summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/ci/junit_test_reports.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/ci/junit_test_reports.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/ci/junit_test_reports.md170
1 files changed, 170 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/ci/junit_test_reports.md b/doc/ci/junit_test_reports.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3fd54647abb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/ci/junit_test_reports.md
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+# JUnit test reports
+
+> [Introduced](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/45318) in GitLab 11.2.
+Requires GitLab Runner 11.2 and above.
+
+## Overview
+
+It is very common that a [CI/CD pipeline](pipelines.md) contains a
+test job that will verify your code.
+If the tests fail, the pipeline fails and users get notified. The person that
+works on the merge request will have to check the job logs and see where the
+tests failed so that they can fix them.
+
+You can configure your job to use JUnit test reports, and GitLab will display a
+report on the merge request so that it's easier and faster to identify the
+failure without having to check the entire log.
+
+## Use cases
+
+Consider the following workflow:
+
+1. Your `master` branch is rock solid, your project is using GitLab CI/CD and
+ your pipelines indicate that there isn't anything broken.
+1. Someone from you team submits a merge request, a test fails and the pipeline
+ gets the known red icon. To investigate more, you have to go through the job
+ logs to figure out the cause of the failed test, which usually contain
+ thousands of lines.
+1. You configure the JUnit test reports and immediately GitLab collects and
+ exposes them in the merge request. No more searching in the job logs.
+1. Your development and debugging workflow becomes easier, faster and efficient.
+
+## How it works
+
+First, GitLab Runner uploads all JUnit XML files as artifacts to GitLab. Then,
+when you visit a merge request, GitLab starts comparing the head and base branch's
+JUnit test reports, where:
+
+- The base branch is the target branch (usually `master`).
+- The head branch is the source branch (the latest pipeline in each merge request).
+
+The reports panel has a summary showing how many tests failed and how many were fixed.
+If no comparison can be done because data for the base branch is not available,
+the panel will just show the list of failed tests for head.
+
+There are three types of results:
+
+1. **Newly failed tests:** Test cases which passed on base branch and failed on head branch
+1. **Existing failures:** Test cases which failed on base branch and failed on head branch
+1. **Resolved failures:** Test cases which failed on base branch and passed on head branch
+
+Each entry in the panel will show the test name and its type from the list
+above. Clicking on the test name will open a modal window with details of its
+execution time and the error output.
+
+![Test Reports Widget](img/junit_test_report.png)
+
+## How to set it up
+
+NOTE: **Note:**
+For a list of supported languages on JUnit tests, check the
+[Wikipedia article](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JUnit#Ports).
+
+To enable the JUnit reports in merge requests, you need to add
+[`artifacts:reports:junit`](yaml/README.md#artifacts-reports-junit)
+in `.gitlab-ci.yml`, and specify the path(s) of the generated test reports.
+
+In the following examples, the job in the `test` stage runs and GitLab
+collects the JUnit test report from each job. After each job is executed, the
+XML reports are stored in GitLab as artifacts and their results are shown in the
+merge request widget.
+
+### Ruby example
+
+Use the following job in `.gitlab-ci.yml`:
+
+```yaml
+## Use https://github.com/sj26/rspec_junit_formatter to generate a JUnit report with rspec
+ruby:
+ stage: test
+ script:
+ - bundle install
+ - rspec spec/lib/ --format RspecJunitFormatter --out rspec.xml
+ artifacts:
+ reports:
+ junit: rspec.xml
+```
+
+### Go example
+
+Use the following job in `.gitlab-ci.yml`:
+
+```yaml
+## Use https://github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report to generate a JUnit report with go
+golang:
+ stage: test
+ script:
+ - go get -u github.com/jstemmer/go-junit-report
+ - go test -v 2>&1 | go-junit-report > report.xml
+ artifacts:
+ reports:
+ junit: report.xml
+```
+
+### Java examples
+
+There are a few tools that can produce JUnit reports in Java.
+
+#### Gradle
+
+In the following example, `gradle` is used to generate the test reports.
+If there are multiple test tasks defined, `gradle` will generate multiple
+directories under `build/test-results/`. In that case, you can leverage regex
+matching by defining the following path: `build/test-results/test/TEST-*.xml`:
+
+```yaml
+java:
+ stage: test
+ script:
+ - gradle test
+ artifacts:
+ reports:
+ junit: build/test-results/test/TEST-*.xml
+```
+
+#### Maven
+
+For parsing [Surefire](https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-surefire-plugin/)
+and [Failsafe](https://maven.apache.org/surefire/maven-failsafe-plugin/) test
+reports, use the following job in `.gitlab-ci.yml`:
+
+```yaml
+java:
+ stage: test
+ script:
+ - mvn verify
+ artifacts:
+ reports:
+ junit:
+ - target/surefire-reports/TEST-*.xml
+ - target/failsafe-reports/TEST-*.xml
+```
+
+### C/C++ example
+
+There are a few tools that can produce JUnit reports in C/C++.
+
+#### GoogleTest
+
+In the following example, `gtest` is used to generate the test reports.
+If there are multiple gtest executables created for different architectures (`x86`, `x64` or `arm`),
+you will be required to run each test providing a unique filename. The results
+will then be aggregated together.
+
+```yaml
+cpp:
+ stage: test
+ script:
+ - gtest.exe --gtest_output="xml:report.xml"
+ artifacts:
+ reports:
+ junit: report.xml
+```
+
+## Limitations
+
+Currently, the following tools might not work because their XML formats are unsupported in GitLab.
+
+|Case|Tool|Issue|
+|---|---|---|
+|`<testcase>` does not have `classname` attribute|ESlint, sass-lint|https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/50964|