summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/development/code_review.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/development/code_review.md')
-rw-r--r--doc/development/code_review.md3
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/development/code_review.md b/doc/development/code_review.md
index 138817f5440..be3dd1e2cc6 100644
--- a/doc/development/code_review.md
+++ b/doc/development/code_review.md
@@ -95,8 +95,6 @@ experience, refactors the existing code). Then:
"LGTM :thumbsup:", or "Just a couple things to address."
- Assign the merge request to the author if changes are required following your
review.
-- You should try to resolve merge conflicts yourself, using the [merge conflict
- resolution][conflict-resolution] tool.
- Set the milestone before merging a merge request.
- Avoid accepting a merge request before the job succeeds. Of course, "Merge
When Pipeline Succeeds" (MWPS) is fine.
@@ -105,7 +103,6 @@ experience, refactors the existing code). Then:
- Consider using the [Squash and
merge][squash-and-merge] feature when the merge request has a lot of commits.
-[conflict-resolution]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/user/project/merge_requests/resolve_conflicts.html#merge-conflict-resolution
[squash-and-merge]: https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/user/project/merge_requests/squash_and_merge.html#squash-and-merge
### The right balance