flags.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/operations/feature_flags.md
@@ -112,6 +112,19 @@ If this strategy is selected, then the Unleash client **must** be given a user i
**Percent rollout (logged in users)** is implemented using the Unleash [gradualRolloutUserId](https://unleash.github.io/docs/activation_strategy#gradualrolloutuserid) activation strategy.
+## Target Users
+
+> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/8240) in GitLab 12.2.
+
+A feature flag may be enabled for a list of target users.
+
+![Feature flag target users](img/target_users_v12_2.png)
+
+CAUTION: **Caution:**
+The Unleash client **must** be given a user id for the feature to be enabled for target users. See the [Ruby example](#ruby-application-example) below.
+
+**Target users** is implemented using the Unleash [userWithId](https://unleash.github.io/docs/activation_strategy#userwithid) activation strategy.
+
## Integrating with your application
In order to use Feature Flags, you need to first
@@ -207,7 +220,7 @@ func main() {
Here's an example of how to integrate the feature flags in a Ruby application.
-The Unleash client is given a user id for use with a **Percent rollout (logged in users)** rollout strategy.
+The Unleash client is given a user id for use with a **Percent rollout (logged in users)** rollout strategy or a list of **Target Users**.
```ruby
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
diff --git a/doc/user/project/operations/img/target_users_v12_2.png b/doc/user/project/operations/img/target_users_v12_2.png
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..c88d2b7be97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/user/project/operations/img/target_users_v12_2.png
Binary files differ
diff --git a/doc/user/project/quick_actions.md b/doc/user/project/quick_actions.md
index 6758adf2b43..647250bd02a 100644
--- a/doc/user/project/quick_actions.md
+++ b/doc/user/project/quick_actions.md
@@ -40,18 +40,20 @@ discussions, and descriptions:
| `/label ~label1 ~label2` | Add label(s). Label names can also start without ~ but mixed syntax is not supported. | ✓ | ✓ |
| `/unlabel ~label1 ~label2` | Remove all or specific label(s)| ✓ | ✓ |
| `/relabel ~label1 ~label2` | Replace existing label(s) with those specified | ✓ | ✓ |
-| `/copy_metadata <#issue | !merge_request>` | Copy labels and milestone from other issue or merge request in the project | ✓ | ✓ |
+| `/copy_metadata <#issue>` | Copy labels and milestone from another issue in the project | ✓ | ✓ |
+| `/copy_metadata <!merge_request>` | Copy labels and milestone from another merge request in the project | ✓ | ✓ |
| `/estimate <1w 3d 2h 14m>` | Set time estimate | ✓ | ✓ |
| `/remove_estimate` | Remove time estimate | ✓ | ✓ |
-| `/spend <time(1h 30m | -1h 5m)> <date(YYYY-MM-DD)>` | Add or subtract spent time; optionally, specify the date that time was spent on | ✓ | ✓ |
+| `/spend <time(1h 30m)> <date(YYYY-MM-DD)>` | Add spent time; optionally, specify the date that time was spent on | ✓ | ✓ |
+| `/spend <time(-1h 5m)> <date(YYYY-MM-DD)>` | Subtract spent time; optionally, specify the date that time was spent on | ✓ | ✓ |
| `/remove_time_spent` | Remove time spent | ✓ | ✓ |
| `/lock` | Lock the thread | ✓ | ✓ |
| `/unlock` | Unlock the thread | ✓ | ✓ |
-| `/due <in 2 days | this Friday | December 31st>`| Set due date | ✓ | |
+| `/due <date>` | Set due date. Examples of valid `<date>` include `in 2 days`, `this Friday` and `December 31st`. | ✓ | |
| `/remove_due_date` | Remove due date | ✓ | |
-| `/weight <0 | 1 | 2 | ...>` | Set weight **(STARTER)** | ✓ | |
+| `/weight <value>` | Set weight. Valid options for `<value>` include `0`, `1`, `2`, etc. **(STARTER)** | ✓ | |
| `/clear_weight` | Clears weight **(STARTER)** | ✓ | |
-| `/epic <&epic | group&epic | Epic URL>` | Add to epic **(ULTIMATE)** | ✓ | |
+| `/epic <epic>` | Add to epic `<epic>`. The `<epic>` value should be in the format of `&epic`, `group&epic` or `epic-URL`. **(ULTIMATE)** | ✓ | |
| `/remove_epic` | Removes from epic **(ULTIMATE)** | ✓ | |
| `/promote` | Promote issue to epic **(ULTIMATE)** | ✓ | |
| `/confidential` | Make confidential | ✓ | |
@@ -110,9 +112,9 @@ The following quick actions are applicable for epics threads and description:
| `/label ~label1 ~label2` | Add label(s) |
| `/unlabel ~label1 ~label2` | Remove all or specific label(s) |
| `/relabel ~label1 ~label2` | Replace existing label(s) with those specified |
-| `/child_epic <&epic | group&epic | Epic URL>` | Adds child epic to epic ([introduced in GitLab 12.0](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/7330)) |
-| `/remove_child_epic <&epic | group&epic | Epic URL>` | Removes child epic from epic ([introduced in GitLab 12.0](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/7330)) |
-| `/parent_epic <&epic | group&epic | Epic URL>` | Sets parent epic to epic ([introduced in GitLab 12.1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/10556)) |
+| `/child_epic <epic>` | Adds child epic to `<epic>`. The `<epic>` value should be in the format of `&epic`, `group&epic` or `epic-URL`. ([Introduced in GitLab 12.0](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/7330)) **(ULTIMATE)**|
+| `/remove_child_epic <epic>` | Removes child epic from `<epic>`. The `<epic>` value should be in the format of `&epic`, `group&epic` or `epic-URL`. ([Introduced in GitLab 12.0](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/7330)) **(ULTIMATE)** |
+| `/parent_epic <epic>` | Sets parent epic to `<epic>`. The `<epic>` value should be in the format of `&epic`, `group&epic` or `epic-URL`. ([introduced in GitLab 12.1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/10556)) **(ULTIMATE)** |
| `/remove_parent_epic` | Removes parent epic from epic ([introduced in GitLab 12.1](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/10556)) |
<!-- ## Troubleshooting
diff --git a/lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb b/lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb
index 37fadb47736..75d9a2d55b9 100644
--- a/lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb
+++ b/lib/gitlab/data_builder/push.rb
@@ -129,8 +129,6 @@ module Gitlab
SAMPLE_DATA
end
- private
-
def checkout_sha(repository, newrev, ref)
# Checkout sha is nil when we remove branch or tag
return if Gitlab::Git.blank_ref?(newrev)
diff --git a/spec/services/git/branch_push_service_spec.rb b/spec/services/git/branch_push_service_spec.rb
index ad5d296f5c1..d9e607cd251 100644
--- a/spec/services/git/branch_push_service_spec.rb
+++ b/spec/services/git/branch_push_service_spec.rb
@@ -76,6 +76,22 @@ describe Git::BranchPushService, services: true do
stub_ci_pipeline_to_return_yaml_file
end
+ it 'creates a pipeline with the right parameters' do
+ expect(Ci::CreatePipelineService)
+ .to receive(:new)
+ .with(project,
+ user,
+ {
+ before: oldrev,
+ after: newrev,
+ ref: ref,
+ checkout_sha: SeedRepo::Commit::ID,
+ push_options: {}
+ }).and_call_original
+
+ subject
+ end
+
it "creates a new pipeline" do
expect { subject }.to change { Ci::Pipeline.count }